Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2018 Aug 10;200(17):e00128-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00128-18

Reduce, Induce, Thrive: Bacterial Redox Sensing during Pathogenesis

Michelle L Reniere a,
PMCID: PMC6088161  PMID: 29891640

The abundance of oxidants and reductants must be balanced for an organism to thrive. Bacteria have evolved methods to prevent redox imbalances and to mitigate their deleterious consequences through the expression of detoxification enzymes, antioxidants, and systems to repair or degrade damaged proteins and DNA.

KEYWORDS: virulence, low-molecular-weight thiols, regulation, glutathione, mycothiol, bacillithiol, metabolism, iron, phagocytosis, ROS, RNS, iron regulation, pathogenesis, virulence regulation

ABSTRACT

The abundance of oxidants and reductants must be balanced for an organism to thrive. Bacteria have evolved methods to prevent redox imbalances and to mitigate their deleterious consequences through the expression of detoxification enzymes, antioxidants, and systems to repair or degrade damaged proteins and DNA. Regulating these processes in response to redox changes requires sophisticated surveillance strategies ranging from metal chelation to direct sensing of toxic reactive oxygen species. In the case of bacterial pathogens, stress that threatens to disrupt redox homeostasis can derive from endogenous sources (produced by the bacteria) or exogenous sources (produced by the host). This minireview summarizes the sources of redox stress encountered during infection, the mechanisms by which bacterial pathogens diminish the damaging effects of redox stress, and the clever ways some organisms have evolved to thrive in the face of redox challenges during infection.

INTRODUCTION

Approximately two billion years ago, the photosynthetic activities of cyanobacteria converted the planet into an oxygen-rich environment (1). This new atmosphere brought with it significant metabolic opportunities (aerobic respiration generates more energy than fermentation) and toxic repercussions in the form of poisonous oxygenic by-products, collectively referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROS) (2, 3). The selective pressure of this environment led bacteria to develop mechanisms to mitigate oxidative stress, which results from an imbalance in metabolic homeostasis. In this review, “redox stress” refers to a general imbalance in redox homeostasis due to ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), or reactive electrophilic species (RES). Prokaryotes were diverse prior to the accumulation of oxygen in the atmosphere, and therefore, the mechanisms by which bacteria cope with the challenges of oxygen toxicity are equally varied.

Redox stress is both produced by the bacteria (endogenous) and is encountered in the environment (exogenous) (2). Endogenous ROS are produced in the presence of free metals and during aerobic respiration. Free metals are toxic because they can participate in Fenton chemistry, which is the reaction of hydrogen peroxide with ferrous iron (Fe2+) or, less commonly, cuprous ions (Cu1+), to form hydroxyl radicals (4). Aerobic respiration couples the oxidation of glucose to the four-electron reduction of molecular oxygen. In the electron transport chain, electrons are passed through a series of proteins via oxidation-reduction reactions, with oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor. In this process, oxygen can be incompletely reduced, resulting in the formation of superoxide anions (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (HO·) (Table 1) (5). In addition to respiration, abundant hydrogen peroxide and superoxide are produced from the erroneous oxidation of nonrespiratory flavoproteins, such as dehydrogenases (5, 6).

TABLE 1.

Reactive molecules

Molecule Chemical formula Source(s)a Primary target(s)
Hydrogen peroxide H2O2 Superoxide dismutase, incomplete reduction of O2 Fe-S clusters, proteins
Hydroxyl radical HO· Fenton chemistry, incomplete reduction of O2 DNA
Hypochlorous acid HOCl MPO Proteins
Nitric oxide ˙NO iNOS Proteins, metals
Nitrogen dioxide ˙NO2 Spontaneous reaction of ˙NO and O2 Proteins
Nitroxyl radical NO Product of NorV-mediated NO reduction Proteins
Peroxynitrite ONOO Spontaneous reaction of ˙NO and O2 Proteins, DNA, metals
Superoxide anion O2 NOX, incomplete reduction of O2 Fe-S clusters
a

MPO, myeloperoxidase; iNOS, nitric oxide synthase; NOX, NADPH oxidase.

Endogenous sources of redox stress are evolutionarily ancient and important to consider because they were the original driving force behind the evolution of redox homeostasis pathways. For example, the model Gram-negative organism Escherichia coli produces approximately 10 μM/s hydrogen peroxide and 5 μM/s superoxide during aerobic respiration (6, 7). This endogenous production of ROS can cause significant redox stress if uncontrolled, as evidenced by the substantial aerobic growth defects exhibited by mutant strains unable to detoxify ROS (8, 9). Further, E. coli mutants that cannot detoxify ROS are only able to grow because they induce a stress response that chelates iron and repairs DNA damage, as discussed below (10). While bacteria evolved detoxification strategies to survive in an aerobic environment, these ancient pathways were then repurposed to thrive in the host during infection. This minireview focuses on exogenous sources of redox stress encountered by bacterial pathogens, the mechanisms by which they manage this stress, and examples of bacteria that exploit host defenses to coordinate their metabolic adaptation and activate virulence programs.

EXOGENOUS SOURCES OF REDOX STRESS

Exogenous sources of redox stress are abundant, particularly for bacterial pathogens that encounter assaults from the mammalian immune system during infection. Phagocytes, primarily macrophages and neutrophils, are recruited to sites of infection to ingest invading bacteria and bombard them with oxidants in a process referred to as the “respiratory burst.” The host NADPH oxidase (NOX2) complex is activated by phagocytosis of bacteria (11), generating superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide in the phagosome (Fig. 1). Nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is also induced, producing nitric oxide (˙NO) that reacts with superoxide in the phagosome to form peroxynitrite (ONOO), nitrogen dioxide (˙NO2), and other toxic RNS. Myeloperoxidase in neutrophils then consumes the hydrogen peroxide produced by NOX2 to generate hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a strong two-electron oxidant (12). ROS generated by NOX2 are also important components of neutrophil extracellular traps that ensnare and kill extracellular bacterial pathogens (13).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Host defense mechanisms against intracellular bacterial pathogens. (A) Host-derived antimicrobial ROS and RNS (highlighted in yellow). Host proteins are in blue boxes, and bacterial detoxification enzymes are in red boxes. NADPH oxidase (NOX) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) are recruited to the phagosome in the respiratory burst. Myeloperoxide (MPO) is a significant component of neutrophil granules but is also found in phagolysosomes (97). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (Kat), and peroxiredoxins (Prx) detoxify ROS, while flavohemoglobin (Hmp) and flavorubredoxin (NorV) detoxify RNS. At low pH, peroxynitrite will be protonated (ONOOH [24]). Similarly, superoxide is protonated in the phagolysosome to form the reactive HO2˙ species (13). (B) Simplified schematic depicting macrophage phagosomal maturation (97). The pH of the phagosome steadily decreases, according to the pH scale shown, via recruitment of the vacuolar ATPase (vATPase). The bacterium is in gray. Not drawn to scale.

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a genetic disorder in which individuals lack functional NOX2 and therefore do not mount an effective respiratory burst. The importance of respiratory burst oxidants in microbial killing is underscored by the multitude of recurrent bacterial infections suffered by patients with CGD and their significantly decreased life expectancy (14, 15). CGD patients are particularly susceptible to infection by Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Burkholderia cepacia, and fungal pathogens, with S. aureus being the most frequently isolated bacterium (16). CGD patients are also prone to infection by opportunistic pathogens that rarely cause disease in immunocompetent individuals, highlighting the importance of the respiratory burst to human health.

Bacteria have evolved various mechanisms to cope with the respiratory burst; some actively manipulate the phagosome to prevent accumulation of ROS and RNS, while others escape this compartment entirely and replicate in the host cytosol. However, pathogens are confronted with other sources of redox stress in the mammalian cytosol, such as mitochondrially derived ROS, RNS, and methylglyoxal, an RES that causes alkylation of protein thiols and induces the production of ROS and RNS (17, 18). In addition, mitochondrially derived hydrogen peroxide can oxidize the cytosolic iron storage protein ferritin, releasing free iron that can produce ROS via Fenton chemistry (19).

ROS and RNS are deleterious to nearly all biomolecules, and their effects manifest in distinct fashions (Table 1). The superoxide anion is a charged molecule at physiological pH, so it cannot diffuse freely across membranes; therefore, its effects are restricted to the local microenvironment in which it was formed (8). Superoxide primarily causes damage by oxidizing iron-sulfur clusters, which results in the release of iron. Although catalytically versatile, iron-sulfur clusters are a dangerous redox-sensitive cofactor; oxidation not only damages the cofactor and inhibits enzymatic activity, but it also releases free iron that can propagate the oxidative stress (20). Hydrogen peroxide can oxidize iron-sulfur clusters, as well as lipids and protein cysteine residues, and is capable of generating protein carbonylation (8, 21). The hydroxyl radical is the most potent ROS and can damage the majority of biomolecules, although the most significant impact of this radical is likely in creating DNA lesions (8). Hypochlorous acid oxidizes proteins, primarily on cysteine and methionine residues, leading to protein unfolding and aggregation (Table 1) (12). Nitric oxide can also modify cysteine residues (S-nitrosylation) and react with transition metals (22), while peroxynitrite is a strong oxidizing and nitrating compound that oxidizes protein thiols, purine nucleotides of DNA, and the transition metal centers of metalloproteins (23, 24). The actual consequences of all these ROS and RNS are dependent on several variables, including the density of the bacterial culture, its growth phase and metabolic activity, and the concentration of ROS (25). For example, at low concentrations, hydrogen peroxide primarily targets DNA and has a bacteriostatic effect, whereas at high concentrations, peroxide is bactericidal due to the broad oxidation of protein thiols and iron-sulfur clusters.

REDUCE: MECHANISMS TO REDUCE REDOX STRESS BEFORE DAMAGE OCCURS

To combat both endogenous and exogenous oxidative assaults, pathogenic bacteria have constitutive detoxification methods and inducible systems. Mechanisms to limit redox stress include sequestration of heavy metals, repair of damaged DNA and proteins, production of low-molecular-weight thiol antioxidants, and detoxification enzymes that consume ROS.

To prevent aberrant endogenous ROS accumulation, unincorporated iron is kept at very low concentrations by regulating its uptake, efflux, and storage. Iron can be stored in three types of proteins: ferritin, bacterioferritins, and Dps proteins (26). In addition to sequestering iron, Dps proteins also bind DNA to physically protect it from oxidative damage (27). If DNA is damaged, these oxidative lesions must be repaired. This was demonstrated with the Gram-negative pathogen Salmonella, in which the DNA repair enzyme RecA is required for resistance to hydrogen peroxide in vitro and during infection, indicating that host-derived ROS are sufficient to damage bacterial DNA (25, 28).

Cysteine is an essential amino acid but is prone to metal-catalyzed auto-oxidation yielding cystine and toxic ROS (29). Protein thiols can therefore function as redox-sensitive switches that can be reversibly oxidized to sulfenic acid (-SOH) or disulfides, thereby altering the activity of a protein in response to oxidation (30). In contrast, protein carbonylation and cysteine overoxidation to sulfinic acid (-SO2H) or sulfonic acid (-SO3H) are irreversible and require degradation machinery to remove or repair the damaged proteins. Thus, stress and shock proteins are induced during redox stress and serve as protein chaperones or function in reconstituting overoxidized proteins (31). One well-characterized example is the bacterial heat shock protein 33 (Hsp33), which is an oxidation-sensitive chaperone that is activated upon redox stress to sequester unfolding proteins and prevent the accumulation of protein aggregates (32).

Although less reactive than cysteine, methionine residues can also be oxidized in the presence of ROS, converting them to methionine sulfoxides that alter protein structure and inactivate or modulate protein function. The repair of this oxidation requires dedicated methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) enzymes (33). In the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori, methionine oxidation of catalase (KatA) destabilizes its secondary structure and destroys its activity (34). Therefore, Msr and the protein chaperone GroEL are required to repair oxidatively damaged KatA and restore its activity in order for H. pylori to survive the neutrophil respiratory burst (33, 34). Staphylococcus aureus strains deficient in Msr are also more susceptible to neutrophil killing (35). Together, these data suggest that methionine oxidation occurs in the phagosome of neutrophils and must be repaired for the ingested bacteria to survive.

Low-molecular-weight (LMW) thiols are small molecules containing a reactive sulfhydryl that participates in thiol-disulfide exchange reactions to detoxify ROS and maintain the cytoplasm in a reduced state. During oxidative stress, LMW thiols form reversible mixed disulfides with reactive protein thiols to protect them from overoxidation or to alter their activity, a process referred to as S-glutathionylation (36). Many LMW thiols are also storage forms of cysteine that are more resistant to autoxidation (29, 37). The most abundant LMW thiols produced by prokaryotes are glutathione (GSH), mycothiol (MSH), bacillithiol (BSH), cysteine, and coenzyme A (29). GSH is the primordial LMW thiol and is produced by all eukaryotes with mitochondria, most Gram-negative bacteria, and some Gram-positive bacteria (38). GSH is a tripeptide consisting of glycine, glutamine, and cysteine linked via a unique gamma-glutamyl bond that makes it resistant to canonical cellular peptidases (39). MSH is a cysteine glycoconjugate and is the major LMW thiol produced by actinobacteria, including the important human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (37). M. tuberculosis mutants with altered MSH-to-MSSM (reduced mycothiol-to-oxidized mycothiol) ratios are impaired during infection, highlighting the importance of thiol homeostasis to pathogenesis (40). BSH is a glycoside formed between l-cysteinyl-d-glucosamine and malic acid that is produced by Bacillus species and several staphylococci and streptococci (4143). GSH and its analogs in bacteria have been reviewed by a leader in the field, and the reader is directed to that paper for more details on the structures and functions of these LMW thiols (29).

In addition to LMW thiols, bacteria produce detoxification enzymes that consume ROS. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a metalloenzyme that converts superoxide to hydrogen peroxide and can be localized in the bacterial cytoplasm to scavenge endogenous superoxide or extracytoplasmic to detoxify exogenous superoxide (44). Hydrogen peroxide is then reduced to water by catalase, peroxiredoxin, or glutathione peroxidases (45). Thioredoxins and glutaredoxins are small oxidoreductases that perform thiol-disulfide exchange reactions, keeping protein thiols in the cell reduced. These are then recycled by thioredoxin reductases and GSH, respectively (46).

The most well-characterized RNS detoxifying enzymes are flavohemoglobin (Hmp) and flavorubredoxin (NorV). Hmp is a heme-binding nitric oxide dioxygenase that detoxifies nitric oxide to nitrate (NO3) via a reductase domain that supplies electrons to the active site (47). The enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strains that lack Hmp are attenuated for virulence (48). NorV reduces nitric oxide to nitroxyl (NO), which rapidly decomposes to nitrous oxide (N2O, Fig. 1A). Although NorV is an oxygen-sensitive enzyme utilized during anaerobic growth, it is capable of reducing NO in intracellular enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is required for EHEC survival in macrophages (49). Together, these data suggest that detoxifying NO is critical for infection of Salmonella, UPEC, and EHEC bacteria.

INDUCE: INDUCIBLE DEFENSE REGULONS

Basal expression of antioxidants and scavenging systems is required for surviving constitutive endogenous redox stressors, while the ability to induce detoxification systems is important for combatting exogenous sources of redox stress as they arise. Several families of transcription factors directly sense alterations in the redox environment and adjust the bacterial response appropriately (Table 2). Three transcription factors that directly sense peroxides have been particularly well characterized, OxyR, PerR, and OhrR (45).

TABLE 2.

Redox-responsive regulators

Regulator Stress stimulus Sensory mechanism Reference(s)
NorR Nitric oxide Nitrosylation of coordinated iron 60
NsrR Nitric oxide Nitrosylation of iron-sulfur cluster 61
OhrR Organic peroxide Cysteine oxidation 98
OxyR Hydrogen peroxide Cysteine oxidation 99, 100
PerR Hydrogen peroxide Histidine oxidation 55
Rex NADH/NAD+ ratio NAD+ enhances DNA binding 65
SoxR Redox-cycling compounds Oxidation of iron-sulfur cluster 67
SpxA Disulfide stress Cysteine oxidation 63

The first peroxide-sensing transcription factor described was OxyR in Salmonella, which has since been found to be widely conserved in Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria (50, 51). Experiments in E. coli demonstrated that OxyR is activated by 1 μM extracellular hydrogen peroxide, which equates to intracellular peroxide levels of 200 nM (5). Depending on its oxidation state, OxyR regulates approximately 40 genes in S. enterica (52). In the Gram-negative pathogen Francisella tularensis, OxyR is required to activate the genes encoding catalase and SOD in response to oxidative stress during infection (Table 3). F. tularensis mutants lacking oxyR therefore exhibit a growth defect in macrophages and are attenuated in virulence (53).

TABLE 3.

Examples of redox regulators involved in virulence

Pathogen Regulator (family) Function in vivo Reference(s)
Vibrio cholerae NorR NorR is required to upregulate hmp to detoxify NO during infection 101
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium NsrR NsrR-regulated genes are required for nitrosative stress resistance and infection 102
Staphylococcus aureus MgrA (OhrR) ΔmgrA mutant strains are less virulent due to increased expression of surface proteins and decreased capsule expression 103, 104
Rex Rex derepression is required for upregulation of lactate dehydrogenase and NO resistance during infection 65, 105
Mycobacterium tuberculosis OxyS (OxyR) Oxidation of OxyS derepresses catalase (katG) expression; katG is required for infection, but point mutations result in isoniazid resistance 106, 107
MosR (OhrR) MosR derepresses an oxidoreductase during macrophage infection 59
Francisella tularensis OxyR ΔoxyR mutant is deficient in intracellular survival and virulence due to enhanced susceptibility to oxidative stress 53
Streptococcus pyogenes PerR PerR-dependent gene expression is required to survive the oxidative burst in macrophages 108
SpxA ΔspxA1 mutant is attenuated, ΔspxA2 mutant is hypervirulent 64
Listeria monocytogenes PrfA GSH allosterically activates master virulence regulator 75
SpxA ΔspxA1 mutant is attenuated, ΔspxA2 mutant is fully virulent 109
Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR SoxR is required for virulence 110
Corynebacterium diphtheriae DtxR DtxR derepresses diphtheria toxin under iron-limiting conditions, damaging host 79

PerR, named for its peroxide sensing, is a DNA-binding protein in the Fur family of metal-responsive transcription factors in which repression is relieved upon oxidation of the metal-coordinating histidine residues (Table 2) (54). PerR senses peroxides via metal-catalyzed oxidation of the two histidine residues required to bind iron (55). OhrR (organic hydroperoxide resistance regulator) is a transcriptional repressor whose repression is relieved by oxidation of a conserved cysteine residue in the presence of organic hydroperoxide stress or hypochlorite stress (56, 57). The OhrR subfamily of proteins is extensive and includes regulators, such as MgrA, SarZ, SarA, MosR, RosR, and QsrR that control gene expression in response to the oxidation of one or more protein thiols (58).

Although the particulars vary among different bacteria, in general, OxyR, PerR, and OhrR family proteins regulate genes required to adapt to redox stress. Some of these include genes encoding catalase, thioredoxins, heme biosynthesis machinery, glutathione reductases, Fur, ferritin, and bacterioferritin. Additionally, the OhrR/SarA/MgrA subfamily regulates genes involved in virulence and antibiotic resistance (Table 3). For more comprehensive analyses of the molecular details of redox sensing by OxyR, PerR, and the OhrR family, readers are directed to several excellent recent reviews (45, 58, 59).

Nitric oxide and its analogs are directly sensed by NorR and NsrR (Table 2). In enterobacteria, NsrR and NorR regulate enzymes required to detoxify nitrosative stress, including those encoded by hmp and norV (48). NsrR is a transcriptional repressor that is inactivated by nitrosative stress, whereas NorR is a transcriptional activator that is activated by nitric oxide (60, 61). Both proteins are required to detoxify nitrosative stress in vivo (Table 3).

In addition to the proteins that directly sense peroxides and nitric oxide, redox homeostasis is coordinated by proteins that sense disulfide stress, NADH, and redox-cycling compounds (Table 2). SpxA is a disulfide stress regulator of the arsenate reductase (ArsC) family of proteins that is regulated by redox changes via an N-terminal C-X-X-C redox switch. Oxidized SpxA positively regulates approximately 275 genes in the model Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, including genes encoding bacillithiol biosynthesis, thioredoxin, and components of proteolytic pathways (62, 63). Many Firmicutes encode more than one SpxA family protein that can function cooperatively or independently. For example, in Streptococcus pyogenes, the two SpxA family proteins function antagonistically during infection, such that an spxA1-deficient strain is attenuated, while the deletion of spxA2 results in a hypervirulent strain (Table 3) (64).

Rex is a transcriptional repressor that responds to NADH/NAD+ ratios to regulate metabolic pathways that regenerate NAD+ in Gram-positive bacteria (65). SoxR is a MerR family sensor protein containing two iron-sulfur [2Fe-2S]2+ clusters, the oxidation of which alters the conformation of the protein and its interaction with promoter DNA (52). The SoxR protein was named such due to its importance in the superoxide response in E. coli strains challenged with 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride (Paraquat) (66). However, this response is indirect, and SoxR actually responds to redox cycling compounds (such as Paraquat) via direct oxidation of the bound iron-sulfur cluster (67).

Iron concentrations are critical to control in order to mitigate redox damage, so while not exactly redox-responsive regulators, the metalloregulatory proteins Fur (ferric uptake regulator) and DtxR (diphtheria toxin repressor) are critical to overall redox homeostasis. Fur and DtxR are iron-sensing transcriptional repressors that control the expression of genes encoding iron acquisition systems, iron-dependent enzymes, metabolic proteins, and virulence factors (68). In fact, the abundance of free iron in the cytoplasm of M. tuberculosis is a major determinant of redox stress during infection (40).

Metal availability is so critical to infection outcomes that an arms race has developed between the host and the pathogen surrounding the regulation of metal-dependent enzymes. One example of this comes from the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi, which utilizes manganese in place of iron as a protein cofactor in order to bypass the requirement for iron altogether (69). However, neutrophils attack invading pathogens with a one-two punch, including both ROS generated during the oxidative burst, as well as delivery of the manganese-binding protein calprotectin (70). Calprotectin is the most abundant protein in the neutrophil cytoplasm and functions to chelate manganese and zinc in an effort to starve invading bacteria (71). In the case of the Gram-positive extracellular pathogen S. aureus, calprotectin can limit bacterial growth via inhibition of a manganese-dependent SOD and a simultaneous increase in superoxide concentrations inside the bacterium (72). However, S. aureus counters this attack by producing two SODs, one of which is upregulated in response to calprotectin and can function with either manganese or iron, allowing the bacterium to adapt to the host immune response (73). In addition, S. aureus alters its carbon utilization to reduce manganese demand and resist calprotectin-mediated manganese starvation (74).

THRIVE: BACTERIAL PATHOGENS USE HOST CUES TO MODULATE VIRULENCE

Examples are now emerging of bacteria that have coopted host defenses for their own signaling pathways, metabolic adaptation, and virulence (7577). In a process termed “nutritional immunity,” the host sequesters iron within proteins to withhold it from invading pathogens (78). Bacterial pathogens have evolved to sense the absence of free iron to detect their entry into a vertebrate host (70). For example, in E. coli, the type of SOD produced depends on the microenvironment, whereby Fe-SOD is produced constitutively, and the oxidation-resistant Mn-SOD is induced when the bacterium is exposed to redox stress (2). As discussed previously, Fur and DtxR are iron-sensing transcription factors that regulate iron homeostasis and virulence and are able to identify this low-iron environment in order to adjust the transcriptional response. S. aureus secretion of alpha-toxin and leukotoxin is regulated by Fur to promote pathogenesis in the iron-limiting host. Similarly, expression of the diphtheria toxin in Corynebacterium diphtheriae is regulated by DtxR in an iron-dependent manner (Table 3) (79).

Some intracellular pathogens have evolved detection methods for the ubiquitous and highly abundant cytosolic antioxidant GSH. When phagocytes generate ROS and RNS to destroy invading pathogens during the respiratory burst, they simultaneously produce and import GSH as a self-protection mechanism, and up to 10 mM GSH can accumulate in the cytosol (39, 80, 81). Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative facultative intracellular pathogen that causes melioidosis, and its virulence is completely dependent on the expression of a type VI secretion system (T6SS). During infection, B. pseudomallei senses host-derived GSH via binding to a histidine kinase sensor VirA, which then activates the expression of the T6SS (76). Listeria monocytogenes also senses host GSH but by a distinct mechanism. L. monocytogenes is a Gram-positive intracellular pathogen and the causative agent of the serious foodborne illness listeriosis. Pathogenesis of L. monocytogenes requires activation of the master virulence transcriptional regulator PrfA. It was recently demonstrated that both host-derived and bacterially derived GSH allosterically bind PrfA to transcriptionally activate virulence genes in L. monocytogenes (75, 8284). Moreover, bacterial production of GSH increases specifically in the host cell. These studies further suggest that PrfA itself acts as a redox sensor in which activation requires reduction of the protein thiols as well as abundant GSH (Table 3). It is clear from these examples that intracellular pathogens capitalize on the host cytosol being a GSH-rich niche and have hijacked this LMW thiol as a cue that they are in the host cytosol in order to trigger appropriately timed virulence gene expression.

In addition to utilizing host LMW thiols to activate virulence gene expression, host-derived GSH is also used by pathogens to inhibit specific virulence factors. L. monocytogenes secretes the pore-forming toxin listeriolysin O (LLO) to mediate escape from the phagocytic vacuole, but the activity of LLO in the cytosol has the potential to lyse the host cell, destroying the replicative niche of the bacteria. One pathway to prevent LLO activity in the cytosol is the S-glutathionylation of LLO by host-derived GSH, which inhibits its activity and physically blocks its association with membranes (85). Another example comes from Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, which uses a type III secretion system (T3SS) to transport effector proteins into host cells. The T3SS cap protein LcrV is S-glutathionylated in macrophages, thereby blunting host cell death and enhancing plague pathogenesis (86). Together, these examples illustrate how diverse bacterial pathogens have evolved distinct mechanisms to utilize host-derived GSH to regulate virulence factor production and activity.

BACTERIAL PATHOGENS EXPLOIT HOST DEFENSES FOR THEIR BENEFIT

Bacterial pathogens exploit the host response to coordinate metabolic changes that promote adaptation to the host environment. The simplest example of this is Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, which persists in the environment as dormant endospores. B. anthracis endospores are highly resistant to oxidative stress and germinate in response to superoxide exposure in phagocytes, a critical first step of infection (13, 87). Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the causative agent of gonorrhea, is a Gram-negative extracellular pathogen that forms biofilms, allowing the bacterium to persist within a host and cause chronic infections. Gonococci in the substratum of the biofilm near the surface of host cells can sense the levels of nitric oxide produced by the endothelial or epithelial cells. In response, the bacteria activate genes required for anaerobic respiration and reduce nitric oxide concentrations (88). Commensal E. coli strains also capitalize on the host inflammatory response to gain a growth advantage in the gastrointestinal tract. Nitrate generated by the host as a by-product of iNOS activity feeds E. coli anaerobic respiration in the gut, allowing them to outcompete other commensal bacteria (89).

Another example of bacterial metabolic remodeling during infection comes from S. Typhimurium, an enteric pathogen that causes massive acute inflammation and diarrhea. ROS generated by the influx of phagocytes to the site of inflammation convert thiosulfate to tetrathionate, which can then be used by S. Typhimurium as a terminal electron acceptor, allowing it to outcompete commensal bacteria (90). S. Typhimurium also expresses multiple manganese transporters and manganese-dependent SOD and catalase enzymes to survive in the presence of abundant calprotectin that is secreted in the inflamed gut (91).

H. pylori is a successful gastric pathogen that exploits host defenses to establish chronic infections that can persist for decades. Upon H. pylori invasion of the gastric epithelium, the host defenses are activated, including upregulated ROS production and delivery of calprotectin to the site of infection by innate immune cells. In response, H. pylori first senses the host-derived ROS to drive chemotaxis and promote the colonization of new glands, enabling chronic colonization (92, 93). Second, zinc sequestration by calprotectin inhibits the inflammation-promoting type IV secretion system, resulting in reduced inflammation and, ultimately, increased bacterial persistence (94). Additionally, calprotectin-dependent manganese sequestration can result in lipid A modification, which leads to enhanced biofilm formation and increased bacterial fitness (95).

These examples demonstrate that bacterial pathogens have evolved to not only survive the redox stressors encountered during infection, but in some cases, to utilize them as host-specific signals. This can be described as a “hormetic” response in which a low dose of a poison actually has beneficial effects by stimulating an advantageous response (96). For example, researchers identified OxyR based on the fact that Salmonella spp. preexposed to 60 μM hydrogen peroxide were subsequently resistant to 10 mM peroxide (51). However, in this case, the host-mediated redox changes are detected by the bacteria and “prime” the system to induce not only the bacterial redox defense mechanisms but also virulence genes and metabolic adaptation that promote pathogenesis. To understand this complex interaction, future research will explore the host microenvironments experienced by bacterial pathogens and their adaptive responses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank members of my laboratory, Aaron Whiteley (Harvard Medical School), Beth Traxler (University of Washington), and Ferric Fang (UW) for critical reading of this review. I also apologize to colleagues whose work was not included in this minireview due to space constraints.

Research in my laboratory was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant RO1 AI132356.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Holland HD. 2006. The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:903–915. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hassett DJ, Cohen MS. 1989. Bacterial adaptation to oxidative stress: implications for pathogenesis and interaction with phagocytic cells. FASEB J 3:2574–2582. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.3.14.2556311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lane N. 2002. Oxygen: the molecule that made the world. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fenton HJH. 1894. LXXIII.–oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J Chem Soc Trans 65:899–910. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Imlay JA. 2013. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:443–454. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seaver LC, Imlay JA. 2004. Are respiratory enzymes the primary sources of intracellular hydrogen peroxide? J Biol Chem 279:48742–48750. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408754200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Korshunov S, Imlay JA. 2006. Detection and quantification of superoxide formed within the periplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 188:6326–6334. doi: 10.1128/JB.00554-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Imlay JA. 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:395–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carlioz A, Touati D. 1986. Isolation of superoxide dismutase mutants in Escherichia coli: is superoxide dismutase necessary for aerobic life? EMBO J 5:623–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park S, You X, Imlay JA. 2005. Substantial DNA damage from submicromolar intracellular hydrogen peroxide detected in Hpx mutants of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9317–9322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502051102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Decoursey TE, Ligeti E. 2005. Regulation and termination of NADPH oxidase activity. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2173–2193. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5177-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ. 2013. Redox reactions and microbial killing in the neutrophil phagosome. Antioxid Redox Signal 18:642–660. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paiva CN, Bozza MT. 2014. Are reactive oxygen species always detrimental to pathogens? Antioxid Redox Signal 20:1000–1037. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dinauer MC. 2005. Chronic granulomatous disease and other disorders of phagocyte function. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005:89–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van den Berg JM, van Koppen E, Ahlin A, Belohradsky BH, Bernatowska E, Corbeel L, Español T, Fischer A, Kurenko-Deptuch M, Mouy R, Petropoulou T, Roesler J, Seger R, Stasia M-J, Valerius NH, Weening RS, Wolach B, Roos D, Kuijpers TW. 2009. Chronic granulomatous disease: the European experience. PLoS One 4:e5234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Buvelot H, Posfay-Barbe KM, Linder P, Schrenzel J, Krause KH. 2017. Staphylococcus aureus, phagocyte NADPH oxidase and chronic granulomatous disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:139–157. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murphy MP. 2009. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J 417:1–13. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakraborty S, Karmakar K, Chakravortty D. 2014. Cells producing their own nemesis: understanding methylglyoxal metabolism. IUBMB Life 66:667–678. doi: 10.1002/iub.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yoon JH, An SH, Kyeong IG, Lee MS, Kwon S-C, Kang JH. 2011. Oxidative modification of ferritin induced by hydrogen peroxide. BMB Rep 44:165–169. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2011.44.3.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Imlay JA. 2006. Iron-sulphur clusters and the problem with oxygen. Mol Microbiol 59:1073–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Semchyshyn H, Bagnyukova T, Storey K, Lushchak V. 2005. Hydrogen peroxide increases the activities of soxRS regulon enzymes and the levels of oxidized proteins and lipids in Escherichia coli. Cell Biol Int 29:898–902. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vázquez-Torres A, Bäumler AJ. 2016. Nitrate, nitrite and nitric oxide reductases: from the last universal common ancestor to modern bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol 29:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Szabó C, Ischiropoulos H, Radi R. 2007. Peroxynitrite: biochemistry, pathophysiology and development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:662–680. doi: 10.1038/nrd2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Radi R. 2013. Peroxynitrite, a stealthy biological oxidant. J Biol Chem 288:26464–26472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.472936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fang FC. 2011. Antimicrobial actions of reactive oxygen species. mBio 2:e00141-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00141-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cassat JE, Skaar EP. 2013. Iron in infection and immunity. Cell Host Microbe 13:509–519. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao G, Ceci P, Ilari A, Giangiacomo L, Laue TM, Chiancone E, Chasteen ND. 2002. Iron and hydrogen peroxide detoxification properties of DNA-binding protein from starved cells. J Biol Chem 277:27689–27696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202094200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buchmeier NA, Libby SJ, Xu Y, Loewen PC, Switala J, Guiney DG, Fang FC. 1995. DNA repair is more important than catalase for Salmonella virulence in mice. J Clin Invest 95:1047–1053. doi: 10.1172/JCI117750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fahey RC. 2013. Glutathione analogs in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3182–3198. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lo Conte M, Carroll KS. 2013. The redox biochemistry of protein sulfenylation and sulfinylation. J Biol Chem 288:26480–26488. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.467738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J. 2000. Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species. Int Microbiol 3:3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dahl J-U, Gray MJ, Jakob U. 2015. Protein quality control under oxidative stress conditions. J Mol Biol 427:1549–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ezraty B, Aussel L, Barras F. 2005. Methionine sulfoxide reductases in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1703:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mahawar M, Tran V, Sharp JS, Maier RJ. 2011. Synergistic roles of Helicobacter pylori methionine sulfoxide reductase and GroEL in repairing oxidant-damaged catalase. J Biol Chem 286:19159–19169. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.223677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pang YY, Schwartz J, Bloomberg S, Boyd JM, Horswill AR, Nauseef WM. 2014. Methionine sulfoxide reductases protect against oxidative stress in Staphylococcus aureus encountering exogenous oxidants and human neutrophils. J Innate Immun 6:353–364. doi: 10.1159/000355915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Loi VV, Rossius M, Antelmann H. 2015. Redox regulation by reversible protein S-thiolation in bacteria. Front Microbiol 6:187. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Newton GL, Arnold K, Price MS, Sherrill C, Delcardayre SB, Aharonowitz Y, Cohen G, Davies J, Fahey RC, Davis C. 1996. Distribution of thiols in microorganisms: mycothiol is a major thiol in most actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 178:1990–1995. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.7.1990-1995.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fahey RC, Brown WC, Adams WB, Worsham MB. 1978. Occurrence of glutathione in bacteria. J Bacteriol 133:1126–1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meister A, Anderson ME. 1983. Glutathione. Annu Rev Biochem 52:711–760. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.003431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nambi S, Long JE, Mishra BB, Baker R, Murphy KC, Olive AJ, Nguyen HP, Shaffer SA, Sassetti CM. 2015. The oxidative stress network of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals coordination between radical detoxification systems. Cell Host Microbe 17:829–837. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee J-W, Soonsanga S, Helmann JD. 2007. A complex thiolate switch regulates the Bacillus subtilis organic peroxide sensor OhrR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:8743–8748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702081104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nicely NI, Parsonage D, Paige C, Newton GL, Fahey RC, Leonardi R, Jackowski S, Mallett TC, Claiborne A. 2007. Structure of the type III pantothenate kinase from Bacillus anthracis at 2.0 Å resolution: implications for coenzyme A-dependent redox biology. Biochemistry 46:3234–3245. doi: 10.1021/bi062299p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Newton GL, Rawat M, La Clair JJ, Jothivasan VK, Budiarto T, Hamilton CJ, Claiborne A, Helmann JD, Fahey RC. 2009. Bacillithiol is an antioxidant thiol produced in bacilli. Nat Chem Biol 5:625–627. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lynch M, Kuramitsu H. 2000. Expression and role of superoxide dismutases (SOD) in pathogenic bacteria. Microbes Infect 2:1245–1255. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01278-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dubbs JM, Mongkolsuk S. 2012. Peroxide-sensing transcriptional regulators in bacteria. J Bacteriol 194:5495–5503. doi: 10.1128/JB.00304-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Imlay JA. 2008. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem 77:755–776. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Poole RK. 2005. Nitric oxide and nitrosative stress tolerance in bacteria. Biochem Soc Trans 33:176–180. doi: 10.1042/BST0330176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Green J, Rolfe MD, Smith LJ. 2015. Transcriptional regulation of bacterial virulence gene expression by molecular oxygen and nitric oxide. Virulence 5:794–809. doi: 10.4161/viru.27794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shimizu T, Tsutsuki H, Matsumoto A, Nakaya H, Noda M. 2012. The nitric oxide reductase of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli plays an important role for the survival within macrophages. Mol Microbiol 85:492–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Christman MF, Storz G, Ames BN. 1989. OxyR, a positive regulator of hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium, is homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:3484–3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Christman MF, Morgan RW, Jacobson FS, Ames BN. 1985. Positive control of a regulon for defenses against oxidative stress and some heat-shock proteins in Salmonella Typhimurium. Cell 41:753–762. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chiang SM, Schellhorn HE. 2012. Regulators of oxidative stress response genes in Escherichia coli and their functional conservation in bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys 525:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ma Z, Russo VC, Rabadi SM, Jen Y, Catlett SV, Bakshi CS, Malik M. 2016. Elucidation of a mechanism of oxidative stress regulation in Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Mol Microbiol 101:856–878. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mongkolsuk S, Helmann JD. 2002. Regulation of inducible peroxide stress responses. Mol Microbiol 45:9–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee J-W, Helmann JD. 2006. The PerR transcription factor senses H2O2 by metal-catalysed histidine oxidation. Nature 440:363–367. doi: 10.1038/nature04537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chi BK, Roberts AA, Huyen TTT, Bäsell K, Becher D, Albrecht D, Hamilton CJ, Antelmann H. 2013. S-Bacillithiolation protects conserved and essential proteins against hypochlorite stress in Firmicutes bacteria. Antioxid Redox Signal 18:1273–1295. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fuangthong M, Atichartpongkul S, Mongkolsuk S, Helmann JD. 2001. OhrR is a repressor of ohrA, a key organic hydroperoxide resistance determinant in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 183:4134–4141. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4134-4141.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Antelmann H, Helmann JD. 2011. Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation. Antioxid Redox Signal 14:1049–1063. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hillion M, Antelmann H. 2015. Thiol-based redox switches in prokaryotes. Biol Chem 396:415–444. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2015-0102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.D'Autréaux B, Tucker NP, Dixon R, Spiro S. 2005. A non-haem iron centre in the transcription factor NorR senses nitric oxide. Nature 437:769–772. doi: 10.1038/nature03953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tucker NP, Hicks MG, Clarke TA, Crack JC, Chandra G, Le Brun NE, Dixon R, Hutchings MI. 2008. The transcriptional repressor protein NsrR senses nitric oxide directly via a [2Fe-2S] cluster. PLoS One 3:e3623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rochat T, Nicolas P, Delumeau O, Rabatinová A, Korelusová J, Leduc A, Bessières P, Dervyn E, Krásny L, Noirot P. 2012. Genome-wide identification of genes directly regulated by the pleiotropic transcription factor Spx in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 40:9571–9583. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nakano S, Küster-Schöck E, Grossman AD, Zuber P. 2003. Spx-dependent global transcriptional control is induced by thiol-specific oxidative stress in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13603–13608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2235180100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Port GC, Cusumano ZT, Tumminello PR, Caparon MG. 2017. SpxA1 and SpxA2 act coordinately to fine-tune stress responses and virulence in Streptococcus pyogenes. mBio 8:e00288-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00288-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pagels M, Fuchs S, Pane-Farre J, Kohler C, Menschner L, Hecker M, McNamarra PJ, Bauer MC, Wachenfeldt von C, Liebeke M, Lalk M, Sander G, Eiff von C, Proctor RA, Engelmann S. 2010. Redox sensing by a Rex-family repressor is involved in the regulation of anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 76:1142–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07105.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Greenberg JT, Monach P, Chou JH, Josephy PD, Demple B. 1990. Positive control of a global antioxidant defense regulon activated by superoxide-generating agents in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:6181–6185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gu M, Imlay JA. 2011. The SoxRS response of Escherichia coli is directly activated by redox-cycling drugs rather than by superoxide. Mol Microbiol 79:1136–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07520.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wakeman CA, Skaar EP. 2012. Metalloregulation of Gram-positive pathogen physiology. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Posey JE, Gherardini FC. 2000. Lack of a role for iron in the Lyme disease pathogen. Science 288:1651–1653. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hood MI, Skaar EP. 2012. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:525–537. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Corbin BD, Seeley EH, Raab A, Feldmann J, Miller MR, Torres VJ, Anderson KL, Dattilo BM, Dunman PM, Gerads R, Caprioli RM, Nacken W, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP. 2008. Metal chelation and inhibition of bacterial growth in tissue abscesses. Science 319:962–965. doi: 10.1126/science.1152449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kehl-Fie TE, Chitayat S, Hood MI, Damo S, Restrepo N, Garcia C, Munro KA, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP. 2011. Nutrient metal sequestration by calprotectin inhibits bacterial superoxide defense, enhancing neutrophil killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe 10:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Garcia YM, Barwinska-Sendra A, Tarrant E, Skaar EP, Waldron KJ, Kehl-Fie TE. 2017. A superoxide dismutase capable of functioning with iron or manganese promotes the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to calprotectin and nutritional immunity. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006125. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Radin JN, Kelliher JL, Párraga Solórzano PK, Kehl-Fie TE. 2016. The two-component system ArlRS and alterations in metabolism enable Staphylococcus aureus to resist calprotectin-induced manganese starvation. PLoS Pathog 12:e1006040. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Hamilton KL, John SM, Lauer P, Brennan RG, Portnoy DA. 2015. Glutathione activates virulence gene expression of an intracellular pathogen. Nature 517:170–173. doi: 10.1038/nature14029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wong J, Chen Y, Gan Y-H. 2015. Host cytosolic glutathione sensing by a membrane histidine kinase activates the type VI secretion system in an intracellular bacterium. Cell Host Microbe 18:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Behnsen J, Perez-Lopez A, Nuccio S-P, Raffatellu M. 2015. Exploiting host immunity: the Salmonella paradigm. Trends Immunol 36:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Weinberg ED. 1975. Nutritional immunity. Host's attempt to withhold iron from microbial invaders. JAMA 231:39–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Becker KW, Skaar EP. 2014. Metal limitation and toxicity at the interface between host and pathogen. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:1235–1249. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Seres T, Knickelbein RG, Warshaw JB, Johnston RB Jr. 2000. The phagocytosis-associated respiratory burst in human monocytes is associated with increased uptake of glutathione. J Immunol 165:3333–3340. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.3333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Roos D, Weening RS, Wyss SR, Aebi HE. 1980. Protection of human neutrophils by endogenous catalase: studies with cells from catalase-deficient individuals. J Clin Invest 65:1515–1522. doi: 10.1172/JCI109817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hall M, Grundström C, Begum A, Lindberg MJ, Sauer UH, Almqvist F, Johansson J, Sauer-Eriksson AE. 2016. Structural basis for glutathione-mediated activation of the virulence regulatory protein PrfA in Listeria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:14028–14738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614028114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang Y, Feng H, Zhu Y, Gao P. 2017. Structural insights into glutathione-mediated activation of the master regulator PrfA in Listeria monocytogenes. Protein Cell 8:308–312. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0390-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Portnoy DA. 2016. An in vivo selection identifies Listeria monocytogenes genes required to sense the intracellular environment and activate virulence factor expression. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005741. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Portman JL, Huang Q, Reniere ML, Iavarone AT, Portnoy DA. 2017. Activity of the pore-forming virulence factor listeriolysin O is reversibly inhibited by naturally occurring S-glutathionylation. Infect Immun 85:e00959-16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00959-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mitchell A, Tam C, Elli D, Charlton T, Osei-Owusu P, Fazlollahi F, Faull KF, Schneewind O. 2017. Glutathionylation of Yersinia pestis LcrV and its effects on plague pathogenesis. mBio 8:e00646-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00646-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Baillie L, Hibbs S, Tsai P, Cao G-L, Rosen GM. 2005. Role of superoxide in the germination of Bacillus anthracis endospores. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Falsetta ML, McEwan AG, Jennings MP, Apicella MA. 2010. Anaerobic metabolism occurs in the substratum of gonococcal biofilms and may be sustained in part by nitric oxide. Infect Immun 78:2320–2328. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01312-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Winter SE, Winter MG, Xavier MN, Thiennimitr P, Poon V, Keestra AM, Laughlin RC, Gomez G, Wu J, Lawhon SD, Popova IE, Parikh SJ, Adams LG, Tsolis RM, Stewart VJ, Bäumler AJ. 2013. Host-derived nitrate boosts growth of E. coli in the inflamed gut. Science 339:708–711. doi: 10.1126/science.1232467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL, Crawford RW, Russell JM, Bevins CL, Adams LG, Tsolis RM, Roth JR, Bäumler AJ. 2010. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 467:426–429. doi: 10.1038/nature09415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Diaz-Ochoa VE, Lam D, Lee CS, Klaus S, Behnsen J, Liu JZ, Chim N, Nuccio S-P, Rathi SG, Mastroianni JR, Edwards RA, Jacobo CM, Cerasi M, Battistoni A, Ouellette AJ, Goulding CW, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP, Raffatellu M. 2016. Salmonella mitigates oxidative stress and thrives in the inflamed gut by evading calprotectin-mediated manganese sequestration. Cell Host Microbe 19:814–825. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Collins KD, Hu S, Grasberger H, Kao JY, Ottemann KM. 2018. Chemotaxis allows bacteria to overcome host-generated reactive oxygen species that constrain gland colonization. Infect Immun 86:e00878-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00878-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Flint A, Stintzi A, Saraiva LM. 2016. Oxidative and nitrosative stress defences of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species that counteract mammalian immunity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:938–960. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gaddy JA, Radin JN, Loh JT, Piazuelo MB, Kehl-Fie TE, Delgado AG, Ilca FT, Peek RM, Cover TL, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP, Scott Algood HM. 2014. The host protein calprotectin modulates the Helicobacter pylori cag type IV secretion system via zinc sequestration. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004450. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gaddy JA, Radin JN, Cullen TW, Chazin WJ, Skaar EP, Trent MS, Algood HMS. 2015. Helicobacter pylori resists the antimicrobial activity of calprotectin via lipid A modification and associated biofilm formation. mBio 6:e01349-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01349-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kaiser J. 2003. Hormesis. Sipping from a poisoned chalice. Science 302:376–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Weiss G, Schaible UE. 2015. Macrophage defense mechanisms against intracellular bacteria. Immunol Rev 264:182–203. doi: 10.1111/imr.12266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fuangthong M, Helmann JD. 2002. The OhrR repressor senses organic hydroperoxides by reversible formation of a cysteine-sulfenic acid derivative. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:6690–6695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102483199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Choi H, Kim S, Mukhopadhyay P, Cho S, Woo J, Storz G, Ryu SE. 2001. Structural basis of the redox switch in the OxyR transcription factor. Cell 105:103–113. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00300-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Jo I, Chung I-Y, Bae H-W, Kim J-S, Song S, Cho Y-H, Ha N-C. 2015. Structural details of the OxyR peroxide-sensing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6443–6448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424495112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Stern AM, Hay AJ, Liu Z, Desland FA, Zhang J, Zhong Z, Zhu J. 2012. The NorR regulon is critical for Vibrio cholerae resistance to nitric oxide and sustained colonization of the intestines. mBio 3:e00013-. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00013-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Karlinsey JE, Bang I-S, Becker LA, Frawley ER, Porwollik S, Robbins HF, Thomas VC, Urbano R, McClelland M, Fang FC. 2012. The NsrR regulon in nitrosative stress resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 85:1179–1193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08167.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Crosby HA, Schlievert PM, Merriman JA, King JM, Salgado-Pabón W, Horswill AR. 2016. The Staphylococcus aureus global regulator MgrA modulates clumping and virulence by controlling surface protein expression. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005604. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Gupta RK, Alba J, Xiong YQ, Bayer AS, Lee CY. 2013. MgrA activates expression of capsule genes, but not the α-toxin gene in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. J Infect Dis, 2nd ed 208:1841–1848. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Richardson AR, Libby SJ, Fang FC. 2008. A nitric oxide-inducible lactate dehydrogenase enables Staphylococcus aureus to resist innate immunity. Science 319:1672–1676. doi: 10.1126/science.1155207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li Y, He Z-G. 2012. The mycobacterial LysR-type regulator OxyS responds to oxidative stress and negatively regulates expression of the catalase-peroxidase gene. PLoS One 7:e30186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Pym AS, Saint-Joanis B, Cole ST. 2002. Effect of katG mutations on the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the implication for transmission in humans. Infect Immun 70:4955–4960. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4955-4960.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gryllos I, Grifantini R, Colaprico A, Cary ME, Hakansson A, Carey DW, Suarez-Chavez M, Kalish LA, Mitchell PD, White GL, Wessels MR. 2008. PerR confers phagocytic killing resistance and allows pharyngeal colonization by group A Streptococcus. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000145. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Whiteley AT, Ruhland BR, Edrozo MB, Reniere ML. 2017. A redox-responsive transcription factor is critical for pathogenesis and aerobic growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun 85:e00978-16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00978-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Palma M, Zurita J, Ferreras JA, Worgall S, Larone DH, Shi L, Campagne F, Quadri LEN. 2005. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR does not conform to the archetypal paradigm for SoxR-dependent regulation of the bacterial oxidative stress adaptive response. Infect Immun 73:2958–2966. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2958-2966.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES