The phospholipid composition of the cell membrane influences the spatial and temporal biochemistry of cells. We studied molecular mechanisms connecting membrane composition to cell morphology in the model bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The peptidoglycan (PG) layer of the cell wall is a dominant component of cell mechanical properties; consequently, it has been an important antibiotic target. We found that the anionic phospholipid cardiolipin (CL) plays a role in determination of the shape of R. sphaeroides cells by affecting PG precursor biosynthesis. Removing CL in R. sphaeroides alters cell morphology and increases its sensitivity to antibiotics targeting proteins synthesizing PG. These studies provide a connection to spatial biochemical control in mitochondria, which contain an inner membrane with topological features in common with R. sphaeroides.
KEYWORDS: MreB, MurG, cardiolipin, cell shape, peptidoglycan
ABSTRACT
Cardiolipin (CL) is an anionic phospholipid that plays an important role in regulating protein biochemistry in bacteria and mitochondria. Deleting the CL synthase gene (Δcls) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides depletes CL and decreases cell length by 20%. Using a chemical biology approach, we found that a CL deficiency does not impair the function of the cell wall elongasome in R. sphaeroides; instead, biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan (PG) precursor lipid II is decreased. Treating R. sphaeroides cells with fosfomycin and d-cycloserine inhibits lipid II biosynthesis and creates phenotypes in cell shape, PG composition, and spatial PG assembly that are strikingly similar to those seen with R. sphaeroides Δcls cells, suggesting that CL deficiency alters the elongation of R. sphaeroides cells by reducing lipid II biosynthesis. We found that MurG—a glycosyltransferase that performs the last step of lipid II biosynthesis—interacts with anionic phospholipids in native (i.e., R. sphaeroides) and artificial membranes. Lipid II production decreases 25% in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells compared to wild-type cells, and overexpression of MurG in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells restores their rod shape, indicating that CL deficiency decreases MurG activity and alters cell shape. The R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant is more sensitive than the wild-type strain to antibiotics targeting PG synthesis, including fosfomycin, d-cycloserine, S-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)isothiourea (A22), mecillinam, and ampicillin, suggesting that CL biosynthesis may be a potential target for combination chemotherapies that block the bacterial cell wall.
INTRODUCTION
Bacterial cells have diverse shapes that play roles in their adaptation and survival, including motility, adhesion, replication, pathogenicity, and evasion of the mammalian immune system (1, 2). The shape of bacteria arises from the morphology of the cell wall and specifically from the layer of peptidoglycan (PG) surrounding the cytoplasmic membrane that resists osmotic pressure and other mechanical forces applied to cells (3, 4). Researchers in the field of antibiotic development have paid acute attention to the underlying machinery controlling PG assembly and the catastrophic effect of inhibiting its biosynthesis (5, 6). PG is synthesized in three distinct steps in Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 1). (i) Monosaccharide-peptide precursors are synthesized in the cytoplasm by seven enzymes: MurABCDEF and DdlA. (ii) A lipid attached by MraY tethers this precursor to the inner leaflet of the cytoplasmic membrane (referred to as lipid I), a second sugar is attached by MurG to create a disaccharide-peptide precursor (referred to as lipid II), and the molecule is flipped to the outer leaflet of the bilayer by MurJ. (iii) Lipid II is polymerized in the periplasmic space by a glycosyltransferase (GTase) and the nascent glycan strands are incorporated into the existing PG by a transpeptidase (TPase) that cross-links peptides on adjacent lipid II molecules.
In rod-shaped bacteria, PG synthesis occurs at different sites in the cell at different stages of the cell cycle. During cell division, FtsZ initiates the organization of the divisome containing PBP1b (a bifunctional GTase and TPase) and PBP3 (a TPase that requires FtsW for its function), which perform PG assembly at the division site. During cell elongation, MreB forms a scaffold for assembly of an elongasome containing PBP1a (a bifunctional GTase and TPase) and PBP2 (a TPase that requires RodA for its activity), which catalyze PG assembly along the sidewalls of the cell (3, 4).
Previous studies demonstrating a connection between membrane composition and bacterial biochemistry (7) motivated us to explore the role of the phospholipid bilayer in synthesis of PG and determination of bacterial cell shape. We previously observed that a mutant (strain Δcls) of the Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides lacking the anionic, intrinsically curved phospholipid cardiolipin (CL) creates cells that are shorter in length than those created by the wild-type (wt) strain (8). A similar change in cell morphology has not been observed in other rod-shaped bacterial cells lacking CL, e.g., Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis (9, 10), suggesting that this phenotype may be unique to alphaproteobacteria. In this paper, we describe R. sphaeroides using a strategy similar to that used by other bacteria—i.e., MreB-directed cell elongation—to determine the rod shape of cells. Despite a reduction in growth along its cylindrical cell body, the CL-deficient mutant of R. sphaeroides has an elongasome that functions normally. We found that the influence of the depletion of CL on R. sphaeroides cell shape arises from effects on the biosynthesis of the PG precursor, lipid II. We describe experiments supporting the hypothesis that a CL deficiency in R. sphaeroides reduces the supply of lipid II to the elongasome for PG assembly at the sidewalls of the cell, which alters cell shape and makes cells susceptible to PG-targeting antibiotics.
RESULTS
CL plays a role in determining R. sphaeroides cell shape.
The R. sphaeroides cell membrane contains four major classes of phospholipids, namely, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PGL), and CL, in a ratio of approximately 5:2:2.4:0.6 (PE/PC/PGL/CL) by weight (11). A CL-deficient mutant of R. sphaeroides lacking the CL synthase gene (strain Δcls) produces a reduced amount of CL (0.5% of total lipids, representing an ∼90% decrease in CL) and displays a cell shape phenotype with a characteristic decrease (20%) in cell length compared to the wt strain (Fig. 2A and B) (8, 11). To investigate whether the change in the cell shape of the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant is due to an increased cell division rate (relative to cell growth), we performed single-cell time-lapse imaging of both R. sphaeroides wild-type (wt) and Δcls cells (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We imaged cells, tracked their growth directly between cell division events, and found that the wt and Δcls strains had comparable doubling times of ∼150 min. The Δcls mutant, however, displayed a 40% decrease in the rate of cell elongation compared to the wt strain, suggesting that the morphological change in the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant may arise from a defect in cell elongation. Complementation of the Δcls mutant by ectopically expressing CL synthase in cells from the IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside)-inducible expression vector pIND (12) increased the concentration of CL to 2.3% of total lipids (∼50% of the level in wt cells) and restored the cell elongation rate by 20% (Fig. S1), suggesting that CL contributes to sculpting the rod shape of R. sphaeroides cells.
CL deficiency does not impair R. sphaeroides elongasome function.
MreB is a bacterial cytoskeletal protein that is homologous to eukaryotic actin (13). In rod-shaped bacteria, MreB polymerizes into filamentous structures positioned on the inner leaflet of the cytoplasmic membrane that is associated with elongasome components, including the cell elongation-specific TPase PBP2. MreB filaments move circumferentially around the cell with a velocity that is correlated to the rate of PG assembly and in an orientation that may guide elongation of the PG layer of the cell wall (14–16). In R. sphaeroides, MreB, MreC, MreD, PBP2, and RodA are hypothetically encoded at the same locus (Fig. S2A) (17). MreB requires MreC and MreD for its cellular localization, and PBP2 requires RodA for its TPase activity (3). RodA has recently been reported to also possess GTase activity (18, 19). We used a chemical biology approach to investigate whether R. sphaeroides uses a elongasome strategy for shape-determination similar to that summarized above. We treated R. sphaeroides cells with the small-molecule inhibitors S-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)isothiourea (A22; binds MreB and disassembles MreB filaments) and mecillinam (MEC; binds PBP2 and inhibits its TPase activity required for cell elongation). The MIC of A22 was 60 μg/ml for R. sphaeroides, and the MIC of MEC was 3 μg/ml. Treatment using sub-MICs of both drugs (A22, 10 μg/ml; MEC, 0.5 μg/ml) did not significantly impair R. sphaeroides cell growth and yet decreased cell length (A22, 40%; MEC, 30%), which matches the phenotype of these compounds in other rod-shaped bacteria (3) and suggests a conserved cell elongation machinery in R. sphaeroides (Fig. 2C and D). We observed a similar phenotype (i.e., shorter cell length) in comparisons between R. sphaeroides cells with reduced CL concentrations and cells treated with A22 and MEC; this result led us to hypothesize that an altered elongasome function in the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant may reduce PG assembly at the sidewalls of the cell.
We used real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to test if transcription of genes coding for elongasome components is altered in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells. We found no significant difference in the levels of transcription of elongasome genes in wt and Δcls cells (Fig. S2B). We also treated R. sphaeroides cells with the PBP1a inhibitor cefsulodin to inhibit its TPase activity. The MIC of cefsulodin for R. sphaeroides cells is 20 μg/ml; a sub-MIC (5 μg/ml) of the drug did not cause significant growth defects or changes in cell shape (Fig. S3), suggesting that PBP1a does not participate in cell elongation (19).
MreB filaments are involved in the process of PG assembly at the sidewalls of cells during cell elongation. We examined whether the structure and function of MreB are disrupted in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells by comparing the PG growth patterns of R. sphaeroides wt and Δcls strains. We probed PG assembly in cells at different stages of the cell cycle with HADA, a fluorescent analog of d-alanine containing a coumarin moiety that can be covalently incorporated into newly synthesized PG (20, 21). PG assembly in R. sphaeroides wt cells occurred along the sidewalls and accompanied cell elongation (Fig. 2G). At early and late stages of cell division (i.e., cell septation), PG assembly is focused at the division plane. After the mother and daughter cells are separated, PG assembly returns to the sidewalls as cells elongate. This cycle of PG assembly was not observed in R. sphaeroides wt cells treated with A22 in which the structure of MreB was disrupted (Fig. 2H); A22-treated R. sphaeroides cells exhibited three aberrant phenotypes: round shapes, irregular shapes, and asymmetric cell division. Round R. sphaeroides cells displayed peripheral PG assembly and divided at the mid-cell. PG was assembled at apparently random positions in cells with irregular shapes. Cells undergoing asymmetrical division displayed asymmetrical labeling of septal PG. R. sphaeroides wt cells treated with MEC had phenotypes similar to those of A22-treated cells, suggesting that inhibiting PBP2 activity may disrupt the structure of MreB or retard the movement of MreB filaments (Fig. 2H). The pattern of PG assembly in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells was similar to that in wt cells (Fig. 2G), suggesting that a change in shape is unlikely to arise from disrupting the MreB structure or inhibiting PBP2 activity.
Inhibition of lipid II biosynthesis results in a phenotype that resembles that of R. sphaeroides Δcls cells.
In rod-shaped bacteria, lipid II biosynthesis colocalizes with PG assembly at different stages of the cell cycle (22). The change in cell shape that we observed in the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant may have arisen from a reduction in lipid II biosynthesis. To test this hypothesis, we reduced lipid II biosynthesis by treating R. sphaeroides cells with the MurA inhibitor fosfomycin (FOS) and the DdlA inhibitor d-cycloserine (DCS). MurA converts UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) into UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid (UDP-MurNAc) in the first concerted step in lipid II biosynthesis. DdlA is a d-alanine (d-Ala) ligase that produces d-Ala-d-Ala for incorporation into lipid I (Fig. 1). The MICs of FOS and DCS for R. sphaeroides were 1.5 mg/ml and 1 μg/ml, respectively. R. sphaeroides cells treated with sub-MICs of either drug (FOS, 250 μg/ml; DCS, 0.05 μg/ml) had a decrease in cell length (FOS, 15%; DCS, 25%) and lacked significant growth defects (Fig. 2E and F). HADA labeling experiments indicated that these two drugs did not affect the pattern of PG assembly in R. sphaeroides cells (Fig. 2G), suggesting that a change in the shape of R. sphaeroides Δcls cells may arise from a decrease in lipid II biosynthesis arising from a CL deficiency.
To test this hypothesis, we determined the PG composition of R. sphaeroides cells using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) (Table 1; see also Fig. S4). We treated R. sphaeroides wt cells with A22 and MEC, isolated PG, digested it with mutanolysin (an N-acetylmuramidase), analyzed the material by UPLC-MS (23), and found that both compounds changed the PG composition of cells (Fig. 3A). Compared to wt cells, treatment with either A22 or MEC decreased the concentration of disaccharide-peptide (muropeptide) monomer by 33% and increased the concentration of crossed-linked muropeptides (dimer and trimer) by 20%, resulting in a 32% increase in the degree of cross-linking (Fig. 3B). Treatment with both A22 and MEC led to a 60% increase in the concentration of anhydromuramyl muropeptides present at the terminating end of the glycan strand, reflecting a 43% decrease in the average glycan strand length (Fig. 3C) (24). Similar results were found in E. coli cells treated with A22 (25). Surprisingly, R. sphaeroides Δcls cells have a PG composition indistinguishable from that seen in wt cells or in wt cells treated with FOS or DCS (Fig. 3), suggesting that CL deficiency does not impair the elongasome function and that a change in cell shape of the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant may arise from a reduction in lipid II biosynthesis.
TABLE 1.
Peaka | Retention time (min) |
Calculated mass |
Observed m/z |
Length of the stem peptides |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 7.6 | 870.37 | 871.37 (+1) | Tri |
2 | 9 | 698.29 | 699.29 (+1) | Di |
3 | 12 | 941.41 | 942.41 (+1) | Tetra |
4a | 13.7 | 1,722.71 | 575.23 (+3) | Tri-tri |
4b | 20.3 | 1,722.71 | 862.35 (+2) | Tri-tri |
5a | 21.7 | 1,793.77 | 897.88 (+2) | Tri-tetra |
5b | 22.8 | 1,793.77 | 897.88 (+2) | Tri-tetra |
6 | 24.1 | 1,864.81 | 933.40 (+2) | Tetra-tetra |
7a | 28 | 2,717.15 | 906.71 (+3) | Tri-tetra-tetra |
7b | 29.2 | 2,717.15 | 906.71 (+3) | Tri-tetra-tetra |
8 | 30.1 | 2,788.21 | 930.40 (+3) | Tetra-tetra-tetra |
9a | 30.7 | 1,773.74 | 887.87 (+2) | Anhydro tri-tetra |
9b | 31.9 | 1,773.74 | 887.87 (+2) | Anhydro tri-tetra |
10 | 33.2 | 1,844.77 | 923.38 (+2) | Anhydro tetra-tetra |
Refer to chromatograms in Fig. S4.
CL affects lipid II biosynthesis.
We found no significant differences in the levels of transcription of genes coding for enzymes that synthesize lipid II in R. sphaeroides wt and Δcls cells (Fig. S5). We then investigated the impact of CL on the activity of specific enzymes involved in lipid II biosynthesis. MurG is a GTase and a hypothetical peripheral membrane protein that catalyzes the rate-limiting step of lipid II formation by transferring the GlcNAc from UDP-GlcNAc to lipid I (Fig. 1) (26, 27). We fused gfp to the genomic murG in both R. sphaeroides wt and Δcls strains (resulting in TyL1 and TyL2 strains, respectively; Fig. S6) and imaged the cells. During elongation, MurG localized to the membrane and concentrated at the cell poles. During division, MurG localized at the division plane (Fig. 4A). This subcellular MurG localization pattern was unchanged in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells. Cell fractionation experiments indicated no significant difference between the amounts of membrane-localized MurG (∼75%) in R. sphaeroides wt cells and Δcls cells (Fig. 4B). Apparently, membrane localization of MurG does not require CL and changes in R. sphaeroides Δcls cell shape are not due to MurG mislocalization.
Anionic phospholipids, such as CL and PGL, have been shown to accumulate at the polar regions of rod-shaped bacterial cells, where they may reduce the surface energy of curvature-mediated membrane strain (9, 28). We labeled R. sphaeroides membranes with the fluorescent probe 10-N-nonyl acridine orange (NAO), which has a preference for interacting with anionic phospholipids, and observed an enrichment of the fluorophore at the polar regions of both wt and Δcls cells (Fig. 4C). As PGL is the precursor of CL, R. sphaeroides Δcls cells contained a higher level of PGL than wt cells (11). Enrichment of MurG at the R. sphaeroides wt and Δcls cell poles suggests that its localization may occur through interacting with CL and PGL. We purified recombinant R. sphaeroides MurG and quantified the interaction between MurG and membranes with different phospholipid compositions using in vitro liposome-pelleting assays. In these assays, 67% of the total MurG present interacted with liposomes containing 100 moles percent (mol%) PC and segregated to the pellet fraction. When 10 mol% CL or PGL was incorporated into PC-containing liposomes, the fraction of MurG interacting with membranes increased to 92% for both anionic phospholipids (Fig. 4D), suggesting equal preferences for MurG binding of CL and PGL. Other CL-binding peripheral membrane proteins show a similar relationship between these two lipids (29).
A hydrophobic patch in E. coli MurG was proposed to bind the cell membrane (30). Sequence alignment revealed that this membrane-binding interface is conserved in R. sphaeroides MurG (Fig. S7). The hydrophobic patch of amino acids in E. coli MurG is surrounded by several basic amino acid residues that may contribute to its preferential interaction with CL (30, 31). With the exception of R77 (corresponding to R79 in E. coli MurG), these residues are not conserved in R. sphaeroides MurG (Fig. S7). We purified R. sphaeroides MurGR77E protein and found that the R77E mutation decreased the amount of MurG interacting with liposomes containing 100 mol% PC by 17% and abolished its preference for anionic phospholipids (Fig. 4D).
CL and PGL are both important for the function of E. coli MurG; however, CL is more effective at stimulating the GTase activity of MurG (31). Although the MurG-membrane interaction is unlikely to be affected in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells (due to the presence of PGL), the depletion of CL in the cell membrane should in principle decrease MurG activity and reduce the biosynthesis of lipid II available for cell elongation. To test this hypothesis, we treated R. sphaeroides cells with the MurG inhibitor murgocil (32). Regrettably, murgocil is specific to staphylococcal species and was inactive against R. sphaeroides due to amino acid differences between the two strains in the MurG-murgocil binding site (Fig. S7). Alternatively, we indirectly compared the amounts of lipid II produced by R. sphaeroides wt and Δcls cells by quantifying the incorporation of HADA into the cell wall (Fig. 4E). Removing CL decreased the production of lipid II in R. sphaeroides by 25% (Fig. 4F). Treating R. sphaeroides cells with FOS and DCS reduced HADA incorporation by 21% and 24%, respectively (Fig. S8A). Complementation of CL synthase in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells (which restores ∼50% of the concentration in wt cells and the rate of cell elongation by 20%; Fig. S1) restored lipid II production by 14% as measured in this assay (Fig. 4F), suggesting that CL is important for the enzymatic activity of MurG and cell elongation. Although murgocil is ineffective against Gram-negative bacteria, we performed a control experiment in which we treated Staphylococcus aureus cells with murgocil and found an 81% decrease in HADA incorporation (Fig. S8B), thereby correlating MurG activity to PG assembly.
Overexpression of MurG in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells restores the rod shape of cells.
To further explore the correlation between changes in MurG activity and cell length, we increased MurG activity in R. sphaeroides cells by overexpressing MurG (an N-terminal green fluorescent protein [GFP] fusion protein) from pIND. Leaky expression of GFP-MurG from the plasmid did not affect the subcellular localization of MurG and cell growth (as did 1 and 10 μM IPTG); consequently, we used leaky expression to increase the intracellular concentration of MurG. This approach increased R. sphaeroides cell length by 21% compared to control cells expressing cytoplasmic GFP. Expressing GFP-MurGR77E (which should have reduced binding to the membrane) in wt R. sphaeroides cells abolished polar localization of GFP and increased the cell length by 16% compared to cells expressing GFP (Fig. 5A to C). These results correlate MurG activity with the length of R. sphaeroides cells.
We created R. sphaeroides MurG mutant L76E (corresponding to residue L78 in the proposed hydrophobic patch of E. coli MurG) and expressed GFP-MurGL76E in R. sphaeroides cells by the leaky-expression approach. GFP-MurGL76E was localized to the division plane, failed to bind the R. sphaeroides cytoplasmic membrane, and increased the length of R. sphaeroides cells by only 5% compared to cells expressing GFP, demonstrating the importance of MurG-membrane interaction for cell elongation (Fig. 5D).
To compensate for the decreased MurG activity in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells, we also increased MurG expression in cells using a leaky promoter. MurG expression increased the length of R. sphaeroides Δcls cells by 13% compared to Δcls cells expressing GFP (Fig. 5E and F), suggesting that the morphological abnormality of the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant is a result of a decrease in MurG activity that reduces the supply of lipid II for cell elongation.
CL deficiency increases the sensitivity of R. sphaeroides to antibiotics targeting PG synthesis.
As CL alters the activity of MurG, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of lipid II, we hypothesized that the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant may have increased susceptibility to antibiotics that inhibit lipid II biosynthesis and its assembly. To test this hypothesis, we performed spot-titer assays and found that R. sphaeroides Δcls cells—compared to wt cells—had increased sensitivity to drugs interfering with lipid II biosynthesis, including FOS and DCS, and drugs interrupting PG assembly, including A22, MEC, and ampicillin (AMP; binds penicillin-binding proteins [PBPs] and inhibits their TPase activities) (Fig. 6). These results further support our hypothesis that a CL deficiency impedes the production of lipid II in R. sphaeroides.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated that CL contributes to bacterial cell shape by altering cell wall synthesis. Our data led us to hypothesize that CL may regulate the activity of enzymes synthesizing lipid II during cell elongation. Of the nine lipid II synthases shown in Fig. 1, MurG catalyzes the rate-limiting step of lipid II biosynthesis and preferentially interacts with CL (versus PE and PGL) in E. coli (31). We demonstrated that the change in R. sphaeroides Δcls cell shape arises from a decrease in MurG activity. A CL deficiency may also decrease the activities of other lipid II synthases in R. sphaeroides, such as the integral membrane protein MraY and the lipid II flippase MurJ. In addition to decreased cell length, R. sphaeroides cells that were Δcls or treated with inhibitors FOS or DCS also had an increased cell width (Fig. 2B, E, and F), which suggests that inhibiting lipid II production may alter the orientation of MreB filaments and their relationship to cell diameter (33).
CL has four acyl tails and a relatively small head group that creates a large intrinsic curvature of ∼1.3 nm−1 (34). In rod-shaped bacteria, CL has a preference for localizing in the inner leaflet of the cell membrane and concentrates at regions of high membrane curvature (e.g., cell poles), where it reduces the local elastic strain on this liquid crystalline material (28); this phenomenon is particularly relevant to liquid crystals in the field of materials science (35). PGL has a significantly smaller curvature (∼0.11 nm−1) than CL and also concentrates at the polar regions of cells through unknown mechanisms, which may entail electrostatic interactions with proteins (9). The heterogeneous distribution of anionic phospholipids in membranes has been hypothesized to function as a mechanism for localizing membrane-associated proteins into different regions within bacterial cells (7). We found that MurG interacts with anionic phospholipids—equally preferring CL and PGL—and is enriched at the poles of R. sphaeroides cells, where PG is relatively inert. Polar enrichment of MurG has been observed in E. coli cells and has been hypothesized to provide a mechanism for the storage of excess protein (36).
Although we were unable to test it directly, our data support a model in which binding to CL influences the structure of MurG and stimulates its GTase activity. Within membranes that are energy transducing and have parallels to those found in R. sphaeroides, CL binds tightly to respiratory complexes in the electron transport chain, stabilizes protein complexes, and promotes ATP synthesis (37, 38). In E. coli, CL binds tightly to the SecYEG protein complex, stabilizes its dimeric form, and regulates protein translocation (39, 40). In Vibrio cholerae, CL stabilizes the oligomerization state of EpsE and stimulates its Eps system, which exports cholera toxin across the outer membrane (41). Purified, recombinant MurG and other GTases have been reported to be dimers or oligomers (42) that may be stabilized and activated by CL.
Although MurG also binds PGL and its subcellular localization in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells is unchanged, PGL is unable to restore the observed reduction in MurG activity. A recent study demonstrated that E. coli RecA displays different tryptophan fluorescence emission spectra upon binding to CL- and PGL-containing liposomes and suggested that RecA adopts different conformations when interacting with different families or anionic phospholipids (43). To explore whether the structure of MurG may be altered upon membrane binding, we measured the tryptophan fluorescence of R. sphaeroides MurG (containing two tryptophan residues; see Fig. S7 in the supplemental material) and found difference in emission spectra in the presence of liposomes containing different anionic phospholipids (e.g., CL and PGL; Fig. S9). The structural mechanisms differentiating the effects of the two anionic phospholipids on MurG activity require further studies.
E. coli mutants lacking CL do not have an altered morphology because the MurG activity is increased in cells due to the upregulation of MurG expression (31). In contrast, the expression of MurG in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells remained unchanged compared to R. sphaeroides wt cells (Fig. S10). Overexpression of MurG in R. sphaeroides wt cells increases the length of cells, correlating MurG activity to the growth of cells at the sidewalls. We overexpressed MurG in R. sphaeroides Δcls cells to restore its activity and found that the cells partially recovered their rod-shaped morphology.
R. sphaeroides MurG mutant R77E interacts with the membrane, loses its preference for anionic phospholipids, and does not localize to cell poles. Expression of the MurGR77E mutation increased the length of cells, suggesting that the mutation did not abolish MurG enzyme activity. However, the cells expressing MurGR77E were shorter than the cells overexpressing wild-type MurG, which suggests that anionic phospholipids optimize the interaction of MurG with membranes and its activity. The molecular mechanisms underlying the preferential interaction between MurG and anionic phospholipids remain to be determined. Interestingly, the L76E MurG membrane-binding mutant was still able to localize at the division plane, suggesting that MurG interacts with the divisome using a motif that is different from the hydrophobic patch and does not interact with membranes during cell division. This observation may explain why a CL deficiency did not affect MurG activity at the septum and cause a defect in cell division in R. sphaeroides.
A growing body of evidence indicates that CL plays a fundamental role in a variety of bacterial processes, including ATP synthesis, DNA replication and repair, cell division, protein translocation, osmoadaptation, biofilm formation, and pathogenicity (7, 8, 29, 44–48). Our research provides the first example of the role of CL in determining bacterial cell shape. The PG layer of the cell wall is the canonical target for antibiotics; many of the antibiotics in this family have lost activities due to resistance. Although the R. sphaeroides Δcls mutant has no significant defect in growth, it is more sensitive to antibiotics that target PG than the R. sphaeroides wt strain. It has been shown that a Pseudomonas putida Δcls mutant is susceptible to several antibiotics, as its drug efflux system is impaired (49). These data suggest that in addition to the interesting biochemistry regulated by CL, its biosynthesis may be a potential target to explore for antibiotics or their adjuvants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
R. sphaeroides strains were grown aerobically in Sistrom’s succinate medium at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm. When required, kanamycin (25 μg/ml), spectinomycin (5 μg/ml), or tetracycline (0.025 μg/ml) was added to the medium. E. coli strains were grown in LB broth at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. When required, kanamycin (25 μg/ml) or tetracycline (10 μg/ml) was added to the medium. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Strain or plasmid | Genotype or description | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
E. coli strains | ||
DH5α | recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 deoR Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 λ (φ80d lacZΔM15) | Laboratory collection (CGSC#12384) |
S17-1 | recA pro hsdR RP4-2-Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7 | Laboratory collection |
BL21(DE3) | Host strain for recombinant protein expression | Laboratory collection |
R. sphaeroides strains | ||
2.4.1 | Wild type | ATCC 17023 |
Δcls | 2.4.1 containing a kanamycin resistance cassette in place of the genomic cls | 11 |
TyL1 | 2.4.1 murG::gfp-murG | This study |
TyL2 | Δcls murG::gfp-murG | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pIND5 | A derivative of pIND4 in which the NcoI site is replaced with an NdeI site; pIND4 is an IPTG-inducible expression vector for R. sphaeroides; kanamycin resistance |
8 |
pIND5TetR | A variant of pIND5 with a tetracycline resistance cassette in place of the kanamycin resistance cassette |
This study |
gfp-pIND5 | pIND5 containing gfp | This study |
gfp-murG-pIND5 | pIND5 containing gfp-murG | This study |
gfp-pIND5TetR | pIND5TetR containing gfp | This study |
gfp-murG-pIND5TetR | pIND5TetR containing gfp-murG | This study |
gfp-murGR77E-pIND5 | pIND5 containing gfp-murGR77E | This study |
gfp-murGL76E-pIND5 | pIND5 containing gfp-murGL76E | This study |
pK18mobsacB | Suicide plasmid for allele exchange; kanamycin resistance | Laboratory collection |
pK18mobsacBTetR | A variant of pK18mobsacB with a tetracycline resistance cassette in place of the kanamycin resistance cassette |
This study |
1k-gfp-murG-pK18 mobsacBTetR |
pK18mobsacBTetR containing murG and its 5′ upstream DNA sequence, with a gfp inserted between the two |
This study |
pET28b(+) | A vector for expression of proteins with an N-terminal His tag/thrombin/T7 tag in the E. coli pET system |
Novagen |
murG-pET28b(+) | pET28b(+) containing murG | This study |
murGR77E-pET28b(+) | pET28b(+) containing murGR77E | This study |
cls-pIND5sp | pIND5sp containing cls; pIND5sp is a variant of pIND5 with a spectinomycin resistance cassette in place of the kanamycin resistance cassette |
8 |
Analysis of cell morphology.
An aliquot of cell cultures in log phase (absorbance of 0.6, λ = 600 nm) was transferred to the surface of a 2% (wt/vol) agarose pad prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.76 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), covered with a glass coverslip, and imaged with an inverted Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope equipped with a Photometrics CoolSNAP HQ2 charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera and a 120-W mercury arc lamp (X-cite Series 120; EXFO). Images were acquired with a 100× objective (Nikon Plan Apo 100×/1.40 oil Ph3 DM) and the Nikon Instruments Software (NIS)-Elements Advanced Research (AR) microscope imaging software program (version 4.000.07). Cell width and length were determined using ImageJ. To track the cell growth at single-cell level, cells were transferred to the surface of a 2% (wt/vol) agarose pad prepared in Sistrom’s succinate medium and imaged every 5 min for 6 h at 30°C.
Plasmid constructions.
The primers used in this study are listed in Table 3. Cloning of PCR fragments into vectors were performed by In-Fusion cloning (Clontech) in accordance with the user manual unless otherwise noted. The pIND and pK18mobsacB constructs were transformed into E. coli S17-1 and subsequently mobilized via conjugation into the recipient R. sphaeroides wt or Δcls strain as described previously (8).
TABLE 3.
Primer name | Primer sequence |
---|---|
RF-TetR-F | TGCTTACATAAACAGTAATACAAGGGGTGTTATGAAACCCAACATACCCCTG |
RF-TetR-R | GCCAGTGTTACAACCAATTAACCAATTCTGATCAGCGATCGGCTCGTTG |
NdeI-gfp_p5 | GGAGAAATTAACATATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG |
BglII-gfp_p5 | GATGGTGATGAGATCTCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCAT |
NdeI-murG_p5 | GGAGAAATTAACATATGGGCCGGCCGCTCCTCCTG |
BglII-murG_p5 | GATGGTGATGAGATCTTGTCTCTTTCCTTGCCAG |
murG-NdeI-gfp | AGCGGCCGGCCCATATGCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCAT |
murG_R77E_S | CGCCGCCCGCGATCTCGAGGGGGACCAGC |
murG_R77E_AS | GCTGGTCCCCCTCGAGATCGCGGGCGGCG |
murG_L76E_S | GCCCGCGATGCGCTCGGGGACCAGCGC |
murG_L76E_AS | GCGCTGGTCCCCGAGCGCATCGCGGGC |
BamHI-murG1k | CGGTACCCGGGGATCCTCGACAAATGGTCGCTGA |
HindIII-murG1k | GGCCAGTGCCAAGCTTTCATGTCTCTTTCCTTGC |
murG1k+NdeI_S | GGGGCGGTGACCATATGGGCCGGCC |
murG1k+NdeI_AS | GGCCGGCCCATATGGTCACCGCCCC |
murG1k-NdeI-gfp | GGGGCGGTGACCATATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG |
NdeI-murG_p28 | CGCGCGGCAGCCATATGGGCCGGCCGCTCCTCCTG |
XhoI-murG_p28 | GGTGGTGGTGCTCGAGTCATGTCTCTTTCCTTGC |
WSG | AGATGGTCTATGGCTCCA |
(i) gfp-pIND5. gfp was amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-gfp_p5 and BglII-gfp_p5 and cloned into pIND5 at the NdeI and BglII sites.
(ii) gfp-murG-pIND5. murG was amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-murG_p5 and BglII-murG_p5 from R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 genomic DNA and cloned into pIND5 at the NdeI and BglII sites to generate murG-pIND5. gfp was then amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-gfp_p5 and murG-NdeI-gfp and cloned into murG-pIND5 at the NdeI site.
(iii) pIND5TetR. The tetracycline resistance gene was amplified by PCR using primers RF-TetR-F and RF-TetR-R. The PCR products were used as megaprimers to replace the kanamycin resistance gene in pIND5 using the restriction-free method.
(iv) gfp-pIND5TetR. gfp was amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-gfp_p5 and BglII-gfp_p5 and cloned into pIND5TetR at the NdeI and BglII sites.
(v) gfp-murG-pIND5TetR. murG was amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-murG_p5 and BglII-murG_p5 from R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 genomic DNA and cloned into pIND5TetR at the NdeI and BglII sites to generate murG-pIND5TetR. gfp was then amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-gfp_p5 and murG-NdeI-gfp and cloned into murG-pIND5TetR at the NdeI site.
(vi) gfp-murGR77E-pIND5. murGR77E was created by using a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The template used was gfp-murG-pIND5, and the primers used were murG_R77E_S and murG_R77E_AS.
(vii) gfp-murGL76E-pIND5. murGL76E was created by using a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The template used was gfp-murG-pIND5, and the primers used were murG_L76E_S and murG_L76E_AS.
(viii) 1k-gfp-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR. murG and its 5′ upstream DNA sequence (∼1 kb) were amplified by PCR using primers BamHI-murG1k and HindIII-murG1k from R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 genomic DNA and cloned into pK18mobsacBTetR at the BamHI and HindIII sites to generate 1k-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR. An NdeI site was inserted into 1k-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR between murG and its 5′ upstream DNA sequence by the use of a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit and primers murG1k+NdeI_S and murG1k+NdeI_AS to create 1k-NdeI-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR. gfp was then amplified by PCR using primers murG1k-NdeI-gfp and murG-NdeI-gfp and cloned into 1k-NdeI-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR at the NdeI site.
(ix) murG-pET28b(+). murG was amplified by PCR using primers NdeI-murG_p28 and XhoI-murG_p28 and cloned into pET28b(+) at the NdeI and XhoI sites. The MurG expressed from the pET28b(+) vector contained an N-terminal His tag followed by a thrombin cleavage sequence.
(x) murGR77E-pET28b(+). murGR77E was created by using a Stratagene QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The template used was murG-pET28b(+), and the primers used were murG_L77E_S and murG_L77E_AS.
qPCR.
Cells were grown to log phase (absorbance of 0.6, λ = 600 nm), and RNA was isolated as previously described (8). The RNA samples were then treated with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and further purified with an RNeasy CleanUp kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA synthesis was performed with a High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Five nanograms of cDNA was used for each qPCR reaction. The Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with SYBR green chemistry was used to monitor amplification and to quantify the amounts of PCR products. Relative quantitation of gene expression was calculated by the threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method; the level of rpoZ gene (encodes the Ω subunit of RNA polymerase) expression was used as an internal control. The qPCR primers used in this study are listed in Table 4.
TABLE 4.
Gene | Primer type |
Primer sequence |
---|---|---|
rpoZ | Forward | TGACAAGAACCCTGTCGTG |
Reverse | GCAGCTTCTCTTCGGACAT | |
mreB | Forward | CTTCTTGCCGTCCTTCACA |
Reverse | CGCGAACACGCTGATCTA | |
mreC | Forward | CTTCCTTCCAGGCCTTCATC |
Reverse | TCGAGAACTTCCAGTCCTACA | |
mreD | Forward | CACATGCGTCTCCCGAAG |
Reverse | CCATCCTCTGCTATCCTCTGAT | |
pbp2 | Forward | GATGACGACGCGGTAATTCT |
Reverse | ATCAACATCCGGCTGATCC | |
rodA | Forward | GTTCACCGCGAGATAGAAGAAG |
Reverse | CTCGCTTCTGGTGCTCTATG | |
pbp1A | Forward | CGTCATGAAGCTCTGGAACA |
Reverse | CGTCTGGTTCATCGGCTATAC | |
murA | Forward | CTTCCGCACGATGTCGTAAT |
Reverse | CACGATGACGCAGCTTCT | |
murB | Forward | GCATTCCAACTTCCTCATCAAC |
Reverse | CCGCATGATTTCCCACTCTA | |
murC | Forward | GCAAGACCACGACCACTAC |
Reverse | GAGCCATAGGCATGGATCAC | |
murD | Forward | CAATGACATCGGCCTCTTCT |
Reverse | CGACAGGATGTGATGGATGAG | |
murE | Forward | CGCATCGTCGTCGTCTTC |
Reverse | GATTGTCGTCGGTGACATAGAG | |
murF | Forward | AAGACCTCGACCAAGGAGA |
Reverse | CCCAGTGGTTGTTGTAGGAG | |
ddlA | Forward | CTCTTCGGTAGGCGTCTATATC |
Reverse | GACATAGGTCTCGACCATCAG | |
mraY | Forward | GCTCGACAATCCTTACGTCTG |
Reverse | CCCTTGGTGTTCTGCTTCTT | |
murG | Forward | ACCTTCTTCACCGACATTCC |
Reverse | CGGCCGATGATCGAGATG | |
murJ | Forward | CTCATGACCTTCCAGCTTCTT |
Reverse | ATGTTCCGCCGCTTCTT |
HADA labeling and quantification.
Cells were grown to early log phase (absorbance of 0.3, λ = 600 nm) and labeled with 0.5 mM HADA for ∼1/8 of the doubling time (20 min) at room temperature, followed by three washes with PBS to remove excess dye. We imaged the labeled cells by microscopy using a DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) filter. The fluorescence of HADA incorporated into PG was measured with an excitation wavelength of 405 nm and an emission wavelength of 450 nm using a Tecan infinite M200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan, San Jose, CA).
PG isolation and UPLC-MS analysis.
Cells were grown in plain medium or medium containing the indicated small-molecule inhibitors (A22 [10 μg/ml], MEC [0.5 μg/ml], FOS [250 μg/ml], and DCS [0.05 μg/ml]) to early log phase (absorbance of 0.3, λ = 600 nm) and pelleted by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then resuspended in 1 ml 0.25% SDS–0.1 M Tris/HCl (pH 6.8) and boiled for 40 min. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, and the pellet was washed with double-distilled water (ddH2O) to remove SDS. The pellet was then resuspended in 1 ml ddH2O and put in a water bath sonicator for 30 min at room temperature. Nuclease solution (15 μg/ml DNase, 60 μg/ml RNase, 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 6.8) (500 μl) was added into the sample, which was then incubated for 60 min at 37°C in a shaker. The sample was augmented with 500 μl trypsin solution (50 μg/ml trypsin–ddH2O), incubated for another 60 min at 37°C in a shaker, and then boiled for 15 min to inactivate the enzymes. The suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, and the pellet was washed with ddH2O. The pellet was resuspended in digestion buffer (12.5 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, pH 5.5) to reach an level of absorbance of 3.0 (λ = 600 nm), and a 1/10 volume of mutanolysin solution (5.000 U/ml mutanolysin–ddH2O) was added. The sample (∼175 μl) was incubated for 16 h at 37°C in a shaker and then boiled for 15 min to inactivate the enzyme. The suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, and the PG was in the supernatant. A 50-μl volume of reduction solution (20 mg/ml sodium borohydrate–0.5 M borax–ddH2O, pH 9.0) was added into the PG solution, which was then incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The sample was adjusted to pH 2.0 to 3.0 with phosphoric acid solution (50%) and analyzed by UPLC-MS.
For UPLC-MS, we injected 7.5 μl of purified muropeptides into a Cortecs C18 column (Waters) (2.1 by 100 mm) packed with 1.6-μm-diameter particles and equipped with a Cortecs C18 guard column (Waters). The column temperature was maintained at 52°C using an Acquity standard flow UPLC system equipped with an inline photodiode array (Waters). For muropeptide separation by UPLC, we used solvent A (Optima LC-MS-grade water–0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) and solvent B (30% [vol/vol] Optima LC-MS-grade methanol–Optima LC-MS-grade water–0.05% trifluoroacetic acid) (Fisher Scientific). Muropeptides were eluted from the column with a gradient of increasing solvent B (1 min hold at 1% B to 99% B at 60 min to hold at 99% B 5 min to 1% B at 65.5 min to 4.5 min hold at 1% B) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. We analyzed the eluent from the column using a Bruker MaXis Ultra-High Resolution time-of-flight 4G mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik) with an MS method. The capillary voltage was set to 4,100 V, the nebulizer pressure was 2.0 bar, and the drying gas was set to 6.0 liters/m at 220°C. Muropeptides were detected at λ = 205 nm and via MS.
Creation of TyL1 and TyL2.
1k-gfp-murG-pK18mobsacBTetR was introduced into R. sphaeroides wt or Δcls cells by conjugation. The integration of plasmid into the R. sphaeroides genome through homologous recombination was selected by plating cells on plates containing Sistrom’s minimal medium with 1.5% agar and tetracycline. A single colony was picked into plain Sistrom’s minimal medium and grown for 2 days. The excision of the plasmid from the genome through a second homologous recombination step was selected by plating cells on plates containing Sistrom’s minimal medium with 1.5% agar and 10% sucrose. The insertion of gfp between murG and its upstream sequences was confirmed by PCR using primers WSG and HindIII-murG1k.
Cell fractionation.
Cells were grown to early log phase (absorbance of 0.3, λ = 600 nm), pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and then resuspended in Buffer T (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0). Cells were passed through a Constant Systems cell disruptor (Constant Systems Ltd.) at 10,000 lb/in2, and the resulting cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The clear lysate was quantified, and equal amounts of wt and Δcls lysates were brought to the same volume using Buffer T, followed by centrifugation at 45,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, and were then divided into fractions of supernatant and pellet (dissolved in Buffer T). The same amounts of proteins in the fractions of supernatant (enriched in cytosolic proteins) and pellet (enriched in membrane proteins) were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-GFP antibodies.
NAO staining.
Cells were grown to early log phase (absorbance of 0.3, λ = 600 nm), and NAO was added at a final concentration of 10 μM into the cultures, which were grown for another 4 h. The cells were then imaged under a fluorescence microscope using 480-nm-excitation and 685-nm-emission filters.
MurG purification.
E. coli BL21(DE3) cells transformed with pET28b containing R. sphaeroides murG were grown to an absorbance of 0.6 (λ = 600 nm) and induced with 1 mM IPTG for 3 h at 37°C. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and then resuspended in Buffer T containing 5 mM imidazole and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cells were passed through a Constant Systems cell disruptor (Constant Systems Ltd.) at 20,000 lb/in2, and the resulting cell lysate was mixed with Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 3% for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. The supernatant and insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at 25,000 × g for 40 min at 4°C. The supernatant was added to a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) agarose (Qiagen) column equilibrated with Buffer T. The column was washed stepwise with Buffer T, 25 imidazole–Buffer T, and then 50 mM imidazole–Buffer T, and the MurG protein was eluted with 100 mM imidazole–Buffer T. The protein was concentrated into Buffer T (without imidazole) using a 10-kDa-cutoff spin column (Millipore). To remove the His tag from the recombinant protein, the protein concentrate was subjected to thrombin (Millipore) cleavage with a dilution factor for thrombin of 1:200 for 16 h at 22°C. The reaction mixture was mixed with 25 μl of streptavidin agarose beads at 22°C for 30 min with rotation, followed by centrifugation in a spin filter (Millipore). The filtrate, free of biotinylated thrombin, was concentrated into Buffer T using a 10-kDa-cutoff spin column. To remove undigested protein, 25 μl of Ni-NTA agarose was added to the resulting protein concentrate and the sample was incubated at 22°C for 30 min with rotation. The Ni-NTA agarose was removed using a spin filter. The concentration of MurG with a molar extinction coefficient of 21,430 cm−1 M−1 was determined by measuring the absorbance at λ = 280 nm.
Liposome preparation.
The following phospholipids used in this study were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids: 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-d-phosphocoline (PC), 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-d-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (PG), and 1,1′,2,2′-tetra-(9Z-octadecenoyl) cardiolipin (CL). To prepare liposomes of uniform size, lipid mixtures were dissolved in chloroform, dried in a glass vial, and rehydrated in Buffer T. The resulting liposome solutions were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed in a 37°C water bath 5 times, followed by extrusion (Avanti Polar Lipid Mini Extruder) 15 times through a membrane filter (Whatman) with a pore size of 1 μm.
Liposome-pelleting assay.
To block nonspecific binding, phospholipids at 5 mM were preincubated with 0.6 μM of bovine serum albumin (BSA)–Buffer T for 10 min. MurG in Buffer T was then added into the solution, resulting in a final MurG concentration of 6 μM, a phospholipid concentration of 4 mM, and a BSA concentration of 0.5 μM. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min, centrifuged at 16,300 × g for 30 min, and then divided into fractions of supernatant and pellet (dissolved in Buffer T). All the procedures were performed at room temperature. Proteins in the supernatant and pellet fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie blue staining.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Ferguson-Miller laboratory (Michigan State University) for R. sphaeroides strain Δcls, the Donohue laboratory (University of Wisconsin—Madison) for plasmid pIND, the Roemer laboratory (Merck) for murgocil, the NBRP (NIG, Japan): E. coli for MreB antibody, and Cameron Scarlett (University of Wisconsin—Madison) for UPLC-MS support. We are grateful to Kaitlin Schaefer (Harvard University), Suzanne Walker (Harvard Medical School), and Dan Kahne (Harvard University) for input and exploratory MurG experiments.
This research was supported by a William R. & Dorothy E. Sullivan Wisconsin Distinguished Graduate Fellowship (T.-Y.L.), a Dr. James Chieh-Hsia Mao Wisconsin Distinguished Graduate Fellowship (T.-Y.L.), and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation/Keck Foundation (grant 5263.04 to D.B.W.).
Footnotes
Citation Lin T-Y, Gross WS, Auer GK, Weibel DB. 2019. Cardiolipin alters Rhodobacter sphaeroides cell shape by affecting peptidoglycan precursor biosynthesis. mBio 10:e02401-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02401-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Yang DC, Blair KM, Salama NR. 2016. Staying in shape: the impact of cell shape on bacterial survival in diverse environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:187–203. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Young KD. 2006. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:660–703. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cabeen MT, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2005. Bacterial cell shape. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:601–610. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Typas A, Banzhaf M, Gross CA, Vollmer W. 2011. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:123–136. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Teeseling MCF, de Pedro MA, Cava F. 2017. Determinants of bacterial morphology: from fundamentals to possibilities for antimicrobial targeting. Front Microbiol 8:1264. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Teo AC, Roper DI. 2015. Core steps of membrane-bound peptidoglycan biosynthesis: recent advances, insight and opportunities. Antibiotics (Basel) 4:495–520. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics4040495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lin TY, Weibel DB. 2016. Organization and function of anionic phospholipids in bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:4255–4267. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7468-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lin TY, Santos TM, Kontur WS, Donohue TJ, Weibel DB. 2015. A cardiolipin-deficient mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides has an altered cell shape and is impaired in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 197:3446–3455. doi: 10.1128/JB.00420-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oliver PM, Crooks JA, Leidl M, Yoon EJ, Saghatelian A, Weibel DB. 2014. Localization of anionic phospholipids in Escherichia coli cells. J Bacteriol 196:3386–3398. doi: 10.1128/JB.01877-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawai F, Shoda M, Harashima R, Sadaie Y, Hara H, Matsumoto K. 2004. Cardiolipin domains in Bacillus subtilis Marburg membranes. J Bacteriol 186:1475–1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang X, Tamot B, Hiser C, Reid GE, Benning C, Ferguson-Miller S. 2011. Cardiolipin deficiency in Rhodobacter sphaeroides alters the lipid profile of membranes and of crystallized cytochrome oxidase, but structure and function are maintained. Biochemistry 50:3879–3890. doi: 10.1021/bi101702c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ind AC, Porter SL, Brown MT, Byles ED, de Beyer JA, Godfrey SA, Armitage JP. 2009. Inducible-expression plasmid for Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6613–6615. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01587-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van den Ent F, Amos LA, Löwe J. 2001. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 413:39–44. doi: 10.1038/35092500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Garner EC, Bernard R, Wang W, Zhuang X, Rudner DZ, Mitchison T. 2011. Coupled, circumferential motions of the cell wall synthesis machinery and MreB filaments in B. subtilis. Science 333:222–225. doi: 10.1126/science.1203285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dominguez-Escobar J, Chastanet A, Crevenna AH, Fromion V, Wedlich SR, Carballido LR. 2011. Processive movement of MreB-associated cell wall biosynthetic complexes in bacteria. Science 333:225–228. doi: 10.1126/science.1203466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Errington J. 2015. Bacterial morphogenesis and the enigmatic MreB helix. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:241–248. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Slovak PM, Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2005. Localization of MreB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides under conditions causing changes in cell shape and membrane structure. J Bacteriol 187:54–64. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.1.54-64.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meeske AJ, Riley EP, Robins WP, Uehara T, Mekalanos JJ, Kahne D, Walker S, Kruse AC, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2016. SEDS proteins are a widespread family of bacterial cell wall polymerases. Nature 537:634–638. doi: 10.1038/nature19331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cho H, Wivagg CN, Kapoor M, Barry Z, Rohs PD, Suh H, Marto JA, Garner EC, Bernhardt TG. 2016. Bacterial cell wall biogenesis is mediated by SEDS and PBP polymerase families functioning semi-autonomously. Nat Microbiol 19:16172. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kuru E, Hughes HV, Brown PJ, Hall E, Tekkam S, Cava F, de Pedro MA, Brun YV, VanNieuwenhze MS. 2012. In situ probing of newly synthesized peptidoglycan in live bacteria with fluorescent d-amino acids. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:12519–12523. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liechti GW, Kuru E, Hall E, Kalinda A, Brun YV, VanNieuwenhze M, Maurelli AT. 2014. A new metabolic cell-wall labelling method reveals peptidoglycan in Chlamydia trachomatis. Nature 506:507–510. doi: 10.1038/nature12892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.den Blaauwen T, de Pedro MA, Nguyen-Distèche M, Ayala JA. 2008. Morphogenesis of rod-shaped sacculi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:321–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kuhner D, Stahl M, Demircioglu DD, Bertsche U. 2014. From cells to muropeptide structures in 24 h: peptidoglycan mapping by UPLC-MS. Sci Rep 4:7494. doi: 10.1038/srep07494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Glauner B. 1988. Separation and quantification of muropeptides with high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 172:451–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Varma A, de Pedro MA, Young KD. 2007. FtsZ directs a second mode of peptidoglycan synthesis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189:5692–5704. doi: 10.1128/JB.00455-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mengin-Lecreulx D, Texier L, Rousseau M, van Heijenoort J. 1991. The murG gene of Escherichia coli codes for the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine: N-acetylmuramyl-(pentapeptide) pyrophosphoryl-undecaprenol N-acetylglucosamine transferase involved in the membrane steps of peptidoglycan synthesis. J Bacteriol 173:4625–4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bupp K, van Heijenoort J. 1993. The final step of peptidoglycan subunit assembly in Escherichia coli occurs in the cytoplasm. J Bacteriol 175:1841–1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang KC, Mukhopadhyay R, Wingreen NS. 2006. A curvature-mediated mechanism for localization of lipids to bacterial poles. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rajendram M, Zhang L, Reynolds BJ, Auer GK, Tuson HH, Ngo KV, Cox MM, Yethiraj A, Cui Q, Weibel DB. 2015. Anionic phospholipids stabilize RecA filament bundles in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell 60:374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ha S, Walker D, Shi Y, Walker S. 2000. The 1.9 A crystal structure of Escherichia coli MurG, a membrane-associated glycosyltransferase involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Protein Sci 9:1045–1052. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.6.1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van den Brink-van der Laan E, Boots JW, Spelbrink RE, Kool GM, Breukink E, Killian JA, de Kruijff B. 2003. Membrane interaction of the glycosyltransferase MurG: a special role for cardiolipin. J Bacteriol 185:3773–3779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mann PA, Muller A, Xiao L, Pereira PM, Yang C, Ho Lee S, Wang H, Trzeciak J, Schneeweis J, Dos Santos MM, Murgolo N, She X, Gill C, Balibar CJ, Labroli M, Su J, Flattery A, Sherborne B, Maier R, Tan CM, Black T, Onder K, Kargman S, Monsma FJ Jr, Pinho MG, Schneider T, Roemer T. 2013. Murgocil is a highly bioactive staphylococcal-specific inhibitor of the peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase enzyme MurG. ACS Chem Biol 8:2442–2451. doi: 10.1021/cb400487f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ouzounov N, Nguyen JP, Bratton BP, Jacobowitz D, Gitai Z, Shaevitz JW. 2016. MreB orientation correlates with cell diameter in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 111:1035–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Powell GL, Hui SW. 1996. Tetraoleoylpyrophosphatidic acid: a four acyl-chain lipid which forms a hexagonal II phase with high curvature. Biophys J 70:1402–1406. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79698-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rahimi M, Ramezani-Dakhel H, Zhang R, Ramirez-Hernandez A, Abbott NL, de Pablo JJ. 2017. Segregation of liquid crystal mixtures in topological defects. Nat Commun 8:15064. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Michaelis AM, Gitai Z. 2010. Dynamic polar sequestration of excess MurG may regulate enzymatic function. J Bacteriol 192:4597–4605. doi: 10.1128/JB.00676-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Haines TH, Dencher NA. 2002. Cardiolipin: a proton trap for oxidative phosphorylation. FEBS Lett 528:35–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Musatov A, Sedlak E. 2017. Role of cardiolipin in stability of integral membrane proteins. Biochimie 142:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gold VA, Robson A, Bao H, Romantsov T, Duong F, Collinson I. 2010. The action of cardiolipin on the bacterial translocon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:10044–10049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914680107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tsirigotaki A, De Geyter J, Sostaric N, Economou A, Karamanou S. 2017. Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:21–36. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Camberg JL, Johnson TL, Patrick M, Abendroth J, Hol WG, Sandkvist M. 2007. Synergistic stimulation of EpsE ATP hydrolysis by EpsL and acidic phospholipids. EMBO J 26:19–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ha S, Chang E, Lo M-C, Men H, Park H, Ge M, Walker S. 1999. The kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli MurG using synthetic substrate analogues. J Am Chem Soc 121:8415–8426. doi: 10.1021/ja991556t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang L, Rajendram M, Weibel DB, Yethiraj A, Cui Q. 2016. Ionic hydrogen bonds and lipid packing defects determine the binding orientation and insertion depth of RecA on multicomponent lipid bilayers. J Phys Chem B 120:8424–8437. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wood JM. 2018. Perspective: challenges and opportunities for the study of cardiolipin, a key player in bacterial cell structure and function. Curr Genet 64:795–798. doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0811-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Romantsov T, Gonzalez K, Sahtout N, Culham DE, Coumoundouros C, Garner J, Kerr CH, Chang L, Turner RJ, Wood JM. 2018. Cardiolipin synthase A colocalizes with cardiolipin and osmosensing transporter ProP at the poles of Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol 107:623–638. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rowlett VW, Mallampalli V, Karlstaedt A, Dowhan W, Taegtmeyer H, Margolin W, Vitrac H. 1 July 2017. Impact of membrane phospholipid alterations in Escherichia coli on cellular function and bacterial stress adaptation. J Bacteriol doi: 10.1128/JB.00849-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rossi RM, Yum L, Agaisse H, Payne SM. 2017. Cardiolipin synthesis and outer membrane localization are required for Shigella flexneri virulence. mBio 8:e01199-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01199-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dalebroux ZD, Edrozo MB, Pfuetzner RA, Ressl S, Kulasekara BR, Blanc MP, Miller SI. 2015. Delivery of cardiolipins to the Salmonella outer membrane is necessary for survival within host tissues and virulence. Cell Host Microbe 17:441–451. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bernal P, Munoz-Rojas J, Hurtado A, Ramos JL, Segura A. 2007. A Pseudomonas putida cardiolipin synthesis mutant exhibits increased sensitivity to drugs related to transport functionality. Environ Microbiol 9:1135–1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.