Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2018 Jul 31;8(8):350. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1374-0

Genetic homogeneity in South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: a new invasive pest to oriental region

P R Shashank 1,, S Twinkle 1, K Chandrashekar 2, Naresh M Meshram 1, Sachin S Suroshe 1, A S R Bajracharya 3
PMCID: PMC6068067  PMID: 30073135

Abstract

South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is an important invasive pest of Tomato which invaded India and Nepal in 2014 and 2016, respectively. In the present study, samples from five localities of India and one from Nepal were used for the investigation of genetic diversity of T. absoluta by employing a fragment in the mtDNA gene-encoding cytochrome oxidase I (COI). Based on the partial COI gene, high genetic homogeneity was detected in T. absoluta populations of India and Nepal with rest of the world. Less nucleotide diversity (π 0.00137) was also detected in the populations of T. absoluta from different countries. This is first attempt to analyze molecular data for this new invasive species from India and Nepal.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13205-018-1374-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Cytochrome oxidase, Invasive pest, India, Nepal, Tomato, Tuta absoluta

Introduction

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) is one of the most important vegetable crops in the world and particularly in India. In India, its production has increased 36 times from a mere 0.54 Mt in 1961 to 18.7 Mt in 2015–2016. At present, India is the second largest producer, accounting for 11.2% of the world production and the second largest in terms of acreage accounting for 18.27% (IHD 2017).

South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), also known as the tomato leaf miner is an oligophagous pest associated with solanaceous crops. It causes reductions in yield and fruit quality to the tune of 50–100% loss in either greenhouses or fields. Plants are damaged by direct feeding on leaves, stems, buds, calyx, young fruits, and also on ripe fruits. Furthermore, damage is also caused by the invasion of secondary pathogens which enter through the wounds made by the pest (EPPO 2005). There are several host plants infested by T. absoluta, the primary host is tomato, but damage has been reported on some other secondary hosts like eggplant, Solanum melongena L.; pepper, Capsicum annuum L.; potato, Solanum tuberosum L.; sweet pepper, S. muricatum L.; tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. (Vargas 1970; Pereyra and Sánchez 2006). This moth has also been reported from several solanaceous weeds, viz., Datura ferox L., D. stramonium L. and N. glauca Graham (Larrain 1986; Desneux et al. 2010).

T. absoluta was accidentally introduced to Spain in 2006, from where it spread North to The Netherlands and East to Iran (Desneux et al. 2010, 2011; Baniameri and Cheraghian 2012). Following its introduction up to Afro-Eurasia in 2010, this pest was in the quarantine watch list of India. In October, 2014, this pest was first detected infesting tomato fields in Pune, Ahmednagar, Dhule, Jalgaon, Nashik, and Satara Districts of Maharashtra, India (Shashank et al. 2015). Subsequently, pest was recorded from Karnataka (ICAR 2015; Kalleshwaraswamy et al. 2015; Ballal et al. 2016), Tamil Nadu (Shanmugam et al. 2016; Ballal et al. 2016), Andhra Pradesh, Telangana (Kumari et al. 2015), Gujarat (Ballal et al. 2016; Chavan et al. 2016; Per. Comm.), North India (Shashank et al. 2016), and Northeastern India (Sankarganesh et al. 2017). Since its introduction to India, the possibility of invasion to Nepal was always existed due to open border, weak quarantine, and import of tomato from India. In May 2016, this pest was first reported from Nepal (Bajracharya et al. 2016). The report of these two invasions from India and Nepal is the first report from oriental region.

The success of an invasive species such as T. absoluta may be determined by both biotic and abiotic factors that promote its adaptation and spread through a wide geographical area (Cifuentes et al. 2011). Assessing the genetic structure and diversity of a invasive species population with native ones using molecular markers helps in understanding gene flow, migration rates, isolation among populations, and other micro-evolutionary processes related with genetic differentiation (Ito et al. 2011; Hufbauer and Roderick 2005). Many studies have shown that the population genetic structure and molecular diversity of most species would change in new habitats, it is observed obviously in some invasive species (Hoos et al. 2010; Rubinoff et al. 2011). Because, mitochondrial DNA is variable and has strict maternal heredity and no genetic recombination, it is ideal for examining population genetic structure and tracing the history of variations in organism (Trewick 2000; Gissi et al. 2008; Shashank et al. 2014; Sarma et al. 2016). In addition, mtDNA provides a good indication of intra- and inter-population variations (Vogler et al. 1993; Margam et al. 2011).

As a successive invasive species, T. absoluta has invaded major tomato growing areas of India (Shashank et al. 2015, 2016) and Nepal (Bajracharya et al. 2016). However, nothing is known about the existence of the wild population of T. absoluta in India. In view of its potential for economic damage and spread, the monitoring of the invasion of T. absoluta is critical and to know the point/source of entry of a population in to new country is very important. The aim of this study is to describe the basic information for molecular variability and population genetic structure of T. absoluta using mitochondrial marker cytochrome C oxidase (COI).

Methods

The larvae of the T. absoluta were collected from five localities (Pusa campus, Delhi; Pune, Maharastra; Hyderabad, Telangana; Bangalore, Karnataka; Tapi, Gujarat) in India and one locality in Nepal (Balaju, Kathmandu) (details in Table 1). The larvae were morphologically identified as T. absoluta using diagnostic characters provided by Hayden et al. (2013).

Table 1.

Details of the sample data used in the analyses of T. alsoluta population

Continents and countries Accession no. Code Specific location Latitude Longitude
Oriental
 India
 Delhi KY619685
KY619686
KY619687
DEL1
DEL2
DEL3
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 28.6282 77.1602
 Maharashtra KP814055
KP814056
KP814057
MHA1
MHA2
MHA3
IARI-Regional Station, Pune
 Telangana KY619681
KY619682
KY619683
KY619684
TEL1
TEL 2
TEL 3
TEL 4
Hyderabad 17.3351 78.4204
 Karnataka KP793741
KP793742
BAN1
BAN2
IIHR, Bangalore
 Gujarat KY619673
KY619674
KY619675
KY619676
GUJ1
GUJ2
GUJ3
GUJ4
Tapi, Gujarat 21.0954 73.3916
 Nepal KY619677
KY619678
KY619679
KY619680
NEP1
NEP2
NEP3
NEP4
Balaju, Kathmandu 27.7313 85.2945
Europe
 Serbia JN417242 SER1 Leskovac, Serbia
 France HQ968678 FRA1 Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur, France
 Bosnia and Herzegovina KC852871 BOH1 Bijeljina, Bosnia, and Herzegovina
 Montenegro KC852872 MON2 Ulcinj, Montenegro
South America
 Peru KX443108
KX443110
KX443111
PER1
PER2
PER3
International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru
Africa
 Tunisia JQ749676
JQ749677
JQ749678
JQ749679
JQ749680
JQ749681
JQ749682
JQ749683
JQ749684
JQ749685
TUN1
TUN2
TUN3
TUN4
TUN5
TUN6
TUN7
TUN8
TUN9
TUN10
 Kenya KP324752 KEN1 Isiolo, Kenya
KP324753 KEN2 Isiolo, Kenya
Middle east
 Oman KT452897.1 OMA1
Out groups
 Bombyx mori KU205352.1
 Scrobipalpula sacculicola KT139410.1
 Scrobipalpula tussilaginis KX049635.1
 Gnorimoschema herbichii KT782393.1
 Gnorimoschema subterranea KT131942.1

The sequencing data generated in this study is from samples collected from different parts in India and Nepal. Gene was sequenced from 3′–5′ direction

Genomic DNA was isolated from larvae using a DNeasy animal tissue kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The rest of the larvae were preserved as the specimen voucher in the National Pusa Collection (NPC), Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi. The genomic DNA was visualized using 0.8% agarose gel and quantified by fluorometer using the standard procedures. A portion of the total DNA was preserved in − 70 °C for future reference purposes. The universal barcode primer described by Folmer et al. (1994) (LCO-50-GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G-30; HCO-50-TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CA-30) specific to mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) was used in the present study. The optimized PCR conditions (per 24 µL) using 0.1 µL Dream Taq DNA polymerase (5U/µL) (Thermo Scientific, Lithuania) were 2.5 µL of 10X PCR buffer with 2 µL of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µL of 10 mM dNTPs (Thermo Scientific, Lithuania), 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, 16 µL of nuclease-free water (Ambion, USA). The PCR (Applied Biosystems® Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler) conditions were as follows: the initial denaturation for 4 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of denaturing for 30 s at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min at 47 °C, and extension time of 50 s at 72 °C, with a final extension for 8 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were visualized using AlphaImager® HP (AlphaView Version 3.2.2.0) on agarose gel after electrophoresis (SCIE-PLAS HU10 Mini-Plus horizontal). Purified PCR products are sequenced in an automated sequencer (ABI Prism 3730; Applied Biosystems, USA) at the specific commercial facilities (AgriGenome, Hyderabad, India).

Data analysis

All the sequences in FASTA format were imported into the sequence alignment application of MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) software package and multiple sequence alignments were performed with the ClustalW (Jeanmougin et al. 1998) algorithm using the default parameters. The BLAST program was used to search for homologous T. absoluta sequences in the NCBI databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The sequence details were analyzed carefully and submitted to NCBI for GenBank Accessions (Table 1).

A total of 40 sequences (20 from this study and 20 sequences from different localities were downloaded from NCBI database) were used in diversity analysis. DnaSP 5.10.01 (Librado and Rozas 2009) was used to estimate a series of population-level parameters including pairwise nucleotide diversity π and haplotype diversity h. Neutrality tests like Tajima’s D (1989), Fu and Li’s D (1993), and Fu’s FS (1997), were also calculated by DnaSP 5.10.01 (Librado and Rozas 2009) for investigating the historical population demographics and testing whether the sequences conformed to the expectations of neutrality. We calculated pairwise FST using Arlequin 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010), which accurately reflects the patterns of genetic variation. Sampling locations were grouped according to historical records of T. absoluta distribution and invasion, resulting in the following combinations: rest of the world (Table 1) and Oriental (India–Nepal).

Results

Genetic variability of COI sequences

Twenty individuals of T. absoluta breeding on tomato were collected from five different localities of India and one from Nepal. Other 20 sequences were downloaded from NCBI database from eight countries based on the spread of T. absoluta (Table 1). The sample size disparity is mainly based on lack of sequence information from different countries. Totally, 40 sequences were used for analysis. The mean total nucleotide composition is A 28.2%, T 39.5%, C 16.5%, and G 15.8% in the sequences. The average AT content is 67.7% and the CG is 32.3%. This high AT content (67.7%) is a general feature of the COI region in arthropods, and is comparable with other studies on insect and mite taxa. Furthermore, test statistics were generated for the 40 COI sequences in which rest of the world group and oriental (India–Nepal) were analyzed as discrete units in the case of the diversity and selective neutrality tests (Table 2). Surprisingly, there is a lack of variation in COI sequences. A total of three haplotypes in rest of the world group and single haplotype in oriental group were observed. There is a negligible nucleotide diversity (π) 0.00137 among rest of world group which also contains native range, while locations newly invaded that is Oriental group are completely monotypic (Table 2). Demographic history changes were analyzed for two groups through neutrality tests. The AMOVA analysis revealed that 95.19% of total genetic variation was partitioned within populations. The remaining 4.81% was partitioned among populations (Fst = 0.04812): this amount of variance is highly insignificant (P < 0.001) and reveals that there is no considerable population genetic structure (Table 3).

Table 2.

Genetic variability of COI sequences by group

Rest of the world Oriental Total
Sample size 20 20 40
No. of haplotypes (Nh) 3 1 2
Haplotype diversity (h) 0.195 0 0.099
Nucleotide diversity (π) 0.00137 0 0.00069
No. of segregating sites (S) 7 0 7
Fu and Li’s F − 2.68009 N/A − 3.35235 (**P < 0.02)
Fu and Li’s D − 2.45506 N/A − 3.20829 (**P < 0.02)
Tajima’s D − 1.97235 N/A − 2.10017 (*P < 0.05)
Fu’s F 0.695 N/A − 0.212

Rest of the world grouping includes all the sequences from Table 1 except India–Nepal region. For Fu and Li’s F and D and Tajima’s D values, significant (P < 0.05) values, while others have P > 0.10

Table 3.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for the COI sequences

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation
Among populations 1 5.025 0.12632 Va 4.81
Within populations 38 94.950 2.49868 Vb 95.19
Total 39 99.975 2.62500
Fixation Index F ST : 0.04812

Phylogenetic analysis

The neighbor-joining tree (NJ tree based on Kimura three-parameter distance at 1000 iterations) was constructed based on 40 sequences including 18 sequences from the present study and 22 sequences from GenBank and outliers (Table 1) using MEGA 7.0. Based on strict consensus NJ tree, all populations cluster together in a single group. The phylogenetic tree had a total branch length of 0.3455 base substitutions per site. The tree shows that there is no clustering associated with geographic origin. However, the samples from the same localities are grouped together with Kenyan samples as a base. This suggests that there is a homogeneity in the T. absoluta populations.

Discussion

Mitochondrial DNA has been used for elucidating genetic variation, speciation of complex insect species, identification, and origin invasive species (Kruse and Sperling 2001; Armstrong and Ball 2005; Valade et al. 2009; Hafiz and Samreen 2016). Information on genetic diversity and population genetics of invasive species is essential in the context of developing invasive species management strategies (Lee 2002). Tuta absoluta is one of the most devastating pest-threatening tomato crops worldwide. In the last decade, this pest has spread and expanded to most of Europe, Africa, and now in Asia, causing extensive damage to the crop itself and to the international tomato trade (Campos et al. 2017). T. absoluta introduced to India and Nepal in 2014 and 2015, respectively (Shashank et al. 2015; Bajracharya et al. 2016). However, information on genetic diversity of this invasive species is totally lacking in both the countries. This is the first report of genetic diversity of this pest from India and Nepal using mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene.

The present results recorded high genetic homogeneity among different populations which is evident by less nucleotide variation. Furthermore, the lack of genetic variability was also represented by neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 1). The genetic homogeneity observed in the present results is in similar to those of Flores et al. (2003) who also observed high genetic homogeneity in Argentinian populations of T. absoluta using allozymic polymorphisms. They concluded that lack of particular alleles or allelic frequencies in populations of T. absoluta from arid regions or from subtropical areas hinder characterisation of each population according to its geographic origin. Similar study was conducted by Cifuentes et al. (2011) in T. absoluta using cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and internal transcribed spacers 1 (ITS1 and ITS2) to understand genetic diversity of 23 Mediterranean and ten native South American populations. They also observed high genetic homogeneity in T. absoluta populations from the Mediterranean Basin and South America, and concluded that a single genetic type was identified in this pest. Genetic homogeneity in recently introduced species in a new habitat is not atypical, similar results have been observed in other arthropods such as Oryctes rhinoceros (Reil et al. 2016), Ochlerotatus caspius (Porretta et al. 2007), Linepithema humile (Tsutsui and Case 2001), and Sitobion avenae (Figueroa et al. 2005).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic consensus tree generated from the COI gene sequences of T. absoluta and from other insects (Bombyx mori, Scrobipalpula sacculicola, Scrobipalpula tussilaginis, Gnorimoschema herbichii, and Gnorimoschema subterranean) as the outgroup. The consensus tree was inferred from 2000 bootstrap replicates and only values > 90% are shown at the internodes. The scale bar shows two nucleotide exchanges per 100 nucleotides

Furthermore, it is reported that many invasive species exhibit reduced genetic variation as a result of founder effects and bottlenecks during colonization and establishment (Hawley et al. 2006; Lindholm et al. 2005; Tsutsui et al. 2000). New invasive populations are genetically less variable than the original population from which they are originated, because they are only a subset of the genetic diversity present in the native population (Nei et al. 1975; Chakraborty and Nei 1977; Cifuentes et al. 2011). Similarly, when introduced populations are small, there is a decreased genetic diversity (Roderick 2004). However, reduction in genetic diversity is generally harmful but occasionally contributed to the success of invasive species in some arthropods (Tsutsui and Case 2001; Figueroa et al. 2005). In T. absoluta, Cifuentes et al. (2011) ruled out the influence founder effects on the genetic homogeneity of the Mediterranean populations. Furthermore, genetic homogeneity in two continents (Europe and South America) was found in the mtCOI and rDNA analyses, suggesting that the Mediterranean populations are probable derived from a South American population or also the South American population is itself invasive (Cifuentes et al. 2011).

In conclusion, with the level of genetic variation of T. absoluta shown in the mtCOI marker in the present study, it is not possible to identify the exact origin of the Indian and Nepal populations using the present marker. However, this is first attempt to generate molecular data for this new invasive species from India and Nepal. Furthermore, other genetic markers like microsatellites could be used in future studies to trace the exact route of origin of this destructive invasive pest for developing effective management strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Head, Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi for her guidance. We thank DST-SERB (SB/YS/LS-126/2014) for the financial assistance to conduct this work.

Author contributions

SPR collected and identified specimens. TS performed molecular work. Conceptualization: SPR and NMM. Data curation: SPR, TS, and SSS. Data analysis: SPR and ASRB. Supervision: SPR and KC. Funding acquisition: SPR. All authors read, reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

References

  1. Armstrong KF, Ball SL. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:1813–1823. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajracharya ASR, Mainali RP, Bhat B, Bista S, Shashank PR, Meshram NM. The first record of South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Nepal. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2016;4:1359–1363. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballal CR, Gupta A, Mohan M, Lalitha Y, Verghese A. The new invasive pest Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India and its natural enemies along with evaluation of Trichogrammatids for its biological control. Current Sci. 2016;110:2155. doi: 10.18520/cs/v110/i11/2155-2159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baniameri V, Cheraghian A. The first report and control strategies of Tuta absoluta in Iran. EPPO Bull. 2012;42:322–324. doi: 10.1111/epp.2577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campos MR, Biondi A, Adiga A, Guedes RN, Desneux N. From the Western Palaearctic region to beyond: Tuta absoluta 10 years after invading Europe. J Pest Sci. 2017;1:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakraborty AB, Nei M. Bottleneck effect on average heterozygosity and genetic distance with the stepwise mutation model. Evolution. 1977;31:347–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cifuentes D, Chynoweth R, Bielza P. Genetic study of Mediterranean and South American populations of tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Povolny, 1994) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using ribosomal and mitochondrial markers. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67:1155–1162. doi: 10.1002/ps.2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Desneux N, Wajnberg E, Wyckhuys KAG, Burgio G, Arpaia S, Narva´ez-Vasquez CA, Gonza´lez-Cabrera J, Catala´n Ruescas D, Tabone E, Frandon J, Pizzol J, Poncet C, Cabello T, Urbaneja A. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: ecology, history of invasion and prospects for biological control. J Pest Sci. 2010;83:197–215. doi: 10.1007/s10340-010-0321-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desneux N, Luna MG, Guillemaud T, Urbaneja A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: the new threat to tomato world production. J Pest Sci. 2011;84:403–408. doi: 10.1007/s10340-011-0398-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. EPPO Data sheets on quarantine pests: Tuta absoluta. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 2005;35:434–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2005.00852.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res. 2010;10:564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Figueroa CC, Simon JC, Le Gallic JF, Prunier-Leterme N, Briones LM, Dedryver CA, Niemeyer HM. Genetic structure and clonal diversity of an introduced pest in Chile, the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae. Heredity. 2005;95:24–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flores LV, Gilardon E, Gardenal CN. Genetic structure of populations of Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) J Basic Appl Genet. 2003;15:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fu Y, Li W. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993;133:693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity. 2008;101:301–320. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hafiz MT, Samreen A. Services of DNA barcoding in different fields. Mitochondr DNA Part A. 2016;27:4463–4474. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1089572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hawley DM, Hanley D, Dhondt AA, Lovette IJ. Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:263–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayden JE, Lee S, Passoa SC, Young J, Landry JF, Nazari V, Mally R, Somma LA, Ahlmark KM (2013) Digital identification of microlepidoptera on solanaceae. USDA-APHIS-PPQ identification technology program (ITP). Fort Collins, CO. http://idtools.org/id/leps/micro/. Accessed 09 Feb 2017
  21. Hoos PM, Whitman Miller A, Ruiz GM, Vrijenhoek RC, Geller JB. Genetic and historical evidence disagree on likely sources of the Atlantic amethyst gem clam Gemma gemma (Totten, 1834) in California. Diver Dist. 2010;16:582–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00672.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hufbauer RA, Roderick GK. Microevolution in biological control: mechanisms, patterns, and processes. Biol Control. 2005;35:227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. ICAR (2015) Tuta absoluta: A new invasive pest alert. Indian Council of Agricultural Research New Delhi, India, 2015. http://www.icar.org.in/en/node/8600. Accessed 23 Jun 2016
  24. IHD (2017) Indian Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi. http://nhb.gov.in/PDFViwer.aspx?enc=3ZOO8K5CzcdC/Yq6HcdIxC0U1kZZenFuNVXacDLxz28=. Accessed 18 Nov 17
  25. Ito K, Nishikawa H, Shimada T, Ogawa K, Minamiya Y, Tomoda M, Nakahira K, Kodama R, Fukuda T, Arakawa R. Analysis of genetic variation and phylogeny of the predatory bug, Pilophorus typicus, in Japan using mitochondrial gene sequences. J Insect Sci. 2011;11:18. doi: 10.1673/031.011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. Multiple sequence alignment with ClustalX [J] Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:403–405. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01285-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalleshwaraswamy CM, Murthy MS, Viraktamath CA, Kumar NK. Occurrence of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the Malnad and Hyderabad–Karnataka Regions of Karnataka, India. Fla Entomol. 2015;98(3):970–971. doi: 10.1653/024.098.0326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kruse JJ, Sperling FA. Molecular phylogeny within and between species of the Archips argyrospila complex (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2001;94:166–173. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0166:MPWABS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumari DA, Anitha G, Anitha V, Lakshmi BK, Vennila S, Rao NH. New record of leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrich) in Tomato. Insect Environ. 2015;20:136–138. [Google Scholar]
  31. Larrain PS. Plagas del tomate. IPA La Platina. 1986;39:30–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee CE. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:386–391. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02554-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP V5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lindholm AK, Breden F, Alexander HJ, Chan WK, Thakurta SG, Brooks R. Invasion success and genetic diversity of introduced populations of guppies Poecilia reticulata in Australia. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:3671–3682. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02697.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Margam VM, Coates BS, Ba MN, Sun W, Binso-Dabire CL, Baoua I, Ishiyaku MF, Shukle JT, Hellmich RL, Covas FG, Ramasamy S, Armstrong J, Pittendrigh BR, Murdock LL. Geographic distribution of phylogenetically-distinct legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:893–903. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution. 1975;29:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pereyra PC, Sánchez NE. Effect of two solanaceous plants on developmental and population parameters of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Neotrop Entomol. 2006;35:671–676. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000500016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Porretta D, Canestrelli D, Bellini R, Celli G, Urbanelli S. Improving insect pest management through population genetic data: a case study of the mosquito Ochlerotatus caspius (Pallas) J Appl Ecol. 2007;44:682–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01301.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reil JB, San Jose M, Rubinoff D. Low variation in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA inhibits resolution of invasion pathways across the Pacific for the Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (Scarabeidae: Oryctes rhinoceros) Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc. 2016;48:57–69. [Google Scholar]
  40. Roderick GK, Mateille T. Tracing the origin of pests and natural enemies: genetic and statistical approaches. In: Lester EE, Sforza R, editors. Genetics, evolution and biological control. Cambridge: CABI; 2004. pp. 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rubinoff D, Holland BS, San Jose M, Powell JA. Geographic proximity not a prerequisite for invasion: Hawaii not the source of California invasion by light brown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana) PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sankarganesh E, Firake DM, Sharma B, Verma VK, Behere GT. Invasion of the south American Tomato Pinworm, Tuta absoluta, in northeastern India: a new challenge and biosecurity concerns. Entomol Gen. 2017;36:335–345. doi: 10.1127/entomologia/2017/0489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sarma NP, Singh S, Sarma DK, Bhattacharyya DR, Kalita MC, Mohapatra PK, Dohutia C, Mahanta J, Prakash A. Mitochondrial DNA-based genetic diversity of Anopheles nivipes in North East India. Mitochondr DNA Part A. 2016;27:4236–4239. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1022757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shanmugam PS, Ramaraju K, Indhumathi K. First record of South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Tamil Nadu, India. Entomon. 2016;41:61–66. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shashank PR, Chakravarthy AK, Raju BR, Bhanu KR. DNA barcoding reveals the occurrence of cryptic species in host-associated population of Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Appl Entomol Zool. 2014;49:283–295. doi: 10.1007/s13355-014-0248-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shashank PR, Chandrashekar K, Meshram NM, Sreedevi K. Occurrence of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) an invasive pest from India. Indian J Entomol. 2015;77:323–329. doi: 10.5958/0974-8172.2015.00070.X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Shashank PR, Suroshe SS, Singh PK, Chandrashekar K, Nebapure SM, Meshram NM. Report of invasive tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) from northern India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2016;86:1635–1636. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Trewick SA. Molecular evidence for dispersal rather than vicariance as the origin of flightless insect species on the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. J Biogeogr. 2000;27:1189–1200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00492.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. Population genetics and colony structure of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in its native and introduced ranges. Evolution. 2001;55:976–985. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0976:PGACSO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:5948–5953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100110397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Valade R, Kenis M, Hernandez-lopez A, Augustin S, Mari Mena N, Magnoux E, Rougerie R, Lakatos F, Roques A, Lopez-Vaamonde C. Mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA markers reveal a Balkan origin for the highly invasive horse-chestnut leaf miner Cameraria ohridella (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) Mol Ecol. 2009;18:3458–3470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vargas H. Observaciones sobre la biologia y enemigos naturales de la polilla del tomate, Gnorimoschema absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Idesia. 1970;1:75–110. [Google Scholar]
  54. Vogler AP, Desalle R, Assmann T, Knisley CB, Schultz TD. Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1993;86:142–152. doi: 10.1093/aesa/86.2.142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES