Abstract
The Skp1-Cullin-1/Cdc53-F-box protein (SCF) ubiquitin ligase plays an important role in various biological processes. In this enzyme complex, a variety of F-box proteins act as receptors that recruit substrates. We have identified a fission yeast gene encoding a novel F-box protein Pof3, which contains, in addition to the F-box, a tetratricopeptide repeat motif in its N terminus and a leucine-rich-repeat motif in the C terminus, two ubiquitous protein–protein interaction domains. Pof3 forms a complex with Skp1 and Pcu1 (fission yeast cullin-1), suggesting that Pof3 functions as an adaptor for specific substrates. In the absence of Pof3, cells exhibit a number of phenotypes reminiscent of genome integrity defects. These include G2 cell cycle delay, hypersensitivity to UV, appearance of lagging chromosomes, and a high rate of chromosome loss. pof3 deletion strains are viable because the DNA damage checkpoint is continuously activated in the mutant, and this leads to G2 cell cycle delay, thereby preventing the mutant from committing lethal mitosis. Pof3 localizes to the nucleus during the cell cycle. Molecular analysis reveals that in this mutant the telomere is substantially shortened and furthermore transcriptional silencing at the telomere is alleviated. The results highlight a role of the SCFPof3 ubiquitin ligase in genome integrity via maintaining chromatin structures.
INTRODUCTION
The ubiquitin-proteasome–dependent proteolysis plays a pivotal role in a variety of systems (Hershko and Ciechanover, 1992; Hochstrasser, 1996). This proteolytic pathway consists of a series of enzymatic reactions involving a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a ubiquitin- conjugating enzyme (E2), and finally a ubiquitin ligase (E3). The E3 ubiquitin ligase is required for determining the timing and specificity of protein degradation. There are a number of E3 species in a single organism such as the HECT domain and RING finger proteins (Freemont, 2000).
A multiprotein complex, the SCF ubiquitin ligase, consists of at least four subunits, Skp1, Cullin-1, the RING finger Rbx1/Roc1/Hrt1 and F-box proteins (SCF stands for underlined components) (Peters, 1998; Zachariae and Nasmyth, 1999; Jackson et al., 2000; Tyers and Jorgensen, 2000). Although the first three subunits are common core components of the SCF, F-box proteins comprise multiple different molecules. The F-box consists of 50 amino acid residues and represents a motif required for Skp1 binding (Bai et al., 1996). It is the F-box protein that plays a major role in substrate recognition in the SCF, and accordingly it is called a substrate-specific receptor (Feldman et al., 1997; Skowyra et al., 1997). In budding yeast 16 F-box proteins are encoded in the genome (Bai et al., 1996; Patton et al., 1998), whereas in metazoans the number exceeds at least 30 (Cenciarelli et al., 1999; Regan-Reiman et al., 1999; Winston et al., 1999). Thus, to understand a cellular role of the SCF ubiquitin ligase as a whole, systematic characterization of individual F-box proteins would be one of the most orthodox routes. In this context, budding yeast and fission yeast are ideal model organisms by which to explore this question, because the entire genome has been sequenced, and both forward and reverse genetics is more amenable compared with other experimental systems.
For successive cell divisions, accurate chromosome segregation is a key event. To achieve an equal partitioning of genetic information, both cis-acting sequence and trans-acting factors play an interdependent role. cis elements include centromeres and telomeres on chromosomes, whereas trans factors comprise structural and regulatory molecules involved in kinetochore and telomere function. The cell is constantly exposed to an antagonistic environment, such as DNA-damaging agent, deprivation of the nucleotide pool, and spindle destruction. To circumvent these harmful conditions, the cell has developed surveillance mechanisms, collectively called checkpoint (Hartwell and Weinert, 1989; Murray, 1995). Failure in checkpoint activation under adverse conditions will lead to uncontrolled cell cycle progression without arrest and repair, resulting in genome ploidy defects (Hartwell et al., 1994; Lengauer et al., 1998). In particular, cancerous cells are often associated with aneuploidy and understanding the underlying mechanisms of accurate chromosome segregation is one of the goals for basic biology (Nasmyth et al., 2000; Hoeijmakers, 2001).
Recent molecular analysis of the telomere has established an essential role for this specialized structure not only in the protection of the end of linear chromosomes and its replication but also in genome integrity in general (Lingner and Cech, 1998; Cooper, 2000). Telomere length, albeit varied from species to species and cell to cell, is tightly regulated with regard to proliferation capacity and cellular senescence. Furthermore, the telomere-proximal regions contain heterochromatin, which displays a specific higher order chromatin structure causing gene expression to be repressed (known as silencing).
Previously, we isolated five independent alleles of temperature-sensitive (ts) skp1 mutants. Phenotypic analysis of these mutants showed that, despite some variations in defective phenotypes, all the mutants showed G2 cell cycle delay (Yamano et al., 2000; Lehmann and Toda, unpublished data). In contrast, mutations in two previously characterized F-box proteins, Pop1 and Pop2, result in polyploid phenotypes, which are attributable to the accumulation of Cdc18 (an S-phase regulator) and Rum1 (an inhibitor of Cdc2) (Kominami and Toda, 1997; Kominami et al., 1998). We, therefore, reasoned that another F-box protein must exist, which is responsible for this G2 cell cycle delay in ts skp1 strains. In this study we have identified a novel F-box protein Pof3 in fission yeast, the mutation of which displays G2 cell cycle delay. We show that Pof3 plays a crucial role in overall genome integrity and is required for the maintenance of telomere length and transcriptional silencing at the telomere.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, Media, Genetic Methods, and Nomenclatures
Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. YPD (2% dextrose, 2% polypeptone, and 1% yeast extract) and YE5S were used as rich media and modified synthetic EMM2 was used as minimal medium. For minichromosome loss assay, rich YE medium lacking additional auxotrophic supplements was used. Standard methods were followed as described (Moreno et al., 1991). Gene disruptions are abbreviated as the gene proceeded by Δ such as Δpof3. Proteins are designated by an uppercase first letter, e.g., Pof3.
Table 1.
Strain list
Strains | Genotype | Derivations |
---|---|---|
HM123 | h−leu1 | Our stock |
TP108-3A | h−leu1ura4 | Our stock |
mik1 | h−leu1ura4mik1∷LEU2 | Paul Nurse |
wee1- 50 | h−leu1ura4wee1-50 | Paul Nurse |
mik1wee1 | h−leu1ura4mik1∷LEU2wee1-50 | Paul Nurse |
rad1- d | h+leu1ura4rad1∷ura4+ | Anthony M. Carr |
rad3- d | h+leu1ura4rad3∷ura4+ | Anthony M. Carr |
rad3ts | h+leu1ura4ura4rad3-ts | Anthony M. Carr |
rad17-d | h−leu1ura4ade6rad17∷ura4+ | Anthony M. Carr |
rad26-d | h−leu1ura4ade6rad26∷ura4+ | Anthony M. Carr |
chk1 | h−leu1ura4ade6chk1∷ura4+ | Anthony M. Carr |
crb2 | h−leu1ura4crb2∷ura4+ | (Saka et al., 1997) |
cds1 | h−leu1ura4cds1∷ura4+ | (Murakami and Okayama, 1995) |
AE148 | h−leu1ura4mad2∷ura4+ | (Kim et al., 1998) |
Δatb2 | h−leu1atb2∷LEU2 | (Adachi et al., 1986) |
CN2 | h−leu1ade6-704Ch10- CN2 | (Niwa et al., 1989) |
1872 | h90leu1ura4-DS/Eade6-210his3-d1 | |
otr1(SphI)∷ade6+ura4+- tel2L | Robin C. Allshire | |
TP487-5C | h−leu1ura4pof3∷ura4+mik1∷LEU2 | This study |
TP487-14B | h−leu1ura4pof3∷ura4+mik1∷LEU2wee1- 50 | This study |
TP492-9B | h−leu1ura4pof3∷ura4+ | This study |
SKP414-17 | h−leu1ura4pcu1+-13myc- kanr | (Osaka et al., 2000) |
SKDP521 | h−/h+leu1/leu1ura4/ura4his7/his7 | |
ade6-210/ade6- 216pof3∷ura4+/+ | This study | |
SKPNX01 | h−leu1ura4pof3∷ura4+wee1-50 | This study |
SKP459 | h−ura4 pof3∷ura4+rad3ts | This study |
SKP465 | h−leu1ura4kanr-nmt81-GFP- pof3+ | This study |
SKP467-13 | h−leu1ura4chk1+-13myc-kanr | This study |
SKP470 | h−leu1ura4pof3∷kanrcut12+-GFP-ura4+ | This study |
SKP471 | h−leu1ura4pof3∷kanr | This study |
SKP472 | h−leu1ura4pof3∷ura4+chk1+-13myc-kanr | This study |
SKP481-1 | h−leu1ura4pof3∷kanrmad2∷ura4+ | This study |
SKP491 | h−leu1ade6-704pof3∷kanrCh10-CN2 | This study |
SKP494 | h90leu1ura4-DS/Eade6-210his3-d1pof3∷kanr | |
otr1(SphI)∷ade6+ura4+-tel2L | This study | |
SKP512 | h−leu1ade6pof3+-13myc-kanr | This study |
SKP513-1B | h−leu1ura4 pof3∷kanrcds1∷ura4+ | This study |
SKP524 | h−leu1ura4cdc25- 22pof3+-13myc-kanr | This study |
SKP525 | h−leu1ura4pof3+-3HA-kanrpcu1+-13myc- kanr | This study |
All the leu1 and ura4 alleles used in this study are leu1-32 and ura4-D18, respectively, unless otherwise stated.
Identification of Schizosaccharomyce pombe Open Reading frames (ORFs) That Encode F-box Proteins
An S. pombe genomic database (Sanger Center, Hixton, United Kingdom) was searched with the F-box sequence taken from Pop1 and Pop2 as a query. In parallel, a homology search with 16 budding yeast F-box proteins as queries was also performed. F-box regions of each candidate were then visually inspected after alignment with the F-box consensus sequence. In this way, in addition to Pop1 and Pop2, 13 novel F-box proteins have been identified from the fission yeast genome (Pof1-Pof13; this study; Katayama, Harrison, and Toda, unpublished data).
Nucleic Acids Preparation and Manipulation
Enzymes were used as recommended by the suppliers (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Nucleotide sequence data reported in this article are in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under accession number AB032411 (pof3+).
Gene Disruption
The pof3+ gene was disrupted using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-generated fragments as described (Bähler et al., 1998). A whole ORF was deleted and replaced with the ura4+ gene in a diploid. At least 20 asci were dissected for each strain. In the case of disruption by the kanr gene, a haploid strain was used directly to disrupt pof3+.
UV Irradiation and Detection of Thymine Dimers
Approximately 109 cells of wild-type or pof3 mutants were collected on filter papers (HAWG025; Millipore, Bedford, MA) and irradiated with UV (100 J/m2, UV Stralinker 1800; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Cells on filters were resuspended in rich liquid medium and aliquots were collected afterward for immunoblotting. Genomic DNA was isolated from each sample, spotted on nitrocellulose paper, and fixed as described (McCready et al., 1993). To detect thymine dimers, monoclonal antibody specific to cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (TDM-2) (Mori et al., 1991) was used. For a loading control, duplicate samples were spotted onto Parafilm (American National Can, Neenah, WI) and stained with ethidium bromide.
Mitotic Chromosome Stability Test
Standard procedure for measurements of nonessential minichromosomes (Ch10-CN2) (Niwa et al., 1989) was followed (Allshire et al., 1995). Briefly cells (500–1000) from Ade+ colonies were plated on YE plates and incubated at 30°C for 4 d. Some plates were further incubated for 2 d at 4°C to allow development of the red color in Ade− colonies. The number of colonies with a red sector covering at least half of the colonies was counted. The number of chromosome loss events per division is the number of these half-sectored colonies divided by the total number of white colonies plus half-sectored colonies.
Chromosomally Integrated Epitope Tagging
The N- and C-terminal epitope tagging of the pof3+ gene was performed with PCR-generated fragments (Bähler et al., 1998). Green fluorescent protein (GFP), triple hemagglutinin (3HA), and 13Myc epitopes were used. Whereas C-terminal tagging with HA and Myc under the natural promoter did not interfere with Pof3 function, GFP tagging at the C terminus was not functional, because strains containing Pof3-GFP showed cell elongation phenotypes like those of gene-deleted mutants. For N-terminal tagging, GFP under the control of the thiamine-repressible weak nmt81 promoter was integrated in-frame in front of the initiator ATG of the genomic pof3+ gene. This strain (nmt81-GFP-pof3+) grew apparently normally irrespective of the presence or absence of thiamine. It appeared that the small amount of GFP-Pof3 protein produced under repressed conditions was sufficient to support normal growth. The chk1+ gene was tagged in its C terminus with 13Myc in wild type and pof3 mutants.
Synchronous Culture
Exponentially growing cdc25-22 mutant carrying the tagged pof3+ gene (pof3+-13myc) was first arrested at 35.5°C for 4 h and 15 min and then shifted back to 26°C. Aliquots were taken every 20 min until 340 min. To monitor synchrony, the percentage of septated cells was counted using Calcofluor to stain the septum.
Live Imaging of GFP-Pof3 and Chromosomal DNA
Exponentially growing cells containing integrated nmt81-GFP-pof3+ were washed with distilled water and resuspended in water. Chromosomal DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/ml) (Chikashige et al., 1994). GFP-Pof3 and chromosomal DNA were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.
Immunochemical Assays
Fission yeast whole cell extracts were prepared using glass beads to disrupt yeast cells in TEG buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 30 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 60 mM β-glycerophosphate, 15 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate, 0.1 mM NaF, 10 μg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 20 μg/ml leupeptin, 50 μg/ml aprotinin, 2 μg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mM Na-orthovanadate). Mouse monoclonal anti- α-tubulin antibody (TAT-1) was provided by Dr. Keith Gull (University of Manchester, Manchester, UK). Mouse monoclonal anti-HA (16B12), anti-Myc (9E10) antibodies, rabbit polyclonal anti-HA (HA.11) and anti-Myc antibodies were purchased from BAbCO (Richmond, CA). Rabbit polyclonal anti-Skp1 antibody was prepared as follows. cDNA containing an entire skp1+ ORF was amplified using fission yeast cDNA library (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) as a template with PCR and cloned into pET-14b (Novagen, Madison, WI). 6His-tagged Skp1 fusion protein was purified by Ni2+-NTA beads (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) as recommended by the supplier. Crude anti- Skp1 serum was affinity purified using the Skp1 fusion protein that was immobilized on nitrocellulose filters. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and a chemiluminescence system (enhanced chemiluminescence; Amersham plc, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) were used to detect bound antibody. For immunoprecipitations, 2 mg of total protein extract was used (Katayama et al., 1999). To detect phosphorylation of Chk1-13Myc by immunoblotting, 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel in which a ratio between acrylamide and bis is 200:1 was used.
Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells were fixed with methanol or formaldehyde and images of GFP, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), or Hoechst 33342 were observed by fluorescence microscopy connected to a chilled video-linked charge-coupled device camera (model C5985; Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Images were processed by use of Adobe Photoshop (version 5.5; Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).
Measurements of Telomere Length
Genomic DNA was prepared from wild type and pof3 mutants, digested with ApaI or EcoRI, run on a 1.2% agarose gel, and blotted onto nitrocellulose filters. Southern hybridization was performed with telomere probes (Sugawara and Szostak, 1986; Hiraoka et al., 1998) as previously described (Cooper et al., 1997). A nonradioisotopic detection system (enhanced chemiluminescence direct nucleic acid labeling system; Amersham plc) was used.
RESULTS
Structure of Pof3 F-box Protein
By searching the fission yeast genome database with the F-box sequence as a query, we have identified 15 ORFs, which encode putative F-box proteins. These include the pop1+ and pop2+ genes, which we had identified previously in an independent study, as those encoding components of the SCF ubiquitin ligase (Kominami and Toda, 1997; Kominami et al., 1998). Besides these two genes, all 13 other ORFs are novel and designated pombe F-box proteins (pof1+ to pof13+; Figure 1, A and B). In addition to the conserved F-box domain, F-box proteins often contain, usually in their C-terminal region, a protein–protein interaction motif, e.g., Pop1 and Pop2 both contain WD- repeat motifs (Kominami and Toda, 1997; Kominami et al., 1998). Domain searching showed that the Pof3 protein is unique in that, besides the F-box, it is composed of two separate protein–protein interaction domains (Figure 1A). One is three repeats of a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif (Goebl and Yanagida, 1991) that locates to the N-terminal region proximal to the F-box (residues 7–108; Figure 1C), whereas the other is eight repeats of a leucine-rich-repeat motif (LRR) (Kobe and Deisenhofer, 1994), which is situated in the C-terminal region (residues 317–569; Figure 1D).
Figure 1.
Structure of the Pof3 F-box protein. (A) Overall structural organization. Schematic comparison of Pof3 and three other F-box proteins (fission yeast Pop1 and Pop2 and budding yeast Fcl1) is depicted. F in squares shows the F-box, whereas three other protein–protein interaction domains are indicated as follows: WD-repeats (ovals), TPR (squares), and LRRs (hexagons). (B and C) Alignment of amino acid sequence of the F-box (B) and TPR (C). Identical amino acids are shown in black squares with open letters, whereas conservative amino acids are shown in dark squares with black letters. Amino acid number and consensus amino acid residues are shown to the left and at the bottom, respectively. (D) Sequence alignment of LRRs. Consensus amino acid residues are boxed, and a repeating unit is shown below with consensus leucine and asparagine residues.
A homology search by using Pof3 as a query against the entire database (DDBJ, EMBL, GenBank, and SWISS-PLOT) showed that budding yeast contains an analogous F-box protein, Fcl1/Dia2 (Figure 1A).
Pof3 Is a Component of SCF Ubiquitin Ligase
The F-box is a binding module for Skp1 (Bai et al., 1996), a universal component of the SCF ubiquitin ligase (Feldman et al., 1997; Skowyra et al., 1997). However, recent analysis has shown that there are F-box proteins that are, despite binding to Skp1, neither components of the SCF nor involved in SCF activity (Kaplan et al., 1997; Galan et al., 2001; Reimann et al., 2001; Seol et al., 2001). To clarify whether Pof3 functions via fission yeast SCF, binding between Pof3 and known components of SCF was examined. For this purpose, strains in which the chromosomal pof3+ gene was tagged with 3HA or 13Myc were constructed (Bähler et al., 1998). Also a double- tagged strain (Pof3–3HA Pcu1-13Myc) was constructed using a tagged Pcu1 strain (Pcu1 is a cullin-1 homolog) (Kominami et al., 1998). Tagging did not interfere with protein function because growth rate of these strains is indistinguishable compared with wild-type cells.
Reciprocal immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-HA and anti-Myc antibodies. Immunoblotting showed that anti-HA coprecipitated Pcu1-13Myc and conversely anti-Myc coprecipitated Pof3-3HA (Figure 2A). We have previously shown that the Pcu1 protein consists of two populations, one is modified by NEDD8 and the other is unmodified (Osaka et al., 2000). Pof3-3HA coprecipitated with two bands of Pcu1-13Myc (lane 3), suggesting that both forms of Pcu1, unmodified and modified by NEDD8, are capable of forming a complex with Pof3. It is of note that in the case of Pop1, only the modified form of Pcu1 forms a complex with Pop1 in vivo (Osaka et al., 2000). To confirm binding of Pof3 to the SCF, immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Skp1 antibody (in this case, a Pof3- 13Myc strain was used) and immunoblotted with anti-Myc antibody. As shown in Figure 2B, Pof3-13Myc forms a complex with Skp1. From these results, we concluded that the novel F-box protein Pof3 is a component of the SCF ubiquitin ligase.
Figure 2.
Complex formation between Pof3 and core components of the SCF ubiquitin ligase. (A) Interaction between Pof3 and cullin-1. Protein extracts were prepared from untagged wild-type (TP108-3A; Table 1, lanes 1 and 4), a singly tagged (SKP414-17, pcu1+- 13myc, lanes 2 and 5), or doubly tagged strain (SKP525, pof3+-3HA pcu1+-13myc, lanes 3 and 6), and immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-HA (lanes 1–3) or with anti-Myc antibody (lanes 4–6). After running on SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting was performed with anti-HA (top) or anti- Myc antibody (bottom). (B) Interaction between Pof3 and Skp1. Protein extracts were prepared from untagged wild-type (lanes 1 and 3) or a Pof3- 13Myc strain (SKP512, lanes 2 and 4), and immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-Skp1 antibody (lanes 3 and 4), followed by immunoblotting with anti-Myc antibody. Total extracts were also run (lanes 1 and 2).
Loss of Pof3 Results in Cell Cycle Delay during G2 Phase
To examine the role of Pof3, gene disruption was performed, in which the complete ORF of one of the pof3+ genes in a diploid cell was deleted. Tetrad dissection of this heterozygous diploid showed that the pof3+ gene was not essential for cell viability, but pof3-deleted haploid cells (Δpof3) grew much slower (the doubling time is ∼180 min at 30°C compared with 130 min for wild- type cells; Figure 3A). Morphological observation showed that pof3- deleted cells exhibited cell elongation, reminiscent of a G2 cell cycle delay (Figure 3B). Average cell length at division was 24 μm at 26°C and division delay was exaggerated when grown at 36°C (36 μm, whereas it was 14 μm in wild-type cells at both temperatures; Table 2).
Figure 3.
Gene disruption of pof3+ results in cell elongation and cell cycle delay. (A) Tetrad analysis of diploid heterozygous for pof3. Three tetrads dissected from heterozygous diploid (SKDP521) are shown. In each tetrad, two normal-sized and two small- sized colonies are formed, of which small colonies are pof3 deleted. (B) Cell morphology of Δpof3 cells. Cells taken from one set of tetrads (A, 1a–d) were grown on rich media plates for 1 d. Bar, 10 μm.
Table 2.
Genetic interaction between pof3 and wee1 and mik1
Strains | Cell
length at division (μm)
|
|
---|---|---|
26°C | 36°C | |
Wild type | 14.0 ± 1.3 | 14.3 ± 1.3 |
mik1∷LEU2 | 13.6 ± 1.5 | 13.7 ± 1.5 |
wee1-50 | 11.1 ± 2.1 | 8.0 ± 1.2 |
wee1-50mik1∷LEU2 | 10.6 ± 1.2 | lethal |
pof3∷ura4+ | 24.2 ± 4.1 | 36.2 ± 10.9 |
pof3∷ura4+mik1∷LEU2 | 23.3 ± 3.6 | 38.9 ± 14.3 |
pof3∷ura4+wee1-50 | 22.1 ± 3.7 | 15.7 ± 2.7 |
pof3∷ura4+wee1- 50mik1∷LEU2 | 14.5 ± 0.8 | lethal |
The length of at least 100 septated cells was measured in each strain.
Next, genetic analysis was performed using various cell cycle mutants to examine the involvement of Pof3 in cell cycle progression. It was found that G2 delay phenotypes of pof3 mutants were independent of Wee1 and Mik1, negative regulators of Cdc2 (Nurse, 1990), mutants of Δpof3wee1-50 (at 26 or 36°C) or Δpof3Δmik1wee1-50 (at 26°C) divided at a size intermediate between each single mutant (Table 2). Also pof3-dependent cell cycle delay was synergistic with cdc25-22 mutants (Katayama and Toda, unpublished data), defective in a phosphatase that positively regulates Cdc2. This result suggested that Pof3 is involved in cell cycle transition from G2 to M phase, and indirectly, positively regulates Cdc2.
pof3 Mutants Activate DNA Damage Checkpoint
We were interested in seeking further for the molecular mechanisms underlying G2 delay phenotypes in the pof3 mutant. One possibility was that in the pof3 mutant, the DNA structure checkpoint, which is operational at the G2/M transition (Carr and Hoekstra, 1995; Russell, 1998), is somehow activated under vegetative growing conditions. To address this question, a series of genetic crosses between Δpof3 and checkpoint mutants were performed. The results are outlined below and also summarized in Table 3. It was found that Δpof3 was lethal in combination with a number of checkpoint mutants, including deletion alleles of rad1+, rad3+, rad17+, and rad26+, which are the initial components of the DNA structure checkpoint (Carr and Hoekstra, 1995; Russell, 1998). To characterize the terminal phenotypes of pof3 mutants in the absence of checkpoint function, Δpof3 was crossed with a temperature-sensitive rad3 strain (rad3ts) (Mundt et al., 1999). In line with previous analysis using rad3-deleted strains, Δpof3rad3ts double mutants were viable at 26°C, but could not form colonies at 36°C (Figure 4A). Liquid culture analysis showed that a Δpof3rad3ts strain lost viability rapidly upon temperature shift-up (Figure 4B). Nuclear staining with DAPI showed that this double mutant lost viability because of “cut” phenotypes, septum formation without nuclear division, characteristic of checkpoint defects (Figure 4C, arrowheads) (Enoch et al., 1992). It should be noted that in a single Δpof3 strain, cells with defects in chromosome segregation were observed (see below; Figure 6, B and C, arrows). From these results, we concluded that in the absence of Pof3 the DNA structure checkpoint is activated.
Table 3.
Synthetic lethal interaction between pof3 and checkpoint mutants
Double mutants | Phenotype |
---|---|
pof3∷ura4+Δrad1 | lethal |
Δrad3 | lethal |
rad3ts | ts |
Δrad17 | lethal |
Δrad26 | lethal |
Δchk1 | lethala |
Δcrb2 | lethal |
Δcds1 | slow growthb |
Δmad2 | viablec |
Small pin colonies were sometimes formed, but these colonies were unable to propagate.
Doubling time of this double mutant at 30°C is approximately 50% longer than a pof3 single mutant.
Colony size is indistinguishable from a Δpof3 single mutant.
Figure 4.
DNA damage checkpoint is activated in the absence of Pof3. (A) Synthetic lethality between Δpof3 and ts rad3 mutants. Cells of wild-type (HM123), rad3ts, Δpof3 (SKP471), or Δpof3rad3ts (SKP459) were streaked on rich media plates and incubated at 36°C for 2 d. (B) Loss of viability in Δpof3rad3ts. Exponentially growing cultures of four strains shown in A (wild type, squares; rad3ts, diamonds; Δpof3, circles; Δpof3rad3ts, triangles) were shifted from 26 to 36°C. Cell number was measured at each time point and viability was examined by plating cells on rich media plates after appropriate dilution. After incubating plates at 26°C, the number of colonies was counted and viability was calculated by dividing the number of viable colonies by the cell number. (C) Checkpoint defective phenotypes of Δpof3rad3ts. Cells of Δpof3 (left) or Δpof3rad3ts (right) grown at 26°C were shifted to 36°C, and incubated for 3 h, and nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI. Arrowheads show cut cells, whereas arrows emphasize cells with defects in chromosome segregation (see text; Figure 6, B and C). Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 6.
High frequency of minichromosome loss and chromosome segregation defects in the absence of Pof3. (A) Loss of minichromosomes. Wild-type (CN2, top) and Δpof3 cells (SKP491, bottom) containing minichromosomes, which had been grown in minimal medium without adenine (selective conditions for minichromosomes), were streaked on rich media plates and incubated at 30°C for 4 d (left). Colonies of adenine auxotroph appeared as red colonies. Quantification of chromosome loss rate is shown on the right-hand side. (B) Chromosome segregation defects. Exponentially growing Δpof3 was stained with Hoechst 33342. Unequally segregated chromosomes are marked with arrows. Wild-type control is shown on the right-hand side. (C) Visualization of lagging chromosome. Live cells of a wild-type or Δpof3 strain containing integrated cut12+-GFP (green; Bridge et al., 1998) are stained with Hoechst 33342 (red) and viewed by fluorescence microscopy to observe chromosomes and the spindle pole body. Bar, 10 μm. (D) Hypersensitivity to thiabendazole (TBZ). Cells of wild-type, Δpof3, or Δatb2 (defective in α2-tubulin; Adachi et al., 1986) strains were spotted onto rich media plates in the absence (left) or presence of thiabendazole (+TBZ, 10 μg/ml, right) as serial dilutions (∼105 cells in the left row and then diluted 10-fold in each subsequent spot rightward) and incubated at 30°C for 3 d.
The DNA structure checkpoint is a bifurcated pathway in which one branch responds to stalled DNA replication, whereas the other responds to DNA damage. To distinguish in which pathway Pof3 is involved, crosses between Δpof3 and Δchk1 or Δcds1 were performed. These two genes encode protein kinases that act downstream of the aforementioned checkpoint Rad proteins. The Chk1 kinase is involved in the DNA damage checkpoint, whereas Cds1 is required for the DNA replication checkpoint (Murakami and Nurse, 2000; Rhind and Russell, 2000). Δpof3 was synthetic lethal with Δchk1, but not with Δcds1, although growth of Δpof3Δcds1 mutants was compromised (Table 3). This result suggested that in the absence of Pof3, the DNA damage checkpoint is activated. This notion was further supported by synthetic lethality between Δpof3 and the Δcrb2/Δrhp9 mutant (Table 3), which is, like Δchk1, involved in the DNA damage checkpoint, but not in the DNA replication checkpoint (Saka et al., 1997; Willson et al., 1997; Esashi and Yanagida, 1999). Therefore, Pof3 plays a crucial role in cellular surveillance mechanism of DNA damage such that in its absence the DNA damage checkpoint is activated, which results in G2 cell cycle delay.
In pof3 Mutants, Chromosomal DNA Is Damaged
Having established that G2 cell cycle delay in the absence of Pof3 is ascribable to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint, we next asked what is the molecular basis of this activation. To explain this phenotype, two scenarios are readily predictable. One is that in pof3 mutants DNA is physically damaged as in the case of UV irradiation, whereas the other possibility is that downstream components are activated without any DNA damage, such as overproduction of the Chk1 kinase (Furnari et al., 1997).
To clarify this point, immunoblotting against DNA was performed with a monoclonal antibody specific to thymine dimers (TDM-2) (Mori et al., 1991). As a control, wild-type and Δpof3 cells were also treated with UV. In wild-type cells, there were no thymine dimers present under exponentially growing conditions (−UV; Figure 5A, top), whereas upon UV irradiation, their formation was easily detected with immunoblotting (+UV). Thymine dimers were sustained for 1 h after irradiation then DNA repair occurred and they almost disappeared after 2 h. In contrast, in pof3 mutants, small but significant amounts of thymine dimers existed in growing cultures (Figure 5A, bottom), suggesting that without adverse treatment, chromosomal DNA of pof3 mutants has already suffered from some sort of DNA damage. It should be noted that, although thymine dimers were formed without treatment, their amount was increased dramatically with UV irradiation like wild type, and more importantly these newly formed dimers were repaired with almost the same kinetics as wild-type cells. As a result, after 4 h a similar amount of residual thymine dimers to that found before irradiation was detectable in the mutant. This indicates that the repair machinery itself is not impaired in the pof3 mutant.
Figure 5.
DNA is damaged in pof3 disruptants. (A) Detection of thymine dimers. Wild-type and Δpof3 cells collected on filter papers were irradiated with UV (100 J/m2) and resuspended in fresh liquid medium at 26°C. Genomic DNA was prepared before and after UV irradiation (up until 4 h) and blotted onto a nitrocellulose filter (top) and also onto parafilm (bottom). The filter was immunoblotted with specific anti-thymine dimer antibody (TDM-2) (Mori et al., 1991), whereas DNA spotted on Parafilm (bottom) was stained with ethidium bromide (ETBr) to ensure equal loading of DNA. (B) Phosphorylation of Chk1. Wild-type (SKP467-13, lanes 2 and 3) and Δpof3 cells (SKP472, lanes 4 and 5) tagged with Chk1- 13Myc were grown exponentially and collected on two nitrocellulose filters. One filter of each strain was irradiated with UV (100 J/m2). After 20-min incubation in rich liquid medium for recovery, protein extracts were prepared from with (lanes 3 and 5) and without irradiation (lanes 2 and 4) and immunoblotting was performed with anti-Myc antibody. Immunoblotting was also performed in extracts from a nontagged wild-type strain (lane 1) as a negative control. Bands corresponding to phosphorylated (top) and nonphosphorylated Chk1 are marked. (C) Hypersensitivity to UV. The three strains indicated (wild-type, squares; Δrad3, diamonds; Δpof3, circles) were plated on rich medium and irradiated with various doses of UV. The number of viable colonies was counted after 4-d incubation at 26°C. Vertical axis (%) is shown logarithmically. (D) Normal responses to DNA damage in Δpof3. The three strains indicated were grown in rich liquid culture in the presence of phleomycin (10 μg/ml) at 26°C for 5 h, and cell morphology was observed. Bar, 10 μm. (E) Normal sensitivity to HU. Cells of wild-type, Δrad3 or Δpof3 were spotted onto rich media plates in the presence (right) or absence (left) of 2 mM HU, as serial dilutions (∼105 cells in the left row in each lane and then diluted 10-fold in the subsequent rightward spots) and incubated at 30°C for 3 d.
It is known that DNA damage induces phosphorylation of the Chk1 kinase, which is detectable as a slower mobility band on SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Walworth and Bernards, 1996). To examine whether Chk1 is already phosphorylated in pof3 mutants without any exogenous damage, the chromosomal chk1+ gene was tagged with 13Myc in wild-type and pof3 backgrounds. Protein extracts were prepared before and after UV irradiation, and immunoblotting performed with anti-Myc antibody. As shown in Figure 5B, it was found that Chk1 is phosphorylated in the pof3 mutant, a slower mobility band was detected in exponentially growing pof3 cells (lane 4), whereas in wild-type cells this form only appeared upon UV irradiation (lane 3). These results established that in the pof3 mutant, chromosomal DNA is damaged constitutively, which induces activation of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway.
If pof3 mutants suffer from DNA damage, they would be expected to be hypersensitive to further damage. This was indeed the case. As shown in Figure 5C, compared with wild type, Δpof3 cells were more sensitive to UV irradiation. This hypersensitivity was not due to checkpoint defects, because pof3 mutant cells showed, like wild-type cells and unlike rad3 mutants, cell elongation upon treatment with phleomycin (Figure 5D). This drug is known to induce single- and double-stranded breaks and leads to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint (Steighner and Povirk, 1990; Belenguer et al., 1995; Wang et al., 1999). On the other hand, pof3 mutants were not hypersensitive to hydroxyurea (HU; Figure 5E), and also the process of DNA replication appeared normal, because a G2 peak appeared in a similar kinetic to wild-type cells when nutrient-derived G1 cells were released into the rich medium (Katayama and Toda, unpublished data). Taking these results together, we propose that Pof3 plays a role in the maintenance of genome integrity and its absence results in DNA damage, including formation of thymine dimers and leads to Chk1 phosphorylation and G2 cell cycle delay even under normal growing conditions.
pof3 Mutants Show High Frequency of Minichromosome Loss with Impaired Chromosome Segregation
Given that Pof3 is required for genome integrity, we now questioned whether Pof3 is involved in chromosome segregation. To this end, we first examined chromosome stability in pof3 mutants. Using a standard minichromosome assay (Niwa et al., 1989), the frequency of minichromosome loss was examined. As shown in Figure 6A, red colonies of adenine auxotroph were readily detectable in pof3 mutants. Quantitative measurement of the rate of loss indicated that pof3 mutants lose minichromosomes at least 500-fold higher at frequency than wild-type cells (Figure 6A, right).
Second, we examined more carefully segregation patterns of endogenous chromosomes by live staining with Hoechst 33342 (Chikashige et al., 1994). Although not extremely frequent, aberrantly segregating chromosomes were evident in some populations of mitotic pof3 mutants (Figure 6B, 20–25% of mitotic cells). To examine their phenomenon in greater detail, a strain, which contained integrated cut12+-GFP (cut12+ encodes an integral component of the spindle pole body) (Bridge et al., 1998), was constructed in a Δpof3 background, and anaphase cells were observed. What we found through this observation was abnormal mitotic cells with lagging chromosome, as shown in Figure 6C, similar to those reported in mutants defective in transcriptional silencing (Ekwall et al., 1995, 1996; Pidoux et al., 2000). Furthermore, consistent with these defective chromosome segregation and chromosome loss phenotypes, pof3 mutants were hypersensitive to microtubule-destabilizing drugs (Figure 6D). Despite these defects, pof3 mutants did not activate the kinetochore-mediated spindle assembly checkpoint, because growth properties of Δpof3Δmad2 double mutants were indistinguishable from Δpof3 single mutants (Table 3). These results showed that Pof3 is required for faithful chromosome segregation and normal progression through anaphase.
Pof3 Localizes to Nucleus Continuously during Cell Cycle
Next, the cellular localization of the Pof3 protein was examined. GFP was tagged in the N terminus under thiamine-repressible weaker nmt81 promoter (Basi et al., 1993; Bähler et al., 1998). This tagged strain grew normally in both the presence and the absence of thiamine. A series of live imaging of GFP-Pof3 costained with Hoechst 33342 are shown in Figure 7A. It was found that GFP-Pof3 localizes to the nucleus during the entire cell cycle. In addition to the chromatin region, Pof3 appeared to localize to nonchromatin region, because at anaphase, GFP signals were observed in not only chromatin regions but also interchromatin regions, the area between two segregating chromosomes (Figure 7A, c and d). The amount of Pof3 appeared to be constant during the cell cycle as shown in Figure 7B. G2-arrest cdc25-22 block and release experiments indicated that Pof3-13Myc levels were not noticeably altered during the cell cycle. Taken together, these results showed that Pof3 is a nuclear protein, which may imply that Pof3 substrates are involved in DNA and chromatin integrity.
Figure 7.
Nuclear localization of Pof3. (A) Pof3 localization during the cell cycle. A strain containing integrated nmt81-GFP-pof3+ (SKP465) was grown in rich liquid medium and stained with Hoechst 33342. Representative images of cells in different cell cycle stages are shown (left, GFP-Pof3; middle, Hoechst 33342; right, merged). Bar, 10 μm. (B) Pof3 levels during the cell cycle. Exponentially growing cdc25-22 mutants containing a tagged Pof3-13Myc (SKP524) was first arrested at 35.5°C for 4 h and 15 min, and shifted down to 26°C. Aliquots were taken every 20 min for immunoblotting and measurement of percentage of septated cells. α-Tubulin levels are used as a loading control.
Pof3 Is Required for Length Maintenance of and Silencing at Telomere
As mentioned previously, the abnormal chromosome segregation phenotypes are similar to those found in a series of mutants defective in the maintenance of chromatin structure (Ekwall et al., 1995, 1996; Ekwall and Partridge, 1999; Pidoux et al., 2000). It was reported that telomere architecture is tightly regulated via a complex genetic network in fission yeast as it is in other eukaryotes (Nakamura et al., 1997; Dahlén et al., 1998; Naito et al., 1998; Matsuura et al., 1999; Baumann and Cech, 2000, 2001; Manolis et al., 2001), and in budding yeast cdc13 mutants, which arrest at G2, are defective in telomere structure (Hartwell and Weinert, 1989). To examine whether Pof3 is involved in the maintenance of telomere integrity, telomere length was examined in this mutant. Southern hybridization analysis with telomere probes showed that telomere sequence is significantly shorter in this mutant (Figure 8, A and B). It should also be pointed out that, probably because of shorter telomeres, hybridization signals in telomere regions were reproducibly weaker in the pof3 mutant (Figure 8B, lane 4).
Figure 8.
Pof3 is required for length maintenance and transcriptional silencing at the telomere. (A) Schematic depiction of the telomeric region of the chromosome. Two of the three chromosomes in fission yeast contain ApaI restriction sites just centromere-proximal to their telomeric repeats, whereas all three chromosomes contain EcoRI restriction sites at ∼1 kb from the ends (Cooper et al., 1997; Matsuura et al., 1999). (B) Shortening of the telomere. Genomic DNA was prepared from exponentially growing wild-type (lanes 1 and 3) or Δpof3 cells (lanes 2 and 4), digested with EcoRI (lanes 1 and 2) or ApaI (lanes 3 and 4), run on a 1.2% agarose gel, transferred onto nylon membranes, and hybridized with specific telomeric sequences as a probe (Cooper et al., 1997; Matsuura et al., 1999). The telomere regions are marked with open rectangles. (C) Loss of silencing at the telomere. Four strains (Ura+ and Ura− control, wild-type, and Δpof3 strains, in which the ura4+ marker gene is integrated in the telomeric region, 1872, and SKP494, respectively) were spotted in a serial dilution on minimal plates lacking uracil (left), rich media plates containing 1 mg/ml FOA, or minimal plates containing uracil.
It is known that, as in other eukaryotes, the fission yeast telomere is one of the heterochromatic DNA regions that shows position effect variegation, i.e., transcription of a gene inserted in this region is repressed (Nimmo et al., 1994). This silencing is functionally linked to telomere structures because a number of mutants with defects in telomere length exhibit desilencing phenotypes (Cooper et al., 1997; Dahlén et al., 1998; Matsuura et al., 1999). We were interested in whether Pof3 also plays a role in silencing at telomeres. A pof3 mutant in which the ura4+ gene is integrated in the telomere vicinity (Nimmo et al., 1994) was constructed, and the uracil requirement of this strain was examined. In contrast to a wild-type strain, which showed uracil auxotrophic phenotypes (Ura−) and simultaneous resistance to 5′-fluoroorotic acid (FOA), pof3 mutants were Ura+ and also sensitive to FOA (Figure 8C). Therefore, the Pof3 F-box protein is required for silencing at the telomere and its length maintenance, in addition to chromosome stability and segregation.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we have shown that a novel F-box protein Pof3 plays an important role in genome integrity such that its absence results in a number of phenotypes, including cell cycle delay ascribable to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint, hypersensitivity to UV irradiation, chromosome instability, chromosome segregation defects, and telomere disfunction. As far as we are concerned, these types of abnormalities in genome integrity have not been described in any SCF mutants previously characterized, and we believe that our work sheds more light on the involvement of SCF-mediated proteolysis in cell proliferation and potentially in carcinogenesis.
Potential Substrates of SCFPof3
F-box proteins have been shown to play a role, as substrate-specific receptors, in the recruitment of substrates to specific sites for ubiquitination. For example, Cdc4 in budding yeast localizes to the nucleus, and this localization is essential for its substrate Far1 to be degraded (Blondel et al., 2000). In this context, the nuclear localization of Pof3 suggests that substrates of SCFPof3 are also nuclear proteins. Recent biochemical analysis shows further that a significant amount of Pof3 is fractionated as chromatin-bound forms (Katayama and Toda, unpublished data). It is possible that SCFPof3 substrates are involved in chromatin architecture, and their accumulation in the pof3 mutant results in some structural alterations in chromatin, including telomere regions, which are detected by the DNA damage checkpoint machinery.
pof3 disruptants show a number of defective phenotypes. Do these defects arise from the accumulation of a single protein or of multiple substrates, each of which results in distinct phenotypes? The activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and telomere disfunction might at least be attributed to a single cause. It is well known that abnormalities in the telomere lead to activation of this checkpoint. For instance, in budding yeast, mutations in a single-stranded, telomeric DNA binding protein, Cdc13, lead to G2 cell cycle arrest, ascribable to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint (Hartwell and Weinert, 1989). Furthermore, it has been shown that mutants defective in silencing at the telomere show chromosome segregation defects and a high frequency of minichromosome loss, like the pof3 disruptant. These include mutations in the ATM/ATR homolog-encoding tel1+ and rad3+ (Matsuura et al., 1999), the chromodomain protein-encoding swi6+, the histone deacetylase- encoding hda1+ and hst4+ (Olsson et al., 1998; Freeman-Cook et al., 1999), and the histone H3 methyltransferase-encoding clr4+ (Bannister et al., 2001; Nakayama et al., 2001a). It is, therefore, possible that the assorted phenotypes of the pof3 mutant might arise from accumulation of a relatively small number of protein species. They could even be caused by accumulation of a single protein.
Accumulation of any inhibitory factors of these telomere/chromatin-associated proteins would lead to inactivation of function, resulting in defective phenotypes similar to those mentioned above. Thus, such inhibitory factors could be potential candidates for substrates for SCFPof3. Despite several efforts to determine proteins in pof3 mutants with altered levels, at present none has been identified. It is intriguing that fission yeast Pof3 and budding yeast Fcl1 appear to play a similar role (Fcl1 stands for F- box/chromosome loss; Tyers, personal communication). It is highly likely that substrates for SCFPof3 and SCFFcl1 are conserved between these two yeast species, as in the case of SCFPop1, Pop2 and SCFCdc4 (Toda et al., 1999).
Lagging Chromosomes
Recent analysis in mammalian tissue culture cells has demonstrated that merotelic kinetochore orientation, which leads to lagging chromosomes, is a major mechanism of aneuploidy. Intriguingly, as in pof3 or other fission yeast mutants mentioned above (clr4+, hst4+, swi6+, etc.) (Pidoux et al., 2000), these lagging chromosomes do not activate the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint, albeit exhibiting mitotic delay (Cimini et al., 2001). Further analysis of the Pof3-dependent proteolysis pathway will enable us to shed light on the molecular mechanisms of this aneuploidy phenomenon.
Conserved Function of SCFPof3 Ubiquitin Ligase
We have identified 15 F-box protein-encoding ORFs in the fission yeast genome, some of which are conserved throughout evolution, whereas others appear to exist only in yeast (budding and fission) or are orphan fission yeast proteins (Katayama, Harrison, and Toda, unpublished data). F-box proteins containing LRR (F/LRR) are ubiquitous among virtually all eukaryotes, and together with the F/WD type, comprise the most abundant form of this protein family (Cenciarelli et al., 1999; Regan- Reiman et al., 1999; Winston et al., 1999). As mentioned previously, budding yeast, if not other eukaryotes, contain Fcl1, a protein structurally and functionally related to Pof3. Although at present proteins containing all three motifs, TPR/F/LRR, have not been identified in organisms other than yeast, given the ubiquitous presence of TPR and LRR motifs, we suspect that this type of F-box protein containing double modules might exist in other organisms.
On the other hand, it should be pointed out that despite the conservation of substrates of the SCF, there is a situation where F-box proteins have become diverged between yeast and vertebrates. For instance, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in yeast, Rum1 in fission yeast, and Sic1 in budding yeast are degraded via Pop1/Pop2 and Cdc4, respectively, which are F/WD type (Patton et al., 1998; Toda et al., 1999), whereas in vertebrates it is Skp2, F/LRR type, which is responsible for SCF-mediated degradation of p27Kip1 (Nakayama et al., 2001b). Thus, it is possible that functional, not structural homologs of Pof3/Fcl1, which play a role in genome integrity, exist in higher eukaryotes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Drs. Robin Allshire, Tony Carr, Fumiko Esashi, Keith Gull, Fuyuki Ishikawa, Tomohiro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Murakami, Osami Niwa, Paul Nurse, Alison Pidoux, and Mitsuhiro Yanagida for strains and plasmids. We thank Drs. Jacqueline Hayles and Frank Uhlmann for critical reading of the manuscript, Mike Tyers and Mathias Peters for information on budding yeast Fcl1 before publication, Robin Allshire and Junko Kanoh for stimulating discussion, and Hiroshi Murakami and Satoko Yamaguchi for instructions in SDS-PAGE for the detection of phospho-Chk1. S.K. was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowships for Research Abroad. This work is supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Human Frontier Science Program Research Grant.
Abbreviations used:
- GFP
green fluorescence protein
- HU
hydroxyurea
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- ts
temperature sensitive
Footnotes
DOI:10.1091/mbc.01–07-0333.
REFERENCES
- Adachi Y, Toda T, Yanagida M. Differential expression of essential and nonessential α- tubulin genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:2168–2178. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.6.2168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allshire RC, Nimmo ER, Ekwall K, Javerzat JP, Cranston G. Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 1995;9:218–233. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.2.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bähler J, Wu J, Longtine MS, Shah NG, McKenzie A, III, Steever AB, Wach A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1998;14:943–951. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<943::AID-YEA292>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai C, Sen P, Hofmann K, Ma L, Goebl M, Harper JW, Elledge SJ. SKP1connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box. Cell. 1996;86:263–274. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF, Miska EA, Thomas JO, Allshire RC, Kouzarides T. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 2001;410:120–124. doi: 10.1038/35065138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basi G, Schmid E, Maundrell K. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1promoter affect transcriptional efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene. 1993;123:131–136. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90552-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumann P, Cech TR. Protection of telomeres by the Ku protein in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:3265–3275. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumann P, Cech TR. Pot1, the putative telomere end-binding protein in fission yeast and humans. Science. 2001;292:1171–1175. doi: 10.1126/science.1060036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belenguer P, Oustrin M-L, Tiraby G, Ducommun B. Effects of phleomycin-induced DNA damage on the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1995;11:225–231. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blondel M, Galan J-M, Chi Y, Lafourcade C, Longaretti C, Deshaies R, Peter M. Nuclear-specific degradation of Far1 is controlled by the localization of the F-box protein Cdc4. EMBO J. 2000;19:6085–6097. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridge AJ, Morphew M, Bartlett R, Hagan IM. The fission yeast SPB component Cut12 links bipolar spindle formation to mitotic control. Genes Dev. 1998;12:927–942. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.7.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carr AM, Hoekstra MF. The cellular responses to DNA damage. Trends Cell Biol. 1995;5:32–40. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)88934-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cenciarelli C, Chiaur DS, Guardavaccaro D, Parks W, Vidal M, Pagano M. Identification of a family of human F-box proteins. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1177–1179. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chikashige Y, Ding D-Q, Funabiki H, Haraguchi T, Mashiko S, Yanagida M, Hiraoka Y. Telomere- led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. Science. 1994;264:270–273. doi: 10.1126/science.8146661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Degrassi F, Salmon ED. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:517–528. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JP. Telomere transitions in yeast: the end of the chromosome as we know it. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000;10:169–177. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00070-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JP, Nimmo ER, Allshire RC, Cech TR. Regulation of telomere length and function by a Myb- domain protein in fission yeast. Nature. 1997;385:744–747. doi: 10.1038/385744a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahlén M, Olsson T, Kanter-Smoler G, Ramne A, Sunnerhagen P. Regulation of telomere length by checkpoint genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:611–621. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.3.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekwall K, Javerzat J-P, Lorentz A, Schmidt H, Cranston G, Allshire R. The chromodomain protein Swi6: a key component at fission yeast centromere. Science. 1995;269:1429–1431. doi: 10.1126/science.7660126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekwall K, Nimmo ER, Javerzat JP, Borgstrom B, Egel R, Cranston G, Allshire R. Mutations in the fission yeast silencing factors clr4+ and rik1+disrupt the localization of the chromo domain protein Swi6p and impair centromere function. J Cell Sci. 1996;109:2637–2648. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.11.2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekwall K, Partridge JF. Fission yeast chromosome analysis: fluorescence in situhybridization (FISH) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) In: Bickmore WA, editor. Chromosome Structural Analysis, a Practical Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 39–57. [Google Scholar]
- Enoch T, Carr AM, Nurse P. Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication. Genes Dev. 1992;6:2035–2046. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esashi F, Yanagida M. Cdc2 phosphorylation of Crb2 is required for reestablishing cell cycle progression after the damage checkpoint. Mol Cell. 1999;4:167–174. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80364-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feldman RMR, Correll CC, Kaplan KB, Deshaies RJ. A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1p. Cell. 1997;91:221–230. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80404-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman-Cook LL, Sherman JM, Brachmann CB, Allshire RC, Boeke JD, Pillus L. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hst4+ gene is a SIR2homologue with silencing and centromeric functions. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:3171–3186. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.10.3171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freemont PS. RING for destruction? Curr Biol. 2000;10:R84–R87. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00287-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furnari B, Rhind N, Russell P. Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Science. 1997;277:1495–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galan JM, Wiederkehr A, Seol JH, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Deshaies RJ, Riezman H, Peter M. Skp1p and the F-box protein Rcy1p form a non-scf complex involved in recycling of the snare Snc1p in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:3105–3117. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3105-3117.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goebl M, Yanagida M. The TPR snap helix: a novel protein repeat motif from mitosis to transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991;16:173–177. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90070-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwell L, Weinert T, Kadyk L, Garvik B. Cell cycle checkpoints, genomic integrity, and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1994;59:259–263. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1994.059.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989;246:629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:761–807. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiraoka Y, Henderson E, Blackburn EH. Not so peculiar: fission yeast telomere repeats. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:126. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hochstrasser M. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu Rev Genet. 1996;30:405–439. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature. 2001;411:366–374. doi: 10.1038/35077232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson PK, Eldridge AG, Freed E, Furstenthal L, Hsu JY, Kaiser BK, Reimann JD. The lore of the RINGs: substrate recognition and catalysis by ubiquitin ligases. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:429–439. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01834-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan KB, Hyman AA, Sorger PK. Regulating the yeast kinetochore by ubiquitin- dependent degradation and Skp1p-mediated phosphorylation. Cell. 1997;91:491–500. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80435-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katayama S, Hirata D, Arellano M, Pérez P, Toda T. Fission yeast α-glucan synthase Mok1 requires the actin cytoskeleton to localize the sites of growth and plays an essential role in cell morphogenesis downstream of protein kinase C function. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:1173–1186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim SH, Lin DP, Matsumoto S, Kitazono A, Matsumoto T. Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science. 1998;279:1045–1047. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5353.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. The leucine-rich repeat: a versatile binding motif. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994;19:415–421. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kominami K, Ochotorena I, Toda T. Two F-box/WD-repeat proteins Pop1 and Pop2 form hetero- and homo-complexes together with cullin-1 in the fission yeast SCF (Skp1-Cullin-1-F-box) ubiquitin ligase. Genes Cells. 1998;3:721–735. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kominami K, Toda T. Fission yeast WD-repeat protein Pop1 regulates genome ploidy through ubiquitin- proteasome-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor Rum1 and the S-phase initiator Cdc18. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1548–1560. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.12.1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998;396:643–649. doi: 10.1038/25292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lingner J, Cech TR. Telomerase and chromosome end maintenance. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998;8:226–232. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manolis KG, Nimmo ER, Hartsuiker E, Carr AM, Jeggo P, A, Allshire RC. Novel functional requirements for non-homologous DNA end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 2001;20:210–221. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.1.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuura A, Naito T, Ishikawa F. Genetic control of telomere integrity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: rad3+ and tel1+ are parts of two regulatory networks independent of the downstream protein kinases chk1+ and cds1+ Genetics. 1999;152:1501–1512. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCready S, Carr AM, Lehmann AR. Repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Microbiol. 1993;10:885–890. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. Molecular genetic analyses of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:773–782. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori T, Nakane M, Hattori T, Matsunaga T, Ihara M, Nikaido O. Simultaneous establishment of monoclonal antibodies specific for either cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer or (6-4) photoproduct from the same mouse immunized with ultraviolet-irradiated DNA. Photochem Photobiol. 1991;54:225–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb02010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mundt KE, Porte J, Murray JE, Brikos C, Christensen PU, Caspari T, Hagan IM, Millar JBA, Simanis V, Hofmann K, Carr AM. The COP9/signalosome complex is conserved in fission yeast and has a role in S phase. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1427–1430. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakami H, Nurse P. DNA replication and damage checkpoints and the fission and budding yeasts. Biochem J. 2000;349:1–12. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3490001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakami H, Okayama H. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature. 1995;374:817–819. doi: 10.1038/374817a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray AW. The genetics of cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Genet. 1995;5:5–11. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naito T, Matsuura A, Ishikawa F. Circular chromosome formation in a fission yeast mutant defective in two ATMhomologues. Nature Genet. 1998;20:203–206. doi: 10.1038/2517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura TM, Morin GB, Chapman KB, Weinrich SL, Andrews WH, Lingner J, Harley CB, Cech TR. Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science. 1997;277:955–959. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama J, Rice JC, Strahl BD, Allis CD, Grewal SI. Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science. 2001a;292:110–113. doi: 10.1126/science.1060118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama KI, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama K. Regulation of the cell cycle at the G1-S transition by proteolysis of cyclin E and p27Kip1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001b;282:853–860. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nasmyth K, Peters J-M, Uhlman F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science. 2000;288:1379–1384. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nimmo ER, Cranston G, Allshire RC. Telomere-associated chromosome breakage in fission yeast results in variegated expression of adjacent genes. EMBO J. 1994;13:3801–3811. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06691.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niwa O, Matsumoto T, Chikashige Y, Yanagida M. Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombeminichromosome deletion derivatives and a functional allocation of their centromere. EMBO J. 1989;8:3045–3052. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08455.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nurse P. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature. 1990;344:503–508. doi: 10.1038/344503a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsson TG, Ekwall K, Allshire RC, Sunnerhagen P, Partridge JF, Richardson WA. Genetic characterization of hda1+, a putative fission yeast histone deacetylase gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:3247–3254. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.13.3247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osaka F, et al. Covalent modifier NEDD8 is essential for SCF ubiquitin-ligase in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2000;19:3475–3484. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patton EE, Willems AR, Tyers M. Combinatorial control in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis: don't Skp the F-box hypothesis. Trends Genet. 1998;14:236–243. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters J-M. SCF and APC: the Yin and Yang of cell cycle regulated proteolysis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:759–768. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pidoux AL, Uzawa S, Perry PE, Cande WZ, Allshire RC. Live analysis of lagging chromosomes during anaphase and their effect on spindle elongation rate in fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:4177–4191. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.23.4177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regan-Reiman JD, Duong QV, Jackson PK. Identification of novel F-box proteins in Xenopus laevis. Curr Biol. 1999;9:R762–R763. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimann JDR, Freed E, Hsu JY, Kramer EH, Peters J-M, Jackson PK. Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc2 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex. Cell. 2001;105:645–655. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00361-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhind N, Russell P. Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:3889–3896. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.22.3889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell P. Checkpoints on the road to mitosis. Trends Biol Sci. 1998;23:399–402. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01291-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saka Y, Esashi F, Matsusaka T, Mochida S, Yanagida M. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev. 1997;11:3387–3400. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seol JH, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Deshaies RJ. Skp1 forms multiple protein complexes, including RAVE, a regulator of V-ATPase assembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:384–391. doi: 10.1038/35070067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skowyra D, Craig KL, Tyers M, Elledge SJ, Harper JW. F-box proteins are receptors that recruit phosphorylated substrates to the SCF ubiquitin- ligase complex. Cell. 1997;91:209–219. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80403-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steighner RJ, Povirk LF. Bleomycin-induced DNA lesions at mutational hot spots: implications for the mechanism of double-strand cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:8350–8835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sugawara N, Szostak JW. Fission yeast telomere sequence. Yeast. 1986;2(suppl):S373. [Google Scholar]
- Toda T, Ochotorena I, Kominami K. Two distinct ubiquitin-proteolysis pathways in the fission yeast cell cycle. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354:1551–1557. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyers M, Jorgensen P. Proteolysis and the cell cycle: with this RING do thee destroy. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000;10:54–64. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S-W, Norbury C, Harris AL, Toda T. Caffeine can override the S-M checkpoint in fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:927–937. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.6.927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willson J, Wilson S, Warr N, Watts FZ. Isolation and characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rhp9gene: a gene required for the DNA damage checkpoint but not the replication checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:2138–2145. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.11.2138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winston JT, Koepp DM, Zhu C, Elledge SJ, Harper JW. A family of mammalian F-box proteins. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1180–1182. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walworth NC, Bernards R. rad- dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 1996;271:353–356. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamano H, Kitamura K, Kominami K, Lehmann A, Katayama S, Hunt T, Toda T. The spike of S phase cyclin Cig2 expression at the G1-S border in fission yeast requires both APC and SCF ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1377–1387. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00135-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zachariae W, Nasmyth K. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2039–2058. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]