Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus - a commensal of the human skin, nares and gastrointestinal tract - is also a leading cause of bacterial skin and soft tissue infection (SSTIs), bacteremia, sepsis, peritonitis, pneumonia and endocarditis. Antibiotic-resistant strains, designaed MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus), are common and represent a therapeutic challenge. Current research and development efforts seek to address the challenge of MRSA infections through vaccines and immune therapeutics. Mice have been used as experimental models for S. aureus SSTI, bacteremia, sepsis, peritonitis and endocarditis. This work led to the identification of key virulence factors, candidate vaccine antigens or immune-therapeutics that still require human clinical testing to establish efficacy. Past failures of human clinical trials raised skepticism whether the mouse is an appropriate model for S. aureus disease in humans. S. aureus causes chronic-persistent infections that, even with antibiotic or surgical intervention, reoccur in humans and in mice. Determinants of S. aureus evasion from human innate and adaptive immune responses have been identified, however only some of these are relevant in mice. Future research must integrate these insights and refine the experimental mouse models for specific S. aureus diseases to accurately predict the failure or success for candidate vaccines and immune-therapeutics.
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that colonizes the skin, nares and gastrointestinal tract of humans (1). Approximately 20% of the human population are stably colonized while 30% are colonized in a variable manner (1, 2). S. aureus is also a pathogen that causes invasive disease, predominantly skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) but also bacteremia, sepsis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis and endocarditis (1). The pathological hallmark of S. aureus infection is the formation of purulent abscess lesions that are formed around a nidus of the pathogen, primarily via the infiltration of neutrophils (3). In humans, S. aureus infection does not lead to the development of protective immune responses and chronic persistent or recurrent infections are common (4). Some isolates of S. aureus cause toxic-shock syndrome, exfoliative skin disease, and enteritis in humans (1). Secreted toxins are the key virulence determinants for these diseases (5, 6) and transfer of the corresponding genes among staphylococcal strains involves specific bacteriophages (7).
S. aureus is also an important pathogen of live-stock, causing large scale infections in ruminants (sheep, goats, cows), poultry and pigs (8). Molecular epidemiological data suggest that a common pathogenic S. aureus clone associated with ruminants originated in humans (9). This strain adapted to its chosen niche more than 11,000 years ago, at a time when farming domesticated animals became common practice, and then diversified (9). Similar jumps from humans to new hosts occurred for several different clinical lineages (10). Adaptation to new hosts required a combination of gene loss, allelic diversification, and acquisition of mobile genetic elements, for example elements that support the expression of unique von-Willebrand factor binding protein alleles in S. aureus strains that infect ruminants and horses (11). Nevertheless, the core genome of ruminant associated S. aureus is stable and can lead to reciprocal transmission of newly emerging clones into the human population (12). This type of pathogen introduction occurs on a global scale and is associated with transport of live-stock or people (13). It has led to outbreaks of human S. aureus disease in countries that otherwise have low prevalence for staphylococcal disease (9).
The genome of S. aureus strains varies in size (2.6-2.9 MB), based on the presence of prophages and pathogenicity islands (14, 15). Nevertheless, all S. aureus isolates encompasses a core genome for the functional expression of genes that are shared by most if not all clinically relevant strains (16). For example, S. aureus isolates generally coagulate blood, agglutinate in plasma, and bind to animal immunoglobulin (17). Although nasal colonization is asymptomatic for most individuals, it represents a risk factor for hospital-acquired infection (18). Other risk factors for nosocomial infection include indwelling catheters, endotracheal intubation, medical implants, trauma, diabetes, immunosuppression and immunosuppressive therapy, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (19, 20). In the United States, S. aureus is the single most frequent cause of hospital-acquired infectious disease mortality (21).
Massive use of antibiotics in animals and humans led to the selection of drug-resistant strains, designated MRSA for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (22). Broad spectrum β-lactam resistance is caused by MecA, a penicillin-binding protein that cannot be inhibited by β-lactamase resistant β-lactam or cephalosporin compounds (22). Recommended therapeutics against MRSA strains are vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid (23-25). However, vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) strains, which acquired genes for the synthesis of altered peptidoglycan precursors from enterococci, have been isolated (26-28). S. aureus strains have also evolved resistance mechanisms to daptomycin and linezolid shortly after these compounds were approved for clinical use (28-30). MRSA infections occur frequently in American hospitals and in the community (21). The public health crisis of community- and hospital-acquired MRSA infections may be addressed through the development of vaccines, however all clinical trials that sought to address this problem have thus far failed (31). Healthcare providers currently have limited treatment options, a situation reminiscent of the pre-antibiotic era (32). The National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine (IOM) placed comparative effectiveness research on MRSA as one of the top 25 priorities for national investment. S. aureus was the only bacterial pathogen addressed in the IOM report.
Staphylococcus aureus infections of mice
When designed to recapitulate human disease, animal studies with infectious agents aim to provide experimental proof for the molecular basis of pathogenesis, the establishment of protective immunity and the molecular mechanisms whereby immunity is achieved (33-35). Over the past forty years, infectious diseases research championed the mouse as a model for human infectious diseases, generating a plethora of reagents that enable rapid advances. Another important factor favoring the mouse is costs. Small body size, short gestation and large litter size render mice less expensive to rear than any other mammal currently used for infectious diseases research (35-37).
Mice are, however, not a natural host for human clinical S. aureus isolates and require genetic adaptation to cause transmissible disease in mouse facilities (38). Key clinical presentation of natural S. aureus infection is the development of preputial gland abscess lesions in male mice as well as nasal and gastrointestinal colonization (38). Because most experimental approaches are designed towards elucidating the virulence factors of human clinical isolates and deriving protective vaccines for humans, mouse isolates have not yet been examined in detail. Nevertheless, mice have served as the premier experimental model to study S. aureus blood-borne persistent and metastatic abscess formation (3), septic arthritis (39), sepsis (40), neonatal sepsis and meningitis (41), endocarditis (42), peritonitis (43), subcutaneous skin infection (44) and pneumonia (45). This work provided several key insights. First, S. aureus can induce a diverse spectrum of diseases in mice - similar to what is observed in humans - albeit that the infectious dose required to produce a desired pathology varies widely. Second, the genetic determinants of S. aureus required to produce specific pathologies vary between the different disease models but are generally consistent when analyzing different staphylococcal strains (3, 45). Third, some models require a very large inoculum to elicit disease pathology, and one cannot expect to identify many of the key genetic determinants of S. aureus that would support pathogenesis in humans, where a lower inoculum may suffice (46). Fourth, the pathogenesis of different S. aureus infectious diseases appears to require multiple virulence factors and these can differ between disease types (17, 47, 48). Fifth, some secreted factors play key roles in neutralizing human innate defenses and are expressed by virtually all human clinical isolates, yet these factors are not adapted to mice and play no role in the various disease models (49, 50). Sixth, both immune-competent inbred and outbred mice can be used as disease models although the infectious dose required to produce disease can vary by a factor of 10-100 (51).
Below we discuss the most frequently used mouse models for S. aureus disease, describe the key virulence factors, and the relevance of each model for human disease. We point to important mechanisms for pathogen survival, and describe how each model was used for the discovery of protective antigens. It has been argued that mouse models cannot accurately identify the protective antigens of S. aureus and that mouse studies have misinformed the development of vaccine antigens (52). This criticism is not entirely justified. Past vaccine failures can also be explained by mismatches between disease model and trial design, by unexpected safety issues and by ignoring the immune evasive attributes of S. aureus (53).
Preparing S. aureus for experimental infection
Blood-borne spread of staphylococci can generate abscess lesion in any human organ tissue. Initially, S. aureus strains were isolated from specific organ tissues with the notion that unique genetic determinants or the variation of certain virulence genes may favor replication at these sites (54). For example, strains isolated from infected endocardium or infected joints were used to examine infective endocarditis and arthritis in animals, respectively (54). Extensive DNA sequence analysis of clinical isolates has demonstrated that S. aureus strains, although endowed with variable genetic traits (55), invariably retain the ability for blood-borne dissemination and for the seeding of abscess lesions (15, 16). Such insight enables the field to focus on a few well characterized strains, for example the methicillin-sensitive isolate S. aureus Newman (55) and the CA-MRSA isolate USA300 (LAC) (56), to conduct comparative analyses of virulence factors and vaccine antigens. To standardize the inoculation of staphylococci into animals, we recommend that bacteria are grown as overnight cultures in tryptic soy broth with rotation at 37°C, diluted 1:100 into fresh broth and incubated further to absorbance at 600 nm (A600) 0.5. Staphylococci in culture aliquots should be sedimented by centrifugation, bacteria washed and suspended in sterile PBS to the desired volume and inoculum. Each inoculum should be quantified by spreading aliquots on agar plates and enumerating colony forming units (CFU).
Skin infection
Ogston first isolated S. aureus from the pus of surgical wound infections and showed that, when injected into the subcutaneous tissue of experimental animals, this material could elicit abscess lesions in guinea pigs and mice (57, 58). Infections in humans may occur at sites where the skin barrier function has been breached (wound or surgical site infections) or without apparent breaches, for example at hair follicles (folliculitis), as bullous or superficial lesions (impetigo), deep (furuncles) or confluent abscesses (carbuncles) (1). S. aureus infections of the human skin elicit purulent exudate, which drains from the infectious site. To induce skin infections in mice, the hair on the back or flank of mice is shaved and a suspension of 107-109 CFU S. aureus in PBS is injected into subcutaneous tissues (44, 59). Within 24 hours, bacteria elicit inflammatory responses and cause an indurated swelling, which increases over 5-7 days to a size of 30-100 mm2 (59). Abscess lesions are gradually resolved over the next 7-9 days either with or without drainage of purulent material (44, 46). Depending on the S. aureus strain tested and its production of secreted α-hemolysin (α-toxin), subcutaneous skin lesions are associated with superficial dermonecrosis, which heals at a similar rate as the resolution of subcutaneous abscess lesions (46).
S. aureus strains require the structural gene for α-hemolysin (hla) to produce wild-type size lesions and dermonecrosis in the mouse model for skin disease (46). Immunization of mice with HlaH35L, a non-toxigenic variant (60), elicits neutralizing antibodies that provide protection against Hla-mediated pathological effects but cannot prevent the establishment of smaller sized lesions without dermonecrosis (46). Similar protective effects are achieved in passive transfer experiments with monoclonal antibodies that neutralize Hla (61). ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10) serves as the receptor for Hla and is conserved in humans and mice (62). The Hla-ADAM10 interaction leads to disruption of host cell membrane junctions, a process that exacerbates necrosis of the epidermis and dermis (46, 62, 63).
MRSA strains of the USA300 lineage are causing an epidemic of community-acquired skin infections in the United States (64, 65). These strains express a bacteriophage encoded leukocidin, the pore-forming cytotoxin PVL (66, 67), which binds to the complement receptors C5aR and C5L2 of human leukocytes but not to the complement receptors of murine immune cells (68). Not surprisingly, deletion of the structural genes for PVL does not affect the pathogenesis of USA300 variants in the mouse skin infection model (69, 70).
Phenol soluble modulins (PSMs) contribute to the pathogenesis of mouse skin infections. Originally identified in S. epidermidis (71), subsequent studies in MRSA described two types of PSMs: α-PSMs are relatively short (20-25 amino acid long) and form an amphipathic α-helix, whereas β-PSMs are longer (~50 amino acid long) and only their C-terminal domain may adopt an α-helical structure (72, 73). PSMs are not synthesized as signal-peptide bearing precursors and require a dedicated ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter for secretion as formylated peptides (74). PSMs elicit proinflammatory responses by interacting with the formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) of host cells including neutrophils (74, 75). In particular, PSMα3 has been proposed to activate, attract and lyse neutrophils (72). S. aureus continues to produce PSMs following its uptake by neutrophils, suggesting that PSMs may perhaps promote an intracellular lytic activity (76). In agreement with these hypotheses, S. aureus variants unable to produce α-PSMs are associated with reduced dermonecrosis (72, 74).
The mouse model for S. aureus skin infection has been modified to examine the contribution of specific skin cells or tissue structures and of specific immune cells such as neutrophils or macrophages. Some protocols damage the skin (removal of superficial keratinocytes, incision or heat damage) prior to inoculation of S. aureus, whereas other protocols inoculate staphylococci along with implanted foreign material (sutures, dextran beads, cotton dust) (77-80). These modifications allow investigators to reduce the staphylococcal challenge dose required to cause pathologic lesions.
Depletion of immune cells via specific monoclonal antibodies (anti-Ly6G) or chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide) causes a dramatic reduction in the challenge dose required for skin infection (81, 82). In contrast to immune-competent mice, leukopenic mice cannot contain staphylococci in the skin and develop systemic infections with rapidly lethal outcome (83). Similar observations have been made in humans, where iatrogenic leukopenia or hereditary defects in the NADPH oxidase or in the respiratory burst of myeloid cells are associated with increased susceptibility towards S. aureus infection (84). Humans with abnormal T cell function (including HIV/AIDS patients), atopic dermatitis, and hyper-IgE syndrome, also display increased susceptibility toward S. aureus cutaneous infection (85-88). These phenotypes can be recapitulated in mice with similar skin conditions or immune defects (80). For example skin lesions of S. aureus-infected MyD88- and IL-1R-deficient mice, and to a lesser extend TLR2-deficient mice, are substantially larger in size, with higher staphylococcal load, as compared to lesions in wild-type mice (89). The severity of skin infections correlates with the decreased recruitment of neutrophils to the site of infection (89). Similarly, mice deficient in dendritic epidermal T cells (γδ T cells) and IL-17R develop larger skin lesions with higher bacterial load and impaired neutrophil recruitment (90). IL-17 producing T lymphocytes (TH17) play an important role in controlling S. aureus cutaneous infection by recruiting neutrophils to the infectious site (91). A growing body of evidence implicates TH17 cells as critical for protection against skin and lung infections, whereas TH17/IL-17 responses may be less critical in other tissues (92, 93).
Thus, immune-competent mice (C57BL/6 or BALB/c) represent a good model for the study of S. aureus skin infections and the characterization of staphylococcal virulence factors. The subcutaneous injection of a relatively large inoculum prevents the identification of virulence factors acting at early stages of disease pathogenesis (adherence to skin structures, invasion across epidermal layers). As some secreted factors of S. aureus require human specific interactions, the mouse model can likely be improved by generating transgenic animals expressing specific human genes or by developing mouse models in which the mouse innate or adaptive immune system is replaced by its human counterpart (94). For example, expression of human complement receptors C5aR in murine myeloid cells could restore susceptibility toward staphylococcal PVL. Approximately one-fifth of SSTI patients receiving antibiotic therapy develop recurrent skin infections with the same strain (95). It will be important to determine whether recurrent skin infection occurs in mice and, if so, what genetic determinants of staphylococci promote this disease process.
Bacteremia and metastatic abscess formation
Invasive staphylococcal disease in humans is associated with staphylococcal bacteremia and the formation of abscess lesions in many different organ tissues (96). In mice, intravenous inoculation of S. aureus also triggers dissemination of blood-borne bacteria into organ tissues, where they establish abscess lesions in skeletomuscular, vascular, brain, lung, heart, liver, spleen and kidney tissues (3). Briefly, mice are injected into the tail vein or the periorbital venous plexus with 106-107 CFU, which causes staphylococcal bacteremia (3). The bacteria eventually exit from the blood stream but can be recovered from peripheral organs, for example renal tissues, where they attract large immune cell infiltrates. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of thin-sectioned tissue samples provides the first histopathologic evidence for S. aureus infection, as early as 48 hours following intravenous inoculation (3). By day 4, renal tissues harbor multiple abscess lesions that, on histopathologic examination are characterized by a bacterial nidus (staphylococcal abscess community) encapsulated by eosinophilic fibrin deposits. These fibrin deposits shield staphylococci from surrounding immune cell infiltrates. During early stages of abscess development (days 2-5), immune cells infiltrates are comprised predominantly of neutrophils, arranged in concentric layers of apoptotic, healthy and apoptotic PMNs (3). Macrophages and lymphocytes are positioned in the periphery of these lesions (97). By day 15 following inoculation, T and B lymphocytes as well as macrophages are recruited into abscess lesions, which slowly progress towards the organ surface and eventually rupture to release purulent material with staphylococci into circulation (3). Released staphylococci seed new abscesses at other sites and, by day 30-50, accumulating lesions eventually promote lethality (3).
S. aureus Newman variants have been analyzed for their phenotypic defects in the renal abscess model. Sortase A mutants, defective for anchoring any one of 19 surface proteins with LPXTG sorting signals to the cell wall envelope, are unable to cause abscess lesions (3). In contrast, mutations in individual surface protein genes cause either no significant defect or display a reduction in the number and size of abscess lesions and in staphylococcal load (3). Mutants that display the most severe defects harbor mutations in genes for the following surface proteins: staphylococcal protein A (SpA), iron-regulated surface determinant A (IsdA) and B (IsdB), adenosine synthase A (AdsA), as well as serine-aspartate repeat protein D (SdrD) (3). Both IsdA and IsdB promote heme-iron scavenging during infection (98, 99) and antibodies against these proteins provide partial protection by reducing the number of abscess lesions and the bacterial load in renal tissues (100-102). The IsdB vaccine was subjected to a clinical trial in humans to reduce post-surgical mediastinal and superficial wound infections as well as bacteremia in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (103). The trial was ended because multiorgan dysfunction and mortality following S. aureus infection occurred more frequently in individuals receiving the IsdB vaccine than in control cohorts and IsdB immunization did not show clinical benefit (103). Antibodies against SdrD also provide partial protection against S. aureus renal abscess formation, albeit that the molecular basis for protection is not known since the exact function of SdrD is still unknown (101). A similar protective effect is achieved when the CnaB domain of SdrE, which is conserved among members of this protein family (SdrD and SdrE) (104), is used as a vaccine antigen (105).
SpA binds to human and animal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgD, IgE and IgM) either at Fcγ, the CH2-CH3 hinge region of IgG involved in binding to complement factor C1q and Fcγ-receptors, or the heavy chain variable region (Fab) of VH3 class antibodies (106-108). The former activity neutralizes antibody effector functions for opsonophagocytosis (109), whereas the latter activates VH3-clan B cell receptors (IgM), resulting in non-productive B cell expansions and suppression of adaptive immune responses (110, 111). SpA-neutralizing polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies provide partial protection in the renal abscess model but also neutralize the B cell superantigen activity of staphylococci to promote antibody responses against almost all secreted products of S. aureus (112, 113). When used as a vaccine antigen, SpAKKAA, a non-toxigenic variant that cannot bind immunoglobulin, elicits neutralizing antibodies and partial protection against S. aureus renal abscess disease (112). Further, SpAKKAA immunization enhances antibody responses against many secreted products of S. aureus in animals that are exposed to this pathogen (112). SpA-mediated B cell superantigen activity is thought to suppress pathogen-specific antibody responses and the development of protective immunity (114). In agreement with this, infection of mice with spa variants that lack B cell superantigen activity elicits broad-spectrum antibody responses and promotes protective immunity (111).
AdsA, another surface protein requiring sortase A for envelope assembly, catalyzes the conversion of ATP, ADP and AMP to adenosine, a signal for mammalian immune suppression (115, 116). AdsA also converts 5’ and 3’ monophosphate cleavage products of DNA, derived from staphylococcal nuclease activity with NETs (neutrophil extracellular DNA traps) (117), into deoxyadenosine, thereby inducing apoptosis in macrophages (97). This mechanism supports abscess formation and staphylococcal escape from phagocytic clearance in these lesions, which for several days remain devoid of macrophages (97).
S. aureus secretes two polypeptides, coagulase (Coa) and von-Willebrand Factor binding protein (vWbp), that associate with and activate prothrombin to generate staphylothrombin complexes, thereby cleaving fibrinogen and generating fibrin clots (118, 119). This activity, which can be monitored in vitro with the coagulase test, is essential for the establishment of renal abscesses, as coa/vwb mutants are unable to generate these lesions (119). When used as vaccine antigens, Coa and vWbp raise neutralizing antibodies that protect against abscess lesions (119). Of note, α-hemolysin does not play a key role in the establishment of abscess lesions (3). Capsular polysaccharides (CP5/CP8) and poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG) have been advocated as important vaccine antigens, raising antibody responses protective against staphylococcal abscess formation in renal tissues (120-123). Compared with other virulence determinants, the traits for capsule or PNAG production are not critically important for disease pathogenesis in S. aureus Newman and in the CA-MRSA isolate USA300 LAC, presumably because encapsulation is either diminished or absent (3, 124).
In summary, staphylococcal abscess formation can be thought of as a developmental process that occurs in four discrete stages (17). Following intravenous inoculation, S. aureus requires specific genes to survive in the blood stream of infected mice for subsequent deposition into peripheral organ tissues (Stage I). Of note, staphylococci can disseminate as extracellular pathogens but also when located within neutrophils (125). Staphylococcal invasion of host tissues triggers massive immune cell infiltrations with neutrophils predominating early during infection (Stage II). Due to the formation of a fibrin capsule and other virulence strategies, staphylococci replicate as abscess communities and manipulate immune cell infiltrates to promote tissue destruction and abscess maturation at organ surfaces (Stage III). Liquefaction necrosis and drainage of pus releases staphylococci for renewed dissemination to new sites within the infected host (Stage IV).
Blood stream infections are a risk factor for septic arthritis in humans and the metastatic abscess model can also be used to study S. aureus septic arthritis in mice (54). Following inoculation of staphylococci, mice are weighed daily and examined for arthritis and clinical appearance. At timed intervals, one pair of limbs (fore and hind) is used for histopathologic examination of joints (synovitis), while paws are examined for the bacterial load. Alternatively, bacteria may be injected directly in the knee joint (126). In this model, 3.6×104 CFU of strain Newman in 20 μl of PBS are injected into the joint and animals are killed 3 days after inoculation for histopathologic examination of synovitis. Synovitis is defined as synovial membrane thickness of over two cell layers and infiltration of inflammatory cells to the extra-articular space with cartilage or bone destruction (126). A histopathology index scores the severity of synovitis and tissue destruction (126). S. aureus sortase A, protein A and clumping factor A (vide infra) are virulence factors in this model, whereas Hla and IsdA/IsdB are not (127-131).
Sepsis
S. aureus is a common cause of sepsis, a frequently fatal, systemic inflammation with multiple organ dysfunction, typically triggered by immune responses towards bacterial replication in blood (132). Intravenous inoculation of 5×107-5×108 CFU S. aureus causes infected animals to develop septic shock with lethal outcome within 12-48 hours (119). Animals present with clinical signs of disease within 2-3 hours, including ruffled fur, diminished activity and appetite, hunched posture, loss of movement, diarrhea, dehydration and labored breathing (3). During necropsy, staphylococci can be isolated from blood and from all organ tissues examined. S. aureus Newman variants lacking sortase A are avirulent in this model system and do not precipitate a lethal outcome over 14 days following blood stream inoculation (133). Two surface proteins play a key role in sepsis pathogenesis, AdsA (vide supra) and ClfA (133). Clumping factor A (ClfA) binds to the D domain of fibrinogen and fibrin (134-136). When expressed in human or animal plasma together with Coa and vWbp, ClfA mediates staphylococcal association with fibrin filaments, a phenotype that has been designated clumping or agglutination (133). ClfA association with fibrin filaments protects staphylococci from macrophages (137) and also promotes vascular occlusions by agglutinated bacteria in organ tissues (133). A triple mutant strain lacking coa, vwb and clfA is avirulent in the mouse sepsis model, whereas clfA or coa/vwb variants are severely attenuated (119, 133). The pathogenesis of S. aureus sepsis can be perturbed with antibodies that neutralize the biochemical activities of Coa, vWbp and ClfA or with direct thrombin inhibitors, small molecules that also block staphylothrombin cleavage of fibrinogen (119, 133). ClfA, Coa and vWbp-derived vaccines can prevent S. aureus sepsis in mice (138) and mice with a genetic defect in fibrinogen, which abolishes its association with ClfA, are less susceptible to S. aureus induced sepsis than wild-type mice (139).
S. aureus hla mutants display delayed time-to-death and increased survival in the mouse sepsis model, likely because ADAM10 activation by the toxin is a key factor for the increased vascular permeability associated with disease (140). S. aureus secretes several other pore forming toxins, LukED and LukAB, that cause injury to myeloid cells by interacting with their G-protein coupled receptor molecules (141-144). The severity of S. aureus induced sepsis can be ameliorated by depletion of neutrophils that are targeted by LukED in a manner requiring specific chemokine receptors (141, 145). LukAB association with its CD11b receptor occurs in a host specific manner, as this toxin is capable of injuring human neutrophils but not mouse neutrophils (144). The possibility of targeting leukocidins (LukED, LukAB, PVL) as vaccine antigens represents an exciting frontier that awaits the development of refined mouse models with functional human chemokine receptors on myeloid cells.
Peritonitis
S. aureus is a frequent cause of peritonitis in individuals with end-stage renal disease and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (146). When injected with staphylococci into the peritoneal cavity, mice require a very large inoculum to develop lethal disease: LD50=5×108 CFU and LD90= 6×109 CFU for S. aureus Newman (43). The animals typically succumb within 12-24 hours of challenge and survivors of lower challenge doses harbor intraperitoneal abscess lesions filled with large numbers of immune cells, mostly neutrophils and macrophages, and surrounded by layers of fibrin and collagen (43). Very few staphylococci enter the blood stream and the establishment of metastatic abscess lesions is rare. On the other hand, lesions that were formed within the recesses of the peritoneal cavity are often associated with tissues of organs that are covered with peritoneal lining, e.g. the kidneys. Following necropsy, staphylococci are found in homogenized renal tissues, although the bacteria were located in the peritoneal cavity but not in renal parenchyma (43). The ease of administering staphylococci into the peritoneal cavity has led to the widespread use of this model and the identification of capsular polysaccharides as a key virulence determinant (147). Several studies indicate however that α-toxin is the key determinant for the lethal outcome of intraperitoneal S. aureus challenge (43, 148). In agreement with this, active immunization with HlaH35L or passive immunization with Hla-neutralizing antibody protects mice against the lethal outcome of intraperitoneal S. aureus inoculation but does not affect intraperitoneal abscess formation (43, 149).
Pneumonia
S. aureus infection of the lower respiratory tract leads to significant morbidity and mortality (150). Disease severity correlates with staphylococcal isolates in particular CA-MRSA strains (151). S. aureus is also a frequent cause of ventilator-assisted pneumonia in patients with significant co-morbidities (152). Instillation of staphylococcal suspensions (4×108 CFU S. aureus Newman) into the left nare of anesthetized adult mice that are held upright causes labored breathing marked by a high respiratory rate and exaggerated chest wall excursion immediately after infection (45). This state resolves within 6 h, however the combined effects of aspiration and S. aureus virulence leads to the development of pneumonia with 50% mortality at 24 h, followed by an additional 20% of the animals succumbing within 48 h following inoculation (45). At these time points, all infected animals appear ill, and have an increased respiratory rate, hunched posture, and decreased mobility. A small reduction of the inoculum (8×107 CFU) results in no mortality, although all animals appear ill but recover fully within 48 h. Inoculation with 8×108 CFU of S. aureus Newman results in about 90% mortality by 24 h. For bacterial enumeration (CFU) and histopathology analysis of lungs, animals may be infected with 2×108 CFU of S. aureus (45). Histopathology analysis reveals infiltration of immune cells and destruction of alveolar architecture by 24 h post challenge. These damages correlated with increased replication of staphylococci (45). Animals that survive beyond the 72 h observation period, resolve the infection, show lungs with restored air space and only residual inflammation on alveolar walls (45). α-hemolysin is the key virulence factor for the pathogenesis of S. aureus pneumonia in this model, whereas surface proteins and other secreted product play either no specific or minor roles (45, 60). Mutant mice that lack expression of the ADAM10 receptor for α-hemolysin display resistance towards S. aureus pneumonia (63). Both active (HlaH35L) and passive immunization of mice with neutralizing antibodies provides complete protection against lethal pneumonia following challenge with both MSSA and MRSA strains (60, 153). In a pneumonia model with neonatal mice, SpA has been shown to function as a virulence factor (154). In this model, SpA activates tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling cascades, thereby perturbing tight junctions of alveolar epithelia (155, 156). Compared to wild-type S. aureus, a spa mutant fails to transmigrate the epithelial monolayer in tissue culture media (157). tnfr-1 null mice were found to be more resistant to pulmonary infection as compared to wild-type animals, providing support for a distinct host pathogen interaction mediated by SpA (158).
Models requiring surgery
S. aureus frequently infects medical implants and catheters by forming biofilms on the surfaces of these inert structures (1, 159). Several different mouse models involving S. aureus infection of surgically implanted medical devices and catheters have been developed (160-163). Because of space constraints, we must limit the discussion below to two mouse models involving surgery: staphylococcal osteomyelitis and endocarditis.
Osteomyelitis or musculoskeletal infection of children occurs with an annual incidence of 1 in 5,000-10,000 in the United States (164, 165). In adults, osteomyelitis is associated with compound fractures, contiguous soft-tissue infections, and diabetes (166). As with other staphylococcal infections, CA-MRSA is a causative agent of osteomyelitis in otherwise healthy individuals. S. aureus inflicts significant bone destruction and local inflammation, and, if not controlled, disseminates into the blood stream. Thus, treatment of osteomyelitis involves surgical debridement followed by prolonged antimicrobial therapy and is complicated by bacteremia, venous thrombosis, and pathologic fractures (167). A mouse model of osteomyelitis was recently described whereby a 2-μl suspension containing 106 CFU of S. aureus is inoculated into the intramedullary canal of the femurs of animals following the creation of a 1-mm unicortical bone defect (168). For this procedure, a small incision is made to expose the left femur of the hind limb of anesthetized animals, and trephination with a 21-gauge needle is performed to create a 1-mm diameter unicortical bone defect at the mid-femur. Bacteria are delivered through the bone defect into the intramedullary canal. All exposed areas are immediately closed with suture, and mice administered buprenorphine every 12 h for 72 h following surgery (168). Disease has been assessed by CFU enumeration upon removal of femur. Cassat and colleagues also used high-resolution microcomputed tomography and histology for visualization of bone loss and abscess formation (168). Continuous observation over 14 days shows that the staphylococcal burden peak at day 4 and imaging analysis of microcomputed tomography reveals profound bone remodeling (both destruction and formation) at the damaged site. Infected femurs lose up to 50% of their original cortical volume. Mock-infected animals heal rapidly following surgery. Histopathology examination demonstrates substantial abscess formation throughout the bone marrow of infected femurs. A mutant lacking sae was found to be attenuated in this model (168). The sae locus encodes a two component regulatory system that controls the secretion of numerous proteins in S. aureus. The Sae-regulated protease aureolysin was found to be a key contributor for this disease by mediating the degradation of PSMs, which in turn triggered osteoblast cell death and bone destruction (168). Of note, aureolysin is not a virulence factors for S. aureus induced septic arthritis (169).
Infective endocarditis (IE) occurs in 30-60% of patients with S. aureus bacteremia and is associated with 40-50% mortality (170). IE is characterized by the formation of septic vegetations on the endocardium that consist of a meshwork of host factors, such as fibrin and platelets, as well as bacterial aggregates (171). Currently, S. aureus is the leading causative agent of infective endocarditis, a rapidly progressing, destructive infection of the heart valves (172, 173). An increased frequency of nosocomial endocarditis caused by S. aureus has also been documented, possibly linked to increased use of intravascular devices (172). It has also been reported that S. aureus bacteremia in patients with intravascular devices often results in venous thrombosis (174). A robust animal model of S. aureus endocarditis should feature aortic valve bacterial vegetations resembling those in humans. These features have been achieved in a mouse model of experimental infective endocarditis, which encompasses intravenous challenge with 106 CFU S. aureus one day following aortic valve trauma (175). Valve trauma is produced by introduction of an indwelling 32-gauge polyurethane catheter (sealed) into the aortic valve via the left carotid artery on anesthetized animals (175). Animals are placed in dorsal recumbency, the hair on the ventral neck and chest region shaved, and the shaved skin cleaned. Animals are kept on a vented warming table for thermoregulation and an incision is made from the thoracic inlet to the ramus of the left mandible. The left carotid artery is isolated and ligated cranially with suture. A surgical microscope is used to produce a small hole in the carotid artery with a 27-gauge needle to insert of the sealed tube (catheter) that is fed retrograde through the aortic valve (for a length of 1.3-cm). The catheter is secured in place by sutures and the incision closed. Catheters are left in place for the duration of the study and mice are infected 18 to 24 h following this procedure (175). The model has been validated by using a vancomycin regimen at exposures comparable to human dosing (175). It has also been used to demonstrate the essential contribution of staphylocoagulases, Coa and vWbp, to IE (42). Because of the small size of the carotid artery, the mouse is a technically challenging model for the study of IE, which can also be examined in rats or rabbits (176, 177).
Conclusions and Perspectives
Mouse models have been essential for the study of several different infectious diseases caused by S. aureus, revealing virulence determinants and supporting efficacy studies with vaccine antigens or immune therapeutics. This work demonstrated also that S. aureus infection does not elicit protective immune responses against subsequent challenge with the same strain or with different S. aureus isolates (112, 178). These insights initiated a search for immune evasive factors that may represent key targets for vaccine development, however only some of these targets can currently be studied in mice (114). These limitations may be addressed by developing transgenic animals that express human factors critical for disease pathogenesis, as has been achieved for IsdB-mediated heme-iron scavenging in mice transgenic for human hemoglobin (179, 180). Assessing the contributions of several other human-specific virulence factors, for example SCIN, CHIPS, and SAK, which directly or indirectly inhibit C3 convertase, C5a receptor, and C3b, will require development of new transgenic models (49, 181). Another key insight is the realization that different types of diseases (sepsis, abscess formation, peritonitis, osteomyelitis, etc.) require different types of virulence factors. Thus, if key virulence determinants were chosen as vaccine antigens, single antigen vaccine approaches cannot be expected to address all of the staphylococcal diseases discussed herein. A universal vaccine, derived from S. aureus virulence factors, would need to incorporate several different antigens into a single vaccine formulation (3, 101, 119, 178, 182). Finally, mouse models, developed for any one S. aureus disease, can reveal virulence contributions and vaccine efficacy of a specific antigen(s), and this information may be useful to predict the success of human clinical trials for the same disease. It seems unlikely, however, that such data may predict the success of clinical trials addressing another disease. If so, studies with capsular polysaccharide vaccines in the mouse peritonitis model cannot predict vaccine success in patients with end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis-related bacteremia (123, 183). Further, studies with IsdB in mouse models for sepsis or abscess formation are unlikely to predict IsdB vaccine success in patients with mediastinal infections following cardiothoracic surgery (102, 103). We presume that mouse models for S. aureus diseases will remain the most important surrogates for the study of staphylococcal infections in humans, their therapy and prevention.
Figure 1.
Mouse models for S. aureus infections. Mice are susceptible to S. aureus infections. Staphylococci can be administered by four different routes: intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous and intranasal inoculation. Intravenous delivery of staphylococci generates metastatic infectious lesions in multiple internal organs including heart and kidneys. In heart, agglutinated staphylococci (staphylococcal abscess community; SAC) are surrounded by necrotic cardiac myocytes (red). In renal tissue, SAC are surrounded by fibrin deposits (brown - eosinophilic pseudocapsule) which separate bacteria from massive immune cell infiltrates (purple). Injection of staphylococci into the peritoneum creates a lesion comprised of a large number of immune cells with staphylococci. This lesion is attached to the peritoneal lining and surrounded by an inner layer of fibrin deposits (brown) and an outer layer of collagen (blue). Subcutaneous injection of staphylococci generates a subcutaneous abscess and dermonecrotic (red) lesions on the overlying skin. Lower respiratory tract infection caused by intranasal inoculation of staphylococci is characterized by obstruction of airspace (red) by inflammatory cell infiltrates and aggregates of S. aureus.
Table I.
Summary of mouse models for S. aureus infection
Disease model | Infection route | Infectious dose (CFUs) |
Phenotype | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Skin infection | Subcutaneous | 1×107 – 1×109 | Dermonecrosis caused by secreted toxins | (46, 59) |
Metastatic abscess formation | Intravenous | 1×106 – 1×107 | Abscess formation in most internal organs | (3) |
Sepsis | Intravenous | 5×107 – 5×108 | Acute lethal disease within 48 hours of infection; formation of multiple lesions in heart | (119, 133) |
Peritonitis | Intraperitoenal | 5×108 (LD50) 6×109 (LD90) |
Acute lethal disease within 12 hours of infection; formation of abscess lesions on peritoneal surfaces | (43) |
Pneumonia | Intranasal | 2-4×108 | Acute lethal disease within 72 hours of infection; infiltration of inflammatory cells into alveolar air space | (45) |
Highlights.
Staphylococcus aureus is a human commensal
S. aureus causes invasive and recurrent diseases
S. aureus infections fail to elicit protective immune responses
S. aureus disease attributes can be studied in experimental mouse models of infection
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Work on staphylococcal diseases in our laboratory was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Infectious Diseases Branch (AI038897, AI052474, AI075258). The authors acknowledge membership within and support from the Region V “Great Lakes” Regional Center of Excellence in Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Consortium (NIH Award 1-U54-AI-057153).
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors declare a conflict of interests as inventors of patent applications that are related to the development of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines and are currently under commercial license.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. New Engl. J. Med 339, 520–532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, and Peters G (2001) Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N. Engl. J. Med 344, 11–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheng AG, Kim HK, Burts ML, Krausz T, Schneewind O, and Missiakas DM (2009) Genetic requirements for Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation and persistence in host tissues. FASEB J. 23, 3393–3404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lessa FC, Mu Y, Davies J, Murray M, Lillie M, Pearson A, and Fridkin SK (2010) Comparison of incidence of bloodstream infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between England and United States, 2006–2007. Clin. Infect. Dis 51, 925–928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bukowski M, Wladyka B, and Dubin G (2010) Exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins (Basel) 2, 1148–1165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McCormick JK, Yarwood JM, and Schlievert PM (2001) Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an update. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 55, 77–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Novick RP, Christie GE, and Penadés JR (2010) The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 8, 541–551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fluit AC. (2012) Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 18, 735–744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fitzgerald JR (2012) Human origin for livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 3, e00082–00012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fitzgerald JR (2012) Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat. Trends Microbiol. 20, 192–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Viana D, Blanco J, Tormo-Más MA, Selva L, Guinane CM, Baselga R, Corpa JM, Lasa I, Novick RP, Fitzgerald JR, and Penades JR (2010) Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to ruminant and equine hosts involves SaPI-carried variants of von Willebrand factor-binding protein. Mol. Microbiol 77, 1583–1594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spoor LE, McAdam PR, Weinert LA, Rambaut A, Hasman H, Aarestrup FM, Kearns AM, Larsen AR, Skov RL, and Fitzgerald JR (2013) Livestock Origin for a Human Pandemic Clone of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, Pearson T, Waters AE, Foster JT, Schupp J, Gillece J, Driebe E, Liu CM, Springer B, Zdovc I, Battisti A, Franco A, Zmudzki J, Schwarz S, Butaye P, Jouy E, Pomba C, Porrero MC, Ruimy R, Smith TC, Robinson DA, Weese JS, Arriola CS, Yu F, Laurentk F, Keim P, Skov R, and Aarestrup FM (2012) Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio 3, e00305–00311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kuroda M, Ohta T, Uchiyama I, Baba T, Yuzawa H, Kobayashi I, Cui L, Oguchi A, Aoki K, Nagai Y, Lian J, Ito T, Kanamori M, Matsumaru H, Maruyama A, Murakami H, Hosoyama A, Mitsutani-Ui Y, Kobayashi N, Sawano T, Inoue R, Kaito C, Sekimizu K, Hirakawa H, Kuhara S, Goto S, Yabuzaki J, Kanehisa M, Yamashita A, Oshima K, Furuya K, Yoshino C, Shiba T, Hattori M, Ogasawara N, Hayashi H, and Hiramatsu K (2001) Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357, 1225–1240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, Chantratita N, Gardete S, Tavares A, Day N, Lindsay JA, Edgeworth JD, de Lencastre H, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, and Bentley SD (2010) Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327, 469–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McCarthy AJ, and Lindsay JA (2010) Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiology 10, 173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cheng AG, DeDent AC, Schneewind O, and Missiakas D (2011) A play in four acts: Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation. Trends Microbiol 19, 225–232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, McQuillan G, McDougal LK, Fosheim GE, Jensen BJ, Killgore G, Tenover FC, and Kuehnert MJ (2008) Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001–2004. J Infect Dis 197, 1226–1234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miller LG, Quan C, Shay A, Mostafaie K, Bharadwa K, Tan N, Matayoshi K, Cronin J, Tan J, Tagudar G, and Bayer AS (2007) A prospective investigation of outcomes after hospital discharge for endemic, community-acquired methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Clin Infect Dis 44, 483–492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kallen AJ, Mu Y, Bulens S, Reingold A, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Patel P, Fridkin SK, and Program., A. B. C. s. A. M. I. o. t. E. I. (2010) Health care-associated invasive MRSA infections, 2005–2008. JAMA 304, 641–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Gaynes RP, and System NNIS (2008) The impact of antimicrobial-resistant, health care-associated infections on mortality in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis 47, 927–930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.DeLeo FR, and Chambers HF (2009) Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 7, 629–641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu C., Bayer A., Cosgrove SE., Daum RS., Fridkin SK., Gorwitz RJ., Kaplan SL., Karchmer AW., Levine DP., Murray BE., M, J. R., Talan DA., and Chambers HF. (2011) Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 52, 285–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arbeit RD, Maki D, Tally FP, Campanaro E, and Eisenstein BI (2004) The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Clin. Infect. Dis 38, 1673–1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stevens DH, Herr D, Campiris H, Hunt JL, Batts DH, and Hafkin B (2002) Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Infect. Dis 34, 1481–1490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, Shah S, Rudrik JT, Pupp GR, Brown WJ, Cardo D, Fridkin SK, and Team, V.-R. S. a. I. (2003) Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N. Engl. J. Med 348, 1342–1347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fridkin SK (2001) Vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus: what the infectious disease specialist needs to know. Clin. Infect. Dis 32, 108–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weigel LM, Clewell DB, Gill SR, Clark NC, McDougal LK, Flannagan SE, Kolonay JF, Shetty J, Killgore GE, and Tenover FC (2003) Genetic analysis of a high-level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Science 302, 1569–1571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Richter SS, Diekema DJ, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Crispell EK, Riahi F, McDanel JS, Satola SW, and Doern GV (2013) Activity of Vancomycin, Ceftaroline, and Mupirocin Against Staphylococcus aureus from a 2011 National Surveillance Study in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sader HS, Flamm RK, and Jones RN (2013) Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline tested against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin from U.S. hospitals, 2008 to 2011. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57, 3178–3181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Proctor RA (2012) Challenges for a universal Staphylococcus aureus vaccine. Clin. Infect. Dis 54, 1179–1186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AK, Wertheim HF, Sumpradit N, Vlieghe E, Hara GL, Gould IM, Goossens H, Greko C, So AD, Bigdeli M, Tomson G, Woodhouse W, Ombaka E, Peralta AQ, Qamar FN, Mir F, Kariuki S, Bhutta ZA, Coates A, Bergstrom R, Wright GD, Brown ED, and Cars O (2013) Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. The Lancet infectious diseases 13, 1057–1098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koch R (1882) The Ätiologie der Tuberkulose. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift 19, 221–230 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Behring EA (1890) Über das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-Immunität bei Thieren. Deutsche Medzinische Wochenschrift 16, 1145–1148 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wiles S., Hanage WP., Frankel G., and Robertson B. (2006) Modelling infectious disease - time to think outside the box? Nature reviews. Microbiology 4, 307–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Szabo EK, and MacCallum DM (2011) The contribution of mouse models to our understanding of systemic candidiasis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 320, 1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wade CM., and Daly MJ. (2005) Genetic variation in laboratory mice. Nat. Genet. 37, 1175–1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Holtfreter S, Radcliff FJ, Grumann D, Read H, Johnson S, Monecke S, Ritchie S, Clow F, Goerke C, Bröker BM, Fraser JD, and Wiles S (2013) Characterization of a mouse-adapted Staphylococcus aureus strain. PLoS One 8, e71142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bremell T, Lange S, Yacoub A, Ryden C, and Tarkowski A (1991) Experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis in mice. Infect. Immun 59, 2615–2623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cheng AG, McAdow M, Kim HK, Bae T, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2010) Contribution of coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus disease and protective immunity. PLoS Pathog 6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Placencia FX, Kong L, and Weisman LE (2009) Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neonatal mice: lysostaphin versus vancomycin. Pediatr Res 65, 420–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Panizzi P, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo JL, Panizzi J, Marinelli B, Iwamoto Y, Keliher E, Maddur AA, Waterman P, Kroh H, Leuschner F, Aikawa E, Swirski FK, Pittet MJ, Hackeng TM, Fuentes-Prior P, Schneewind O, Bock PE, and Weissleder R (2011) In vivo detection of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis by targeting pathogen-specific prothrombin activation. Nat. Med 17, 1142–1146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rauch S, Dedent AG, Kim HK, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2012) Abscess formation and alpha-hemolysin induced toxicity in a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus peritoneal infection. Infect Immun [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bunce C, Wheeler L, Reed G, Musser J, and Barg N (1992) Murine model of cutaneous infection with gram-positive cocci. Infection and immunity 60, 2636–2640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bubeck Wardenburg J, Patel RJ, and Schneewind O (2007) Surface proteins and exotoxins are required for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect Immun 75, 1040–1044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kennedy AD, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Gardner DJ, Long D, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Schneewind O, and DeLeo FR (2010) Targeting of alpha-hemolysin by active or passive immunization decreases severity of USA300 skin infection in a mouse model. The Journal of infectious diseases 202, 1050–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Foster TJ (2005) Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 3, 948–958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dedent A, Kim HK, Missiakas D, and Schneewind O (2012) Exploring Staphylococcus aureus pathways to disease for vaccine development. Semin Immunopathol 34, 317–333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, Roos A, Daha MR, Presanis JS, Sim RB, van Wamel WJ, van Kessel KP, and van Strijp JA (2005) Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat. Immunol 6, 920–927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Spaan AN, Surewaard BGJ, Nijland R, and van Strijp JAG (2013) Neutrophils versus Staphylococcus aureus: a biological tug of war. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 67, 629–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Rohde M, Oehmcke S, Miller LS, Cheung AL, Herwald H, Foster S, and Medina E (2008) Immunological mechanisms underlying the genetic predisposition to severe Staphylococcus aureus infection in the mouse model. Am. J. Pathol 173, 1657–1668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Proctor RA (2012) Challenges for a universal Staphylococcus aureus vaccine. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 54, 1179–1186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bagnoli F, Bertholet S, and Grandi G (2012) Inferring reasons for the failure of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines in clinical trials. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 2, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tarkowski A, Collins LV, Gjertsson I, Hultgren OH, Jonsson IM, Sakiniene E, and Verdrengh M (2001) Model systems: modeling human staphylococcal arthritis and sepsis in the mouse. Trends In microbiology 9, 321–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Baba T, Bae T, Schneewind O, Takeuchi F, and Hiramatsu K (2007) Genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman and comparative analysis of staphylococcal genomes. J. Bacteriol 190, 300–310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, and Perdreau-Remington F (2006) Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367, 731–739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ogston A (1881) Report upon Micro-Organisms in Surgical Diseases. Br Med J 1, 369 b362–375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ogston A (1882) Micrococcus Poisoning. J Anat Physiol 17, 24–58 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Malachowa N, Kobayashi SD, Braughton KR, and DeLeo FR (2013) Mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Methods Mol Biol 1031, 109–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bubeck Wardenburg J, and Schneewind O (2008) Vaccine protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J. Exp. Med 205, 287–294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tkaczyk C, Hua L, Varkey R, Shi Y, Dettinger L, Woods R, Barnes A, MacGill RS, Wilson S, Chowdhury P, Stover CK, and Sellman BR (2012) Identification of anti-alpha toxin monoclonal antibodies that reduce the severity of Staphylococcus aureus dermonecrosis and exhibit a correlation between affinity and potency. Clin. Vaccine iImmunol 19, 377–385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wilke GA, and Bubeck Wardenburg J (2010) Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 13473–13478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Inoshima I, Inoshima N, Wilke GA, Powers ME, Frank KM, Wang Y, and Bubeck Wardenburg J (2011) A Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxin subverts the activity of ADAM10 to cause lethal infection in mice. Nature medicine 17, 1310–1314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, Limbago B, Albrecht V, and Moran GJ (2011) Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections in US emergency department patients, 2004 and 2008. Clin Infect Dis 53, 144–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, Harriman K, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, and Farley MM (2005) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N. Engl. J. Med 352, 1436–1444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chambers HF (2005) Community-associated MRSA--resistance and virulence converge. N. Engl. J. Med 352, 1485–1487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Panton PN, and Valentine FCO (1932) Staphylococcal toxin. Lancet 222, 506–508 [Google Scholar]
- 68.Spaan AN, Henry T, van Rooijen WJ, Perret M, Badiou C, Aerts PC, Kemmink J, de Haas CJ, van Kessel KP, Vandenesch F, Lina G, and van Strijp JA (2013) The staphylococcal toxin Panton-Valentine Leukocidin targets human C5a receptors. Cell Host Microbe 13, 584–594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bubeck Wardenburg J, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2008) Vaccines for Staphylococcus aureus Infections In New Generation Vaccines (Levine MM., Kaper JB., Rappuoli R., Liu MF., and Good AL., eds), Informa Health Care, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Voyich JM, Otto M, Mathema B, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Welty D, Long RD, Dorward DW, Gardner DJ, Lina G, Kreiswirth BN, and DeLeo FR (2006) Is Panton-Valentine leukocidin the major virulence determinant in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease? J. Infect. Dis 194, 1761–1770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mehlin C, Headley CM, and Klebanoff SJ (1999) An inflammatory polypeptide complex from Staphylococcus epidermidis: isolation and characterization. The Journal of experimental medicine 189, 907–918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, and Otto M (2007) Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med 13, 1510–1514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cheung GY, Kretschmer D, Queck SY, Joo HS, Wang R, Duong AC, Nguyen TH, Bach TH, Porter AR, Deleo FR, Peschel A, and Otto M (2013) Insight into structure-function relationship in phenol-soluble modulins using an alanine screen of the phenol-soluble modulin (PSM) alpha3 peptide. Faseb J [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chatterjee SS, Joo HS, Duong AC, Dieringer TD, Tan VY, Song Y, Fischer ER, Cheung GY, Li M, and Otto M (2013) Essential Staphylococcus aureus toxin export system. Nature medicine 19, 364–367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kretschmer D, Gleske AK, Rautenberg M, Wang R, Koberle M, Bohn E, Schoneberg T, Rabiet MJ, Boulay F, Klebanoff SJ, van Kessel KA, van Strijp JA, Otto M, and Peschel A (2010) Human formyl peptide receptor 2 senses highly pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host & Microbe 7, 463–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Surewaard BG, Nijland R, Spaan AN, Kruijtzer JA, de Haas CJ, and van Strijp JA (2012) Inactivation of staphylococcal phenol soluble modulins by serum lipoprotein particles. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Agarwal DS (1967) Subcutaneous staphylococcal infection in mice. I. The role of cotton-dust in enhancing infection. Br J Exp Pathol 48, 436–449 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Asai A, Tsuda Y, Kobayashi M, Hanafusa T, Herndon DN, and Suzuki F (2010) Pathogenic role of macrophages in intradermal infection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in thermally injured mice. Infection and immunity 78, 4311–4319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.McRipley RJ, and Whitney RR (1976) Characterization and quantitation of experimental surgical-wound infections used to evaluate topical antibacterial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 10, 38–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nakamura Y, Oscherwitz J, Cease KB, Chan SM, Munoz-Planillo R, Hasegawa M, Villaruz AE, Cheung GY, McGavin MJ, Travers JB, Otto M, Inohara N, and Nunez G (2013) Staphylococcus delta-toxin induces allergic skin disease by activating mast cells. Nature 503, 397–401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kraft WG, Johnson PT, David BC, and Morgan DR (1986) Cutaneous infection in normal and immunocompromised mice. Infection and immunity 52, 707–713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Molne L, Verdrengh M, and Tarkowski A (2000) Role of neutrophil leukocytes in cutaneous infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Infection and immunity 68, 6162–6167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hahn BL, Onunkwo CC, Watts CJ, and Sohnle PG (2009) Systemic dissemination and cutaneous damage in a mouse model of staphylococcal skin infections. Microb Pathog 47, 16–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Heyworth PG, Cross AR, and Curnutte JT (2003) Chronic granulomatous disease. Curr Opin Immunol 15, 578–584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mathews WC, Caperna JC, Barber RE, Torriani FJ, Miller LG, May S, and McCutchan JA (2005) Incidence of and risk factors for clinically significant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a cohort of HIV-infected adults. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 40, 155–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bieber T (2008) Atopic dermatitis. The New England journal of medicine 358, 1483–1494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Milner JD, Brenchley JM, Laurence A, Freeman AF, Hill BJ, Elias KM, Kanno Y, Spalding C, Elloumi HZ, Paulson ML, Davis J, Hsu A, Asher AI, O'Shea J, Holland SM, Paul WE, and Douek DC (2008) Impaired T(H)17 cell differentiation in subjects with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 452, 773–776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ma CS, Chew GY, Simpson N, Priyadarshi A, Wong M, Grimbacher B, Fulcher DA, Tangye SG, and Cook MC (2008) Deficiency of Th17 cells in hyper IgE syndrome due to mutations in STAT3. J Exp Med 205, 1551–1557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Miller LS, O'Connell RM, Gutierrez MA, Pietras EM, Shahangian A, Gross CE, Thirumala A, Cheung AL, Cheng G, and Modlin RL (2006) MyD88 mediates neutrophil recruitment initiated by IL-1R but not TLR2 activation in immunity against Staphylococcus aureus. Immunity 24, 79–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cho JS, Pietras EM, Garcia NC, Ramos RI, Farzam DM, Monroe HR, Magorien JE, Blauvelt A, Kolls JK, Cheung AL, Cheng G, Modlin RL, and Miller LS (2010) IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation 120, 1762–1773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Stockinger B, and Veldhoen M (2007) Differentiation and function of Th17 T cells. Curr Opin Immunol 19, 281–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Iwakura Y, Nakae S, Saijo S, and Ishigame H (2008) The roles of IL-17A in inflammatory immune responses and host defense against pathogens. Immunol Rev 226, 57–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Frank KM, Zhou T, Moreno-Vinasco L, Hollett B, Garcia JG, and Bubeck Wardenburg J (2012) Host response signature to Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin implicates pulmonary Th17 response. Infect Immun 80, 3161–3169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, and Greiner DL (2007) Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol 7, 118–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Sreeramoju P, Porbandarwalla NS, Arango J, Latham K, Dent DL, Stewart RM, and Patterson JE (2011) Recurrent skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus requiring operative debridement. Am J Surg 201, 216–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, and Fridkin SK (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298, 1763–1771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Thammavongsa V, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2013) Staphylococcus aureus degrades neutrophil extracellular traps to promote immune cell death. Science 342, 863–866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Torres VJ, Pishchany G, Humayun M, Schneewind O, and Skaar EP (2006) Staphylococcus aureus IsdB is a hemoglobin receptor required for heme-iron utilization. J. Bacteriol 188, 8421–8429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mazmanian SK, Skaar EP, Gaspar AH, Humayun M, Gornicki P, Jelenska J, Joachmiak A, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2003) Passage of heme-iron across the envelope of Staphylococcus aureus. Science 299, 906–909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kim HK, DeDent A, Cheng AG, McAdow M, Bagnoli F, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2010) IsdA and IsdB antibodies protect mice against Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation and lethal challenge. Vaccine 28, 6382–6392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Stranger-Jones YK, Bae T, and Schneewind O (2006) Vaccine assembly from surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16942–16947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kuklin NA, Clark DJ, Secore S, Cook J, Cope LD, McNeely T, Noble L, Brown MJ, Zorman JK, Wang XM, Pancari G, Fan H, Isett K, Burgess B, Bryan J, Brownlow M, George H, Meinz M, Liddell ME, Kelly R, Schultz L, Montgomery D, Onishi J, Losada M, Martin M, Ebert T, Tan CY, Schofield TL, Nagy E, Meineke A, Joyce JG, Kurtz MB, Caulfield MJ, Jansen KU, McClements W, and Anderson AS (2006) A novel Staphylococcus aureus vaccine: iron surface determinant B induces rapid antibody responses in rhesus macaques and specific increased survival in a murine S. aureus sepsis model. Infect. Immun 74, 2215–2223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Fowler VG, Allen KB, Moreira ED, Moustafa M, Isgro F, Boucher HW, Corey GR, Carmeli Y, Betts R, Hartzel JS, Chan IS, McNeely TB, Kartsonis NA, Guris D, Onorato MT, Smugar SS, DiNubile MJ, and Sobanjo-ter Meulen A (2013) Effect of an investigational vaccine for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections after cardiothoracic surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 309, 1368–1378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Deivanayagam CC, Rich RL, Carson M, Owens RT, Danthuluri S, Bice T, Höök M, and Narayana SV (2000) Novel fold and assembly of the repetitive B region of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen-binding surface protein. Structure 8, 67–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Becherelli M, Prachi P, Viciani E, Biagini M, Fiaschi L, Chiarot E, Nosari S, Brettoni C, Marchi S, Biancucci M, Fontana MR, Montagnani F, Bagnoli F, Barocchi MA, and Manetti AG (2013) Protective activity of the CnaBE3 domain conserved among Staphylococcus aureus Sdr proteins. PLoS One 8, e74718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Forsgren A, and Sjöquist J (1966) Protein A from S. aureus. I. Pseudo-immune reaction with human gamma-globulin. J. Immunol 97, 822–827 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Deisenhofer J (1981) Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of a human Fc fragment and its complex with fragment B of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus at 2.9- and 2.8-A resolution. Biochemistry 20, 2361–2370 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Graille M, Stura EA, Corper AL, Sutton BJ, Taussig MJ, Charbonnier JB, and Silverman GJ (2000) Crystal structure of a Staphylococcus aureus protein A domain complexed with the Fab fragment of a human IgM antibody: structural basis for recognition of B-cell receptors and superantigen activity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5399–5404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Forsgren A, and Quie PG (1974) Effects of staphylococcal protein A on heat labile opsonins. J. Immunol 112, 1177–1180 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Goodyear CS, and Silverman GJ (2003) Death by a B cell superantigen: In vivo VH-targeted apoptotic supraclonal B cell deletion by a staphylococcal toxin. J Exp Med. 197, 1125–1139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Falugi F, Kim HK, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2013) Role of protein A in the evasion of host adaptive immune responses by Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 4, e00575–00513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Kim HK, Cheng AG, Kim H-Y, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2010) Non-toxigenic protein A vaccine for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus infections. J. Exp. Med 207, 1863–1870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kim HK, Emolo C, DeDent AC, Falugi F, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2012) Protein A-specific monoclonal antibodies and prevention of Staphylococcus aureus disease in mice. Infection and immunity 80, 3460–3470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kim HK, Thammavongsa V, Schneewind O, and Missiakas D (2012) Recurrent infections and immune evasion strategies of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15, 92–99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Thammavongsa V, Kern JW, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2009) Staphylococcus aureus synthesizes adenosine to escape host immune responses. J Exp Med 206, 2417–2427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Thammavongsa V, Schneewind O, and Missiakas DM (2011) Enzymatic properties of Staphylococcus aureus adenosine synthase (AdsA). BMC Biochem 12, 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Berends ET, Horswill AR, Haste NM, Monestier M, Nizet V, and von Köckritz-Blickwede M (2010) Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitates escape from neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Innate Immun 2, 576–586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Friedrich R, Panizzi P, Fuentes-Prior P, Richter K, Verhamme I, Anderson PJ, Kawabata S, Huber R, Bode W, and Bock PE (2003) Staphylocoagulase is a prototype for the mechanism of cofactor-induced zymogen activation. Nature 425, 535–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cheng AG, McAdow M, Kim HK, Bae T, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2010) Contribution of coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus disease and protective immunity. PLoS Pathog 6, e1001036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.McKenney D, Pouliot KL, Wang Y, Murthy V, Ulrich M, Doring G, Lee JC, Goldmann DA, and Pier GB (1999) Broadly protective vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus based on an in vivo-expressed antigen. Science 284, 1523–1527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Albus A, Arbeit RD, and Lee JC (1991) Virulence studies of Staphylococcus aureus mutants altered in type 5 capsule production. Infect. Immun 59, 1008–1014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lee JC, Betley MJ, Hopkins CA, Perez NE, and Pier GB (1987) Virulence studies, in mice, of transposon-induced mutants of Staphylococcus aureus differing in capsule size. J. Infect. Dis 156, 741–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Fattom AI, Horwith G, Fuller S, Propst M, and Naso R (2004) Development of StaphVAX, a polysaccharide conjugate vaccine against S. aureus infection: from the lab bench to phase III clinical trials. Vaccine 22, 880–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sutter DE, Summers AM, Keys CE, Taylor KL, Frasch CE, Braun LE, Fattom AI, and Bash MC (2011) Capsular serotype of Staphylococcus aureus in the era of community-acquired MRSA. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 63, 16–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, and Lindberg FP (2000) Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. J Immunol 164, 3713–3722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Josefsson E, Hartford O, O'Brien L, Patti JM, and Foster T (2001) Protection against experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis by vaccination with clumping factor A, a novel virulence determinant. The Journal of infectious diseases 184, 1572–1580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Nilsson IM, Hartford O, Foster T, and Tarkowski A (1999) Alpha-toxin and gamma-toxin jointly promote Staphylococcus aureus virulence in murine septic arthritis. Infect. Immun 67, 1045–1049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Palmqvist N, Foster TJ, Tarkowski A, and Josefsson E (2002) Protein A is a virulence factor in Staphylococcus aureus arthritis and septic death. Microb. Pathog 33, 239–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Josefsson E, Higgins J, Foster TJ, and Tarkowski A (2008) Fibrinogen binding sites P336 and Y338 of clumping factor are crucial for Staphylococcus aureus virulence. PLoS One 3, e2206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Jonsson IM, Mazamanian SK, Schneewind O, Vendrengh M, Bremell T, and Tarkowski A (2002) On the role of Staphylococcus aureus sortase and sortase-catalyzed surface protein anchoring in murine septic arthritis. J. Infect. Dis. 185, 1417–1424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Hurd AF, Garcia-Lara J, Rauter Y, Cartron M, Mohamed R, and Foster SJ (2012) The iron-regulated surface proteins IsdA, IsdB, and IsdH are not required for heme iron utilization in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 329, 93–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Osuchowski MF, Valentine C, Kurosawa S, and Remick DG (2010) The pathogenesis of sepsis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis 6, 19–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.McAdow M, Kim HK, Dedent AC, Hendrickx AP, Schneewind O, and Missiakas DM (2011) Preventing Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis through the Inhibition of Its Agglutination in Blood. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.McDevitt D, Francois P, Vaudaux P, and Foster TJ (1994) Molecular characterization of the clumping factor (fibrinogen receptor) of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol 11, 237–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.McDevitt D, Nanavaty T, House-Pompeo K, Bell E, Turner N, McIntire L, Foster T, and Höök M (1997) Characterization of the interaction between the Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor (ClfA) and fibrinogen. Eur. J. Biochem 247, 416–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ganesh VK, Rivera JJ, Smeds E, Ko Y-P, Bowden MG, Wann ER, Gurusidappa S, Fitzgerald JR, and Höök M (2008) A structural model of the Staphylococcus aureus ClfA-fibrinogen interaction opens new avenues for the design of anti-staphylococcal therapeutics. PLoS Pathog. 4, e1000226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Palmqvist N, Patti JM, Tarkowski A, and Josefsson E. (2004) Expression of staphylococcal clumping factor A impedes macrophage phagocytosis. Microbes Infect. 6, 188–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.McAdow M, DeDent AC, Emolo C, Cheng AG, Kreiswirth BN, Missiakas DM, and Schneewind O (2012) Coagulases as determinants of protective immune responses against Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 80, 3389–3398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Flick MJ, Du X, Prasad JM, Raghu H, Palumbo JS, Smeds E, Höök M, and Degen JL (2013) Genetic elimination of the binding motif on fibrinogen for the S. aureus virulence factor ClfA improves host survival in septicemia. Blood in press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Powers ME, Kim HK, Wang Y-T, and Bubeck-Wardenburg J (2012) ADAM10 mediates vascular injury induced by Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin. J. Infect. DIs EPub ahead of print [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Alonzo F. r., Benson MA, Chen J, Novick RP, Shopsin B, and Torres VJ (2012) Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin ED contributes to systemic infection by targeting neutrophils and promoting bacterial growth In vivo. Mol. Microbiol 83, 423–435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Alonzo F. r., Kozhaya L, Rawlings SA, Reyes-Robles T, DuMont AL, Myszka DG, Landau NR, Unutmaz D, and Torres VJ (2013) CCR5 is a receptor for Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED. Nature 493, 51–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.DuMont AL, Yoong P, Surewaard BG, Benson MA, Nijland R, van Strijp JA, and Torres VJ (2013) Staphylococcus aureus elaborates leukocidin AB to mediate escape from within human neutrophils. Infect. Immun 81, 1830–1841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.DuMont AL, Yoong P, Day CJ, Alonzo F. r., McDonald WH, Jennings MP, and Torres VJ (2013) Staphylococcus aureus LukAB cytotoxin kills human neutrophils by targeting the CD11b subunit of the integrin Mac-1. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10794–10799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Reyes-Robles T, Alonzo F. r., Kozhaya L, Lacy DB, Unutmaz D, and Torres VJ (2013) Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED targets the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 to kill leukocytes and promote infection. Cell Host Microbe 14, 453–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Troidle L, and Finkelstein F (2006) Treatment and outcome of CPD-associated peritonitis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Fattom AI, Sarwar J, Ortiz A, and Naso R (1996) A Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide (CP) vaccine and CP-specific antibodies protect mice against bacterial challenge. Infection and immunity 64, 1659–1665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kernodle DS, Voladri RK, Menzies BE, Hager CC, and Edwards KM (1997) Expression of an antisense hla fragment in Staphylococcus aureus reduces alpha-toxin production in vitro and attenuates lethal activity in a murine model. Infection and immunity 65, 179–184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Menzies BE, and Kernodle DS (1996) Passive immunization with antiserum to a nontoxic alpha-toxin mutant from Staphylococcus aureus is protective in a murine model. Infect. Immun 64, 1839–1841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Napolitano LM, Brunsvold ME, Reddy RC, and Hyzy RC (2009) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia and ARDS: 1-year follow-up. Chest 136, 1407–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, Lina G, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, and Floret D (2001) [Severe staphylococcal pneumonia in children]. Arch Pediatr 8 Suppl 4, 742s–746s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Kollef MH, Morrow LE, Niederman MS, Leeper KV, Anzueto A, Benz-Scott L, and Rodino FJ (2006) Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 129, 1210–1218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Ragle BE, and Bubeck-Wardenburg J (2009) Anti-alpha-hemolysin monoclonal antibodies mediate protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect. Immun 77, 2712–2718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Gomez MI, Lee A, Reddy B, Muir A, Soong G, Pitt A, Cheung A, and Prince A (2004) Staphylococcus aureus protein A induces airway epithelial inflammatory responses by activating TNFR1. Nat. Med 10, 842–848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Gomez MI, O'Seaghdha M, Magargee M, Foster TJ, and Prince AS (2006) Staphylococcus aureus protein A activates TNFR1 signaling through conserved IgG binding domains. J Biol Chem 281, 20190–20196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Gómez MI, O'Seaghdha M, and Prince AS (2007) Staphylococcus aureus protein A activates TACE through EGFR-dependent signaling. EMBO J. 26, 701–709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Soong G, Martin FJ, Chun J, Cohen TS, Ahn DS, and Prince A (2011) Staphylococcus aureus protein A mediates invasion across airway epithelial cells through activation of RhoA GTPase signaling and proteolytic activity. J Biol Chem 286, 35891–35898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Gomez MI, Lee A, Reddy B, Muir A, Soong G, Pitt A, Cheung A, and Prince A (2004) Staphylococcus aureus protein A induces airway epithelial inflammatory responses by activating TNFR1. Nature Med. 10, 842–848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Gordon RJ, Quagliarello B, and Lowy FD (2006) Ventricular assist device-related infections. Lancet Infect Dis 6, 426–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Arrecubieta C, Asai T, Bayern M, Loughman A, Fitzgerald JR, Shelton CE, Baron HM, Dang NC, Deng MC, Naka Y, Foster TJ, and Lowy FD (2006) The role of Staphylococcus aureus adhesins in the pathogenesis of ventricular assist device-related infections. J Infect Dis 193, 1109–1119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Arrecubieta C, Matsunaga I, Asai T, Naka Y, Deng MC, and Lowy FD (2008) Vaccination with clumping factor A and fibronectin binding protein A to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infection of an aortic patch in mice. J Infect Dis 198, 571–575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Bernthal NM., Stavrakis AI., Billi F., Cho JS., Kremen TJ., Simon SI., Cheung AL., Finerman GA., Lieberman JR., Adams JS., and Miller LS. (2010) A mouse model of post-arthroplasty Staphylococcus aureus joint infection to evaluate in vivo the efficacy of antimicrobial implant coatings. PLoS One 5, e12580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Snowden JN, Beaver M, Smeltzer MS, and Kielian T (2012) Biofilm-infected intracerebroventricular shunts elicit inflammation within the central nervous system. Infect Immun 80, 3206–3214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Weichert S, Sharland M, Clarke NM, and Faust SN (2008) Acute haematogenous osteomyelitis in children: is there any evidence for how long we should treat? Curr Opin Infect Dis 21, 258–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Gerber JS, Coffin SE, Smathers SA, and Zaoutis TE (2009) Trends in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in children's hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 49, 65–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lew DP, and Waldvogel FA (1997) Osteomyelitis. N Engl J Med 336, 999–1007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Belthur MV, Birchansky SB, Verdugo AA, Mason EO Jr., Hulten KG, Kaplan SL, Smith EO, Phillips WA, and Weinberg J (2012) Pathologic fractures in children with acute Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94, 34–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Cassat JE, Hammer ND, Campbell JP, Benson MA, Perrien DS, Mrak LN, Smeltzer MS, Torres VJ, and Skaar EP (2013) A secreted bacterial protease tailors the Staphylococcus aureus virulence repertoire to modulate bone remodeling during osteomyelitis. Cell Host Microbe 13, 759–772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Calander AM, Jonsson IM, Kanth A, Arvidsson S, Shaw L, Foster SJ, and Tarkowski A (2004) Impact of staphylococcal protease expression on the outcome of infectious arthritis. Microbes Infect. 6, 202–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Bor DH, Woolhandler S, Nardin R, Brusch J, and Himmelstein DU (2013) Infective endocarditis in the U.S., 1998–2009: a nationwide study. PLoS One 8, e60033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Thiene G, and Basso C (2006) Pathology and pathogenesis of infective endocarditis in native heart valves. Cardiovasc Pathol 15, 256–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Fowler VG Jr., Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Rubinstein E, Corey GR, Spelman D, Bradley SF, Barsic B, Pappas PA, Anstrom KJ, Wray D, Fortes CQ, Anguera I, Athan E, Jones P, van der Meer JT, Elliott TS, Levine DP, and Bayer AS (2005) Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 293, 3012–3021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Federspiel JJ, Stearns SC, Peppercorn AF, Chu VH, and Fowler VG Jr. (2012) Increasing US rates of endocarditis with Staphylococcus aureus: 1999–2008. Arch Intern Med 172, 363–365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Crowley AL, Peterson GE, Benjamin DK Jr., Rimmer SH, Todd C, Cabell CH, Reller LB, Ryan T, Corey GR, and Fowler VG Jr. (2008) Venous thrombosis in patients with short- and long-term central venous catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Crit Care Med 36, 385–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Gibson GW, Kreuser SC, Riley JM, Rosebury-Smith WS, Courtney CL, Juneau PL, Hollembaek JM, Zhu T, Huband MD, Brammer DW, Brieland JK, and Sulavik MC (2007) Development of a mouse model of induced Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis. Comp Med 57, 563–569 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Gupta RK, Alba J, Xiong YQ, Bayer AS, and Lee CY (2013) MgrA activates expression of capsule genes, but not the α-toxin gene in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. J. Infect Dis 208, 1841–1848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Sullam PM, Bayer AS, Foss WM, and Cheung AL (1996) Diminished platelet binding in vitro by Staphylococcus aureus is associated with reduced virulence in a rabbit model of infective endocarditis. Infect. Immun 64, 4915–4921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Kim HK, Kim HY, Schneewind O, and Missiakas D (2011) Identifying protective antigens of Staphylococcus aureus, a pathogen that suppresses host immune responses. FASEB J [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Pishchany G, McCoy AL, Torres VJ, Krause JC, Crowe JE Jr., Fabry ME, and Skaar EP (2010) Specificity for human hemoglobin enhances Staphylococcus aureus infection. Cell Host & Microbe 8, 544–550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Otto M (2011) A MRSA-terious enemy among us: end of the PVL controversy? Nature medicine 17, 169–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Serruto D, Rappuoli R, Scarselli M, Gros P, and van Strijp JA (2010) Molecular mechanisms of complement evasion: learning from staphylococci and meningococci. Nature reviews. Microbiology 8, 393–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Bagnoli F, Bertholet S, and Grandi G (2012) Inferring reasons for the failure of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines in clinical trials. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Shinefield H, Black S, Fattom A, Horwith G, Rasgon S, Ordonez J, Yeoh H, Law D, Robbins JB, Schneerson R, Muenz L, Fuller S, Johnson J, Fireman B, Alcorn H, and Naso R (2002) Use of a Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med 346, 491–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]