Abstract
A number of different B cell subsets have been shown to exhibit regulatory activity using a variety of mechanisms to attenuate inflammatory diseases. Here we show, using anti-CD20-mediated partial B cell depletion in mice, that a population of mature B cells distinguishable by IgDlow/- expression maintains tolerance by, at least in part, promoting CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell homeostatic expansion via glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand, or GITRL. Cell surface phenotyping, transcriptome analysis and developmental study data show that B cells expressing IgD at a low level (BDL) are a novel population of mature B cells that emerge in the spleen from the transitional-2 stage paralleling the differentiation of follicular B cells. The cell surface phenotype and regulatory function of BDL are highly suggestive that they are a new B cell subset. Human splenic and peripheral blood IgDlow/- B cells also exhibit BDL regulatory activity, rendering them of therapeutic interest.
B cells produce antibodies to mediate various immune functions, but are also reported to negatively regulate immune responses. Here, the authors show that a subset of mature B cells expressing low levels of IgD, present in both mice and human, may pursue this regulatory function indirectly by inducing the proliferation of regulatory T cells via GITRL.
Introduction
A regulatory role for B cells in controlling the severity of autoimmunity was first described by us in the mouse model of multiple sclerosis (MS), experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)1. Specifically, we showed that B10.PL mice deficient in B cells (μMT) immunized with the myelin basic protein (MBP)-immunodominant peptide Ac1–11 were unable to recover from the signs of EAE exhibiting a chronic disease course1. We subsequently reproduced these findings in mice on the B10.PL background using adoptive transfer EAE and in anti-CD20-depleted mice2,3. Our original findings were replicated in C57BL/6μMT mice immunized with the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35–55 peptide4. The later study identified B cell production of interleukin-10 (IL-10) as the mechanism by which B cells regulate the severity of EAE4. However, numerous studies failed to identify a distinct B cell subset that regulates via IL-105. In addition, it has become clear that other B cell regulatory mechanisms exist6,7. The existence of B cells with regulatory activity in humans has also been demonstrated, but as in mice, a definitive phenotype has remained elusive8
We were the first to identify an IL-10-independent regulatory B cell mechanism operational in EAE3. We found that μMT and CD20 B cell-depleted mice had a significant reduction in the absolute number of CD4+Foxp3+ T regulatory cells (Tregs)3. B cell reconstitution of μMT mice induced Treg proliferation and maintenance resulting in resolution of EAE3. Tregs are essential for the maintenance of tolerance against self-antigens and when absent or depleted humans and mice quickly succumb to autoimmune manifestations9. We found that the ability of B cells to homeostatically expand Treg was glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand (GITRL)-dependent, but IL-10-independent3. GITR the receptor for GITRL is highly expressed by Treg and when engaged has been reported to induce Treg proliferation10,11. Given the importance of B cells in providing protection against pathogens, it is unlikely that all B cell subsets would have the capacity to homeostatically expand Treg, which would potentially be detrimental for pathogen clearance.
Using a partial B cell depletion strategy to enrich for B cells with regulatory activity, here we find that B cells exhibiting an IgD low (L) (BDL) phenotype induce Treg expansion and promote recovery from EAE. Both genetic and developmental studies lead us to conclude that BDL are a new subset of mature B cells. Importantly, human B cells with an IgDlow/− phenotype exhibit BDL regulatory activity by the induction of Treg proliferation. The ability to modulate Treg numbers to either suppress or enhance immune responses is a goal for the treatment of disease. Thus, the ability to harness the regulatory function of BDL is of therapeutic interest.
Results
Anti-CD20 IgG1 B cell depletion retains regulatory activity
In our previous studies, total B cell depletion with anti-CD20 immunoglobulin G 2a (IgG2a) prior to EAE induction led to significantly reduced Treg numbers and the inability to recover from EAE3, indicating that the protective B cell population was depleted. These data suggested that a specific B cell population that facilitates Treg homeostasis and EAE resolution could be identified3. To that end, the strategy we chose was to partially deplete B cells with anti-CD20 that contains the same antigen recognition domain, but with the IgG2a Fc region swapped for IgG112. Administration of anti-CD20 IgG1 led to a significant reduction in the total number of splenic B cells that was due to 85% loss of follicular (FO) B cells, while sparing the marginal zone (MZ) subset (Fig. 1a). Representative flow cytometry plots are shown in Fig. 1b. The kinetics of anti-CD20 IgG1 B cell depletion are shown in Suppl. Figure 1a12. We developed a 4-color immunofluorescence strategy to visualize B cell depletion by staining for the T cell zone (CD3), B cell follicle (IgD+IgM+), and the MZ (SIGN-R1). In isotype control mice splenic architecture is shown as a distinct T cell zone surrounded by B cell follicles encircled by the MZ (Fig. 1c, left panel). Following anti-CD20 IgG1 administration, interestingly, IgD expression was lost while IgM expression remained (Fig. 1c, right panel). The MZ remained intact and there was no impact on the T cell zone (Fig. 1c, right panel). In addition, there was ~30% reduction in peripheral blood B cells (Suppl. Figure 1B) and ~95% reduction in lymph node B cells (Suppl. Figure 1C). We also found that Treg numbers were not altered (Fig. 1d). Representative CD4+ T cell and Treg flow cytometry is shown in Suppl. Figure 2. When we induced EAE in the anti-CD20-treated mice they recovered similarly to wild-type (WT) and isotype control-treated mice, as compared to chronic disease in μMT mice (Fig. 1e).
We next determined whether B cells refractory to anti-CD20 IgG1 depletion retained regulatory activity. Mice receiving anti-CD20 IgG1-depleted B cells recovered in a similar manner as the WT controls (Fig. 1f). Subsequently, we found that the FO, but not MZ, B cell subset was responsible for recovery from EAE (Fig. 1g).
Anti-CD20 IgG1- depleted B cells are enriched for IgDlow/−
Given that B cell regulatory activity resided within the retained FO B cell subset, they were further analyzed by flow cytometry to uncover an enriched phenotype. This was accomplished by utilizing a B cell gating strategy utilizing differential expression of IgM, CD21, and CD2313,14. First, B220+ B cells and differential IgM and CD21 expression was used to define three groups: IgMhiCD21hi containing T2-MZP and MZ B cells, IgMintCD21int containing T3 and FO B cells, and IgMhiCD21low/− containing T1 and T2 B cells (Fig. 2a). We then used CD93 and CD23 expression to further delineate each of the three groups. Because B cell depletion with anti-CD20 IgG1 resulted in a loss of IgD-expressing cells in the B cell follicle (Fig. 1c), we measured IgD expression on the retained FO subset and found an eight-fold enrichment in IgDlow/− B cells or BDL (Fig. 2b). The FO IgDhi subset will henceforth will be referred to as FO B cells (Fig. 2b). Because B cell depletion with anti-CD20 IgG1 may impact the phenotype of the remaining B cells, we repeated our staining strategy using naive mice and included additional B cell markers. First, we determined whether the reduction in cell surface expression of IgD by BDL was due to the lack of protein expression. As shown in Fig. 2c, the reduced level of cell surface IgD expression by BDL, as compared to FO B cells, was paralleled by a similar reduction in intracellular IgD (Fig. 2c). MZ B cells, the control for IgDlow expression, also had reduced intracellular IgD (Fig. 2c). For IgM, BDL expressed higher levels of cell surface IgM (Fig. 2d, top histogram), but similar levels of intracellular IgM, as compared to FO B cells (Fig. 2d). MZ B cells expressed the highest levels of both cell surface and intracellular IgM (Fig. 2d).
We then further refined the expression pattern of BDL in naive mice and found that they expressed slightly lower levels of the B cell marker B220, as compared to FO and MZ B cells (Fig. 2e). Their expression of CD20 was intermediate between FO and MZ B cells, indicating that reduced CD20 expression was not likely why they were retained (Fig. 2f). BDL expressed an intermediate level of CD23 (Fig. 2g) and expressed the lowest levels of CD21 (Fig. 2h). BDL express the highest levels of CD93 of the three subsets (Fig. 2i). These data suggest that BDL are a splenic B cell subset that to the best of our knowledge has not been previously described. These results indicate that the refined BDL phenotype is B220+IgDlow/−CD21intCD23+CD93int.
BDL regulatory activity is IL-10-independent
We next demonstrated that BDL exhibit B cell regulatory activity by driving Treg expansion after transfer into µMT mice similarly to total B cells (Fig. 3a, b). In contrast, neither FO (Fig. 3a) nor MZ (Fig. 3b) B cell transfer led to a significant increase in Treg. To determine the lowest number of BDL required to induce maximal Treg proliferation, we performed a dose−response curve and found that 2 × 106 and 3 × 106 BDL induced similar levels of Treg expansion (Suppl. Figure 3A), but 5 × 106 BDL was required to completely restore Treg numbers (Fig. 3a, b). We confirmed that BDL induced Treg proliferation in an IL-10-independent manner (Suppl. Figure 3B). We also confirmed that BDL did not express high levels of CD5 (Suppl. Figure 3C), CD1d (Suppl. Figure 3D), or Tim1 (Suppl. Figure 3E), which are markers of IL-10-producing B cells5.
We next tested the regulatory potential of BDL in EAE. To control for the possibility that IgG1 anti-CD20 treatment modulated the function of the non-depleted cells, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified splenic B cell subsets from naive mice were utilized. Adoptive transfer of BDL into μMT mice prior to EAE induction resulted in complete recovery similar to WT (Fig. 3c). In contrast, μMT control mice and those that received FO or MZ B cells did not recover (Fig. 3c). We next determined the kinetics of Treg expansion during EAE and found that in WT mice Treg numbers that started at ~3 × 106 (Fig. 3a) were decreased in the spleen at the onset (day 7) and peak of disease (day 18), which then increased when the mice recovered from EAE (Fig. 3d). In μMT mice, Treg numbers were similar on days 0 and 7, but were decreased on days 18 and 30 (Fig. 3a vs. Fig. 3d). In μMT mice that received BDL, Treg numbers were similar to WT on day 7, which were reduced on days 18 and 30 (Fig. 3d). Importantly, in μMT mice that received BDL Treg numbers were significantly elevated at every timepoint as compared to μMT mice (Fig. 3d). We also tracked the fate of conventional CD4 T cells and found that in each of the experimental conditions their numbers increased at the peak of disease and then were reduced on day 30 (Fig. 3e). As with Treg, conventional CD4 T cell numbers were significantly higher in the BDL group as compared to μMT mice (Fig. 3e). These data indicate that BDL also likely promote CD4 T cell expansion. A reduction in Treg and conventional CD4 T cells on day 7 as compared to day 0 (Fig. 3a) is consistent with the mice being sublethally irradiated for EAE induction.
To demonstrate that BDL regulatory activity is not restricted to EAE, we performed the same experiment in a contact hypersensitivity (CHS) model that does not require B cells for induction15. As with EAE, μMT mice exhibited a more severe disease course than WT mice that was normalized to WT levels in mice that received BDL (Fig. 3f). In contrast, when FO or MZ B cells were transferred, ear swelling was similar to the μMT control mice (Fig. 3f). Only mice that received BDL exhibited a significant increase in Treg numbers at 120 h, albeit not to WT levels, which is consistent with slightly increased ear swelling as compared to WT mice (Fig. 3f, g).
BDL are a new B cell subset separate from FO and MZ B cells
To determine whether BDL could be differentiated from FO and MZ B cells, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) comparing splenic BDL to FO and MZ B cells. Using principal component (PC) analysis plotted in three-dimensional (3D), we obtained the expected result that FO and MZ B cells cluster differentially in all three dimensions (Fig. 4a). A similar result was obtained when BDL and MZ B cells were compared (Fig. 4a). To further confirm that BDL are distinct from the MZ B cell lineage, we utilized mice with a conditional deletion in Notch2 in B cells that lack MZ B cells16. We found that the percentage of BDL within the FO B cell subset (Suppl. Figure 4A) and their regulatory function were identical in Notch2fl/fl CD19Cre+ and the control Notch2fl/fl CD19Cre− mice (Suppl. Figure 4B). These cumulative data provide evidence that BDL are unrelated to MZ B cells.
When we compared BDL and FO B cells, the subsets clustered similarly in PC1 and PC2 (Fig. 4a). However, in PC3 the two B cell subsets clustered separately. When we compared BDL and FO B cells, we found that 343 transcripts were significantly more highly expressed (red) in BDL and 121 transcripts were significantly less expressed (blue) (Fig. 4b). These data demonstrate that BDL express a unique transcriptome that can be used to distinguish them from FO B cells. Using gene set overrepresentation analysis, we found increased expression of genes involved in cell cycle/proliferation in BDL (Fig. 4c). Forty-four genes involved in developmental processes (Fig. 4d) and 21 genes involved in cell surface receptor signaling (Fig. 4e) were increased. Because an increase in genes regulating cell cycle/division were increased in BDL (Fig. 4c), we then measured the steady-state proliferation of splenic B cell subsets. Using Ki-67 staining proliferation was highest in the T1 and then T2 stages (Fig. 4f)13,17,18. As B cells matured into T2-MZP and MZ B cells proliferation decreased with the lowest level found in FO B cells (Fig. 4f). BDL exhibited identical levels of proliferation as T2-MZP (~30%) (Fig. 4f), which was significantly lower than FO B cells. Representative Ki-67 flow cytometry is shown in Suppl. Figure 5.
We then utilized flow cytometry to validate increased cell surface expression of proteins indicated in the RNA-seq. Cell surface proteins validated are CD93 (Fig. 2i), CD5 (Suppl. Figure 3c), CD9 (Suppl. Figure 6A), CD43 (Suppl. Figure 6B), and CD80 (Suppl. Figure 6C), albeit the increased expression was marginal. Cell surface proteins not validated include CD25 (Suppl. Figure 6D), F4/80 (Suppl. Figure 6E), NK1.1 (Suppl. Figure 6F), and Ly6C (Suppl. Figure 6G). We also examined additional B cell surface proteins not indicated by the RNA-seq analysis and found that BDL expressed slightly lower levels of CD38 (Suppl. Figure 6H) and CD40 (Suppl. Figure 6I) and higher levels of CD86 (Suppl. Figure 6J) as compared to FO B cells. MZ B cells were included in the analysis to further demonstrate that BDL do not share their partially activated phenotype (Suppl. Figure 6). Although both CD80 and CD86 levels were increased on BDL, we previously demonstrated that neither was essential for B cells to induce Treg proliferation3. Although not indicated in the RNA-seq data (Fig. 4b), we showed that BDL expressed lower levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (Suppl. Figure 6K), which has been shown to be a B cell effector cytokine in EAE19.
BDL regulatory function is GITRL-dependent
In our previous studies using total splenic B cells, we found that their regulatory activity was GITRL-dependent3. Consistent with this finding, we found that Tnfs18 (GITRL) message was upregulated 2.5-fold (p = 0.001) in BDL in the RNA-seq analysis. When we examined the cell surface expression of GITRL, we found that all splenic B cell subsets expressed low levels of GITRL (Fig. 5a). As with the RNA-seq analysis, BDL expressed significantly higher levels of GITRL than FO B cells (Fig. 5a). Reconstitution of μMT mice with BDL, but not FO B cells, resulted in a significant increase in Treg numbers (Fig. 5b). Antibody blocking of GITRL on BDL prior to transfer completely abrogated their ability to promote Treg expansion, while it had no effect on FO B cells (Fig. 5b). These findings were confirmed using Tnfsf18−/− mice, which had a significant reduction in the absolute number of Treg (Fig. 5c). In addition, Tnfsf18−/− BDL upon adoptive transfer into μMT mice were unable to induce Treg proliferation, as compared to WT BDL (Fig. 5d). These data indicate that GITRL is the primary mechanism by which BDL promote Treg proliferation.
The BDL subset develops in parallel with FO B cells in the spleen
We next determined whether BDL develop independently from FO B cells. This was accomplished by determining the timing of BDL emergence as compared to FO B cells following sublethal irradiation18. As shown in Fig. 6a, b, cells in the T2 stage peaked on day 13 post irradiation. The finding that FO B cells peaked later on day 17 indicates that they developed from the T2 stage (Fig. 6a)17. The kinetics of BDL emergence and peaking was identical to FO B cells, indicating that they develop independently and not directly along the FO pathway (Fig. 6a). These results were confirmed using a bone marrow (BM) transplantation approach (Fig. 6b)20,21. In a third confirmatory approach, we adoptively transferred FACS-purified CD45.1+ T2 B cells into CD45.2+ WT mice and determined their maturation into BDL and FO B cells18. One and two days after transfer, T2 cells were detectable in the spleen and they had matured into both BDL and FO subsets at a similar level (Fig. 6c). The absolute cell number of T2, FO, and BDL recovered are shown in Fig. 6d, which is consistent with published studies18.
BDL are a stable mature B cell subset
We next examined the stability of BDL upon adoptive transfer by repeating the sublethal irradiation experiment (Fig. 6a), and on day 11 just prior to the emergence of BDL and FO B cells, FACS-purified CD45.1 BDL or CD45.1 FO B cells were adoptively transferred into CD45.2 recipient mice. This timepoint was chosen because the splenic microenvironment would support B cell development. The transferred B cells were identified as CD45.1+ and carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was used to determine whether the cells had proliferated. FO B cells upon transfer were stable with 96% of the cells the retaining their phenotype one day later (Fig. 7a) and 88% on day 2 (Fig. 7b). The increase in MZ B cells on day 2 was likely due to shedding of CD23 and not differentiation of FO B cells into the MZ lineage (Fig. 7a, b)22. Even though in the steady state only ~5% of FO B cells undergo cell proliferation (Fig. 4f), ~50% of FO B cells underwent proliferation after transfer on day 1 (Fig. 7a, inset), which increased to ~82% on day 2 (Fig. 7b, inset). The induction of FO B cell proliferation was likely due to the lymphopenic environment23. When BDL were adoptively transferred on day 1, ~97% of the cells had undergone proliferation (Fig. 7c, inset) and 86% of the cells exhibited a FO phenotype (Fig. 7c). On day 2, as with the FO B cell subset, the decrease in the number of FO B cells was offset by an increase in MZ B cells (Fig. 7d). Interestingly, the percentage of BDL remained stable at 12% from day 1 (Fig. 7c) to day 2 (Fig. 7d).
To determine whether the BDL phenotype is stable long term, we tracked their presence in EAE following adoptive transfer. On EAE day 7, ~5% of spleenocytes were B220+ (Fig. 8a). We then gated on IgM+CD23+ cells to exclude CD4+B220+ T cells, isotype class-switched B cells, and plasmablast/plasma cells and found that ~70% of the cells retained the BDL IgDlow/− phenotype (Fig. 8a). Similar results were obtained at the peak of disease on day 18 (Fig. 8b). On day 30, BDL were still present (Fig. 8c), which is consistent with Treg levels that were statistically higher in the mice that had received BDL, as compared to μMT mice (Fig. 3d). These cumulative data indicate that the IgDlow/− BDL phenotype is stable upon adoptive transfer.
Human BDL cells are present in spleen and peripheral blood
We next determined whether a similar population of BDL human B cells exist that also promote Treg proliferation. To accomplish this, splenic human B cells were FACS purified by gating on total B cells (CD4−CD19+) (Fig. 9a) and then subsequently on CD20+CD24− mature B cells (Fig. 9b), from which IgDlow/− B cells were obtained (Fig. 9c). We included CD20 in the gating strategy to remove plasma cells. Total B cells and IgDlow/− B cells were co-cultured with FACS-purified Tregs (CD4+CD25hi) from the same donor in the presence of anti-CD3 and irradiated antigen-presenting cells (APC). We found that Treg proliferation was similar in the presence or absence of total B cells (Fig. 9d). In contrast, in the presence of IgDlow/− B cells, Treg proliferation was significantly increased by 50% as compared to Treg alone (Fig. 9d). Figure 9e shows representative CSFE flow cytometry data. We next determined whether we could identify BDL in the peripheral blood using a modified strategy. By substituting anti-CD28 for the APC, we largely eliminated Treg background proliferation in the absence of B cells (Fig. 9f). As with the spleen, inclusion of total B cells slightly increased Treg proliferation, and as observed in the mouse, IgDlow/− B cells, but not IgDhi B cells supported Treg proliferation (Fig. 9f). Representative gating for Treg and peripheral blood B cells is shown in Suppl. Figure 7. These data demonstrate that human BDL cells are present in both spleen and peripheral blood that importantly can be identified by an IgDlow/− phenotype and induce Treg proliferation.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to identify a definitive cell surface phenotype that could be used to identify B cells with the capacity to promote Treg proliferation that we have named BDL. Extensive cell surface phenotying and functional assays revealed that BDL are IgDlow/−. These cumulative data led to the conclusion that BDL are a B cell subset that plays an essential role in immune tolerance by regulating the homeostatic expansion of Treg.
The ability of B cells to regulate inflammation was indicated as early as 1974 in models of delayed-type hypersensitivity, sarcoma and autoimmunity24–26. These studies fell short of definitively demonstrating a regulatory role for B cells. When μMT mice became available, we demonstrated that B cells were required for EAE recovery1. Subsequently, a regulatory role for B cells in a model of inflammatory bowel disease was demonstrated27, which were shown to regulate via IL-1028. B cells were also shown to regulate EAE severity via IL-104. These studies were impactful on the field and led to a plethora of papers demonstrating B cell regulation via IL-10 in a variety of disease models and in humans29,30. Given the capacity for all B cell subsets to produce IL-10, in retrospect, it is not surprising that a number of B cell phenotypes were described that regulate via IL-10 production29–32. Recently, the phenotype of B cells that regulate via IL-10 was identified as a population of LAG-3+ regulatory plasma cells that develop from numerous B cell subsets in a BCR (B cell Ag receptor)-dependent manner33. In humans, the most definitive IL-10-producing B cell phenotype was reported as CD19+CD24hiCD38hi, which includes both immature and CD5+CD1dhi B cells34. Thus, B cells that regulate via IL-10 are not a unique B cell subset.
To define IL-10-independent B regulatory mechanisms, we utilized an adoptive transfer model of EAE, that is, it does not require B cell effector functions2,3,35. This approach allowed us to discover that B cells induce the proliferation of Treg in a GITRL-dependent manner3. Our development of in vivo B cell regulatory assays allowed us to track the ability of purified B cell subsets to induce Treg proliferation3. This afforded us the opportunity to identify a definitive B cell regulatory phenotype. It is well known that the various IgG isotypes exhibit differential cell depletion. The effector function of the IgG subclass is determined by the Fc domain. The primary difference between the mouse IgG1 and IgG2a subclasses is that the later binds with high affinity to both FcγRI and FcγRIV, which are activating receptors that facilitate antibody-dependent cell clearance36–39. In mice, anti-CD20 IgG2a efficiently depletes all B cells in the spleen, while the IgG1 depletes the majority of FO B cells, but not the MZ subset (Fig. 1a)12. Using the partial depleting strategy, we determined that BDL activity resided within the undepleted FO subset (Fig. 1g). This result surprised us because at the time B cell regulatory activity had not been described for the FO subset. By performing extensive B cell phenotyping on the non-depleted FO B cells, we found that they were enriched for cells expressing IgDlow/− (Fig. 2b). Retained IgM expression (Fig. 2a, d) indicated that they had not undergone isotype class switching leading to loss of IgD40.
To the best of our knowledge, a subset of FO B cells expressing IgDlow/− has not been previously described. Using functional assays, EAE and CHS disease models (Fig. 3), we concluded that BDL are unique in their ability to induce Treg expansion. As for total B cells3, BDL also require GITRL expression to induce Treg expansion (Fig. 5b–d). While GITRL expression is low on all B cell subsets, BDL expressed significantly higher levels as compared to FO B cells (Fig. 5a). We found that upon adoptive transfer of BDL, ~13–20% of the Treg population underwent cell proliferation. Although Treg numbers increased 2–3-fold (Figs. 3a, 5b), we do not know whether the increase is due to a high proliferation of a small subpopulation of Treg or induction of Treg proliferation on larger scale. However, because the majority of the Treg underwent one to two cell divisions (Suppl. Figures 3B, 4B), we favor the later explanation. We tracked the fate of CD4 T cells during EAE and found both Treg and CD4 T cells were increased in μMT mice that received BDL (Fig. 3d, e). These data are consistent with a report demonstrating that chronic B cell depletion during acute viral infection in mice disrupted the homeostasis of both Treg and conventional CD4 T cells41.
Currently, there are four major populations of mature B cells including B1a that arise from the fetal liver and BM-derived B1b, MZ, and FO subsets42,43. CD5+ B1a cells are the major producers of natural IgM and IgG3, aid in the control of infections, play a prominent role in autoimmunity, and produce high levels of IL-1044,45. CD5−CD11b+ B1b have the natural tendency to recognize protective antigens in bacteria46. MZ B cells are the first line of defense against blood-borne pathogens, particularly those with repeating polysaccharides47. FO B cells produce the majority of high-affinity isotype class-switched antibodies in a T cell-dependent manner48. Here, we now provide evidence for the existence of BDL as a fifth mature B2 cell population that develops in the spleen from the T2 stage (Fig. 6). When BDL were adoptively transferred into an environment that would support their short-term survival and expansion, we found that 12% of the transferred cells remained stable for 2 days (Fig. 7c, d). The remaining cells upregulated IgD and thus fell into the FO phenotyping gate. When we tracked BDL following adoptive transfer in EAE just prior to EAE onset, 70% of B cells were BDL (Fig. 8a). At the peak of disease, this level remained high at 60% (Fig. 8b). As EAE progressed the separation between the IgDlow/− and IgDhi B cells became more evident and resembled what was observed in human spleen (Fig. 8, Fig. 9c). On day 30 the separation between IgDlow/− and IgDhi B cells became less demarcated more closely resembling naive mice (Fig. 8c). These data suggest that immune responses induce BDL expansion in parallel with the need for Treg to dampen inflammation.
Adoptive transfer studies demonstrate that a stable BDL phenotype does exist (Figs. 6–8). However, their relationship to FO B cells is not clear. BDL could directly differentiate into FO B cells, but we do not favor that hypothesis because the kinetics of the developmental studies show that both subsets emerge simultaneously (Fig. 6a, b). In addition, BDL may be a subset of FO B cells, but because we have never found a situation in which FO B cells induce Treg proliferation, they are a functionally distinct subset. Figure 10 depicts a revised model of B cell development including BDL. As with other mature B cells, BDL are endowed with a unique function whereby they play an essential role in tolerance. To that end, we previously showed that total B cell depletion led to a break in tolerance as indicated by reduced numbers of Treg and the onset of spontaneous EAE in MBP-TCR transgenic mice and acceleration of colitis onset in Il10−/− mice3. Here, we demonstrate that BDL induction of Treg expansion is also important for the resolution of CHS (Fig. 3f). Further support for a role for BDL in regulating disease severity is a recent paper demonstrating that B cells via a GITRL-dependent manner induced Treg expansion that suppressed Friend’s virus-specific antibody responses in turn attenuating the magnitude of the germinal center response49. These cumulative results provide support for BDL maintenance of Treg homeostasis being a broadly utilized mechanism in disease.
Because BDL play an essential role in the maintenance of immunological tolerance they are clinically relevant. In autoimmunity, they could be potentially harnessed to increase Treg numbers50. Conversely, a reduction in BDL thereby decreasing Treg numbers could promote immune responses to clear cancer51. Using IgDlow/− as the marker of BDL, we have been able to demonstrate the presence of BDL in humans (Fig. 9). The ability to identify BDL in the peripheral blood will allow their tracking in disease. The importance of B cells in a variety of diseases has become evident with antibody-based therapeutics to deplete B cells. In MS, B cell depletion with rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), has demonstrated efficacy52,53. As with mouse, human IgG subclasses also exhibit differential cell-depleting activity and are organized into two groups. Type I lead to CD20 redistribution into lipid rafts triggering complement-dependent cytotoxicity54,55. Type II trigger homotypic adhesion and lysosomal nonapoptotic cell death56–58. Rituximab is a type I antibody and thus would be predicted to spare some populations of B cells56. New-generation type II anti-CD20 antibodies with increased cytotoxicity have been developed, thereby enhancing B cell depletion59,60. It is not known whether BDL are refractory to depletion by anti-CD20 type I and/or II mAb. If BDL are differentially depleted by anti-CD20 therapeutics, an intriguing concept would be to tailor their use such that Treg numbers are either maintained or reduced depending on the specific disease.
In this study, we provide evidence for the existence of BDL whose unique effector function is the maintenance of immune tolerance by promoting the homeostatic expansion of Treg in a GITRL-dependent manner. Our findings are an important first step in determining the therapeutic potential of BDL.
Methods
Mice
B10.PL, C57BL/6J (CD45.2), B6.129S2-Ighmtm1Cgn/J (C57BL/6µMT), B6N(Cg)-Tnfsf18tm1.1(KOMP)Vlcg/J (GITRL−/−) and B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ (CD45.1) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). MBP-TCR transgenic mice and generation of Foxp3EGFP, µMT, and Il10−/− mice on the B10.PL (H-2u) background was previously described1,3,61. MBP-TCR transgenic mice were genotyped by PCR using the following primers: forward-5ʹ-TGC AGT ATC CCG GAG AAG GG-3ʹ; reverse-5ʹ-TTC TCA TTT CCA TAG TTC TCA C-3ʹ. Notch2fl/flCD19cre− and Notch2fl/flCD19cre+ mice were kindly provided by Dr. Shigeru Chiba (Tokyo University, Japan) and Dr. Maeda Takahiro (Beckman Research of the City of Hope, CA, USA)16. Mice were housed and bred at the animal facility of the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) and animal protocols using all relevant ethical regulations were approved by the MCW Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All experiments were carried out with mice that were age matched and sex matched utilizing both genders.
B cell depletion in vivo
Anti-mouse-CD20 mAb (18B12IgG1) and its corresponding isotype control (2B8 msIgG1) were provided by Biogen Inc. Two hundred and fifty micrograms of antibody was intravenously (i.v.) injected into mice, once, or twice, 14 days apart.
Peptide and antibodies
MBP Ac1–11 peptide (Ac-ASQKRPSQRSK) was generated by the Protein Core Laboratory of the Blood Research Institute, Versiti Wisconsin. The 2.4G2 hybridoma was obtained from American Tissue Culture Collection. Commercial antibodies utilized in this study are described in Supplementary Table 1.
Flow cytometry and FACS purification
Single-cell suspensions from mouse and human spleens or human peripheral blood were obtained, counted and 0.2–1 × 106 cells were cell surface stained with specific antibodies. Frozen human splenocytes were thawed and washed twice prior to staining. Intracellular Foxp3, IgD, and IgM staining was performed using the anti-mouse/rat Foxp3PE staining kit from eBioscience using anti-Foxp3, anti-IgD, or anti-IgM in the final step (San Diego, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were acquired on an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Fluorochrome-labeled and/or enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-expressing cells were sorted using a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA).
Histolological analysis
Frozen section (6 μM) of spleens from B10.PL mice treated with 250 μg anti-CD20 antibody (18B12IgG1) or isotype control (2B8msIgG1) were fixed with acetone for 10 min. The fixed splenic sections were stained with anti-mouse IgM-PE-Dazzle 594, IgD-Alex Fluor 488, anti-mouse CD3Brilliant Violet 421, and anti-mouse CD209b (SIGN-R1)-APC and images were captured with Olympus VS120 fluorescent microscope at ×80 magnification.
EAE induction
EAE was induced by the i.v. adoptive transfer of 1 × 106 MBP-specific encephalitogenic T cells activated in vitro with MBP Ac1–11 peptide into sublethally irradiated (360–380 rad) mice as described2,35. Clinical symptoms of EAE were scored daily as follows: 0, no disease; 1, limp tail; 1.5, hind limb ataxia; 2, hind limb paresis; 2.5, partial hind limb paralysis; 3, total hind limb paralysis; 4, hind and fore limb paralysis; and 5, death.
Sorting and adoptive transfer of B cells
Total splenic B cells from 8–10-week-old mice were purified by negative selection using magnetic cell sorting (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) followed by FACS purification of FO (B220+IgM+CD21intCD23+CD93−) or MZ (B220+IgMhiCD21hiCD23−CD93−) B cells from anti-CD20-depleted mice or FO (IgDhi), MZ, BDL (B220+IgM+CD21intCD23+CD93−IgDlow/−), or T2 (B220+IgMhiCD21low/−CD23+CD93+) B cells from WT or Tnfsf18−/− mice. B cell purities were ~99% as determined by flow cytometry. For some experiments, FACS-purified B cells were incubated with anti-mouse GITRL (10μg/ml) at 4 °C for 60 min for GITRL blocking. B cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 5–20 × 106 cells were i.v. injected into each recipient mouse. EAE or CHS challenge was induced 3 days later or splenic CD4+Foxp3+ cells were enumerated on day 10. For CHS, B cells were transferred one day after sensitization. We have found that BDL functional activity is equivalent on both the B10.PL and C57BL/6 backgrounds, and thus both strains were utilized in the studies described.
Induction of CHS
C57BL/6 mice were sensitized by epicutaneous application of 100 µL 3% (wt/vol) oxazolone (4-ethoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazolin-5-one) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in an acetone:ethanol mixture (1:3 v/v) to shaved abdominal skin. After 4 days, ear thickness was measured using a micrometer. Mice were then challenged by application of 10 µL 1% (wt/vol) oxazolone in an acetone:olive oil mixture (1:1 v/v) to both sides of the ears and ear thickness was measured every 24 h for 5 days.
RNA-seq and PC analysis
Total RNA was isolated from sorted B cells using RNAqueous®-4PCR kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). RNA-seq was performed by PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) using the TruSeq stranded mRNA kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) on an Illumina HiSeq2500, running HiSeq Control Software V2.2.68, and Real-time Analysis (RTA) software V1.18.66.3. Basecall files (*.bcl) generated by the Illumina instruments were de-multiplexed and converted to fastq.gz format using bcl2Fastq v1.8.2., one file per direction, and two files per sample. For samples that were sequenced on multiple lanes and/or multiple flow cells, resulting fastq.gz files were concatenated into single file sets. The raw fastq files were then mapped to the whole mouse genome build mm9 using Tophat v2.1.0 with parameters --no-novel-juncs --no-coverage-search. Cufflinks were used to estimate the transcript abundance in Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped fragments (FPKM). The average FPKM was calculated for each sample and log2 FPKM was used for PC analysis. Differential expression analysis was conducted with Cuffdiff62 to calculate the most differentially expressed significant genes based on a Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p value < 0.05 an absolute fold change of 2 or greater. All significantly differentially expressed genes (log2 fold change <−1 or >1; adjusted p value <0.05) were ordered by descending fold change for gene set overrepresentation analysis. This gene list was submitted to g:Profiler version r1741_e90_eg3763 as an ordered query to identify overrepresented terms and pathways within the Gene Ontology64,65 biological process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes 66,67 databases.
B cell development assays
C57BL/6 mice were sublethally irradiated (500 rad) and on days 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 24 the absolute number of splenic T2, FO, and BDL was determined by flow cytometry. C57BL/6 mice were lethally irradiated (950 rad) and transplanted with 5 × 106 total BM cells from C57BL/6J CD45.1 mice. C57BL/6J CD45.1 mice were sublethally irradiated (500 rad) and 15 days later splenic T2 B cells were FACS purified and labeled with CFSE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) prior to adoptive transfer (1.25 × 106) into C57BL/6J CD45.2 recipient mice. Donor (CD45.1+CFSE+) T2, FO, and BDL were quantitated 24 and 48 h post transfer. C57BL/6J mice were sublethally irradiated (500 rad), and on day 11 post irradiation, they were adoptively transferred CFSE-labeled FO or BDL (1.5 × 106) from C57BL/6J CD45.1 donor mice. Donor (CD45.1+CFSE+) FO and BDL were quantitated 24 and 48 h post transfer.
Isolation of human splenocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Human splenic tissue was obtained from the Wisconsin Donor Network and Tissue Bank, Versiti Wisconsin (Milwaukee, WI, USA) through written informed consent and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Versiti Wisconsin as non-human subject research. Portions of human splenic tissue were digested with collagenase D (1 mg/ml) (Roche) for 1 h followed by dissociation using gentleMACS™ C tubes in combination with the gentleMACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, USA)68,69. Red blood cells were lysed with RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience) and lymphocytes were further purified using 60% percoll (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were washed and stored frozen in liquid nitrogen. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated from buffy coats obtained from Versiti Wisconsin from healthy donors in a non-human subject research manner. Buffy coats were diluted 2× with PBS and lymphocytes were separated using a 60% Percoll gradient.
In vitro co-culture of human B cells and Treg
B cells, APC (CD19−CD3−), and CD4+CD25hi Tregs were FACS purified from human splenocytes or peripheral blood from the same donor. The sorted Tregs were labeled with 3μM CFSE and cultured alone (0.5 × 105) or with sorted B cells (1 × 105) in the presence of anti-CD3 (OKT3) (2 µg/ml) and irradiated (3000 rad) APC or in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3 (10 mg/ml) and anti-CD28 (10 mg/ml). After 96 h, the cells were stained with CD4, CD25, and DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and proliferation of Tregs was determined by dye dilution and by flow cytometry3.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad prism (San Diego, CA, USA) and were presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using the unpaired t -test. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Jennifer Idsvoog for assistance with the animal colony, Benedetta Bonacci for assistance with FACS, Dr. Chiba and Takahiro for the Notch2fl/flCD19cre mice, and Biogen Inc. for the anti-CD20 antibody. In particular, we would like to thank the families of the spleen donors whose generosity has allowed our research to advance. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants 1R56AI122655 (B.N.D.), 1R56AI129348 (B.N.D.), AI069358 (B.N.D.), AI069358 (B.N.D.), AI079087 (D.W.), and HL130724 (D.W.); National Multiple Sclerosis Society research grant RG 1501-03034 (B.N.D.) and the Versiti Blood Research Foundation.
Author contributions
Conception: A.R., M.I.K. and B.N.D. Experimental design and execution: A.R., M.I.K., S.R., C.J.G. and B.N.D. Data acquisition: A.R., M.I.K., S.B. and D.W. Data analysis and interpretation: A.R., M.I.K., K.L.P., R.T.B., S.R. and B.N.D. Preparation of the manuscript: A.R., M.I.K.., R.T.B., S.R. and B.N.D.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession code GSE111911 and went public December 3, 2018. All relevant data and novel reagents are available from the authors upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Avijit Ray, Mohamed I. Khalil.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-08122-9.
References
- 1.Wolf SD, Dittel BN, Hardardottir F, Janeway CA., Jr. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in genetically B cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:2271–2278. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.6.2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mann MK, Maresz K, Shriver LP, Tan Y, Dittel BN. B cell regulation of CD4+CD25+T regulatory cells and IL-10 via B7 is essential for recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2007;178:3447–3456. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.6.3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ray A, Basu S, Williams CB, Salzman NH, Dittel BN. A novel IL-10-independent regulatory role for B cells in suppressing autoimmunity by maintenance of regulatory T cells via GITR ligand. J. Immunol. 2012;188:3188–3198. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:944–950. doi: 10.1038/ni833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tedder TF. B10 cells: a functionally defined regulatory B cell subset. J. Immunol. 2015;194:1395–1401. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ray, A. & Dittel, B. N. Mechanisms of regulatory B cell function in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases beyond IL-10. J. Clin. Med. 6, 10.3390/jcm6010012 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Ray A, Mann MK, Basu S, Dittel BN. A case for regulatory B cells in controlling the severity of autoimmune-mediated inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2010;230:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.10.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mauri C, Menon M. Human regulatory B cells in health and disease: therapeutic potential. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:772–779. doi: 10.1172/JCI85113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells and Foxp3. Immunol. Rev. 2011;241:260–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01018.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liao G, et al. GITR engagement preferentially enhances proliferation of functionally competent CD4+CD25+FoxP3+regulatory T cells. Int. Immunol. 2010;22:259–270. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ronchetti, S. et al. Glucocorticoid-induced tumour necrosis factor receptor-related protein: a key marker of functional regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 10.1155/2015/171520 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Zhang AH, Skupsky J, Scott DW. Effect of B-cell depletion using anti-CD20 therapy on inhibitory antibody formation to human FVIII in hemophilia A mice. Blood. 2011;117:2223–2226. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-293324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Allman D, et al. Resolution of three nonproliferative immature splenic B cell subsets reveals multiple selection points during peripheral B cell maturation. J. Immunol. 2001;167:6834–6840. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.6834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Basu S, Ray A, Dittel BN. Cannabinoid receptor 2 is critical for the homing and retention of marginal zone B lineage cells and for efficient T-independent immune responses. J. Immunol. 2011;187:5720–5732. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seidel-Guyenot W, Alt R, Perschon S, Knop J, Steinbrink K. B cells are not required for T cell priming in low zone tolerance to contact allergens and contact hypersensitivity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004;34:3082–3090. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saito T, et al. Notch2 is preferentially expressed in mature B cells and indispensable for marginal zone B lineage development. Immunity. 2003;18:675–685. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allman D, Pillai S. Peripheral B cell subsets. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008;20:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meyer-Bahlburg A, Andrews SF, Yu KO, Porcelli SA, Rawlings DJ. Characterization of a late transitional B cell population highly sensitive to BAFF-mediated homeostatic proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:155–168. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barr TA, et al. B cell depletion therapy ameliorates autoimmune disease through ablation of IL-6-producing B cells. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:1001–1010. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Loder F, et al. B cell development in the spleen takes place in discrete steps and is determined by the quality of B cell receptor-derived signals. J. Exp. Med. 1999;190:75–89. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Srivastava B, Quinn WJ, III, Hazard K, Erikson J, Allman D. Characterization of marginal zone B cell precursors. J. Exp. Med. 2005;202:1225–1234. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mayer RJ, et al. CD23 shedding: requirements for substrate recognition and inhibition by dipeptide hydroxamic acids. Inflamm. Res. 2002;51:85–90. doi: 10.1007/BF02684008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Woodland RT, Schmidt MR. Homeostatic proliferation of B cells. Semin. Immunol. 2005;17:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2005.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Katz SI, Parker D, Turk JL. B-cell suppression of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Nature. 1974;251:550–551. doi: 10.1038/251550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gorczynski RM. Immunity to murine sarcoma virus-inducted tumors. II. Suppression of T cell-mediated immunity by cells from progressor animals. J. Immunol. 1974;112:1826–1838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Russell AS, Liburd EM, Diener E. In vitro suppression of cell mediated autoimmunity in NZB mice. Nature. 1974;249:43–45. doi: 10.1038/249043a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mizoguchi E, Mizoguchi A, Preffer FI, Bhan AK. Regulatory role of mature B cells in a murine model of inflammatory bowel disease. Int. Immunol. 2000;12:597–605. doi: 10.1093/intimm/12.5.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Takedatsu H, Blumberg RS, Bhan AK. Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity. 2002;16:219–230. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00274-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mauri C, Bosma A. Immune regulatory function of B cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:221–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rosser EC, Mauri C. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity. 2015;42:607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Heine G, et al. Autocrine IL-10 promotes human B-cell differentiation into IgM- or IgG-secreting plasmablasts. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:1615–1621. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barr TA, Brown S, Ryan G, Zhao J, Gray D. TLR-mediated stimulation of APC: distinct cytokine responses of B cells and dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37:3040–3053. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lino AC, et al. LAG-3 inhibitory receptor expression identifies immunosuppressive natural regulatory plasma cells. Immunity. 2018;49:120–133 e129. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Blair PA, et al. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Immunity. 2010;32:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dittel BN, Merchant RM, Janeway CA., Jr. Evidence for Fas-dependent and Fas-independent mechanisms in the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 1999;162:6392–6400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pescovitz MD. Rituximab an anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody: history and mechanism of action. Am. J. Transplant. 2006;6:859–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Clark, E. A. & Ledbetter, J. A. How does B cell depletion therapy work, and how can it be improved?. Ann. Rheum. Dis.64(Suppl. 4), iv77–iv80 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Weiner GJ. Rituximab: mechanism of action. Semin. Hematol. 2010;47:115–123. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bruhns P, Jonsson F. Mouse and human FcR effector functions. Immunol. Rev. 2015;268:25–51. doi: 10.1111/imr.12350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Geisberger R, Lamers M, Achatz G. The riddle of the dual expression of IgM and IgD. Immunology. 2006;118:429–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02386.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lykken JM, et al. Acute and chronic B cell depletion disrupts CD4+ and CD8+ T cell homeostasis and expansion during acute viral infection in mice. J. Immunol. 2014;193:746–756. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kobayashi M, et al. Functional B-1 progenitor cells are present in the hematopoietic stem cell-deficient embryo and depend on Cbfbeta for their development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12151–12156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407370111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghosn EE, et al. Distinct B-cell lineage commitment distinguishes adult bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:5394–5398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121632109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang X. Regulatory functions of innate-like B cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2013;10:113–121. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2012.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Savage HP, Baumgarth N. Characteristics of natural antibody-secreting cells. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2015;1362:132–142. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cunningham AF, et al. B1b cells recognize protective antigens after natural infection and vaccination. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:535. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pillai S, Cariappa A, Moran ST. Marginal zone B cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005;23:161–196. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang Y, Garcia-Ibanez L, Toellner KM. Regulation of germinal center B-cell differentiation. Immunol. Rev. 2016;270:8–19. doi: 10.1111/imr.12396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Moore, T. C., Gonzaga, L. M., Mather, J. M., Messer, R. J. & Hasenkrug, K. J. B cell requirement for robust regulatory T cell responses to friend retrovirus infection. mBio8, 10.1128/mBio.01122-17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Arellano B, Graber DJ, Sentman CL. Regulatory T cell-based therapies for autoimmunity. Discov. Med. 2016;22:73–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Takeuchi Y, Nishikawa H. Roles of regulatory T cells in cancer immunity. Int. Immunol. 2016;28:401–409. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxw025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Naismith RT, et al. Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial. Neurology. 2010;74:1860–1867. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e24373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bar-Or A, et al. Rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 72-week, open-label, phase I trial. Ann. Neurol. 2008;63:395–400. doi: 10.1002/ana.21363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tipton TR, et al. Antigenic modulation limits the effector cell mechanisms employed by type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Blood. 2015;125:1901–1909. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-588376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Beers SA, et al. Antigenic modulation limits the efficacy of anti-CD20 antibodies: implications for antibody selection. Blood. 2010;115:5191–5201. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-263533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Beers SA, et al. Type II (tositumomab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody out performs type I (rituximab-like) reagents in B-cell depletion regardless of complement activation. Blood. 2008;112:4170–4177. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-149161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ivanov A, et al. Monoclonal antibodies directed to CD20 and HLA-DR can elicit homotypic adhesion followed by lysosome-mediated cell death in human lymphoma and leukemia cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:2143–2159. doi: 10.1172/JCI37884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alduaij W, et al. Novel type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (GA101) evokes homotypic adhesion and actin-dependent, lysosome-mediated cell death in B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2011;117:4519–4529. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-296913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lim SH, et al. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: historical and future perspectives. Haematologica. 2010;95:135–143. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.001628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bologna L, et al. Mechanism of action of type II, glycoengineered, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody GA101 in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia whole blood assays in comparison with rituximab and alemtuzumab. J. Immunol. 2011;186:3762–3769. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ray A, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis due to Helicobacter drives an increase in marginal zone B cells in the absence of IL-10 signaling in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2015;195:3071–3085. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Trapnell C, et al. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:46–53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Reimand J, et al. g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W83–W89. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ashburner M, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.The Gene Ontology, C. Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D331–D338. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D353–D361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Thome JJ, et al. Spatial map of human T cell compartmentalization and maintenance over decades of life. Cell. 2014;159:814–828. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Meng W, et al. An atlas of B-cell clonal distribution in the human body. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:879–884. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession code GSE111911 and went public December 3, 2018. All relevant data and novel reagents are available from the authors upon request.