Skip to main content
Journal of Aging Research logoLink to Journal of Aging Research
. 2018 Nov 25;2018:2126368. doi: 10.1155/2018/2126368

Positive Mental Attitude Associated with Lower 35-Year Mortality: The Leisure World Cohort Study

Annlia Paganini-Hill 1,, Claudia H Kawas 1,2,3, María M Corrada 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC6286774  PMID: 30595919

Abstract

Background

Although emerging research has suggested that “positive psychological well-being” is associated with better health outcomes, studies of long-term health and mortality in the elderly are limited. This study assessed the relationship of mental attitude and mortality in older adults followed up for 35 years.

Methods

In the 1980s, the Leisure World Cohort Study recruited residents of a California retirement community to a prospective cohort study of health promotion and disease prevention. Participants completed a postal survey including seven positively worded items from the Zung self-rating depression scale. Age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted (for lifestyle behaviors and disease conditions) hazard ratios (HRs) for death were calculated using Cox regression for 8682 women and 4992 men (median age at entry, 74 years). During follow-up (1981–2016), 13,405 participants died (median age at death, 88 years).

Results

In both women and men, HRs for death were significantly related to mental attitude with increasing risk with decreasing positive responses for total attitude and the seven individual items. The multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) for death for individuals in the lowest vs. highest quarter of total attitude was 1.24 (1.16, 1.32) for women and 1.30 (1.19, 1.41) for men. Some attenuation in the observed associations occurred after adjustment for potential confounders and after elimination of the first five years of follow-up.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that persons with negative attitude have an increased risk of death even after many years of follow-up. Research into strategies to improve mental outlook may help improve the quantity as well as the quality of life.

1. Introduction

The number of elderly adults continues to increase as does the need for them to lead lives in good mental and physical condition. Although “positive mental attitude,” “psychological well-being,” “life satisfaction,” and “happiness” are vague concepts, emerging research suggests that they are associated with better health outcomes [15] while their opposites “negative mental attitude,” “life dissatisfaction,” “pessimism,” and “depression and depressive symptoms” are associated with poorer outcomes [69].

Studies of mental attitude and long-term health (including mortality) in the elderly are limited by sample size and length of follow-up. Four prospective cohort studies of all-cause mortality in the elderly have included more than 10,000 participants [1013], and only one of these included both sexes [10]. Follow-up has been greater than 10 years in only three studies [10, 14, 15]. Thus, little is known about whether positive mental attitude has any predictive value in old age over a long-time span.

In 1981, we undertook a prospective cohort study of nearly 14,000 elderly women and men in a California retirement community with the aim of studying factors associated with longevity and successful aging. We report here the results of positive mental attitude (seven items from the Zung self-rating depression scale [16]) on all-cause mortality with 35 years of follow-up. To determine whether mental attitude is associated with mortality independently of known predictors of mortality, we adjusted for medical history (hypertension, angina, heart attack, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and arthritis), body mass index, and lifestyle practices (smoking, alcohol consumption, caffeine intake, and exercise). In addition, the large size of our cohort allowed us to analyze the two sexes separately. As those with health problems may have a poorer mental attitude in the time immediately preceding death, the elimination of early deaths permitted us to determine the long-term effect of mental attitude. Thus, our study adds to the existing knowledge on well-being and mortality in the aged.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Vital Status

The Leisure World Cohort Study was established in the early 1980s when 13,978 residents (8,877 women and 5,101 men) of a California retirement community (Leisure World Laguna Hills) completed a postal health survey. Recruitment procedures have been previously described [17, 18]. Briefly, residents were recruited in 4 waves: those who owned homes in Leisure World on June 1, 1981, and new residents who had moved into the community and were living there on June 1, 1982, June 1, 1983, and October 1, 1985. Recruitment included mailing the survey with simultaneous advertisements describing the study in the local community newspaper, second and third mailings to nonrespondents, and then telephoning nonrespondents (if a local phone number was listed). The baseline survey asked for information on demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, height, and weight), basic medical history (high blood pressure, heart attack, angina, stroke, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, glaucoma, fractures, and cancer), and several personal habits (smoking, alcohol consumption, caffeine intake, vitamin supplement use, and physical activity). The Leisure World population and the cohort are predominantly Caucasian, well-educated, and upper-middle class. Vital status of cohort members was determined by periodic resurvey, annual mailings, search of death indexes, and ascertainment of death certificates. Participants were followed to death or December, 31, 2016, whichever came first. To date, 25 cohort members have been lost to follow-up, including 5 who moved out of the country.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Southern California and the University of California, Irvine.

2.2. Mental Attitude Variables

The survey included only the seven positively worded items from the 20-item Zung self-rating depression scale [16]; the other 13 items were not asked. Participants were asked to read the seven items (Table 1) and to indicate “how much of the time the statement describes how you have been feeling during the past week.” Possible responses were “none or a little of the time, some of the time, a good part of the time, most or all of the time” and were scored 1 through 4, respectively. A total attitude score (7–28) was calculated by summing the seven responses. A score of 7 indicates that the subject selected “none or a little of the time” as a response to all items and represents the poorest possible mental outlook. A score of 28 indicates that all responses were “most or all of the time” and represents the most positive mental outlook. To account for items with missing responses, we calculated the total attitude score in three ways: (1) calculating the total score only for participants without missing responses, (2) assigning a nonresponse item the lowest score of 1 and including it in the total attitude score, and (3) assigning a nonresponse item the highest score of 4 and including it in the total attitude score. For analyses of individual items, those with missing responses were excluded from the analyses.

Table 1.

Attitude questions from the Zung self-rated depression scale in the Leisure World Cohort Study, 1980s, N=13,674.

Attitude statement No response None or a little of the time (1) Some of the time (2) A good part of the time (3) Most or all of the time (4)
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
My mind is as clear as it used to be 104 (0.8%) 233 (1.7%) 823 (6.0%) 3139 (23%) 9375 (69%)
I find it easy to do the things I used to do 156 (1.1%) 969 (7.1%) 3080 (23%) 5214 (38%) 4255 (31%)
I feel hopeful about the future 263 (1.9%) 530 (3.9%) 1438 (11%) 3170 (23%) 8273 (61%)
I find it easy to make decisions 124 (0.9%) 444 (3.2%) 1596 (12%) 4198 (31%) 7312 (53%)
I feel that I am useful and needed 178 (1.3%) 594 (4.3%) 1573 (12%) 2895 (21%) 8434 (62%)
My life is pretty full 157 (1.1%) 540 (3.9%) 1321 (9.7%) 3286 (24%) 8370 (61%)
I still enjoy the things I used to 120 (0.9%) 514 (3.8%) 1662 (12%) 3374 (25%) 8004 (59%)
Quarters of total attitude (sum of scores for the above seven items) Q1 7–20 Q2 21–24 Q3 25–26 Q4 27–28

All persons: those with no response on any of the seven items included in no response category 657 (4.8%) 2646 (19%) 3421 (25%) 2757 (20%) 4193 (31%)
All persons: if no response on any item that response recoded as 1 = “none or a little of the time” 3057 (22%) 3633 (27%) 2791 (20%) 4193 (31%)
All persons: if no response on any item that response recoded as 4 = “most or all of the time” 2789 (20%) 3617 (26%) 2917 (21%) 4357 (32%)

2.3. Potential Confounding Variables

Several factors asked on the same survey with the mental attitude variables were previously found to be related to mortality in this cohort. We included these in analyses as potential confounders. Medical history was elicited in response to a question “Has a doctor ever told you that you have any of these conditions?” Smoking refers to cigarette use [19]. We estimated daily caffeine intake by summing the frequency of consumption of each beverage and chocolate multiplied by its average caffeine content (milligrams/standard unit) as 115, 3, 50, 50, and 6 for regular coffee, decaffeinated coffee, tea, cola soft drinks, and chocolate, respectively [20]. Consumption of alcoholic beverages was asked separately for wine, beer, and hard liquor and combined into number of alcoholic drinks per day [21]. Body mass index (BMI) (weight (kilograms)/height2 (meters)) was calculated based on self-reported height and weight at baseline and categorized according to federal guidelines: underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), and obese (30+) [22]. Exercise included active outdoor activities (e.g., swimming, biking, jogging, tennis, and vigorous walking) and active indoor activities (e.g., exercising and dancing). The time spent per day in active activities was calculated by summing the reported times spent in active outdoor and active indoor activities [23]. Previous reports present details of data collection [1724].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Differences between women and men were tested using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between mental attitude and mortality were calculated separately for women and men using Cox regression analysis [25] with age as the time scale. Participants contributed person-years from age at baseline survey (delayed entry) to age at death or December 31, 2016, whichever occurred first. Total attitude (continuous and quartile categories) as well as the seven individual items were analyzed as independent variables. The reference category for the HRs was “good mental attitude,” i.e., response of “most or all of the time” for the seven individual items and a total attitude score of 27-28. To control for potential confounders, we performed analysis adjusting for factors previously found to be related to mortality in this cohort: smoking (never, past, and current), alcohol intake (0, ≤1, 2-3, and 4+ drinks/day), caffeine (<50, 50–99, 100–199, 200–399, and 400+ mg/day), exercise (0, ¼, ½, ¾-1¾, and 2+ hour/day), BMI (underweight, normal, overweight, and obese), and histories (yes/no) of hypertension, angina, heart attack, stroke, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer [1923]. To account for the possibility that recent disease development may have altered attitude as well as be related to mortality, we repeated the analyses after excluding the first five years of follow-up. We performed sensitivity analyses to explore how results would change if the total attitude score on the Zung scale was computed with missing items assigned to either the lowest value (1 = none or little of the time) or alternatively to the highest value (4 = all or most of the time). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All tests were two-sided, and no adjustment in the p-values was made for multiple comparisons.

3. Results

After excluding 89 subjects with missing information on all seven attitude items and an additional 215 with missing information on potential confounding variables, data on 8682 women and 4992 men were analyzed. At study entry, the participants ranged in age from 44 to 101 years (median, 74 years). By December 31, 2016, 13,405 (98%) had died at ages 59 to 110 years (median, 88 years).

Table 1 presents the responses to the seven individual attitude questions. While 13,017 (95%) participants answered all seven questions, 443 did not answer one, 123 two, 28 three, 20 four, 9 five, and 34 six. The distributions of responses differed among the seven statements. The statement “I find it easy to do the things I used to do” had the least number of “most or all of the time” responses (31%) and far fewer than the other statements (53–69%).

Table 2 gives selected characteristics of the participants by sex. Men were on average older than women at study entry (74 vs. 73 years), and a smaller proportion were alive at the end of follow-up (0.9% vs. 2.7%). Men also had on average a greater BMI, exercised more, and consumed more alcohol and caffeine than women, but a smaller proportion never smoked. More men had a history of angina, heart attack, stroke, and diabetes, while more women had high blood pressure, cancer, and rheumatoid arthritis. Women were more likely to have a higher attitude score than men (score ≥25: 52% vs. 50%). All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.02).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics in the Leisure World Cohort Study, 1980s.

Characteristic Total (N=13,674) Men (N=4992) Women (N=8682)
Mean ± SD
Age at baseline, years 73.6 ± 7.3 74.3 ± 7.2 73.2 ± 7.4
Age at last follow-up, years 87.6 ± 7.4 86.1 ± 7.1 88.5 ± 7.4
Follow-up years 14.0 ± 8.3 11.7 ± 7.7 15.3 ± 8.3
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.5 ± 3.3 24.2 ± 2.9 23.1 ± 3.4
Exercise, hours/day 1.0 ± 1.2 1.1 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 1.1
Alcohol, drinks/day 1.4 ± 1.4 1.6 ± 1.5 1.2 ± 1.2
Caffeine, mg/day 171 ± 168 176 ± 172 168 ± 166
N (%)
History of disease
 High blood pressure 5335 (39%) 1803 (36%) 3532 (41%)
 Angina 1547 (11%) 728 (15%) 819 (9.4%)
 Heart attack 1396 (10%) 828 (17%) 568 (6.5%)
 Stroke 670 (4.9%) 351 (7.0%) 319 (3.7%)
 Cancer 1593 (12%) 467 (9.4%) 1126 (13%)
 Diabetes 841 (6.2%) 414 (8.3%) 427 (4.9%)
 Rheumatoid arthritis 807 (5.9%) 220 (4.4%) 587 (6.8%)
Cigarette use
 Never 6436 (47%) 1664 (33%) 4772 (55%)
 Past 5724 (42%) 2900 (58%) 2824 (33%)
 Current 1514 (11%) 428 (8.6%) 1086 (12%)
Total attitude
 Missing response 657 (4.8%) 207 (4.1%) 450 (5.2%)
 7–20 2646 (19%) 995 (20%) 1651 (19%)
 21–24 3421 (25%) 1286 (26%) 2135 (25%)
 25–26 2757 (20%) 1051 (21%) 1706 (20%)
 27–28 4193 (31%) 1453 (29%) 2740 (32%)
Alive at follow-up 269 (2.0%) 44 (0.9%) 225 (2.6%)

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation. p < 0.0001 for all differences between men and women except caffeine (p < 0.009) and total attitude (p < 0.0006).

HRs of mortality for the seven individual attitude items and for the total attitude score are shown in Table 3 for women and in Table 4 for men. Analysis of total attitude score by quartiles showed higher mortality with lower scores (more negative attitude) in both women and men (Figure 1). In the model fully adjusted for age and potential confounders, women with scores of <21 had 24% greater risk of death and men had a 30% greater risk of death compared with persons with scores of 27-28; these risks were 22% and 24% after exclusion of the first five years of follow-up including 854 deaths in women and 1102 deaths in men. As a continuous variable, risk of death significantly increased 2% (women) and 4% (men) for each unit decrease in the total attitude score. In sensitivity analyses that calculated the total score by assigning either the lowest value (1 = none or little of the time) or the highest value (4 = all or most of the time) to the missing items, the results were very similar to those where individuals with missing items were excluded when computing the total score (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

Attitude and hazard ratio of death among women: the Leisure World Cohort Study, 1981–2016.

All subjects (N=8682) Excluding first five years of follow-up (N=7828)
No. subjects No. deaths Model 1a Model 2b No. subjects No. deaths Model 1a Model 2b
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
My mind is as clear as it used to be
 None or little of the time 124 121 1.43 1.20, 1.72 1.28 1.07, 1.54 78 75 1.14 0.91, 1.43 1.02 0.81, 1.29
 Some of the time 495 491 1.39 1.27 1.52 1.27 1.16, 1.40 406 402 1.43 1.30, 1.59 1.33 1.20, 1.47
 A good part of the time 1937 1901 1.09 1.03, 1.15 1.07 1.01, 1.12 1716 1680 1.09 1.03, 1.15 1.07 1.01, 1.13
 Most or all of the time 6048 5866 1.00 1.00 5558 5366 1.00 1.00

I find it easy to do the things I used to do
 None or little of the time 544 539 1.65 1.51, 1.82 1.39 1.26, 1.53 373 368 1.54 1.38, 1.72 1.30 1.16, 1.46
 Some of the time 1920 1898 1.29 1.22, 1.37 1.18 1.11, 1.26 1635 1613 1.30 1.22, 1.38 1.18 1.11, 1.26
 A good part of the time 3283 3214 1.03 0.98, 1.09 0.99 0.94, 1.04 3072 3003 1.05 0.99, 1.11 1.01 0.95, 1.06
 Most or all of the time 2826 2697 1.00 1.00 2664 2535 1.00 1.00

I feel hopeful about the future
 None or little of the time 331 328 1.53 1.36, 1.71 1.34 1.20, 1.50 242 239 1.46 1.28, 1.66 1.29 1.13, 1.47
 Some of the time 924 911 1.25 1.16, 1.34 1.16 1.08, 1.24 785 772 1.22 1.13, 1.31 1.13 1.05, 1.22
 A good part of the time 1973 1941 1.09 1.04, 1.15 1.07 1.02, 1.13 1767 1735 1.08 1.02, 1.14 1.07 1.01, 1.13
 Most or all of the time 5275 5099 1.00 1.00 4885 4709 1.00 1.00

I find it easy to make decisions
 None or little of the time 289 282 1.18 1.05, 1.33 1.10 0.97, 1.24 213 206 1.09 0.95, 1.26 1.04 0.90, 1.19
 Some of the time 1101 1080 1.10 1.03, 1.17 1.05 0.99, 1.13 967 946 1.11 1.03, 1.18 1.07 0.99, 1.14
 A good part of the time 2698 2642 0.96 0.92, 1.01 0.96 0.91, 1.01 2451 2395 0.97 0.92, 1.02 0.96 0.91, 1.01
 Most or all of the time 4509 4370 1.00 1.00 4125 3986 1.00 1.00

I feel that I am useful and needed
 None or little of the time 412 406 1.28 1.16, 1.42 1.14 1.03, 1.26 305 299 1.21 1.08, 1.36 1.09 0.97, 1.22
 Some of the time 1038 1027 1.24 1.16, 1.33 1.16 1.09, 1.24 876 865 1.21 1.13, 1.31 1.14 1.06, 1.23
 A good part of the time 1750 1705 1.03 0.97, 1.08 1.02 0.96, 1.08 1581 1536 1.02 0.96, 1.08 1.01 0.95, 1.07
 Most or all of the time 5364 5203 1.00 1.00 4976 4815 1.00 1.00

My life is pretty full
 None or little of the time 316 310 1.58 1.41, 1.78 1.33 1.19, 1.50 228 222 1.45 1.26, 1.66 1.22 1.06, 1.40
 Some of the time 856 848 1.38 1.28, 1.48 1.25 1.16, 1.35 701 693 1.33 1.23, 1.44 1.21 1.12, 1.31
 A good part of the time 1996 1955 1.14 1.08, 1.20 1.09 1.03, 1.14 1788 1747 1.14 1.08, 1.20 1.09 1.03, 1.15
 Most or all of the time 5412 5242 1.00 1.00 5034 4864 1.00 1.00

I still enjoy the things I used to
 None or little of the time 289 285 1.62 1.44, 1.82 1.39 1.23, 1.57 200 196 1.44 1.25, 1.67 1.27 1.10, 1.46
 Some of the time 990 973 1.29 1.20, 1.38 1.18 1.10, 1.26 820 803 1.27 1.18, 1.37 1.17 1.08, 1.26
 A good part of the time 2011 1978 1.07 1.02, 1.13 1.02 0.97, 1.08 1812 1779 1.07 1.01, 1.13 1.02 0.97, 1.08
 Most or all of the time 5304 5133 1.00 1.00 4925 4754 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (persons with missing items excluded)
 <21 1651 1632 1.38 1.29, 1.46 1.24 1.16, 1.32 1354 1335 1.35 1.26, 1.44 1.22 1.14, 1.31
 21–24 2135 2092 1.12 1.05, 1.18 1.07 1.01, 1.13 1927 1883 1.11 1.05, 1.18 1.06 1.00, 1.13
 25-26 1706 1662 1.02 0.96, 1.09 0.99 0.94, 1.06 1589 1543 1.03 0.96, 1.10 1.00 0.94, 1.07
 27-28 2740 2625 1.00 1.00 2592 2472 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (missing items given score of 1)
 <21 1925 1904 1.37 1.29, 1.45 1.23 1.16, 1.31 1561 1540 1.34 1.26, 1.43 1.22 1.14, 1.30
 21–24 2289 2244 1.12 1.06, 1.19 1.06 1.00, 1.13 2067 2021 1.12 1.06, 1.19 1.07 1.01, 1.13
 25-26 1728 1684 1.02 0.96, 1.09 1.00 0.94, 1.06 1608 1562 1.03 0.97, 1.10 1.00 0.94, 1.07
 27-28 2740 2625 1.00 1.00 2592 2472 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (missing items given score of 4)
 <21 1741 1721 1.38 1.30, 1.47 1.24 1.17, 1.32 1418 1397 1.34 1.26, 1.44 1.22 1.14, 1.30
 21–24 2272 2227 1.12 1.06, 1.18 1.07 1.01, 1.13 2039 1994 1.11 1.05, 1.18 1.07 1.01, 1.13
 25-26 1823 1779 1.04 0.98, 1.10 1.01 0.95, 1.07 1686 1642 1.04 0.97, 1.10 1.01 0.95, 1.08
 27-28 2846 2730 1.00 1.00 2686 2570 1.00 1.00

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. Subjects do not always total 8682 or 7828 due to those with missing values. aModel 1: adjusted for age (i.e., age as time scale). bModel 2: adjusted for age, smoking, body mass index, exercise, alcohol intake, caffeine consumption, and histories of hypertension, angina, heart attack, stroke, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer.

Table 4.

Attitude and hazard ratio of death among men: the Leisure World Cohort Study, 1981–2016.

All subjects (N=4992) Excluding first five years of follow-up (N=3980)
No. subjects No. deaths Model 1a Model 2b No. subjects No. deaths Model 1a Model 2b
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
My mind is as clear as it used to be
 None or little of the time 109 109 1.55 1.27, 1.88 1.41 1.16, 1.71 55 55 1.38 1.06, 1.80 1.34 1.02, 1.75
 Some of the time 328 327 1.47 1.31, 1.65 1.31 1.17, 1.47 203 202 1.44 1.25, 1.66 1.30 1.13, 1.50
 A good part of the time 1202 1194 1.10 1.03, 1.17 1.06 0.99, 1.13 957 949 1.16 1.08, 1.25 1.13 1.05, 1.21
 Most or all of the time 3327 3292 1.00 1.00 2749 2713 1.00 1.00

I find it easy to do the things I used to do
 None or little of the time 425 425 2.02 1.81, 2.25 1.64 1.46, 1.83 205 205 1.76 1.52, 2.05 1.49 1.28, 1.73
 Some of the time 1160 1157 1.32 1.22, 1.42 1.19 1.10, 1.28 848 845 1.32 1.21, 1.44 1.20 1.10, 1.32
 A good part of the time 1931 1914 1.10 1.03, 1.18 1.05 0.98, 1.13 1645 1628 1.13 1.05, 1.22 1.09 1.01, 1.17
 Most or all of the time 1429 1405 1.00 1.00 1250 1225 1.00 1.00

I feel hopeful about the future
 None or little of the time 199 199 1.79 1.55, 2.07 1.51 1.31, 1.75 104 104 1.62 1.33, 1.98 1.46 1.20, 1.79
 Some of the time 514 512 1.31 1.19, 1.44 1.17 1.06, 1.29 353 351 1.23 1.10, 1.38 1.11 0.99, 1.24
 A good part of the time 1197 1188 1.04 0.98, 1.12 0.99 0.92, 1.06 953 944 1.04 0.96, 1.12 0.99 0.92, 1.07
 Most or all of the time 2998 2966 1.00 1.00 2520 2487 1.00 1.00

I find it easy to make decisions
 None or little of the time 155 155 1.90 1.62, 2.24 1.53 1.30, 1.80 71 71 1.83 1.44, 2.31 1.48 1.17, 1.89
 Some of the time 495 494 1.17 1.07, 1.29 1.10 1.00, 1.21 354 353 1.14 1.02, 1.27 1.07 0.96, 1.20
 A good part of the time 1500 1489 1.07 1.01, 1.14 1.03 0.96, 1.09 1207 1196 1.09 1.01, 1.17 1.04 0.97, 1.12
 Most or all of the time 2803 2771 1.00 1.00 2317 2284 1.00 1.00

I feel that I am useful and needed
 None or little of the time 182 181 1.83 1.57, 2.12 1.64 1.40, 1.90 88 87 1.53 1.23, 1.89 1.44 1.16, 1.78
 Some of the time 535 531 1.29 1.17, 1.41 1.14 1.04, 1.25 374 370 1.20 1.07, 1.33 1.06 0.95, 1.18
 A good part of the time 1145 1136 1.10 1.02, 1.17 1.08 1.01, 1.16 907 898 1.06 0.98, 1.14 1.05 0.97, 1.13
 Most or all of the time 3070 3041 1.00 1.00 2575 2546 1.00 1.00

My life is pretty full
 None or little of the time 224 223 1.89 1.64, 2.16 1.56 1.36, 1.80 111 110 1.59 1.31, 1.92 1.38 1.14, 1.68
 Some of the time 465 462 1.37 1.24, 1.51 1.20 1.09, 1.33 306 303 1.25 1.11, 1.41 1.10 0.97, 1.24
 A good part of the time 1290 1279 1.14 1.07, 1.22 1.06 0.99, 1.14 1022 1011 1.14 1.06, 1.23 1.07 1.00, 1.15
 Most or all of the time 2958 2929 1.00 1.00 2509 2480 1.00 1.00

I still enjoy the things I used to
 None or little of the time 225 225 2.23 1.95, 2.56 1.76 1.53, 2.03 86 86 1.86 1.50, 2.31 1.45 1.16, 1.81
 Some of the time 672 668 1.36 1.25, 1.48 1.20 1.10, 1.31 455 451 1.31 1.18, 1.45 1.18 1.06, 1.31
 A good part of the time 1363 1354 1.11 1.04, 1.19 1.05 0.99, 1.13 1116 1107 1.14 1.06, 1.22 1.08 1.00, 1.16
 Most or all of the time 2700 2669 1.00 1.00 2305 2274 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (persons with missing items excluded)
 <21 995 993 1.54 1.42, 1.67 1.30 1.19, 1.41 631 629 1.43 1.30, 1.58 1.24 1.12, 1.37
 21–24 1286 1273 1.16 1.08, 1.25 1.09 1.01, 1.18 1056 1043 1.19 1.10, 1.29 1.13 1.04, 1.23
 25-26 1051 1041 1.13 1.04, 1.22 1.06 0.98 1.15 893 883 1.17 1.08, 1.28 1.12 1.02, 1.22
 27-28 1453 1435 1.00 1.00 1270 1252 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (missing items given score of 1)
 <21 1132 1130 1.55 1.43, 1.67 1.32 1.21, 1.43 706 704 1.43 1.31, 1.57 1.25 1.14, 1.38
 21–24 1344 1330 1.15 1.07, 1.24 1.08 1.00, 1.16 1103 1089 1.18 1.09, 1.28 1.12 1.03, 1.22
 25-26 1063 1053 1.13 1.04, 1.23 1.06 0.98, 1.15 901 891 1.18 1.08, 1.28 1.12 1.03, 1.22
 27-28 1453 1435 1.00 1.00 1270 1252 1.00 1.00

Attitude score (missing items given score of 4)
 <21 1048 1046 1.55 1.43, 1.67 1.31 1.21, 1.42 655 653 1.43 1.30, 1.57 1.24 1.13, 1.37
 21–24 1345 1332 1.17 1.09, 1.26 1.10 1.02, 1.18 1092 1079 1.20 1.10, 1.30 1.13 1.04, 1.23
 25-26 1094 1084 1.13 1.04, 1.22 1.06 0.98 1.14 924 914 1.17 1.08, 1.28 1.11 1.02, 1.21
 27-28 1505 1486 1.00 1.00 1309 1290 1.00 1.00

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. Subjects do not always total 4992 or 3980 due to those with missing values. aModel 1: adjusted for age (i.e., age as time scale). bModel 2: adjusted for age, smoking, body mass index, exercise, alcohol intake, caffeine consumption, and histories of hypertension, angina, heart attack, stroke, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Attitude score and hazard ratios of death: the Leisure World Cohort Study, 1981–2016. Note: data shown are from analyses of total attitude score as quartile categories excluding persons with missing items. HRs and 95% confidence intervals derived from Cox regression analysis model 2, which adjusts for age (as the time scale), smoking, body mass index, exercise, alcohol intake, caffeine consumption, and histories of hypertension, angina, heart attack, stroke, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer.

The seven attitude items similarly showed a higher risk of death with increasing level of negative attitude. Adjustment for potential confounders resulted in modest attenuation of risks (less than 20%), and the HRs for poor mental attitude (responses of “none or little of the time” and “some of the time”) remained statistically significant for all items except “I find it easy to make decisions” in women. For all seven items, the HRs for the poorest mental attitude (response of “none or little of the time”) were larger in men than women (about 20% or more except for “My mind is clear as it used to be”). With elimination of the first five years of follow-up, the age-adjusted HRs for women changed by less than 10% for all items except “My mind is as clear as it used to be,” where the HR for the poorest mental attitude (response of “none or little of the time”) was reduced from 1.43 to 1.14. The multivariable-adjusted HRs showed smaller reductions, and the HRs for the poorest mental attitude (response of “none or a little of the time”) for three of the seven items (“mind is clear,” “easy to make decisions,” and “feel useful and needed”) were no longer statistically significant. For men with the elimination of the first five years of follow-up, the age-adjusted HRs for the poorest mental attitude (response of “none or a little of the time”) for all seven items were reduced 10–15% but remained statistically significant; the HRs for other response categories changed by less than 10%. The multivariable-adjusted HRs showed smaller reductions, and HRs for the poorest mental attitude remained statistically significant for all seven items.

4. Discussion

We found modest increased risks of death with poor mental attitude that persisted after adjustment for potential confounders including disease history and lifestyle practices. The observed risks, especially for the most negative attitudes, were attenuated after eliminating the first five years of follow-up suggesting that diseases leading to early death might be the cause of some of the negativity. The associations found after adjustment and elimination of the first five years of follow-up may thus be more accurate from a perspective of a causal relationship. Although mental attitude is associated with lifestyle practices and disease states which are also related with mortality, a poor attitude appears to confer additional risk of death.

Those with a positive mental attitude or psychological well-being differ from those with a more negative outlook on a number of health processes—healthier lipid profile, lower levels of inflammatory markers, higher levels of serum antioxidants, better immune responses, and healthier autonomic function [26]—and on a number of healthier behaviors—increased physical activity, nonsmoking, healthier diets, and higher quality of sleep [27]. These may partly serve as mechanisms for the association of mental attitude with mortality.

Previous prospective population-based studies have evaluated mental attitude and all-cause mortality in older population groups [1015, 2835]. However, follow-up has generally been less than 10 years, the cohort size less than 10,000, or the study has included only one sex. Table 5 summarizes these studies. Similar to our study, all previous studies except two [12, 28] found that persons with the most positive attitude (measured in different ways) had the lowest risk of death, and that the risk was attenuated after adjustment of health conditions and lifestyle factors. An inverse dose-response relationship (decreased risk of mortality with increasing levels of positive mental attitude) was seen in both women and men and in studies conducted in diverse countries (USA, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Finland, and China).

Table 5.

Prospective cohort studies of mental attitude and mortality in the elderly.

First author, date [reference] Study name
Population
Number Age (years) Follow-up (years) Sex Mental attitude instrument HR, 95% CIAge- and sex-adjusted Most adjusted model
Gitlay, 2004 [30] Arnhem Elderly Study
The Netherlands
999 65–85 Mean = 9 M,F Scale of Subjective Well-Being for Older Persons 0.55, 0.42–0.77
0.71, 0.52–0.97
Pitkala, 2004 [32] Helsinki Aging Study
Finland
491 75, 80, 85 10 M,F 6 questions on positive life orientation 0.67, 0.53–0.87
0.89, 0.83–0.93
Tindle, 2009 [13] Women's Health Initiative
USA
97,253 50–79 8 F Life Orientation Test-Revised
0.86, 0.79–0.93
Koopmans, 2010 [14] Arnhem Elderly Study
The Netherlands
861 65–85 15 M,F 2 “happiness” questions 0.78, 0.64–0.95
0.92, 0.75–1.14
Benito-Leon, 2010 [29] Neurological Disorders in Central Spain 2516 65+ 7 M,F Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale 1.60, 1.29–2.21
1.35, 1.00–1.81
Tilvis, 2012 [35] National Sample
Finland
2490 >75 5 M,F 6 questions on positive life orientation 0.65, 0.53–0.81
0.85, 0.67–1.08
Niklasson, 2015 [31] GERDA
Sweden and Finland
646 85+ 5 M,F Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale 1.73, 1.33–2.26
1.36, 1.03–1.80
St John, 2015 [33] Manitoba Study of Health and Aging, Canada 1751 65+ 5 M,F Terrible-Delightful Scale 0.75, 0.66–0.86
0.90, 0.78–1.04
Steptoe, 2015 [34] English Longitudinal Study of Aging 9050 Mean = 65 Mean = 8 M,F Eudemonic well-being 0.42, 0.36–0.49
0.70, 0.58–0.83
Anthony, 2016 [28] Rancho Bernardo Study
USA
876 50+ < = 12 mean = 8 M,F Life Orientation Test-Revised 0.98, 0.94–1.02
0.99, 0.94–1.03
Gong, 2016 [10] Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey 18,676 80–122 16 M,F 7 items on psychological well-being
0.84, 0.79–0.88
Liu, 2016 [12] Million Women Study
United Kingdom
719,671 50–69 10 F “How often do you feel happy?” 1.29, 1.25–1.33
0.98, 0.94–1.01
Kim, 2017 [11] Nurses' Health Study
USA
70,021 Mean = 70 6 F Life Orientation Test-Revised 0.71, 0.66–0.76
0.91, 0.85–0.97
Okely, 2018 [15] Survey of Health Aging and Retirement in Europe 13,596 50+ ∼12 M,F CASP-12 0.41, 0.38–0.43
0.57, 0.53–0.61

HR for high vs. low category of positive mental attitude, except for Benito-Leon, Niklasson, and Liu studies which compared low vs. high category. Unadjusted HR. Adjusted for additional demographic factors as well.

As in previous studies, risk of death was attenuated after adjustment of health conditions and lifestyle factors associated with both mental attitude and survival. To reduce concerns that recent changes in mental attitude may be due to underlying illness, we analyzed the data excluding participants who died within five years of study baseline. Likewise, early deaths were eliminated in the Nurses' Health Study (within two years) [11] and the Million Women Study (within five years) [12] to reduce these concerns about reverse causality. However, mental attitude may alter the time course of disease processes and influence health behaviors directly, so the possibility of overadjustment exists and we may be adjusting for the effect of intermediate factors in the causal pathway.

Although some studies have evaluated the association of the Zung self-rating depression scale with mortality [3638], only those reporting results on the individual items can be directly compared to our study. Takeida and colleagues analyzed the Zung scale as a predictor of death in a Japanese cohort of 2,166 aged 60–74 years and followed five years [39]. Of the seven items included in our study, they found six significantly related to mortality. Those items and their relative risks (RR) were “I find it easy to do the things I used to” (RR = 3.84), “My life is pretty full” (RR = 2.39), “I find it easy to make decisions” (RR = 2.27), “My mind is as clear as it used to be” (RR = 2.05), “I feel hopeful about the future” (RR = 1.67), and “I feel that I am useful and needed” (RR = 1.44). The item “I still enjoy the things I used to do” (RR = 1.35) was not related to mortality. In our older cohort, all seven items were related to mortality. That the individual items we used had a high predictive value of risk of death indicates that refusing to answer any single question does not invalidate the use of the questionnaire nor does the use of the seven rather than the 20 items of the Zung scale.

Several strengths and limitations of this study must be considered. Our data on mental attitude were self-reported using a mailed questionnaire. The seven items included in our survey were extracted from the Zung self-rating depression scale, but we did not ask the other 13 items. Thus, we are not able to compare our results with studies reporting the full Zung scale. Similar to other studies, we previously found our mental attitude score to be related to suicide in the first five years of follow-up [40]. However, conclusions regarding attitude are limited by the crudeness of measurement. Although assessing the true level of attitude is difficult, self-reported rating is suitable for ranking of individuals.

Our large cohort size allowed us to analyze men and women separately. We did this for comparison with other studies reporting sex-specific results [11, 13, 30], because of differences between men and women on baseline characteristics and mortality rates, and due to the possibility of differential response on attitude between men and women. Chang and coworkers showed significant sex differences in reporting of psychological outcomes with more women reporting negative outcomes [41]. This was also seen in several of the prospective studies of attitude and mortality [29, 31], but they did not report sex-specific HRs for death. Differential reporting may help explain the lower HRs for negative attitudes we observed in women compared with men. The cohort reported here is elderly, white, and in the upper middle socioeconomic stratum. Therefore, our results may not be generalizable to other populations.

Our study has the advantages of a prospective design, large size, long and essentially complete follow-up, and the capability to control for numerous potential confounding factors. Still our investigation is an observational study, not a randomized trial. It does, however, suggest that confounders account for only a portion of the associations between mental attitude and risk of death. However, residual confounding due to suboptimal variables or to unmeasured variables remain possibilities.

5. Conclusions

Results in this large elderly cohort with long follow-up are consistent with a modest relationship between mental attitude and long-term mortality. The development of interventions to foster a positive outlook may improve the personal and public health of the elderly and prolong life.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant nos. R01CA32197 and R01AG21055, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and the Earl Carrol Trust Fund.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

HR:

Hazard ratio

PGCMS:

Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale

LOT-R:

Life Orientation Test-Revised

RR:

Relative risk.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Boehm J. K., Peterson C., Kivimaki M., Kubzansky L. A prospective study of positive psychological well-being and coronary heart disease. Health Psychology. 2011;30(3):259–267. doi: 10.1037/a0023124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boehm J. K., Trudel-Fitzgerald C., Kivimaki M., Kubzansky L. D. The prospective association between positive psychological well-being and diabetes. Health Psychology. 2015;34(10):1013–1021. doi: 10.1037/hea0000200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burns R. A., Byles J., Mitchell P., Anstey K. J. Positive components of mental health provide significant protection against likelihood of falling in older women over a 13-year period. International Psychogeriatrics. 2012;24(9):1419–1428. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gale C. R., Cooper C., Deary I. J., Aihie Sayer A. Psychological well-being and incident frailty in men and women: the english longitudinal study of ageing. Psychological Medicine. 2014;44(4):697–706. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huffman J. C., Legler S. R., Boehm J. K. Positive psychological well-being and health in patients with heart disease: a brief review. Future Cardiology. 2017;13(5):443–450. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blazer D. G., Hybels C. F. What symptoms of depression predict mortality in community-dwelling elders? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004;52(12):2052–2056. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52564.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pankalainen M. T., Kerola T. V., Hintikka J. J. Pessimism and the risk for coronary heart disease among middle-aged and older finnish men and women: a ten-year follow-up study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2015;15(1):p. 113. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0097-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saz P., Dewey M. E. Depression, depressive symptoms and mortality in persons aged 65 and over living in the community: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2001;16(6):622–630. doi: 10.1002/gps.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Whooley M. A., Browner W. S., Grp S. O. F. R. Association between depressive symptoms and mortality in older women. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998;158(19):2129–2135. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.19.2129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gong E. Y., Hua Y. C., Yan L. J. L. Psychological wellbeing and all-cause mortality in the oldest old in China: a longitudinal survey-based study. The Lancet. 2016;388:p. S22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31949-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim E. S., Hagan K. A., Grodstein F., DeMeo D. L., De Vivo I., Kubzansky L. D. Optimism and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;185(1):21–29. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu B., Floud S., Pirie K., et al. Does happiness itself directly affect mortality? the prospective UK million women study. The Lancet. 2016;387(10021):874–881. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01087-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tindle H. A., Chang Y. F., Kuller L. H., et al. Optimism, cynical hostility, and incident coronary heart disease and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation. 2009;120(8):656–662. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.827642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koopmans T. A., Geleijnse J. M., Zitman F. G., Giltay E. J. Effects of happiness on all-cause mortality during 15 Years of follow-up: the arnhem elderly study. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2010;11(1):113–124. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9127-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okely J. A., Weiss A., Gale C. R. The interaction between individualism and wellbeing in predicting mortality: survey of health ageing and retirement in Europe. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2018;41(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9871-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zung W. W. A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1965;12(1):63–70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paganini-Hill A., Chao A., Ross R. K., Henderson B. E. Exercise and other factors in the prevention of hip fracture: the leisure world study. Epidemiology. 1991;2(1):16–25. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199101000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paganini-Hill A., Ross R. K., Henderson B. E. Prevalence of chronic disease and health practices in a retirement community. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1986;39(9):699–707. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90153-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paganini-Hill A., Hsu G. Smoking and mortality among residents of a California retirement community. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84(6):992–995. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.6.992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paganini-Hill A., Kawas C. H., Corrada M. M. Non-alcoholic beverage and caffeine consumption and mortality: the leisure world cohort study. Preventive Medicine. 2007;44(4):305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paganini-Hill A., Kawas C. H., Corrada M. M. Type of alcohol consumed, changes in intake over time and mortality: the leisure world cohort study. Age and Ageing. 2007;36(2):203–209. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Corrada M. M., Kawas C. H., Mozaffar F., Paganini-Hill A. Association of body mass index and weight change with all-cause mortality in the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;163(10):938–949. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paganini-Hill A., Kawas C. H., Corrada M. M. Activities and mortality in the elderly: the leisure World cohort study. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2011;66(5):559–567. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paganini-Hill A. Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease: the leisure world cohort study. Neuroepidemiology. 2001;20(2):118–124. doi: 10.1159/000054770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cox D. R. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology. 1972;34(2):187–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steptoe A., Demakakos P., de Oliveira C., Wardle J. Distinctive biological correlates of positive psychological well-being in older men and women. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2012;74(5):501–508. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31824f82c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sapranaviciute-Zabazlajeva L., Luksiene D., Virviciute D., Bobak M., Tamosiunas A. Link between healthy lifestyle and psychological well-being in Lithuanian adults aged 45-72: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):p. e014240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anthony E. G., Kritz-Silverstein D., Barrett-Connor E. Optimism and mortality in older men and women: the rancho bernardo study. Journal of Aging Research. 2016;2016:9. doi: 10.1155/2016/5185104.5185104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Benito-Leon J., Louis E. D., Rivera-Navarro J., Medrano M. J., Vega S., Bermejo-Pareja F. Low morale is associated with increased risk of mortality in the elderly: a population-based prospective study (NEDICES) Age and Ageing. 2010;39(3):366–373. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Giltay E. J., Geleijnse J. M., Zitman F. G., Hoekstra T., Schouten E. G. Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2004;61(11):1126–1135. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Niklasson J., Hornsten C., Conradsson M., et al. High morale is associated with increased survival in the very old. Age and Ageing. 2015;44(4):630–636. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pitkala K. H., Laakkonen M. L., Strandberg T. E., Tilvis R. S. Positive life orientation as a predictor of 10-year outcome in an aged population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(4):409–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.St John P. D., Mackenzie C., Menec V. Does life satisfaction predict five-year mortality in community-living older adults? Aging and Mental Health. 2015;19(4):363–370. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.938602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steptoe A., Deaton A., Stone A. A. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet. 2015;385(9968):640–648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tilvis R. S., Laitala V., Routasalo P., Strandberg T. E., Pitkala K. H. Positive life orientation predicts good survival prognosis in old age. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012;55(1):133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arve S., Lehtonen A., Tilvis R. S. Prognosis of depression with and without dementia in old age. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 1998;27(2):141–146. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(98)00107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hiltunen M., Nieminen T., Kettunen R., et al. Depressive symptoms and cardiovascular burden-related mortality among the aged. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2014;44(5):486–492. doi: 10.1111/eci.12262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tilvis R. S., Strandberg T. E., Juva K. Apolipoprotein E phenotypes, dementia and mortality in a prospective population sample. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1998;46(6):712–715. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Takeida K., Nishi M., Miyake H. Zung’s depression scale as a predictor of death in elderly people: a cohort study in Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Epidemiology. 1999;9(4):240–244. doi: 10.2188/jea.9.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ross R. K., Bernstein L., Trent L., Henderson B. E., Paganini-Hill A. A prospective study of risk factors for traumatic deaths in a retirement community. Preventive Medicine. 1990;19(3):323–334. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90032-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chang E. C., Sanna L. J., Kim J. M., Srivastava K. Optimistic and pessimistic bias in European americans and asian americans: a preliminary look at distinguishing between predictions for physical and psychological health outcomes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2010;41(3):465–470. doi: 10.1177/0022022109359691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Journal of Aging Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES