Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2018 Aug 13;7:e38064. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38064

Prolonged cross-bridge binding triggers muscle dysfunction in a Drosophila model of myosin-based hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

William A Kronert 1, Kaylyn M Bell 2, Meera C Viswanathan 3, Girish C Melkani 1, Adriana S Trujillo 1, Alice Huang 2, Anju Melkani 1, Anthony Cammarato 3, Douglas M Swank 2,4,, Sanford I Bernstein 1,
Editors: Lee Sweeney5, Didier YR Stainier6
PMCID: PMC6141233  PMID: 30102150

Abstract

K146N is a dominant mutation in human β-cardiac myosin heavy chain, which causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We examined how Drosophila muscle responds to this mutation and integratively analyzed the biochemical, physiological and mechanical foundations of the disease. ATPase assays, actin motility, and indirect flight muscle mechanics suggest at least two rate constants of the cross-bridge cycle are altered by the mutation: increased myosin attachment to actin and decreased detachment, yielding prolonged binding. This increases isometric force generation, but also resistive force and work absorption during cyclical contractions, resulting in decreased work, power output, flight ability and degeneration of flight muscle sarcomere morphology. Consistent with prolonged cross-bridge binding serving as the mechanistic basis of the disease and with human phenotypes, 146N/+ hearts are hypercontractile with increased tension generation periods, decreased diastolic/systolic diameters and myofibrillar disarray. This suggests that screening mutated Drosophila hearts could rapidly identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy alleles and treatments.

Research organism: D. melanogaster

eLife digest

Myosin is a motor protein that drives the contraction of muscles. Filaments made from myosin molecules slide between filaments of another protein called actin, tugging the edges of the muscle cell inwards. To achieve this, part of each motor protein – called the 'head' – grabs hold of actin and uses energy to pull on the filaments.

Small genetic mutations in the gene for myosin can change the shape of the protein. This can change the way that it interacts with actin, altering the molecular machinery that makes muscles contract. In some cases, gene errors can cause the heart muscle wall to thicken, a condition called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mapping the locations of known mutations revealed 'hot spots' on the myosin protein where these errors are likely to cause disease. These include the part of the molecule that swings the myosin heads, and the heads themselves.

It only takes a change to a single letter in the DNA code to thicken the heart wall, but the impact of each possible change is not yet known. Kronert et al. have now genetically modified fruit flies to give them one of the mutations that causes thickening of the heart wall in humans. The mutation, known as K146N, does not appear in one of the well-known 'hot spots'. The experiments revealed that the mutation causes myosin to remain attached to actin for longer than normal. This increased the amount of force the myosin generated, but slowed down actin movement, causing muscle stiffness. This resulted in less power for every cycle of muscle movement, and caused the muscles to degenerate over time. As a result, the flies were less able to use their wings, and their hearts pumped less well.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can cause death in young adults, particularly competitive athletes. Yet studying the disease in humans is challenging. Recreating myosin mutations in fruit flies provides a way to study hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the laboratory. In the future, extensions to this technique could allow researchers to examine the impact of other mutations. Models like this one could also allow early testing of new drugs or genetic treatments to repair faulty myosin molecules.

Introduction

Heritable hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a leading cause of death among young adults, particularly competitive athletes. This heterogeneous and complex disease typically involves asymmetric growth of the heart, interventricular septum thickening, disorganized cellular architecture, diastolic dysfunction, arrhythmias, and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (Davis et al., 2016; Maron, 2002; Maron and Maron, 2013; Masarone et al., 2018). Diastolic dysfunction is characterized by impaired left ventricular relaxation, chamber stiffening, elevated filling pressures, and, consequently, reduced stroke volumes and cardiac output. Enhanced cardiomyocyte contractile activity is a leading hypothesis for the underlying cause of HCM. Increased Ca2+-sensitivity of the contractile apparatus as well as heightened function of the myosin molecular motor are potential molecular mechanisms. The over-active contractile apparatus can prolong mechanical tension, which apparently initiates hypertrophy via activation of specific signaling cascades that regulate heart growth (Davis et al., 2016). Although therapies exist to treat problematic HCM abnormalities, there is no cure. Thus, it is critical to better understand both the disease-causing mutations and the mechanism by which they produce HCM.

Over 1400 point mutations in sarcomeric proteins cause HCM (Maron and Maron, 2013), with the largest number (>300) found in the β-cardiac myosin heavy chain. This myosin II molecule forms sarcomere thick filaments and serves as a molecular motor to drive ATP-dependent movement along actin-containing thin filaments. Mapping the locations of the mutations onto a three-dimensional structure of myosin reveals several hot spots. These include the converter domain (Colegrave and Peckham, 2014) and the recently described ‘myosin mesa’ (Homburger et al., 2016). The converter guides the myosin lever arm in its rotation during the power stroke that generates force and motion (Mesentean et al., 2007). The myosin mesa has been implicated in enabling formation of an interacting head motif (Trivedi et al., 2018), wherein the heads of the dimeric molecule fold together to dampen motor function (Woodhead et al., 2005). Several molecular and physiological studies suggest that enhanced ATPase, in vitro actin sliding speed and muscle contractile force and/or velocity correlate with many, but not all, of the HCM-causing myosin mutations (Adhikari et al., 2016; Moore et al., 2012; Sommese et al., 2013; Spudich, 2014). For the domains cited above, this could occur via activation of the lever arm through enhanced converter function or stimulation of myosin cross-bridge initiation through inhibiting the formation of the interacting head motif. The mechanism by which increased contractility results in development of HCM phenotypes remains an active area of investigation (Davis et al., 2016; Garfinkel et al., 2018).

In this communication, we model a human myosin HCM mutation in Drosophila melanogaster, which provides a highly integrative approach that yields unique insights into the disease. The Drosophila heart, although a relatively simple tube-shaped structure, shares numerous gene expression patterns, as well as developmental and functional properties, with the human heart (Bier and Bodmer, 2004). Further, the fly system allows evaluation of the effects of a mutation upon isolated myosin (Swank et al., 2000), as well as on the myofibrillar structure and physiological function of both skeletal (Maughan and Vigoreaux, 1999) and cardiac muscles (Ocorr et al., 2014). A major advantage of Drosophila is its simplified genetics, in that one Mhc gene gives rise to all myosin isoforms through alternative RNA splicing (George et al., 1989). Hence compensation by myosin multigene family members that can mask mutant protein effects does not occur. Further, myosin expression levels and tissue-specificity can be controlled by combining Mhc transgenes with lines containing Mhc alleles that specifically knock out myosin heavy chain expression in the indirect flight muscles (Collier et al., 1990) or in all muscle types (O'Donnell and Bernstein, 1988). Previously, using this approach, we showed that a mutant myosin with enhanced ATPase activity yielded disrupted skeletal muscle structure and function and restricted the Drosophila cardiac tube to reduce its output (Cammarato et al., 2008). This indicates that Drosophila models could yield insights into the basis of HCM through assessing human mutations that cause overactive myosin.

For the current study, we produced transgenic flies expressing the Drosophila equivalent of the K146N human HCM myosin mutation. This mutation was identified in the family of an adult patient with increased left ventricular wall thickness in the absence of hypertension (Ingles et al., 2005) and as a spontaneous mutation in a child who displayed left ventricular hypertrophy (Morita et al., 2008). Residue 146 is particularly interesting in that it does not map to a well-studied HCM hot spot. Instead, it maps near the N-terminus of the protein, which has few HCM-causing mutations (Colegrave and Peckham, 2014). However, mutational analysis in Dictyostelium (Ruppel et al., 1994) and a domain swap study in Drosophila (Swank et al., 2003) suggest that effects on the mechanochemical cycle of myosin might be expected from alterations to the N-terminal region of myosin II molecules. Our molecular modeling predicts that mutation of residue 146 of muscle myosin reduces its interaction with the myosin lever arm during the pre-power stroke state. The myosin S1 head domain is in a cocked position during this state, so that it is prepared to drive the power stroke and muscle contraction upon actin binding during the mechanochemical cycle. We found that the primary result of the 146N mutation is that myosin spends increased time in strongly bound states of the cross-bridge cycle. This prolonged binding of myosin to actin increases force generation, but slows actin motility, decreases cyclical muscle power generation and reduces flight ability. Higher force production and stiffness also cause progressive skeletal and cardiac muscle structural degeneration, and a restricted cardiac phenotype with diastolic dysfunction. Some of our observations, such as the prolonged periods of systolic tension as well as increased ATPase rates, indicate this HCM mutation causes hyperdynamic contractile properties. However, our use of the integrative approach in the Drosophila system shows that the mutant phenotype is complex, with reduced functions for a number of other parameters. This emphasizes the need for a comprehensive analysis, from the molecular to organismal levels, which has allowed us to provide key insights into defining the molecular mechanism behind myosin-based HCM.

Results

Molecular modeling of myosin residue 146 and predicted effects of the HCM mutation

We determined the location and interactions for the amino acid residue corresponding to human K146, which in its mutant form (K146N) causes HCM. The Drosophila indirect flight muscle (IFM) myosin heavy chain sequence was modeled onto the scallop muscle myosin II crystal structure during the pre-power stroke state (PDB 1QVI) and the actin-detached post-power stroke state (PDB 1KK8) (Figure 1A and B). Both scallop and Drosophila substitute an identically charged arginine residue for lysine at residue 146, as do some human muscle myosins (Rossi et al., 2010) (for clarity of comparison, the human β-cardiac myosin numbering system is used throughout). The location of the modeled Drosophila residue, which is at the surface of the motor domain of the molecule, is shown in magenta. In the pre-power stroke state, this residue is in close proximity to the lever arm (Figure 1A), a domain that rotates to generate movement and force during muscle contraction. As a result of configuration changes during the mechanochemical cycle, the N-terminus and R146 are distant from the lever arm in the post-power stroke state (Figure 1B). The Drosophila, scallop and human β-cardiac myosins show strong sequence similarity in the R146 region and also in the lever arm interacting region (Figure 1B inset).

Figure 1. Location and interactions of R146 within the myosin molecule during pre- and post-power stroke states.

(A) Scallop myosin S1 in the pre-power stroke state (1QVI) was used as a template to model Drosophila IFM S1. R146, the positively charged residue involved in HCM is depicted with magenta spheres. In this state, the lever arm is in close proximity to R146, with the site of interaction colored green. The inset shows the amino acid context for R146 (top) and its interaction sites on the lever arm (bottom) in scallop, Drosophila and human β-cardiac myosin. Identical (green) and conserved (yellow) residues demonstrate a high degree of sequence similarity. (B) Scallop myosin S1 in the post-power stroke state (1KK8) was used as a template to model Drosophila IFM S1. In this state, R146 is distant from the lever arm interaction site (green). (C) Close-up view of potential interactions of R146 in modeled Drosophila IFM S1 in the pre-power stroke state. R146 displays charge interaction with E774 with a contact distance of 3.2 Å. A second charge interaction occurs between R146 and E775 with a contact distance of 3.0 Å. The close contact distances permit the formation of salt bridges between the positively charged R146 and the negatively charged E774 and E775 residues. (D) The R146N mutation eliminates the close contacts with E774 and E775 during the pre-power stroke state. R146N to E774 distance is 4.5 Å and R146N to E775 distance is 5.7 Å.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Analysis of the K146 residue in mammalian cardiac myosin in the pre-power stroke state.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Scallop myosin S1 in the pre-power stroke state (PDB 1QVI) was used as a template to model the human β-cardiac myosin sequence. K146, the positively charged residue involved in HCM is in close proximity to E775 with a contact distance of 2.9 Å. (B) By modeling hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation K146N of β-cardiac myosin during the pre-power stroke state, it is observed that the close contact with E775 is eliminated and the mutant residue remains distant from E774. (C) Bovine β-cardiac myosin structure in the presence of omecamtiv mecarbil (PDB 5N69) shows that the drug, which stabilizes the pre-power stroke state, interacts with both K146 and E774. There is a 4.4 Å distance between these two β-cardiac myosin residues in the presence of the drug.

Analysis of the pre-power stroke model reveals specific charge interactions with residue 146 (Figure 1C). There is a 3.2 Å contact distance between positively charged R146 and negatively charged E774, as well as a 3.0 Å contact distance between R146 and E775. These close contact distances permit the formation of salt bridges with E774 and E775 residues in the lever arm of the molecule. In a model with HCM mutant residue R146N, the close contact and salt bridges with E774 and E775 are eliminated, with distances increased to 4.5 and 5.7 Å, respectively (Figure 1D). This could decrease the stability of the pre-power stroke state and alter rates of conformational changes required for the actin-myosin mechanochemical cycle to proceed normally. A similar disruption may occur for the human β-cardiac mutant myosin as well (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

Production and verification of R146N transgenic lines

To study the effects of the R146N mutation within myosin and Drosophila muscle, we constructed a mutant myosin transgene and obtained 29 transgenic lines by P element-mediated transformation. Three independent transgenic inserts that mapped to the third chromosome (PwMhcR146N-11, PwMhcR146N-15, PwMhcR146N-28; abbreviated hereafter with PwMhc deleted) were crossed into the Mhc10 background, which is null for myosin heavy chain in IFM (Collier et al., 1990). RT-PCR of RNA isolated from dissected IFM verified that each transgenic line expresses only the mutant myosin in the IFM and that the normal alternative exon splicing pattern is not disrupted (see Materials and methods). SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed that upper thoraces of mutant 2-day-old adult female flies from lines 11, 15 and 28 express normalized ratios of myosin to actin (1.06 ± 0.06, 0.99 ± 0.02, 0.98 ± 0.01, respectively) that are essentially identical to the wild-type control transgenic line PwMhc2 (1.00 ± 0.04).

R146N doubles basal myosin ATPase activities, but slows in vitro motility

To explore the impact of the R146N mutation on the mechanochemical cycle of myosin, we assessed the steady-state ATPase parameters of myosin isolated from the IFM of R146N homozygotes (Figure 2A–E). Both Ca-ATPase (16.64 ± 1.87 vs. 9.51 ± 1.08 sec−1) and basal Mg-ATPase (0.62 ± 0.14 vs. 0.25 ± 0.04 sec−1) rates of R146N myosin increased significantly, about two-fold compared to wild-type myosin (Figure 2A,B). While Ca2+ typically yields higher in vitro ATPase activities, Mg2+ is the physiologically relevant cation that is employed for actin stimulation. We found that actin-stimulated Mg-ATPase activity (Vmax) (Figure 2C) was not significantly different from the control (1.57 ± 0.27 vs. 1.62 ± 0.14 sec−1). The Km of actin concentration relative to ATPase activity was significantly increased, indicating that a 35% higher actin concentration is required to reach 50% Vmax (0.42 ± 0.06 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04 µM) (Figure 2D). Further, the mutant’s catalytic efficiency (defined as Vmax/Km) was significantly lower than that of the control (3.80 ± 0.60 vs. 5.34 ± 1.07 sec−1/µM) (Figure 2E). Analysis of in vitro actin-sliding velocity data showed that the mutant myosin possesses an ~two fold reduction in its ability to drive actin filament sliding compared to myosin isolated from control IFM (3.32 ± 0.21 vs. 6.71 ± 0.17 µm/s) (Figure 2F). Thus the major effects of the R146N mutation on ATPase and in vitro motility are an enhancement of basal Mg- and Ca-ATPase rates and a decrease in actin filament sliding velocity.

Figure 2. Effects of R146N on myosin enzymatic activity and in vitro actin sliding velocity.

Figure 2.

Myosin isolated from IFMs of wild-type transgenic control (PwMhc2) and R146N lines was assessed for ATPase parameters (N = 5): (A) Ca-ATPase activity, (B) basal Mg-ATPase activity (C) actin-activated Mg-ATPase activity (Vmax), (D) actin affinity relative to ATPase (Km) and (E) catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km). Actin sliding velocity (F) was determined using the in vitro motility assay, with at least 30 filaments tracked per myosin preparation (N = 3). For all parameters, mean ± S.D. values are given. These were assessed for statistically significant differences by Student’s t-tests. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ns, not significant.

R146N myosin disrupts IFM myofibril stability

To determine if the R146N mutation affects muscle structure and stability, we employed transmission electron microscopy to examine IFMs of homozygous female flies at late-pupal stage as well as fibers from 2-hr-old, 2-day-old and 1-week-old adults. Transverse and longitudinal sections of R146N late-stage pupae and 2-hr-old adults (Figure 3E,F) showed normal sarcomeres containing double hexagonal arrays of thick and thin filaments, which are indistinguishable from those of the PwMhc2 homozygous control line at the same developmental stages (Figure 3A,B). Transverse and longitudinal sections of R146N 2-day-old adults showed minor disruptions of thick and thin filament packing (Figure 3G) compared to the control (Figure 3C), with even more modest disruption seen in R146N/+ heterozygotes (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Transverse and longitudinal sections of R146N 7-day-old adults showed more disorder in myofibril morphology, with gaps in the hexagonal packing of thick and thin filaments and disruption in the Z- and M-lines (Figure 3H) compared to the control (Figure 3D). Hence R146N mutant myosin is capable of contributing to the formation of normal myofibrillar structures that begin to deteriorate at 2 days into adulthood, presumably as a result of mechanical stress during use. We minimized any influence of structural changes in R146N adult IFMs on our muscle mechanical assays by employing fibers from 2-hr-old flies for these assays. We also assessed heterozygous organisms (R146N/+) to determine whether the dominant nature of the mutation in humans is mirrored in Drosophila.

Figure 3. The R146N myosin mutation disrupts IFM myofibril stability.

Transverse and longitudinal sections are shown from the homozygous control line, PwMhc2 (A–D), and R146N homozygotes (E–H), for four different developmental stages: (A, E) late-stage pupae, (B, F) 2-hr-old adults, (C, G) 2-day-old adults, (D, H) 7-day-old adults. Each panel shows one myofibril that is representative of the population for that stage of development. Thick and thin filaments are arrayed in a normal double hexagonal pattern and well formed Z- and M-lines are observed in the sarcomeres at all stages in control organisms and at the late pupal and 2-hr-old adult stages for R146N. Mild disorder in the hexagonal packing of thick and thin filaments and some M-line disruption of sarcomeres (arrows) is observed in 2-day-old mutant adults (G). The structure of the mutant further deteriorates (arrows) in seven-day-old adults (H), with myofilament packing defects and strong disruption of both M- and Z-lines (m, m-line, z, z-line). All three R146N lines yielded similar phenotypes. Scale bars, 0.5 µm. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 homozygous control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N}/P{R146N}).

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. The R146N myosin mutation acts in a dominant fashion to cause minor disruption in IFM myofibril stability.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Transverse and longitudinal sections of IFM are shown from R146N/+ (full genotype: Mhc10/+; P{R146N}) (A–C), for three different developmental stages: (A) late-stage pupa, (B) 2-hr-old adult, (C) 2-day-old adult. Each panel shows one myofibril that is representative of the population for that stage of development. Thick and thin filaments are arrayed in a normal double hexagonal pattern and well formed Z- and M-lines are observed in the sarcomeres at the late pupal and 2-h-old adult stages. Mild disorder in the hexagonal packing of thick and thin filaments (arrow) is observed in 2-day-old R146N/+ heterozygotes (C). m, m-line, z, z-line. All three R146N lines yielded similar phenotypes. Scale bars, 0.5 μm.

Muscle mechanical assays show that R146N myosin influences work, power and cross-bridge cycle rate constants

R146N reduces work and power output

We employed two muscle assays to determine the influence of the R146N mutation on IFM fiber mechanical properties (Figures 4 and 5). The first, small amplitude sinusoidal analysis, involves imposing a 0.125% sinusoidal length change on an active muscle fiber and recording the resultant fiber force output. By measuring the amplitude and phase shift of the force trace relative to the length trace, muscle properties such as muscle stiffness, power, work, and cross-bridge kinetics can be elucidated (Figure 5—figure supplement 1) (Kawai and Brandt, 1980; Swank, 2012). The second assay, the work loop technique, is a more physiological measure of work and power because longer muscle length changes are used. Work and power are calculated by plotting the imposed length change versus force and integrating the area inside the resulting loop (Josephson, 1985). Sinusoidal analysis revealed that fibers from homozygotes (R146N/R146N) and heterozygotes (R146N/+) showed decreased IFM fiber power generation over the frequency ranges 40–210 Hz and 40–100 Hz, respectively (Figure 4A). The average optimal power generation by homozygous fibers was 43% lower than for the PwMhc2 control line, but there was not a significant decrease in maximum power generation by the heterozygous fibers (Table 1). The decrease in power from homozygous fibers appears to be primarily caused by a decrease in net work generation, rather than an overall slowing of average muscle kinetics (power = work*frequency). This is suggested by homozygous mutant fibers showing the same percent drop in maximum work production as maximum power production (both 40%) and because there were not significant differences in the frequencies at which maximum power (fmax) and the frequency at which maximum work (fWmax) were generated compared to control values (Table 1). However, the frequency of maximal power (fmax) and the frequency of maximal work (fWmax) values for R146N/heterozygous fibers were significantly greater than those from R146N homozygous fibers, suggesting some influence of the mutation on the underlying myosin kinetics.

Figure 4. Power and work are decreased by the R146N mutation.

Figure 4.

(A) Muscle power was measured by small amplitude, 0.125% muscle length (ML), sinusoidal analysis over a range of oscillation frequencies. Control fibers (PwMhc2 homozygotes) are represented by green squares, heterozygous fibers (R146N-15/+) by black circles and homozygous fibers (R146N-15/R146N-15) by purple triangles. Dashed lines in green, black and purple represent the respective fibers’ fmax. x Significant difference from R146N-15/heterozygotes at p<0.05. Bars indicate statistical significance from control, p<0.05, Student’s t-test. N = 12 for control and heterozygous fibers, 16 for homozygous fibers. (B) Work and power were measured using the work loop technique, which allows for variation in ML oscillation. In this representative example, the fibers were subjected to different ML amplitudes and oscillation frequencies until conditions were found that generated maximum power. The area within the loop is the amount of net work generated per cycle, and power is calculated by multiplying net-work times oscillation frequency. The control fiber (green) has a larger loop area than those of the heterozygous (black) or homozygous (purple) mutant fibers. Arrows show the counter-clockwise direction of the work loops indicating net work production rather than net work absorption. The mutant fibers perform best at 0.5% ML, 125 Hz and 150 Hz, for the R146N-15 homozygous and R146N-15/heterozygous fibers, respectively, while the control fiber produced maximum power at 0.75% ML, 125 Hz. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 homozygote control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N-15/+ heterozygote (Mhc10/+; P{R146N-15}); R146N-15 homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N-15}/P{R146N-15}).

Figure 5. Varying [ATP] and [Pi] reveals information about cross-bridge kinetics.

(A) The frequency at which small amplitude sinusoidal power was maximal, fmax, was measured for a range of ATP concentrations for control (PwMhc2 homozygotes), heterozygous (R146N-15/+) and homozygous (R146N-15/R146N-15) fibers. The curves were fit with the Michaelis-Menten equation and Vmax and Km values determined (see inset). Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or heterozygote (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). (B) fmax relative to inorganic phosphate concentration. fmax decreased with increasing [Pi], suggesting phosphate is competing with ATP for the rigor state. * indicates statistically significant difference from 0 mM Pi (Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). Linear regression analysis showed mutants had a steeper decline of fmax and larger negative slopes than the control. Seven control, 12 heterozygous, and seven homozygous fibers were tested. (C) Change in active stiffness with increasing ATP concentration. In-phase stiffness (elastic modulus) was measured at pCa 5.0 at 500 Hz ML oscillation using small amplitude sinusoidal analysis. All R146N stiffness values are statistically greater than the control’s by a Student’s t-test at p<0.05. (D) Active isometric tension generation as a function of ATP concentration at pCa 5.0. For the ATP study, N = 12 control, 12 heterozygous and 14 homozygous fibers. Black and purple horizontal lines indicate [ATP] where heterozygous and homozygous tension values are statistically greater than control’s (t-test, p<0.05). Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 homozygote control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N-15/+ heterozygote (Mhc10/+; P{R146N-15}); R146N-15 homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N-15}/P{R146N-15}).

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Acto-myosin cross-bridge cycle scheme.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

A is actin, M is myosin and Pi is inorganic phosphate. Asterisks indicate a second conformational state with the same nucleotide. Muscle apparent rate constants 2πb and 2πc are derived from sinusoidal analysis of Drosophila IFM fibers (Swank, 2012). The primary cross-bridge transitions that influence 2πb and 2πc are bracketed. Cross-bridge transitions on the right hand side generally produce work (Pi release and the power stroke) in the muscle and hence primarily influence 2πb, while those on the left side of the diagram generally absorb work (ADP release, ATP induced dissociation of actin and myosin) and primarily influence 2πc.
Table 1. Small amplitude power, work, and isometric tension.

Means ± S.E.M are reported. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or heterozygote (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). fmax: the frequency at which maximum power was generated, fWmax: frequency at which maximum work was generated as determined using small amplitude sinusoidal analysis. Passive tension was measured at pCa 8.0 and active at pCa 5.0. N = 12 fibers for control and mutant heterozygotes; N = 16 for mutant homozygotes. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N-15/+ heterozygote (Mhc10/+; P{R146N-15}); R146N-15 homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N-15}/P{R146N-15}).

Line Power (W/m3) fmax
(Hz)
Work (J/m3) fWmax
(Hz)
Passive
Tension
Active
Tension
PwMhc2 control 100 ± 11 151 ± 3 0.71 ± 0.08 128 ± 2 1.94 ± 0.30 3.07 ± 0.32
R146N-15/+ heterozygote 81 ± 10 158 ± 4 0.54 ± 0.07 136 ± 4 3.16 ± 0.40* 4.40 ± 0.51*
R146N-15 homozygote 57 ± 5***x 145 ± 4x 0.41 ± 0.04** 122 ± 4x 2.73 ± 0.32 4.59 ± 0.29**

The work loop technique takes advantage of the fact that muscle shows a unique response compared to other materials when measuring its stress during lengthening and shortening contraction cycles (Josephson, 1985). While most materials produce a clockwise work loop indicating that work is absorbed by the material, an active muscle is able to generate work and power, as indicated by a counter-clockwise work loop (arrows in Figure 4B). We first optimized muscle length change amplitude and frequency of oscillation until parameters were found that produced maximum power for each fiber type. Even when optimized, fibers from both the R146N/heterozygotes and the R146N homozygotes produced about 60% less work and 43% and 65% less power, respectively, than control fibers (Figure 4B, Table 2). We next measured the mutant fibers’ ability to generate power when tested under the control fibers’ typical optimal power producing parameters (Supplementary file 1). Under these parameters, power and work generation decreased further: 60% for heterozygotes and 90% for homozygotes compared to that generated under their optimized parameters (compare Table 2 to Supplementary file 1). This is likely due to the increase in percent muscle length change from 0.5% to 0.75%. In both cases, the net work and power output decrease resulted from the ratio of work generated to work absorbed being lowered by the mutation, resulting in less net (useful) work and power being produced during the IFM’s cyclical contractions. This was the case even when mutant work generated was higher than the control work generated (homozygotes in Supplementary file 1).

Table 2. Optimized work loops.

Muscle length (ML) change amplitude and frequency of large amplitude sinudoidal oscillations were varied until maximum power generating parameters were obtained. fPmax: the frequency at which maximum power was generated as determined using the work loop technique. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or heterozygote (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). N = 12 for control and mutant heterozygotes; N = 16 for mutant homozygotes. Full genotypes given in legend to Table 1.

Line Power
(W/m3)
Net work (J/m3) Work Gen. (J/m3) Work abs. (J/m3) % ML Amplitude fPmax (Hz)
PwMhc2 control 240 ± 34 2.18 ± 0.3 36.16 ± 4.19 33.98 ± 3.95 0.79 ± 0.06 115 ± 8
R146N-15/+ heterozygote 137 ± 20* 0.93 ± 0.1*** 21.92 ± 2.70** 20.99 ± 2.59** 0.5 ± 0.03*** 150 ± 5**
R146N-15 homozygote 85 ± 7***x 0.65 ± 0.06*** 22.50 ± 1.51** 21.84 ± 1.46** 0.52 ± 0.03*** 130 ± 3xx

R146N alters cross-bridge cycle rate constants

To gain additional insight into possible changes in cross-bridge kinetics resulting from the R146N mutation, we derived apparent muscle rate constants by fitting Nyquist curves generated by sinusoidal analysis using a complex modulus equation (Figure 5—figure supplement 1) (Kawai and Brandt, 1980; Swank, 2012). While amplitudes A, B and C from the mutant showed no differences compared to control values, there were significant changes in rate constants 2πb and 2πc (Table 3). 2πb values are influenced largely by steps associated with myosin attachment to actin and the power stroke, while 2πc values are influenced principally by steps associated with detachment of myosin from actin. Under maximum power generating conditions, 2πb was 30% greater for R146N/heterozygote fibers compared to control fibers, while 2πc was 13% lower for R146N homozygote fibers than control fibers (Table 3). These data suggest that the presence of the mutation increases the speed of at least one step associated with attachment rate and the power stroke, but decreases the speed of at least one step associated with myosin detachment rate. According to the interpretation of Palmer et al. (2007), this also suggests that the myosin spends a longer time in strongly bound cross-bridge states.

Table 3. Muscle apparent rate constants derived from sinusoidal analysis (Kawai and Brandt, 1980).

Means ± S.E.M are reported. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). N = 12 for control and mutant heterozygotes; N = 16 for mutant homozygotes (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1 for an explanation of how the apparent rate constants relate to the cross-bridge cycle). Full genotypes given in legend to Table 1.

Line A B 2πb (s -1) C 2πc (s -1)
PwMhc2 control 339 ± 23 741 ± 73 1036 ± 35 923 ± 76 5376 ± 169
R146N-15/+ heterozygote 305 ± 33 832 ± 75 1343 ± 52*** 1009 ± 85 4928 ± 262
R146N-15 homozygote 304 ± 33 751 ± 87 1224 ± 80 934 ± 93 4671 ± 232*

To determine if the slower detachment rate could be caused by decreased ATP-induced detachment of myosin from actin, we varied ATP concentration while performing sinusoidal analysis. The most informative result was observed when plotting [ATP] vs. fmax (Figure 5A). By fitting these data with a Michaelis-Menten curve, we found that the fibers from R146N homozygotes had a threefold larger Km value for fmax than the control, 5.0 ± 1.2 mM vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 mM, respectively, suggesting that the mutant fibers have decreased affinity for ATP. The Km value of fibers from R146N/heterozygotes, 1.6 ± 0.2 mM, was not statistically different from the control. Results obtained from varying phosphate concentration also suggested changes to cross-bridge kinetics. The control fibers showed no change in fmax (Figure 5B) with increasing [Pi], as is typical of IFM fibers (Swank et al., 2006). However, fibers from both the homozygous and heterozygous mutants showed that fmax decreased as [Pi] increased, with plots showing significantly steeper slopes than the control. This decrease is typically attributed to phosphate competing with ATP for the rigor state (Pate and Cooke, 1989), again suggesting lower affinity of the mutant fibers for ATP.

If R146N myosin spends a longer time in strongly bound states than control myosin, one would expect increased stiffness and isometric tension generation in muscle fibers. We indeed found that fiber active stiffness, measured by oscillating fibers at 500 Hz, was greater than control levels at all ATP concentrations tested, for fibers from both R146N/heterozygous and R146N homozygous organisms (Figure 5C). Likewise, fibers from both heterozygous and homozygous flies showed total calcium-activated isometric tension levels that were at least 1.5-fold greater than the control at all ATP concentrations tested (Figure 5D). Interestingly, analysis of passive (relaxed) isometric tension at pCa 8.0 revealed that some of the increase in isometric tension is due to an increase in passive tension, particularly for heterozygous fibers (Table 1). This suggests that more cross-bridges were binding to actin at low calcium concentrations in the mutant fibers compared to control. Based on the muscle mechanics results, it appears that the R146N mutation changes at least two rates of the cross-bridge cycle. The mutation increases a cross-bridge rate associated with myosin attachment to actin and/or the power stroke, and decreases a rate associated with ATP-induced myosin detachment from actin.

R146N myosin decreases flight ability

We assessed the effects of R146N myosin on IFM function by testing flight ability. Line 15 R146N homozygotes exhibited ~50% and ~70% decreases in flight index at 15°C (temperature employed for flight muscle mechanics) and 22°C (ambient temperature), respectively, compared to the control line (Table 4). The flight index of R146N/heterozygotes was significantly higher than that of homozygotes at both temperatures, with a statistically significant 15% reduction compared to the control line at 22°C and no significant difference with the control line at 15°C (Table 4). The flight ability of the other two lines of homozygous R146N mutants also was severely diminished (Supplementary file 2). Impairment for all lines increased with age in a statistically significant manner, as flight index at 7 days decreased to about half that at 2 days (Supplementary file 2). In contrast, the flight index of control organisms showed a significant decrease of only 11% during the same timeframe (Supplementary file 2).

Table 4. Flight ability and wing beat frequency (WBF) of R146N mutants.

Adult female flies were aged for 2 days prior to flight testing. Transgenic flies were then assayed for the ability to fly up (U), horizontal (H), down (D) or not at all (N). Flight index = 6 U/T+4 H/T+2 D/T+0 N/T; T is the total number of flies tested (given in parentheses). Flight index and WBF values are mean ±S.E.M. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from 2-day-old PwMhc2 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or statistically different from heterozygous mutant (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). Full genotypes given in legend to Table 1.

Line Age (days) Flight index 22°C Flight index 15°C WBF 22°C (Hz) WBF 15°C (Hz)
PwMhc2 control 2 4.1 ± 0.16 (111) 2.3 ± 0.12 (111) 196 ± 3 (10) 156 ± 3 (10)
R146N-15/+ heterozygote 2 3.5 ± 0.16 (111)*** 2.0 ± 0.10 (111) 194 ± 3 (10) 150 ± 2 (10)
R146N-15 homozygote 2 1.1 ± 0.11 (111)***xxx 1.1 ± 0.10 (111)***xxx 182 ± 3 (10)***xx 141 ± 4 (10)** x

We also assessed wing beat frequency (WBF) at 2 days of age and found a significant reduction in the homozygous R146N mutants, with 10% (15°C) and 7% (22°C) decreases compared to controls (Table 4). The R146N/heterozygous mutant showed no significant decrease in WBF at either temperature. However, there was a significant difference between the WBFs of the heterozygous and homozygous mutants at both temperatures. Thus, R146N myosin detrimentally affects WBF and flight ability. Homozygotes display more severe phenotypes than heterozygotes.

Structural changes in R146N/heart tubes

We next assessed the structure of adult hearts of R146N/heterozygous flies by transmission electron microcopy to determine the effects of the dominant myosin mutation on cardiac ultrastructure. Two distinct layers are observed in transverse sections taken between the second and third abdominal segments (Figure 6). The lumen-facing layer is composed of contractile cardiomyocytes that contain a circumferential array of myofibrils oriented perpendicularly to the anterior-posterior axis of the heart. A layer of structurally supportive ventral-longitudinal skeletal muscle is located ventral to the cardiomyocyte layer (Figure 6, VL). In heterozygous controls (PwMhc2/+), both young 1-week-old and aged 3-week-old flies showed intact myofibrils with characteristic discontinuous Z-lines (Achal et al., 2016) (Figure 6 left). In contrast, R146N-15/+ heterozygotes displayed areas of myofibrillar discontinuity, where filamentous fields appear to have been pulled apart (Figure 6 center, arrows) and these defects worsened with aging. Although R146N-28/+ hearts showed essentially normal myofibrillar integrity and organization in young flies, they displayed myofibrillar discontinuities in aged flies (Figure 6 right, arrows). This suggests that defects in older mutant flies are not due to gross assembly defects but occur during the aging process. To assess whether concentric cardiac hypertrophy (addition of myofibrils in parallel) occurs in R146N/heterozygotes, we measured the average cardiomyocyte thickness in ventral and dorsal areas and compared values between young and aged flies for mutant lines and controls. Cardiomyocyte thickness in both young and aged mutant heterozygotes showed no statistically significant differences compared to controls (Supplementary file 3). Further, we observed no evidence of eccentric hypertrophy (addition of sarcomeres in series), given that our cardiac physiological analysis showed no increases in chamber dimensions in young or old mutant hearts under basal conditions (Figure 7A–C), and a dilated phenotype was not observed after complete relaxation with EGTA+ blebbistatin (Figure 8A–C). Hence the R146N myosin mutation caused progressive defects in myofibrillar continuity, but did not yield hypertrophy in the Drosophila heart.

Figure 6. Transmission electron microscopy images of hearts of 1- and 3-week-old PwMhc2/+ control and R146N/+ mutant heterozygote lines.

Figure 6.

Micrographs show transverse images through the cardiac tube between the second and third sets of ostia. M, mitochondria. VL, supportive ventral-longitudinal fibers. ‘Lumen’ refers to the hemolymph-containing center of the heart tube. Arrows indicate areas of myofibrillar discontinuities, which are only observed in mutant hearts. Scale bars, 500 nm. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

Figure 7. Expression of R146N myosin engenders a restricted cardiac physiology with diastolic dysfunction.

Figure 7.

M-mode kymograms generated from high-speed videos of beating 3-week-old PwMhc2/+ and R146N-15/+ hearts. (A) Vertical red lines delineate diastolic diameters. Mutant hearts display cardiac restriction. (B) Horizontal lines demarcate systolic intervals (SI, top) and heart periods (HP, bottom). Mutant hearts display prolonged systolic phases. (C) R146N-15/+ Drosophila exhibit highly significant alterations in several cardiac functional parameters relative to PwMhc2/+ control flies. Both lines were examined at 1- and 3-weeks of age to track potential physiological defects and cardiac remodeling over time. Decreased cardiac dimensions, fractional shortening, and extended periods of systole are observed in 1- and 3-week-old mutants relative to controls. Data are presented as mean ±S.E.M. (N = 40–44 for each genotype and age group) and were evaluated using two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni multiple comparisons tests. Significance was assessed at p<0.05. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

Figure 8. Excessive Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent actomyosin associations during diastole promote incomplete relaxation of R146N-15/+ cardiomyocytes.

Figure 8.

(A) Significant, incremental increases in cardiac diameters (repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc tests) occur for PwMhc2/+ and R146N-15/+ hearts following extra- and intra-cellular Ca2+ chelation (EGTA/EGTA,AM) and again, upon blebbistatin incubation (***p≤0.0001). (B) The change in diameter across the heart wall in response to EGTA/EGTA,AM is higher in R146N-15/+ cardiac tubes, indicative of impaired Ca2+ homeostasis and a Ca2+-dependent increase in resting myocardial tension contributing to the restricted cardiac diameter (**p≤0.01). (C) Addition of blebbistatin after chelation of extra- and intracellular Ca2+ also prompted a significantly greater increase in cardiac dimensions of R146N-15/+ hearts relative to that observed for PwMhc2/+ hearts (***p≤0.0001). This implies that excessive Ca2+-independent cross-bridge cycling occurs in R146N-15/+ hearts, resulting in further enhanced resting basal tension and incomplete relaxation. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (N = 20). The effects of EGTA, EGTA-AM and blebbistatin treatment on diameters were evaluated using paired t-tests. Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to distinguish significant differences in cardiac responses to EGTA, EGTA.AM and blebbistatin between PwMhc2/+ and R146N-15/+ hearts. Significance was assessed at p<0.05. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

The R146N mutation causes cardiac restriction and diastolic dysfunction

To investigate the pathophysiological consequences of the dominant R146N HCM mutation on the adult Drosophila heart, we surgically exposed, imaged, and assessed wall movement in semi-intact R146N/heterozygous flies. The effects of mutant myosin expression on cardiac dimensions and contractile performance, at 1- and 3-weeks of age, were quantified and compared to those resulting from wild-type transgenic myosin expression in age-matched PwMhc2/+ controls (Figure 7A–C). The diastolic and systolic diameters across the heart wall of 1-week-old control (PwMhc2/+) Drosophila were 65.68 ± 0.73 and 39.60 ± 0.46 µm, respectively, and were 67.58 ± 0.80 and 43.49 ± 0.67 µm in 3-week-old animals (Supplementary file 4). R146N myosin expression triggered a significant reduction in dimensions at both ages. The diastolic and systolic diameters of R146N-15/+at 1 week were 52.13 ± 0.53 and 32.83 ± 0.45 µm, respectively, and were 48.62 ± 0.64 and 34.76 ± 0.53 µm at 3 weeks. The greater mutational effect on diastolic vs. systolic diameter resulted in 7.5% and 22% decreases in fractional shortening at 1 and 3 weeks of age relative to controls (Figure 7C). Similar results were found for R146N-28/flies (Supplementary file 4). The age-related decrease in fractional shortening suggests progressive remodeling in the mutant, which correlates with the decreasing myofibrillar continuity we observed.

The heart period, which is the time required for a complete cardiac cycle consisting of a diastolic and subsequent systolic phase, was not significantly different between mutant and control flies at either age tested (Figure 7C). The systolic interval, however, was 0.19 ± 0.01 and 0.21 ± 0.01 s for 1- and 3-week-old control flies and 0.21 ± 0.01 and 0.23 ± 0.01 s for R146N-15/+ heterozygotes. Therefore, the proportion of time during the cardiac cycle that was spent generating tension, calculated by determining the ratio of systolic interval to heart period (SI/HP), was significantly greater for the mutant heart tubes relative to controls at all ages studied (Figure 7C). Together, these findings illustrate that the R146N/hearts exhibit reduced cardiac diameters and potentially elevated tone during diastole, as well as prolonged periods of systolic tension generation, which are indicative of restrictive physiology, diastolic dysfunction, and impaired relaxation (Cammarato et al., 2008; Viswanathan et al., 2014; Viswanathan et al., 2017).

The R146N mutation reduces cardiac diameters during diastole by calcium-dependent and calcium-independent mechanisms

To further investigate the molecular basis of diastolic restriction and potentially altered resting tone in the R146N/+ heterozygote hearts, we compared the responses of three-week-old control and mutant cardiac tubes to treatments with EGTA-AM, a cell permeable chelator of intracellular Ca2+ (Johnson et al., 1997) and blebbistatin, a small molecule myosin inhibitor (Fedorov et al., 2007; Limouze et al., 2004). Upon incubation with artificial hemolymph supplemented with 10 mM EGTA and 100 µM EGTA-AM, which removes extra- and intracellular Ca2+, the hearts ceased beating and ‘relaxed’, as manifest by an increase in diameter across the wall of both control and R146N/+ hearts relative to diastole (Figure 8A). Interestingly, there was a significantly amplified relaxation response in R146N/+hearts (Δ = 4.50 ± 0.13 µm) relative to controls (Δ = 3.77 ± 0.19 µm) (Figure 8B).

We previously demonstrated in vivo, that a small population of residual cross-bridges actively cycles and generates force, and helps establish basal mechanical tone in wild-type Drosophila myocardium during diastole (Viswanathan et al., 2014; Viswanathan et al., 2017). In this regard, subsequent treatment of control and mutant hearts with artificial hemolymph containing 10 mM EGTA, 100 µM EGTA-AM, and 100 µM blebbistatin generated a second ‘relaxation’ response (Figure 8A). Comparing the cardiac diameters after extra- and intra-cellular Ca2+ chelation and following blebbistatin treatment revealed a significant increase of roughly 2.8% (Δ = 2.34 ± 0.17 µm) in control hearts (Figure 8C). Notably, there was a strikingly augmented response to blebbistatin treatment in the R146N/+ heterozygote hearts that led to a ~ 10% (Δ = 6.14 ± 0.35 µm) increase in heart tube diameter (Figure 8C). Comparing the change in diameters between the two genotypes revealed that the response to blebbistatin is significantly greater in the R146N/+ mutant hearts vs. that for controls (Figure 8C). Our observations suggest that, in addition to elevated diastolic Ca2+ and Ca2+-activated cross-bridge cycling, excessive Ca2+-independent cross-bridges contribute to diastolic dysfunction and inadequate relaxation in the R146N/+ mutant hearts.

Overall, we utilized an integrative approach in the Drosophila system to determine the effects of a myosin HCM mutation on myosin function, skeletal muscle structure, muscle mechanics and cardiac physiology. We found that altering modeled interactions between the mutant R146N residue and the lever arm leads to increased basal ATPase activity and changes to myosin cross-bridge kinetics that disrupt actin motility, myofibril power output, myofibril stability, flight ability and cardiac structure and function. Our analyses provide insight into how a myosin mutation translates into mutant phenotypes, thereby elucidating underlying mechanisms of HCM.

Discussion

We leveraged the strengths of the Drosophila myosin system to determine new phenotypic and mechanistic insights into HCM, a common disease of young adults. The Drosophila model is an outstanding tool for integrative analysis of contractile protein mutations and for dissecting the mechanistic basis of disease, allowing an understanding from the molecular through the whole organism level. In our HCM model, the Drosophila heart tube shows a restricted phenotype, which, like abnormalities in the mutated IFM, develops from prolonged cross-bridge binding to actin. The restricted cardiac tube and diastolic dysfunction in this model of human HCM is congruent with phenotypes observed when expressing myosin with enhanced function (Cammarato et al., 2008) or tropomyosin that is inefficient at blocking the myosin binding site on actin (Viswanathan et al., 2014). This suggests that Drosophila is an excellent analytical system for screening mutations to assess their potential for causing human HCM, which are typically expected to enhance contractility (Adhikari et al., 2016; Nag et al., 2017; Spudich, 2014).

Integrating the results from our ATPase, actin motility and muscle mechanical studies reveals that there are alterations to the myosin cross-bridge cycle caused by the R146N mutation. Muscle mechanics measurements showed an increase in apparent rate constant 2πb, which, according to the modeling of Kawai and Brandt (1980) is influenced by rates associated with myosin attachment to actin, including binding rate, phosphate release and the power stroke (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). The enhanced basal myosin ATPase rates suggest that phosphate release rate has been increased, since this parameter is rate limiting for basal ATPase rate. This would yield an increased speed of weak to strong actin binding.

Our modeling of molecular interactions within the myosin molecule suggests a destabilization of the pre-power stroke state, which could account for the increased affinity of the R146N myosin ADP.Pi state for actin and faster phosphate release rate. Drosophila myosin residue R146 normally has charge-based interactions with E774 and E775 of the myosin lever arm at the pre-power stroke state (Figure 1C). This interaction is abolished by the R146N mutation (Figure 1D), which would reduce the stability of the pre-power stroke molecule. This could drive the cycle forward by enhancing ATP hydrolysis and the production of cross-bridges, possibly contributing to prolonged actin binding. A similar mechanism may occur for human β-cardiac myosin as well, since the analogous K146 residue is also predicted to interact with E775 in the pre-power stroke state (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A) and this contact is destroyed by the K146N mutation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Interestingly, analysis of another HCM mutation suggests a similar mode of action as for R146N (Guhathakurta et al., 2017). Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of myosin containing the E56G mutation in the lever-arm-binding essential light chain showed a reduction in pre-power stroke state molecules and enhanced levels of those in the post-power stroke state in the presence of ATP. As with R146N, this yielded greater actin attachment and an increased duty ratio (Guhathakurta et al., 2017).

Recent studies of omecamtiv mecarbil, a compound that enhances cardiac myosin power output (Liu et al., 2015; Planelles-Herrero et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2010), are also relevant to understanding the molecular basis of the R146N mutant phenotypes. As shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1C, the compound binds in a pocket at the nexus of the N-terminus (including K146), the relay helix and the converter domain/lever arm (including residue E774) (Planelles-Herrero et al., 2017). Omecamtiv mecarbil enhances the actin attachment rate and the duty ratio and slows in vitro motility (Liu et al., 2015), similar to the effects that we observed with R146N myosin. In contrast to our findings, ATPase activity in the absence of actin is inhibited by the compound (Liu et al., 2015). However, the rate of phosphate release is increased upon actin binding. While the R146N mutation enhances basal activity, which may arise from destabilization of the pre-power stroke state, omecamtiv mecarbil appears to stabilize this state prior to actin interaction, including facilitation of a weak charge-based interaction between K146 and E774 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Further clinical evidence supports the importance of these interactions in relationship to HCM, in that mutation of E774 to V774 also yields HCM (Moric et al., 2003). More rapid cross-bridge formation due to the R146N or E774V mutations destabilizing the pre-power stroke state coupled with decreased detachment rates (see below) stabilize actin-myosin interaction, leading to enhanced force production and decreased actin filament in vitro motility. A similar outcome could arise from omecamtiv mecarbil increasing the number of molecules in the pre-power stroke state, which would increase the number of attached cross-bridges as the myosin molecules move through the mechanochemical cycle.

Although myosin attachment (Brizendine et al., 2017) and detachment rates (Harris and Warshaw, 1993) both influence the duty ratio (the fraction of time myosin is strongly bound to actin during a mechanochemical cycle), the latter is thought to have the major influence on in vitro motility at high myosin concentrations. Thus, the ~50% decrease in the rate of actin movement in vitro for R146N myosin (Figure 2F) is likely facilitated by the decreased actin detachment rate suggested by our fiber mechanics measurements. We observed a decrease in apparent rate constant 2πc (Table 3), a measure of rates associated with myosin detachment from actin, which includes detachment induced by ADP release and ATP binding (Kawai and Brandt, 1980) (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Further, our observed increase in ATP Km in the fiber studies (Figure 5A) suggests decreased ATP affinity, which would slow the ATP-induced detachment rate of myosin from actin. This is supported by the trends showing decreases in fmax with increasing phosphate concentration for the mutant (Figure 5B), which does not occur in control myosin. fmax is most likely being slowed by phosphate competing with ATP for the rigor state (Pate and Cooke, 1989). Normally, increasing phosphate either has no effect (as seen in the control) or causes fmax and 2πb to increase (as seen in many slow vertebrate muscle types [Galler et al., 2005; Kawai et al., 1993; Siemankowski et al., 1985]). Overall, the increase in attachment and decrease in detachment rate, in concert with no change in actin-activated ATPase rate arising from the mutation, indicate an increase in duty ratio. In addition to slowed in vitro motility, an increase in duty ratio would cause the increased fiber tension generation and stiffness that we observed from analysis of elastic modulus values (Figure 5C,D).

The increased duty ratio is also expected to negatively influence mutant IFM power generation (Figure 4A). The major cause of power loss is likely decreased net work production, given that there was relatively little change in optimal frequency for muscle power generation (fmax). Lack of change in fmax may be due to increased actin attachment and phosphate release being balanced by reduced ATP-induced detachment rate. Work production, however, was decreased proportionally to power for homozygous fibers examined via sinusoidal analysis, and for both homozygous and heterozygous fibers when measured using the work loop technique (Figure 4B, Table 2). When amplitude and length change conditions were optimized for power generation, the ratio of work absorption to work generation was increased in the mutants compared to control fibers. Tellingly, decreasing optimal muscle length change amplitude allowed the mutant fibers to generate more power (compare optimal power work loops with work loops performed under the identical length change and frequency conditions). This indicates that less muscle stretching was beneficial because it decreased work absorbed, resulting in more net work and hence more power. It appears that increased time of cross-bridge attachment causes cross-bridge elements to act more like brakes or shock absorbers during cyclical power generation. These abnormally high stresses on the myofilaments likely result in the disruption of sarcomere integrity that develops over time in the IFM expressing the mutant myosin (Figure 3), as well as the reduced flight ability and WBF (Table 4).

Our analysis of the heart tube in R146N/+ heterozygotes produced results that support the thesis that an increased myosin duty ratio yields significant mutant phenotypes. While the hearts in the mutants did not show a change in heart period (suggesting no overall change in kinetics, in agreement with no change for fmax in IFM and for actin-activated ATPase), the heart spent a greater portion of each heart period in systole compared to the control (Figure 7). This is consistent with prolonged contractions arising from increased myosin attachment kinetics and a decreased detachment rate. An enhanced attachment rate would also increase the rate of force generation, which may partially account for the restricted cardiac phenotype. The reduced fractional shortening observed for the R146N/+ heart may correspond to its optimal pumping mode, mimicking the improved IFM fiber mechanical performance at shorter muscle length changes. At the ultrastructural level, the observed myofibrillar discontinuity in cardiomyocytes (Figure 6) could be caused by the same mechanism as IFM degeneration, that is, excessive tension generation disrupting the integrity of the sarcomeric ultrastructure. We did not detect hypertrophy of the cardiomyocytes in R146N/+ heterozygotes, although it has been shown that hypertrophy can occur in the conical chamber of the Drosophila heart as a result of abnormal receptor tyrosine kinase pathway signaling (Yu et al., 2013). It is important to note, however, that there is significant variability in the presence and degree of hypertrophy detected in patients carrying the 146N mutation (personal communication from Jodie Ingles, Sydney Medical School), suggesting that interacting genes or environment may play a role in hypertrophy.

Interestingly, our data suggest that cross-bridges in the Drosophila heart bind to thin filaments via Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent mechanisms during diastole. This contributes to impaired relaxation. Our results imply that small amounts of diastolic Ca2+ promote contraction and yield slightly shortened cardiomyocytes at rest in both mutant and control lines. However, based upon the greater diameter increase (greater tension drop) in R146N/+ hearts compared to control hearts upon extra- and intracellular Ca2+ chelation with EGTA/EGTA,AM (Figure 8B), disruption of Ca2+-handling in the mutant appears likely, which may promote the restricted cardiac tube phenotype. Therefore, it is possible that perturbation of Ca2+-handling in R146N/+ mutant fly hearts, as is frequently observed in human cardiomyopathies (Kranias and Bers, 2007), results in excessive diastolic Ca2+ levels, yielding enhancement of cell shortening and elevated basal tone. Additionally, the higher duty ratio of R146N myosin could indirectly enhance the Ca2+ sensitivity of the cross-bridges through thin filament activation. Full thin filament activation requires both Ca2+ binding to troponin and strong binding of cross-bridges. Thus, a higher duty-ratio myosin will have a greater number of myosin molecules strongly bound at a lower Ca2+ concentration than a lower-duty-ratio myosin. We experimentally demonstrated this when we expressed the high-duty-ratio EMB myosin in the jump muscle, which caused enhanced Ca2+ sensitivity for tension development compared to jump muscle myosin (Eldred et al., 2010). Thus, the same concentration of Ca2+ in the R146N/+ mutant heart would generate higher force than in the control, yielding decreased cardiac diameters.

Our analysis with blebbistatin, which impedes acto-myosin cycling (Kovács et al., 2004), indicates that a portion of the cross-bridges responsible for diastolic tone is calcium-independent in both control and R146N/+ hearts. Treatment with the drug (Figure 8C) shows that there is a greater diameter increase in R146N/+ hearts than in control hearts, suggesting an enhanced number of Ca2+-independent cross-bridges. This enhancement likely arises from the higher on-rate (actin affinity), which contributes to the restricted phenotype and impaired relaxation observed in R146N/+ mutant hearts.

Increased cross-bridge availability could also result from disruption of the super-relaxed state that has been documented in both skeletal and cardiac muscles (Hooijman et al., 2011; Stewart et al., 2010). This state correlates with the presence of the interacting head motif, wherein the dimeric heads of myosin molecules interact to reduce their actin binding and ATPase activity (Trivedi et al., 2018; Woodhead et al., 2005). Disruption of this motif by mutation is linked to myosin activation that correlates with HCM (Alamo et al., 2017b; Nag et al., 2017). Interestingly, myosin is found in its pre-power stroke configuration in the interacting head motif (Alamo et al., 2017a; Alamo et al., 2016) and disturbance of this state of filament packing by the R146N mutation could reduce the number of molecules in the super-relaxed state. This would enhance myosin activity within the myofibril, leading to the phenotypes we observed. Drosophila myosins are indeed capable of entering the interacting head motif (Lee et al., 2018), but the presence of the super-relaxed state in thick filaments or muscle fibers is yet to be documented.

In summary, our integrative analysis of the Drosophila analogue of the K146N human HCM mutation revealed increases in several, but not all, contractile parameters, as posited for a general mechanism of action for HCM mutations in humans (Spudich, 2014). Notably, enhancements in basal ATPase rate, length of systole and cross-bridge binding are concordant with these expectations. Further, the restricted phenotype and reduced fractional shortening observed in the Drosophila heart mimic the diastolic dysfunction/impaired relaxation and reduced ejection fraction that can accompany HCM (Davis et al., 2016; Maron, 2002; Maron and Maron, 2013; Masarone et al., 2018). The restricted phenotype observed in our model of an HCM mutant, as well as the restricted phenotypes arising from a hyperactive myosin (Cammarato et al., 2008) or mutant troponin T or actin that enhance myosin binding (Viswanathan et al., 2014; Viswanathan et al., 2017), suggest that restriction is a common phenotype produced in the Drosophila cardiac tube due to over-active cross-bridges. If all or most HCM mutations have increased force production as their basis, the restricted cardiac tube phenotype in Drosophila could serve as a useful screening tool for determining whether specific human mutations are causative of HCM. The fly might also serve to illuminate conserved signaling pathways that lead from contractile protein mutations to HCM. Further, the amelioration of the mutant phenotype through genetic or drug screens in Drosophila may yield insights into potential treatments for human HCM.

Materials and methods

Protein structure modeling

Scallop muscle myosin II crystal structures in the pre-power stroke state (PDB 1QVI) (Gourinath et al., 2003) and the actin-detached post-power stroke state (PDB 1KK8) were used as templates to predict Drosophila and human myosin structures (Himmel et al., 2002). Myosin S1 amino acid sequences were modeled using the SWISS-MODEL homology modeling server (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) (Arnold et al., 2006). Structures were viewed using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org; DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA).

DNA constructs

A P element-containing Mhc transgene with the R146N mutation was constructed using standard cloning techniques along with site directed mutagenesis. The wild-type genomic construct PwMhc2 (Swank et al., 2000) was digested with Eag I to produced two subclones, PwMhc-5’ and pMhc3’. The PwMhc-5’ subclone contains an 11.3 kb Eag I Mhc fragment cloned into the pCaSpeR vector (Thummel and Pirrotta, 1992). The PMhc-3’ subclone contains a 12.5 kb Eag I Mhc fragment cloned into pBluescriptKS Eag I site (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The PwMhc-5’ subclone was further digested with Xho I and Avr II. A 6.8 kb Xho I-Avr II digested fragment from PwMhc-5’ was gel isolated and ligated into an Xho I-Avr II site in pLitmus 28I vector (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) to produce pMhc-5’-XA. The PwMhc-5’-XA subclone was further digested with Pst I and Avr II. A 4.3 kb Pst I-Avr II digested fragment from PwMhc-5’-XA was gel isolated and ligated into an Pst I-Avr II site in pLitmus 28I vector, to produce pMhc-5’-PA. The PwMhc-5’-PA subclone was further digested with Pst I and Age I. A 1.6 kb Pst I-Age I digested fragment from PwMhc-5’-PA was gel isolated and ligated into an Pst I-Age I site in pLitmus 28I vector, to produce pMhc-5’-PA1.6. The pMhc-5’-PA1.6 subclone was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange II kit (Stratagene) and exon specific-primer 5’-CCGTGGCAAGAACCGTAATGAGG-3’ containing the R146N nucleotide coding change (bold) to yield, pR146N-5’PA-1.6. Upon sequence confirmation of the R146N site-directed mutagenesis product, the pR146N-5’-PA-1.6 subclone was digested with Pst I and Age I. The 1.6 kb R146N fragment from this digest was used to replace the wild-type Pst I-Age I fragment of pMhc-5’PA. The resulting clone was digested with Pst I-Avr II and the Pst I-Avr II fragment was used to replace the wild-type Pst I-Avr II fragment of pMhc-5’-XA. The resulting clone was digested with Xho I-Avr II and the isolated Xho I-Avr II fragment was used to replace the wild-type Xho I-Avr II fragment of PwMhc-5’. The resulting clone, PwMhcR146N-5’, was digested with Eag I. The wild-type 3’ end subclone pMhc-3’ also was digested with Eag I. The 12.5 kb Eag I fragment was gel isolated and ligated into the Eag I of PwMhcR146N-5’, to yield PwMhcR146N. The entire coding region and all ligation sites of the final PwMhcR146N plasmid were confirmed by DNA sequencing (Eton Bioscience, San Diego, CA) prior to P element transformation.

P element transformation of Mhc genes

Transgenic lines for PwMhcR146N were generated by P element-mediated germline transformation (Rubin and Spradling, 1982) by BestGene, Inc. (Chino Hills, CA). BestGene injected 1200 embryos with the PwMhcR146N transgene, and 29 transgenic lines were obtained. Each insert was mapped to its chromosomal location using balancer chromosomes and standard genetic crosses. Ten inserts mapped to the second chromosome, 3 to the X chromosome and 16 to the third chromosome. Three independent lines that mapped to the third chromosome were crossed into Mhc10 background, which is null for myosin heavy chain in IFM and TDT muscle due to mutation of the endogenous Mhc gene, which is located on the second chromosome (Collier et al., 1990).

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RT-PCR was employed to verify that Mhc transcripts from the PwMhcR146N transgenic lines contained the appropriate site-directed nucleotide changes in exon four and that flanking alternative exons 3 and 7 were spliced correctly. RNA was prepared by LiCl2 extraction (Becker et al., 1992) from 2-day-old adult female transgenic flies. cDNAs were generated for each line using the Protoscript cDNA synthesis kit (New England Biolabs). A reverse primer specific to exon 8 (5’-GTTCGTCACCCAGGGCCGTA-3’) and a forward primer specific to exon 2 (5’-TGGATCCCCGACGAGAAGGA-3’) were used to generate cDNA. Briefly, 3 μmol of reverse specific primer were mixed with 0.5 μg of total RNA from each transgenic line. PCR was performed using 1 μl of cDNA and 3 μmol of forward and reverse primers under the following conditions: 60 s at 94° C then 30 cycles of: 30 s at 94° C, 30 s at 55° C and 2 min at 68° C. RT-PCR products were sequenced by Eton Bioscience.

Myosin expression levels

To determine myosin protein expression levels for each transgene in an Mhc10 background, SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was utilized as previously described (O'Donnell et al., 1989). Upper thoraces from six 2-day-old homozygous female flies were homogenized in 60 µl SDS gel buffer. Six µl of sample were loaded on a 9% polyacrylamide gel. This was repeated five different times each time using a freshly prepared sample. Protein accumulation was determined using Coomassie blue stained gels that were digitally scanned and analyzed on NIH Image J software. Values are expressed relative to the control transgene ±S.E.M.

Actin and myosin preparation, ATPase activity and in vitro motility

As previously reported, actin was prepared from chicken skeletal muscle after multiple steps of polymerization–depolymerization (Kronert et al., 2014; Kronert et al., 2015). Myosin was isolated from dissected dorsolongitudinal IFMs of ~250 transgenic flies and its concentration was determined by spectrophotometry (Kronert et al., 2014; Kronert et al., 2015; Swank et al., 2001). A final concentration of 2.0 µg/µl myosin was used for ATPase assays and 0.5 µg/µl was used for in vitro motility assays. Steady-state calcium, magnesium and actin-stimulated magnesium ATPase activities of myosin were obtained using [γ-32P]-ATP as previously described (Kronert et al., 2014; Kronert et al., 2015; Swank et al., 2001). Basal Mg-ATPase activities obtained in the absence of actin and actin-stimulated Mg-ATPase was determined using increasing concentrations of filamentous actin. Basal Mg-ATPase values were subtracted from all data points, which were then fit with the Michaelis–Menten equation to determine actin-stimulated ATPase (Vmax) and actin affinity relative to ATPase (Km). Catalytic efficiency (defined as Vmax/Km) was determined as previously reported (Kronert et al., 2014; Kronert et al., 2015). In vitro motility assays were carried out by adding ATP and filamentous actin labeled with fluorescent phalloidin to nitrocellulose treated cover slips coated with wild-type or mutant myosin (Kronert et al., 2014; Kronert et al., 2015; Swank et al., 2001). Video sequences captured under fluorescence optics were analyzed computationally to determine actin-sliding velocity. Mean values from five independent experiments (two assays for each) for the mutant and wild-type ATPase or from three independent motility assays (at least 30 filaments/assay) were compared for statistically significant differences (p<0.05) by Student’s t-tests.

Transmission electron microscopy

To determine the effects of transgene expression on IFM structure in an Mhc10 null background, transmission electron microscopy was performed as previously described (O'Donnell and Bernstein, 1988). We examined four different stages of development; late stage pupae, 2-hr-old adults, 2-day-old adults and 1-week-old adults. Cross-sections and longitudinal sections were obtained from females for each homozygous transgenic line, with at least three different samples examined for each of the three transgenic lines. One myofibril is shown in each panel and is representative of the entire population at the given stage of development. Images were obtained using a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope with a TVIPS 214 high-resolution camera.

For cardiac electron microscopy, heart samples at 1 or 3 weeks of age (three per age per genotype) were surgically exposed in an oxygenated artificial hemolymph solution and fixed using a modified procedure as described previously (Achal et al., 2016). Rhythmic beating was observed to confirm structural integrity of samples. Hearts were relaxed in 10 mM EGTA, fixed in primary fixative (3% formaldehyde, 3% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4), washed 6x in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4, then bathed in secondary fixative (1% OsO4, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4) and washed 3x in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4. The samples were dehydrated in an acetone series, oriented and embedded in Epon-filled BEEM capsules, and polymerized at 60°C under vacuum. Thin sections (≤50 nm) were obtained using a Leica ultramicrotome, picked up on Formvar-coated grids, and stained with 4% uranyl acetate for 10 min. Images were obtained at 120 kV on a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope.

Transverse sections of the heart were utilized to determine average cardiac thickness between the second and third abdominal segments. For each measurement, a roughly rectangular area of cardiomyocyte tissue (defined as myofibrillar and mitochondrial material) of 10 µm in length within the inner and outer edges of the cardiac tube was highlighted using Adobe Photoshop. The image was imported into ImageJ to calculate the area of the highlighted region. Dividing the resulting cardiomyocyte area by 10 µm yielded the average cardiac thickness for that highlighted section. At least three images each for dorsal areas and for ventral areas per heart section were analyzed. Three or more transverse sections along the anterior-poster axis at least 10 µm apart were assessed in the same way. Cardiac thickness measurements from dorsal-side or ventral-side images were averaged per section and the data were then averaged for each biological replicate. Data from at least three hearts were averaged per line to yield the final values, which are presented as mean ± SEM. A one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction determined statistical significance (p<0.05).

Dissection of IFMs for mechanics

Newly eclosed female PwMhcR146N-15 homozygous or heterozygous flies were collected every half hour and allowed to mature for 2 hr. Control flies were taken from the PwMhc2 stock. Individual IFM fibers were isolated by dissection as previously described by Swank (Swank, 2012). Briefly, the head, abdomen and wings were removed and the thorax was placed into dissection solution (Swank, 2012). The thorax was split in half, and the IFM fiber bundle was removed. The fibers were skinned in the dissection solution for 1 hr at 6°C before being transferred to storage solution (same as the dissection solution but without Triton X-100). Individual fibers were then separated from the bundle and split in half with a long, thinly etched tungsten probe. The split fiber was then fitted with a pair of aluminum foil t-clips.

Muscle mechanics

The clipped fiber was mounted in relaxing solution (pCa 8.0, 12 mM MgATP, 30 mM creatine phosphate, 600 U/ml creatine phosphokinase, 1 mM free Mg2+, 5 mM EGTA, 20 mM pH 7.0 BES, 200 mM ionic strength, adjusted with Na methane sulfonate, 1 mM DTT) onto a mechanics apparatus by settling it onto two hooks attached to a motor arm and a force transducer. The muscle was lengthened to be just taught, then stretched 5% beyond this length. The resulting length, width and height were measured to obtain cross-sectional area. Passive tension (Po) was recorded before adding activating solution (the same as relaxing solution except that pCa was adjusted to 5.0). The maximum power of the muscle was determined by performing sinusoidal analysis (see below), under low amplitude conditions (0.125% muscle length). After every run, the muscle was stretched by 2% muscle length (ML) until the power did not increase by more than 3%. The active tension (Ao) at the optimal muscle length was measured and the net tension (Fo) was calculated by Ao-Po.

Work loops

To measure the power under longer ML conditions, the fiber was subjected to a series of ten identical length changes (cycles) over a range of amplitudes (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.25% ML) and frequencies (50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, or 200 Hz) to find the optimal conditions for maximum power generation. The power measurement from cycles 7 or 8 was used because the power values become consistent after cycle 6 (Ramanath et al., 2011). The fiber was then stretched by 1% ML and sinusoidal analysis repeated at 0.125% amplitude before any further experiments were performed to ensure fiber integrity.

ATP and phosphate response

The standard fiber activating solution was first exchanged to increase the ATP concentration from 12 mM to 20 mM. Sinusoidal analysis was then performed at decreasing ATP concentrations of 20.0, 15.0, 12.5, 10.0, 7.5, 5.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5 mM by exchanging with the appropriate amount of 0 mM ATP activating solution. Similar to the ATP response, activating solution was exchanged so that [Pi] = 0 mM, and then the concentration of phosphate was sequentially increased to 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 mM by exchanging in appropriate amounts of a 20 mM phosphate activating solution before performing sinusoidal analysis. All solutions were made so that the ionic strength did not change when calcium, ATP or Pi was varied (Swank, 2012). High ATP solution was the same as relaxing solution with the following modifications: pCa 5.0, 20 mM ATP, 37 mM creatine phosphate, 450 U/ml CPK, and 260 mM ionic strength. Low ATP was the same as high ATP, except for 0 mM ATP. High Pi was the same as high ATP, except for 13 mM ATP and 20 mM Pi. Low Pi was the same as high ATP, except 13 mM ATP and 0 mM Pi.

Sinusoidal analysis

Sinusoidal analysis was performed as previously described (Swank, 2012). Briefly, the muscle fiber was oscillated at 50 different frequencies, from 0.5 Hz to 650 Hz. Each oscillation was 0.125% ML and the elastic and viscous modulus were calculated from the amplitude and phase differences. Work and power were calculated as described in Wang et al. (2014). To determine fiber apparent rate constants, the complex modulus was fit with the equation Y(f) = A (2π if/α)k − B if /(b + if) + C if/ (c + if) developed by Kawai and Brandt (1980), and described in Swank (2012). The b frequency value is most influenced by work producing steps of the cross-bridge cycle, while the c frequency value is most influenced by work absorbing steps. Frequencies b and c are multiplied by 2π to convert from frequency to time (s−1).

Flight assays

Two- and 7-day-old homozygotes for each of the three transgenic lines and controls were tested for flight ability in an Mhc10 background at 22°C. Flight was determined by the ability to fly up (U), horizontal (H), down (D) or not at all (N) (Drummond et al., 1991). As previously described (Tohtong et al., 1995) flight index is defined as: 6 U/T+ 4 H/T+ 2 D/T+ 0 N/T where T is the total number of flies tested. Flight abilities and wing beat frequencies of two-day-old PwMhcR146N-15 homozygotes and heterozygotes were examined at 15°C and 22°C. An optical tachometer was used to measure the wing beat frequency of tethered flies (Tohtong et al., 1995). All values represent mean ± SEM. Significance was assessed by a Student’s t-test at p<0.05.

Cardiac analysis of semi-intact Drosophila preparations

Cardiac tubes of 1- and 3-week-old female adult flies were surgically exposed under oxygenated artificial hemolymph as described by Vogler and Ocorr (2009). High-speed videos of contracting hearts were taken at ~120 frames per second using a Hamamatsu Orca Flash 2.8 CMOS camera on a Leica DM5000B TL microscope with a 10x (0.30 NA) immersion lens. Physiological parameters were assessed from individual videos using the semiautomatic optical heartbeat analysis (SOHA v.3) program as previously outlined (Cammarato et al., 2015; Fink et al., 2009; Viswanathan et al., 2017). M-mode kymograms were generated to provide an edge trace documenting the movement of heart wall in the y-axis over time in the x-axis. Values represent mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVAs were employed to test if the effects of genotype and age (or if an interaction exists) were significant for each cardiac parameter investigated. Significance was assessed at p<0.05.

Quantitation of EGTA.AM and Blebbistatin-induced changes in cardiac dimensions

Beating hearts from 3-week-old heterozygous female PwMhc2/+ and PwMhcR146N-15/+ flies were imaged as described above using a 20x (0.50 NA) immersion objective lens and analyzed as previously detailed (Viswanathan et al., 2014; Viswanathan et al., 2017). The effects of EGTA/EGTA-AM and blebbistatin treatment on cardiac diameters were evaluated using paired t-tests of the matched groups. Unpaired t-tests were used to distinguish significant differences in the cardiac responses to EGTA, EGTA.AM and blebbistatin between PwMhc2 and mutant MHC expressing hearts. Significance was assessed at p<0.05.

Funding Statement

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Contributor Information

Douglas M Swank, Email: swankd@rpi.edu.

Sanford I Bernstein, Email: sbernstein@sdsu.edu.

Lee Sweeney, , United States.

Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institutes of Health R37GM032443 to Sanford I Bernstein.

  • National Institutes of Health R01HL124091 to Anthony Cammarato.

  • National Institutes of Health R01AR064274 to Douglas M Swank.

  • Rees-Stealy Research Foundation Graduate Student Fellowship to Adriana S Trujillo.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft.

Supervision, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Power generation measured using the work loop technique under the same muscle length (ML) and frequency parameters.

All three fiber types were oscillated through ten 0.75% ML amplitude and 125 Hz contraction cycles. These parameters are the optimal power producing parameters for most of the control fibers (average results are shown in Table 2). Means ± S.E.M are reported. N = 12 for the control and homozygous fibers, 13 for heterozygous fibers. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or heterozygote (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N-15/+ heterozygote (Mhc10/+; P{R146N-15}); R146N-15 homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N-15}/P{R146N-15}).

elife-38064-supp1.docx (36.5KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.018
Supplementary file 2. Flight ability of R146N homozygous adults at two and seven days.

Adult female flies were aged for two or seven days prior to flight testing. Transgenic flies were then assayed for the ability to fly up (U), horizontal (H), down (D) or not at all (N). Flight index = 6 U/T+ 4 H/T+ 2 D/T+ 0 N/T; T is the total number of flies tested, listed in parentheses. Flight index is mean ±S.E.M. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from same age PwMhc2 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or from same fly line at 2 days of age (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N}/P{R146N}).

elife-38064-supp2.docx (40.7KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.019
Supplementary file 3. Cardiomyocyte thickness measurements.

At least three hearts were analyzed per line and genotype, including three sections along the anterior-poster axis at least 10 microns apart per sample, and ≥3 images each for dorsal or ventral areas per section analyzed. Means ± S.E.M are reported. A one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction determined that no statistically significant differences (p<0.05) exist for any of the comparisons within or between samples at the same or different ages. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

elife-38064-supp3.docx (34.4KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.020
Supplementary file 4. Cardiac parameters for R146N-15/+ and R146N-28/+ mutant lines relative to PwMhc2/+ control.

Means ± S.E.M are reported. Two-way ANOVA results summarizing the statistical differences between the control and mutant flies can be found in Figure 7. No significant differences (p<0.05) in any cardiac physiological indices reported were noted between the two mutant lines via two-way ANOVA. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

elife-38064-supp4.docx (59.1KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.021
Transparent reporting form
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.022

Data availability

Data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Achal M, Trujillo AS, Melkani GC, Farman GP, Ocorr K, Viswanathan MC, Kaushik G, Newhard CS, Glasheen BM, Melkani A, Suggs JA, Moore JR, Swank DM, Bodmer R, Cammarato A, Bernstein SI. A restrictive cardiomyopathy mutation in an invariant proline at the myosin head/rod junction enhances head flexibility and function, yielding muscle defects in Drosophila. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2016;428:2446–2461. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhikari AS, Kooiker KB, Sarkar SS, Liu C, Bernstein D, Spudich JA, Ruppel KM. Early-Onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations significantly increase the velocity, force, and Actin-Activated ATPase activity of human β-Cardiac myosin. Cell Reports. 2016;17:2857–2864. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alamo L, Koubassova N, Pinto A, Gillilan R, Tsaturyan A, Padrón R. Lessons from a tarantula: new insights into muscle thick filament and myosin interacting-heads motif structure and function. Biophysical Reviews. 2017a;9:461–480. doi: 10.1007/s12551-017-0295-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alamo L, Qi D, Wriggers W, Pinto A, Zhu J, Bilbao A, Gillilan RE, Hu S, Padrón R. Conserved intramolecular interactions maintain myosin Interacting-Heads motifs explaining tarantula muscle Super-Relaxed state structural basis. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2016;428:1142–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alamo L, Ware JS, Pinto A, Gillilan RE, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Padrón R. Effects of myosin variants on interacting-heads motif explain distinct hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy phenotypes. eLife. 2017b;6:e24634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:195–201. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker KD, O'Donnell PT, Heitz JM, Vito M, Bernstein SI. Analysis of Drosophila paramyosin: identification of a novel isoform which is restricted to a subset of adult muscles. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1992;116:669–681. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bier E, Bodmer R. Drosophila, an emerging model for cardiac disease. Gene. 2004;342:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brizendine RK, Sheehy GG, Alcala DB, Novenschi SI, Baker JE, Cremo CR. A mixed-kinetic model describes unloaded velocities of smooth, skeletal, and cardiac muscle myosin filaments in vitro. Science Advances. 2017;3:eaao2267. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao2267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cammarato A, Dambacher CM, Knowles AF, Kronert WA, Bodmer R, Ocorr K, Bernstein SI. Myosin transducer mutations differentially affect motor function, myofibril structure, and the performance of skeletal and cardiac muscles. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2008;19:553–562. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-09-0890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cammarato A, Ocorr S, Ocorr K. Enhanced assessment of contractile dynamics in Drosophila hearts. BioTechniques. 2015;58:77–80. doi: 10.2144/000114255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Colegrave M, Peckham M. Structural implications of β-cardiac myosin heavy chain mutations in human disease. The Anatomical Record. 2014;297:1670–1680. doi: 10.1002/ar.22973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collier VL, Kronert WA, O'Donnell PT, Edwards KA, Bernstein SI. Alternative myosin hinge regions are utilized in a tissue-specific fashion that correlates with muscle contraction speed. Genes & Development. 1990;4:885–895. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.6.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis J, Davis LC, Correll RN, Makarewich CA, Schwanekamp JA, Moussavi-Harami F, Wang D, York AJ, Wu H, Houser SR, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Regnier M, Metzger JM, Wu JC, Molkentin JD. A tension-Based model distinguishes hypertrophic versus dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell. 2016;165:1147–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drummond DR, Hennessey ES, Sparrow JC. Characterisation of missense mutations in the Act88F gene of Drosophila melanogaster. MGG Molecular & General Genetics. 1991;226:70–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00273589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eldred CC, Simeonov DR, Koppes RA, Yang C, Corr DT, Swank DM. The mechanical properties of Drosophila jump muscle expressing wild-type and embryonic myosin isoforms. Biophysical Journal. 2010;98:1218–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fedorov VV, Lozinsky IT, Sosunov EA, Anyukhovsky EP, Rosen MR, Balke CW, Efimov IR. Application of blebbistatin as an excitation-contraction uncoupler for electrophysiologic study of rat and rabbit hearts. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fink M, Callol-Massot C, Chu A, Ruiz-Lozano P, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Giles W, Bodmer R, Ocorr K. A new method for detection and quantification of heartbeat parameters in Drosophila, zebrafish, and embryonic mouse hearts. BioTechniques. 2009;46:101–113. doi: 10.2144/000113078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Galler S, Wang BG, Kawai M. Elementary steps of the cross-bridge cycle in fast-twitch fiber types from rabbit skeletal muscles. Biophysical Journal. 2005;89:3248–3260. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.056614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Garfinkel AC, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Genetic pathogenesis of hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart Failure Clinics. 2018;14:139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. George EL, Ober MB, Emerson CP. Functional domains of the Drosophila melanogaster muscle myosin heavy-chain gene are encoded by alternatively spliced exons. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1989;9:2957–2974. doi: 10.1128/MCB.9.7.2957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gourinath S, Himmel DM, Brown JH, Reshetnikova L, Szent-Györgyi AG, Cohen C. Crystal structure of scallop myosin s1 in the pre-power stroke state to 2.6 a resolution: flexibility and function in the head. Structure. 2003;11:1621–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guhathakurta P, Prochniewicz E, Roopnarine O, Rohde JA, Thomas DD. A cardiomyopathy mutation in the myosin essential light chain alters actomyosin structure. Biophysical Journal. 2017;113:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harris DE, Warshaw DM. Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1993;268:14764–14768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Himmel DM, Gourinath S, Reshetnikova L, Shen Y, Szent-Györgyi AG, Cohen C. Crystallographic findings on the internally uncoupled and near-rigor states of myosin: further insights into the mechanics of the motor. PNAS. 2002;99:12645–12650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202476799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Homburger JR, Green EM, Caleshu C, Sunitha MS, Taylor RE, Ruppel KM, Metpally RP, Colan SD, Michels M, Day SM, Olivotto I, Bustamante CD, Dewey FE, Ho CY, Spudich JA, Ashley EA. Multidimensional structure-function relationships in human β-cardiac myosin from population-scale genetic variation. PNAS. 2016;113:6701–6706. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606950113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hooijman P, Stewart MA, Cooke R. A new state of cardiac myosin with very slow ATP turnover: a potential cardioprotective mechanism in the heart. Biophysical Journal. 2011;100:1969–1976. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ingles J, Doolan A, Chiu C, Seidman J, Seidman C, Semsarian C. Compound and double mutations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: implications for genetic testing and counselling. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2005;42:e59. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.033886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson JD, Jiang Y, Flynn M. Modulation of Ca2+ transients and tension by intracellular EGTA in intact frog muscle fibers. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 1997;272:C1437–C1444. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.5.C1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Josephson RK. Mechanical power output from striated-muscle during cyclic contraction. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1985;114:493–512. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawai M, Brandt PW. Sinusoidal analysis: a high resolution method for correlating biochemical reactions with physiological processes in activated skeletal muscles of rabbit, frog and crayfish. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 1980;1:279–303. doi: 10.1007/BF00711932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kawai M, Saeki Y, Zhao Y. Crossbridge scheme and the kinetic constants of elementary steps deduced from chemically skinned papillary and trabecular muscles of the ferret. Circulation Research. 1993;73:35–50. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.73.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kovács M, Tóth J, Hetényi C, Málnási-Csizmadia A, Sellers JR. Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:35557–35563. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kranias EG, Bers DM. Calcium and Cardiomyopathies Calcium Signalling and Disease. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. pp. 523–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kronert WA, Melkani GC, Melkani A, Bernstein SI. Mapping interactions between myosin relay and converter domains that power muscle function. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:12779–12790. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.550673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kronert WA, Melkani GC, Melkani A, Bernstein SI. A failure to communicate: myosin residues involved in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy affect inter-domain interaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:29270–29280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.681874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee KH, Sulbarán G, Yang S, Mun JY, Alamo L, Pinto A, Sato O, Ikebe M, Liu X, Korn ED, Sarsoza F, Bernstein SI, Padrón R, Craig R. Interacting-heads motif has been conserved as a mechanism of myosin II inhibition since before the origin of animals. PNAS. 2018;115:E1991–E2000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715247115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Limouze J, Straight AF, Mitchison T, Sellers JR. Specificity of blebbistatin, an inhibitor of myosin II. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2004;25:337–341. doi: 10.1007/s10974-004-6060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu Y, White HD, Belknap B, Winkelmann DA, Forgacs E. Omecamtiv Mecarbil modulates the kinetic and motile properties of porcine β-cardiac myosin. Biochemistry. 2015;54:1963–1975. doi: 10.1021/bi5015166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Maron BJ, Maron MS. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The Lancet. 2013;381:242–255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60397-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:1308–1320. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.10.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Masarone D, Kaski JP, Pacileo G, Elliott PM, Bossone E, Day SM, Limongelli G. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of genetic cardiomyopathies. Heart Failure Clinics. 2018;14:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Maughan DW, Vigoreaux JO. An integrated view of insect flight muscle: genes, motor molecules, and motion. News Physiological Sciences. 1999;14:87–92. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1999.14.3.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mesentean S, Koppole S, Smith JC, Fischer S. The principal motions involved in the coupling mechanism of the recovery stroke of the myosin motor. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2007;367:591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.12.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore JR, Leinwand L, Warshaw DM. Understanding cardiomyopathy phenotypes based on the functional impact of mutations in the myosin motor. Circulation Research. 2012;111:375–385. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moric E, Mazurek U, Połońska J, Domal-Kwiatkowska D, Smolik S, Kozakiewicz K, Tendera M, Wilczok T. Three novel mutations in exon 21 encoding beta-cardiac myosin heavy chain. Journal of Applied Genetics. 2003;44:103–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Morita H, Rehm HL, Menesses A, McDonough B, Roberts AE, Kucherlapati R, Towbin JA, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Shared genetic causes of cardiac hypertrophy in children and adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358:1899–1908. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nag S, Trivedi DV, Sarkar SS, Adhikari AS, Sunitha MS, Sutton S, Ruppel KM, Spudich JA. The myosin mesa and the basis of hypercontractility caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2017;24:525–533. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. O'Donnell PT, Bernstein SI. Molecular and ultrastructural defects in a Drosophila myosin heavy chain mutant: differential effects on muscle function produced by similar thick filament abnormalities. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1988;107:2601–2612. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. O'Donnell PT, Collier VL, Mogami K, Bernstein SI. Ultrastructural and molecular analyses of homozygous-viable Drosophila melanogaster muscle mutants indicate there is a complex pattern of myosin heavy-chain isoform distribution. Genes & Development. 1989;3:1233–1246. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.8.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ocorr K, Vogler G, Bodmer R. Methods to assess Drosophila heart development, function and aging. Methods. 2014;68:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Palmer BM, Suzuki T, Wang Y, Barnes WD, Miller MS, Maughan DW. Two-state model of acto-myosin attachment-detachment predicts C-process of sinusoidal analysis. Biophysical Journal. 2007;93:760–769. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pate E, Cooke R. Addition of phosphate to active muscle fibers probes actomyosin states within the powerstroke. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology. 1989;414:73–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00585629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Planelles-Herrero VJ, Hartman JJ, Robert-Paganin J, Malik FI, Houdusse A. Mechanistic and structural basis for activation of cardiac myosin force production by omecamtiv mecarbil. Nature Communications. 2017;8:190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00176-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ramanath S, Wang Q, Bernstein SI, Swank DM. Disrupting the myosin converter-relay interface impairs Drosophila indirect flight muscle performance. Biophysical Journal. 2011;101:1114–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rossi AC, Mammucari C, Argentini C, Reggiani C, Schiaffino S. Two novel/ancient myosins in mammalian skeletal muscles: MYH14/7b and MYH15 are expressed in extraocular muscles and muscle spindles. The Journal of Physiology. 2010;588:353–364. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rubin GM, Spradling AC. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982;218:348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ruppel KM, Uyeda TQ, Spudich JA. Role of highly conserved lysine 130 of myosin motor domain. in vivo and in vitro characterization of site specifically mutated myosin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994;269:18773–18780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shen YT, Malik FI, Zhao X, Depre C, Dhar SK, Abarzúa P, Morgans DJ, Vatner SF. Improvement of cardiac function by a cardiac myosin activator in conscious dogs with systolic heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2010;3:522–527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.930321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Siemankowski RF, Wiseman MO, White HD. ADP dissociation from actomyosin subfragment 1 is sufficiently slow to limit the unloaded shortening velocity in vertebrate muscle. PNAS. 1985;82:658–662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sommese RF, Sung J, Nag S, Sutton S, Deacon JC, Choe E, Leinwand LA, Ruppel K, Spudich JA. Molecular consequences of the R453C hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation on human β-cardiac myosin motor function. PNAS. 2013;110:12607–12612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309493110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Spudich JA. Hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy: four decades of basic research on muscle lead to potential therapeutic approaches to these devastating genetic diseases. Biophysical Journal. 2014;106:1236–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Stewart MA, Franks-Skiba K, Chen S, Cooke R. Myosin ATP turnover rate is a mechanism involved in thermogenesis in resting skeletal muscle fibers. PNAS. 2010;107:430–435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909468107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Swank DM, Bartoo ML, Knowles AF, Iliffe C, Bernstein SI, Molloy JE, Sparrow JC. Alternative exon-encoded regions of Drosophila myosin heavy chain modulate ATPase rates and actin sliding velocity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:15117–15124. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008379200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Swank DM, Knowles AF, Kronert WA, Suggs JA, Morrill GE, Nikkhoy M, Manipon GG, Bernstein SI. Variable N-terminal regions of muscle myosin heavy chain modulate ATPase rate and actin sliding velocity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278:17475–17482. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212727200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Swank DM, Vishnudas VK, Maughan DW. An exceptionally fast actomyosin reaction powers insect flight muscle. PNAS. 2006;103:17543–17547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604972103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Swank DM, Wells L, Kronert WA, Morrill GE, Bernstein SI. Determining structure/function relationships for sarcomeric myosin heavy chain by genetic and transgenic manipulation of Drosophila. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2000;50:430–442. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20000915)50:6&#x0003c;430::AID-JEMT2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Swank DM. Mechanical analysis of Drosophila indirect flight and jump muscles. Methods. 2012;56:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Thummel C, Pirrotta V. New pCaSpeR P element vectors. Dros Inf Serv. 1992;71:150 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tohtong R, Yamashita H, Graham M, Haeberle J, Simcox A, Maughan D. Impairment of muscle function caused by mutations of phosphorylation sites in myosin regulatory light chain. Nature. 1995;374:650–653. doi: 10.1038/374650a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Trivedi DV, Adhikari AS, Sarkar SS, Ruppel KM, Spudich JA. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the myosin mesa: viewing an old disease in a new light. Biophysical Reviews. 2018;10:27–48. doi: 10.1007/s12551-017-0274-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Viswanathan MC, Kaushik G, Engler AJ, Lehman W, Cammarato A. A Drosophila melanogaster model of diastolic dysfunction and cardiomyopathy based on impaired troponin-T function. Circulation Research. 2014;114:e6–e17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Viswanathan MC, Schmidt W, Rynkiewicz MJ, Agarwal K, Gao J, Katz J, Lehman W, Cammarato A. Distortion of the actin A-triad results in contractile disinhibition and cardiomyopathy. Cell Reports. 2017;20:2612–2625. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Vogler G, Ocorr K. Visualizing the beating heart in Drosophila. Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE. 2009;e1425 doi: 10.3791/1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang Q, Newhard CS, Ramanath S, Sheppard D, Swank DM. An embryonic myosin converter domain influences Drosophila indirect flight muscle stretch activation, power generation and flight. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014;217:290–298. doi: 10.1242/jeb.091769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Woodhead JL, Zhao FQ, Craig R, Egelman EH, Alamo L, Padrón R. Atomic model of a myosin filament in the relaxed state. Nature. 2005;436:1195–1199. doi: 10.1038/nature03920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yu L, Daniels J, Glaser AE, Wolf MJ. Raf-mediated cardiac hypertrophy in adult Drosophila. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2013;6:964–976. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Lee Sweeney1

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Prolonged cross-bridge binding triggers muscle dysfunction in a fly model of myosin-based hypertrophic cardiomyopathy" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor, a Reviewing Editor, and three reviewers. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Lee Sweeney (Reviewer #1); Justin E Molloy (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart condition involving abnormal heart structures and dysregulated cardiac functions. Mutations linked to HCM have been found in genes encoding proteins responsible for cardiac muscle contractility such as cardiac muscle myosins and troponins. However, it is not well understood how these mutations affect the encoded proteins and consequently cause HCM.

In this manuscript, Kronert et al., report an integrative study using a Drosophila mutant model on an HCM mutation, R146N, in the human cardiac myosin heavy chain gene (K146N is the Drosophila equivalent), to investigate a potential molecular mechanism underlying HCM. Structurally, the 146N mutation abolishes a salt bridge between the motor domain and the lever arm and presumably destabilizes the pre-power stroke state pf the myosin head. Biochemically, the 146N mutation enhanced ATPase activity of myosin and decreased actin filament sliding. Kinetically, 146N mutant muscles exhibited reduced work and power output. The biochemical and kinetics data suggests that the mutant myosin spends a longer time in strongly bound cross-bridge states. Degeneration in skeletal and cardiac muscles and decrease in flight ability occurred in 146N mutant flies in an age-dependent manner.

In Drosophila muscle, the 146N mutation appears to model the key aspects of a human mutation that has been suggested to interfere with interactions of cross-bridge packing rather than cross-bridge kinetics. The impact of such mutations cannot be properly assessed in solution and thus Drosophila muscles may provide an important model system for determining the impact of human HCM-causing mutations.

Essential revisions:

The three reviewers are all enthusiastic about the work, which they feel is of the highest quality and should be published in eLife. However, the comments of the reviewers should be addressed prior to publication. This will improve the readability and impact of the paper for a general audience. For the most part, this is more a matter of presentation and discussion, and not a need for further experimentation, so the authors should be able to accomplish this quickly. There is a request for additional modeling and structural information, which may or may not have already been done but not presented.

1) The significance the work is the fact that the impact of the mutation might have been restricted to cardiac muscle of vertebrates, but it is not. Not only does this allow for the use as Drosophila as a model organism to assess human HCM mutations, but it begs a broader discussion of the mechanism. The authors model the potential electrostatic interactions made by R146N and the lever arm and postulate that loss of this interaction might destabilize the pre-power stroke (PPS) state, which is supported by an increase in the actin-independent ATPase activity. However, they stop short in connecting this concept to the potential importance of this state for the myosin head packing during relaxation, which has been termed the super-relaxed state. There seems to be conservation of the head packing interactions, which were first described for single molecules of regulated smooth muscle myosin and has since been shown to fit the head-head interactions of myosin in filaments from tarantula muscle as well as in vertebrate cardiac muscle. This conservation of the packing is striking and must be the basis of what is happening in the flies as well. It has been modeled, and data confirms, that the PPS state is the state in which the myosin heads interact and pack, so anything that destabilizes the PPS conformation would be expected to disrupt the packing of the heads on the filament. This point is not stressed and yet is the real take home message.

2) The "myosin mesa" hypothesis really refers to the idea that for a large subset of the HCM mutations, the mutation does not directly alter the kinetics of the head, but instead disrupts the filament packing of the heads, which leads to effects such as reported for the R146N mutation of this paper. This should be emphasized, and some modeling of the impact of the R146N mutation on the packing of cardiac myosin heads into the filament would have been helpful. This could be added to Figure 1, but at the very least, further discussion should be added.

3) R146N/+ heterozygous flies displayed myofibrillar discontinuity suggesting a dominant effect of this mutation on cardiac ultrastructure. The IFM from R146N/+ heterozygotes also exhibited changes in power and work generation and cross-bridge kinetics. However, the authors did not present the IFM structure and the flight ability of the heterozygous flies. Is there an age-related delay in structural disruptions, since IFM myofibrils were deteriorated in older flies (7 day adults)? The authors suggested that this deterioration results from mechanical stress during muscle use. To strengthen this conclusion, transgenic flies of the same ages without muscle use could be examined. If there is no defect in the structure and the function of IFM (somatic muscle) in the heterozygotes at the ages presented, in contrast to the cardiac muscle, please discuss what properties of the two muscles can cause this difference. This is a significant point if the authors are using somatic muscles to investigate a cardiac muscle mutation.

4) The R146N mutation recapitulated some pathological phenomena of HCM such as disorganized myofibrils and diastolic dysfunction in Drosophila. However, the authors did not observe the hypertrophic effect on skeletal and cardiac muscles. The authors discussed that it might be consistent to the 'significant variability in the presence and degree of hypertrophy detected in patients carry the 146N mutation'. Since hypertrophy in Drosophila heart can occur due to abnormal cell proliferation from misregulated EGFR-Ras-Raf signaling (Yu et al., 2013), it would be interesting to test if increased stress by 146N mutation on Drosophila heart has an additive or synergistic effect on hypertrophy caused by abnormal RTK signaling.

eLife. 2018 Aug 13;7:e38064. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38064.025

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The significance the work is the fact that the impact of the mutation might have been restricted to cardiac muscle of vertebrates, but it is not. Not only does this allow for the use as Drosophila as a model organism to assess human HCM mutations, but it begs a broader discussion of the mechanism. The authors model the potential electrostatic interactions made by R146N and the lever arm and postulate that loss of this interaction might destabilize the pre-power stroke (PPS) state, which is supported by an increase in the actin-independent ATPase activity. However, they stop short in connecting this concept to the potential importance of this state for the myosin head packing during relaxation, which has been termed the super-relaxed state. There seems to be conservation of the head packing interactions, which were first described for single molecules of regulated smooth muscle myosin and has since been shown to fit the head-head interactions of myosin in filaments from tarantula muscle as well as in vertebrate cardiac muscle. This conservation of the packing is striking and must be the basis of what is happening in the flies as well. It has been modeled, and data confirms, that the PPS state is the state in which the myosin heads interact and pack, so anything that destabilizes the PPS conformation would be expected to disrupt the packing of the heads on the filament. This point is not stressed and yet is the real take home message.

This is an excellent point and certainly worthy of better discussion in the manuscript. We have added a paragraph to the Discussion section that introduces the super-relaxed state (SRX). We indicate how the interacting head motif appears to be the basis for SRX. We then state that the pre-power stroke state is found in the SRX and hence its likely disruption from the R146N mutation could enhance cross-bridge binding, leading to the phenotypes we have documented.

2) The "myosin mesa" hypothesis really refers to the idea that for a large subset of the HCM mutations, the mutation does not directly alter the kinetics of the head, but instead disrupts the filament packing of the heads, which leads to effects such as reported for the R146N mutation of this paper. This should be emphasized, and some modeling of the impact of the R146N mutation on the packing of cardiac myosin heads into the filament would have been helpful. This could be added to Figure 1, but at the very least, further discussion should be added.

As stated in #1, a paragraph has been added to the Discussion section on this topic has been added. We point out that disruption of filament packing could be a key element in the effect of the R146N mutation. Further, we indicate that we have recently shown (with Roger Craig) that Drosophila myosins are capable of forming the interacting head motif (Lee et al., 2018). However, the IHM and SRX have not yet been documented in Drosophila muscle and the observed phenotypes may be explained without invoking disruption of SRX. So, while we provided the requested further discussion, we felt that modeling of filament packing would be premature.

3) R146N/+ heterozygous flies displayed myofibrillar discontinuity suggesting a dominant effect of this mutation on cardiac ultrastructure. The IFM from R146N/+ heterozygotes also exhibited changes in power and work generation and cross-bridge kinetics. However, the authors did not present the IFM structure and the flight ability of the heterozygous flies. Is there an age-related delay in structural disruptions, since IFM myofibrils were deteriorated in older flies (7 day adults)? The authors suggested that this deterioration results from mechanical stress during muscle use. To strengthen this conclusion, transgenic flies of the same ages without muscle use could be examined. If there is no defect in the structure and the function of IFM (somatic muscle) in the heterozygotes at the ages presented, in contrast to the cardiac muscle, please discuss what properties of the two muscles can cause this difference. This is a significant point if the authors are using somatic muscles to investigate a cardiac muscle mutation.

The flight ability of heterozygotes is presented in Table 4 of the manuscript. We found a statistically significant reduction in flight ability at room temperature in two-day-old heterozygotes compared to controls (now mentioned in the Results). We now include a developmental series of electron micrographs as Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Here we show that assembly and structure are normal in the late pupa and two-hour-old adult, but there is minor myofibril deterioration at two days. While we have not assessed older heterozygous adults or determined whether muscle disuse prevents deterioration, it is clear that muscle function and structure (at least to some extent) are compromised in a dominant fashion, as is the case in the heart.

4) The R146N mutation recapitulated some pathological phenomena of HCM such as disorganized myofibrils and diastolic dysfunction in Drosophila. However, the authors did not observe the hypertrophic effect on skeletal and cardiac muscles. The authors discussed that it might be consistent to the 'significant variability in the presence and degree of hypertrophy detected in patients carry the 146N mutation'. Since hypertrophy in Drosophila heart can occur due to abnormal cell proliferation from misregulated EGFR-Ras-Raf signaling (Yu et al., 2013), it would be interesting to test if increased stress by 146N mutation on Drosophila heart has an additive or synergistic effect on hypertrophy caused by abnormal RTK signaling.

While a hypertrophic response in the Drosophila cardiac tube was not resolved in our studies, our primary goal was to uncover the mechanical effects of a human HCM-causing mutation in myosin across the molecular, myofibrillar, cellular, and tissue scales and, thereby, provide key insights into defining the mechanism behind K146N myosin-based cardiomyopathy. We believe we accomplished this goal. We would like to emphasize that Yu et al., (2013) reported that hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in fly hearts was characterized by decreased end diastolic lumen dimensions that resulted from abnormal cardiomyocyte fiber morphology and increased heart wall thickness, rather than abnormal cell proliferation. According to the authors there were no changes in cardiomyocyte cell numbers. Nonetheless, we agree with the reviewer that it would be interesting to determine the effects of the myosin mutation in the context of abnormal receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. In fact, such genetic interaction experiments are perfectly suited for the fly model. However, we feel these experiments are non-trivial to perform and are well beyond the scope of the current manuscript.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary file 1. Power generation measured using the work loop technique under the same muscle length (ML) and frequency parameters.

    All three fiber types were oscillated through ten 0.75% ML amplitude and 125 Hz contraction cycles. These parameters are the optimal power producing parameters for most of the control fibers (average results are shown in Table 2). Means ± S.E.M are reported. N = 12 for the control and homozygous fibers, 13 for heterozygous fibers. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or heterozygote (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 control (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N-15/+ heterozygote (Mhc10/+; P{R146N-15}); R146N-15 homozygote (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N-15}/P{R146N-15}).

    elife-38064-supp1.docx (36.5KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.018
    Supplementary file 2. Flight ability of R146N homozygous adults at two and seven days.

    Adult female flies were aged for two or seven days prior to flight testing. Transgenic flies were then assayed for the ability to fly up (U), horizontal (H), down (D) or not at all (N). Flight index = 6 U/T+ 4 H/T+ 2 D/T+ 0 N/T; T is the total number of flies tested, listed in parentheses. Flight index is mean ±S.E.M. Student’s t-test with p<0.05 significantly different from same age PwMhc2 (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) or from same fly line at 2 days of age (xp<0.05, xxp<0.01, xxxp<0.001). Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2 (P{PwMhc2}/P{PwMhc2}; Mhc10/Mhc10); R146N (Mhc10/Mhc10; P{R146N}/P{R146N}).

    elife-38064-supp2.docx (40.7KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.019
    Supplementary file 3. Cardiomyocyte thickness measurements.

    At least three hearts were analyzed per line and genotype, including three sections along the anterior-poster axis at least 10 microns apart per sample, and ≥3 images each for dorsal or ventral areas per section analyzed. Means ± S.E.M are reported. A one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction determined that no statistically significant differences (p<0.05) exist for any of the comparisons within or between samples at the same or different ages. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

    elife-38064-supp3.docx (34.4KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.020
    Supplementary file 4. Cardiac parameters for R146N-15/+ and R146N-28/+ mutant lines relative to PwMhc2/+ control.

    Means ± S.E.M are reported. Two-way ANOVA results summarizing the statistical differences between the control and mutant flies can be found in Figure 7. No significant differences (p<0.05) in any cardiac physiological indices reported were noted between the two mutant lines via two-way ANOVA. Full genotypes are shown in parentheses: PwMhc2/+ (P{PwMhc2}; Mhc1/+); R146N/+ (Mhc1/+; P{R146N}).

    elife-38064-supp4.docx (59.1KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.021
    Transparent reporting form
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38064.022

    Data Availability Statement

    Data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES