Abstract
Purpose:
Acquisition timing and B1 calibration are two key factors that affect the quality and accuracy of hyperpolarized 13C MRI. The goal of this project was to develop a new approach using regional bolus tracking to trigger Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping and real-time B1 calibration based on regional B1 measurements, followed by dynamic imaging of hyperpolarized 13C metabolites in vivo.
Methods:
The proposed approach was implemented on a system which allows real-time data processing and real-time control on the sequence. Real-time center frequency calibration upon the bolus arrival was also added. The feasibility of applying the proposed framework for in vivo hyperpolarized 13C imaging was tested on healthy rats, tumor-bearing mice and a healthy volunteer on a clinical 3T scanner following hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate injection. Multichannel receive coils were used in the human study.
Results:
Automatic acquisition timing based on either regional bolus peak or bolus arrival was achieved with the proposed framework. Reduced blurring artifacts in real-time reconstructed images were observed with real-time center frequency calibration. Real-time computed B1 scaling factors agreed with real-time acquired B1 maps. Flip angle correction using B1 maps results in a more consistent quantification of metabolic activity (i.e, pyruvate-to-lactate conversion, kPL). Experiment recordings are provided to demonstrate the real-time actions during the experiment.
Conclusion:
The proposed method was successfully demonstrated on animals and a human volunteer, and is anticipated to improve the efficient use of the hyperpolarized signal as well as the accuracy and robustness of hyperpolarized 13C imaging.
Keywords: Real-time, Bloch-Siegert, B1 mapping, 13C, Hyperpolarized, MRI, metabolic imaging, Bolus tracking, Pyruvate
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized 13C-labeled compounds prepared via dynamic nuclear polarization (1) has been used to non-invasively study metabolic processes in vivo (2). In this method, the hyperpolarized state of the agent and any metabolic products will irreversibly decay to thermal equilibrium due to metabolic conversion, RF depletion and T1 relaxation. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate has been widely used to monitor metabolic pathways (3–12) and its feasiblity for human study has been demonstrated (11,12). The T1s of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate and its downstream metabolites (e.g. lactate) at clinical field strengths are estimated to be 25s to 45s (11, 13) in vivo. In light of the nonrenewable nature and fast decay of the hyperpolarized magnetization, acquisition timing and transmit power (B1) calibration are two key factors that affect the quality and accuracy of hyperpolarized 13C imaging.
Bolus tracking for triggering the acquisition has been used in clinical MRI for proton MR angiography (14). Appropriate acquisition timing for hyperpolarized 13C imaging is useful in several aspects: a) Excitation before the bolus arrival may saturate the nonrecoverable hyperpolarized signal particularly near the coils conductive elements where the B1 can be elevated. b) Many variable flip schemes (15–18) that optimize the hyperpolarized MRI signal sampling require knowledge of the bolus arrival. c) It is more straightforward for kinetic modeling to start signal sampling after the bolus maximum (19) to eliminate the need to account for the input function. d) Inconsistent acquisition timing leads to quantification errors when metabolite to substrate ratios are used as a quantitative metric (19, 20). Currently, in vivo hyperpoliarized 13C imaging protocols typically start at a certain delay time after bolus injection. The delay time is determined based on prior knowledge, which can be unreliable due to the inherent physiological variability of each individual. This is particularly problematic in human subjects in which 12 s variations in bolus arrival have been observed (11). This variability can be further exacerbated in tumors where the vascularization and perfusion are highly inconsistent over subjects (21). Recently, a bolus tracking method using a slab FID as tracking signal was demonstrated (19) for automatic acquisition timing. However, this method didn’t reflect the signal variation within the imaging slab. In this study, bolus tracking was improved by using the bolus signal from a region of interest (ROI) on a tracking image rather than from the entire excitation slab.
In the context of hyperpoliarized 13C MRI, B1 calibration is crucial for variable flip angle schemes (15, 16, 18) and quantification of metabolic activities (22). Due to the virtually non-existent endogenous 13C signal, 13C B1 calibration is typically performed on external phantoms, but this approach does not account for the variability of subject loading. Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping has been applied to hyperpolarized 13C imaging (23, 24) and is advantageous due to its short acquisition time and efficient use of the hyperpolarization signal. However, real-time power compensation has not yet been accomplished to calibrate the flip angle during the scan.
This work presents a new approach using regional bolus tracking to trigger Bloch-Siegert B 1 mapping and real-time RF power compensation based on regional B1 measurements followed by dynamic imaging of hyperpolarized 13C metabolites. Real-time center frequency calibration upon bolus arrival was also implemented. Thermally polarized 13C phantom experiments were performed to validate Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping. The feasibility of applying the proposed framework for in vivo hyperpolarized 13C imaging was demonstrated on healthy rats, tumor-bearing mice and a healthy volunteer on a clinical 3T scanner. This proposed method was designed to improve the efficient use of the hyperpolarized signal as well as the accuracy and the robustness of hyperpolarized 13C imaging.
Methods
Real-time Hyperpolarized 13C MRI
The proposed scheme is illustrated in Fig. 1. ROIs for both bolus tracking and B1 calibration are prescribed according to proton anatomical images before starting 13C sequences. The bolus tracking sequence starts before the hyperpolarized substrate is injected. Real-time center frequency calibration based on the acquired slab frequency spectrum can be triggered upon the bolus arrival. When the peak bolus signal in the prescribed ROI is detected, Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping is triggered and the RF power for all sequences is then calibrated in real time based on the measured ROI B1. The sequence triggered upon the completion of B1 calibration for most experiments in this study is alternate pyruvate/lactate dynamic imaging, which could be replaced by any hyperpolarized 13C sequence for other studies. Our proposed scheme was implementedon a GE Signa MR 3T scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) using a commercial software (RTHawk, HeartVista, Los Altos, CA) which allows for real-time reconstruction of acquired data and feedback control of the pulse sequence. The software was installed on a workstation (2.4GHz, 16 proccessors, 64 GB RAM) running the Ubuntu operating system.
The bolus tracking sequence used a singleband spectral-spatial excitation pulse and a single-shot spiral readout, similar to Fig. 2 but without the Fermi pulse and associated delay. In these studies, this was used for selective imaging of [1-13C]pyruvate, but could be adapted for other metabolites (e.g. 13C-urea). The algorithm for tracking the maximum bolus signal was implemented based on prior works (14,19). The bolus signal is the mean value of a prescribed ROI on the tracking image. Our bolus tracking acquisition consists of two modules, i.e., noise calibration and bolus tracking, which can be performed independently. Noise calibration is used to determine the tracking threshold. If the tracking threshold has been previously computed, bolus tracking can be performed without running noise calibration. In the noise calibration module, the tracking threshold Sthr is determined as , where σ is the standard deviation of Gaussian noise in the complex image, mnoise is the mean value of magnitude images of noise and cthr is a scaling factor. 100 calibration scans (TR = 200 ms) are performed to compute mnoise which is converted to σ (25). Given the noise distribution of the background in magnitude images follows a Rayleigh distribution (25), if a probability Pthr that a noise signal is above the tracking threshold is required, the proportional relationship between Sthr and σ can be derived using the cumulative distribution function of a Rayleigh distribution. For example, cthr = 3 would result in a Pthr of 0.001%. In the bolus tracking module, the sequence is resumed automatically if the bolus peak is not detected. When a cumulative number ncum of signal increases is detected and all these signals are above the tracking threshold as well as greater than upeak fraction of its previous signal, the program starts to update the peak value. When the bolus signal is lower than upeak fraction of the current peak signal, detection of bolus peak will be reported. In our study, upeak was determined based on estimated hypolarization loss due to T1. For example, under the assumptions of a T1 of 30s, an excitation ip angle of 5°, no more pyruvate from the bolus coming into the ROI and neglecting metabolic conversion, the hyperpolarization loss over a TR of 1s for the bolus tracking sequence would be 1 - cos(5° × π/180) × exp(-1/30) = ~0.04, and the remaining hyperpolarization (~0.96) was used as upeak. The use of cumulative increase rather than successive increase as used in the previous work (19) aims to improve the robustness of the tracking algorithm to motion and injection with unstable rates. For some experiments, during the time that bolus signal was below the current signal peak but above upeak threshold, a short repetition time was used to shorten the time interval between actual bolus peak and detected bolus peak.
The Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping sequence (23, 24, 26) (Fig. 2) shared the similar excitation and readout as bolus tracking, using a singleband spectral-spatial excitation pulse and a single-shot spiral readout, whereas an off-resonance Fermi pulse (KBS = 6.76rad=G2) was inserted in between. The phase difference between two Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping sequences with opposite ωRF was used to calculate B1. Taking the phase difference removes receiver phase and minimizes the influence of B0 off-resonance frequency (26). Parameters used in this study were designed to measure a maximum B1 of 0.48G. The two phase maps were masked based on corresponding magnitude images in order to eliminate noisy phases due to low signal. The threshold is determined as SB1 = cB1σ, where cB1 is a scaling factor and noise standard deviation σ was obtained from the bolus tracking sequence. The ratio of the desired B1 to the measured ROI B1 was passed to all sequences as a scaling factor to calibrate transmit power in real time.
The center frequency calibration sequence consists of a sinc excitation pulse with slab selection gradient and a 102 ms readout with a 5kHz bandwidth. The acquired spectrum is used to calibrate center frequency for all sequences in real time. Alternate pyruvate and lactate dynamic imaging shared the same excitation and readout as bolus tracking, using a single-band spectral-spatial excitation pulse and a single-shot spiral readout, but with alternating excitation frequencies and different flip angles to image pyruvate and lactate.
All methods described are available through the HeartVista research collaboration portal (https://www.heartvista.com/git/shuyu/hv_research_shuyu).
Phantom and Animal Experiments
Validations of the Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping sequence were performed on a 13C/1H birdcage coil as well as on a 13C figure-8 transceiver coil. For experiments using the 13C/1H birdcage coil, a cylindrical ethylene glycol phantom with a base of 3.6cm diameter was used. Axial 13C B1 maps at four transmit powers (50%, 75%, 100% and 150% of the calibrated power) were acquired (FA 90º, slice thickness 10mm, Fermi pulse duration TRF 12ms, frequency offset ωRF ±4.5kHz, FOV 10cm, in-plane resolution 2.5 × 2.5mm, TR 2s, NEX 100). For experiments using the 13C figure-8 transceiver coil, a cup (cross-section diameter from 5.5 to 7.5cm, height7.5cm) filled with oil was placed on top of the coil. An axial 13C magnitude map with a nominal 180° excitation (FA 180°, slice thickness 100mm, FOV 20cm, in-plane resolution 5 × 5mm, TR 1s, NEX 100) and its corresponding B1 map (FA 60°, slice thickness 100mm, Fermi pulse duration TRF 8ms, frequency offset ωRF ±3kHz, FOV 20cm, in-plane resolution 5 × 5mm, TR 1s and NEX 200) were acquired. A 2D phase unwrapping algorithm (27) based on minimum spanning tree was implemented to correct phase images of B1 mapping off line.
Hyperpolarized 13C animal experiments were performed to test our proposed scheme using normal Sprague-Dawley rats and transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice with 13C/1H birdcage coils (8cm diameter for rats, 5cm diameter for mice). Two experiments were also performed on a rat with a 13C figure-8 transceiver coil. A total of six rats and two TRAMP mice were used to test the proposed scheme.All animal studies were conducted under protocols approved by the University of California San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Both rats and mice were anesthetized with iso urane (1–2%) and placed in a supine position on a heated pad throughout the duration of the experiments. [1-13C]pyruvic acid (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) mixed with 15mM trityl radical (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) and 1.5mM Gd-DOTA (Guerbet, Roissy, France) was polarized in a HyperSense dissolution DNP system (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) at 1.35K and 3.35T for ~1h. A 4.5mL volume of 80mM NaOH and 40mM Tris buffer was used as dissolution media, resulting in a 80mM [1-13C]pyruvate solution, with final pH of 6–8. The hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate was injected into the animal via tail vein catheters, ~2.6mL for each rat and ~350μL for the mouse. Each animal received two injections.
All animal experiments were performed using the proposed scheme (Fig. 1). 13C sequence parameters for animal experiments are shown in Table 1. Some experiments were performed with real-time center frequency calibration. The desired B1 of the Fermi pulse in B1 mapping sequence for all experiments was always set to 0.3G (344% of B1 required for a 90° excitation of the spectral-spatial pulse used in this study). Using the measured transmit B1 maps, all in vivo results were compensated for spatial B1 variations and flip angles between sequences. RF power measurements are shown as relative B1 maps which are the measured B1 normalized by the desired B1. For some experiments, data from alternate pyruvate and lactate dynamic imaging was used to quantify pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate (kPL) based on a two-site exchange model (28) using non-linear least-squares fitting.
Table 1:
Sequence | Parameters | Rat/Birdcage | TRAMP | Rat/Surface |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bolus Tracking | Slice thickness (mm) | 10 | 20 | 10 |
Resolution (mm) | 2.5 × 2.5 | 2.5 × 2.5 | 2.94 × 2.94 | |
Shared Parameters | FOV 10cm, FA 5°, TR 1s/0.5s before/after bolus peak, upeak 0.95, Cthr 6 ncum 3 | |||
B1 Mapping | Slice thickness (mm) | 10 | 20 | 10 |
Resolution (mm) | 2.5 × 2.5 | 2.5 × 2.5 | 2.94 × 2.94 | |
Shared Parameters | FOV 10cm, FA 10°, TR 200ms, 3, desired B1 0.3G | |||
Pyruvate/Lactate Dynamic Imaging | FOV (cm) | 10 | 8 | 10 |
Slice thickness (mm) | 10 | 20 | 10 | |
Resolution (mm) | 2.5 × 2.5 | 2.86 × 2.86 | 2.94 × 2.94 | |
Shared Parameters | FApyr 10°, FAlac 40°, Temporal resolution 2s | |||
Frequency Calibration | Slice thickness (mm) | NA | 20 | 10 |
Shared Parameters | NA | FA 3°, TR 150ms |
For rat experiments using the 13C/1H birdcage coil, an anatomical localizer was acquired using proton 3D bSSFP sequence (FOV 16 × 8 × 4.8cm, Matrix size 256 × 256 × 76). A total number of five injections were performed on three rats using the proposed scheme with different combinations of injection times (8s, 12s) and transmit gains (100%, 120% of pre-scan power calibration). Real-time center frequency calibration were not performed in these studies. A 13C urea phantom was used for frequency and pre-scan power calibrations. 13C images were acquired on the axial kidney plane. ROIs for bolus tracking and B1 calibration were both placed on the left kidney.
For rat experiments using the 13C transceiver coil, an anatomical localizer was acquired using proton T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (FOV 6 × 6cm, Matrix size 256 × 256) with the scanner body coil. The rat was positioned in a way that right kidney was about 1 cm further than left kidney from the bottom 13C transceiver coil. This set up was designed to produce a distinct B1 variation between two kidneys. Two injections were performed using the proposed scheme with the same parameters but with different tracking/B1 calibrating ROIs, one on right kidney and the other on left kidney. A 13C urea phantom embedded on the coil was used for pre-scan frequency calibration. Real-time center frequency calibration was performed at the bolus arrival. 13C images were acquired on the axial kidney planes with an injection time of 10s and transmit gain set based on pre-scan with the 13C-urea phantom.
For the TRAMP experiment, an anatomical localizer was acquired using proton T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (FOV 6 × 6cm, Matrix size 256 × 256). Real-time center frequency calibration was performed at the bolus arrival. 13C images were acquired on the axial tumor plane with an injection time of 12s and transmit gain the same as the calibrated power in pre-scan. A 13C urea phantom was used for pre-scan frequency and power calibration. ROIs for bolus tracking and B1 calibration were both in the tumor.
Volunteer Study
One human study was performed to test the proposed scheme (Fig. 1). A healthy volunteer was recruited with institutional review board approval and provided with written informed consent for participation in the study. The volunteer was a 37-year-old male. An Investigational New Drug approval was obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for generating the agent and implementing the clinical protocol. 1.47g of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) [1-13C]pyruvate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) mixed with 15mM electron paramagnetic agent (EPA) (AH111501, GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was polarized using a 5T SPINlab polarizer (General Electric, Niskayuna, NY) for 3h before being rapidly dissolved with 130°C water and forced through a filter that removed EPA. The solution was then collected in a receiver vessel and neutralized with NaOH and Tris buffer. The receive assembly that accommodates quality-control processes provided rapid measurements of pH, pyruvate and EPA concentrations, polarization, and temperature. In parallel, the hyperpolarized solution was pulled into a syringe (Medrad Inc, Warrendale, PA) through a 0.5μm sterile lter (ZenPure, Manassas, VA) and transported into the scanner for injection. The integrity of this filter was tested in agreement with manufacturer specifications prior to injection. A 0.43mL/kg dose of ~250mM pyruvate was injected at a rate of 5mL/s via an intra-venous catheter placed in the antecubital vein, followed by a 20mL saline flush.
In this study, 13C axial brain images were acquired with in-house built birdcage transmit coil and 32-channel receive array (29). Different from animal experiments, excitation pulses for bolus tracking, B1 mapping and metabolic-specific dynamic imaging were replaced with a different singleband spectral-spatial RF pulse (130Hz FWHM passband, 870Hz stopband) (30). Single-slice real-time B1 calibration was triggered right after real-time center frequency calibration rather than on bolus peak. The ROI for both bolus tracking and B1 calibration was on the brain tissue near the superior sagittal sinus. Following B1 calibration, multi-slice 2D acquisitions were performed to cover the entire brain, and [1-13C]pyruvate, [1-13C]lactate and [1-13C]bicarbonate signals were acquired alternately. A 13C urea phantom embedded on the coil was used for pre-scan frequency calibration. Pre-scan power calibration was performed on a 13C ethylene glycol head phantom. Proton anatomical reference was acquired with body coil built in the scanner, using 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo with FOV 26.6×26.6×16cm, matrix size 256×256×160. 13C sequence parameters for this study are presented in Table 2.
Table 2:
Sequence | Parameters |
---|---|
Bolus Tracking | FA 5o, Slice thickness 30mm, Resolution 1.5 × 1.5cm, FOV 39cm, TR 1s, cthr 4 |
B1 Mapping | FA 10o, Slice thickness 30mm, Resolution 1.5 × 1.5cm, FOV 39cm, TR 200ms, 2, desired B1 0.3G |
Multi-slice Pyruvate/Lactate/Bicarbonate Dynamic Imaging | FApyr 20o, FAlac 30o, FAbicarb 30o, Slice thickness 20mm, NSlices 8, FOV 39cm, Resolution 1.5 × 1.5cm, TR 125ms, Temporal resolution 3s |
Frequency Calibration | FA 3o, Slice thickness 20mm, TR 150ms |
For the online reconstruction, multichannel k-space data were combined using sum of squares. In the offline processing, coil combination was performed by using pyruvate signals as coil sensivitiy maps (31).
Results
Axial thermal 13C B maps of the 13C/1H birdcarge coil at 50%, 75%, 100% and 150% of the calibrated transmit power are shown in Fig. 3a. The mean B1 value of the phantom region versus the relative transmit power is plotted (Fig. 3b) to demonstrate the quadratic relationship between Bloch-Siegert phase difference and transmit power. A comparison between the magnitude image of nominal 180° excitation and its corresponding B1 map of a thermal 13C phantom on the 13C transceiver coil is shown in Fig. 3c and Fig. 3d. The B1 value along the dark band in Fig. 3c and its corresponding theoretical excitation flip angle(0.3 G) is plotted in Fig. 3e, demonstrating the accuracy of Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping.
Results of a representative hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate experiment using the proposed scheme to image the kidneys of a healthy rat with 13C/1H birdcage coil are shown in Fig.4. Real-time center frequency calibration was not performed in this study. Fig. 4d displays every other timeframe of the real-time reconstructed data where magnitude images are normalized by the peak value of the corresponding metabolic series. The full set of images can be found in Sup. Fig. S1. The acquired B1 map (Fig. 4b) was homogenous, as expected for this coil. The initial transmit power was purposely set to 120% of the power calibrated on a thermal 13C phantom and resulted in a nominal B1 scaling factor of 0.83 (1/1.2), which was in reasonable agreement with the real-time computed B1 scaling factor of ~0.87. Normalized pyruvate signal curves combining the data of bolus tracking and pyruvate/lactate dynamic imaging are shown in Fig. 4c for different ROIs. These pyruvate signal curves demonstrate that the ROI (left kidney) bolus peak was successfully detected, and acquisition timing would be different if the tracking ROI was on the major vessels.
Results of a hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate experiment using the proposed scheme to image the tumor of a TRAMP mouse with 13C/1H birdcage coil are shown in Fig. 5. Fig. 5e displays every other timeframe of the real-time reconstructed data where magnitude images are normalized by the peak value of the corresponding metabolic series. The full set of images can be found in Sup. Fig. S2. The frequency spectrum (Fig. 5d) acquired from the imaging slab at the bolus arrival shows that the measured pyruvate frequency was 20Hz downfield from the frequency calibrated based on a thermal 13C phantom. Bolus tracking images right before and after real-time center frequency calibration in Fig. 5e demonstrate that real-time center frequency calibration reduced blurring caused by off resonance reconstruction in real-time reconstructed images. Fig. 5b depicts the normalized B1 map which is homogenous as expected for the coil. The real-time B1 scaling factor (Fig. 5b) was 1.05, indicating a 5% difference from the power calibrated on a thermal 13C phantom. Tumor kPL (Fig. 5c) fitted using pyruvate and lactate signals was ~ 0.09 s−1, agreeing with prior works (32) which showed a kPL range of 0.03 to 0.08 s−1 for high grade TRAMP tumor.
Results of two hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate experiments using the proposed scheme to image the kidneys of healthy rats with one-sided 13C surface transceiver coil are shown in Fig. 6. Two experiments were performed with the same parameters but with the different tracking/calibrating ROIs, one on the right and the other on the left kidney, where the left kidney was closer to the coil. B1 maps (Fig. 6b) acquired in two experiments are consistent and show that the left kidney experienced a 40% higher B1 than the right kidney did. This agreed with the real-time B1 scaling factors, 1.49 and 1.07 for the tracking experiments on the left and right kidney, respectively. kPL maps fitted with and without flip angle correction for the two experiments are shown in Fig. 6c, where kPL values of right kidney, left kidney and intestine are labeled. Root mean squared errors of kPL values in the three labeled ROIs between two experiments are 0.0033 with flip angle correction and 0.0045 without flip angle correction, demonstrating that using acquired B1 maps to correct flip angle results in more consistent kPL estimations.
Results of the hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate human experiment using the proposed scheme to image the brain are shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. The polarization of the injected dose, back-calculated to the time of dissolution, was 41.9%. The ROI for both bolus tracking and B1 calibration was on the brain tissue near the superior sagittal sinus of slice 5. The frequency spectrum (Fig. 7c) acquired from slice 5 upon the bolus arrival shows that the measured pyruvate frequency was the same as the frequency calibrated in pre-scan. Fig. 7b depicts the normalized B1 map which is homogenous as expected for the birdcage transmit coil. The real-time B1 scaling factor (Fig. 7b) was ~1.04, 4% difference from the power calibrated in pre-scan. Pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate sum-over-time images are displayed in Fig. 8, where maximum SNRs for pyruvate, lactate and bicarbonate are 627, 60 and 20, respectively. Dynamic images can be found in Sup. Fig. S3.
Experiment recordings are provided on YouTube (see links in the figure) to demonstrate real-time actions during the experiments.
Discussion
As discussed in the Introduction section, automatic acquisition timing via bolus tracking improves efficient use of hyperpolarization as well as consistency and accuracy of hyperpolarized 13C imaging. Furthermore, accurate timing is critical for some optimal variable fiip angle schemes and metabolic quantification (15–18). The implementation of regional bolus tracking in this work improves the flexibility and accuracy of acquisition timing, and it would be especially useful for imaging tissue with low perfusion rate where injected metabolites would arrive at the target region later relative to major vessels or other tissues. The resolution of the bolus tracking image should be chosen as coarse as possible to improve image SNR but fine enough to separate the desired tracking region (e.g. major vessels from other tissues). An alternative approach is to use 2D spatially selective excitation pulses, but this approach is less robust to signals from off-resonance metabolites. In this study, bolus tracking triggered its following sequences either upon bolus arrival or following peak detection. This could easily be modified to use other schemes, such as starting metabolic imaging during the bolus or adding an additional delay from the peak. Manually triggering sequences during bolus tracking is also allowed in the designed framework and is useful if the automatic tracking algorithm fails. The bolus tracking used a flip angle of 5° and a TR of 1 s. Assuming an injection time of 10s, the expected total hyperpolarized signal loss due to bolus tracking RF pulses would be less than 2%.
The naturally low-abundance 13C signal requires real-time B1 mapping for accurate in vivo measurements of RF power in hyperpolarized 13C imaging. The acquired B1 map is useful for flip angle correction of images and is crucial for quantification of metabolism (e.g. kPL (22)) as demonstrated in in vivo results (Fig. 6). Real-time B1 calibration could achieve accurate flip angle during the scan, which is critical for variable flip angle schemes (15 18) and large flip angle pulses (33), and avoiding unnecessary use of hyperpolarization. The upper limit of the B1 measurement depends on the KBS value of the Bloch-Siegert pulse while the lower limit depends on the SNR. 2D phase unwrapping could be implemented in real time to extend the upper limit of B1 measurement. Real-time masking of the acquired B1 map based on signal intensity made the real-time B1 calibration robust when the B1 calibration ROI contained regions with low hyperpolarized signal. The two TRs required for the B1 mapping sequence used a pyruvate flip angle of 10°, using only 3% of the hyperpolarization magnetization.
Center frequency calibration is crucial for metabolite specific imaging. For singleband spetral-spatial pulses, frequency calibration errors will reduce the flip angle and may also excite undesired resonances. For spiral or echo-planar imaging (EPI) readouts, frequency calibration errors will lead to off-resonance blurring and shift artifacts. Both of these factors can undermine the accuracy of Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping and quantification of metabolism. Using a thermal 13C phantom, which must be placed external to the subject, center frequency calibration doesn’t capture B0 within the subject. Although B0 maps can be obtained via proton imaging, in vivo shimming could still be challenging, particularly in the presence of motion. In this study, real-time center frequency was triggered upon bolus arrival, which improved the quality of all the following real-time reconstructed images (Fig. 5e). The 102ms readout duration of the center frequency measurement sequence resulted in a ~10Hz frequency resolution which could be improved with a longer readout duration. A 3° flip angle cost less than 0.2% hyperpolarization.
The transition time between acquisitions is mainly attributed to real-time image reconstruction and loading sequence waveforms. For animal experiments using single-channel acquisition, the transition times of a bolus tracking acquisition, real-time center frequency calibration, real-time B1 calibration and their following sequences were about 60ms, 60ms and 400ms, respectively. For the human experiment using 32-channel acquisition, a longer transition time (~800ms) was observed for real-time B1 calibration, whereas transition times for bolus tracking acquisition and real-time center frequency calibration remained similar. The longer transition time found in B1 calibration could be caused by its more complicated reconstruction compared to frequency calibration, and its shorter TR compared to a bolus tracking acquisition which typically used a TR of 1s and allowed real-time reconstruction to be completed during the dead time of a TR.
A 13C-pyruvate and 13C-urea co-polarized injection (34) would benefit substantially from the proposed methods. 13C-urea could be used to perform bolus tracking, real-time center frequency and B1 calibration. This strategy would fully reserve hyperpolarized signal of pyruvate (19) and provide higher SNR for B1 mapping by using a larger flip angle. Cardiac and respiratory motion could detrimentally affect bolus tracking and Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping. Cardiac gating could be used (23). In terms of respiratory motion, breathholding is often used in clinical studies. Respiratory gating is not suitable for bolus tracking due to large potential delays but can be applied to perform B1 mapping at the end of exhalation (23), in which case, a short TR (200ms) as used in this study is recommended. A more challenging but robust approach to handle motion is to perform real-time image registration. To extend the proposed scheme for volumetric calibration, real-time center frequency and B1 calibration can be integrated with a multislice imaging framework (23). More than one ROI for tracking or B1 calibration could be useful when B1 (e.g. Fig. 6b) or acquisition timing (e.g. Fig. 4c) shows variation within the imaging subject.
Conclusion
This work demonstrated an approach that integrates automatic acquisition timing using the regional bolus signal with real-time center frequency calibration, Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping and real-time RF power compensation based on regional B1 measurements as well as dynamic hyperpolarized 13C imaging. This scheme allows for timing the acquisition based on bolus information of a local region within the imaging plane. Acquiring in vivo B1 maps, performing real-time center frequency calibration and B1 calibration, ensures accurate center frequency and flip angles which are used in the following hyperpolarized 13C sequences. The proposed scheme was successfully demonstrated for in vivo hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate imaging on a clinical 3T scanner. Future work will focus on incoporating pyruvate-urea co-polarized injections, volumetric calibration and motion-compensation methods into the proposed scheme to improve efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of hyperpolarized 13C studies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Lucas Carvajal, Mark Van Criekinge, James Slater, Mary Mcpolin, Kimberly Okamoto, Hsin-Yu Chen, Daniele Mammoli, Yiran Chen and Peng Cao for their help on the project. This work was supported by grants R01EB017449, R01EB016741, R01CA183071, and P41EB013598 from the National Institutes of Health.
References
- [1].ArdenkjærLarsen JH, Golman K, Gram A, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Wolber J. Increase of signal-to-noise of more than 10,000 times in liquid state nmr. Discov Med 2003; 3:37–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Golman K, in ‘t Zandt R, Thaning M. Real-time metabolic imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:11270–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Day SE, Kettunen MI, Gallagher FA, Hu DE, Lerche M, Wolber J, Golman K, ArdenkjaerLarsen JH, Brindle KM. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13c magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat Med 2007; 13:1382–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Zierhut ML, Zhang VY, Kohler SJ, Tropp J, Hurd RE, Yen YF, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Hyperpolarized 13c lactate, pyruvate, and alanine: noninvasive biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and grading. Cancer Res 2008; 68:8607–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Schroeder MA, Cochlin LE, Heather LC, Clarke K, Radda GK, Tyler DJ. In vivo assessment of pyruvate dehydrogenase flux in the heart using hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:12051–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Park I, Larson PEZ, Zierhut ML, Hu S, Bok R, Ozawa T, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Vandenberg SR, James CD, Nelson SJ. Hyperpolarized 13c magnetic resonance metabolic imaging: application to brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2010; 12:133–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Witney TH, Kettunen MI, Hu De, Gallagher FA, Bohndiek SE, Napolitano R, Brindle KM. Detecting treatment response in a model of human breast adenocarcinoma using hyperpolarised [1-13c]pyruvate and [1,4-13c2]fumarate. Br J Cancer 2010; 103:1400–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Rider OJ, Tyler DJ. Clinical implications of cardiac hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15:93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Darpolor MM, Yen YF, Chua MS, Xing L, ClarkeKatzenberg RH, Shi W, Mayer D, Josan S, Hurd RE, Pfefferbaum A, Senadheera L, So S, Hofmann LV, Glazer GM, Spielman DM. In vivo mrsi of hyperpolarized [1-13c]pyruvate metabolism in rat hepatocellular carcinoma. NMR Biomed 2011; 24:506–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Brindle K, Chekmenev EY, Comment A, Cunningham CH, Deberardinis RJ, Green GG, Leach MO, Rajan SS, Rizi RR, Ross BD, Warren WS, Malloy CR. Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research. Neoplasia 2011; 13:81–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Larson PEZ, Harzstark AL, Ferrone M, van Criekinge M, Chang JW, Bok R, Park I, Reed G, Carvajal L, Small EJ, Munster P, Weinberg VK, ArdenkjaerLarsen JH, Chen AP, Hurd RE, Odegardstuen LI, Robb FJ, Tropp J, Murray JA. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyper-polarized [1-13c]pyruvate. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5:198ra108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Cunningham CH, Lau JYC, Chen AP, Geraghty BJ, Perks WJ, Roifman I, Wright GA, Connelly KA. Hyperpolarized 13c metabolic mri of the human heart: Initial experience. Circ Res 2016; 119:1177–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Kazan SM, Reynolds S, Kennerley A, Wholey E, Bluff JE, Berwick J, Cunningham VJ, Paley MN, Tozer GM. Kinetic modeling of hyperpolarized 13c pyruvate metabolism in tumors using a measured arterial input function. Magn Reson Med 2013; 70:943–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced mr angiography. Radiology 1997; 203:275–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Xing Y, Reed GD, Pauly JM, Kerr AB, Larson PEZ. Optimal variable flip angle schemes for dynamic acquisition of exchanging hyperpolarized substrates. J Magn Reson 2013; 234:75–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Nagashima K Optimum pulse flip angles for multi-scan acquisition of hyperpolarized nmr and mri. J Magn Reson 2008; 190:183–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhao L, Mulkern R, Tseng CH, Williamson D, Patz S, Kraft R, Walsworth RL, Jolesz FA, Albert MS. Gradient-echo imaging considerations for hyperpolarized 129xe mr. J Magn Reson B 1996; 113:179–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Maidens J, Gordon JW, Arcak M, Larson PEZ. Optimizing flip angles for metabolic rate estimation in hyperpolarized carbon-13 mri. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35:2403–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Durst M, Koellisch U, Gringeri C, Janich MA, Rancan G, Frank A, Wiesinger F, Menzel MI, Haase A, Schulte RF. Bolus tracking for improved metabolic imaging of hyper-polarised compounds. J Magn Reson 2014; 243:40–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Yen YF, Kohler SJ, Chen AP, Tropp J, Bok R, Wolber J, Albers MJ, Gram KA, Zierhut ML, Park I, Zhang V, Hu S, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J, Dirven HAAM, Hurd RE. Imaging considerations for in vivo 13c metabolic mapping using hyperpolarized 13c-pyruvate. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Gillies RJ, Schornack PA, Secomb TW, Raghunand N. Causes and effects of heterogeneous perfusion in tumors. Neoplasia 1999; 1:197–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Sun CY, Walker CM, Michel KA, Venkatesan AM, Lai SY, Bankson JA. Influence of parameter accuracy on pharmacokinetic analysis of hyperpolarized pyruvate. Magn Reson Med 2018; 79:3239–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Lau AZ, Chen AP, Cunningham CH. Integrated Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping and multi-slice imaging of hyperpolarized 13c pyruvate and bicarbonate in the heart. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67:62–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Schulte RF, Sacolick L, Deppe MH, Janich MA, Schwaiger M, Wild JM, Wiesinger F. Transmit gain calibration for nonproton mr using the bloch-siegert shift. NMR Biomed 2011; 24:1068–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:910–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Sacolick LI, Wiesinger F, Hancu I, Vogel MW. B1 mapping by bloch-siegert shift. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63:1315–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Towers D, Judge T, Bryanston-Cross P. Automatic interferogram analysis techniques applied to quasi-heterodyne holography and espi. Opt Lasers Eng 1991; 14:239–81. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Harrison C, Yang C, Jindal A, Deberardinis RJ, Hooshyar MA, Merritt M, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. Comparison of kinetic models for analysis of pyruvate-to-lactate exchange by hyperpolarized 13c NMR. NMR Biomed 2012; 25:1286–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Mareyam A, Carvajal A, Xu D, Gordon J, Park I, Vigneron DB, Nelson SJ, Stock-mann JP, Keil B, Wald LL. 31-channel brain array for hyperpolarized 13c imaging at 3t. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 25 2017; p. 1225. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Gordon JW, Hansen RB, Shin PJ, Feng Y, Vigneron DB, Larson PEZ. 3d hyperpolarized c-13 epi with calibrationless parallel imaging. J Magn Reson 2018; 289:92–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Zhu Z, Zhu X, Ohliger M, Cao P, Tang S, Gordon JW, Aggarwal R, Bok R, Kurhanewicz J, Munster P, Larson PEZ, Vigneron DB. Coil combination methods using multi-channel hyperpolarized 13c clinical spectroscopic imaging data. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 26 2018; p. 8706. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Chen HY, Larson PEZ, Bok RA, von Morze C, Sriram R, DelosSantos R, DelosSantos J, Gordon JW, Bahrami N, Ferrone M, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB. Assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness with hyperpolarized dual-agent 3d dynamic imaging of metabolism and perfusion. Cancer Res 2017; 77:3207–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Schulte RF, Sperl JI, Weidl E, Menzel MI, Janich MA, Khegai O, Durst M, ArdenkjaerLarsen JH, Glaser SJ, Haase A, Schwaiger M, Wiesinger F. Saturation-recovery metabolic-exchange rate imaging with hyperpolarized [1-13c] pyruvate using spectral-spatial excitation. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69:1209–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Wilson DM, Keshari KR, Larson PEZ, Chen AP, Hu S, VanCriekinge M, Bok R, Nelson SJ, Macdonald JM, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Multi-compound polarization by dnp allows simultaneous assessment of multiple enzymatic activities in vivo. J Magn Reson 2010; 205:141–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.