Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018 Mar 15;28(16):2708–2712. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.03.035

Towards New Antibiotics Targeting Bacterial Transglycosylase: Synthesis of a Lipid II Analog as Stable Transition-State Mimic Inhibitor

Xiaolei Wang a, Larissa Krasnova a, Kevin Binchia Wu a, Wei-Shen Wu b, Ting-Jen Cheng b, Chi-Huey Wong a,b
PMCID: PMC6182773  NIHMSID: NIHMS957162  PMID: 29602680

Abstract

Described here is the asymmetric synthesis of iminosugar 2b, a Lipid II analog, designed to mimic the transition state of transglycosylation catalyzed by the bacterial transglycosylase. The high density of functional groups, together with a rich stereochemistry, represents an extraordinary challenge for chemical synthesis. The key 2,6-anti- stereochemistry of the iminosugar ring was established through an iridium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic amination. The developed synthetic route is suitable for the synthesis of focused libraries to enable the structure-activity relationship study and late-stage modification of iminosugar scaffold with variable lipid, peptide and sugar substituents. Compound 2b showed 70% inhibition of transglycosylase from Acinetobacter baumannii, providing a basis for further improvement.

Keywords: Iminosugar, Inhibitor, Lipid II, Transglycosylase, Synthesis

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms957162u1.jpg


The increasingly common occurrences of infections caused by the drug-resistant bacteria represent a major threat to public health.1 The urgent demand for novel antibacterials has led to the search for underexploited drug targets. In the past, targeting the assembly of peptidoglycan (PG), a polymer-like structure that helps maintain the integrity of bacteria cell and protects it from lysis, has proven to be a successful strategy for the discovery of antibiotics. Our group has a long-standing interest in the enzyme transglycosylase (TG) as target, which catalyzes the polymerization of Lipid II (1, Figure 1A) to generate a nascent PG before it is cross-linked by transpeptidase (Figure 1B). First reported 50 years ago,2a TG is still viewed as a difficult,2b albeit an attractive target.2c–d Located on the external surface of the cytoplasmic membrane, TG is accessible to potential inhibitors. As TG does not have any mammalian counterpart, it is possible to design new antibiotics that are specific against prokaryotic pathogens. In addition, because TG recognizes an invariant carbohydrate backbone, it may be less susceptible to the traditional mechanisms of resistance development.3 Although, antibacterials that inhibit Lipid II polymerization by sequestering its substrate have been identified (e.g., vancomycin), the direct binders of TG with potent inhibitory activities and pharmacological properties suitable for clinical use have yet to be developed. One major effort in this direction has been the optimization of moenomycin structure,4 the only TG-specific inhibitor known to date.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) The structure of Lipid II (1) and the target iminosugar derivatives. (B) Schematic representation for the inhibition of the donor site of TG with iminosugar 2.

Based on recent efforts towards finding the minimal required features of Lipid II/Lipid IV,57 we designed structure 2 (Figure 1A) as a potential transition-state mimic of the TG-catalyzed reaction.5 Compound 2 consists of iminosugar ring connected to an additional ring of GlcNAc, a truncated peptide moiety with two essential methyl groups from the lactyl-alanine sequence,5a,6a,d along with a phosphono-phosphate linked lipid chain,6b which is necessary for the proper recognition and binding. Towards structure 2, our group has initially reported the synthesis of the truncated analog 2a (Figure 1A), which indeed showed inhibition of TG function.6b The two drawbacks of compound 2a are of note. First, because TG is a processive enzyme,7 it is highly unlikely that this mono-sugar derivative 2a can reach the desired donor site of TG due to the lack of the second GlcNAc, therefore preventing enzyme to process 2a. Hence, the observed activity could be a result of 2a binding to the acceptor site only, and its designation as a transition-state analog inhibitor could not be fully realized. Second, the synthetic strategy developed for the assembly of 2a is not suitable for the preparation of the highly functionalized iminosugar 2 and its derivatives,6b required for the detailed structure-activity relationship (SAR) study of TG inhibition. To solve the drawbacks of compound 2a, herein we report an optimized asymmetric synthesis of the iminosugar 2b as a core inhibitor of TG. Since 2b is a pseudo-disaccharide derivative of Lipid II, we envisioned that upon binding it could be processed by the enzyme and pulled into the donor site, where it can block any further transglycosylation reactions (Figure 1B). The synthetic route developed for the assembly of 2b can be further applied for the preparation of other analogs, e.g., 2c and 2d (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Retrosynthetic analysis of target molecule 2.

The retrosynthetic analysis of the target molecule is presented in Scheme 1. The introduction of the sugar and lipid substituents can take place at the late stage using conventional glycosylation with GlcNAc donor (3) and a CDI-activated lipid phosphate (4). Functional groups at positions C-3 and C-4 can be installed via double bond functionalization of 6. Although the proposed synthesis leads to a mannosyl-like iminosugar, the hydroxyl group R2 is well positioned for the inversion with azide to provide the NHAc substituent R3 if required. The most challenging part is the 2,6-anti configuration of the key iminosugar core, which could be accessed through a ligand-controlled asymmetric allylic amination.8 The stereo centers at positions C-5 and C-6 of amine 9 can be obtained from (R)-Garner’s aldehyde. The dense array of functional groups, high polarity and rich stereochemistry of the target molecule signify a substantial synthetic challenge. The most difficult steps of our synthesis, which we successfully solved, include installation of the 2,6-anti configuration of iminosugar, the C-P bond formation and pyrophosphate coupling of the complex pseudo-disaccharide to a long hydrophobic lipid chain.

The starting amine 9 was prepared on a gram-scale through a 5-step sequence from the (R)-Garner’s aldehyde requiring only one purification step (Scheme 2). Carbonate 8a was obtained in a high yield via a 3-step sequence. Compounds 8b and 8c were synthesized in a similar manner according to the known procedures.9

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of the amine 9 and carbonate 8a.

Using chiral amines 9 and 10, and different carbonates 8a-c, we tested the conditions for the asymmetric allylic amination reaction. The results are summarized in Table 1. During the initial screen using 10 (or its HCl salt) and carbonate 8a (entries 1-2, Table 1),8d we observed a trace amount of the desired product 13 together with unreacted starting material. Because the free hydroxyl groups might influence reactivity, we then switched to the protected amine 9, which provided 13 in an excellent yield and selectivity. Since it is very difficult to introduce the phosphonate group into the highly functionalized iminosugar at the late stage,10 we decided to test esters 8b-c under the optimized reaction conditions. Unfortunately, using 8b we could only observe the product of elimination (14). The reaction with 8c, where the acidic protons are replaced with fluorine atoms,11 gave only a linear diene (15). Nevertheless, the availability of intermediate 13 allowed us to pursue the synthesis of our target molecule.

Table 1.

Screen of substrates for the Ir-catalized allylic amination reaction.a

graphic file with name nihms957162u2.jpg
entry amine 8 additive resultb
1 10·HCl 8a NaH2PO4 13 (trace)
2 10 8a 13 (trace)
3 9 8a 13 (>95%)c
4 9 8b 14
5 9 8b NaH2PO4 14
6 9 8c 15
a

Standard reaction conditions: 8 (1.1 equiv.), 9 or 10 (1.0 equiv.), [Ir(dbcot)Cl]2 (2 mol%), 12 (4 mol%), n-BuNH2 (4 mol%), DMSO, 50 °C, 12 h.

b

Determined by LCMS.

c

Isolated yield.

Synthesis of amine 13 was scaled up without any impact on the stereoselectivity or yield, and afforded gram-quantities of material. Upon switching to inert atmosphere, the loading of iridium catalyst can be lowered to 1 mol% (Scheme 3). With the key intermediate 13, we aimed to close the ring and to introduce substituents at positions C-3 and C-4. For the optimization of ring-closing metathesis conditions, we screened different salts of amine 13, which however failed to provide the cyclized product. Trifluoroacetamide protection of amine (16),12 however, allowed a high-yield preparation of ene-17 using the second-generation Grubbs catalyst. Crystallization of the intermediate 17 resulted in compound 18 (Scheme 3),13a a crystal structure of which confirmed the 2,6-anti selectivity of the asymmetric allylic amination step. Next, we performed an osmium-catalyzed dihydroxylation of ene-17, which gave diol 19a. To verify the stereochemistry of the last step, we carried out a global deprotection to obtain 19b, which matched the NMR data reported for the iminosugar scaffold previously described in the literature (Scheme 3).13b

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of the iminosugar core and determination of the absolute stereochemistry.

The remaining sequence of steps is presented in Scheme 4. The TFAc protection of amine 19a was replaced by the base-compatible Cbz-protection giving the diol-20 in a high overall yield. Next, protection of the diol with the benzyl group (21), removal of PMB and iodination of 22 afforded intermediate 23. One of the most challenging steps in our synthesis was the installation of C-P bond. After screening a variety of different substrates and reagents, the reaction of iodo-derivative 23 with triethyl phosphite was identified as the only effective method, which provided phosphonate 24 in moderate yield. Selective opening of the benzylidene ring afforded acceptor 25,14 which was glycosylated with donor 3 to give the desired pseudo-disaccharide 26.15 Subsequent transformation of NHTroc to NHAc, hydrolysis of phosphonate ester16 and global removal of protecting groups yielded the key intermediate 28. Coupling of 28 with CDI-activated geranylgeranyl phosphate 4 afforded target molecule 2b.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Diversification of iminosugar scaffold and synthesis of target molecule 2b.

The inhibition of TG by 2b was determined using HPLC-based assay.17 At 50 μM, 2b showed 70% inhibition of TG from Gram-negative A. baumannii; and the observed activity of 2b is comparable with di- and monosaccharide mimics of moenomycin that bind to the donor site of TG.4a This result validates our strategy for the design of TG inhibitors and suggests that the presence of a peptide moiety may be required to improve the potency of 2b. The related analogs are being investigated in our laboratory, and the results will be reported in a due course.

In conclusion, we have developed an efficient route towards the Lipid II analog 2b from the commercially available (R)-Garner’s aldehyde. The key step, installation of the 2,6-anti-stereochemistry of iminosugar was achieved using the iridium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic amination procedure, which was optimized to the gram-scale process. The developed route could be used to access other Lipid II mimics, particularly 2c and 2d, which are expected to have better binding affinities towards TG, than 2b; these structures will serve as a template for further SAR and structural studies, hence accelerating the development of new antibiotics.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gembicky (UCSD crystallography facility) for the X-ray diffraction analysis of 18. Professor Timor Baasov is acknowledged for the help with preparation of this communication. This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (AI072155), Academia Sinica and the Kwang Hua Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material (procedures and characterization of compounds) can be found online at https://dx.doi.org/XXXX. The crystallographic data for compound 18 was deposited at The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC); the assigned number for structure 18 is CCDC 1828266.

References and notes

  • 1.(a) Taubes G. Science. 2008;321:356. doi: 10.1126/science.321.5887.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gautam A, Vyas R, Tewari R. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2011;31:295. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2010.525498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ventola CL. P T. 2015;40:277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Davies J, Davies D. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:417. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Anderson JS, Matsuhashi M, Haskin MA, Strominger JL. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:3180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lovering AL, Safadi SS, Strynadka NC. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:451. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-112742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Galley NF, O’Reilly AM, Roper DI. Bioorg Chem. 2014;55:16. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Derouaux A, Sauvage E, Terrak M. Front Immunol. 2013;4:78. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:175. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.175-188.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rebets Y, Lupoli T, Qiao Y, Schirner K, Villet R, Hooper D, Kahne D, Walker S. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9:459. doi: 10.1021/cb4006744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Zuegg J, Muldoon C, Adamson G, McKeveney D, Le Thanh G, Premraj R, Becker B, Cheng M, Elliott AG, Huang JX, Butler MS, Bajaj M, Seifert J, Singh L, Galley NF, Roper DI, Lloyd AJ, Dowson CG, Cheng TJ, Cheng WC, Demon D, Meyer E, Meutermans W, Cooper MA. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7719. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sofia MJ, Allanson N, Hatzenbuhler NT, Jain R, Kakarla R, Kogan N, Liang R, Liu D, Silva DJ, Wang H, Gange D, Anderson J, Chen A, Chi F, Dulina R, Huang B, Kamau M, Wang C, Baizman E, Branstrom A, Bristol N, Goldman R, Han K, Longley C, Axelrod HR, et al. J Med Chem. 1999;42:3193. doi: 10.1021/jm990212a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Baizman ER, Branstrom AA, Longley CB, Allanson N, Sofia MJ, Gange D, Goldman RC. Microbiology. 2000;146:3129. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-12-3129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Gampe CM, Tsukamoto H, Doud EH, Walker S, Kahne D. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:3776. doi: 10.1021/ja4000933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Garneau S, Qiao L, Chen L, Walker S, Vederas JC. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:6473. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Mesleh MF, Rajaratnam P, Conrad M, Chandrasekaran V, Liu CM, Pandya BA, Hwang YS, Rye PT, Muldoon C, Becker B, Zuegg J, Meutermans W, Moy TI. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2016;87:190. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Shih HW, Chang YF, Li WJ, Meng FC, Huang CY, Ma C, Cheng TJ, Wong CH, Cheng WC. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng. 2012;51:10123. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Meng FC, Chen KT, Huang LY, Shih HW, Chang HH, Nien FY, Liang PH, Cheng TJ, Wong CH, Cheng WC. Org Lett. 2011;13:5306. doi: 10.1021/ol2021687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Shih HW, Chen KT, Cheng TJR, Wong CH, Cheng WC. Org Lett. 2011;13:4600. doi: 10.1021/ol201806d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chen KT, Kuan YC, Fu WC, Liang PH, Cheng TJ, Wong CH, Cheng WC. Chemistry. 2013;19:834. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Huang LY, Huang SH, Chang YC, Cheng WC, Cheng TJ, Wong CH. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53:8060. doi: 10.1002/anie.201402313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Cheng TJR, Sung MT, Liao HY, Chang YF, Chen CW, Huang CY, Chou LY, Wu YD, Chen YH, Cheng YSE, Wong CH, Ma C, Cheng WC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710868105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Huang CY, Shih HW, Lin LY, Tien YW, Cheng TJR, Cheng WJ, Wong CH, Ma C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:6496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203900109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Dumbre S, Derouaux A, Lescrinier E, Piette A, Joris B, Terrak M, Herdewijn P. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9343. doi: 10.1021/ja302099u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hsu CH, Schelwies M, Enck S, Huang LY, Huang SH, Chang YF, Cheng TJ, Cheng WC, Wong CH. J Org Chem. 2014;79:8629. doi: 10.1021/jo501340s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Qiao L, Vederas J. C J Org Chem. 1993;58:3480. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lin CK, Chen KT, Hu CM, Yun WY, Cheng WC. Chemistry. 2015;21:7511. doi: 10.1002/chem.201406629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Martinez Farias MA, Kincaid VA, Annamalai VR, Kiessling LL. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8492. doi: 10.1021/ja500622v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Yuan Y, Barrett D, Zhang Y, Kahne D, Sliz P, Walker S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:5348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701160104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Perlstein DL, Andrew Wang T-S, Doud EH, Kahne D, Walker S. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:48. doi: 10.1021/ja909325m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.For selected reviews:; (a) Johannsen M, Jørgensen KA. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1689. doi: 10.1021/cr970343o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hartwig JF, Stanley LM. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar100047x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Some selected examples:; (c) Pouy MJ, Stanley LM, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:11312. doi: 10.1021/ja905059r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Tosatti P, Horn J, Campbell AJ, House D, Nelson A, Marsden SP. Adv Synth Catal. 2010;352:3153. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Butt AH, Percy JM, Spencer NS. Chem Commun. 2000:1691–1692. doi: 10.1039/b200560n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Anderson GT, Alexander MD, Taylor SD, Smithrud DB, Benkovic SJ, Weinreb S. J Org Chem. 1996;61:125. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.CF2 group is expected to be a better bioisotere of oxygen, than CH2.; Meanwell NA. J Med Chem. 2011;54:2529. doi: 10.1021/jm1013693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Protection of 13 with Cbz group was found to be problematic (screen of reaction conditions resulted in no reaction or decomposition of 13).
  • 13.(a) We believe that transformation of 17 to 18 took place via intramolecular attack of the OPMB ether to the carbonyl of trifluoroacetyl group to form cyclized intermediate, which broke down with migration of CF3 to give 18 and 1-methoxy-4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)benzene.; (b) Nakagawa S, Adachi I, Wormald MR, Yoshihara A, Morimoto K, Akimitsu K, Izumori K, Fleet GWJ. Org Lett. 2012;14:2050. doi: 10.1021/ol3005744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bajaj SO, Sharif EU, Akhmedov NG, O’Doherty GA. Chem Sci. 2014;5:2230. doi: 10.1039/C4SC00593G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Other known methods (e.g., TFA/TES, or TfOH/TES) for the selective opening of benzylidene ring afforded only fully deprotected diol in our hands.
  • 15.The presence of Cbz-protecting group leads to broadening of signals in 1H NMR making it unsuitable for the assignment of the stereochemistry at the anomeric center. Nevertheless, 1H NMR of the fully deprotected intermediate 28 confirms formation of the glycosidic β-linkage.
  • 16.The TMSBr/pyridine/acetonitrile procedure was found to be the only effective method for the hydrolysis of phosphonate ester. Use of DCM instead of acetonitrile or switching to triethylamine base has led to decomposition of starting material, whereas bulky base, such as 2,6-lutidine, was not efficient at promoting the desired transformation.
  • 17.Cheng TJ, Wu YT, Yang ST, Lo KH, Chen SK, Chen YH, Huang WI, Yuan CH, Guo CW, Huang LY, Chen KT, Shih HW, Cheng YS, Cheng WC, Wong CH. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:8512. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES