Current approaches to tackling fungal infections are limited, and new targets must be identified to protect against the emergence of resistant strains. We investigated the potential of targeting mitochondria, which are organelles required for energy production, growth, and virulence, in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Our findings suggest that mitochondria can be targeted using drugs that can be tolerated by humans and that this treatment enhances their recognition by immune cells. However, release of C. albicans cells from respiratory inhibition appears to activate a stress response that increases the levels of traits associated with virulence. Our results make it clear that mitochondria represent a valid target for the development of antifungal strategies but that we must determine the mechanisms by which they regulate stress signaling and virulence ahead of successful therapeutic advance.
KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, cell wall, mitochondria, mycology, yeast
ABSTRACT
The human fungal pathogen Candida albicans requires respiratory function for normal growth, morphogenesis, and virulence. Mitochondria therefore represent an enticing target for the development of new antifungal strategies. This possibility is bolstered by the presence of characteristics specific to fungi. However, respiration in C. albicans, as in many fungal organisms, is facilitated by redundant electron transport mechanisms, making direct inhibition a challenge. In addition, many chemicals known to target the electron transport chain are highly toxic. Here we made use of chemicals with low toxicity to efficiently inhibit respiration in C. albicans. We found that use of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and of the alternative oxidase inhibitor salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) prevents respiration and leads to a loss of viability and to cell wall rearrangements that increase the rate of uptake by macrophages in vitro and in vivo. We propose that treatment with SNP plus SHAM (SNP+SHAM) leads to transcriptional changes that drive cell wall rearrangement but which also prime cells to activate the transition to hyphal growth. In line with this, we found that pretreatment of C. albicans with SNP+SHAM led to an increase in virulence. Our data reveal strong links between respiration, cell wall remodeling, and activation of virulence factors. Our findings demonstrate that respiration in C. albicans can be efficiently inhibited with chemicals that are not damaging to the mammalian host but that we need to develop a deeper understanding of the roles of mitochondria in cellular signaling if they are to be developed successfully as a target for new antifungals.
INTRODUCTION
Candida albicans is one of the most prevalent fungal pathogens and a major cause of nosocomial infections which have a high mortality rate (1). Current antifungals, although effective, target a limited number of cellular processes, and the development of new therapeutic approaches is essential. C. albicans requires mitochondrial function for normal growth, morphogenesis, and virulence (2–4), but mitochondria had not been exploited as a therapeutic target to date. Given the central role of this organelle in processes essential for growth, maintenance, and adaptability, coupled to the presence of fungal specific characteristics, it may be possible to develop therapies based on mitochondrial inhibition.
C. albicans is a Crabtree effect-negative yeast and relies mainly on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production during growth and morphogenesis. It possesses a classical electron transfer chain (ETC), consisting of complexes I to IV, as well as a cyanide-insensitive alternative oxidase, which permits respiration when the classical chain is inhibited (Fig. 1A) (5). A functional electron transport system has been shown to be important for aspects of C. albicans biology that are linked to virulence. For example, inhibition of respiration in C. albicans and other pathogenic fungi leads to a decreased growth rate (6). Mutants defective in respiration have consistently been shown to affect the hyphal morphological switch, an important determinant of virulence in C. albicans, whether negatively (goa1Δ, ndh51Δ) (7) or positively (dbp4Δ, hfl1Δ, rbf1Δ) (8). Respiratory inhibition has been linked to reduced activation of Ras1 signaling, a major determinant of morphogenesis, via an uncharacterized mechanism that correlates with reduced ATP levels (9). A link between electron transport and control of Ras1 has also been suggested to regulate a loss of hyphal growth under anaerobic conditions (10).
The cell wall is critical for viability of fungal pathogens and is a major determinant of virulence. Its composition and organization also determine the recognition of C. albicans by the immune system (11–13). Recent work has shown that masking of cell wall components facilitates immune evasion. Changes in surface beta-glucan exposure can occur in response to a variety of stimuli, including changes in carbon sources and pH (14, 15). A number of studies have suggested that mitochondrial function may be linked to the maintenance of the C. albicans cell wall. Loss of the complex I regulator Goa1 revealed a link between respiration and sensitivity to cell wall-damaging agents (16) and cell wall architecture (17). In addition, impairment of mitochondrial function by deletion of SAM37, which encodes a component of the mitochondrial outer membrane sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) complex, also resulted in defects in cell wall integrity (CWI) (18). Mitochondrial interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum is also important for maintaining cell wall integrity; deletion of the mitochondrial GTPase Gem1 led to abnormal mitochondrial morphology and susceptibility to cell wall stress through reduced Cek1 activation (19). A better understanding of the links between mitochondrial function and virulence and, indeed, of the consequences of respiration inhibition are crucial if we are to develop mitochondria as a potential drug target.
In an attempt to understand the consequences of respiration inhibition in C. albicans, we adopted a pharmacological approach. We made use of nitric oxide (NO), which inhibits respiration at the level of complex IV and has a safe record for use as a vasodilator (20) and in dermatologic applications (21). NO has been evaluated as a therapy in a variety of bacterial and fungal infections, including infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cases of cystic fibrosis and infections caused by dermatophytes (22–24). NO inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase at low concentrations is rapidly reversible by oxygen treatment. However, permanent inhibition of respiration can result at higher NO concentrations (25). In addition, NO causes the formation of reactive nitrogen species (such as peroxynitrite) which can damage mitochondrial function and which have been shown to have strong antifungal activity (26). Several studies reported the efficacy of NO against C. albicans (27–29). The alternative oxidase can be inhibited by hydroxamic acids such as salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM). The low in vivo toxicity of alternative oxidase inhibitors such as SHAM and ascofuranone has been evaluated with respect to their ability to treat trypanosomiasis (30, 31).
We found that C. albicans cells are highly adaptive to classical respiration inhibition but that a combination of SHAM and the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (SNP+SHAM) led to fitness defects and loss of viability. In addition, treatment with SNP+SHAM led to cell wall organization defects that unmasked C. albicans cells and to increased immune cell recognition in cell culture and animal models. However, release of cells from SNP+SHAM treatment led to a rapid activation of the hyphal transition program and increased virulence in a mouse model. Our data suggest that mitochondria form part of a complex response network that is imbedded within the cellular responses required for C. albicans virulence.
RESULTS
SNP+SHAM inhibits respiration and growth and reduces viability in C. albicans.
Our goal was to identify conditions that would allow the reproducible inhibition of classical and alternative respiration in C. albicans. Complex I can be inhibited by rotenone, complex III by antimycin A, and complex IV by cyanide (Fig. 1A). However, although effective as research tools, these compounds are highly toxic and unsuitable for use in humans. As an alternative to treatment with cyanide compounds, oxygen consumption was measured upon exposure of cells to the nitric oxide donor SNP, which inhibits cytochrome c oxidase, and to the alternative oxidase (Aox) inhibitor SHAM. Initial titration experiments suggested that the concentrations of 1 mM SNP and 0.5 mM SHAM were suitable for our purpose. Recovery from NO-induced inhibition of classical respiration by SNP addition was rapid, with full restoration achieved within 30 min (Fig. 1B). Further application of SNP did not lead to a reduction in oxygen consumption, suggesting that cells had switched to alternative respiration upon SNP treatment (Fig. 1B). This was confirmed by subsequent addition of SHAM, which decreased the respiration level significantly (Fig. 1B). Addition of 2 mM cyanide was sufficient to inhibit the remaining respiration. Simultaneous addition of SNP+SHAM led to a significant loss of respiration that was comparable to that observed upon cyanide addition (Fig. 1C; see also Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). In support of the idea of a rapid transition to alternative respiration, an increase in Aox2 protein levels was detectable within 20 min following exposure to SNP (Fig. 1D). Addition of SHAM alone did not lead to a decrease in respiration (Fig. S1B), suggesting that AOX did not contribute significantly except under conditions of induction in response to inhibition of the classical respiratory chain.
Given the effects of SNP+SHAM on respiration, we investigated its effects on growth and viability. Incubation of C. albicans cells with SNP+SHAM led to a decrease in growth and in final biomass in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1E). Treatment with SNP+SHAM for 3 h did not have a significant effect on viability; however, prolonged SNP+SHAM exposure resulted in decreased viability compared to the results seen with untreated controls (Fig. 1F). These data suggest that C. albicans possesses a robust and adaptable respiratory system that can be targeted using a SNP+SHAM cotreatment approach.
SNP+SHAM treatment induces structural rearrangements within the cell wall.
Previous studies suggested a link between respiration and cell wall integrity (8, 16). Our goal was to determine whether chemical inhibition of respiration using SNP+SHAM could negatively impact cell wall integrity. In line with this, SNP+SHAM exposure led to a reduction in growth and to sensitivity to the cell wall-damaging agents calcofluor white (CFW) and Congo red (CR) at both 30 and 37°C (Fig. 2A). We employed transmission electron microscopy to examine cell wall structure following SNP+SHAM treatment (Fig. 2B). This analysis revealed that the outer cell wall, composed of mannans and cell wall proteins, but not the inner cell wall was reduced in thickness compared to untreated cells (Fig. 2B and C). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of acid-hydrolyzed cell wall components showed that SNP+SHAM treatment caused no significant changes in the relative levels of chitin, glucan, or mannan (Fig. 2D). This suggests that cell wall changes induced by SNP+SHAM may be due to changes in organization rather than to gross changes in the relative levels of cell wall components. Interestingly, we also observed the presence of a large structure adjacent to the vacuole within SNP+SHAM-treated cells (Fig. 2E). We confirmed this to be a lipid droplet by the use of the neutral lipid stain LD540 (Fig. 2F). SNP treatment alone was sufficient to induce lipid droplet accumulation, suggesting a link to inhibition of classical respiration (Fig. 2F). This finding suggests a link between respiratory inhibition and the regulation of lipid metabolism in C. albicans.
Caspofungin resistance reveals a link between respiration inhibition and Upc2.
Cell wall damage can be sensed and repaired by activation of the cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway (32). To determine whether this mechanism was engaged by SNP+SHAM treatment, CWI pathway activity was measured by detection of the phosphorylated forms of Mkc1, a well-characterized marker of pathway activation (33). We also determined whether SNP+SHAM treatment led to the activation of Hog1, a major oxidative stress response regulator that also influences cell wall biosynthesis (34). Unlike the results seen with the positive controls, SNP+SHAM treatment did not cause activation of Hog1 or Mkc1 (Fig. 3A). This suggests either that the major cell wall integrity responses are not involved in SNP+SHAM-induced cell wall changes or that the mitochondrial compartment functions downstream of Hog1 and Mkc1 within the cell wall response.
To identify potential regulators of the SNP+SHAM response that may be important in cell wall organization, we treated C. albicans with a combination of SNP+SHAM and caspofungin, which targets the cell wall (Fig. 3B). We observed that SNP+SHAM treatment led to caspofungin resistance, presumably as a result of the alteration in cell wall structure (Fig. 3B). Using this phenotype, we screened a library of transcription factor deletion mutants (35) by growing the strains in the presence of SNP+SHAM in combination with caspofungin at a level that inhibited growth of the wild-type (WT) strain. A single transcription factor, Upc2, was found to be required for caspofungin resistance upon SNP+SHAM treatment. Deletion of UPC2, which plays an important role in the regulation of ergosterol biosynthesis (36), led to a reproducible reduction in caspofungin resistance upon exposure to cotreatment with SNP+SHAM (Fig. 3C). To confirm the results from the initial screen, microdilution growth assays of caspofungin in combination with SNP+SHAM were performed. An independently derived upc2Δ mutant (37) showed a caspofungin MIC that was 8-fold lower that than seen with the wild-type strain when SNP+SHAM were added in combination (Fig. 3D). These data suggests a role for Upc2 in regulating cell wall changes in response to SNP+SHAM treatment.
Analysis of transcriptional changes in response to SNP+SHAM treatment.
To further investigate the changes caused by SNP+SHAM, we examined the transcriptional response of C. albicans to this treatment using RNA sequencing. RNA was extracted from log-phase yeast cells exposed to 1 mM SNP or 0.5 mM SHAM or both for 30 min (Fig. 4; see also Tables S2, S3, and S4 in the supplemental material). A short exposure time was selected in order to capture early alterations rather than profiles from the expansion of adapted cell lineages. SNP and SNP+SHAM treatment led to differential expression of over 1,500 genes, whereas SHAM treatment led to a smaller range of responses, with only 131 genes differentially expressed (Fig. 4A; see also Tables S2, S3, and S4). A significant overlap of differentially expressed genes within the SNP and SNP+SHAM treatment data sets was observed (Fig. 4A). As expected, the AOX2 and AOX1 genes encoding the alternative oxidases and genes required for a response to nitric oxide, such as YHB1, were upregulated in both the SNP-only group and the SNP+SHAM group. Several genes encoding components of classical respiration were downregulated upon SNP+ SHAM treatment, whereas genes involved in the glyoxylate cycle (MLS1 and ICL1) and glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (FBP1, GPM1, GPM2, PCK1, PGI1, PGK1) (Tables S2 and S4) were upregulated. These changes suggest a shift in carbon metabolism in response to respiration inhibition.
A number of transcriptional regulators were upregulated in response to both classical and alternative respiration inhibition (Fig. 4A). To examine which key regulators were involved in the response to SNP+SHAM treatment, we analyzed the genes on the list of those differentially expressed using PathoYeastract, a tool which ranks transcription factors in the order of the number of genes in the list that they regulate and for which there exists supporting expression evidence (38). This analysis showed that the Sko1 transcription factor has regulatory associations with 33.8% of the differentially expressed genes. SKO1 itself was upregulated upon SNP+SHAM treatment. Interestingly, the upregulation of SKO1 seems to have been a SHAM-specific effect, as it was not differentially expressed in the SNP-only data set. Upc2 binding sites were identified within the promoters of 13.4% of the genes differentially regulated upon SNP+SHAM treatment. This, along with the fact that UPC2 expression was itself upregulated upon SNP+SHAM treatment, further suggests a role for this transcription factor.
Analysis of SNP+SHAM RNA-seq data showed that several genes involved in chitin synthesis and organization were downregulated, including the CHT1, CHT2, and CHT4 chitinase genes (Fig. 4B). Mannan biosynthesis and organization genes were upregulated, as were genes involved in β-glucan synthesis and organization. However, as no significant changes in relative glucan, mannan, or chitin levels were detected by HPLC, these changes do not seem to be realized at the protein level. One possibility is that SNP+SHAM-induced transcriptional changes led to alterations in cell wall organization but not to substantial changes in composition. Supporting this hypothesis, we observed that several glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell wall protein genes that play a role in cross-linking cell wall components were also differentially expressed (Fig. 4B).
Genes encoding chitinase Cht2 and GPI-anchored cell wall protein Pga26, previously shown to have roles in the unmasking of cell wall β-glucan, were downregulated (15). This appears to have been a result of inhibition of classical respiration, as SNP treatment alone led to reduced expression of CHT2 and PGA26. The majority of genes in the so-called “common in fungal extracellular membranes” (CFEM) family, including PGA7, PGA10, RBT5, and CSA2, were upregulated (39). These genes encode proteins with roles in iron acquisition and adhesion. Expression of several of these genes is controlled by Bcr1, a transcription factor known to be important in the hypoxic response (40), and BCR1 was itself upregulated. Genes involved in adhesion, including several of the ALS genes, as well as the RIM101 regulator were also upregulated (Fig. 4B).
SNP+SHAM treatment also led to changes in genes involved in lipid metabolism. Upregulation of several lipase genes suggested a mobilization of lipid stores (see Table S4). This is in agreement with our observation of increased formation of lipid droplets upon SNP+SHAM treatment (Fig. 2E and F). A number of genes involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway were downregulated (Fig. 4B). In addition, genes involved in the synthesis of phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) (CHO1 and CHO2, respectively) and linoleic acid (FAD3 and FAD2) were also downregulated. Collectively, these data suggest that SNP+SHAM treatment led to changes in lipid metabolism.
SNP+SHAM treatment increased surface chitin and β-glucan exposure.
Our data suggests that inhibition of respiration led to cell wall rearrangement (Fig. 2B to D). To investigate this further, we assessed the exposure of chitin and β-glucan at the cell surface using fluorescent probes. Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) binds chitin in fungal cell walls but, due to its large size, cannot penetrate the cell wall to stain chitin in the innermost layers where it is usually found (41). WGA therefore typically stains structures such as bud scars where chitin is exposed, and staining of the lateral cell wall indicates that chitin is exposed at the surface of the cell wall. SNP+SHAM-treated cells exhibited greater lateral wall staining than untreated cells (Fig. 5A and B). An increase in chitin exposure was observed upon SNP treatment alone and was enhanced at 37°C compared to 30°C (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that SNP+SHAM treatment caused exposure of the normally hidden chitin in the cell wall but that this effect was linked to the effects of NO upon the classical respiratory chain. This effect was also previously observed in a cek1Δ mutant (42), suggesting that SNP+SHAM-induced chitin unmasking is independent of Cek1 signaling (Fig. 5F).
Dectin-1 recognizes β(1,3)-glucan in the inner fungal cell wall and is one of the major receptors involved in the immune response to fungal pathogens (43). To determine whether SNP+SHAM treatment causes a change in β(1,3)-glucan exposure in C. albicans, a soluble form of dectin-1 was used to stain treated cells. SNP+SHAM pretreatment significantly increased the level of dectin-1 staining of the cell wall (Fig. 5C and D). This suggests that the cell wall changes induced by SNP+SHAM treatment resulted in cell wall rearrangements exposing β-glucan at the cell surface.
The observed sensitivity of upc2Δ cells to caspofungin in the presence of SNP+SHAM suggested that Upc2 links respiration to cell wall integrity. This led us to examine the effect of SNP+SHAM on chitin and β-glucan exposure in the upc2Δ mutant to determine whether Upc2 influences unmasking. The degree of surface chitin exposure in upc2Δ and the increase in unmasking upon SNP+SHAM treatment were not significantly different from levels seen with the wild type (Fig. 5E). Similarly, the results of dectin-1 staining for upc2Δ were also not significantly different from results seen with the wild-type strain (Fig. S1C). These results suggest that cell wall unmasking and the sensitivity to caspofungin in response to SNP+SHAM treatment may not share a mechanism.
Given that Upc2 was not linked to β(1,3)-glucan or chitin exposure, we tested a number of strains deleted for transcription factors that were identified as upregulated within our RNA-seq data in response to SNP+SHAM treatment. Our investigations did not identify deletions of any single transcription factor that could prevent β(1,3)-glucan or chitin exposure. However, deletion of SKO1 led to an increase in chitin unmasking following SNP+SHAM exposure relative to the level seen with the wild-type strain (Fig. 5E). This may suggest that Sko1 acts as a repressor of chitin unmasking or simply that it is involved in the repair of cell wall rearrangements caused by this treatment.
We wished to examine whether other forms of respiration deficiency could lead to the same cell wall unmasking phenotype. The ndh51Δ mutant (7) does not possess a functional complex I and has a low respiration level. It showed a very high degree of chitin unmasking as determined by WGA staining (Fig. S2A). Dectin-1 staining was also significantly increased, although to a lesser degree than in SNP+SHAM-treated cells (Fig. S2B). These results demonstrate that inhibition of the classical electron transfer chain through the activity of either complex I or complex IV can cause unmasking of chitin and β(1,3)-glucan.
Pretreatment with SNP+SHAM increased phagocytosis by macrophages.
Due to the higher β(1,3)-glucan surface exposure in SNP+SHAM-treated cells, it was hypothesized that these cells may be recognized and engulfed more readily by macrophages. SNP+SHAM-treated cells were coincubated with J774.1 murine macrophages and were examined after 1 h by microscopy and scored for uptake. A higher proportion of the SNP+SHAM-pretreated cells than of untreated cells were taken up by macrophages after 1 h (Fig. 6A and B). In line with unmasking being linked to inhibition of classical respiration, uptake by macrophages was enhanced to the same degree upon SNP pretreatment (Fig. 6B). A similar increase in uptake was observed when cells were pretreated with 1 mM potassium cyanide (KCN) only (Fig. S3A), also suggesting that inhibition of the classical respiratory chain was responsible for this phenotype. In agreement with this, inhibition of the alternative respiration pathway alone by the use of SHAM or of the aox2Δ aox1Δ mutant had no significant effect on uptake (Fig. S3A). An increase in uptake of ndh51Δ cells was also observed, but the degree of increase was not the same as that seen with SNP+SHAM-pretreated cells (Fig. S3B). In order to understand how SNP+SHAM pretreatment would influence systemic candidiasis in vivo during infection, we used the zebrafish larva model, in which we could examine phagocytosis of C. albicans in vivo. C. albicans expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) was pretreated with SNP+SHAM for 18 h. The pretreated cells were then injected into zebrafish larvae with fluorescently labeled macrophages. Z-stack images of each fish were taken using confocal microscopy, and uptake by macrophages was assessed manually. The uptake of pretreated cells was approximately 10% higher than the uptake of untreated cells (Fig. 6C and D).
SNP+SHAM pretreatment increased the virulence of C. albicans in a mouse systemic model of candidiasis.
It was not clear whether the increased uptake of SNP+SHAM-pretreated C. albicans by macrophages would attenuate virulence in vivo. To determine this, C. albicans were pretreated with SNP+SHAM before being washed and injected into the tail vein of 6-to-8-week-old female BALB/c mice, and the progression of infection was followed by monitoring weight loss and the condition of the animals. Kidney fungal burden measurements were made at 3 days postinfection to give an “outcome score.” A higher outcome score is indicative of greater weight loss and higher fungal burdens and thus of virulence. It was observed that the weight loss caused by SNP+SHAM-pretreated C. albicans was more rapid than that seen with the controls (Fig. 7A). Infection with SNP+SHAM-treated C. albicans cells also led to significantly higher fungal burdens within the kidney at the time of culling. The combination of these factors led to a significantly higher outcome score for SNP+SHAM-pretreated cells than for untreated cells (Fig. 7A). Histological analysis of kidney tissue from mice infected with cells pretreated with SNP-SHAM revealed an increase in immune infiltrate and fungal cell numbers compared to controls (Fig. 7B). The resulting data suggest that pretreatment with SNP+SHAM did not reduce the fitness of C. albicans in the host but in fact increased virulence in the murine model.
One possibility is that pretreatment of C. albicans with SNP+SHAM may cause a stress response which primes cells to activate traits associated with virulence when the pretreated C. albicans is injected into the host. The rapid induction of filamentation is generally associated with increased escape from macrophages and virulence (44, 45). To investigate this, the incidence of hyphal formation was assessed after 90 min of incubation in serum-containing media at 37°C for cells which had been pretreated with SNP+SHAM for 18 h. The majority of pretreated cells showed filamentation within 90 min, while the untreated cells were slower to transition to hyphae under these conditions (Fig. 7C and D). The activation of rapid filamentation was also observed when cells were treated with SNP alone but was not seen with SHAM-only treatment (Fig. 7D). These results suggest that respiratory inhibition may prime cells for hyphal growth and that this facilitates a rapid hyphal switch when the inhibitors are removed. In agreement with this, a similar effect was observed when cells were pretreated with cyanide (Fig. S4A and S4B in the supplemental material). Since both cyanide and NO induce alternative respiration, germination after SNP+SHAM treatment was examined in an aox2Δ aox1Δ mutant. The mutant did not show the same level of hyphal formation as the WT, suggesting that the alternative oxidase enzymes are required for the filamentation response upon inhibition of classical respiration (Fig. 7E). It is possible that the inhibition of the respiratory chain could lead to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and that this might provide a signal that promotes hyphal switching. To investigate this, we assessed superoxide production and found that an increase could be detected upon SNP+SHAM treatment (Fig. S4C). The addition of N-acetyl cysteine was sufficient to prevent ROS accumulation but did not prevent the activation of filamentation in SNP+SHAM-treated cells (Fig. S4C and D). These data do not support the idea of a role for ROS production in linking the inhibition of respiration to filamentation.
DISCUSSION
Mitochondrial function has been studied extensively in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae but has been a neglected area in the study of pathogenic fungi. Mitochondria have essential roles in pathogenicity (46) and antifungal drug resistance (3). The electron transport chain of C. albicans, consists of an alternative and parallel pathway in addition to the classical ETC (47); this allows electron flow to be rerouted should one of the pathways become blocked. Nevertheless, simultaneous inhibition of the classical and alternative pathways can inhibit respiration by up to 90% and severely restricts growth (48).
We have shown that NO exposure resulting from SNP treatment is effective in inhibiting respiration and activation of an alternative respiration response, as has been shown for other inhibitors of classical respiration (48). Inhibition of both classical and alternative respiration using SNP+SHAM led to sustained inhibition of respiration, suggesting that the level of NO released by SNP in our experiments was sufficient to irreversibly inhibit cytochrome c oxidase. Peroxynitrite, which can be formed when NO reacts with endogenous superoxide, has also been shown to cause irreversible inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase (49).
SNP+SHAM treatment showed a synergistic effect with cell wall-damaging agents, calcofluor white, and Congo red. C. albicans respiration-deficient mutants dpb4Δ, hfl1Δ, and rbf1Δ (8) and mutants goa1Δ and ndh51Δ (16) have similarly been shown to be sensitive to CFW and CR. A number of genes found to be differentially expressed upon SNP+SHAM treatment have been reported to be involved in the response to caspofungin. Genes induced in this response include AGP2, KRE1, PGA13, RHR2, and CZF1; repressed genes include CHT2, PGA4 and SCW11, HAS1, CRZ1, and ENG1 (50–52). These expression changes may help to explain why SNP+SHAM-treated cells were more resistant to caspofungin.
Growth in the presence of SNP+SHAM caused an increase in the surface exposure of chitin and β(1,3)-glucan. Sherrington et al. showed that unmasking of β(1,3)-glucan and chitin occurred during adaptation to low pH (15).Those authors found no activation of Mkc1 kinase involved in the cell wall integrity response and reported increased uptake by macrophages, both of which were also seen in SNP+SHAM-induced unmasking. Masking of β(1,3)-glucan has been shown to occur during growth on lactate, which aids in immune evasion. (14). It was found that Crz1 was required for β(1,3)-glucan masking and that pga26Δ and cht2Δ mutants showed elevated β(1,3)-glucan exposure. These and other genes encoding cell wall proteins were found to be downregulated in SNP+SHAM-treated cells, suggesting repression of glucan masking at the level of Crz1 but also a shift in the cell wall protein profile, promoting elevated β(1,3)-glucan exposure (Fig. 4B).
The role of mitochondria in maintaining phospholipid homeostasis was previously shown to be important for cell wall integrity (53). Genes involved in the synthesis of phosphatidylserine (PS) (CHO1) and linoleic acid (FAD3 and FAD2) were also downregulated in SNP+SHAM-treated cells. The cho1Δ mutant, which is defective in PS synthesis, was shown to exhibit unmasking of β(1,3)-glucan (54), and CHO1 is also essential for cell wall integrity (55). Treatment of cells with SNP+SHAM also led to the downregulation of a group of ergosterol biosynthesis pathway genes (Fig. 4B). Inhibition of sterol biosynthesis has been shown to lead to an increase in the incidence of lipid droplets (56), which we observed in SNP+SHAM-treated cells. UPC2, encoding a transcription factor known to activate ergosterol biosynthesis, especially under hypoxic conditions, was upregulated and required for the observed resistance to caspofungin. Decreased ergosterol production has previously been observed in respiration-deficient C. albicans mutants (57–59). An increase in UPC2 expression might be a compensatory response to reduced ergosterol production, or, alternatively, SNP+SHAM treatment might mimic hypoxia, a condition that also leads to elevated Upc2 levels. In agreement with this, we observed a significant overlap in differential expression of genes with SNP+SHAM treatment and published microarray data produced under conditions of hypoxia (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material) (60). However, two recent studies clearly indicated that hypoxic conditions led to alterations in the cell wall that mask C. albicans from host responses (61, 62). This suggests that respiration inhibition and hypoxia lead to changes in cell wall architecture via independent mechanisms. Shorter outer cell wall fibrils were seen in the respiration-deficient goa1Δ mutant, similarly to those observed in SNP+SHAM-treated cells. The cell wall alterations in the goa1Δ mutant included a reduction in the levels of high- and intermediate-molecular weight mannans (17), but no significant changes in the relative levels of glucan, chitin, or mannan were observed in SNP+SHAM-treated cells. In addition, the reduced recognition of the goa1Δ mutant by macrophages, which contrasts with the results seen in SNP+SHAM-treated cells, suggested that the cell wall changes resulting from transient respiration inhibition were distinct from those seen in the goa1Δ mutant.
Despite unmasking leading to an increase in immune cell recognition, SNP+SHAM pretreatment led to enhanced virulence in a mouse model, with a clear increase in immune cell infiltrate and yeast cell numbers within the kidney (Fig. 7B). Exposure of cell wall β-glucan has been shown to increase the inflammation response (63). One possibility, therefore, is that SNP+SHAM pretreatment may have led to an increased and damaging inflammation response. Another possibility rests with the activation of hyphal switching that we observed upon removal of SNP+SHAM. Enhanced germination may have facilitated escape from macrophages as well as damage to epithelial barriers, aiding dissemination of the infection. It might have been the case that release from respiratory inhibition (as the SNP+SHAM-treated cells were washed prior to injection) led to an increase in activation of Ras1, a key regulator of hyphal transition. This hypothesis is supported by observations revealing that inhibition of respiration decreases Ras1 activation, which prevents hyphal switching (9). Reduced Ras1 activity in response to inhibition of respiration is correlated with a reduction in ATP levels; this did not appear to be sensed by AMPK (9). The mechanism connecting mitochondrial inhibition and Ras1 activation is unknown. The absence of an increase in hyphal switching in SNP+SHAM-pretreated aox2Δ aox1Δ mutant cells suggests that an increased level of Aox2 could be important for the increased switch to hyphae in response to respiratory stress. This observation, together with previous evidence that the alternative pathway is more active in hyphal cells (64), warrants further investigation into the precise role of Aox2 in morphogenetic switching.
In addition to hyphal growth regulators, several other virulence-related genes were upregulated by SNP+SHAM treatment. For example, Tsa1 (thioredoxin peroxidase 1), which provides resistance to reactive nitrogen species and has also been shown to contribute to fungal virulence (65), was among the most highly upregulated genes following SNP+SHAM treatment. Other upregulated genes associated with pathogenesis included SAP6 (66), GLK1 and PHO112 (67), and PLB1 (68) and the transcription factor GAT1 as well as its regulation targets DUR1,2 and MEP2 (69). The induction of these genes, several of which are normally associated with the hyphal form of C. albicans, suggests that SNP+SHAM treatment may prime cells for increased virulence, which could manifest upon withdrawal of the treatment.
In summary, our study results suggest that inhibition of respiration as an antifungal strategy in C. albicans is a complex proposition. Respiration inhibition with SNP+SHAM causes cell wall unmasking, which leads to enhanced recognition by macrophage cells but primes a stress response leading to enhanced filamentation and increased virulence when inhibition is removed. We would argue that the development of a mitochondrial inhibition strategy, while still an attractive goal given the importance of the organelle for C. albicans growth, requires a better understanding of the signaling properties of this organelle under conditions of stress.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A detailed description of the strains and of the materials and methods used in this study can be found in Text S1 in the supplemental material.
C. albicans growth conditions and chemicals.
The C. albicans strains used in this study are identified in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Growth and manipulation conditions are detailed within Text S1. The aox2Δ aox1Δ and aox2Δ mutant strains used were constructed as detailed within Text S1.
Whole-cell respirometry.
Respirometry was carried out in real time using an Oxygraph-2k respirometer (Oroboros Instruments, Austria) as detailed in Text S1. Data were analyzed using Datlab 6 software (Oroboros Instruments). Six independent experiments were performed.
Viability and susceptibility assays.
Analysis of viability and sensitivity to cell wall-disrupting agents or antifungal drugs was carried out as described in Text S1. In all cases, three independent experiments were performed.
RNA isolation and RNA-seq.
C. albicans SC5314 was grown for 5 h in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) at 30°C in a shaking incubator. SNP and SHAM were added to reach final concentrations of 1 mM and 0.5 mM, respectively, and the cells were returned to the incubator for a further 30 min. RNA was then extracted and prepared for RNA sequencing as described in Text S1. Raw RNA-seq data were analyzed using the suite of tools available on the Galaxy platform; for full details, see Text S1.
Cell wall staining and analysis.
Cells from an overnight culture in YPD were diluted in YPD to a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.2 and grown for 5 h at 30°C. SNP (1 mM) and SHAM (0.5 mM) were added to the cultures, and they were grown for a further 18 h. The cells were processed for wheat germ agglutinin or dectin-1 staining as described in Text S1. At least 400 cells were counted for each experiment, and three independent experiments were performed per analysis. Cell wall composition was analyzed by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography as described in Text S1.
Western blotting.
Western blotting was carried out as described in Text S1. Phosphorylated Hog1 or Mkc1 was detected using p44/p42 (1:2,000) or p38 (1:1,000) monoclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology catalog no. 4695 and 8690, respectively). A monoclonal antibody (AS10 699, Agrisera, Sweden) (1:100) against Sauromatum guttatum Aox which recognizes C. albicans Aox2 was used for Aox immunoblotting. Actin was detected using an antibody raised against S. cerevisiae actin (a kind gift from John Cooper, University of Washington) at a 1:1,000 dilution.
Phagocytosis assay.
Uptake of C. albicans by J774.1 murine macrophages was carried out as described in Text S1. The percentage of uptake was determined as the number of internalized C. albicans cells relative to the total number of C. albicans cells. At least 200 C. albicans cells were counted for each experiment. Five independent experiments were performed.
Hyphal induction.
C. albicans hyphal induction assays were carried out as described in Text S1. The percentage of hyphal cells was determined manually using ImageJ. A total of least 500 cells were counted for each experiment.
Zebrafish in vivo imaging.
Imaging of C. albicans uptake within 2-day-old zebrafish was carried out as described in Text S1. Assessment of C. albicans uptake by macrophages was performed manually using NIS-Elements Viewer 4.20 (Nikon, Richmond, United Kingdom). Three independent experiments were performed using 10 larvae per condition.
Electron microscopy.
Imaging of C. albicans sections by transmission electron microscopy was carried out as described in Text S1. ImageJ was used to manually measure the thicknesses of the inner (i) and outer (o) cell walls (as indicated in Fig. 2B). Five measurements were taken along the cell wall for each cell, for a total of 25 cells per group.
Lipid droplet staining.
LD540 lipid droplet stain was used as described in Text S1.
Murine C. albicans systemic infection model.
The effect of SHAM+SNP pretreatment of C. albicans was evaluated using a murine intravenous challenge assay as described in the supplemental materials. Mouse kidneys were cryosectioned and analyzed as described in Text S1.
Data accessibility.
The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE114531 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE114531).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Gordon Brown (MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Aberdeen) for providing Dectin-1-Fc. We also thank the Microscopy and Histology Core Facility of the Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, where the high-pressure freezing was performed, and the staff at the Centre for Genome Enabled Biology and Medicine (University of Aberdeen Medical Research Facility) who performed RNA sequencing procedures. We would also thank members of the Aberdeen Fungal Group and the Kent Fungal Group and Wellcome Trust Strategic Award in Medical Mycology and Fungal Immunology (WTSA-MMFI) consortia for comments and useful discussion throughout the project. C.A.M. and L.A.W. acknowledge the support of the Medical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology and the University of Aberdeen (MR/N006364/1).
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award for Medical Mycology and Fungal Immunology 097377/Z/11/Z.
Footnotes
Citation Duvenage L, Walker LA, Bojarczuk A, Johnston SA, MacCallum DM, Munro CA, Gourlay CW. 2019. Inhibition of classical and alternative modes of respiration in Candida albicans leads to cell wall remodeling and increased macrophage recognition. mBio 10:e02535-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02535-18.
Contributor Information
Ana Traven, Monash University.
Judith Berman, Tel Aviv University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gow NAR, Yadav B. 2017. Microbe profile: Candida albicans: a shape-changing, opportunistic pathogenic fungus of humans. Microbiology 163:1145–1147. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calderone R, Li D, Traven A. 2015. System-level impact of mitochondria on fungal virulence: to metabolism and beyond. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov027. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shingu-Vazquez M, Traven A. 2011. Mitochondria and fungal pathogenesis: drug tolerance, virulence, and potential for antifungal therapy. Eukaryot Cell 10:1376–1383. doi: 10.1128/EC.05184-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.She X, Khamooshi K, Gao Y, Shen Y, Lv Y, Calderone R, Fonzi W, Liu W, Li D. 2015. Fungal-specific subunits of the Candida albicans mitochondrial complex I drive diverse cell functions including cell wall synthesis. Cell Microbiol 17:1350–1364. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Helmerhorst EJ, Murphy MP, Troxler RF, Oppenheim FG. 2002. Characterization of the mitochondrial respiratory pathways in Candida albicans. Biochim Biophys Acta 1556:73–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruy F, Vercesi AE, Kowaltowski AJ. 2006. Inhibition of specific electron transport pathways leads to oxidative stress and decreased Candida albicans proliferation. J Bioenerg Biomembr 38:129–135. doi: 10.1007/s10863-006-9012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McDonough JA, Bhattacherjee V, Sadlon T, Hostetter MK. 2002. Involvement of Candida albicans NADH dehydrogenase complex I in filamentation. Fungal Genet Biol 36:117–127. doi: 10.1016/S1087-1845(02)00007-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khamooshi K, Sikorski P, Sun N, Calderone R, Li D. 22 January 2014. The Rbf1, Hfl1 and Dbp4 of Candida albicans regulate common as well as transcription factor-specific mitochondrial and other cell activities. BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grahl N, Demers EG, Lindsay AK, Harty CE, Willger SD, Piispanen AE, Hogan DA. 2015. Mitochondrial activity and Cyr1 are key regulators of Ras1 activation of C. albicans virulence pathways. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Watanabe T, Ogasawara A, Mikami T, Matsumoto T. 2006. Hyphal formation of Candida albicans is controlled by electron transfer system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 348:206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McKenzie CGJ, Koser U, Lewis LE, Bain JM, Mora-Montes HM, Barker RN, Gow NAR, Erwig LP. 2010. Contribution of Candida albicans cell wall components to recognition by and escape from murine macrophages. Infect Immun 78:1650–1658. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00001-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gow NAR, Netea MG, Munro CA, Ferwerda G, Bates S, Mora-Montes HM, Walker L, Jansen T, Jacobs L, Tsoni V, Brown GD, Odds FC, Van der Meer JWM, Brown AJP, Kullberg BJ. 2007. Immune recognition of Candida albicans beta-glucan by dectin-1. J Infect Dis 196:1565–1571. doi: 10.1086/523110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Netea MG, Brown GD, Kullberg BJ, Gow NAR. 2008. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:67–78. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ballou ER, Avelar GM, Childers DS, Mackie J, Bain JM, Wagener J, Kastora SL, Panea MD, Hardison SE, Walker LA, Erwig LP, Munro CA, Gow NAR, Brown GD, MacCallum DM, Brown AJP. 2016. Lactate signalling regulates fungal β-glucan masking and immune evasion. Nat Microbiol 2:16238. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sherrington SL, Sorsby E, Mahtey N, Kumwenda P, Lenardon MD, Brown I, Ballou ER, MacCallum DM, Hall RA. 2017. Adaptation of Candida albicans to environmental pH induces cell wall remodelling and enhances innate immune recognition. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006403. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.She X, Zhang L, Chen H, Calderone R, Li D. 2013. Cell surface changes in the Candida albicans mitochondrial mutant goa1Δ are associated with reduced recognition by innate immune cells. Cell Microbiol 15:1572–1584. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.She X, Calderone R, Kruppa M, Lowman D, Williams D, Zhang L, Gao Y, Khamooshi K, Liu W, Li D. 2016. Cell wall N-linked mannoprotein biosynthesis requires Goa1p, a putative regulator of mitochondrial complex I in Candida albicans. PLoS One 11:e0147175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Qu Y, Jelicic B, Pettolino F, Perry A, Lo TL, Hewitt VL, Bantun F, Beilharz TH, Peleg AY, Lithgow T, Djordjevic JT, Traven A. 2012. Mitochondrial sorting and assembly machinery subunit Sam37 in Candida albicans: insight into the roles of mitochondria in fitness, cell wall integrity, and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 11:532–544. doi: 10.1128/EC.05292-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koch B, Tucey TM, Lo TL, Novakovic S, Boag P, Traven A. 2017. The mitochondrial GTPase Gem1 contributes to the cell wall stress response and invasive growth of Candida albicans. Front Microbiol 8:2555. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carpenter AW, Schoenfisch MH. 2012. Nitric oxide release: part II. Therapeutic applications. Chem Soc Rev 41:3742. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15273h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Del Rosso JQ, Kircik LH. 2017. Spotlight on the use of nitric oxide in dermatology: what is it? What does it do? Can it become an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for skin disease? J Drugs Dermatol 16:s4–s10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deppisch C, Herrmann G, Graepler-Mainka U, Wirtz H, Heyder S, Engel C, Marschal M, Miller CC, Riethmüller J. 2016. Gaseous nitric oxide to treat antibiotic resistant bacterial and fungal lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis: a phase I clinical study. Infection 44:513–520. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0879-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adler BL, Friedman AJ. 1 August 2015. Nitric oxide therapy for dermatologic disease. Future Sci OA doi: 10.4155/fso.15.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Margel D, Mizrahi M, Regev-Shoshani G, Ko M, Moshe M, Ozalvo R, Shavit-Grievink L, Baniel J, Kedar D, Yossepowitch O, Lifshitz D, Nadu A, Greenberg D, Av-Gay Y. 2017. Nitric oxide charged catheters as a potential strategy for prevention of hospital acquired infections. PLoS One 12:e0174443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brown GC. 1999. Nitric oxide and mitochondrial respiration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1411:351–369. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(99)00025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nathan C, Shiloh MU. 2000. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the relationship between mammalian hosts and microbial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:8841–8848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ahmadi MS, Lee HH, Sanchez DA, Friedman AJ, Tar MT, Davies KP, Nosanchuk JD, Martinez LR. 2016. Sustained nitric oxide releasing nanoparticles induce cell death in Candida albicans yeast and hyphal cells preventing biofilm formation in vitro and in a rodent central venous catheter model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2185–2194. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02659-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Macherla C, Sanchez DA, Ahmadi MS, Vellozzi EM, Friedman AJ, Nosanchuk JD, Martinez LR. 2012. Nitric oxide releasing nanoparticles for treatment of Candida albicans burn infections. Front Microbiol 3:1–9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Privett BJ, Nutz ST, Schoenfisch MH. 2010. Efficacy of surface-generated nitric oxide against Candida albicans adhesion and biofilm formation. Biofouling 26:973–983. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.534552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yabu Y, Yoshida A, Suzuki T, Nihei C, Kawai K, Minagawa N, Hosokawa T, Nagai K, Kita K, Ohta N. 2003. The efficacy of ascofuranone in a consecutive treatment on Trypanosoma brucei brucei in mice. Parasitol Int 52:155–164. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clarkson AB, Brohn FH. 1976. Trypanosomiasis: an approach to chemotherapy by the inhibition of carbohydrate catabolism. Science 194:204–206. doi: 10.1126/science.986688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dichtl K, Samantaray S, Wagener J. 2016. Cell wall integrity signalling in human pathogenic fungi. Cell Microbiol 18:1228–1238. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Navarro-García F, Alonso-Monge R, Rico H, Pla J, Sentandreu R, Nombela C. 1998. A role for the MAP kinase gene MKC1 in cell wall construction and morphological transitions in Candida albicans. Microbiology 144:411–424. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-2-411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eisman B, Alonso-Monge R, Román E, Arana D, Nombela C, Pla J. 2006. The Cek1 and Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinases play complementary roles in cell wall biogenesis and chlamydospore formation in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 5:347–358. doi: 10.1128/EC.5.2.347-358.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Homann OR, Dea J, Noble SM, Johnson AD. 2009. A phenotypic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet 5:e1000783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.MacPherson S, Akache B, Weber S, De Deken X, Raymond M, Turcotte B. 2005. Candida albicans zinc cluster protein Upc2p confers resistance to antifungal drugs and is an activator of ergosterol biosynthetic genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1745–1752. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1745-1752.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dunkel N, Liu TT, Barker KS, Homayouni R, Morschhäuser J, Rogers PD. 2008. A gain-of-function mutation in the transcription factor Upc2p causes upregulation of ergosterol biosynthesis genes and increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical Candida albicans isolate. Eukaryot Cell 7:1180–1190. doi: 10.1128/EC.00103-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Monteiro PT, Pais P, Costa C, Manna S, Sa-Correia I, Teixeira MC. 2017. The PathoYeastract database: an information system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in pathogenic yeasts. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D597–D603. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ding C, Vidanes GM, Maguire SL, Guida A, Synnott JM, Andes DR, Butler G. 1 December 2011. Conserved and divergent roles of Bcr1 and CFEM proteins in Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans. PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Synnott JM, Guida A, Mulhern-Haughey S, Higgins DG, Butler G. 2010. Regulation of the hypoxic response in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 9:1734–1746. doi: 10.1128/EC.00159-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hall RA, Bates S, Lenardon MD, MacCallum DM, Wagener J, Lowman DW, Kruppa MD, Williams DL, Odds FC, Brown AJP, Gow NAR. 2013. The Mnn2 mannosyltransferase family modulates mannoprotein fibril length, immune recognition and virulence of Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003276. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V, Johnson AD. 2010. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat Genet 42:590–598. doi: 10.1038/ng.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brown GD, Gordon S. 2001. Immune recognition. A new receptor for beta-glucans. Nature 413:36–37. doi: 10.1038/35092620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lo HJ, Köhler JR, DiDomenico B, Loebenberg D, Cacciapuoti A, Fink GR. 1997. Nonfilamentous C. albicans mutants are avirulent. Cell 90:939–949. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80358-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lewis LE, Bain JM, Lowes C, Gillespie C, Rudkin FM, Gow NAR, Erwig L-P. 2012. Stage specific assessment of Candida albicans phagocytosis by macrophages identifies cell wall composition and morphogenesis as key determinants. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002578. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chatre L, Ricchetti M. 2014. Are mitochondria the Achilles’ heel of the kingdom Fungi? Curr Opin Microbiol 20:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Helmerhorst EJ, Stan M, Murphy MP, Sherman F, Oppenheim FG. 2005. The concomitant expression and availability of conventional and alternative, cyanide-insensitive, respiratory pathways in Candida albicans. Mitochondrion 5:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Huh WK, Kang SO. 2001. Characterization of the gene family encoding alternative oxidase from Candida albicans. Biochem J 356:595–604. doi: 10.1042/bj3560595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sharpe MA, Cooper CE. 1998. Interaction of peroxynitrite with mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase. J Biol Chem 273:30961–30972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.30961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bruno VM, Kalachikov S, Subaran R, Nobile CJ, Kyratsous C, Mitchell AP. 2006. Control of the C. albicans cell wall damage response by transcriptional regulator Cas5. PLoS Pathog 2:e21. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marotta DH, Nantel A, Sukala L, Teubl JR, Rauceo JM. 2013. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling and enrichment mapping reveal divergent and conserved roles of Sko1 in the Candida albicans osmotic stress response. Genomics 102:363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Suwunnakorn S, Wakabayashi H, Rustchenko E. 2016. Chromosome 5 of human pathogen Candida albicans carries multiple genes for negative control of caspofungin and anidulafungin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7457–7467. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01888-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dagley MJ, Gentle IE, Beilharz TH, Pettolino FA, Djordjevic JT, Lo TL, Uwamahoro N, Rupasinghe T, Tull DL, McConville M, Beaurepaire C, Nantel A, Lithgow T, Mitchell AP, Traven A. 2011. Cell wall integrity is linked to mitochondria and phospholipid homeostasis in Candida albicans through the activity of the post-transcriptional regulator Ccr4-Pop2. Mol Microbiol 79:968–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hasim S, Allison DP, Retterer ST, Hopke A, Wheeler RT, Doktycz MJ, Reynolds TB. 29 December 2017. β-(1,3)-Glucan unmasking in some Candida albicans mutants correlates with increases in cell wall surface roughness and decreases in cell wall elasticity. Infect Immun doi: 10.1128/IAI.00601-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen Y-L, Montedonico AE, Kauffman S, Dunlap JR, Menn F-M, Reynolds TB. 2010. Phosphatidylserine synthase and phosphatidylserine decarboxylase are essential for cell wall integrity and virulence in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 75:1112–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ishida K, Fernandes Rodrigues JC, Cammerer S, Urbina JA, Gilbert I, de Souza W, Rozental S. 2011. Synthetic arylquinuclidine derivatives exhibit antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 10:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Geraghty P, Kavanagh K. 2003. Disruption of mitochondrial function in Candida albicans leads to reduced cellular ergosterol levels and elevated growth in the presence of amphotericin B. Arch Microbiol 179:295–300. doi: 10.1007/s00203-003-0530-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Thomas E, Roman E, Claypool S, Manzoor N, Pla J, Panwar SL. 2013. Mitochondria influence CDR1 efflux pump activity, Hog1-mediated oxidative stress pathway, iron homeostasis, and ergosterol levels in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5580–5599. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00889-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.She X, Zhang P, Gao Y, Zhang L, Wang Q, Chen H, Calderone R, Liu W, Li D. 2018. A mitochondrial proteomics view of complex I deficiency in Candida albicans. Mitochondrion 38:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sellam A, van Het Hoog M, Tebbji F, Beaurepaire C, Whiteway M, Nantel A. 2014. Modeling the transcriptional regulatory network that controls the early hypoxic response in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 13:675–690. doi: 10.1128/EC.00292-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lopes JP, Stylianou M, Backman E, Holmberg S, Jass J, Claesson R, Urban CF. 2018. Evasion of immune surveillance in low oxygen environments enhances Candida albicans virulence. mBio 9:e02120-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02120-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pradhan A, Avelar GM, Bain JM, Childers DS, Larcombe DE, Netea MG, Shekhova E, Munro CA, Brown GD, Erwig LP, Gow NAR, Brown AJP. 2018. Hypoxia promotes immune evasion by triggering β-glucan masking on the Candida albicans cell surface via mitochondrial and cAMP-protein kinase A signaling. mBio 9:e01318-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01318-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Inoue K, Takano H, Oda T, Yanagisawa R, Tamura H, Ohno N, Adachi Y, Ishibashi K, Yoshikawa T. 2007. Candida soluble cell wall beta-d-glucan induces lung inflammation in mice. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 20:499–508. doi: 10.1177/039463200702000308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Guedouari H, Gergondey R, Bourdais A, Vanparis O, Bulteau AL, Camadro JM, Auchère F. 2014. Changes in glutathione-dependent redox status and mitochondrial energetic strategies are part of the adaptive response during the filamentation process in Candida albicans. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842:1855–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Missall TA, Lodge JK, McEwen JE. 2004. Mechanisms of resistance to oxidative and nitrosative stress: implications for fungal survival in mammalian hosts. Eukaryot Cell 3:835–846. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.4.835-846.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Buu L-M, Chen Y-C. 2013. Sap6, a secreted aspartyl proteinase, participates in maintenance the cell surface integrity of Candida albicans. J Biomed Sci 20:101. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tsang PWK, Fong WP, Samaranayake LP. 7 December 2017. Candida albicans orf19.3727 encodes phytase activity and is essential for human tissue damage. PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Leidich SD, Ibrahim AS, Fu Y, Koul A, Jessup C, Vitullo J, Fonzi W, Mirbod F, Nakashima S, Nozawa Y, Ghannoum MA, Acta YBB. 1998. Cloning and disruption of caPLB1, a phospholipase B gene involved in the pathogenicity of Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 273:26078–26086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.26078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Limjindaporn T, Khalaf RA, Fonzi WA. 2003. Nitrogen metabolism and virulence of Candida albicans require the GATA-type transcriptional activator encoded by GAT1. Mol Microbiol 50:993–1004. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE114531 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE114531).