ABSTRACT
Diffuse brain invasion by glioma cells prevents effective surgical or molecular-targeted therapy and underlies a detrimental outcome. Migrating glioma cells are guided by complex anatomical brain structures but the exact mechanisms remain poorly defined. To identify adhesion receptor systems and matrix structures supporting glioma cell invasion into brain-like environments we used 2D and 3D organotypic invasion assays in combination with antibody-, peptide- and RNA-based interference. Combined interference with β1 and αV integrins abolished the migration of U-251 and E-98 glioma cells on reconstituted basement membrane; however, invasion into primary brain slices or 3D astrocyte-based scaffolds and migration on astrocyte-deposited matrix was only partly inhibited. Any residual invasion was supported by vascular structures, as well as laminin 511, a central constituent of basement membrane of brain blood vessels. Multi-targeted interference against β1, αV and α6 integrins expressed by U-251 and E-98 cells proved insufficient to achieve complete migration arrest. These data suggest that mechanocoupling by integrins is relatively resistant to antibody- or peptide-based targeting, and cooperates with additional, as yet unidentified adhesion systems in mediating glioma cell invasion in complex brain stroma.
KEY WORDS: Glioma invasion, Integrins, Laminin, Adhesion plasticity, 3D brain models
Summary: Integrin-dependent and integrin-independent mechanisms of glioma cell invasion in 3D brain-like environments indicate remarkable adhesion plasticity and escape routes from targeted intervention.
INTRODUCTION
Gliomas originate from transformed progenitor cells, in which abnormal brain development programs are combined with unrestricted local growth and diffuse infiltration into the brain stroma (Wen and Reardon, 2016). Glioma cell invasion occurs along defined tissue structures, including white matter tracks comprising myelinated axons and astrocyte processes, forming topologically complex cellular networks filled with hydrated, soft extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of hyaluronan and proteoglycans (Cuddapah et al., 2014; Gritsenko et al., 2012; Miyata and Kitagawa, 2017). As an alternative invasion route, brain blood vessels provide a particularly permissive niche of confined space between vascular basement membranes and adjacent brain stroma, which are molecularly and physically complex types of confined space (Di Russo et al., 2017; Farin et al., 2006; Gritsenko et al., 2012; Watkins et al., 2014). To interact with structural basement membrane proteins, glioma cells depend upon integrin adhesion receptors, including: α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 binding to laminins, α1β1 and α2β1 interacting with type-IV collagen (Kawataki et al., 2007; Khoshnoodi et al., 2008; Ramovs et al., 2017; Yurchenco, 2011, 2015), and αVβ3 engaging with both laminin and type IV collagen (Pedchenko et al., 2004; Sasaki and Timpl, 2001; Xu et al., 2001). Invading glioma cells upregulate several integrin subsets, including α3β1 and αVβ3 integrins (Bello et al., 2001; Paulus et al., 1993; Schittenhelm et al., 2013). For their migration along 2D surfaces or through transwell filters coated with different laminin isoforms and collagen IV or reconstituted basement membrane (rBM; Matrigel), glioma cells depend upon α3β1, α6β1 and α1β1 integrins (Delamarre et al., 2009; Hamaia et al., 2012; Kawataki et al., 2007; Nakada et al., 2013; Wondimu et al., 2013). Whereas the adhesion mechanisms mediating glioma cell migration along rBM are largely established, the adhesion systems supporting perivascular and interstitial invasion in brain tissue remain unclear.
In addition to rBM, other diverse 2D and 3D in vitro assays have been developed to model glioma cell invasion into brain stroma (Rao et al., 2014; Rape et al., 2014). 3D collagen scaffolds, broadly used in cancer research, are effectively invaded by glioma cells (Frolov et al., 2016; Kaufman et al., 2005); furthermore, combined targeting of β1 integrin and JNK kinase significantly inhibited glioma cell invasion in type I collagen gels (Vehlow et al., 2017). However, the relevance of fibrillar collagen for the largely collagen-free brain parenchyma remains unclear (Gritsenko et al., 2012; Rape et al., 2014). Cross-linked hyaluronan also supports glioma cell migration (Ananthanarayanan et al., 2011; Gordon et al., 2003), but hyaluronan-based substrates lack cellular components and structural ligands for guidance (Cuddapah et al., 2014; Gritsenko et al., 2012). Astrocytes cultured as 2D monolayers release migration-enhancing molecules and enable gap junctional communication to glioma cells (Hong et al., 2015; Oliveira et al., 2005; Rath et al., 2013), and 3D astrocyte cultures provide additional topologic complexity supporting glioma cell invasion as single cells and multicellular networks (Gritsenko et al., 2017). Rat brain aggregates formed by cells originating from fetal brain reproduce the 3D structure of neuropil without blood vessels (Bjerkvig, 1986). Single-targeted interference of β1 or αVβ3 integrins was largely ineffective in inhibiting glioma invasion into rat brain aggregates, and combinations of targeting other integrin subsets and ligand conditions were not explored (Tonn et al., 1998). As the most complex multi-ligand system currently utilized, brain slice culture provides in vivo-like substrate topologies to reproduce glioma cell invasion including radial migration along blood vessels (de Bouard et al., 2002; Fayzullin et al., 2016); however, the adhesion mechanisms mediating glioma cell invasion into brain slices remain unexplored.
To experimentally test the mechanistic variability and adaptability of glioma cell invasion in different brain environments, we apply recently developed complementary in vitro models (Gritsenko et al., 2017) and address the role of integrins in mediating adhesive migration along or through rBM and organotypic brain-like 3D environments. Using stringent, multi-inhibitor integrin targeting strategies, we reveal substantial residual glioma invasion competence after interference with integrins in complex brain environments and on a laminin-511-coated surface, suggesting cooperation of integrin-dependent and/or other adhesion systems.
RESULTS
U-251 and E-98 glioma cell lines abundantly expressed α3 and β1 integrin subunits, moderate levels of α6, αV, β3, β4 and negligible levels of α1, α2 integrins (Fig. S1). Based on known subunit combinations, both cell lines thus expressed predominantly α3β1 and α6β1 integrin heterodimers, indicating a combined ligand preference for laminins (Nishiuchi et al., 2003, 2006). Compared with E-98 cells, U-251 expressed higher levels of αVβ3, an RGD-dependent integrin with broad substrate specificity (Demircioglu and Hodivala-Dilke, 2016; Goodman and Picard, 2012).
In reference to published work (Benton et al., 2014), we tested the role of integrins in the emigration of U-251 and E-98 cells from spheroids on rBM. Combined antibody and peptide targeting of β1 and αV integrins, but not individual interference, abrogated migration of U-251 cells in this assay, confirming both integrin subsets as essential for U-251 cell migration on rBM (Fig. S2A,B). Compared with U-251 cells, E-98 cells migrating on rBM were more sensitive to targeting of β1 integrin (Fig. S2A,B), indicating a more-restricted substrate preference, possibly due to limited αVβ3 integrin availability (Fig. S1). The relevance of β1 and αV integrins in supporting migration of both cell types was confirmed using a 3D rBM-hyaluronan interface assay (Fig. S2C,D), suggesting that rBM but not hyaluronan is the dominant invasion-promoting substrate.
When cultured on 3D organotypic brain slices, U-251 and E-98 cells invaded preferentially along blood vessels (Fig. 1A,D), and combined anti-β1 or -αV integrin interference decreased the distance migrated and the total number of cells that had invaded by ∼50-60% (Fig. 1B). Despite the abundant level of an adhesion-perturbing antibody (4B4) at the cell surface, detected by post-fixation confocal microscopy using secondary antibody only (Fig. 1C, green channel), glioma cell elongation and their interaction with capillary basement membranes remained intact during emigration from spheroids (Fig. 1C, arrowheads). Notably, the fraction of migrating glioma cells associated with blood vessels increased significantly in response to integrin inhibition (Fig. 1D). This compartmental transition after interference with integrins indicates differential adhesion requirements in the invasion of perivascular space versus interstitial tissue.
To address the mechanisms of interstitial glioma cell invasion directly, astrocyte-generated 3D scaffolds containing both living astrocytes and ECM deposited by astrocytes were used as a migration substrate (Gritsenko et al., 2017). Emigrating from spheroids, U-251 and E-98 cells infiltrated astrocyte scaffolds by moving between astrocyte boundaries (Fig. 2A). Similarly to invasion of brain slices, infiltration into astrocyte scaffolds was reduced by ∼50-60% by dual-targeting of β1 and αV integrins, whereas the total number of invaded cells was decreased more profoundly, up to ∼70-90% (Fig. 2B). The differential sensitivity to interference suggests that cell detachment from the spheroid and the migration thereafter depend on distinct adhesion thresholds mediated by integrins. To discern whether the cell or matrix components primarily support glioma cell invasion in this assay, astrocyte-deposited matrix was decellularized and used as a migration substrate. Whereas inhibition of migration on rBM was complete after interference with β1 and αV integrin subunits, the inhibition of glioma cell migration on astrocyte-deposited matrix was less efficient, with reductions of up to 95% (U-251) or 60% (E-98) (Fig. 3A-C). Similar residual migration in E-98 cells was obtained on matrix deposited by human astrocytes and no further inhibition was achieved by addition of anti-αV or -α6 antibody (Fig. 3C-E). Thus, in contrast to glioma cell migration along rBM, which could be abrogated by antibody- and peptide-based interference of integrins (Fig. 3B,C,E), invasion into brain slices, 3D astrocyte scaffolds or along astrocyte-deposited matrix were less affected by these inhibition schemes.
To identify the underlying protein repertoire, astrocyte-deposited matrices were analysed by mass spectrometry. Nine and 22 ECM proteins were identified in murine and human astrocyte matrices, respectively (Fig. S3A-C; Tables S2 and S3). Besides laminin 111, type-IV collagen, nidogen, perlecan and fibronectin, which were present in both astrocyte-deposited ECM and rBM, laminin α5 was detected in astrocyte cultures but largely absent in rBM (Hughes et al., 2010). Laminin α5 contributes to laminin 511, the predominant isoform in basement membranes of brain blood vessels (Di Russo et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2009). To test whether laminin 511 accounts for integrin-dependent or integrin-independent glioma-cell–matrix interactions, cell culture plastic coated with human recombinant laminin 511 was used as a migration substrate. Combined β1 and αV integrin interference decreased U-251 cell migration on laminin 511 by 28%, whereas the migration of E-98 cells was not significantly changed (Fig. 4A,B). However, this treatment did ablate U-251 and E-98 migration on laminin 211, type IV collagen, fibronectin and rBM (Fig. 4B and Fig. S4A,B), confirming the technical stringency of the dual-interference strategy and revealing the pro-migratory properties of laminin 511 beyond β1 and αV integrin engagement.
Principal cell receptors for adhesion to laminin 511 include α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 integrins (Nishiuchi et al., 2003; Nishiuchi et al., 2006). To address whether glioma cells moving on laminin 511 after dual-integrin targeting still develop focal adhesions, samples were stained for paxillin, a structural protein contributing to integrin–actin-filament linkage (Schaller, 2001). U-251 and E-98 cells, in the absence or presence of β1 or αV integrin inhibitors, formed string-like focalized enrichments consistent with focal adhesions (Fig. 4C), suggesting residual integrin-mediated adhesion or an alternative laminin 511-binding mechanism. To address whether inhibition of β1 integrin by monoclonal antibodies was incomplete, siRNA-mediated transient downregulation of β1 integrin was combined with antibody- and peptide-based β1 and αV integrin interference. β1 integrin siRNAs caused a 73-88% reduction of cell surface levels of β1 subunits in the majority of cells detected by flow cytometry (Fig. S5A) or confocal microscopy (Fig. S5B). When compared with dual-targeting of integrins, this triple interference further enhanced the inhibition efficiency by up to 40% (U-251) and 60% (E-98) on laminin 511 (Fig. 5A,B and Fig. S5C), and by ∼30% in 3D astrocyte scaffolds (Fig. 5A,B). To further test whether α6β4 integrin (expressed by U-251 but not E-98 cells; Fig. S1) supports migration, adhesion-perturbing anti-α6 integrin monoclonal antibody (Sonnenberg et al., 1987) was combined with our triple-interference strategy described above (Fig. 6A-C). This quadruple interference strategy did not yield any additional inhibition of U-251 cell invasion in 3D astrocyte scaffolds or migration on a laminin-511-coated surface (Fig. 6D). Despite the additive effects reached by combinatorial integrin targeting, residual migration distances of ∼20 or 200 µm/day in astrocyte scaffolds and on laminin 511, respectively, was remarkably retained.
DISCUSSION
Our data suggest that β1 and αV integrins represent the primary adhesion systems for glioma cell migration in different migration models. However, when comparing the same interference strategy, the contribution of integrin-dependent glioma invasion varies and glioma cells consistently demonstrated residual migration in complex brain-like environments or on purified laminin-511-coated surfaces, suggesting that alternative interaction strategies are complex brain-like models.
Major constituents of brain basement membranes include type IV collagen and the laminin isoforms 511, 211, 332, 111 (Di Russo et al., 2017; Kawataki et al., 2007; Yurchenco, 2015). rBM, a popular substrate that reproduces aspects of basement membranes in vitro based on its content of laminin 111 and type IV collagen (Hughes et al., 2010), lacks important brain-related laminin isoforms and differs from the ligand heterogeneity of ECM deposited by astrocytes, endothelium pericytes and glioma cells (Di Russo et al., 2017; Kawataki et al., 2007). The particularly high sensitivity of glioma cell migration on rBM to β1 and αV integrin dual-interference thus overestimates the relevance of integrin-mediated migration, whereas basement membranes in the brain slices and 3D astrocyte scaffolds likely support both integrin-dependent and integrin-independent, alternative mechanisms of migration.
By mass-spectrometry analysis of the astrocyte-deposited matrices, we identified laminin 511 as a basement membrane constituent, which supports glioma cell migration and focalized adhesion formation. Laminin 511 is a multifunctional adhesion protein ubiquitously expressed in the basement membranes of different tissue structures including brain blood vessels (Pouliot and Kusuma, 2013; Spenlé et al., 2013; Yousif et al., 2013). Integrins α3β1, α6β1, α6β4 and α7β1 are the major receptors mediating cell adhesion on laminin 511 (Nishiuchi et al., 2003, 2006) and αVβ3 integrin can provide additional interactions to this laminin isoform (Sasaki and Timpl, 2001). Laminin 511 contains independent binding sites for α3β1 and αVβ3 integrins (Ido et al., 2004; Kikkawa et al., 2007; Nielsen and Yamada, 2001; Sasaki and Timpl, 2001) and may engage multiple integrin subtypes simultaneously in a non-competitive manner. Accordingly, β1 integrin is the predominant subunit expressed by U-251 and E-98 cells and other glioma models (Kawataki et al., 2007), and mediates migration along laminin 511 in both cell types; however, significant residual migration was retained despite dual- and multi-targeted interference. Incomplete inhibition resulting from overlapping mechanisms may be one possible explanation. β1 integrins interact with laminin 511 with high affinity (Nishiuchi et al., 2003, 2006) and thus may outcompete the antagonistic efficacy of the integrin inhibitors. In addition, laminin 511 contains binding sites for non-integrin cell surface receptors, including Lu/B-CAM, α-dystroglycan and syndecan-4 (Kikkawa et al., 2007, 2013; Lin and Kurpakus-Wheater, 2002; Shimizu et al., 1999), which may substitute for integrin-mediated force generation.
In addition to receptor-dependent interaction with laminin, glioma cell invasion along confined spaces between the stroma–blood-vessel interface or dense astrocyte scaffolds may occur through non-adhesive, physical mechanisms, mediated by tubulin polymerization, myosin II contraction and/or ion channel-mediated alterations of cytoplasmic volume (Balzer et al., 2012; Beadle et al., 2008; Katsetos et al., 2015; Panopoulos et al., 2011; Paul et al., 2017; Thompson and Sontheimer, 2016). The relative contribution of adhesive versus non-adhesive mechanisms of glioma invasion in organotypic assays in vitro and their relevance to the invasion mechanisms utilized by glioma cells in vivo in the brain, still requires further investigation.
Because of their prominent mechanotransducing functions to multiple ligands, integrins have been considered for therapeutic intervention to combat glioma cell dissemination in the brain tissue. Targeting αVβ3 and αVβ5 integrins using an RGD-mimicking cyclic peptide, cilengitide (Dechantsreiter et al., 1999), demonstrated promising pre-clinical efficacy in reducing glioma invasion in mouse and rat brains (Ishida et al., 2014; Onishi et al., 2013). However, recent phase II and III clinical trials in late-stage glioblastoma patients did not show efficacy of cilengitide in improving overall survival (Khasraw et al., 2016; Mason, 2015; Nabors et al., 2015; Stupp et al., 2014). Thus, mono-targeted interference with αVβ3 and αVβ5 integrins may not suffice to halt or revert glioma progression. The inefficiency of cilengitide to improve outcome is in line with the comparably weak effects we observed for αV integrin targeting in reducing glioma migration on basement membrane-related substrates, since cilengitide does not interfere with the adhesion functions of laminin and collagen IV binding integrins (α1β1, α2β1, α3β1, α6β1, α7β1 and α6β4). Preclinical antibody-based targeting of α7 or β1 integrin subunits results in a significant reduction in invasion of implanted glioma cells in the mouse brain but with a notable (up to 40–50%) residual invasion distance (Carbonell et al., 2013; Haas et al., 2017). Obviously, combined anti-αV and -β1 integrin targeting to interfere with preclinical and clinical glioma progression warrants further investigation. In line with available preclinical and clinical data, our findings indicate that overlapping integrin-dependent and, possibly, integrin-independent adhesion systems support glioma cell invasion and dissemination in brain tissue, as also observed in other cell models and tumour types (Balzer et al., 2012; Bergert et al., 2015; Hegerfeldt et al., 2002). The resilience of glioma cell migration in complex environments despite stringent molecular interference raises the concern that even multi-targeted anti-integrin adhesion perturbation may at best delay but not abrogate invasive progression of gliomas in vivo and thus will require additional combinatorial strategies designed to prevent adhesion plasticity and switching of invasion routes in brain tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies and reagents
Antibodies used for flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining and for integrin targeting are listed in Table S1. Isotype-matched non-specific mouse or rat IgGs were used for antibody staining (FACS, IF) for background controls, or in integrin-targeting experiments as control non-adhesion perturbing antibodies. cRGDfV (cyclo Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Val; BACHEM, H-2574) and control cRADfV (cyclo Arg-Ala-Asp-D-Phe-Val; BACHEM, H-4088) peptides were used in migration assays to interfere with αVβ3, αVβ5 and α5β1 integrins (Belvisi et al., 2006; Pfaff et al., 1994; Shono et al., 2001; Zimmermann et al., 2005). cRGDfV peptide inhibits the following ligand interactions with purified integrins: fibrinogen-αIIbβ3, vitronectin-αVβ3, fibronectin-α5β1, echistatin-αVβ3 and -αVβ5, with IC50 varying from 2.5 nM to 6.4 µM (Belvisi et al., 2006; Dechantsreiter et al., 1999; Pfaff et al., 1994). To maximize inhibition, 50 µM cRGDfV peptide was used for function-blocking studies, in line with reported doses required to abrogate binding of αVβ3integrin with fibronectin (50 µM) or vitronectin (50 nM) (Shono et al., 2001). Growth factor-reduced rBM (Matrigel; Corning, Cat: 356231) was used as an undiluted solution in migration assays (≍9.8 mg/ml) or after dilution for coating culture plastic (30 µg/ml in PBS). Recombinant human laminin 511, laminin 211 (both from BioLamina), human placenta-derived type IV collagen (Advanced Bio Matrix) and fibronectin from human blood plasma (Sigma) were used for coating culture plastic (10 µg/ml in PBS).
Cell lines and culture
Human glioblastoma U-251MG cells (kind gift from Dr Joost Schalkwijk, Dept. of Dermatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and E-98 cells (Claes et al., 2008; Navis et al., 2015) were propagated in vitro in flasks for up to passage 35. The identity of tumour cells was verified by short tandem repeat (STR) DNA profiling (IDEXX BioResearch). No mammalian interspecies contamination was detected. STR of E-98 cells was generated for the first time, as follows: AMEL, X,Y; CSF1PO, 7,10; D13S317, 11; D16S539, 11; D5S818, 11,12; D7S820, 9,11; TH01, 8,9.3; TPOX, 8; vWA, 16,17. This profile does not match any other reported profile in the DSMZ STR database (Leibniz Institute DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH). Cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (Myco Alert, Lonza). Histone2B-eGFP (H2B/eGFP)-expressing U-251 and E-98 cells were generated by lentiviral transduction with pLenti6.2/V5-DEST Gateway (Invitrogen) containing H2B-eGFP. Primary mouse astrocytes immortalized with SV40 large T antigen and additionally transformed with retrovirus pBabe puro H-Ras V12 (Depner et al., 2016; Sawamiphak et al., 2010) were kindly provided by Dr Amparo Acker-Palmer, Frankfurt, Germany. Primary human astrocytes immortalized with SV40 large T antigen, were used as a reference.
Glioma cells and astrocytes were cultured in complete Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml; both PAA), L-glutamine (2 mM, Invitrogen) and sodium pyruvate (1 mM; Invitrogen).
Generation of glioma cell spheroids
U-251 and E-98 cell spheroids were generated using the hanging drop method, as described (Gritsenko et al., 2017). In brief, cells were detached from subconfluent culture (1 mM EDTA, 0.075% trypsin), washed, and maintained for 24 h in complete DMEM with methylcellulose (2.4%; Sigma) as hanging droplets (25 μl) containing 1000 (U-251) or 2000 cells (E-98).
Interference with integrin expression and function
Integrin function was perturbed by subunit-specific mouse-anti-human monoclonal antibodies targeting β1 (4B4; 15 µg/ml), α6 (GOH3; 10 µg/ml) and αV (17E6; 10 µg/ml). Cyclic peptide cRGDfV targeting RGD-binding αVβ3, αVβ5 and α5β1 integrins was used at 50 µM to ensure efficient inhibition of integrin binding to various matrix molecules (Pfaff et al., 1994; Shono et al., 2001; Zimmermann et al., 2005). As negative controls, isotypic IgG (10-15 µg/ml) or not-functional cRADfV peptide (50 µM) were used. Antibodies and peptides were added to the culture medium 3 h after seeding to secure initial spheroid engagement with the substrate. To increase the stringency of multi-targeting, interfering antibodies and peptide were combined with transient down-regulation of β1 integrin expression by siRNA. Glioma cells were incubated with β1-integrin-targeted or non-targeting smart-pool siRNA (Dharmacon; 50 nM) in the presence of Lipofectamine-2000 (1:1000, Dharmacon) for 20 h, washed with growth medium, cultured for 4 h, aggregated for glioma cell spheroid generation (24 h, hanging drop assay) and monitored in migration assays for an additional 24-48 h. Efficiency of β1 integrin downregulation was assessed by flow cytometry of single cells after detachment with EDTA (2 mM) 2-4 days after transfection.
Reconstituted basement membrane migration assays
Glioma cell spheroids were placed on 96-well plates coated with growth factor-reduced rBM (30 µg/ml, 16-18 h, +4°C) and overlaid with medium. 3D rBM-hyaluronan interface cultures were generated by polymerizing rBM on a culture dish (30 min, 37°C), followed by addition of glioma spheroids (2 h, 37°C) and complete DMEM supplemented with hyaluronan (10 mg/ml; Sigma), as described (Gritsenko et al., 2017). Migration efficacy was analysed after 24 h culture in fixed samples (4% PFA) using bright-field or confocal microscopy.
Invasion into murine brain slices
Glioma cell invasion from multicellular spheroids was probed using 3D murine brain slice culture, as described (Gritsenko et al., 2017). In brief, brains were dissected from 5- to 6-week-old female mice (Charles River or Jackson Laboratories) C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/Crl (OT1), which were crossed with B6.Cg-Tg(CAG-DsRed*MST)1Nagy/J (dsRed) in our laboratory to introduce red fluorescent brain stroma. 400-µm-thick tissue slices were freshly sectioned using a vibratome (Leica, VT100s) and maintained on transwell insert membranes (Costar, 12-well plate; 8 µm pore diameter) in complete DMEM (37°C, 5% CO2) for 1 h. Glioma cell spheroids expressing H2B-eGFP were added (8-10 spheroids per slice), allowed to initially adhere to the substrate (3 h), and antibodies and peptides were then added. During culture, medium and inhibitors were refreshed after 24 h and migration efficacy was assessed after 48 h. Brain slices were fixed [4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), 1 h, room temperature], washed and stained with human-specific anti-vimentin antibody to discriminate glioma cells from DsRed-expressing blood vessels.
3D astrocyte scaffold invasion assay
3D-astrocyte-derived scaffolds were generated by immortalized murine astrocytes maintained at high cell density in 96-well plates (20,000 cells/well, coated with growth-factor-reduced rBM) for 2 days resulting in consolidated scaffolds of up to three cell layers in thickness (∼50 µm), as described (Gritsenko et al., 2017). Glioma cell spheroids expressing H2B-eGFP were cultured on top of astrocyte scaffolds for 2 days, fixed (30 min, 4% PFA) and stained to visualize glioma cells and astrocytes. Primary antibodies were visualized with secondary Alexa Fluor-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Invitrogen; 5 µg/ml). Cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 2.5 µg/ml).
Microscopy and quantification of glioma cell migration
Confocal microscopy (Olympus FV1000) was performed using long working distance 20× NA 0.50 and 40× NA 0.80 objectives at a step size of 2-3 µm. Imaris v.6.1.5 software (Bitplane) was used for 3D reconstruction of Z-stacks. Widefield microscopy of glioma cell invasion was performed by automated high-content epifluorescence microscopy followed by image stitching (Leica DMI6000B). For quantitative image analysis, operator-assisted image segmentation of bright-field or confocal 3D stacks was performed (Fiji software, V.1.49 g; Schindelin et al., 2012). The average cell migration distance representing radial migration of glioma cells from spheroids was calculated according to the following formula: average distance of cell migration=√(total cell area/π)−√(spheroid area/π).
The number of glioma cells that had migrated from spheroids on laminin 511-coated surfaces was quantified from bright field images and in brain slice or astrocyte scaffold culture was quantified by confocal and epifluorescence microscopy using H2B-eGFP-positive glioma cell nuclei. The average cell migration distance, which reflects the speed of cell movement, was used as the main parameter to identify cooperating integrin systems in glioma cell migration. Glioma cells associated with blood vessels in mouse brain slices were quantified as percentage of the total number of glioma cells invading from multicellular spheroids from 3D confocal stacks by manual image analysis.
Mass spectrometry
To identify proteins deposited during murine and human astrocyte culture on plastic dishes after 3 or 7 days, respectively, cells were detached (2 mM EDTA in PBS), remnants of cells solubilized (0.25% Triton X-100, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate in PBS), and adsorbed proteins were harvested by scraping (disposable cell scraper, Greiner bio-one). The resulting protein fraction was centrifuged (4250 g, 45 min), the sediment dissolved (8 M urea, 3% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol), separated electrophoretically on a 12% gel (TGX, Bio-Rad) for 30 min and digested with trypsin.
After extraction from the gel, the digested sample was loaded on a STAGE-tip (Stop And Go Elution, C18-reversed phase SPE) for desalting and concentration. Peptides were separated on a nanoLC system using a reversed phase C18 column coupled to a LTQ FT Ultra mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Radboud Proteomics Centre, Radboudumc, Nijmegen). Peptide analysis was performed using a customized database consisting of the RefSeq protein database with Mus musculus or Homo sapiens, together with Bos taurus taxonomies to identify possible contaminating proteins originating from fetal bovine serum used for cell culture. Validation of peptide and protein identifications was carried out by applying score thresholds to minimize false-positive identification of emPAI values and number of peptides identified per protein. emPAI values were calculated as: emPAI=[10(Nobserved/Nobservable)]–1, where Nobserved is the number of experimentally observed peptides and Nobservable is the calculated number of observable peptides for each protein (Ishihama et al., 2005).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Prof. Amparo Acker-Palmer for immortalized mouse astrocytes and William Leenders and Michael Weiger for constructive comments on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: P.G.G., P.F.; Methodology: P.G.G., P.F.; Investigation: P.G.G., P.F.; Writing - original draft: P.G.G., P.F.; Writing - review & editing: P.G.G., P.F.; Supervision: P.F.; Project administration: P.F.; Funding acquisition: P.F.
Funding
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO-VICI 918.11.626), Pieken in the Delta Oost Nederland, the European Research Council (ERC-CoG Deepinsight, 617430), National Institutes of Health (U54 CA210184-01) and the Cancer Genomics Center, The Netherlands. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.216382.supplemental
References
- Ananthanarayanan B., Kim Y. and Kumar S. (2011). Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. Biomaterials 32, 7913-7923. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balzer E. M., Tong Z., Paul C. D., Hung W.-C., Stroka K. M., Boggs A. E., Martin S. S. and Konstantopoulos K. (2012). Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 26, 4045-4056. 10.1096/fj.12-211441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beadle C., Assanah M. C., Monzo P., Vallee R., Rosenfeld S. S. and Canoll P. (2008). The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3357-3368. 10.1091/mbc.e08-03-0319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bello L., Francolini M., Marthyn P., Zhang J., Carroll R. S., Nikas D. C., Strasser J. F., Villani R., Cheresh D. A. and Black P. M. (2001). avb3 and avb5 Integrin Expression in Glioma Periphery. Neurosurgery 49, 380-390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belvisi L., Bernardi A., Colombo M., Manzoni L., Potenza D., Scolastico C., Giannini G., Marcellini M., Riccioni T., Castorina M. et al. (2006). Targeting integrins: insights into structure and activity of cyclic RGD pentapeptide mimics containing azabicycloalkane amino acids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14, 169-180. 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.08.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benton G., Arnaoutova I., George J., Kleinman H. K. and Koblinski J. (2014). Matrigel: from discovery and ECM mimicry to assays and models for cancer research. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 79-80, 3-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergert M., Erzberger A., Desai R. A., Aspalter I. M., Oates A. C., Charras G., Salbreux G. and Paluch E. K. (2015). Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 524-529. 10.1038/ncb3134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bjerkvig R. (1986). Reaggregation of fetal rat brain cells in a stationary culture system. II: Ultrastructural characterization. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 22, 193-200. 10.1007/BF02623303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Bouard S., Christov C., Guillamo J.-S., Kassar-Duchossoy L., Palfi S., Leguerinel C., Masset M., Cohen-Hagenauer O., Peschanski M. and Lefrancois T. (2002). Invasion of human glioma biopsy specimens in cultures of rodent brain slices: a quantitative analysis. J. Neurosurg. 97, 169-176. 10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbonell W. S., Delay M., Jahangiri A., Park C. C. and Aghi M. K. (2013). Beta1 Integrin targeting potentiates antiangiogenic therapy and inhibits the growth of bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 73, 3145-3154. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Claes A., Schuuring J., Boots-Sprenger S., Hendriks-Cornelissen S., Dekkers M., van der Kogel A. J., Leenders W. P., Wesseling P. and Jeuken J. W. (2008). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of orthotopic human glioma models and its relevance for the study of anti-glioma therapy. Brain Pathol. 18, 423-433. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00141.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuddapah V. A., Robel S., Watkins S. and Sontheimer H. (2014). A neurocentric perspective on glioma invasion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 455-465. 10.1038/nrn3765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dechantsreiter M. A., Planker E., Mathä B., Lohof E., Hölzemann G., Jonczyk A., Goodman S. L. and Kessler H. (1999). N-Methylated cyclic RGD peptides as highly active and selective alpha(V)beta(3) integrin antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 42, 3033-3040. 10.1021/jm970832g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delamarre E., Taboubi S., Mathieu S., Bérenguer C., Rigot V., Lissitzky J., Figarella-branger D. and Ouafik L. H. (2009). Expression of integrin alpha6 beta1 enhances tumorigenesis in glioma cells. Am J Pathol. 175, 844-855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demircioglu F. and Hodivala-Dilke K. (2016). alphavbeta3 integrin and tumour blood vessels-learning from the past to shape the future. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 121-127. 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Depner C., Zum Buttel H., Böğürcü N., Cuesta A. M., Aburto M. R., Seidel S., Finkelmeier F., Foss F., Hofmann J., Kaulich K. et al. (2016). EphrinB2 repression through ZEB2 mediates tumour invasion and anti-angiogenic resistance. Nat. Commun. 7, 12329 10.1038/ncomms12329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Russo, J., Hannocks M.-J., Luik A.-L., Song J., Zhang X., Yousif L., Aspite G., Hallmann R. and Sorokin L. (2017). Vascular laminins in physiology and pathology. Matrix Biol. 57–58, 140-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farin A., Suzuki S. O., Weiker M., Goldman J. E., Bruce J. N. and Canoll P. (2006). Transplanted glioma cells migrate and proliferate on host brain vasculature: a dynamic analysis. Glia 53, 799-808. 10.1002/glia.20334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fayzullin A., Tuvnes F. A., Skjellegrind H. K., Behnan J., Mughal A. A., Langmoen I. A. and Vik-Mo E. O. (2016). Time-lapse phenotyping of invasive glioma cells ex vivo reveals subtype-specific movement patterns guided by tumor core signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 349, 199-213. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frolov A., Evans I. M., Li N., Sidlauskas K., Paliashvili K., Lockwood N., Barrett A., Brandner S., Zachary I. C. and Frankel P. (2016). Imatinib and Nilotinib increase glioblastoma cell invasion via Abl-independent stimulation of p130Cas and FAK signalling. Sci. Rep. 6, 27378 10.1038/srep27378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman S. L. and Picard M. (2012). Integrins as therapeutic targets. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 405-412. 10.1016/j.tips.2012.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon V. D., Valentine M. T., Gardel M. L., Andor-Ardo D., Dennison S., Bogdanov A. A., Weitz D. A. and Deisboeck T. S. (2003). Measuring the mechanical stress induced by an expanding multicellular tumor system: a case study. Exp. Cell Res. 289, 58-66. 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00256-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gritsenko P. G., Ilina O. and Friedl P. (2012). Interstitial guidance of cancer invasion. J. Pathol. 226, 185-199. 10.1002/path.3031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gritsenko P., Leenders W. and Friedl P. (2017). Recapitulating in vivo-like plasticity of glioma cell invasion along blood vessels and in astrocyte-rich stroma. Histochem. Cell Biol. 148, 395-406. 10.1007/s00418-017-1604-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haas T. L., Sciuto M. R., Brunetto L., Valvo C., Signore M., Fiori M. E., di Martino S., Giannetti S., Morgante L., Boe A. et al. (2017). Integrin alpha7 is a functional marker and potential therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Cell Stem Cell 21, 35-50.e9. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamaia S. W., Pugh N., Raynal N., Némoz B., Stone R., Gullberg D., Bihan D. and Farndale R. W. (2012). Mapping of potent and specific binding motifs, GLOGEN and GVOGEA, for integrin alpha1beta1 using collagen toolkits II and III. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 26019-26028. 10.1074/jbc.M112.353144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegerfeldt Y., Tusch M., Brocker E.-B. and Friedl P. (2002). Collective cell movement in primary melanoma explants: plasticity of cell-cell interaction, beta1-integrin function, and migration strategies. Cancer Res. 62, 2125-2130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong X., Sin W. C., Harris A. L. and Naus C. C. (2015). Gap junctions modulate glioma invasion by direct transfer of microRNA. Oncotarget 6, 15566-15577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes C. S., Postovit L. M. and Lajoie G. A. (2010). Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 10, 1886-1890. 10.1002/pmic.200900758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ido H., Harada K., Futaki S., Hayashi Y., Nishiuchi R., Natsuka Y., Li S., Wada Y., Combs A. C., Ervasti J. M. et al. (2004). Molecular dissection of the alpha-dystroglycan- and integrin-binding sites within the globular domain of human laminin-10. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 10946-10954. 10.1074/jbc.M313626200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishida J., Onishi M., Kurozumi K., Ichikawa T., Fujii K., Shimazu Y., Oka T. and Date I. (2014). Integrin inhibitor suppresses bevacizumab-induced glioma invasion. Transl. Oncol. 7, 292-302.e1. 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.02.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishihama Y., Oda Y., Tabata T., Sato T., Nagasu T., Rappsilber J. and Mann M. (2005). Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1265-1272. 10.1074/mcp.M500061-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katsetos C. D., Reginato M. J., Baas P. W., D'Agostino L., Legido A., Tuszyn Ski J. A., Dráberová E. and Dráber P. (2015). Emerging microtubule targets in glioma therapy. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 22, 49-72. 10.1016/j.spen.2015.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaufman L. J., Brangwynne C. P., Kasza K. E., Filippidi E., Gordon V. D., Deisboeck T. S. and Weitz D. A. (2005). Glioma expansion in collagen I matrices: analyzing collagen concentration-dependent growth and motility patterns. Biophys. J. 89, 635-650. 10.1529/biophysj.105.061994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawataki T., Yamane T., Naganuma H., Rousselle P., Andurén I., Tryggvason K. and Patarroyo M. (2007). Laminin isoforms and their integrin receptors in glioma cell migration and invasiveness: evidence for a role of alpha5-laminin(s) and alpha3beta1 integrin. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 3819-3831. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.07.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khasraw M., Lee A., McCowatt S., Kerestes Z., Buyse M. E., Back M., Kichenadasse G., Ackland S. and Wheeler H. (2016). Cilengitide with metronomic temozolomide, procarbazine, and standard radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter in ExCentric, an open-label phase II trial. J. Neurooncol. 128, 163-171. 10.1007/s11060-016-2094-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khoshnoodi J., Pedchenko V. and Hudson B. G. (2008). Mammalian collagen IV. Microsc. Res. Tech. 71, 357-370. 10.1002/jemt.20564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kikkawa Y., Sasaki T., Nguyen M. T., Nomizu M., Mitaka T. and Miner J. H. (2007). The LG1-3 tandem of laminin alpha5 harbors the binding sites of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule and alpha3beta1/alpha6beta1 integrins. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 14853-14860. 10.1074/jbc.M611706200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kikkawa Y., Ogawa T., Sudo R., Yamada Y., Katagiri F., Hozumi K., Nomizu M. and Miner J. H. (2013). The lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule promotes tumor cell migration by modulating integrin-mediated cell attachment to laminin-511 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 30990-31001. 10.1074/jbc.M113.486456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin L. and Kurpakus-Wheater M. (2002). Laminin alpha5 chain adhesion and signaling in conjunctival epithelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 2615-2621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason W. P. (2015). End of the road: confounding results of the CORE trial terminate the arduous journey of cilengitide for glioblastoma. Neuro. Oncol. 17, 634-635. 10.1093/neuonc/nov018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyata S. and Kitagawa H. (2017). Formation and remodeling of the brain extracellular matrix in neural plasticity: roles of chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronan. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1861, 2420-2434. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nabors L. B., Fink K. L., Mikkelsen T., Grujicic D., Tarnawski R., Nam D. H., Mazurkiewicz M., Salacz M., Ashby L., Zagonel V. et al. (2015). Two cilengitide regimens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter: results of the open-label, controlled, randomized phase II CORE study. Neuro. Oncol. 17, 708-717. 10.1093/neuonc/nou356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakada M., Nambu E., Furuyama N., Yoshida Y., Takino T., Hayashi Y., Sato H., Sai Y., Tsuji T., Miyamoto K. et al. (2013). Integrin α3 is overexpressed in glioma stem-like cells and promotes invasion. Br. J. Cancer 108, 2516-2524. 10.1038/bjc.2013.218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navis A. C., van Lith S. A. M., van Duijnhoven S. M. J., de Pooter M., Yetkin-Arik B., Wesseling P., Hendriks W. J. A. J., Venselaar H., Timmer M., van Cleef P. et al. (2015). Identification of a novel MET mutation in high-grade glioma resulting in an auto-active intracellular protein. Acta Neuropathol. 130, 131-144. 10.1007/s00401-015-1420-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen P. K. and Yamada Y. (2001). Identification of cell-binding sites on the Laminin alpha 5 N-terminal domain by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10906-10912. 10.1074/jbc.M008743200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishiuchi R., Murayama O., Fujiwara H., Gu J., Kawakami T., Aimoto S., Wada Y. and Sekiguchi K. (2003). Characterization of the ligand-binding specificities of integrin alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 using a panel of purified laminin isoforms containing distinct alpha chains. J. Biochem. 134, 497-504. 10.1093/jb/mvg185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishiuchi R., Takagi J., Hayashi M., Ido H., Yagi Y., Sanzen N., Tsuji T., Yamada M. and Sekiguchi K. (2006). Ligand-binding specificities of laminin-binding integrins: a comprehensive survey of laminin-integrin interactions using recombinant alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins. Matrix Biol. 25, 189-197. 10.1016/j.matbio.2005.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira R., Christov C., Guillamo J. S., de Boüard S., Palfi S., Venance L., Tardy M. and Peschanski M. (2005). Contribution of gap junctional communication between tumor cells and astroglia to the invasion of the brain parenchyma by human glioblastomas. BMC Cell Biol. 6, 7 10.1186/1471-2121-6-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onishi M., Ichikawa T., Kurozumi K., Fujii K., Yoshida K., Inoue S., Michiue H., Chiocca E. A., Kaur B. and Date I. (2013). Bimodal anti-glioma mechanisms of cilengitide demonstrated by novel invasive glioma models. Neuropathology 33, 162-174. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01344.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Panopoulos A., Howell M., Fotedar R. and Margolis R. L. (2011). Glioblastoma motility occurs in the absence of actin polymer. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2212-2220. 10.1091/mbc.e10-10-0849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul C. D., Mistriotis P. and Konstantopoulos K. (2017). Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 131-140. 10.1038/nrc.2016.123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paulus W., Baur I., Schuppan D. and Roggendorf W. (1993). Characterization of integrin receptors in normal and neoplastic human brain. Am. J. Pathol. 143, 154-163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedchenko V., Zent R. and Hudson B. G. (2004). Alpha(v)beta3 and alpha(v)beta5 integrins bind both the proximal RGD site and non-RGD motifs within noncollagenous (NC1) domain of the alpha3 chain of type IV collagen: implication for the mechanism of endothelia cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2772-2780. 10.1074/jbc.M311901200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaff M., Tangemann K., Muller B., Gurrath M., Muller G., Kessler H., Timpl R. and Engel J. (1994). Selective recognition of cyclic RGD peptides of NMR defined conformation by alpha IIb beta 3, alpha V beta 3, and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20233-20238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pouliot N. and Kusuma N. (2013). Laminin-511 A multi-functional adhesion protein regulating cell migration, tumor invasion and metastasis. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 142-149. 10.4161/cam.22125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramovs V., Te Molder L. and Sonnenberg A. (2017). The opposing roles of laminin-binding integrins in cancer. Matrix Biol. 57–58, 213-243. 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao S. S., Lannutti J. J., Viapiano M. S., Sarkar A. and Winter J. O. (2014). Toward 3D biomimetic models to understand the behavior of glioblastoma multiforme cells. Tissue Eng. Part B. Rev. 20, 314-327. 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rape A., Ananthanarayanan B. and Kumar S. (2014). Engineering strategies to mimic the glioblastoma microenvironment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 79–80, 172-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rath B. H., Fair J. M., Jamal M., Camphausen K. and Tofilon P. J. (2013). Astrocytes enhance the invasion potential of glioblastoma stem-like cells. PLoS One 8, e54752 10.1371/journal.pone.0054752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki T. and Timpl R. (2001). Domain IVa of laminin alpha5 chain is cell-adhesive and binds beta1 and alphaVbeta3 integrins through Arg-Gly-Asp. FEBS Lett. 509, 181-185. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03167-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawamiphak S., Seidel S., Essmann C. L., Wilkinson G. A., Pitulescu M. E., Acker T. and Acker-Palmer A. (2010). Ephrin-B2 regulates VEGFR2 function in developmental and tumour angiogenesis. Nature 465, 487-491. 10.1038/nature08995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaller M. D. (2001). Paxillin: a focal adhesion-associated adaptor protein. Oncogene 20, 6459-6472. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B. et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676-682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schittenhelm J., Schwab E. I., Sperveslage J., Tatagiba M., Meyermann R., Fend F., Goodman S. L. and Sipos B. (2013). Longitudinal expression analysis of αv integrins in human gliomas reveals upregulation of integrin αvβ3 as a negative prognostic factor. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 72, 194-210. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182851019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu H., Hosokawa H., Ninomiya H., Miner J. H. and Masaki T. (1999). Adhesion of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells to laminin-1 mediated by dystroglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11995-12000. 10.1074/jbc.274.17.11995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shono T., Mochizuki Y., Kanetake H. and Kanda S. (2001). Inhibition of FGF-2-mediated chemotaxis of murine brain capillary endothelial cells by cyclic RGDfV peptide through blocking the redistribution of c-Src into focal adhesions. Exp. Cell Res. 268, 169-178. 10.1006/excr.2001.5276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonnenberg A., Janssen H., Hogervorst F., Calafat J. and Hilgers J. (1987). A complex of platelet glycoproteins Ic and IIa identified by a rat monoclonal antibody. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10376-10383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spenlé C., Simon-assmann P., Orend G. and Miner J. H. (2013). Laminin α5 guides tissue patterning and organogenesis. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 90-100. 10.4161/cam.22236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stupp R., Hegi M. E., Gorlia T., Erridge S. C., Perry J., Hong Y.-K., Aldape K. D., Lhermitte B., Pietsch T., Grujicic D. et al. (2014). Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Oncol. 15, 1100-1108. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70379-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson E. G. and Sontheimer H. (2016). A role for ion channels in perivascular glioma invasion. Eur. Biophys. J. 45, 635-648. 10.1007/s00249-016-1154-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonn J. C., Wunderlich S., Kerkau S., Klein C. E. and Roosen K. (1998). Invasive behaviour of human gliomas is mediated by interindividually different integrin patterns. Anticancer Res. 18, 2599-2605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vehlow A., Klapproth E., Storch K., Dickreuter E., Seifert M., Dietrich A., Butof R., Temme A. and Cordes N. (2017). Adhesion- and stress-related adaptation of glioma radiochemoresistance is circumvented by beta1 integrin/JNK co-targeting. Oncotarget 8, 49224-49237. 10.18632/oncotarget.17480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watkins S., Robel S., Kimbrough I. F., Robert S. M., Ellis-Davies G. and Sontheimer H. (2014). Disruption of astrocyte-vascular coupling and the blood-brain barrier by invading glioma cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 4196 10.1038/ncomms5196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wen P. Y. and Reardon D. A. (2016). Neuro-oncology in 2015: Progress in glioma diagnosis, classification and treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 69-70. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wondimu Z., Omrani S., Ishikawa T., Javed F., Oikawa Y., Virtanen I., Juronen E., Ingerpuu S. and Patarroyo M. (2013). A novel monoclonal antibody to human laminin α5 chain strongly inhibits integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration on laminins 511 and 521. PLoS One 8, 14-24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0053648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C., Ivars F., Anderson P., Hallmann R., Vestweber D., Nilsson P., Robenek H., Tryggvason K., Song J., Korpos E. et al. (2009). Endothelial basement membrane laminin alpha5 selectively inhibits T lymphocyte extravasation into the brain. Nat. Med. 15, 519-527. 10.1038/nm.1957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Rodriguez D., Petitclerc E., Kim J. J., Hangai M., Moon Y. S., Davis G. E. and Brooks P. C. (2001). Proteolytic exposure of a cryptic site within collagen type IV is required for angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 154, 1069-1079. 10.1083/jcb.200103111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yousif L. F., Di Russo, J. and Sorokin L. (2013). Laminin isoforms in endothelial and perivascular basement membranes. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 101-110. 10.4161/cam.22680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yurchenco P. D. (2011). Basement membranes: cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a004911 10.1101/cshperspect.a004911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yurchenco P. D. (2015). Integrating Activities of Laminins that Drive Basement Membrane Assembly and Function. Curr. Top. Membr. 76, 1-30. 10.1016/bs.ctm.2015.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmermann D., Guthöhrlein E. W., Malešević M., Sewald K., Wobbe L., Heggemann C. and Sewald N. (2005). Integrin alpha5beta1 ligands: biological evaluation and conformational analysis. Chembiochem 6, 272-276. 10.1002/cbic.200400279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.