Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2018 Jun 30;25(7):1298–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.06.010

Species-specific molecular signature of Commiphora species of Saudi Arabia inferred from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA

M Ajmal Ali 1
PMCID: PMC6252017  PMID: 30505173

Abstract

The deciduous habit and tendency to produce flowers prior to developing leaves, and a predominantly dioecious system of breeding in the genus Commiphora leads to difficulties in its taxonomic identification at species level. The characteristics of easy amplification by universal primer, shorter length and higher discrimination power at the species level makes the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) to a smart gene for generating species-specific phylogenetic inferences in most of the plants groups. The present study deals the ITS sequence of nrDNA based molecular genotyping of seven species of the genus Commiphora of Saudi Arabia. The molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences of nrDNA of Commiphora species distributed in Saudi Arabia reveals the the occurrence of C. madagascariens in Saudi Arabia.

Keywords: ITS, nrDNA, Molecular genotyping, Commiphora, Burseraceae, Saudi Arabia

1. Introduction

Commiphora Jacq., (family Burseraceae) is a genus of about 185 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions (Byng, 2014). Several species of the genus Commiphora produce fragrant resins used for incense, perfume and also used medicinally in the diseases of liver, gastrointestinal disorder, urinary tract, rheumatism, scurvy and jaundice (Abdul-Ghani and Amin, 1997, Al-Howiriny et al., 2004, Al-Howiriny et al., 2005, Hanuša et al., 2005, Shen et al., 2008, Iluz and Hoffman, 2010), cancer (Hartwell, 1982), respiratory, kidney, muscular, and in kidney complaints (Tejero et al., 2008); and thus gum/resins produced by the different species of Commiphora have high commercial value (Chaudhary, 2001). In Saudi Arabia, the genus Commiphora is represented by seven species i.e. C. erythraea, C. gileadensis, C. habessinica, C. kataf, C. myrrha, C. opobalsamum and C. quadricincta (Chaudhary, 2001). The systematic understanding of the genus Commiphora at species level has been hindered because of the life history which includes deciduous habit, a predominantly dioecious breeding system, and a tendency to produce flowers prior to developing leaves (Weeks and Simpson, 2007). Infrageneric groups of Commiphora have been proposed but limited to northeastern and tropical East Africa species (Wild, 1959, Gillett, 1991, Vollesen, 1986). The characteristics of easy amplification by universal primer, shorter length and higher discrimination power at the species level makes the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) to a smart gene for generating species-specific phylogenetic inferences in most of the plants groups (Chen et al., 2010, Poczai and Hyvönen, 2010, Yao et al., 2010, Ali et al., 2014). Hence, the present study attempts to establish ITS sequence of nrDNA based species-specific molecular signature for the genus Commiphora distributed in Saudi Arabia.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sampling of the plant materials and sequencing of ITS gene

The leaf materials of a total number of seven species of the genus Commiphora distributed in Saudi Arabia (Table 1) were collected from herbarium specimens housed at the Herbarium, Department of Botany and Microbiology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (KSUH). The taxonomic identification of specimens were confirmed through the consultation of Flora of Saudi Arabia (Chaudhary, 2001). The extraction of total genomic DNA were performed using Qiagen kit and then it was subjected to polymerase chain reaction for the amplification of ITS gene and the amplified product were further used for DNA sequencing following previously described method (Ali et al., 2010).

Table 1.

Taxon sampling information and GenBank accession number for the sequences used in the molecular phylogenetic analysis.

S. No. Taxon Locality Voucher GenBank Accession No.
1. Commiphora erythrea (Ehrenb.) Engl. Abha, Saudi Arabia Al-Farhan and Masin 1755 (KSUH) MH522401
2. Commiphora gileadensis (L.) C.Chr. [Syn = Commiphora opobalsamum (L.) Engl.] Farasan, Saudi Arabia R.A. Baseni 3159 (KSUH) MH522402
3. Commiphora habessinica (O.Berg) Engl. Jabal Shada, Saudi Arabia A.R. Al-Zaudi 21191 (KSUH) MH522403
4. Commiphora kataf (Forssk.) Engl. Jabal Shada,Saudi Arabia A.R. Al-Zaudi 21211 (KSUH) MH522404
5. Commiphora madagascariens Jacq. {[synonym Commiphora roxburghii Alston], [Illegitimate], http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2733654} Jabal Fayfa, Saudi Arabia M.I. Hassan 4092 (KSUH) MH522405
6. Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. Abha, Saudi Arabia Al-Farhan and Masin 1786 (KSUH) MH522406
7. Commiphora quadricincta Schweinf. Jabal, Saudi Arabia sn 19278 (KSUH) MH522407
Open in a new tab

2.2. Molecular phylogenetic analysis

The similarity of the ITS sequences of nrDNA generated in the present study were matched using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Too) search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) by NCBI server (Altschul et al., 1990). The ITS sequences of nrDNA of 14 species of Commiphora (Table 2) were retrieved from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The ITS sequences of nrDNA of Bursera attenuate (GenBank accession number AF445871) was used as outgroup in the phylogenetic analyses. The sequence included in the molecular phylogenetic analyses were aligned using CLUSTAL X v.1.81 (Thompson et al., 1997). The ITS sequences of nrDNA generated in the present study were submitted to GenBank (Table 1). The aligned sequences were saved in nexus format. The nexus file of aligned sequences were imported in to MEGA 5 software (Tamura et al., 2011), and phylogenetic analyses were performed using Maximum Parsimony (MP) method (Tamura et al., 2011).

Table 2.

The ITS sequences of nDNA retrieved from GenBank, and used in the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Commiphora.

S. No. Species GenBank Accession No.
1 Commiphora africana(A.Rich.) Endl. AF445873
2 Commiphora edulis (Klotzsch) Engl. JF919026
3 Commiphora eminii Engl. JN882700
4 Commiphora falcata Capuron KF906076
5 Commiphora grandifolia Engl. JN882671
6 Commiphora kataf (Forssk.) Engl. JN882709
7 Commiphora kua (R.Br. ex Royle) Vollesen JN882696
8 Commiphora leptophloeos (Mart.) J.B.Gillett AF445875
9 Commiphora monstruosa (H.Perrier) Capuron AF080004
10 Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. KC311151
11 Commiphora neglecta Verd. JF919029
12 Commiphora orbicularis Engl. JN882697
13 Commiphora schimperi (O.Bergman) Engl. JN882702
14 Commiphora wightii (Arn.) Bhandari EU419975
Open in a new tab

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Combined length of the ITS gene, GC content and BLAST

The combined length and GC content of ITS region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) in studied taxa ranges from 608 to 656 nucleotide base pairs (bp) and 65–67% respectively (length 620 bp and GC content 67% in C. erythrea, length 619 bp and GC content 67% in C. gileadensis, length 649 bp and GC content 66% in C. habessinica, length 608 bp and GC content 65% in C. kataf, length 646 bp and GC content 66% in C. madagascariens, length 651 bp and GC content 66% in C. myrrha, and length 656 bp and GC content 67% in C. quadricincta). The BLAST search of ITS sequence shows high similarity with GenBank sequences of C. myrrha, C. kataf, C. neglecta, C. gowlello, C. habessinica and C. kua [99% identity of sequence of C. gileadensis with C. myrrha (KC311151), 99% identity of sequence of C. kataf with GenBank sequence of C. kataf (JN882709), 100% identity of sequence of C. myrrha with GenBank sequence of C. myrrha (JN882706) and 96% identity with C. kua (JN882696), 97% identity of sequence of C. erythrea with C. neglecta (JF919029), 97% identity of sequence of C. habessinica with C. gowlello (JN882674), 96% identity of sequence of C. madagascariens with C. gowlello (JN882674), and 96% identity of sequence of C. quadricincta with C. habessinica (JN882673) and 96% identity with C. kua (JN882696)].

3.2. Molecular phylogenetic relationships

The molecular phylogenetic analysis of the ITS gene (data matrix- 513 positions, parsimony informative sites- 106) using MP method (Eck and Dayhoff, 1966, Felsenstein, 1985, Nei and Kumar, 2000, Tamura et al., 2011) resulted in 16 maximally parsimonious trees (length- 287, consistency index- 0.637, retention index- 0.741, and composite index- 0.540) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

The maximum parsimony tree (length- 287, consistency index- 0.637, retention index- 0.741, composite index- 0.540) recovered from the molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA of 21 species of Commiphora; the number on the node indicated bootstrap support in 1000 bootstrap replicates.

The maximum parsimony tree recovered (Fig. 1) from the phylogenetic analysis clearly revealed the occurrence of the C. kataf and C. myrrha in Saudi Arabia; C. kataf and C. myrrha showed proximity [bootstrap support (BS 99%)] with the sequence of C. kataf and C. myrrha included in the analysis from GenBank (GenBank accession number JN882709 and KC311151) respectively. C. kataf clade with C. gileadensis-C. neglecta (BS 36%) and C. erythrea- C. eminii (BS 54%). Morphologically C. myrrha (fruit beaked, pseudoaril with broad triangular lobes) differs from C. gileadensis (fruit 4-valved, with prominent line) and C. erythrea (stout gnarled tree, fruit globose-ovoid, tomentose).

3.3. New distributional record of Commiphora madagascariens

C. quadricincta clade with C. africana, C. schimperi, C. myrrha, C, wightii, C. kua, C. madagascariens and C. habessinica (BS 95%). C. madagascariens (fruit beaked rounded oblong when viewed from above, with 2 small apical pits) is native to Tanzania, formerly cultivated in Mauritius, and surviving near Bhagalpur (India) on the Ganges as a relic of cultivation (http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:127719-1)] showed close proximity with C. habessinica (fruit not beaked, pseudoaril with four parallel-sided arms) (BS 95%). At the molecular level, there were four specific nucleotide differences at the alignment position i.e. 99 (C → Gap), 207 (Gap → G), 482 (C → Gap and 483 (T → Gap) were noted in between C. habessinica and C. madagascariens. Thus the present study herein reports the occurrence of C. madagascariens for the first time from Saudi Arabia.

3.4. Species-specific molecular signature

The taxonomic identification of plants based on morphological characteristics depends on sufficient experience and expertise in plant taxonomy, and it is well known that the morphological characteristics can easily be varied by the geographical environment (Marcon et al., 2005, Rai et al., 2012); however, the DNA sequences is hardly influenced by environment, and remain same even in the developmental stages (Liu et al., 2011); and therefore, the DNA based species-specific molecular genotyping (DNA barcoding) is an effective tools to classical morphological methods (Hebert et al., 2003) which is being used for the species identification successfully across all the groups of live forms. Further, the tools and techniques of DNA barcoding has now been proven useful in assessment of biodiversity, forensics and in conservation genetics (Ali et al., 2014). The ITS sequences of nrDNA generated in the present study have been submitted to GenBank (Table 1), which may be used as species-specific molecular signature of Commiphora species of Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgments

Research supported by the King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Science, Research Center.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Abdul-Ghani A.S., Amin R. Effect of aqueous extract of Commiphora opobalsamum on blood pressure and heart rate in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997;57:219–222. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(97)00063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Howiriny T.A., Al-Sohaibani M.O., Al-Said M.S., Al-Yahya M.A., El-tahir K.H., Rafatullah S. Hepatoprotective properties of Commiphora opobalsamum (Balessan), a traditional medicinal plant of Saudi Arabia. Drugs exptl. Clin. Res. 2004;5&6:213–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Howiriny T., Al-Sohaibani M., Al-Said M., Al-Yahya M., El-Tahir K., Rafatullah S. Effect of Commiphora opobalsamum (L.) Engl. (Balessan) on experimental gastric ulcers and secretion in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005;98:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali M.A., Van D.L., Kim S.K. Molecular systematic study of Cardamine glechomifolia Levl. (Brassicaceae) using internal transcribed spacer sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) and chloroplast trnL and trnL-F sequences. Saudi Journal of Biological. Science. 2010;17(4):275–290. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali M.A., Gábor G., Norbert H., Balázs K., Al-Hemaid F.M.A., Pandey A.K., Lee J. The changing epitome of species identification- DNA barcoding. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014;21(3):204–231. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Byng J.W. Plant Gateway Ltd.; Hertford, UK: 2014. The Flowering Plants Handbook: A practical guide to families and genera of the world. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaudhary S.A. Ministry of Agriculture and Water; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: 2001. Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen S., Yao H., Han J., Liu C., Song J., Shi L., Zhu Y., Ma X., Gao T., Pang X., Luo K., Li Y., Li X., Jia X., Lin Y., Leon C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One. 2010;5(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eck R.V., Dayhoff M.O. National Biomedical Research Foundation; Silver Springs, Maryland: 1966. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillett, J.B., 1991. Burseraceae. In: Polhill, R.M. (Ed.), Flora of Tropical East Africa. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1–95.
  13. Hanuša L., Ezankab T., Dembitskya V.M., Moussaieffa A. Myrrh –Commiphora Chemistry. Biomed. Papers. 2005;149:3–28. doi: 10.5507/bp.2005.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell J.L. Plants Used Against Cancer, A Survey. 1982;vol. II:89–93. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., deWaard J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003;270:313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iluz D., Hoffman1 M., Gilboa-Garber1 N., Amar Zohar. Medicinal properties of Commiphora gileadensis. African J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010;4(8):516–520. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu C., Liang D., Gao T., Pang X., Song J., Yao H., Han J., Liu Z., Guan X., Jiang K., Li H., Chen S. PTIGS-IdIt, a system for species identification by DNA sequences of the psbA-trnH intergenic spacer region. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S13-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marcon A.B., Barros I.C., Guerra M. Variation in chromosome numbers, CMA bands and 45S rDNA sites in species of Selaginella (Pteridophyta) Ann. Bot. 2005;95:271–276. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nei M., Kumar S. Oxford University Press; New York: 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. [Google Scholar]
  20. Poczai P., Hyvönen J. Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010;37(4):1897–1912. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9630-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rai P.S., Bellampalli R., Dobriyal R.M., Agarwal A., Satyamoorthy K., Narayana D.A. DNA barcoding of authentic and substitute samples of herb of the family Asparagaceae and Asclepiadaceae based on the ITS2 region. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2012;3:136–140. doi: 10.4103/0975-9476.100177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shen T., Wan Wen-Zhu, Wang Xiao-Ning, Sun Ling-Mei, Yuan Hui-Qing, Wang Xiao-Ling, Ji Mei, Lou Hong-Xiang. Sesquiterpenoids from the Resinous Exudates of Commiphora opobalsamum (Burseraceae) Helvetica Chimica Acta. 2008;91:881–887. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tejero M.R.G., Casares-Porcel M., Sanchez-Rojas C.P., Ramiro-Gutíerrez J.M., Molero-Mesa J., Pieroni A., Giusti M.E., Censorii E., de Pasquale C., Della A., Paraskeva-Hadijchambi D., Hadjichambis A., Houmani Z., El-Demerdash M., El-Zayat M., Hmamouchi M., ElJohrig S. Medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: Synthesis of the results of the project Rubia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116:341–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;24:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vollesen, K., 1986. Commiphora, some thoughts on the classification of an “impossible” genus. In: Hedberg, I. (Ed.), Research on the Ethiopian Flora: Proceedings of the Wrst Ethiopian Flora Symposium held in Uppsala May 22–26, 1984. Almqvist & Wikdell International, Uppsala, pp. 204–212.
  27. Weeks A., Simpson B.B. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Commiphora (Burseraceae) yields insight on the evolution and historical biogeography of an “impossible” genus. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2007;42:62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wild H. A revised classification of the genus Commiphora Jacq. Bol. Soc. Broteriana. 1959;33:67–95. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yao H., Song J., Liu C., Luo K., Han J., Li Y., Pang X., Xu H., Zhu Y., Xiao P., Chen S. Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS One. 2010;5(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES