Abstract

Small molecule inhibitors of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein (NC) are considered as promising agents in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. In an effort to exploit the privileged 2-amino-4-phenylthiazole moiety in NC inhibition, here we conceived, synthesized, and tested in vitro 18 NC inhibitors (NCIs) bearing a double functionalization. In these NCIs, one part of the molecule is deputed to interact noncovalently with the NC hydrophobic pocket, while the second portion is designed to interact with the N-terminal domain of NC. This binding hypothesis was verified by molecular dynamics simulations, while the linkage between these two pharmacophores was found to enhance antiretroviral activity both on the wild-type virus and on HIV-1 strains with resistance to currently licensed drugs. The two most interesting compounds 6 and 13 showed no cytotoxicity, thus becoming valuable leads for further investigations.
Keywords: Nucleocapsid protein, HIV, NC inhibitors, aminothiazole, drug resistance, antiretroviral
The HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein (NC) is a zinc-finger protein acting as a nucleic acid chaperone that is involved in multiple steps of the HIV-1 replication cycle, thus becoming a desirable target for antiretroviral therapy.1 To date, pharmacological modulation of the NC has been achieved by means of three different strategies: (i) small molecules able to promote the ejection of zinc from the NC and to induce protein unfolding, which are considered rather toxic and poorly specific although some of them have been recently profiled in preclinical studies;2 (ii) noncovalent NC binders that inhibit the interaction between NC and nucleic acids, which are potentially more specific and less toxic than (i);1,3−5 (iii) noncovalent binders to nucleic acids that compete with the NC, which are currently more suited as tool compounds than lead candidates.6,7
Our research has long focused on strategy (ii) with the aim to develop different chemotypes of effective NC inhibitors (NCIs) endowed with antiretroviral activity against wild-type and drug-resistant HIV-1 strains.8−10 These molecules are designed to bind to a hydrophobic pocket located in the C-terminal zinc finger of NC, which accommodates the critically recognized guanosine of nucleic acid targets through interaction with Gly35, Trp37, Gln45, and Met46, as shown by NMR studies (Figure 1a).11,12 Most of these residues belong also to the more extended hydrophobic platform that is instrumental for the specific recognition and destabilization of nucleic acids.12−15
Figure 1.

Design strategy adopted in this work. (a) Sequence of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein from the LAV strain; the N-ter is colored blue, while residues of the hydrophobic pocket targeted also by AN3 are colored red. The various regions of the protein are labeled in the bottom bar (ZF means zinc finger). (b) Chemical structures of AN1 and AN3. (c) Schematic representation of the bifunctional aminothiazoles studied in this work, in which hydrophobic pocket binder (HPB) and N-ter binder (NTB) moieties are connected by a linker.
In a previous work, NC inhibition by the 2-amino-4-phenylthiazole derivative AN3 (Figure 1b) was characterized by a multidisciplinary approach, and AN3 was shown to anchor the NC by interacting within the hydrophobic pocket described above.8,12,15 In an effort to obtain rough structure–activity relationships (SAR) of AN3, the derivative AN1 (Figure 1b) was designed,8 but unfortunately it proved less effective than AN3 in NC inhibition. Moreover, AN1 was shown to bind preferentially to residues located near the N-terminal region of NC, i.e., Met1–Lys14 (N-ter) (Figure 1a), which are crucial for nucleic acids recognition and annealing.16−21 By using NMR spectroscopy, Goudreau et al. have recently disclosed an NCI able to form a 2:1 complex with the NC; one molecule binds the hydrophobic pocket, while the second molecule binds the N-ter as well as the first molecule in a head-to-tail stacking conformation (Supporting Information, Figure S1).22
Based on these evidence, here we designed and synthesized 18 bifunctional NCIs by linking pharmacophores and chemical moieties from AN3, namely, the hydrophobic pocket binder (HPB), to those from AN1, namely, the N-ter binder (NTB) (Figure 1b,c) in individual molecular entities endowed with improved antiretroviral activity.
Structural information on AN3/NC complex8 identified the carboxylic acid group as the preferred site for the introduction of the linker, as it is solvent exposed and not involved in binding to the NC. In a first attempt, AN1 and AN3 were coupled through four linkers with different length and flexibility including piperazine, to understand which distance is required to interact with both the hydrophobic pocket and the N-ter of the NC (compounds 1–4, Figure 2a). Evaluation of the antiviral activity of 1–4 showed that the molecules exhibit enhanced efficacy (Table 1) compared to parent compound AN3, this latter having IC50 = 95 μM as determined previously.8 Particularly, compound 1 bearing a two-carbon linker proved to be the most effective NCI of this preliminary series, which guided the design of additional derivatives. Thus, modifications were first introduced within the HPB portion by means of a fluorine (5) or a chlorine (6) substituent in position 4 of the (benzyloxy)benzene ring. Moreover, both aminothiazoles were replaced by aminoxazole rings (7) or a single aminothiazole was replaced by a benzothiazole (8) (Figure 2b). In addition, derivatives 9–18 bearing modifications to the NTB were designed and synthesized by removing and/or replacing AN1 pharmacophores. Progressive shortening of the NTB portion was planned to optimize the interaction with the N-ter as well as to improve the drug-likeness of the compounds (Figure 2c). Details of chemistry are reported in the Supporting Information.
Figure 2.

Chemical structures of bifunctional aminothiazoles. (a) Derivatives bearing different linkers; (b) derivatives bearing modifications on the HPB portion; (c) derivatives bearing modifications on the NTB portion.
Table 1. Antiretroviral Activity (Two Different Assays), NC Inhibition, and Cytotoxicity of the Tested Molecules.
| cmpd | BiCycle IC50 ± SD (μM) | MonoCycle IC50 ± SD (μM) | % NC inhibition at 10 μM | MTSa TD50 (μM) | SIb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 5 ± 1 | 24 ± 6 | 30 | 23 |
| 2 | 12 ± 10 | >50 | 16 ± 2 | - | - |
| 3 | 5 ± 2 | 16 ± 3 | 19 ± 3 | >100 | >20 |
| 4 | 28 ± 5 | >50 | 15 ± 2 | - | - |
| 5 | 1.1 ± 1 | >50 | 16 ± 1 | >50 | >45 |
| 6 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | >50 | 20 ± 6 | >50 | >63 |
| 7 | 6.2 ± 0.5 | >50 | 21 ± 7 | - | - |
| 8 | 37 ± 6 | >50 | 17 ± 2 | - | - |
| 9 | 15 ± 3 | 12 ± 5 | 15 ± 1 | - | - |
| 10 | 5 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 | not active | - | - |
| 11 | 12 ± 10 | 28 ± 5 | 21 ± 6 | - | - |
| 12 | >100 | >100 | - | - | - |
| 13 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 1 | 18 ± 3 | 16 | 53 |
| 14 | 36 ± 9 | >50 | 16 ± 2 | - | - |
| 15 | 6 ± 4 | 35 ± 6 | not active | - | - |
| 16 | >100 | >100 | - | - | - |
| 17 | 3.8 ± 2.1 | >50 | 15 ± 2 | 45 | 12 |
| 18 | >100 | >100 | - | - | - |
| AN3 | 95c | - | 6 ± 1 | - | - |
MTS assay was performed only on compounds showing an IC50 (BiCycle) ≤ 5 μM, and being positive in the NC inhibition assay.
Selectivity index (SI) = TD50 (MTS)/IC50 (BiCycle). SD: standard deviation.
From ref (8), first cycle of infection in HeLa P4.R5MAGI cells. - means not performed.
The antiviral activity of compounds 1–18 was tested against the HIV-1 wild type NL4–3 strain (sequence alignment between NC from LAV and NL4–3 strains is described in Supporting Information, Figure S2) in a TZM-bl cell line-based phenotypic assay (Table 1).23
The reporter cell line TZM-bl allows the detection of HIV-1 replication through the activation of luciferase and β-galactosidase genes integrated in the cell genome under the control of HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter. After infection, the expression of the reporter genes is activated by the viral Tat protein, which is mainly produced in the late phase of HIV-1 life cycle. In particular, two approaches were adopted to evaluate the effect of candidate NCIs in the early phase of viral replication (MonoCycle assay) and on the whole replication cycle (BiCycle assay).23 While the MonoCycle assay consists in a single cycle of infection in TZM-bl cells in the presence of dilutions of compounds, the BiCycle assay includes a first infection in MT-2 cells with dilutions of compounds, then the viral particles produced in this step are subsequently measured by infecting TZM-bl cells. Most compounds showed a good antiviral activity with IC50 ranging from 0.3 to 37 μM with the exceptions of 12, 16, and 18, which were inactive up to 100 μM concentration. Most compounds showed an IC50 generally lower in the BiCycle assay than the MonoCycle assay, suggesting a multistep inhibition of viral replication that is consistent with the multiple roles of NC in the HIV replication cycle.24,25 Notably, compared to the parent AN3, antiretroviral activity was increased around 100-fold.
To monitor whether the target of the antiretroviral activity in vitro could be the NC, compounds showing efficacy in the BiCycle assay were then tested for their ability to inhibit the NC chaperone activity toward nucleic acids. To this aim, a well-established fluorescence assay that monitors the destabilization of cTAR DNA labeled with the Alexa488 dye and the Dabcyl quencher at its 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively, was used.26,27 A threshold of 15% of NC inhibition at compound concentration of 10 μM was arbitrarily set to classify NCIs. Such threshold was based on NC inhibition by the parent compound AN3 at 10 μM (6%) and on the limited water solubility of some compounds at higher concentrations. Results are summarized in Table 1 and show that all tested compounds except 10 and 15 can target the NC and inhibit NC-induced cTAR destabilization with efficacy above the threshold.
Coupling this information with the antiretroviral activity (BiCycle assay) led to define some preliminary SAR. Introduction of a fluorine or a chlorine (compounds 5 and 6) in the HPB portion of the scaffold did not significantly affect the antiviral activity but induced a slight decrease in IC50 values in comparison to the dehalogenated compound 1. Replacement of the aminothiazole with the benzothiazole ring (compound 8) in the HPB portion led to a significant drop of antiviral activity compared to 1, suggesting that the phenylaminothiazole is a privileged moiety to bind within the hydrophobic pocket. The NTB portion proved more suitable to substitutions and modifications than the HPB, particularly with respect to molecular shortening. Compound 13 showed the best antiviral activity, while its amidic analog 14 displayed a lower efficacy. Whether water solubility of most bifunctional aminothiazoles was not an issue in antiretroviral assays, one may note that it could impair further development. In this respect, replacement of the aminothiazole ring in the NTB portion with an aminopyridine (compound 17) led to a good antiviral activity in the low micromolar range, as well as an improved water solubility (i.e., up to 100 μM compared to an approximate value of 10 μM for 6 and 13, as determined by monitoring absorbance spectra—data not shown). Compound 17 might thus represent the starting point for the development of a second generation of bifunctional NCIs endowed with lead-like features.
The possible binding mode of the most potent antiretroviral hits 6 and 13 toward the full length NC was investigated by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Details of the computational methods are reported in the Supporting Information. After energy minimization, heating, and density equilibration, unrestrained MD trajectories were produced for 300 ns in explicit water solvent. A cluster analysis on the ligand/NC complexes highlighted the most abundant cluster of binding conformations, which was used to discuss the structural details of the interaction between NC and 6 or 13.
Both compounds can bind to the hydrophobic pocket of NC and interact with the side chain of the key residue Trp37 (Figure 3). Additional interactions of the HPB portion are established with the backbone of Lys33 and Gly35 residues, with the aromatic ring of Phe16 and with Arg32 (only 13), in good agreement with the binding mode of the parent AN3 and other noncovalent NCIs.3,4,8,10 Consistent with our design, the NTB portion of the molecules interacts within the N-ter region of NC. In detail, 6 establishes a cation–pi and a H-bond interaction with the side chain of Arg7 and an H-bond with Lys11 (Figure 3a). Compound 13 establishes a network of direct and water-bridged H-bonds with residues of the N-ter, such as Ile1, Gln9, and Lys14 (Figure 3b). Overall, the slightly higher efficacy of 13 as compared to 6 could be due to its stronger interaction with the NC, as highlighted by the network of contacts shown in Figure 3b, and by the binding energy calculated through the MM-GBSA approach (delta energy of binding of 6 and 13 to the NC is −24.7 ± 1.2 and −30.6 ± 0.4 kcal/mol, respectively).28 It is worth mentioning that MD simulations were carried out using the only available structure of NC in complex with a small molecule (Supporting Information, Figure S1),22 whose sequence corresponds to that of the NL4–3 strain. Among the few differences with the LAV strain (Supporting Information, Figure S2), which are conservative and do not affect the interactions observed by MD, this structure has the residue Ile1 instead of Met1. Since 13 was shown to bind the backbone of Ile1 and not its side-chain, it is reasonably expected that this interaction observed by MD simulations could be exploited also in the presence of Met1 in different HIV-1 strains.
Figure 3.

Binding mode of hits 6 (a) and 13 (b) to the NC. The protein is colored green and is shown as cartoon. Residues contacted by the ligands are shown as sticks. NCIs are shown as cyan sticks and H-bond interactions are highlighted by black dashed lines. Zn(II) ions are showed as gray spheres.
In order to assess the potentiality of this class of NCIs to become lead candidates, the cytotoxicity of active hits showing an IC50 ≤ 5 μM in the BiCycle assay, and being positive for NC inhibition, was evaluated in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PMBC) through the MTS assay (Table 1). The selectivity index (SI) was then calculated as the ratio between TD50 and IC50 measured in the respective assays. Overall, active hits showed poor cytotoxicity, and thus, high SI values.
Consistent with the role of NC in HIV-1 replication,1,24,25 it is expected that NCIs are active against wild-type and drug-resistant HIV-1 strains. To prove this hypothesis, the antiretroviral activity of the most interesting hits 1, 5, 6, 13, and 17 was tested against a panel of HIV-1 strains harboring mutations conferring high levels of resistance to drugs currently used for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. IC50 values on drug-resistant strains were obtained by the BiCycle assay. Fold change values were calculated by comparison with IC50 values determined with the wild-type strain NL4–3 (Table 2). Results clearly indicated that all resistant viruses are as susceptible as the wild-type strain to the tested NCIs, which is consistent with inhibition of the NC and the lack of interference with other validated anti-HIV targets. By coupling these data with the results of Table 1, and in particular the SI values, it is further suggested that the NCI hits identified in this work are safe and could be truly considered for further development.
Table 2. Determination of Susceptibility to NCIs of Viral Strains Harboring Resistance to Drugs Currently Used in Clinical Practice.
| IC50 ± SD μM (fold change)a | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cmpd | NL4–3 IC50 μM | 11808b (PI) | 12465b (PI) | 7400b (NRTI) | 7401b (NRTI) | 12231b (NNRTI) | 12229b (NNRTI) | 11845b (INI) |
| 1 | 1.3 | 2.1 ± 1 (1.3) | 1.2 ± 0.5 (0.9) | 0.8 ± 0.5 (0.6) | 1.2 ± 0.8 (0.9) | 0.8 ± 0.8 (0.6) | 2.2 ± 1 (1.7) | 1 ± 1 (0.8) |
| 5 | 1.1 | 0.8 ± 0.4 (0.7) | 2.0 ± 0.7 (1.8) | 1.1 ± 1.0 (1.0) | 0.6 ± 0.2 (0.5) | 4 ± 1 (3.6) | 0.9 ± 0.4 (0.8) | 3 ± 1 (2.7) |
| 6 | 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.4 (0.7) | 1.6 ± 1 (2.0) | 0.7 ± 0.8 (0.9) | 1.4 ± 1 (1.8) | 6 ± 2 (7.5) | 1 ± 1 (1.2) | 2.2 ± 1 (2.7) |
| 13 | 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.4 (3.6) | 0.4 ± 0.2 (1.2) | 0.1 ± 0.1 (0.4) | 0.5 ± 0.3 (1.5) | 0.7 ± 0.5 (2.2) | 0.3 ± 0.2 (1.0) | 0.7 ± 1.0 (2.3) |
| 17 | 3.8 | 3 ± 1 (0.8) | 6 ± 3 (1.6) | 1.5 ± 0.7 (0.4) | 2.7 ± 0.4 (0.7) | 5 ± 1 (1.3) | 12 ± 4 (3.1) | 2.3 ± 1 (0.6) |
Fold change values indicate the ratio between IC50 values from drug-resistant and NL4–3 wild type reference strains.
NIH AIDS Reagent Program catalogue number of resistant strains (www.aidsreagent.org). SD, standard deviation; PI, resistance to Protease Inhibitor; NRTI, resistance to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor; NNRTI, resistance to Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor; INI, resistance to Integrase Inhibitor
The impact of NCIs in HIV-1 life cycle was evaluated through the quantification of viral nucleic acid intermediates produced in the course of viral replication. To this end, MT-2 cells infected with NL4–3 wild-type strain at multiplicity of infection of 0.1 were incubated with 6 or 13, the two most potent NCI hits, or the reference integrase inhibitor (INI) raltegravir (RAL), the protease inhibitor (PI) darunavir (DRV), or the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) rilpivirine (RPV).
According to the amount of the total and integrated HIV-1 DNA measured at 16 and 30 h post infection (p.i.), respectively, and the intra/extracellular HIV-1 genomic RNA detected at 30 h p.i., our data suggested that compound 13 impaired reverse transcription but with a lower efficacy than RPV, while compound 6 did not affect this process at all (Figure 4a). In the presence of 13, the integrated HIV-1 DNA levels reflected the amount of HIV-1 DNA produced during reverse transcription, suggesting that the integrase activity was not affected by 13 (Figure 4b). Similarly, compound 6 did not decrease the level of integrated HIV-1 DNA, in sharp contrast to the integrase inhibitor RAL.
Figure 4.
Real-time PCR quantification of HIV-1 nucleic acid species produced in the presence of compound 6 (20 μM), compound 13 (5 μM), or 1 μM reference compounds darunavir (DRV), rilpivirine (RPV), and raltegravir (RAL). The percentage of viral nucleic acid species was calculated with respect to the no drug control culture. The different graphs show the effects on total HIV-1 DNA at 16 h post infection (p.i.; a), integrated HIV-1 DNA at 30 h post infection (b), and both intracellular and extracellular genomic HIV-1 RNA at 30 h post infection (c).
Viral transcripts measured approximately after one infection cycle (30 h p.i.) indicated that compound 6 had a minimal impact on the amount of intracellular RNA, but caused a decrease in extracellular RNA similar to DRV, supporting antiviral activity in the late phases of viral replication (Figure 4c). Differently, viral transcripts measured in the presence of compound 13 were lower than with compound 6, in agreement with the impairment of earlier steps such as reverse transcription. Taken together, these data are consistent with the results of antiretroviral assays showed in Table 1, where compound 6 was found active only in the BiCycle assay, thus indicating a possible effect during maturation and/or on the infectivity of viral particles, while compound 13 interfered with early steps of viral replication as observed in both Mono- and BiCycle assay.
In conclusion, to follow-up a prior work and optimize a validated scaffold of NCIs, bifunctional aminothiazoles were designed, synthesized, and tested as anti-HIV agents that target the NC. The design strategy was aimed to target simultaneously the hydrophobic pocket and N-ter domain of the NC, in order to increase the antiretroviral efficacy with respect to parent compounds that target only the hydrophobic pocket or the N-ter. Most synthesized compounds proved effective in inhibiting HIV-1 replication at low- to submicromolar concentrations, while cytotoxicity in PMBC was not detected for compounds able to inhibit the replication of HIV-1 in infected cells. Notably, the NC inhibition assay in vitro confirmed that almost all antiretroviral compounds target the NC, as further suggested by MD simulations. Similar findings were also obtained by further characterization of the mechanism of action in infected MT-2 cells, which was carried out by monitoring HIV-1 nucleic acids levels at different time-points in the presence of the most potent hits (namely, 6 and 13). All the results point to the relevance of these molecules for NC inhibition, particularly in the context of resistance acquired to currently licensed drugs. Future experiments will be carried out to test whether candidate NCIs select mutations in the target NC, as a proof of concept of NC inhibition in HIV-1 infected cells. Of note, this approach will also allow to estimate the genetic barrier to resistance of NCIs and the frequency of emerging mutations among naturally circulating HIV-1 strains. These NCI hits represent therefore a valuable starting point for further optimization.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00506.
Figures, chemistry, characterization of chemical compounds, and experimental details on molecular dynamics, NC inhibition assay, antiretroviral assay, cytotoxicity evaluation, and virology (PDF)
Author Contributions
○ These authors equally contributed to this work. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement no. 601969.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Mori M.; Kovalenko L.; Lyonnais S.; Antaki D.; Torbett B. E.; Botta M.; Mirambeau G.; Mely Y. Nucleocapsid Protein: A Desirable Target for Future Therapies Against HIV-1. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 389, 53–92. 10.1007/82_2015_433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartman T. L.; Yang L.; Helfrick A. N.; Hassink M.; Shank N. I.; George Rosenker K.; Scerba M. T.; Saha M.; Hughes E.; Wang A. Q.; Xu X.; Gupta P.; Buckheit R. W. Jr.; Appella D. H. Preclinical evaluation of a mercaptobenzamide and its prodrug for NCp7-targeted inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus. Antiviral Res. 2016, 134, 216–225. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamba E.; Mori M.; Kovalenko L.; Giannini A.; Sosic A.; Saladini F.; Fabris D.; Mely Y.; Gatto B.; Botta M. Identification of novel 2-benzoxazolinone derivatives with specific inhibitory activity against the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 145, 154–164. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.12.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M.; Kovalenko L.; Malancona S.; Saladini F.; De Forni D.; Pires M.; Humbert N.; Real E.; Botzanowski T.; Cianferani S.; Giannini A.; Dasso Lang M. C.; Cugia G.; Poddesu B.; Lori F.; Zazzi M.; Harper S.; Summa V.; Mely Y.; Botta M. Structure-Based Identification of HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein Inhibitors Active against Wild-Type and Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Strains. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13 (1), 253–266. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breuer S.; Chang M. W.; Yuan J.; Torbett B. E. Identification of HIV-1 inhibitors targeting the nucleocapsid protein. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55 (11), 4968–77. 10.1021/jm201442t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sosic A.; Sinigaglia L.; Cappellini M.; Carli I.; Parolin C.; Zagotto G.; Sabatino G.; Rovero P.; Fabris D.; Gatto B. Mechanisms of HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein Inhibition by Lysyl-Peptidyl-Anthraquinone Conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016, 27 (1), 247–56. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sosic A.; Cappellini M.; Scalabrin M.; Gatto B. Nucleocapsid Annealing-Mediated Electrophoresis (NAME) assay allows the rapid identification of HIV-1 nucleocapsid inhibitors. J. Visualized Exp. 2015, (95), 52474. 10.3791/52474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M.; Nucci A.; Lang M. C.; Humbert N.; Boudier C.; Debaene F.; Sanglier-Cianferani S.; Catala M.; Schult-Dietrich P.; Dietrich U.; Tisne C.; Mely Y.; Botta M. Functional and Structural Characterization of 2-Amino-4-phenylthiazole Inhibitors of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein with Antiviral Activity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9 (9), 1950–5. 10.1021/cb500316h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M.; Schult-Dietrich P.; Szafarowicz B.; Humbert N.; Debaene F.; Sanglier-Cianferani S.; Dietrich U.; Mely Y.; Botta M. Use of virtual screening for discovering antiretroviral compounds interacting with the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein. Virus Res. 2012, 169 (2), 377–87. 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M.; Manetti F.; Botta M. Predicting the binding mode of known NCp7 inhibitors to facilitate the design of novel modulators. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51 (2), 446–54. 10.1021/ci100393m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spriggs S.; Garyu L.; Connor R.; Summers M. F. Potential intra- and intermolecular interactions involving the unique-5′ region of the HIV-1 5′-UTR. Biochemistry 2008, 47 (49), 13064–73. 10.1021/bi8014373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amarasinghe G. K.; De Guzman R. N.; Turner R. B.; Chancellor K. J.; Wu Z. R.; Summers M. F. NMR structure of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein bound to stem-loop SL2 of the psi-RNA packaging signal. Implications for genome recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 301 (2), 491–511. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourbigot S.; Ramalanjaona N.; Boudier C.; Salgado G. F.; Roques B. P.; Mely Y.; Bouaziz S.; Morellet N. How the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein binds and destabilises the (−)primer binding site during reverse transcription. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 383 (5), 1112–28. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beltz H.; Clauss C.; Piemont E.; Ficheux D.; Gorelick R. J.; Roques B.; Gabus C.; Darlix J. L.; de Rocquigny H.; Mely Y. Structural determinants of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein for cTAR DNA binding and destabilization, and correlation with inhibition of self-primed DNA synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 348 (5), 1113–26. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Guzman R. N.; Wu Z. R.; Stalling C. C.; Pappalardo L.; Borer P. N.; Summers M. F. Structure of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein bound to the SL3 psi-RNA recognition element. Science 1998, 279 (5349), 384–8. 10.1126/science.279.5349.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Didierlaurent L.; Houzet L.; Morichaud Z.; Darlix J. L.; Mougel M. The conserved N-terminal basic residues and zinc-finger motifs of HIV-1 nucleocapsid restrict the viral cDNA synthesis during virus formation and maturation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (14), 4745–53. 10.1093/nar/gkn474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berthoux L.; Pechoux C.; Ottmann M.; Morel G.; Darlix J. L. Mutations in the N-terminal domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein affect virion core structure and proviral DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 1997, 71 (9), 6973–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoylov S. P.; Vuilleumier C.; Stoylova E.; De Rocquigny H.; Roques B. P.; Gerard D.; Mely Y. Ordered aggregation of ribonucleic acids by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein. Biopolymers 1997, 41 (3), 301–12. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M.; Dietrich U.; Manetti F.; Botta M. Molecular dynamics and DFT study on HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein-7 in complex with viral genome. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50 (4), 638–50. 10.1021/ci100070m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tisne C.; Roques B. P.; Dardel F. Specific recognition of primer tRNA Lys 3 by HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein: involvement of the zinc fingers and the N-terminal basic extension. Biochimie 2003, 85 (5), 557–61. 10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCauley M. J.; Rouzina I.; Manthei K. A.; Gorelick R. J.; Musier-Forsyth K.; Williams M. C. Targeted binding of nucleocapsid protein transforms the folding landscape of HIV-1 TAR RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112 (44), 13555–60. 10.1073/pnas.1510100112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goudreau N.; Hucke O.; Faucher A. M.; Grand-Maitre C.; Lepage O.; Bonneau P. R.; Mason S. W.; Titolo S. Discovery and structural characterization of a new inhibitor series of HIV-1 nucleocapsid function: NMR solution structure determination of a ternary complex involving a 2:1 inhibitor/NC stoichiometry. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425 (11), 1982–98. 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saladini F.; Giannini A.; Boccuto A.; Vicenti I.; Zazzi M. Agreement between an in-house replication competent and a reference replication defective recombinant virus assay for measuring phenotypic resistance to HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase inhibitors. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32 (1), e22206. 10.1002/jcla.22206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlix J. L.; de Rocquigny H.; Mely Y. The multiple roles of the nucleocapsid in retroviral RNA conversion into proviral DNA by reverse transcriptase. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44 (5), 1427–1440. 10.1042/BST20160101-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlix J. L.; de Rocquigny H.; Mauffret O.; Mely Y. Retrospective on the all-in-one retroviral nucleocapsid protein. Virus Res. 2014, 193, 2–15. 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernacchi S.; Mely Y. Exciton interaction in molecular beacons: a sensitive sensor for short range modifications of the nucleic acid structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (13), E62. 10.1093/nar/29.13.e62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernacchi S.; Stoylov S.; Piemont E.; Ficheux D.; Roques B. P.; Darlix J. L.; Mely Y. HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein activates transient melting of least stable parts of the secondary structure of TAR and its complementary sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 317 (3), 385–99. 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller B. R.; McGee T. D.; Swails J. M.; Homeyer N.; Gohlke H.; Roitberg A. E. MMPBSA.py: An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8 (9), 3314–3321. 10.1021/ct300418h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

