Abstract
Just as in clay molding or glass blowing, sculpting biological structures requires the constituent material to locally flow like a fluid while maintaining overall mechanical integrity like a solid. Disordered soft materials, such as foams, emulsions and colloidal suspensions, switch from fluid-like to solid-like behaviors at a jamming transition1–4. Similarly, cell collectives have been shown to display glassy dynamics in 2D and 3D5,6 and jamming in cultured epithelial monolayers7,8, behaviors recently predicted theoretically9–11 and proposed to influence asthma pathobiology8 and tumor progression12. However, it is unknown if these seemingly universal behaviors occur in vivo and, specifically, if they play any functional role during embryonic morphogenesis. By combining direct in vivo measurements of tissue mechanics with analysis of cellular dynamics, we show that during vertebrate body axis elongation, posterior tissues undergo a jamming transition from a fluid-like behavior at the extending end, the mesodermal progenitor zone (MPZ), to a solid-like behavior in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). We uncover an anteroposterior, N-cadherin-dependent gradient in yield stress that provides increasing mechanical integrity to the PSM, consistent with the tissue transiting from a wetter to a dryer foam-like architecture. Our results show that cell-scale stresses fluctuate rapidly (~1 min), enabling cell rearrangements and effectively ‘melting’ the tissue at the growing end. Persistent (>0.5 h) stresses at supracellular scales, rather than cell-scale stresses, guide morphogenetic flows in fluid-like tissue regions. Unidirectional axis extension is sustained by the reported PSM rigidification, which mechanically supports posterior, fluid-like tissues during remodeling prior to their maturation. The spatiotemporal control of fluid-like and solid-like tissue states may represent a generic physical mechanism of embryonic morphogenesis.
One of the hallmarks of animal development is the formation of the anteroposterior (AP) body axis, which occurs by nearly unidirectional elongation of tissues at the anterior and posterior body ends13. During posterior elongation, which does not depend on cell proliferation at early stages14, descendants of neuromesodermal progenitors move ventrally from the dorsal medial (DM) region to the paraxial MPZ as mesodermal progenitors15,16 (Fig. 1a,b). These progenitor cells progressively differentiate into mature mesodermal cells that are incorporated in the PSM as body elongation proceeds. Both in amniotes and fish, cells display a graded reduction of their movements as they progress from the MPZ (referred to as posterior PSM in amniotes) to the PSM15,17, where they arrest and undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition that anticipates somite formation18. The observed patterns of cell motion in these kinematic studies15,17 could potentially be caused by a gradient in cell or tissue mechanics along the AP axis. However, the physical mechanism causing such cellular movements and, more generally, sculpting the body axis, remains unknown.
Mechanical forces are generally believed to guide morphogenetic movements19. To establish the role of mechanical forces in vertebrate body elongation, we measured the endogenous mechanical stresses along the zebrafish AP axis using magnetically-responsive oil microdroplets20 (Fig. 1a–c; Methods). In the absence of applied magnetic field, the deformations of droplets inserted between cells in the tissue provide a readout of the local mechanical stresses21. To detect potential spatial variations in mechanical stresses at supracellular scales we analyzed the droplets’ ellipsoidal deformation (Fig. 1d; Methods). Our analysis shows a posterior-to-anterior increase in the magnitude of supracellular stresses (Fig. 1e), with the axis of droplet elongation oriented mediolaterally in the medial MPZ (M-MPZ) and progressively reorienting along the AP axis in the PSM (Fig. 1f), consistent with the previously reported directions of morphogenetic flows15,17. Monitoring the ellipsoidal droplet deformation over time shows that supracellular stresses persist over more than 30 min (Fig. 1g), compatible with developmental timescales (~0.5–1h). These data indicate that supracellular stresses guide morphogenetic flows and reveal an increase in mediolateral constriction during PSM maturation, consistent with mediolateral thinning of the body axis15 and anisotropy of nuclear deformation and cell shape (Extended Data Fig. 1).
Beyond supracellular stresses, the deviations of the droplets’ shapes from ellipsoidal deformations display cell-sized stress inhomogeneities (Fig. 1h,j; Extended Data Fig. 2; Methods). Both the average and maximal values of these cell-scale stresses are uniform along the AP axis (Fig. 1i). Temporal autocorrelation analysis of these higher order droplet deformations shows that cell-scale stresses are short-lived, with a persistence time of approximately 1 min (Fig. 1k; Methods). These data show that cell-scale stresses are non-persistent at developmental timescales (~0.5–1h) and uniform throughout the tissue, suggesting that their role may be to introduce active stress fluctuations (causing cell ‘jiggling’; Supplementary Video 1), as previously proposed for 3D multicellular aggregates22.
Since morphogenetic flows also depend on the tissue material properties23,24 and involve large tissue rearrangements, it is important to probe the tissue mechanical response to large deformations. To do so, we applied a controlled, uniform magnetic field for a defined time period (15 min) to droplets previously inserted in the tissue20 (Fig. 2a; Methods). Magnetic actuation caused large droplet deformations of more than one cell size, corresponding to applied strains in the 50–150% range (Fig. 2a,b). Upon removal of the magnetic field, droplets progressively relaxed toward a spherical shape due to the restoring force of interfacial tension (capillary stress, σc), but arrested before reaching that state, displaying a residual deformation and revealing the presence of a yield stress σy in the tissue (Fig. 2a–c; Methods). The yield stress, which corresponds to the maximal mechanical stress that a material can sustain in a solid-like state before starting to flow3, provides a direct measure of the tissue’s ability to withstand sustained mechanical loads, i.e., its mechanical integrity. Performing these experiments along the body axis shows that the yield stress is spatially graded and minimal in the MPZ (Fig. 2d; Methods), revealing a posterior-to-anterior gradient of increasing tissue mechanical integrity that parallels PSM maturation.
As pointed out by D’Arcy Thompson25 and others more recently9,22, the disordered cellular structure of tissues strongly resembles that of aqueous foams, which display a finite yield stress when the volume fraction ϕ of fluid between bubbles becomes lower than a critical value ϕc at the jamming transition1,2 (Supplementary Figure 1). Following the analogy to foams, we explored the potential role of the extracellular spaces in controlling tissue yield stress. We measured the volume fraction of extracellular spaces along the AP axis using fluorescent Dextran (Methods) and observed decreasing spaces between cells away from the posterior end (Fig. 2e). Since cohesion between cells depends on their adhesion strength and N-cadherin (Cdh2) has been shown to be essential for body axis elongation15,26 and PSM maturation27 in zebrafish, we measured the volume fraction of extracellular space and yield stress along the AP axis of cdh2 loss-of-function mutants26. Disruption of N-cadherin-mediated adhesion resulted in larger extracellular spaces in the PSM, but not in the MPZ (Fig. 2g,h; Extended Data Fig. 3). Accordingly, the yield stress in cdh2 mutants is altered in the PSM but not in the MPZ (Fig. 2i). No significant spatial variation in yield stress was observed in cdh2 mutants, indicating that N-cadherin-mediated adhesion is necessary to maintain the AP gradient in extracellular spaces and tissue mechanical integrity (yield stress). In addition, the reported AP gradients in supracellular stresses (Fig. 1e) and nuclear anisotropy observed in wild type (WT) are lost in cdh2 mutants (Extended Data Fig. 1), indicating that mediolateral constriction in the PSM is N-cadherin-dependent. Further supporting the analogy to foams, both the measured values of yield stress along the AP axis in WT, and the changes in yield stress between WT and cdh2 mutants, can be accounted for (with no adjustable parameters) by assuming such changes to result solely from the observed variations in extracellular volume fraction in a tissue that behaves like a 3D disordered monodispersed foam (Fig. 2f,j; Methods). Cell rearrangements induced by droplet actuation (Extended Data Fig. 4) further indicate that the yield stress arises from the jammed cellular environment, as in 3D disordered foams1. While jamming transitions have recently been predicted by 2D vertex models of multicellular systems with no extracellular spaces10,11 and observed in epithelial cell culture8, our measurements indicate that jamming in 3D embryonic tissues is consistent with classical jamming scenarios in foams, where the volume fraction of extracellular spaces plays a prominent role1,2.
Unlike aqueous foams though, living tissues are characterized by active cellular stresses that could locally unjam the system and fluidize the tissue, as known for systems in which thermal fluctuations are relevant2,4,9. Comparison of the yield stress and the magnitude of cell-scale stresses indicates that the maximal stress fluctuations are well above the yield stress in the MPZ, but below it in the anterior PSM (A-PSM; Fig. 3a), suggesting that actively-generated stress fluctuations may help fluidize the tissue at its posterior end. Since neighbor exchanges are necessary to fluidize foam-like tissues1,9 and actomyosin-driven fluctuations in cell-cell contact length cause cellular rearrangements19, we characterized the dynamics of cell-cell contacts both in the PSM and MPZ (Fig. 3b–f; Methods). Autocorrelation analysis shows that cell-cell contact lengths become temporally uncorrelated within less than 1 min and spatially uncorrelated beyond 2–3 cell sizes (Fig. 3c,d), consistent with our measurements of cell-scale stresses (Fig. 1i,k) and indicating that, at developmental timescales (~0.5–1h), cell-cell contact dynamics can be seen as short-lived, active fluctuations uniform in the tissue. As only large fluctuations can induce neighbor exchanges and fluidize the tissue, we measured the distribution of cell-cell contact lengths both in the PSM and MPZ tissues (Methods). Our results show a broader distribution in the MPZ, with large fluctuations being considerably more frequent in this region than in the PSM (Fig. 3e), both in WT and in cdh2 mutants (Extended Data Fig. 5). Accordingly, we found that the neighbor exchange rate is 6 times higher in the MPZ than in the PSM (Fig. 3e, inset), consistent with the MPZ being in a fluid-like state and the PSM in a solid-like state. No systematic alignment of neighbor exchanges along a single spatial direction was observed (Extended Data Fig. 6), indicating that cell intercalation in these tissues does not contribute to posterior elongation. Interpreting active fluctuations as an effective temperature9,17,22, a key parameter in the control of jamming transitions2,4, it is possible to obtain the energy landscape of neighbor exchanges in both MPZ and PSM (Extended Data Fig. 7; Methods). In this framework, reducing fluctuations in cell-cell contact length (lower effective temperature) by impairing myosin II-dependent force generation at the cell cortex should render the MPZ more solid-like. Partial inhibition of myosin activity with blebbistatin led to smaller cell-cell contact length fluctuations (narrower distribution; Fig. 3f), decreased neighbor exchange rate (Fig. 3f, inset) and increased yield stress in the MPZ (Fig. 3g), thereby rigidifying the tissue and leading to a reduction in both cell movements and body elongation speed (Extended Data Fig. 8). These results indicate that while the PSM is jammed in a solid-like state, with weak cell-cell contact length fluctuations (low effective temperature) unable to fluidize the tissue, the stronger cell-cell contact length fluctuations (high effective temperature) in the MPZ cause substantial cell rearrangements that effectively ‘melt’ the tissue into a fluid-like state.
Since cellular movements result from the combined effect of active stresses and mechanical constraints (tissue material properties), their analysis informs about the mechanical state of the tissue6,8. Both direct observation (Fig. 3h) and analysis (Fig. 3i; Mean Squared Relative Displacement, MSRD; Methods) of cellular movements in the tissue showed caged behavior in the PSM, consistent with cells being trapped in a solid-like material, and uncaged cell mixing in the MPZ, consistent with this region being fluid-like. Our measurements indicate that the posterior-to-anterior transition between uncaged to caged cellular movements, consistent with previous observations in chicken17, results from an increase in physical constraints on cells, rather than a decrease in cellular stresses, as the spaces between cells are reduced anteriorly while maintaining a constant cell density (Extended Data Fig. 9; Methods).
Taken together, our direct in vivo measurements of tissue mechanics and analysis of cell rearrangements and movements are all consistent with the tissue behaving as a disordered, glassy material undergoing a jamming transition as the MPZ progressively rigidifies into the PSM (Fig. 4a,b). The solid-like state of the PSM helps maintain tissue architecture and mechanically supports the extending, fluid-like end of the posterior body, as cells from the DM region are added to the MPZ and progressively elongate the body axis (Fig. 4b). Indeed, simulations of tissue morphogenesis based solely on first principles (Fig. 4c–e; Methods; Supplementary Note 1) show that unidirectional body axis elongation naturally occurs in the presence of the observed fluid-to-solid jamming transition (Fig. 4d; Supplementary Video 2). In absence of jamming transition, the tissue expands isotropically like a growing spherical blob and no unidirectional axis elongation occurs (Fig. 4e; Supplementary Video 3). The predicted tissue morphogenetic flows in the presence of the reported jamming transition display high posterior-directed velocities at the posterior end, no tissue flow in the A-PSM, and the existence of two counter-rotating vortices as the tissue transits from fluid-like to solid-like states (Fig. 4d, inset). Remarkably, all these predicted features in tissue flows have been observed experimentally15, indicating that the fluid-to-solid jamming transition is essential for proper unidirectional axis elongation. Phenotypes like curved tails and the reduced elongation speed in cdh2 mutants (Extended Data Fig. 8) can be explained by the reported loss of mechanical integrity in the PSM (Fig. 2i) during body axis elongation.
More generally, the spatiotemporal control of fluid-like and solid-like tissue states, enabling or restricting morphogenetic flows, represents a novel mechanism of tissue morphogenesis. The previously observed oscillations in actomyosin contractility during apical constriction28 in Drosophila epithelia may be necessary to overcome a yield stress and fluidize an otherwise jammed tissue29. Beyond cellular jamming, transitions between fluid-like and solid-like states in tissues containing extracellular matrix between cells are likely to occur via the control of the extracellular matrix physical-chemical state. As suggested by D’Arcy Thompson a century ago25, the shaping of living tissues shares fundamental physical principles with the sculpting of many inert materials, where fluid-to-solid transitions are necessary to mold them into functional shapes.
Methods
Zebrafish husbandry, fish lines, and experimental manipulations
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were maintained as previously described30. Animals were raised and experiments were performed following all ethical regulations and according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California, Santa Barbara. For ubiquitous labeling of cell membranes we used Tg(actb2:MA-Citrine) embryos26,31 or embryos at 1-cell stage were injected with membrane-GFP mRNA. For experiments to perturb the amount of extracellular spaces we used cdh2tm101/tm101 embryos (parachute (pac) mutants26), which feature a truncated N-cadherin (CDH2) extracellular domain and have been shown to display cell-cell adhesion defects26. For tracking of cell movements, 1-cell stage embryos were injected with H2B-RFP mRNA.
Generation and injection of ferrofluid droplets
The composition and preparation of ferrofluid droplets was identical as previously described20. Briefly, we prepared biocompatible fluorocarbon-based ferrofluids by diluting DFF1 (Ferrotec) in Novec 7300 (3M) at varying concentrations to achieve the necessary magnetic stresses to generate the desired droplet deformations (applied strains). To prevent non-specific adhesion between the cells and the ferrofluid droplets, a fluorinated Krytox-PEG(600) surfactant (008-fluorosurfactant, RAN Biotechnologies32) was diluted in the ferrofluid at a 2.5% (w/w) concentration. The ferrofluid used in each experiment was calibrated as previously described20, so that the stresses applied by the ferrofluid droplet on the surrounding material in the presence of a uniform magnetic field are quantitatively known. Ferrofluid droplets were generated inside embryos, by direct injection of the ferrofluid in the tissue of interest, as previously described20. Control of droplet size was achieved by controlling the injection pressure and time of the injection pulse. Droplets were injected in the MPZ tissue at the 4- and 6-somite stages for measurements in the PSM and MPZ, respectively. Droplets were imaged at least 2 hours after injection to allow enough time for the tissue to recover from the injection. The mechanical relaxation timescales in the MPZ and PSM are short (~1 min; Supplementary Figure 2b) and cell rearrangements are observed in timescales shorter than 10 min (Fig. 3e, inset). Therefore, our experiments, performed 2 hours after injection, allow enough time for the tissue to remodel. Indeed, no trace of the injection is observed in the tissue when imaged. Importantly, we have previously shown that injection and actuation of magnetic droplets located in the MPZ and PSM tissues do not affect normal developmental processes and, especially, body axis elongation20.
Imaging
Embryos were mounted for imaging in 0.8% low-melting agarose and imaged at 25 °C using a laser scanning confocal (LSM 710, Carl Zeiss Inc.). Images were taken every at 2.5 – 5 s (0.3 – 0.5 s) temporal resolution using a 40x water immersion objective (LD C-Apochromat 1.1W, Carl Zeiss Inc.) or a 10x air objective (EC Epiplan-Neofluar 10x 0.25, Carl Zeiss Inc.). Imaging of ferrofluid droplets in the embryo was done as previously reported20. Ferrofluid droplets were fluorescently labelled using a custom-synthesized fluorinated Rhodamine dye33, which was dissolved in the fluorocarbon-based ferrofluid oil at a final concentration of 37 μM.
Measurement of supracellular (tissue-level) stresses
To quantify supracellular stresses we measured the droplet ellipsoidal deformation, as this deformation mode reveals mechanical stresses occurring at the length scale of the droplet diameter (and slightly larger scales), which we purposely made larger than the cell size (Fig. 1d; droplet diameter: 44 ± 6 μm; cell diameter: 11 ± 5 μm; mean ± SEM). We used ferrofluid droplets because their interfacial tension can be calibrated in vivo20. No magnetic field was applied on the droplet before or during the measurement of supracellular stresses. Moreover, we prevented cell adhesion to the droplets to reveal the stresses associated solely with (supracellular) morphogenetic flows, mirroring previous studies in inert fluids34. Two hours after injection, the droplet mid-plane was imaged using confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 710, Zeiss Inc.). To quantify the ellipsoidal deformation of the droplet (and neglect high order deformations), we fitted an ellipse to the measured droplet shape, as previously described20. The value of anisotropic stresses for the ellipsoidal droplet deformation is given by , where Hb and Ha are the mean curvatures of the droplet at the intersection of the two principal axis with the ellipsoid and γ is the droplet’s interfacial tension (Fig. 1d), as previously established for droplet with arbitrary deformations21,35. The mean curvatures Hb and Ha are given by Hb = b/a2 and Ha = 1/2a + a/(2b2), with b and a being the long and short semi-axis of the fitted ellipse (Fig. 1d). At the end of each experiment, i.e. after recording the shape of each droplet, we measured its interfacial tension γ in situ, within the developing embryo, as previously described20.
To obtain the direction of droplet deformation, we measured the angle between the direction defined by the long axis of elliptical droplet deformation and the AP axis of the embryo using ImageJ.
While droplets cannot measure isotropic stresses because of droplet incompressibility21, the ellipsoidal droplet deformation provides a quantitative measure of the difference in stresses along the direction of droplet elongation and the perpendicular direction in the observation plane (the principal directions of the deformation). Ellipsoidal droplet deformations can, in general, be caused both by shear stresses or by stress differences along principal axes of droplet deformation (stress anisotropy).
Droplet shape segmentation and measurement of in-plane curvature
Confocal sections through the middle of a ferrofluid droplet were obtained by confocal microscopy, as described above. We then used a custom-made MATLAB code (adapted from a previously published code35) to obtain the coordinates of the droplet contour (segmentation) and measure the in-plane curvature κ(s) along the droplet contour, with s being the arclength along the contour. We first applied a gaussian lowpass filter on the original raw image. The drop shape was identified from the filtered image using active contour segmentation to generate a mask. The edge was located by convolving the mask with the sobel operator. The locations of edge pixels were then converted to ordered polar coordinates, which were smoothed using a moving average filter with a span of 5 pixels. We resampled the coordinates at even spacing using shape-preserving piecewise cubic interpolation. The curvature κ(s) along the droplet contour was obtained by cubic fitting of edge coordinates over a small neighborhood of each point along the contour.
Measurement of stresses associated with deviations from the ellipsoidal droplet deformations
To measure the value of stresses associated with deformation modes of higher order than the ellipsoidal deformation mode (droplet deformations at length scales smaller than the droplet size), we used a similar procedure as that described in21 to obtain cellular stresses from 2D confocal sections. Maximal and minimal values of the curvature along the droplet contour were spaced on average by the measured cell size (Fig. 1h,j), confirming that these deformations are associated with spatial variations in stresses occurring at the cell scale. Briefly, we first segmented the 2D droplet shape and obtained the in-plane curvature κ(s) along the droplet contour, as described above. We then calculated the deviations δκ(s) ≡ κ(s) − κe(s) of the curvature along the contour from the curvature κe of the elliptical deformation mode. We fitted an ellipse to the contour coordinates using the Matlab function EllipseDirectFit (written by Nikolai Chernov based on previous algorithm) to determine the elliptical curvature κe, and then calculated directly δκ(s) along the droplet contour. We then detected the maxima and minima of δκ along the contour and defined the amplitude of curvature deviations from the elliptical mode as the difference between a consecutive maximum and minimum of curvature, δκMAX and δκMIN respectively, along the droplet contour, namely ΔκC ≡ δκMAX − δκMIN. We also defined the maximum amplitude of curvature deviations from the elliptical deformation mode, , where δκMAX,A and δκMIN,A correspond to the absolute maximum and absolute minimum in δκ along the droplet contour. The average and maximal values of the stresses associated to cell-sized deviations from the ellipsoidal mode, and respectively, are given by (average 〈·〉 was done over multiple consecutive maxima and minima for a single droplet and also over multiple droplets in the same region of the tissue in different embryos) and (average 〈·〉 was done over multiple droplets in the same region of the tissue in different embryos). As previously noted21, this calculation assumes no major structural anisotropies in the tissue.
To measure the length scale associated with shape deviations from the elliptical deformation mode, we obtained the locations of maxima and minima of δκ(s) along a droplet’s contour, and calculated the contour distance λ between consecutive maxima and minima (Fig. 1h).
Measurement of persistence in supra-cellular (tissue-level) stresses
To quantify the persistence timescale of tissue-level stresses, we imaged equatorial sections of magnetic droplets (no applied magnetic fields, as described above) at time intervals of one second for up to 30 minutes. We fitted ellipses to droplet sections at each timepoint and reported the droplet aspect ratio as a function of time. We observed no substantial change in the average droplet aspect ratio over the course of 30 minutes, indicating that tissue-level stress anisotropies persist in the tissue for longer than at least 30 minutes.
Measurement of persistence in cell-scale stresses
To obtain the persistence of cell-scale stresses, we performed time-lapses of ferrofluid droplets (no magnetic actuation) inserted in the MPZ tissue at 2.5 s time intervals, for 10 to 16 minutes. We segmented those droplets at each timepoint and obtained the in-plane curvature κ(s, t) along the contour (parameterized with the contour length s), as well as the curvature deviations from the elliptical droplet deformation, κ(s, t), as described above. For each time-lapse, we resampled κ(s, t) at equal angular (θ ) spacing, to obtain κ(θ, t). We then calculated the temporal autocorrelation Cδκ(τ) at each value of θ, namely
We reported the value of the timescale τ1/2 for which Cδκ(τ) drops below 0.5 (or Cδκ(τ1/2) = 0.5), which corresponds to its half-life and provides a measure of the timescale of correlation loss or, equivalently, the persistence timescale of cell-scale droplet deformations.
Measurement of average cell size
Cell size was calculated using the polygonal drawing tool of ImageJ to outline the cells of each region and calculate the area of each selection. The average cell diameter was obtained by the diameter of a circle with the same area as the measured from the polygonal cell shape. The average cell size in a given region of the tissue was obtained from the ensemble average of 100 cells (approximately 35 in each region, A-PSM, P-PSM and MPZ).
Measurement of cell shape and nuclear anisotropy
Maximum intensity projections of 3 consecutive planes of a confocal stack, spanning in total 6 μm in z, were subjected to thresholding and converted to binary images using ImageJ. Subsequently, the ImageJ plug-in ‘Fill Holes’ was applied and ellipses were fitted to the H2B-labeled nuclei. Nuclear anisotropy was given by the aspect ratio of the fitted ellipse. To quantify the orientation of nuclear elongation, we used ImageJ to measure the angle between the axis of nuclear elongation (given by the long axis of the fitted ellipse) and the AP axis. The direction of the AP axis was revealed by the notochord in the images. To obtain cell shape anisotropy, we first measured the length of cell-cell contacts oriented within 18 degrees of the AP and mediolateral (ML) axis. To do so, we used Tissue Analyzer (see methods section ‘Spatial and temporal autocorrelation of cell-cell contact length’) to obtain the cell-cell contact lengths versus their orientation in 2D confocal sections of different regions. Each image contained roughly 200 cells and 1000 cell-cell contacts. We analyzed 11 images for PSM and 8 images for MPZ.
Magnetic actuation of ferrofluid microdroplets
Actuation of ferrofluid droplets was done with the same equipment and methods as described in20. Briefly, we deformed a ferrofluid droplet previously injected in the tissue using an applied, uniform and constant magnetic field (as previously described20), thereby generating a controlled local strain in the tissue. We applied a uniform and constant magnetic field for 15 minutes, as this time is considerably longer than all measured stress relaxation timescales in the tissue20 (Supplementary Figure 2b). Ferrofluid droplets deform into ellipsoids when a uniform, constant magnetic field is applied20,36. We monitored the time evolution of the droplet deformation and measured the initial (b0), maximal (bM) and final (bF ) droplet semi-axis in the direction of the applied magnetic field (Fig. 2a,b). The final droplet semi-axis (bF ) was determined from the asymptotic deformation of the droplet after relaxation following the removal of the applied magnetic field. We defined the droplet strain as ε ≡ (b − R/R) 20. With this definition, the initial strain ε0, the maximum applied strain εM and the final strain εF are given by ε0 = (b0 − R)/R, εM = (bM − R)/R and εF = (bF − R)/R, respectively. We applied maximal mechanical strains in the 50–150% range, depending on the droplet’s interfacial tension and the magnitude of the applied magnetic field.
Measurement of local yield stress with ferrofluid microdroplets
To measure yield stress, we applied strong magnetic fields to generate ellipsoidal droplet deformations larger than at least one cell size, as in these conditions the tissue flows irreversibly. Upon removal of the magnetic field, the capillary stress of the droplet pulls the droplet back towards the undeformed, spherical droplet shape (Fig. 2c). The capillary stress, σc, is the mechanical normal stress that tries to restore the spherical droplet shape because of the presence of an interfacial tension and depends on how deformed the droplet is: the larger the droplet deformation, the larger the capillary stress, as its value at a given point of the droplet’s surface is proportional to the mean curvature H of the droplet at that point. Starting from the maximal droplet deformation induced by the applied magnetic field (maximal strain, εM), the capillary stresses driving droplet relaxation are large and become smaller as the droplet shape relaxes towards the sphere. In the absence of a yield stress in the tissue, the droplet would relax to the spherical shape. However, the presence of a yield stress halts the relaxation of the droplet at the aspect ratio for which the capillary stress is equal to the yield stress (Fig. 2c), preventing further droplet relaxation. At this point, the yield stress balances the droplet’s capillary stresses (Fig. 2c). Since the interfacial tension of the droplet is measured in situ, the final aspect ratio of the arrested droplet serves as a direct read out of the yield stress. Importantly, we applied the magnetic field in the perpendicular direction to the droplet pre-deformation, so that the final aspect ratio in the direction of the magnetic field could not be attributed to the supracellular tissue anisotropy in mechanical stress that deformed the droplet initially. Moreover, to allow accurate comparisons between the measured anisotropic stresses and yield stress measurements, we defined the anisotropic yield stress as the anisotropic stress that results from the residual droplet deformation that remains after droplet relaxation is halted by the yield stress (Fig. 2c). The anisotropic yield stress is given by σy = 2γ(Hb,r − Ha,r), where Hb,r and Ha,r are the mean curvatures of the residual droplet shape (deformation) at the intersection of the principal axis with the ellipsoid. Since the residual droplet shape is a prolate spheroid with long and short semi-axes br and ar, respectively, Hb,r and Ha,r read and . The interfacial tension of each droplet was measured directly in situ, within the developing embryo, as previously described20. Using the measured value of the interfacial tension for each droplet and the mean curvatures of the residual droplet deformation, we obtained the value of the yield stress, σy.
The measured values of the yield stress did not depend on the extent of droplet deformation before starting the relaxation process (maximal droplet deformation or strain, εM; Fig. 2a,b), ruling out potential memory effects that could occur in hysteretic plastic materials (Extended Data Fig. 10).
Measurement of volume fraction of extracellular space
To obtain the volume fraction of the extracellular space we injected Dextran, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (10000 MW) in the MPZ of 9-somite stage embryos. After 30–45 minutes embryos were mounted and imaged. 3D reconstructions of different regions of the paraxial mesoderm were analyzed in Imaris (Bitplane), using the surface reconstruction algorithm. The volumes encapsulated by the Alexa Fluor™ 488+ segmented surfaces were then divided by the total volume analyzed. Injection of Dextran, Alexa Fluor™ 488 in the PSM of 9-somite stage embryos led to consistent results. The extracellular spaces are also visible by fluorescently labeling cell membranes (Extended Data Fig. 4), but the quantification of extracellular spaces was considerably more difficult and less accurate in this case.
Theoretical predictions of yield stress from volume fraction of extracellular space
To obtain the predicted values of yield stress (gradient in WT, Fig. 2f, and change between cdh2 mutants and WT, Fig. 2j) from the measured values of the volume fraction ϕ of extracellular space, we assumed the tissue to behave as a 3D disordered monodispersed foam1 for which the yield stress is given by , where ϕC is the critical volume fraction (ϕC = 0.36 for 3D disordered monodispersed foams1) and is a stress scale that depends on the interfacial tension of bubbles and their size. We assumed the magnitude of cell-cell contact tensions (playing the role of the bubble interfacial tension in an aqueous foam) to be constant along the AP axis, as our measurements indicated that cell-scale stresses are largely uniform in the tissue. The cell size was also assumed to be constant because our measurements indicate no significant changes along the AP axis (Extended Data Figure 9). The comparison between the experimental values of the yield stress and the predicted ones has no adjustable parameters (Fig. 2f,j).
Measurement and analysis of 3D cellular movements
To track cellular movements in 3D, both in WT and cdh2 embryos, we first fluorescently labeled cellular nuclei by injecting H2BmRFP mRNA into one-cell stage embryos. At the 10-somite stage, embryos were manually dechorionated and mounted in 0.8% low melting point agarose in a 35mm glass-bottom dish (MatTek Corporation). Each region (A-PSM, P-PSM and MPZ) was imaged at 25°C using a 40x water immersion objective (LD C-Apochromat 1.1W, Carl Zeiss Inc.), with z-stacks acquired at one minute intervals for 30 minutes total. Z-stacks were cropped to include only cells corresponding to the region of interest. Loss of signal intensity over time was corrected with the EMBL Bleach Correction plugin for ImageJ using the Histogram Matching Method. The 3D nuclei positions r⃗i (with i specifying the nuclei) at each time point were determined using the Imaris (Bitplane) automated spot detection. We then used the Imaris (Bitplane) tracking algorithm to obtain the nuclei trajectories r⃗i(t). For subsequent analysis, the results were filtered by track duration to include only those tracks that were maintained over the full course of the time lapse. We then used the nuclei 3D trajectories r⃗i(t) as a proxy for the trajectories of the cells. To eliminate the effect of translational and rotational motions of the whole tissue/embryo, we analyzed the relative cell distances r⃗ij ≡ r⃗i − r⃗j. We evaluated the mean-square displacement of the relative distances, or mean-square relative displacements (MSRD), from their initial values, i.e. MSRD (t) ≡ 〈(r⃗ij(t) − r⃗ij(0))2〉, for (i,j) pairs which were nearest neighbors at t = 0. We evaluated the normalized MSRD(t), namely (MSRD(t) − MSRD(t = 0))/d2 (with d being the average cell size), for every (i,j) nearest pair in each region (A-PSM, P-PSM, and MPZ) of a given embryo, and averaged the results over all the pairs in the same region for each embryo.
Spatial and temporal autocorrelation of cell-cell contact length
To determine the characteristic timescale of changes in cell-cell contact lengths, we acquired a single confocal section of embryos injected with memGFP mRNA for 30 minutes with time resolution of 5 seconds. We detected the location of cells’ vertices and cell-cell contact lengths in the images using Tissue Analyzer37 (TA, formerly known as Packing Analyzer), a Fiji plugin capable of segmenting 2D tissue images and quantifying cell-cell contact lengths and position of vertices over time. For each embryo, we segmented a region of interest (ROI) in the PSM or Tailbud (MPZ) for which cell-cell contacts were trackable over a 400s time period. We then used the TA package to obtain the contour length of cell-cell contacts and the (x,y) positions of the vertices. Using the time-series of the contour length of cell-cell contacts and the (x,y) positions of the vertices, we calculated the temporal autocorrelation function, namely
where ℓ is the cell-cell contact length. To reduce numerical errors, each average 〈·〉t was evaluated with the data in a time interval (0,T − τ), with T being the duration of the experiment, and 〈·〉t+τ was evaluated with the data in the time interval (τ, T). We analyzed each ROI and obtained the correlation function for each embryo separately. The obtained autocorrelation functions were nearly exponential in all cases (Fig. 3c). We therefore obtained the characteristic timescale of the decay of the correlation function by fitting an exponential function. The reported characteristic timescale was obtained from a weighted average of the timescales measured in different embryos, with the weights being the inverse of the variance. To obtain the spatial cross-correlation, a similar analysis was done, but correlating instead every two pair of cell-cell contact lengths in the region of the tissue analyzed. The distance between cell-cell contact pairs was given by the norm of the vector connecting the midpoints of the two cell-cell contacts (Fig. 3d).
Normalized frequency (distribution) of cell-cell contact length fluctuations and energy landscape of neighbor exchanges
We obtained the distribution of normalized cell-cell contact lengths, and the corresponding dimensionless energy landscape, which characterizes neighbor exchanges. For the ROIs described above (in ‘Spatial and temporal autocorrelation of cell-cell contact length’), we selected all cell-cell contacts that persist for at least 100s, and obtained their time-dependent normalized lengths ℓ/ℓ̄, where ℓ is the cell-cell contact length at a given time point and ℓ̄ is the average length of each individual cell-cell contact over time. We then combined all the values of ℓ/ℓ̄ for all times and cell-cell contacts into a single, normalized frequency distribution p(ℓ/ℓ̄) which peaks around 1 (Fig. 3e). Assuming that the cell-cell contact length fluctuations are probing an energy landscape that varies much more slowly (equilibrium approximation) before they undergo neighbor exchanges, we obtained the dimensionless energy landscape of neighbor exchanges by calculating -ln[p(ℓ/ℓ̄)] (Extended Data Figure 7). Since the statistics of cell-cell contact length fluctuations is small for values close to 0 (i.e., close to a neighbor exchange event), this method provides the dimensionless energy landscape close to the bottom of the energy landscape but does not allow to obtain the size of the energy barrier.
Measurement of neighbor exchange rates and orientation
To quantify the neighbor exchange rate in the tissue, we analyzed 2D confocal sections of WT and blebbistatin-treated embryos, both in the PSM and MPZ. We counted the number of cell-cell contacts that underwent a neighbor exchange in the plane of observation. We obtained the neighbor exchange rate per cell by normalizing the number of measured neighbor exchanges in the observed region with the average cell area and observation time (30 min). To obtain their orientation we measured the angle between the cell-cell contact and the direction of the AP axis before neighbor exchange. The direction of the AP axis was revealed by the notochord in the images.
Inhibition of myosin activity
Myosin activity was inhibited by adding in the embryo medium blebbistatin (Tocris) at the final concentration of 100 μM. Treatments were started at the 4-somite stage.
Measurement of cell density
To measure cell number density (number of cells per unit volume), we performed confocal 3D scans of the different regions (MPZ, P-PSM and A-PSM) in embryos with fluorescently labeled nuclei (same procedure as described above in ‘Measurement and analysis of 3D cellular movements’). We then used Imaris software to detect the location of the nuclei in the tissue (approximately 300 cells per imaged volume). After obtaining the 3D coordinates of each nuclei in a volume, we defined a box of smaller size than the full scanned volume and measured the number of nuclei in the box. Moving the small box inside the originally scanned volume, we obtained statistics for the density measurement. This procedure was repeated with varying box sizes to ensure that the measured value of the density did not depend on the box size.
Actin staining
10-somite stage embryos were dechorionated and fixed in 4% PFA for 1.5 hours at RT. Embryos were then washed 2–3 times with PBS. One drop of ActinRed™ was added to the PBS solution (500 μL) containing the embryos. After 30 minutes the embryos were washed with new PBS for 3 times and prepared for imaging as described above.
Simulations
We simulated the physical expansion of a 2D dorsal-ventral projection of the PSM and MPZ tissues at supracellular length scales and developmental time scales using Finite Element Methods, accounting for the fluid-to-solid jamming transition (or its absence, depending on the simulation) and the entrance of cells to the MPZ from DM tissues (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). The fluid-to-solid jamming transition was simulated by a sharp increase in the tissue viscosity along the AP axis, with a diverging (very large) viscosity simulating the solid-like tissue state. The dynamics of the tissue is governed by fundamental physical laws, namely momentum conservation (which reduces here to local force balance because inertial terms are negligible for embryonic tissues) and mass balance. We solved the equations using COMSOL Multiphysics 5.3 software, starting from a semi-circular tissue shape and with a fixed rigid boundary at the most anterior end. The solutions provided the time evolution of the tissue shape and velocity field.
Statistics
In experiments involving zebrafish embryos, the sample size was chosen so that new data points would not change significantly the standard deviation. No samples were excluded from the analysis and the analysis of all the data was done by automated software to ensure full blinding and avoid biases in the analysis. No randomization of the data was used.
Code availability
A previously published version of the custom-made Matlab code to analyze droplet deformations35 is available on GitHub at https://github.com/ElijahShelton/drop-recon. A modified version of that code to analyze 2D confocal sections of the droplet is available upon request.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank E. Sletten (University of California, Los Angeles) for sharing custom-made fluorinated dyes. We also thank all lab members and the UCSB Animal Research Center for support. PR thanks B. Aigouy (IBDM, Marseille) for assistance with Tissue Analyzer. AM thanks EMBO (EMBO ALTF 509-2013), Errett Fisher Foundation and Otis Williams Fund for financial support. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (CMMI-1562910) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (R21HD084285; R01HD095797).
Footnotes
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper.
Author contributions A.M. and O.C. designed research; A.M., H.J.G., D.A.K. and F.S. performed experiments; A.M., H.J.G., P.R., E.S. and J.G. analyzed the data; P.R. and O.C. performed theoretical interpretation of experiments; E.K.C. and P.R. performed simulations; A.A.L. assisted with droplet generation; A.M. and O.C. wrote the paper; O.C. supervised the project.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Data Availability Statement
Source data supporting these findings are available online as Supplementary Data.
References
- 1.Cohen-Addad S, Höhler R, Pitois O. Flow in Foams and Flowing Foams. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2013;45:241–267. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu AJ, Nagel SR. Jamming is just not cool any more. Nature. 1998;396:21–22. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bonn D, Denn MM, Berthier L, Divoux T, Manneville S. Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter. Rev Mod Phys. 2017;89:15. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Trappe V, Prasad V, Cipelletti L, Segre PN, Weitz DA. Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles. Nature. 2001;411:772–775. doi: 10.1038/35081021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Angelini TE, et al. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4714–4719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010059108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schotz EM, Lanio M, Talbot JA, Manning ML. Glassy dynamics in three-dimensional embryonic tissues. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2013;10:20130726–20130726. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sadati M, Qazvini NT, Krishnan R, Park CY, Fredberg JJ. Differentiation. 2013;86:121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park JA, et al. Unjamming and cell shape in the asthmatic airway epithelium. Nature Materials. 2015;14:1040–1048. doi: 10.1038/nmat4357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM, Manning ML. Energy barriers and cell migration in densely packed tissues. Soft Matter. 2014;10:1885. doi: 10.1039/c3sm52893f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM, Manning ML. A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues. Nat Phys. 2015;11:1074–1079. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Farhadifar R, Röper JC, Aigouy B, Eaton S, Jülicher F. The Influence of Cell Mechanics, Cell-Cell Interactions, and Proliferation on Epithelial Packing. Current Biology. 2007;17:2095–2104. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oswald L, Grosser S, Smith DM, Käs JA. Jamming transitions in cancer. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2017;50:483001–18. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8e83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bénazéraf B, Pourquié O. Formation and Segmentation of the Vertebrate Body Axis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang L, Kendrick C, Julich D, Holley SA. Cell cycle progression is required for zebrafish somite morphogenesis but not segmentation clock function. Development. 2008;135:2065–2070. doi: 10.1242/dev.022673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lawton AK, et al. Regulated tissue fluidity steers zebrafish body elongation. Development. 2013;140:573–582. doi: 10.1242/dev.090381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimelman D. Essays on Developmental Biology Part A. Vol. 116. Elsevier Inc; 2016. Tales of Tails (and Trunks): Forming the Posterior Body in Vertebrate Embryos; pp. 517–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bénazéraf B, et al. A random cell motility gradient downstream of FGF controls elongation of an amniote embryo. Nature. 2010;466:248–252. doi: 10.1038/nature09151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aulehla A, Pourquie O. Signaling Gradients during Paraxial Mesoderm Development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a000869–a000869. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Heisenberg CP, Bellaiche Y. Forces in Tissue Morphogenesis and Patterning. Cell. 2013;153:948–962. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Serwane F, et al. In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues. Nat Methods. 2017;14:181–186. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Campas O, et al. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues. Nat Methods. 2014;11:183–189. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marmottant P, et al. The role of fluctuations and stress on the effective viscosity of cell aggregates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17271–17275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902085106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campas O. A toolbox to explore the mechanics of living embryonic tissues. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;55:119–130. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miller CJ, Davidson LA. The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:733–744. doi: 10.1038/nrg3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thompson DW. On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press; 1917. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lele Z, et al. parachute/n-cadherin is required for morphogenesis and maintained integrity of the zebrafish neural tube. Development. 2002;129:3281–3294. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.14.3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chal J, Guillot C, Pourquié O. PAPC couples the segmentation clock to somite morphogenesis by regulating N-cadherin-dependent adhesion. Development. 2017;144:664–676. doi: 10.1242/dev.143974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Martin AC, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF. Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature. 2009;457:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nature07522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Atia L, et al. Geometric constraints during epithelial jamming. Nat Phys. 2018;14:613–620. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0089-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nüsslein-Volhard C, Dahm R. Zebrafish. Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mosaliganti KR, Noche RR, Xiong F, Swinburne IA, Megason SG. ACME: Automated Cell Morphology Extractor for Comprehensive Reconstruction of Cell Membranes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holtze C, et al. Biocompatible surfactants for water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Lab Chip. 2008;8:1632–1639. doi: 10.1039/b806706f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sletten EM, Swager TM. Fluorofluorophores: Fluorescent Fluorous Chemical Tools Spanning the Visible Spectrum. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:13574–13577. doi: 10.1021/ja507848f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rallison J. The deformation of small viscous drops and bubbles in shear flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1984;16:45–66. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shelton E, Serwane F, Campas O. Geometrical characterization of fluorescently labelled surfaces from noisy 3D microscopy data. Journal of microscopy. 2017;269:259–268. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rowghanian P, Meinhart CD, Campas O. Dynamics of ferrofluid drop deformations under spatially uniform magnetic fields. J Fluid Mech. 2016;802:245–262. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aigouy B, et al. Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila. Cell. 2010;142:773–786. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.