The Enterococcus Cassette Chromosome, a Genomic Variation Enabler in Enterococci

A Sivertsen; J Janice; T Pedersen; T M Wagner; J Hegstad; K Hegstad

doi:10.1128/mSphere.00402-18

. 2018 Nov 7;3(6):e00402-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00402-18

The Enterococcus Cassette Chromosome, a Genomic Variation Enabler in Enterococci

A Sivertsen ^a,^b,^*, J Janice ^a,^b, T Pedersen ^b, T M Wagner ^a, J Hegstad ^c, K Hegstad ^a,^b,^✉

Editor: Craig D Ellermeier^d

PMCID: PMC6222049 PMID: 30404935

Enterococcus faecium is a bacterium found in a great variety of environments, ranging from the clinic as a nosocomial pathogen to natural habitats such as mammalian intestines, water, and soil. They are known to exchange genetic material through horizontal gene transfer and recombination, leading to great variability of accessory genes and aiding environmental adaptation. Identifying mobile genetic elements causing sequence variation is important to understand how genetic content variation occurs. Here, a novel genetic island, the enterococcus cassette chromosome, is shown to contain a wealth of genes, which may aid E. faecium in adapting to new environments. The transmission mechanism involves the only two conserved genes within ECC, ccrAB_Ent, large serine recombinases that insert ECC into the host genome similarly to SCC elements found in staphylococci.

KEYWORDS: Enterococcus faecium, enterococci, mobile genetic element, serine recombinase, ccrAB_Ent, SCCmec

ABSTRACT

Enterococcus faecium has a highly variable genome prone to recombination and horizontal gene transfer. Here, we have identified a novel genetic island with an insertion locus and mobilization genes similar to those of staphylococcus cassette chromosome elements SCCmec. This novel element termed the enterococcus cassette chromosome (ECC) element was located in the 3′ region of rlmH and encoded large serine recombinases ccrAB similar to SCCmec. Horizontal transfer of an ECC element termed ECC::cat containing a knock-in cat chloramphenicol resistance determinant occurred in the presence of a conjugative rep_pLG1 plasmid. We determined the ECC::cat insertion site in the 3′ region of rlmH in the E. faecium recipient by long-read sequencing. ECC::cat also mobilized by homologous recombination through sequence identity between flanking insertion sequence (IS) elements in ECC::cat and the conjugative plasmid. The ccrAB_Ent genes were found in 69 of 516 E. faecium genomes in GenBank. Full-length ECC elements were retrieved from 32 of these genomes. ECCs were flanked by attR and attL sites of approximately 50 bp. The attECC sequences were found by PCR and sequencing of circularized ECCs in three strains. The genes in ECCs contained an amalgam of common and rare E. faecium genes. Taken together, our data imply that ECC elements act as hot spots for genetic exchange and contribute to the large variation of accessory genes found in E. faecium.

IMPORTANCE Enterococcus faecium is a bacterium found in a great variety of environments, ranging from the clinic as a nosocomial pathogen to natural habitats such as mammalian intestines, water, and soil. They are known to exchange genetic material through horizontal gene transfer and recombination, leading to great variability of accessory genes and aiding environmental adaptation. Identifying mobile genetic elements causing sequence variation is important to understand how genetic content variation occurs. Here, a novel genetic island, the enterococcus cassette chromosome, is shown to contain a wealth of genes, which may aid E. faecium in adapting to new environments. The transmission mechanism involves the only two conserved genes within ECC, ccrAB_Ent, large serine recombinases that insert ECC into the host genome similarly to SCC elements found in staphylococci.

INTRODUCTION

Enterococci are a public health concern as a common cause of hospital-associated infections and a burden to patient morbidity and mortality. They have acquired antimicrobial resistance mechanisms toward many currently available antibiotics through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) (1 –4). They are also able to survive a broad range of environments and environmental stressors to which other bacteria succumb (5, 6). Enterococci contain a broad diversity of large integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) and nonconjugative genomic islands (GIs) believed to contribute to their genomic diversity (7).

The staphylococcus cassette chromosome element SCCmec is a GI in Staphylococcus aureus harboring the mecA gene providing resistance toward beta-lactams (8). Movement of SCCmec occurs by the serine recombinases CcrA and CcrB that recognize a specific attachment site (attB) in the 3′ region of rlmH, a conserved tRNA methyltransferase gene in S. aureus (9, 10), and a corresponding attachment site (attSCC) on the circularized SCCmec intermediate. CcrAB use these sites to integrate SCCmec, after which attL (5′) and attR (3′) sites are generated as excision sites on either end of the element (9, 11, 12). SCCmec elements show a large degree of diversity in the gene content in both S. aureus (13) and in other species within the Staphylococcus genus (14 –16). HGT of SCCmec between staphylococci has been observed during antimicrobial therapy (17), in the lab using bacteriophages as transfer vehicles (18, 19), and by conjugation after SCCmec integration by homologous recombination of IS elements into a staphylococcal conjugative plasmid in vitro (20).

Orthologues to the S. aureus ccrAB genes have been found by screening a collection of several species of the Enterococcus genus (21). These ccrAB_Ent genes were expressed as a bicistronic mRNA (21) in reference strain Enterococcus faecium DO (22).

Here, we demonstrate the mobility of the novel genetic island enterococcus cassette chromosome (ECC) in E. faecium. ECC shares insertion site and movement by large serine recombinases with SCCmec. ECCs are present in 9% of available E. faecium genomes in the NCBI database, and their gene content is highly variable. We postulate that ECCs act as gene traffickers between the enterococcal chromosomes.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

ECC::cat was successfully transferred between strains by the help of a conjugative rep_pLG1 megaplasmid.

UWECC::cat is a clinical plasmid-cured E. faecium strain with a knocked-in selectable marker, the chloramphenicol resistance-encoding gene cat immediately downstream of ccrAB_Ent. Filter mating experiments using strain UWECC::cat without a helper plasmid failed to produce transconjugants with ECC::cat within the detection limits (10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻⁹ transconjugants/donor cell). To mobilize ECC::cat into recipient strain BM4105-RF, a conjugation apparatus was provided by filter mating a 298-kb rep_pLG1 megaplasmid into UWECC::cat via BM4105-RF from clinical isolate K60-19 (Table 1; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (23). The rep_pLG1 megaplasmid contains a type IV secretion system (T4SS), an aac(6’)Ie-aph(2”)Ia gentamicin resistance selection determinant, and belongs to the RepA_N family which previously has been shown to mobilize large chromosomal stretches of DNA in E. faecium (24, 25). Transconjugants occurred at frequencies of 3 × 10⁻⁷ per donor in UWECC::cat rep_pLG1 × BM4105-RF filter mating experiments.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial experimental strains and plasmids

Species and strain	Plasmid	Relevant resistance characteristic(s) [gene(s)]^a	Relevant description	Type of sequence data	Reference	GenBank accession no.
E. faecium strains
UW1551			ECC-containing clinical isolate		52
UWΔp			UW1551 cured of most plasmids		This study
UWECC::cat		Chl^r [cat]	Plasmid-cured UW1551 with cat resistance marker inserted in ORF1 next to ccrAB_Ent		This study
K60-19	rep_pLG1	Gen^r [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2'')Ia]	Clinical rep_pLG1 plasmid donor with many other plasmids		23
BM4105-RF rep_pLG1	rep_pLG1	Rif^r, Fus^r, Gen^r [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2'')Ia]	rep_pLG1 plasmid donor containing only this plasmid		This study
UWECC::cat rep_pLG1	rep_pLG1	Chl^r [cat], Gen^r [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2'')Ia]	Donor UWECC::cat with rep_pLG1	PacBio	This study	NMZL01000001.1, NMZL01000002.1, NMZL01000003.1
BM4105-RF		Rif^r, Fus^r	Recipient	Nanopore and Illumina combined	54	CP030110.1
BMECC::cat	rep_pLG1	Chl^r [cat], Rif^r, Fus^r, Gen^r [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2'')Ia]	Transconjugant containing ECC::cat on BM4105-RF chromosome	PacBio	This study	NMZK01000001.1, NMZK01000002.1
BM pECC::cat	rep_pLG1ECC::cat	Chl^r [cat), Rif^r, Fus^r, Gen^r [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2'')Ia]	Transconjugant containing ECC::cat on plasmid	PacBio	This study	NMZJ01000001.1, NMZJ01000002.1

E. coli strains
pTEX5500ts		Chl^r [cat], Gen^r [aph(2'')-Id]	Shuttle plasmid, temperature sensitive in Gram-positive host		53
pORF1a		Chl^r [cat], Gen^r [aph(2'')-Id]	pTEX5500ts with cloned ORF1 fragment upstream of the cat gene		This study
pORF1b		Chl^r [cat], Gen^r [aph(2'')-Id]	pTEX5500ts with cloned ORF1 fragments flanking the cat gene		This study

Open in a new tab

The r superscript indicates resistance. Drugs are abbreviated as follows: Chl, chloramphenicol; Gen, gentamicin; Rif, rifampin; Fus, fusidic acid.

FIG S1

Filter mating scheme showing the transfer of mobile genetic elements from donors to recipients. A rep_pLG1 plasmid (gray ring) was transferred from clinical isolate K60-19 (green) into BM4105-RF (orange, top). This plasmid was then transferred into UWECC::cat (blue) and back again into BM4105-RF with the hitchhiking ECC::cat (black curled line). BM4105-RF transconjugants (orange, bottom) containing ECC::cat in the chromosome (right) or on the plasmid with rep_pLG1 (left). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB^{(762.7KB, pdf)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We also obtained horizontal transfer of ECC::cat by the aid of five other rep_pLG1 megaplasmids from clinical E. faecium strains (results not shown), confirming that they are vehicles for mobilization of genetic elements in E. faecium.

ECC::cat was inserted into the recipient chromosome in an SCCmec-like fashion.

E. faecium UWECC::cat, recipient BM4105-RF, and two transconjugants were long read sequenced to resolve genomic structures and identify insertion sites of ECC::cat. A 32-kb ECC element was inserted chromosomally downstream of rlmH in the transconjugants BMECC::cat, flanked by direct repeat regions representing att sites (Fig. 1 and Table S1). BM4105-RF contains an ECC remnant, as an attL site is contained within rlmH and an attR site could be identified downstream. Three genes near the attR site had been lost in the transconjugant compared to recipient BM4105-RF (Fig. 1). The likely explanation for the organization of the ECC::cat chromosomal region in transconjugant BMECC::cat is excision and loss of the recipient’s ECC remnant and subsequent replacement with ECC::cat.

FIG 1 — Pairwise alignment showing the genetic organization of chromosomal integration of ECC::*cat*. The insertion region in recipient BM4105-RF (top) is aligned with its transconjugant BMECC::*cat* (middle) after horizontal transfer from UWECC::*cat* (bottom). The *ccrAB_Ent* genes and *cat* knock-in location are highlighted in UWECC::*cat*. Green and orange triangles show the locations of *attL* and *attR* sites, respectively. The *rlmH* gene is drawn in red. Ten-kilobase direct repeats in UWECC::*cat* are highlighted in yellow, and the ISEfm1 element is highlighted in purple.

TABLE S1

Metadata of strains and ECCs in E. faecium genomes. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB^{(19.7KB, xlsx)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The identified direct repeats of approximately 50 nucleotides flanking ECC::cat showed similarity to direct repeats found in SCCmec-containing S. aureus N315 (Fig. 2), and thus represent att sites compatible with ccrAB_Ent-mediated specific excision and insertion. The repeats contained a conserved central motif (5′-TATCATAA-3′) identical to SCCmec att sites.

FIG 2 — ECC movement and MEME motifs of *att* site sequences in ECC elements. (A) Schematic view of the circular intermediate of ECC and ECC integrated into the chromosome. The colors of *att* site halves in the figure and between MEME motifs and SCCmec sequences are identical. The locations of circularization PCR primers are shown with green arrows. (B) MEME motifs of enterococcal putative ECC *attL* and *attR* sites (colored letters) and *att* sites from *S. aureus* N315 (black letters), with central *ccrAB* recognition motifs underlined. Imperfect inverted repeats in *att* sites are shown by red arrows. The numbers of sequences used to create the MEME motifs are shown on the left of the sequences.

Excision of ECC.

ECC is expected to circularize during excision, as is observed in SCCmec. Circularization PCRs of ECC::cat and ECC elements from E. faecium DO and K59-68 (Fig. 2, primers in green arrows) were Sanger sequenced, showing circularization of ECC in these strains (attECC sequences in Table S1). The consensus sequences in Fig. 2 show how the attECC and attR sites contain inverted repeats (red arrows), creating a dyad symmetry characteristic of serine recombinase att sites (26).

ECC elements in enterococcal genomes.

In order to evaluate the presence of ECCs in enterococci, 1,478 enterococcal genomes downloaded from NCBI, including three PacBio-sequenced strains in our own collection (UWECC::cat, K59-68, and 9-F-6) were analyzed by BLASTn searches for ccrAB_Ent. The ccrAB_Ent genes spread sporadically throughout the Enterococcus genus, as BLAST hits were found in E. faecium, E. faecalis, E. durans, E. hirae, and E. mundtii in addition to five enterococci without species designations (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Number of enterococcal genomes analyzed and positive for ccrAB_Ent

Species	No. of genomes analyzed	No. of genomes positive for ccrAB_Ent
E. faecium	516	69
E. faecalis	677	4
E. durans	10	4
E. hirae	34	8
E. mundtii	20	1
Enterococcus sp.	221	5

Total	1,478	91

Open in a new tab

We decided to analyze elements in E. faecium, as they contained the most ccrAB_Ent-positive strains (Fig. 3A, Table 2, and Table S1). It was of interest to see whether ECC was enriched in specific lineages or environments. As determined by the E. faecium whole-genome sequence (WGS) phylogeny and metadata (shown for complete ECCs in Fig. S2 and Table S1), the ccrAB_Ent-containing isolates are found in both commensal and nosocomial lineages and originate from both clinical, farm animal, and commensal sampling sites without apparent preference.

FIG S2

Gene synteny and metadata among ECC elements in E. faecium and one E. durans sorted according to ccrAB_Ent phylogeny. To the left is a RAxML maximum likelihood tree of the ccrAB_Ent genes aligned with Mafft, with 100 bootstraps. Isolates are colored by species or clade as follows: E. durans (black), E. faecium commensal clade (blue), and E. faecium clinical/farm animal clade (red). In the middle, metadata are shown as apparent from the Patric database (white indicates no available information). To the right is a Mauve alignment of ECC elements with conserved regions marked with individual local collinear block colors. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 2.3 MB^{(2.4MB, pdf)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Complete ECC elements were identified by two criteria: ccrAB_Ent located downstream of rlmH and the presence of identifiable attL and attR sites. The ccrAB_Ent genes were often located on small contigs and/or near contig ends in many short-read-based assemblies thus impairing analysis of the up- and downstream regions. Thirty-two complete or scaffolded ECC elements with ccrAB_Ent and both attL and attR could be identified in E. faecium.

ECC putative attL and attR sites are conserved 50-bp sequences.

To evaluate att site conservation among ECC elements, we searched for att sites in ECC-containing strains with BLASTn-short (Table S1) and concatenated all identified att site regions into MEME motifs (Fig. 2B). The putative attL and attR sites consist of 50-bp direct repeats, containing inverted repeats in attR and in attECC after ECC excision/circularization (Fig. 2B, red arrows). The att sites from S. aureus strain N315 (12) were included for comparison. A conserved (5′-TATCATAA-3′) motif in SCCmec is conserved in ECC att sites and is also partly present on the complementary strand (5′-ATGATA-3′) within the inverted repeat in attR and attECC (Fig. 2). According to Wang et al. (12), the only essential nucleotide capable of completely abrogating SCCmec CcrAB function if substituted is the C surrounded by the TAT/ATA palindrome (5′-TATCATAA-3′). This nucleotide was conserved in all ECC attL and attR sequences.

To investigate the number of att sites present in each genome, att sites were queries in BLASTn-short analyses. This consistently resulted in less than five hits per genome and att sites most often located near ccrAB_Ent in circularized genomes. Multiple attR sites could be found in 16 of 32 ECCs (Table S1), as has also been observed in S. aureus strains containing complex SCC elements, see Wang et al. (12) and references therein. One isolate (GCA_000321805/EnGen0001) had ECC on two contigs, of which one spanned both att sites. However, tandem ECCs with multiple ccrAB_Ent genes were not observed directly.

ECCs are highly variable in gene content.

After identifying 32 ECC elements in enterococci, the basal features of size and content were analyzed. The sizes of the ECCs varied from 21 kb to 78 kb (Table S1), with an average of 42 kb. There were on average 42 ORFs in each ECC, and the largest contained 92 ORFs.

A Roary pan-genome analysis was done to evaluate the gene content of ECCs and identified 283 gene clusters. Most genes were present in one ECC or in a few ECCs (Fig. 3A and Table S2). This is also reflected in the core/pan-genome plot (Fig. 3B), which shows a limited number of shared genes (ccrA, ccrB, and insertion gene rlmH).

TABLE S2

Genes found as part of ECCs in E. faecium. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.1 MB^{(77.1KB, xlsx)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We hypothesized that the most abundant genes in ECCs were specific to this element and would not be present in strains without ECC. A BLAST database of representative genes clustered in ECC as determined by Roary was created and used as the basis to search for ECC genes among the 516 E. faecium genomes investigated. Interestingly, many of the ECC genes are common in E. faecium genomes, but not necessarily as part of ECCs (Fig. 3C).

The ECC insertion locus rlmH resides in >99% of the enterococcal strains and therefore could serve as an entry point for ECCs in most enterococci. The analyses showed two alleles of this gene with less than 75% DNA identity. Both rlmH1 and rlmH2 contained the attL site. The locations of the 283 ECC genes within circularized genomes (n = 26) were plotted to investigate the locations of these genes in E. faecium genomes relative to rlmH. These genes were found located throughout the whole genome in strains both with and without ECC elements (Fig. S3). This finding either supports that gene synteny conservation in E. faecium is limited or that ECCs may acquire gene cargo with limited conservation with regard to the position in the chromosome. Often, ECC-associated genes are enriched in the vicinity of rlmH, possibly representing ECC remnants or showing that ECCs are prone to engulf neighboring DNA. IS elements and transposases are found in abundance within ECCs and are likely carriers of genetic cargo entering ECCs by composite transposition or by representing homologous recombination sites between IS elements in ECCs and other genomic regions.

FIG S3

Locations of ECC genes in E. faecium genomes. All genes found in ECCs except genes annotated to encode transposon units (indicated with gray letters in Data Set S2) were plotted according to genomic position in closed E. faecium genomes found in the NCBI databases. Genes clustered around positions 250000 to 300000, as indicated by the blue lines. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB^{(289.1KB, pdf)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ECC gene content may vary by ecological background.

The gene synteny of the 32 ECCs was assessed via a Mauve alignment. Fifty-four percent of the ECC genes were unique to only one ECC (Fig. 3C and Table S2) and tended to be connected within particular local colinear blocks (LCBs) (Fig. S2), thus representing independent genetic acquisitions. Strain habitat and phylogenetic proximity influence LCB content, as there is more variability between phylogenetic clades than within the clades, and ECCs in isolates from similar origins share more LCBs (Fig. S2). These observations indicate that ECC elements have a role in enterococci similar to that of SCCmec in staphylococci where the surrounding regions have been described as sequence variation “hot spots” (13, 27).

Notable functions of genes enriched in ECC elements.

Mir-Sanchis et al. (28) characterized conserved hypothetical genes in SCCmec, containing domains with unknown functions DUF 927, DUF 950, DUF 960, and DUF 1643. Among these, DUF 960 (n = 30) and DUF 927 (n = 20) were found in ECCs (Table S2) including ECC::cat, which supports the idea that these ORFs may encode central unknown functions in both SCCmec and ECC. DUF 927 is predicted to encode a helicase, which implies autonomous replication of SCCmec in its circular state.

Genes associated with carbohydrate transport and metabolism were enriched among ECC genes and largely consisted of phosphotransferase systems (PTS) (Table S2). PTS genes associated with increased virulence such as ptsD encoding the PTS IID subunit which has been implicated in improved intestinal colonization during antimicrobial treatment (29) or the bepA gene encoding PTS permease implicated in endocarditis and biofilm formation (30) were not found.

Of interest, many ECC elements contained defense system-related genes (Table S2). Mostly, they were identified as hsdR, hsdS, and hsdM genes, which when all are present, encode a functional EcoKI type I restriction/modification (R/M) system. EcoKI has been observed in staphylococcal SCC elements and is thought to contribute to SCC persistence in its host (16, 31). Another R/M system (SfaNI) has previously been associated with ccrAB_Ent in the single ccrAB_Ent-positive E. faecalis strain (32), which further suggests that R/M systems are associated with cassette chromosome elements. Incomplete type I R/M systems (n = 13) occur more often than complete ones (n = 8) in ECC elements, which is surprising given that orphan methylases from type I R/M systems are rarely found (33) and should be inactive without hsdS (34).

One ECC harbors the tetracycline resistance gene tetM (Table S2) as part of a Tn916-like ICE. The reason why we do not see more of this resistance gene in other ECC elements may be that tetM is already present on a Tn916-like element which successfully transfers itself and inserts into random genomic sites with little sequence homology (35).

Alternative mobilization by integration of ECC into the conjugative plasmid.

Species in which HGT frequently occur demonstrate “Russian doll”-like dissemination patterns of MGEs, permitting multiple pathways of movement within the cell as well as by HGT (36). Horizontal movement of large segments of chromosomal DNA has previously been shown in enterococci through conjugative plasmid cointegration of chromosomal DNA and subsequent integration into the recipient chromosome by recombination along homologous regions (24, 37).

Strain UWECC::cat contained a novel IS982-family ISEfm1-like element (purple in Fig. 4) within two 10-kb repeats (yellow) up- and downstream of the central region containing ccrAB_Ent. This ISEfm1-like element has a size of 2427 bp. As seen in Fig. 4, the region transferred from UWECC::cat into the plasmid was bounded exactly by the two ISEfm1-like copies. Likely, plasmid integration was enabled by homologous recombination between ISEfm1-like elements. This hybrid plasmid was then transferred from strain UWECC::cat to BM4105-RF, resulting in BMpECC::cat, which contains an altered ECC::cat lacking attL.

In one closed chromosome (6E6/GCA_001518735), ccrAB_Ent was present but was not located downstream of rlmH. Two attR sites were found downstream of the ccrAB_Ent genes, but no attL site was found upstream. There are several IS elements up- and downstream of this ccrAB_Ent, which could have contributed to alternative mobility.

The ECC of strain 9-F-6 harbors parts of Tn6085 (38), a Tn916-like ICE, which may allow cotransfer of ECC with Tn916. Cotransfer of GIs by Tn916 has previously been seen for the small GI MTnSag1 in Streptococcus agalactiae (39).

Mobilization of GIs by plasmids and ICEs has previously been shown (40, 41) and is dependent on compatibility between the hitchhiking GI and the conjugative element. Mobilizable GIs either encode a relaxase that is compatible with a type 4 coupling protein (T4CP) of a T4SS expressed by another conjugative MGE, or the T4SS may have a relaxase recognizing an oriT within the mobilizable GI to enable hitchhiking. Some relaxases show a less strict requirement for the base sequences within oriT sequences and can initiate transfer from a variety of sites (42, 43). The most likely ECC transfer mechanism is recognition of an oriT within the circular ECC by the rep_pLG1 replication and conjugation apparatus.

Alternatively, ECC::cat encodes its own relaxase able to interact with the T4CP of the rep_pLG1 T4SS apparatus. A gene determinant thought to engage in rolling-circle replication (rep) was detected in six of 32 investigated ECC elements, including isolate DO and isolate UWECC::cat used in the mobilization experiments. This is the same putative replication gene others have associated with ccrAB_Ent (21, 28).

Conclusions.

For the first time, SCCmec-like elements have been identified in Enterococcus. The novel element was named enterococcus cassette chromosome (ECC) and shared characteristics like the insertion site downstream of rlmH, att site sequences, and variable gene content with SCCmec. We also show mobilization with the help of a conjugative rep_pLG1 megaplasmid.

Cassette chromosome elements had previously been found only in the Staphylococcus genus. The existence of a similar element in Enterococcus suggests that cassette chromosome elements are more abundant than previously thought. Several resistance genes (toward methicillin, kanamycin, tobramycin, bleomycin, penicillins, heavy metals, tetracycline, macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin) have been found in SCCmec (44, 45), but only one ECC harbored a tetracycline resistance gene. Introduction of other clinically important resistance genes in the ECC element such as mecA in SCCmec may result in more spread and stability of this type of element due to antimicrobial selection.

The ECC gene content variability parallel results of Farrugia et al. (46) who found a family of GIs in Proteobacteria which were characterized by site-specific insertion in tRNA-dihydrouridine synthase A (dusA) by dusA-associated integrases (DAIs). The only universal features of these GIs were presence of DAIs and a consensus insertion sequence within the dusA gene, while the accessory genes within the GI varied extensively.

On the basis of the genetic contents in the studied ECC elements, we propose that they act as vehicles for exchange of genes in E. faecium. In SCCmec typing systems, accessory genes are located in the originally termed “junkyard” or “joining” “regions” (47). Little is known about the accessory genes in SCCmec and what effect they confer to their hosts in various environments. Accessory genes in general often seem to encode functions associated with peripheral functions thought to aid survival of bacterial populations in changing environments (48, 49).

Several others have indicated that genomic islands perform an adaptive evolutionary role for their hosts (50 –52). Introduction into new ecological niches may be aided by gene acquisition and loss within these genomic sites. Understanding the underlying dynamics of such events is crucial to understand the evolution of their respective hosts, as well as the stability and dissemination of the individual GI itself.

The enterococci have already been shown to contain a vast array of mobile genetic elements. Here we add another layer of complexity to the E. faecium pan-genome through the discovery of an element with a variable gene content. Future endeavors connecting the genes of the mobilome by how they travel between MGEs such as ECC could shine light on the genetic connectivity of a highly recombinogenic species such as E. faecium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth or agar and E. faecium in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth or agar at 37°C unless specified otherwise.

The German clinical E. faecium ST17 UW1551 (53) was first partially plasmid cured by growth in novobiocin at 45°C overnight. After curing, the strain designated UWΔp showed a different plasmid profile (results not shown) visualized by gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA isolated by alkaline lysis (54) and had lost resistance to vancomycin, gentamicin, and tetracycline. A chloramphenicol resistance-encoding gene (cat) was then inserted by a double crossover into an ORF encoding a hypothetical protein immediately downstream of ccrAB_Ent using pTEX5501ts (55), resulting in strain UWECC::cat. The rep_pLG1 helper plasmid originating from the clinical E. faecium isolate K60-19 was first mated into isolate BM4105-RF (56) and from there into UWECC::cat.

Introduction of chloramphenicol resistance gene downstream of ccrAB_Ent.

The gene replacement protocol described by Nallapareddy et al. (55) with minor modifications was used to insert a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene into the open reading frame (ORF1) downstream of ccrAB_Ent. In brief, an 822-bp-long upstream region of ORF1 designated ORF1UpDel was amplified from genomic DNA from strain UWΔp by using the ORF1UpDel primers with restriction sites NheI and HindIII, respectively (Table S3). The PCR product was digested with NheI and HindIII and ligated to similarly digested pTEX5500ts, resulting in pORF1a. Subsequently, an 842-bp-long downstream region of ORF1 designated ORF1DnDel, was amplified using primers ORF1DnDel including restriction sites for PstI and PvuI, respectively. This PCR product was digested with PstI and PvuI and ligated to similarly digested pORF1a, resulting in pORF1b, which is pTEX5500ts with cloned ORF1 fragments flanking the cat gene. pORF1a and pORF1b were transferred into E. coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen) for propagation and plasmid purification. pORF1b was introduced into strain UWΔp by electroporation to generate an insertion of cat into ORF1. Correct insertion of cat in ORF1 was checked by PCRs using primers for amplification of single and double crossovers (Table S3), by SmaI PFGE, Southern hybridization with ccrB_Ent and Cm (cat) probes using protocols described by Sivertsen et al. (57), and DNA sequencing.

TABLE S3

Primers used in this study. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.05 MB^{(52.5KB, pdf)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Genomic DNA from E. faecium was purified using the Qiagen genomic DNA kit (Qiagen). PCRs were performed with a Gene Amp PCR system 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) using Pfu turbo polymerase (Promega). PCR products were purified using EZNA Cycle pure kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc.). Plasmid DNA from E. coli was purified using the EZNA plasmid minikit I (Omega Bio-Tek Inc.) or Qiagen plasmid maxikit (Qiagen). Constructs were transformed into E. faecium by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad) by the method of Nallapareddy et al. (55).

Filter mating and verification of transconjugants.

The filter mating protocol from Sivertsen et al. (57) was used with the following antibiotics and concentrations: chloramphenicol (Chl), 30 mg/liter; gentamicin (Gen), 300 mg/liter; rifampin (Rif), 20 mg/liter; fusidic acid (Fus), 10 mg/liter. For schematic presentation of experiments and which elements were transferred, see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. All experiments were done using BHI agar. The presence of ccrAB_Ent in strains was determined by primers FB and RB from Bjørkeng et al. detecting ccrB (21). The presence of the rep_pLG1 plasmid was determined by primers aac(6’)Ie-aph(2”)Ia F and R detecting the HLGR determinant (54). PCRs specific to strains UWECC::cat and BM4105-RF were designed by identifying genes unique to each genome through Roary (58) comparisons. Primers are listed in Table S3. Transconjugants were further verified and characterized by the use of SmaI and S1 nuclease PFGEs, Southern hybridizations with Dig-labeled ccrB_Ent and aac(6’)Ie-aph(2”)Ia probes.

Genome sequencing.

Experimental isolates were cultured on blood agar overnight and a single colony was transferred to BHI broth and grown overnight. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the Promega Wizard genomic DNA purification kit with the addition of 30 U mutanolysin in the lysis step. gDNA was sent to the Norwegian Sequencing Centre (NSC) (University of Oslo) where the 20-kb library preparation protocol and 6-kb cutoff BluePippin (Sage Sciences) size selection were done and sequenced with the Pacific Biosciences RSII sequencer using P6-C4 chemistry, 360-min movie time, and one SMRT cell per sample. Illumina sequencing was performed at the Genomics Support Center Tromsø, with Nextera 500 Illumina technology. For Oxford Nanopore sequencing, gDNA was purified using the Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol for Gram-positive bacterial samples, with 50 U mutanolysin added to the lysis mixture. The library was prepared using the rapid barcoding kit (SQK-RBK001) and sequenced on an R9.4 flow cell (FLO-MIN106), both supplied by Oxford Nanopore Technologies.

Bioinformatic analyses.

Reads from Pac-Bio sequencing were assembled and polished at NSC using the HGAP v3 (Pacific Biosciences, SMRT Analysis Software v2.3.0) software (59). Unitigs were circularized by Minimus2 from the AMOS package (60), and dnaA (chromosome) or repA (plasmid) genes were set at the first nucleotide positions of unitigs using the circlator software (61), as well as closed with PCRs (data not shown). BM4105-RF Illumina and Nanopore data were combined in Unicycler v0.4.4 (62) and polished with Pilon v1.22 (63) after initial nanopore base calling with albacore v2.1.7, standard trimming by porechop v0.2.3 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop), removal of reads of <2 kb, downsampling to 1 gb, and Illumina data adaptor trimming and quality trimming (Q > 28) with Trim Galore! (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/). Nanopore reads were then mapped to the circularized genome using minimap2 (64) and processed by samtools (65) to confirm uniform coverage.

All E. faecium and E. faecalis genome assemblies available as of June 2016 and other enterococcal genomes available as of May 2018 (n = 1,478) were downloaded from NCBI. Searches for ccrAB_Ent (UniProt accession nos. Q3Y3B0 and Q3Y3B1) were done with BLASTn and BLASTp. Perfect and imperfect repeats were identified using the NUCmer (v3.1) software (66) with a window size of 20 nt. Searches for att sites in enterococcal sequences was done with BLASTn-short. Pairwise alignment figures were created with EasyFig v.2.2.2. All ECC elements and novel genome sequences were annotated using prokka v1.11 (67) and further manual curation with BLASTp results. Transfer of ccrAB_Ent-containing elements and surrounding regions were manually inspected in Artemis and Artemis Comparison Tool (68). ProgressiveMauve (69) from Mauve v.2.3.1 with standard settings was used to find common local colinear blocks and produce an alignment figure of ccrAB_Ent elements. Gene clustering of ccrAB_Ent elements were done with Roary (58) using standard settings. Phylogeny of E. faecium was produced by constructing a whole-genome alignment using Parsnp v.2.1.8 (70). Consensus motifs for att sites were produced at the MEME webpage (71). Functional annotation of ECC genes was done using the eggNOG mapper (72) and eggNOG database (73). To find ECC genes in E. faecium genomes, a representative gene of each gene cluster as determined by Roary v.3.6.8 was included in a custom nucleotide BLAST database in ABRicate (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate). ECC genes were found in E. faecium genomes with inclusion criteria defined as >75% DNA identity to include functionally equivalent genes and >95% coverage to exclude smaller genes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Eirik Wasmuth Lundblad for construction of the chloramphenicol insertion mutant, Girum Tadesse Tessema for plasmid curing of UW1551, and Kristina Borch-Pedersen, Tracy Munthali Lunde, Bettina Aasnæs, and Ellen H. Josefsen for their excellent technical assistance. Furthermore, we thank Ave Tooming Klunderud at the Norwegian Sequencing Centre for Pac-Bio sequence library preparation, sequencing, assembly, and assembly polishing.

Access to the computational resources at Stallo (UiT) was supported by Notur project NN9415K.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The publication charges for this article have been funded by a grant from the publication fund of UiT-The Arctic University of Norway.

REFERENCES

1.Arias C, Murray BE. 2012. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:266–278. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team and Participating NHSN Facilities. 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. doi: 10.1086/668770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). 2013. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2013. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
4.Miller WR, Murray BE, Rice LB, Arias CA. 2016. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic challenges in the 21st century. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:415–439. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Lebreton F, Willems RJL, Gilmore MS. 2014. Enterococcus diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization, p 5–64. In Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Lebreton F, Manson AL, Saavedra JT, Straub TJ, Earl AM, Gilmore MS. 2017. Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 169:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Duerkop BA, Palmer KL, Horsburgh MJ. 2014. Enterococcal bacteriophages and genome defense, p 421–464. In Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Shore AC, Coleman DC. 2013. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec: recent advances and new insights. Int J Med Microbiol 303:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Boundy S, Safo MK, Wang L, Musayev FN, O’Farrell HC, Rife JP, Archer GL. 2013. Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus rRNA methyltransferase encoded by orfX, the gene containing the staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) insertion site. J Biol Chem 288:132–140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.385138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Noto MJ, Kreiswirth BN, Monk AB, Archer GL. 2008. Gene acquisition at the insertion site for SCCmec, the genomic island conferring methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 190:1276–1283. doi: 10.1128/JB.01128-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Misiura A, Pigli YZ, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS, Boocock MR, Rice PA. 2013. Roles of two large serine recombinases in mobilizing the methicillin-resistance cassette SCCmec. Mol Microbiol 88:1218–1229. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Wang L, Safo M, Archer GL. 2012. Characterization of DNA sequences required for the CcrAB-mediated integration of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, a Staphylococcus aureus genomic island. J Bacteriol 194:486–498. doi: 10.1128/JB.05047-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Hill-Cawthorne GA, Hudson LO, El Ghany MFA, Piepenburg O, Nair M, Dodgson A, Forrest MS, Clark TG, Pain A. 2014. Recombinations in staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements compromise the molecular detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 9:e101419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Hanssen A-M, Ericson Sollid JU. 2006. SCCmec in staphylococci: genes on the move. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 46:8–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2005.00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MTG, Ba X, Rolo J, Morgan FJE, Pichon B, Kearns A, Zadoks RN, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Holmes MA. 2014. A novel hybrid SCCmec-mecC region in Staphylococcus sciuri. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:911–918. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Semmler T, Harrison EM, Lübke-Becker A, Ulrich RG, Wieler LH, Guenther S, Stamm I, Hanssen A-M, Holmes MA, Vincze S, Walther B. 2016. A look into the melting pot: the mecC-harboring region is a recombination hot spot in Staphylococcus stepanovicii. PLoS One 11:e0147150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Bloemendaal ALA, Brouwer EC, Fluit AC. 2010. Methicillin resistance transfer from Staphylococcus epidermidis to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a patient during antibiotic therapy. PLoS One 5:e11841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Mašlaňová I, Doškař J, Varga M, Kuntová L, Mužík J, Malúšková D, Růžičková V, Pantůček R. 2013. Bacteriophages of Staphylococcus aureus efficiently package various bacterial genes and mobile genetic elements including SCCmec with different frequencies. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Scharn CR, Tenover FC, Goering RV. 2013. Transduction of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements between strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5233–5238. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01058-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Ray MD, Boundy S, Archer GL. 2016. Transfer of the methicillin resistance genomic island among staphylococci by conjugation. Mol Microbiol 100:675–685. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Bjørkeng EK, Tessema GT, Lundblad EW, Butaye P, Willems R, Sollid JE, Sundsfjord A, Hegstad K. 2010. ccrABEnt serine recombinase genes are widely distributed in the Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus species groups and are expressed in E. faecium. Microbiology 156:3624–3634. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.041491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Qin X, Galloway-Peña JR, Sillanpaa J, Roh JH, Nallapareddy SR, Chowdhury S, Bourgogne A, Choudhury T, Muzny DM, Buhay CJ, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha S, Liu W, Kovar C, Sodergren E, Highlander S, Petrosino JF, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus faecium strain TX16 and comparative genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium genomes. BMC Microbiol 12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Rosvoll TCS, Lindstad BL, Lunde TM, Hegstad K, Aasnaes B, Hammerum AM, Lester CH, Simonsen GS, Sundsfjord A, Pedersen T. 2012. Increased high-level gentamicin resistance in invasive Enterococcus faecium is associated with aac(6’)Ie-aph(2’’)Ia-encoding transferable megaplasmids hosted by major hospital-adapted lineages. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 66:166–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.García-Solache M, Lebreton F, McLaughlin RE, Whiteaker JD, Gilmore MS, Rice LB. 2016. Homologous recombination within large chromosomal regions facilitates acquisition of β-lactam and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5777–5786. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00488-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Lanza VF, Tedim AP, Martínez JL, Baquero F, Coque TM. 2015. The plasmidome of Firmicutes: impact on the emergence and the spread of resistance to antimicrobials. Microbiol Spectr 3:PLAS-0039-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.PLAS-0039-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Stark WM. 2014. The serine recombinases. Microbiol Spectr 2:25–32. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0046-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Everitt RG, Didelot X, Batty EM, Miller RR, Knox K, Young BC, Bowden R, Auton A, Votintseva A, Larner-Svensson H, Charlesworth J, Golubchik T, Ip CLC, Godwin H, Fung R, Peto TEA, Walker AS, Crook DW, Wilson DJ. 2014. Mobile elements drive recombination hotspots in the core genome of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun 5:3956. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Mir-Sanchis I, Roman CA, Misiura A, Pigli YZ, Boyle-Vavra S, Rice PA. 2016. Staphylococcal SCCmec elements encode an active MCM-like helicase and thus may be replicative. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:891–898. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Zhang X, Top J, de Been M, Bierschenk D, Rogers M, Leendertse M, Bonten MJM, van der Poll T, Willems RJL, van Schaik W. 2013. Identification of a genetic determinant in clinical Enterococcus faecium strains that contributes to intestinal colonization during antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis 207:1780–1786. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Paganelli FL, Huebner J, Singh KV, Zhang X, van Schaik W, Wobser D, Braat JC, Murray BE, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL, Leavis HL. 2016. Genome-wide screening identifies phosphotransferase system permease BepA to be involved in Enterococcus faecium endocarditis and biofilm formation. J Infect Dis 214:189–195. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Ito T, Ma XX, Takeuchi F, Okuma K, Yuzawa H, Hiramatsu K. 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2637–2651. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2637-2651.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Furmanek-Blaszk B, Sektas M. 2015. The SfaNI restriction-modification system from Enterococcus faecalis NEB215 is located on a putative mobile genetic element. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362:fnv028. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Oliveira PH, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. 2014. The interplay of restriction-modification systems with mobile genetic elements and their prokaryotic hosts. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10618–10631. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Dryden DT, Murray NE, Rao DN. 2001. Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 29:3728–3741. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.18.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Rubio-Cosials A, Schulz EC, Lambertsen L, Smyshlyaev G, Rojas-Cordova C, Forslund K, Karaca E, Bebel A, Bork P, Barabas O. 2018. Transposase-DNA complex structures reveal mechanisms for conjugative transposition of antibiotic resistance. Cell 173:208–220.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Sheppard AE, Stoesser N, Wilson DJ, Sebra R, Kasarskis A, Anson LW, Giess A, Pankhurst LJ, Vaughan A, Grim CJ, Cox HL, Yeh AJ, Modernising Medical Microbiology (MMM) Informatics Group, Sifri CD, Walker AS, Peto TE, Crook DW, Mathers AJ. 2016. Nested Russian doll-like genetic mobility drives rapid dissemination of the carbapenem resistance gene bla_KPC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3767–3778. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Manson JM, Hancock LE, Gilmore MS. 2010. Mechanism of chromosomal transfer of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenicity island, capsule, antimicrobial resistance, and other traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:12269–12274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000139107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Rice LB, Carias LL, Rudin S, Hutton Rla, Marshall S. 2010. Multiple copies of functional, Tet(M)-encoding Tn916-like elements in a clinical Enterococcus faecium isolate. Plasmid 64:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Achard A, Leclercq R. 2007. Characterization of a small mobilizable transposon, MTnSag1, in Streptococcus agalactiae. J Bacteriol 189:4328–4331. doi: 10.1128/JB.00213-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Carraro N, Rivard N, Ceccarelli D, Colwell RR, Burrus V. 2016. IncA/C conjugative plasmids mobilize a new family of multidrug resistance islands in clinical Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 isolates from Haiti. mBio 7:e00509-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00509-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Waldor MK. 2010. Mobilizable genomic islands: going mobile with oriT mimicry. Mol Microbiol 78:537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07365.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Jandle S, Meyer R. 2006. Stringent and relaxed recognition of oriT by related systems for plasmid mobilization: implications for horizontal gene transfer. J Bacteriol 188:499–506. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.2.499-506.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Ramsay JP, Firth N. 2017. Diverse mobilization strategies facilitate transfer of non-conjugative mobile genetic elements. Curr Opin Microbiol 38:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE. 2007. The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:222–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1549–1555. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Farrugia DN, Elbourne LDH, Mabbutt BC, Paulsen IT. 2015. A novel family of integrases associated with prophages and genomic islands integrated within the tRNA-dihydrouridine synthase A (dusA) gene. Nucleic Acids Res 43:4547–4557. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosomal Elements (IWG-SCC). 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4961–4967. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00579-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Smillie CS, Smith MB, Friedman J, Cordero OX, David LA, Alm EJ. 2011. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature 480:241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature10571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP. 2015. Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet 16:472–482. doi: 10.1038/nrg3962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Oliveira PH, Touchon M, Cury J, Rocha EPC. 2017. The chromosomal organization of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. Nat Commun 8:841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00808-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Rocha EPC. 2018. Neutral theory, microbial practice: challenges in bacterial population genetics. Mol Biol Evol 35:1338–1347. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.McInerney JO, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. 2017. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat Microbiol 2:17040. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Dahl KH, Simonsen GS, Olsvik O, Sundsfjord A. 1999. Heterogeneity in the vanB gene cluster of genomically diverse clinical strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1105–1110. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Rosvoll TCS, Pedersen T, Sletvold H, Johnsen PJ, Sollid JE, Simonsen GS, Jensen LB, Nielsen KM, Sundsfjord A. 2010. PCR-based plasmid typing in Enterococcus faecium strains reveals widely distributed pRE25-, pRUM-, pIP501- and pHTbeta-related replicons associated with glycopeptide resistance and stabilizing toxin-antitoxin systems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 58:254–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2006. Construction of improved temperature-sensitive and mobilizable vectors and their use for constructing mutations in the adhesin-encoding acm gene of poorly transformable clinical Enterococcus faecium strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:334–345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.334-345.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P. 1994. Heterogeneric conjugal transfer of the pheromone-responsive plasmid pIP964 (IncHlyI) of Enterococcus faecalis in the apparent absence of pheromone induction. FEMS Microbiol Lett 122:173–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Sivertsen A, Billström H, Melefors Ö, Liljequist BO, Wisell KT, Ullberg M, Özenci V, Sundsfjord A, Hegstad K. 2014. A multicentre hospital outbreak in Sweden caused by introduction of a vanB2 transposon into a stably maintained pRUM-plasmid in an Enterococcus faecium ST192 clone. PLoS One 9:e103274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Treangen TJ, Sommer DD, Angly FE, Koren S, Pop M. 2011. Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 11:Unit 11.8. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1108s33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Li H. 2018. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Carver T, Berriman M, Tivey A, Patel C, Böhme U, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Rajandream M-A. 2008. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics 24:2672–2676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Machanick P, Bailey TL. 2011. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 27:1696–1697. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2017. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol 34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Metadata of strains and ECCs in E. faecium genomes. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB^{(19.7KB, xlsx)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Genes found as part of ECCs in E. faecium. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.1 MB^{(77.1KB, xlsx)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Primers used in this study. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.05 MB^{(52.5KB, pdf)}.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

[B1] 1.Arias C, Murray BE. 2012. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:266–278. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B2] 2.Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team and Participating NHSN Facilities. 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. doi: 10.1086/668770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B3] 3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). 2013. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2013. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden. [Google Scholar]

[B4] 4.Miller WR, Murray BE, Rice LB, Arias CA. 2016. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic challenges in the 21st century. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:415–439. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B5] 5.Lebreton F, Willems RJL, Gilmore MS. 2014. Enterococcus diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization, p 5–64. In Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B6] 6.Lebreton F, Manson AL, Saavedra JT, Straub TJ, Earl AM, Gilmore MS. 2017. Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 169:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B7] 7.Duerkop BA, Palmer KL, Horsburgh MJ. 2014. Enterococcal bacteriophages and genome defense, p 421–464. In Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B8] 8.Shore AC, Coleman DC. 2013. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec: recent advances and new insights. Int J Med Microbiol 303:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B9] 9.Boundy S, Safo MK, Wang L, Musayev FN, O’Farrell HC, Rife JP, Archer GL. 2013. Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus rRNA methyltransferase encoded by orfX, the gene containing the staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) insertion site. J Biol Chem 288:132–140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.385138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B10] 10.Noto MJ, Kreiswirth BN, Monk AB, Archer GL. 2008. Gene acquisition at the insertion site for SCCmec, the genomic island conferring methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 190:1276–1283. doi: 10.1128/JB.01128-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B11] 11.Misiura A, Pigli YZ, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS, Boocock MR, Rice PA. 2013. Roles of two large serine recombinases in mobilizing the methicillin-resistance cassette SCCmec. Mol Microbiol 88:1218–1229. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B12] 12.Wang L, Safo M, Archer GL. 2012. Characterization of DNA sequences required for the CcrAB-mediated integration of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, a Staphylococcus aureus genomic island. J Bacteriol 194:486–498. doi: 10.1128/JB.05047-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B13] 13.Hill-Cawthorne GA, Hudson LO, El Ghany MFA, Piepenburg O, Nair M, Dodgson A, Forrest MS, Clark TG, Pain A. 2014. Recombinations in staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements compromise the molecular detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 9:e101419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B14] 14.Hanssen A-M, Ericson Sollid JU. 2006. SCCmec in staphylococci: genes on the move. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 46:8–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2005.00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B15] 15.Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MTG, Ba X, Rolo J, Morgan FJE, Pichon B, Kearns A, Zadoks RN, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Holmes MA. 2014. A novel hybrid SCCmec-mecC region in Staphylococcus sciuri. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:911–918. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B16] 16.Semmler T, Harrison EM, Lübke-Becker A, Ulrich RG, Wieler LH, Guenther S, Stamm I, Hanssen A-M, Holmes MA, Vincze S, Walther B. 2016. A look into the melting pot: the mecC-harboring region is a recombination hot spot in Staphylococcus stepanovicii. PLoS One 11:e0147150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B17] 17.Bloemendaal ALA, Brouwer EC, Fluit AC. 2010. Methicillin resistance transfer from Staphylococcus epidermidis to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a patient during antibiotic therapy. PLoS One 5:e11841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B18] 18.Mašlaňová I, Doškař J, Varga M, Kuntová L, Mužík J, Malúšková D, Růžičková V, Pantůček R. 2013. Bacteriophages of Staphylococcus aureus efficiently package various bacterial genes and mobile genetic elements including SCCmec with different frequencies. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B19] 19.Scharn CR, Tenover FC, Goering RV. 2013. Transduction of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements between strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5233–5238. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01058-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B20] 20.Ray MD, Boundy S, Archer GL. 2016. Transfer of the methicillin resistance genomic island among staphylococci by conjugation. Mol Microbiol 100:675–685. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B21] 21.Bjørkeng EK, Tessema GT, Lundblad EW, Butaye P, Willems R, Sollid JE, Sundsfjord A, Hegstad K. 2010. ccrABEnt serine recombinase genes are widely distributed in the Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus casseliflavus species groups and are expressed in E. faecium. Microbiology 156:3624–3634. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.041491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B22] 22.Qin X, Galloway-Peña JR, Sillanpaa J, Roh JH, Nallapareddy SR, Chowdhury S, Bourgogne A, Choudhury T, Muzny DM, Buhay CJ, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha S, Liu W, Kovar C, Sodergren E, Highlander S, Petrosino JF, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus faecium strain TX16 and comparative genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium genomes. BMC Microbiol 12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B23] 23.Rosvoll TCS, Lindstad BL, Lunde TM, Hegstad K, Aasnaes B, Hammerum AM, Lester CH, Simonsen GS, Sundsfjord A, Pedersen T. 2012. Increased high-level gentamicin resistance in invasive Enterococcus faecium is associated with aac(6’)Ie-aph(2’’)Ia-encoding transferable megaplasmids hosted by major hospital-adapted lineages. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 66:166–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B24] 24.García-Solache M, Lebreton F, McLaughlin RE, Whiteaker JD, Gilmore MS, Rice LB. 2016. Homologous recombination within large chromosomal regions facilitates acquisition of β-lactam and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5777–5786. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00488-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B25] 25.Lanza VF, Tedim AP, Martínez JL, Baquero F, Coque TM. 2015. The plasmidome of Firmicutes: impact on the emergence and the spread of resistance to antimicrobials. Microbiol Spectr 3:PLAS-0039-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.PLAS-0039-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B26] 26.Stark WM. 2014. The serine recombinases. Microbiol Spectr 2:25–32. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0046-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B27] 27.Everitt RG, Didelot X, Batty EM, Miller RR, Knox K, Young BC, Bowden R, Auton A, Votintseva A, Larner-Svensson H, Charlesworth J, Golubchik T, Ip CLC, Godwin H, Fung R, Peto TEA, Walker AS, Crook DW, Wilson DJ. 2014. Mobile elements drive recombination hotspots in the core genome of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun 5:3956. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B28] 28.Mir-Sanchis I, Roman CA, Misiura A, Pigli YZ, Boyle-Vavra S, Rice PA. 2016. Staphylococcal SCCmec elements encode an active MCM-like helicase and thus may be replicative. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:891–898. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B29] 29.Zhang X, Top J, de Been M, Bierschenk D, Rogers M, Leendertse M, Bonten MJM, van der Poll T, Willems RJL, van Schaik W. 2013. Identification of a genetic determinant in clinical Enterococcus faecium strains that contributes to intestinal colonization during antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis 207:1780–1786. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B30] 30.Paganelli FL, Huebner J, Singh KV, Zhang X, van Schaik W, Wobser D, Braat JC, Murray BE, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL, Leavis HL. 2016. Genome-wide screening identifies phosphotransferase system permease BepA to be involved in Enterococcus faecium endocarditis and biofilm formation. J Infect Dis 214:189–195. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B31] 31.Ito T, Ma XX, Takeuchi F, Okuma K, Yuzawa H, Hiramatsu K. 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2637–2651. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2637-2651.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B32] 32.Furmanek-Blaszk B, Sektas M. 2015. The SfaNI restriction-modification system from Enterococcus faecalis NEB215 is located on a putative mobile genetic element. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362:fnv028. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B33] 33.Oliveira PH, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. 2014. The interplay of restriction-modification systems with mobile genetic elements and their prokaryotic hosts. Nucleic Acids Res 42:10618–10631. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B34] 34.Dryden DT, Murray NE, Rao DN. 2001. Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 29:3728–3741. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.18.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B35] 35.Rubio-Cosials A, Schulz EC, Lambertsen L, Smyshlyaev G, Rojas-Cordova C, Forslund K, Karaca E, Bebel A, Bork P, Barabas O. 2018. Transposase-DNA complex structures reveal mechanisms for conjugative transposition of antibiotic resistance. Cell 173:208–220.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B36] 36.Sheppard AE, Stoesser N, Wilson DJ, Sebra R, Kasarskis A, Anson LW, Giess A, Pankhurst LJ, Vaughan A, Grim CJ, Cox HL, Yeh AJ, Modernising Medical Microbiology (MMM) Informatics Group, Sifri CD, Walker AS, Peto TE, Crook DW, Mathers AJ. 2016. Nested Russian doll-like genetic mobility drives rapid dissemination of the carbapenem resistance gene bla_KPC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3767–3778. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B37] 37.Manson JM, Hancock LE, Gilmore MS. 2010. Mechanism of chromosomal transfer of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenicity island, capsule, antimicrobial resistance, and other traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:12269–12274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000139107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B38] 38.Rice LB, Carias LL, Rudin S, Hutton Rla, Marshall S. 2010. Multiple copies of functional, Tet(M)-encoding Tn916-like elements in a clinical Enterococcus faecium isolate. Plasmid 64:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B39] 39.Achard A, Leclercq R. 2007. Characterization of a small mobilizable transposon, MTnSag1, in Streptococcus agalactiae. J Bacteriol 189:4328–4331. doi: 10.1128/JB.00213-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B40] 40.Carraro N, Rivard N, Ceccarelli D, Colwell RR, Burrus V. 2016. IncA/C conjugative plasmids mobilize a new family of multidrug resistance islands in clinical Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 isolates from Haiti. mBio 7:e00509-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00509-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B41] 41.Waldor MK. 2010. Mobilizable genomic islands: going mobile with oriT mimicry. Mol Microbiol 78:537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07365.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B42] 42.Jandle S, Meyer R. 2006. Stringent and relaxed recognition of oriT by related systems for plasmid mobilization: implications for horizontal gene transfer. J Bacteriol 188:499–506. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.2.499-506.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B43] 43.Ramsay JP, Firth N. 2017. Diverse mobilization strategies facilitate transfer of non-conjugative mobile genetic elements. Curr Opin Microbiol 38:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B44] 44.Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE. 2007. The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:222–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B45] 45.Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1549–1555. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B46] 46.Farrugia DN, Elbourne LDH, Mabbutt BC, Paulsen IT. 2015. A novel family of integrases associated with prophages and genomic islands integrated within the tRNA-dihydrouridine synthase A (dusA) gene. Nucleic Acids Res 43:4547–4557. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B47] 47.International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosomal Elements (IWG-SCC). 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4961–4967. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00579-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B48] 48.Smillie CS, Smith MB, Friedman J, Cordero OX, David LA, Alm EJ. 2011. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature 480:241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature10571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B49] 49.Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP. 2015. Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet 16:472–482. doi: 10.1038/nrg3962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B50] 50.Oliveira PH, Touchon M, Cury J, Rocha EPC. 2017. The chromosomal organization of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. Nat Commun 8:841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00808-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B51] 51.Rocha EPC. 2018. Neutral theory, microbial practice: challenges in bacterial population genetics. Mol Biol Evol 35:1338–1347. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B52] 52.McInerney JO, McNally A, O’Connell MJ. 2017. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat Microbiol 2:17040. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B53] 53.Dahl KH, Simonsen GS, Olsvik O, Sundsfjord A. 1999. Heterogeneity in the vanB gene cluster of genomically diverse clinical strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1105–1110. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B54] 54.Rosvoll TCS, Pedersen T, Sletvold H, Johnsen PJ, Sollid JE, Simonsen GS, Jensen LB, Nielsen KM, Sundsfjord A. 2010. PCR-based plasmid typing in Enterococcus faecium strains reveals widely distributed pRE25-, pRUM-, pIP501- and pHTbeta-related replicons associated with glycopeptide resistance and stabilizing toxin-antitoxin systems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 58:254–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B55] 55.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2006. Construction of improved temperature-sensitive and mobilizable vectors and their use for constructing mutations in the adhesin-encoding acm gene of poorly transformable clinical Enterococcus faecium strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:334–345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.334-345.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B56] 56.Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P. 1994. Heterogeneric conjugal transfer of the pheromone-responsive plasmid pIP964 (IncHlyI) of Enterococcus faecalis in the apparent absence of pheromone induction. FEMS Microbiol Lett 122:173–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B57] 57.Sivertsen A, Billström H, Melefors Ö, Liljequist BO, Wisell KT, Ullberg M, Özenci V, Sundsfjord A, Hegstad K. 2014. A multicentre hospital outbreak in Sweden caused by introduction of a vanB2 transposon into a stably maintained pRUM-plasmid in an Enterococcus faecium ST192 clone. PLoS One 9:e103274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B58] 58.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B59] 59.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B60] 60.Treangen TJ, Sommer DD, Angly FE, Koren S, Pop M. 2011. Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 11:Unit 11.8. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1108s33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B61] 61.Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B62] 62.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B63] 63.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B64] 64.Li H. 2018. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B65] 65.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B66] 66.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B67] 67.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B68] 68.Carver T, Berriman M, Tivey A, Patel C, Böhme U, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Rajandream M-A. 2008. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics 24:2672–2676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B69] 69.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B70] 70.Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B71] 71.Machanick P, Bailey TL. 2011. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 27:1696–1697. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B72] 72.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2017. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol 34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B73] 73.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

The Enterococcus Cassette Chromosome, a Genomic Variation Enabler in Enterococci

A Sivertsen

J Janice

T Pedersen

T M Wagner

J Hegstad

K Hegstad

Roles

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

ECC::cat was successfully transferred between strains by the help of a conjugative reppLG1 megaplasmid.

TABLE 1.

ECC::cat was inserted into the recipient chromosome in an SCCmec-like fashion.

FIG 1.

FIG 2.

Excision of ECC.

ECC elements in enterococcal genomes.

TABLE 2.

FIG 3.

ECC putative attL and attR sites are conserved 50-bp sequences.

ECCs are highly variable in gene content.

ECC gene content may vary by ecological background.

Notable functions of genes enriched in ECC elements.

Alternative mobilization by integration of ECC into the conjugative plasmid.

FIG 4.

Conclusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

Introduction of chloramphenicol resistance gene downstream of ccrABEnt.

Filter mating and verification of transconjugants.

Genome sequencing.

Bioinformatic analyses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

REFERENCES

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

ECC::cat was successfully transferred between strains by the help of a conjugative rep_pLG1 megaplasmid.

Introduction of chloramphenicol resistance gene downstream of ccrAB_Ent.