Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;62(1):168–184. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000418

Stimulant Use in Pregnancy – an under-recognized epidemic among pregnant women

Marcela C SMID 1,2,3, Torri D Metz 1, Adam J Gordon 2,3
PMCID: PMC6438363  NIHMSID: NIHMS1512389  PMID: 30601144

Abstract

Stimulant use, including cocaine, methamphetamines, ecstasy, and prescription stimulants, in pregnancy is increasingly common. In the US, stimulants are the second most widely used and abused substances during pregnancy and pregnant women using stimulants in pregnancy are at increased risk of adverse perinatal, neonatal, and childhood outcomes. In this review, we describe the pharmacology, pathophysiology and epidemiology of stimulants, summarize the maternal and neonatal effects of perinatal stimulant use, and outline treatment options for stimulant use disorders among pregnant women. Development of effective treatment strategies for stimulant use disorders identified among pregnant women are urgently needed.

Keywords: pregnancy, substance use disorder, methamphetamine, cocaine, bath salts, ecstasy

Introduction

Stimulants, including cocaine, ecstasy, methamphetamines and prescription stimulants, are the second most widely used and abused substances in the United States.1 The lifetime prevalence among adults for stimulant use is 29.2%, second only to marijuana 46.9%.1 Also known as “uppers,” stimulants refer to any drug that increases activity of the central nervous system or those with sympathomimetic properties. Stimulants are widely used both for medical purposes including mood disorders, impulse control disorders such as attention deficit disorder, sleep disorders and obesity.25 Because of their euphoric effects, they can be used illegally for recreational and performance-enhancing purposes. While the rate of stimulant use is similar between men and women, it is increasingly recognized that women may be disproportionately vulnerable to developing stimulant misuse and abuse due to factors related to hormones69 and reinforcement of gender constructs.1012 Women progress faster from first exposure to addiction than men—known as telescoping—presenting additional challenges to preventing stimulant use disorders.13,14

In 2015, 1.38 million reproductive age (15–44 years old) women used a stimulant in past month (misuse of stimulant prescriptions 1.0%; cocaine 0.7%; methamphetamine 0.7%; ecstasy 0.3%).1 In the US, stimulant use among pregnant women has increased consistent with the nationwide rise in use rates. Stimulant use among pregnant women is of growing public health concern and is associated with several factors including psychiatric co-morbidities,15,16 poverty and social isolation,17,18 history of trauma19 and domestic violence,20,21 all of which impact maternal and child health outcomes. In the 21st century, attention has shifted to the impact of the opioid epidemic on pregnant women;22 however, prenatal stimulant use is more common than opioid use.23,24

The purpose of this article is to describe the pharmacology, pathophysiology and epidemiology of stimulants (cocaine, methamphetamine, prescription stimulant misuse, ecstasy, ephedra and bath salts), summarize the maternal and neonatal effects of perinatal stimulant use and outline treatment options for stimulant use disorders among pregnant women.

Cocaine

Pharmacology, pathophysiology and epidemiology

Cocaine is derived from the coca bush Erythroxylon coca, which is native to the Andes Mountain of South America. It produces a dramatic prolonged adrenergic stimulation by presynaptic uptake of sympathomimetic neurotransmitters (norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine).25,26 The psychoactive effects of cocaine derive from the prolonged effect of dopamine on the brain’s limbic system and cerebral cortex. Cocaine is used in three primary preparations: 1) base (“crack cocaine”) which has a low melting point and when heated, vaporizes allowing it to be smoked and 2) hydrochloride salt which has a high melting point, thus cannot be smoked because it is destroyed by heat, but is water soluble making it easier to dissolve for injection and intranasal use. While crack cocaine possession is associated with higher legal penalties, cocaine base and hydrochloride salt have identical physiological and psychological effects on the mother and fetus. Cocaine rapidly crosses the maternal and fetal blood brain barrier and the placenta by simple diffusion, causing generalized vasoconstriction by directly affecting fetal and maternal blood vessels.27 Vasoconstriction of maternal vessels has indirect effects on the fetus, which may lead to utero-placental insufficiency, acidosis and fetal hypoxia.28

In the 1980’s and 1990’s, rising cocaine use, particularly in urban and minority communities, and the emergence of the “crack baby” phenomenon ultimately led to the stigmatization of pregnant women with substance use disorders.29 In the general population, 40% of emergency department visits related to substance use are associated with cocaine, making it the leading cause of illicit drug use associated visits.30 Among women who also use opioids for non-medical purposes, 9.4% of reproductive age women (18–44 years) used cocaine in the past 30 days and 7.4% used methamphetamine or other stimulants.31 In 2015, cocaine was the second most common illicit substance used by pregnant women; 3.4% of pregnant women used cocaine in the past month.1 Pregnant women using cocaine or crack cocaine tend to be older, African-American and of low socioeconomic status.32,33 While on the decline, cocaine abuse remains the leading cause of antepartum hospitalizations for substance use among pregnant women.34

Cocaine and perinatal outcomes

Maternal complications of cocaine use in pregnancy include cardiovascular complications such as hypertension, myocardial infarction and ischemia, renal failure, hepatic rupture, cerebral ischemia/infarction and maternal death.3541 Cardiovascular complications of cocaine are not dose-dependent and small doses may lead to cardiac morbidity and mortality in otherwise healthy pregnant women.42 Pregnancy may increase the cardiovascular toxicity of cocaine due to cardiac muscle’s sensitivity to cocaine in the presence of increasing progesterone concentrations.4345 Contractility of papillary muscles of pregnant and non-pregnant progesterone-treated female rats becomes severely compromised at substantially lower cocaine concentrations compared to non-pregnant female rats.46 At the time of cesarean, active cocaine use may lead to combative behavior, cocaine-induced thrombocytopenia, ephedrine-resistant hypotension, and altered pain perception due to altered μ and κ receptors despite adequate pain levels.47 Among pregnant women, cocaine toxicity may cause severe hypertension, hyperreflexia, proteinuria, edema and seizures, which can be easily confused with preeclampsia.39,48 Beta-adrenergic antagonists, including labetalol and propranolol, should be avoided as they may create unopposed alpha-adrenergic stimulation and are associated with coronary vasoconstriction and end-organ ischemia.47 In the case of suspected maternal cocaine toxicity, hydralazine should be used for the treatment of hypertension.42

Since the 1980’s, hundreds of peer-reviewed articles have been published linking maternal cocaine use to adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, many of these studies do not control for important confounders including maternal age, poverty, stress, co-occurring psychiatric comorbidities, other substances including tobacco, alcohol and other drugs. There is disagreement on whether cocaine use increases the risk of structural malformations,49 although some studies show an increase in urinary tract anomalies,5052 and other studies show an increase in vascular disruption-type abnormalities, including limb reduction and intestinal atresia.53

Gouin et al (2011)’s systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies found that cocaine use puts women at increased risk for five adverse perinatal outcomes: preterm delivery, low birth weight (< 2500 gms), small for gestational age infants, earlier gestational age at delivery and reduced birth weight.54 Maternal cocaine use is also associated with increased risk of vertical transmission of HIV, hepatitis and syphilis.49 Several authors have noted that some women report that cocaine use is associated with shorter labor duration; however, studies suggest that while labor duration appears to be similar, women do present with more advanced cervical dilatation and at an earlier gestational age than women who do not use cocaine.55,56 Some studies also suggest increased risk of miscarriage,57 stillbirth,58 placental abruption59,60 and uterine rupture.61 In a meta-analysis, after controlling for other factors, increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome could not be associated with cocaine use alone.62

Cocaine is found in breastmilk63 and active illicit drug use, including cocaine use, is considered a contraindication to breastfeeding.64,65

Cocaine use and long-term maternal and childhood outcomes

Very little is known about postpartum outcomes among mothers with prenatal cocaine use. Postpartum psychological distress was greater among mothers with prenatal cocaine use compared to mothers not using cocaine.66 Definitive studies of long-term outcomes among children with cocaine exposure remain elusive. Some studies have found that children with prenatal exposure have dysregulated behavior,33,67 growth,68 inhibitory control,69 attention70 and abstract reasoning.68 In a systematic review of 36 studies of children younger than six years of age assessing physical growth, cognition, language skills, motor skills, attention, affect and neurophysiology, Frank et al. did not find compelling evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with adverse outcomes that cannot be attributed to gestational age at delivery, caregiver psychiatric co-morbidities, other prenatal exposures (tobacco, marijuana or alcohol) or quality of postnatal environment.71

Methamphetamines

Pharmacology, pathophysiology and epidemiology

Methamphetamine, also known as speed, ice, crank and crystal meth, is the methylated derivative of dextroamphetamine. Methamphetamine is a central nervous system stimulant and causes the presynaptic concentration of dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine. Its use is associated with intense euphoria and energy. It is the only illicit substance that can be manufactured from commonly available items such as over-the-counter cough syrups and decongestants.72 It can be snorted, smoked, used rectally and injected with high bioavailability.72,73 Because of its alpha and beta adrenergic properties, methamphetamine increases the risk of myocardial infarction, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and stroke.72 Illicit use of methamphetamine has been strongly linked with severe dental disease74 and increased risk of infection including HIV and Hepatitis C.75,76

Methamphetamine use has escalated in the past two decades and represents a serious public health concern among reproductive age women. From 2010–2014, the rate of drug overdose involving methamphetamine has doubled.77 In 2015, 1.7 million individuals (0.6% of the population) used methamphetamine in the past year; of those, 52.7% used in the past month.1 From 2005 to 2015 among persons who inject drugs, the proportion reporting injecting methamphetamine increased from 2 to nearly 30%.78 Compared to men, women have lower lifetime (6.6 vs 4.1%), past year (0.9 vs 0.4%) and past month use (0.5 vs 0.2%) use of methamphetamines.1 Women who use methamphetamines are at substantially increased risk of death; they have an observed death rate 26 times that of women who do not use.79 In contrast, men who use methamphetamines have an observed death rate six times higher than men who did not use. Among high school students (9th to 12th grade), lifetime use of methamphetamine is 6.8% and is a significant risk factor for adolescent pregnancy.80

Among pregnant women, methamphetamine use has also increased. From 1988 to 2004, hospitalization for amphetamine abuse among pregnant women doubled while cocaine abuse decreased 44%.34 During the same time period, nearly a quarter million pregnant women were admitted to federally funded treatment centers in the United States for methamphetamine treatment, making it the primary substance for which pregnant women seek care. 24

Pregnant women using methamphetamine are more likely be white (64%), unemployed, and less than 24 years old.24,34 They are also more likely to have significant psychiatric disorders,15,81 live in poverty, and have lower perceptions of quality of life. They are also at increased risk for legal complications and have a greater likelihood of substance use among friends and family than those not using.82

Methamphetamine and perinatal outcomes

While methamphetamine use among pregnant women is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes including fetal death,83 growth restriction84 and preterm birth,15 most studies are unable to distinguish between methamphetamine exposure and other factors including maternal co-morbidities, other drugs, smoking, contaminant in non-pharmaceutical preparation or poverty.16,8588 In a single center study, women using methamphetamine in pregnancy were more likely to have a preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, neonatal death and maternal intensive care unit admission. However, this study did not control for other factors including smoking, other drug use or socioeconomic status.88 In a meta-analysis of eight studies, methamphetamine use during pregnancy was associated with earlier gestational age at delivery, lowler birthweight and smaller head circumference.89 There was no difference in preeclampsia or other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in this meta-analysis. However, in a study comparing women who were hospitalized for cocaine and methamphetamine in pregnancy, infant morbidity including premature delivery and poor fetal growth were more common in the cocaine using group, whereas vasoconstrictive effects such as cardiovascular disorders and hypertension complicating pregnancy were more common in the amphetamine using group.34

Several case reports and retrospective studies have suggested increased risk of congenital anomalies with methamphetamine use including cardiac defects,90,91 gastroschisis,92 limb reduction,93 biliary atresia94 and neural tube defects.95 However, several prospective studies have failed to demonstrate an association between methamphetamine use and anomalies with the exception of cleft palate.15,96,97 Infants with prenatal exposure to methamphetamines may develop a constellation of symptoms including jitteriness, drowsiness and respiratory distress suggesting amphetamine withdrawal, although very few will require pharmacological intervention 98,99

Methamphatemine is neurotoxic,100,101 making prenatal exposure particularly concerning for fetal brain development. In animal models, maternal use of methamphetamines resulted in preferential concentration of metabolites in the fetal brain.102 Effects on the fetal brain were gestational age dependent; exposure to methamphetamine in early to mid trimester produced long-lasting effects on the serotonergic development of the fetal brain.103 Sex differences in methamphetamine exposure may start in the fetal period. Male offspring with prenatal exposure to methamphetamine may be at increased risk of drug-induced neurotoxicity as adults.104 There is a paucity of neuroimaging studies of children exposed to methamphetamine prenatally. In two studies using the same population, smaller subcortical brain volumes and alterations in cellular metabolism in the basal ganglia were noted among methamphetamine-exposed children versus unexposed children.105,106 Notable limitations of these studies include more alcohol and tobacco exposure in the methamphetamine group compared to the control group.

Methamphetamine use and long-term maternal and child outcomes

Similar to cocaine, long-term studies of children exposed to methamphetamine are limited. However, the Infant Development, Environment and Lifestyle study (IDEAL) has followed 412 maternal-child pairs (204 methamphetamine exposed versus 208 unexposed pairs) from the United States and New Zealand longitudinally from delivery through childhood providing valuable insight into maternal postpartum outcomes and infant and child development.82,99,107,108 Infants were matched with controls based on prenatal exposure to alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and maternal depression. Infants exposed to opioids and cocaine were excluded, limiting the generalizability of study findings. At one month of age, one-third of women with prenatal methamphetamine use did not have custody of their children compared to 2% of women with no use.82 Prenatal methamphetamine exposure has been linked to increased likelihood of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, decreased arousal and increased physiological stress81,108,109 which subsequently improved at one month of age.110 Mothers with prenatal methamphetamine use were also more likely to be depressed which correlated with poorer infant autonomic stress response.111 At age three, differences in cognitive, behavioral, language and emotional outcomes between exposed and unexposed children were correlated with adverse social environments and not prenatal methamphetamine exposure.112 However, in subsequent studies of the same IDEAL population, heavy prenatal methamphetamine exposure (≥ 3 days per week) was associated with anxiety/depression and attention problems by age 3 and 5 years after controlling for other substances and caregiver/environmental risk factors.113,114 In the IDEAL cohort, children exposed to methamphetamine at age 7.5 years had poorer cognitive function on the Conner’s Parent Rating Scale, but not behavioral problems.115

Several neuroimaging and cognitive function studies have assessed structural brain development of children with prenatal methamphetamine exposure. In a study of children aged 3–4, there were no differences in global cognitive functioning between methamphetamine exposed versus control groups.116 Methamphetamine exposed children did perform worse on visual motor processing tests than control children; however, a large number of tests were performed without adjustment for multiple comparisons.116 While not correlated with functional differences, methamphetamine-exposed female children had changes in frontal white matter suggestive of altered neuronal and glial development. Several studies using neuroimaging to assess structural brain development of children 7–15 years old with prenatal methamphetamine exposure have demonstrated alterations in the striatum and frontal lobes with sex differences, suggesting that prenatal methamphetamine exposure leads to 1) rewiring of corticostriatal networks, 2) a differential effect in male and female children, 3) changes that persist into late childhood and adolescence and 4) structural differences that are correlated with cognitive and functional differences.117121

Methamphetamines are excreted in the breastmilk122 and, as with cocaine, active illicit drug use is a contraindication to breastfeeding.64,65

Prescription stimulant misuse

Prescription stimulants including a mixture of amphetamine salts (Adderall), lisdexamfetamine (Viviane) and methylphenidate (Ritalin) are primarily used for the treatment of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which affect 3–7% of young people. Among college students, the life-time prevalence of non-medical prescription stimulant use was 6.9–8.1%, past year prevalence was 4.1–5.4% and past month prevalence was 2.1%.123,124 Non-prescription use of stimulants includes those taking medications not prescribed to the individual or not taking as directed (exceeding quantity, alternative routes such as intranasal). Among reproductive age women, 3% of women have ADHD and in cases of moderate to severe impairment, the benefits of prescription stimulant use may outweigh risks.125 In 2015, 1% of reproductive age women reported prescription stimulant misuse.1

Prescription misuse effect on pregnancy

Very little is known about prescription misuse of stimulants. Most known data about prescription stimulant use are derived from studies of women treated for ADHD during pregnancy. Based on several population-based cohort studies, first trimester exposure to prescription stimulants does not appear to be associated with increased risk of congenital anomalies.126128 Among women taking prescription stimulant medications, there was a small increased risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth.129 Among women who filled at least two prescriptions for stimulants between 8 and 18 weeks, the risk of placental abruption increased. Those continuing to the third trimester had an increased risk of preterm delivery. Women in this cohort were receiving prescriptions from medical providers and the proportion of women misusing these medications is unknown.

Among women treated primarily with methylphenidate during pregnancy, there was an increased risk of neonatal seizures and NICU admission in one population-based Swedish cohort study. However, authors acknowledge residual confounding which limits the ability to directly attribute these findings to stimulant use.130 In another Australian study of women with ADHD, treatment with stimulants both before and during pregnancy was associated with adverse outcomes, including preeclampsia and preterm birth, at similar rates, suggesting that stimulant treatment did not account for the increased risk.131 Notably, both of these studies assume that pregnant women take medications as prescribed and markers of misuse (early refills, multiple providers, multiple pharmacies) were not assessed.

Amphetamines are excreted in human breastmilk, however very limited data are available. A threshold of 20 mg daily is suggested as quantity sufficient to detect metabolites in the neonatal urine, however, this is based on the study of one woman treated for narcolepsy with amphetamine 20 mg daily followed for six weeks pospartum.132 Despite known passage into the breastmilk, no adverse neonatal effects were identified in a cohort of 103 breastfed infants with prescription amphetamine exposure.133 While illicit stimulant use, including prescription stimulant misuse is a contraindication to breastfeeding,64,65 use of prescribed stimulants as directed may not be associated with increased risk.

Ecstasy (N-methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine; 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine)

N-methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine; 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), commonly referred to as Ecstasy, E and Molly, is an amphetamine used for recreational purposes. An estimated 6.4 million people have used MDMA1 and exposure among high school age children has dramatically increased.134 In 2015, 0.3% of reproductive age women used MDMA in the past year.1 Pregnant women who use MDMA during pregnancy are more likely to suffer negative consequences including work and social problems compared to those who did not use MDMA.135

MDMA effects on pregnancy

There is limited information on effects of MDMA in pregnancy. In the largest prospective study, 71 women had MDMA only exposure and 56 women had MDMA and other substance exposure. Of continued pregnancies (n=78), 15.4% of infants had congenital anomalies, which is higher than the expected frequency (2–3%).134 Cardiovascular (26 per 100 livebirths versus expected 5–10 per 100) and musculoskeletal malformations (38 per 100 livebirths versus expected 1 per 1000) were most common. There is one additional case report of a congenital heart defect with prenatal MDMA exposure.136 A case-control study found that MDMA exposure was associated with vasoconstrictive disorders including gastroschisis; however, there were only seven women with prenatal exposure in this cohort.92 There is little known about other pregnancy outcomes or lactation with MDMA.

MDMA and long term maternal and child outcomes

Like methamphetamine, MDMA is neurotoxic.137 Little data are available on maternal outcomes after MDMA prenatal use. Several studies have suggested that MDMA is associated with worse infant outcomes, including poorer motor quality and lower milestone attainment, in a dose dependent fashion.135,138 The observed developmental delays particularly in fine and gross motor delays persisted at 24 months.139,140

Ephedra

Ephedra, found in several Ephedraceae species, is a commonly used herb in Chinese and Western herbal traditions. In Chinese traditional medicine, it is also known as ma huang. Ephedra contains ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, norephedrine and norpseudoephedrine. At high doses, ephedra use has been associated with cardiovascular complications and death in the general population.141,142 Among individuals with co-existing psychiatric disorders or in the presence of polysubstance use, ephedra has been associated with psychosis, severe depression, mania and suicidal ideation.143 Among US adults, 3.9% report using ephedra (ma huang).144 Ephedra is reportedly one of the more commonly used herbs with 1.1% of women reporting use three months prior to pregnancy and 0.6% in the first trimester.145 In one study of women using weight loss products, approximately 1% of women reported using ephedra-containing products inadvertently in the peri-conception period. In the National Birth Defects Prevention Study which included 18438 women from 10 states from 199–2003, 1.3% reported using ephedra during pregnancy.146 There were five cases of anencephaly among women with ephedra use, however, there was no statistically significant association compared to women no using ephedra (odds ratio 2.8, confidence interval 1.0–7.3). Very little is known about ephedra use and perinatal outcomes or lactation.

Natural and Synthetic Cathinones

Natural and synthetic cathinones contain simulants derived from the khat plant (Catha edulis) which is native to East Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Khat leaves contain two stimulants cathinone and methcanthinones and are chewed for mild stimulant properties. Synthetic cathinone, widely known as “bath salts,” are considered part of a group of “new psychoactive substances” that unregulated psychoactive substances with no legitimate medical use.147 They are introduced and then reintroduced in quick succession to obstruct law enforcement. Synthetic cathinones are generally white or brown crystal-like powder and can produce increased friendliness and sex drive, agitation, violent behavior and hallucinations. They are illegal in most states due to adverse mental and physical effects.148,149 The three most popular bath salt constituents include mephedrone, methylone and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV). Cathinones act at the dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine synapses and produce stimulant similar effects to methamphetamines and cocaine.150 One study found that MDPV is ten times more potent than cocaine at producing locomotor activation, tachycardia and hypertension in rats.151 MDPV has been implicated in bath salt overdoses in the United States and produces a cocaine-like blockage of transporters for dopamine and norepinephrine. Because of action at the serotonin transporter, bath salt overdose is associated with serotonin syndrome which manifests as agitation, psychosis, hyperthermia and tachycardia.

The epidemiology of bath salt use is limited. Among high school seniors, 1.1% have used bath salts in the past year.152 In an on-line survey of predominantly educated white males, (N=113), bath salt use was associated with increased sexual desire and high risk sexual behaviors.153 To our knowledge, there is no available information on the prevalence of bath salt use among reproductive age or pregnant women.

Cathinones and perinatal outcomes pregnancy

Studies from Africa and Middle East demonstrate an association between khat use and decreased uterine blood flow and decrease in birth weight.154156 A small study (N=642) in Yemen found no increased risk of stillbirth or congenital malformations among pregnant women who chewed khat during their pregnancies.157 Among lactating women who chew khat, nor-pseudoephedrine has been found in breast milk.158 In a study of women who chewed khat while breastfeeding, 75% women who chewed khat four or more times a week had a history of a child dying compared to 7% of women who chewed khat once a week; however the study did not account for other significant confounders of childhood mortality in this region, including age of children, socioeconomic status and amount of breastfeeding.159 There are no studies currently available on the maternal, fetal or childhood effects of bath salts.

Treatment of stimulant use disorders among pregnant women

There is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pharmacotherapy for stimulant use disorder. In the non-pregnant population, studies of pharmacotherapy for cocaine and amphetamine use disorders have largely shown no efficacy for any pharmacotherapy including anti-depressants, anti-convulsants and dopamine agonists inhibitors.160 Psychosocial treatments appear to be the only effective treatment for stimulant use disorders.161 Most notably, contingency management, also known as motivational incentives, provides rewards for desired behaviors (i.e. negative drug test) and withholding privileges for undesired behaviors (i.e. relapse) appears to be most effective for treatment of stimulant use disorders.162

However, studies often exclude reproductive age women due to fears of unintentional effects on the fetus in the event of unanticipated pregnancy. The growing body of evidence that stimulant use has important gender and sex differences suggests that studies on effective treatment of reproductive age and pregnant women are urgently needed. Clinicians and policymakers should be aware of the impact of stimulant use during pregnancy and significant resources are needed to adequately to address this epidemic.

Conclusions

Stimulant use in pregnancy is an under-recognized public health epidemic and has important short-term and long-term implications for maternal and neonatal health (Table 1). Illicit stimulant use is likely associated with adverse perinatal outcomes including shorter gestational age and low birth weight, however, less is known about prescribed stimulant use and perinatal outcomes. Little is known about safety of stimulant use during breastfeeding. Screening for substance use, including prescription use for non-medical purposes and illicit stimulant use, is recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist and the American Society for Addiction Medicine.65 Despite these recommendations, the majority of obstetrical providers do not systematically screen pregnant or postpartum women for substance use and are likely to miss women using stimulants if selective screening is based on age, race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status.163,164 Post-partum screening may be particularly important as risk of drug relapse is highest in the postpartum period.165,166 Among women identified at low or moderate risk may respond well to brief intervention, however, those at high risk of a stimulant use disorder likely need referral to treatment.163 Significant research gaps exist regarding stimulant use disorders among pregnant and postpartum women (Table 2). Research studies have systematically excluded pregnant and lactating women from studies on pharmacological therapy for stimulant use disorder despite a growth body of literature showing important sex and gender differences in treatment responses. Systems barriers for pregnant and postpartum women also prevent many women from seeking treatment for stimulant use disorder. In general, many drug treatment programs do not admit pregnant women or parenting women with children. Once they delivered, many women face loss of insurance after pregnancy which may disrupt or preclude substance use treatment. Pregnancy and family-oriented treatment approaches are urgently needed. Furthermore, research studies on novel treatment approaches for stimulant use disorder should systematically include pregnant and postpartum women given the association between adverse perinatal outcomes and untreated stimulant use disorder. Finally, long-term studies that track family based outcomes are needed to understand the interplay of maternal, paternal and childhood outcomes associated with perinatal stimulant use.

Table 1:

Maternal, perinatal, fetal and childhood outcomes associated with stimulant use

Substance Maternal effects Perinatal effects Structural fetal anomalies Childhood neurodevelopmental effects

Cocaine
Cardiovascular complications including:
• Hypertension
• Myocardial ischemia and infarction
• Cardiotoxicity
Infectious disease (HIV, Hepatitis B and C)
Renal failure
Hepatic rupture
Thrombocytopenia
Cerebral ischemia and infarction
Maternal death

Preterm birth
Low birth weight
Small for gestational age infant
Shorter gestational age at delivery
Reduced birth weight
Perinatal infection (HIV, hepatitis, syphilis)
Placental aburption

Genitourinary defects

Limb reduction

Intestinal atresia

Some evidence of adverse behavioral, growth, cognition and learning outcomes, which may be attributable to other social and other perinatal factors.

Amphetamine/ methamphetamine (illicit) Cardiovascular complications including:
• Hypertension
• Myocardial ischemia and infarction
• Cardiomyopathy
Infectious disease (HIV, Hepatitis B and C)
Dental disease
Adolescent pregnancy
Intrauterine growth restriction
Preterm birth
Fetal death
Earlier gestational age
Lower birthweight
Smaller head circumference
Cleft Palate Increased anxiety and depression & attention problems at 3 and 5 years old
Poorer cognitive outcomes at 7.5 years old
Frontal and striatal brain changes at age 7–15 years old with differential effects by sex

Ecstasy (MDMA) Limited information
Work and social problems
Limited Cardiovascular
Musculoskeletal (clubbed foot)
Gastroschisis
Poor motor quality and lower milestone attainment at 4 and 12 months of age
Fine and gross motor delays at 24 months of age

Ephedra Limited information
Cardiovascular complications
Death
Among those with co-existing psychiatric conditions, psychosis, severe depression, mania, suicidal ideation
** Based on data from non-pregnant populations
Limited Limited Limited

Synthetic Cathinone (“Bath salts”) None available None available None available None available
Table 2:

Research gaps in stimulant use among pregnant women

Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT)
  • Proportion of pregnant women who are using illicit and prescription misuse stimulant with universal screening
  • Effect of brief intervention among pregnant women at low and moderate risk of stimulant use disorder
  • Proportion of women with identified stimulant use disorder referred to treatment
Short and long term outcomes of perinatal stimulant use
  • Maternal, perinatal, fetal and childhood outcomes of stimulant use in pregnancy
Treatment studies
  • Inclusion of pregnant and postpartum women in pharmacotherapy studies for methamphetamine and cocaine use disorders
  • Inclusion of pregnant and postpartum women in behavioral health intervention studies in stimulant use disorders
Health services
  • Proportion of pregnant and postpartum women who are able to access substance use treatment
  • Impact of family centered care models for stimulant use disorders

Acknowledgments

FUNDING: MCS is supported by Women’s Reproductive Health Research (WRHR K12, 1K12 HD085816) Career Development Program

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: The authors have no disclosures to report.

References

  • 1.Center for Behavioral Health Statistics Quality. 2015 National survey on drug use and health: Detailed tables In:2016.
  • 2.Fisher BL, Schauer P. Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. The American journal of surgery 2002;184(6):S9–S16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCabe SE, Teter CJ, Boyd CJ. Medical use, illicit use and diversion of prescription stimulant medication. J Psychoactive Drugs 2006;38(1):43–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arnsten AF. Stimulants: therapeutic actions in ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006;31(11):2376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gyllenhaal C, Merritt SL, Peterson SD, Block KI, Gochenour T. Efficacy and safety of herbal stimulants and sedatives in sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev 2000;4(3):229–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sofuoglu M, Dudish-Poulsen S, Nelson D, Pentel PR, Hatsukami DK. Sex and menstrual cycle differences in the subjective effects from smoked cocaine in humans. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1999;7(3):274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Evans SM, Foltin RW. Exogenous progesterone attenuates the subjective effects of smoked cocaine in women, but not in men. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006;31(3):659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.White TL, Justice AJ, de Wit H. Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 2002;73(4):729–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roth ME, Cosgrove KP, Carroll ME. Sex differences in the vulnerability to drug abuse: a review of preclinical studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004;28(6):533–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brecht M-L, O’Brien A, Von Mayrhauser C, Anglin MD. Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addict Behav 2004;29(1):89–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Joe KA. Ice is strong enough for a man but made for a woman. Crime, law and social change 1994;22(3):269–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miller J, Carbone-Lopez K, Gunderman MV. Gendered narratives of self, addiction, and recovery among women methamphetamine users. Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime 2015:69–95.
  • 13.Lynch W, Potenza MN, Cosgrove KP, Mazure CM. Sex differences in vulnerability to stimulant abuse. Women and addiction: a comprehensive handbook Guilford, New York 2009.
  • 14.Tuchman E. Women and addiction: the importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. J Addict Dis 2010;29(2):127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wright TE, Schuetter R, Tellei J, Sauvage L. Methamphetamines and pregnancy outcomes. J Addict Med 2015;9(2):111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oei JL, Abdel-Latif ME, Clark R, Craig F, Lui K. Short-term outcomes of mothers and infants exposed to antenatal amphetamines. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Boeri MW, Tyndall BD, Woodall DR. Suburban poverty: Barriers to services and injury prevention among marginalized women who use methamphetamine. West J Emerg Med 2011;12(3):284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wermuth L. Poverty and methamphetamine abuse: A study of AIDS risk behaviors among rural Northern California Women. Journal of poverty 1999;3(1):25–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kissin WB, Svikis DS, Morgan GD, Haug NA. Characterizing pregnant drug-dependent women in treatment and their children. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001;21(1):27–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martin SL, English KT, Clark KA, Cilenti D, Kupper LL. Violence and substance use among North Carolina pregnant women. Am J Public Health 1996;86(7):991–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hedin LW, Janson PO. Domestic violence during pregnancy: The prevalence of physical injuries, substance use, abortions and miscarriages. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79(8):625–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krans EE, Patrick SW. Opioid use disorder in pregnancy: health policy and practice in the midst of an epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Terplan M Why is there no moral panic surrounding methamphetamine use in pregnancy in the US? Adiktologie 2008(Supplement 2). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Terplan M, Smith EJ, Kozloski MJ, Pollack HA. Methamphetamine use among pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113(6):1285–1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gold MS, Washton AM, Dackis CA. Cocaine abuse: Neurochemistry, phenomenology, and treatment. Cocaine use in America: epidemiologic and clinical perspectives National Institute on Drug Abuse Research monograph 1985;61:130–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pitts D, Marwah J. Autonomic actions of cocaine. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1989;67(9):1168–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krishna RB, Levitz M, Dancis J. Transfer of cocaine by the perfused human placenta: the effect of binding to serum proteins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169(6):1418–1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sheinkopf SJ, Lagasse LL, Lester BM, et al. Prenatal cocaine exposure: cardiorespiratory function and resilience. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1094(1):354–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chavkin W. Cocaine and pregnancy—time to look at the evidence. JAMA 2001;285(12):1626–1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abuse S Mental Health Services Administration, Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National Estimates of Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits. HHS publication no(SMA) 2013;13:4760. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jarlenski M, Barry CL, Gollust S, Graves AJ, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Kozhimannil K. Polysubstance use among US women of reproductive age who use opioids for nonmedical reasons. Am J Public Health 2017;107(8):1308–1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Day NL, Cottreau CM, Richardson GA. The epidemiology of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among women of childbearing age and pregnant women. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36(2):232–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Richardson GA, Day NL, Mcgauhey PJ. The impact of prenatal marijuana and cocaine use on the infant and child. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36(2):302–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cox S, Posner SF, Kourtis AP, Jamieson DJ. Hospitalizations with amphetamine abuse among pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(2):341–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lampley EC, Williams S, Myers SA. Cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis causing renal failure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87(5):804–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moen MD, Caliendo MJ, Marshall W, Uhler ML. Hepatic rupture in pregnancy associated with cocaine use. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(4 Pt 2 Suppl):687–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mercado A, Johnson JG, Calver D, Sokol RJ. Cocaine, pregnancy, and postpartum intracerebral hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73(3 Pt 2):467–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lange RA, Hillis LD. Cardiovascular complications of cocaine use. N Engl J Med 2001;345(5):351–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Towers CV, Pircon RA, Nageotte MP, Porto M, Garite TJ. Cocaine intoxication presenting as preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81(4):545–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Slutsker L Risks associated with cocaine use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79(5 (Pt 1)):778–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burkett G, Bandstra ES, Cohen J, Steele B, Palow D. Cocaine-related maternal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(1):40–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuczkowski KM. The effects of drug abuse on pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19(6):578–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Woods JR, Plessinger MA. Pregnancy increases cardiovascular toxicity to cocaine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162(2):529–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Plessinger MA, Woods JR. Progesterone increases cardiovascular toxicity to cocaine in nonpregnant ewes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(5):1659–1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Plessinger MA, Woods JR Jr. The cardiovascular effects of cocaine use in pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 1991;5(2):99–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sharma A, Plessinger MA, Sherer DM, Liang C-s, Miller RK, Woods JR Jr. Pregnancy enhances cardiotoxicity of cocaine: role of progesterone. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1992;113(1):30–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kuczkowski KM. Anesthetic implications of drug abuse in pregnancy. J Clin Anesth 2003;15(5):382–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Plessinger MA, Woods JJ. Maternal, placental, and fetal pathophysiology of cocaine exposure during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36(2):267–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bauer CR, Langer JC, Shankaran S, et al. Acute neonatal effects of cocaine exposure during pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159(9):824–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chavez G, Mulinare J, Cordero J. Maternal cocaine use during early pregnancy as a risk factor for congenital urogenital anomalies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1990;31(3):309–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chavez G, Mulinare J, Cordero J. Maternal cocaine use and the risk for genitourinary tract defects: an epidemiologic approach. Am J Human Genetics 1988;43:A43. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chávez GF, Mulinare J, Cordero JF. Maternal cocaine use during early pregnancy as a risk factor for congenital urogenital anomalies. JAMA 1989;262(6):795–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hoyme HE, Jones KL, Dixon SD, et al. Prenatal cocaine exposure and fetal vascular disruption. Pediatrics 1990;85(5):743–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gouin K, Murphy K, Shah PS. Effects of cocaine use during pregnancy on low birthweight and preterm birth: systematic review and metaanalyses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204(4):340 e341–340. e312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dombrowski MP, Wolfe HM, Welch RA, Evans MI. Cocaine abuse is associated with abruptio placentae and decreased birth weight, but not shorter labor. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77(1):139–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Webbeh H, Matthews RP, McCalla S, Feldman J, Minkoff HL. The effect of recent cocaine use on the progress of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(3):1014–1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ness RB, Grisso JA, Hirschinger N, et al. Cocaine and tobacco use and the risk of spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med 1999;340(5):333–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bingol N, Fuchs M, Diaz V, Stone RK, Gromisch DS. Teratogenicity of cocaine in humans. The Journal of pediatrics 1987;110(1):93–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Acker D, Sachs BP, Tracey KJ, Wise WE. Abruptio placentae associated with cocaine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146(2):220–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chasnoff IJ, Burns WJ, Schnoll SH, Burns KA. Cocaine use in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1985;313(11):666–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gonsoulin W, Borge D, Moise KJ. Rupture of unscarred uterus in primigravid woman in association with cocaine abuse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(2):526–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fares I, McCulloch KM, Raju T. Intrauterine cocaine exposure and the risk for sudden infant death syndrome: a meta-analysis In:1997. [PubMed]
  • 63.Chasnoff IJ, Lewis DE, Squires L. Cocaine intoxication in a breast-fed infant. Pediatrics 1987;80(6):836–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Drugs AAoPCo. Transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 2001;108(3):776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Committee Opinion No. 711: Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(2):e81–e94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Singer L, Arendt R, Farkas K, Minnes S, Huang J, Yamashita T. Relationship of prenatal cocaine exposure and maternal postpartum psychological distress to child developmental outcome. Dev Psychopathol 1997;9(3):473–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Accornero VH, Anthony JC, Morrow CE, et al. Estimated effect of prenatal cocaine exposure on examiner-rated behavior at age 7 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(3):370–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Richardson GA, Goldschmidt L, Larkby C, Day NL. Effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on adolescent development. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2015;49:41–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bridgett DJ, Mayes LC. Development of inhibitory control among prenatally cocaine exposed and non-cocaine exposed youths from late childhood to early adolescence: The effects of gender and risk and subsequent aggressive behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(1):47–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Carmody DP, Bennett DS, Lewis M. The effects of prenatal cocaine exposure and gender on inhibitory control and attention. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(1):61–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Frank DA, Augustyn M, Knight WG, Pell T, Zuckerman B. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA 2001;285(12):1613–1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cruickshank CC, Dyer KR. A review of the clinical pharmacology of methamphetamine. Addiction 2009;104(7):1085–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Elkashef A, Vocci F, Hanson G, White J, Wickes W, Tiihonen J. Pharmacotherapy of methamphetamine addiction: an update. Subst Abus 2008;29(3):31–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hart CL, Gunderson EW, Perez A, et al. Acute physiological and behavioral effects of intranasal methamphetamine in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33(8):1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Miller CL, Kerr T, Fischer B, Zhang R, Wood E. Methamphetamine injection independently predicts hepatitis C infection among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. J Adolesc Health 2009;44(3):302–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Anderson R, Flynn N. The methamphetamine-HIV connection in Northern California. Amphetamine Misuse: International Perspectives on Current Trends, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers 1997:181–196.
  • 77.Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM, Anderson RN, Miniño AM. Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980–2008. NCHS data brief 2011(81):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Al-Tayyib A, Koester S, Langegger S, Raville L. Heroin and methamphetamine injection: An emerging drug use pattern. Subst Use Misuse 2017;52(8):1051–1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.KUO CJ, LIAO YT, Chen WJ, TSAI SY, LIN SK, CHEN CC. Causes of death of patients with methamphetamine dependence: A record-linkage study. Drug and alcohol review 2011;30(6):621–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zapata LB, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM, Lowry R. Methamphetamine use is independently associated with recent risky sexual behaviors and adolescent pregnancy. J Sch Health 2008;78(12):641–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shah R, Diaz SD, Arria A, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and short-term maternal and infant medical outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2012;29(5):391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Derauf C, LaGasse LL, Smith LM, et al. Demographic and psychosocial characteristics of mothers using methamphetamine during pregnancy: preliminary results of the infant development, environment, and lifestyle study (IDEAL). The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse 2007;33(2):281–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gorman MC, Orme KS, Nguyen NT, Kent EJ III, Caughey AB. Outcomes in pregnancies complicated by methamphetamine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(4):429 e421–429. e427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nguyen D, Smith LM, LaGasse LL, et al. Intrauterine growth of infants exposed to prenatal methamphetamine: results from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle study. The Journal of pediatrics 2010;157(2):337–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Barlow A, Mullany BC, Neault N, et al. Examining correlates of methamphetamine and other drug use in pregnant American Indian adolescents. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The Journal of the National Center 2010;17(1):1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.McElhatton P Fetal effects of substances of abuse. Journal of Toxicology-Clinical Toxicology 2000;38(2):194–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Eriksson M, Larsson G, Zetterström R. Amphetamine addiction and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981;60(3):253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Good MM, Solt I, Acuna JG, Rotmensch S, Kim MJ. Methamphetamine use during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(2):330–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kalaitzopoulos D-R, Chatzistergiou K, Amylidi A-L, Kokkinidis DG, Goulis DG. Effect of methamphetamine hydrochloride on pregnancy outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Med 2018;12(3):220–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gilbert EF, Khoury GH. Dextroamphetamine and congenital cardiac malformations. The Journal of Pediatrics 1970;76(4):638. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nora J, Vargo T, Nora A, Love K, Mcnamara D. Dexamphetamine: a possible environmental trigger in cardiovascular malformations. The Lancet 1970;295(7659):1290–1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Draper ES, Rankin J, Tonks AM, et al. Recreational drug use: a major risk factor for gastroschisis? Am J Epidemiol 2007;167(4):485–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.BAYS J Fetal vascular disruption with prenatal exposure to cocaine or methamphetamine. Pediatrics 1991;87(3):416–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Levin JN. Amphetamine ingestion with biliary atresia. The Journal of pediatrics 1971;79(1):130–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Matera R, Zabala H, Jimenez A. Bifid exencephalia. Teratogen action of amphetamine. Int Surg 1968;50(1):79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Milkovich L, van den Berg BJ. Effects of antenatal exposure to anorectic drugs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;129(6):637–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Little BB, Snell LM. Methamphetamine abuse during pregnancy: outcome and fetal effects. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72(4):541–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Oro AS, Dixon SD. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. The Journal of pediatrics 1987;111(4):571–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Smith L, Yonekura ML, Wallace T, Berman N, Kuo J, Berkowitz C. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on fetal growth and drug withdrawal symptoms in infants born at term. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003;24(1):17–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Jablonski SA, Williams MT, Vorhees CV. Mechanisms involved in the neurotoxic and cognitive effects of developmental methamphetamine exposure. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews 2016;108(2):131–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Davidson C, Gow AJ, Lee TH, Ellinwood EH. Methamphetamine neurotoxicity: necrotic and apoptotic mechanisms and relevance to human abuse and treatment. Brain Research Reviews 2001;36(1):1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Won L, Bubula N, McCoy H, Heller A. Methamphetamine concentrations in fetal and maternal brain following prenatal exposure. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2001;23(4):349–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Won L, Bubula N, Heller A. Fetal exposure to methamphetamine in utero stimulates development of serotonergic neurons in three-dimensional reaggregate tissue culture. Synapse 2002;43(2):139–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Heller A, Bubula N, Lew R, Heller B, Won L. Gender-dependent enhanced adult neurotoxic response to methamphetamine following fetal exposure to the drug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;298(2):769–779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chang L, Smith LM, LoPresti C, et al. Smaller subcortical volumes and cognitive deficits in children with prenatal methamphetamine exposure. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 2004;132(2):95–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Smith L, Chang L, Yonekura M, Grob C, Osborn D, Ernst T. Brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in children exposed to methamphetamine in utero. Neurology 2001;57(2):255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Arria AM, Derauf C, LaGasse LL, et al. Methamphetamine and other substance use during pregnancy: preliminary estimates from the Infant Development, Environment, and Lifestyle (IDEAL) study. Maternal and child health journal 2006;10(3):293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.LaGasse LL, Wouldes T, Newman E, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome in the USA and New Zealand. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(1):166–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Smith LM, LaGasse LL, Derauf C, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine use and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2008;30(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kiblawi ZN, Smith LM, Diaz SD, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal and infant neurobehavioral outcome: results from the IDEAL study. Subst Abus 2014;35(1):68–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Smith LM, Paz MS, LaGasse LL, et al. Maternal depression and prenatal exposure to methamphetamine: neurodevelopmental findings from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle (ideal) study. Depress Anxiety 2012;29(6):515–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Derauf C, LaGasse L, Smith L, et al. Infant temperament and high risk environment relate to behavior problems and language in toddlers. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP 2011;32(2):125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.LaGasse LL, Derauf C, Smith LM, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and childhood behavior problems at 3 and 5 years of age. Pediatrics 2012:peds. 2011–2209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 114.Derauf C, LaGasse LL, Smith LM, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and inhibitory control among young school-age children. The Journal of pediatrics 2012;161(3):452–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Diaz SD, Smith LM, LaGasse LL, et al. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on behavioral and cognitive findings at 7.5 years of age. The Journal of pediatrics 2014;164(6):1333–1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chang L, Cloak C, Jiang C, et al. Altered neurometabolites and motor integration in children exposed to methamphetamine in utero. Neuroimage 2009;48(2):391–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Roussotte FF, Bramen JE, Nunez SC, et al. Abnormal brain activation during working memory in children with prenatal exposure to drugs of abuse: the effects of methamphetamine, alcohol, and polydrug exposure. Neuroimage 2011;54(4):3067–3075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Roussotte FF, Rudie JD, Smith L, et al. Frontostriatal connectivity in children during working memory and the effects of prenatal methamphetamine, alcohol, and polydrug exposure. Dev Neurosci 2012;34(1):43–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Colby JB, Smith L, O’Connor MJ, Bookheimer SY, Van Horn JD, Sowell ER. White matter microstructural alterations in children with prenatal methamphetamine/polydrug exposure. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 2012;204(2–3):140–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Roos A, Jones G, Howells FM, Stein DJ, Donald KA. Structural brain changes in prenatal methamphetamine-exposed children. Metab Brain Dis 2014;29(2):341–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Roos A, Kwiatkowski MA, Fouche J-P, et al. White matter integrity and cognitive performance in children with prenatal methamphetamine exposure. Behav Brain Res 2015;279:62–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Bartu A, Dusci LJ, Ilett KF. Transfer of methylamphetamine and amphetamine into breast milk following recreational use of methylamphetamine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009;67(4):455–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.McCabe SE, Knight JR, Teter CJ, Wechsler H. Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: Prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction 2005;100(1):96–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Teter CJ, McCabe SE, LaGrange K, Cranford JA, Boyd CJ. Illicit use of specific prescription stimulants among college students: prevalence, motives, and routes of administration. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 2006;26(10):1501–1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Baker AS, Freeman MP. Management of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder During Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics 2018;45(3):495–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Huybrechts KF, Bröms G, Christensen LB, et al. Association between methylphenidate and amphetamine use in pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a cohort study from the international pregnancy safety study consortium. JAMA psychiatry 2018;75(2):167–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Källén B, Borg N, Reis M. The use of central nervous system active drugs during pregnancy. Pharmaceuticals 2013;6(10):1221–1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Pottegård A, Hallas J, Andersen JT, et al. First-trimester exposure to methylphenidate: a population-based cohort study. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 2014;75(1):88–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Cohen JM, Hernández-Díaz S, Bateman BT, et al. Placental complications associated with psychostimulant use in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(6):1192–1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Nörby U, Winbladh B, Källén K. Perinatal Outcomes After Treatment With ADHD Medication During Pregnancy. Pediatrics 2017;140(6):e20170747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Poulton AS, Armstrong B, Nanan RK. Perinatal Outcomes of Women Diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An Australian Population-Based Cohort Study. CNS drugs 2018;32(4):377–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Steiner E, Villen T, Hallberg M, Rane A. Amphetamine secretion in breast milk. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1984;27(1):123–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ayd FJ Jr. Excretion of psychotropic drugs in human breast milk. Psychopharm Review 1973;8(9):33–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Landry MJ. MDMA: a review of epidemiological data. J Psychoactive Drugs 2002;34(2):163–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Singer LT, Moore DG, Fulton S, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes of infants exposed to MDMA (Ecstasy) and other recreational drugs during pregnancy. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2012;34(3):303–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.van Tonningen MR, Garbis H, Reuvers M. Ecstasy exposure during pregnancy. Teratology 1998;58:33A. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Colado M, O’shea E, Granados R, Misra A, Murray T, Green A. A study of the neurotoxic effect of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) on 5-HT neurones in the brains of mothers and neonates following administration of the drug during pregnancy. Br J Pharmacol 1997;121(4):827–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Singer LT, Moore DG, Min MO, et al. One-year outcomes of prenatal exposure to MDMA and other recreational drugs. Pediatrics 2012:peds. 2012–0666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 139.Singer LT, Moore DG, Min MO, et al. Developmental outcomes of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy)-exposed infants in the UK. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 2015;30(4):290–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Singer LT, Moore DG, Min MO, et al. Motor delays in MDMA (ecstasy) exposed infants persist to 2 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2016;54:22–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Haller CA, Benowitz NL. Adverse cardiovascular and central nervous system events associated with dietary supplements containing ephedra alkaloids. N Engl J Med 2000;343(25):1833–1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Samenuk D, Link MS, Homoud MK, et al. Adverse cardiovascular events temporally associated with ma huang, an herbal source of ephedrine. Paper presented at: Mayo Clinic Proceedings2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Maglione M, Miotto K, Iguchi M, Jungvig L, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Psychiatric effects of ephedra use: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration reports of adverse events. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(1):189–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kennedy J. Herb and supplement use in the US adult population. Clin Ther 2005;27(11):1847–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Broussard CS, Louik C, Honein MA, Mitchell AA, Study NBDP. Herbal use before and during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(5):443 e441–443. e446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Bitsko RH, Reefhuis J, Louik C, et al. Periconceptional use of weight loss products including ephedra and the association with birth defects. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2008;82(8):553–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Abuse NIoD. Synthetic Cathinones “Bath salts” https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/synthetic-cathinones-bath-salts. Accessed October 25th 2018.
  • 148.Miller BL, Stogner JM, Miller JM, Fernandez MI. The arrest and synthetic novel psychoactive drug relationship: Observations from a young adult population. Journal of Drug Issues 2017;47(1):91–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.John ME, Thomas-Rozea C, Hahn D. Bath Salts Abuse Leading to New-Onset Psychosis and Potential for Violence. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses 2017;11(2):120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Miotto K, Striebel J, Cho AK, Wang C. Clinical and pharmacological aspects of bath salt use: a review of the literature and case reports. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;132(1–2):1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Baumann MH, Partilla JS, Lehner KR, et al. Powerful cocaine-like actions of 3, 4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), a principal constituent of psychoactive ‘bath salts’ products. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38(4):552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Palamar JJ. “Bath salt” use among a nationally representative sample of high school seniors in the United States. The American journal on addictions 2015;24(6):488–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Johnson PS, Johnson MW. Investigation of “bath salts” use patterns within an online sample of users in the United States. J Psychoactive Drugs 2014;46(5):369–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Khawaja M, Al-Nsour M, Saad G. Khat (Catha edulis) chewing during pregnancy in Yemen: findings from a national population survey. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2008;12(3):308–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hassan N, Gunaid A, Murray Lyon I. Khat [Catha edulis]: health aspects of khat chewing 2007. [PubMed]
  • 156.Arimi M, Kyama M, Langat D, Mwenda J. Effects of khat (Catha edulis) consumption on reproductive functions: a review 2017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 157.Nakajima M, Jebena MG, Taha M, et al. Correlates of khat use during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. Addict Behav 2017;73:178–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Kristiansson B, Abdul Ghani N, Eriksson M, Garle M, Qirbi A. Use of khat in lactating women: a pilot study on breast-milk secretion. J Ethnopharmacol 1987;21(1):85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Ibrahim Ali Omer M, Mansoub MA, Omer R, Omer R, Shadli M, Williams R. The effect of qat chewing and other factors on breast-feeding and child survival in a Yemeni society. Sudanese journal of paediatrics 2011;11(2):14–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Lima MSd, Soares BGdO, Reisser AAP, Farrell M. Pharmacological treatment of cocaine dependence: a systematic review. Addiction 2002;97(8):931–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165(2):179–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006;101(11):1546–1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wright TE, Terplan M, Ondersma SJ, et al. The role of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment in the perinatal period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215(5):539–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Madsen AM, Stark LM, Has P, Emerson JB, Schulkin J, Matteson KA. Opioid Knowledge and Prescribing Practices Among Obstetrician–Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131(1):150–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Schiff DM, Nielsen T, Terplan M, et al. Fatal and Nonfatal Overdose Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Massachusetts. Obstet Gynecol 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Platner M, Loucks TL, Lindsay MK, Ellis JE. Pregnancy-Associated Deaths in Rural, Nonrural, and Metropolitan Areas of Georgia. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(1):113–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES