Abstract
Background:
Obesity is associated with poor outcomes in patients with breast cancer expressing hormone receptors, but this association is not well established for triple-negative breast cancer. In this study, we investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI) in triple-negative breast cancer outcomes.
Methods:
This is a descriptive and analytical retrospective cohort study at the Regional Oncology Center Hassan II-Oujda. We identified 115 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, met the criteria for inclusion, treated between January 2009 and December 2011. The clinicopathological characteristics were collected to assess the association between BMI and overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years, using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox model.
Results:
Data analysis focused on 115 patients, 34 patients (28.7%) were normal weight (BMI < 25) and 82 patients (71.3%) were overweight (BMI ≥ 25). The rates of overall mortality and progression at 5 years were 37.4% and 69.6% respectively. After adjusting for clinicopathological variables and menopausal status, overweight was associated with OS (HR: 2.903, 95% CI: 1.551- 5.432, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR: 1.899, 95% IC: 1.05 – 3.433, p=0.034) in all patients with triple-negative breast cancer. When stratified by menopausal status, overweight was associated with DFS and OS (HR: 3.242, 95% CI: 1.249 to 8.412, p = 0.016) and (HR: 2.752, 95% CI: 1.267 to 5.978, p = 0.011) respectively in pre-menopausal women. By cons, BMI was not associated with DFS or OS in postmenopausal women.
Conclusions:
Overweight is an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS at 5 years in all patients with triple-negative breast cancer, and menopausal status may be a mitigating factor. Premenopausal women with overweight are at greater risk of death and progression than women with normal weight. Once validated, these results should be considered in the development of prevention programs.
Keywords: Body mass index, Triple-negative breast cancer, overweight, overall survival, disease free-survival
Introduction
Breast cancer is now widely recognized that is a heterogeneous disease composed of different subtypes, characterized by their different clinico-pathological features, prognoses and responses to treatment (Perou et al., 2000; Sorlie et al., 2001). Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) expression. This molecular subtype is particularly aggressive, frequently seen in premenopausal women, and accounts for 10–15% of breast cancers in white women, with a higher prevalence among black women (Perou et al.,1999; Rais et al., 2012).
Obesity is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but this association is not well established for triple-negative breast cancer. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the effects of BMI at the time of breast cancer diagnosis on outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
This descriptive and analytical retrospective cohort study included all female patients with triple-negative breast cancer who received treatment at the Regional Oncology Center Hassan II-Oujda, Morocco, between January 2009 and December 2011. Exclusion criteria included ER or PR positivity, HER2 overexpression/ amplification and male sex.
Information was available for all patients’ age and menopausal status at diagnosis, height and weight at diagnosis (for BMI calculations), tumor size, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, histological type and grade, treatment regimen.
Associations between BMI and other characteristics were analyzed using the chi-square test. For the assessment of the influence of BMI on survival outcome (OS and DFS at 5 years), we adjusted for age at diagnosis, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, grade and systemic adjuvant therapy by multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. All P values were two-sided. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 21.0. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Patients and follow up
The study included 115 women with TNBC, 34 (28.7%) of whom were a normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2) and 82 (71.3%) of whom were overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2)
The normal weight group’s median age was 47.1 years (range: 29–65 years). The overweight group’s median age was 45.6 years (range: 26–87 years)
The overweight group had a significantly higher proportion of larger tumours (>3 cm; p=0.05) with vascular emboli (p=0.038) and included more premenopausal women (p<0.001). BMI was not associated with tumour grade, lymph node status and age (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients
Characteristics | IMC < 25 | IMC ≥ 25 | p |
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | ||
Tumor size (cm) | |||
≤ 3 | 8 (23.5) | 34 (42) | 0.05 |
> 3 | 26 (76.5) | 47 (58) | |
Lymph node status | |||
N – | 16 (47) | 32 (39.5) | 0.276 |
N + | 18 (53) | 49 (60.5) | |
Tumor grade | |||
I – II | 20 (58.8) | 45 (55.5) | 0.428 |
III | 14 (41.2) | 36 (44.5) | |
Vascular emboli | |||
No | 26 (76.5) | 48 (59.3) | 0.038 |
Yes | 8 (23.5) | 33 (40.7) | |
Menopausal status | |||
Pre- | 12 (35.3) | 73 (90.2) | < 0.001 |
Post- | 22 (64.7) | 8 (9.8) | |
Age (years) | |||
≤ 40 | 11 (32.3) | 27 (33.3) | 0.586 |
> 40 | 23 (67.7) | 54 (66.7) |
Mortality and disease progression
Rates of overall mortality and disease progression at 5 years were 37.4% and 69.6%, respectively.
The normal weight group’s rates of overall mortality and disease progression at 5 years were 41.9% and 61.3%, respectively. The overweight group’s rates of overall mortality and disease progression at 5 years were 66.7% and 81.6%, respectively.
After adjusting for clinico-pathological variables and menopausal status, overweight BMI was associated with a worse overall survival OS (p=0,002) and disease-free survival DFS (p=0,002) than underweight BMI in patients with TNBC (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Kaplan- Meier Plots of Time to Mortality (a) and time to disease progression (b) in women with TNBC, according to BMI (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2)
Figure 2.
Kaplan- Meier Plots of Time to Mortality (a) and time to disease progression (b) in premenopausal women with TNBC, according to BMI (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2)
Figure 3.
Kaplan- Meier Plots of Time to Mortality (a) and time to disease progression (b) in postmenopausal women with TNBC, according to BMI (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2)
In multivariable analysis, overweight was significantly with OS (hazard ratio [HR] for mortality 2.903, 95% CI: 1.551- 5.432, p=0.001, Table 3) and DFS (HR for progression 1.899, 95% CI: 1.05- 3.433, p=0.034, Table 2) after adjustment for clinicopathologic risk factors.
Table 2.
Univariate and Multivariate DFS Analysis of BMI in TNBC Patients According to Menopausal Status
Menopausal status / BMI | Univariate p | Multivariate p | HR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 0.002 | 0.034 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 1.899 | 1.05 – 3.433 | ||
Premenopausal patients | 0.05 | 0.016 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 3.242 | 1.249 – 8.412 | ||
Postmenopausal patients | 0.642 | 0.736 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 1.035 | 0.276 – 6.172 |
Table 3.
Univariate and Multivariate OS Analysis of BMI in TNBC Patients According to Menopausal Status
Menopausal status / BMI | Univariate p | Multivariate p | HR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 0.002 | 0.001 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 2.903 | 1.551-5.432 | ||
Premenopausal patients | 0.019 | 0.011 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 2.752 | 1.267-5.978 | ||
Postmenopausal patients | 0.036 | 0.648 | ||
BMI ≤ 25 | 1 | - | ||
BMI >25 | 1.345 | 0.375-4.831 |
In stratification analysis, overweight was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR: 3.242, 95% CI: 1.249- 8.412, p=0.016, Table 2) and OS (HR: 2.752, 95% CI: 1.267- 5.978, p=0.011, Table 3).
Among postmenopausal women, BMI did not predict for DFS (HR: 1.345, 95% CI: 0.375–4.831, P = 0.648, Table 2) or OS (HR: 1.305, 95% CI: 0.276–6.172, p = 0.736, Table 3).
Discussion
Patients with this breast cancer phenotype tend to have a worse clinical outcome partly as a result of lacking a therapeutic target. Consequently, establishing a relation between modifiable factors that may portend an adverse outcome potentially may be beneficial to these patients (Ademuyiwa et al., 2011).
A number of studies (Dal Maso et al.,2008; Kroenke et al., 2005; Loi et al., 2005; Nichols et al, 2009) have evaluated the adverse prognostic effect of general obesity before breast cancer diagnosis or at the time of or shortly after a diagnosis of breast cancer, but very few studies have focused on BMI’s prognostic role in specially TNBC, the results of which vary considerably (Tao et al, 2006; Majed et at, 2008; Dawood et al, 2008).
In the current study, we demonstrated that overweight has a negative influence on DFS and OS only in premenopausal patients with TNBC but not in postmenopausal ones. Our results agreed with several reports in the literature, which showed that increasing BMI is related to a poor outcomes and short survivorship.
In a large study that involved 8,872 women, Fontanella et al demonstrated that mean DFS and OS were shorter in obese and very obese compared with normal weight patients in TNBC after a median follow up of 42.7 months (Fontanella et al., 2015). In a single center study of 818 patients with TNBC, obesity was associated with worse DFS and OS for premenopausal patients with TNBC at a median follow-up of 29 months (Turkoz et al., 2013). Pajares et al., (2013) performed a retrospective analysis including 5,683 operable BC patients enrolled in four randomized clinical trials (GEICAM/9906, GEICAM/9805, GEICAM/2003-02, and BCIRG 001) to assess the prognostic effect of body mass index (BMI) on disease recurrence, breast cancer mortality (BCM), and overall mortality (OM). As a result, Severely obese patients present a worse prognosis regarding recurrence, BCM, and OM than patients with BMI < 25. The magnitude of the harmful effect of BMI on survival-related outcomes was similar across subtypes including TNBC. Shuang Hao et al investigated the prognostic effects of body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcomes in 1106 patients with TNBC. They identified Overweight as an independent prognostic factor of OS in all women with TNBC, and menopause status as mitigating factor (Hao et al., 2015). Premenoposaul women who are overwheight with TNBC are at a greater risk of poor prognosis than normal weight ones. On the other side, no significant relationship between obesity and outcomes in patients with TNBC after controlling for clinically significant factors was found either by Tait et al., (2014) or Ademuyiwa et al (Ademuyiwa et al., 2011). This is possibly because TNBC patients tend to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy which may neutralize potential detrimental effects of a higher BMI (Hao et al., 2015).
There are several hypotheses on the mechanisms that link increasing BMI to TNBC prognosis (Rose et al., 2009; Verreault et al.,1989; Foluso et al., 2011). Such as obesity associated comorbidities that interfere with optimal treatment (Hao et al., 2015). Metabolic syndrome, presents increased levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor, hormones with potent mitogenic activity toward epithelial cells (Nelson et al., 2013; Renehan et al., 2006; Yu et al., 2000). Also paracrine secretion of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the establishment of a pro-inflammatory micro-environment can induce the development of malignant phenotypes that are independent of hormonal secretion (Howe et al., 2013). Alternatively, the detrimental effect of obesity on TNBC prognosis might be linked to sub-therapeutic treatment. Drug dosing has traditionally been based on a patient’s estimated body surface area (BSA) in adults (Chen et al., 2016). It’s suggested elsewhere that the adipokines, which include leptin and vascular endothelial growth factor and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor- like growth factor, exert a stimulatory effect on ER-negative breast cancers, where estrogen action is not a factor, by hormonal, paracrine, and autocrine mechanisms (Zheng et al., 2013). Ishikawa et al., (2004) found that high leptin and leptin receptor expression in breast cancer tissue was associated with distant metastases. And Liu et al., (2011)reported that serum leptin concentrations were higher in patients with high-grade tumors and that a polymorphism in the leptin receptor gene at codon 109 (LEPRO-109RR genotype) was more frequent in patients who were overweight and those with triple-negative cancers. Leptin implicate stimulatory effects on breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion, but also possesses angiogenic activity (Niu et al., 2013).
It seems to be the first study to examine the relationships between obesity and TNBC survival outcomes in Moroccan patients, to our knowledge. Our study established a relationship between overweight and TNBC which is beneficial for this aggressive subtype of breast cancer. These results will be taken into account in the programs of prevention and also in the medical management by using intensified treatments in patients with overweight. However, there were some potential limitations in our study. Firstly, due to the relatively proportion of underweight and obese patients, classification was measured in a binary scale. This classification did not allow to clearly distinguish between women who were obese and those who were overweight. Secondly, the retrospective nature of the study design and its relatively small sample size.
In conclusion, this retrospective cohort analysis showed that overweight BMI was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS at 5 years in women with TNBC. Our analysis indicated that menopausal status may be a mitigating factor, with overweight premenopausal women at greater risk of death and progression than women with a normal weight. Clearly, the relationships between outcome and obesity in triple-negative breast cancer are an important topic for further study. Once validated, these results could be considered in the clinical management of breast cancer and in the development of targeted preventive programs.
List of abbreviations
BMI, Body Mass Index
OS, Overall Survival
HR, Hazard Ratio
CI, Confident Interval
DFS, Disease Free Survival
DNA, Deoxy-Ribonucleic Acid
ER, Oestrogen Receptor
PR, Progesteron Receptor
HER 2, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2
Declarations section
Ethics approval and consent the study was performed according to the ethical principles and informed patient consent for using data was obtained.
Standards of reporting
Reporting guidelines “STIPOD”.
Consent of publication
The patients provided consent for publication.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Al jarroudi performed data collection, analysis and interpretation and drafted the article. Seddik and Brahmi participated in the collection of data. Abda participated in the statistical analysis and interpretation of results. Said Afqir contributed in the article’s drafting and performed a critical revision of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank the entire medical and paramedical team who contributed together to the care of these patients.
References
- Ademuyiwa FO, Groman A, O’Connor T, et al. Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:4132–40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen HL, Ding A, Wang M, et al. Impact of central obesity on prognostic outcome of triple negative breast cancer in Chinese women. Springerplus. 2016;5:594. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2200-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dal Maso L, Zucchetto A, Talamini R, et al. Effect of obesity and other lifestyle factors on mortality in women with breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2188–94. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dawood S, Broglio K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Prognostic value of body mass index in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:1718–25. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foluso O, Ademuyiwa MD. Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes in triple negative breast cancer. Wiley OnlineLibrary; 2011. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fontanella C, Lederer B, Gade S, et al. Impact of body mass index on neoadjuvant treatment outcome: a pooled analysis of eight prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150:127–39. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3287-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao S, Liu Y, Yu K-D, et al. Overweight as a prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancers in Chinese women. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howe LR, Subbaramaiah K, Hudis CA, et al. Molecular pathways: adipose inflammation as a mediator of obesity-associated cancer. Clinical Cancer Res. 2013;19:6074–83. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Nagawa H, et al. Enhanced expression of leptin and leptin receptor (OB-R) in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4325–31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kroenke CH, Chen WY, Rosner B, et al. Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1370, 8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu CL, Chang YC, Cheng SP, et al. The roles of serum leptin concentration and polymorphism in leptin receptor gene at codon 109 in breast cancer. Oncology. 2007;72:75–81. doi: 10.1159/000111097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu C, Liu L. Polymorphisms in three obesity-related genes (LEP, LEPR, and PON1) and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2011;32:1233–40. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loi S, Milne RL, Friedlander ML, et al. Obesity and outcomes in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1686–91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Majed B, Moreau T, Senouci K, et al. Is obesity an independent prognosis factor in woman breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:329–42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9785-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson ER, Wardell SE, Jasper JS, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol links hypercholesterolemia and breast cancer pathophysiology. Science. 2013;342:1094–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1241908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM, et al. Body mass index before and after breast cancer diagnosis: Associations with all-cause, Breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009:1403–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1094. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu J, Jiang L. The association between Leptin level and breast cancer: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pajares B, Pollan M, Martin M, et al. Obesity and survival in operable breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes according to pathological subtypes: a pooled analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R105. doi: 10.1186/bcr3572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perou CM, Jeffrey SS, Van de Rijn M, et al. Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9212, 17. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature. 2000;406:747–52. doi: 10.1038/35021093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rais G, Raissouni S, Aitelhaj M, et al. Triple negative breast cancer in Moroccan women: clinicopathological and therapeutic study at the national institute of oncology. BMC Women’s Health. 2012;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renehan AG, Frystyk J, Flyvbjerg A, et al. Obesity and cancer risk: the role of the insulin-IGF axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2006;17:328–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rose DP, Vona-Davis L. Influence of obesity on breast cancer receptor status and prognosis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:1091–1101. doi: 10.1586/era.09.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibsirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tait S, Pacheco JM, Gao F, et al. Body mass index, diabetes, and triple-negative breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146:189–97. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3002-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao MH, Shu XO, Ruan ZX, et al. Association of overweight with breast cancer survival. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:101–7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turkoz FP, Solak M, Petekkaya I, et al. The prognostic impact of obesity on molecular subtypes of breast cancer in premenopausal women. J BUON. 2013;18:335–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verreault R, Brisson J, Deschenes L, et al. Body weight and prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Modifying effect of estrogen receptors. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:260–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu H, Rohan T. Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1472–89. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.18.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Q, Banaszak L, Fracci S, et al. Leptin receptor maintains cancer stem-like properties in triple negative breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:797–808. doi: 10.1530/ERC-13-0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.