Abstract
The NAD+-metabolizing ectoenzyme CD38 is an established therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. The CD38-specific monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab show promising results in the clinic. Nanobodies correspond to the single variable domains (VHH) derived from heavy chain antibodies that naturally occur in camelids. VHHs display high solubility and excellent tissue penetration in vivo. We recently generated a panel of CD38-specific nanobodies, some of which block or enhance the enzymatic activity of CD38. Fusion of such a nanobody to the hinge, CH2, and CH3 domains of human IgG1 generates a chimeric llama/human hcAb of about half the size of a conventional moAb (75 vs. 150 kDa). Similarly, a fully human CD38-specific hcAb can be generated using a CD38-specific human VH3 instead of a CD38-specific camelid nanobody. Here we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of CD38-specific hcAbs vs. conventional moAbs and provide an outlook for the potential use of CD38-specific hcAbs as novel therapeutics for multiple myeloma.
Keywords: antibody engineering, CD38, heavy chain antibody, monoclonal antibody, multiple myeloma, nanobody
Introduction
CD38 is a cell surface ectoenzyme that metabolizes NAD+ released from damaged cells in inflammation (1). In concert with the ecto-enzymes CD203 and CD73, CD38 contributes to the conversion of NAD+ to immunosuppressive extracellular adenosine. In the tumor microenvironment, CD38 may promote tumor growth by suppressing effector T cell responses (1, 2). Since CD38 is overexpressed by multiple myeloma cells and other hematological tumors, it has attracted interest as a target for therapeutic antibodies (3–5).
Nanobodies are single domain antibody fragments derived from the heavy chain IgG antibodies naturally occurring in llamas and other camelids (6–8). In these animals, the IgG2 and IgG3 isotypes lack the CH1 domain and do not bind to light chains. Nanobodies correspond to the variable domain (VHH) of these heavy chain antibodies. VHHs carry characteristic residues in the framework region 2 (FR2) that render them highly soluble in the absence of a paired light chain (8–10). VHHs often have a long complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) that can mediate binding to the catalytic cavity of an enzyme and other hidden epitopes that are not accessible for conventional antibodies (11–13). Their robust, soluble single domain format renders nanobodies amenable for genetic fusion to the hinge and Fc domains of other antibody isotypes (14, 15). Owing to their high solubility, it is much easier to link two or more VHHs into bi- or multivalent formats than the corresponding VH+VL domains of conventional antibodies.
CD38-specific therapeutic chimeric mouse/human and fully human conventional antibodies
The conventional CD38-specific moAbs daratumumab and isatuximab have proven therapeutic efficacy in multiple myeloma (5, 16). Both antibodies were derived from mice immunized with human CD38. While daratumumab was generated from CD38-immunized transgenic mice that carry genomic loci encoding human IgH and IgL (17), isatuximab was generated from CD38-immunized wild type mice (18). The VH and VL domains of the murine moAb were genetically fused to the CH1-hinge-CH2-CH3 domains of human IgG1 and to the constant domain of the kappa light chain (Cκ), respectively, generating a classic mouse/human chimeric antibody (Figure 1A). The crystal structure of isatuximab in complex with CD38 indicates that its capacity to inhibit the enzymatic activity of CD38 is by an allosteric mechanism (18). Recently, the VH and VL domains of daratumumab were used to construct a single-chain human anti-CD38 cytokine-antibody fusion protein termed IL2-αCD38-αCD38-scTRAIL (19). The bivalent tandem scFv of daratumumab mediated specific binding to CD38 expressing myeloma cells, while the engineered homotrimeric format of TRAIL induced apoptosis of these cells, presumably by binding to cognate death receptors.
CD38-specific chimeric llama/human and fully human heavy chain antibodies
Recently, CD38-specific nanobodies were generated from CD38-immunized llamas (20, 21). Some of these nanobodies inhibited or enhanced CD38 enzymatic activity in a dose dependent manner and effectively targeted CD38 on human tumor cells in a mouse Xenograft model (20). Several nanobodies bind independently of daratumumab. Such nanobodies have proven useful for detecting cell surface CD38 in patients treated with daratumumab (22). Owing to their high solubility, the nanobodies can readily be fused to other protein domains, including the hinge and Fc domains of human IgG1 (Figure 1B). Such chimeric llama/human heavy chain antibodies acquire the capacity to induce classic Fc-mediated effector functions, including ADCC and CDC (23).
In contrast to the hydrophylic nature of camelid VHH domains, human VH domains display a natural “stickiness” and tendency to aggregate in the absence of a light chain (24–26). This “stickiness” is attributed to the hydrophobic interface that helps to properly orient VH and VL domains for joint interaction with the target antigen (27). “Camelization” of human VH domains by substituting hydrophobic amino acid residues in FR2 with hydrophilic residues can greatly enhance the solubility of human VH domains (28–30). In order to express human heavy chain antibodies in transgenic mice or rats it is therefore advisable to inactivate not only the endogenous rodent heavy chain locus, but also the kappa and lambda light chain loci. Interestingly, during the ensuing immune response, somatic hypermutation and selection drive the expansion of VH variants that increase the solubility of heavy chain antibodies (31, 32). A similar mechanism was observed when human VH domains were affinity matured in vitro (33). Recently, CD38-specific human heavy chain antibodies were generated successfully from CD38-immunized human heavy chain-only transgenic rats (32).
Advantages and disadvantages of CD38-specific heavy chain antibodies vs. conventional moAbs
Tissue penetration and in vivo half life
Heavy chain antibodies are only half the size of conventional moAbs (75 vs. 150 kDa). HcAbs may therefore penetrate more effectively into CD38-expressing tumors than full size moAbs, particularly when the tumors promote increased interstitial pressure. Better tissue penetration has indeed been demonstrated for nanobodies vs. conventional antibodies in solid tumors and subcutaneous tumors (34, 35). Tissue penetration is a highly relevant issue, in particular when considering that multiple myeloma resides in the bone marrow and is surrounded by a dense immune suppressive microenvironment (1). It will be important to determine whether nanobody-based hcAbs do reach myeloma cells in the bone marrow more efficiently than conventional antibodies.
The half life of therapeutic antibodies is influenced by several factors, including size, glycosylation, and affinity to the neonatal Fc receptor. While a smaller size may facilitate tissue penetration, a small size may also facilitate renal filtration and thereby shorten the persistence of the therapeutic in vivo. Several strategies have been employed successfully to prolong the in vivo half life of nanobodies, including conjugation to polyethylene glycol polymers (36), genetic fusion to an albumin-specific nanobody (34, 37). In case of nanobody based hcAbs, Fc engineering could be used to introduce mutations that enhance binding to the neonatal Fc receptor and thereby prolong persistence in vivo (38, 39).
Developability of bispecific therapeutics
The soluble nature of the nanobody VHH domain, facilitates the construction and production of bispecific antibodies. For example, a bispecific nanobody-based heavy chain antibody can readily be generated simply by fusing a second nanobody to the N-terminus of a nanobody-based hcAb. Importantly, nanobody-based bispecific hcAbs are composed of two identical polypeptide chains, i.e., their production does not require any “knob in hole” technology or adjusting the of expression levels of two or more vectors (40, 41). This simplifies the production and developability of bispecific hcAbs, although the moderate increase in size of a bispecific vs. a mono-specific hcAb (from ~75 to ~100 kDa) may compromise tissue penetration. By tandem fusion of two nanobodies that recognize independent epitopes of CD38 to the Fc domain of human IgG, we recently generated tetravalent biparatopic hcAbs that exhibit a markedly enhanced capacity to induce CDC of CD38-expressing myeloma cells.
Modulation of enzyme activity
Owing to the inherent capacity of nanobodies to extend into and block active site crevices (11, 12), a heavy chain antibody containing a CD38-antagonistic nanobody may provide an additional therapeutic benefit by inhibiting the production of immunosuppressive adenosine (1, 2). Conceivably, the potency of enzyme inhibition may be enhanced by fusion of an enzyme-inhibiting nanobody to a nanobody recognizing a distinct epitope of CD38, e.g., in a biparatopic activity blocking hcAb.
Immunogenicity
The potential immunogenicity of antibody therapeutics is a relevant concern (5, 42, 43). The development of neutralizing antibodies against the therapeutic antibody by the patient usually renders the patient resistant to the therapeutic. This risk for developing such antibodies is larger for chimeric antibodies that contain murine VH and VL domains such as rituximab and isatuximab than for fully human antibodies such as dartumumab which is composed only of human domains. However, it is impossible to fully humanize the idiotype of an antibody without losing specificity of effectivity since the unique CDR loops of the VH and VL domains are required for specificity. Hence, the potential development of antibodies directed against the unique CDR loops remains a concern for any therapeutic antibody. Drug antibodies have not yet been detected in any daratumumab-treated patients (5). However, it is uncertain to what extent this is due to the lack of a sensitive assay for such antibodies.
The human germline encodes ~50 distinct VH domains and 4 distinct IgG isotypes (Figure 2A) (44, 45). V-D-J recombination during B-cell development generates millions of distinct idiotypes (antigen binding paratopes). Subsequent to antigen encounter, somatic hypermutation generates many more variant VH domains. During pregnancy, maternal IgG is translocated from the maternal blood through placental trophoblasts into the blood stream of the fetus, leading to tolerization of the new born immune system against millions of VH variants, but only 4 distinct IgG isotypes. In germline configuration, llama VHH domains show ~80–90% amino acid sequence identity to human VH3 domains, i.e., the predominant VH subset found in human immunoglobulins (46). As a result of somatic hypermutation, two matured human VH domains often differ more from one another than a germline human VH3 domain from a llama VHH3 domain. A few hydrophilic amino acid residues in framework region 2 and the long CDR3 that can partially fold back onto the former interface to the VL domain largely account for the dramatically improved solubility of camelid VHH domains vs. human VH3 domains. These residues cannot be fully humanized without compromising solubility. Notwithstanding, the idiotype (CDR regions 1, 2, and 3) cover a much larger space (both, in the literal sense and in terms of potential immunogenicity) than these hydrophilic amino acids in the former VL interface.
Although the immunogenicity of a therapeutic antibody can be reduced by humanization, the residual risk remains for any therapeutic antibody that the patient develops antibodies directed against the idiotype (Figure 2B). Such anti-drug antibodies usually render the therapeutic useless for the patient. If more than one therapeutic antibody is available for a particular target, an option in such cases is to switch to a different biologic targeting the same molecule (e.g., from daratumumab to isatuximab or vice versa). It is conceivable that in the future, the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies can be reduced further by tolerization strategies that will become available and permit tolerization of the patient to the therapeutic antibody before treatment is initiated.
Conclusions and outlook
Later this year, Caplacizumab, a dimeric nanobody directed against the van Willebrand factor, is expected to receive FDA approval as the first nanobody in the clinic (47, 48). Nanobodies that antagonize CD38 provide proof of concept for the notion that these small biologics represent attractive alternatives to small molecule inhibitors for inhibiting the production of immunosuppressive adenosine. Nanobody-based heavy chain antibodies retain all effector functions of full sized moAbs, at half the size. This size advantage will likely facilitate targeting of tumor cells in vivo, even under conditions of increased interstitial pressure within tumors. Owing to their excellent solubility, it is much easier to link different nanobodies in a single therapeutic than the combined VH+VL domains of conventional moAbs. The high solubility of CD38-specific heavy chain antibodies may come at the price of a slightly higher risk for inducing anti-drug antibodies compared to conventional human CD38-specific moAbs. In addition to the complementarity determining regions, the VL face of heavy chain antibodies may provide a second, albeit much smaller, vulnerability than the idiotype. It will be interesting to see whether “humanized” nanobody heavy chain antibodies or “camelized” human heavy chain antibodies will hold the leading nose in the race to the clinic.
Author contributions
PB and FK-N conceived the project. FK-N wrote the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
FK-N receives a share of antibody sales via MediGate GmbH, a wholly owned subsidiary of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. PB and FK-N are co-inventors on a patent application on CD38-specific nanobodies. The Handling Editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors, FK-N.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- ADCC
antibody-dependent cytotoxicity
- CDC
complement-dependent cytotoxicity
- CDR
compelementarity determining region
- Fc
crystallizing fragment
- FR
framework region
- Ig
immunoglobulin
- kD
kilodalton
- NAD
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
- moAb
monoclonal antibody
- Nb
nanobody
- Nb-hcAb
nanobody-based (human) heavy chain antibody
- scFv
single chain variable fragment
- VH
variable domain of a conventional heavy chain
- VHH
variable domain of a camelid heavy chain antibody.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by grants from the Sander Stiftung to FK-N and PB, and by grant SFB1328-Z2 from the DFG to FK-N.
References
- 1.Horenstein AL, Chillemi A, Quarona V, Zito A, Roato I, Morandi F, et al. NAD(+)-Metabolizing ectoenzymes in remodeling tumor-host interactions: the human myeloma model. Cells (2015) 4:520–37. 10.3390/cells4030520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chini EN, Chini CCS, Espindola Netto JM, de Oliveira GC, van Schooten W. The pharmacology of CD38/NADase: an emerging target in cancer and diseases of aging. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 39:424–36. 10.1016/j.tips.2018.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Afifi S, Michael A, Lesokhin A. Immunotherapy: A new approach to treating multiple myeloma with daratumumab and elotuzumab. Ann Pharmacother. (2016) 50:555–68. 10.1177/1060028016642786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rajan AM, Kumar S. New investigational drugs with single-agent activity in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. (2016) 6:e451. 10.1038/bcj.2016.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van de Donk N, Richardson PG, Malavasi F. CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma: back to the future. Blood (2017) 131:13–29. 10.1182/blood-2017-06-740944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hamers C, Songa EB, et al. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature (1993) 363:446–8. 10.1038/363446a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Muyldermans S. Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem. (2013) 82:775–97. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ingram JR, Schmidt FI, Ploegh HL. Exploiting Nanobodies' Singular Traits. Annu Rev Immunol. (2018) 36:695–715. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldman ER, Liu JL, Zabetakis D, Anderson GP. Enhancing stability of camelid and shark single domain antibodies: an overview. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:865. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Konning D, Zielonka S, Grzeschik J, Empting M, Valldorf B, Krah S, et al. Camelid and shark single domain antibodies: structural features and therapeutic potential. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2017) 45:10–6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lauwereys M, Arbabi Ghahroudi M, Desmyter A, Kinne J, Holzer W, De Genst E, et al. Potent enzyme inhibitors derived from dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. EMBO J. (1998) 17:3512–20. 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Genst E, Silence K, Decanniere K, Conrath K, Loris R, Kinne J, et al. Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:4586–91. 10.1073/pnas.0505379103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wesolowski J, Alzogaray V, Reyelt J, Unger M, Juarez K, Urrutia M, et al. Single domain antibodies: promising experimental and therapeutic tools in infection and immunity. Med Microbiol Immunol. (2009) 198:157–74. 10.1007/s00430-009-0116-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bannas P, Hambach J, Koch-Nolte F. Nanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1603. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ingram JR, Blomberg OS, Rashidian M, Ali L, Garforth S, Fedorov E, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 therapy requires an Fc domain for efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:3912–7. 10.1073/pnas.1801524115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martin T, Baz R, Benson DM, Lendvai N, Wolf J, Munster P, et al. A phase 1b study of isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (2017) 129:3294–303. 10.1182/blood-2016-09-740787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Weers M, Tai YT, van der Veer MS, Bakker JM, Vink T, Jacobs DC, et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J Immunol. (2011) 186:1840–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.1003032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deckert J, Wetzel MC, Bartle LM, Skaletskaya A, Goldmacher VS, Vallee F, et al. SAR650984, a novel humanized CD38-targeting antibody, demonstrates potent antitumor activity in models of multiple myeloma and other CD38+ hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. (2014) 20:4574–83. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.De Luca R, Kachel P, Kropivsek K, Snijder B, Manz MG, Neri D. A novel dual-cytokine-antibody fusion protein for the treatment of CD38-positive malignancies. Protein Eng Des Sel. (2018) 31:173–9. 10.1093/protein/gzy015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fumey W, Koenigsdorf J, Kunick V, Menzel S, Schutze K, Unger M, et al. Nanobodies effectively modulate the enzymatic activity of CD38 and allow specific imaging of CD38(+) tumors in mouse models in vivo. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:14289. 10.1038/s41598-017-14112-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li T, Qi S, Unger M, Hou YN, Deng QW, Liu J, et al. Immuno-targeting the multifunctional CD38 using nanobody. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:27055. 10.1038/srep27055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oberle A, Brandt A, Alawi M, Langebrake C, Janjetovic S, Wolschke C, et al. Long-term CD38 saturation by daratumumab interferes with diagnostic myeloma cell detection. Haematologica (2017) 102:e368–370. 10.3324/haematol.2017.169235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nolte F, Bannas P, Schütze K, Fumey F, Schriewer L. Antigen-Binding Polypeptides directed against CD38. WO2017081211A2 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barthelemy PA, Raab H, Appleton BA, Bond CJ, Wu P, Wiesmann C, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the factors contributing to the stability and solubility of autonomous human VH domains. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:3639–54. 10.1074/jbc.M708536200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ewert S, Cambillau C, Conrath K, Pluckthun A. Biophysical properties of camelid V(HH) domains compared to those of human V(H)3 domains. Biochemistry (2002) 41:3628–36. 10.1021/bi011239a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feige MJ, Buchner J. Principles and engineering of antibody folding and assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1844:2024–31. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Teplyakov A, Obmolova G, Malia TJ, Luo J, Muzammil S, Sweet R, et al. Structural diversity in a human antibody germline library. MAbs (2016) 8:1045–63. 10.1080/19420862.2016.1190060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Davies J, Riechmann L. ‘Camelising' human antibody fragments: NMR studies on VH domains. FEBS Lett. (1994) 339:285–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dudgeon K, Rouet R, Kokmeijer I, Schofield P, Stolp J, Langley D, et al. General strategy for the generation of human antibody variable domains with increased aggregation resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2012) 109:10879–84. 10.1073/pnas.1202866109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim DY, Hussack G, Kandalaft H, Tanha J. Mutational approaches to improve the biophysical properties of human single-domain antibodies. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1844:1983–2001. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nilvebrant J, Tessier PM, Sidhu SS. Engineered Autonomous Human Variable Domains. Curr Pharm Des. (2016) 22:6527–37. 10.2174/1381612822666160921143011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aldred SF, Bourdreau A, Buelow B, Clarke S, Dank K, Davison L, et al. Multispecific antibodies targeting CD38 show potent tumor-specific cytotoxicity. (Abstract). J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36(5Suppl.):57 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.5_suppl.57 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Julian MC, Li L, Garde S, Wilen R, Tessier PM. Efficient affinity maturation of antibody variable domains requires co-selection of compensatory mutations to maintain thermodynamic stability. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:45259. 10.1038/srep45259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tijink BM, Laeremans T, Budde M, Stigter-van Walsum M, Dreier T, de Haard HJ, et al. Improved tumor targeting of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor Nanobodies through albumin binding: taking advantage of modular Nanobody technology. Mol Cancer Ther. (2008) 7:2288–97. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bannas P, Well L, Lenz A, Rissiek B, Haag F, Schmid J, et al. In vivo near-infrared fluorescence targeting of T cells: comparison of nanobodies and conventional monoclonal antibodies. Contrast Media Mol Imaging (2014) 9:135–42. 10.1002/cmmi.1548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rashidian M, Keliher EJ, Bilate AM, Duarte JN, Wojtkiewicz GR, Jacobsen JT, et al. Noninvasive imaging of immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2015) 112:6146–51. 10.1073/pnas.1502609112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Danquah W, Meyer-Schwesinger C, Rissiek B, Pinto C, Serracant-Prat A, Amadi M, et al. Nanobodies that block gating of the P2X7 ion channel ameliorate inflammation. Sci Transl Med. (2016) 8:366ra162. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ghetie V, Popov S, Borvak J, Radu C, Matesoi D, Medesan C, et al. Increasing the serum persistence of an IgG fragment by random mutagenesis. Nat Biotechnol. (1997) 15:637–40. 10.1038/nbt0797-637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Scheuplein F, Rissiek B, Driver JP, Chen YG, Koch-Nolte F, Serreze DV. A recombinant heavy chain antibody approach blocks ART2 mediated deletion of an iNKT cell population that upon activation inhibits autoimmune diabetes. J Autoimmun. (2010) 34:145–54. 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ridgway JB, Presta LG, Carter P. ‘Knobs-into-holes' engineering of antibody CH3 domains for heavy chain heterodimerization. Protein Eng. (1996) 9:617–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.De Nardis C, Hendriks LJA, Poirier E, Arvinte T, Gros P, Bakker ABH, et al. A new approach for generating bispecific antibodies based on a common light chain format and the stable architecture of human immunoglobulin G1. J Biol Chem. (2017) 292:14706–17. 10.1074/jbc.M117.793497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chames P, Van Regenmortel M, Weiss E, Baty D. Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future. Br J Pharmacol. (2009) 157:220–33. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.van Schie KA, Wolbink GJ, Rispens T. Cross-reactive and pre-existing antibodies to therapeutic antibodies–Effects on treatment and immunogenicity. MAbs (2015) 7:662–71. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1048411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chothia C, Lesk AM, Gherardi E, Tomlinson IM, Walter G, Marks JD, et al. Structural repertoire of the human VH segments. J Mol Biol. (1992) 227:799–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.de Bono B, Madera M, Chothia C. VH gene segments in the mouse and human genomes. J Mol Biol. (2004) 342:131–43. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Klarenbeek A, El Mazouari K, Desmyter A, Blanchetot C, Hultberg A, de Jonge N, et al. Camelid Ig V genes reveal significant human homology not seen in therapeutic target genes, providing for a powerful therapeutic antibody platform. MAbs (2015) 7:693–706. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1046648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kaplon H, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2018. MAbs (2018) 10:183–203. 10.1080/19420862.2018.1415671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Peyvandi F, Scully M, Kremer Hovinga JA, Cataland S, Knobl P, Wu H, et al. Caplacizumab for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. (2016) 374:511–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1505533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]