Skip to main content
Cartilage logoLink to Cartilage
. 2017 Oct 9;10(2):186–195. doi: 10.1177/1947603517734028

Hyperosmolar Potassium (K+) Treatment Suppresses Osteoarthritic Chondrocyte Catabolic and Inflammatory Protein Production in a 3-Dimensional In Vitro Model

Josh Erndt-Marino 1, Erik Trinkle 1, Mariah S Hahn 1,
PMCID: PMC6425543  PMID: 28992763

Abstract

Objective

The main goal of this study was to provide a proof-of-concept demonstrating that hyperosmolar K+ solutions can limit production of catabolic and inflammatory mediators in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs).

Methods

A 3-dimensional in vitro model with poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels was used. Catabolic and pro-inflammatory protein production from encapsulated OACs was assessed following culture for 1 or 7 days in the presence or absence of 80 mM K+ gluconate, 80 mM sodium (Na+) gluconate, or 160 mM sucrose, each added to culture media (final osmolarity ~490 mOsm).

Results

Relative to untreated controls, OACs treated with hyperosmolar (80 mM Na+ gluconate or 160 mM sucrose) solutions produced lower levels of catabolic and inflammatory mediators in a marker- and time-dependent manner (i.e., MMP-9 after 1 day; MCP-1 after 7 days (P ≤ 0.015)). In contrast, OAC treatment with 80 mM K+ gluconate reduced catabolic and inflammatory mediators to a greater extent (both the number of markers and degree of suppression) relative to untreated, Na+ gluconate, or sucrose controls (i.e., MMP-3, -9, -13, TIMP-1, MCP-1, and IL-8 after 1 day; MMP-1, -3, -9, -13, TIMP-1, MCP-1, and IL-8 after 7 days (P ≤ 0.029).

Conclusions

Hyperosmolar K+ solutions are capable of attenuating protein production of catabolic and inflammatory OA markers, providing the proof-of-concept needed for further development of a K+-based intra-articular injection for OA treatment. Moreover, K+ performed significantly better than Na+- or sucrose-based solutions, supporting the application of K+ toward improving irrigation solutions for joint surgery.

Keywords: chondrocyte activation, osteoarthritis, potassium, catabolism, inflammation

Introduction

In osteoarthritis (OA), chondrocytes become activated (in part by inflammation) and lose the balance between anabolic and catabolic activity, favoring matrix degradation (catabolism) and hypertrophic differentiation.1-3 The long-term goal of this work is to develop a potassium (K+)-based intra-articular injection treatment for OA. Our working hypothesis is that K+ can be used to limit 2 processes associated with cartilage matrix degeneration: (1) chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation/catabolism and (2) production of pro-inflammatory mediators. This hypothesis was derived from 2 fields. First, studies from the bioelectricity field posit that cell state is related to a cell’s transmembrane potential (Vmem), with depolarized and hyperpolarized Vmem values being associated with stem/proliferative/cancer cells or terminally differentiated cells, respectively.4-7 Adding extracellular hyperosmolar K+ to culture media depolarizes Vmem and has been demonstrated to prevent adipocytic and osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells, even in the presence of the most potent chemical factors known to drive differentiation down these lineages.8 Second, the powerful capacity of K+ to modulate cell phenotype was recently reinforced, albeit in a different, immunosuppressive context. Here, hyperosmolar extracellular K+ was demonstrated to suppress T-cell effector function, independent of its influence on Vmem and separate from other immunosuppressive chemical mediators.9 Thus, hyperosmolar K+ may exert positive influences on major OA disease processes coupled to cartilage matrix degradation—chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation/catabolism and inflammation.

Separate from our intentions for the development of an intra-articular OA therapy, using K+ to improvehyperosmolar saline joint irrigation solutions for surgery represents another goal of this work. Hypertonic saline solutions (~600 mOsm) are currently being developed and validated for limiting cartilage damage (and posttraumatic OA) during surgical procedures, conferring chondroprotective effects in a number of model systems.10-14 Although the underlying mechanisms have not been investigated, the hyperosmolarity of the solution, rather than the ionic content, is considered to be most important.10-15 Interestingly, the sodium ion (Na+) in saline has recently been demonstrated to be pro-inflammatory16-19 and therefore may exacerbate joint inflammation. Thus, a hyperosmolar K+ solution may retain beneficial effects of hyperosmolarity and provide independent immunosuppression while circumventing potential inflammation induced by Na+.

In the present study, we first show that treatment of human osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs) with hyperosmolar K+ promotes an anabolic/healthy gene signature with a concomitant decrease in catabolic/OA gene levels. The superior capacity of hyperosmolar K+ solutions (over Na+ or sucrose-based solutions) to attenuate production of catabolic, inflammatory, and OA markers in OACs was then examined in depth at the protein level.

Materials and Methods

Polymer Synthesis and Functionalization with Cell Adhesive Peptides

Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) was synthesized from PEG-diol (6 kDa, Sigma Aldrich) at ~99% acrylation as reported previously.20 NH2-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-COOH (RGDS; American Peptide Company) was included to facilitate cell attachment within the PEGDA network. The product (ACRL-PEG-RGDS) was purified by dialysis, lyophilized, and stored at −80°C until further use.

Osteoarthritic Chondrocyte (OAC) Culture and Encapsulation

Primary human OACs (Cell Applications Inc.) were thawed and expanded in chondrogenic growth medium (Lonza) within a 37°C–5% CO2 jacketed incubator. One passage before experiments, the cells were transitioned to regular growth medium: high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Fisher Scientific).

Prior to cell encapsulation, a 10% (w/v) PEGDA hydrogel precursor solution was prepared in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Life Technologies) with 3.9 mg/mL ACRL-PEG-RGDS. OACs (passage 5) were harvested and the resulting cell pellet was resuspended in the hydrogel precursor solution at 5 × 106 cells per mL. Aliquots (100 µL; 0.5 × 106 cells per construct) of the cell suspension were dispensed into the wells of a 96-well plate (Corning) and cured by exposure to longwave ultraviolet light (~10 mW/cm2) for 6 minutes. Importantly, human OACs have been demonstrated to form hyaline cartilage in high-density culture, even after extended 2-dimensional (2D) passaging (9 population doublings) prior to seeding as high-density cultures21 and have previously been used to model OA inflammation in vitro.22

Postfabrication, all hydrogel discs were washed with DPBS for 5 minutes and immersed in cell culture medium. After 24 hours of equilibration in regular growth media, the OAC-laden hydrogels cultured with or without 80 mM K+ gluconate, 80 mM Na+ gluconate, or 160 mM sucrose (all from Sigma) for 1 or 7 days. At culture endpoints, the hydrogels were washed in DPBS for 5 to 10 minutes, harvested by flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until further analysis.

Reverse Transcriptase Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

mRNA and protein extraction from hydrogels were performed as previously described.22 qPCR was performed to compare mRNA levels across the various experimental groups using a StepOne Real-Time PCR system and the SuperScript III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Validated qPCR primers were purchased from Qiagen or OriGene. Available primer sequences are provided in Table 1 . Gene expression was normalized to 3 reference genes (GAPDH, L32, and β-actin) and expressed relative to day 1 control OACs. Melting temperature analysis was performed for each reaction to verify the appropriate amplification product.

Table 1.

Primer Sequences Used for qRT-PCR Analysis of Genes Associated with Anabolic/Healthy and Catabolic/OA Chondrocyte Phenotypes.

Function Gene Marker Primer Sequence, Forward (F), Reverse (R)
Anabolic/Healthy markers SOX9 F: AGGAAGCTCGCGGACCAGTAC
R: GGTGGTCCTTCTTGTGCTGCAC
Aggrecan (ACAN) Qiagen
Col 2A1 Qiagen

Catabolic/OA markers RUNX2 F: CCCAGTATGAGAGTAGGTGTCC
R: GGGTAAGACTGGTCATAGGACC
MMP-13 F: CCTTGATGCCATTACCAGTCTCC
R: AAACAGCTCCGCATCAACCTGC
Col 1A1 Qiagen

Reference/Housekeeping β-actin F: CACCATTGGCAATGAGCGGTTC
R: AGGTCTTTGCGGATGTCCACGT
GAPDH F: GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG
R: ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA
L32 F: ACAAAGCACATGCTGCCCAGTG
R: TTCCACGATGGCTTTGCGGTTC

OA = osteoarthritis; qRT-PCR = quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.

MAGPIX Immunoassay Multiplexing

The protein levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, -3, -9, and -13, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were measured from cell lysates using a human premixed magnetic bead analyte kit (R&D Systems) and a MAGPIX detection system (Luminex). Briefly, samples were loaded into a 96-well plate, after which magnetic bead suspensions, detection antibodies, and streptavidin-phycoerythrin were added to sample wells. Sample concentrations of proteins were obtained on the basis of a median fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to a standard curve. The resulting measures were then normalized by sample DNA content, assessed with the PicoGreen assay per the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). Data were then further normalized to the control, untreated OACs for each experimental time point.

Justification of Experimental Parameters

Three-Dimensional Culture with PEGDA Hydrogels

PEGDA hydrogels were selected as the material for the 3D in vitro model due to their widespread use in cartilage research23-27 and for the ability of these materials to restrict cell proliferation and protein adhesion, even in serum-containing culture environments.28 The latter property enables tight control over the study of the treatment in question on cell phenotype, without confounding influences from the selection of specific phenotypes over time or due to presence of adhered proteins. In the present studies, we have tethered the peptide RGD to the PEGDA network to enable consistent initial cell-matrix adhesion levels across experimental groups.

Concentration of Osmolytes

The concentrations of added osmolytes (i.e., 80 mM for ionic and 160 mM for nonionic) were selected based off literature from the bioelectricity field8,29-32 and for achieving osmolarities similar to those being investiaged for joint irrigation solutions.10-15 The base osmolarity of high glucose DMEM is ~330 mOsm/L, which is raised to ~490 mOsm/L with 160 mOsm of additional osmolytes. These values are comparable, although not as hyperosmolar, to those used in hypertonic saline studies, where 300 and 600 mOsm/L solutions represent control and hyperosmolar formulations, repsectively.10-15

Endpoint Marker Assessment

For gene expression analyses, all proteins selected play major roles in cartilage biology and/or OA. Sex determining region Y Box 9 (SOX9) and runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were analyzed because they are major transcription factors involved in maintaining a healthy/anabolic and hypertrophic/catabolic chondrocyte phenotype, respectively.33,34 Aggregan (ACAN) and collagen type II, alpha-1 chain (Col 2A1) comprise most of the protein/extracellular matrix (ECM) content found in hyaline cartilage35 and are associated with an anabolic phenotype.2,3,33 Finally, MMP-13 and collagen type I, alpha-1 chain (Col 1A1) are proteins associated with the catabolic, hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes in addition to being upregulated in all stages of OA.33,36

For protein analyses, the selected markers all have been demonstrated to stimulate OA disease progression (for reviews, see references1-3,37-39). Generally, in cartilage and OA, MMP-1, -3, -9, and -13 are widely studied.37,40-42 In particular, MMP-13, which degrades collagen type II, the major collagen protein found in articular cartilage, has received considerable attention.33,43 Although TIMP-1 limits matrix degradation, TIMP-1 was analyzed because this protein has been shown to be increased in OA,44,45 aging-related processes,46,47 angiogenesis,48 and fibrosis49,50 — all of which are considered undesirable in OA. The inflammatory proteins IL-8,51,52 VEGF,53,54 and MCP-155,56 were selected because they have been demonstrated to exacerbate OA progression/cartilage degradation. To help segment the study and aid in presentation of the results, the MMPs and TIMP-1 have been grouped together under “catabolic/OA markers” while the inflammatory proteins have been grouped together under “inflammation/OA markers.”

Statistical Analyses

All data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation and are representative of 2 independent experiments with the same OA donor. In each experiment, results presented for each treatment group were based on measures from 4 independent hydrogel samples. Means were compared using either a 2-way or 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; n = 4 samples per group), as appropriate. In the first experiment, a 2-way ANOVA was used to determine significance resulting from main effects of 80 mM K+ gluconate treatment or culture time. Homogeneity of variance was confirmed using Levene’s test. For the second experiment, comparison of experimental group means was performed using Tukey’s post hoc test or a Games-Howell post hoc test (in cases where Levene’s test returned a significant result). For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered significant and SPSS software was used.

Results

Initial Characterization of Hyperosmolar K+-Treated OACs

Before moving into more complex experiments, we first asked what happens at the gene level when OACs are treated with solutions of hyperosmolar K+. Briefly, OACs were encapsulated in 3D PEGDA hydrogels and treated with 80 mM K+ gluconate for 1 and 7 days ( Fig. 1A ). Relative to control OACs, 80 mM K+ gluconate treated OACs exhibited significantly increased mRNA levels of all anabolic/healthy markers investigated, including SOX9, ACAN, and Col 2A1 (P < 0.015; Fig. 1B ). In addition, the mRNA levels of critical catabolic/OA markers MMP-13 and Col 1A1 were significantly suppressed (P < 0.0005) whereas RUNX2 remained unchanged in OACs treated with 80 mM K+ gluconate ( Fig. 1C ). Cumulatively, these data suggest that hyperosmolar K+ gluconate treatment promotes an anabolic/healthy chondrocyte phenotype and suppresses a catabolic/osteoarthritic phenotype.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Experimental design for the pilot study to investigate influence of hyperosmolar K+ on gene expression of osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs.) (B) Relative mRNA expression of anabolic/healthy and (C) catabolic/OA markers in OACs cultured for 1 or 7 days in the presence of 80 mM K+ gluconate. A combination of L32, GAPDH, and β-actin were employed as house-keeping/reference genes. *Denotes a significant main effect of 80 mM K+ gluconate. #Denotes a significant main effect of culture time.

Isolating Effects of K+, Gluconate, Ionic Strength, and/or Osmolarity

Based off our initial results, we conducted an additional experiment to determine if the effects noted previously were from the K+ ions, gluconate ions, ionic strength and/or osmolarity of the solution ( Fig. 2 ). An 80 mM Na+ gluconate group was included to control for the effects of the gluconate ion and the ionic strength of the solution whereas a 160 mM sucrose group was included as an osmolarity/nonionic osmolyte control. In addition to these controls, we also analyzed a more complete set of phenotypic markers at the protein level using MAGPIX multiplexing technology ( Fig. 2 ). Emphasis was placed on catabolic and inflammatory markers known to be elevated in OA because of their important role in OA pathology and cartilage degradation in general. For these experiments, we were particularly interested in effects noticed after 1 day of stimulation, as this time point is more comparable to joint irrigation during surgery than the 7-day time point. A longer culture time was included to yield further information about how these solutions influence OACs and for experimental design consistency with our pilot study.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Experimental design for determining the influence of hyperosmolar solutions of differing osmolyte composition on the production of catabolic and inflammatory proteins from osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs) in 3-dimensional poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels. Similar to the pilot study, culture was performed for 1 and 7 days before sample analyses. Na+ gluconate (80 mM) was included to control for effects of ionic strength and the gluconate ion. Sucrose (160 mM) was included as a nonionic osmolyte control.

Catabolic/Osteoarthritis Markers

Figure 3 displays the relative protein production of several catabolic, matrix-degrading enzymes (MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-13) as well as TIMP-1 in OACs treated with various hyperosmolar solutions for 1 or 7 days. Data are presented relative to control/untreated OACs for each time point and normalized to DNA content shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Absolute values of protein levels (expressed as pg protein/ng DNA) are shown in Supplementary Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Relative protein production of several catabolic/OA markers in OACs cultured for (A) 1 day or (B) 7 days in the presence or absence of hyperosmolar solutions of differing compositions. *Denotes a significant difference relative to control (Cntl) osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs). #Denotes a significant difference relative to 80 mM K+ gluconate.

After 1 day of treatment, all 3 hyperosmolar solutions significantly reduced the production of MMP-9 (≤80%, P ≤ 0.012; Fig. 3A ). Aside from this single difference, there were several instances where K+ gluconate further limited the production of matrix-degrading/OA markers. Specifically, OACs treated with K+ gluconate produced significantly less MMP-3 (40%, P = 0.002) and MMP-13 (65%, P = 0.002) relative to control OACs ( Fig. 3A ). In contrast, treatment with either 80 mM Na+ gluconate or 160 mM sucrose did not significantly alter levels of MMP-3 or MMP-13 relative to control OACs ( Fig. 3A ). Moreover, OACs treated with K+ gluconate exhibited significantly reduced MMP-13 (70%, P = 0.011) levels relative to Na+ gluconate treated OACs and TIMP-1 levels relative to Na+ gluconate (71%, P = 0.011) and sucrose (76%, P = 0.045) treated OACs ( Fig. 3A ). These day 1 data suggest that K+ gluconate is superior at suppressing catabolic/OA related markers compared with Na+ gluconate or sucrose.

Similar to day 1, the influence of osmolarity was limited after 7 days, although the markers that were significantly altered changed with time ( Fig. 3A vs B ). After 7 days, relative to control OACs, all 3 hyperosmolar solutions significantly reduced the production of TIMP-1 (≤75%, P < 0.0005), and solutions with greater ionic strength (Na+ and K+ gluconate) significantly reduced MMP-13 (≤71%, P ≤ 0.025; Fig. 3B ). Several additional differences were also observed in the K+ gluconate group at 7 days. Here, OACs treated with K+ gluconate produced significantly less MMP-1 (74%, P = 0.029) relative to control OACs ( Fig. 3B ). In contrast, treatment with either Na+ gluconate or sucrose did not elicit any change in MMP-1 levels ( Fig. 3B ). Furthermore, relative to Na+ gluconate, OACs treated with K+ gluconate produced significantly reduced levels of all catabolic/OA markers investigated (≤66%, P ≤ 0.023; Fig. 3B ). Similarly, relative to sucrose, K+ gluconate treatment resulted in significantly lower production of MMP-3, MMP-13, and TIMP-1 (≤57%, P ≤ 0.018; Fig. 3B ).

Cumulatively, these data suggest that (1) hyperosmolar solutions suppress several important catabolic/OA markers in a limited, marker-specific, and time-dependent manner; (2) treatment of OACs with 80 mM K+ gluconate further attenuates the number and production of these markers; and (3) K+ is likely responsible for the additional beneficial response.

Inflammation/Osteoarthritis Markers

Figure 4 displays the relative protein production of several inflammatory (MCP-1, VEGF, IL-8) markers in OACs treated with various hyperosmolar solutions for 1 or 7 days. Data are presented relative to control/untreated OACs for each time point and normalized to DNA content shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Absolute values of protein levels (expressed as pg protein/ng DNA) are shown in Supplementary Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Relative protein production of several inflammation/osteoarthritis (OA) markers in osteoarthritic chondrocytes (OACs) cultured for (A) 1 day or (B) 7 days in the presence or absence of hyperosmolar solutions of differing compositions. *Denotes a significant difference relative to control (Cntl) OACs. #Denotes a significant difference relative to 80 mM K+ gluconate. +Denotes a significant difference relative to 80 mM Na+ gluconate.

After 1 day of treatment, all 3 hyperosmolar solutions significantly reduced the production of IL-8 (≤59%, P ≤ 0.002) while none of the treatments influenced VEGF ( Fig. 4A ). However, OACs treated with 80 mM K+ gluconate produced significantly less MCP-1 (≤80%, P < 0.048) relative to all other experimental groups ( Fig. 4A ). In contrast, treatment with either 80 mM Na+ gluconate or 160 mM sucrose did not significantly alter levels of MCP-1 relative to control OACs ( Fig. 4A ). These day 1 data suggest that K+ gluconate is superior at suppressing inflammation/OA related markers compared to Na+ gluconate or sucrose.

After 7 days of culture, relative to control OACs, all three hyperosmolar solutions significantly reduced production of IL-8 (≤28%, P < 0.0005) and MCP-1 (≤83%, P < 0.015; Fig. 4B ). However, similar to day 1, OACs in the K+ gluconate group produced significantly less MCP-1 relative to Na+ gluconate and sucrose (≤78%, P < 0.019; Fig. 4B ).

Cumulatively, these data suggest that (1) hyperosmolar solutions suppress several important inflammation/OA markers in a limited, marker-specific, and time-dependent manner; (2) treatment of OACs with 80 mM K+ gluconate further reduces production of select markers; and (3) K+ is likely mediating the additional beneficial effects.

Discussion

The long-term goal of this work is to develop a K+-based intra-articular injection for the treatment of OA and to improve irrigation solutions currently used for joint surgery. However, the capacity of K+ to suppress catabolic, inflammatory, and OA disease markers in chondrocytes has never been explicitly investigated. Thus, the objective of the current study was to provide an initial proof-of-concept and to highlight the therapeutic potential of K+ for OA reasearch. In all studies, 3D cell culture in PEGDA hydrogels was used as an in vitro model. The concentrations of osmolytes (i.e., 80 mM for ionic and 160 mM for nonionic) were selected based off literature from the bioelectricity field8,29-32 and for achieving osmolarities similar to those being investigated for joint irrigation solutions.10-15 Markers selected for endpoint analyses were chosen based off of their important roles in chondrocyte biology and for their prevalance in OA.

In our first experiment, OACs were treated with 80 mM K+ gluconate for 1 or 7 days ( Fig. 1A ). At the gene level, qPCR analyses revealed that OACs treated with 80 mM K+ gluconate exhibited significantly increased amounts of SOX9, ACAN, and Col 2A1 mRNA levels with a concurrent significant decrease in MMP-13 and Col 1A1 mRNA levels ( Fig. 1B and C ). These data indicated that hyperosmolar K+ gluconate treatment promotes an anabolic/healthy and suppresses a catabolic/osteoarthritic chondrocyte gene signature.

Based off our initial results, we conducted an additional experiment to gain deeper insight into what might be eliciting the beneficial changes noted ( Fig. 2 ). In a treatment of 80 mM K+ gluconate, the cell response could be a result of any 1 of 3 factors: (1) the individual K+ or gluconate ions, (2) the ionic strength of the solution, and/or (3) osmolarity of the solution. Decoupling these variables is necessary for demonstrating that K+ may have therapeutic potential for limiting cartilage catabolism and inflammation in OA and for determining the optimal composition of solutions used for the irrigation of joints during surgery.

With regard to catabolic and inflammatory proteins, hyperosmolarity exerted a suppressive influence on OACs in a limited, marker-dependent, and time-dependent manner. For instance, only MMP-9 was significantly reduced by all three hyperosmolar groups after day 1, and this significance was lost by day 7 ( Fig. 3 ). Conversely, increased osmolarity did not significantly alter MCP-1 levels after 1 day of stimulation, but did significantly decrease this inflammatory chemokine by day 7 ( Fig. 4 ). In contrast to these selective effects of hyperosmolarty, both the number of markers and/or their degree of suppression were significantly increased by K+ gluconate ( Figs. 3 and 4 ). Treatment with K+ gluconate favorably diminished almost every protein investigated (MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-13, TIMP-1, MCP-1, IL-8), with many of the changes occurring even after 1 day of culture ( Figs. 3 and 4 ). Importantly, relative to 80 mM Na+ gluconate and 160 mM sucrose, there was not a single instance where 80 mM K+ gluconate stimulation resulted in significantly greater production of catabolic, inflammatory, and other proteins involved in OA progression. Cumulatively, these data provide the proof-of-concept that hyperosmolar K+ gluconate suppresses production of catabolic and inflammatory proteins, and that the K+ ion is the driving force behind many of these changes. Because of the significant capacity of K+ to modulate key proteins involved in OA progression/cartilage degradation, future development of K+-based intra-articular injections is warranted. As OA is a disease of the entire joint, ongoing work is investigating K+ influences on other tissues and cells, such as the macrophages in the synovium. Furthermore, the enhanced suppressive effect of K+ gluconate over the other hyperosmolar solutions supports the notion that hypertonic solutions comprised of K+, rather than currently utilized Na+, should be considered for the development of joint irrigation formulations to promote cartilage repair/prevent degradation.

How could K+ influence OACs, and what other molecular pathways are mechanistically involved? Whether Vmem alterations from 80 mM K+ gluconate and/or a pure chemical influence of K+ was responsible for the changes noted remains unknown and deserves further investigation. Interestingly, the changes in gene expression elicited by K+ gluconate occurred independently of RUNX2, an essential transcription factor for hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation whose expression often couples with MMP-13 expression.33,57 Similar to our gene results, enhanced hypoxia inducible factor–1 (HIF-1) stability has been shown to promote SOX9, ACAN, and Col 2A1 while concurrently suppressing Col 1A1 mRNA expression in chondrocytes.58-60 Finally, K+ has recently been demonstrated to increase phosphorylated Smad 2/3 levels in T-cells.61 Smad 2 and 3 are important for maintaining an anabolic chondrocyte phenotype.3,33,62,63 Thus, future work will focus on the HIF and Smad signaling proteins in response to hyperosmolar K+ stimulation.

A few limitations to the present study merit comment. First, extrapolating these findings to cartilage present in a diseased/injured environment may be difficult because of the experimental system used (which lacked applied inflammatory stimuli, involved extended preculture of cells from a single donor, and incorporated limited chondrogenic stimuli aside from a rounded cell morphology induced by PEGDA hydrogels). Inclusion of an inflammatory cytokine in culture media would help mimic inflammation present in OA and may further highlight the therapeutic potential of K+. In addition, expanding chondrocytes in 2D is known to induce dedifferentiation which may be responsible for some changes noted. That said, 3D culture has been shown to be the most effective way for inducing redifferentiation of chondrocytes expanded in 2D,64 and 3D culture is commonly used to study chondrocyte biology.

In terms of applying K+-based solutions toward improving joint irrigation solutions, the exact formulation implemented in this study may not fully recapitulate those currently used clinically (i.e., 490 mOsm culture media with 10% FBS vs 600 mOsm saline). The precise formulation of osmolytes will need to be elucidated and validated with previous in situ models10,11 in subsequent work. Next, our study did not examine any potential (negative or positive) effects of K+ on nondiseased cells that would be present in cartilage during early OA or undergoing surgery. Finally, the time of K+ exposure (1 day) used is longer than would be feasible for intra-articular injections of small molecules (up to a 13-hour half-life),65,66 or for irrigation during surgery (up to 2.5 hours).10,11,13,14 However, K+ has influenced key cell signaling pathways within 5 minutes of exposure.9 Future work will address normal and diseased cell responses following short-term stimulation utilizing several donors at lower passage numbers. Assessing these parameters will yield a deeper understanding of K+ effects on 3D cultured chondrocytes.

In summary, this study demonstrated that hyperosmolar K+ solutions are capable of attenuating protein production of catabolic and inflammatory OA markers, providing the proof-of-concept needed for further development of a K+-based intra-articular injection for OA treatment. Moreover, K+ performed significantly better than Na+- or sucrose-based solutions, supporting the application of K+ toward improving irrigation solutions for joint surgery. Future and ongoing studies will aim to characterize (1) underlying signaling mechanisms involved, (2) cell response to shorter stimulations, and (3) K+ influence on other cell types involved in OA progression.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Supplementary material

Footnotes

Acknowledgments and Funding: The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the NSF (award number 0955259 and 1508422) for MH and the Ajit Prabhu Fellowship from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for JEM.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JEM and MSH have a provisional patent (U.S. Provisional Patent, Application Number 62/474,891) for this work.

Informed Consent: Informed consent was not sought for the present study because it was previously obtained through the third party vendor in which the cells were purcahsed from (Cell Applications).

Ethical Approval: Ethical approval was not sought for the present study because the cells were obtained from patients through a third party vendor (Cell Applications).

Trial Registration: Not applicable.

Supplementary Material: Supplementary material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1. Dreier R. Hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis: the developmental aspect of degenerative joint disorders. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Aigner T, Soder S, Gebhard PM, McAlinden A, Haag J. Mechanisms of disease: role of chondrocytes in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis—structure, chaos and senescence. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007;3:391-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Chondrocyte hypertrophy and osteoarthritis: role in initiation and progression of cartilage degeneration? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:223-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Levin M. Large-scale biophysics: ion flows and regeneration. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17:261-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Levin M. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:543-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Levin M. Molecular bioelectricity: how endogenous voltage potentials control cell behavior and instruct pattern regulation in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:3835-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Levin M, Stevenson CG. Regulation of cell behavior and tissue patterning by bioelectrical signals: challenges and opportunities for biomedical engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:295-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Membrane potential controls adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eil R, Vodnala SK, Clever D, Klebanoff CA, Sukumar M, Pan JH, et al. Ionic immune suppression within the tumour microenvironment limits T cell effector function. Nature. 2016;537:539-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Amin AK, Huntley JS, Patton JT, Brenkel IJ, Simpson AHRW, Hall AC. Hyperosmolarity protects chondrocytes from mechanical injury in human articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93B:277-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Amin AK, Huntley JS, Simpson AHRW, Hall AC. Increasing the osmolarity of joint irrigation solutions may avoid injury to cartilage: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:875-884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Capito NM, Smith MJ, Stoker AM, Werner N, Cook JL. Hyperosmolar irrigation compared with a standard solution in a canine shoulder arthroscopy model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Eltawil NM, Ahmed S, Chan LH, Simpson AHRW, Hall AC. Chondroprotection in models of cartilage injury by raising the temperature and osmolarity of irrigation solutions. Cartilage. Epub 2017. January 30. doi: 10.1177/1947603516688511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Eltawil NM, Howie SEM, Simpson AHRW, Amin AK, Hall AC. The use of hyperosmotic saline for chondroprotection: implications for orthopaedic surgery and cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:469-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Capito NM, Cook JL, Yahuaca B, Capito MD, Sherman SL, Smith MJ. Safety and efficacy of hyperosmolar irrigation solution in shoulder arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26:745-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Binger KJ, Gebhardt M, Heinig M, Rintisch C, Schroeder A, Neuhofer W, et al. High salt reduces the activation of IL-4-and IL-13-stimulated macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:4223-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jantsch J, Schatz V, Friedrich D, Schroder A, Kopp C, Siegert I, et al. Cutaneous Na+ storage strengthens the antimicrobial barrier function of the skin and boosts macrophage-driven host defense. Cell Metab. 2015;21:493-501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kleinewietfeld M, Manzel A, Titze J, Kvakan H, Yosef N, Linker RA, et al. Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nature. 2013;496:518-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wu C, Yosef N, Thalhamer T, Zhu C, Xiao S, Kishi Y, et al. Induction of pathogenic Th17 cells by inducible salt sensing kinase SGK1. Nature. 2013;496:513-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Erndt-Marino JD, Hahn MS. Probing the response of human osteoblasts following exposure to sympathetic neuron-like PC-12 cells in a 3D coculture model. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105:984-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bianchi VJ, Weber JF, Waldman SD, Backstein D, Kandel RA. Formation of hyaline cartilage tissue by passaged human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23:156-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Samavedi S, Diaz-Rodriguez P, Erndt-Marino JD, Hahn MS. A three-dimensional chondrocyte-macrophage coculture system to probe inflammation in experimental osteoarthritis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23:101-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Williams CG, Kim TK, Taboas A, Malik A, Manson P, Elisseeff J. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a photopolymerizing hydrogel. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:679-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bahney CS, Hsu CW, Yoo JU, West JL, Johnstone B. A bioresponsive hydrogel tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. FASEB J. 2011;25:1486-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nguyen QT, Hwang Y, Chen AC, Varghese S, Sah RL. Cartilage-like mechanical properties of poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6682-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lin S, Sangaj N, Razafiarison T, Zhang C, Varghese S. Influence of physical properties of biomaterials on cellular behavior. Pharm Res. 2011;28:1422-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bryant SJ, Anseth KS. Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:63-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nuttelman CR, Tripodi MC, Anseth KS. Synthetic hydrogel niches that promote hMSC viability. Matrix Biol. 2005;24:208-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lan JY, Williams C, Levin M, Black LD. Depolarization of cellular resting membrane potential promotes neonatal cardiomyocyte proliferation in vitro. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2014;7:432-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Depolarization alters phenotype, maintains plasticity of predifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:1889-908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sundelacruz S, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Comparison of the depolarization response of human mesenchymal stem cells from different donors. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sundelacruz S, Li CM, Choi YJ, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Bioelectric modulation of wound healing in a 3D in vitro model of tissue-engineered bone. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6695-705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Goldring MB, Otero M, Plumb DA, Dragomir C, Favero M, El Hachem K, et al. Roles of inflammatory and anabolic cytokines in cartilage metabolism: signals and multiple effectors converge upon MMP-13 regulation in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;21:202-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lefebvre V, Smits P. Transcriptional control of chondrocyte fate and differentiation. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2005;75:200-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health. 2009;1:461-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lorenz H, Richter W. Osteoarthritis: Cellular and molecular changes in degenerating cartilage. Prog Histochem Cytochem. 2006;40:135-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7:33-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sellam J, Berenbaum F. The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:625-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wojdasiewicz P, Poniatowski LA, Szukiewicz D. The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:561459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bluteau G, Conrozier T, Mathieu P, Vignon E, Herbage D, Mallein-Gerin F. Matrix metalloproteinase-1, -3, -13 and aggrecanase-1 and -2 are differentially expressed in experimental osteoarthritis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1526:147-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Koskinen A, Vuolteenaho K, Moilanen T, Moilanen E. Resistin as a factor in osteoarthritis: synovial fluid resistin concentrations correlate positively with interleukin 6 and matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 and MMP-3. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43:249-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Troeberg L, Nagase H. Proteases involved in cartilage matrix degradation in osteoarthritis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1824:133-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gauci SJ, Standton H, Little CB, Fosnang AJ. Proteoglycan and collagen degradation in osteoarthritis. In: Grässel S, Aszódi A, editors. Cartilage. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 41-62. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Dahlberg L, Friden T, Roos H, Lark MW, Lohmander LS. A longitudinal study of cartilage matrix metabolism in patients with cruciate ligament rupture—synovial fluid concentrations of aggrecan fragments, stromelysin-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:1107-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Macip-Rodriguez PM, Cabral AR. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pannus have similar qualitative metabolic characteristics and pro-inflammatory cytokine response. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26:554-60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kwak HB, Kim JH, Joshi K, Yeh A, Martinez DA, Lawler JM. Exercise training reduces fibrosis and matrix metalloproteinase dysregulation in the aging rat heart. FASEB J. 2011;25:1106-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mine S, Fortunel NO, Pageon H, Asselineau D. Aging alters functionally human dermal papillary fibroblasts but not reticular fibroblasts: a new view of skin morphogenesis and aging. PLoS One. 2008;3:e4066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hsieh JL, Shiau AL, Lee CH, Yang SJ, Lee BO, Jou IM, et al. CD8+ T cell-induced expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinses-1 exacerbated osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:19951-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Breynaert C, de Bruyn M, Arijs I, Cremer J, Martens E, Van Lommel L, et al. Genetic deletion of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1/TIMP-1 alters inflammation and attenuates fibrosis in dextran sodium sulphate-induced murine models of colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1336-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Simon F, Bergeron D, Larochelle S, Lopez-Valle CA, Genest H, Armour A, et al. Enhanced secretion of TIMP-1 by human hypertrophic scar keratinocytes could contribute to fibrosis. Burns. 2012;38:421-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chauffier K, Laiguillon MC, Bougault C, Gosset M, Priam S, Salvat C, et al. Induction of the chemokine IL-8/Kc by the articular cartilage: possible influence on osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79:604-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Takahashi A, de Andres MC, Hashimoto K, Itoi E, Oreffo RO. Epigenetic regulation of interleukin-8, an inflammatory chemokine, in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:A191-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ludin A, Sela JJ, Schroeder A, Samuni Y, Nitzan DW, Amir G. Injection of vascular endothelial growth factor into knee joints induces osteoarthritis in mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:491-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yuan Q, Sun L, Li JJ, An CH. Elevated VEGF levels contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Xu YK, Ke Y, Wang B, Lin JH. The role of MCP-1-CCR2 ligand-receptor axis in chondrocyte degradation and disease progress in knee osteoarthritis. Biol Res. 2015;48:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Yuankun X, Yan K, Bin W, Jian-Hao L. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 induced chondrocytes degeneration and cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(Suppl 1):S140-1. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Terauchi K, Kobayashi H, Yatabe K, Yui N, Fujiya H, Niki H, et al. The NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin-1 regulates the expression of osteogenic transcriptional activator runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and production of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 in chondrocytes in osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Duval E, Bouyoucef M, Leclercq S, Bauge C, Boumediene K. Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha down-regulates type i collagen through Sp3 transcription factor in human chondrocytes. IUBMB Life 2016;68:756-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Duval E, Leclercq S, Elissalde JM, Demoor M, Galera P, Boumediene K. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha inhibits the fibroblast-like markers type I and type III collagen during hypoxia-induced chondrocyte redifferentiation: hypoxia not only induces type ii collagen and aggrecan, but it also inhibits type i and type iii collagen in the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-dependent redifferentiation of chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3038-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Pfander D, Cramer T, Schipan E, Johnson RS. HIF-1 alpha controls extracellular matrix synthesis by epiphyseal chondrocytes. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1819-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Khalili H, Malik S, Ananthakrishnan AN, Garber JJ, Higuchi LM, Joshi A, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel association between dietary potassium and risk of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Front Immunol. 2016;7:554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Tang X, Fan L, Pei M, Zeng L, Ge Z. Evolving concepts of chondrogenic differentiation: history, state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Eur Cell Mater. 2015;30:12-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Li JM, Dong SW. The signaling pathways involved in chondrocyte differentiation and hypertrophic differentiation. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:2470351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Caron MMJ, Emans PJ, Coolsen MME, Voss L, Surtel DAM, Cremers A, et al. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20:1170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Evans CH, Kraus VB, Setton LA. Progress in intra-articular therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:11-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Larsen C, Ostergaard J, Larsen SW, Jensen H, Jacobsen S, Lindegaard C, et al. Intra-articular depot formulation principles: role in the management of postoperative pain and arthritic disorders. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:4622-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Supplementary material

Articles from Cartilage are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES