Abstract
The utilization of bioactive peptides in the development of highly selective and potent pharmacologic agents for the disruption of protein-protein interactions is appealing for drug discovery. It is known that HIV-1 entry into host cell is through a fusion process that is mediated by the trimeric viral glycoprotein gp120/41 which are derived from gp160 through proteolytic processing. Peptides derived from the HIV gp41 C-terminus have proven to be potent in inhibiting the fusion process. These peptides bind tightly to the hydrophobic pocket on gp-41 N-terminus which was previously identified as a potential inhibitor binding site. In this study, we introduced modified 23-residue C-peptides, 3 and 4, bearing a sulfono-γ-AA residue substitution and hydrocarbon stapling, respectively, which were developed for HIV-1 gp-41 N-terminus binding. Intriguingly, both 3 and 4 were capable of inhibiting envelope-mediated membrane fusion in cell-cell fusion assays at nanomolar potency. Our study reveals that sulfono-γ-AA modified peptides could be used for the development of more potent anti-HIV agents.
Graphical Abstract
Peptide 4 with sulfono-γ-AA1(γK) substitution and hydrocarbon stapling exhibited potent anti-HIV activity and improved biostability.
Introduction
The global HIV statistics of 2015 revealed that approximately 36.7 million people worldwide are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and over 2.1 million new cases of HIV infection was recorded annually.1–2 During the membrane fusion process, gp41 of HIV forms a fusion active six-helix bundle (6-HB) with a hydrophobic pocket.3 In this six-helix bundle, the amino-terminal heptad repeat (N-HR) forms a central trimeric coiled-coil core whereas the trimeric helical carboxyl terminal heptad repeat (C-HR) wraps around and interact with it in an antiparallel mode.4 This six-helix bundle brings into close proximity and facilitates the fusion of the viral and host cell membranes.5 The mutual dependence of N-HR and C-HR on each other in the 6-HB formation during viral entry makes them very important targets for fusion inhibitor design (Figure 1A). Indeed, targeting viral entry and fusion process of enveloped virus remains a very appealing therapeutic strategy due to its relative accessibility. Potent inhibitors which block these specific interactions that are mandatory for HIV-1 viral entry have been reported. For instance, small molecules 6, engineered peptides7 and artificially designed peptidomimetics8 have been developed for the inhibition of viral entry and fusion. However, peptides derived from N-HR mostly show weak inhibitory activity if the design does not promote trimerization of N-HR peptides.4,9 Only typical N-HR constructs forming stable trimers can efficiently target HIV-1 fusion.10 As a result, C-HR derived peptides have been studied extensively in the therapeutic search for potential fusion inhibitors. Examples include α-helical peptides such as Enfuvirtide (T20) 11 and C34 (Figure 1B).12
Figure 1.
(A) Schematic illustration of the different regions of HIV-1 gp41. FP: Fusion peptide, N-HR: N Heptad Repeat, C-HR: C Heptad Repeat, MPER: Membrane Proximal Ectodomain Region, TM: Transmembrane region, CP: cytoplasmic domain and (B) C-HR derived peptides. “X” shows the position of the hydrocarbon staple; “γK” is sulfono-γAA-Lysine. Peptide 1 is MT-SC22EK and was first reported in ref. 16b
Enfuvirtide got market approval as the only HIV-1 fusion inhibitor for clinical use and works by competitively binding the N-HR thereby blocking the formation of the six-helical bundle required for fusion. It is very active against various HIV-1 strains including those resistant to reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors.11b,13 It is similar in design to a segment of C-HR comprising amino acids 127 to 162 of the C-terminal end.14 Although T20 has great anti-HIV activity, it is prone to induce drug resistance through mutations within the N-HR sites. Additionally, its poor bioavailability and large dose requirements complicate its therapeutic use.15 Similar to T20, C34 also has sequence homology to the C-HR. Due to a 22-amino acid overlap between T-20 and C34 peptides, HIV-1 has also developed major mutations for C34 resistance in vitro.15b
To overcome the problems posed by T20 and other similar HIV fusion inhibitors, great efforts have been made to optimize the fusion inhibitors derived from the C-HR helical region of gp41 in order to suppress the emergence of resistant strains and increase the in-vivo stability and N-HR binding affinity. 16 One approach is to introduce electrostatic constraints into peptides to improve helicity and antiviral activity profile. This entails the substitution of charged and hydrophilic amino acids such as glutamic acid (E) and Lysine (K) at i and i+4 positions in the solvent-accessible site of C34 and its short variants3b,17. In a six helix bundle, C-HR interact with N-HR at the amino acid residues at the a and d positions of the heptad repeat (Figures 2A & 2C). These residues are known to be critical for molecular recognition between both heptad repeats while residues at positions b, c, f and g are exposed to the solution and are almost non-crucial for gp41 C-HR and N-HR interaction (Figure 2A).5a However, the residues at these positions are very critical for solubility and stability and they have great effects on the in-vivo activity and druggability of peptide fusion inhibitors. These engineered electrostatic interactions are helix enhancers and have significantly improved the solubility, helicity and potency of such derived peptides.3b,17a–b Effects on antiviral activity of improved helicity of C-peptide variants have been well documented.17a–c It is believed that the ability of derived C-HR peptides to adopt stable helical conformation upon interaction with the N-HR fosters the formation of the six helix bundle (6-HB) by increasing the binding affinity and in-vivo stability. This in turn increases the anti-HIV activity.17c
Figure 2.
A. Schematic illustration of the helical wheel of the C-terminal Heptad repeat of gp-41. B. General structures of α-peptides, γ-AApeptides and sulfono- γ-AApeptides. C. Schematic illustration of the positioning of the hydrocarbon staple and sulfono-γAA1.
An additional approach is to introduce conformational restraints by substitution with non-proteinogenic amino acids at the solvent-exposed site of C-HR derived peptide mimics. For instance, peptidomimetics with unnatural amino acids and building blocks have been reported to successfully mimic the molecular interaction between gp41 C-HR and N-HR. 8, 14b, 16b–c Peptide mimics that targets gp41 N-HR include D-peptides8d,10a, unnatural foldamers20, and covalently restrained α-helices.8b–c,21 These peptide mimics have generated highly potent fusion inhibitors with outstanding in-vivo stability.
Sulfono-γ-AApeptides are a sub-class of γ-AApeptides that are oligomers of N-acylated-N-aminoethyl amino acids.22 The replacement of carboxylic acids with sulfonyl chlorides in γ-AApeptides produces sulfono- γ-AApeptides (Figure 2B). They have enormous potential in functional group diversity. Like γ-AApeptides, sulfono- γ-AApeptides are able to display the same number of side chains as conventional peptides of equal length, endowing them with the ability to mimic bioactive peptides. As evidenced by their crystal structures, sulfono- γ-AApeptides possess an intrinsic folding propensity which is most likely a result of the bulkiness of the tertiary sulfonamide group and intramolecular hydrogen bonding.23 Their optical analysis by circular dichroism and 2D-NMR also supports their well-crafted helical conformation.23 To explore the potential of sulfono-γ-AApeptides for their ability to modulate HIV-1 fusion at the cell entry stage, we designed two peptides (3 & 4) containing sulfono-γ-AA residues. Our previous findings suggested that replacement of amino acid residues with sulfono-γ-AA residues could retain sequence helicity.24 Thus, we envisioned these sequences were still capable of mimicking gp41.
Results and Discussion
Peptide 1 is a 24-residue electrostatically constrained C-HR derived peptide with MT-hook (Table 1), which was previously reported to be an active fusion inhibitor.16b Thus, it was used as the template sequence for modification (Figure 1B ).16b At first, we substituted all the “EE” and “KK”-motifs” in peptide 1 with “γE” and “γK” respectively to (Table S2 and Figure S4).The resulting peptide, P1, exhibited poor helicity and antiviral activity (Table S2 and Figure S5). We hypothesized that substitution of too many amino acid residues with sulfono-γ-AA residues disrupt the secondary structure of 1. This led us to limit our point of substitution to either N- or C-terminal end, resulting in peptides P3 and P4. Similar to P1, P3 and P4 displayed poor antiviral activity and helicity (Table S2, Figure S5). We believed that inserting both “γE” and “γK” in the same sequence could sufficiently affect the folding propensity of 1. We then concluded to study the effects of “γK” substitution on the helicity and antiviral activity of 1. We designed peptides 3 (Figure 1B) and P2 (Table S2) with “γK” substitution at various points on the C-terminal end. To our surprise, 3 showed similar antiviral activity as 1 (Table 2). However, P2 displayed poor antiviral activity and poor helical propensity (Table S2, Figure S5). As such, our attention was given to the development of 3.
Table 1.
List of peptides and modifications
Peptide | Sequence | Modification |
---|---|---|
1 | MTWEEWDKKIEEYTKKIEELIKKS | - |
2 | MTWXEWDXKIEEYTKKIEELIKKS | Hydrocarbon stapling |
3 | MTWEEWDKKIEEYTKKIEELIγKS | Sulfono-γAA1(γK) |
4 | MTWXEWDXKIEEYTKKIEELIγKS | both |
Table 2.
Antiviral activity from HIV neutralisation assay
IC50 (nM)a | CZA97 | B41 | BG505 | SF162 | MN | DU422 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.8±1.6 | 181.1±89.1 | 15.2±0.2 | 11.3±2.2 | 102.4±29.9 | 14.8±0.3 |
2 | 7.6±1.0 | 210.8±58.9 | 14.0±0.5 | 15.6±0.9 | 67.1±9.1 | 16.0±1.1 |
3 | 4.6±0.1 | 118.8±4.0 | 9.0±0.2 | 7.2±1.8 | 77.9±2.4 | 6.0±2.7 |
4 | 6.5±0.8 | 171.3±4.6 | 9.7±2.6 | 11.4±0.8 | 51.2±10.2 | 11.3±0.1 |
T20 | 941.0±328.3 | 214.6±16.2 | 18.4±10.1 | 23.9±2.1 | 6.5±0.6 | 56.0±1.6 |
AZT | 184.6±26.4 | 106.4±16.8 | 84.0±1.8 | 109.6±23.5 | 194.1±1.6 | 183.3±1.9 |
Antiviral activity shown as the IC50, was determined by HIV neutralization assay. Each IC50 represents the mean ± SEM obtained from at least two independent experiment.
In order to optimize our design, we sought to improve the helicity of 3 by employing a combination of sulfono γ-AA residue substitution (γK) and single hydrocarbon stapling (Figure 1B). We further developed 2 (control) and 4. 2 and 4 are stapled variants of 1 and 3 respectively. 3 contain a sulfono- γ-AA1 residue (γK) at the 22nd position while 2 and 4 contain hydrocarbon staples between residues X at the 4th and 8th position (Figure 2C).Our decision to install the hydrocarbon staple at the N-terminus was inspired by a previous report by Bird et al. They ranked the order of antiviral activity of hydrocarbon stapled lengthy peptide as double stapling ˃N-terminus single stapling >C-terminus single stapling.21
We next first conducted CD studies to assess the helical propensity of the sequences. As shown in Figure 3A, both 1 and 3 exhibited comparable helical folding propensity with characteristic minima at both 207 and 222 nm suggesting the existence of probable α-helical conformation. This suggests that incorporation of sulfono-γ-AA residue did not alter helicity significantly. As expected, after hydrocarbon stapling, both 2 and 4 clearly showed a significant increase in helicity compared to their unstapled counterparts, 1 and 3 (Figure 3A). This is consistent with the previous findings that i, i+4 hydrocarbon stapling enhances the α-helicity of peptides.21,25–26 These findings are corroborated by the thermal stability studies (Fig 3B). 1 and 2 showed similar behavior at high temperature. However, 1 is more stable than 2 at temperatures lower than 35°C. Also, 4 demonstrated increased stability than 3. Overall, hydrocarbon stapling improved the helicity and thermal stability profiles of 2 and 4.
Figure 3.
(A) CD spectra of peptides 1–4 (B) Change in mean residue ellipticity [θ] 222nm for peptides 1–4 as a function of temperature (5–70°C).Conditions – pH 7,25°C,Solvent – H20
We then examined the antiviral activity of these sulfono-γ-AA containing peptides by HIV neutralization assay (Table 2).27
Conformationally stabilized pre-formed recombinant env trimers derived from various subtypes of HIV-1 strains were used in the assay.28 Both (enfuvirtide) T20 and AZT were also tested for comparison. Interestingly, both 3 and 4 displayed similar antiviral activity across the various strains tested. 1 and 2 also show a similar trend in antiviral activity. However, 3 displayed increased antiviral activity (< 2-fold) than 1. This indicates that the introduction of the peptidomimetic monomer, sulfono- γ-AA1, slightly improved the interaction of peptide 3 with the N-HR of gp41, resulting in the inhibition of six-helical bundle formation. It is noteworthy that antiviral activity is not strictly dependent on secondary structures as evidenced by the obtained results (Table 2), as 3 and 4 exhibited comparable antiviral activity, just like 1 and 2. All tested peptides showed comparable or greater anti-HIV activity than enfuvirtide (T20), a fusion inhibitor and AZT, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor which are currently being used in the clinics for the treatment of the symptomatic disease (Table 2). Thus, 3 emerged to be the most active with the best antiviral activity across all strains tested (< 2-fold increase).
To directly interrogate the effect of sulfono-γAA1 substitution and hydrocarbon stapling on proteolytic cleavage, we used LC/MS to identify proteolytic fragments generated by the digestion of our peptide panels with chymotrypsin. After 10 mins,1, 2 and 4 demonstrated greater stability to chymotrypsin than 3, (Table 3 and Fig S6) suggesting that the inclusion of sulfono-γ-AA residue slightly altered the helicity, making it easier to be hydrolyzed. However, after backbone stapling, still possessing one sulfono-γ-AA residue, 4 exhibited almost similar resistance to proteolytic degradation as 1, indicating that the introduction of unnatural residue could enhance stability of the sequence.
Table 3.
Enzymatic hydrolysis assay with chymotrypsin
Peptide | % remaining after 10 mins |
---|---|
1 | 53.3 |
2 | 69.3 |
3 | 17.6 |
4 | 57.2 |
Conclusions
To summarize, although the daunting challenges hampering the clinical applications of enfuvirtide (T20) has limited the repository of active peptide-fusion inhibitors, the possibility of incorporating non-natural scaffolds may ultimately usher in new generation of peptide –fusion inhibitors with great therapeutic potential and improved protease resistance. Although our current design did not yield peptides with enhanced stability toward proteolysis, our study reveals that sulfono-γ-AA modified peptides could be used for the development of more potent anti-HIV agents. Furthermore, it is known that homogeneous sulfono-γ-AApeptides are completely resistant to enzymatic degradation and they possess remarkable helical propensity, we envision that we could use homogeneous sulfono-γ-AApeptides to design HIV-1 gp41 mimetics in the future. Additionally, the strategy implemented herein not only provide ideas for future HIV-1 inhibitor design, but may also be explored for the protein-protein interaction inhibitor (PPII) design.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
We thank the support from NIH 1R01GM112652-01A1.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare in this work.
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Notes and references
- 1.J. U. N. P. O. HIV/AIDS, Biomedical AIDS Research: Recent and Upcoming Advances Retrieved May, 2015, 12, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hallenberger S, Bosch V, Angliker H, Shaw E, Klenk HD and Garten W, Nature, 1992, 360, 358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Su S, Wang Q, Xu W, Yu F, Hua C, Zhu Y, Jiang S and Lu L, AIDS (London, England), 2017; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Naito T, Izumi K, Kodama E, Sakagami Y, Kajiwara K, Nishikawa H, Watanabe K, Sarafianos SG, Oishi S, Fujii N and Matsuoka M, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 2009, 53, 1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lu M, Blacklow SC and Kim PS, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 1995, 2, 1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Chan DC, Fass D, Berger JM and Kim PS, Cell, 1997, 89, 263; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ryser HJ and Fluckiger R, Drug Discovery Today, 2005, 10, 1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Li W, Lu L, Li W and Jiang S, Expert Opin. Ther. Pat, 2017, DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2017.1281249, 1–13; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lu L, Yu F, Cai L, Debnath AK and Jiang S, Curr. Top. Med. Chem, 2016, 16, 1074; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Frey G, Rits-Volloch S, Zhang XQ, Schooley RT, Chen B and Harrison SC, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2006, 103, 13938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Augusto MT, Hollmann A, Castanho MARB, Porotto M, Pessi A and Santos NC, J. Antimicrob. Chemother, 2014, 69, 1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Horne WS, Johnson LM, Ketas TJ, Klasse PJ, Lu M, Moore JP and Gellman SH, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2009, 106, 14751; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang D, Lu M and Arora PS, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed, 2008, 47, 1879; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sia SK, Carr PA, Cochran AG, Malashkevich VN and Kim PS, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2002, 99, 14664; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Eckert DM, Malashkevich VN, Hong LH, Carr PA and Kim PS, Cell, 1999, 99, 103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lu M and Kim PS, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn, 1997, 15, 465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Eckert DM and Kim PS, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2001, 98, 11187; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Root MJ, Kay MS and Kim PS, Science (New York, N.Y.), 2001, 291, 884; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cai L, Balogh E and Gochin M, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 2009, 53, 2444; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Jiang X, Jia Q, Lu L, Yu F, Zheng J, Shi W, Cai L, Jiang S and Liu K, Amino Acids, 2016, 48, 2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Fletcher CV, Lancet, 2003, 361, 1577; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lalezari JP , Henry K , O’Hearn M , Montaner JSG , Piliero PJ , Trottier B , Walmsley S , Cohen C , Kuritzkes DR , Eron JJJ , Chung J , DeMasi R , Donatacci L , Drobnes C , Delehanty J and Salgo M, N. Engl. J. Med, 2003, 348, 2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Louis JM, Baber JL and Clore GM, Biochemistry, 2015, 54, 6796; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sugaya M, Hartley O, Root MJ and Blauvelt A, J. Invest. Dermatol, 2007, 127, 1436; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hashimoto C, Nomura W, Ohya A, Urano E, Miyauchi K, Narumi T, Aikawa H, Komano JA, Yamamoto N and Tamamura H, Bioorg. Med. Chem, 2012, 20, 3287; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ma X, Tan J, Su M, Li C, Zhang X and Wang C, PLoS One, 2014, 9, e111923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lazzarin A , Clotet B , Cooper D , Reynes J , Arastéh K , Nelson M , Katlama C , Stellbrink H-J , Delfraissy J-F , Lange J , Huson L , DeMasi R , Wat C , Delehanty J , Drobnes C and Salgo M, N. Engl. J. Med, 2003, 348, 2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Wild C, Greenwell T and Matthews T, AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses, 1993, 9, 1051–1053; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xiong S, Borrego P, Ding X, Zhu Y, Martins A, Chong H, Taveira N and He Y, J. Virol, 2017, 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Greenberg ML and Cammack N, J. Antimicrob. Chemother, 2004, 54, 333; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Izumi K, Kodama E, Shimura K, Sakagami Y, Watanabe K, Ito S, Watabe T, Terakawa Y, Nishikawa H, Sarafianos SG, Kitaura K, Oishi S, Fujii N and Matsuoka M, J. Biol. Chem, 2009, 284, 4914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Eron JJ, Gulick RM, Bartlett JA, Merigan T, Arduino R, Kilby JM, Yangco B, Diers A, Drobnes C, DeMasi R, Greenberg M, Melby T, Raskino C, Rusnak P, Zhang Y, Spence R and Miralles GD, J. Infect. Dis, 2004, 189, 1075; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chong H, Yao X, Qiu Z, Sun J, Zhang M, Waltersperger S, Wang M, Liu S-L, Cui S and He Y, FASEB J, 2013, 27, 1203; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chong H, Qiu Z, Su Y, Yang L and He Y, AIDS (London, England), 2015, 29, 13; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) He Y, Cheng J, Li J, Qi Z, Lu H, Dong M, Jiang S and Dai Q, J. Virol, 2008, 82, 6349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Nishikawa H, Nakamura S, Kodama E, Ito S, Kajiwara K, Izumi K, Sakagami Y, Oishi S, Ohkubo T, Kobayashi Y, Otaka A, Fujii N and Matsuoka M,Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol, 2009, 41, 891; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shimura K, Nameki D, Kajiwara K, Watanabe K, Sakagami Y, Oishi S, Fujii N, Matsuoka M, Sarafianos SG and Kodama EN, J. Biol. Chem, 2010, 285, 39471; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Shimane K, Kawaji K, Miyamoto F, Oishi S, Watanabe K, Sakagami Y, Fujii N, Shimura K, Matsuoka M, Kaku M, Sarafianos SG and Kodama EN, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 2013, 57, 4035; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Miyamoto F and Kodama EN, Antiviral Chem. Chemother, 2012, 22, 151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Su Y, Chong H, Qiu Z, Xiong S and He Y, J. Virol, 2015, 89, 5801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Chong H, Yao X, Sun J, Qiu Z, Zhang M, Waltersperger S, Wang M, Cui S and He Y, J. Biol. Chem, 2012, 287, 34558; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chong H, Xue J, Xiong S, Cong Z, Ding X, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Chen T, Feng Y, He L, Guo Y, Wei Q, Zhou Y, Qin C and He Y, J. Virol, 2017, 91, e00288–00217; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chong H, Qiu Z, Sun J, Qiao Y, Li X and He Y, Retrovirology, 2014, 11, 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.(a) Stephens OM, Kim S, Welch BD, Hodsdon ME, Kay MS and Schepartz A, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2005, 127, 13126; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bautista AD, Stephens OM, Wang L, Domaoal RA, Anderson KS and Schepartz A, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 2009, 19, 3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bird GH, Madani N, Perry AF, Princiotto AM, Supko JG, He X, Gavathiotis E, Sodroski JG and Walensky LD, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 2010, 107, 14093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.(a) Niu Y, Hu Y, Li X, Chen J and Cai J, New J. Chem, 2011, 35, 542; [Google Scholar]; (b) Teng P, Shi Y, Sang P and Cai J, Chem.–Eur. J, 2016, 22, 5458; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Shi Y, Teng P, Sang P, She F, Wei L and Cai J, Acc. Chem. Res, 2016, 49, 428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu H, Qiao Q, Hu Y, Teng P, Gao W, Zuo X, Wojtas L, Larsen RW, Ma S and Cai J,Chem.–Eur. J,2015, 21, 2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Teng P, Ma N, Cerrato DC, She F, Odom T, Wang X, Ming L-J, van der Vaart A, Wojtas L, Xu H and Cai J, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2017, 139, 7363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blackwell HE, Sadowsky JD, Howard RJ, Sampson JN, Chao JA, Steinmetz WE, O’Leary DJ and Grubbs RH, J. Org. Chem,2001, 66, 5291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schafmeister CE, Po J and Verdine GL, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2000, 122, 5891. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Beddows S, Schülke N, Kirschner M, Barnes K, Franti M, Michael E, Ketas T, Sanders RW, Maddon PJ, Olson WC and Moore JP, J. Virol, 2005, 79, 8812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Joyce MG, Georgiev IS, Yang Y, Druz A, Geng H, Chuang GY, Kwon YD, Pancera M, Rawi R, Sastry M, Stewart-Jones GBE, Zheng A, Zhou T, Choe M, Van Galen JG, Chen RE, Lees CR, Narpala S, Chambers M, Tsybovsky Y, Baxa U, McDermott AB, Mascola JR and Kwong PD, Cell Rep, 2017, 21, 2992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.