Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2018 Aug 13;115(35):8799–8804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721820115

Foxp2 regulates anatomical features that may be relevant for vocal behaviors and bipedal locomotion

Shuqin Xu a, Pei Liu a, Yuanxing Chen a, Yi Chen b, Wei Zhang a, Haixia Zhao a, Yiwei Cao a, Fuhua Wang a, Nana Jiang a, Shifeng Lin a, Baojie Li a, Zhenlin Zhang c, Zhanying Wei c, Ying Fan c, Yunyun Jin d, Lin He a, Rujiang Zhou a, Joseph D Dekker e, Haley O Tucker e, Simon E Fisher f,g, Zhengju Yao a, Quansheng Liu b,1, Xuechun Xia a,1, Xizhi Guo a,1
PMCID: PMC6126773  PMID: 30104377

Significance

Speech and bipedalism are key aspects of behavior that emerged during human evolution. FOXP2, a gene implicated in a human speech and language disorder, has been suggested to contribute to language evolution. Here, through knockout studies of mouse Foxp2, we show that this gene is not only important for neural circuits involved in vocal behaviors, it also helps regulate relevant anatomical substrates. We additionally demonstrate that Foxp2 influences skeletal features that may be relevant for bipedal locomotion. Our findings raise the possibility that FOXP2 might be important for anatomical features contributing to derived human traits, including speech and bipedalism.

Keywords: Foxp2, vocalization, bipedalism, cranial base, bone remodeling

Abstract

Fundamental human traits, such as language and bipedalism, are associated with a range of anatomical adaptations in craniofacial shaping and skeletal remodeling. However, it is unclear how such morphological features arose during hominin evolution. FOXP2 is a brain-expressed transcription factor implicated in a rare disorder involving speech apraxia and language impairments. Analysis of its evolutionary history suggests that this gene may have contributed to the emergence of proficient spoken language. In the present study, through analyses of skeleton-specific knockout mice, we identified roles of Foxp2 in skull shaping and bone remodeling. Selective ablation of Foxp2 in cartilage disrupted pup vocalizations in a similar way to that of global Foxp2 mutants, which may be due to pleiotropic effects on craniofacial morphogenesis. Our findings also indicate that Foxp2 helps to regulate strength and length of hind limbs and maintenance of joint cartilage and intervertebral discs, which are all anatomical features that are susceptible to adaptations for bipedal locomotion. In light of the known roles of Foxp2 in brain circuits that are important for motor skills and spoken language, we suggest that this gene may have been well placed to contribute to coevolution of neural and anatomical adaptations related to speech and bipedal locomotion.


Spoken language and bipedalism are two behavioral traits that distinguish humans from other living apes, each with a complex evolutionary history. The emergence of such derived traits was accompanied by various changes in skeletal anatomy. For example, as well as long-term increases in overall cranial capacity over the course of primate evolution, more recent alterations in skull shape occurred in our ancestors, changes that some hypothesize as important for language evolution (1, 2). Advances in genomics are uncovering genes of relevance for distinct human traits like language (3). In particular, disruptions of the FOXP2 transcription factor are implicated in a monogenic disorder involving childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and expressive–receptive language impairments (47). The first etiological FOXP2 mutation was identified in a family (KE) in which all affected members carried an R553H substitution within the Forkhead-box DNA-binding domain. In addition, mutations of FOXP1, the closest paralogue of FOXP2, cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome including speech and language impairments (811), partially overlapping with deficits associated with FOXP2 variants in multiple different cases (1214). The functions of Foxp2 in vocal behaviors have been assessed through analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in mouse models (1520), or learned song in songbirds (2123). Foxp2 is highly conserved across species, but underwent positive selection on the lineage that led to modern humans (24, 25). Two amino acid substitutions occurred in human FOXP2 after splitting from our common ancestor with the chimpanzee. Investigations of these substitutions in partially humanized mice suggest they affect connectivity and plasticity of cortico-basal ganglia circuits, impacting learning mechanisms (26, 27).

Morphological correlation or covariation, a concept going as far back as Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, is an essential driving force for evolution. The emergence of human speech involved not only neural changes, but also modifications in anatomical features of the vocal tract, including configuration of superficial vocal folds, trachea, and oral cavities. For instance, the importance of a relatively descended larynx for human speech has been a topic of much discussion (28). While multiple studies of Foxp2 have focused on neuronal functions, none have tested its potential contributions to vocal anatomical geometry. Of note, a comparison of transcriptional regulation by human and chimpanzee versions of FOXP2 reported enrichment of differential targets involved in craniofacial formation and cartilage development (29). Moreover, in a previous study, we demonstrated cooperative functions of Foxp1/2 in regulating endochondral ossification during embryonic bone development (30).

Building on our demonstration of a Foxp2 role in embryonic bone development, and in light of prior hypothesized involvement of this gene in human evolution, we here used skeleton-specific loss-of-function analyses in mice to investigate how it might help regulate anatomy. Unexpectedly, skeletal Foxp2 loss led to disruption of pup vocalizations, similar to phenotypes previously reported for global mutant or knockout lines (17, 31). Most interestingly, loss of Foxp2 in skeletal tissue also led to pleiotropic deficits in skull shaping and bone strengthening. Our findings reveal regulatory roles of Foxp2 in helping build anatomic substrates that are important for vocal behaviors, and suggest that it might also be considered a candidate for skeletal adaptations relevant to bipedal locomotion.

Results

Cartilage-Specific Deletion of Foxp2 Impairs Cranial Base Development.

Cranial base morphogenesis is a major determinant of skull shaping (32). Basicranial skeletons, such as the sphenoid and basioccipital bones (Bos), are primarily formed through endochondral ossification. To test roles of Foxp2 in cranial base development, we firstly examined its expression in the synchondrosis joint—the unique growth plate sustaining endochondral ossification in sphenoid bones. We detected expression of Foxp2 protein, as well as its paralogue Foxp1, in mesenchymal progenitor cells in resting zone and/or perichondrium (white arrows in Fig. 1A). We then generated chondrocyte-specific Foxp2 conditional knockout (cKO) mice by crossing a homozygous floxed line Foxp2fl/fl with Col2-Cre, which targeted cartilage in appendicular skeletons and partial craniofacial mesenchyme. We observed that craniofacial elements were consistently shortened in homozygous Foxp2Col2∆/∆ cKO mice compared with controls at postnatal day 10 (P10) and P30 stages (double-headed arrows in Fig. 1B). The skulls of Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice were smaller in size than Foxp2fl/fl littermates at embryonic stage 15.5 days (E15.5) and P13 (Fig. 1C). Endochondral ossification of the Bo, the basisphenoid bone (Bs) and the nasal bone, were attenuated in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice at E15.5, as evidenced by diminished Alizarin red staining (arrows in Fig. 1C). In particular, broader funnel-shaped presphenoids were observed in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice at P13 (arrows in Fig. 1 D and F). Minor alterations in presphenoid morphology were also detected at P7 in Foxp2R552H/+ mutant mice, which carry a point mutation matching that found in affected members of the KE family (Fig. 1 E and G and SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Altered presphenoid morphology was much more evident in homozygous Foxp2R552H/R552H mice at P0 (arrows in Fig. 1H and SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). At the histological level, Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice showed delayed chondrocyte hypertrophy and ossification within sphenooccipital synchondroses, as revealed by Safranin O staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) examination using Col X, Osterix (Osx), and Foxp2 antibodies (SI Appendix, Figs. S1C and S2A). Collectively, these data indicate that Foxp2 is important for sphenoid development and cranial shaping.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Deletion of Foxp2 in cartilage impairs craniofacial shaping. (A) IHC examinations detected the expression of Foxp1 and Foxp2 in different subsets of chondrocytes in intersphenoidal synchondrosis of sphenoid bones at P7. PC, proliferating chondrocytes; RC, resting chondrocytes. (Scale bar, 100 μm.) (B) Top view of heads of Foxp2fl/fl (Contr) and Foxp2Col2∆/∆ (Col2-cKO) mice at P10 and P30. (C) Top view of skull visualized by Alcian blue/Alizarin red staining at E15.5 and P13. (D and E) Top view of cranial bases of Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice (D) at P13, and Foxp2R552H/+ (R552H/+) mutant (E) at P7. (F and G) Enlarged view of presphenoid in D and E. Double arrow indicated the funnel position of presphenoid. (H) Altered morphology of presphenoid (arrow) in Foxp2R552H/R552H (R552H/R552H) mutant mice at P0. (Lower) Magnified presphenoid. Bs, basisphenoid; bo, basioccipital; ps, presphenoid.

Foxp1/2 redundantly regulate endochondral ossification during embryonic development (30). Therefore, we also examined the impact of Foxp1 on craniofacial development by generating cartilage-specific knockout mice. As observed in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice, homozygous Foxp1Col2∆/∆ mice had shorter nasal bones (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 B and C) and minor morphological deformities in their presphenoid bone (arrows in SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D and E), with similarities to features observed in cases of heterozygous human FOXP1 disruption (10, 11). Then, we compared craniofacial shaping within the single (Foxp1Col2∆/∆ and Foxp2Col2∆/∆) and the double (Foxp1/2Col2∆/∆) cKO mice at E18.5. Shortening of nasal bones and vaulted skulls were evident in the Foxp1/2Col2∆/∆ double mutant compared with controls (SI Appendix, Fig. S2F, Upper). Defective sphenoid formation was more pronounced in Foxp1/2Col2∆/∆ double mutants than either single mutant or Foxp1/2fl/fl controls (yellow arrows in SI Appendix, Fig. S2F, Lower). The additive effect of double Foxp1/2 deficiency on skull shaping was also observed in heterozygous knockout mice (Foxp1fl/+Foxp2fl/+, Foxp1Col2∆/+Foxp2Col2∆/+, Foxp1Col2∆/+Foxp2Col2∆/∆, and Foxp1Col2∆/∆Foxp2Col2∆/+) at P10 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2G). These results indicate that Foxp2 and Foxp1 regulate craniofacial development cooperatively.

Ablation of Foxp2 in Cartilage Disrupts Pup USVs.

Morphogenesis and elasticity of the larynx and vocal tract are rudimentary for animal sound production (33). In our observations, complete loss of Foxp2 in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ cartilage tissue resulted in a minor perturbation of the morphogenesis of laryngeal thyroid and trachea cricoid cartilage, revealed by reduced Alcian blue staining in cricoid and trachea cartilage at P13 (Fig. 2A) and ectopic ventral expansion of the esophagus below the glottis (arrows in Fig. 2B). Subtle decreases in size of laryngeal cartilage were also observed in Foxp2R552H/R552H or Foxp2R552H/+ mutant mice, at P0 and P7, respectively, as indicated by brackets in Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Fig. S3. Meanwhile, development of trachea cartilage was relatively attenuated in homozygous Foxp2R552H/R552H mutant mice, as evidenced by Alcian blue staining (black arrows in Fig. 2 C and D and SI Appendix, Fig. S3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Ablation of Foxp2 in cartilage impairs USVs in pup calls. (A) Alcian blue staining of larynx cartilages from Foxp2Col2∆/∆ (Col2-cKO) mice. CC, cricoid cartilage; TC, thyroid cartilage; Tr, trachea cartilage. (B) Safranin O staining for the transverse sections of larynx at P10. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) E, esophagus; G, glottis. (C and D) Alcian blue staining of larynx cartilages from Foxp2R552H/R552H (R552H/R552H, C) at P0 and Foxp2R552H/+ (R552H/+, D) mutant mice at P7. (E) Representative spectrograms of pup isolation calls in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ (Col2-cKO) mice at P10. The y axis indicates the frequency change of the USVs in the kilohertz range, whereas the x axis indicates time in seconds. Color depths in the sonograms represent relative intensity strength in decibels. C, complex syllable; S, simple syllable. (F) The sonic characteristics of pup calls, including syllable rate, proportion of complex syllables, syllable duration, peak frequency, wiener entropy, and bandwidth in Foxp2fl/fl (Contr) mice. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Foxp2fl/fl mice, n = 27; Foxp2Col2∆/∆ knockouts, n = 26.

We next examined the consequences of homozygous cartilage-specific Foxp2 loss for mouse pup vocalizations. Foxp2Col2∆/∆ cKO mice at P10 were subjected to sound recording and spectrogram analyses. According to our bioacoustic analysis, Foxp2Col2∆/∆ pup calls were significantly perturbed compared with that of controls (Fig. 2E). Of note, approximately one-third of the Foxp2Col2∆/∆ pups presented no detectable calls. For the other two-thirds of Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mice, the call rate (Z51 = 5.392, P < 0.01) and the proportion of complex syllables, t(34) = −3.237, P < 0.01, were both significantly reduced in Foxp2Col2∆/∆ pups compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 2E). Pup calls were also significantly shorter in duration, t(42) = −3.691, P < 0.01, broader in bandwidth, t(42) = 2.093, P < 0.05, and higher in entropy, t(42) = 5.099, P < 0.01, than those of controls (Fig. 2F). No significant differences were observed in the USVs of male and female cKO mice. Similar vocalization defects were observed in Foxp1Col2∆/∆ mice at P10 (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B). Together these observations suggest that Foxp2 is involved in regulating multiple aspects of vocal tract configuration, including morphological features of the trachea and larynx that are important for vocal production.

Foxp2 Loss Perturbs Skull Integrity.

The interparietal bone is the boundary component between the parietal and occipital bones, which is considered to be a “hot spot” that is susceptible to cranial remodeling (34). Parietal and interparietal bones are formed in a process of intramembranous ossification. Foxp2 expression was detected in Osterix+ skeletal progenitor cells in developing interparietal bones, as indicated by IHC examination of sections of skull from Osx-GFP:Cre embryos at E15.5 (arrow in SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). To investigate the contributions of Foxp2 to skull vault development, we generated cKO mice with Foxp2 deletion strictly in mesenchymal progenitor cells by crossing Foxp2fl/fl animals to a Prx1-Cre line. The Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ cKO mice were grossly indistinguishable from their wild-type littermates (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B), with significant deletion of Foxp2 in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 C and D). Loss of Foxp2 from mesenchymal progenitors perturbed osteogenesis of interparietal bones (Fig. 3A), as evidenced by diminished Osx+ osteoblasts at the suture (SI Appendix, Fig. S5E), and decreased expression of osteogenic genes (Osx, Runx2, Col1a1, and Alp) in mesenchymal progenitor cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S5F). Effects on lambdoid suture fusion were also observed in Foxp2R552H/R552H or Foxp2R552H/+ perinatal mutant mice (Fig. 3 B and C and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Attenuation in lambdoid suture closure was much more penetrant in Foxp1/2Prx1∆/∆ double knockout mice (Fig. 3D). Our findings suggest that Foxp2 helps to regulate posterior skull integrity, including interparietal bone development and lambdoid suture closure, by promoting osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Disruption of posterior skull integrity in Foxp2 knockout mice. (A) Dorsal view of skulls of Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ mice (Prx1-cKO) at E18.5. Ip, interparietal bone. (B and C) Dorsal view of skulls of Foxp2R552H/R552H (R552H/R552H) mutant mice at P0 and Foxp2R552H/+ mice (R552H/+) at P7. (D) Dorsal view of skulls of Foxp1/2fl/fl, Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO), and Foxp1/2Prx1∆/∆ [Prx1-cKO (P1/2)] mice at 1 mo of age. Dashed lines outline the lambdoid suture.

Ablation of Foxp2 Impairs Leg Gracility and Cartilage Maintenance.

For appendicular long bones, postnatal elongation occurs at and depends on the growth plates, which progressively narrow down and ultimately disappear with age. Compared with control littermates, Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ femur bones were shortened in both males and females at 2 mo of age (Fig. 4 A and B). In cultures of MSCs prepared from wild-type bone marrow, Foxp2 showed overlapping expression with Nestin (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ mutants was impaired compared with controls, as evaluated by Alcian blue staining and qPCR of chondrogenic markers (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 B and C). Consistent with this observation, growth plates in Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ femurs were narrower at 6 mo and manifested obvious signs of cessation/disruption at 12 mo (Fig. 4C). Thus, it appears that loss of Foxp2 from mesenchymal progenitors leads to precocious arrest in the growth plate, partially accounting for the shortening of lower limbs. Given that our previous study showed that Foxp2 sustains chondrocyte proliferation and protects from apoptosis in embryonic growth plates (30), the effect of Foxp2 on chondrogenesis may underlie the defective maintenance of the postnatal growth plate.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Impaired articular cartilage integrity due to Foxp2 loss. (A) Representative pictures of femur bones from Foxp2fl/fl (Contr) and Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) mice at 2 mo old. (B) Quantification of the length of femur bones in A. n = 5; *P < 0.05. (C) Safranin O staining for growth plate in tibia bones from mice at 6 mo (Upper) and 12 mo (Lower) of age. (Scale bar, 500 μm.) (D) Representative pictures of articular cartilages from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) mice at 6 mo of age. (E) Representative photographs of articular cartilages at knee joints from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) 2-mo-old mice following 6-wk recovery from DMM surgery. (Scale bar, 100 μm.) (F) Representative pictures of intervertebral discs (IVDs) in lumbar vertebrates from Foxp2Col2∆/∆ (Col2-cKO) mice at 2 mo of age.

As a consequence of bipedal locomotion, the articular cartilage in humans endures much more pressure than in other primates. Histological analyses of Safranin O-stained sections revealed that Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ cKO animals manifested osteoarthritis (OA)-like pathology in their knee joints from the age of 6 mo, as well as reduction of superficial zones and proteoglycan content in distal femurs (Fig. 4D). Signs of OA in mutant knee joints were exacerbated by destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) at 2 mo of age (Fig. 4E). Interestingly, precocious signs of intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration could be detected in the lumbar IVD of Foxp2Col2∆/∆ mutant at 2 mo of age, as evidenced by decreased Safranin O staining in annulus fibrosus (Fig. 4F).

Strong and less massive legs have been suggested to represent evolutionary adaptations to improve walking economy (35). A key indicator for bone strength is stiffness, a parameter reflecting the deformation of bone under stress. We assessed the effects of Foxp2 loss on bone strength at 2 mo of age by employing the three-point bending approach. According to the load-deformation curves, femurs from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ knockouts had higher maximum load and yield load, but lower stiffness than wild-type littermates (SI Appendix, Fig. S7D). This finding suggests that Foxp2 loss weakens long bone strength by impairing its bone material properties. Taken together, the data indicate that Foxp2 helps maintain articular cartilage and IVD integrity, factors that are important for forging gracile but strong legs.

Foxp2 Regulates Bone Remodeling.

To dissect the cellular basis of Foxp2 function in leg strengthening, we investigated its role in bone remodeling, including osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-dependent bone resorption. In Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ mutant mice, μCT analyses revealed that trabecular bone volume, bone mineral density, thickness, and numbers were increased at 2 mo of age (Fig. 5A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). H&E staining of mutant femur sections displayed increased trabecular bone masses (SI Appendix, Fig. S7F). In addition, bone formation rate was still relatively reduced in Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ knockout mice, as quantified by dual calcein labeling (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 G and H). Consistent with that result, the osteogenic potency of Foxp2-deficient MSCs was impaired, indicated by a reduction in ALP and Alizarin red staining (Fig. 5B), as well as altered expression levels of osteoblast markers (Alp, Col1a1, Runx2, and Osterix; SI Appendix, Fig. S8A) during osteogenic induction. The above observations suggest that Foxp2 sustains MSC osteogenic differentiation.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Foxp2 controls bone remodeling in cooperation with Foxp1. (A) Representative images of 3D reconstruction of μCT analysis of Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) femur bones. (Upper) Cortical bone. (Lower) Trabecular bone. (B) ALP and Alizarin red staining following 14 d of osteogenic induction of MSCs from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) mice at 2 mo of age. (C) Representative images of 3D reconstruction of μCT analysis of Foxp2Ctsk∆/∆ (Ctsk-cKO) femur bones at 2 mo of age. (Upper) Trabecular bone. (Lower) Cortical bone. (D) TRAP staining of osteoclastogenic cultures of bone marrow from Foxp2Ctsk∆/∆ (Ctsk-cKO) mice at 2 mo of age. (Scale bar, 250 μm.) (E) Western blotting detection of the expression of Notch-related proteins (Delta4, Jagged2, and Hey1) in MSCs from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) mice. (F) qPCR assessment for expression of Notch-related marker genes (Delta4, Jagged2, Hey1, and HeyL) in bone marrow MSCs from Foxp2Prx1∆/∆ (Prx1-cKO) mice at 2 mo of age. n = 3. (G and H) Co-IP detected the in vivo interaction of Foxp1, Foxp2, and RBPjκ proteins in bone marrow MSCs, or in 293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. (I) Luciferase assay in 293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Foxp2 repressed the transactivation of RBPjκ-Luc (containing RBPjκ DNA-binding sites in promoter region) by NICD2, whereas a Foxp2 missense mutation (R552H) alleviated the repressive function. n = 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant. (J) Diagrammatic summaries of the pleiotropic roles of Foxp2 in helping to regulate anatomical features involved in vocalization and bone strengthening. Foxp2 regulates skull shaping, vocalization, and bone remodeling by forming complexes with Foxp1 and RBPjκ proteins.

Postnatal bone homeostasis is also affected by osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. We generated osteoclast-specific Foxp2 cKO mice by crossing Foxp2fl/fl with a Ctsk-Cre line. Foxp2Ctsk∆/∆ mice showed increased bone mass in both cortical and trabecular bones at 2 mo of age (Fig. 5C and SI Appendix, Fig. S8C). Osteoclast differentiation was impaired in Foxp2Ctsk∆/∆ bone marrow, as determined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining in osteoclastogenic cultures derived from mononuclear cells in bone marrow (Fig. 5D). This was coupled with down-regulation of prototypic osteoclastic genes (c-Fos, Nfat2, Ctsk, Trap, and Rankl) (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B). These findings suggest that Foxp2 promotes osteoclastogenesis in both a cell autonomous and nonautonomous manner. Collectively, our data show that Foxp2 helps to build strong bones by promoting bone remodeling with dual effect on bone formation and resorption.

Foxp2 Controls Bone Formation in Cooperation with Foxp1.

As noted above, compound knockouts of Foxp1 and Foxp2 presented mostly additive defects in endochondral or intramembranous ossification (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Our previous study demonstrated that Foxp1 promotes MSC osteogenic differentiation by repressing Notch signaling (36). Foxp2Prx1Δ/Δ MSCs exhibited elevated expression of several Notch signaling members (e.g., Delta4, Jag2, Jag1, Hey1, and HeyL; Fig. 5 E and F). In terms of defective MSC osteogenic differentiation, Foxp1/2Prx1∆/∆ double knockout mice were more penetrant compared with either the Foxp1 or Foxp2 single knockouts (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). We further observed that Foxp2 interacted at the protein level with Foxp1 and RBPjκ in bone marrow MSCs, as judged by in vitro and in vivo coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays (Fig. 5 G and H). While Foxp2 repressed the activation of Rbpjκ-Luc via the intracellular domain of Notch (NICD2), a Foxp2 (R552H) version with a mutated DNA-binding domain relieved the repression (Fig. 5I). These findings suggest that Foxp2, in cooperation with Foxp1, promotes osteogenic differentiation of MSCs partially through repression of Notch signaling.

Discussion

To date, the majority of investigations into the genetic bases of vocal communication and language functions have focused on neural pathways (37). Here we used conditional knockouts in mice to extend the examination of Foxp2 function to skull shaping and long bone development. As shown in the model of Fig. 5J, our work suggests that Foxp2 exerts pleiotropic influences on skeletal development by helping to regulate: (i) skull shaping, including cranial base formation and interparietal bone development; (ii) vocal tract geometry, including the sphenoid bone and laryngeal cartilage, anatomical substrates that are important for speech; and (iii) development of gracile and strong hind limbs, and maintenance of cartilage integrity in knee joint and IVD. In sum, Foxp2 influences multiple skeletal features conferring susceptibility to anatomical variances in vocal production and, we speculate, maybe also bipedal locomotion.

In line with the speech and language disorders observed in people with heterozygous FOXP2 mutations (i.e., with haploinsufficiency of the gene), prior studies of humans and animals have given substantial evidence that the gene is important for development and function of relevant brain circuits (38, 39). For example, neural investigations of mice with mutated Foxp2 have identified significant effects on neurite outgrowth and synaptic plasticity of the corticostriatal and corticocerebellar circuits where it is typically expressed (4042). The core behavioral phenotype associated with heterozygous disruptions of human FOXP2 is still a matter of debate (39). The most obvious diagnostic feature is CAS, involving problems with the neural control of sequences of orofacial movements (6), and expressive skills are more profound than problems with receptive language and/or grammar. Recent work also points to cognitive deficits in phonological working memory in FOXP2 mutation carriers in the KE family (43). Craniofacial and/or skeletal abnormalities have seldom been documented for human heterozygous FOXP2 mutation cases. Interestingly, studies of people with FOXP2 variants have anecdotally reported difficulties in infant feeding and coughing in a few cases (12, 13, 44, 45), which could feasibly relate to larynx cartilage changes. In the present study, cartilage-specific ablation of Foxp2 in mouse pups disrupted the production of innate USVs, despite normal neural expression in key brain structures (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). The primary findings stem from homozygous skeleton-specific deletions of Foxp2. Thus, besides its important actions in the central nervous system and in vocal production learning (46), Foxp2 also helps to establish anatomical substrates important for vocal communication. On the other hand, our investigations also revealed that Foxp2R552H homozygous mutant mice showed alterations in presphenoid and larynx cartilage, although heterozygous mutants displayed only minor changes (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S3). The potential existence of subtle anatomical anomalies should be taken into consideration when dissecting the etiology of speech and language disorders.

Modifications of vocal tract morphology may have played roles in the emergence of human speech (33). Unlike speech, mouse vocalizations are not learned, but acoustic analysis of USVs is a commonly used tool for studying mice carrying mutations associated with communication disorders. Recent work has revealed a novel mechanism of USV production, a planar impinging air jet within the larynx (47). When epiglottis and thyroid cartilage in the larynx is damaged, the production of USVs may be blocked to varying degrees. In the present study, cartilage-specific ablation of Foxp2 silenced around one-third of the knockout pups, which may correlate with their dysmorphogenesis of the larynx (Fig. 2 AD). Moreover, a substantial reduction of USV syllable rates was observed in both Foxp1Col2∆/∆ and Foxp2Col2∆/∆ knockout pups (Fig. 2F and SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). However, the peak frequency, which is mostly regulated by laryngeal muscle motor and airflow pressure (48, 49), showed a significant increase in the Foxp1Col2∆/∆, but not Foxp2Col2∆/∆ knockout line. These findings also remind us to be cautious about using pup USVs to try to model human speech impairments (50).

FOXP1 and FOXP2 show partially overlapping expression patterns in the brain, and heterozygous disruptions of these genes lead to a distinct yet overlapping spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders (11). The phenotype associated with heterozygous FOXP1 mutations is more severe and extensive, including global developmental delay, intellectual disability, autistic features and, notably, a number of documented craniofacial symptoms (9, 51). Interestingly, neuron-specific knockout of Foxp1 in mice also impairs neonatal USVs (52, 53). In the present study, cartilage-specific knockout of Foxp1 in mice led to impairment of cranial base formation and USVs, just as with knockout of Foxp2. In addition, loss of Foxp1 and Foxp2 displayed additive effects in skull shaping and bone formation (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Figs. S2 F and G and S9). Therefore, Foxp1 and Foxp2 cooperatively regulate craniofacial shaping.

Paleoanthropological evidence suggests that bipedalism emerged at an early stage of hominid evolution following the split from chimpanzee lineages (35). Two amino acid changes in FOXP2 occurred on the lineage that led to modern humans, after splitting from the chimpanzee but before the divergence of Neandertals, and these changes have been considered as candidates for involvement in the evolution of speech (24, 26). We still know little about the genetic basis of bipedal gait, which is thought to provide advantages in strength and walking economy (35, 54). Given the coordination of osteogenesis and neurogenesis in shaping of the skull and brain (1), it is interesting to speculate on whether Foxp2 may have been relevant for bipedal evolution in early human history. Although we have not tested evolutionary changes in the present study, our findings suggest that Foxp2 may have been well placed to provide resources for adaptations in bone and cartilage that are relevant for human evolution. Firstly, Foxp2 helps regulate craniofacial shaping and skull integrity (Fig. 3), such as sphenooccipital synchondrosis and interparietal bone, which are major evolutionary sources of skull reshaping (55). Secondly, Foxp2 helps to forge gracile but strong bones through its dual effects on bone remodeling (Figs. 4A and 5 AD), improving walking economy and energy expenditure. Finally, Foxp2 sustains growth plate competency for elongation of hind limbs and helps maintain the integrity of knee joint articular cartilage and IVDs. All these features have the potential to protect bones from stress damage during bipedal striding. In summary, this study raises hypotheses about contributions of FOXP2 to human evolution that can be empirically tested through studies of, for example, mice that have been humanized for this locus.

Materials and Methods

All animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines and approved by the ethical committee of Bio-X Institutes of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SYXK 2011-0112). For skeletal morphological analysis, skeletal preparations for mice of different ages were made by Alcian blue/Alizarin red staining as previously reported. For μCT analysis, femurs were dissected from mice and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4 °C. μCT scanning of bones was performed on SkyScan 1176. A 3D model was reconstructed and structural indices were calculated using CTAn software, and the region of interest selected was 5 mm below growth plate of bones.

The details of other materials and methods can be found in SI Appendix.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Jianquan Chen in Suzhou University for μCT scanning. This work was supported by research funding from National Major Fundamental Research 973 Program of China Grant 2014CB942902 and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 91749103, 81421061, 31100624, and 81200586 (to X.G.); Project of Comprehensive Strategic Cooperation between Guangdong Province and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant 2012B091100260 and Guangdong Academy of Sciences Grants 2016GDASPT-0215 and 2017GDASCX-0107 (to Q.L.); NIH Grant R01CA31534; Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas Grants RP120348 and RP120459; the Marie Betzner Morrow Centennial Endowment (to H.O.T.); and Lymphoma Research Foundation Award 300463 (to J.D.D.). S.E.F. is supported by the Max Planck Society.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1721820115/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Boeckx C, Benítez-Burraco A. Osteogenesis and neurogenesis: A robust link also for language evolution. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:291. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neubauer S, Hublin JJ, Gunz P. The evolution of modern human brain shape. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaao5961. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deriziotis P, Fisher SE. Speech and language: Translating the genome. Trends Genet. 2017;33:642–656. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins K, Alcock K, Fletcher P, Passingham R. Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:930–933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watkins KE, Dronkers NF, Vargha-Khadem F. Behavioural analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: Comparison with acquired aphasia. Brain. 2002;125:452–464. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lai CS, Fisher SE, Hurst JA, Vargha-Khadem F, Monaco AP. A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature. 2001;413:519–523. doi: 10.1038/35097076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morgan A, Fisher SE, Scheffer I, Hildebrand M. 2016 FOXP2-related speech and language disorders. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336128. Accessed July 26, 2018.
  • 8.Pariani MJ, Spencer A, Graham JM, Jr, Rimoin DL. A 785kb deletion of 3p14.1p13, including the FOXP1 gene, associated with speech delay, contractures, hypertonia and blepharophimosis. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52:123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carr CW, et al. Chiari I malformation, delayed gross motor skills, severe speech delay, and epileptiform discharges in a child with FOXP1 haploinsufficiency. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:1216–1220. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sollis E, et al. Identification and functional characterization of de novo FOXP1 variants provides novel insights into the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorder. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:546–557. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sollis E, et al. Equivalent missense variant in the FOXP2 and FOXP1 transcription factors causes distinct neurodevelopmental disorders. Hum Mutat. 2017;38:1542–1554. doi: 10.1002/humu.23303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turner SJ, et al. Small intragenic deletion in FOXP2 associated with childhood apraxia of speech and dysarthria. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A:2321–2326. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reuter MS, et al. DDD Study FOXP2 variants in 14 individuals with developmental speech and language disorders broaden the mutational and clinical spectrum. J Med Genet. 2017;54:64–72. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Estruch SB, Graham SA, Chinnappa SM, Deriziotis P, Fisher SE. Functional characterization of rare FOXP2 variants in neurodevelopmental disorder. J Neurodev Disord. 2016;8:44. doi: 10.1186/s11689-016-9177-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kurt S, Fisher SE, Ehret G. Foxp2 mutations impair auditory-motor association learning. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shu W, et al. Altered ultrasonic vocalization in mice with a disruption in the Foxp2 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9643–9648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503739102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fujita E, et al. Ultrasonic vocalization impairment of Foxp2 (R552H) knockin mice related to speech-language disorder and abnormality of Purkinje cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:3117–3122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712298105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fujita-Jimbo E, Momoi T. Specific expression of FOXP2 in cerebellum improves ultrasonic vocalization in heterozygous but not in homozygous Foxp2 (R552H) knock-in pups. Neurosci Lett. 2014;566:162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gaub S, Fisher SE, Ehret G. Ultrasonic vocalizations of adult male Foxp2-mutant mice: Behavioral contexts of arousal and emotion. Genes Brain Behav. 2016;15:243–259. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chabout J, et al. A Foxp2 mutation implicated in human speech deficits alters sequencing of ultrasonic vocalizations in adult male mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:197. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Miller JE, et al. Birdsong decreases protein levels of FoxP2, a molecule required for human speech. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2015–2025. doi: 10.1152/jn.90415.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schulz SB, Haesler S, Scharff C, Rochefort C. Knockdown of FoxP2 alters spine density in area X of the zebra finch. Genes Brain Behav. 2010;9:732–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murugan M, Harward S, Scharff C, Mooney R. Diminished FoxP2 levels affect dopaminergic modulation of corticostriatal signaling important to song variability. Neuron. 2013;80:1464–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Enard W, et al. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature. 2002;418:869–872. doi: 10.1038/nature01025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coop G, Bullaughey K, Luca F, Przeworski M. The timing of selection at the human FOXP2 gene. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1257–1259. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Enard W, et al. A humanized version of Foxp2 affects cortico-basal ganglia circuits in mice. Cell. 2009;137:961–971. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schreiweis C, et al. Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:14253–14258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414542111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ghazanfar AA, Rendall D. Evolution of human vocal production. Curr Biol. 2008;18:R457–R460. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Konopka G, et al. Human-specific transcriptional regulation of CNS development genes by FOXP2. Nature. 2009;462:213–217. doi: 10.1038/nature08549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao H, et al. Foxp1/2/4 regulate endochondral ossification as a suppresser complex. Dev Biol. 2015;398:242–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen YC, et al. Foxp2 controls synaptic wiring of corticostriatal circuits and vocal communication by opposing Mef2c. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1513–1522. doi: 10.1038/nn.4380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lieberman DE, McBratney BM, Krovitz G. The evolution and development of cranial form in Homosapiens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:1134–1139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022440799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fitch WT. The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4:258–267. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Esteve-Altava B, Rasskin-Gutman D. Evo-devo insights from pathological networks: Exploring craniosynostosis as a developmental mechanism for modularity and complexity in the human skull. J Anthropol Sci. 2015;93:103–117. doi: 10.4436/JASS.93001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bramble DM, Lieberman DE. Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature. 2004;432:345–352. doi: 10.1038/nature03052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li H, et al. FOXP1 controls mesenchymal stem cell commitment and senescence during skeletal aging. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1241–1253. doi: 10.1172/JCI89511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Konopka G, Roberts TF. Insights into the neural and genetic basis of vocal communication. Cell. 2016;164:1269–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fisher SE, Scharff C. FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends Genet. 2009;25:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vargha-Khadem F, Gadian DG, Copp A, Mishkin M. FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:131–138. doi: 10.1038/nrn1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.French CA, et al. An aetiological Foxp2 mutation causes aberrant striatal activity and alters plasticity during skill learning. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:1077–1085. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vernes SC, et al. Foxp2 regulates gene networks implicated in neurite outgrowth in the developing brain. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Groszer M, et al. Impaired synaptic plasticity and motor learning in mice with a point mutation implicated in human speech deficits. Curr Biol. 2008;18:354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schulze K, Vargha-Khadem F, Mishkin M. Phonological working memory and FOXP2. Neuropsychologia. 2018;108:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Feuk L, et al. Absence of a paternally inherited FOXP2 gene in developmental verbal dyspraxia. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:965–972. doi: 10.1086/508902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rice GM, et al. Phenotype of FOXP2 haploinsufficiency in a mother and son. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:174–181. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haesler S, et al. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus area X. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mahrt E, Agarwal A, Perkel D, Portfors C, Elemans CP. Mice produce ultrasonic vocalizations by intra-laryngeal planar impinging jets. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R880–R881. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Elemans CP, et al. Universal mechanisms of sound production and control in birds and mammals. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8978. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Riede T. Subglottal pressure, tracheal airflow, and intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity during rat ultrasound vocalization. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2580–2592. doi: 10.1152/jn.00478.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.French CA, Fisher SE. What can mice tell us about Foxp2 function? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;28:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Song H, Makino Y, Noguchi E, Arinami T. A case report of de novo missense FOXP1 mutation in a non-Caucasian patient with global developmental delay and severe speech impairment. Clin Case Rep. 2015;3:110–113. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Usui N, et al. Foxp1 regulation of neonatal vocalizations via cortical development. Genes Dev. 2017;31:2039–2055. doi: 10.1101/gad.305037.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fröhlich H, Rafiullah R, Schmitt N, Abele S, Rappold GA. Foxp1 expression is essential for sex-specific murine neonatal ultrasonic vocalization. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:1511–1521. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kozma EE, et al. Hip extensor mechanics and the evolution of walking and climbing capabilities in humans, apes, and fossil hominins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:4134–4139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715120115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lieberman DE. Sphenoid shortening and the evolution of modern human cranial shape. Nature. 1998;393:158–162. doi: 10.1038/30227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES