Abstract
T cells play a crucial role in viral clearance and vaccine responses; however, the mechanisms that regulate their homeostasis during viral infections remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the machineries of T-cell homeostasis and telomeric DNA damage using a human model of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We found that naïve CD4 T cells in chronically HCV-infected patients (HCV T cells) were significantly reduced due to apoptosis compared with age-matched healthy subjects (HSs). These HCV T cells were not only senescent, as demonstrated by overexpression of aging markers and particularly shortened telomeres; but also DNA damaged, as evidenced by increased dysfunctional telomere-induced foci (TIF). Mechanistically, the telomere shelterin protein, in particular telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) that functions to protect telomeres from DNA damage, was significantly inhibited posttranscriptionally via the p53-dependent Siah-1a ubiquitination. Importantly, knockdown of TRF2 in healthy T cells resulted in increases in telomeric DNA damage and T-cell apoptosis, whereas overexpression of TRF2 in HCV T cells alleviated telomeric DNA damage and T-cell apoptosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report revealing that inhibition of TRF2 promotes T-cell telomere attrition and telomeric DNA damage that accelerates T-cell senescent and apoptotic programs, which contribute to naïve T-cell loss during viral infection. Thus, restoring the impaired T-cell telomeric shelterin machinery may offer a new strategy to improve immunotherapy and vaccine response against human viral diseases.
Introduction
T cells play a pivotal role in controlling viral infection and vaccine responses; however, the mechanisms underlying T-cell dysfunction that lead to chronic infection and poor vaccine response remain unclear. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly efficient at establishing chronic infection, thus becoming an excellent model to study the mechanisms of T-cell dysregulation and viral persistence1.
Recently, we and others have found that HCV infection can accelerate T-cell aging, as evidenced by overexpression of aging markers and attrition of telomeres, indicating excessive cell proliferative turnover or inadequate telomeric DNA maintenance2–9. Telomeres are repeating hexameric DNA sequences that are found at chromosome ends in association with a complex of shelterin proteins. Telomere integrity is a key feature of linear chromosomes that preserve genome stability and function, whereas telomere erosion is a hallmark of cell senescence that drives cell dysfunction or apoptosis10,11. Although telomere length is maintained in most cases by the telomerase, shelterin is essential to protect telomeres against unwanted DNA damage response (DDR)12,13. Shelterin comprises six polypeptides (TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, TPP1, and POT1), of which telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) is a key factor that plays an essential role in maintaining telomere integrity14. TRF2 also protects chromosome ends against replicative DNA damage, particularly those that occur due to topological stress15. Notably, TRF2 expression is increased in a variety of human cancers; consistently, its downregulation reduces tumorigenicity16,17. The role of TRF2 in reprogramming telomeric DNA damage and remodeling T-cell homeostasis during viral infection, however, is largely unknown.
To identify factors that perturb T-cell homeostasis during viral infection, we have explored the role of TRF2 in protecting telomeric DNA damage and T-cell apoptosis with a model of HCV infection. We provide evidence revealing that TRF2 inhibition promotes telomere attrition and DNA damage during HCV infection, rendering HCV T cells more senescent and apoptotic, thus potentially contributing to the HCV persistence and vaccine non-responsiveness.
Materials and methods
Subjects
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of East Tennessee State University and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center (ETSU/VA IRB, Johnson City, TN). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient included in this study. The study subjects were composed of two populations: 180 chronically HCV-infected patients and 160 age-matched healthy subjects (HSs). All HCV-infected patients were positive for HCV RNA, prior to antiviral treatment. HSs, obtained from Physicians Plasma Alliance (PPA), Gray, TN, were negative for HBV, HCV, and HIV infection.
Cell isolation and culture
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood by Ficoll (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) density centrifugation. Naïve and memory CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs using the Naïve or Memory CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit and a MidiMACS™ Separator (Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA). The isolated T cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA), 100 IU/ml penicillin and 2 mM l-glutamine (Thermo Scientific, Logan, Utah) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Flow cytometry
For phenotypic analysis of T cells, PBMCs were stained with CD3-PE, CD4-APC, CD45RA−FITC, and CD28-PerCP/Cy5 antibodies or isotype controls (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). CD39-PE and CD57-APC (BioLegend) were employed to assess senescent status of CD4 T cells. To determine cell apoptosis, PBMCs were stained with CD45RA−FITC, CD4-APC along with Annexin V (Av)-PE and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured using the 2ʹ,7ʹ-Dichlorofluorescin Diacetate (DCFDA)−based Cellular ROS Detection Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Flow cytometric analysis, gating strategy, and background controls were performed as described previously6.
Flow-FISH
Telomere length was measured by Flow-FISH18. Briefly, PBMCs were stained with CD4-Alexa-647, and fixed in Cell Fixation buffer (BioLegend) for 20 min. Cells were incubated with telomere probe TelC (5ʹ-CCCTAACCCTAACCCTAA-3ʹ)-FITC (0.3 μg probe/mL, PNA Bio, Newbury Park, CA) at room temperature for 10 min in the dark and then at 82 °C for 10 min. The cells were washed with post-hybridization buffer, followed by flow cytometry buffer, then stained with CD45RA−perCP/Cy5.5, and analyzed by flow cytometry.
RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from 1 × 106 cells using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and complementary DNA was synthesized using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Bio systems, Foster city, CA) per the manufacturer’s instruction. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in triplicate as described previously4. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH levels and is presented as fold changes using the 2-ΔΔct method. PCR primer sequences are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Target gene | Sequence 5′ to 3′ |
---|---|
hTERT-F | CCAAGTTCCTGCACTGGCTGA |
hTERT-R | TTCCCGATGCTGCCTGACC |
TERF1-F | TGCTTTCAGTGGCTCTTCTG |
TERF1-R | ATGGAACCCAGCAACAAGAC |
TERF2-F | GGTACGGGGACTTCAGACAG |
TERF2-R | CGCGACAGACACTGCATAAC |
POT1-F | TTCCACTAAAGAGCAGGCAA |
POT-R | TGAAGTTCTTTAAGCCCCCA |
TINF2-F | CCAGAAAGGGTTCCCCATAC |
TINF2-R | TTTACCAGCAGGTGAAGCAG |
TERF2IP-F | TCTTCTTCAGGCAAATCTGGA |
TERF2IP-R | CCTCCTCCCAGAAGCTCAA |
TPP1-F | TCACCAGATCAGCCACATTC |
TPP1-R | GGAAAGACTCTCGGAGCTG |
TP53-F | ATGGAGGAGCCGCAGTCAGAT |
TP53-R | GCAGCGCCTCACAACCTCCGTC |
CDKN1A-F | CGATGGAACTTCGACTTTGTCA |
CDKN1A-R | GCACAAGGGTACAAGACAGTG |
CDKN2A-F | AGACTTGGGTGGAAGAGGA |
CDKN2A-R | TAATCATCACAGCTGTTCGG |
GAPDH-F | TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC |
GAPDH-R | GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG |
Western blotting
Naïve CD4 T cells (2 × 106) purified from HCV patients and HSs were used for western blot as described previously6. Primary and secondary antibodies included TRF2, TPP1, RAP1, TIN2, γH2AX, phospho-p53ser15, p21, PARP-1, caspase-3, GAPDH, β-actin (Cell Signaling), POT1 (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN), TRF1 (Thermo Fisher), p53, Ub (Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas), Siah1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and horseradish peroxide-conjugated antibody (Cell Signaling). Images were captured using ChemiDoc™ XRS + System (Bio-Rad). Protein band intensity was quantitated by Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and ubiquitination assay
Naïve CD4 T cells (6 × 106) were lysed in ubiquitination assay buffer supplemented with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Equal amount of cell lysates were subjected to Co-IP assay by adding TRF2 monoclonal antibody or IgG control, and overnight rotated at 4 °C. Next, 50 μl protein A/G agarose beads (Santa Cruz) were added to each sample, incubated at 4 oC for 1.5 h with rotation. Conjugated beads were washed five times with ice-cold ubiquitination assay buffer, then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blot as described above.
Confocal microscopy
Naïve CD4 T cells were isolated and cultured as described above, followed by immunofluorescence staining using a method described previously6. Rabbit anti-53BP1 (Cell Signaling) and mouse TRF1 (Thermo Fisher) were used as primary antibodies and anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-mouse IgG- Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. Then, cells were washed and mounted with DAPI Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL). Images were acquired with a confocal laser-scanning inverted microscope (Leica Confocal, Model TCS sp8, Germany).
siRNA silencing
Naïve CD4 T cells (5 × 106) isolated from HSs were transfected with 100 nM of Smartpools siRNA targeting 4× sequences on TERF2 open-reading frame or scramble siRNA control (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO), using the Human T Nucelofector Kit and Nucleofector I Device (Lonza, Allendale, NJ) following the manufacturer’s instruction. After 72 h, the cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry, western blotting, and confocal microscopy.
Lentivirus transduction
For lentiviral packaging, HEK293T cells at 80% confluency were transfected with 2.5 μg of pMD2.G (# 12259), 7.5 μg of psPAX2 (# 12260) (both gifts from Dr. Didier Trone, Addgene), and 10 μg pWPiR or pWPiR-TRF2 plasmids, which contain Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES)-driven Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) protein expression (generous gifts from Dr. Eric Gibson and Dr. Vincent Picco) using TransporterTM 5 (Polyscience, Inc, Warrington, PA) reagent following the manufacturer’s instruction. After 4 days, cells were harvested and subjected to flow cytometry and western blotting.
Statistics
The data were analyzed using Prism 7 software, and are presented as mean ± SEM or median with interquartile range. Comparisons between two groups were made using unpaired Student’s t-test, or paired Tt-test. Multiple groups were analyzed by ANOVA, with a Tukey’s test or a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test. P-values < 0.05, < 0.01, or < 0.001 were considered statistically significant or very significant, respectively.
Results
T-cell homeostasis and apoptosis in HCV-infected patients versus age-matched HS
Dysregulated T-cell homeostasis is a characteristic of persistent viral infection; however, the mechanisms that control T-cell homeostasis and virus persistence in humans remain unclear19. As an initial approach to identify factors that perturb T-cell homeostasis in HCV infection, we first analyzed total CD4+, naïve CD4+CD45RA+, and memory CD4+CD45RA− T-cell subsets in PBMCs isolated from HCV and HS. As shown in Fig. 1a, although the percentage of total CD4+ T-cell frequencies were similar in HCV patients and HS, the naïve CD4 T-cell repertoire was significantly contracted, whereas memory CD4 T cells expanded, in HCV-infected patients. To exclude the possibility of gating CD4+ monocytes, we gated on lymphocytes and then CD3+ T cells, followed by analysis of CD3+CD4+CD45RA+ (naïve) and CD3+CD4+CD45RA− (memory) T-cell subsets. This analysis yielded the same results (Fig. 1b). In addition to analyzing CD4 T-cell frequencies by flow cytometry, we also examined the absolute CD4 T-cell numbers by purifying naïve CD4 T cells from peripheral blood of HCV patients versus HS. Base on the isolated PBMCs and the yield of naïve CD4+ T cells, we observed a significantly lower number of naïve CD4 T cells in the blood of HCV patients compared with HS (Table S1). These findings of contracted naïve CD4 and expanded memory CD4 T-cell subsets are consistent with previous reports by us and others6,20 showing reduced naïve CD4 T cells, suggesting a state of cell activation/differentiation followed by exhaustion/senescence in patients with chronic HCV infection.
The total size of the T-cell repertoire is well maintained by a fine balance between influx of newly generated T cells from the thymus, efflux by consumption of programmed cell death, and self-replication within the existing pool of lymphocytes21. With deficient influx from the thymus in adults, the immune system reacts by expanding existing T cells, leading to increased proliferative turnover, cell senescence, and ultimately, cell apoptosis21. To explore the contribution of apoptosis to T-cell homeostasis during HCV infection, PBMCs derived from HCV patients were compared with HS for the expression of Av and 7AAD. As shown in Fig. 1c, Av expression in CD4 T cells revealed an increased rate of apoptosis in HCV patients in total CD4, as well as naïve and memory CD4 T cells. Notably, naïve CD4 T cells were more apoptotic than memory CD4 T cells in HCV patients. This apoptotic susceptibility of T cells in HCV patients may necessitate compensatory homeostatic proliferation that can lead to telomere attrition and cell senescence.
T-cell premature senescence in HCV-infected patients versus age-matched HS
To determine the role of homeostatic proliferation in T-cell senescence, we assessed the aging markers in T cells from HCV patients and HS. Because loss of CD28 (a T-cell receptor (TCR) co-stimulatory molecule required for T-cell activation and survival) is considered an unequivocal marker for T-cell senescence22, we first measured CD28 expression on CD3+CD4+CD45RA+ naïve T cells and CD3+CD4+CD45RA- memory T cells. As shown in Fig. 2a, we did not observe any difference in CD28 expression on T-cell subsets between HCV patients and HS. We also measured the expression of CD39 (a cell surface-located ATPase that identifies terminally differentiated cells23) on CD4 T cells following anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation for 0, 1, 3, and 5 days. Again, no differences were detected in CD39 expression on either the resting or TCR-stimulated CD4 T cells in HCV patients versus HS (Fig. 2b). We next measured the expression levels of CD57 (also known as human natural killer 1, HNK1), a glycoprotein expressed on senescent NK or T lymphocytes24. Remarkably, at day 3 of TCR stimulation, CD57 expression on CD4+CD45RA+ naïve T cells was significantly increased in HCV patients compared with HS (Fig. 2c).
To better define the aging process in naïve T cells during viral infection, we assessed the aging-associated cell cycle inhibitors25 including p16ink4a, p21cip1, and p53. As shown in Fig. 2d, HCV naïve T cells exhibited higher mRNA levels of CDKN1A (encodes p21cip1), CDKN2A (encodes p16ink4a), and p53, as determined by real-time RT-PCR. Although we could not detect p16ink4a, p21cip1, and pp53ser15 protein expressions in resting naïve CD4 T cells by western blot, we observed increases in total p53 protein expression in HCV T cells compared with HS (Fig. 2e). In addition, we found increases in pp53ser15, total p53, and p21cip1 protein expressions in TCR-stimulated naïve CD4 T cells from HCV patients (Fig. 2f). We also examined the expression of aging makers in memory CD4 T cells at both mRNA and protein levels. As shown in supplemental Fig. S1, we did not observe any difference in mRNA expression of TP53, CDKN1A, and CDKN2A (Fig. S1A). However, we observed increases in p53 protein expression and cleaved poly ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP-1) in unstimulated memory CD4 T cells (Fig. S1B), as well as increases in p21 and γH2AX levels in TCR-stimulated memory CD4 T cells (Fig. S1C) derived from HCV patients, suggesting that memory CD4 T cells also overexpress aging proteins during HCV infection. These findings reaffirm our previous observations that aging markers are upregulated in CD4 T cells during chronic HCV infection3–5,26.
Along with others, we have shown that naïve CD4 T cells are typically resistant to Fas/Fas-L-mediated apoptosis, pointing to cell internal signals as apoptosis initiators27. One of the internal stressors linked to cell apoptosis is damaged DNA, which is particularly important in senescent cells chronically exposed to endogenously generated ROS28. To determine whether ROS can cause DNA damage and cell apoptosis during viral infection, we measured the ROS levels in naïve CD4 T cells isolated from HCV and HS by flow cytometry using the DCFDA, a fluorogenic dye that measures ROS within the cells29. Indeed, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DCFDA was significantly increased in naïve (Fig. 2g), as well as memory (Fig. S1D) CD4 T cells derived from HCV patients compared with HS, indicating that ROS generated during infection may play a role in DNA damage and cell apoptosis.
Telomere attrition and DNA damage in T cells from HCV patients versus age-matched HS
As telomere attrition is a hallmark of cell senescence, we further characterized T-cell senescence in HCV infection by determining telomere length in total, naïve and memory CD4 T cells by Flow-FISH. As shown in Fig. 3a, telomere length was significantly shortened in HCV-derived total CD4 T cells, as well as in naïve and memory CD4 T cells compared with HS. In addition, telomere loss was observed in activated CD4 T cells following TCR stimulation for 3 days.
As mammalian telomeres consist of plentiful triple guanine repeats (TTAGGG) that are very sensitive to oxidative DNA damage, we speculate that telomeres in HCV T cells are not only shortened, but more importantly, DNA damaged. Notably, following genotoxic insult, 53BP1 is recruited to the DNA damage site and acts as a docking station for other adaptor proteins to form microscopically visible nuclear foci (DNA damage foci)30. Thus, identifying dysfunctional telomere-induced foci (TIF) is typically regarded as a hallmark of telomeric DDR30. To determine telomeric DNA damage in T cells during HCV infection, we compared the number of TIFs per nucleus and the percentages of cells with > 3 TIFs by examining the colocalization of 53BP1/TRF1 using confocal microscopy31,32. As shown in Fig. 3b, the number of TIF per nucleus, as well as the percentage of T cells with > 3 TIFs were significantly higher in CD4 T cells derived from HCV patients compared with HS. These results suggest that telomeres in patients with chronic HCV infection are not only shortened but also sustain DNA damage, which may cause cell apoptosis, emphasizing the role of telomere integrity in securing T-cell survival.
Telomeric shelterin proteins in T cells from HCV-infected patients versus age-matched HS
To determine the cause of telomere attrition in T cells during HCV infection, we next investigated the integrity of telomeric shelterin proteins that function to protect telomeres from unwanted DNA damage12. We first examined their mRNA expression, by real-time RT-PCR, in T cells isolated from HCV patients and HS. As shown in Fig. 4a, there were no significant difference in their mRNA levels, except TPP1 that was upregulated in total CD4 T cells from HCV-infected patients. Notably, TPP1 was also significantly upregulated, whereas TRF2, TIN2, and POT1 slightly elevated, in HCV-derived naïve CD4 T cells without stimulation (Fig. 4b). As changes in mRNA expression may not necessarily be linear to their protein levels within the cells, we also examined their protein levels in naïve CD4 T cells isolated from HCV patients and HS by western blot. In contrast to their mRNA transcripts, the TRF2 protein level was significantly downregulated, whereas the TRF1, TPP1, and TIN2 proteins were slightly decreased in HCV T cells compared with HS (Fig. 4c). Notably, TRF2 protein inhibition was also observed in total CD4 T cells isolated from HCV patients compared with HS (Fig. 4d). These results indicate TRF2 inhibition, at the posttranscriptional level, in CD4 T cells during HCV infection.
Mechanisms involved in inhibiting TRF2 protein expression in T cells during HCV infection
As p53-mediated proteasomal degradation via E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah-1a is a major mechanism for regulating TRF2 protein stability in fibroblasts33, we examined these proteins by western blot in HCV- and HS-derived naïve CD4 T cells treated with or without the proteasomal inhibitor MG132. As shown in Fig. 4e, p53 protein expression was significantly increased in naïve CD4 T cells from HCV patients versus HS, with or without MG132 treatment. Along with p53 upregulation, the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah-1a was also increased in both MG132-treated and untreated naïve CD4 T cells derived from HCV patients compared with HS, which was accompanied by decreases in TRF2 expression. In addition, expression of p21cip1, a p53 downstream cell cycle inhibitor and cell senescence marker, was significantly elevated after the MG132 treatment, especially in HCV-derived naïve CD4 T cells. Concurrently, the DNA damage marker γH2AX was also markedly elevated in HCV T cells compared with HS, regardless of the MG132 treatment. Collectively, these results suggest that TRF2 inhibition is associated with increases in the p53/Siah-1a signaling in senescent, DNA damaged T cells during HCV infection.
To further address the possibility of ubiquitin degradation as a mechanism for TRF2 inhibition in T cells during HCV infection, we examined the ubiquitination of TRF2 in naïve CD4 T cells with or without MG132 treatment. We performed immunoprecipitation (IP) using a TRF2 monoclonal antibody and then probed the immunoprecipitates with both TRF2- and ubiquitin-specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4f, without MG132 treatment, ubiquitinlated TRF2 was significantly higher in HCV T cells, consistent with the lower level of TRF2 before the protein pull-down, compared with HS (lane 2 versus lane 1). These data suggest that ubiquitination-mediated proteasomal degradation of TRF2 occurs in HCV T cells. We also noticed an increased TRF2 ubiquitination in healthy T cells (lane 3 versus lane 1) by the MG132 treatment, but this TRF2 ubiquitination did not increase further in HCV-derived cells (lane 4 versus lane 2), suggesting a highly active TRF2 ubiquitination machinery in HCV T cells. We found a similar pattern of ubiquitin probe in naïve CD4 T cells derived from HCV and HS, with or without MG132 treatment. Taken together, these data indicate an increased proteasomal degradation of TRF2 that is associated with the activation of the p53/Siah-1a ubiquitination pathway in T cells during HCV infection.
TRF2 plays a key role in protecting telomeres from DNA damage and T-cell apoptosis
TRF2 is a key factor in telomere protection and chromosomal stability, which are critical for cell survival and function14,15, but its role in T-cell biology in the setting of viral infection remains unknown. To elucidate the role of TRF2 in protecting telomere integrity and T-cell survival, we knocked down TRF2 in healthy T cells and measured DNA damage, cell apoptosis, and cell function. As shown in Fig. 5a, healthy naïve CD4 T cells transfected with siRNA specific to TRF2 (siTERF2) exhibited a significant decrease in TRF2 protein expression compared with cells treated with scramble siRNA. Concurrently, p53 and γH2AX expressions were remarkably upregulated in the TRF2 knockdown T cells. Notably, the expression of caspase-3-dependent cleavage of PARP-1 (an enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of ADP-ribose onto target proteins and plays an important role in maintaining DNA chromosomal stability34) was decreased, whereas its cleaved form was increased in T cells after TRF2 knockdown. Correspondingly, caspase-3 was decreased but its cleaved form was increased, which is in line with the increases in apoptosis in TRF2 siRNA-treated cells that have increased p53-mediated DNA damage. Additionally, the numbers of dysfunctional TIF per nucleus (Fig. 5b) and the percentages of Av+ apoptotic cells were also significantly increased (Fig. 5c), and the IL-2 expression was substantially decreased in T cells after TRF2 knockdown (Fig. 5d).
To determine whether reconstitution of TRF2 in T cells can alleviate the DNA damage and cell apoptosis occurring during HCV infection, we overexpressed TRF2 in naïve CD4 T cells derived from HCV patients using a lentiviral expression system. As shown in Fig. 5e, lentivirus-mediated, IRES-driven GFP protein expression was observed in T-cell transduced with the pWPiR control vector and the pWPiR-TRF2 construct, but not in untransduced cells. Importantly, TRF2 expression was markedly increased in pWPiR-TRF2-transduced T cells and was accompanied by a decrease in p53, γH2AX, and cleaved PARP-1 levels, indicating an alleviation of p53-mediated DNA damage. In addition, Av expression was significantly reduced in HCV-derived T cells transduced by the pWPIR-TRF2. These data demonstrate that telomere uncapping and recapping is critical for DNA damage and apoptosis, determining T-cell survival and function.
Discussion
Chronic viral infections are characterized by dysfunctional T cells. Here, we show that homeostatic remodeling of the T-cell repertoire during HCV infection primarily affects the naïve T-cell compartment. Specifically, we find that naïve CD4 T cells in HCV patients are senescent, as demonstrated by the overexpression of aging markers, along with telomere attrition with telomeric DNA damage due to loss of the TRF2 protection, thus contributing to increased cell apoptosis. Healthy naïve T cells entered crisis prematurely upon knockdown of TRF2, as evidenced by increased p53 and γH2AX expression, accompanied by increases in the cleaved form of PARP-1 and caspase-3. Accordingly, TRF2 silenced T cells exhibited increased numbers of TIF and apoptosis, concomitant with decreased IL-2 production. In contrast, overexpression of TRF2 in HCV T cells reduced telomeric DNA damage and cell apoptosis. We thus conclude that TRF2 protein inhibition leads to telomere attrition and telomeric DNA damage that triggers cell apoptosis during HCV infection. Based on these novel findings, we propose a model, as depicted in Fig. 6, where HCV-induced telomere deprotection by TRF2 protein inhibition causes accumulation of telomeric DNA damage and telomere erosion, thus contributing to T-cell apoptosis. Telomere attrition-mediated T-cell apoptosis may necessitate homeostatic proliferation and impose replicative stress on unprimed naïve T cells, further contributing to naïve T-cell loss. This represents a novel molecular mechanism that underlies T-cell senescence and T-cell loss.
The immune system is in constant turnover during viral infection, with high demands for lymphocyte replenishment to maintain the T-cell equilibrium. Ongoing antigenic stimulation during chronic viral infection induces continuous differentiation of naïve T cells and turnover of antigen-reactive T cells. In this regard, memory T cells would expand and thus compromise the size and survival of naïve T-cell repertoire. Our study focused on the naïve T cells because they represent the reserves of the immune system, and their survival critically affects the outcome of immune aging. Undoubtedly, the apoptotic loss of naïve T cells determines the generation of sufficient antigen-specific T-cell clones, as well as the cellular yield of homeostatic proliferation, a process that generates new T cells upon the response to neo-antigens, including vaccines. Indeed, along with others, we have shown poor vaccine (HAV, HBV, influenza, and Pneumovax) responses in the setting of chronic viral (HCV and HIV) infections2,3,35–39. Our new findings in this study indicate that naïve helper T cells in HCV patients have aberrant abnormalities that jeopardize their ability to mount effective immune (vaccine) responses. In particular, the naïve T cells compartment is severely contracted, and naïve CD4 T cells exhibit telomere attrition with damaged DNA due to the lack of TRF2 protection. Accumulated DNA damage renders HCV T cells more prone to apoptotic death, thus imposing replicative stress and premature senescence.
A typical feature of T cells in chronic viral infection is premature aging, characterized by telomere shortening compared with age-matched HS2–9. In normal primary T cells, telomeres undergo shortening at a rate of 50–100 base pairs (bp) per cell division, and predictable loss of telomeric DNA with each cell replication allows telomeres to serve as molecular clock that controls the replicative capacity of T cells before entering cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis40,41. However, telomere loss can increase up to 250 bp per cell cycle during chronic viral infection and, in compensating for this, cell cycle arrest occurs when progressive telomere loss reaches a critical point, a phenomenon known as replicative senescence40,41. Based on our studies, we believe that HCV-induced naïve CD4 T-cell loss is primarily driven by ROS-mediated DNA damage and telomere attrition. As depicted in Fig. 6, in healthy young subjects the telomeres are intact with shelterin complexes well formed to protect telomeres from unwanted DNA damage; thus, normal T cells can proliferate/differentiate efficiently in response to antigen stimulation. However, HCV infection can induce TRF2 protein degradation via the p53/Siah1-mediated ubiquitination, leading to telomere uncapping and telomeric DNA damage. We believe that HCV-induced TRF2 inhibition, telomere loss, cellular senescence, and apoptosis are sequential but constant events, that is, if telomeres are mildly or moderately shortening, the over-expanded cells are exhausted or senescent, and cell cycles are arrested in the G1 phase to allow for DNA damage repair. If telomeres are severely shortening to a critical point that the damaged DNAs are irreparable, then the cells will undergo suicidal apoptosis and die. This continuous depletion of naïve CD4 T cells serves as a mechanism and contributes to the high rates of HCV persistence and vaccine non-responsiveness in virally infected individuals.
Several mechanisms may potentially contribute to the senescence-associated telomere attrition. First, increased T-cell proliferative turnover can cause cell division-induced telomere erosion. Typically, telomere is lost due to incomplete synthesis of the terminal DNA during cell division. The enzyme telomerase counteracts telomere loss by synthesizing telomeric repeats during cell proliferation. However, we have found that telomerase expression and its activity in CD4 T cells were unchanged or not dramatically suppressed during HCV infection (unpublished observations), suggesting that other mechanisms might be involved in telomere attrition. In our study, we found a significant decrease in TRF2 and a slight decrease in TRF1, TPP1, and TIN2 protein expressions in HCV T cells. Given that TPP1 and TIN2 are required to bridge the TRF1 and TRF2 complexes for telomere sheltering42, we speculate that the relative lower levels of TRF2, TRF1, TPP1, and TIN2 in T cells of HCV patients could lead to poor sheltering, telomere uncapping or deprotection, and thus ROS-mediated DNA damage. Additionally, Zhong et al. reported that the oligonucleotide binding (OB)-fold domain of TPP1 recruits telomerase to telomeres through an association with Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT)43. Reconstitution of shelterin complexes reveals unexpected stoichiometry that can enhance telomerase processivity44. We thus believe that with decreased shelterin proteins, there would be insufficient recruitment of telomerase to telomeres for chromosomal end maintenance during HCV infection. This possibility is under active investigation in our lab.
Second, telomeres are highly susceptible to DNA damage. Human naïve T cells have a relatively long life span (150–160 days) and are exposed to a multitude of genotoxic stressors, causing 1% of approximately 300 billion T cells to be replaced daily. Their telomeric DNA is particularly vulnerable to ROS-induced DDR, even more so than non-telomeric DNA. Plasmid-inserted human telomeres, for example, accumulate sevenfold higher strand breakage than control sequences45. In addition, the frequency of single-strand breaks is several-fold higher in telomeres than in the bulk genome when cells are exposed to oxidative stress46. In line with these findings, we find that T cells derived from HCV patient exhibit not only shortened telomeres, but also damaged DNA, which can contribute to telomere loss.
Third, an inhibition of protective shelterin proteins may lead to deprotection of the telomeres. In our study, the expression of TRF2 is significantly inhibited at the protein level via the p53/Siah-1a-mediated ubiquitin pathway in naïve CD4 T cells during HCV infection, rendering the uncapped telomeres prone to DNA damage and cell apoptosis. T-cell replicative senescence is induced by uncapped telomeres, which activates DDR and telomere erosion. T-cell death, however, requires overriding of senescence through further telomere attrition, concomitant with loss of DNA damage checkpoints, thus causing cell apoptosis. Notably, TRF2 is a key factor that plays an essential role in maintaining telomere integrity by suppressing the ATM-dependent DDR14. Recently, we have shown that telomere loss in HCV T cells is triggered by DDR and the inability of a timely repair by the ATM pathway6. Similar to our study, Guo et al.47,48 reported that ATM activation in response to ROS was independent of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex (MRN) complex. ROS-mediated ATM signaling represses mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling and therefore cell growth and proliferation through activation of Tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) (a negative regulator of mTOR) by liver kinase B1 and AMP-dependent kinases49. ATM engagement of the TSC2/mTORC1 signaling pathway can also regulate autophagy50, and differential localization of ATM is correlated with activation of distinct downstream pathways51. We have also discovered that KML001, a telomere-targeting drug, can induce telomeric DNA damage and T-cell apoptosis by inhibiting TRF2 expression and impairing the ATM pathway (unpublished observations). Moreover, inhibition of Topoisomerase I or II by camptothecin or ICRF-193, which induces topological stress by suppressing telomere TRF2 protection, also exacerbates telomeric DNA damage and enhances T-cell death (unpublished observations). In this study, we show that TRF2 silencing amplifies telomere uncapping, triggers telomeric DNA damage, and decides cellular fate, suggesting that telomere deprotection via TRF2 inhibition is the underlying molecular mechanism that causes telomeric DNA damage and cell apoptosis in HCV infection. It should be pointed out, however, that the pathogenesis of HCV persistence is multifaceted, in that not only telomere shelterin proteins (especially TRF2) are inhibited, but other mechanisms appear impaired, including DNA repair enzymes (ATM/ATR), telomerase access to telomeres, and DNA topoisomerases, all of which can work in concert to damage telomeres and lead to naïve T-cell loss during HCV infection.
Our findings of TRF2-mediated telomere uncapping and T-cell apoptosis during HCV infection are clinically relevant and highly significant. We propose that TRF2 inhibition is the molecular mechanism that controls T-cell life span in the setting of chronic HCV infection. In line with this, we have recently found that CD4 T cells in latently HIV-infected individuals are also senescent with shortened, DNA-damaged telomeres due to TRF2 and ATM inhibition (unpublished observations). Thus, TRF2-mediated telomere attrition and cell apoptosis may represent a universal mechanism that controls T-cell homeostasis in chronic viral infections. Importantly, our results show that reconstitution of TRF2 is necessary and sufficient to protect telomeres from unwanted DNA damage and rescue HCV T cells from apoptosis, indicating the importance of TRF2 in telomere protection and T-cell survival in human infectious diseases.
These findings might also offer a clinical opportunity for oncogenesis and anticancer treatment, as cell cycle arrest has been associated with tumorigenesis in checkpoint-compromised cells52, whereas exacerbation of TRF2-mediated telomere deprotection sensitizes cancer cells to telomere-targeting drugs. Similarly, bone marrow failure and related diseases are often observed in individuals with telomeropathies, which could potentially be explained by cell mitotic arrest resulting from excessive shortened and/or damaged telomeres53,54. Therefore, TRF2-mediated telomere uncapping and telomere loss-driven cell cycle arrest may have broader implications through impairing diverse cellular functions.
Telomere integrity is essential to life, as telomere clearly preserves genomic DNA stability and cell proliferative potential. Thus, recognizing telomeric DNA damage due to TRF2 uncapping as a fundamental mechanism of cellular aging will create a new paradigm in cell aging research. Notably, chronic infection or inflammation-induced immunosenescence (i.e., inflammaging) may prove to be a key molecular process that applies to a wide range of clinical scenarios. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that inhibition of shelterin protein TRF2 promotes T-cell telomere attrition and telomeric DNA damage to accelerate T-cell senescence and apoptosis in human viral infection. It should be noted that while telomere TRF2 uncapping explains both telomeric DNA damage and cell apoptosis, it may function as a double-edged sword, resulting in both an overwhelming cell death in acute infection and immune tolerance or immune suppression in chronic infection. Our findings indicate that appropriate manipulation of telomere/TRF2 shelterin machinery may restore T-cell competency and prevent premature immune senescence, thus providing a new strategy to improve immunotherapy and vaccine responses against human viral diseases.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01DK093526, R01AI114748, R21AI138598, S10OD021572-01A1, and by a VA Merit Review Award INFA-016-15S. We are grateful to Dr. Eric Gibson at University of Nice and Dr. Vincent Picco at Principality of Monaco for their generous gifts of pWPiR and pWPiR-TRF2 lentiviral plasmids. This publication is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the James H. Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The contents in this publication do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by H.-U. Simon
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-0897-y).
References
- 1.Thomas DL. Global control of hepatitis C: where challenge meets opportunity. Nat. Med. 2013;19:850–858. doi: 10.1038/nm.3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yao ZQ, Moorman JP. Immune exhaustion and immune senescence: two distinct pathways for HBV vaccine failure during HCV and/or HIV infection. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2013;61:193–201. doi: 10.1007/s00005-013-0219-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shi L, et al. KLRG1 impairs CD4+ T cell responses via p16ink4a and p27kip1 pathways: role in hepatitis B vaccine failure in individuals with hepatitis C virus infection. J. Immunol. 2014;192:649–657. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li G, et al. Hepatitis C virus-induced reduction in miR-181a impairs CD4+ T-cell responses through overexpression of DUSP6. Hepatology. 2015;61:1163–1173. doi: 10.1002/hep.27634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou Y, et al. Protection of CD4+ T cells from hepatitis C virus infection-associated senescence via ΔNp63-miR-181a-Sirt1 pathway. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016;100:1201–1211. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5A0316-119RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao J, et al. Insufficiency of DNA repair enzyme ATM promotes naïve CD4 T cell loss in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Cell Discov. 2018;4:16. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0015-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoare M, et al. CD4+ T-lymphocyte telomere length is related to fibrosis stage, clinical outcome and treatment response in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2010;53:252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Biron-Shental T, et al. Telomere length and telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA expression in patients with hepatitis C. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2013;60:1713–1716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grady BP, Nanlohy NM, van Baarle D. HCV monoinfection and HIV/HCV coinfection enhance T-cell immune senescence in injecting drug users early during infection. Immun. Ageing. 2016;13:10. doi: 10.1186/s12979-016-0065-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carneiro MC, de Castro IP, Ferreira MG. Telomeres in aging and disease: lessons from zebrafish. Dis. Model Mech. 2016;9:737–748. doi: 10.1242/dmm.025130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blackburn EH, Greider CW, Szostak JW. Telomeres and telomerase: the path from maize, Tetrahymena and yeast to human cancer and aging. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1133–1138. doi: 10.1038/nm1006-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Lange T. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2100–2110. doi: 10.1101/gad.1346005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Giraud-Panis MJ, et al. One identity or more for telomers? Front. Oncol. 2013;3:48. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Okamoto K, et al. A two-step mechanism for TRF2-mediated chromosome-end protection. Nature. 2013;494:502–505. doi: 10.1038/nature11873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ye J, et al. TRF2 and Apollo cooperate with topoisomerase 2alpha to protect human telomeres from replicative damage. Cell. 2010;142:230–242. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nijjar T, et al. Accumulation and altered localization of telomere-associated protein TRF2 in immortally transformed and tumor-derived human breast cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:3369–3376. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Biroccio A, et al. TRF2 inhibition triggers apoptosis and reduces tumourigenicity of human melanoma cells. Eur. J. Cancer. 2006;42:1881–1888. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Derradji H, Bekaert S, Van Oostveldt P, Baatout S. Comparison of different protocols for telomere length estimation by combination of quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) and flow cytometry in human cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(2A):1039–1050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhou Y, et al. Viral (HCV, HBV, HIV) persistence and immune homeostasis. Immunology. 2014;143:319–330. doi: 10.1111/imm.12349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yonkers NL, Sieg S, Rodriguez B, Anthony DD. Reduced naive CD4 T cell numbers and impaired induction of CD27 in response to T cell receptor stimulation reflect a state of immune activation in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;203:635–645. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qi Q, Zhang DW, Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Mechanisms shaping the naïve T cell repertoire in the elderly – Thymic involution or peripheral homeostatic proliferation? Exp. Gerontol. 2014;54:71–74. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tanaskovic S, Price P, French MA, Fernandez S. Impaired upregulation of the costimulatory molecules, CD27 and CD28, on CD4+ T cells from HIV patients receiving ART is associated with poor proliferative responses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2017;33:101–109. doi: 10.1089/aid.2015.0327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fang F, et al. Expression of CD39 on activated T cells impairs their survival in older individuals. Cell Rep. 2016;14:1218–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Focosi D, Bestagno M, Burrone O, Petrini M. CD57+ T lymphocytes and functional immune deficiency. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010;87:107–116. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0809566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sharpless NE, Sherr CJ. Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:397–408. doi: 10.1038/nrc3960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yao ZQ, Eisen-Vandervelde A, Ray S, Hahn YS. HCV core/gC1qR interaction arrests T cell cycle progression through stabilization of the cell cycle inhibitor p27kip1. Virology. 2003;314:271–282. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00419-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fujii H, Shao L, Colmegna I, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Telomerase insufficiency in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:4360–4365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811332106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Z, et al. Characterization of oxidative guanine damage and repair in mammalian telomeres. PLoSGeneit. 2010;6:e1000951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Figueroa D, Asaduzzaman M, Young F. Real time monitoring and quantification of reactive oxygen species in breast cancer cell line MCF-7 by 2’,7’-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) assay. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods. 2018;94(Pt 1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Takai H, Smogorzewsk.a A, de Lange T. DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:1549–1556. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00542-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gu P, et al. Human Pot1 OB-fold mutations unleash rampant telomere instability to initiate tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2017;36:1939–1951. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tennen RI, Bua DJ, Wright WE, Chua KF. SIRT6 is required for maintenance of telomere position effect in human cells. Nat. Commun. 2011;2:433. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fujita K, et al. Positive feedback between p53 and TRF2 during telomere-damage signaling and cellular senescence. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:1205–1212. doi: 10.1038/ncb2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bouglares AH, et al. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in apoptosis. Caspase 3-resistant PARP mutant increases rates of apoptosis in transfected cells. J. Bio. Chem. 1999;274:22932–22940. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.22932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moorman JP, et al. Impaired hepatitis B vaccine responses during chronic hepatitis C infection: involvement of the PD-1 pathway in regulating CD4+ T cell responses. Vaccine. 2011;29:3169–3176. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang JM, et al. Tim-3 alters the balance of IL-12/IL-23 and drives TH17 cells: role in hepatitis B vaccine failure during hepatitis C infection. Vaccine. 2013;31:2238–2245. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kramer ES, Hofmann C, Smith PG, Shiffman ML, Sterling PK. Response to hepatitis A and B vaccine alone or in combination in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus and advanced fibrosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2009;54:2016–2025. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0867-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Malaspina A, et al. Compromised B cell responses to influenza vaccination in HIV-infected individuals. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;191:1442–1450. doi: 10.1086/429298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rodriguez-Barradas MC, et al. Response of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy to vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;37:438–447. doi: 10.1086/375841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Arkus N. A mathematical model of cellular apoptosis and senescence through the dynamics of telomere loss. J Theoretical Biol. 2005;235:13–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blackburn EH. Telomere states and cell fates. Nature. 2000;408:53–56. doi: 10.1038/35040500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.O’Connor MS, Safari A, Xin H, Liu D, Songyang Z. A critical role for TPP1 and TIN2 interaction in high-order telomeric complex assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:11874–11879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605303103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhong FL, et al. TPP1 OB-fold domain controls telomere maintenance by recruiting telomerase to chromosome ends. Cell. 2012;150:481–494. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lim CJ, Zaug AJ, Kim HJ, Cech TR. Reconstitution of human shelterin complexes reveals unpectected stoichiometry and dual pathways to enhance telomerase processivity. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1075. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01313-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Henle ES, et al. Sequence-specific DNA cleavage by Fe2+ -mediated fenton reactions has possible biological implications. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:962–971. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.2.962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Petersen S, Saretzki G, von Zglinicki T. Preferential accumulation of single-stranded regions in telomeres of human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 1998;239:152–160. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guo Z, Deshpande R, Paull TT. ATM activation in the presence of oxidative stress. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:4805–4811. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.24.14323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Guo Z, Kozlov S, Lavin MF, Person MD, Paull TT. ATM activation by oxidative stress. Science. 2010;330:517–521. doi: 10.1126/science.1192912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alexander A, et al. ATM signals to TSC2 in the cytoplasm to regulate mTORC1 in response to ROS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:4153–4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913860107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Alexander A, Kim J, Walker CL. ATM engages the TSC2/mTORC1 signaling node to regulate autophagy. Autophagy. 2010;6:672–673. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.5.12509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alexander A, Walker CL. Differential localization of ATM is correlated with activation of distinct downstream signaling pathways. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:3685–3686. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.18.13253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dalton WB, Yang VW. Role of prolonged mitotic checkpoint activation in the formation and treatment of cancer. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1363–1370. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Armanios M, Blackburn EH. The telomere syndromes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:693–704. doi: 10.1038/nrg3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Batista LF, Artandi SE. Understanding telomere diseases through analysis of patient-derived iPS cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2013;23:526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.