Abstract
Background
Raisins are a commonly consumed dried fruit and given their nutrient profile may offer nutritional and health benefits.
Objective
To examine the association between consumption of raisins and raisin‐containing foods with nutrient intake and dietary quality in children.
Methods
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data for 2001–2012 in those 2–18 years of age (n = 20,175) were used. Consumers of raisins (n = 154, 51.6% female) and raisin‐containing foods (n = 1,993, 52.5% female) were defined as reporting any consumption of raisins and raisin‐containing foods, respectively, during the first 24‐hr diet recall. Diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)‐2010. Regression analyses were conducted comparing consumers and nonconsumers using appropriate sample weights and adjusted for demographic and lifestyle covariates with significance set at p < 0.01.
Results
Regarding “nutrients of public health concern/shortfall nutrients” and “nutrients to limit,” raisin consumers had higher intakes of dietary fiber (23%), potassium (16%), magnesium (12%) with lower intakes of added sugars (−19%) than nonconsumers. Similarly, consumers of raisin‐containing foods also had higher intakes of dietary fiber (15%), potassium (5%), magnesium (11%), iron (6%), vitamin A (10%), and vitamin E (13%) and lower intake of sodium (−5%). Consumers of raisin and raisin‐containing foods had higher intakes of fruits (60%, 16%, respectively), whole fruits (119%, 23%, respectively) and whole grains (44%, 93%, respectively) and had a better diet quality as per higher total HEI 2010 scores (22%, 8%, respectively) than nonconsumers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, consumption of raisins or raisin‐containing foods was associated with better nutrient intake and diet quality in American children.
Keywords: children, healthy eating index, NHANES, nutrient intake, raisins
1. INTRODUCTION
Increased intake of fruit and vegetables is an unequivocal recommendation by Dietary Guidelines worldwide. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015–2020 (DGA) recommended adequate consumption of fruits and vegetables as part of healthy eating pattern [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. Dietary recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics for children and adolescents also include eating more fruits and vegetables and reducing added sugar [Gidding et al., 2006]. MyPlate (ChooseMyPlate.gov) recommends one to two cup equivalents of fruit per day for children depending on age, gender, and physical activity [USDA, 2010]. Despite these recommendations, about 25% of 1–3‐year‐old toddlers, about 40% of 4–8‐year‐old young children, 76% of 9–13‐year‐old children, and over 85% 14–18‐year‐old teens in the United States do not consume amount of fruit recommended [NCI, 2014a]. Fruits are naturally low in fat and sodium and can be important sources of potassium, dietary fiber, vitamin C, and folate.
Raisins (dried grapes) are a commonly consumed dried fruit [Keast, O'Neil, & Jones, 2011]. Raisins provide dietary fiber and important minerals and are low‐medium energy dense. A serving (43 g) of raisins provides 129 calories with 1.6 g dietary fiber, 0.2 g total fat, 25 g total sugar, 14 mg magnesium, 322 mg potassium, and 0.8 mg iron [USDA, 2016]. Raisins also contain various phytochemicals including flavonoids (catechins, quercetin, kaempferol, and rutin), hydrocinnamic acids (coutaric and cafterics), epicatechins, phytoestrogens (genestein and daidzein), and resveratrol [Karadeniz, Durst, & Wrolstad, 2000; Williamson & Carughi, 2010], but the physiological consequences of consumption of these compounds remain to be elucidated. However, intervention studies examining nutritional and health effect of raisin consumption have been mostly limited to adults [Williamson & Carughi, 2010; Anderson & Waters, 2013; Kanellos et al., 2014; Anderson, Weiter, Christian, Ritchey, & Bays, 2014; Bays, Weiter, & Anderson, 2015; Kanellos et al., 2013; Esfahani, Lam, & Kendall, 2014; ]. Satiating effects of raisins have been reported in a couple of studies with children [Patel, Luhovyy et al., 2013; Patel, Luhovyy, Mollard, Painter, & Anderson, 2013]. Using NHANES data, we have recently reported that raisin consumption in adults was associated with better diet quality, and better nutrient intake, with lower risks of having metabolic syndrome and being obese and (Fulgoni, Painter, & Carughi, 2017). Epidemiological studies evaluating the effect of raisins on diet quality and nutrient intake in children are very limited. In one cross‐sectional study in children aged 2–19 years, the intake of grapes and grape products (juice and raisins) was associated with a healthier overall dietary pattern and higher intake of certain nutrients [McGill, Keast, Painter, Romano, & Wightman, 2013]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of raisin or raisin‐containing foods consumption with nutrient intakes and diet quality in a large, nationally representative sample of US children.
2. METHODS
2.1. Subjects
Data from children age 2–18 years participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2002, 2003–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, 2009–2010, and 2011–2012 [CDC, 2015] were used for these analyses to improve sample size. Exclusion criteria included those with incomplete or unreliable 24‐hr recall data and those pregnant and/or lactating. Written informed consent was obtained for all participants or proxies (i.e., parents or guardians for children under 6 years; those 6–11 years had assistance from parents or guardians), and the survey protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Review Board at the NCHS.
2.2. Estimation of intake
Dietary intake data from the first 24‐hr recall dietary interviews collected using United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) automated multiple‐pass method were utilized [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2015]. Similar to our previous work (Fulgoni et al., 2017), intake of raisins were assessed using only two USDA food codes [USDA 2015a]: plain raisins (USDA food code 62125100) and cooked raisins (USDA food code 62125110). Intake of raisin‐containing foods was assessed using 147 USDA food codes that contained raisins as an ingredient. A list of top 40 foods containing raisins and their food codes is provided in Table 1. Consumers of raisins (n = 154) were defined as those consuming raisins in any amount during the 24‐hr recall. Consumers of raisin‐containing foods (n = 2,059) were defined as those consuming any quantity of foods that contained raisins during the 24‐hr recall. Energy and nutrient intake were determined similar to that of Fulgoni et al., 2017; in short, the respective Food & Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies for each NHANES cycle were used [USDA, 2015a]. MyPlate servings were calculated using the USDA MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED; for older surveys) and Food Patterns Equivalents Database (FPED; for more recent surveys) [Bowman, Friday, & Moshfegh, 2008; USDA, 2015b] which provides servings of major food groups and corresponding subgroups. The MyPlate food group intakes per day were calculated by aggregating the number of servings for all the foods reported in the 24‐hr recall.
Table 1.
Food Code | Description | Food Code | Description |
---|---|---|---|
56203030 | Oatmeal, cooked, instant, fat not added in cooking | 51180080 | Bagel, with fruit other than raisins |
51160110 | Roll, sweet, cinnamon bun, frosted | 51301800 | Bagel, wheat, with raisins |
62125100 | Raisins | 56203070 | Oatmeal, cooked, instant, fat added in cooking |
53542100 | Granola bar, NFS | 58116120 | Empanada, Mexican turnover, filled with meat and vegetables |
74406100 | Steak sauce, tomato‐base | 51161020 | Roll, sweet, with fruit, frosted |
57330000 | Raisin Bran, Kellogg's | 91739010 | Raisins, chocolate covered |
42501000 | Nut mixture with dried fruit and seeds | 52304010 | Muffin, wheat bran |
57329000 | Raisin bran, NFS | 53233040 | Cookie, oatmeal, reduced fat, NS as to raisins |
57227000 | Granola, NFS | 13210110 | Pudding, bread |
53241600 | Cookie, butter or sugar, with fruit and/or nuts | 51160100 | Roll, sweet, cinnamon bun, no frosting |
53510100 | Danish pastry, with fruit | 57000100 | Oat cereal, NFS |
51160000 | Roll, sweet, no frosting | 53610170 | Coffee cake, crumb or quick‐bread type, with fruit |
51129010 | Bread, raisin | 53102100 | Cake or cupcake, applesauce, without icing or filling |
51161000 | Roll, sweet, with fruit, no frosting | 27146160 | Chicken with mole sauce |
51180030 | Bagel, with raisins | 52404060 | Bread, pumpkin |
57331000 | Raisin Bran, Post | 53540000 | Breakfast bar, NFS |
13210410 | Pudding, rice | 57330010 | Raisin Bran Crunch, Kellogg's |
51129020 | Bread, raisin, toasted | 75141100 | Cabbage salad or coleslaw with apples and/or raisins, with dressing |
56203213 | Oatmeal, cooked, instant, made with milk, fat not added in cooking | 53237000 | Cookie, raisin |
28522000 | Mole poblano (sauce) | 51301120 | Bread, wheat or cracked wheat, with raisins |
2.3. Estimation of diet quality
USDA's Healthy Eating Index (HEI)‐2010 was used to estimate diet quality. HEI‐2010 has 12 components, and each component represents a particular aspect of diet quality [Guenther et al., 2013]. Dietary intake data (day 1) and the SAS code downloaded from the USDA website [NCI, 2014b] were used to determine HEI‐2010 scores.
2.4. Statistical analysis
SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and SUDAAN 11 (RTI, Research Triangle Park, NC) were used for all analysis. The complex sample design of NHANES was considered using primary sampling units and strata with appropriate survey weights (day one dietary sample weights) in all intake analyses. Similar to our approach used previously (Fulgoni et al., 2017), least square means (LSMs) and standard errors (SEs) were generated via regression analyses for intakes of energy, nutrients, and food groups and diet quality in consumers and nonconsumers of raisins and raisin‐containing foods. Analyses of intakes of food groups and nutrient intakes were adjusted for age, ethnicity, gender, poverty income ratio, physical activity level, current smoking status, and energy intake. Analyses of energy intake and diet quality were adjusted for the same covariates but without energy intake; HEI scores are determined based on energy intake. For all analyses, p < 0.01 was deemed significant.
3. RESULTS
Approximately, 0.92% children (n = 154, 51.6% females) were consumers of raisins and 10.3% children (n = 1,993, 52.5% females) were consumers of raisin‐containing foods. Consumers of raisins as well as of raisin‐containing foods were younger than nonconsumers. Consumers of raisins were less likely to be Mexican American and smokers while the consumers of raisin‐containing foods were more likely to be non‐Hispanic White and less likely to be of other ethnicity (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variables | Raisins | Raisins containing foods | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NonConsumers Mean ± SE | Consumers Mean ± SE | p Valuea | NonConsumers Mean ± SE | Consumers Mean ± SE | p Valuea | |
Sample (N) | 20,175 | 154 | 18,270 | 2,059 | ||
Age (years) | 10.1 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 | 10.1 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 0.2 | 0.2176 |
Gender | ||||||
Male (%) | 50.7 ± 0.6 | 48.4 ± 5.6 | 0.6908 | 51.0 ± 0.6 | 47.5 ± 1.7 | 0.0438 |
Race/Ethnicity | ||||||
Mexican American (%) | 13.5 ± 0.9 | 5.1 ± 1.4 | <0.0001 | 13.6 ± 0.9 | 11.7 ± 0.9 | 0.1522 |
Other Hispanic (%) | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 1.1 | 0.0122 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 5.9 ± 0.9 | 0.8936 |
Non‐Hispanic white (%) | 59.1 ± 1.6 | 71.2 ± 4.8 | 0.0162 | 58.6 ± 1.6 | 65.0 ± 1.8 | 0.0081 |
Non‐Hispanic black (%) | 14.4 ± 0.9 | 12.4 ± 3.4 | 0.5669 | 14.5 ± 0.9 | 13.2 ± 1.0 | 0.3570 |
Other (%) | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 8.6 ± 3.1 | 0.5927 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 0.7 | 0.0002 |
Poverty income ratio | 2.5 ± 0.04 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.0854 | 2.5 ± 0.04 | 2.6 ± 0.07 | 0.0332 |
Smoker (%) | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.0001 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 0.1651 |
Physical activity | ||||||
Sedentary (%) | 12.6 ± 0.4 | 10.3 ± 2.3 | 0.3242 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 10.7 ± 1.0 | 0.0491 |
Moderate (%) | 19.9 ± 0.5 | 16.2 ± 3.8 | 0.3369 | 20.0 ± 0.6 | 19.2 ± 1.3 | 0.5946 |
Vigorous (%) | 67.5 ± 0.6 | 73.5 ± 4.2 | 0.1601 | 67.3 ± 0.7 | 70.1 ± 1.6 | 0.1030 |
SE, standard error
aComparison of consumers and nonconsumers.
Values in bold indicate significant at p<0.01.
Nutrient intakes differed significantly between the consumers of raisins and nonconsumers as well as between consumers and nonconsumers of raisin‐containing foods (Table 3). Consumers of raisins had significantly higher (p < 0.01) energy adjusted daily intakes of dietary fiber (22.9%), magnesium (11.6%) and potassium (16.0%), and lower intakes of added sugar (‐19.1%), total fat (−5.1%), and monounsaturated fat (−9.2%) compared to nonconsumers. Similarly, consumers of raisin‐containing foods also had significantly higher (p < 0.01) intakes of energy (10.8%), carbohydrate (1.8%), dietary fiber (14.6%), total sugar (3.2%), copper (7.9%), iron (6.6%), magnesium (11.5%), potassium (5.3%), vitamin A (10.0%), vitamin B6 (10.0%), and vitamin E (12.9%) with lower intakes of monounsaturated fat (−3.6%) and sodium (−4.6%) compared to nonconsumers. The intakes of other nutrients were not significantly different among consumers/nonconsumers of raisins as well as of consumers/nonconsumers raisin‐containing foods (Table 3).
Table 3.
Variablesa | Raisins | Raisins containing foods | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | |
Energy (kcal) | 1953 ± 12 | 1883 ± 50 | 0.1762 | 1934 ± 12 | 2142 ± 28 | <0.0001 |
Protein (gm) | 70.2 ± 0.4 | 73.0 ± 3.2 | 0.3723 | 70.2 ± 0.4 | 70.5 ± 0.8 | 0.6855 |
Carbohydrate (gm) | 267 ± 1 | 278 ± 5 | 0.0330 | 267 ± 1 | 272 ± 1 | 0.0030 |
Dietary Fiber (gm) | 13.3 ± 0.1 | 16.3 ± 0.8 | 0.0002 | 13.2 ± 0.1 | 15.1 ± 0.3 | <0.0001 |
Total Sugars (gm) | 132 ± 1 | 137 ± 5 | 0.3103 | 132 ± 1 | 136 ± 2 | 0.0089 |
Added Sugars (tsp) | 20.0 ± 0.2 | 16.2 ± 1.1 | 0.0004 | 20.0 ± 0.2 | 19.7 ± 0.4 | 0.4645 |
Total Fat (gm) | 72.9 ± 0.3 | 67.8 ± 1.7 | 0.0035 | 73.0 ± 0.3 | 71.6 ± 0.6 | 0.0177 |
MUFA (gm) | 26.5 ± 0.1 | 24.1 ± 0.7 | 0.0006 | 26.6 ± 0.1 | 25.6 ± 0.3 | 0.0002 |
PUFA (gm) | 14.7 ± 0.1 | 14.0 ± 0.4 | 0.0874 | 14.7 ± 0.1 | 15.2 ± 0.3 | 0.0830 |
SFA (gm) | 25.5 ± 0.2 | 23.9 ± 0.9 | 0.0727 | 25.5 ± 0.2 | 24.8 ± 0.3 | 0.0089 |
Cholesterol (mg) | 231 ± 3 | 218 ± 13 | 0.3231 | 232 ± 3 | 221 ± 6 | 0.0398 |
Calcium (mg) | 985 ± 9 | 1070 ± 45 | 0.0573 | 987 ± 9 | 973 ± 19 | 0.4779 |
Copper (mg) | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 1.22 ± 0.09 | 0.0357 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 0.0001 |
Iron (mg) | 14.4 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.7 | 0.1434 | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 15.3 ± 0.3 | 0.0005 |
Magnesium (mg) | 229 ± 1 | 256 ± 7 | 0.0005 | 227 ± 1 | 253 ± 4 | <0.0001 |
Phosphorus (mg) | 1237 ± 6 | 1307 ± 46 | 0.1323 | 1236 ± 6 | 1252 ± 14 | 0.2545 |
Potassium (mg) | 2228 ± 15 | 2585 ± 108 | 0.0012 | 2220 ± 15 | 2337 ± 33 | 0.0007 |
Selenium (μg) | 94.6 ± 0.6 | 97.7 ± 5.3 | 0.5657 | 94.5 ± 0.6 | 95.6 ± 1.4 | 0.4420 |
Sodium (mg) | 3150 ± 18 | 3001 ± 130 | 0.2607 | 3161 ± 19 | 3016 ± 35 | 0.0001 |
Zinc (mg) | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 0.5434 | 10.6 ± 0.2 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 0.4978 |
Vitamin A (μg) | 563 ± 8 | 612 ± 37 | 0.1798 | 558 ± 8 | 614 ± 17 | 0.0007 |
Thiamin (mg) | 1.55 ± 0.04 | 1.55 ± 0.05 | 0.8786 | 1.55 ± 0.04 | 1.59 ± 0.05 | 0.1568 |
Riboflavin (mg) | 2.02 ± 0.04 | 2.07 ± 0.09 | 0.4945 | 2.01 ± 0.04 | 2.08 ± 0.05 | 0.0940 |
Niacin (mg) | 20.8 ± 0.1 | 21.3 ± 1.3 | 0.7316 | 20.7 ± 0.2 | 21.7 ± 0.4 | 0.0356 |
Folate DFE (μg) | 532 ± 5 | 545 ± 34 | 0.7094 | 531 ± 5 | 539 ± 12 | 0.5245 |
Vitamin B6 (mg) | 1.69 ± 0.04 | 1.84 ± 0.13 | 0.2194 | 1.68 ± 0.04 | 1.85 ± 0.05 | 0.0003 |
Vitamin B12 (μg) | 5.00 ± 0.13 | 5.19 ± 0.38 | 0.5848 | 5.00 ± 0.13 | 5.03 ± 0.16 | 0.7861 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 89.4 ± 1.6 | 87.9 ± 7.6 | 0.8438 | 89.3 ± 1.7 | 89.8 ± 2.7 | 0.8593 |
Vitamin D (μg) | 5.80 ± 0.07 | 5.70 ± 0.44 | 0.8214 | 5.79 ± 0.08 | 5.80 ± 0.16 | 0.9872 |
Vitamin E (mg) | 5.96 ± 0.06 | 5.74 ± 0.23 | 0.3307 | 5.89 ± 0.06 | 6.65 ± 0.25 | 0.0031 |
Vitamin K (μg) | 56.8 ± 1.2 | 50.8 ± 2.7 | 0.0196 | 56.7 ± 1.2 | 58.1 ± 2.3 | 0.4771 |
MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs, saturated fatty acids; LSMs—least square means; SE, standard error.
aValues are adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, poverty income ratio, physical activity level, current smoking status, and energy (except for energy); bComparison of consumers and nonconsumers.
Values in bold indicate significant at p<0.01.
Intake of raisins as well as of raisin‐containing foods was also associated with significant differences (p < 0.01) in food group intake (Table 4). Intakes of total fruit, whole fruit, and whole grain were significantly (higher p < 0.01) among consumers of raisins (60.1%, 119%, 44.1%, respectively) and raisin‐containing foods (15.6%, 22.7%, 93.2%, respectively) compared to nonconsumers. Overall diet quality (total scores for HEI‐2010) among consumers was significantly higher (21.5% for consumers of raisins and 7.7% for consumers of raisin‐containing foods) compared to nonconsumers (Table 5). HEI‐2010 subcomponent scores for total fruit (36.8%, 11.3%), whole fruit (81.4%, 19.6%), whole grain (60.0%, 81.9%), sodium (23.8%, 11.8%), and refined grains (22.7%, 7.9%) were higher for the consumers of raisins and consumers of raisin‐containing foods, respectively, compared to respective nonconsumers. Consumers of raisins also had a higher score for SoFAAS calories (30.8%), and consumers of raisin‐containing foods had a higher score for seafood and plant protein (22.2%) compared to their respective nonconsumers (Table 5).
Table 4.
Variablesa | Raisins | Raisins containing foods | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | |
Total fruit (cup eq.) | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 1.76 ± 0.18 | 0.0002 | 1.09 ± 0.04 | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 0.0038 |
Whole fruit (cup eq.) | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 1.24 ± 0.15 | <0.0001 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.0032 |
Total vegetable (cup eq.) | 0.94 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 0.6426 | 0.94 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.9296 |
Total grain (oz eq.) | 6.69 ± 0.13 | 6.48 ± 0.23 | 0.2653 | 6.69 ± 0.13 | 6.69 ± 0.19 | 0.9471 |
Whole grain (oz eq.) | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 0.0095 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | <0.0001 |
Total dairy (cup eq.) | 2.10 ± 0.07 | 2.27 ± 0.16 | 0.2701 | 2.12 ± 0.07 | 1.99 ± 0.10 | 0.0362 |
Total protein group (oz eq.) | 4.27 ± 0.12 | 4.32 ± 0.48 | 0.9178 | 4.26 ± 0.12 | 4.37 ± 0.18 | 0.3682 |
LSMs, least square means; SE, standard error
aValues are adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, poverty income ratio, physical activity level, current smoking status, and energy; bComparison of consumers and nonconsumers.
Values in bold indicate significant at p<0.01.
Table 5.
Variablesa | Raisins | Raisins containing foods | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | NonConsumers LSM ± SE | Consumers LSM ± SE | p Valueb | |
HEI‐2010 Total score | 45.7 ± 0.2 | 55.6 ± 1.7 | <0.0001 | 45.5 ± 0.2 | 49.0 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 |
Component 1 (Total vegetables) | 2.16 ± 0.03 | 2.30 ± 0.22 | 0.5432 | 2.17 ± 0.03 | 2.15 ± 0.06 | 0.8378 |
Component 2 (Greens & Beans) | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.16 | 0.4424 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 0.2407 |
Component 3 (Total fruit) | 2.52 ± 0.04 | 3.45 ± 0.20 | <0.0001 | 2.50 ± 0.04 | 2.78 ± 0.08 | 0.0010 |
Component 4 (Whole fruit) | 2.03 ± 0.04 | 3.68 ± 0.16 | <0.0001 | 2.01 ± 0.04 | 2.40 ± 0.08 | <0.0001 |
Component 5 (Whole Grains) | 1.77 ± 0.04 | 2.83 ± 0.33 | 0.0012 | 1.66 ± 0.04 | 3.02 ± 0.13 | <0.0001 |
Component 6 (Dairy) | 6.73 ± 0.06 | 6.79 ± 0.32 | 0.8496 | 6.75 ± 0.06 | 6.55 ± 0.12 | 0.0949 |
Component 7 (Total Protein Foods) | 3.63 ± 0.03 | 3.69 ± 0.15 | 0.7165 | 3.63 ± 0.03 | 3.68 ± 0.07 | 0.5114 |
Component 8 (Seafood & Plant Protein) | 1.42 ± 0.04 | 1.94 ± 0.25 | 0.0404 | 1.40 ± 0.04 | 1.71 ± 0.07 | 0.0008 |
Component 9 (Fatty Acid Ratio) | 3.91 ± 0.06 | 3.81 ± 0.37 | 0.7833 | 3.91 ± 0.06 | 3.94 ± 0.13 | 0.8601 |
Component 10 (Sodium) | 4.94 ± 0.07 | 6.11 ± 0.44 | 0.0084 | 4.89 ± 0.07 | 5.47 ± 0.13 | <0.0001 |
Component 11 (Refined Grains) | 5.16 ± 0.07 | 6.33 ± 0.35 | 0.0011 | 5.13 ± 0.07 | 5.54 ± 0.15 | 0.0074 |
Component 12 (SoFAAS Calories) | 10.7 ± 0.1 | 14.1 ± 0.8 | <0.0001 | 10.8 ± 0.1 | 11.0 ± 0.3 | 0.3037 |
LSM, least square means; SE, standard error.
aValues are adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, poverty income ratio, physical activity level, and current smoking status; bComparison of consumers and nonconsumers.
Values in bold indicate significant at p<0.01.
4. DISCUSSION
This is the first report to explore relationships of consumption of raisins and raisin‐containing foods with diet quality and nutrient intakes among US children using a large nationally representative sample. We combined data NHANES 2001–2012 thus providing a sample size of over 20,000 children in the present study. Approximately, 0.9% of the children in the United States reported consumption of raisins and 10% of US children reported consumption of raisin‐containing foods on the day of the recall and consumption of raisins and raisins containing foods was associated with better nutrient intake and diet quality.
Consumers of raisins had significantly higher intakes of energy adjusted dietary fiber, potassium and magnesium, and less added sugar than nonconsumers. Similarly, consumers of raisin‐containing foods consumed significantly more energy, dietary fiber, vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin E, iron, magnesium, and copper, with less sodium compared to nonconsumers. While consuming raisins and raisin‐containing foods was associated with numerous positive impacts on nutrient intake, the clinical significance of these changes was not assessed. Consumers of grapes and grape products (juice and raisins) using NHANES 2003–2008 [McGill et al., 2013] were reported to have higher intake of several key nutrients including dietary fiber, vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, and magnesium compared to nonconsumers. DGA has identified most of these nutrients (fiber, potassium, magnesium, and vitamin E) as—”shortfall nutrients” as these are currently underconsumed [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. Additionally, DGA has termed fiber and potassium as “nutrients of public health concern” as current intakes are low enough to possibly pose health risks [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. The intake of less than 5% of population is at or above the Adequate Intake for potassium or dietary fiber currently [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. Low intakes of potassium and dietary fiber are likely due to low intakes of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. DGA recommended eating more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains along with low fat dairy to increase intake of potassium and fiber as well as other nutrients of public health concern [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. Consumers of raisins also had lower intakes of added sugars, and consumers of raisin‐containing foods had lower intakes of sodium compared to nonconsumers. DGA classified added sugar and sodium “nutrients to limit” and recommended eating patterns that are limited in added sugar and sodium [DHHS/USDA, 2015]. While sugars naturally occurring in raisins are not considered added sugars, any sugar added to the outside of raisins like that in certain ready‐to‐eat cereals would be considered added sugars.
The consumers of raisins and also of raisin‐containing foods also had higher intakes of fruits, whole fruit, and whole grain. The higher intake of these food groups is associated with healthier diets. HEI‐2010 is a validated measure of diet quality and is indicative of compliance with dietary recommendations. It has 12 components (nine components address adequacy intake and three address moderation of intake) each of which relate to a specific DGA recommendation [DHHS/USDA, 2011]. HEI has been previously used to assess whether diet quality changes over time [Juan, Guenther, & Kott, 2008], the effectiveness of dietary interventions, and to validate research tools and nutrition indices [Fulgoni, Keast, & Drewnowski, 2009]. It has also been effectively used to evaluate diets of population subgroups [Hiza, Casavale, Guenther, & Davis, 2013] and food environments [Reedy, Krebs‐Smith, & Bosire, 2010]. Several recent studies have also used HEI to assess relationships between intakes of nutrients, specific foods, and dietary patterns with health‐related outcomes [Fulgoni et al., 2017; Nicklas, O'Neil, & Fulgoni, 2012; Chiuve et al., 2012; Reedy et al., 2008; O'Neil, Nicklas, Rampersaud, & Fulgoni, 2011]. Total and many subcomponent HEI‐2010 scores of consumers of raisins and raisin‐containing foods were significantly higher than those of nonconsumers. Consumers of grapes and grape products (juice and raisins) were reported to have higher diet quality as compared to nonconsumers [McGill et al., 2013]. In adults, we previously found that HEI‐2010 total scores and scores of many subcomponents were higher in raisin consumers than nonconsumers [Fulgoni et al., 2017].
One limitation of this study is the use of cross‐sectional data, which cannot confer casualty. Additionally, given 24‐hr dietary recalls rely on participants’ memory to self‐report dietary intakes, they are subject to misreporting or reporting bias. Data used in this study were based on a single 24‐hr dietary recall and for some participants relied on intakes reported by parents/caregivers. Major strengths of this study included the use of a nationally representative large sample and the use of numerous covariates to adjust data in an attempt to remove potential confounding. However, residual confounding may still exist that could explain some of the results reported.
In conclusion, the results from this study suggest that consumption of raisins/raisin‐containing foods is associated with better diet quality and nutrient intake in American children.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
JP consults with Sun‐Maid Raisin Growers of California, the National Pasteurized Egg Board, Paramount Pistachios, and the National Dairy Council. AC works for Sun‐Maid Raisin Growers of California. VLF provides analyses of NHANES for members of the food/beverage industry.
ETHICAL STATEMENTS
Ethical review: The Research Ethics Review Board at the National Center for Health Statistics of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention approved the survey protocol.
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was provided by all participants or proxies (i.e., parents or guardians).
RESPONSIBILITIES
VLF and AC designed of the study. VLF conducted analysis; VLF, JP, and AC reviewed results. VLF developed the first draft of the manuscript; JP and AC provided edits. All authors read the final version.
Fulgoni VL III, Painter J, Carughi A. Association of raisin and raisin‐containing food consumption with nutrient intake and diet quality in US children: NHANES 2001‐2012. Food Sci Nutr. 2018;6:2162–2169. 10.1002/fsn3.780
Funding Information
Sun‐Maid Raisin Growers of California
References
- Anderson, J. W. , & Waters, A. R. (2013). Raisin consumption by humans: Effects on glycemia and insulinemia and cardiovascular risk factors. Journal of Food Science, 78, A11–A17. 10.1111/1750-3841.12071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J. W. , Weiter, K. M. , Christian, A. L. , Ritchey, M. B. , & Bays, H. E. (2014). Raisins compared with other snack effects on glycemia and blood pressure: A randomized, controlled trial. Postgraduate Medicine, 126, 37–43. 10.3810/pgm.2014.01.2723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bays, H. , Weiter, K. , & Anderson, J. (2015). A randomized study of raisins versus alternative snacks on glycemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 43, 37–43. 10.1080/00913847.2015.998410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman, SA , Friday, JE , & Moshfegh, A . (2008). MyPyramid Equivalents Database. Food Surveys Research Group Web site: USDA Agricultural Research Service; Available from: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=17565. [cited 28 Sept 2015].
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) , National Center for Health Statistics . (2015). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm [cited 28 Sept 2015]. [Google Scholar]
- Chiuve, S. , Fung, T. , Rimm, E. , Hu, F. , McCullough, M. , Wang, M. , Stampfer, M. J. , Willett, W. C. (2012). Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. Journal of Nutrition, 142, 1009–1018. 10.3945/jn.111.157222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esfahani, A. , Lam, J. , & Kendall, C. W. (2014). Acute effects of raisin consumption on glucose and insulin reponses in healthy individuals. Journal of Nutritional Science, 3, 1–6. 10.1017/jns.2013.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulgoni, V. L. , Keast, D. R. , & Drewnowski, A. (2009). Development and validation of the Nutrient‐rich Foods Index: A tool to measure nutritional quality of foods. Journal of Nutrition, 139, 1549–1554. 10.3945/jn.108.101360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulgoni, V. L. III , Painter, J. , & Carughi, A. (2017). Association of raisin consumption with nutrient intake, diet quality, and health risk factors in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001‐2012. Food & Nutrition Research, 61, 1378567 10.1080/16546628.2017.1378567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gidding, S. S. , Dennison, B. A. , Birch, L. L. , Daniels, S. R. , Gilman, M. W. , Lichtenstein, A. H. , … Van Horn, L. (2006). Dietary recommendations for children and adolescents: A guide for practitioners. Pediatrics, 117, 544–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guenther, P. M. , Casavale, K. O. , Reedy, J. , Kirkpatrick, S. I. , Hiza, H. A. , Kuczynski, K. J. , … Krebs‐Smith, S. M. (2013). Update of the healthy eating index: HEI‐2010. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113, 569–580. 10.1016/j.jand.2012.12.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiza, H. A. , Casavale, K. O. , Guenther, P. M. , & Davis, C. A. (2013). Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113, 297–306. 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juan, W. Y. , Guenther, P. M. , & Kott, P. S . (2008). Nutrition Insight 41. Alexandria: United States Department of Agriculture Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; Diet quality of older Americans in 1994–96 and 2001–02 as measured by the Healthy Eating Index‐2005.
- Kanellos, P. T. , Kaliora, A. C. , Liaskos, C. , Tentolouris, N. K. , Perrea, D. , & Karathanos, V. T. (2013). A study of glycemic response to Corinthian raisins in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 68, 145–148. 10.1007/s11130-013-0348-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanellos, P. T. , Kaliora, A. C. , Tentolouris, N. K. , Argiana, V. , Perrea, D. , Kalogeropoulos, N. , … Karathanos, V. T. (2014). A pilot, randomized controlled trial to examine the health outcomes of raisin consumption in patients with diabetes. Nutrition, 30, 358–364. 10.1016/j.nut.2013.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karadeniz, F. , Durst, R. W. , & Wrolstad, R. E. (2000). Polyphenolic composition of raisins. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 48, 5343–5350. 10.1021/jf0009753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keast, D. R. , O'Neil, C. E. , & Jones, J. M. (2011). Dried fruit consumption is associated with improved diet quality and reduced obesity in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004. Nutrition Research, 31, 460–467. 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGill, C. R. , Keast, D. R. , Painter, J. E. , Romano, C. S. , & Wightman, J. D. (2013). Improved diet quality and increased nutrient intakes associated with grape product consumption by U.S. children and adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2008. Journal of Food Science, 78, A1–A4. 10.1111/1750-3841.12066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Cancer Institute . (2014a). Usual dietary intakes: recommended amounts of total fruits table. Available from: http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/diet/usualintakes/pop/2007-10/table_b01.html; [cited 1 April 2015].
- National Cancer Institute . (2014b) Healthy Eating Index. HEI tools for researchers. (updated April 2014). Available from: http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/hei/tools.html. [cited 28 Sept 2015].
- Nicklas, T. A. , O'Neil, C. E. , & Fulgoni, V. L. (2012). Diet quality is inversely related to cardiovascular risk factors in adults. Journal of Nutrition, 142, 2112–2118. 10.3945/jn.112.164889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Neil, C. E. , Nicklas, T. A. , Rampersaud, G. C. , & Fulgoni, V. L. (2011). One hundred percent orange juice consumption is associated with better diet quality, improved nutrient adequacy, and no increased risk for overweight/obesity in children. Nutrition Research, 31, 673–682. 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel, B. P. , Bellissimo, N. , Luhovyy, B. , Bennett, L. J. , Hurton, E. , Painter, J. E. , & Anderson, G. H. (2013). An after‐school snack of raisins lowers cumulative food intake in young children. Journal of Food Science, 78, A5–A10. 10.1111/1750-3841.12070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel, B. P. , Luhovyy, B. , Mollard, R. , Painter, J. E. , & Anderson, G. H. (2013). A premeal snack of raisins decreases mealtime food intake more than grapes in young children. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 38, 382–389. 10.1139/apnm-2012-0309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reedy, J. , Krebs‐Smith, S. M. , & Bosire, C. (2010). Evaluating the food environment: Application of the Healthy Eating Index‐2005. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 465–471. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reedy, J. , Mitrou, P. N. , Krebs‐Smith, S. M. , Wirfält, E. , Flood, A. , Kipnis, V. , … Subar, A. F. (2008). Index‐based dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: The NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168, 38–48. 10.1093/aje/kwn097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- United States Department of Agriculture . (2010). All About the Fruit Group. Available from: https://www.choosemyplate.gov/fruit [cited 18 Oct 2016]
- United States Department of Agriculture , Agriculture Research Service . (2016). USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 28. Available from: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2371?fgcd=&manu=&lfacet=&format=&count=&max=35&offset=&sort=&qlookup=raisins [cited 18 Oct 2016].
- U.S. Department of Agriculture , Agricultural Research Service . (2015a). Food Surveys Research Group: Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, Available from: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/fndds/ [cited 28 Sept, 2015].
- U.S. Department of Agriculture , Agricultural Research Service . (2015b). USDA Food Patterns Equivalent Database. Available from: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/fped-databases/[cited 28 Sept 2015]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010, 7th ed Washington, DC: GPO. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture . (2015) 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. December 2015. Available from http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/.
- Williamson, G. , & Carughi, A. (2010). Polyphenol content and health benefits of raisins. Nutrition Research, 30, 511–519. 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]