Abstract
Vascular calcification is highly prevalent in end-stage renal diseases and is predictive of cardiovascular events and mortality. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibition or deletion is vasoprotective in several disease models. Here we show that PARP activity is increased in radial artery samples from patients with chronic renal failure, in arteries from uraemic rats, and in calcified vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in vitro. PARP1 deficiency blocks, whereas PARP1 overexpression exacerbates, the transdifferentiation of VSMCs from a contractile to an osteogenic phenotype, the expression of mineralization-regulating proteins, and calcium deposition. PARP1 promotes Runx2 expression, and Runx2 deficiency offsets the pro-calcifying effects of PARP1. Activated PARP1 suppresses miRNA-204 expression via the IL-6/STAT3 pathway and thus relieves the repression of its target, Runx2, resulting in increased Runx2 protein. Together, these results suggest that PARP1 counteracts vascular calcification and that therapeutic agents that influence PARP1 activity may be of benefit to treat vascular calcification.
Vascular calcification is a hallmark of end stage renal disease. Here, Cheng et al. show that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activity is increased in calcified arteries in patients and uremic rats, and that PARP1 promotes vascular calcification by suppressing miR-204 expression via IL-6/STAT3 signaling, thus relieving repression of the osteogenic regulator Runx2.
Introduction
Vascular calcification is highly prevalent in chronic renal failure (CRF) and is associated with further cardiovascular morbidity and mortality1–3. Calcification rapidly progresses in patients on dialysis. Ectopic calcium deposition in the vasculature contributes to vessel wall stiffening and loss of elastic recoil, thus resulting in unstable hemodynamic consequences and finally leading to a decline in end-organ perfusion and subsequent ischaemic events and heart failure1,4.
However, no ideal approaches exist to prevent or reverse vascular calcification, partly because the mechanisms are heterogeneous and complex. Previously, vascular calcification was thought to be a passive process involving the excess precipitation of calcium-phosphate minerals in vascular tissue. A more recently recognized characteristic of the disease is that arterial calcification is an active, complicated and regulated process5,6. Ectopic vascular calcification follows a process similar to physiologic bone formation. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are of mesenchymal origin and, under stress, can differentiate into different mesenchymal-derived cell types, such as osteoblasts and chondrocytes, leading to calcification, altered matrix production, and lipid accumulation. At sites of calcification, VSMCs undergo an osteochondrocytic phenotypic change and upregulate the expression of mineralization-regulating proteins, thus contributing to vascular calcification7,8.
Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) 1 is a dominant member of the PARP family in eukaryotes, accounting for approximately 90% of cellular PARP activity. Upon activation, PARP1 attaches ADP-ribose polymer chains to target proteins using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) as a substrate and facilitates the process of DNA repair9. However, increasing evidence demonstrates that PARP1 can go beyond DNA repair and is involved in a wide range of cellular and biological processes10, including chromatin compaction, stress signaling, cell death, inflammation, and differentiation9,11–13. Furthermore, defects in PARP1 function have been linked to diseases, such as chronic inflammation, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer14–16. However, the role and mechanism of PARP1 in vascular calcification are poorly understood.
Oxidative stress has emerged as a constant feature of CRF17,18. Accumulating data indicate that oxidative stress is associated with dysfunction of various organs, including arterial medial calcification in chronic kidney disease (CKD). PARP1 functions as an oxidative stress sensor that propagates stress signals to execute downstream molecular actions9, thus leading to multiple physiological and pathological processes. Although Edit Nagy et al. recently found an increased transcript level of PARP1 in the interstitial cells of human calcified tricuspid aortic valves19,20, the valvular calcification is quite different from vascular calcification, including architecture and the resident cell populations. Therefore, the detailed contributions of PARP1 to vascular calcification and VSMC osteogenesis in CRF still remain unknown.
Runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx2), a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation and bone development, plays an important role in vascular calcification and can induce transdifferentiation of VSMCs to an osteochondrocytic phenotype21–23. In normal vascular cells, Runx2 expression is nearly undetected but is dramatically elevated in calcified vascular tissue specimens from atherosclerotic plaques or uraemic arteries24. The expression and activity of Runx2 are regulated by several signaling pathways, such as TGFβ/BMP2 and Wnt25,26. Moreover, aberrant post-translational modifications of Runx2, such as microRNA (miRNA)-dependent control27, acetylation or methylation, also play critical roles during vascular calcification.
In this study, our results show that manipulation of PARP1 expression can dramatically interfere with VSMC osteogenic transition and vascular calcification both in vivo and in vitro. We screen Runx2 as the downstream target, and discover that activated PARP1 promotes Runx2 expression at the post-transcriptional level via the IL-6/STAT3/miR-204 pathway, suggesting a key role for PARP1 in vascular calcification and new approaches for potential therapy.
Results
PARP activity is increased during vascular calcification
Oxidative stress is enhanced in uraemia17,28,29 (Supplementary Fig. 1) and PARP1 can be activated by multiple cellular stresses, especially ROS, so it is rational to speculate that PARP1 can be evoked during vascular calcification as a result of CRF. To confirm this hypothesis, PARP activity was tested in radial artery specimens from uraemic patients who underwent an arterial venous fistula operation30. Compared to normal controls, increased total poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation levels and PARP1 expression were observed in CRF specimens (Fig. 1a), and vascular PARP activity was also significantly increased (Fig. 1b), indicating that PARP was activated in the CRF arterial specimens. Next, we quantified PARP activity and the extent of arterial calcification. As shown in Fig. 1c, a positive correlation was observed between PARP activity and the extent of calcium content (R2 = 0.4463, P < 0.05, Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis), suggesting that PARP activation is associated with the severity of arterial calcification. A rat CRF model was generated by feeding Wistar rats a 0.75% adenine diet for 6 weeks to mimic arterial medial calcification, and a significant increase was consistently observed in the plasma levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) (Supplementary Table 1). Along with increased aortic calcification and calcium deposition, as evidenced by the morphology (Supplementary Fig. 2a), von Kossa staining and calcium quantification (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 2b, 12a), respectively, immunofluorescence staining showed a clear upregulation of aortic poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation levels in CRF rats compared to chow-fed controls (Fig. 1d). To confirm this finding, mineralization of rat aortic rings was successfully induced in osteogenic media containing 10 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate (βGP) for different periods31 (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). High Pi conditions increased the calcium content and corresponding PARP activity in aortic rings in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1e). These observations were verified by rat VSMC calcification in vitro, which showed similar trends as the calcium content, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and corresponding PARP activity (Fig. 1f–h). Taken together, these data suggest the relevance of activated PARP in vascular calcification.
PARP1 deficiency attenuates vascular calcification
Because PARP1 is activated in calcified arteries, we hypothesized that inhibition of PARP1 activity might have beneficial effects on the onset and development of vascular calcification. Abdominal aortas were inoculated with adenovirus carrying PARP1 (PARP1 shRNA) or scrambled shRNA (Scr shRNA) after 3 weeks of the adenine diet. Six weeks after induction of the diet, specific knockdown of PARP1 in aortas was verified at the protein level (Fig. 2a), along with the serum biochemical parameters (Supplementary Table 2). Strikingly, PARP1 knockdown markedly decreased calcified nodule formation and calcium deposition compared to the scrambled group (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 12b), suggesting that deficiency of PARP1 alleviates CRF-induced vascular calcification. In support of this supposition, we found that treatment of CRF rats with the PARP inhibitor 3AB also attenuated aortic calcium deposition, as demonstrated by von Kossa staining and a calcium content assay (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 12c). Because vascular calcification is mainly mediated by VSMCs, we further examined the effects of PARP1 on atrial calcification in cultured primary VSMCs induced by βGP. Knockdown of PARP1 or treatment with the PARP inhibitor 3AB significantly reduced the intensity of Alizarin red S staining, calcium deposition and the corresponding ALP activity (Fig. 2d–f and Supplementary Fig. 3c–e).
PARP1 overexpression aggravates vascular calcification
We next examined whether overexpression of PARP1 could promote VSMC calcification. We delivered Ad-PARP1 or Ad-Null to CRF rat aortas, and PARP1 overexpression was verified as indicated in Fig. 2g, along with the serum biochemical parameters (Supplementary Table 3). Ad-Null infection did not alter the calcification of the abdominal aorta. In contrast, Ad-PARP1 greatly aggravated aortic calcification, as evidenced by von Kossa staining and calcium quantification (Fig. 2h, i and Supplementary Fig. 12d). We then evaluated the effects of PARP1 overexpression on cultured VSMCs in vitro. When exposed to high βGP, Ad-PARP1 clearly exacerbated the calcium deposition in VSMCs compared to Ad-Null (Fig. 2j–l). Thus, these results suggest that PARP1 promotes vascular calcification.
PARP1 promotes the osteogenic transition of VSMCs
VSMC calcification is concomitant with osteochondrocytic phenotypic changes, which are characterized by the induction of osteochondrogenic transdifferentiation markers and suppression of smooth muscle cell lineage markers (Supplementary Fig. 4), and require the uptake of phosphate by sodium-dependent phosphate co-transporters (PIT1 and PIT2). We found that PARP1 deficiency had no effects on the expression of PIT1 or PIT2 (Fig. 3a, b), but surprisingly interfered with the osteogenic transition of VSMCs. Expression of the osteogenic markers osteocalcin (OC), collagen IA1 (ColIA1), and osteopontin (OPN) was markedly depressed in calcified VSMCs with PARP1 knockdown (Fig. 3c) or treated with PARP1 inhibitors (Fig. 3d), while the levels of the contractile markers of SMA, SM22 and SMMHC were concomitantly reversed. In contrast, forced expression of PARP1 resulted in increased osteogenic gene expression but suppressed contractile gene expression (Fig. 3e). Moreover, in human aortic SMCs (HASMCs), either PARP inhibitor or PARP1 deficiency could attenuate the βGP-induced osteogenic transition together with the decreased calcium deposition (Supplementary Fig. 5). Combined, these data show that activated PARP1 promotes the osteogenic transition of VSMCs and subsequent vascular calcification.
PARP1 aggravates vascular calcification via Runx2
Osteogenic transdifferentiation of VSMCs relies on multistep molecular pathways regulated by different transcription factors and signaling proteins, such as Runx2, MSX2, SOX9, DLX5, and OSTERIX3,32,33. After screening, only Runx2 expression was subject to PARP1 regulation. Western blot and immunofluorescence staining analyses revealed that PARP1 knockdown suppressed the elevated expression of Runx2 in cultured VSMCs (Fig. 4a) and in the abdominal aortas of CRF rats (Fig. 4b), accompanied by reciprocal changes in SMA.
To explore whether Runx2 mediates the VSMC calcification promoted by PARP1, rat abdominal aortas were transfected with adenovirus carrying Runx2 shRNA and Ad-PARP1 (Supplementary Table 4). Although PARP1 markedly enhanced vascular calcification, Runx2 deficiency effectively suppressed the vascular calcification, as evidenced by the von Kossa staining results and calcium content, and the related osteogenic marker expression (Fig. 4c–e and Supplementary Fig. 12e). Consistent with this observation, Runx2 depletion also dramatically abrogated the increase in calcium deposition by PARP1 in cultured artery rings and VSMCs (Fig. 4f, g), indicating that Runx2 may be essential for PARP1-induced vascular calcification.
Considering that PARP1 was not activated without phosphate treatment (Supplementary Fig. 6a), we chose the PARP1 L713F mutant, which is constitutively active in cells34–36, to assess the dependence of PARP1 on Runx2 without phosphate treatment. Interestingly, WT PARP1 could not directly induce osteogenic gene expression or calcium deposition, but L713F mutant could induce these changes. When Runx2 was depleted, the above effects of PARP1 L713F were suppressed (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). Moreover, we further overexpressed Runx2 in the presence of PARP1 deficiency in vitro. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7, ectopic Runx2 antagonized the protective effects of PARP1 deficiency on Pi-induced VSMC calcification. These data suggest a direct dependence of PARP1 on Runx2 for vascular calcification.
PARP1 enhances Runx2 expression via suppression of miR-204
We further explored the specific mechanisms underlying the regulation of Runx2 by PARP1. As PARP1 is involved in the transcriptional regulation of multiple genes, we first sought to evaluate whether PARP1 could influence the transcriptional activity of the Runx2 promoter. We transfected A7r5 cells with the Runx2 promoter (pGL3-Runx2-luc) and subjected cells to the indicated treatments. The luciferase assay results showed that neither PARP1 knockdown nor overexpression altered Runx2 promoter activity (Fig. 5a).
miRNAs (or miRs), targeting the mRNA 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTR) for translational repression or mRNA degradation37, have emerged as an alternative method of gene regulation. We fused the full-length Runx2 3′UTR to the luciferase reporter (pMIR-REPORT) and transfected it into A7r5 cells. Surprisingly, high Pi conditions dramatically increased Runx2 3′UTR luciferase activity, while PARP1 inhibition or knockdown comparably suppressed the increased activity (Fig. 5b). We also performed quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in cultured VSMCs and found no clear changes in Runx2 mRNA with PARP1 manipulation (Supplementary Fig. 8), suggesting that miRs might participate in the regulation of Runx2 via PARP1 through translational repression.
Next, we performed bioinformatics analyses using the TargetScan, miRanda, and miRwalk programmes to search for Runx2-targeting miRNAs. We identified several conserved miRNAs, such as miR-23a, miR-30c, miR-137, miR-204, miR-205, miR-217, miR-218, miR-221, miR-338, and miR-445 (Fig. 5c), and performed qRT-PCR on calcifying VSMCs. While the expression of miR-30c, miR-204, miR-221, and miR-338 was inhibited by high Pi concentration, only miR-204 could be reversed by the inhibitor PJ34 (Fig. 5d), which is highly conserved among the rat, mouse and human genomes (Fig. 5e). Then, we determined whether miR-204 mediated the regulation of PARP1 through Runx2. We first performed a luciferase assay after manipulating miR-204 levels. Under high Pi stimulation, the miR-204 antagomir efficiently antagonized the decreased luciferase activity of the Runx2 3′UTR due to PARP1 inhibitor (3AB and PJ34) or PARP1 deficiency (Fig. 5f). Due to the dependence of miRNA function on the association of the miRNA/mRNA complex with Argonaute proteins to form an miRNA-induced silencing complex, we performed RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) using an anti-Argonaute-2 antibody and found that Pi treatment led to a reduction in the enrichment of miR-204 and Runx2 mRNA from Argonaute complexes, which was partly reversed by PJ34 (Fig. 5g). Taken together, Pi-activated PARP1 suppresses miR-204 expression and the complex formation, thus relieving the translational repression on Runx2.
Finally, to explore whether miR-204 is truly involved in vascular calcification, we injected CRF rats with a miR-204 agomir. Successful miRNA interference was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 5h), along with the serum biochemical parameters (Supplementary Table 5). Western blot analysis revealed that in vivo application of the miR-204 mimic repressed Runx2 expression and its downstream signaling (OPN, OCN, Col1A1) compared to Ad-PARP1 (Fig. 5i). Accompanying the decrease in gene expression, calcium deposition in vessels was also downregulated (Fig. 5j, k and Supplementary Fig. 12f). This observation was reinforced by transfection of the miR-204 agomir into high-Pi-stimulated cultured artery rings and VSMCs. The miR-204 mimic significantly antagonized the pro-calcifying effect of PARP1 on VSMCs (Fig. 5l, m). Based on these findings, we concluded that PARP1 activation leads to a decrease in miR-204 and the subsequent release of translational repression of Runx2 mRNA, resulting in increased Runx2 protein levels and vascular calcification.
PARP1 represses miR-204 expression via IL-6/STAT3 pathway
STAT3 activation has been reported to suppress miR-204 expression in endometrial carcinoma cells38. We found that STAT3 phosphorylation and activation (increased p-STAT3/STAT3 ratio) were substantially increased in response to high Pi concentrations and were prevented by PARP1 knockdown or PJ34 (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 9a), indicating a role for pSTAT3 in miR-204 regulation. We then silenced STAT3 via shRNA in calcified VSMCs and found that STAT3 knockdown abolished the downregulation of miR-204 mediated by PARP1 (Fig. 6b). Accordingly, the increased expression of Runx2 and osteogenic genes by PARP1, as well as calcium deposition, were all suppressed by STAT3 silencing in calcified VSMCs (Fig. 6c, d).
Both JAK2 and Src kinases are well-known tyrosine kinases that are responsible for phosphorylating and activating STAT3. We next detected the activation status of JAK2 and Src in calcified VSMCs to examine the upstream signaling. As shown in Fig. 6e and Supplementary Fig. 9b, phosphorylation of JAK2 was significantly induced in VSMCs, and PARP1 inhibition partially reversed this activation. However, Src activation was not detected.
IL-6 is known to stimulate the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway, and cells with activated PARP1 can produce high levels of IL-639,40. To test the possibility that PARP1 leads to the production and subsequent autocrine activity of IL-6 in VSMCs, cultured cell supernatants were subjected to an ELISA. Although low levels of IL-6 were detected in untreated cells, PARP1 produced a notable increase in IL-6 abundance in calcified VSMCs. Furthermore, PARP1 knockdown suppressed this upregulation (Fig. 6f). Moreover, PARP1 deficiency decreased, but PARP1 overexpression increased, the mRNA and protein levels of IL-6 in arteries of CRF rats in vivo (Fig. 6g, h and Supplementary Fig. 10). Then, we administered neutralizing antibodies against IL-6, and found that combined with blockade of STAT3 and JAK2 activation, the PARP1-enhanced calcification was nullified, as evidenced by decreased Runx2 expression and calcium content (Fig. 6i–k). In contrast, control antibodies had no effect. Together, these results provide strong evidence that autocrine IL-6 acts as a bridge between PARP1 and the JAK2-STAT3-miR-204-Runx2 pathway.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that PARP1 may act as an endogenous regulator of vascular calcification. Aberrant activation of PARP1 led to the osteogenic transition of VSMCs, increased mineralization-regulating proteins and subsequent calcification. PARP1 increased Runx2 protein levels by relieving the translational repression of miR-204. These data identify Runx2 as a deleterious calcifying mediator of catastrophic PARP1 activation.
PARP1 functions at the centre of cellular stress responses, where it can be activated by various stimuli and in return determines cellular fate through multiple regulatory mechanisms11. A growing body of evidence suggests that PARP1 is relevant to vascular pathophysiology, including vascular fibrosis41. However, no studies have linked PARP1 to vascular calcification. Here, we provide evidence that, in the presence of extensive ROS caused by high Pi concentrations, PARP1 was highly activated. Calcium deposition exhibited a positive correlation with PARP1 activity in arteries from CRF patients. Although our data support a role for oxidative stress in PARP1 activation, other mechanisms (DNA damage, inflammation, etc.) might also be implicated in the process. PARP1 can trigger DNA repair and promote cell survival when stress is light or moderate, but it aggravates cell death when the stress is excessive42. Persistent DNA damage signaling associated with cellular senescence also involves VSMC calcification43. So excessive DNA damage might also participate in PARP1 activation during calcification, but further study is required.
Vascular calcification is an active cell-mediated process involving VSMC apoptosis, vesicle release, a shift in the balance of inhibitors and promoters, and VSMC transdifferentiation from a contractile to an osteochondrogenic phenotype. In our study, PARP1 could indeed promote the osteogenic transition of VSMCs and calcification in rats and humans via Runx2, which was not dependent on transcriptional activity. Rather, it relied on miR-204 repression at the post-transcriptional level. Activated PARP1 suppressed miR-204 expression and function, thus relieving the translational repression of Runx2. Several lines of evidence indicate that pSTAT3 is responsible for miR-204 suppression44. Our results show that PARP1 could activate STAT3 (pSTAT3) in cultured VSMCs after stimulation with high Pi levels, which contributed to miR-204 downregulation. MiR-204 is encoded within intron 6 of the TRPM3 gene (transient receptor potential melastatin 3) (Supplementary Fig. 11a). PARP1 was found to co-regulate TRPM3 in the same manner as miR-204, suggesting that PARP1 downregulates miR-204 by suppressing its transcription (Supplementary Fig. 11b). Nonetheless, we silenced TRPM3 and discovered that TRPM3 did not disrupt calcification (Supplementary Fig. 11c, d).
IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling was found to mediate the regulation of PARP1 by miR-204 in VSMC calcification, but how PARP1 regulates IL-6 remains unknown. NF-κB has been implicated in promoting high phosphate-induced VSMC calcification45–47. Inhibition of NF-κB activity within SMCs reduces arterial medial calcification in mice with CKD48. We and other researchers have verified NF-κB as a substrate of PARP1-mediated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, which then enhances NF-κB-dependent promoter activity40,49,50. And IL-6 is a classical direct target for activated NF-κB39,49,51. Interestingly, our results showed that PARP1 deficiency decreased, but PARP1 overexpression increased, the mRNA and protein levels of IL-6 in arteries of CRF rats in vivo, suggesting that PARP1 possibly upregulates IL-6 expression via promoting NF-κB transactivation during VSMC calcification.
The VSMC osteogenic phenotype is characterized by the induction of osteochondrogenic transdifferentiation markers and inhibition of smooth muscle cell lineage markers. DNA binding sites of Runx2 have been identified in the Col I, OC, and OPN genes, and Runx2 directly induces the expression of these genes or activates their promoters in osteoblasts52–54. Consistently, we found that increased osteogenic gene expression (OPN, OCN, CollA1) by PARP1 was dependent on Runx2. However, the mechanism by which PARP1 downregulates VSMC markers under high Pi stimulation is not fully understood. A recent study found that a direct interaction of Runx2 with SRF, which disrupts the formation of myocardin and the SRF complex, mediates the effect of Runx2 on smooth muscle cell marker gene expression55. It is therefore rational to speculate that elevation of Runx2 levels by PARP1 results in increased interactions with SRF, leading to suppressed expression of contractile genes, although this hypothesis requires further research.
In conclusion, this study provides evidence that PARP1 acts as a critical mediator of CRF-related vascular calcification. Under physiological conditions, VSMCs express a trace level of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. When phosphorus metabolism disorders occur, activated PARP1 promotes vascular calcification. Our findings provide an insight on the prevention and treatment of a variety of cardiovascular diseases related to vascular calcification.
Methods
Reagents, chemicals, and antibodies
Adenine (Cat#A8626), βGP (Cat#G9422), L-ascorbic acid (Cat#A4544), dexamethasone (Cat#D4902), Alizarin Red S (Cat#A5533), Pluronic F-127 (Cat#P2443) and 3AB (Cat#A0788) were purchased from Millipore-Sigma (MO, USA). PJ34 (Cat#ALX-270-289-M025) was obtained from Enzo Life Sciences (NY, USA). The PARP universal colourimetric assay kit and antibody against PAR (Cat#4335-MC-100; 1:1000 for WB; 1:100 for IF) were purchased from Trevigen (MD, USA). Antibodies against PARP1 (Cat#9532; 1:1000), Runx2 (Cat#12556; 1:1000 for WB; 1:100 for IF), pSTAT3 (Cat#9145; 1:1000), STAT3 (Cat#12640; 1:1000), pJAK2 (Cat#3776; 1:1000), JAK2 (Cat#3230; 1:1000), pSRC (Cat#6943; 1:1000) and SRC (Cat#2109; 1:1000) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (MA, USA). Antibodies against SMA (Cat#ab8226; 1:2000 for WB; 1:100 for IF), osteopotin (Cat#ab8448; 1:500), OC (Cat#ab13420; 1:500), osterix (Cat#ab209484; 1:1000), MSX2 (Cat#ab223692; 1:1000). Sox9 (Cat#ab185966; 1:1000), GAPDH (Cat#ab8245; 1:2000) and Argonaute-2 (Cat#ab32381;1:100) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Antibodies against SM22 (Cat#10493-1-AP; 1:1000) and SMMHC (Cat#21404-1-AP; 1:1000) were obtained from Proteintech (IL, USA). Antibodies against Pit1 (Cat#a4117; 1:500) and Pit2 (Cat#a6739; 1:500) were purchased from Abclonal (Wuhan, China). The Col1A1 (Cat#NB600-408; 1:500) antibody was purchased from Novus (CO, USA). TRPM3 (Cat#GTX16612; 1:500) antibody was purchased from GeneTex (CA, USA). The miR-204 agomir and its control were obtained from RIBOBIO (Guangzhou, China). Trypsin, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), and foetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from GIBCO (MA, USA). The luciferase assay system was obtained from Promega (WI, USA).
Patient artery samples
All procedures involving human samples complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients or their legal guardians. A 5- to 8-mm segment of the radial artery was excised from uraemic patients who underwent an arterial venous fistula operation (CRF, n = 17) or from patients who underwent amputation surgery due to arm trauma (controls, n = 9) and had no diagnosed complications of diabetes or CKD. Samples were then dissected to remove fat and stored at −80 °C until use.
Animal models
All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and were performed in accordance with relevant institutional and national guidelines and regulations. Eight-week-old male Wistar rats were randomized to feed with a standard chow diet containing 0.6% phosphate and 1.2% calcium for the control group or a specific diet containing 0.75% adenine, 0.9% phosphorus and 1.2% calcium for the CRF group37. Interventions were performed 3 weeks after initiation of the adenine diet. 3AB (30 mg/kg/d) was intraperitoneally injected every day. In the adenovirus-transfected group, rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg), and surgery was performed. The left renal artery was used as a marker, and the abdominal aorta was exposed ~2.0 cm above this point. Adenovirus (Ad-shPARP1, Ad-PARP1, Ad-shRunx2, Ad-Runx2, Ad-Scr shRNA or Ad-Null) (5 × 109 plaque forming units) was mixed with 30% pluronic gel solution and applied to the exposed abdominal aorta. For the miR-204 intervention, the miR-204 agomir was intravenously injected through the tail vein for three consecutive days. Six weeks later, rats were euthanized, and blood was collected to measure blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), calcium, and phosphate using an autoanalyser (Hitachi, Japan). The abdominal arteries were excised for further analysis.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Vascular specimens were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with antibodies against PAR (1:100), SMA (1:100) or Runx2 (1:100) overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with Alexa Fluor® (Jackson ImmunoReasearch) secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37 °C. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Negative controls without the primary antibody were routinely employed. Images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Cell and vascular tissue culture
Primary rat VSMCs were obtained by an explant method41. Briefly, medial tissues were separated from segments of rat aortas, cut into 1- to 2-mm2 sections, and placed in a culture flask with DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS. Cells that migrated from the explants were grown in DMEM plus 15% FBS. Cells from passage 3 to 6 were used for experiments. The A7r5 and human aortic SMC (HASMC) cell lines were obtained from ATCC and grown in DMEM with 10% FBS. Rat aortic arteries were removed under sterile conditions. After removing the adventitia and endothelium, the vessels were cut into 2- to 3-mm rings and placed in DMEM containing 10% FBS. For viral infections, cells were plated overnight and then infected with adenoviruses.
In vitro calcification and quantification
VSMCs or aortic rings were cultured in osteogenic medium containing βGP (10 mM), L-ascorbic acid (0.25 mM), and dexamethasone (10−8 mM) for 14 days; the medium was changed every other day. After washing with cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cells or rings were treated with 0.6 M HCl overnight at 4 °C. The calcium content in the HCl supernatant was subjected to colourimetric analysis using a Calcium Assay Kit (BioSino, Beijing, China) and normalized to the protein content. In parallel sets, ALP activity was measured in a colourimetric analysis using an ALP assay kit (BioSino) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Alizarin Red S or von Kossa staining
For Alizarin red S staining, VSMCs in 3 cm2 dishes were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, exposed to 2% Alizarin red S (Sigma) for 30 min and washed with 0.2% acetic acid. Positively stained cells showed a reddish/purple color. For von Kossa staining, vascular tissues sections were incubated with 5% silver nitrate solution for 30 min, exposed to bright light for 15 min, washed and treated with 5% sodium thiosulfate. Calcified nodules were stained brown to black.
A semiquantitative score of von Kossa staining was determined based on calcification in arterial cross section at three different levels using the following system: 0, no calcification; 1, focal calcification spots; 2, partial calcification covering 20–80% of the arterial circumference; and 3, circumferential calcification56. To avoid evaluation biases, von Kossa analyses were independently performed by two experienced pathologists who were blinded to the tissue information. Cases with discrepancies were jointly re-evaluated until a consensus was reached.
PARP activity assay
PARP activity was assayed using a universal colourimetric PARP assay kit (Trevigen) based on the incorporation of biotinylated ADP-ribose into histone proteins. Cell lysates containing 50 μg of proteins were loaded onto a 96-well plate coated with histones and biotinylated poly(ADP-ribose), allowed to incubate for 1 h, treated with strep-HRP, and read at 450 nm on a spectrophotometer.
Western blot assays
Western blotting was performed to detect protein levels in cells or tissues57,58. Proteins were extracted in RIPA lysis buffer (Santa Cruz) and measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo). After denaturation and SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, separated proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes and probed with primary antibodies and secondary HRP-conjugated IgG antibodies. Chemiluminescence signals were detected by Image Lab statistical software (Bio-Rad). Uncropped scans for western blot analysis were shown in Supplementary Figs. 14–17.
Generation of recombinant adenovirus
An adenovirus kit, AdMax™ (Microbix, Canada), was used to generate adenovirus-based constructs according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, the recombinant shuttle plasmids were co-transfected with the genomic plasmid into HEK293 cells to produce recombinant viral particles, and viral titres were enriched by two rounds of infection in HEK293 cells. To generate adenoviruses encoding full-length human PARP1 (PubMed No. NM_001618.3), PARP1 mutants (L713F), or Runx2 (PubMed No. NM_001024630.3), Flag-PARP1 and Myc-Runx2 cDNA fragments were transferred from pcDNA3-based vectors to the shuttle plasmid pDC316. The CMV-null adenovirus was used as the negative control (Ad-Null).
To generate optimal adenoviruses expressing shRNA against PARP1, Runx2, STAT3, and TRMP3, three lines of corresponding adenoviruses were designed and constructed, and VSMCs were then infected to detect the knockdown efficiency (Supplementary Fig. 13). The most efficient virus was used in the following experiments. The following optimal sequences were used: PARP1 shRNA with the target sequence 5′-GGATGATCTTCGACGTGGA-3′; Runx2 shRNA with the target sequence 5′-TGGCAGCACGCTATTAA-3′; STAT3 shRNA with the target sequence 5′-GGCTGATCATTTATATAAA-3′; and TRMP3 shRNA with the target sequence 5′-CCGTAAGCAAGTTTATGATTCTCAT-3′. A negative control adenovirus was designed to express non-targeting scrambled shRNA (Scr shRNA).
Plasmid constructs and reporter assay
The 2-kp promoter for the coding sequence of the rat Runx2 gene was subcloned into the pGL3 luciferase reporter vector (Promega, USA). The ∼4-kp full-length 3′UTR of Runx2 mRNA was inserted into the pMIR-REPORT miRNA expression reporter vector (Ambion, USA)27. Luciferase reporter constructs were co-transfected into VSMCs with an internal control plasmid, pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid, Promega), followed by the indicated stimulation. Then, cells were harvested and lysed, and the luciferase activity was determined with the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
qRT-PCR analysis of mRNA and miRNA
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Takara, Japan). For mRNA quantification, a PrimeScript™RT reagent Kit (Takara) was used to prepare the cDNA. Real-time PCR was performed with SYBR Green (Bio-Rad, USA) on a Bio-Rad CFX-96 real-time system. The relative mRNA levels were determined by normalizing to the 18S rRNA levels. The qPCR primer pairs of Runx2 (Cat#QT01300208), PIT1 (Cat#QT00179627), PIT2 (Cat#QT00384573) and 18sRNA (Cat#QT02589300) were obtained from QIAGEN (Germany). For miRNA quantification, qRT-PCR was performed using the Bulge-LoopTM miRNA qRT-PCR Primer (RiboBio, China) following the manufacturer’s protocols. U6 was detected as the internal control. The qPCR primer pairs of miR-23a, miR-30c, miR-137, miR-204, miR-205, miR-217, miR-218, miR-221, miR-338, and miR-445 were obtained from RIBOBIO (China).
RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP)
RIP was performed according to the RIP Kit (Millipore). VSMCs were lysed in RIP lysis buffer, incubated with magnetic beads conjugated to anti-Argonaute-2 antibody and then rotated at 4 °C overnight. After washing, proteinase K was added to digest the proteins. RNA was purified by phenol chloroform extraction, and the purified RNA was analysed by qRT-PCR.
Statistical analysis
Values are shown as the means ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments. Normality of data distribution was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test prior to the application of parametric tests. For non-normally distributed data, nonparametric tests were used to analyze statistical differences. For comparisons between two groups, significance was determined using Student’s t-test or nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. For comparisons among multiple groups, ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni test or nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn’s post hoc test. An F test (two groups) or Brown–Forsythe test (multiple groups) was used to determine difference in variances for t-test and ANOVA, respectively. The statistical significance of correlations was determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. Significant differences are indicated by * or # (P < 0.05), and very significant differences are indicated by ** or ## (P < 0.01). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 22.0, SPSS Inc).
Reporting summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81170239), Major key technology research project of Science and Technology Department in Hubei Province (2016ACA151), Key projects of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2016JCTD107), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016 YFA0101100). We thank Dr. Xiaomin Zhang (Department of Occupational and Environmental Health and Ministry of Education, Key Lab for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) for rechecking the statistical analysis.
Author contributions
C.W., W.J.X., and J.A. performed most of the experiments. M.L.L., F.X.Z., and Q.S.T. provided technical support, and contributed to experimental plans. Y.Q.L. provided related human samples. C.W., and W.J.X. wrote the manuscript. C.W. and K.H. conceived and supervised the study. All authors contributed to experimental design and edited the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information or from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 4a, 4e, 5d, 5i, 6c, and 6i and Supplementary Figs. 5b, 5d, 6b and 7a are provided as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Cheng Wang, Wenjing Xu.
Contributor Information
Cheng Wang, Email: chenwang@hust.edu.cn.
Kai Huang, Email: kaihuangunion@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-09174-1.
References
- 1.Demer LL, Tintut Y. Vascular calcification: pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation. 2008;117:2938–2948. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lanzer P, et al. Medial vascular calcification revisited: review and perspectives. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:1515–1525. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shroff R, Long DA, Shanahan C. Mechanistic insights into vascular calcification in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;24:179–189. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011121191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jablonski KL, Chonchol M. Vascular calcification in end-stage renal disease. Hemodial. Int. 2013;17(Suppl 1):S17–S21. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Steitz SA, et al. Smooth muscle cell phenotypic transition associated with calcification: upregulation of Cbfa1 and downregulation of smooth muscle lineage markers. Circ. Res. 2001;89:1147–1154. doi: 10.1161/hh2401.101070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Al Aly Z, Edwards JC. Vascular biology in uremia: insights into novel mechanisms of vascular injury. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2004;11:310–318. doi: 10.1053/j.arrt.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shanahan CM, Crouthamel MH, Kapustin A, Giachelli CM. Arterial calcification in chronic kidney disease: key roles for calcium and phosphate. Circ. Res. 2011;109:697–711. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.234914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McCarty MF, DiNicolantonio JJ. The molecular biology and pathophysiology of vascular calcification. Postgrad. Med. 2014;126:54–64. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.03.2740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luo X, Kraus WL. On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-1. Genes Dev. 2012;26:417–432. doi: 10.1101/gad.183509.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schreiber V, Dantzer F, Ame JC, de Murcia G. Poly(ADP-ribose): novel functions for an old molecule. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:517–528. doi: 10.1038/nrm1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bock FJ, Chang P. Stress response: PARP1 911. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:179–180. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang C, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 promotes oxidative-stress-induced liver cell death via suppressing farnesoid X receptor alpha. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013;33:4492–4503. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00160-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang C, Xu W, Zhang Y, Huang D, Huang K. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PXR is a critical regulator of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:819. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0875-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pacher P, Szabo C. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) in cardiovascular diseases: the therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors. Cardiovasc. Drug. Rev. 2007;25:235–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00018.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jagtap P, Szabo C. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the therapeutic effects of its inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2005;4:421–440. doi: 10.1038/nrd1718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang Z, Wang F, Tang T, Guo C. The role of PARP1 in the DNA damage response and its application in tumor therapy. Front. Med. 2012;6:156–164. doi: 10.1007/s11684-012-0197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vaziri ND. Oxidative stress in uremia: nature, mechanisms, and potential consequences. Semin. Nephrol. 2004;24:469–473. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2004.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vaziri ND, Dicus M, Ho ND, Boroujerdi-Rad L, Sindhu RK. Oxidative stress and dysregulation of superoxide dismutase and NADPH oxidase in renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 2003;63:179–185. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagy E, Caidahl K, Franco-Cereceda A, Back M. Increased transcript level of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) in human tricuspid compared with bicuspid aortic valves correlates with the stenosis severity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;420:671–675. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.03.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hutcheson JD, Blaser MC, Aikawa E. Giving Calcification Its Due: Recognition of a Diverse Disease: A First Attempt to Standardize the Field. Circ. Res. 2017;120:270–273. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun Y, et al. Smooth muscle cell-specific runx2 deficiency inhibits vascular calcification. Circ. Res. 2012;111:543–552. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.267237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lin ME, Chen T, Leaf EM, Speer MY, Giachelli CM. Runx2 Expression in Smooth Muscle Cells Is Required for Arterial Medial Calcification in Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:1958–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin, M. E. et al. Runx2 deletion in smooth muscle cells inhibits vascular osteochondrogenesis and calcification but not atherosclerotic lesion formation. Cardiovasc. Res.112, 606–616 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Byon CH, et al. Oxidative stress induces vascular calcification through modulation of the osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 by AKT signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:15319–15327. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800021200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jun, J. H. et al. BMP2-activated Erk/MAP kinase stabilizes Runx2 by increasing p300 levels and histone acetyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem.285, 36410–36419 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Gaur T, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33132–33140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Y, et al. A program of microRNAs controls osteogenic lineage progression by targeting transcription factor Runx2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9863–9868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018493108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Himmelfarb J, Hakim RM. Oxidative stress in uremia. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2003;12:593–598. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200311000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yamada S, et al. The antioxidant tempol ameliorates arterial medial calcification in uremic rats: important role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:474–485. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Du Y, et al. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein inhibits vascular smooth muscle calcification by interacting with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Circ. Res. 2011;108:917–928. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.234328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dai XY, et al. Phosphate-induced autophagy counteracts vascular calcification by reducing matrix vesicle release. Kidney Int. 2013;83:1042–1051. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng SL, et al. Targeted reduction of vascular Msx1 and Msx2 mitigates arteriosclerotic calcification and aortic stiffness in LDLR-deficient mice fed diabetogenic diets. Diabetes. 2014;63:4326–4337. doi: 10.2337/db14-0326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nishimura R, Hata K, Matsubara T, Wakabayashi M, Yoneda T. Regulation of bone and cartilage development by network between BMP signalling and transcription factors. J. Biochem. 2012;151:247–254. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvs004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rank L, et al. Analyzing structure-function relationships of artificial and cancer-associated PARP1 variants by reconstituting TALEN-generated HeLa PARP1 knock-out cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:10386–10405. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Langelier MF, Planck JL, Roy S, Pascal JM. Structural basis for DNA damage-dependent poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by human PARP-1. Science. 2012;336:728–732. doi: 10.1126/science.1216338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dawicki-McKenna JM, et al. PARP-1 activation requires local unfolding of an autoinhibitory domain. Mol. Cell. 2015;60:755–768. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhao Y, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling inhibition ameliorates vascular calcification via Klotho upregulation. Kidney Int. 2015;88:711–721. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bao W, et al. A TrkB-STAT3-miR-204-5p regulatory circuitry controls proliferation and invasion of endometrial carcinoma cells. Mol. Cancer. 2013;12:155. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang D, et al. Activation and overexpression of PARP-1 in circulating mononuclear cells promote TNF-alpha and IL-6 expression in patients with unstable angina. Arch. Med. Res. 2008;39:775–784. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang Y, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase-1 protects chronic alcoholic liver injury. Am. J. Pathol. 2016;186:3117–3130. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang Y, et al. Inhibition of PARP prevents angiotensin II-induced aortic fibrosis in rats. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;167:2285–2293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meloche J, et al. Role for DNA damage signaling in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2014;129:786–797. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu Y, Drozdov I, Shroff R, Beltran LE, Shanahan CM. Prelamin A accelerates vascular calcification via activation of the DNA damage response and senescence-associated secretory phenotype in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2013;112:e99–e109. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Courboulin A, et al. Role for miR-204 in human pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:535–548. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao G, et al. Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B accelerates vascular calcification by inhibiting ankylosis protein homolog expression. Kidney Int. 2012;82:34–44. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Al-Aly Z. Phosphate, oxidative stress, and nuclear factor-kappaB activation in vascular calcification. Kidney Int. 2011;79:1044–1047. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhao, M. M., et al. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species promote p65 nuclear translocation mediating high-phosphate-induced vascular calcification in vitro and in vivo. Kidney Int.79, 1071–1079 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Yoshida, T., Yamashita, M., Horimai, C & Hayashi, M. Smooth muscle-selective nuclear factor-kappaB inhibition reduces phosphate-induced arterial medial calcification in mice with chronic kidney disease. J. Am. Heart. Assoc.6, pii: e007248 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Bai P, Virag L. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in the regulation of inflammatory processes. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:3771–3777. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hassa PO, Hottiger MO. A role of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in NF-kappaB transcriptional activation. Biol. Chem. 1999;380:953–959. doi: 10.1515/BC.1999.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Martinez-Zamudio RI, Ha HC. PARP1 enhances inflammatory cytokine expression by alteration of promoter chromatin structure in microglia. Brain Behav. 2014;4:552–565. doi: 10.1002/brb3.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schroeder, T. M., Kahler, R. A., Li, X., Westendorf, J. J. Histone deacetylase 3 interacts with runx2 to repress the osteocalcin promoter and regulate osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 41998–42007 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Sowa AK, et al. Functional interaction of osteogenic transcription factors Runx2 and Vdr in transcriptional regulation of Opn during soft tissue calcification. Am. J. Pathol. 2013;183:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Drissi MH, et al. Runx2/Cbfa1 stimulation by retinoic acid is potentiated by BMP2 signaling through interaction with Smad1 on the collagen X promoter in chondrocytes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003;90:1287–1298. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shi N, Li CX, Cui XB, Tomarev SI, Chen SY. Olfactomedin 2 regulates smooth muscle phenotypic modulation and vascular remodeling through mediating runt-related transcription factor 2 binding to serum response factor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017;37:446–454. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Neven E, et al. Chondrocyte rather than osteoblast conversion of vascular cells underlies medial calcification in uremic rats. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010;30:1741–1750. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.204834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xu W. et al. A20 prevents obesity-induced development of cardiac dysfunction. J. Mol. Med. (Berl)96, 159–172 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 58.Wang, C., Xu W., Liang, M., Huang, D., Huang, K. CTRP13 inhibits atherosclerosis via autophagy-lysosome-dependent degradation of CD36. FASEB J. 33, 2290–2300 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information or from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 4a, 4e, 5d, 5i, 6c, and 6i and Supplementary Figs. 5b, 5d, 6b and 7a are provided as a Source Data file.