Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0203498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203498

Brain gray and white matter abnormalities in preterm-born adolescents: A meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies

Le Zhou 1,2,#, Youjin Zhao 1,#, Xinghui Liu 3,*, Weihong Kuang 4, Hongyan Zhu 5, Jing Dai 6, Manxi He 6, Su Lui 1, Graham J Kemp 7, Qiyong Gong 1,*
Editor: Branko Aleksic8
PMCID: PMC6179190  PMID: 30303972

Abstract

Introduction

Studies using voxel-based morphometry report variable and inconsistent abnormalities of gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter volume (WMV) in brains of preterm-born adolescents (PBA). In such circumstances a meta-analysis can help identify the most prominent and consistent abnormalities.

Method

We identified 9 eligible studies by systematic search of the literature up to October 2017. We used Seed-based d Mapping to analyze GMV and WMV alterations between PBA and healthy controls.

Results

In the GMV meta-analysis, PBA compared to healthy controls showed: increased GMV in left cuneus cortex, left superior frontal gyrus, and right anterior cingulate cortex; decreased GMV in bilateral inferior temporal gyrus (ITG), left superior frontal gyrus, and right caudate nucleus. In the WMV meta-analysis, PBA showed: increased WMV in right fusiform gyrus and precuneus; decreased WMV in bilateral ITG, and right inferior frontal gyrus. In meta-regression analysis, the percentage of male PBA negatively correlated with decreased GMV of bilateral ITG.

Interpretation

PBA show widespread GMV and WMV alterations in the default mode network, visual recognition network, and salience network. These changes may be causally relevant to socialization difficulties and cognitive impairments. The meta-regression results perhaps reveal the structural underpinning of the cognition-related sex differences in PBA.

Introduction

Nearly 10% of all live births worldwide are preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation)[1, 2]. Although the survival of very preterm infants has improved, preterm-born adolescents (PBA) are at risk for long-term abnormalities of neurodevelopment [1, 3, 4]. These can manifest as socialization difficulties [5], educational underachievement[6], language impairment[7], motor dysfunction[8], cognitive delay[9], and emotional/behavior adjustment problems[3] in both preschool and school-aged children born preterm [1, 6, 9, 10]. PBA are also at increased risk of developing psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia[1], bipolar affective disorder[11], autism[10], depression and anxiety disorder[1, 4, 11]. Many studies have shown that the abnormality of cognition and behavior are in related with brain structure alterations and brain function alterations. We hypothesized that preterm birth would result in long-lasting changes in brain development. It is therefore important to understand the effects of preterm birth on the brain, particularly its long-term impact on neurodevelopment.

Over the last 20 years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had been widely used to investigate brain abnormalities in psychiatric disorders. There are several MRI analytic approaches to quantifying structural abnormalities, including traditional hand-drawn regions of interest (ROIs) and whole-brain morphometrics. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is an automated whole-brain technique with comparable accuracy to ROI approaches. VBM compares regional GM or WM changes in terms of density and volume in all brain areas through structural MRI scans. It can detect subtle changes in the brain MRI images between groups of subjects[12].

Reported gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter volume (WMV) abnormalities in PBA have been variable and inconsistent: increased GMV in the fusiform gyrus[13]; decreased GMV in the temporal[1416], parietal[16, 17] and prefrontal[14] cortex, and in the hippocampus[16], and caudate nucleus[15]; increased WMV in the parahippocampal region and cerebellum[18]; and decreased WMV in the temporal and frontal regions[15]. Some results are contradictory, probably owing to methodological differences and small or heterogeneous study samples: for example, Meng et al. reported increased GMV in the posterior cingulate cortices[19], whereas Lean et al. found decreased GMV in part of this region [16]. Soria-Pastor et al. did not observe any region of increased GMV in PBA[17].

Therefore, identifying prominent and consistent results from VBM studies of WMV and GMV in PBA through meta-analysis is of particular significance. This was the first aim of this study. The second aim was to examine the effects of demographics and clinical characteristics on GMV and WMV in PBA, using Seed-based d Mapping (formerly "Signed Differential Mapping") (SDM). SDM is a relatively reliable and valid quantitative coordinate-based meta-analytic tool. It has the technical advantage over other meta-analytical tools that the same map includes positive and negative findings from contributing studies. SDM has been successfully applied to neuroimaging studies of several psychiatric disorders such as anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, Alzheimer's disease and posttraumatic stress disorder [1, 11, 20, 21]. It possesses good overlap with pooled analysis, adequate sensitivity, and excellent control over false positives[22].

In brief, we conducted separate meta-analyses of VBM studies on GMV and WMV, in order to find the long-lasting changes in brain development.

Methods and materials

Literature searches

Meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA)[23]. A systematic search strategy was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Science Direct up to October 2017, with the following search terms: “premature labor” or “preterm infant” or “premature birth” or “premature delivery” or “preterm born” and “voxel-based morphometry” or “VBM” or “morphometry”. The reference lists of the articles included in the review were manually checked to identify further studies for inclusion. There was no language restriction, though all included articles were written in English.

We included studies which: (1) used VBM to analyze GMV and/or WMV changes in PBA; (2) compared PBA and healthy controls (HC); (3) performed a whole-brain analysis; and (4) reported coordinates in a defined stereotaxic space (i.e. Montreal Neurological Institute space or Talaraich space). For studies where multiple independent patient samples were compared with HC, we included the appropriate coordinates as separate datasets. To avoid sample overlaps: (1) in the case of longitudinal studies, we included only the pretreatment data; (2) in the case of multiple studies using the same patient group, we included only the largest sample.

Recorded variables

We recorded the following variables for each included study: sample size, gender and mean age of subjects; gestational age, birth weight, and the scores of Wechsler intelligence scales (either the WISC-R or the WAIS-III depending on subjects’ age); and the method used to correct whole-brain results for multiple comparisons.

Standard meta-analyses of GMV and WMV abnormalities

We conducted separate voxel-based meta-analyses of GMV and WMV abnormalities using the SDM software package (http://www.sdmproject.com). We re-created maps of the effect size of group differences in GMV and WMV by using the peak coordinates. Both negative and positive coordinates were reconstructed in the same map to prevent a particular voxel appearing to be significant in opposite directions. The re-creation is based on converting the peak t value to Hedges’ effect size and then applying a non-normalized Gaussian kernel to the voxels close to the peak. Importantly, we also included negative studies. We used a threshold of p = 0.005 with peak Z >1 and a cluster extent of >50 voxels[24].

Sensitivity analysis

To test the replicability of the results, we used a systematic whole-brain voxel-based jackknife sensitivity analysis. We repeated the main analysis 8 times for GMV and 6 times for WMV, discarding a different study each time. If a previously significant brain region remained significant in all or most of the combinations of the studies, it could be concluded that this finding was highly replicable.

Heterogeneity and publication bias analysis

We examined the statistical (between-studies) heterogeneity of individual clusters using a random-effects model with Q statistics (χ2 distribution converted to z values) and tested with a permutation approach. The potential publication bias was formally assessed with Egger tests. We created funnel plots of the peaks of the main findings in order to discard gross abnormalities.

Meta-regression analysis

We explored the following variables by meta-regression: the percentage of males, mean age of subjects at testing, gestational age, birth weight, and the scores of Wechsler intelligence scales (full IQ). In order to minimize the detection of spurious relationships, we decreased the probability threshold to 0.0005 and required abnormalities to be detected both in the slope and in one of the extremes of the regression, and discarded findings in regions other than those detected in the main analyses. Furthermore, we inspected regression plots to discard fittings driven by too few studies[24].

Results

Included studies and sample characteristics

The search strategy identified 36 studies after the duplicates were removed. Based on the stated inclusion criteria, a total of 9 articles[1419, 2528] (8 datasets of GMV from 7 articles, and 6 datasets of WMV from 5 articles) were ultimately included, with 633 PBA (314 males and 319 females; mean age 15.2 years) and 485 HC (258 males and 227 females; mean age 15.1 years). Two studies used overlapping samples[15, 28]: Nosarti’s study reported WMV findings and GMV findings, and Scott’s study only had GMV findings. After email discussion with these authors we selected Scott’s GMV findings and Nosarti’s WMV findings. One study compared male and female samples with HC separately, so the appropriate coordinates were included as two separate datasets[14]. Ultimately, we included 8 datasets of GMV and 6 datasets of WMV in the meta-analysis. Fig 1 shows a flow diagram of the identification and attrition of the studies. Clinical and demographic data are summarized in Table 1.

Fig 1. Search strategy used.

Fig 1

Study selection was done according to “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis” (PRISMA) guidelines. Abbreviation: GMV, gray matter volume; ROI, region of interest; WMV, white matter volume.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects in the 9 voxel-based morphometry studies included in the meta-analysis.

Study Gray
matter
White
matter
Subject,n(male,n) Age at testing (years) Gestational
age
(weeks)
Birth weight
(g)
Full IQ
(score)
Statistical threshold
PBA HC PBA HC
Gimenz(2006)[25] N Y 50(24) 50(22) 14.5 14.5 29.9 1327 103.0 corrected
Kesler(2008)[14] Y Y 17(17) 10(10) 12.2 12.2 28.3 945 N.A. FWE corrected
Kesler(2008)[14] Y Y 12(0) 12(0) 12.3 12.2 28.7 1000 N.A. FWE corrected
Nosarti(2008)[15] N Y 207(115) 104(59) 15.2 15.2 29.1 1276 N.A. FWE corrected
Soria(2009)[17] Y Y 20(11) 22(14) 9.3 9.3 32.5 1754 105.8 corrected
Nagy(2009)[29] Y N 74(23) 69(16) 14.9 14.3 28.5 1070 N.A. corrected
Scott(2011)[28] Y N 207(115) 104(59) 15.2 15.0 29.1 1276 N.A. FWE corrected
Nosarti(2014)[18] Y Y 68(32) 43(13) 20.2 19.3 28.9 1225 96.2 FWE corrected
Meng(2014)[19] Y N 85(47) 69(44) 26.45 26.35 30.7 1356 95.3 FWE corrected
Lean(2017)[16] Y N 100(50) 106(57) 12.1 12.2 27.9 1063.5 N.A. FWE corrected

Abbreviation: FWE = familywise error correction; HC = healthy controls; IQ = Intelligence Quotient; N.A. = not available; PBA = preterm-born adolescents.

Changes in regional gray matter volume

The main GMV meta-analysis, a group comparison of PBA with HC across the 8 datasets, showed increased GMV relative to HC in the left cuneus cortex, the left medial superior frontal gyrus (mSFG), and the right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC); and decreased GMV relative to HC in the bilateral inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) extending to the middle and superior temporal gyrus, the orbital part of left superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and the right caudate nucleus (CN) (Table 2, Fig 2).

Table 2. Regional differences in gray matter and white matter volume between PBA and HC subjects identified by the present meta-analyses (voxelwise p<0.005 and FWHM 20 mm).

Region Talairach coordinates SDM
z score
P, uncorrected Voxel, n Cluster breakdown(voxel, n)
x y z
Pooled meta-analysis of all eligible studies of gray matter
PBA>HC
Left cuneus cortex, BA 18 0 -88 22 1343 0.001230597 388 Left cuneus cortex, BA 18(311)
Right cuneus cortex, BA 18(77)
Left superior frontal gyrus, medial, BA 8 -4 26 44 1.554 0.000495434 376 Left superior frontal gyrus, medial, BA 8(376)
Right anterior cingulate, BA 32 12 40 8 1.363 0.001138210 151 Right anterior cingulate, BA 32(98)
Right median cingulate (30)
Left anterior cingulate, BA 24(23)
PBA<HC
Right inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20 48 -2 -14 -4.061 0.000006199 5504 Right inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20,21(1721)
Right middle temporal gyrus, BA 20,21,22(1596)
Right superior temporal gyrus, BA 21,38,40(1132)
Right insula, BA 48(1055)
Left inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20 -46 -8 -16 -3.967 0.000008523 4769 Left inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20,21(1567)
Left middle temporal gyrus, BA 21,48(1259)
Left superior temporal gyrus, BA 22,48(1098)
Left insula, BA 48(845)
Left superior frontal gyrus, orbital part, BA 11 -15 29 -20 -2.198 0.003046155 182 Left superior frontal gyrus, orbital part, BA 11(182)
Right caudate nucleus 10 14 4 -2.197 0.003058553 56 Right caudate nucleus(56)
Pooled meta-analysis of all eligible studies of white matter
PBA>HC
Right fusiform gyrus, BA 37 38 -48 -16 2.934 0.000010312 615 Right fusiform gyrus, BA 18,30, 37(615)
Right precuneus, BA 30 4 -52 14 2.920 0.000015497 103 Right precuneus, BA 29,30(103)
PBA<HC
Left inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20 -42 -10 -16 -5.404 ~0 1739 Left inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20,21(711)
Left middle temporal gyrus, BA 20,21(529)
Left insula, BA 48(313)
Left superior temporal gyrus, BA 22,38,48(186)
Right inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20 46 -2 -26 -4.278 0.000030994 1447 Right inferior temporal gyrus, BA 20(672)
Right middle temporal gyrus, BA 21(441)
Right superior temporal gyrus, BA 21,22,38(334)
Left cortico-spinal projections -6 -22 -8 -2.960 0.000495434 259 Left anterior thalamic projections(259)
Right inferior frontal gyrus 48 8 10 -3.599 0.000108361 255 Right inferior frontal gyrus (255)
Right cortico-spinal projections 8 -24 -4 -2.904 0.000541866 117 Left anterior thalamic projections(117)

Abbreviation: BA = Brodmann area; FWHM = full width at half maximum; HC = healthy control; PBA = preterm-born adolescents; SDM = Seed-based d Mapping.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Regions showing increased (red) and decreased (blue) GMV in PBA compared with healthy controls. Abbreviation: ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; CN, caudate nucleus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; L, left; R, right; SFG, superior frontal gyrus.

Whole-brain jack-knife sensitivity analysis showed that increased GMV in the left cuneus cortex, left mSFG, right dACC and decreased GMV in the bilateral ITG and the orbital part of left SFG were highly replicable, being preserved throughout all 8 combinations of datasets. Decreased GMV in the right CN remained significant in all but two combinations[19, 27].

The regions with altered GMV did not showed significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (p > 0.005).

In analysis of publication bias, the Egger test was nonsignificant in the left cuneus cortex (p = 0.60), left mSFG (p = 0.60), right dACC (p = 0.85), right ITG (p = 0.23), left ITG (p = 0.39), the orbital part of left SFG (p = 0.81), and right CN (p = 0.85) (S1 Fig). Funnel plots demonstrated that the main findings were driven by at least 6 datasets (S1 Fig).

As shown in Fig 3, the percentage of male PBA was negatively correlated with decreased GMV in the left ITG (r = -0.407, permutation-derived p < 0.0001) and the right ITG (r = -0.554, permutation-derived p < 0.0001) in meta-regression analyses. The age at testing, gestational age, birth weight and full IQ were not linearly correlated with any GMV findings in PBA.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Regions showing increased (red) and decreased (blue) WMV in PBA compared with healthy controls. Abbreviation: B, bilateral; CSP, cortico-spinal projections; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; L, left; R, right.

Changes in regional white matter volume

The main WMV meta-analysis, a group comparison of PBA with HC across the 6 datasets, showed increased WMV relative to HC in the right fusiform gyrus and right precuneus; and decreased WMV relative to HC in the bilateral ITG, the bilateral cortico-spinal projections, and the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in PBA (Table 2, Fig 4).

Fig 4. Meta-regression results show that the percentage of male patients was negatively correlated with gray matter in the bilateral temporal lobe.

Fig 4

In the graphs, the effect sizes needed to create this plot have been extracted from the peak of maximum slope significance, and each study is represented as a dot. The regression line (meta-regression signed differential mapping slope) is shown. Abbreviation: ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; L, left; R, right.

Whole-brain jackknife sensitivity analysis showed that increased WMV in the right fusiform gyrus, and right precuneus, and also decreased WMV in bilateral ITG, bilateral cortico-spinal projections, and right IFG, were all highly replicable, being preserved throughout all 6 combinations of datasets.

The regions with altered WMV did not show significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (p > 0.005).

In analysis of publication bias, the Egger test was nonsignificant in the right fusiform gyrus (p = 0.06), right precuneus (p = 0.06), bilateral cortico-spinal projections (p = 0.07 / 0.08), and the right IFG (p = 0.14) (S1 Fig). Funnel plots showed that the main findings were driven by at least 6 datasets (S1 Fig).

Meta-regression analyses revealed that the changes of WMV-related brain abnormal in PBA were not associated with the percentage of male PBA, age at testing, gestational age and birth weight and full IQ, at least linearly.

Discussion

To our knowledge this is the first voxel-wise meta-analysis of VBM studies in PBA examining GMV and WMV abnormalities. The PBA group, compared with HC, showed significantly and robustly decreased GMV and WMV in the bilateral ITG extending to the middle and superior temporal gyrus. PBA also showed increased GMV in the left cuneus cortex, the left mSFG, and the right dACC; decreased GMV in the orbital part of left SFG, and the right CN; increased WMV in the right fusiform gyrus and right precuneus; and decreased WMV in the bilateral cortico-spinal projections and the right IFG. Meta-regression analyses revealed that the percentage of male PBA was negatively associated with decreased GMV in the bilateral ITG.

Next we discuss what these abnormalities might tell us about pathophysiology.

Inferior temporal gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex and precuneus: The default mode network

The most prominent findings were decreased GMV and WMV in the bilateral ITG, extending to the middle and superior temporal gyrus; almost the entire temporal lobe is affected. Volume reductions in the temporal gyrus were previously reported in PBA[17]. It is known that brain maturation starts in the central area, proceeds toward the parieto-occipital cortex, and only then reaches the temporal lobe. Late development of these regions might make these structures more vulnerable to the influence of environmental factors during childhood[29]. As can be seen in the SDM maps, the GMV abnormalities get very close to the WMV abnormalities in the bilateral temporal lobe (compare Figs 2 and 3). One possible mechanism is exaggeration of synaptic pruning (‘hyperpruning’), a process which normally refines interneuron function and connectivity from adolescence through early adulthood[30]. Alternatively, abnormal gray matter architecture may have effects on both distant and adjacent brain regions, which fail to receive input from the damaged cortex [31].

Dysfunction of the ITG is important in cognitive impairment[32], of which PBA are at significant risk[33]. The STG is important in the development of linguistic abilities such as reading and spelling[34], and language difficulties are common in children born prematurely[7]. Thus the decreased GMV and WMV we found in the bilateral temporal lobe may be causally important in cognitive impairment and language difficulties in PBA.

The PBA group also showed increased GMV in the left mSFG, a part of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) which is implicated in spelling and language ability [28], intellectual ability[35], cognitive outcome and emotion regulation[36]. We also found increased WMV in the precuneus.

The ITG, mPFC and precuneus are critical components of the default mode network (DMN), which functions in emotion regulation[37], language comprehension and cognition[38]. The period of 32–40 weeks gestational age is an important developmental epoch for the DMN[39], and this may underlie damage to the DMN system in PBA. Abnormalities in the DMN have also been identified in almost every major psychiatric disorder including anxiety, depression, autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)[38, 40], which might explain why these are all common in PBA. DMN dysfunction may therefore be the main pathophysiological mechanism in PBA.

Cuneus and fusiform gyrus: The visual recognition network

Compared with HC, PBA showed increased GMV in the cuneus and increased WMV in the fusiform gyrus, which are both parts of the visual recognition network. Increases in both GMV and WMV may reflect an abnormal or delayed pruning program, thus reflecting both destructive and adaptive developmental processes [15]. The visual recognition network is important for visual perception and related functions such as learning, memory and interactions with the visual world[41]. The cuneus is part of the occipital lobe. Rapid occipital development may make this region more vulnerable to premature birth, which might underlie the visual impairment in PBA[42]. The fusiform gyrus is important implications in the development of social skills[43], and this abnormality may be causally related to the ‘socially immaturity’ of PBA. Thus alterations in the visual recognition network may be closely related to both visual impairment and social immaturity in PBA.

Orbital frontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: The salience network

The PBA group showed decreased GMV in the orbital part of left SFG corresponding to the left medial orbital frontal cortex (OFC). Decreased GMV in OFC has been previously observed in VPT samples[15], and moreover, has been found to correlate with intellectual ability in PBA[35]. There are other reports relating social dysfunction in PBA to structural abnormalities in OFC [13], because of its importance in social regulation, social cognition and theory of mind [22].

The PBA showed increased GMV in the right dACC. The dACC is thought to play a role in regulating attention and monitoring task performance [44]. This may why PBA are at increased risk of attention problems, being twice as likely as full-term children to be diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [45]. Bora et al. found that reduced cerebral tissue volumes in OFC at term were associated with attention/hyperactivity problems in PBA from age 4 to 9 years[46].

The OFC and dACC are core nodes in the salience network (SN), which is involved in cognitive and behavioral phenomena related to decision-making and cognitive control [47]. It may therefore be that these GMV alterations in the OFC and dACC are causally related to the impairments of cognition, motor control, attention and social function in PBA [48, 49].

Gender effects

Meta-regression analyses showed that the percentage of male PBA was negatively associated with decreased GMV in the bilateral ITG: that is, male PBA tend to have a smaller temporal lobe GMV. This may be because delayed myelination is reportedly more frequent in male than female PBA[50]. Myelination is critical for normal neurodevelopment and may be adversely affected by preterm birth [50]. Male PBA are more likely than females to have moderate to severe cerebral palsy, and this has been related to poor general neuromotor behavior outcome at age 7 years [51]. Sex differences are also seen in cognitive aspects: male PBAs had lower cognitive and language scores than females [52]. It may therefore be that the sex differences of GMV in bilateral ITG contribute to differences in cognitive aspects of PBA.

Limitations and conclusions

This study has several limitations. First, the relatively small number of eligible studies, some with rather small and selective samples of PBA, limits the generalizability of the results, especially in the meta-regression. Second, peak-based meta-analyses are based on summarized data (i.e. coordinates from published studies) rather than raw statistical brain maps, and this may result in less accurate results[53]. Third, there are no prospective randomized controlled studies of the long-term effects of preterm birth on brain structure. Fourth, a number of studies provided limited information about clinical characteristics and social background.

In summary, to our knowledge this is the first voxel-wise meta-analysis of VBM studies in PBA. PBA show widespread GMV and WMV alterations mainly in the default mode network (ITG, mPFC and precuneus), visual recognition network (cuneus and fusiform gyrus), and salience network (dACC). These changes may be causally associated with socialization difficulties, educational underachievement, language impairment, cognitive impairment, and behavioral problems in PBA. Meta-regression suggests that male PBA tend to have smaller temporal lobe GMV, which may reflect the structural underpinnings of the sex differences observed in cognitive aspects of PBA. Future studies will benefit from the use of a longitudinal approach to investigate dynamic brain structure changes and the influence of external and internal factors on brain development in PBA.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Results of the funnel plot analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. PRISMA checklist.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors of the studies included and the authors. The corresponding author had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 81621003 and 81030027) and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT, Grant No. IRT16R52) of China to LZ.

References

  • 1.Walshe M, Rifkin L, Rooney M, Healy E, Nosarti C, Wyatt J, et al. Psychiatric disorder in young adults born very preterm: role of family history. Eur Psychiatry. 2008;23(7):527–31. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(1):31–8. 10.2471/BLT.08.062554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woodward LJ, Moor S;Hood KM, Champion PR, Foster-Cohen S, Inder TE, et al. Very preterm children show impairments across multiple neurodevelopmental domains by age 4 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F339–44. 10.1136/adc.2008.146282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson S, Marlow N. Preterm birth and childhood psychiatric disorders. Pediatr Res. 2011;69(5 Pt 2):11R–8R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson S, Hollis C, Kochhar P, Hennessy E, Wolke D, Marlow N. Psychiatric disorders in extremely preterm children: longitudinal finding at age 11 years in the EPICure study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(5):453–63.e1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(1):43–56. 10.1038/nrn2961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Northam GB, Liégeois F, Tournier JD, Croft LJ, Johns PN, Chong WK, et al. Interhemispheric temporal lobe connectivity predicts language impairment in adolescents born preterm. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 12):3781–98. 10.1093/brain/aws276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Allin M, Matsumoto H, Santhouse AM, Nosarti C, AlAsady MH, Stewart AL, et al. Cognitive and motor function and the size of the cerebellum in adolescents born very pre-term. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 1):60–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC, Howard K, Inder TE. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):685–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa053792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Solomon M, Olsen E, Niendam T, Ragland JD, Yoon J, Minzenberg M, et al. From lumping to splitting and back again: atypical social and language development in individuals with clinical-high-risk for psychosis, first episode schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2011;131(1–3):146–51. 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cannon M, Jones P, Gilvarry C, Rifkin L, McKenzie K, Foerster A, et al. Premorbid social functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: similarities and differences. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(11):1544–50. 10.1176/ajp.154.11.1544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage. 2001;14(6):1238–43. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Healy E, Reichenberg A, Nam KW, Allin MP, Walshe M, Rifkin L, et al. Preterm birth and adolescent social functioning-alterations in emotion-processing brain areas. J Pediatr. 2013;163(6):1596–604. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kesler SR, Reiss AL, Vohr B, Watson C, Schneider KC, Katz KH, et al. Brain volume reductions within multiple cognitive systems in male preterm children at age twelve. J Pediatr. 2008;152(4):513–20, 520.e1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nosarti C, Giouroukou E, Healy E, Rifkin L, Walshe M, Reichenberg A, et al. Grey and white matter distribution in very preterm adolescents mediates neurodevelopmental outcome. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 1):205–17. 10.1093/brain/awm282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lean RE, Melzer TR, Bora S, Watts R, Woodward LJ. Attention and Regional Gray Matter Development in Very Preterm Children at Age 12 Years. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(7):539–550. 10.1017/S1355617717000388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soria-Pastor S, Padilla N, Zubiaurre-Elorza L, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Botet F, Costas-Moragas C, et al. Decreased regional brain volume and cognitive impairment in preterm children at low risk. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1161–70. 10.1542/peds.2009-0244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nosarti C, Nam KW, Walshe M, Murray RM, Cuddy M, Rifkin L, et al. Preterm birth and structural brain alterations in early adulthood. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;6:180–91. 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meng C, Bäuml JG, Daamen M, Jaekel J, Neitzel J, Scheef L, et al. Extensive and interrelated subcortical white and gray matter alterations in preterm-born adults. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221(4):2109–21. 10.1007/s00429-015-1032-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carlisi CO, Norman LJ, Lukito SS, Radua J, Mataix-Cols D, Rubia K. Comparative Multimodal Meta-analysis of Structural and Functional Brain Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry; 2016;82(2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Norman LJ, Carlisi C, Lukito S, Hart H, Mataix-Cols D, Radua J, et al. Structural and Functional Brain Abnormalities in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Comparative Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(8):815–25. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rogers CE, Anderson PJ, Thompson DK, Kidokoro H, Wallendorf M, Treyvaud K, et al. Regional cerebral development at term relates to school-age social-emotional development in very preterm children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(2):181–91. 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg, 2010;8(5):336–41. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Radua J, Romeo M, Mataix-Cols D, Fusar-Poli P. A general approach for combining voxel-based meta-analyses conducted in different neuroimaging modalities. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(3):462–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giménez M, Junqué C, Narberhaus A, Bargalló N, Botet F, Mercader JM. White matter volume and concentration reductions in adolescents with history of very preterm birth: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage. 2006;32(4):1485–98. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soria-Pastor S, Gimenez M, Narberhaus A, Falcon C, Botet F, Bargallo N, et al. Patterns of cerebral white matter damage and cognitive impairment in adolescents born very preterm. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2008;26(7):647–54. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nagy Z, Ashburner J, Andersson J, Jbabdi S, Draganski B, Skare S, et al. Structural correlates of preterm birth in the adolescent brain. Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):e964–72. 10.1542/peds.2008-3801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scott FE, Mechelli A, Allin MP, Walshe M, Rifkin L, Murray RM, et al. Very preterm adolescents show gender-dependent alteration of the structural brain correlates of spelling abilities. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(9):2685–93. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carmichael ST, Price JL. Limbic connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1995;363(4):615–641. 10.1002/cne.903630408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(21):8174–9. 10.1073/pnas.0402680101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gressens P, Richelme C, Kadhim HJ, Gadisseux JF, Evrard P. The germinative zone produces the most cortical astrocytes after neuronal migration in the developing mammalian brain. Biol Neonate. 1992;61(1):4–24. 10.1159/000243526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ment LR, Hirtz D, Hüppi PS. Imaging biomarkers of outcome in the developing preterm brain. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(11):1042–55. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70257-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allin MP, Salaria S, Nosarti C, Wyatt J, Rifkin L, Murray RM. Vermis and lateral lobes of the cerebellum in adolescents born very preterm. Neuroreport. 2005;16(16):1821–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Booth JR, Cho S, Burman DD, Bitan T. Neural correlates of mapping from phonology to orthography in children performing an auditory spelling task. Dev Sci. 2007;10(4):441–51. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00598.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peterson BS, Vohr B, Staib LH, Cannistraci CJ, Dolberg A, Schneider KC, et al. Regional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants. JAMA. 2000;284(15):1939–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Etkin A, Egner T, Kalisch R. Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(2):85–93. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sylvester CM, Corbetta M, Raichle ME, Rodebaugh TL, Schlaggar BL, Sheline YI, et al. Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(9):527–35. 10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(10):483–506. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Smyser CD, Snyder AZ, Neil JJ. Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain. Neuroimage. 2011;56(3):1437–52. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mohan A, Roberto AJ, Mohan A, Lorenzo A, Jones K, Carney MJ, et al. The Significance of the Default Mode Network (DMN) in Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Review. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89(1):49–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bisley JW. The neural basis of visual attention. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 1):49–57. 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Narberhaus A, Lawrence E, Allin MP, Walshe M, McGuire P, Rifkin L, et al. Neural substrates of visual paired associates in young adults with a history of very preterm birth: alterations in fronto-parieto-occipital networks and caudate nucleus. Neuroimage. 2009;47(4):1884–93. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Johnson MH, Griffin R, Csibra G, Halit H, Farroni T, de Haan M, et al. The emergence of the social brain network: evidence from typical and atypical development. Dev Psychopathol. 2005;17(3):599–619. 10.1017/S0954579405050297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sadaghiani S, D'Esposito M. Functional Characterization of the Cingulo-Opercular Network in the Maintenance of Tonic Alertness. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(9):2763–73. 10.1093/cercor/bhu072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002;288(6):728–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bora S, Pritchard VE, Chen Z, Inder TE, Woodward LJ. Neonatal cerebral morphometry and later risk of persistent inattention/hyperactivity in children born very preterm. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55:828–38. 10.1111/jcpp.12200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peters SK, Dunlop K, Downar J. Cortico-Striatal-Thalamic Loop Circuits of the Salience Network: A Central Pathway in Psychiatric Disease and Treatment. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016;10: 104 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Makris N, Biederman J, Monuteaux MC, Seidman LJ. Towards conceptualizing a neural systems-based anatomy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dev Neurosci. 2009;31(1–2):36–49. 10.1159/000207492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kawamoto T, Ura M, Nittono H. Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes of social exclusion. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:62 10.3389/fnins.2015.00062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Volpe JJ. Neurology of the newborn. Major Probl Clin Pediatr. 1981;22:1–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Kenneth PW, Higgins RD. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(10):1239–48. 10.1080/08035250600599727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Skiöld B, Alexandrou G, Padilla N, Blennow M, Vollmer B, Adén U. Sex differences in outcome and associations with neonatal brain morphology in extremely preterm children. J Pediatr. 2014;164(5):1012–8. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nakao T, Radua J, Rubia K, Mataix-Cols D. Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(11):1154–63. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Results of the funnel plot analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. PRISMA checklist.

(DOC)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES