Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2018 Sep 17;6:e5432. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5432

Th2 cytokine bias induced by silver nanoparticles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Wen-Ta Li 1,2, Lei-Ya Wang 1,2, Hui-Wen Chang 1,2, Wei-Cheng Yang 2, Chieh Lo 3, Victor Fei Pang 1,2, Meng-Hsien Chen 4, Chian-Ren Jeng 1,2,
Editor: Susanne Brander
PMCID: PMC6147119  PMID: 30245924

Abstract

Background

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been widely used in many commercial products due to their excellent antibacterial ability. The AgNPs are released into the environment, gradually accumulate in the ocean, and may affect animals at high trophic levels, such as cetaceans and humans, via the food chain. Hence, the negative health impacts caused by AgNPs in cetaceans are of concern. Cytokines play a major role in the modulation of immune system and can be classified into two types: Th1 and Th2. Th1/Th2 balance can be evaluated by the ratios of their polarizing cytokines (i.e., interferon [IFN]-γ/Interleukin [IL]-4), and animals with imbalanced Th1/Th2 response may become more susceptible to certain kinds of infection. Therefore, the present study evaluated the in vitro cytokine responses of cetacean peripheral blood mononuclear cells (cPBMCs) to 20 nm citrate-AgNPs (C-AgNP20) by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

Methods

Blood samples were collected from six captive common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). The cPBMCs were isolated and utilized for evaluating the in vitro cytokine responses. The cytokines evaluated included IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, interferon (IFN)-γ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. The geometric means of two housekeeping genes (HKGs), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β2-microglobulin (B2M), of each sample were determined and used to normalize the mRNA expression levels of target genes.

Results

The ratio of late apoptotic/necrotic cells of cPBMCs significantly increased with or without concanavalin A (ConA) stimulation after 24 h of 10 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment. At 4 h of culture, the mRNA expression level of IL-10 was significantly decreased with 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment. At 24 h of culture with 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20, the mRNA expression levels of all cytokines were significantly decreased, with the exceptions of IL-4 and IL-10. The IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio was significantly decreased at 24 h of culture with 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment, and the IL-12/IL-4 ratio was significantly decreased at 4 or 24 h of culture with 0.1 or 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment, respectively. Furthermore, the mRNA expression level of TNF-α was significantly decreased by 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 after 24 h of culture.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that the sublethal dose of C-AgNP20 (≤1 µg/ml) had an inhibitory effect on the cytokine mRNA expression levels of cPBMCs with the evidence of Th2 cytokine bias and significantly decreased the mRNA expression level of TNF-α. Th2 cytokine bias is associated with enhanced immunity against parasites but decreased immunity to intracellular microorganisms. TNF-α is a contributing factor for the inflammatory response against the infection of intracellular pathogens. In summary, our data indicate that C-AgNP20 suppresses the cellular immune response and thereby increases the susceptibility of cetaceans to infection by intracellular microorganisms.

Keywords: Cetacean, Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), Immunotoxicity, Cytokine, Th2 bias, qRT-PCR

Introduction

The application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in industry and in consumer products has increased, and the production of AgNPs and the number of AgNP-containing products will increase over time (Massarsky, Trudeau & Moon, 2014). AgNPs can be released during the production, transport, decay, use, and/or disposal of AgNP-containing products, subsequently draining into the surface water and then accumulating in the marine environment (Farre et al., 2009; Walters, Pool & Somerset, 2014). Therefore, the increasing use and growing production of AgNPs, as potential sources of Ag contamination, raise public concerns about the environmental toxicity of Ag (Li et al., 2018a). Previous research has demonstrated that AgNPs can precipitate in marine sediments, be ingested by benthic organisms (such as benthic invertebrate species), enter and be transferred from one trophic level to the next via the food chain, and thereby cause negative effects on the animals at different trophic levels, such as algae, invertebrates and fishes (Buffet et al., 2014; Farre et al., 2009; Gambardella et al., 2015; Huang, Cheng & Yi, 2016b; Wang et al., 2014). Previous studies have demonstrated that AgNPs are toxic to all tested marine organisms in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that AgNPs may have negative effects on marine organisms at different trophic levels of the marine environment. Immunotoxic effects of AgNPs have been demonstrated in some aquatic animals such as Nile tilapia and mussel (Gagne et al., 2013; Thummabancha, Onparn & Srisapoome, 2016). Nevertheless, to date the potential toxicity of AgNPs on marine mammals such as cetaceans has not been sufficiently studied.

AgNPs have been demonstrated to cause several negative effects, such as hepatitis, nephritis, neuron cell apoptosis, and alteration of gene expression of the brain, on laboratory mammals (Espinosa-Cristobal et al., 2013; Sardari et al., 2012; Shahare & Yashpal, 2013). In vitro studies using different cell lines have also indicated that AgNPs can cause damage to DNA, cell membranes, and mitochondria through reactive oxygen species (ROS) dependent/independent pathways and further induce cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (Kim & Ryu, 2013). In addition, previous studies conducted in laboratory mammals, including mice and rats, have demonstrated that AgNPs can enter the blood circulation through alimentary tracts and then deposit in multiple organs (Espinosa-Cristobal et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2013; Shahare & Yashpal, 2013; Van der Zande et al., 2012). Considering the negative effects of AgNPs and the presence of AgNPs in blood circulation, the negative effects of AgNPs on leukocytes should be of concern. Previous studies have demonstrated that AgNPs can cause several negative effects on human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). These studies demonstrated that AgNPs can cause morphological alterations, cytotoxicity, atypical cell death, inhibition of de novo protein synthesis, increased production of the CXCL8 chemokine (IL-8), and impaired lysosomal activity in human neutrophils (Poirier et al., 2014; Poirier, Simard & Girard, 2016; Soares et al., 2016). Only a few studies have investigated the toxicity of AgNPs on human PBMCs, which have shown that AgNPs can cause cytotoxicity and functional perturbations, including inhibition of proliferative activity and cytokine production (Franco-Molina et al., 2016; Ghosh et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2016a; Orta-Garcia et al., 2015; Paino & Zucolotto, 2015; Shin et al., 2007).

The environmental contamination level of AgNPs is expected to increase greatly in the near future, and cetaceans, as the top predators in the ocean, will suffer the potentially negative impacts caused by AgNPs. Besides, immunotoxic effects of AgNPs have been demonstrated previously in humans and aquatic animals. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the immunotoxic effects caused by AgNPs in cetaceans. Generally, in vivo experiments are rarely feasible, and the ethical issues concerning the study of immunotoxic effects caused by environmental contaminants in cetaceans are difficult to overcome, so in vitro study using blood samples from captive cetaceans would be a logical and crucial approach (Beineke et al., 2010; Desforges et al., 2016). Cytokines play a major role in the modulation of the immune system, including lymphocyte proliferation/differentiation, lymphoid development, cell trafficking, and inflammatory response through the interactions between the cytokines themselves and the surface receptors of many different cells (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013a). Previous studies have found that the sequence homology of cytokines among terrestrial and aquatic mammals is low, but conserved molecule regions can still be found on biologically active areas in marine mammals, such as the receptor binding sites of cytokines, suggesting a conserved biological activity of cytokines in both terrestrial and aquatic mammal species (Beineke et al., 2004; Beineke et al., 2010). Therefore, the functions of cytokines on the immune system in cetaceans may be similar to those in mice and humans. Cytokines can be classified into two groups, Th1 and Th2, and their secretion pattern is associated with the balance of Th1 and Th2 responses (Kidd, 2003; Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). Th1 response promotes cell-mediated immune response and thus enhances the immunity against intracellular microorganisms, such as Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella spp., and a variety of viruses. In contrast, Th2 response is associated with enhanced immunity against parasites but decreased immunity to intracellular microorganisms (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). The Th1/Th2 balance can be evaluated by the ratios of their polarizing cytokines (i.e., interferon [IFN]-γ/interleukin [IL]-4), and animals with imbalanced Th1/Th2 response (Th1/Th2 polarization) may become more susceptible to certain kinds of infection (Owen et al., 2013; Raphael et al., 2015; Tizard, 2013b).

Cytokine profiling is still a relatively new field of immunotoxicology in cetaceans, and thus the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit is not widely used for cytokine profiling in cetaceans (Desforges et al., 2016). Hence, it is more feasible to study the cytokine profiling by molecular biology (i.e., quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; qRT-PCR). Therefore, the present study evaluates the in vitro cytokine responses of cPBMCs to C-AgNP20 by qRT-PCR. The cytokines measured were as follows: polarizing cytokines of Th1 (IL-12 and IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-4), and some pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α).

Material and Methods

AgNPs characterization

Considering the extensive use of 20 nm citrate-AgNPs (C-AgNP20) in recently reported studies of cetacean and human blood cells (Huang et al., 2016a; Li et al., 2018b; Poirier et al., 2014; Poirier, Simard & Girard, 2016), commercial C-AgNP20 (Pelco® citrate Biopure™ silver; Ted Pella, Redding, CA, USA) was chosen. The C-AgNP20 had been extensively washed (without centrifugation) so that the level of trace elements becomes less than 0.000001%. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for determining surface area and size/shape distributions, UV-visible spectroscopy for measuring the optical properties, particle hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) for determining the size distribution were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and previous studies (Poirier et al., 2014; Poirier, Simard & Girard, 2016). The endotoxin level of C-AgNP20 suspension was examined by ToxinSensor™ Single Test Kit (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and it was lower than or equal to 0.015 EU/ml. For characterization, the C-AgNP20 obtained from the manufacturer were suspended in complete RPMI-1640 medium (RPMI-1640 (Gibco, New York, NY, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2mM L-glutamine, 50 IU penicillin, and 50 µg streptomycin) at a concentration of 50 µg/ml, and then examined using a JEM-1400 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) TEM. The size distribution and zeta potential of the C-AgNP20 were determined through Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments Inc., Westborough, MA, USA) (Table 1). Measurements were performed by using 100 and 500 µg/ml C-AgNP20 in two mM citrate buffer (pH 7.4). The C-AgNP20 were diluted to one, 10, and 100 µg/ml with two mM citrate buffer and instantly used for subsequent experiments. Two mM citrate buffer was used as a vehicle control (0 µg/ml C-AgNP20).

Table 1. The size distribution and zeta potential of the 20 nm citrate-AgNPs (C-AgNP20).

Concentration (µg/ml) 100 500
Z-Average (nm) 26.62 ± 0.15 26.54 ± 0.08
Size (nm) (intensity) 30.27 ± 0.18 (100%) 29.64 ± 0.30 (100%)
Zeta potential (mV) −38.97 ± 1.33 −44.2 ± 1.35
PdI 0.12 ± 0.00 0.11 ± 0.01

Notes.

Results shown are means ± SD from three different lectures.

NP were suspended in 2 nM citrate buffer and measurements performed at room temperature.

PdI, Poly-dispersity Index.

Animals and blood sample collection

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with international guidelines, and the protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Council of Agriculture of Taiwan (Approval number 1051700175). Voluntary blood samples were obtained from six clinically healthy bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with confirmation by physical examination, complete blood count, and biochemistry on a monthly basis from 2015 to 2017 at Farglory Ocean Park. Forty millilitres of heparin-anticoagulated whole blood were collected, stored, and shipped at four °C within 8 h for subsequent experiments.

Isolation of cPBMCs

Cetacean peripheral blood leukocytes (cPBLs) were collected by slow spin method with minor modifications (Bossart et al., 2008). The isolated cPBLs were resuspended in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, New York, NY, USA) with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and subsequently used in the isolation of cPBMCs by density gradient centrifugation method. After centrifugation at 1, 200 × g for 30 min at 20 °C, the cPBMCs were collected from the cell layer between the RPMI-1640 (Gibco) and Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), washed with RPMI-1640 twice, resuspended to a final concentration of 1 × 107 cells/ml in complete RPMI-1640 media, and kept on ice until they were utilized in subsequent experiments. The cell viability of cPBMCs was determined by the trypan blue exclusion method using a hemacytometer, and the cell purity based on the cell size (forward-scattered light; FSC) and inner complexity (side-scattered light; SSC) of cPBMCs were determined by FACScalibur flow cytometry (BD, CA, USA). The cPBMCs with higher than 90% viability and 80% purity were used in this study.

Determination of the sub-lethal dose of C-AgNP20 on cPBMCs with/without concanavalin A (ConA)

The cytotoxicity of C-AgNP20 on cPBMCs was evaluated by the Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (Strong Biotech, Taipei, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Freshly-isolated cPBMCs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and exposed to C-AgNP20 at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10 µg/ml with or without two µg/ml ConA (Sigma-Alderich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 24 h of culture, cells were collected and resuspended in binding buffer for further analysis by FACScalibur flow cytometry (BD). The percentages of early apoptotic (PI—and Annexin +) and late apoptotic/necrotic cells (PI + and Annexin +) were determined. A total of 8,000 events/sample were acquired. The sub-lethal doses of C-AgNP20 for cPBMCs were determined and subsequently used in the cytokine expression assay.

qRT-PCR efficiency of each primer sets

The primer sets used in cytokine expression assay are summarized in Table 2. The amplification efficiency (E) of qRT-PCR with each primer set was evaluated by the slope and R2 of standard curves using the equation: E = 10−(1∕slope) − 1 (Svec et al., 2015). The standard templates for qRT-PCR with target primer sets were prepared by serial dilution of PCR products, which were amplified from cDNA samples of isolated cPBMCs with target primer sets. The PCR product was 500-fold diluted with subsequent six steps of serial 10-fold dilutions, and subsequently used for qRT-PCR. The Cycle threshold (Ct) values of each dilution were evaluated by qRT-PCR with each primer set to generate the standard curves.

Table 2. Primer sets used in this study and their efficiencies.

Gene Accession number Primer sequence (5′–3′) Efficiency (%) R2 Reference
GAPDH DQ404538.1 CACCTCAAGATCGTCAGCAA 100.97 0.9949 Chen et al. (2015)
GCCGAAGTGGTCATGGAT
B2M DQ404542.1 GGTGGAGCAATCAGACCTGT 93.32 0.9984 Chen et al. (2015)
GCGTTGGGAGTGAACTCAG
IL-2 EU638316 CATGCCCAAGAAGGCTACAGAATTG 91.92 0.999 Sitt et al. (2008)
GTGAATCTTGTTTCAGATCCCTTTAG
IL-4 EU-638315 GGAGCTGCCTGTAGAAGACGTCTTTGC 99.25 0.9982 Sitt et al. (2008)
CTTCATTCACAGAACAGGTCATGTTTGCC
IL-10 AB775207 TGCTGGAGGACTTTAAGGGTTA 93.14 0.9986 Segawa et al. (2013)
ATGAAGATGTCAAACTCACTCATG
IL-12 EU638319 CAGACCAGAGCGATGAGGTCTTG 91.08 0.9999 Sitt et al. (2008)
GGGCTCTTTCTGGTCCTTTAAGATA
IFN-γ EU638318 CAGAGCCAAATAGTCTCCTTCTACTTC 92.42 0.9976 Sitt et al. (2008)
CTGGATCTGCAGATCATCTACCGGAATTTG
TNF-α EU638323 GAGGGAAGAGTTCCCAACTGGCTA 101.48 0.9934 Sitt et al. (2008)
CTGAGTACTGAGGTTGGCTACAAC

Extraction of RNA, synthesis of cDNA and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from blood samples by RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA samples were treated with genomic DNA (gDNA) wipeout solution (Qiagen). Treated samples were then tested by qRT-PCR to confirm the absence of residue gDNA prior to cDNA synthesis. The QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen) was used for cDNA synthesis. The reverse transcription was conducted within 4 h after RNA extraction. The cDNA from each sample was stored at −20 °C for qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR was performed on Mastercycler® ep realplex (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Each reaction contained 10 µl of SYBR® Advantage® qPCR Premix (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), 7.2 µl of RNase/DNase-free sterile water, 0.4 µl of each 10 mM forward/reverse primers, and two µl of DNA template, and the final volume of each reaction was 20 µl. Two microliters of RNase/DNase-free sterile water was used as the non-template negative control. The thermocycle conditions were set as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s and 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 60 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s with fluorescence detection. Furthermore, the melting curve analysis was performed at the end to identify non-specific amplification. All PCR protocols were performed in accordance with the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines (Bustin et al., 2009; Taylor & Mrkusich, 2014).

Time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs

To evaluate the time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines in cPBMCs with ConA, the cytokine gene expression levels of cPBMCs with ConA (0.5 µg/ml) were determined by qRT-PCR ( N = 4). Freshly-isolated cPBMCs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h of culture in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Then the cPBMCs were collected for subsequent mRNA extraction, complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, and qRT-PCR. The cPBMCs with 0 h incubation were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two housekeeping genes (HKGs), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β2-microglobulin (B2M), of each sample were determined and used to normalize the expression levels of target genes (Hellemans et al., 2007; Vandesompele et al., 2002).

Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs

The cPBMCs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and exposed to sub-lethal doses of C-AgNP20 with 0.5 µg/ml ConA for 4 and 24 h of culture in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After incubation, the cPBMCs were collected for subsequent mRNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR. PBMCs with 4 and 24 h incubation without C-AgNP20 treatment were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two HKGs, GAPDH and B2M, of each sample were determined and used to normalize the expression levels of target genes (Hellemans et al., 2007; Vandesompele et al., 2002). The experiment was independently repeated twice in duplicate (N = 12).

Statistical analysis

In all experiments, the results from duplicates were averaged. To compensate for individual differences, the results at different concentrations of C-AgNP20 for each individual were calculated as percentages of the results of the control (exposed to 0 µg/ml C-AgNP20). In addition, Th1/Th2 ratios at different concentrations of C-AgNP20 were determined by the cytokine mRNA ratios of Th1 (IL-12 or INF-γ) and Th2 (IL-4) polarizing cytokines and then compared to the control. Our data were first checked by Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Brown-Forsythe test, and the results indicated that the assumptions of normality and/or equal variance were violated. Therefore, the Kruskal-Wallis Test (post hoc test: Dunn’s multiple comparison test) was subsequently performed on the data. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and the analysis was performed in Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). All data were plotted on box-plot graphics. The bar in the middle of the box represented the second quartile (median), and the bottom and top of the box described the first and third quartiles. The whiskers showed that the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times IQR and 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR of all data, and any values that greater than these were defined as outliers and plotted as individual points. Asterisks above the boxplots indicated statistically significant differences compared to the control of each experiment.

Results

Characterization of C-AgNP20

The C-AgNP20 in complete RPMI-1640 media were spherical and close to 20 nm in diameter (Fig. 1). The size distributions and zeta potentials of C-AgNP20 (100 or 500 µg/ml) in 2 mM citrate buffer are illustrated in Table 1. The size distributions were 30.27 ± 0.18 (100%) and 29.64 ± 0.30 (100%) for C-AgNP20 at 100 and 500 µg/ml, respectively. The values of the zeta potential were −38.97 ± 1.33 and −44.2 ± 1.35 mV for C-AgNP20 at 100 and 500 µg/ml, respectively. Furthermore, the Poly-dispersity Indexes (PDIs) were 0.12 ± 0.00 and 0.11 ± 0.01, indicating that the composition of C-AgNP20 in the stock was in a single size mode without aggregates.

Figure 1. Characterization of C-AgNP20.

Figure 1

Representative TEM image of C-AgNP20 in complete RPMI-1640.

Sub-lethal dose of C-AgNP20 to the cPBMCs with or without ConA stimulation

The treatment of C-AgNP20 at 10 µg/ml significantly increased the ratios of late apoptotic/necrotic cells in cPBMCs with or without ConA stimulation. The ratios of early apoptotic and late apoptotic/necrotic cells of cPBMCs with different concentrations of C-AgNP20 as compared to the control are presented in Fig. 2. After 24 h of 10 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment, the ratios of late apoptotic/necrotic cells of cPBMCs significantly increased with (median ± interquartile range (IQR): 3.55 ± 3.42; p = 0.0073) or without ConA stimulation (median ± IQR: 1.78 ± 2.24; p = 0.0103). In contrast, no statistically significant increases in the ratios of apoptotic and late apoptotic/necrotic cells in cPBMCs were found after 24 h culture with 0.1 and 1.0 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatments. Therefore, 0.1 and 1.0 µg/ml C-AgNP20 were defined as the sub-lethal doses for cPBMCs and used in the subsequent mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines in cPBMCs to C-AgNP20.

Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of C-AgNP20 on cPBMCs after 24 h of culture with or without ConA.

Figure 2

(A) Ratio of apoptotic cPBMCs in percentage between treatment and control without ConA. (B) Ratio of late apoptotic/necrotic cPBMCs in percentage between treatment and control without ConA. (C) Ratio of apoptotic cPBMCs in percentage between treatment and control with ConA. (D) Ratio of late apoptotic/necrotic cPBMCs in percentage between treatment and control with ConA. The bar in the middle of the box represents the median, and the bottom and top of the box describe the first and third quartiles. The whiskers show the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times IQR and 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR of all data, and any values that are greater than these are defined as outliers and plotted as individual points. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis Test).

qRT-PCR efficiency of each primer set

Amplification efficiency (E) values for selected HKGs and cytokine genes, including GAPDH, B2M, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, ranged from 91.08 to 101.48% with R2 > 0.99. The results are summarized in Table 2.

Time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs with ConA stimulation

The mRNA expression levels of IL-2 and TNF-α were significantly increased at 4 h of culture, gradually decreased from 8 to 20 h of culture, and then mildly but not significantly increased at 24 h of culture. The mRNA expression level of IFN- γ was significantly increased at 4 h of culture, gradually decreased at 8 and 12 h of culture, and then increased from 16 to 24 h of culture. In addition, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-12 were significantly increased at 4 h of culture and gradually decreased over time. Therefore, the time points chosen for the following experiments were 4 h and 24 h. All the results are illustrated in Fig. 3.

Figure 3. Time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of (A) IL-2, (B) IL-4, (C) IL-10, (D) IL-12, (E) IFN-γ and (F) TNF-α of cPBMCs with ConA.

Figure 3

The bar in the middle of the box represents the median, and the bottom and top of the box describe the first and third quartiles. The whiskers show the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times IQR and 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR of all data, and any values that are greater than these are defined as outliers and plotted as individual points. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis Test).

Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines in cPBMCs

At 4 h of culture, the mRNA expression level of IL-10 was significantly decreased (median ± IQR: 0.7864 ± 0.2355; p = 0.0049) at 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20, but no significant differences were observed in the mRNA expression levels of other cytokine genes at 0.1 or 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 (Fig. 4). Following 24 h of culture with 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20, the mRNA expression levels of IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were significantly decreased, but no significant difference was found in those of IL-4 and IL-10. Furthermore, the mRNA expression levels of IL-12 (median ± IQR: 0.8337 ± 0.2088; p = 0.0339) and IFN-γ (median ± IQR: 0.7894 ± 0.389; p = 0.0164) were also significantly decreased at 0.1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 (Fig. 4). The Th1/Th2 bias was defined by the ratios of Th1 and Th2 polarizing cytokines. The IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio was significantly decreased following 24 h of culture with 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20, and the IL-12/IL-4 ratio was significantly decreased following 4 or 24 h of culture with 0.1 or 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatments. Overall, the in vitro cytokine responses of cPBMCs with C-AgNP20 treatments were biased toward Th2 cytokine response (Fig. 5).

Figure 4. Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of (A) IL-2, (B) IL-4, (C) IL-10, (D) IL-12, (E) IFN-γ and (F) TNF-α of cPBMCs with ConA.

Figure 4

The bar in the middle of the box represents the median, and the bottom and top of the box describe the first and third quartiles. The whiskers show the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times IQR and 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR of all data, and any values that are greater than these are defined as outliers and plotted as individual points. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis Test).

Figure 5. The ratios of Th1 and Th2 polarizing cytokines at 4 and 24 h of culture.

Figure 5

(A) Ratio of IFN-γ and IL-4; (B) ratio of IL-12 and IL-4. The bar in the middle of the box represents the median, and the bottom and top of the box describe the first and third quartiles. The whiskers show the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times IQR and 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR of all data, and any values that are greater than these are defined as outliers and plotted as individual points. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control (p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis Test).

Discussion

Our data indicated that the concentration of 10 µg/ml C-AgNP20 was lethal dose for cPBMCs after 24 h of culture. Although previous studies of human PBMCs have used a variety of AgNPs (including different sizes and coatings), the lethal dose of AgNPs to human PBMCs is generally higher than 10 µg/ml (Ghosh et al., 2012; Greulich et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2016a; Orta-Garcia et al., 2015; Paino & Zucolotto, 2015; Shin et al., 2007). Therefore, our data suggest that cPBMCs may be more vulnerable than human PBMCs to the cytotoxic effects of C-AgNP20. However, previous studies have demonstrated that the toxicity and physicochemical characteristics of AgNPs are associated with their surface coating and size (Kim & Ryu, 2013), and thus further investigation using the same AgNPs from the same manufacturer is necessary to compare the differences of susceptibility between cetaceans and humans. In addition, the negative effects of AgNPs with different sizes and coatings on the cPBMCs are also worth to be further studied.

It has been demonstrated that ConA (a selective T-cell mitogen) induces proliferative activity and gene expression of cytokines in bottlenose dolphins, but no information is available regarding the time course (Hofstetter et al., 2017; Segawa et al., 2013; Sitt et al., 2008). Previous studies on ConA-induced cytokine mRNA expression levels of cPBMCs only presented one or two time points (Segawa et al., 2013; Sitt et al., 2008). Sitt et al. (2008) quantified the ConA-induced cytokine mRNA expression levels of cPBMCs after 48 h of treatment, but the reason for choosing this time point was not explained. Their results showed that the mRNA expression levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, and IFN-γ in cPBMCs are induced after 48 h of ConA stimulation, but those of IL-10 and TNF-α were not increased (Sitt et al., 2008). The other study demonstrated that the mRNA expression level of IL-10 in cPBMCs increased after 6 h of ConA stimulation (Segawa et al., 2013). Therefore, to apply appropriate time points for studying the effects of C-AgNP20 on the cytokine mRNA expression levels of cPBMCs, the time kinetics (from 0 to 24 h) of mRNA expression levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF- α in cPBMCs with ConA stimulation were investigated. Our data indicated that the mRNA expression levels of all cytokine genes were significantly increased at 4 h of ConA stimulation and then gradually decreased with time. A longer incubation time was not possible in our study because the cell numbers of isolated cPBMCs were insufficient.

Previous studies have investigated the negative effects of AgNPs on cytokines in human PBMCs (Franco-Molina et al., 2016; Greulich et al., 2011; Shin et al., 2007). Uncoated AgNPs (1.5 nm; 1 to 2.5 nm in diameter) significantly inhibited the phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-induced IL-5, IFN-γ, and TNF-α production respectively at concentrations ≥10μg/ml, ≥3μg/ml, and ≥3μg/ml in human PBMCs (Shin et al., 2007). It was reported that uncoated AgNPs (100 nm; 90 to 190 nm in diameter) at 0.0175 µg/ml can inhibit both PHA and ConA-induced IL-2 production in human PBMCs (Franco-Molina et al., 2016). Furthermore, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-coated AgNPs (75 ± 20 nm) of five to 20 µg/ml significantly increased the generations of IL-6 and IL-8 but significantly decreased the release of IL-1ra from human PBMCs, while PVP-coated AgNPs did not affect the productions of IL-2, IL-4 and TNF-α (Greulich et al., 2011). As mentioned above, the effects of AgNPs on cytokine production in human PBMCs remain inconclusive.

The mRNA expression levels of IL-4 and IFN-γ were mildly increased and that of IL-12 was seemingly unaffected at 4 h of C-AgNP20 treatment. IL-4, as a polarizing Th2 cytokine, is mainly produced by T cells (especially the Th2 subset) and mast cells, and it promotes the differentiation of naïve T cells to Th2 cells, stimulates the growth and differentiation of B cells, and induces class switching to IgE, which may promote allergic responses (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). IFN-γ, as a polarizing Th1 cytokine and a key mediator of cell-mediated immune response, is produced by Th1 cells, cytotoxic T cells, and NK cells. The major functions of IFN-γ are enhancement of Th1 differentiation, inhibition of Th2 differentiation, and activations of NK cells and macrophages (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). IL-12 is also a polarizing Th1 cytokine and is produced by dendritic cells, monocytes, macrophages and B cells. IL-12 induces differentiation of Th1 cells, increases IFN-γ production by T cells and NK cells, and enhances NK and cytotoxic T cell activity (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). This mixed pattern of Th1 and Th2 cytokines may be indicative of a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine response of cPBMCs at 4 h of C-AgNP20 treatment. However, considering the significant decrease in the IL-12/IL-4 ratio, Th2 cytokine response is still predominant in cPBMCs following 4 h of C-AgNP20 treatment. The mRNA expression levels of IL-12 and IFN-γ were significantly decreased by 0.1 or one µg/ml C-AgNP20, and that of IL-4 was seemingly unaffected, in cPBMCs following 24 h of culture. The significantly decreased Th1/Th2 (i.e., IFN-γ/IL-4 and IL-12/IL-4) ratios suggested that the immune response of cPBMCs following 24 h of C-AgNP20 treatment is Th2 biased.

Furthermore, the mRNA expression level of TNF-α was significantly decreased by 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 after 24 h of culture. TNF-α is a cytokine specifically useful to measure the inflammatory state of an animal and it is primarily produced by macrophages and both Th1 and Th2 cells in response to both acute and chronic conditions (Eberle et al., 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated that TNF-α is a contributing factor in the inflammatory response against infection of intracellular micropathogens such as Plasmodium spp., T. gondii, Leishmania major, and Trypanosoma spp. (Korner et al., 2010). Hence, our data indicate that C-AgNP20 induced a Th2 biased immune response and suppressed the mRNA expression level of TNF-α in cPBMCs, which may weaken the cellular immune response and further impair the immunity against intracellular organisms and virus. Similar Th2 immune response was observed in other studies that evaluated the expression of cytokines in different cetacean tissues (Jaber et al., 2010). A variety of infections caused by intracellular pathogens in cetaceans have been reported and may be associated with the mass stranding events of cetaceans (Cvetnic et al., 2016; Domingo et al., 1990; Domingo et al., 1992; Dubey et al., 2007; Dubey et al., 2008; Mazzariol et al., 2016; Mazzariol et al., 2017). In addition, previous studies suggested that Ag contamination exists in all aspects of the marine ecosystem, and cetaceans may have been negatively affected by Ag contamination (Becker et al., 1995; Caceres-Saez et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2017; Dehn et al., 2006; Kunito et al., 2004; Li et al., 2018a; Mendez-Fernandez et al., 2014; Reed et al., 2015; Rosa et al., 2008; Seixas et al., 2009; Woshner et al., 2001). The direct correlation between the infection of intracellular pathogens and the severity of Ag contamination in cetaceans is worth studying.

Following 4 h of 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20 treatment, the mRNA expression level of IL-10 was significantly decreased and that of IL-2 was mildly increased. In other words, mRNA expression levels of IL-2 and IL-10 were respectively upregulated and downregulated by C-AgNP20 in cPBMCs. Subsequently, the mRNA expression level of IL-2 was significantly decreased, and that of IL-10 seemingly unaffected, in cPBMCs following 24 h of treatment of 1 µg/ml C-AgNP20. IL-2, which is produced by activated T cells, can stimulate proliferation and differentiation of T and B cells and activates NK cells (Owen et al., 2013; Tizard, 2013b). However, a growing body of evidence has indicated that IL-2 is crucial for the development and function of regulatory T cells (Treg cells), which secrete effector cytokines, such as IL-10, to control and modulate the immunity to self, neoplasia, microorganisms, and grafts (Owen et al., 2013; Pérol & Piaggio, 2016). Considering the roles of IL-2 and IL-10 in immune tolerance, it is speculated that C-AgNP20 may play a significant role in peripheral immune tolerance by regulating the balance between IL-2 and IL-10 (Pérol & Piaggio, 2016; Veiopoulou et al., 2004).

The effect of C-AgNP20 on the ConA-induced mRNA expression levels of the selected cytokines in cPBMCs is mainly inhibitory. A previous study found that PVP-AgNPs (10, 25, 40, 45, and 110 nm in diameter) could bind to RNA polymerase, disturb the process of RNA transcription, and thus decreased the overall RNA synthesis in mouse erythroid progenitor cells (Wang et al., 2013). Although the down-regulation of mRNA expression levels may be associated with decreased RNA synthesis due to the direct interaction between C-AgNP20 and RNA polymerase, it cannot fully explain the unaffected Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) of cPBMCs in this study. On the other hand, the ConA-induced proliferative activity of cPBMCs is inhibited by 0.1 and 1.0 µg/ml C-AgNP20 (Li et al., 2018b), and this phenomenon may be associated with the decreased mRNA expression levels of IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α and/or a suppressive effect on DNA/RNA synthesis induced by ConA. Further investigation on the underlying mechanism of AgNPs in cetacean leukocytes is important to ascertain the negative health impact caused by AgNPs on cetaceans, and such investigation would improve the understanding of the potential hazards of AgNPs to environmental condition and human health.

Furthermore, although the biodistribution of AgNPs or Ag in cetaceans is still undetermined, previous in vivo studies of AgNPs by oral exposure in laboratory rats demonstrated that the Ag concentration in the liver is approximately 10 times higher than that in the blood or plasma (Lee et al., 2013; Loeschner et al., 2011; Van der Zande et al., 2012). Based on these animal models, it is presumed that the Ag concentrations in the blood of cetaceans may range from 0.01 to 72.6 µg/ml (Chen et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018a). Although previous studies have indicated that the status of AgNPs in the aquatic environment is complicated and variable (i.e., the concentrations of AgNPs and other Ag/Ag compounds are still undetermined in cetaceans)(Levard et al., 2012; Massarsky, Trudeau & Moon, 2014), our data suggest that cetaceans may be negatively affected by AgNPs.

Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated: (1) the sublethal dose of C-AgNP20 to cPBMCs (≤1 µg/ml), (2) the time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines in cPBMCs, and (3) the inhibitory effect of C-AgNP20 (0.1 and 1 µg/ml) on the mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs with evidence of Th2 cytokine bias. Taken together, C-AgNP20 may suppress the cellular immune response and thus inhibit the immunity against intracellular microorganisms in cetaceans.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. The size distribution and zeta pontential of the 100 and 500 µg/ml C-AgNP20 in 2 mM citrate buffer (pH 7.4).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Cytotoxicity of of C-AgNP20 in cPBMCs with or without ConA stimulation.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. qPCR efficiencies of each primer set (ct values).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-3
Figure S1. qPCR efficiencies of each primer set.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-4
Supplemental Information 4. Time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs.

The cPBMCs with 0 h incubation were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two housekeeping genes (HKGs), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β2-microglobulin (B2M), of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes. The numbers in the sheet were the expression levels.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-5
Supplemental Information 5. Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs (4 h).

The cPBMCs with 4 h incubation without C-AgNP20 treatment were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two HKGs, GAPDH and B2M, of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-6
Supplemental Information 6. Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs (24 h).

The cPBMCs with 24 h incubation without C-AgNP20 treatment were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two HKGs, GAPDH and B2M, of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-7

Acknowledgments

We thank the personnel of Farglory Ocean Park for blood sample collection and storage, the dolphins in Farglory Ocean Park for donating their blood, and Dr. Bang-Yeh Liou for blood sample transportation.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the Ministry of Science & Technology, Taiwan under Grant MOST 106-2313-B-002-054. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Chieh Lo is the veterinarian of Farglory Ocean Park, Hualien, Taiwan.

Author Contributions

Wen-Ta Li conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lei-Ya Wang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hui-Wen Chang, Wei-Cheng Yang, Victor Fei Pang and Meng-Hsien Chen conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Chieh Lo performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, collected the blood samples from captive dolphins.

Chian-Ren Jeng conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with international guidelines, and the protocol had been reviewed and approved by the Council of Agriculture of Taiwan (Approval number 1051700175).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Becker et al. (1995).Becker P, Mackey E, Demiralp R, Suydam R, Early G, Koster B, Wise S. Relationship of silver with selenium and mercury in the liver of two species of toothed whales (odontocetes) Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1995;30:262–271. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(94)00176-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Beineke et al. (2004).Beineke A, Siebert U, Van Elk N, Baumgartner W. Development of a lymphocyte-transformation-assay for peripheral blood lymphocytes of the harbor porpoise and detection of cytokines using the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Immunology and Immunopathology. 2004;98:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beineke et al. (2010).Beineke A, Siebert U, Wohlsein P, Baumgartner W. Immunology of whales and dolphins. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2010;133:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bossart et al. (2008).Bossart GD, Romano TA, Peden-Adams MM, Rice CD, Fair PA, Goldstein JD, Kilpatrick D, Cammen K, Reif JS. Hematological, biochemical, and immunological findings in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with orogenital papillomas. Aquatic Mammals. 2008;34:166–177. doi: 10.1578/AM.34.2.2008.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Buffet et al. (2014).Buffet PE, Zalouk-Vergnoux A, Chatel A, Berthet B, Metais I, Perrein-Ettajani H, Poirier L, Luna-Acosta A, Thomas-Guyon H, Risso-de Faverney C, Guibbolini M, Gilliland D, Valsami-Jones E, Mouneyrac C. A marine mesocosm study on the environmental fate of silver nanoparticles and toxicity effects on two endobenthic species: the ragworm Hediste diversicolor and the bivalve mollusc Scrobicularia plana. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;470–471:1151–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bustin et al. (2009).Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55:611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caceres-Saez et al. (2013).Caceres-Saez I, Ribeiro Guevara S, Dellabianca NA, Goodall RN, Cappozzo HL. Heavy metals and essential elements in Commerson’s dolphins (Cephalorhynchus c. commersonii) from the southwestern South Atlantic Ocean. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2013;185:5375–5386. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2952-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2015).Chen IH, Chou LS, Chou SJ, Wang JH, Stott J, Blanchard M, Jen IF, Yang WC. Selection of suitable reference genes for normalization of quantitative RT-PCR in peripheral blood samples of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Scientific Reports. 2015;5:15425. doi: 10.1038/srep15425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2017).Chen MH, Zhuang MF, Chou LS, Liu JY, Shih CC, Chen CY. Tissue concentrations of four Taiwanese toothed cetaceans indicating the silver and cadmium pollution in the western Pacific Ocean. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017;124:993–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cvetnic et al. (2016).Cvetnic Z, Duvnjak S, Duras M, Gomercic T, Reil I, Zdelar-Tuk M, Spicic S. Evidence of Brucella strain ST27 in bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in Europe. Microbiology. 2016;196:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dehn et al. (2006).Dehn LA, Follmann EH, Thomas DL, Sheffield GG, Rosa C, Duffy LK, O’Hara TM. Trophic relationships in an Arctic food web and implications for trace metal transfer. Science of the Total Environment. 2006;362:103–123. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Desforges et al. (2016).Desforges JP, Sonne C, Levin M, Siebert U, De Guise S, Dietz R. Immunotoxic effects of environmental pollutants in marine mammals. Environment International. 2016;86:126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domingo et al. (1990).Domingo M, Ferrer L, Pumarola M, Marco A, Plana J, Kennedy S, McAliskey M, Rima BK. Morbillivirus in dolphins. Nature. 1990;348:21. doi: 10.1038/348021a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domingo et al. (1992).Domingo M, Visa J, Pumarola M, Marco AJ, Ferrer L, Rabanal R, Kennedy S. Pathologic and immunocytochemical studies of morbillivirus infection in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) Veterinary Pathology. 1992;29:1–10. doi: 10.1177/030098589202900101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dubey et al. (2008).Dubey JP, Fair PA, Sundar N, Velmurugan G, Kwok OC, McFee WE, Majumdar D, Su C. Isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Journal of Parasitology. 2008;94:821–823. doi: 10.1645/GE-1444.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dubey et al. (2007).Dubey JP, Morales JA, Sundar N, Velmurugan GV, Gonzalez-Barrientos CR, Hernandez-Mora G, Su C. Isolation and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) from Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology. 2007;93:710–711. doi: 10.1645/GE-1120R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eberle et al. (2018).Eberle KC, Venn-Watson SK, Jensen ED, LaBresh J, Sullivan Y, Kakach L, Sacco RE. Development and testing of species-specific ELISA assays to measure IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0190786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espinosa-Cristobal et al. (2013).Espinosa-Cristobal LF, Martinez-Castanon GA, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Patino-Marin N, Reyes-Macias JF, Vargas-Morales JM, Ruiz F. Toxicity, distribution, and accumulation of silver nanoparticles in Wistar rats. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2013;15 doi: 10.1007/S11051-013-1702-6. Article 1702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Farre et al. (2009).Farre M, Gajda-Schrantz K, Kantiani L, Barcelo D. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2009;393:81–95. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2458-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Franco-Molina et al. (2016).Franco-Molina MA, Mendoza-Gamboa E, Zarate-Triviño DG, Coronado-Cerda EE, Alcocer-González JM, Resendez-Pérez D, Rodríguez-Salazar MC, Rivera-Morales LG, Tamez-Guerra R, Rodríguez-Padilla C. In vitro evaluation of colloidal silver on immune function: Antilymphoproliferative activity. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2016;2017:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2016/4176212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gagne et al. (2013).Gagne F, Auclair J, Fortier M, Bruneau A, Fournier M, Turcotte P, Pilote M, Gagnon C. Bioavailability and immunotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanata. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 2013;76:767–777. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2013.818602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gambardella et al. (2015).Gambardella C, Costa E, Piazza V, Fabbrocini A, Magi E, Faimali M, Garaventa F. Effect of silver nanoparticles on marine organisms belonging to different trophic levels. Marine Environmental Research. 2015;111:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghosh et al. (2012).Ghosh MJM, Manivannan J, Sinha S, Chakraborty A, Mallick SK, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A. In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Mutation Research. 2012;749:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greulich et al. (2011).Greulich C, Diendorf J, Gessmann J, Simon T, Habijan T, Eggeler G, Schildhauer TA, Epple M, Koller M. Cell type-specific responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011;7:3505–3514. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hellemans et al. (2007).Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biology. 2007;8 doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19. Article R19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hofstetter et al. (2017).Hofstetter AR, Eberle KC, Venn-Watson SK, Jensen ED, Porter TJ, Waters TE, Sacco RE. Monitoring bottlenose dolphin leukocyte cytokine mRNA responsiveness by qPCR. PLOS ONE. 2017;12:e0189437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang et al. (2016a).Huang H, Lai W, Cui M, Liang L, Lin Y, Fang Q, Liu Y, Xie L. An evaluation of blood compatibility of silver nanoparticles. Scientific Reports. 2016a;6:25518. doi: 10.1038/srep25518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huang, Cheng & Yi (2016b).Huang J, Cheng J, Yi J. Impact of silver nanoparticles on marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2016b;36:1343–1354. doi: 10.1002/jat.3325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jaber et al. (2010).Jaber JR, Perez J, Zafra R, Herraez P, Rodriguez F, Arbelo M, De los Monteros AE, Fernandez A. Cross-reactivity of anti-human, anti-porcine and anti-bovine cytokine antibodies with cetacean tissues. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 2010;143:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kidd (2003).Kidd Th1/Th2 balance: the hypothesis, its limitations, and implications for health and disease. Alternative Medicine Review. 2003;8:223–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim & Ryu (2013).Kim S, Ryu DY. Silver nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress, genotoxicity and apoptosis in cultured cells and animal tissues. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2013;33:78–89. doi: 10.1002/jat.2792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Korner et al. (2010).Korner H, McMorran B, Schluter D, Fromm The role of TNF in parasitic diseases: still more questions than answers. International Journal for Parasitology. 2010;40:879–888. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kunito et al. (2004).Kunito T, Nakamura S, Ikemoto T, Anan Y, Kubota R, Tanabe S, Rosas FC, Fillmann G, Readman JW. Concentration and subcellular distribution of trace elements in liver of small cetaceans incidentally caught along the Brazilian coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2004;49:574–587. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee et al. (2013).Lee JH, Kim YS, Song KS, Ryu HR, Sung JH, Park JD, Park HM, Song NW, Shin BS, Marshak D, Ahn K, Lee JE, Yu IJ. Biopersistence of silver nanoparticles in tissues from Sprague-Dawley rats. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2013;10 doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-36. Article 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Levard et al. (2012).Levard C, Hotze EM, Lowry GV, Brown Jr GE. Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity. Environmental Science and Technology. 2012;46:6900–6914. doi: 10.1021/es2037405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2018a).Li WT, Chang HW, Chen MH, Chiou HY, Liou BY, Pang VF, Yang WC, Jeng CR. Investigation of silver (Ag) deposition in tissues from stranded cetaceans by autometallography (AMG) Environmental Pollution. 2018a;235:534–545. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2018b).Li WT, Chang HW, Yang WC, Lo C, Wang LY, Pang VF, Chen MH, Jeng CR. Immunotoxicity of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) on the Leukocytes of Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Scientific Reports. 2018b;8:5593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23737-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Loeschner et al. (2011).Loeschner K, Hadrup N, Qvortrup K, Larsen A, Gao X, Vogel U, Mortensen A, Lam HR, Larsen EH. Distribution of silver in rats following 28 days of repeated oral exposure to silver nanoparticles or silver acetate. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2011;8 doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-8-18. Article 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Massarsky, Trudeau & Moon (2014).Massarsky A, Trudeau VL, Moon TW. Predicting the environmental impact of nanosilver. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2014;38:861–873. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazzariol et al. (2016).Mazzariol S, Centelleghe C, Beffagna G, Povinelli M, Terracciano G, Cocumelli C, Pintore A, Denurra D, Casalone C, Pautasso A, Di Francesco CE, Di Guardo G. Mediterranean fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) threatened by dolphin morbillivirus. Infectious Diseases. 2016;22:302–305. doi: 10.3201/eid2202.15-0882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazzariol et al. (2017).Mazzariol S, Centelleghe C, Di Provvido A, Di Renzo L, Cardeti G, Cersini A, Fichi G, Petrella A, Di Francesco CE, Mignone W, Casalone C, Di Guardo G. Dolphin morbillivirus associated with a mass stranding of sperm whales, Italy. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2017;23:144–146. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.160239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mendez-Fernandez et al. (2014).Mendez-Fernandez P, Webster L, Chouvelon T, Bustamante P, Ferreira M, Gonzalez AF, Lopez A, Moffat CF, Pierce GJ, Read FL, Russell M, Santos MB, Spitz J, Vingada JV, Caurant F. An assessment of contaminant concentrations in toothed whale species of the NW Iberian Peninsula: part II. Trace element concentrations. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;484:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Orta-Garcia et al. (2015).Orta-Garcia ST, Plascencia-Villa G, Ochoa-Martinez AC, Ruiz-Vera T, Perez-Vazquez FJ, Velazquez-Salazar JJ, Yacaman MJ, Navarro-Contreras HR, Perez-Maldonado IN. Analysis of cytotoxic effects of silver nanoclusters on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells ‘in vitro’. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2015;35:1189–1199. doi: 10.1002/jat.3190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Owen et al. (2013).Owen JA, Punt J, Stranford SA, Jones PP, Kuby J. Kuby immunology. W.H. Freeman; New York: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Paino & Zucolotto (2015).Paino IM, Zucolotto V. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-coated silver nanoparticles: activation of neutrophils and nanotoxicology effects in human hepatocarcinoma and mononuclear cells. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2015;39:614–621. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pérol & Piaggio (2016).Pérol L, Piaggio E. New molecular and cellular mechanisms of tolerance: tolerogenic actions of IL-2. In: Cuturi MC, Anegon I, editors. Suppression and regulation of immune responses: methods and protocols. Vol. II. Humana Press; New York: 2016. pp. 11–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poirier et al. (2014).Poirier M, Simard JC, Antoine F, Girard D. Interaction between silver nanoparticles of 20 nm (AgNP20) and human neutrophils: induction of apoptosis and inhibition of de novo protein synthesis by AgNP20 aggregates. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2014;34:404–412. doi: 10.1002/jat.2956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poirier, Simard & Girard (2016).Poirier M, Simard JC, Girard D. Silver nanoparticles of 70 nm and 20 nm affect differently the biology of human neutrophils. Journal of Immunotoxicology. 2016;13:375–385. doi: 10.3109/1547691X.2015.1106622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raphael et al. (2015).Raphael I, Nalawade S, Eagar TN, Forsthuber TG. T cell subsets and their signature cytokines in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Cytokine. 2015;74:5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reed et al. (2015).Reed LA, McFee WE, Pennington PL, Wirth EF, Fulton MH. A survey of trace element distribution in tissues of the dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima) stranded along the South Carolina coast from 1990–2011. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015;100:501–506. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosa et al. (2008).Rosa C, Blake JE, Bratton GR, Dehn LA, Gray MJ, O’Hara TM. Heavy metal and mineral concentrations and their relationship to histopathological findings in the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) Science of the Total Environment. 2008;399:165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sardari et al. (2012).Sardari RRR, Zarchi SR, Talebi A, Nasri S, Imani S, Khoradmehr A, Sheshde SAR. Toxicological effects of silver nanoparticles in rats. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:5587–5593. doi: 10.5897/Ajmr11.1070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Segawa et al. (2013).Segawa T, Karatani N, Itou T, Suzuki M, Sakai T. Cloning and characterization of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) interleukin-10. Immunology and Immunopathology. 2013;154:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seixas et al. (2009).Seixas TG, Kehrig HA, Di Beneditto AP, Souza CM, Malm O, Moreira I. Essential (Se, Cu) and non-essential (Ag, Hg, Cd) elements: what are their relationships in liver of Sotalia guianensis (Cetacea, Delphinidae)? Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2009;58:629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shahare & Yashpal (2013).Shahare B, Yashpal M. Toxic effects of repeated oral exposure of silver nanoparticles on small intestine mucosa of mice. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 2013;23:161–167. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2013.764950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shin et al. (2007).Shin SH, Ye MK, Kim HS, Kang HS. The effects of nano-silver on the proliferation and cytokine expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. International Immunopharmacology. 2007;7:1813–1818. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sitt et al. (2008).Sitt T, Bowen L, Blanchard MT, Smith BR, Gershwin LJ, Byrne BA, Stott JL. Quantitation of leukocyte gene expression in cetaceans. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 2008;32:1253–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soares et al. (2016).Soares T, Ribeiro D, Proenca C, Chiste RC, Fernandes E, Freitas M. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human neutrophils assessed by multiple analytical approaches. Life Sciences. 2016;145:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Svec et al. (2015).Svec D, Tichopad A, Novosadova V, Pfaffl MW, Kubista M. How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification. 2015;3:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor & Mrkusich (2014).Taylor SC, Mrkusich EM. The state of RT-quantitative PCR: firsthand observations of implementation of minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments (MIQE) Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;24:46–52. doi: 10.1159/000356189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thummabancha, Onparn & Srisapoome (2016).Thummabancha K, Onparn N, Srisapoome Analysis of hematologic alterations, immune responses and metallothionein gene expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to silver nanoparticles. Journal of Immunotoxicology. 2016;3:909–917. doi: 10.1080/1547691X.2016.1242673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tizard (2013a).Tizard IR. Cell signaling: cytokines and their receptors. In: Tizard IR, editor. Veterinary immunology. Ninth Edition Saunders; St. Louis: 2013a. pp. 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Tizard (2013b).Tizard IR. Helper T cells and their response to antigen. In: Tizard IR, editor. Veterinary immunology. Ninth Edition Saunders; St. Louis: 2013b. pp. 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Zande et al. (2012).Van der Zande M, Vandebriel RJ, Van Doren E, Kramer E, Herrera Rivera Z, Serrano-Rojero CS, Gremmer ER, Mast J, Peters RJ, Hollman PC, Hendriksen PJ, Marvin HJ, Peijnenburg AA, Bouwmeester H. Distribution, elimination, and toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in rats after 28-day oral exposure. ACS Nano. 2012;6:7427–7442. doi: 10.1021/nn302649p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vandesompele et al. (2002).Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology. 2002;3:research0034.1–research0034.11. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Veiopoulou et al. (2004).Veiopoulou C, Kogopoulou O, Tzakos E, Mavrothalassitis G, Mitsias D, Karafoulidou A, Paliogianni F, Moutsopoulos HM, Thyphronitis G. IL-2 and IL-10 production by human CD4+T cells is differentially regulated by p38: mode of stimulation-dependent regulation of IL-2. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2004;11:199–208. doi: 10.1159/000078437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walters, Pool & Somerset (2014).Walters CR, Pool EJ, Somerset VS. Ecotoxicity of silver nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: a review of literature and gaps in nano-toxicological research. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering. 2014;49:1588–1601. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2014.938536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2014).Wang H, Ho KT, Scheckel KG, Wu F, Cantwell MG, Katz DR, Horowitz DB, Boothman WS, Burgess RM. Toxicity, bioaccumulation, and biotransformation of silver nanoparticles in marine organisms. Environmental Science and Technology. 2014;48:13711–13717. doi: 10.1021/es502976y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2013).Wang Z, Liu S, Ma J, Qu G, Wang X, Yu S, He J, Liu J, Xia T, Jiang GB. Silver nanoparticles induced RNA polymerase-silver binding and RNA transcription inhibition in erythroid progenitor cells. ACS Nano. 2013;7:4171–4186. doi: 10.1021/nn400594s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woshner et al. (2001).Woshner VM, O’Hara TM, Bratton GR, Suydam RS, Beasley VR. Concentrations and interactions of selected essential and non-essential elements in bowhead and beluga whales of arctic Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2001;37:693–710. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-37.4.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. The size distribution and zeta pontential of the 100 and 500 µg/ml C-AgNP20 in 2 mM citrate buffer (pH 7.4).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Cytotoxicity of of C-AgNP20 in cPBMCs with or without ConA stimulation.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. qPCR efficiencies of each primer set (ct values).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-3
Figure S1. qPCR efficiencies of each primer set.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-4
Supplemental Information 4. Time kinetics of mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs.

The cPBMCs with 0 h incubation were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two housekeeping genes (HKGs), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β2-microglobulin (B2M), of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes. The numbers in the sheet were the expression levels.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-5
Supplemental Information 5. Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs (4 h).

The cPBMCs with 4 h incubation without C-AgNP20 treatment were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two HKGs, GAPDH and B2M, of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-6
Supplemental Information 6. Effects of C-AgNP20 on mRNA expression levels of selected cytokines of cPBMCs (24 h).

The cPBMCs with 24 h incubation without C-AgNP20 treatment were used as control for the calculation of cytokine expression level by ΔΔCT method. In addition, the geometric means of two HKGs, GAPDH and B2M, of each samples were determined and used to normalize the the expression levels of target genes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5432/supp-7

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES