Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis logoLink to Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis
. 2018;89(Suppl 8):53–57. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i8-S.7986

Non-invasive method for the assessment of gastric acid secretion

Miraglia Chiara 1,✉, Moccia Florenzo 1, Russo Michele 1, Scida Serena 1, Franceschi Marilisa 2, Crafa Pellegrino 1, Franzoni Lorella 1, Nouvenne Antonio 1, Meschi Tiziana 1, Leandro Gioacchino 3, Luigi de’ Angelis Gian 4, Di Mario Francesco 1
PMCID: PMC6502207  PMID: 30561418

Abstract

Methods for the measure of gastric acid secretion include invasive and non-invasive tests. The gold-standard to measure the acid output is the collection of gastric after in basal condition (Basal Acid Output, B.A.O.) and after an i.m. injection of pentagastrin (Maximal Acid Output, M.A.O.). However, direct measurement of gastric acid production is out of order in clinical practice, but many GI symptoms are claimed to be related with acid disorders and empirically cured. Hypochlorhydria is associated with precancerous conditions such as chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG). Acid measurement with non-invasive methods (pepsinogens) is supported by international guidelines. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Keywords: acid measurement, atrophy, acid secretion, pepsinogens, aspiration test, maximal acid output

Introduction

Gastric acid secretion has a complex pathophysiological role in humans (1) being an important protective mechanism against ingested pathogens and being related to different diseases.

The measurement of acid secretion proves useful in the diagnostic workup and treatment of these conditions: increased gastric acidity is characteristic of duodenal ulcer (DU) and patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; in contrast, low or even absent acid secretion is found in patients with pernicious anemia and atrophic gastritis (AG), which is the most important know risk condition for gastric cancer, and is characterized by a decrease of acid-producing parietal cells and the PG-secreting chief cells. Last but not least, AG is per se clinically silent but low acid secretion is also linked with non-neoplastic and “extra-gastric” diseases, even more important than the cancer burden from viewpoints of the public health, and frequent especially in the elder population; these “extra-gastric” conditions are for example risks of malabsorption of vitamin B12 and other micronutrients and the predisposition to enteric infections (e.g. E. coli, Clostridium difficile), being the stomach a natural defense against orale microbes (2-16). The overgrowth of bacteria and fungi in acid-free stomach results also in production of class I carcinogens (e.g. acetaldehyde and nitrosamines) that increase the likelihood of cancer promoting mutations in gastric epithelial cells (17, 18).

The importance of gastric acid in the 21st century, characterized by an evident decrease of peptic ulcer, is especially related to the possibility to detect precancerous conditions that result in a hypochlorhydric or acid-free stomach (19,20) and to the increasing use of proton-pump-inhibitors (PPIs). It could be useful an acid secretion examination prior the PPI medication, to ensure that the patient does not have atrophic gastritis and hypochlorhydric or even achlorhydric stomach (21,22), and to detect people with a higher secretion, who could benefit from antisecretory therapy (23,24). Identification of hyperchlorhydria may have other significant clinical implications, even apart from extreme cases such as the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. For example, some studies reported that individuals with hyperchlorhydria are at high risk of low-dose aspirin-induced gastropathy (25).

Furthermore, in daily clinical practice, a lot of symptoms, mainly aspecific, are claimed to be caused by an acid disorder and then empirically cured. This is the reason why the measurement of acid secretion remains highly relevant to practicing clinicians.

Methods of measuring gastric acid secretion

Aspiration tests

Methods for the measure of gastric acid secretion include invasive and non-invasive tests.

The gold standard for measuring gastric acid secretion remains the invasive method that is aspiration test (26), involving placing a tube (endoscopic or nasogastric tube) in the most lower part of the stomach. The right position of the tube is usually determined radiologically or with recovery test, which is performed administering 100 mL of water aspirated through the gastric tube.

After that, the basal acid output (B.A.O.) is measured using a pump with continuous suction at a subatmospheric pressure of 30 to 50 mmHg or manually by a syringe in 15 minutes periods. Pentagastrin, histamine or tetragastrin are used as stimulation to collect maximal acid output (M.A.O.), which is aspirated for four 15-minute intervals for a total of one hour. After collecting the samples, the volume and titratable acid are measured using alkaline solution and chemical indicators and the amount of acid in each specimen is calculated (27-31).

Gastric acid aspiration test may cause discomfort to the patient, is invasive and time consuming: for these reasons, it’s no longer used in clinical practice, leaving a gap in the diagnostic possibilities: nowadays, considering the high prevalence of acid related diseases, the overuse of PPI (32) and the interest in detecting precancerous conditions such as AG, the absence of a validated tool to measure acid secretion is more evident than ever.

Intragastric pH measurement

A combined pH electrode (usually made of glass or antimony) is positioned transnasally in the gastric corpus and is connected with a recording device. Significant regional variations exist in intragastric pH, also related to post-prandial periods: therefore, it is necessary to check fluoroscopically that the intragastric electrode is maintained in a rather fixed position. This method was developed for esophageal pH studies but gained a popularity for its usefulness in the diagnosis and management of patients with acid-related disorders, in particular for the possibility to evaluate the effect of acid-suppressing drugs. However, this invasive technique gives a measure of intragastric pH and does not offer a quantitative measure of acid secretion.

Non invasive tests

Current interest lies in finding a rapid, reliable and inexpensive non-invasive test (33).

The determination of serum pepsinogen I (sPGI) is regarded as reliable gastric secretory parameter (34-36). sPGI has been reported by a lot of studies and comprehensive and high quality meta-analysis’ as predictive of the histological status of the gastric mucosa (37-44), and has been proposed as marker of gastric atrophy and screening tool for gastric cancer, as recommended by international guidelines (45-46). Pepsinogens are aspartic proteinases from which derivate the active enzyme pepsin after exposure to hydrochloric acid, and they are responsible of initial protein digestion functioning between a pH of 1.5 and 5.0. Pepsinogens can be divided in two groups according to biochemical and immunological differences: pepsinogen I (PGA or PGI, pepsinogens 1-5) and pepsinogen II (PGC or PGII, pepsinogens 6,7). PGI is a product of the chief cells and the mucus neck cells in the fundus area (47-48) and reflects the structural and functional status of the stomach. PGI is stable in the individual but show differences based on some individual factors such as age, weight, gender, ethnicity, diet, and circadian rhythm. Since high levels of this enzyme is present in the serum of duodenal ulcers patients (49-51) and it decreases in AG, it can be used in clinical practice as serum biomarker. In fact, the anatomical site of production of PGI underlies a large number of the studies on the relationship between serum pepsinogen levels and gastric acid secretion. PGI-II levels may change during different pathological conditions involving gastric mucosa and this reflects both functional and morphological status of stomach. If PGI/PGII ratio decreases, it might be an indication for precancerous disease such as atrophic gastritis. The plasma levels of fasting gastrin-17 are also able to give indirectly information of gastric acidity.

A diagnostic panel of biomarker tests, GastroPanel (including PGI, PGII, G17 and H. pylori serology) has been proposed to screen subjects at risk for gastric cancer, but also to evaluate patients with chronic stomach complaints. GastroPanel® provides a method to diagnose whether the stomach mucosa is healthy or not and if the atrophic gastritis is H. pylori positive or not (52).

The serologic profile of these atrophy markers in different combinations can be applied to population screening to detect individuals at risk for precancerous lesions to be further evaluated by endoscopy and biopsy (53). The usefulness of GastroPanel® has been demonstrated (54). A meta-analysis of 27 population-based screening studies (comprising 296,553 subjects) and 15 selected groups (with 4385 subjects) (55), indicated that pepsinogen test had a sensitivity of 77% in detecting GC, with negative predictive values ranging from 99.1 and 99.9%. It concludes that this method is useful in identifying high-risk subjects rather than cancer itself. A meta-analysis done in 2017 on 20 studies with a total of 4241 subjects assessed the performance of serum panel test for diagnosis of atrophic gastritis regardless the site in the stomach. It pointed out that sensitivity was 74.7%, specificity was 95.6% and negative predictive value was 91%.

Conclusions

Invasive and non-invasive tests are able to measure gastric acid secretion. Aspiration test is claimed to be the gold standard, but it’s not currently used in clinical practice. Several studies recommend the measurement of serum PGI as a screening test for achlorydria (31-40), and as suggested in Kyoto (2014) and Maastricht V (2016) guidelines serological PGI levels are the best indicators of gastric atrophy. It is generally accepted that PGI serum levels reflects acid secretion, based on many studies assessing its correlation with histological findings of AG, which represents a hypochlorhydria of acid-free stomach.

The measure of serum PGI levels in gastric cancer screening and clinical practice is able to identify hypoclorhydria to figure out who of the patients are at high cancer risk and in whom the assessment of severe gastric disorders (such as ulcer disease) through the gastroscopy is mandatory. The possibility to evaluate gastric acid secretion levels by simple measurement a serum markers has significant clinical implications in daily practice.

References

  • 1.Di Mario F, Goni E. Gastric acid secretion: Changes during a century. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014;28(6):953–965. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cook GC. Infective gastroenteritis and its relationship to reduced gastric acidity. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1985;111:17–23. doi: 10.3109/00365528509093751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giannella RA, Broitman SA, Zamcheck N. Influence of gastric acidity on bacterial and parasitic enteric infections. A perspective. Ann Intern Med. 1973;78:271–6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sack GH, Jr, Pierce NF, Hennessey KN, Mitra RC, Sack RB, Mazumder DN. Gastric acidity in cholera and noncholera diarrhoea. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;47:31–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martinsen T. C, Bergh K, Waldum H. L. Gastric juice: a barrier against infectious diseases. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. 2005;96(2):94–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cavalcoli F, Zilli A, Conte D, Massironi S. Micronutrient deficiencies in patients with chronic atrophic autoimmune gastritis: A review. World journal of gastroenterology. 2017;23(4):563. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gonçalves C, Oliveira ME, Palha AM, Ferrão A, Morais A, Lopes AI. Autoimmune gastritis presenting as iron deficiency anemia in childhood. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15780–15786. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aditi A, Graham DY. Vitamin C. gastritis, and gastric disease: a historical review and update. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2504–2515. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2203-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ludden J, Flexner J, Wright I. Studies on ascorbic acid deficiency in gastric diseases: Incidence, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Digest Dis. 1941;8:249–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mowat C, McColl KE. Alterations in intragastric nitrite and vitamin C levels during acid inhibitory therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;15:523–537. doi: 10.1053/bega.2000.0196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carmel R. Diagnosis and management of clinical and subclinical cobalamin deficiencies: why controversies persist in the age of sensitive metabolic testing. Biochimie. 2013;95:1047–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rush EC, Katre P, Yajnik CS. Vitamin B12: one carbon metabolism, fetal growth and programming for chronic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:2–7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rébeillé F, Ravanel S, Marquet A, Mendel RR, Webb ME, Smith AG, Warren MJ. Roles of vitamins B5, B8, B9, B12 and molybdenum cofactor at cellular and organismal levels. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:949–962. doi: 10.1039/b703104c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stabler SP. Vitamin B12 deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2041–2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1304350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carmel R. Prevalence of undiagnosed pernicious anemia in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1097–1100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sipponen P, Härkönen M. Hypochlorhydric stomach: a risk condition for calcium malabsorption and osteoporosis? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:133–138. doi: 10.3109/00365520903434117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salaspuro M. Key role of local acetaldehyde in upper GI tract carcinogenesis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Salaspuro M. Acetaldehyde, microbes, and cancer of the digestive tract. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. 2003;40(2):183–208. doi: 10.1080/713609333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.EL-OMAR EMAD M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic gastric acid hyposecretion. Gastroenterology. 1997;113(1):15–24. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70075-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hunt R. H, Camilleri M, Crowe S. E, El-Omar E. M, Fox J. G, Kuipers E. J, Sonnenberg A. The stomach in health and disease. Gut, gutjnl-2014. 2015 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagiwara T, Mukaisho K. I, Nakayama T, Sugihara H, Hattori T. Long-term proton pump inhibitor administration worsens atrophic corpus gastritis and promotes adenocarcinoma development in Mongolian gerbils infected with Helicobacter pylori. Gut. 2011;60(5):624–630. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.207662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fox J. G, Kuipers E. J. Long-term proton pump inhibitor administration, H pylori and gastric cancer: lessons from the gerbil. Gut. 2011;60(5):567–568. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.229286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shiotani Akiko, David Y Graham. “Pathogenesis and therapy of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease”. Medical Clinics. 2002;86(6):1447–1466. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(02)00083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Phan Jennifer, Jihane N Benhammou, Joseph R Pisegna. “Gastric hypersecretory states: investigation and management”. Current treatment options in gastroenterology. 2015;13(4):386–397. doi: 10.1007/s11938-015-0065-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iijima K, et al. “Identification of a high-risk group for low-dose aspirin-induced gastropathy by measuring serum pepsinogen in H. pylori-infected subjects”. Journal of gastroenterology. 2015;50(3):305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0976-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ghosh T, Lewis DI, Axon ATR, Everett SM. Review Article: Methods of Measuring Gastric Acid Secretion. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2011;33(7):768–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hassan M. A, Hobsley M. Positioning of subject and of nasogastric tube during a gastric secretion study. Br Med J. 1970;1(5694):458–460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5694.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kovacs T. O, Walsh J. H. In Clinical Investigation of Gastric Function. Vol. 17. Karger Publishers; 1990. Standard secretory tests: Methodology; p. 2.p. 12. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lawrie JH, Forrest AP. The measurement of gastric acid. Postgrad Med J. 1965;41:408–17. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.41.477.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Findlay JM, Prescott RJ, Sircus W. Comparative evaluation of water recovery test and fluoroscopic screening in positioning a nasogastric tube during gastric secretory studies. Br Med J. 1972;4:458–61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5838.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meeroff JC. The nomenclature of gastric acid output. Dig Dis Sci. 1979;24:87–8. doi: 10.1007/BF01297248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ladd AM, Panagopoulos G, Cohen J, Mar N, Graham R. Potential costs of inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors. Am J Med Sci. 2014;347:446–51. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31829f87d5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Di Mario F, Cavallaro L. G. Non-invasive tests in gastric diseases. Digestive and liver disease. 2008;40(7):523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Iijima K, Koike T, Abe Y, Shimosegawa T. Cutoff serum pepsinogen values for predicting gastric acid secretion status. The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine. 2014;232(4):293–300. doi: 10.1620/tjem.232.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Samloff I.M, Secrist D.M, Passaro E. Jr. A study of the relationship between serum group I pepsinogen levels and gastric acid secretion. Gastroenterology. 1975;69:1196–1200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nakanome C, Akai H, Goto Y. Serum group I pepsinogen levels in patients with peptic ulcer and normal subjects. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1983;139:151–158. doi: 10.1620/tjem.139.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miki K, Ichinose M, Shimizu A, Huang S.C, Oka H, Furihata C, Matsushima T, Takahashi K. Serum pepsinogens as a screening test of extensive chronic gastritis. Gastroenterol. Jpn. 1987;22:133–141. doi: 10.1007/BF02774209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miki K. Gastric cancer screening using the serum pepsinogen test method. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9:245–253. doi: 10.1007/s10120-006-0397-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haruma K, Yoshihara M, Sumii K, Tari A, Watanabe C, Kodoi A, Kajiyama G. Gastric acid secretion, serum pepsinogen I, and serum gastrin in Japanese with gastric hyperplastic polyps or polypoid-type early gastric carcinoma. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1993;28:633–637. doi: 10.3109/00365529309096102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kinoshita Y, Kawanami C, Kishi K, Nakata H, Seino Y, Chiba T. Helicobacter pylori independent chronological change in gastric acid secretion in the Japanese. Gut. 1997;41:452–458. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.4.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pizzi M, Saraggi D, Fassan M, Megraud F, Di Mario F, Rugge M. Secondary prevention of epidemic gastric cancer in the model of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis. Digestive Diseases. 2014;32(3):265–274. doi: 10.1159/000357857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Agréus L, Kuipers E. J, Kupcinskas L, Malfertheiner P, Di Mario F, Leja M, Rugge M. Rationale in diagnosis and screening of atrophic gastritis with stomach-specific plasma biomarkers. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 2012;47(2):136–147. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.645501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sipponen P, Graham DY. Importance of atrophic gastritis in diagnostics and prevention of gastric cancer: Application of plasma biomarkers. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:2–10. doi: 10.1080/00365520600863720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Telaranta-Keerie A, Kara R, Paloheimo L, Härkönen M, Sipponen P. Prevalence of undiagnosed advanced atrophic corpus gastritis in Finland: an observational study among 4256 volunteers without specific complaints. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1036–1041. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.487918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Malfertheiner P, et al. “Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report”. Gut. 2017;66(1):6–30. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sugano Kentaro, et al. “Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis”. Gut. 2015;64(9):1353–1367. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gritti I, Banfi G, Roi GS. Pepsinogens: physiology, pharmacology pathophysiology and exercise. Pharmacol Res. 2000;41:265–81. doi: 10.1006/phrs.1999.0586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Samloff IM. Cellular localization of group I pepsinogens in human gastric mucosa by immunofluorescence. Gastroenterology. 1971;61:185–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vianello F, Plebani M, Piccoli A, Tessaro P, Di Mario F, Naccarato R, Burlina A. Role of serum pepsinogen in detecting ulcer disease. Clinica chimica acta. 1988;172(2):335–339. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(88)90339-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Samloff I. M. Peptic ulcer: the many proteinases of aggression. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(2):586–595. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(89)80054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Del Bianco T, Borgonil R, Del Bianco P, Cedaro P, Vianello F, Danieli G. A, Di Mario F. Peptic ulcer inheritance in patients with elevated serum pepsinogen group A levels and without infection of Helicobacter pylori. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2000;32(1):12–19. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(00)80038-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Iijima K, Abe Y, Kikuchi R, Koike T, Ohara S, Sipponen P, Shimosegawa T. Serum biomarker tests are useful in delineating between patients with gastric atrophy and normal, healthy stomach. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 February 21;15(7):853–859. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rugge M, Genta RM, Di Mario F. Gastric Cancer as Preventable Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Watabe H, Mitsushima T, Yamaji Y, et al. Predicting the development of gastric cancer from combining Helicobacter pylori antibodies and serum pepsinogen status: a prospective endoscopic cohort study. Gut. 2005;54:764–8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.055400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Miki K. Gastric cancer screening by combined assay for serum anti-H. pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen levels-“ABC method”. Proc Jpn Acad SerB Phys Biol Sci. 2011;87:405–14. doi: 10.2183/pjab.87.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis are provided here courtesy of Mattioli 1885

RESOURCES