Abstract
Understanding the roles of neutrophils and macrophages in fighting bacterial infections is a critical issue in human pathologies. Although phagocytic killing has been extensively studied, little is known about how bacteria are eliminated extracellularly in live vertebrates. We have recently developed an infection model in the zebrafish embryo in which leukocytes cannot reach the injected bacteria. When Escherichia coli bacteria are injected within the notochord, both neutrophils and macrophages are massively recruited during several days, but do not infiltrate the infected tissue presumably because of its tough collagen sheath. Nevertheless, the bacteria are killed during the first 24 hours, and we report here that neutrophils, but not macrophages are involved in the control of the infection. Using genetic and chemical approaches, we show that even in absence of phagocytosis, the bactericidal action relies on NADPH oxidase-dependent production of superoxide in neutrophils. We thus reveal a host effector mechanism mediated by neutrophils that eliminates bacteria that cannot be reached by phagocytes and that is independent of macrophages, NO synthase or myeloperoxidase.
Author summary
Deciphering the defence mechanisms of leukocytes remains a challenge for public health. Although phagocytic killing has been extensively studied, little is known about how bacteria are eliminated extracellularly in live vertebrates. Herein we use the notochord infection model in the zebrafish embryo to describe how leukocytes eliminate distant bacteria that are inaccessible for phagocytosis. In this context neutrophils but not macrophages are instrumental for bacterial clearance and larva survival. We then found that neutrophil bactericidal action relies on the NADPH oxidase dependent production of superoxide and is independent of NO synthase or myeloperoxidase.
Introduction
The innate immune system is the first line of defence of the host. It includes large phagocytes (such as macrophages and granulocytes) equipped with a battery of weapons to destroy the invader within minutes or hours. Since the seminal work of Elie Metchnikoff [1], the defence mechanisms relying on leukocytes remain a challenging subject. When microbes penetrate the epithelial barrier, macrophages and neutrophils are rapidly recruited and upon contact, engulf the bacteria into a vacuole called a phagosome that fuses with intracellular granules or lysosomes to form a lytic vacuole in which bacteria may be killed by a wide variety of mechanisms involving chemicals and enzymes [2,3]. Non-oxidative effectors include antimicrobial proteins, while the oxygen-dependent mechanism, also known as the respiratory burst, involves the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4,5,6]. ROS production inside the phagocytic vacuole involves NADPH oxidase and the major ROS, superoxide (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), can directly or indirectly promote the death of the microbe, according to the nature of the pathogens [7,8]. Nitric oxide (NO), produced by NO synthase, can contribute to microbicidal activity and is essential for the defence against intracellular organisms such as Salmonella enterica and mycobacteria [9,10].
Many microbes manage to survive within macrophages after phagocytosis. While some cope with the phagolysosomal conditions (S. enterica serovar Typhimurium [11]), others like Listeria, Shigella and some mycobacteria [12,13,14] are able to block the maturation of the phagosome or even to escape from these compartments. Host cells, however, have developed counter strategies to fight cytosolic bacteria including directing them to autophagosomes [15].
While microbe killing inside the phagosome has been extensively studied, it is less well understood how phagocytes are capable of killing microbes extracellularly in whole organisms. Neutrophils can fight bacterial pathogens without phagocytosis either by release of toxic granule contents (degranulation) [16] or by expelling neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are networks of extracellular fibres built upon expulsion of chromatin [17]. However, events such as these are very hard to disentangle from phagocytosis-mediated killing in the full context of tissue infection.
Thanks to its transparency and genetic amenability, the zebrafish embryo is a useful model for the study of host/pathogen interactions in vivo. The zebrafish model has been used to evaluate the respective roles of neutrophils and macrophages in eliminating invading bacteria [10,18,19]; this relies not only on the nature of the invading microbe, but also on the route and anatomical site of infection. One striking observation was that macrophages are very efficient at engulfing microbes from body fluids (“flypaper” strategy) while neutrophils may be very efficient at clearing surface associated microbes in a “vacuum-cleaner”-like behaviour [20].
We have recently developed an infection model in the zebrafish embryo in which the bacteria are trapped in a tissue in which macrophages and neutrophils cannot enter. When non-pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria are injected in the notochord, the swollen rod that provides axial stiffness to the developing embryo, they slide between notochord cells and the thick cylindrical collagen sheath that encases the cord. Although unable to thread their way through this envelope, neutrophils and macrophages are massively recruited all along the infected notochord where they stay in a highly activated state for days. Interestingly, these inaccessible bacteria are cleared within the first 24 hours [21].
Here we address the mechanisms of E. coli clearance in the notochord infection model where professional phagocytes cannot directly encounter the injected bacteria. We first investigate whether macrophages or neutrophils are involved in this clearance and then investigate the nature of the molecules instrumental for bacterial killing.
Results
Macrophages are not required for the control of E. coli infection in the notochord
We previously showed that K12 Escherichia coli cells injected in the notochord of zebrafish embryos cannot be reached by phagocytes, yet are killed in one day [21]. We confirmed the physical separation of freshly injected K12 from phagocytes by the notochord collagen matrix (S1A and S1B Fig). To verify that this is not a quirk of this laboratory strain, we first compared enteric adherent invasive E. coli strains, E. coli AIEC LF82 and its mutant, LF82-ΔlpfA, E. coli JM83-ΔmsbB strain and laboratory K12 strain in our notochord infection model. We observed that they behaved similarly (S1C and S1D Fig). We therefore went on using the laboratory K12 strain. To investigate the role of macrophages in the observed bacterial clearance, we injected liposome-encapsulated clodronate (Lipo-clodronate) that kills phagocytic macrophages [22,23]. At 1 day post-fertilization (dpf), macrophage/neutrophil dual reporter embryos, tg(mpeg1:mCherry-F)/tg(mpx:GFP), or macrophage reporter embryos, tg(mpeg1:mCherry-F), were injected with 10 nl of Lipo-Clodronate in the posterior caudal vein (intravenous, i.v.). As previously described [22] 24 h after Lipo-Clodronate injection, macrophages were efficiently eliminated without affecting the neutrophil population, nor inducing unspecific toxicity (Fig 1A and 1B). This was correlated with the decrease of mpeg1 mRNA expression in Lipo-Clodronate treated larvae compared to Lipo-PBS controls, as shown by RT-qPCR (Fig 1C). To further confirm the efficiency of lipo-clodronate to suppress macrophage population, we generated another macrophage reporter line with microfibrillar-associated protein 4 (mfap4) promoter whose expression is strong and stable in zebrafish macrophages [24], i.e. the tg(mfap4:mCherry-F) line. Injection of Lipo-clodronate in tg(mfap4:mCherry-F) induced a dramatic reduction in the number of mfap4+ cells (Fig 1D and 1E), showing the suitability of this approach to deplete macrophages. Macrophage depleted larvae were selected and injected in the notochord with fluorescent E. coli. We observed that bacteria were cleared within the first 24 hours post infection (hpi) in both, macrophage-depleted larvae, as well as in control Lipo-PBS injected larvae, as revealed by fluorescence microscopy and CFU counts (Fig 1F and 1G). Importantly, upon notochord infection, neutrophils were normally recruited around the infected notochord regardless of the presence or absence of macrophages (Fig 1H).
To confirm, that macrophages are not fundamental for bacterial clearance in notochord infection model, we ablate macrophages using tg(mpeg1:Gal4 / UAS:nfsB-mCherry) embryos in which macrophage express gene 1 promoter indirectly drives the expression of E. coli nitroreductase enzyme in macrophages. Treatment of tg(mpeg1:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) embryos with the pro-drug metronidazole (MTZ) at 30 hpf (hours post-fertlilization) specifically decreased macrophage number at 1 and 2 days post-treatment (dpT) (S2A and S2B Fig). Tg(mpeg1:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) were then infected with E. coli-GFP at 2 dpf in the notochord. MTZ-mediated macrophage depletion did not impact the bacterial burden at 1 dpi (day post-infection) as shown by Fluorescent Pixel Counts (FPC) (S2C and S2D Fig). Altogether, these data show that macrophages are not required for bacterial clearance in this model.
Neutrophils are essential for the control of notochord infection by E. coli
To investigate the role of neutrophils in bacterial clearance, we ablated neutrophils by two independent approaches. First, we specifically inhibited neutrophil development and function by knocking down the G-CSF/GCSFR pathway using a morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) specifically blocking gcsfr/csf3r translation (MO csf3r) [25,26]. Injection of MO csf3r in the neutrophil reporter embryos, tg(mpx:GFP), led to approximately 70% reduction in the total number of neutrophils as compared to larvae injected with a control morpholino (MO CTRL) at 3 dpf (Fig 2A, 2C and 2D). We infected these morphants with 2500 CFUs fluorescent E. coli. Bacteria disappeared in the control larvae (Fig 2B and 2E) while they proliferated in neutrophil-depleted embryos (Fig 2B and 2F). The bacterial proliferation correlated with a further dramatic reduction in neutrophil number at 1 and 2 dpi (days post infection), suggesting neutrophil death (Fig 2D). Subsequently, infected csf3r morphants died between 2 and 3 dpi (Fig 2G) with overwhelming bacterial proliferation and neutropenia (S3B Fig).
We also ablated neutrophils, using tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) embryos in which the myeloperoxidase promoter (mpx) indirectly drives the expression of nitroreductase in neutrophils. Treatment of tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) embryos with metronidazole at 40 hpf specifically depleted neutrophils at 1 and 2 days post-treatment (Fig 3A). Since macrophages are required to clear apoptotic cells, we asked whether neutrophil death in MTZ treatment alters macrophage number or distribution in the triple transgenic line tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry/ mpeg1:GFPcaax). At 1 dpT, MTZ treatment did not affect the number of macrophages and they were similarly distributed throughout the larva to the control (Fig 3B and 3C). Larvae were then infected with E. coli-crimson and 4 hours after E. coli injection, macrophages were recruited to the infected notochord in both MTZ and DMSO conditions, showing that ablation of neutrophil using nfsB/MTZ system does not impair macrophage response (Fig 3D). Infection outcome was then analysed in tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) larvae infected with fluorescent E. coli-GFP. Similarly to csf3r morphants, bacteria were cleared in control larvae (nfsB+ DMSO and nfsB- MTZ), while bacteria proliferated in embryos with low neutrophil density (nfsB+ MTZ), as shown by fluorescent microscopy and by quantification of bacterial burden (Fig 3E and 3F). These experiments demonstrate that neutrophils are essential for the control of notochord infection by E. coli.
We further investigated the relationship between neutrophil supply and bacterial disappearance in the notochord. Normal neutrophil levels were able to eliminate small amounts of bacteria (S3A Fig), but embryos with depressed neutrophil populations did not survive low bacterial loads (S3B Fig), while a higher bacterial inoculum overcame larvae with a normal neutrophil population (S3C Fig). However, by artificially increasing neutrophil density in the developing embryo through overexpression of gcsfa, we observed that increasing neutrophil density allow the embryo to cope with even higher amounts of injected bacteria (S3D Fig and S4A and S4C Fig). Similar results were observed by overexpressing gcsfb (S4 Fig). Our data reveals that the balance of neutrophils versus bacteria is instrumental for the outcome of the infection and that neutrophil populations are limiting in fighting the infection. To evaluate cell death, Sytox Green, a vital dye which labels DNA of dying cells, was injected into the vein of infected tg(lyz:DsRed) larvae. While PBS and low dose E. coli induced few cell death around the notochord, embryos experiencing neutropenia (i.e. infected with high dose E. coli) displayed increased cell death including dead neutrophils (S5 Fig). This suggests that when the neutrophil versus bacteria balance is not correct, neutrophils die by apoptosis. Of note, by contrast to neutrophil, macrophage number did not decrease, but instead increased 2 days after high dose infection (S6 Fig). These results are reminiscent to what happen in mammals in which neutrophil/bacteria ratio is fundamental for host defence [27].
Neutrophil myeloperoxidase is not required to control notochord infection
Our previous study revealed that approximately one-third of recruited neutrophils degranulate around infected notochords [21]. We therefore investigated the role of the neutrophil-specific myeloperoxidase (Mpx) that is present in the azurophilic granules, in bacterial clearance. We introduced the mpx:GFP transgene in the mpx-null mutant ‘spotless’ [28] to generate tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx-/- offspring in which neutrophils express the eGFP but lack Mpx activity. Active MPX in neutrophil granules can be visualized in zebrafish embryos using Sudan black staining [29]. Sudan Black staining confirmed that neutrophils did not carry Mpx activity in tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx-/- while in tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx+/- siblings, neutrophils contained active Mpx in their granules (Fig 4A). A low dose of fluorescent E. coli was injected in the notochord of 2 dpf tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx-/- embryos; neutrophils were normally recruited along the notochord, and the injected E. coli were cleared at 1 dpi as in the wild type (Fig 4B). Mpx is therefore not required for the clearance of E. coli in the notochord.
Superoxide is produced in neutrophils of notochord-infected embryos
Neutrophils use different diffusible molecules to fight infections, including NO and ROS. We investigated NO production by neutrophils during the course of notochord infections using the NO reporter fluorescent probe DAF-FM-DA. We used Salmonella infected embryos as positive controls to detect NO production in neutrophils within the Aorta-Gonad-Mesonephros (AGM) (S7A Fig) [30]. As described [31], the notochord itself was labelled by DAF-FM-DA in uninfected embryos, but we could not observe any evidence of NO production by neutrophils in our notochord infection model (S7B Fig). L-NAME was previously shown to specifically inhibit NO synthases in zebrafish larvae [30]. To block NO production in our system, we thus treated larvae with L-NAME and injected E. coli into the notochord. We did not observe any difference in the outcome of the infection between L-NAME-treated larvae and controls (DMSO) (S7C Fig).
The phagocyte NADPH oxidase and ROS production play a key role in the elimination of engulfed bacteria [4]. To detect intracellular ROS accumulation in the form of superoxide anions in tg(mpx:GFP) embryos infected with E. coli, we used Dihydroethidium (DHE), a cell permeable probe that fluoresces in red after reacting with superoxide within the cell [32,33]. First, we imaged the injection site, where some bacteria initially leaked from the pierced notochord and got engulfed by neutrophils and observed that these phagocytosing leukocytes, abundantly produced superoxide in intracellular compartments harboring bacteria, which are most probably phagosomes (Fig 5A and 5B). Green fluorescent E. coli were rapidly lysed within 20 minutes in the putative phagosome (Fig 5B and 5C and S1 Video). We then imaged the upstream region, where bacteria are separated from the recruited neutrophils by the notochord collagen sheath. Interestingly, these recruited neutrophils also produced large amounts of superoxide, even though they had not phagocytosed bacteria (Fig 5D). DHE was also detected at a basal level in notochord surrounding tissues (Fig 5E). To test the specificity of DHE staining in detecting superoxide anions we treated infected embryos with N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), a broad-specificity ROS scavenger. We observed a general decrease of DHE staining within cells of the trunk and more particularly a decrease of DHE+ recruited cells (Fig 5E and 5F) and of DHE+ recruited neutrophils (Fig 5E and 5G) around the infected notochord while the number of recruited neutrophils was unchanged by the treatment (Fig 5E and 5H), confirming that DHE probe specifically detects ROS in this model.
NADPH oxidase activity is essential for bacterial killing at a distance and larva survival to notochord infection
To investigate whether this superoxide production could be involved in bacterial killing, we used Apocynin, a NADPH oxidase (NOX) inhibitor [34,35]. Upon notochord infection, Apocynin-treated embryos had reduced number of superoxide producing cells, including recruited DHE+ neutrophils at the inflammation site, as compared to DMSO-treated larvae (Fig 6A and 6B), showing the efficiency of Apocynin as a NOX inhibitor in zebrafish. To test whether Apocynin alters the steady state of neutrophils, tg(mpx:GFP) larvae were treated with this drug at 2 dpf. Apocynin treatment decreased the total number of neutrophils after 6 or 24 h of treatment, but by less than 15% (Fig 6C and 6D), showing that this approach is suitable to test the role of NOX in zebrafish neutrophils. Therefore, we infected tg(lyz:DsRed) embryos with a very low dose of E. coli (<1000 CFUs) in the notochord. Even with the very low dose infection, 80% of Apocynin-treated embryos failed to clear the bacteria, while all bacteria were efficiently killed in DMSO-control embryos (Fig 6E). Apocynin-treated embryos displayed unrestricted bacterial growth in the notochord at 1 dpi, as demonstrated with fluorescence microscopy (Fig 6E and 6F). This was correlated with neutropenia and eventually death at 2–3 dpi (Fig 6F and 6G). The effect was specific to the clearance of bacteria in this notochord infection model since Apocynin treatment did not interfere with the clearance of bacteria injected in the muscle, where phagocytosis occurs (S8 Fig). Similar results were obtained using another NOX inhibitor [36], VAS2870 (VAS) (S9 Fig).
Interestingly, in mammals, Apocynin activity requires that target cells do express an active Mpx [35]. Therefore, we compared the results of Apocynin treatment in mpx-/- and mpx+/+ infected embryos, and observed that Apocynin increased susceptibility to notochord infection only in the presence of Mpx (Fig 6H and 6I). Thus, Apocynin action is also dependent on Mpx in zebrafish, and thus specifically acts on neutrophils. Overall, these data thus strongly suggest that inhibition of superoxide production in neutrophils increases susceptibility to notochord infection.
To further examine the role of phagocyte NOX, morpholino-mediated gene knockdown was used. Injection of p47phox MO in tg(mpx:GFP) did not induce noticeable morphological defects, but, as expected, decreased superoxide production in neutrophils following infection compared to control morpholino (CTRL MO) (S10 Fig). To address the effect p47phox MO on the development and the recruitment of neutrophil, we analyzed tg(mpx:GFP) p47phox morphants before and after E. coli infection in the notochord at 2 dpf. Although p47phox morphants displayed 20% less neutrophils than in control morphants, (Fig 7A and 7B) these leukocytes were recruited in normal numbers to the notochord at 4 hpi and 1 dpi (Fig 7C), showing that p47phox morphants can mobilize neutrophils properly during the infection. Then, p47phox morphants were infected in the notochord with E. coli-GFP. P47phox MO induced higher bacterial burden as evidenced by fluorescence microscopy (Fig 7D) and CFUs counts (Fig 7E). This was correlated with an increase in the severity of infection (Fig 7F).
As neutrophils are instrumental for larva survival and bacterial clearance during notochord infection and as pharmacological (apocynin and VAS2870) and genetic (p47phox morpholino) inhibition caused a slight decrease of neutrophil numbers, we tested whether inducing high neutrophil number in the context of NADPH incompetence could restore survival of the infected larvae. One-cell stage tg(lyz:DsRed) embryos were thus injected with gcsfa expressing plasmid and 2 days later were treated either with DMSO or VAS2870 (Fig 8A). Beside the fact that gcsfa forced expression increased the number of neutrophils compared to controls (Fig 8B), it did not restore a better survival of the infected larvae in the presence of Nox inhibitor VAS2870 (Fig 8C).
Altogether these data show that NOX-induced superoxide is necessary for bacteria elimination at a distance by neutrophils.
Discussion
Many studies have used the zebrafish embryo model to address the respective roles of neutrophils and macrophages in eliminating invading bacteria, but in all instances, at least one of these two cellular populations had direct access to the bacteria. In our model neither neutrophils nor macrophages could reach the bacteria. We first observed an active recruitment of both macrophages and neutrophils around the infected notochord that is correlated with the elimination of the bacteria in the notochord within 24 hours. Specifically depleting individual myeloid populations, we have investigated their contribution in the clearance of E. coli at a distance and describe molecular pathways involved in bacterial elimination by neutrophils.
Using chemical and genetic ablation of macrophages, we revealed that despite being massively recruited to the notochord, macrophages are not required for the bacterial killing. By contrast, whichever the strategy to lower the amount of neutrophils within the developing zebrafish, the embryo becomes unable to cope even with low-dose infection, leading to bacterial proliferation and death of the embryo, showing that neutrophils are essential to control notochord infection. Further analysis should reveal whether other mechanisms are also involved in the death of E. coli within the notochord, such as complement-mediated killing or killing by the notochordal cells.
Furthermore, we highlight the importance of the numerical balance between neutrophils and bacteria to the outcome of notochord infection in which phagocytosis is not feasible. This observation suggests that the bactericidal molecules produced by the neutrophils to fight the bacteria are produced in limiting quantities. During Salmonella infections, the correct population of neutrophils is maintained through a mechanism of demand-driven granulopoiesis in the main site of hematopoietic stem cells emergence, i.e., the AGM [30]. Similarly, we observed here, that in low dose E. coli infections, the host is able to increase the neutrophil pool to control notochord infection. However, too low a neutrophil/bacteria ratio (either by increasing bacterial load or decreasing the number of neutrophils) results in bacterial proliferation, onset of neutropenia, and death within 2 to 3 dpi. Conversely, the neutrophil-enriched embryos can cope with a very high dose of bacteria. These data are reminiscent of results in human where the maintenance of a proper pool of neutrophil is critical for effective bacterial killing [27,37,38], emphasizing thus the relevance of the tractable zebrafish larvae system for the study of dynamic interactions between neutrophil bactericidal activity and bacteria in vivo.
To capture and kill microbes they cannot phagocytize, neutrophils have been described to expel their chromatin to form Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs), but this may lead to neutrophil death (Netosis) [39,40]. NET formation relies on complex intracellular processes involving the activity, among others, of myeloperoxidase [41]. We report here that myeloperoxidase activity is not necessary to fight the infection in our experimental system. This shows that MPX dependent-NET formation is not responsible for bacterial killing at a distance. However Myeloperoxidase may not be required with all stimuli, since MPO was shown to be dispensable for NET induction in infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. Therefore, we cannot exclude the involvement of MPO-independent NETs in our system [42].
We report here that NOX activity and the production of superoxide by neutrophils are essential to cope with notochord infection by E. coli. Indeed, using fluorescent probes, we showed that neutrophils swarm around the notochord and produce large amounts of superoxide. Treatments of the embryos with inhibitors of NOX assembly, VAS2870 and Apocynin, or the specific knock down of Nox subunit p47phox using morpholinos, lead to bacterial proliferation and increased severity of the infection. This is accompanied with the decrease of superoxide production in neutrophils, consistent with an essential role of superoxide in the clearance of E. coli without direct phagocytosis (Fig 9). Apocynin activity was shown to be dependent on the presence of myeloperoxidase in neutrophils [35]. In our model, Apocynin has almost no activity in mpx-/- mutant, reinforcing the specificity of its effect. This demonstrates that Nox activity in neutrophils is required for bacterial clearance in the notochord.
The present work raises different questions related to the death of the different actors, the bacteria, the neutrophils, and the embryo. Foremost is the question as to how bacteria are killed at a distance by neutrophils. Neutrophils massively degranulate around the infected notochord [21] and we show here that an oxidative burst is necessary for bacterial elimination. Superoxide is known to be weakly bactericidal [4,43], but is rapidly converted to hydrogen peroxide by dismutation. Although products of NADPH oxidase are soluble, they are rapidly consumed by reactions with other targets within a limited diffusion distance [44]; however we cannot exclude the possibility that these ROS diffuse through the very thin (<1 μm) collagen sheath. A more possible scenario, would be that superoxide is not involved in a direct killing mechanism but instead is interacting with a host- or microbe- derived species, triggering a superoxide-dependent process (Fig 9). Indeed, besides inducing oxidative stress, ROS also serve as signalling molecules to regulate biological processes. One of the best-understood mechanism of redox signalling involves H2O2-mediated oxidation of cysteine residues within proteins, altering thus their function [45]. These reversible modifications could trigger activation of signalling cascade and the release of bactericidal agents. Another important target of ROS is the transcription factor NF-κB which is known to control many aspects of the immune response [46]. Therefore neutrophil superoxide may act as a second messenger of a killing strategy at a distance. Why do neutrophils die when the bacteria/neutrophil ratio is too high in favor of the invaders? If bacteria proliferate within the infected notochord, then neutrophils massively die, and the embryo becomes neutropenic. This could be due to a factor released by the densely packed bacteria within the notochord. However, there may be no reason why this virulence factor would specifically kill neutrophils while sparing the highly endocytic macrophages that are also massively recruited to the notochord but not affected by bacterial proliferation. For this reason, we propose that death of neutrophils could rather be a consequence of the excessive concentration of bacteria-derived molecules, similarly to a quorum sensing mechanism, triggering hyper activation of the neutrophils and leading to their death [47]. This hyper activation, akin to a local cytokine storm is likely also responsible for the death of the embryo in cases where E. coli proliferates within the notochord. Importantly, we have no indication that the bacteria used in this study could kill the embryo by themselves. We consider that in cases where the embryos die, it is the consequence of their heavy inflammatory status mimicking a cytokine storm. This hypothesis is consistent with the similar outcome observed with pathogenic and non-pathogenic E. coli strains, as well as with our experiments with mycobacteria. We have demonstrated that mycobacteria can replicate within the notochord ultimately leading to notochord break down, without triggering the heavy inflammation described here with E. coli. The subsequent fate of the embryo depends on the virulence of the mycobacteria. The non-virulent Mycobacterium smegmatis is eliminated by phagocytosis, leading to the host survival while M. marinum resists destruction by phagocytosis and keeps proliferating until the host dies [48]. Conversely, E. coli only effectively kills infected embryos when injected alive in excessive amounts in the notochord where this triggers a heavy inflammation that kills the neutrophils and ultimately the embryo.
To overcome killing by neutrophils, some pathogenic bacteria developed strategies to avoid contact with phagocytes. Some pathogens invade tissues that are inaccessible to phagocytes, while other employ strategies to prevent engulfment [3]. They harbor on their surfaces molecules preventing recognition by phagocytes, such as capsular antigens O75 and K5 of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (Burns and Hull, 1999) and polysaccharide capsules of Streptococcus pneumoniae that increase the resistance to phagocytosis. Staphylococcus aureus secretes the 16 kD Extracellular fibrinogen binding protein that blocks its phagocytosis by human neutrophils by forming a “capsule”-like shield [49]. By contrast, Yersinia pestis (the agent of bubonic and pneumonic plaque), Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (gastroenteritis) and Yersinia enterocolitica (gastroenteritis and mesenteric adenitis) are able to inhibit the actin cytoskeleton required for engulfment, through the secretion of effector proteins into the cytoplasm of the immune cell, leading to decreased phagocytosis by neutrophils and increased virulence [3]. Oxidative burst at a distance might be an alternative mechanism employed by neutrophils to prevent such escape mechanisms. Further investigations should determine whether host targeted therapeutic strategies may be beneficial against medically relevant infections, especially in patients suffering from Chronic Granulomatous Disease whose neutrophil function is deficient for NADPH activity.
Methods
Ethics statement
Animal experimentation procedures were carried out according to the European Union guidelines for handling of laboratory animals (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/home_en.htm) and were approved by the Comité d'Ethique pour l'Expérimentation Animale under reference CEEA-LR-13007 and APAFIS#5737–2016061511212601 v3. Fish husbandry and experiments were performed at the University of Montpellier. Embryos were obtained from the University of Montpellier and the Institut Pasteur. Experiments were performed on 0 hour to 5 days past fertilization stages when the embryos were used.
Fish husbandry
Fish maintenance, staging and husbandry were performed as described [21] with golden strain and transgenic lines. Tg(mpeg1:mCherry-F)ump2, referred as tg(mpeg1:mCherry-F) [50], tg(mpeg1:GFPcaax) [51] and tg(mfap4:mCherry-F) (ump6tg, present study) were used to visualize macrophages. Tg(mpx:GFP)i114 and tg(lyz:DsRed)nz50 used to label neutrophils and the mpxt30963/t30963 null ‘spotless’ mutant, are referred here as tg(mpx:GFP) [52], tg(lyz:DsRed) [53] and mpx-/- [28], respectively. Tg(rcn3:gal4) (PD1023) crossed with tg(UAS:mCherry) (PD1112) were used to visualize notochordal cells [54]. Tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) was used to ablate neutrophils [55]. Tg(mpeg1:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) was used to ablate macrophages [26]. Embryos were obtained from pairs of adult fishes by natural spawning and raised at 28.5°C in tank water. Embryos and larvae were staged according to [56].
Generation of the macrophage reporter line, Tg(mfap4:mCherry-F)
The Mfap4 promoter used to drive the specific expression of membrane-targeted mCherry in macrophages was amplified using the upstream primer zMfap4_3P1 (5’ ATC CAT GCC CTT CGA CTG TT 3’) and the zMfap4_123E2N primer matching the start of the second exon of the Mfap4 gene (5’ TAT AGC GGC CGC ACA GCA CGA TCT AAA GTC ATG AA 3’). The 2.4 kb amplified fragment was digested by NotI, and ligated to the coding phase of the farnesylated mCherry protein so that the Mfap4 AUG is in phase with the downstream mCherry-F ORF on a I-SceI meganuclease and Tol2-derived vector (GenBank accession no. GU394080). The resulting plasmid was injected, together with I-SceI meganuclease, into embryos at the one-cell stage.
E. coli and Salmonella injections
E. coli K12 or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (here called Salmonella) carrying plasmids encoding GFP or DsRed fluorescent proteins were injected in the notochord of 2 dpf embryos as described [21]. Four different doses of E. coli were used: very low (1000 CFU), low (<3000 CFU), high (3000<n<6000 CFU) and very high (>7000 CFU). 3000 CFU of Salmonella were injected in the hindbrain or in the notochord. Enteroinvasive E. coli AIEC bacteria strain LF82 [57] and its mutant, LF82-ΔlpfA [58] and JM83ΔmsbB [59] were injected at a low dose (CFU<3000) in the notochord.
Quantification of bacterial load by CFU counts and by Fluorescent Pixel Counts
CFU counts were performed as previously described [21]. For quantification of bacterial load by Fluorescent Pixel Counts (FPC), fluorescent bacteria were injected in the larvae and imaged using MVX10 Olympus microscope. Fluorescence was quantified by computation using Fiji (ImageJ software) as following: 1/ Background was measured in images of PBS injected larvae and then was subtracted in the fluorescence images, 2/ “make binary” function was run, and 3/ “measure area” function was used to determine the number of fluorescent pixels of the image.
Macrophage and neutrophil ablation and overproduction
To induce macrophage depletion, 10 nl of Lipo-Clodronate or Lipo-PBS (clodronateliposomes.com) were injected intravenously (i.v.) in larvae at 1 dpf. Macrophage-depleted larvae were selected for infection based on the reduction of red-labeled macrophages tg(mpeg1:mCherry-F) 24 h after the treatment. For neutrophil depletion, 3 nl of antisense translational morpholino csf3r 0.7 mM (5’GAAGCACAAGCGAGACGGATGCCAT3’, Gene Tools) was microinjected in the one-cell stage tg(mpx:GFP) embryos. Standard control from Gene Tools (see Morpholino injection section) was used as a control. Neutrophils or macrophages were alternatively depleted using metronidazole treatment of tg(mpx:gal4/UAS:nfsb-mCherry) larvae or tg(mpeg1:gal4/UAS:nfsb-mCherry), respectively (see below). Microinjection of 3 nl of 10 ng/μl of gcsf3a or gcsf3b over-expressing plasmids [60] at 1-cell stage was used to increase neutrophil supply in embryos.
Drug treatments of zebrafish larvae and morpholino injection
For neutrophil depletion, tg(mpx:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) and tg(mpx:Gal4 /UAS:nfsB-mCherry/mpeg1:GFPcaax) embryos expressing a Nitroreductase-mCherry fusion protein specifically in neutrophils, were placed in fish water containing 5 or 10 mM Metronidazole/0.1% DMSO (MTZ, Sigma-Aldrich) (freshly prepared), at 40 hpf. Treatment with 0.1% DMSO and not transgenic siblings treated with MTZ were used as controls. Higher neutrophil depletion was observed using 10 mM MTZ. Therefore, 10 mM concentration of MTZ was used for further analysis, excepted in Fig 3C where a representative larva with 50% neutrophil depletion using 5 mM MTZ is shown. For macrophage depletion, tg(mpeg1:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) were treated with 10 mM Metronidazole/0.1% DMSO at 30 hpf. tg(mpeg1:Gal4/UAS:nfsB-mCherry) treated with 0.1% DMSO and not transgenic siblings treated with MTZ were used as controls. VAS2870 (Sigma-Aldrich SML0273) stock was prepared in DMSO at 15 mM. Two dpf tg(lyz:DsRed) embryos were injected in the yolk with 5 nl of 20 μM VAS2870 diluted in miliQ water or with 5 nl of water-diluted DMSO. Apocynin (Santa Cruz, CAS498-02-2) was dissolved at 100 mM in DMSO. E. coli-infected larvae were placed in fish water containing 250 μM Apocynin for 1 day. Decrease of superoxide production was detected using DHE (Dihydroethidium, Santa Cruz CAS104821-25-2) staining (see below). Nitric Oxide inhibition was performed with the pan-NOS inhibitor NG-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS 51298-62-5). After notochord infection, embryos were placed immediately in 1 mM L-NAME fish water for the whole time course of the experiments. To knock down translation of P47phox, the antisense oligonucleotide morpholino (5’ CGGCGAGATGAAGTGTGTGAGCGAG 3’), overlapping the AUG start codon [61] was used. 2.1 ng of P47phox or Control (standard control from Gene Tools, 5' CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA 3') morpholinos were injected at 1-cell stage.
Staining and immuno-labelling in whole embryo
Mpx activity and neutrophils were detected in tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx+/- and tg(mpx:GFP)/mpx-/- larvae at 1 day post E. coli injection (dpi) using Sudan black staining and anti-GFP antibody (molecular probe A11122, dilution 1/500), respectively [21]. For superoxide detection within the cells, DHE was added to the fish medium at 3 μM at 1 dpi for one hour and larvae were washed 2 times before imaging using confocal microscopy (excitation/emission 532/605 nm) [32]. To detect nitric oxide, infected tg(lyz:DsRed) embryos were stained with 4-Amino-5-methylamino-2’,7’-difluorofluorescein diacetate, Diaminofluorescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM-DA) (Sigma, CAS 254109-22-3) [31] at 5 μM in fish medium for 2 hours at 6, 10 hpi and 1 dpi (for E. coli infection) or 2 hpi (for Salmonella infection). Larvae were rinsed three times in fish water before imaging using epi-fluorescence and confocal microscopy (excitation/emission: 488/515 nm). Dead cells were detected using Sytox Green staining. Larvae were injected with 3 nL of 50 μM Sytox Green (Molecular Probes) in the vein at 1 dpi and placed at 28.5°C. One hour after Sytox Green injection, larvae were mounted in 1% low-melting-point agarose and imaged using epi-fluorescence and spinning disk confocal microscopy (excitation/emission: 488/526 nm).
Quantification of total leukocyte population, quantification of recruited neutrophils and quantification of dead cells
Tricaine-anesthetized reporter larvae were imaged using MVX10 Olympus microscope. In Figs 2, S3 and S6 total numbers of fluorescent neutrophils or macrophages were quantified as Leukocyte Units (LUs) by computation using Fiji (ImageJ software) as described in [62]. In Figs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, S2 and S9 the total number of fluorescent leukocytes were quantified by computation using Fiji (ImageJ software) as following: 1/ leukocytes were detected using “Find Maxima” function, 2/ Maxima were automatically counted using run("ROI Manager …"), roiManager("Add") and 3/ roiManager("Measure") functions. For quantification of recruited fluorescent neutrophils, tricaine-anesthetized reporter larvae were imaged using MVX10 Olympus microscope or confocal microscope. Neutrophils were directly quantified on the images, in a defined region of interest (the Notochord or muscle region as indicated in the figure diagrams). Dead cells were directly quantified on confocal images, in a defined region of interest.
Statistics analysis
Graph Pad Prism 4.0 Software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to construct graphs and analyze data in all figures, except Fig 6F, 6H and S9F, which were performed in Excel 2010 (Microsoft). Specific statistical tests were used to evaluate the significance of differences between groups (the test and p value are indicated in the figure legend). Outliers were determined using Grubbs' test (Graph Pad Prism 4.0 Software). The sample size is indicated in the figure legend and the sample size estimation and the power of the statistical test were computed using GPower software. Samples were allocated into experimental groups by randomization. The number of independent experiments (biological replicates) is indicated in the figure legends when applicable. The survival rate of treated embryos was compared with that of the control embryos using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Imaging of live zebrafish larvae
Larvae were anesthetized and mounted as previously described [21]. Epi-fluorescence microscopy was performed using a MVX10 Olympus microscope (MVPLAPO 1X objective; XC50 camera). Confocal microscopy was performed using a confocal Leica SPE upright microscope (40x HCX APO L 0.80 W and 20x CHX APO L 0.5 W objectives) and an ANDOR CSU-W1 confocal spinning disk on an inverted NIKON microscope (Ti Eclipse) with ANDOR Neo sCMOS camera (20x air/NA 0.75 objective). Image stacks for time-lapse movies were acquired at 23–26°C every 4 min, typically spanning 50 μm at 2 μm intervals, at 1024x512 or 512x512 pixel resolution. The 4D files generated from time-lapse acquisitions were processed using Image J, compressed into maximum intensity projections and cropped. Brightness, contrast, and colour levels were adjusted for maximal visibility.
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
For gcsf over-expression, larvae were injected with gcsf3a or gcsf3b over-expressing plasmids or no plasmid as described above. At 2 dpf, larvae were either uninfected or infected with E. coli in the notochord. To determine the relative expression of gcsf3a, gcsf3b and lyz, total RNA from infected larvae and controls (pools of 6 larvae each) was prepared at 1–2 dpi. For mpeg1 mRNA expression analysis, total RNA was extracted from 3 dpf Lipo-PBS and Lipo-clodronate treated larvae (10 larvae per pool, 3 pools per conditions). RNA preparation, reverse transcription and Q-PCR were performed as described in [63], using ef1a as a reference gene. Q-RT-PCR analyses were performed using LC480 software. The primers used were the following: zcsf3a.32 (5’gac tgc tct tct gat gtc tg 3’), zcsf3a.52 (5’aac tac atc tga acc tcc tg 3’), zcsf3b.31 (5’ggc agg gct cca gca gct tc 3’), zcsf3b.51 (5’gga gct ctg cgc acc caa ca 3’), LyzA (5’ccg tta cag taa gaa tcc cag g 3’) and lyzS (5’ aga att tgt gca aag tgg cc 3’), zef1a.5 (5’ ttc tgt tac ctg gca aag gg 3’), zef1a.3 (5’ ttc agt ttg tcc aac acc ca 3’), mpeg1.FW1 (5’ ttt cac ctg ctg atg ctc tg 3’) and mpeg1.RV1 (5’ atg aca tgg gtg ccg taa tc 3’).
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We have special thanks to Annette Vergunst, INSERM France, Paul Guglielmi, INSERM France, Etienne Lelièvre, INSERM France and the members of DIMNP for helpful discussions and Jean-François Dubremetz for electron microscopy. We thank David Stachura, California State University, for the gift of the Csf3 over-expressing plasmids, Nicolas Darnish for LF82 E. coli strains, Richard P. Darveau for E. coli JM83 stains and Steve Renshaw, MRC Sheffield, for transgenic lines. We thank Montpellier Rio Imaging for access to the microscopes.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files, or on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1294921).
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7- PEOPLE-2011-ITN) under the Marie-Curie Initial Training Network FishForPharma [grant agreement no. PITN-GA-2011-289209] and by a grant from the European Community’s H2020 Program [Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network ImageInLife: Grant Agreement n° 721537]. QTP has been supported first by FishForPharma, then by Fondation de la Recherche Médicale (FDT20150532259). TS is supported by ImageInLife. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Metchnikoff É (1892) Leçons Sur La Pathologie Comparée de L ‘ Inflammation: Faites à L ‘ Institut Pasteur En Avril et Mai 1891 / Par Élie Metchnokoff. Edited by G Masson 1 vol.(XI-. Paris: Librairie de l’académie de médecine, 120, Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris.
- 2.Flannagan RS, Cosio G, Grinstein S (2009) Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 355–366. 10.1038/nrmicro2128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Urban CF, Lourido S, Zychlinsky A (2006) How do microbes evade neutrophil killing? Cell Microbiol 8: 1687–1696. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00792.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Babior BM, Curnutte JT, Kipnes BS (1975) Pyridine nucleotide-dependent superoxide production by a cell-free system from human granulocytes. J Clin Invest 56: 1035–1042. 10.1172/JCI108150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Segal AW (2005) How neutrophils kill microbes. Annu Rev Immunol 23: 197–223. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sheshachalam A, Srivastava N, Mitchell T, Lacy P, Eitzen G (2014) Granule protein processing and regulated secretion in neutrophils. Front Immunol 5: 448 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fang FC (2011) Antimicrobial actions of reactive oxygen species. MBio 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paiva CN, Bozza MT (2014) Are reactive oxygen species always detrimental to pathogens? Antioxid Redox Signal 20: 1000–1037. 10.1089/ars.2013.5447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chakravortty D, Hensel M (2003) Inducible nitric oxide synthase and control of intracellular bacterial pathogens. Microbes Infect 5: 621–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang CT, Cambier CJ, Davis JM, Hall CJ, Crosier PS, et al. (2012) Neutrophils exert protection in the early tuberculous granuloma by oxidative killing of mycobacteria phagocytosed from infected macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 12: 301–312. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eswarappa SM, Negi VD, Chakraborty S, Chandrasekhar Sagar BK, Chakravortty D (2010) Division of the Salmonella-containing vacuole and depletion of acidic lysosomes in Salmonella-infected host cells are novel strategies of Salmonella enterica to avoid lysosomes. Infect Immun 78: 68–79. 10.1128/IAI.00668-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pieters J (2008) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the macrophage: maintaining a balance. Cell Host Microbe 3: 399–407. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ray K, Marteyn B, Sansonetti PJ, Tang CM (2009) Life on the inside: the intracellular lifestyle of cytosolic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 333–340. 10.1038/nrmicro2112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tilney LG, Portnoy DA (1989) Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes. J Cell Biol 109: 1597–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mostowy S (2013) Autophagy and bacterial clearance: a not so clear picture. Cell Microbiol 15: 395–402. 10.1111/cmi.12063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nathan C (2006) Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 6: 173–182. 10.1038/nri1785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, et al. (2004) Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303: 1532–1535. 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pagan AJ, Yang CT, Cameron J, Swaim LE, Ellett F, et al. (2015) Myeloid Growth Factors Promote Resistance to Mycobacterial Infection by Curtailing Granuloma Necrosis through Macrophage Replenishment. Cell Host Microbe 18: 15–26. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torraca V, Masud S, Spaink HP, Meijer AH (2014) Macrophage-pathogen interactions in infectious diseases: new therapeutic insights from the zebrafish host model. Dis Model Mech 7: 785–797. 10.1242/dmm.015594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Colucci-Guyon E, Tinevez JY, Renshaw SA, Herbomel P (2011) Strategies of professional phagocytes in vivo: unlike macrophages, neutrophils engulf only surface-associated microbes. J Cell Sci 124: 3053–3059. 10.1242/jcs.082792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nguyen-Chi M, Phan QT, Gonzalez C, Dubremetz JF, Levraud JP, et al. (2014) Transient infection of the zebrafish notochord with E. coli induces chronic inflammation. Dis Model Mech 7: 871–882. 10.1242/dmm.014498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Travnickova J, Tran Chau V, Julien E, Mateos-Langerak J, Gonzalez C, et al. (2015) Primitive macrophages control HSPC mobilization and definitive haematopoiesis. Nat Commun 6: 6227 10.1038/ncomms7227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Rooijen N, Sanders A, van den Berg TK (1996) Apoptosis of macrophages induced by liposome-mediated intracellular delivery of clodronate and propamidine. J Immunol Methods 193: 93–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Walton EM, Cronan MR, Beerman RW, Tobin DM (2015) The Macrophage-Specific Promoter mfap4 Allows Live, Long-Term Analysis of Macrophage Behavior during Mycobacterial Infection in Zebrafish. PLoS One 10: e0138949 10.1371/journal.pone.0138949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ellett F, Pase L, Hayman JW, Andrianopoulos A, Lieschke GJ (2011) mpeg1 promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish. Blood 117: e49–56. 10.1182/blood-2010-10-314120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Palha N, Guivel-Benhassine F, Briolat V, Lutfalla G, Sourisseau M, et al. (2013) Real-time whole-body visualization of Chikungunya Virus infection and host interferon response in zebrafish. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003619 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li Y, Karlin A, Loike JD, Silverstein SC (2004) Determination of the critical concentration of neutrophils required to block bacterial growth in tissues. J Exp Med 200: 613–622. 10.1084/jem.20040725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Elks PM, van der Vaart M, van Hensbergen V, Schutz E, Redd MJ, et al. (2014) Mycobacteria counteract a TLR-mediated nitrosative defense mechanism in a zebrafish infection model. PLoS One 9: e100928 10.1371/journal.pone.0100928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pase L, Layton JE, Wittmann C, Ellett F, Nowell CJ, et al. (2012) Neutrophil-delivered myeloperoxidase dampens the hydrogen peroxide burst after tissue wounding in zebrafish. Curr Biol 22: 1818–1824. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hall CJ, Flores MV, Oehlers SH, Sanderson LE, Lam EY, et al. (2012) Infection-responsive expansion of the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell compartment in zebrafish is dependent upon inducible nitric oxide. Cell Stem Cell 10: 198–209. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lepiller S, Laurens V, Bouchot A, Herbomel P, Solary E, et al. (2007) Imaging of nitric oxide in a living vertebrate using a diamino-fluorescein probe. Free Radic Biol Med 43: 619–627. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.05.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morash MG, Douglas SE, Robotham A, Ridley CM, Gallant JW, et al. (2011) The zebrafish embryo as a tool for screening and characterizing pleurocidin host-defense peptides as anti-cancer agents. Dis Model Mech 4: 622–633. 10.1242/dmm.007310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ogrunc M, Di Micco R, Liontos M, Bombardelli L, Mione M, et al. (2014) Oncogene-induced reactive oxygen species fuel hyperproliferation and DNA damage response activation. Cell Death Differ 21: 998–1012. 10.1038/cdd.2014.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Altenhofer S, Radermacher KA, Kleikers PW, Wingler K, Schmidt HH (2015) Evolution of NADPH Oxidase Inhibitors: Selectivity and Mechanisms for Target Engagement. Antioxid Redox Signal 23: 406–427. 10.1089/ars.2013.5814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vejrazka M, Micek R, Stipek S (2005) Apocynin inhibits NADPH oxidase in phagocytes but stimulates ROS production in non-phagocytic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1722: 143–147. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT, Mitchison TJ (2009) A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature 459: 996–999. 10.1038/nature08119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li Y, Karlin A, Loike JD, Silverstein SC (2002) A critical concentration of neutrophils is required for effective bacterial killing in suspension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 8289–8294. 10.1073/pnas.122244799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Malka R, Wolach B, Gavrieli R, Shochat E, Rom-Kedar V (2012) Evidence for bistable bacteria-neutrophil interaction and its clinical implications. J Clin Invest 122: 3002–3011. 10.1172/JCI59832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2006) Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol 8: 668–676. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yousefi S, Mihalache C, Kozlowski E, Schmid I, Simon HU (2009) Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Death Differ 16: 1438–1444. 10.1038/cdd.2009.96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Metzler KD, Fuchs TA, Nauseef WM, Reumaux D, Roesler J, et al. (2011) Myeloperoxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation: implications for innate immunity. Blood 117: 953–959. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-290171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Papayannopoulos V (2017) Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 18: 134–147. 10.1038/nri.2017.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Klebanoff SJ (1974) Role of the superoxide anion in the myeloperoxidase-mediated antimicrobial system. J Biol Chem 249: 3724–3728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ (2013) Redox reactions and microbial killing in the neutrophil phagosome. Antioxid Redox Signal 18: 642–660. 10.1089/ars.2012.4827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schieber M, Chandel NS (2014) ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol 24: R453–462. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schreck R, Rieber P, Baeuerle PA (1991) Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J 10: 2247–2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Geering B, Simon HU (2011) Peculiarities of cell death mechanisms in neutrophils. Cell Death Differ 18: 1457–1469. 10.1038/cdd.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Alibaud L, Rombouts Y, Trivelli X, Burguiere A, Cirillo SL, et al. (2011) A Mycobacterium marinum TesA mutant defective for major cell wall-associated lipids is highly attenuated in Dictyostelium discoideum and zebrafish embryos. Mol Microbiol 80: 919–934. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07618.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ko YP, Kuipers A, Freitag CM, Jongerius I, Medina E, et al. (2013) Phagocytosis escape by a Staphylococcus aureus protein that connects complement and coagulation proteins at the bacterial surface. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003816 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bernut A, Herrmann JL, Kissa K, Dubremetz JF, Gaillard JL, et al. (2014) Mycobacterium abscessus cording prevents phagocytosis and promotes abscess formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E943–952. 10.1073/pnas.1321390111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Keatinge M, Bui H, Menke A, Chen YC, Sokol AM, et al. (2015) Glucocerebrosidase 1 deficient Danio rerio mirror key pathological aspects of human Gaucher disease and provide evidence of early microglial activation preceding alpha-synuclein-independent neuronal cell death. Hum Mol Genet 24: 6640–6652. 10.1093/hmg/ddv369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Renshaw SA, Loynes CA, Trushell DM, Elworthy S, Ingham PW, et al. (2006) A transgenic zebrafish model of neutrophilic inflammation. Blood 108: 3976–3978. 10.1182/blood-2006-05-024075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hall C, Flores MV, Storm T, Crosier K, Crosier P (2007) The zebrafish lysozyme C promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in transgenic fish. BMC Dev Biol 7: 42 10.1186/1471-213X-7-42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ellis K, Bagwell J, Bagnat M (2013) Notochord vacuoles are lysosome-related organelles that function in axis and spine morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 200: 667–679. 10.1083/jcb.201212095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Robertson AL, Holmes GR, Bojarczuk AN, Burgon J, Loynes CA, et al. (2014) A zebrafish compound screen reveals modulation of neutrophil reverse migration as an anti-inflammatory mechanism. Sci Transl Med 6: 225ra229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203: 253–310. 10.1002/aja.1002030302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boudeau J, Glasser AL, Masseret E, Joly B, Darfeuille-Michaud A (1999) Invasive ability of an Escherichia coli strain isolated from the ileal mucosa of a patient with Crohn's disease. Infect Immun 67: 4499–4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chassaing B, Rolhion N, de Vallee A, Salim SY, Prorok-Hamon M, et al. (2011) Crohn disease—associated adherent-invasive E. coli bacteria target mouse and human Peyer's patches via long polar fimbriae. J Clin Invest 121: 966–975. 10.1172/JCI44632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Somerville JE Jr., Cassiano L, Bainbridge B, Cunningham MD, Darveau RP (1996) A novel Escherichia coli lipid A mutant that produces an antiinflammatory lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest 97: 359–365. 10.1172/JCI118423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Stachura DL, Svoboda O, Campbell CA, Espin-Palazon R, Lau RP, et al. (2013) The zebrafish granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (Gcsfs): 2 paralogous cytokines and their roles in hematopoietic development and maintenance. Blood 122: 3918–3928. 10.1182/blood-2012-12-475392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Brothers KM, Newman ZR, Wheeler RT (2011) Live imaging of disseminated candidiasis in zebrafish reveals role of phagocyte oxidase in limiting filamentous growth. Eukaryot Cell 10: 932–944. 10.1128/EC.05005-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ellett F, Lieschke GJ (2012) Computational quantification of fluorescent leukocyte numbers in zebrafish embryos. Methods Enzymol 506: 425–435. 10.1016/B978-0-12-391856-7.00046-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Aggad D, Mazel M, Boudinot P, Mogensen KE, Hamming OJ, et al. (2009) The two groups of zebrafish virus-induced interferons signal via distinct receptors with specific and shared chains. J Immunol 183: 3924–3931. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files, or on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1294921).