Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2019 Mar 13;201(7):e00630-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00630-18

Global Analysis of Genes Essential for Francisella tularensis Schu S4 Growth In Vitro and for Fitness during Competitive Infection of Fischer 344 Rats

Philip M Ireland a,, Helen L Bullifent a, Nicola J Senior b, Stephanie J Southern a, Zheng Rong Yang b, Rachel E Ireland a, Michelle Nelson a, Helen S Atkins a,b,c, Richard W Titball b, Andrew E Scott a
Editor: Victor J DiRitad
PMCID: PMC6416918  PMID: 30642993

The intracellular bacterial pathogen Francisella tularensis causes a disease in humans characterized by the rapid onset of nonspecific symptoms such as swollen lymph glands, fever, and headaches. F. tularensis is one of the most infectious bacteria known and following pulmonary exposure can have a mortality rate exceeding 50% if left untreated. The low infectious dose of this organism and concerns surrounding its potential as a biological weapon have heightened the need for effective and safe therapies. To expand the repertoire of targets for therapeutic development, we initiated a genome-wide analysis. This study has identified genes that are important for F. tularensis under in vitro and in vivo conditions, providing candidates that can be evaluated for vaccine or antibacterial development.

KEYWORDS: essential genes, Francisella, gene essentiality, TraDIS, transposon insertion sequencing, genomics, virulence

ABSTRACT

The highly virulent intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative bacterium that has a wide host range, including humans, and is the causative agent of tularemia. To identify new therapeutic drug targets and vaccine candidates and investigate the genetic basis of Francisella virulence in the Fischer 344 rat, we have constructed an F. tularensis Schu S4 transposon library. This library consists of more than 300,000 unique transposon mutants and represents a transposon insertion for every 6 bp of the genome. A transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (TraDIS) approach was used to identify 453 genes essential for growth in vitro. Many of these essential genes were mapped to key metabolic pathways, including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, peptidoglycan synthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Additionally, 163 genes were identified as required for fitness during colonization of the Fischer 344 rat spleen. This in vivo selection screen was validated through the generation of marked deletion mutants that were individually assessed within a competitive index study against the wild-type F. tularensis Schu S4 strain.

IMPORTANCE The intracellular bacterial pathogen Francisella tularensis causes a disease in humans characterized by the rapid onset of nonspecific symptoms such as swollen lymph glands, fever, and headaches. F. tularensis is one of the most infectious bacteria known and following pulmonary exposure can have a mortality rate exceeding 50% if left untreated. The low infectious dose of this organism and concerns surrounding its potential as a biological weapon have heightened the need for effective and safe therapies. To expand the repertoire of targets for therapeutic development, we initiated a genome-wide analysis. This study has identified genes that are important for F. tularensis under in vitro and in vivo conditions, providing candidates that can be evaluated for vaccine or antibacterial development.

INTRODUCTION

Tularemia is a disease caused by Francisella tularensis, a highly infectious Gram-negative bacterium and member of the gamma subgroup of proteobacteria. F. tularensis can infect a wide range of invertebrates, birds, and mammals, including humans (1). Three subspecies have been identified: Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis occurs in North America, the less virulent Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica is found in North America and Europe, and Francisella tularensis subsp. mediasiatica is found in central Asia. The route of infection influences the clinical presentation of the disease, which can be classified as ulceroglandular, glandular, pneumonic, oculoglandular, oropharyngeal, or typhoidal (2). F. tularensis spreads systemically from the regional lymph to organs, including the liver, lungs, and spleen. Symptoms of infection can be nonspecific and include fever, malaise, chills, and headaches (3). Pneumonic infection often produces the most severe disease presentation, and a fatality rate that can exceed 50% without treatment (3), leading to concerns surrounding its potential for biological warfare (4).

The infectious dose of F. tularensis is as low as 25 organisms (5). Therefore, it is important that treatment regimens completely clear the bacterial infection upon completion of the therapy. A number of antibiotics are effective for treatment of tularemia, including streptomycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin (68). The potential for relapse following treatment, which can range from 6% to 21% (810), and the high toxicity of some antibiotics (11, 12) provide a need for improved therapies.

There is no vaccine licensed for F. tularensis infection. The live vaccine strain (LVS), an attenuated F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolate, has previously shown to partially protect humans against aerosol challenge with the highly virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis Schu S4 (13). The genomic changes that contribute to the attenuation of the LVS are not fully understood and have in part prevented licensure. Additionally, numerous live vaccine strain candidates have been constructed through deletion of genes required for metabolism or virulence (14). However, potential reversion of single deletion mutant strains back to wild-type virulence, although of low probability, has led to the view that multiple genetic deletions should be considered (14). Consequently, as the number of genetic changes increases, so does the potential to overattenuate the candidate strain with potential loss of immunogenicity (15). Generating live vaccine strains with multiple lesions therefore continues to pose significant challenge.

A range of virulence factors utilized by F. tularensis to facilitate entry and survival in a host are known. These virulence genes include, for example, the intracellular growth locus (16), mglA and mglB (17), type IV pilus genes (18), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) genes (19), and capsule genes (20). F. tularensis is able to evade the immune response and, through inhibition of endosome-lysosome fusion, escape and replicate in the macrophage cystol. However, current understanding of F. tularensis virulence stems largely from studies using murine models of infection and in vitro cell lines. The use of surrogate strains that can be handled safely at lower levels of laboratory containment, such as the LVS or Francisella novicida, has vastly accelerated developments within the field. Nevertheless, despite causing lethality in murine models, these strains are not virulent in humans (F. novicida infection has been reported with near-drowning incidents and immunocompromised individuals [21, 22]). Thus, studies with F. tularensis Schu S4 and similar lethal strains are crucial to complement work with surrogate strains and increase our understanding of the virulence of this pathogen in humans.

Transposon-based mutagenesis is an effective and increasingly utilized approach to evaluate the impact of a gene on the viability or fitness of bacteria through insertional inactivation. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have facilitated techniques such as insertion sequencing (INseq) (23), transposon-directed insertion site sequencing (TraDIS) (24), transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) (25), high-throughput insertion tracking by deep sequencing (HITS) (26), and barcode analysis by sequencing (Bar-seq) (27), that enable the selective enrichment of transposon-genome junctions from saturating transposon libraries. Analysis of transposon insertion frequency across a genome can provide an assessment of all genes under specific conditions at high resolution. The minimal set of genes required under nutritious conditions provides important information regarding key biochemical processes within the organism. However, the essentiality or fitness contribution of a gene largely depends on the context of the environment inhabited by the organism. Therefore, for the purpose of therapeutic development, the identification of genes that are required for fitness of a pathogen in a host can offer an alternative strategy for antibacterial or vaccine development.

Here we describe the generation and analysis of an F. tularensis Schu S4 transposon library. We have used this library to carry out a global analysis of essential genes and genes which contribute to spleen colonization within Fischer 344 rats. The data generated provide a resource that can allow further investigations into the mechanisms of Francisella virulence. Additionally, these data can facilitate the rational design of live attenuated vaccine strains and novel antimicrobial targets for the prevention and treatment of tularemia.

RESULTS

Construction and sequencing of a saturated F. tularensis Schu S4 transposon library.

An F. tularensis Schu S4 library was constructed using the pHimarH3 transposon (28). Sequencing of transposon-genome junctions that had been selectively enriched by PCR generated approximately 15 million reads for each replicate, of which 92% to 96% mapped to the F. tularensis Schu S4 genome (Table 1). The EMBOSS fuzznuc application (29) was used to identify the existence of 414,318 potential Himar1 insertion site recognition sequences (TA) on the forward and complement strands of the F. tularensis Schu S4 genome. Therefore, a mean mutant library size of 323,702 would indicate that 78% of Himar1 recognition sites in the F. tularensis library genome contained transposon insertions.

TABLE 1.

Summary of PCR-amplified transposon-genome junction sequencing reads mapped to the F. tularensis Schu S4 genome following outgrowth of the library in MMH broth

Replicate No. of total reads No. of reads mapped % mappeda No. of UISsb Genome length/UIS
FT1 15,312,503 14,527,401 96.41 316,141 5.99
FT2 15,952,998 14,459,470 92.18 330,262 5.73
FT3 14,392,221 13,420,403 94.63 324,704 5.83
a

Determined from only the reads containing the transposon tag.

b

UIS, unique insertion sites.

Prediction of genes essential to F. tularensis Schu S4.

The use of transposons to identify genes that are required for growth under the test condition can enable identification of those genes that are unable to tolerate transposon insertions and are likely to be essential for bacterial growth or survival. The Bio::Tradis pipeline (30, 31) was used to analyze mapped reads and predict genes essential for F. tularensis Schu S4. Following mapping of PCR-enriched transposon-genome junctions, the insertion count per gene for each replicate was tallied and normalized for gene length (insertion count/gene length) to calculate the insertion index. The insertion index for each was compared across three biological replicates as a scatter plot (Fig. 1) to give a high correlation coefficient, 0.98. We determined that the TA count per gene was highly correlated to gene length, with a Spearman r value of 0.97 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.96 to 0.97, thereby validating gene length a suitable normalizing factor for insertion count in the F. tularensis genome.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Pairwise comparison of gene insertion index values. Reproducibility of sequencing data was demonstrated by calculating the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between biological replicates.

To differentiate the essential from nonessential genes, the insertion index for each gene was plotted by frequency (Fig. 2A). This revealed a bimodal distribution, and the minimal value between the two modes was calculated. Analysis of F. tularensis Schu S4 transposon libraries in this study using the Bio::Tradis tools predicted genes with an insertion index of <0.06 as essential. Gene essentiality was predicted for each of the replicate libraries, with 453 genes present in all three (Fig. 2B). The raw data for each replicate are available in Data Set S1 in the supplemental material and include the essential gene sequences in fastA format. Genes identified as essential mapped to a number of biochemical pathways using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) resource (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/), including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, fatty acid biosynthesis, and peptidoglycan synthesis (Fig. S1).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Prediction of gene essentiality from transposon libraries in F. tularensis Schu S4. (A) Insertion index plotted against density demonstrates a bimodal distribution (representative, FT1 replicate). (B) Essentiality analysis was performed on each replicate, identifying 453 genes that were present in all three. (C) Comparison of essential genes from both F. novicida U112 (32) and F. tularensis Schu S4 (this study) identified 339 predicted essential genes that are common to both species.

Previously 396 candidate essential genes were identified in the related nonvirulent species F. novicida U112 (32). F. tularensis Schu S4 genes predicted to be essential were used in a BLASTx search (expected cutoff, 1E−10) against the F. novicida U112 data set (32) utilizing the Database for Essential Genes (DEG) (http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/deg/) (33). This identified 339 genes from F. tularensis Schu S4 that were also found to be essential in F. novicida U112 (Fig. 2C). Additionally, a total of 57 genes were identified as essential in F. novicida U112 but not essential in F. tularensis Schu S4.

The F. tularensis Schu S4 genes for which no homologue was predicted as essential in F. novicida U112 (114 genes [Fig. 2C]) were used in a BLASTx analysis against the remaining 45 bacterial essential gene data sets present in the DEG. This analysis identified 25 putative F. tularensis Schu S4 essential genes that had no homologue. To limit the possibility of falsely identifying novel essential genes, as a consequence of either a small gene returning an expected value higher than the cutoff or genes with areas of low complexity, the DEG BLASTx analysis was repeated on these 25 genes, this time increasing the expected value cutoff to 1E−05 and without using the low-complexity filter. Nine genes returned hits, including FTT_0346 (rpmJ), FTT_0801c, FTT_0839 (tolA), FTT_1030, FTT_1275 (mglA), FTT_1453c (wzx), FTT_1457c (wbtG), FTT_1607 (minE), and FTT_1730c, and were therefore excluded from the novel essential gene list.

BLASTx analysis of F. tularensis Schu S4 non-DEG homologues.

In order to give a suggestion of function for the 16 F. tularensis Schu S4 genes for which no DEG homologues had been identified (Table 2), a similarity search was performed against the NCBI nonredundant protein database, but excluding sequences from the Francisella genus using BLASTx with an expected value threshold of 1E−05. Many of the F. tularensis essential genes consistently revealed homology to hypothetical genes found in a wide range of environmental organisms often isolated from marine environments. Three hypothetical genes, FTT_0913, FTT_1051c, and FTT_1113c, showed no significant homology to any sequences in the nonredundant database. However, it should be noted that analysis of the TA site distribution across all genes within the F. tularensis genome identified a single gene outlier (FTT_1051c) with a disproportionally lower number of TA sites (10 sites) relative to its length. BLASTx and domain analyses and structural analysis using the I-Tasser protein structure and function prediction tool (34) were performed on the 16 genes of interest (Data Set S2). A number of conserved domains were identified, including a redoxin domain identified in FTT_0557 (domain E value, 1.20E−22) that also showed structural homology (TM scores, 0.97 to 0.855) to peroxiredoxin. A homologue for FTT_0696 was not identified in the DEG despite the presence of an FtsL pfam (35) conserved domain (domain E value, 2.09E−09). Although 14 studies in the DEG identified FtsL as essential, it has been noted that homologues of FtsL often share domain structures that are similar but are not well conserved at the amino acid level (36).

TABLE 2.

Putative essential F. tularensis Schu S4 genes with no DEG homologues

Locus tag Gene name Start End Gene length Function
FTT_0057 FTT_0057 59627 60058 432 Hypothetical membrane protein
FTT_0070c ampG 70944 72209 1,266 Major facilitator superfamily transport protein
FTT_0181c FTT_0181c 197194 197730 537 Conserved membrane protein
FTT_0265 FTT_0265 278751 280550 1,800 ABC transporter, membrane protein
FTT_0557 FTT_0557 575197 575721 525 AhpC/TSA family protein
FTT_0696 FTT_0696 715529 715879 351 Hypothetical protein
FTT_0743 FTT_0743 766572 767387 816 Conserved hypothetical protein
FTT_0859c FTT_0859c 870754 871077 324 Hypothetical protein
FTT_0900 FTT_0900 909502 909873 372 Conserved hypothetical membrane protein
FTT_0913 FTT_0913 920784 921251 468 Hypothetical protein
FTT_0924 FTT_0924 935772 936170 399 Hypothetical membrane protein
FTT_1051c FTT_1051c 1061830 1061994 165 Hypothetical protein
FTT_1113c FTT_1113c 1123209 1123739 531 Hypothetical protein
FTT_1152 FTT_1152 1166334 1166717 384 Hypothetical protein
FTT_1489 FTT_1489 1542386 1543111 726 Hypothetical protein
FTT_1637c FTT_1637c 1702959 1703162 204 Hypothetical protein

Identification of genes required for optimal fitness during infection.

Extending the essential gene analysis, we set out to determine the genes that are important within a host environment. To identify genes important for fitness of F. tularensis in the Fischer 344 rat, a TraDIS approach was again implemented. To avoid potential stochastic loss of mutants from the output pool, the intravenous (i.v.) route was selected for challenge. Fischer 344 rats were challenged i.v. at a dose of 7.8 × 106 CFU of the F. tularensis Schu S4 himar1 transposon library. At this dose, by 4 h postchallenge the bacterial burden in the spleen had reached a mean of 1.31 × 106 CFU/spleen (Fig. 3); this time point was used as an indication of the number of bacteria present in the spleen prior to replication. At 24 h postchallenge there was a mean of 7.32 × 108 CFU/spleen (Fig. 3), representing a 559-fold increase in bacterial numbers.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Colonization of Fischer 344 rat spleens with F. tularensis Schu S4. Two groups of rats were challenged by the i.v. route with an F. tularensis Schu S4 Himar1 transposon library. At 4 h or 24 h postchallenge, rats were humanely culled and spleen bacterial burden was determined.

Genomic DNA was isolated from the input pool and from bacteria isolated from rat spleens at 24 h postchallenge. Transposon-genome junctions were selectively amplified by PCR and sequenced, and fitness analysis was performed using DESeq. To ensure accuracy and reduce the number of genes falsely identified, only genes with an arbitrary minimum value of 200 reads in the input were included in the analysis. A 2-fold reduction cutoff in read count between input and output was applied to generate a list of 163 genes required for fitness within the spleen. Those mutants not present in the output were arbitrarily set a fitness score of −15 (Table S4). Fifty percent of genes conferring reduced fitness in the rat spleen had previously been identified using murine models of Francisella infection (Table S4). This includes genes identified using F. tularensis subsp. holarctica and F. novicida strains. Of the 163 genes required for fitness in the rat spleen, 101 genes had not previously been identified as important for virulence of F. tularensis subsp. tularensis and a further 19 genes had been identified only through changes in gene expression. Additionally, 34 genes had not previously been associated with virulence in any Francisella species or subspecies.

Validation of genes required for fitness in Fischer 344 rats.

To validate data from this TraDIS study, genes were selected for deletion mutagenesis with an emphasis on those not previously reported as involved in virulence (FTT_0232c ddg [acyltransferase], FTT_0614c lnt [apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase], FTT_0970 [uncharacterized protein], FTT_1220 [5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase], FTT_1567c zipA [cell division protein], FTT_0687c hslU [ATP-dependent protease ATPase subunit], and FTT_1258 [outer membrane efflux protein]) (Table S4). Additionally, a mutant that did not exhibit a fitness change (FTT_0715; P = 0.934) was selected as a control. Initially, MMH broth was inoculated with a 1:1 ratio of wild-type (WT) F. tularensis Schu S4 and each mutant. Schu S4 Δlnt::Kanr and ΔFTT_1567::Kanr strains had significantly reduced fitness relative to that of the WT (P = 0.020 and P = 0.035, respectively) (Fig. 4A).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Competitive fitness of F. tularensis Schu S4 mutant strains. The relative fitness of marked mutants was evaluated in competition with WT F. tularensis Schu S4. Values are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals. Competition under two growth conditions was tested; panel A shows the fitness of individual mutants in vitro in MMH broth (n = 3), and panel B shows the fitness of mutants in Fischer 344 rats (n = 5) that were challenged with the WT and mutant at a 1:1 ratio by the i.v. route. Each datum was analyzed with a one-sample t test comparing the competitive index to a value of 1.0. A D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test confirmed Gaussian distribution. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.

The targeted marked deletion strains of F. tularensis Schu S4 were tested to assess validity of the Fisher 344 rat fitness data. Mutant strains were individually mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the WT and used to challenge Fischer 344 rats by the i.v. route. Strains exhibiting in vitro growth defects were not studied further. Animals were humanely culled at the humane endpoint, spleens were removed, and the WT and mutant bacteria were enumerated by culture (Fig. 4B). All deletion strains tested were significantly less fit than the WT with the exception of the ΔFTT_0715::Kanr strain, for which no change in fitness was observed. The reduced fitness of selected mutants, in competition with the WT, successfully validated the Fischer 344 rat transposon negative selection screen.

DISCUSSION

The murine model of tularemia has provided significant contributions to our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of F. tularensis. However, the model is not without limitation. Mutations have attenuated F. tularensis sufficiently for the LVS to be used for human vaccination (37) but are not sufficient to attenuate the organism in mice and prevent lethality, indicating that different mechanisms of virulence maybe be involved for different hosts. The Fischer 344 rat has been used as a model for tularemia vaccine candidate evaluation due to its reduced sensitivity to pulmonary challenge with F. tularensis compared to murine models (38, 39). The lower susceptibility of Fischer 344 rats is described as being closer to that of humans, although similar susceptibilities of mice and Fischer 344 rats to F. tularensis via the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route has been noted (38). Fischer 344 rats, like humans, are highly resistant to the LVS (40), which also provides protection against subsequent challenge with F. tularensis Schu S4. Given that F. tularensis has a broad host range, to fully understand the genetic basis for virulence of this pathogen, it may be necessary to study alternative animal models of infection.

The high insertion frequency of the transposon mutant library described (>300,000 unique mutants) provided the opportunity, prior to study in Fischer 344 rats, to identify genes that are essential in vitro. The analysis identified 453 genes as essential under the condition tested. Comparison to data from an F. novicida library of 8,928 mutants (32) revealed that 339 genes were essential in both species. Although differences in essentiality prediction between the species potentially reflect different metabolisms, they may also be a consequence of different experimental conditions utilized in the two studies. To explore genes not previously identified as essential in Francisella, we performed BLASTx analysis using the 114 essential genes predicted in F. tularensis Schu S4 but not in F. novicida. Many of these non-DEG essential genes showed homology to genes from bacteria occupying a marine or environmental niche. Francisella species have often been associated with aquatic environments (4143), and the absence of these novel essential genes identified in DEG is therefore likely due to the paucity of essentiality data for organisms occupying this niche.

Our data have identified a number of essential genes for which no homologue was identified in the DEG, of which two conferred a level of functional homology. FTT_0070c encodes AmpG, a putative muropeptide transporter involved in recycling peptidoglycan, and shares 38% identity with Escherichia coli AmpG (95% coverage; E value, 1E−93); disruption of ampG in E. coli caused the bacterium to lose up to 40% of its peptidoglycan per generation (36). Peptidoglycan recycling was also identified as an important process in vivo, since ampD (FTT_0162), which encodes a cytoplasmic amidase (44), was required for fitness within the Fischer 344 rat spleen. A link with virulence has previously been reported for F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, for which Brunton et al. (45) observed a reduction in intracellular colonization of ampD mutants during negative selection in J774 macrophage-like and TC-1 epithelial cells. Given that the F. tularensis genome has been described as in an advanced state of decay (46), it is possible that a reduced metabolic repertoire could consequently impose a greater requirement for peptidoglycan recycling under a number of different growth conditions. Additionally, FTT_0557 shows homology to peroxiredoxins, a thiol-specific group of antioxidants. Given the requirement of F. tularensis for cysteine (47, 48), a potential role for peroxiredoxin-mediated protection from oxidative stress during aerobic growth is of interest.

In some cases, isogenic mutants have been created in Francisella for a number of genes we have identified as essential. Our data predict mglA (macrophage growth locus A) and ripA (required for intracellular proliferation factor A) to be essential genes for Schu S4. Yet targeted mglA and ripA deletion strains have been reported for F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, F. novicida, and F. tularensis subsp. tularensis (with the exception of mglA in the last) (17, 4952), suggesting that this gene is dispensable for in vitro growth. However, growth defects have been reported under certain conditions for both of these deletion strains (5153). To our knowledge, mglA deletion has not been reported for F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. It is therefore plausible that either an absolute requirement for the mglA exists for F. tularensis subsp. tularensis or a less fit mutant (for both mglA or ripA) could be lost through competition during outgrowth of our transposon library. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting competition-based transposon studies, as the potential exists for selection against mutants with a growth disadvantage that are not absolutely required for growth under the conditions of the study.

This Fischer 344 rat screen identified many genes previously associated with virulence of Francisella in cell lines, animals, and insect models (fully detailed in Table S4) and contributes to the validation of the sequencing approach used to generate the data. It was not possible to assess the contribution of the Francisella pathogenicity island due to sequencing reads mapping to two genomic locations (duplicated 34-kb region).

To further validate the data generated from the Fischer 344 rat in vivo screen, 8 targeted deletion mutants were produced in F. tularensis Schu S4. Two mutants, F. tularensis Schu S4 Δlnt::Kanr and ΔFTT_1567c::Kanr mutants, had a reduced competitive index (CI) in vitro, suggesting a host-independent growth defect when in competition with WT Schu S4. FTT_1567c contains a ZipA C-terminal domain, as predicted by Interpro annotation (54, 55). ZipA interacts with FtsZ during cell division, promoting septum formation (56), and is known to be essential across a number of bacterial genera (24, 5762), but due to the narrow conservation of ZipA between bacterial species, further interrogation is necessary to determine the function of FTT_1567c. The second mutant exhibiting a defect in growth is the Δlnt::Kanr mutant, in which lnt is predicted to encode an apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase, an enzyme involved in lipoprotein maturation (63). Lipoproteins play a diverse role in bacterial pathogens, ranging from antibiotic resistance to sporulation and many aspects of bacterial virulence (64). LoVullo et al. determined that lnt, a gene that is often found to be essential in Gram-negative bacteria, is not essential for replication of F. tularensis LVS and detected a minor defect in bacterial physiology (63). Our studies identified more significant changes to bacterial physiology following deletion of lnt in F. tularensis Schu S4, primarily a change in cell size during passage in vitro (data not shown) with striking similarity to the changes observed previously through deletion of a predicted lipoprotein, FTT_0831c (65).

This study identified 34 genes that had not previously been associated with virulence in Francisella. One example is rng, which encodes RNase G. RNases are involved in RNA processing and decay (66) and have been shown to influence virulence gene expression (67, 68). RNase C involvement in F. tularensis Schu S4 virulence was previously shown in a negative selection screen using human-derived macrophages (69), and this finding was consistent with our in vivo Fischer 344 rat data. Inactivation of rng has been linked to upregulation of the heat shock response genes (70), but its role in Francisella virulence is unclear. Another potential novel virulence gene identified is the FTT_0750 gene, with homology to the elongation factor P–(R)-beta-lysine ligase (EpmB) gene in Salmonella enterica (98% coverage; E value, 1E−101; identity, 45%), which has been shown to modulate virulence and drug resistance (71). As with many of the genes identified in these studies, limited research has been undertaken. This investigation therefore represents a starting point to stimulate investigations that expand our knowledge on the pathogenesis of F. tularensis.

Currently, there is no licensed vaccine that can protect against F. tularensis. The LVS is able to provide protection in humans against aerosol exposure to virulent F. tularensis (5, 72), but the basis for protection remains unknown. Data generated from this Fischer 344 in vivo negative screen could provide the basis for the rational design of live vaccine strain candidates. The challenge is to identify candidate mutant strains capable of sufficient host colonization to induce a robust adaptive immune response but then unable to disseminate and cause disease. Strains with a greater potential to overattenuate could be identified by those mutants that have been lost entirely from the library or present at low levels in the output which may not be sufficiently exposed to the immune system to provide lasting immunity. A number of live attenuated vaccine candidates have been proposed, such as strains with the clpB (73) and FTT_1103 (74) genes. These strains have been shown to induce protective immunity and in our study presented a moderate log2 fold change (−1.83 and −1.88, respectively) in the output (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Therefore, the potential exists to utilize transposon-based fitness data to increase the probability of identifying mutant strains (live vaccine candidates) that are capable of inducing an immune response but are unable to cause disease.

In conclusion, we have generated a saturated transposon library containing >300,000 unique mutants. In combination with high-throughput next-generation sequencing, we have determined gene essentiality of F. tularensis Schu S4 and identified genes that are required for fitness within the Fischer 344 rat spleen. We were able to confirm previously identified virulence-related genes and identify new ones. Despite having a diverse host range, Francisella is rarely studied outside the mouse model. Our studies of gene essentiality and in vivo fitness provide the foundation to further understand the nutritional requirements and pathogenicity of this highly virulent organism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

F. tularensis subsp. tularensis Schu S4 (75) was used to construct a saturated transposon library. Strains of F. tularensis were grown routinely on modified Mueller-Hinton (MMH) agar or broth (76) or Thayer-Martin agar (77). Where required, medium was supplemented with kanamycin (10 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (5 μg/ml), or polymyxin B (100 μg/ml). All work with F. tularensis was undertaken with the appropriate laboratory containment conditions. Use of chloramphenicol and kanamycin resistance cassettes was approved locally by a genetic manipulation safety committee and approved nationally by the Health and Safety Executive (UK Health and Safety Authority). Lists of strains and plasmids (Table S1) and primers (Tables S2 and S3) can be found in the supplemental material.

Generation of mutant libraries.

Mutagenesis of the Francisella tularensis Schu S4 genome was achieved utilizing a modified Himar1 transposon (HimarFT) contained within a minimal suicide vehicle (pHimarH3), for which random, single, and stable insertions within F. tularensis have previously been demonstrated (28, 78). F. tularensis, grown at 37°C in MMH broth, was rendered electrocompetent by sequential washing and concentration in 0.5 M sucrose prior to electroporation with 1 μg of pHimarH3 at a field strength of 15 kV/cm in 0.2-cm-gap cuvettes (79). After recovery in MMH broth for 3 h, transformants were plated onto MMH agar supplemented with kanamycin. Cell numbers were determined by serial dilution prior to the collection of transformants directly from the plates. Transformants were pooled into batches of 40,000 before being combined to create the final transposon library of 520,000 mutants.

In vitro essential analysis.

A frozen vial of library stock was diluted into 50 ml of MMH broth to an optical density at 590 nm (OD590) of 0.5 and recovered by overnight incubation at 37°C and 200 rpm, achieving a final OD590 of 3.40. Genomic DNA was isolated with the Puregene yeast/bacterium DNA purification kit (Gentra Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

In vivo fitness studies in Fischer 344 rats.

Female Fischer 344 rats 6 to 7 weeks old (∼100 g) were purchased from (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN). The rats had access to food and water with 12-h light/dark cycles and were acclimatized for 10 days prior to the procedure. Animals were handled under biosafety level 3 containment conditions within a half-suit isolator, compliant with British standard BS5726. All procedures within this study were carried out according to the requirements of the United Kingdom Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. A frozen vial of library stock was diluted into 50 ml of MMH broth to an OD590 of 0.5 and was recovered by overnight incubation at 37°C and 200 rpm, achieving a final OD590 of 3.40. F. tularensis Schu S4 was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to 1 × 108 CFU per ml, and 100 μl was used to challenge each of six rats via the i.v. route. Humane endpoints were strictly observed, and animals assessed as incapable of survival were humanely killed by the administration of 1 ml of sodium pentobarbital by the i.p. route. Spleens were removed and homogenized with 2 ml of PBS using 40 μM cell strainers, and for each rat, 100 μl of spleen homogenate was spread onto each of eight MMH agar plates. Bacteria were removed from the agar plates following incubation at 37°C for 48 h and suspended into 10 ml of PBS. Genomic DNA was recovered using the Puregene Gentra kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the addition of a proteinase K (100 μg/ml) digestion step for 1.5 h at 55°C following RNase A treatment.

Illumina sequencing.

The DNA was separated into approximately 500-bp fragments using a Covaris machine with settings as follows: time, 110 s; peak incident power (PIP), 105 W; 200 cycles/burst; and 5% duty factor. The fragments were purified using a Qiagen PCR purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were prepared using a NEBNext DNA library preparation kit for Illumina, according to the manufacturer’s instructions: ends were repaired and A-tailed, and then annealed adapters Ind_Ad-T and Ind_Ad-B were ligated to the free ends. The fragments were then PCR amplified in 10 parallel reactions using primers PE_PCR_V3.3 and Ft_1 FC (Table S1B); the reaction mixtures were made up of 10 μl of JumpStart 10× buffer, 6 μl of MgCl2, 2 μl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 0.6 μl of 100 μM PE_PCR_V3.3 primer, 0.6 μl of Ft_1 FC primer, 1 μl of JumpStart Taq DNA polymerase, and 28.8 μl of nuclease-free water. The reactions were amplified at 94°C for 10 min (94°C for 30 s, 65°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s) for 22 cycles and 72°C for 10 min and then held at 12°C. The PCR products were pooled and quantified using quantitative PCR (qPCR). They were then size selected on a 2% agarose–1× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) gel; agarose blocks were excised corresponding to 350 to 500 bp. These were treated with a Qiagen MinElute gel extraction kit, and then the DNA fragments were requantified both by qPCR and on an Agilent bioanalyzer and sequenced as 100-bp single end reads on an Illumina Hi-Seq 2500 standard model.

Bioinformatic analysis for essential genes.

Adapter sequences and low-quality ends were removed from the raw sequencing reads using Trimmomatic (80), and reads that had been reduced to below 24 bp in length were dropped. Processed reads were mapped, insertion sites/read counts were tabulated, and a prediction of essentiality was determined using the Bio::Tradis pipeline as described previously (30, 31) (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/Bio-Tradis). Briefly, reads containing the pHimarH3 transposon tag were filtered and mapped to the F. tularensis Schu S4 reference genome (EMBL accession number AJ749949) using SMALT-0.7.2, allowing 0 mismatches. Postprocessing of the mapped reads involved determination of the gene insertion index (insertion count/gene length) and excluded the first 5% and last 15% of each gene to avoid insertions that may not affect gene function. Gene essentiality was predicted through fitting gamma distributions to the essential and nonessential peaks of the observed bimodal distributions. Log2 likelihood ratios were calculated between the two modes providing the insertion-index threshold and the prediction of gene essentiality. Genes with log2 likelihood ratios of less than −2 were described as essential, and those with log2 likelihood ratios of greater than 2 were considered nonessential genes (31).

In vivo fitness analysis by DESeq.

Sequence reads were aligned to the reference genome using the sequence alignment tool BWA (81). The mismatch error limit was set 2. All other parameters used default values of the tool. After alignment, an in-house script was used to calculate the frequency data for each gene in each replicate as previously described (82). The “executable C script for annotation” (accessed at http://ecsb.ex.ac.uk/DEM/index.html) established the frequency of transposon hits across the genome. The count data were then converted to reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM). The fitness package DESeq (83) analyzed the matrix to predict the differential fitness of individual mutants. DESeq is a tool for analyzing high-throughput sequence reads data for detecting differentially expressed genes with an assumption that the count data follow a binomial distribution. Default values were used within the DESeq package, and a list detailing the relative abundance of the individual mutants was generated. The tool generates a list of differentially expressed genes based on the P values (84).

Generation of marked and unmarked mutants.

Marked mutants were generated using a modified version of the SacB/oriT suicide plasmid pEDL50 (85) to facilitate the use of the kanamycin gene and its GroES promoter derived from pHimarH3 as the marker for mutagenesis. The kanamycin resistance gene on the pEDL50 backbone was replaced with a chloramphenicol resistance gene. Initially, the multiple-cloning site was removed by restriction digestion with AleI and EcorV and recircularized by ligation. The resulting plasmid was named pMIRE14 and was generated to remove a second PstI site. The chloramphenicol gene from pKK201 (86) was cloned, including a 107-bp upstream region, and was flanked by 5′ SpeI and 3′ PstI sites. Restriction digestion of the subcloned chloramphenicol gene (Zero Blunt TOPO; Thermo Fisher) and pMIRE14 with SpeI and PstI followed by ligation allowed the direct replacement of the kanamycin resistance gene with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette, generating pMIRE15.

To generate marked deletion constructs, flanking regions (∼750 bp) of the target gene were amplified by PCR and ligated into pMIRE15 on either side of a kanamycin resistance gene that had been amplified from pHimarH3 (78). The deletion constructs were electroporated into E. coli S17 λ pir and mobilized into WT F. tularensis Schu S4 by conjugation as described previously (87). Merodiploids generated through chromosomal integration of the suicide plasmid were selected on Thayer-Martin agar containing either chloramphenicol or kanamycin and polymyxin B and incubated at 37°C. Following PCR verification, isolated colonies were spread by diminishing streak onto Thayer-Martin agar supplemented with 5% (wt/vol) sucrose and 10 μg/ml of kanamycin and incubated at 37°C until colonies were evident. The marked deletion was confirmed by PCR of all mutants and six by whole-genome sequencing.

In vitro competitive index.

F. tularensis Schu S4 strains were prepared from sucrose stocks onto MMH agar and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were adjusted by OD590 in MMH broth to 5 × 108 CFU/ml and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 220 rpm. Each strain was adjusted by OD590 to 5 × 108 CFU/ml in MMH broth and used to prepare a 1:1 ratio of each mutant with WT F. tularensis Schu S4. Growth in competition was allowed to proceed for 24 h at 37°C. CFU were determined by serial dilution onto both MMH agar alone and MMH agar with 10 μg/ml of kanamycin. CFU values were log10 transformed and used to calculate the competitive index of WT to marked deletion using the following formula: (mutant output count/WT output count)/(mutant input count/WT input count).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
JB.00630-18-s0001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
JB.00630-18-sd001.xlsx (159.4KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 3
JB.00630-18-sd002.xlsx (26.3KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Funding was provided by the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00630-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Morner T. 1992. The ecology of tularaemia. Rev Sci Tech 11:1123–1130. doi: 10.20506/rst.11.4.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. 2002. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:631–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sjostedt A. 2007. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:1–29. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oyston PC, Sjostedt A, Titball RW. 2004. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:967–978. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saslaw S, Eigelsbach HT, Prior JA, Wilson HE, Carhart S. 1961. Tularemia vaccine study. II. Respiratory challenge. Arch Intern Med 107:702–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tarnvik A, Chu MC. 2007. New approaches to diagnosis and therapy of tularemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:378–404. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker RT, Lister LM, Bauer RE, Hall HE, Woodward TE. 1950. Use of chloramphenicol (chloromycetin) in experimental and human tularemia. JAMA 143:7–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scheel O, Reiersen R, Hoel T. 1992. Treatment of tularemia with ciprofloxacin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11:447–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Enderlin G, Morales L, Jacobs RF, Cross JT. 1994. Streptomycin and alternative agents for the treatment of tularemia: review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 19:42–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Risi GF, Pombo DJ. 1995. Relapse of tularemia after aminoglycoside therapy: case report and discussion of therapeutic options. Clin Infect Dis 20:174–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kraemer PS, Mitchell A, Pelletier MR, Gallagher LA, Wasnick M, Rohmer L, Brittnacher MJ, Manoil C, Skerett SJ, Salama NR. 2009. Genome wide screen in Francisella novicida for genes required for pulmonary and systemic infection in mice. Infect Immun 77:232–244. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00978-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Tulkens PM. 1999. Aminoglycosides: nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1003–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wayne Conlan J, Oyston PC. 2007. Vaccines against Francisella tularensis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:325–350. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jia Q, Horwitz MA. 2018. Live attenuated Tularemia vaccines for protection against respiratory challenge with virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:154. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marohn ME, Barry EM. 2013. Live attenuated tularemia vaccines: recent developments and future goals. Vaccine 31:3485–3491. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nano FE, Zhang N, Cowley SC, Klose KE, Cheung KK, Roberts MJ, Ludu JS, Letendre GW, Meierovics AI, Stephens G, Elkins KL. 2004. A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island required for intramacrophage growth. J Bacteriol 186:6430–6436. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.19.6430-6436.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baron GS, Nano FE. 1998. MglA and MglB are required for the intramacrophage growth of Francisella novicida. Mol Microbiol 29:247–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakraborty S, Monfett M, Maier TM, Benach JL, Frank DW, Thanassi DG. 2008. Type IV pili in Francisella tularensis: roles of pilF and pilT in fiber assembly, host cell adherence, and virulence. Infect Immun 76:2852–2861. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01726-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gunn JS, Ernst RK. 2007. The structure and function of Francisella lipopolysaccharide. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:202–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Apicella MA, Post DM, Fowler AC, Jones BD, Rasmussen JA, Hunt JR, Imagawa S, Choudhury B, Inzana TJ, Maier TM, Frank DW, Zahrt TC, Chaloner K, Jennings MP, McLendon MK, Gibson BW. 2010. Identification, characterization and immunogenicity of an O-antigen capsular polysaccharide of Francisella tularensis. PLoS One 5:e11060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brett M, Doppalapudi A, Respicio-Kingry LB, Myers D, Husband B, Pollard K, Mead P, Petersen JM, Whitener CJ. 2012. Francisella novicida bacteremia after a near-drowning accident. J Clin Microbiol 50:2826–2829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00995-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brett ME, Respicio-Kingry LB, Yendell S, Ratard R, Hand J, Balsamo G, Scott-Waldron C, O’Neal C, Kidwell D, Yockey B, Singh P, Carpenter J, Hill V, Petersen JM, Mead P. 2014. Outbreak of Francisella novicida bacteremia among inmates at a Louisiana correctional facility. Clin Infect Dis 59:826–833. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goodman AL, McNulty NP, Zhao Y, Leip D, Mitra RD, Lozupone CA, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2009. Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe 6:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Langridge GC, Phan MD, Turner DJ, Perkins TT, Parts L, Haase J, Charles I, Maskell DJ, Peters SE, Dougan G, Wain J, Parkhill J, Turner AK. 2009. Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella Typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. Genome Res 19:2308–2316. doi: 10.1101/gr.097097.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. 2009. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6:767–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gawronski JD, Wong SMS, Giannoukos G, Ward DV, Akerley BJ. 2009. Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:16422–16427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906627106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wetmore KM, Price MN, Waters RJ, Lamson JS, He J, Hoover CA, Blow MJ, Bristow J, Butland G, Arkin AP, Deutschbauer A. 2015. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. mBio 6:e00306-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00306-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maier TM, Pechous R, Casey M, Zahrt TC, Frank DW. 2006. In vivo Himar1-based transposon mutagenesis of Francisella tularensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1878–1885. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1878-1885.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16:276–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barquist L, Mayho M, Cummins C, Cain AK, Boinett CJ, Page AJ, Langridge GC, Quail MA, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2016. The TraDIS toolkit: sequencing and analysis for dense transposon mutant libraries. Bioinformatics 32:1109–1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barquist L, Langridge GC, Turner DJ, Phan MD, Turner AK, Bateman A, Parkhill J, Wain J, Gardner PP. 2013. A comparison of dense transposon insertion libraries in the Salmonella serovars Typhi and Typhimurium. Nucleic Acids Res 41:4549–4564. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gallagher LA, Ramage E, Jacobs MA, Kaul R, Brittnacher M, Manoil C. 2007. A comprehensive transposon mutant library of Francisella novicida, a bioweapon surrogate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1009–1014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606713104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Luo H, Lin Y, Gao F, Zhang CT, Zhang R. 2014. DEG 10, an update of the database of essential genes that includes both protein-coding genes and noncoding genomic elements. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D574–D580. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. 2015. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods 12:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A, Potter SC, Qureshi M, Richardson LJ, Salazar GA, Smart A, Sonnhammer ELL, Hirsh L, Paladin L, Piovesan D, Tosatto SCE, Finn RD. 24 October 2018. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gky995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jacobs C, Huang LJ, Bartowsky E, Normark S, Park JT. 1994. Bacterial cell wall recycling provides cystolic muropeptides as effectors for beta-lactamase induction. EMBO J 13:4684–4694. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06792.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hornick RB, Eigelsbach HT. 1966. Aerogenic immunization of man with live tularemia vaccine. Bacteriol Rev 30:532–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ray HJ, Chu P, Wu TH, Lyons CR, Murthy AK, Guentzel MN, Klose KE, Arulanandam BP. 2010. The Fischer 344 rat reflects human susceptibility to Francisella pulmonary challenge and provides a new platform for virulence and protection studies. PLoS One 5:e9952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu TH, Zsemlye JL, Statom GL, Hutt JA, Schrader RM, Scrymgeour AA, Lyons CR. 2009. Vaccination of Fischer 344 rats against pulmonary infections by Francisella tularensis type A strains. Vaccine 27:4684–4693. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Raymond CR, Conlan JW. 2009. Differential susceptibility of Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats to infection by Francisella tularensis. Microb Pathog 46:231–234. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barns SM, Grow CC, Okinaka RT, Keim P, Kuske CR. 2005. Detection of diverse new Francisella-like bacteria in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5494–5500. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5494-5500.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Berrada ZL, Telford SR III.. 2010. Diversity of Francisella species in environmental samples from Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. Microb Ecol 59:277–283. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9568-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Simsek H, Taner M, Karadenizli A, Ertek M, Vahaboglu H. 2012. Identification of Francisella tularensis by both culture and real-time TaqMan PCR methods from environmental water specimens in outbreak areas where tularemia cases were not previously reported. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:2353–2357. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1576-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Holtje JV, Kopp U, Ursinus A, Wiedemann B. 1994. The negative regulator of beta-lactamase induction AmpD is a N-acetyl-anhydromuramyl-L-alanine amidase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 122:159–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brunton J, Steele S, Miller C, Lovullo E, Taft-Benz S, Kawula T. 2015. Identifying Francisella tularensis genes required for growth in host cells. Infect Immun 83:3015–3025. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00004-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Larsson P, Oyston PC, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius HH, Garcia E, Halltorp G, Johansson D, Isherwood KE, Karp PD, Larsson E, Liu Y, Michell S, Prior J, Prior R, Malfatti S, Sjostedt A, Svensson K, Thompson N, Vergez L, Wagg JK, Wren BW, Lindler LE, Andersson SG, Forsman M, Titball RW. 2005. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet 37:153–159. doi: 10.1038/ng1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alkhuder K, Meibom KL, Dubail I, Dupuis M, Charbit A. 2009. Glutathione provides a source of cysteine essential for intracellular multiplication of Francisella tularensis. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000284. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ireland PM, LeButt H, Thomas RM, Oyston PC. 2011. A Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 mutant deficient in gamma-glutamyltransferase activity induces protective immunity: characterization of an attenuated vaccine candidate. Microbiology 157:3172–3179. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.052902-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brotcke A, Weiss DS, Kim CC, Chain P, Malfatti S, Garcia E, Monack DM. 2006. Identification of MglA-regulated genes reveals novel virulence factors in Francisella tularensis. Infect Immun 74:6642–6655. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01250-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fuller JR, Craven RR, Hall JD, Kijek TM, Taft-Benz S, Kawula TH. 2008. RipA, a cytoplasmic membrane protein conserved among Francisella species, is required for intracellular survival. Infect Immun 76:4934–4943. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00475-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cohen O, Zaide G, Bar-Haim E, Mendelson I, Gat O, Ehrlich S, Friedman G, Shafferman A. 2010. Effect of disruption of mglA on the virulence and immunogenicity of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS), p 219–227. In Shafferman A, Ordentlich A, Velan B (ed), The challenge of highly pathogenic microorganisms. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Basel, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Charity JC, Costante-Hamm MM, Balon EL, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ, Dove SL. 2007. Twin RNA polymerase-associated proteins control virulence gene expression in Francisella tularensis. PLoS Pathog 3:770–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fuller JR, Kijek TM, Taft-Benz S, Kawula TH. 2009. Environmental and intracellular regulation of Francisella tularensis ripA. BMC Microbiol 9:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Das U, Daugherty L, Duquenne L, Finn RD, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Kahn D, Kelly E, Laugraud A, Letunic I, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Mulder N, Natale D, Orengo C, Quinn AF, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thimma M, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH, Yeats C. 2009. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D211–D215. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mitchell A, Chang H-Y, Daugherty L, Fraser M, Hunter S, Lopez R, McAnulla C, McMenamin C, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Rato C, Yong S-Y, Bateman A, Punta M, Attwood TK, Sigrist CJA, Redaschi N, Rivoire C, Xenarios I, Kahn D, Guyot D, Bork P, Letunic I, Gough J, Oates M, Haft D, Huang H, Natale DA, Wu CH, Orengo C, Sillitoe I, Mi H, Thomas PD, Finn RD. 2015. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D213–D221. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moy FJ, Glasfeld E, Mosyak L, Powers R. 2000. Solution structure of ZipA, a crucial component of Escherichia coli cell division. Biochemistry 39:9146–9156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cameron DE, Urbach JM, Mekalanos JJ. 2008. A defined transposon mutant library and its use in identifying motility genes in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:8736–8741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803281105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Novick VL, Amaya K, Judson N, Mekalanos JJ. 2002. A genome-scale analysis for identification of genes required for growth or survival of Haemophilus influenzae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:966–971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012602299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gerdes SY, Scholle MD, Campbell JW, Balazsi G, Ravasz E, Daugherty MD, Somera AL, Kyrpides NC, Anderson I, Gelfand MS, Bhattacharya A, Kapatral V, D’Souza M, Baev MV, Grechkin Y, Mseeh F, Fonstein MY, Overbeek R, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN, Osterman AL. 2003. Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J Bacteriol 185:5673–5684. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.19.5673-5684.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Deutschbauer A, Price MN, Wetmore KM, Shao W, Baumohl JK, Xu Z, Nguyen M, Tamse R, Davis RW, Arkin AP. 2011. Evidence-based annotation of gene function in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using genome-wide fitness profiling across 121 conditions. PLoS Genet 7:e1002385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Turner KH, Wessel AK, Palmer GC, Murray JL, Whiteley M. 2015. Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:4110–4115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419677112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang N, Ozer EA, Mandel MJ, Hauser AR. 2014. Genome-wide identification of Acinetobacter baumannii genes necessary for persistence in the lung. mBio 5:e01163-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01163-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.LoVullo ED, Wright LF, Isabella V, Huntley JF, Pavelka MS. 2015. Revisiting the Gram-negative lipoprotein paradigm. J Bacteriol 197:1705–1715. doi: 10.1128/JB.02414-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kovacs-Simon A, Titball RW, Michell SL. 2011. Lipoproteins of bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun 79:548–561. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00682-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Robertson GT, Case EDR, Dobbs N, Ingle C, Balaban M, Celli J, Norgard MV. 2014. FTT0831c/FTL_0325 contributes to Francisella tularensis cell division, maintenance of cell shape, and structural integrity. Infect Immun 82:2935–2948. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00102-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Umitsuki G, Wachi M, Takada A, Hikichi T, Nagai K. 2001. Involvement of RNase G in in vivo mRNA metabolism in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 6:403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Huntzinger E, Boisset S, Saveanu C, Benito Y, Geissmann T, Namane A, Lina G, Etienne J, Ehresmann B, Ehresmann C, Jacquier A, Vandenesch F, Romby P. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression. EMBO J 24:824–835. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Viegas SC, Mil-Homens D, Fialho AM, Arraiano CM. 2013. The virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the insect model Galleria mellonella is impaired by mutations in RNase E and RNase III. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6124–6133. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02044-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lindemann SR, Peng KT, Long ME, Hunt JR, Apicella MA, Monack DM, Allen LAH, Jones BD. 2011. Francisella tularensis Schu S4 O-antigen and capsule biosynthesis gene mutants induce early cell death in human macrophages. Infect Immun 79:581–594. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00863-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bernardini A, Corona F, Dias R, Sanchez MB, Martinez JL. 2015. The inactivation of RNase G reduces the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia susceptibility to quinolones by triggering the heat shock response. Front Microbiol 6:1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Navarre WW, Zou SB, Roy H, Xie JL, Savchenko A, Singer A, Edvokimova E, Prost LR, Kumar R, Ibba M, Fang FC. 2010. PoxA, yjeK, and elongation factor P coordinately modulate virulence and drug resistance in Salmonella enterica. Mol Cell 39:209–221. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McCrumb FR. 1961. Aerosol infection of man with Pasteurella tularensis. Bacteriol Rev 25:262–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Twine S, Shen H, Harris G, Chen W, Sjostedt A, Ryden P, Conlan W. 2012. BALB/c mice, but not C57BL/6 mice immunized with a ΔclpB mutant of Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis are protected against respiratory challenge with wild-type bacteria: association of protection with post-vaccination and post-challenge immune responses. Vaccine 30:3634–3645. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Qin A, Scott DW, Thompson JA, Mann BJ. 2009. Identification of an essential Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis virulence factor. Infect Immun 77:152–161. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01113-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hesselbrock W, Foshay L. 1945. The morphology of Bacterium tularense. J Bacteriol 49:209–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Baker CN, Hollis DG, Thornsberry C. 1985. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Francisella tularensis with a modified Mueller-Hinton broth. J Clin Microbiol 22:212–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Atlas RM. 2004. Handbook of microbiological media. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Maier TA, Casey MS, Becker RH, Dorsey CW, Glass EA, Maltsev N, Zahrt TC, Frank DW. 2007. Identification of Francisella tularensis Himar1-based transposon mutants defective for replication in macrophages. Infect Immun 75:5376–5389. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00238-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.LoVullo ED, Sherrill LA, Perez LL, Pavelka MS. 2006. Genetic tools for highly pathogenic Francisella tularensis subsp tularensis. Microbiology 152:3425–3435. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29121-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yang ZR, Bullifent HL, Moore K, Paszkiewicz K, Saint RJ, Southern SJ, Champion OL, Senior NJ, Sarkar-Tyson M, Oyston PC, Atkins TP, Titball RW. 2017. A noise trimming and positional significance of transposon insertion system to identify essential genes in Yersinia pestis. Sci Rep 7:41923. doi: 10.1038/srep41923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.LoVullo ED, Miller CN, Pavelka MS, Kawula TH. 2012. TetR-based gene regulation systems for Francisella tularensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6883–6889. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01679-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Norqvist A, Kuoppa K, Sandstrom G. 1996. Construction of a shuttle vector for use in Francisella tularensis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 13:257–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Golovliov I, Sjostedt A, Mokrievich A, Pavlov V. 2003. A method for allelic replacement in Francisella tularensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 222:273–280. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00313-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
JB.00630-18-s0001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
JB.00630-18-sd001.xlsx (159.4KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 3
JB.00630-18-sd002.xlsx (26.3KB, xlsx)

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES