Abstract
Lead represents a highly prevalent metal toxicant with potential to alter human biology in lasting ways. A population segment that is particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of lead exposure is the human fetus, as exposure events occurring before birth are linked to varied and long-ranging negative health and behavioral outcomes. An area that has yet to be addressed is the potential that lead exposure during pregnancy alters brain development even before an individual is born. Here, we combine prenatal lead exposure information extracted from newborn bloodspots with the human fetal brain functional MRI data to assess whether neural network connectivity differs between lead-exposed and lead-naïve fetuses. We found that neural connectivity patterns differed in lead-exposed and comparison groups such that fetuses that were not exposed demonstrated stronger age-related increases in cross-hemispheric connectivity, while the lead-exposed group demonstrated stronger age-related increases in posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) to lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) connectivity. These are the first results to demonstrate metal toxicant-related alterations in human fetal neural connectivity. Remarkably, the findings point to alterations in systems that support higher-order cognitive and regulatory functions. Objectives for future work are to replicate these results in larger samples and to test the possibility that these alterations may account for significant variation in future child cognitive and behavioral outcomes.
Keywords: brain, connectivity, fetal, lead, MRI, prenatal, resting-state
1. Introduction
Extensive epidemiological and clinical literature has documented the adverse effects of lead exposure in young children. In particular, exposure of the mother to heavy metal toxicants during pregnancy has been linked to offspring intellectual impairment (Canfield et al., 2004; Grandjean and Herz, 2015; Needleman et al., 1990), developmental disorders (Nuttall, 2017; Polanska et al., 2013), antisocial behavior (Dietrich et al., 2001; Wright et al., 2008), and adult neurological disorders (Mazumdar et al., 2012). Several accounts suggest that impairments in executive control and self-regulation may be core deficits cutting across these observed lead-associated phenotypes (Bellinger, 2011; Canfield et al., 2004; Schwartz et al., 2007; Schwartz et al., 2000). Despite consistent evidence of the harmful effects of prenatal lead exposure, mechanistic understanding of the processes by which exposure alters human development in utero, and how those alterations result in subsequent cognitive impairments and health risks is lacking. However, new developments in non-invasive fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) avail unprecedented opportunity to directly evaluate the effects of prenatal lead, at the time that they occur, by performing in vivo measurements of fetal brain network development (Schopf et al., 2012; Thomason et al., 2013; van den Heuvel and Thomason, 2016). This advance makes it possible to evaluate how integrity of connections within and between separable fetal brain networks varies with presence of confirmed lead exposure during late stages of human pregnancy.
Observed effects of lead neurotoxicity on the central nervous system are widespread. Animal studies have demonstrated that early lead exposure is associated with reduced blood-brain-barrier integrity, altered myelination and synaptogenesis, increased iron deposition, and shifts in brain metabolic content (Zheng, 2001; Zhu et al., 2013). Results from magnetic resonance imaging studies in humans corroborate these effects, reporting altered myelin microstructure (Brubaker et al., 2009; Sahu et al., 2010), reduced structural brain volume (Brubaker et al., 2010; Cecil et al., 2008), altered brain metabolite levels (Cecil et al., 2011; Trope et al., 1998), and reduced activity in task-relevant brain circuitry (Yuan et al., 2006) in individuals exposed to lead. Furthermore, a subset of human imaging studies have linked MRI findings to individual differences in cognitive performance, suggesting brain changes are likely to be a key determinant in the neurobehavioral consequences of lead exposure (Schwartz et al., 2007). Despite this extensive cross-species documentation of the pervasive effects of lead on nervous system integrity and function, information about the effects of lead exposure on coordinated activity across large-scale brain systems is lacking. Additionally, while it is well-known that lead crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissues (Gundacker and Hengstschlager, 2012), neurological studies of lead-exposure have yet to address the effects of lead-exposure measured directly in the prenatal human brain.
Recent advances in fetal resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) MRI make it possible to perform non-invasive assessment of the connectional organization of human brain networks before birth (Schopf et al., 2012; Thomason et al., 2013; van den Heuvel and Thomason, 2016). RSFC MRI is a technique that relies on the assumption that areas that show coherence in patterns of functional activity over time during a resting, task-free state are anatomically and functionally connected to one another (Biswal et al., 1995; Smyser et al., 2011; Zhang and Raichle, 2010). This assumption is supported by demonstration that these covariance patterns map with high fidelity to anatomical architecture (Greicius et al., 2009; Honey et al., 2009). Application of the RSFC MRI approach to the fetal brain is relatively new (discussed in van den Heuvel and Thomason, 2016), but already this approach has led to new insights into normative processes of brain development (Schopf et al., 2012; Thomason et al., 2015), into alterations in neuroconnectivity that precede preterm birth (Thomason et al., 2017), and how variation in prenatal neuroconnectivity relates to infant motor outcomes (Thomason et al., 2018).
Here, we assess the hypothesis that intrauterine exposure to lead disrupts formation of human brain networks before birth. In a sample of typically-developing fetuses we evaluate associations between prenatal lead exposure and brain network integrity, measured using in vivo intrauterine fMRI. Based on newborn blood spot data we derived two subgroups, lead-exposed and lead naïve, that were matched in group size, and on demographic and health variables (Table 1). It is noteworthy that while we refer to the control cases as lead-naïve, some level of exposure may have been experienced in the control group at some point in pregnancy. Based on prior neurological and behavioral evidence that lead exposure may be particularly deleterious to prefrontal regions and executive control processes (Brubaker et al., 2010; Canfield et al., 2004; Cecil et al., 2008), we hypothesized brain regions important for cognitive and attentional control, for example areas that contribute to fronto-parietal and default-mode networks, and those in stages of rapid development in this time period, for example temporal and insular cortices, are most susceptible to effects of prenatal lead exposure.
Table 1.
Lead Naïve (n=13) | Lead Exposed (n=13) | t / χ2/ U | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Birth Outcomes, M (SD) | ||||
Fetal age at birth (weeks) | 39.30 (1.61) | 38.38 (1.78) | 1.37 | 0.18 |
Birth weight (g) | 3071 (633) | 3067 (738) | 0.02 | 0.99 |
Maternal Ethnicity, n (%) | 1.53 | 0.68 | ||
African-American | 9 (69.2) | 11 (84.6) | ||
Asian-American | 1 (7.7) | 0 | ||
Caucasian | 2 (15.4) | 1 (7.7) | ||
Bi-racial | 1 (7.7) | 1 (7.7) | ||
Maternal Education, n (%) | 6.82 | 0.08 | ||
No GED/High-school diploma | 0 | 2 (15.4) | ||
GED/High-school diploma | 4 (30.8) | 7 (53.8) | ||
Some college | 9 (69.2) | 3 (23.1) | ||
4-yr college degree | 0 | 1 (7.7) | ||
Gross Annual Income, n (%) | 6.72 | 0.15 | ||
< $10,000 | 3 (23.1) | 9 (69.2) | ||
$10,000 - $20,000 | 2 (15.4) | 7 2 (15.4) | ||
$20,000 - $30,000 | 3 (23.1) | 1 (7.7) | ||
$50,000 - $60,000 | 2 (15.4) | 0 | ||
$60,000 - $80,000 | 0 | 1 (7.7) | ||
Undeclared | 3 (23.1) | 0 | ||
Marital Status, n (%) | 0.02 | 0.90 | ||
Single | 8(61.5) | 9 (69.2) | ||
Married/Partnered | 4 (30.8) | 4 (30.8) | ||
Undeclared | 1 (7.7) | 0 | ||
Imaging Characteristics, M (SD) | ||||
Maternal age at scan (years) | 25.32 (4.98) | 24.22 (4.56) | 70.0 | 0.46 |
Fetal age at scan (weeks) | 33.73 (4.29) | 33.69 (4.28) | 79.0 | 0.78 |
Amount of rs-fMRI data analyzed | ||||
(minutes) | 4.9 (1.8) | 5.4 (1.9) | 67.5 | 0.38 |
Translational mean movement (mm) | 0.24 (0.13) | 0.26 (0.11) | −0.55 | 0.59 |
Rotational mean movement (degrees) | 0.45 (0.25) | 0.49 (0.21) | −0.45 | 0.66 |
Two sample t-tests were used to assess differences between groups for age at birth, birth weight, translational motion, and rotational motion. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine differences for non-normally distributed, scalar variables (determined by Shapiro-Wilk Tests of Normality), including age at scan, frame count, and maternal age. Chi-square test was used to examine differences between groups for categorical variables, including ethnicity, education, income, and marital status. Due to small sample sizes, the Chi-square test assumption of each cell having a count of at least 5 was violated for all categorical variables. We observed that all comparisons provided above were non-significant, using two-tailed, p < 0.05.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study design
Mothers were recruited during routine obstetrical appointments at Hutzel Women’s Hospital in Detroit, Michigan during the second trimester of pregnancy. Inclusionary criteria included no contraindications for MRI, maternal age >18 years, and singleton pregnancy. 118 Mothers participated in 1 or 2 fetal brain MRI studies and completed questionnaires regarding thoughts, feelings, demographics, and health history. Medical birth records were obtained after delivery from two sources, with maternal consent: (1) Detroit Medical Center health records system, and (2) State of Michigan health records. Mothers provided written consent to access neonatal blood spots maintained by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) Newborn Screening Program.
2.2. Prenatal lead exposure assessment
For a subset of participants neonatal blood spot material was extracted from dried newborn bloodspot samples maintained by the MDHHS. Subject selection was based on a number of factors, including availability of samples and prior maternal consent, but also funding, as this was a pilot project. In brief, quality fetal fMRI data (all cases minimum 100 frames; average movement XYZ 0.233 mm and average PRY 0.165 deg) were available in 118 cases; of those, blood spot material were extracted for n = 72. A 6mm punch and card background material were extracted for each subject, and coded, deidentified samples were then transferred to the MDHHS Bureau of Laboratories (BOL), Division of Chemistry and Toxicology, Analytical Chemistry Section for analysis. MDHHS BOL is a College of American Pathologist (CAP) accredited laboratory. Each specimen was handled in the laboratory using universal precautions. The analysis was performed using a 3 mm punch that was removed from the original 6 mm punch, eluted and analyzed on a Perkin Elmer Nexion 300 ICP-MS following Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health laboratory procedure published standards (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_09_10/pbcd_f_met.pdf). Lead content was analyzed and reported in units of micrograms of lead per deciliter of blood (μg/dL). The method reporting limit is 1.0 μg/dL and therefore values below 1.0 μg/dL were reported as < 1.0 μg/dL. Based on lead outcomes, equally-sized lead-exposed (N = 13; mean age at MRI = 33.69 +/− 4.28 weeks; 7 males) and lead-naïve (< 1.0 μg/dL; N = 13; mean age at MRI = 33.72 +/− 4.29 weeks; 6 males) comparison groups were defined for MRI analysis. Groups were matched on gestational age at scan (p = .80), gestational age at birth (p = .29), birth weight (p = .96), quantity of fMRI data analyzed after removing high-motion frames (U = .38), average translational motion (p = .59), average rotational motion (p = .66), and demographic variables, see Table 1. Groups also did not differ on maternal use of alcohol, drugs of abuse, or tobacco usage during pregnancy, with p-values ranging from .20 to .83.
2.3. MRI acquisition
Fetuses, age range 23.9 to 39.6 weeks gestational age, were scanned on a 3T Siemens Verio scanner equipped with a 4-channel abdominal flex coil. Functional images were collected using an echo planar image sequence sensitized to T2* weighted blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes. Dynamic fluctuation in BOLD signal intensity across brain regions, over time, corresponds with vascular response to oxygen delivery demands corresponding to concurrent brain activity. The result is a 4-dimensional record of activity across all brain areas over time. Specific parameters of the gradient echo sequence were as follows: 32 slices, repetition time TR = 2000 ms, echo time TE = 30, flip angle = 80°, resolution 3.4 × 3.4 × 4 mm3. A total of 360 timeframes were collected in 12 minutes, and when possible, this sequence was repeated. MRI noise was minimized using earplugs and headphones (mother) and a custom-built belly band (fetuses) to minimize sound.
2.4. Fetal fMRI data preprocessing
Fetal RSFC data require extensive preprocessing prior to extraction of a whole brain connectional diagram, or connectome. We have developed a fetal-optimized MRI analysis pipeline that has been used in prior studies (Thomason et al., 2013; Thomason et al., 2015; Thomason et al., 2017). The process begins with isolation of segments of >20 seconds of consecutive low-movement data. Timeframes falling within each low-motion segment are retained for further processing, and all other data are eliminated. Masks are generated for each segment, as fetal head position can change slightly between segments. The brain is manually traced in native image space to produce masks that are then applied using FSL (Smith et al., 2004). Following brain extraction, brains are reoriented into the standard imaging plane using SPM 8 (Statistical Parametric Mapping; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/). Steps that follow are realignment and normalization into 2mm isotropic resolution fetal “template space” (Serag et al., 2012) to enable comparisons across subjects in the same coordinate space. Realignment and normalization are performed separately for each segment, then all data are concatenated, realigned (to correct misalignment between segments) and data are spatially smoothed at 4mm FWHM.
2.5. Whole-brain functional connectome construction
197 brain regions of interest (ROIs) were defined at the group level using spatially constrained spectral clustering (Craddock et al., 2012). In brief, this is a data-driven technique for defining approximately equally-sized, contiguous units (regions/nodes) that cover the full spatial extent of the cortex, subcortex and cerebellum. We then computed the strength of connectivity, or BOLD signal covariance, between every pair of regions using the Connectivity (CONN) FC Toolbox (ver.14n; www.nitrc.org/projects/ conn). Realignment parameters, with another six parameters representing their first order temporal derivatives, were removed with covariate regression analysis, and signals from white matter and cerebral spinal fluid were also regressed out using anatomical component correction (aCompCor; Behzadi et al., 2007; Chai et al., 2012). Band-pass filtering was set to 0.008 < f < 0.09 Hz to remove the low frequency temporal drifts and high frequency physiological- and scanner-based artifact in the data. Functional connectivity values were then calculated as the pairwise zero-lag bivariate correlation between each of the 19,306 pairs of ROI timecourses, and then Fisher-z transformed. This resulted in a single 197 × 197 symmetrical adjacency matrix (a functional connectome) for each participant.
2.6. Statistical analyses
In order to test neural differences at the functional network level between lead-exposed and lead-naïve participant groups we implemented two parallel procedures. The first was to define subnetworks, following previously described routines (Eggebrecht et al., 2017), within the total brain architecture, based on data in the connectivity matrices described above. To achieve this objective fetal RSFC connectivity matrices from all available fetal cases, N = 118, were submitted to an Infomap community detection algorithm (Rosvall and Bergstrom, 2008) to generate a systems-wide functional network model composed of 16 unique subnetworks (Figure 1A). It was within these data-derived subnetworks that within- and between-network connectivity differences were subsequently tested. In parallel, to investigate the relationship between the RSFC data and gestational age (GA) for each group, we first calculated the Pearson correlation for each Fisher-z-transformed ROI-ROI RSFC pair against GA across subjects. Second, following previously developed methods (Eggebrecht et al., 2017; Marrus et al., 2018; McKinnon et al., 2018; Wheelock et al., 2018; Wheelock et al., (under review)), methods for enrichment analyses were adapted from those used in largescale genomic association studies (Backes et al., 2014; Khatri et al., 2012; Rivals et al., 2007). For each study group, each within and between subnetwork pair was tested for enrichment of strong Pearson correlation values, defined as values remaining after being thresholded and binarized at an associated uncorrected P value ≤0.05. This process isolated all individual connections for which gestational age (GA) was significantly correlated with computed Fisher-z-transformed RSFC values.
Following these steps, we (1) used chi-square to test within-groups whether the number of significant edges within and/or between the derived subnetworks was significantly greater than chance, given the number of edges within/between each subnetwork, and (2) used the McNemar chi-square test to assess whether the pattern of significant edges within/between each subnetwork was significantly different between-groups. The chi-square test compares the observed number of strong RSFC-GA correlations within a functional network pair to the null hypothesis that assumes the overall number of strong correlations was uniformly distributed across all possible network pairs. The statistic is large when the number of strong correlations within a network pair is much less than (depletion) or much greater than (enrichment) expected. The McNemar statistic uses the number of discordant tests between study groups (b = number of ROI pairs True for lead-naive but false for lead-exposed, and c = the number of ROI pairs False for lead-naive but True at lead-exposed). For both the chi-square test of enrichment and the McNemar chi-square test across groups, data-driven empirical P values were calculated using randomization because permutation testing provides control over family-wise error rate, is nonparametric, automatically adjusts to the degree of correlation between tests, and does not make specific assumptions about the shape of the population distribution from which the observations have been derived (Backes et al., 2014). For each of 10,000 iterations, the subject pairing of RSFC and GA values was randomized to generate a false correlation statistic from which false within-group enrichment chi-square and across-group McNemar chi-square statistics were calculated to generate a null-distribution for each test. Within each iteration, asymptotic P values reflecting depletion were set to 1 to explicitly focus the statistical test on the probability of observing strong enrichment. The brain-wide permutation-based false-positive rate of the P values reflects the empirical probability of calculating the actual observed statistical value from all of the network blocks and represents a brain-wide null distribution for statistical evaluation of the data; thus, the P values presented below are empirically-derived permutation-based P values. This multi-tiered approach to within and between group connectome topography analysis has been employed and described in prior studies (Eggebrecht et al., 2017; Marrus et al., 2018; McKinnon et al., 2018; Wheelock et al., 2018; Wheelock et al., (under review)). The data and code used in this study will be made available via https://ndar.nih.gov/ and/or accessed upon direct request to M.E. Thomason (data) or A.T. Eggebrecht (code).
3. Results
3.1. Lead exposure groups
19.4% of N = 72 newborn bloodspots available for lead testing were positive for detectable levels of lead, ranging from 1 to 11 μg/dL with mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) of 2.43(0.65) μg/dL. 19% is a high proportion of exposure, but this observation fits with prior reports indicating levels in Detroit are higher than national averages (Zhang et al., 2013). One subject with an estimated level of 7.4 μg/dL was removed from consideration due to a lack of usable fMRI data.
3.2. Age-related change in between- and within-network fetal brain connectivity
Lead-naïve and lead-exposed participant groups were separately assessed for changes in network properties with advancing gestational age. We observed age-related change in 7 network pairs in the lead-naïve group, compared to 4 in the lead-exposed group. For the lead-naïve group the most significant effect was seen in connectivity between the right temporal lobe and left posterior parietal cortex and the direction of this effect was predominately negative, denoting diminished connectivity between these regions at more advanced fetal age. For the lead-exposed group the most significant age-related effect was observed in connectivity within the right posterior parietal cortex and was predominately positive, denoting a strengthening of connectivity within parietal regions in older lead exposed fetuses. A complete summary of all between- and within-network pairs that showed significant age-related change in either study group is provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Lead exposed | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
positive (%) |
negative (%) |
total N | Enrichment χ2 |
Enrichment p-value |
McNemar p-value |
|
CB - CB | 95 | 5 | 20 | 8.79 | 0.050 | 0.787 |
R pPar - R pPar | 100 | 0 | 4 | 19.56 | 0.014 | 0.193 |
PCC - R SFG | 100 | 0 | 15 | 21.53 | 0.011 | 0.023* |
SC - L pIN/TPJ | 43 | 57 | 14 | 10.65 | 0.038 | 0.405 |
Control | ||||||
positive (%) |
negative (%) |
total N | Enrichment χ2 |
Enrichment p-value |
McNemar p-value |
|
CB - CB | 100 | 0 | 21 | 11.80 | 0.029 | 0.787 |
R Temp - SMA | 21 | 79 | 48 | 9.58 | 0.040 | 0.083 |
R Temp - R pPar | 0 | 100 | 10 | 8.42 | 0.048 | 0.154 |
L pIN/TPJ - R Vis | 40 | 60 | 20 | 13.16 | 0.024 | 0.099 |
R Temp - SC | 19 | 81 | 16 | 9.89 | 0.038 | 0.110 |
R IN - CB | 96 | 4 | 24 | 10.97 | 0.032 | 0.079 |
R IN - L pIN/TPJ | 80 | 20 | 15 | 8.66 | 0.046 | 0.031* |
The number of significant connections within each network pair varies from region to region, and the proportion of those that are positive and negative also varies. Percentages denote proportion within each network pair that arose from significant positive or negative associations with age. ‘Total N’ denotes the number of total significant connections within each network pair. Enrichment χ2 statistics and p-values describe the degree to which the number of significant ROI-ROI pairs within each network pair was greater than could be expected by chance. McNemar p-values describe the statistical difference between lead exposed and control fetal ROI-ROI connectivity within each network pair.
3.3. Between-group differences in neural network connectivity
Lead-naïve participants exhibited age-related strengthening of cross-hemispheric connectivity that was not present in in the lead-exposed group. In particular, connectivity of bilateral insular cortices showed age-related effects in the lead-naïve group that was significantly greater than that observed in the lead-exposed group (Figure 2). The reverse was noted for connectivity between the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC); lead-exposed fetuses demonstrated significantly greater age-related increases in connectivity between these networks than did lead-naïve fetuses.
4. Discussion
Growth processes occurring during human embryonic and fetal development are foundational to health and disease across the lifespan. Moreover, it is known that fetal exposure to environmental toxins such as lead can have profound influence on developmental outcomes. However, no prior research has examined the impact of lead exposure on developing fetal brain networks in utero. Here, we report differences in cross-hemispheric and anterior-posterior fetal brain connectivity that are associated with prenatal lead exposure. These results demonstrate that lead exposed fetuses deviate from typical patterns of brain development and suggest that altered neural connectivity may be a biological mechanism underlying poorer cognitive and behavioral outcomes in individuals exposed to lead during the prenatal period.
We observed significant age-related increase in cross-hemispheric connectivity in lead-naïve fetuses that was not observed in lead-exposed comparison subjects. Increased cross-hemispheric connectivity is a normative fetal brain maturational process (Jakab et al., 2014; Thomason et al., 2013) and absence of such early connectivity suggests delay toward attainment of neural connections that support intra-hemispheric information transfer. Moreover, the areas involved in this lead-associated anomaly encompass areas of the insular, frontal and temporal cortices. These are particularly notable territories in the developing human brain, in part because they are the origin of spontaneous waves of activity that are postulated to support patterning of neural systems in the fetal brain (Arichi et al., 2017; Thomason, 2018). Results observed here are also align well with prior studies showing that childhood blood lead levels are associated with altered white matter microstructure (Brubaker et al., 2009; Sahu et al., 2010). Diminished connectivity in utero may precede long-term reduction in integrity of network structure, that in turn may contribute to cognitive deficits associated with neurotoxic insults from significant lead burden.
Another primary observation resulting from this novel comparison is that lead-exposed fetuses demonstrate augmented connectivity between lateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) with advancing age. This is of interest given that the SFG is a major constituent of the frontoparietal control network (FPN) whereas the PCC is a major constituent of the default mode network (DMN). This is a notable dichotomy given that activity in these networks is anticorrelated in the mature human brain, such that engagement of FPN is associated with diminished activity in the DMN and vice versa (Fox et al., 2005). The functional counterbalance between these systems is widely documented and has behavioral relevance. That is, engagement of the DMN is associated with introspective, stimulus-independent thought, and greater suppression of the DMN during attentionally-demanding tasks is associated with better performance (Hampson et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2008; Thomason et al., 2008). Furthermore, both decrement in DMN suppression during task, and hyperconnectivity of the DMN, have been associated with psychopathology (Hamilton et al., 2011; Pomarol-Clotet et al., 2008; Whitfield-Gabrieli and Ford, 2012; Whitfield-Gabrieli et al., 2009). Overall, dynamic opposition between the FPN and DMN is regarded as a healthy feature of human brain functional network organization. Here we see the reverse in lead-exposed fetuses, enhanced positive FPC-DMN connectivity, a feature with potential to contribute to later developmental psychopathology and executive dysfunction.
It is noteworthy that neural effects associated with lead exposure are not ubiquitous across all brain areas, and instead show specificity. Here, we observe significant differences between two systems, and the direction of effects differs such that each group demonstrates augmented connectivity in one of the pairings. We interpret these as reflecting variation in the order and pattern with which brain subsystems and associated structures mature. This form of heterogeneity of observed neurological correlates of lead exposure has also been previously reported, for example, in the work of Brubaker and colleagues (2009) cited above. While this group observed widespread patterns of decreased fractional anisotropy in individuals with higher blood lead levels, they observed concomitant increase in radial MD in the corpus callosum and internal capsule, suggesting relatively higher myelin integrity (cf. Winklewski et al., 2018) in individuals with higher levels of lead exposure.
These data represent the first window into the immediate consequences of lead exposure in the human fetal brain, but these observations must be tempered by inherent limitations in our approach. The primary consideration is that the sample size (N = 26) may be underpowered to reliably detect significant effects. Having said this, the results surpassed significance using data driven methodology, iterative permutation was used to set significance levels, and the results involve areas frequently implicated in lead-related neurotoxicity (Bellinger, 2011; Canfield et al., 2004; Cecil et al., 2008; Schwartz et al., 2007; Schwartz et al., 2000), suggesting that perhaps these are reliable early programming events that set the stage for future brain developmental processes. Nonetheless, pursuit of replication in a larger sample is warranted.
Another consideration is use of neonatal bloodspots for extracting lead exposure during late stages of pregnancy. Levels of detectable lead in a newborn bloodspot is an estimate covering approximately 28 days, coinciding with the half-life of lead. Reliance on this technique leaves us blind to what happened prior to 30 days before delivery, and moreover exposure is a dynamic process; a single snapshot cannot capture timing or exposure in aggregate. In addition, recent work has called into question the accuracy of lead estimates extracted from dried blood spots (Funk et al., 2015). A promising alternative for future work is to collect children’s naturally shed deciduous teeth, as these contain biological signatures of metal exposures with temporal order beginning in week 15 of pregnancy (Modabbernia et al., 2016). An obvious drawback of this alternative is that collection of teeth can be impractical, but if possible, the upside would be an opportunity for evaluation of critical windows and mixture effects.
Two final considerations are that this small sample did not afford opportunity to examine sex-differences (cf. Cecil et al., 2008; Tong et al., 2000), or to link neural effects to variation in individual child outcomes. Both are significant future goals for the expanding exposome field of human developmental neuroscience. Indeed, it is well recognized that males and females demonstrate variation in sensitivity and vulnerability to insults in early development (Bale, 2016; Barnett and Scaramella, 2013; Góes et al., 2015; Whitfield et al., 1997). Further, it is essential to move beyond isolation of traits that differentiate exposure groups at a single timepoint, to follow development longitudinally to determine which of the observed effects precipitate developmental concerns, versus those that recover with developmental plasticity. These are utterly critical targets for future work that could offer core insight into predisposition for and consequences of neurological vulnerability to prenatal metal toxins.
In summary, two unprecedented observations have been achieved in this novel application of fetal fMRI to the formidable field of neurobiological consequences of lead exposure. Lead-exposed fetuses demonstrated relatively less age-related increase in cross-hemispheric connections and also exhibited heightened connectivity of the superior frontal gyrus and the posterior cingulate cortex with age. Both results suggest that the lead exposed group is deviating from typical patterns of development that involve both cross-hemispheric connectivity and negative signal coupling in lateral frontal control regions and the PCC.
5. Acknowledgements
The authors thank Janessa Manning, Sydney Townsel, Justin Bennett, Marjorie Beeghly, Jamie Percy, Jordan Boeve, Pavan Jella, Sophia Neuenfeldt, Toni Lewis, Tamara Qawasmeh for their assistance in data acquisition and analyses. We would also like to thank the participant families who generously shared their time. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [T32 MH100019 to MDW, K01 MH103594 to ATE, MH110793 and ES026022 to MET] and by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award to MET.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Arichi T, Whitehead K, Barone G, Pressler R, Padormo F, Edwards AD, Fabrizi L, 2017. Localization of spontaneous bursting neuronal activity in the preterm human brain with simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Elife 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Backes C, Ruhle F, Stoll M, Haas J, Frese K, Franke A, Lieb W, Wichmann HE, Weis T, Kloos W, Lenhof HP, Meese E, Katus H, Meder B, Keller A, 2014. Systematic permutation testing in GWAS pathway analyses: identification of genetic networks in dilated cardiomyopathy and ulcerative colitis. BMC Genomics 15, 622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bale TL, 2016. The placenta and neurodevelopment: sex differences in prenatal vulnerability. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 18, 459–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett MA, Scaramella LV, 2013. Mothers’ parenting and child sex differences in behavior problems among African American preschoolers. J Fam Psychol 27, 773–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT, 2007. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 37, 90–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellinger D, 2011. The protean toxicities of lead: new chapters in a familiar story. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8, 2593–2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS, 1995. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34, 537–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brubaker CJ, Dietrich KN, Lanphear BP, Cecil KM, 2010. The influence of age of lead exposure on adult gray matter volume. Neurotoxicology 31, 259–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brubaker CJ, Schmithorst VJ, Haynes EN, Dietrich KN, Egelhoff JC, Lindquist DM, Lanphear BP, Cecil KM, 2009. Altered myelination and axonal integrity in adults with childhood lead exposure: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurotoxicology 30, 867–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canfield RL, Gendle MH, Cory-Slechta DA, 2004. Impaired neuropsychological functioning in lead-exposed children. Dev Neuropsychol 26, 513–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cecil KM, Brubaker CJ, Adler CM, Dietrich KN, Altaye M, Egelhoff JC, Wessel S, Elangovan I, Hornung R, Jarvis K, Lanphear BP, 2008. Decreased brain volume in adults with childhood lead exposure. PLoS Med 5, e112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cecil KM, Dietrich KN, Altaye M, Egelhoff JC, Lindquist DM, Brubaker CJ, Lanphear BP, 2011. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in adults with childhood lead exposure. Environ Health Perspect 119, 403–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chai XJ, Castanon AN, Ongur D, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, 2012. Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage 59, 1420–1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craddock RC, James GA, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Hu XP, Mayberg HS, 2012. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum Brain Mapp 33, 1914–1928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dietrich KN, Ris MD, Succop PA, Berger OG, Bornschein RL, 2001. Early exposure to lead and juvenile delinquency. Neurotoxicol Teratol 23, 511–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eggebrecht AT, Elison JT, Feczko E, Todorov A, Wolff JJ, Kandala S, Adams CM, Snyder AZ, Lewis JD, Estes AM, Zwaigenbaum L, Botteron KN, McKinstry RC, Constantino JN, Evans A, Hazlett HC, Dager S, Paterson SJ, Schultz RT, Styner MA, Gerig G, Das S, Kostopoulos P, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE, Piven J, Pruett JR Jr., 2017. Joint Attention and Brain Functional Connectivity in Infants and Toddlers. Cereb Cortex 27, 1709–1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME, 2005. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 9673–9678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funk W, Pleil J, Sauter D, McDade T, Holl J, 2015. Use of dried blood spots for estimating children’s exposures to heavy metals in epidemiological research. Environmental & Analytical Toxicology S 7. [Google Scholar]
- Góes F.V.d., Méio MDBB, Mello R.R.d., Morsch D, 2015. Evaluation of neurodevelopment of preterm infants using Bayley III scale. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil 15, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
- Grandjean P, Herz KT, 2015. Trace elements as paradigms of developmental neurotoxicants: Lead, methylmercury and arsenic. J Trace Elem Med Biol 31, 130–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF, 2009. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex 19, 72–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gundacker C, Hengstschlager M, 2012. The role of the placenta in fetal exposure to heavy metals. Wien Med Wochenschr 162, 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton JP, Furman DJ, Chang C, Thomason ME, Dennis E, Gotlib IH, 2011. Default-mode and task-positive network activity in major depressive disorder: implications for adaptive and maladaptive rumination. Biol Psychiatry 70, 327–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hampson M, Driesen N, Roth JK, Gore JC, Constable RT, 2010. Functional connectivity between task-positive and task-negative brain areas and its relation to working memory performance. Magn Reson Imaging 28, 1051–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honey CJ, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran JP, Meuli R, Hagmann P, 2009. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 2035–2040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jakab A, Schwartz E, Kasprian G, Gruber GM, Prayer D, Schopf V, Langs G, 2014. Fetal functional imaging portrays heterogeneous development of emerging human brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly AM, Uddin LQ, Biswal BB, Castellanos FX, Milham MP, 2008. Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. Neuroimage 39, 527–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ, 2012. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol 8, e1002375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marrus N, Eggebrecht AT, Todorov A, Elison JT, Wolff JJ, Cole L, Gao W, Pandey J, Shen MD, Swanson MR, Emerson RW, Klohr CL, Adams CM, Estes AM, Zwaigenbaum L, Botteron KN, McKinstry RC, Constantino JN, Evans AC, Hazlett HC, Dager SR, Paterson SJ, Schultz RT, Styner MA, Gerig G, Schlaggar BL, Piven J, Pruett JR Jr., 2018. Walking, Gross Motor Development, and Brain Functional Connectivity in Infants and Toddlers. Cereb Cortex 28, 750–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mazumdar M, Xia W, Hofmann O, Gregas M, Ho Sui S, Hide W, Yang T, Needleman HL, Bellinger DC, 2012. Prenatal lead levels, plasma amyloid beta levels, and gene expression in young adulthood. Environ Health Perspect 120, 702–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKinnon CJ, Eggebrecht AT, Todorov A, Wolff JJ, Elison JT, Adams CM, Snyder AZ, Estes AM, Zwaigenbaum L, Botteron KN, McKinstry RC, Marrus N, Evans A, Hazlett HC, Dager SR, Paterson SJ, Pandey J, Schultz RT, Styner MA, Gerig G, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE, Piven J, Pruett JR Jr., 2018. Restricted and Repetitive Behavior and Brain Functional Connectivity in Infants at Risk for Developing Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Modabbernia A, Arora M, Reichenberg A, 2016. Environmental exposure to metals, neurodevelopment, and psychosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 28, 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Needleman HL, Schell A, Bellinger D, Leviton A, Allred EN, 1990. The long-term effects of exposure to low doses of lead in childhood. An 11-year follow-up report. N Engl J Med 322, 83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nuttall JR, 2017. The plausibility of maternal toxicant exposure and nutritional status as contributing factors to the risk of autism spectrum disorders. Nutr Neurosci 20, 209–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polanska K, Jurewicz J, Hanke W, 2013. Review of current evidence on the impact of pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and selected metals on attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder in children. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 26, 16–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pomarol-Clotet E, Salvador R, Sarro S, Gomar J, Vila F, Martinez A, Guerrero A, Ortiz-Gil J, Sans-Sansa B, Capdevila A, Cebamanos JM, McKenna PJ, 2008. Failure to deactivate in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: dysfunction of the default mode network? Psychol Med 38, 1185–1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivals I, Personnaz L, Taing L, Potier MC, 2007. Enrichment or depletion of a GO category within a class of genes: which test? Bioinformatics 23, 401–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosvall M, Bergstrom C, 2008. Maps of random walks on complex networks reaveal community structure. PNAS 105, 1118–1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu JK, Sharma S, Kamate M, Kumar A, Gulati S, Kabra M, Kalra V, 2010. Lead encephalopathy in an infant mimicking a neurometabolic disorder. J Child Neurol 25, 390–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schopf V, Kasprian G, Brugger PC, Prayer D, 2012. Watching the fetal brain at ‘rest’. Int J Dev Neurosci 30, 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz BS, Chen S, Caffo B, Stewart WF, Bolla KI, Yousem D, Davatzikos C, 2007. Relations of brain volumes with cognitive function in males 45 years and older with past lead exposure. Neuroimage 37, 633–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Bolla KI, Simon PD, Bandeen-Roche K, Gordon PB, Links JM, Todd AC, 2000. Past adult lead exposure is associated with longitudinal decline in cognitive function. Neurology 55, 1144–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serag A, Aljabar P, Ball G, Counsell SJ, Boardman JP, Rutherford MA, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D, 2012. Construction of a consistent high-definition spatio-temporal atlas of the developing brain using adaptive kernel regression. Neuroimage 59, 2255–2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM, 2004. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Suppl 1, S208–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smyser CD, Snyder AZ, Neil JJ, 2011. Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain. Neuroimage 56, 1437–1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason M, 2018. Structured Spontaneity: Building Circuits in the Human Prenatal Brain. Trends Neurosci 41, 1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason M, Brown J, Dassanayake M, Shastri R, Marusak H, Hernandez-Andrade E, Yeo L, Mody S, Berman S, Hassan S, Romero R, 2014. Intrinsic functional brain architecture derived from graph theoretical analysis in the human fetus. Plos One. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason M, Chang C, Glover G, Gabrieli J, Greicius M, Gotlib I, 2008. Default-mode function and task-induced deactivation have overlapping brain substrates in children. Neuroimage 41, 1493–1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason M, Dassanayake M, Shen S, Katkuri Y, Alexis M, Anderson A, Yeo L, Mody S, Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan SS, Studholme C, Jeong JW, Romero R, 2013. Cross-hemispheric functional connectivity in the human fetal brain. Sci Transl Med 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason ME, Grove LE, Lozon TA Jr., Vila AM, Ye Y, Nye MJ, Manning JH, Pappas A, Hernandez-Andrade E, Yeo L, Mody S, Berman S, Hassan SS, Romero R, 2015. Age-related increases in long-range connectivity in fetal functional neural connectivity networks in utero. Dev Cogn Neurosci 11, 96–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason ME, Hect J, Waller R, Manning JH, Stacks AM, Beeghly M, Boeve JL, Wong K, van den Heuvel MI, Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan SS, Romero R, 2018. Prenatal neural origins of infant motor development: Associations between fetal brain and infant motor development. Dev Psychopathol 30, 763–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomason ME, Scheinost D, Manning JH, Grove LE, Hect J, Marshall N, Hernandez-Andrade E, Berman S, Pappas A, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Constable RT, Ment LR, Romero R, 2017. Weak functional connectivity in the human fetal brain prior to preterm birth. Sci Rep 7, 39286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong S, McMichael AJ, Baghurst PA, 2000. Interactions between environmental lead exposure and sociodemographic factors on cognitive development. Arch Environ Health 55, 330–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trope I, Lopez-Villegas D, Lenkinski RE, 1998. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of regional brain structure in a 10-year-old boy with elevated blood lead levels. Pediatrics 101, E7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van den Heuvel MI, Thomason ME, 2016. Functional Connectivity of the Human Brain in Utero. Trends Cogn Sci 20, 931–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheelock MD, Austin NC, Bora S, Eggebrecht AT, Melzer TR, Woodward LJ, Smyser CD, 2018. Altered functional network connectivity relates to motor development in children born very preterm. Neuroimage 183, 574–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheelock MD, Hect JL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan SS, Romero R, Eggebrecht AT, Thomason ME, (under review). Sex differences in functional connectivity during fetal brain development Dev Cogn Neurosci. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield MF, Grunau RV, Holsti L, 1997. Extremely premature (< or = 800 g) schoolchildren: multiple areas of hidden disability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 77, F85–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Ford JM, 2012. Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 8, 49–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Thermenos HW, Milanovic S, Tsuang MT, Faraone SV, McCarley RW, Shenton ME, Green AI, Nieto-Castanon A, LaViolette P, Wojcik J, Gabrieli JD, Seidman LJ, 2009. Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 1279–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winklewski PJ, Sabisz A, Naumczyk P, Jodzio K, Szurowska E, Szarmach A, 2018. Understanding the Physiopathology Behind Axial and Radial Diffusivity Changes-What Do We Know? Frontiers in neurology 9, 92–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright JP, Dietrich KN, Ris MD, Hornung RW, Wessel SD, Lanphear BP, Ho M, Rae MN, 2008. Association of prenatal and childhood blood lead concentrations with criminal arrests in early adulthood. PLoS Med 5, e101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan W, Holland SK, Cecil KM, Dietrich KN, Wessel SD, Altaye M, Hornung RW, Ris MD, Egelhoff JC, Lanphear BP, 2006. The impact of early childhood lead exposure on brain organization: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language function. Pediatrics 118, 971–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D, Raichle ME, 2010. Disease and the brain’s dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 6, 15–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang N, Baker H, Tufts M, Raymond R, Salihu H, Elliott M, 2013. Early childhood lead exposure and academic achievement: evidence from Detroit public schools, 2008–2010. Am J Public Health 103, e72–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng W, 2001. Toxicology of choroid plexus: special reference to metal-induced neurotoxicities. Microsc Res Tech 52, 89–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu G, Fan G, Feng C, Li Y, Chen Y, Zhou F, Du G, Jiao H, Liu Z, Xiao X, Lin F, Yan J, 2013. The effect of lead exposure on brain iron homeostasis and the expression of DMT1/FP1 in the brain in developing and aged rats. Toxicol Lett 216, 108–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]