Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2017 Apr 17;22(4):628. doi: 10.3390/molecules22040628

Synthesis and Antiproliferative Activity of Novel All-Trans-Retinoic Acid-Podophyllotoxin Conjugate towards Human Gastric Cancer Cells

Lei Zhang 1,*, Jing Wang 1,*, Lai Liu 1, Chengyue Zheng 1, Yang Wang 1
Editor: Jean Jacques Vanden Eynde1
PMCID: PMC6154554  PMID: 28420180

Abstract

With the purpose of creating a multifunctional drug for gastric cancer treatment, a novel all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) conjugate with podophyllotoxin (PPT) was designed and synthesized, and its in vitro antiproliferative activity was evaluated against human gastric cancer cell lines using CCK-8 assay. The conjugate, P-A, exhibited significant anticancer activity against MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells with IC50 values of 0.419 ± 0.032 and 0.202 ± 0.055 μM, respectively. Moreover, P-A efficiently triggered cell cycle arrest and induced apoptosis in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells due to modulation of cell cycle arrest- (CDK1, CDK2, CyclinA and CyclinB1) and apoptosis- (cleaved caspase-3, -8 and -9) related proteins, respectively. Further mechanism studies revealed that P-A could increase the expression levels of RARα and RARβ, and decrease the level of RARγ in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells. Finally, P-A inhibited the ERK1/2 and AKT signaling in the above two cancer cell lines. More importantly, the underlying mechanisms of P-A were similar to those of precursor PPT but different with the other precursor ATRA. Together, the conjugate P-A was a promising candidate for the potential treatment of human gastric cancer.

Keywords: all-trans-retinoic acid, podophyllotoxin, conjugate, human gastric cancer, anticancer activity

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC), a common malignancy of the gastric, is the fifth most common type of cancer [1]. Systemic chemotherapy is the main treatment method for GC patients [2]. However, the survival rate remains low with chemotherapy, having toxic side effects [3,4]. Therefore, there is a pressing need to investigate novel anticancer agents against gastric cancer.

Retinoic acid (RA), an endogenous metabolite of vitamin A (retinol), is an essential regulator of cell growth and differentiation [5]. RA exists in four isomeric forms, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, Figure 1), 9-cis-retinoic acid, 9,13-dicis-retinoic acid and 13-cis-retinoic acid [6]. Among them, ATRA is thought to be the main active isomer displaying its activity by nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs), which have three types: α, β and γ, and subsequently regulating gene transcription. ATRA regulates many biological processes, such as cell differentiation, reproduction, and regulation of the immune system [7,8,9]. Additionally, RA is connected with the development of several diseases, including neoplasms [5]. So far, the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia by ATRA has been conducted [10]. However, intolerable side effects and high clearance hinder the clinical application of ATRA. To overcome the shortcomings, many chemical modifications of ATRA have been prepared, and several important agents, including 4-HPR, RN1 and ATRA-FDU (Figure 1), were reported to have the potential to kill various cancers, such as leukemia, breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer and melanoma carcinoma [11,12,13,14,15]. Wu and co-workers showed that both RARα and RARβ were mediators in the antineoplastic function of ATRA in gastric MKN-45 cells [16]. Meanwhile, ATRA could induce gastric BGC-823 cell death by apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and regulation of RARα [17,18,19].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The structures of all-trans-retinoic acid and its derivatives.

It is noteworthy that podophyllotoxin (PPT, Figure 2), a naturally-occurring aryltetralin lignan isolated mainly from Podophyllum species, shows important antineoplastic properties by inhibition of microtubule assembly [20]. Due to intolerable side effects (e.g., vomiting, diarrhea, paralytic ileus and central nervous system depression), the clinical potential of podophyllotoxin as an anticancer drug has not been reached [21]. In this regard, extensive structural modifications of podophyllotoxin have been performed to improve the pharmacological properties [22], including the well-known and approved drugs etoposide and teniposide (Figure 2), which have been widely used for the clinical chemotherapy of neuroblastoma, testicular cancer, acute leukaemia and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Diverse derivatives like TOP-53, GL-331, NK-611 and Tafluposide are presently under clinical investigations [23]. Recent studies indicated that podophyllotoxin derivatives also exhibited potential antiproliferative activity against gastric cancer, including MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, by induction of apoptosis [24,25,26].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The structures of podophyllotoxin and its derivatives.

To create more effective antitumor candidates that more affordable, hybridization of natural products or natural product-drug is one promising approach for designing lead compounds [27,28]. Recently, our group has described the synthesis and antiproliferative potential of the PPT conjugates [29,30,31,32,33,34,35], and some derivatives showed dramatic activity. For example, the artesunate-podophyllotoxin conjugate exhibited notable cytotoxicity against several cancer cell lines. Previous reports demonstrated that both ATRA and PPT derivatives displayed antiproliferative activity towards gastric cancer cells. Moreover, the expression of RARs in various gastric cancer cell lines was different, which was connected with the antiproliferative effect of ATRA, however, whether the anticancer activity of PPT against gastric cancer cells was connected with the RARs remains unclear. In addition, it is also unknown whether the conjugate of ATRA and PPT exhibits more anti-gastric cancer potential and less toxicity. The present article described the design, synthesis and in vitro antiproliferative activity of a novel conjugate of ATRA and PPT (Figure 3) using molecular hybridization strategy [36] against two human gastric cancer cell lines (MKN-45 and BGC-823) and a normal human liver cell line (L-O2). The conjugate was preliminarily investigated for its underlying molecular mechanisms.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Design of novel all-trans-retinoic acid-podophyllotoxin conjugate.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The target compound, all-trans-retinoic acid-podophyllotoxin conjugate (P-A), was synthesized as depicted in Scheme 1. The coupling of all-trans-retinoic acid with podophyllotoxin was successfully achieved using 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) and 4-dimethyaminopyridine (DMAP) in dimethylformamide (DMF) at room temperature to give the targeted P-A, in yield of 81%. The synthesized conjugate was fully characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and high resolution mass spectrum (HR-MS).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Synthesis of the all-trans-retinoic acid-podophyllotoxin conjugate.

2.2. Antiproliferative Activity

The P-A conjugate and its precursors (PPT and ATRA) as well as a reference anticancer drug called etoposide, were initially evaluated by CCK-8 assay for their in vitro antiproliferative effects on human gastric cancer cell lines (MKN-45 and BGC-823) and a normal human liver cell line (L-O2). The IC50 ± SD values of the tested molecules are presented in Table 1. In general, conjugate P-A possessed significant antiproliferative activity toward two human gastric cancer cell lines (MKN-45 and BGC-823) with IC50 values of 0.419 ± 0.032 and 0.202 ± 0.055 μM, respectively, which were much stronger than those of ATRA and etoposide, respectively, but less than PPT. Meanwhile, precursor ATRA displayed weak antiproliferative activities toward above two cancer cell lines with IC50 values of 88.462 ± 6.931 and 83.076 ± 15.252 μM, respectively, while the IC50 values of the control drug etoposide were 2.88 ± 0.532 and 1.737 ± 0.294 μM, respectively. In addition, precursor PPT showed higher antiproliferative activities against MKN-45 and BGC-823 with IC50 values of 0.045 ± 0.012 and 0.03 ± 0.005 μM, respectively, however, it also exhibited the most potent cytotoxic activity toward the normal human liver cell line L-O2 with an IC50 value of 0.037 ± 0.008 μM. In contrast, conjugate P-A showed less antiproliferative effect on L-O2 cells than that of PPT. Our data showed that P-A was a potential cytotoxic agent, and although its cytotoxicity was less than that of the parent compound PPT, which may be associated with the solubility property, it improved on that of ATRA.

Table 1.

Antiproliferative activity of tested compounds.

Compound IC50 (μM) 1,2
MKN-45 BGC-823 L-O2
P-A 0.419 ± 0.032 0.202 ± 0.055 0.293 ± 0.081
PPT 0.045 ± 0.012 0.03 ± 0.005 0.037 ± 0.008
ATRA 88.462 ± 6.931 83.076 ± 15.252 >100
Etoposide 2.88 ± 0.532 1.737 ± 0.294 2.006 ± 0.24
Open in a new tab

1 CCK-8 methods, drug exposure was for 72 h; 2 Data were expressed as mean IC50 ± SD from three independent experiments.

2.3. Cell Cycle Analysis

To determine the effect of conjugate P-A on the cell cycle, MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were incubated with different concentrations of P-A, PPT or ATRA for 48 h and then assessed by flow cytometry. Results are shown in Figure 4. Treatment with P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) or ATRA (100 μM) could arrest MKN-45 cells at G1 phase. However, incubation with P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM) significantly blocked BGC-823 cells at the G2 phase, while ATRA (100 μM) did not show significant effect on the cycle of BGC-823 cells. Additionally, as shown in Figure 4, after treatment with 0.5 μM P-A, 0.05 μM PPT and 100 μM ATRA, 85.23%, 85.73% and 78.90%, respectively, cell numbers (MKN-45) were accumulated at the G1 phase. In contrast, the percentages of BGC-823 cells at S phase were 53.88% and 57.73% in P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM)-treated groups, respectively. Taken together, the data showed that conjugate P-A blocked MKN-45 cells at G1 phase, but induced BGC-823 cells at S phase.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, podophyllotoxin (PPT) and the all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) on the cell cycle of MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells. Cells were incubated with 1% DMSO, P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) or ATRA (100 μM) for 48 h.

2.4. Cell Apoptosis Analysis

Subsequently, we tested the effect of conjugate P-A on the cell apoptosis by Hoechst 33342 staining and flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 5, condensation of chromatin, as well as bright fluorescent in apoptosis cells were observed after MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were treated with P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM), respectively. However, no noticeable effects were observed in the ATRA (100 μM) group in two gastric cancer cell lines. Furthermore, Figure 6 shows that the apoptotic cell number increased to 18.41%, 16.73% and 7.10% when MKN-45 cells were incubated with P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) and ATRA (100 μM), respectively, compared to 1.40% in the control group. Apoptotic cell number increased to 29.31% and 32.53% when BGC-823 cells were treated with P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM), respectively, and ATRA (100 μM) showed no significant effect. These data demonstrated that conjugate P-A significantly induced both MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells apoptosis, and that BGC-823 cells were more sensitive than MKN-45 cells to P-A.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the morphology of MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells. Cells were incubated with 1% DMSO, P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) or ATRA (100 μM) for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 for microscopy. Magnification, ×200; scale, 20 μm.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the apoptosis of MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells. Cells were incubated with 1% DMSO, P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) or ATRA (100 μM) for 48 h.

2.5. Expression of Cell Cycle-Related Proteins

Furthermore, we investigated the impact of conjugate P-A treatment on the expression of cell cycle-related proteins in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells by Western blot, as shown in Figure 7. In MKN-45 cells, treatment with P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM) significantly decreased the levels of CDK1, CDK2, CyclinA and CyclinB1, respectively. Simultaneously, ATRA (100 μM) only slightly increased the expression levels of CyclinA and CyclinB1. Additionally, in BGC-823 cells, P-A (0.5 μM), PPT (0.05 μM) and ATRA (100 μM) could upregulate the levels of CDK1 and CDK2, but suppressed the levels of CyclinA and CyclinB1. Hence, our data indicated that hybrid molecule P-A showed different mechanisms underlying the cell cycle arrest in gastric MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, which may explain why P-A blocked MKN-45 cells at G1 phase, but induced BGC-823 cells at S phase in flow cytometry.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the expression levels of cell cycle-related proteins in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells by western blotting using β-actin as control. (A) Control cells; (B) Cells treated with P-A (0.5 μM); (C) Cells treated with PPT (0.05 μM); (D) Cells treated with ATRA (100 μM).

2.6. Expression of Apoptosis-Related Proteins

To further validate the underlying mechanisms of apoptosis induced by conjugate P-A, the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3, -8 and -9 in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were examined by Western blot (Figure 8). We observed that P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM) significantly enhanced the levels of cleaved caspase-3, -8 and -9 in both MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, compared to the control group. However, ATRA (100 μM) displayed no significant effect on MKN-45 cells, but it slightly increased the levels of cleaved caspase-3 and -8 in BGC-823 cells. These results revealed that conjugate P-A induced apoptosis in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells through stimulation of intrinsic and external mitochondrial pathways.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the expression levels of apoptosis-related proteins in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells by western blotting using β-actin as control. (A) Control cells; (B) Cells treated with P-A (0.5 μM); (C) Cells treated with PPT (0.05 μM); (D) Cells treated with ATRA (100 μM).

2.7. Expression of RARs

It was reported that RARs were mediators in the anticancer function of ATRA in gastric MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells [16,17,18,19]. However, to the authors’ knowledge, little is known about the RARs regarding the involvement of PPT in gastric carcinoma. In order to gain more insight into the mechanisms of conjugate P-A in suppressing gastric cancer cell proliferation, we then examined the levels of RARs in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells using Western blot assay. As seen in Figure 9, initially we found that the expression level of RARα was higher, but the level of RARβ was lower in MKN-45 cells, compared to in BGC-823 cells. Also, the RARγ level in both two cancer cell lines was almost equipotent. When MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were treated with P-A (0.5 μM), the expression levels of RARα and RARβ were increased, while the level of RARγ was decreased, which may be associated with the PPT skeleton, because 0.05 μM PPT could stimulate the expression of RARα and RARβ, but inhibit the expression of RARγ. Moreover, ATRA (100 μM) only slightly increased RARα and RARβ levels, but decreased RARγ level in MKN-45 cells. In addition, ATRA (100 μM) slightly increased the level of RARα, downregulated RARβ expression, and had no notable effect on the level of RARγ in BGC-823 cells. These data indicated that PPT could regulate the expression levels of RARs in gastric cancer cells for the first time, as well as the conjugate P-A. Similar to its precursor PPT, it also modulated RARs levels in both MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, which were different from another precursor, ATRA.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the expression levels of RARs in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells by western blotting using β-actin as control. (A) Control cells; (B) Cells treated with P-A (0.5 μM); (C) Cells treated with PPT (0.05 μM); (D) Cells treated with ATRA (100 μM).

2.8. Effects on the ERK1/2, STAT3, mTOR and AKT Signaling

Recent studies demonstrated that some signalling, such as ERK1/2, STAT3, mTOR and AKT, were closely related to the development of carcinoma [37,38]. To further investigate the precise mechanisms of P-A, we examined the regulative effects of P-A on the ERK1/2, AKT, mTOR and STAT3 signalling in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells (Figure 10). It was found that P-A (0.5 μM) and PPT (0.05 μM) significantly suppressed the phosphorylations of ERK1/2 and AKT in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, respectively, and they did not alter the phosphorylation of STAT3 and mTOR. Conversely, ATRA (100 μM) only slightly blocked the phosphorylation of AKT in MKN-45 cells, and it increased the phosphorylation of AKT and restrained the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and mTOR in BGC-823 cells. These results proved that the conjugate P-A could notably inhibit the ERK1/2 and AKT signalling in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells, which was similar to precursor PPT, but different from the other precursor ATRA.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Effects of P-A, PPT and ATRA on the ERK1/2, STAT3, mTOR and AKT signaling in MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells by western blotting using β-actin as control. (A) Control cells; (B) Cells treated with P-A (0.5 μM); (C) Cells treated with PPT (0.05 μM); (D) Cells treated with ATRA (100 μM).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. General

Melting point was determined on an electric SGWX-4 digital visual melting point apparatus. The 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were acquired on Agilent instrument (400 MHz), using TMS as an internal standard. HRMS was obtained on Agilent 6520 TOP-MS instrument. Column chromatography was performed on flash silica gel (200–300 mesh). Reaction was monitored by TLC on silica gel, and detected by UV light (254 nm) accordingly.

3.1.2. Preparation of All-Trans-Retinoic Acid-Podophyllotoxin Conjugate P-A

To a stirred solution of podophyllotoxin (0.29 mmol), all-trans-retinoic acid (0.23 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (0.34 mmol) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (4 mL) was added 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) (0.57 mmol) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 10 min and then for a further 6 h at room temperature (RT = 25 °C). Reaction solution was poured into water (40 mL) and the residue was collected by filtration and dried in vacuum oven. The crude was purified by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:4) to obtain the all-trans-retinoic acid-podophyllotoxin conjugate (P-A).

Compound P-A: Rf = 0.51 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:4), yellow powder, yield 81%; m.p.: 102–104 °C; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.08 (t, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H, polyene chain), 6.82 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.53 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.40 (s, 2H, Ar-H), 6.26–6.37 (m, 2H, polyene chain), 6.12–6.16 (m, 2H, polyene chain), 5.97 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H, O-CH2-O), 5.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.81 (s, 1H, polyene chain), 4.61 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H, CH-Ar), 4.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH-CH2-O), 4.25 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, CH-CH2-O), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.76 (s, 6H, 2 × OCH3), 2.93–2.97 (m, 2H, CH-CH2-O, O=C-CH), 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.01 (s, 5H, CH2 in cyclohexene ring, CH3), 1.71 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.58–1.62 (m, 2H, CH2 in cyclohexene ring), 1.44–1.47 (m, 2H, CH2 in cyclohexene ring), 1.02 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3); 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.93, 162.57, 155.10, 152.54, 147.95, 147.50, 140.58, 137.09, 134.98, 132.17, 129.26, 116.84, 109,60, 107,94, 107.19, 101.52, 72.64, 71.65, 60.75, 56.09, 45.63, 43.76, 39.54, 34.24, 33.10, 31.45, 28.95, 27.26, 21.77, 19.17, 14.08, 13.23, 12.98; HRMS-ESI (m/z): calcd. for C42H52NO9 [M + NH4]+ 714.3637, found 714.3633.

3.2. Biology

3.2.1. Cytotoxicity Assays

Antiproliferative assay was performed on human gastric cancer cells (MKN-45 and BGC-823) and normal human liver cells (L-O2). Cells were seeded into 96-well micro test plates. After 72 h of incubation with tested compounds at various concentrations at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, CCK-8 (10 μL) was added to each well and cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Absorbance of each solution was read at 450 nm wavelength. The IC50 value of each tested compound was calculated by software SPSS.

3.2.2. Cell Cycle Analysis

MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were plated in 6-well plates and incubated with tested compounds for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, respectively. Next, cells were washed with PBS, collected, and fixed with cold 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight, then treated with RNase for 30 min at 37 °C, and stained with PI for 30 min in dark. The percentages of cells were determined using a FACScan flow cytometer.

3.2.3. Hoechst 33242 Staining

MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were incubated with tested compounds for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, respectively. After incubating, the cells were washed with PBS two times and incubated for 10 min with Hoechst 33342 staining buffer in dark. Cells were then analyzed by inverted microscope and fluorescent microscope.

3.2.4. Cell Apoptosis Analysis

MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and then treated with tested compounds for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, respectively. Next, cells were collected and washed twice with, and then stained with 5 μL Annexin V-APC and 5 μL 7-AAD at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Apoptotic cells were detected using a FACScan flow cytometer.

3.2.5. Western Blot Analysis

MKN-45 and BGC-823 cells were incubated with tested compounds for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2, respectively, and then cells were harvested, washed and lysed in complete lysis buffer. The concentration of protein was determined by bicinchonininc acid (BCA) assay kit. Protein samples were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electro-phoresis (SDS-PAGE). Next, the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, blocked for 2 h with 5% skimmed milk at room temperature. Membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: CDK1, CDK2, CyclinA, CyclinB1, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-8, cleaved caspase-9, RARα, RARβ, RARγ, p-ERK1/2, p-STAT3, p-AKT, p-mTOR and β-actin. Unbound antibody was washed with TBST for 15 min and membrane was incubated with the secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. Finally, membrane was detected by chemiluminescence detection system.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the conjugate P-A obtained in the esterification reaction between the well-known anticancer compound all-trans-retinoic acid and natural compound podophyllotoxin displayed interesting antiproliferative activity in two human gastric cancer cells lines at nanomole concentration. The anticancer effect of P-A was also closely connected with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by modulating the cell cycle arrest- and apoptosis-related proteins expression levels, as well as the levels of RARs. Moreover, the conjugate P-A could block the ERK1/2 and AKT signalling in two gastric cancer cells. Our data suggested that the antineoplastic effect of the conjugate P-A may be mainly due to precursor PPT. As topoisomerase II is the mechanism of podophyllotoxin, it is also important to know if the hybrid it holds the same mechanism. Further study on the topoisomerase II inhibition and other molecular mechanisms of P-A will be carried out in due course. Overall, these results indicated that all-trans-retinoic acid-podophyllotoxin conjugate P-A had potent antiproliferative activity against human gastric cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province (No. [2014] 7565, [2014] 7557, [2015] 6010), Ministry of Education “Chunhui Project” Foundation of China (No. Z2015008) and Discipline Construction Funding of Zunyi Medical University.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (276.9KB, pdf)

Supplementary materials are available online.

Author Contributions

Lei Zhang and Jing Wang designed and wrote the paper; Lai Liu, Chengyue Zheng and Yang Wang carried out the experiments. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Sample of the synthsized compound is available from the first author.

References

  • 1.Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roukos D.H. Current Advances and Changes in Treatment Strategy May Improve Survival and Quality of Life in Patients With Potentially Curable Gastric Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1999;6:46–56. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0046-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bang Y.J., van Cutsem E., Feyereislova A., Chung H.C., Shen L., Sawaki A., Lordick F., Ohtsu A., Omuro Y., Satoh T., et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohtsu A., Shah M.A., van Cutsem E., Rha S.Y., Sawaki A., Park S.R., Lim H.Y., Yamada Y., Wu J., Langer B., et al. Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:3968–3976. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gudas L.J. Emerging roles for retinoids in regeneration and differentiation in normal and disease states. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2012;1821:213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blomhoff R., Blomhoff H.K. Overview of retinoid metabolism and function. J. Neurobiol. 2006;66:606–630. doi: 10.1002/neu.20242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hall J.A., Grainger J.R., Spencer S.P., Belkaid Y. The Role of Retinoic Acid in Tolerance and Immunity. Immunity. 2011;35:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maden M. Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:755–765. doi: 10.1038/nrn2212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ross A.C. Vitamin A and retinoic acid in T cell–related immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012;96:1166S–1172S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Soriano A.O., Yang H., Faderl S., Estrov Z., Giles F., Ravandi F., Cortes J., Wierda W.G., Ouzounian S., Quezada A., et al. Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2007;110:2302–2308. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mann K.K., Rephaeli A., Colosimo A.L., Diaz Z., Nudelman A., Levovich I., Jing Y., Waxman S., Miller W.H. A Retinoid/Butyric Acid Prodrug Overcomes Retinoic Acid Resistance in Leukemias by Induction of Apoptosis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2003;1:903–912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nudelman A., Rephaeli A. Novel Mutual Prodrug of Retinoic and Butyric Acids with Enhanced Anticancer Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2000;43:2962–2966. doi: 10.1021/jm990540a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xia Z., Wiebe L.I., Miller G.G., Knaus E.E. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Butanoate, Retinoate, and Bis(2,2,2-trichloroethyl)phosphate Derivatives of 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine and 2′,5-Difluoro-2′-deoxyuridine as Potential Dual Action Anticancer Prodrugs. Arch. Pharm. 1999;332:286–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4184(19998)332:8<286::AID-ARDP286>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Apraiz A., Idkowiak-Baldys J., Nieto-Rementería N., Boyano M.D., Hannun Y.A., Asumendi A. Dihydroceramide accumulation and reactive oxygen species are distinct and nonessential events in 4-HPR-mediated leukemia cell death. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012;90:209–223. doi: 10.1139/o2012-001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Veronesi U., Mariani L., Decensi A., Formelli F., Camerini T., Miceli R., di Mauro M.G., Costa A., Marubini E., Sporn M.B., et al. Fifteen-year results of a randomized phase III trial of fenretinide to prevent second breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2006;17:1065–1071. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu Q., Chen Z.M., Su W.J. Anticancer effect of retinoic acid via AP-1 activity repression is mediated by retinoic acid receptor α and β in gastric cancer cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002;34:1102–1114. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00030-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ping S., Wang S., Zhang J., Peng X. Effect of all-trans-retinoic acid on mRNA binding protein p62 in human gastric cancer cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005;37:616–627. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu S., Wu Q., Che Z.M., Su W.J. The effect pathway of retinoic acid through regulation of retinoic acid receptor alpha in gastric cancer cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2001;7:662–666. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i5.662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang J.P., Chen X.Y., Li J.S. Effects of all-trans-retinoic on human gastric cancer cells BGC-823. J. Digest. Dis. 2007;8:29–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2007.00280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu H., Lv M., Tian X. A Review on Hemisynthesis, Biosynthesis, Biological Activities, Mode of Action, and Structure-Activity Relationship of Podophyllotoxins: 2003–2007. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009;16:327–349. doi: 10.2174/092986709787002682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bohlin L., Rosen B. Podophyllotoxin derivatives: Drug discovery and development. Drug Discov. Today. 1996;1:343–351. doi: 10.1016/1359-6446(96)10028-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Y.D., Tian J., Qian K., Zhao X.B., Morris-Natschke S.L., Yang L., Nan X., Tian X., Lee K.H. Recent Progress on C-4-Modified Podophyllotoxin Analogs as Potent Antitumor Agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2015;35:1–62. doi: 10.1002/med.21319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kamal A., Hussaini S.M.A., Rahim A., Riyaz S. Podophyllotoxin derivatives: A patent review (2012–2014) Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2015;25:1025–1034. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1051727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen J., Ma L., Zhang R., Tang J., Lai H., Wang J., Wang G., Xu Q., Chen T., Peng F., et al. Semi-Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 1,2,3-Triazole-Based Podophyllotoxin Congeners as Potent Antitumor Agents Inducing Apoptosis in HepG2 Cells. Arch. Pharm. 2012;345:945–956. doi: 10.1002/ardp.201100438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li J.L., Zhao W., Zhou C., Zhang Y.X., Li H.M., Tang Y.L., Liang X.H., Chen T., Tang Y.J. Comparison of carbon-sulfur and carbon-amine bond in therapeutic drug: 4β-S-aromatic heterocyclic podophyllum derivatives display antitumor activity. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14814. doi: 10.1038/srep14814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiao L., Zhao W., Li H.M., Wan D.J., Li D.S., Chen T., Tang Y.J. Design and synthesis of the novel DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors: Esterification and amination substituted 4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin derivates exhibiting anti-tumor activity by activating ATM/ATR signaling pathways. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;80:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.03.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mishra S., Singh P. Hybrid molecules: The privileged scaffolds for various pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;124:500–536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fortin S., Bérubé G. Advances in the development of hybrid anticancer drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Dis. 2013;8:1029–1047. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2013.798296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang L., Chen F., Zhang Z., Chen Y., Lin Y., Wang J. Design, synthesis and evaluation of the multidrug resistance-reversing activity of pyridine acid esters of podophyllotoxin in human leukemia cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:4466–4471. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.07.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang L., Chen F., Zhang Z., Chen Y., Wang J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a novel artesunate–podophyllotoxin conjugate as anticancer agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang L., Zhang Z., Wang J., Chen Y., Chen F., Lin Y., Zhu X. Potential anti-MDR agents based on the podophyllotoxin scaffold: Synthesis and antiproliferative activity evaluation against chronic myeloid leukemia cells by activating MAPK signaling pathways. RSC Adv. 2016;6:2895–2903. doi: 10.1039/C5RA24272J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang L., Chen F., Wang J., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Lin Y., Zhu X. Novel isatin derivatives of podophyllotoxin: Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation against human leukaemia cancer cells as potent anti-MDR agents. RSC Adv. 2015;5:97816–97823. doi: 10.1039/C5RA21217K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang L., Zhang Z., Chen F., Chen Y., Lin Y., Wang J. Aromatic heterocyclic esters of podophyllotoxin exert anti-MDR activity in human leukemia K562/ADR cells via ROS/MAPK signaling pathways. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;123:226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang L., Wang J., Liu L., Zheng C., Wang Y., Chen Y., Wei G. Podophyllotoxin–pterostilbene fused conjugates as potential multifunctional antineoplastic agents against human uveal melanoma cells. RSC Adv. 2017;7:10601–10608. doi: 10.1039/C6RA28832D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang L., Liu L., Zheng C., Wang Y., Nie X., Shi D., Chen Y., Wei G., Wang J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel podophyllotoxin-NSAIDs conjugates as multifunctional anti-MDR agents against resistant human hepatocellular carcinoma Bel-7402/5-FU cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;131:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meunier B. Hybrid molecules with a dual mode of action: dream or reality? Acc. Chem Res. 2007;41:69–77. doi: 10.1021/ar7000843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsubaki M., Takeda T., Ogawa N., Sakamoto K., Shimaoka H., Fujita A., Itoh T., Imano M., Ishizaka T., Satoue T., Nishida S. Overexpression of survivin via activation of ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB plays a central role in vincristine resistance in multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia Res. 2015;39:445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao C., Li H., Lin H.J., Yang S., Lin J., Liang G. Feedback Activation of STAT3 as a Cancer Drug-Resistance Mechanism. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016;37:47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (276.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Molecules : A Journal of Synthetic Chemistry and Natural Product Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES