Skip to main content
Journal of Spine Surgery logoLink to Journal of Spine Surgery
. 2019 Mar;5(1):72–78. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.02.01

Non-home discharge disposition after posterior spinal fusion in neuromuscular scoliosis—an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database

Jae Baek 1, Azeem Tariq Malik 1, Robert Tamer 1, Elizabeth Yu 1, Jeffery Kim 1, Safdar N Khan 1,
PMCID: PMC6465464  PMID: 31032441

Abstract

Background

Despite an increasing trend of corrective surgery in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, evidence regarding risk factors associated with non-home discharge destination following surgery remains limited.

Methods

The 2012–2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (22802, 22804 and 22808) for neuromuscular scoliosis. Non-home discharge was defined as discharge to a skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation facility and/or separate acute care unit. Patients who expired during inpatient stay were excluded from the study sample. Only patients aged 2–18 years with a primary diagnosis of neuromuscular scoliosis were included in the final cohort.

Results

Out of a total of 1,269 patients, 76 (6.0%) had a non-home discharge disposition. Following adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics, patients lying in the age bracket of 15–17 years {odds ratio (OR) 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–5.08]; P=0.047} or >17 years [OR 2.29 (95% CI: 1.10–4.79); P=0.027], male gender [OR 1.75 (95% CI: 1.06–2.89); P=0.029], having structural pulmonary abnormality at time of surgery [OR 2.01 (95% CI: 1.17–3.43); P=0.011], a length of stay >4 days [OR 2.29 (95% CI: 1.15–4.55); P=0.018] and having a past history of childhood cancer [OR 4.50 (95% CI: 1.15–17.61); P=0.031] were significant independent predictors associated with a non-home discharge.

Conclusions

Providers can utilize these data to pre-operatively identify patients who might require continued high-level/inpatient care in a facility, and subsequently expedite discharge and reduce costs associated with a prolonged inpatient stay.

Keywords: Neuromuscular scoliosis, non-home discharge, risk factors, predictors, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), pediatric, scoliosis

Introduction

Scoliosis, defined by a spine curvature of more than 10 degrees, can be a result of various congenital, idiopathic, and neuromuscular causes (1). Unlike congenital and idiopathic scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis secondary to diseases such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and spinal muscular atrophy can progress past puberty (2). As a result, patients without proper treatment may lose the ability to walk and experience severe pulmonary difficulties due to decreased space in the chest cavity which can severely decrease their quality of life (3,4).

There are nonoperative management therapies that currently exist for patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Properly fitted braces have been shown to delay the worsening of the curvature and prevent related complications (2,5). In most cases, however, the use of a brace only delays the need for surgery, and many patients still undergo spinal fusion in order to restore correct spine positioning (2,6). From a value-based approach, this can significantly accrue costs over time.

Between 2002 and 2011, the cost of spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis has increased nearly 75% (7). One reason for this could be that surgical techniques are continuously improving so that patients with more severe scoliosis and multiple co-morbidities can undergo more extensive surgical treatment options than were available in the pas (7,8). According to a recent report, the total cost of neuromuscular scoliosis surgery is around $50,096±23,998, with an average hospitalization length of around 8 days (9). Following the cost of the implants themselves, the second major contributor of the cost was due to inpatient stay and ICU admissions (9). As health-care systems begin to adopt value-based approaches towards care, identifying areas of health-care resource utilization will be of utmost important in order to launch appropriate cost-reduction strategies. By understanding patient-level and procedure-level predictors of a non-home discharge, health care providers can determine a better postoperative care plan with a potentially shorter length of stay in the hospital before discharge to facility, significantly reducing costs for the patient. To help aid in this decision making, this study was designed to examine the percentage as well as to determine the independent predictors of a non-home discharge following posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis.

Methods

Database and patient selection

The 2012–2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database used for this study collects more than 120 variables relating to preoperative, intraoperative, and 30-day postoperative risks. The ACS-NSQIP Pediatric database ensures data quality through certified clinical reviewers (SCR) as well as inter-rater reliability (IRR) audits and reports an overall disagreement rate of approximately 2% for all variables. A disagreement rate of 5% or less was determined by ACS-NSQIP Pediatric to be acceptable. Detailed information about how the data are collected can be found on the official ACS-NSQIP website (10).

The ACS-NSQIP Pediatric database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients aged 2–18 years with a primary diagnosis of neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion (22802, 22804, 22808). Patients who expired during inpatient stay were excluded from the study. Discharge was separated into home and non-home, with non-home discharge being defined as discharge to a skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation facility, and/or separate acute care unit.

The data collected for this study were divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors. Preoperative data consisted of baseline demographics (age, sex, gender, race, body mass index) and co-morbidities. Operative data included total operative time, fusion length, type of procedure (primary vs. revision surgery), as well as the use of osteotomy, pelvic fixation, and the use of intervertebral biomechanical devices. Postoperative factors included length of stay in the hospital and occurrence of any pre-discharge complications including but not limited to surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, coma, stroke, seizure, neurologic deficits from surgical positioning, cardiac arrest, graft failure, sepsis, and central-line associated infections.

Statistical analysis

The Pearson-chi square test univariate analysis was used to identify significant association between, preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors and discharge destinations. Multivariate analysis was also used by including all variables in a backward elimination logistic regression model, with entry at P=0.05 and removal at P=0.1, to identify independent predictors of a non-home discharge. Results from the analysis are reported as an adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and P values. For this study, a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS v24 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

After filtering the database using the various inclusion/exclusion criteria, the final study population included 1,269 neuromuscular scoliosis patients out of which 76 (6.0%) had a non-home discharge. There were significant baseline differences using unadjusted analysis (Table 1). Patients who were discharged to a non-home destination were more likely to be 15 years or older, male, exhibit comorbidities [specifically relating to chronic lung disease, structural pulmonary abnormalities, and central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities], underwent pelvic fixations, and had a postoperative hospital stay lasting longer than 4 days. Table 1 shows a complete list of the baseline clinical characteristics of the study population.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population.

Characteristic Home, n (%) Non-home, n (%) P value
Number (N) 1,193 (94.0) 76 (6.0)
Demographics
   Age (years) 0.044
      <12 290 (24.3) 11 (14.5)
      12–14 301 (25.2) 14 (18.4)
      15–17 239 (20.0) 20 (26.3)
      >17 363 (30.4) 31 (40.8)
   Gender 0.007
      Male 579 (48.5) 49 (64.5)
      Female 614 (51.5) 27 (35.5)
   Race 0.134
      White 861 (72.2) 45 (59.2)
      Black/African-American 179 (15.0) 14 (18.4)
      Asian 41 (3.4) 4 (5.3)
      American Indian or Alaska Native 4 (0.3) 1 (1.3)
      Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 2 (0.2) 0 (0)
      Other/unknown/not reported 106 (8.9) 12 (15.8)
   Weight (as per 95th CDC centiles) 0.316
      Normal (5th to <85th percentile) 646 (54.1) 37 (48.7)
      Underweight (<5th percentile) 260 (21.8) 19 (25.0)
      Overweight (85th to <95th percentile) 138 (11.6) 6 (7.9)
      Obese (≥95th percentile) 149 (12.5) 14 (18.4)
Co-morbidities
   Chronic steroid use 38 (3.2) 5 (6.6) 0.113
   Ventilator dependence 150 (12.6) 15 (19.7) 0.072
   Asthma 209 (17.5) 15 (19.7) 0.623
   Bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease 181 (15.2) 18 (23.7) 0.048
   Oxygen support requirement 75 (6.3) 6 (7.9) 0.578
   Tracheostomy 87 (7.3) 10 (13.2) 0.062
   Structural pulmonary abnormality 206 (17.3) 23 (30.3) 0.004
   Esophageal disorders 418 (35.0) 33 (43.4) 0.139
   Prior history of cardiac surgery 64 (5.4) 6 (7.9) 0.349
   Developmental delay 821 (68.8) 54 (71.1) 0.683
   Seizure disorder 482 (40.4) 34 (44.7) 0.456
   Cerebral palsy 539 (45.2) 34 (44.7) 0.94
   CNS abnormality 376 (31.5) 33 (43.4) 0.031
   Neuromuscular disorder 899 (75.4) 61 (80.3) 0.334
   Pre-operative blood transfusion 13 (1.1) 0 (0) 0.36
   Cancer 0.114
      Current cancer 3 (0.3) 0 (0)
      Past history of cancer 14 (1.2) 3 (3.9)
      Nutritional support requirement 392 (32.9) 29 (38.2) 0.341
      Hematologic disorders 42 (3.5) 6 (7.9) 0.053
      Inotropic support at time of surgery 25 (2.1) 3 (3.9) 0.287
   ASA grade 0.342
      I–II 14 (1.2) 0 (0)
      >II 1,179 (98.8) 76 (100)
Operative factors
   Total operative time (min) 0.827
      0–240 248 (20.8) 15 (19.7)
      >240 945 (79.2) 61 (80.3)
   Osteotomy 339 (28.4) 20 (26.3) 0.694
   Fixation to pelvis 468 (39.2) 40 (52.6) 0.021
   Use of intervertebral biomechanical device 7 (0.6) 0 (0) 0.503
   Extent of fusion 0.073
      Up to 6 segments 125 (10.5) 8 (10.5)
      7–12 segments 195 (16.3) 5 (6.6)
      >12 segments 873 (73.2) 63 (82.9)
   Revision surgery 42 (3.5) 0 (0) 0.096
Post-operative factors
   Length of stay >4 days 850 (71.2) 66 (86.8) 0.003
   Occurrence of any pre-discharge complication 939 (78.7) 61 (80.3) 0.748

Adjustments using multivariate backward elimination logistic regression model found that significant independent predictors associated with a non-home discharge, in decreasing order of effect size, were having a past history of childhood cancer [OR 4.50 (95% CI: 1.15–17.61); P=0.031], a hospital length of stay >4 days [OR 2.29 (95% CI: 1.15–4.55); P=0.018], patients >17 years [OR 2.29 (95% CI: 1.10–4.79); P=0.027] or lying in the age bracket of 15–17 years [OR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.01–5.08); P=0.047], having structural pulmonary abnormality at time of surgery [OR 2.01 (95% CI: 1.17–3.43); P=0.011], and belonging to male gender [OR 1.75 (95% CI: 1.06–2.89); P=0.029] (Table 2).

Table 2. Independent predictors associated with a non-home discharge, following adjustment in a multi-variate backward elimination logistic regression model.

Characteristic Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value
Age (years)
   <12 Ref.
   12–14 1.25 (0.54–2.87) 0.599
   15–17 2.27 (1.01–5.08) 0.047
   >17 2.29 (1.10–4.79) 0.027
Male gender 1.75 (1.06–2.89) 0.029
Structural pulmonary abnormality 2.01 (1.17–3.43) 0.011
Length of stay >4 days 2.29 (1.15–4.55) 0.018
Cancer
   Current cancer 1 0.999
   Past history of cancer 4.50 (1.15–17.61) 0.031
   No current or past history Ref.

Discussion

The goal of this study was to examine the overall percentage of non-home discharges and determine the independent predictors of non-home discharges for pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion using a national pediatric surgical database. The estimated non-home discharge rate following corrective neuromuscular scoliosis surgery was 6.0%, much higher than the 1.1% non-home discharge rate of patients undergoing spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (11). Independent predictors associated with a non-home discharge were a past history of cancer, a hospital stay longer than 4 days, concurrent structural pulmonary abnormalities at time of presentation, age between 15–17 years or older than 17 years, and belonged to male gender.

Past cancer history was shown to be the highest independent predictor of a non-home discharge. This may be due to several reasons. Recent evidence has found that parents of children with past history of cancer had increased levels of anxiety and depression than parents of healthy children and expressed other emotional symptoms often related to posttraumatic stress (12). This may cause these parents to become overly cautious and request a non-home discharge at rates higher than usual, to allow their children to recuperate in a more supervised environment as compared to home. In addition, children with prior history of cancer tend to have a higher incidence of other illnesses potentially due to secondary effects experienced from prior radiation and chemotherapy treatment (13). The prolonged length of inpatient stay seen in patients going to a facility could be a result of post-operative complications taking place during the stay, or could also be due to improper discharge planning and/or insurance approvals for a facility-discharge requiring patients to stay in the hospital for un-necessary prolonged time while appropriate paperwork is sorted out.

Males also had an increased risk of a non-home discharge. The prevalence of DMD may be a contributing factor. Of the different types of muscular dystrophies that can lead to neuromuscular scoliosis, DMD is the most common (14). Scoliosis can affect up to 90% of DMD patients (15). Because DMD is an X-linked disease (16), there may inherently be a higher male population undergoing posterior spinal fusions for neuromuscular scoliosis leading to the increased odds ratio seen in this study especially since DMD is the second most common cause of neuromuscular scoliosis after cerebral palsy (17). It would be interesting to note whether the exact cause of the neuromuscular scoliosis played a role in determining discharge destination, but unfortunately due to coding practices this is not routinely reported as part of the surgical database.

Patients with structural pulmonary abnormalities at the time of surgery were also shown to have a higher rate of a non-home discharge. Studies have already shown that lung function, measured by pulmonary function tests, are decreased immediately after scoliosis surgery and do not return to preoperative levels until at least 1 to 2 months after surgery (18). For patients already suffering from structural pulmonary abnormalities, this decrease in lung function from the effects of surgery can be exaggerated. A study examining the predictive risk factors of the use of mechanical ventilation after surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis showed that the only significant predictor of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation was a decrease in preoperative pulmonary function (19), which is often associated with structural pulmonary abnormalities. Prolonged mechanical ventilation could extend the length of hospital stay in addition to requiring patients to be discharged to a non-home facility for closer postoperative monitoring.

There are several limitations to this study and areas that need further exploration. The ACS-NSQIP Pediatric database does not report the Cobb angle for the patients so it is not possible to quantify the severity of the scoliosis prior to surgery. There was also no information regarding the use of braces and other non-surgical management tools used before surgical intervention. Conservative treatments are often used first to slow down the progression of the diseases which may impact risk factors for discharge to a non-home facility. Finally, the database lacks granular information about how the long the patients stayed in the facility, which would be useful in further stratifying and identifying patients who may require high-level prolonged continued inpatient care.

Conclusions

Using a national pediatric surgical dataset, the study identifies several key patient-level and procedure-level factors associated with a non-home discharge following posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Providers can utilize this data to risk-stratify patients and individualize discharge planning according to every patient’s need so as to control costs while providing appropriate quality care.

Acknowledgements

None.

Disclaimer: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Janicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health 2007;12:771-6. 10.1093/pch/12.9.771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allam AM, Schwabe AL. Neuromuscular scoliosis. PM R 2013;5:957-63. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Putzier M, Groß C, Zahn RK, et al. Characteristics of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthopade 2016;45:500-8. 10.1007/s00132-016-3272-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cunin V. Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:S109-18. 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kotwicki T, Durmala J, Czubak J. Bracing for neuromuscular scoliosis: orthosis construction to improve the patient's function. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:161-9. 10.1080/17483100801905900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Turturro F, Montanaro A, Calderaro C, et al. Rate of complications due to neuromuscular scoliosis spine surgery in a 30-years consecutive series. Eur Spine J 2017;26:539-45. 10.1007/s00586-017-5034-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rumalla K, Yarbrough CK, Pugely AJ, et al. Spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: national trends, complications, and in-hospital outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;25:500-8. 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Canavese F, Rousset M, Le Gledic B, et al. Surgical advances in the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis. World J Orthop 2014;5:124-33. 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Diefenbach C, Ialenti MN, Lonner BS, et al. Hospital cost analysis of neuromuscular scoliosis surgery. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2013;71:272-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pediatric Database ACS-NSQIP. Available online: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/childrens-surgery/pediatric
  • 11.Malik AT, Kim J, Yu E, et al. Predictors of a Non-Home Discharge Destination following Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Norberg AL, Boman KK. Parent distress in childhood cancer: a comparative evaluation of posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression and anxiety. Acta Oncol 2008;47:267-74. 10.1080/02841860701558773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1572-82. 10.1056/NEJMsa060185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ryder S, Leadley RM, Armstrong N, et al. The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017;12:79. 10.1186/s13023-017-0631-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kinali M, Main M, Eliahoo J, et al. Predictive factors for the development of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007;11:160-6. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2006.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Worton RG. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: gene and gene product; mechanism of mutation in the gene. J Inherit Metab Dis 1992;15:539-50. 10.1007/BF01799613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roberts SB, Tsirikos AI. Factors influencing the evaluation and management of neuromuscular scoliosis: A review of the literature. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2016;29:613-23. 10.3233/BMR-160675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuan N, Fraire JA, Margetis MM, et al. The effect of scoliosis surgery on lung function in the immediate postoperative period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2182-5. 10.1097/01.brs.0000181060.49993.4a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Udink ten Cate FE, van Royen BJ, van Heerde M, et al. Incidence and risk factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery. J Pediatr Orthop B 2008;17:203-6. 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328301e962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Spine Surgery are provided here courtesy of OSS Press

RESOURCES