Abstract
Aim:
To determine whether regional variation in stroke incidence exists among individuals with AF.
Methods:
Using healthcare utilization claims from two large US databases, MarketScan® (2007-2014) and Optum Clinformatics® (2009-2015), and the 2010 US population as the standard, we estimated age, sex, race (only in Optum) standardized stroke incidence rates by the nine US census divisions. We also used Poisson regression to examine incidence rate ratios (IRR) of stroke and the probability of anticoagulation prescription fills across divisions.
Results:
Both databases combined included 970,683 patients with AF who experienced 15,543 strokes, with a mean follow-up of 23 months. In MarketScan, the age and sex standardized stroke incidence rate was highest in the Middle Atlantic and East South Central divisions at 3.8/1000 person-years (PY) and lowest in the West North Central at 3.2/1000 PY. The IRR of stroke and the probability of anticoagulation fills was similar across divisions. In Optum Clinformatics®, the age, sex, and race standardized stroke incidence rate was highest in the East North Central division at 5.0/1000 PY and lowest in the New England division at 3.3/1000 PY. IRR of stroke and the probability of anticoagulation fills differed across divisions when compared to New England.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest regional differences in stroke incidence among AF patients follow a pattern that differs from the hypothesized trend found in the general population and that other factors may be responsible for this new pattern. Cross-database differences provide a cautionary tale for the identification of regional variation using health claims data.
Introduction
In the United States, stroke is the fifth leading cause of death -- accounting for 1 in 20 deaths--(1, 2) and the leading cause of serious, long-term disability.(3-5) It has been characterized as one of the most expensive chronic diseases to treat, with an annual estimated economic burden of $17.9 billion from direct medical costs.(6) The prevalence of stroke increases with age, with two-thirds of stroke hospitalizations occurring in those aged 65 years and older.(4) With the aging of the US population, its prevalence is expected to dramatically increase over time.(4)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, affecting between 2.7-6.1 million people in the US.(7) Prevalence of AF also increases with age,(8) affecting approximately 9% of people aged 65 years or older compared to 2% of people under age 65.(7) AF increases the risk of stroke(9) and is independently associated with a five-fold increase in stroke incidence.(9, 10) Stroke risk attributable to AF increases with age from 1.5% at 50 to 59 years of age to 23.5% at 80 to 89 years of age.(6) In patients with stroke, AF is associated with increased severity, functional impairment, and mortality.(11-13) Adjusted mean costs of stroke hospitalizations for AF patients compared to non-AF patients were significantly higher for ischemic stroke (~$5,000),(4, 11), hemorrhagic stroke ($7,824), and transient ischemic stroke ($1,890), respectively. (11) Nationally, stroke constitutes a sizable health and economic burden for the AF population.
In the general US population, the burden of stroke has substantial geographical variation that has persisted for decades.(14, 15) Since at least the 1940s, higher stroke mortality rates have been found within the Southeastern region of the US when compared to the rest of the country.(14, 16) During the 1960s, the term “stroke belt” was coined to describe this region of concentrated high stroke mortality rates.(14, 17) The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) has defined the stroke belt as states with 1980 age-adjusted stroke mortality rates more than 10% higher than the US average.(16, 18) These states are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.(18) Analogous to stroke mortality, regional differences have been observed for stroke incidence(19-21) and stroke case-fatality.(22) However, it is currently unknown whether geographic variation in stroke incidence exists in individuals with AF and whether it can be explained by oral anticoagulant patterns or patient characteristics. Identifying which states carry the heaviest burden of incident stroke among AF patients could contribute to understanding overall geographic disparities in stroke and may lead to the evaluation of existing strategies of AF management in regions at elevated risk. In this study, we used health care utilization data from two large US databases, Optum Clinformatics® and MarketScan, to determine stroke incidence rates among patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation by U.S. census division.
Methods
Study Population
This study uses health care utilization data from two large US databases, MarketScan and Optum Clinformatics®.
We included claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and the Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits Database (Truven Health Analytics Inc., Ann Arbor, MI) for the period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014. The MarketScan Commercial Database includes health insurance claims and enrollment data collected from large US employers and health plans that provide private healthcare coverage for employees, their spouses and dependents. The Medicare Supplemental Database includes claims from individuals and their dependents with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental coverage.
We also used de-identified claims data from Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart, a product of OptumInsight, Inc. (Eden Prairie, MN), for the period January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015. The database includes enrollment data and administrative health claims data for commercial and Managed Medicare enrollees from a large national health insurer with enrollees throughout the US. In both MarketScan and Optum Clinformatics®, patient enrollment data are linked with medical and outpatient prescription drug claims and encounter data to provide individual-specific clinical use, expenditure, and outcomes across inpatient and outpatient services and outpatient pharmacy services.
In each database, the analysis was restricted to individuals with available medical and outpatient pharmaceutical data, a history of non-valvular AF, and at least six months of continuous enrollment prior to their AF diagnosis. History of AF was defined as at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims at least 7 days but less than 1 year apart with the International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 427.31 or 427.32 in any position. Individuals with any inpatient ICD-9-CM codes for mitral stenosis or mitral valve disorders were excluded. The Institutional Review Board at Emory University reviewed and approved this study.
Oral anticoagulant use
Each outpatient pharmaceutical claim includes information on the National Drug Code, the prescription fill date, and the number of days supplied. We considered a patient to have received an oral anticoagulant (OAC; warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) if they had any OAC prescription in outpatient claims within the following window: 3 months prior to 6 months after AF diagnosis. We chose this time window to accommodate uncertainty about the date of AF diagnosis. Patients were categorized according to their first anticoagulant prescription during this time period. All direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) prescriptions—dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban—were included regardless of the dosage strength. The validity of warfarin claims in administrative databases is excellent (positive predictive value (PPV) of 99%),(23) which is likely to be similar for DOACs.
Definition of ischemic stroke
The primary outcome in this study was hospitalization for ischemic stroke (allowing for multiple events per patient). To identify ischemic stroke, we used an established algorithm (PPV- 98%) by Williams et al.(24) Ischemic stroke was defined by the presence of ICD-9-CM codes 434.xx (occlusion of cerebral arteries) and 436.xx (acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular disease) as the primary discharge diagnosis in any inpatient claim following their AF diagnosis.
Covariates
Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were ascertained. Race/ethnicity was additionally available in the Optum Clinformatics® database and thus was considered as a covariate for those analyses. Race/ethnicity was collected directly from public records (e.g., driver’s license records) for approximately 30% of individuals, while the remaining data were imputed using commercial software (E-Tech by Ethnic Technologies). The algorithm was developed with first and last names and US Census data zip codes (zip + 4). This method was validated and has 97% specificity, 48% sensitivity, and 71% positive predictive value for predicting the race of black individuals.(25) Comorbidities were defined using ICD-9-CM codes from inpatient and outpatient claims prior to or at the time of AF diagnosis, using all information available since time of database enrollment and were based on validated algorithms.(26) They included heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease. A patient was considered to have a comorbidity if they had an inpatient or outpatient claim with a relevant ICD-9-CM code in any position; a list of ICD-9-codes used to define each comorbidity is included in Supplementary Table S1. These comorbidities were used to compute the CHA2DS2-VASc score.(27) The CHA2DS2-VASc score is defined by the following predictors: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≤75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–75 years, and sex category.
Geographic location
In each database, geographic location was ascertained from patient enrollment data and based on the primary beneficiary’s residence. In the MarketScan database, geographic information is provided at the level of US state, division, and region, however in Optum Clinformatics® geographic information is only provided at the US census level division. For consistency across datasets, we analyzed MarketScan data according to the nine US Census Bureau-designated divisions, defined in Supplementary Table S2.
Statistical analysis
In this analysis, we included patients with a history of non-valvular AF. Follow-up was defined from the date of AF diagnosis and continued until December 31, 2014 (MarketScan) or September 30, 2015 (Optum Clinformatics®), or patient disenrollment from a health insurance company that was include in MarketScan or Optum Clinformatics®, whichever occurred earlier.
We computed descriptive statistics across the nine U.S. Census Bureau-designated divisions. The primary analysis estimated incidence rates per 1,000 person-years (PY) for ischemic stroke across the nine divisions. We calculated both crude and standardized rates. All rates were standardized to the relevant 2010 US census population distribution (28). In the MarketScan database, ischemic stroke incidence rates were age- and sex- standardized within each census divisions. To examine sex differences, we also estimated sex-specific incidence rates that were age-standardized within each census divisions. In the Optum Clinformatics® database, ischemic stroke incidence rates were age-, sex-, and race-standardized across divisions. Sex and race specific incidence rates were compared across divisions, standardizing for age. We examined the incidence rate ratios of stroke using Poisson regression. All models were initially adjusted for demographic factors (age, sex, and race) [Model 1], with the subsequent model adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc score [Model 2]. In the final model [Model 3], we further adjusted for OAC use. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimates were used to compute relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of anticoagulation prescription fills across the US census divisions. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and CHA2DS2-VASc score; in Optum Clinformatics, we also adjusted for race. The New England census division was used as the reference.
Results
MarketScan
Cohort Characteristics
The MarketScan databases included 605,731 patients with a diagnosis of nonvalvular AF in the period of January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2014. Among those patients, a total of 595,631 had available information on geographic location. Table 1 shows demographic and clinical characteristics of the MarketScan cohort at the time of AF diagnosis by the 9 US census divisions. The average age of AF patients across divisions was lowest in the West South Central division at 66.3 years and highest in the East North Central division at 72.1 years. Generally, across divisions patients were less likely to be women, had a similar prevalence for each comorbidity, and had low rates of OAC initiation around the time of AF diagnosis (3 months prior to 6 months after diagnosis).
Table 1.
Characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation by US census bureau divisions in MarketScan, 2007-2014 and Optum Clinformatics 2009-2015 cohorts
New England |
Middle Atlantic |
East North Central |
West North Central |
South Atlantic |
East South Central |
West South Central |
Mountain | Pacific | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MarketScan | |||||||||
N | 25,892 | 89,086 | 150,251 | 28,863 | 103,349 | 33,069 | 57,360 | 27,824 | 79,937 |
Age at baseline, yr | 68.1 (14.8) | 71.1 (14.2) | 72.1 (13.5) | 66.7 (14.5) | 68.7 (14.3) | 67.6 (13.9) | 66.3 (14.6) | 69.4 (14.3) | 71.1 (14.1) |
Women | 39 | 43 | 43.5 | 39.7 | 41.3 | 41.6 | 40.1 | 40.2 | 41 |
Anticoagulation use* | 29 | 24.8 | 26.9 | 27.9 | 26.1 | 26.7 | 25.9 | 26.1 | 25.4 |
CHA2DS2-VASc | 2.9 (2.0) | 3.6 (2.1) | 3.7 (2.1) | 2.8 (2.0) | 3.2 (2.0) | 3.1 (2.0) | 3.0 (2.0) | 3.1 (2.0) | 3.3 (2.0) |
Chronic disease | |||||||||
Chronic heart failure | 22.6 | 27.9 | 30.5 | 22.7 | 23.9 | 25.6 | 25.9 | 24.3 | 26.0 |
Hypertension | 62.8 | 71.7 | 72.5 | 61.7 | 69.6 | 69.6 | 69.4 | 65.7 | 66.5 |
Diabetes mellitus | 23.7 | 29.9 | 31.6 | 25.4 | 28.2 | 28.8 | 26.5 | 24.2 | 24.8 |
Peripheral artery disease | 11.5 | 17.5 | 15.7 | 9.9 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 11.6 |
Ischemic stroke history | 16.1 | 23.8 | 23.6 | 16.5 | 20.4 | 19.5 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 19.2 |
Myocardial infarction | 9.1 | 10.4 | 11.2 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 9.7 | 9.6 |
Optum Clinformatics | |||||||||
N | 19,469 | 27,905 | 53,663 | 41,948 | 76,731 | 14,234 | 40,988 | 38,682 | 61,432 |
Age at baseline, yr | 74.8 (10.8) | 73.5 (12.5) | 72.1 (12.3) | 72.9 (11.7) | 70.0 (12.4) | 70.8 (12.0) | 70.5 (12.7) | 74.0 (11.2) | 77.0 (9.8) |
Women | 47 | 45.7 | 43.9 | 44.1 | 42.8 | 45 | 43.3 | 46.6 | 49.8 |
Race | |||||||||
Asian | 1.4 | 5.1 | .9 | .9 | 1.0 | .9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 5.4 |
Black | 3.9 | 7.8 | 9.3 | 4.6 | 16.6 | 19.9 | 10.0 | 1.9 | 2.5 |
Hispanic | 7.3 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 4.7 | .8 | 14.6 | 9.4 | 12.9 |
White | 87.3 | 78.1 | 87.7 | 93.3 | 77.7 | 78.4 | 74.0 | 87.5 | 79.3 |
Anticoagulation use* | 26.3 | 23.0 | 27.0 | 17.2 | 24.6 | 23.8 | 25.5 | 26.7 | 26.7 |
CHA2DS2-VASc | 4.4 (2) | 4.4 (2.1) | 4 (2.1) | 3.9 (2) | 3.8 (2.1) | 4.1 (2.1) | 4.1 (2.2) | 4.1 (2) | 4.5 (1.9) |
Chronic disease | |||||||||
Chronic heart failure | 36.0 | 36.3 | 33.0 | 30.3 | 30.3 | 35.2 | 35.7 | 31.2 | 37.1 |
Hypertension | 84.6 | 84.5 | 82.1 | 79.6 | 83.4 | 86.9 | 85.4 | 80.0 | 83.2 |
Diabetes mellitus | 38.2 | 43.3 | 34.6 | 29.8 | 36.6 | 38.8 | 37.4 | 30.8 | 34.2 |
Peripheral artery disease | 26.1 | 27.8 | 20.2 | 19.6 | 19.6 | 19.7 | 26.1 | 20.5 | 25.6 |
Ischemic stroke history | 26.5 | 29.8 | 24.6 | 22.8 | 26.3 | 28.7 | 28.3 | 26.9 | 28.8 |
Myocardial infarction | 16.7 | 13.3 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 13.6 | 15.1 | 13.4 | 16.3 |
Numbers correspond to mean (SD) and percentages; CHA2DS2-VASc: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-75 years, and sex category.
Anticoagulation 3 months prior to 6 months after AF diagnosis.
Stroke Incidence Rates
Over a total follow-up time of 1,160,872 PY (mean follow-up 23.4 months), the total ischemic stroke events for the 9 divisions combined were 9026: 93.6% had 1 stroke, 5.7% had 2, and .7% had 3 or more. The resulting crude rate for the entire cohort was 7.8 ischemic strokes per 1000 PY. Patients with stroke represent less than 2% of the AF population within each of the 9 divisions. Crude rates by division are shown in Table 2. The 2010 US population age- and sex-standardized total incident stroke rate for all eligible patients was 3.6/1000 (95% CI: 3.4-3.8). By division, the total standardized rates were highest in the Middle Atlantic and East South Central (3.8/1000) and lowest in West North Central (3.2/1000) (Fig 1A). Rates for each division can be found in Supplementary Table S3. Age-standardized rates were higher for women compared to men across each division (Fig 1B,C). Compared to men, the rate of stroke for women was significantly higher in the East North Central (27%), West South Central (37%), and Mountain (77%) divisions (Supplementary Table S3).
Table 2.
Adjusted Relative Rates (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of Ischemic Stroke Hospitalization, MarketScan, 2007-2014 and Optum Clinformatics®, 2009-2015
MarketScan | Events | Crude Rate‡ (95% CI) |
RR (95%CI) |
Optum
Clinformatics® |
Events | Crude Rate‡
(95% CI) |
RR (95%CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 9,026 | N | 6,517 | ||||
Model 1† | Model 1† | ||||||
New England | 397 | 7.0 (6.3-7.7) | Ref | New England | 356 | 10.3 (9.2-11.3) | Ref |
Middle Atlantic | 1253 | 8.4 (7.9-8.9) | 1.04 (0.93-1.17) | Middle Atlantic | 423 | 9.5 (8.6-10.4) | 0.94 (0.82-1.08) |
East N Central | 2483 | 8.8 (8.4-9.1) | 1.07 (0.97-1.19) | East N Central | 901 | 9.3 (8.7-9.9) | 1.01 (0.90-1.14) |
West N Central | 374 | 6.8 (6.1-7.5) | 1.01 (0.87-1.16) | West N Central | 723 | 8.5 (7.9-9.1) | 0.91 (0.80-1.03) |
South Atlantic | 1345 | 6.8 (6.4-7.1) | 0.95 (0.85-1.06) | South Atlantic | 1100 | 8.2 (7.7-8.7) | 0.97 (0.86-1.10) |
East S Central | 464 | 7.0 (6.3-1.6) | 1.08 (0.95-1.24) | East S Central | 273 | 10.9 (9.6-12.2) | 1.21 (1.03-1.41) |
West S Central | 795 | 7.1 (6.6-1.6) | 1.04 (0.92-1.17) | West S Central | 739 | 8.7 (8.0-9.3) | 0.93 (0.82-1.06) |
Mountain | 406 | 7.7 (7.0-8.4) | 1.03 (0.89-1.18) | Mountain | 638 | 7.7 (7.1-8.4) | 0.77 (0.68-0.88) |
Pacific | 1509 | 8.1 (7.7-8.6) | 1.03 (0.93-1.16) | Pacific | 1364 | 9.9 (9.3-10.4) | 0.84 (0.75-0.94) |
Model 2†† | Model 2†† | ||||||
New England | 397 | 7.0 (6.3-7.7) | Ref | New England | 356 | 10.3 (9.2-11.3) | Ref |
Middle Atlantic | 1253 | 8.4 (7.9-8.9) | 0.99 (0.89,1.11) | Middle Atlantic | 423 | 9.5 (8.6-10.4) | 0.92 (0.8,1.05) |
East N Central | 2483 | 8.8 (8.4-9.1) | 1.02 (0.92,1.14) | East N Central | 901 | 9.3 (8.7-9.9) | 1.01 (0.89,1.14) |
West N Central | 374 | 6.8 (6.1-7.5) | 1.00 (0.87,1.15) | West N Central | 723 | 8.5 (7.9-9.1) | 0.93 (0.82,1.06) |
South Atlantic | 1345 | 6.8 (6.4-7.1) | 0.92 (0.82,1.03) | South Atlantic | 1100 | 8.2 (7.7-8.7) | 0.95 (0.84,1.07) |
East S Central | 464 | 7.0 (6.3-7.6) | 1.05 (0.92,1.20) | East S Central | 273 | 10.9 (9.6-12.2) | 1.15 (0.98,1.35) |
West S Central | 795 | 7.1 (6.6-7.6) | 1.01 (0.89,1.14) | West S Central | 739 | 8.7 (8.0-9.3) | 0.91 (0.80,1.03) |
Mountain | 406 | 7.7 (7.0-8.4) | 1.02 (0.89,1.17) | Mountain | 638 | 7.7 (7.1-8.4) | 0.77 (0.68,0.88) |
Pacific | 1509 | 8.1 (7.7-8.6) | 1.03 (0.92,1.15) | Pacific | 1364 | 9.9 (9.3-10.4) | 0.84 (0.75,0.95) |
Model 3††† | Model 3††† | ||||||
New England | 397 | 7.0 (6.3-1.1) | Ref | New England | 356 | 10.3 (9.2-11.3) | Ref |
Middle Atlantic | 1253 | 8.4 (7.9-8.9) | 0.99 (0.89,1.11) | Middle Atlantic | 423 | 9.5 (8.6-10.4) | 0.92 (0.80,1.06) |
East N Central | 2483 | 8.8 (8.4-9.1) | 1.02 (0.92,1.14) | East N Central | 901 | 9.3 (8.7-9.9) | 1.01 (0.89,1.14) |
West N Central | 374 | 6.8 (6.1-7.5) | 1.00 (0.87,1.15) | West N Central | 723 | 8.5 (7.9-9.1) | 0.94 (0.83,1.07) |
South Atlantic | 1345 | 6.8 (6.4-7.1) | 0.92 (0.82,1.03) | South Atlantic | 1100 | 8.2 (7.7-8.7) | 0.95 (0.84,1.07) |
East S Central | 464 | 7.0 (6.3-7.6) | 1.06 (0.92,1.21) | East S Central | 273 | 10.9 (9.6-12.2) | 1.16 (0.99,1.35) |
West S Central | 795 | 7.1 (6.6-7.6) | 1.01 (0.90,1.14) | West S Central | 739 | 8.7 (8.0-9.3) | 0.91 (0.80,1.03) |
Mountain | 406 | 7.7 (7.0-8.4) | 1.02 (0.89,1.18) | Mountain | 638 | 7.7 (7.1-8.4) | 0.77 (0.68,0.88) |
Pacific | 1509 | 8.1 (7.7-8.6) | 1.03 (0.92,1.15) | Pacific | 1364 | 9.9 (9.3-10.4) | 0.84 (0.75,0.95) |
Crude Stroke Incidence Rates per 1,000 Person-Years
Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex (and race in Optum Clinformatics®)
Model 2: Model 1, additionally adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc variables
Model 3: Model 2, additionally adjusted for oral anticoagulant use
CHA2DS2-VASc: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–75 years, and sex category
Figure 1.
Standardized stroke incidence rates by U.S. Census Bureau divisions in MarketScan, 2007-2014. A. Age- and sex-standardized rates. B. Age-standardized rates for women. C. Age-standardized rates for men.
Incidence Rate Ratios of Ischemic Stroke and Relative Risk of Anticoagulation
The rate of stroke was higher across divisions when compared to New England, with the exception of the South Atlantic division (Table 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The estimates decreased slightly, but remained not statistically significant with further adjustments for CHA2DS2-VASc score components and did not change with adjustments for OAC use. A total of 159,832 (~27%) patients filled an anticoagulant prescription across all census divisions. Compared to patients residing in the New England division, patients in each division were less likely to be anticoagulated (Table 3).
Table 3.
Anticoagulation Fill Patterns of Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation, MarketScan, 2007-2014 and Optum Clinformatics® 2009-2015
Anticoagulation Use, % | RR (95%CI)† | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
MarketScan | 159,832 | ||
New England | 29 | Ref | |
Middle Atlantic | 24.8 | 0.86 (0.84,0.88) | <.0001 |
East N Central | 26.9 | 0.92 (0.90,0.94) | <.0001 |
West N Central | 27.9 | 0.95 (0.93,0.98) | .0001 |
South Atlantic | 26.1 | 0.89 (0.87,0.91) | <.0001 |
East S Central | 26.7 | 0.89 (0.87,0.92) | <.0001 |
West S Central | 25.9 | 0.87 (0.85,0.89) | <.0001 |
Mountain | 26.1 | 0.89 (0.87,0.92) | <.0001 |
Pacific | 25.4 | 0.88 (0.86,0.90) | <.0001 |
Optum Clinformatics® | 94,728 | ||
New England | 26.3 | Ref | |
Middle Atlantic | 23.0 | 0.88 (0.85,0.91) | <.0001 |
East N Central | 27.0 | 1.01 (0.99,1.04) | 0.3136 |
West N Central | 17.2 | 0.65 (0.63,0.67) | <.0001 |
South Atlantic | 24.6 | 0.90 (0.88,0.92) | <.0001 |
East S Central | 23.8 | 0.86 (0.83,0.90) | <.0001 |
West S Central | 25.5 | 0.94 (0.91,0.96) | <.0001 |
Mountain | 26.7 | 1.03 (1.00,1.06) | 0.0656 |
Pacific | 26.7 | 1.06 (1.03,1.08) | <.0001 |
Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of anticoagulation fill.
Adjusted for age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc variables (and race in Optum Clinformatics®)
CHA2DS2-VASc: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–75 years, and sex category
Optum Clinformatics
Cohort Characteristics
Among the 414,495 patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular AF enrolled in the Optum Clinformatics® database for the period of January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015, a total of 375,052 had available race and geographic information. The characteristics of the Optum cohort at the time of AF diagnosis by the nine US census divisions are shown in Table 1. Across divisions, the average age of AF patients was equal to or greater than 70 years. Also, a majority of patients were white and male, with an average CHA2DS2-VASc score range from 3.8-4.5. Approximately one-fourth of patients initiated an OAC 3 months prior to 6 months after AF diagnosis.
Stroke Incidence Rates
The total ischemic stroke events were 6,517: 93.0% had one stroke, 6.5% had two, and 0.6% had three or more. With a total follow-up time of 726,448 PY (mean follow-up 23.2 months), the crude rate for the entire cohort was 9.0/1000 PY. Crude rates by division are shown in Table 2. The 2010 US population age-, sex- and race- standardized total incidence stroke rate for all eligible patients in Optum was 4.0/1000 (95% CI: 3.7-4.3). Across divisions, the total age-, sex- and race- standardized rates were highest in the East North Central (5.0/1000) and Middle Atlantic (4.8/1000) and lowest in New England (3.3/1000) (Figure 2A). Supplementary Table S4 shows the total standardized stroke rates for each division. In contrast to results from the MarketScan databases, where women had higher stroke rates in most divisions, we did not observe a consistent pattern in the age-standardized stroke rates by sex (Figure 2B&C and Supplementary Table S4). Age- and sex- standardized stroke rates for nonwhites were higher than that of whites in most regions [Middle Atlantic (rate ratio (RR) = 1.83), East North Central (RR = 1.74), South Atlantic (RR = 1.59), West South Central (RR = 1.76), and Mountain (RR = 2.26) divisions (Supplementary Table S4)].
Figure 2.
Standardized stroke incidence rates by U.S. Census Bureau divisions in Optum Clinformatics®, 2009-2015 A. Age-,sex-, and race- standardized rates. B,C. Age- standardized rates for women and men, respectively. D,E. Age- and sex-standardized rates for non-whites and whites, respectively.
Incidence Rate Ratios of Ischemic Stroke and Relative Risk of Anticoagulation
In the Optum database, the rate of stroke was also lower across divisions when compared to New England, with the exception of the East South Central division (Table 2). However, with the exception of stroke rates in the Mountain and Pacific divisions, these differences were not statistically significant across any models. A total of 94,728 (~25%) patients filled an anticoagulant prescription across all census divisions. Patients residing in the West North Central division were 35% less likely to be anticoagulated, while those residing in Mountain and Pacific division were 3 and 6% more likely to be anticoagulated, respectively, when compared to New England patients. (Table 3).
Discussion
In this analysis, we used two large administrative claims databases to determine whether there is geographic variability in stroke rates in the AF population, and whether differences in patient characteristics and oral anticoagulant use would account for that variability. Age, sex, and race (when applicable) standardized stroke rates did not cluster in the South as hypothesized based on the distribution of stroke rates in the general population. Across databases, rates were highest in the Middle Atlantic, East South Central, and East North Central divisions. In MarketScan, lower probabilities of anticoagulation corresponded to higher rates of stroke across census divisions when compared to New England. However, in Optum, when compared to New England, the probability of anticoagulation fills within division did not inversely correspond with stroke rates as expected. After successive adjustments for CHA2DS2-VASc score and use of an oral anticoagulant there were no changes in the associations, suggesting that geographic variation in stroke risk could not be explained by regional differences in these risk factors.
First documented in 1965, the term stroke belt was used to describe the concentration of high stroke mortality rates in the Southeastern region compared to the rest of the United States.(14, 16, 17) Mortality rates can be driven by two components-- incidence and case fatality(22). Within recent decades, studies have found regional differences in stroke incidence(19-21, 29) and stroke case-fatality(22) which correspond to the higher stroke risk in the stroke belt, and thus likely contributes to the persistent disparity in mortality rates in the Southern region of the US. Considering AF is an important independent risk factor for stroke(9, 10) and reported to cause 15-20% of ischemic stroke events across all ages(7), we designed this study to determine whether a similar regional pattern in stroke incidence in AF patients would emerge in the Southern region of the United States. Our findings do not support such pattern.
Many of the proposed hypotheses for regional differences in stroke incidence and mortality are based on similar regional variations in the prevalence of stroke risk factors (i.e., hypertension) and socioeconomic characteristics. Hypertension, including uncontrolled hypertension, is a major risk factor for stroke.(30) The prevalence of hypertension is higher in blacks,(31) as well as more prevalent in certain groups in the southeastern United States.(32) Howard, et al. found that the proportion of controlled hypertension in the United States is lower in those at older ages, and in groups with less education, lower income, or lack of access to healthcare.(33) Socioeconomic status (SES) is inversely associated with stroke incidence and stroke mortality. (34) The complex interplay between SES, access to healthcare and health insurance, prevalence of stroke risk factors, and the actual risk of stroke may result in differences between patterns emerging from the evaluation of individuals with health insurance those observed in the general population.
In patients with nonvalvular AF, a risk assessment scheme is used to evaluate stroke risk and help inform the decision of whether or not to initiate anticoagulation therapy. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is currently the recommended risk assessment scheme used to identify patients with AF who are likely to benefit from anticoagulant prophylaxis against stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score assigns one or two points to each of seven critical risk factors, i.e., congestive heart failure (C), hypertension (H), two points to age ≥ 75 years (A), diabetes mellitus (D), two points to previous or transient ischemic attack stroke (S), vascular disease (V; prior myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, or aortic plaque), age 65–74 years (A) and Sex category (Sc: female sex).(27) For AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or greater, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation recommends OACs.(35) Anticoagulation therapy reduces the risk of stroke(36) and is highly effective in stroke prevention. However, underuse of anticoagulation therapy in AF patients remains common(37) and varies across regions in the U.S.(38) In this study, we found regional differences in anticoagulation fill patterns; however, these differences did not attenuate observed stroke rates across census divisions. This suggest that regional differences in stroke rate may not be due differences in the management of AF patients across regions but to other risk factors not measured in this study.
In our analysis we found differences in stroke rate by sex and race which are mostly consistent with prior literature. In MarketScan, but not Optum, we found that women had higher stroke rates when compared to men. This is consistent with the inclusion of female sex as a predictor of stroke in the CHA2DS2-VASc score, (27) the ACC/AHA/HRS recommended stroke risk prediction score. In Optum, we observed higher stroke rates in non-whites vs whites, in most census divisions. These findings are consistent with data from the ARIC cohort which reports higher strokes in blacks vs whites.(39)
Across both databases, we observed a low proportion of patients receiving anticoagulation, <30%. Anticoagulation fill patterns have been shown to be influenced by provider specialty.(40) AF patients seen by a cardiologist are 39% more like to fill an oral anticoagulant compared to patients seen by a primary care physician. The population prevalence of anticoagulant use reported in our study are substantially lower than those reported in AF registries, such as ORBIT-AF (which reports provider anticoagulant prescriptions and not actual fill rates) (41), but are consistent with other administrative databases.(42, 43) As such, our data is likely more representative of what occurs in a usual practice setting.
These findings should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. The results of this analysis rely on the ability to accurately ascertain both the outcome and covariates from administrative data. Validated algorithms were used to ascertain events of interest and it is likely that any misclassification is non-differential. Secondly, race/ethnicity data were imputed for more than two-thirds of patients in Optum. There is the potential for substantial misclassification of race, which could result in residual confounding in race-adjusted estimates. Thirdly, data is presented according to census level divisions and not at the state or county-level. Care should be taken when interpreting divisional stroke rates because it is known that significantly different rates can occur within a division, state or county.(44) Fourthly, the number of stroke hospitalizations identified is a portion of all strokes available in the database. We limited our definition to ICD-9-CM codes with a high PPV in the primary diagnosis of a hospital-related claim. As a result, it is possible that we excluded true cases of strokes that occurred outside the hospital setting, identified by a different ICD-9-CM code, or occurred in a different diagnostic position (resulting in a low sensitivity definition of stroke). Finally, identifying regional differences in claims data may be dependent on the regional coverage of the insurance provider. In this analysis, we used health claims data from two independent databases for which different insurance companies contribute to each. Of note, we did not have information on the overall geographic distribution of either of these products across the country, however we have no reason to assume that one product is more susceptible to variance in enrollment across the country compared to the other. Given that insurance provisions vary widely by state and different insurance companies contribute to MarketScan and Optum Clinformatics®, it is difficult to tease out geography from insurance coverage and the differences between databases are to be expected.
Overall, this paper serves as a cautionary tale for the use of administrative claims data to evaluate geographical variation in an outcome, given the numerous factors that can influence this variation and the difficulty to tease them out. When geographic differences are observed in these databases, it brings to question whether the observed differences are the result of differential penetration of a given insurance product or targeted disease management programs for risk factors of the outcome, or true higher prevalence of the outcome in certain regions. This is valuable information because claims have been utilized for the identification of geographic differences across the country.
In conclusion, we found geographic variation in stroke rates in patients with AF. The highest rates were not in the Southeastern region as hypothesized. These regional differences do not appear to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics or AF treatment (i.e., oral anticoagulants). This finding suggests that other factors may be responsible for this observed pattern. Further investigation into existing strategies of AF management and treatment for existing comorbidities (i.e., hypertension) related to stroke risk should be evaluated.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [award number R01HL122200]; and the American Heart Association [grant number 16EIA26410001]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the American Heart Association.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Disclosures
None.
References
- (1).Health, United States, 2015: With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Yang Q TX, Schieb L, et al. Vital Signs: Recent Trends in Stroke Death Rates — United States, 2000–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:933–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Raji MA, Lowery M, Lin YL, et al. National utilization patterns of warfarin use in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based study of Medicare Part D beneficiaries. Ann Pharmacother 2013;47:35–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Wang G, Joo H, Tong X, et al. Hospital costs associated with atrial fibrillation for patients with ischemic stroke aged 18-64 years in the United States. Stroke. 2015;46:1314–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Wetmore JB, Ellerbeck EF, Mahnken JD, et al. Stroke and the "stroke belt" in dialysis: contribution of patient characteristics to ischemic stroke rate and its geographic variation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:2053–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).CDC. Atrial Fibrillation. August 22, 2017 ed: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2017. p. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- (8).Phillips SJ. Is Atrial Fibrillation an Independent Risk Factor for Stroke? Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 1990;17:163–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Brand FN, Abbott RD, Kannel WB, et al. Characteristics and Prognosis of Lone Atrial Fibrillation: 30-Year Follow-up in the Framingham Study. J Am Med Assoc 1985;254:3449–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial Fibrillation as an Independent Risk Factor for Stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Sussman M, Menzin J, Lin I, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on stroke-related healthcare costs. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1760–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Penado S, Cano M, Acha O, et al. Stroke severity in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2002;112:572–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).El-Saed A, Kuller LH, Newman AB, et al. Geographic variations in stroke incidence and mortality among older populations in four US communities. Stroke. 2006;37:1975–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Liao Y, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB, et al. Factors explaining excess stroke prevalence in the US Stroke Belt. Stroke. 2009;40:3336–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Lanska DJ, Kuller LH. The Geography of Stroke Mortality in the United States and the Concept of a Stroke Belt. Stroke. 1995;26:1145–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Casper ML BE, Williams GI Jr., Halverson JA, Braham VE, Greenlund KJ. Atlas of Stroke Mortality: Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in the United States. [Google Scholar]
- (18).National Heart L, and Blood Institute Stroke Belt Initiative. 1996:1–23. [Google Scholar]
- (19).Howard VJ, Kleindorfer DO, Judd SE, et al. Disparities in stroke incidence contributing to disparities in stroke mortality. Ann Neurol 2011;69:619–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Nguyen-Huynh MN, Johnston SC. Regional variation in hospitalization for stroke among Asians/Pacific Islanders in the United States: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. BMC Neurol 2005;5:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Lackland DT, Bachman DL, Carter TD, et al. The geographic variation in stroke incidence in two areas of the southeastern stroke belt: the Anderson and Pee Dee Stroke Study. Stroke. 1998;29:2061–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Labarthe DR, Howard G, Safford MM, et al. Incidence and Case Fatality at the County Level as Contributors to Geographic Disparities in Stroke Mortality. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;47:96–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Garg RK, Glazer NL, Wiggins KL, et al. Ascertainment of warfarin and aspirin use by medical record review compared with automated pharmacy data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011;20:313–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Williams LS, Rotich J, Qi R, et al. Effects of admission hyperglycemia on mortality and costs in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2002;59:67–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).DeFrank JT, B J. Michael, Rimer BK, et al. Triangulating Differential Nonresponse by Race in a Telephone Survey. Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4:A60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Quan H SV, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD,, Beck CA FT, Ghali WA. Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137:263–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Howden LMaM, Julie A. Age and Sex Composition: 2010. In: Bureau USC, editor. 2010. Census Briefs. Online2011. p. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- (29).Gillum RF, Ingram DD. Relation between residence in the southeast region of the United States and stroke incidence. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:665–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67–e492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Hertz RP, Unger AN, Cornell JA, et al. Racial disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, and management. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2098–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Obisesan TO, Vargas CM, Gillum RF. Geographic variation in stroke risk in the United States. Region, urbanization, and hypertension in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Stroke. 2000;31:19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Howard G, Prineas R, Moy C, et al. Racial and geographic differences in awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study. Stroke. 2006;37:1171–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Bravata DM, Wells CK, Gulanski B, et al. Racial disparities in stroke risk factors: the impact of socioeconomic status. Stroke. 2005;36:1507–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2246–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Lip GY, Lim HS. Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:981–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Ogilvie IM, Newton N, Welner SA, et al. Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2010;123:638–45 e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Hernandez I, Saba S, Zhang Y. Geographic Variation in the Use of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke. 2017;48:2289–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Magnani JW, Norby FL, Agarwal SK, et al. Racial Differences in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. JAMA Cardiol 2016;1:433–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).O'Neal WT, Sandesara PB, Claxton JS, et al. Provider Specialty, Anticoagulation Prescription Patterns, and Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Fosbol EL, Holmes DN, Piccini JP, et al. Provider specialty and atrial fibrillation treatment strategies in United States community practice: findings from the ORBIT-AF registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Lang K, Bozkaya D, Patel AA, et al. Anticoagulant use for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from a multipayer analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Willey V, Franchino-Elder J, Fu AC, et al. Treatment and persistence with oral anticoagulants among newly diagnosed patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective observational study in a US commercially insured and Medicare Advantage population. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Roth GA, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Bertozzi-Villa A, et al. Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014. JAMA. 2017;317:1976–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.