Abstract
Hantaan virus (HTNV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) are rodent-borne hantaviruses that are the primary causes of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Europe and Asia. The development of well characterized animal models of HTNV and PUUV infection is critical for the evaluation and the potential licensure of HFRS vaccines and therapeutics. In this study we present three animal models of HTNV infection (hamster, ferret and marmoset), and two animal models of PUUV infection (hamster, ferret). Infection of hamsters with a ~3 times the infectious dose 99% (ID99) of HTNV by the intramuscular and ~1 ID99 of HTNV by the intranasal route leads to a persistent asymptomatic infection, characterized by sporadic viremia and high levels of viral genome in the lung, brain and kidney. In contrast, infection of hamsters with ~2 ID99 of PUUV by the intramuscular or ~1 ID99 of PUUV by the intranasal route leads to seroconversion with no detectable viremia, and a transient detection of viral genome. Infection of ferrets with a high dose of either HTNV or PUUV by the intramuscular route leads to seroconversion and gradual weight loss, though kidney function remained unimpaired and serum viremia and viral dissemination to organs was not detected. In marmosets a 1,000 PFU HTNV intramuscular challenge led to robust seroconversion and neutralizing antibody production. Similarly to the ferret model of HTNV infection, no renal impairment, serum viremia or viral dissemination to organs was detected in marmosets. This is the first report of hantavirus infection in ferrets and marmosets.
Introduction
Hantaviruses are negative-sense RNA viruses transmitted to humans from small animal hosts. Different viral species are associated with one of two disease syndromes: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), or hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) [1]. Hantaan virus (HTNV), primarily found in Asia, is among the most prevalent HFRS-causing hantaviruses with a case fatality rate of between 1–15% [2]. Puumala virus (PUUV) causes most HFRS cases in Europe, though its case fatality rate is lower at <1% [3, 4]. There are currently no FDA licensed vaccines or therapeutics for either HFRS or HPS [5].
The Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) is the typical animal used to model hantavirus infection and disease. Andes virus (ANDV), an HPS-causing hantavirus, causes lethal disease in immunocompetent hamsters [6], while numerous other HPS-causing hantaviruses including Sin Nombre Virus (SNV) and Choclo virus cause lethal disease in hamsters immunosuppressed with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide [7, 8]. In contrast to HPS-causing hantaviruses, exposure of hamsters to HFRS-causing hantaviruses such as HTNV, PUUV, Dobrava (DOBV) and Seoul (SEOV) leads to asymptomatic infection, despite viral dissemination, even when immunosuppressed (Hooper Lab, unpublished data) [8–11]. In these studies hamsters were exposed to high doses of HTNV and PUUV, far exceeding the infectious dose 99% (ID99) for the virus. Development and characterization of a uniformly infective, low-dose challenge model, enhances the hamster model’s usefulness in vaccine and therapeutic testing. In this report we present a low-dose hamster infection model for both HTNV and PUUV infected animals.
Ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) have become a popular animal model for a number of respiratory pathogens including influenza [12], coronavirus [13], Nipah virus [14], and morbillivirus [15], due to the similarity in lung physiology to humans. In addition, they have recently been described as a disease model of two hemorrhagic fever viruses, Bundibugyo virus and Ebola virus [16, 17], supporting viral replication without prior adaptation. Most hantavirus-related human disease occurs by aerosolized transmission of the virus from the excreta or secreta of infected rodents [18, 19], a model of viral infection for which the ferret is well suited. In this study we demonstrate that ferrets are capable of being infected by high titers of HTNV and PUUV, though aside from gradual weight loss infected animals exhibit no clinical symptoms or impaired renal function.
It has been established that infection of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with HFRS-causing hantaviruses (DOBV, SEOV, HTNV, and PUUV) leads to asymptomatic infection and seroconversion [9], while infection of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) with PUUV leads to a mild disease characterized by lethargy, mild proteinuria and hematuria, and kidney pathology, similar to mild HFRS in humans [20]. However, the macaques’ large size and cost limits their usefulness in therapeutic studies, especially when test article availability is limited, as is often the case in passive transfer studies. The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is becoming more popular for infectious disease studies. Its genetic similarity to humans, cost, relative safety, and small size make it an attractive alternative to traditional non-human primate species [21]. Marmosets have been used as a disease model for other viral agents including Dengue virus [22], Hepatitis C virus [23], influenza virus [24], Lassa fever virus [25], orthopox viruses [26–28], Rift Valley Fever virus [29], Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus [30], and filoviruses [31]. In this study we demonstrate that exposure of marmosets to HTNV leads to asymptomatic infection characterized by high levels of neutralizing antibodies. This is the first report of hantavirus infection in marmosets.
Medical countermeasures are products including biologics (e.g., vaccines and antibodies) and small molecule drugs that can be used to prevent or combat infectious disease outbreaks. This study presents three animal models of HTNV infection, and two models of PUUV infection that can be used to evaluate the efficacy of medical countermeasure that are intended to prevent or mitigate infection (e.g., vaccines) by these viruses through induction of sterile immunity.
Materials and methods
Viruses, cells and medium
HTNV strain 76–118 [32], PUUV strain K27 [33], and PUUV strains Beaumont, and Seloignes (gifts of Piet Maes, Leuven, Beligium) were propagated in Vero E6 cells (Vero C1008, ATCC CRL 1586) in T-150 flasks and cEMEM media (Eagle′s minimal essential medium with Earle′s salts (EMEM) containing 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum, 200 μM glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4; and antibiotics [penicillin (100 U/ml), amphotericin B (250 μg/ml), and gentamicin (50 mg/ml)]. Virus was collected from infected-monolayer supernatants. Cell debris was removed by low speed centrifugation (2500 rpm in a table top centrifuge). HTNV and PUUV strain K27 were twice plaque purified according to published methods [6]. Virus stocks were aliquoted and stored at -60°C or colder. Virus identity has been confirmed by sequencing of the stocks.
Ethics
Animal research was conducted under an IACUC approved protocol at USAMRIID (USDA Registration Number 51-F-00211728 & OLAW Assurance Number A3473-01) in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals. The facility where this research was conducted is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, International and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, 2011.
Hamster procedures
Female Syrian hamsters 6–8 wks of age (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) were anesthetized by inhalation of vaporized isoflurane using an IMPAC 6 veterinary anesthesia machine. Once anesthetized, animals were injected with the indicated concentration of virus diluted in PBS. Intramuscular (i.m.) injections (in the caudal thigh) consisted of 0.2 ml delivered with a 1ml syringe with a 25-gauge, 5/8 in needle. Intranasal (i.n.) instillation consisted of 50 μl total volume delivered as 25 μl per nare with a plastic pipette tip. Blood sampling from the vena cava occurred under previously stated methods of anesthesia, and was limited to 7% of a hamster’s total blood volume per week. At time of arrival animals were randomized into experimental groups. Animals were housed in small animal pans, not exceeding four animals to a pan, in a climate and humidity controlled animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL-3) with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Animals had pelleted food and water provided ad libitum. Enrichment in the form of toys, nesting material and supplemental treats was provided. Humane endpoint conditions were established as decreased mobility (inability to obtain food and water) and subdued response to stimulation, and animals were monitored daily during the experiment. As infected animals did not become ill, these criteria were not met and animals were euthanized by terminal blood collection from the heart after administration of Ketamine–acepromazine–xylazine (KAX)(USAMRIID, Fort Detrick MD) and prior to intracardiac injection with pentobarbital sodium (USAMRIID) at the end of the study. Due to lack of illness no pain relief, aside from anesthesia during procedures, was required.
Hamster sample size justification
Groups of 10 hamsters were used to determine the infectious dose 50% (ID50) and 99% (ID99). Numerical simulations using SAS Probit indicate that a minimum of 3 groups spanning infection rates 0–100% with 10 animals per group yield stable estimates of the values with confidence intervals reaching out to 0.7log10 (approximately 5-fold) under monotome assumptions of response profiles for intermediate doses. As our initial selection of dosages did not meet the desired infection rate span, some dosage groups were repeated leading to 20 hamsters per group. In the serial euthanasia study three hamsters per group were used. This is the minimum number required to provide collection of sufficient samples for detection of antibodies and viral kinetics in tissues. For each experiment pre-sera from animals served as negative control.
Ferret procedures
Adult, female neutered and descented ferrets (Marshall Farms, North Rose, NY), were anesthetized by inhalation of vaporized isoflurane using an IMPAC 6 veterinary anesthesia machine, or i.m. injection of Telazol (Zoetis, Parsippany, NJ). Injections (i.m. and i.n.) and blood sampling were conducted under the same condition as hamsters. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections consisted of 1 ml delivered with a 3 mL syringe and a 23-guage needle. Microchips (BMDS, Seaford, DE) were used to identify and ascertain temperature during ferret experiments. In the first ferret challenge study faulty chips lead to inaccurate temperature readings and were only used for identification purposes. Animals were randomized upon receipt into experimental groups. Ferrets were socially housed in metal caging, two to a cage, with sight lines to additional animals in the study, in a climate and humidity controlled ABSL-3 with 12/hour light and dark cycles. Each cage had a nesting box with bedding material, and numerous tubes and shelfs for play. Ferrets had access to pelleted food supplemented with treats and potable water, through an automated watering system. Enrichment in the form of manipulada (tubes, balls, mirrors) and food was provided. Animals were observed daily by trained personnel in addition to general husbandry assessments. Humane euthanasia criteria, defined as both dyspnea, loss of mobility (to obtain food and water) and >20% weight loss. At the end of the experiment, terminal blood samples were collected from the heart after administration of KAX and prior to intracardiac injection with pentobarbital sodium. No pain relief, aside from anesthesia during procedures, was used.
Ferret sample size justification
When disease occurs independently in each of four ferrets with 50% probability, the experiment will have odds about 9:1 in favor of producing at least one diseased ferret. Conversely failure to observe any diseased ferret in a group of four will yield a 95% confidence interval extending from 0–50%. That is, with 95% confidence it will be admitted that the true disease rate may be 50% or less. For this reason groups of four ferrets were used for the experiments. For each experiment pre-sera from animals served as a negative control.
Marmoset procedures
Adult marmosets weighing over 300g were anesthetized by inhalation of vaporized isoflurane using an IMPAC 6 veterinary anesthesia machine. Once anesthetized, animals were injected with the indicated concentration of virus diluted in PBS. I.m. injections (in the caudal thigh) consisted of 0.2 ml delivered with a 1ml syringe with a 25-gauge, 5/8 in needle. Blood sampling from a femoral vein occurred under previously stated methods of anesthesia, and were limited to 7% of each marmoset’s total blood volume per week. At time of euthanasia, terminal blood samples were collected from the heart after anesthetization by i.m. injection of Telazol and prior to intracardiac administration of pentobarbital sodium. Animals were housed in containment as previously described [26]. In brief, animals were singly housed in metal cages meeting current standards in a climate and humidity controlled room. Animals were fed pelleted food supplemented with fruits and treats daily, and were provided potable water through an automatic watering system ad libitum. Enrichment in the form of manipulada (i.e. toys, metal mirrors), foraging devices, treats, and fruit were provided daily. Animals were observed daily by trained personnel in addition to general husbandry assessments. Animals were observed daily by trained personnel in addition to general husbandry assessments. Animals found moribund (defined as labored breathing, decreased food consumption, persistent prostration and moderate unresponsiveness) would be euthanized under humane endpoint criteria, however, as animals did not become ill during the study this criteria was not met. No additional pain relief, aside from anesthesia during procedures, was necessary. All work was performed in an ABSL-3 laboratory.
Marmoset sample size justification
The marmoset study requires a sample size of 3 for adequate power to determine if the incidence of seroconversion is significantly greater than that which would be expected in the population. This sample size will allow the experimenter to detect seroconversion in at least 2 of 3 animals (66%) versus the expected population constant of <1% at a 95% confidence level using a one-tailed binomial test for proportions.
ELISA
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used to detect nucleocapsid protein (N) specific antibodies (N-ELISA) was described previously [34]. Species-specific secondary antibodies were used at the following concentrations: peroxide-labeled anti-hamster (1:10,000) (Sera Care, Gaithersburg, MD), peroxide-labeled anti-ferret (1:5,000) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-monkey (1:1,000) (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO). Assays using peroxide labeled antibodies were developed with TMB microwell peroxidase substrate (Sera Care) at an absorbance of 450 nm; assays using alkaline phosphatase conjugated antibodies were developed with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 405 nm. A sample was considered positive if its peak optical density (OD) value was greater than either 0.025 or the background value (the average of three negative controls + 3 times their standard deviation), whichever was higher. The specific OD sum is the summation of all values greater than background and represents the area under the titer curve.
Plaque Reduction Neutralization test (PRNT)
PRNT assays were performed as previously described with minor modifications [35–37]. HTNV-infected monolayers were fixed 7 days post-infection, while PUUV-infected monolayers were fixed 10 days post infection by 2 mL of 10% formalin per well. Immunostaining was performed as previously described [38]. All sera samples were assayed in duplicate beginning at a 1:20 final dilution. PRNT50 values represent the reciprocal dilution at which the serum neutralizes 50% of the virus.
Isolation of RNA and real time RT-PCR
Approximately 200 mg of organ tissue was homogenized in 1.0 mL of TRIzol (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) reagent using M tubes on the gentleMACS (Miltenyi Biotec,Auburn, CA) dissociation system on the RNA setting. RNA was extracted from TRIzol per manufacturer’s protocol. A Nanodrop 8000 was used to determined RNA concentration, which was then raised to either 100 ng/μL or 1,000 ng/μL in UltraPure distilled water (Thermofisher). Real-time PCR was conducted on a BioRad CFX thermal cycler using either an Invitrogen Power SYBR Green RNA-to-Ct one-step kit (Thermofisher) or Brilliant II QRT-PCR 1 -Step Master Mix (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. For spiked assays the master mix was spiked with either HTNV or PUUV viral RNA prior to addition to the samples. For HTNV, primer sequences were 594F 5'-AAG CAT GAA GGC AGA AGA GAT -3' and 830R 5'-TAG TCC CTG TTT GTT GCA GG-3'. Cycling conditions were 30 min at 48°C, 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C and 45 sec at 60°C. Data acquisition occurs following the annealing step [39]. For PUUV, primer sequences were 181F 5'-AGG CAA CAA ACA GTG TCA GCA-3' and 334R 5'-GCA TTC ACA TCA AGG ACA TTT CCA TA-3' with a FAM-conjugated probe 278 5’ 5'-6-FAM-CTG ACC CGA CTG GGA TTG AAC CTG ATG-BHQ-1-3'. Cycling conditions were 30 min at 48°C, 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C [40].
Cell culture amplification of infectious virus from urine
T-25 flasks of one week old Vero E6 cells were infected with 50 μL of urine plus an additional 450 μL of cEMEM media. After a 1 hr adsorption at 37°C with 5% CO2, the volume was raised to 3.5 mL. On Day 4 post infection supernatant was collected and frozen down, 500 μL of which was used to infected fresh Vero E6 cells at a later time point. After a 1 hr adsorption at 37°C with 5% CO2, the volume was raised to 3.5 mL. On days 7, 11, 14, 17, 21 and 28 1.2 mL of culture supernatant was collected and frozen down. The volume of cEMEM in the flask was raised to 3.5 mL with fresh media.
Plaque assay
Approximately 200 μg of organ tissue were homogenized in 1 mL of cEMEM media using M tubes on the gentleMACS dissociation system on the RNA setting. Plaque assays using urine, sera, or organ homogenate were then performed beginning at the 1:10 dilution as described in [6, 41] with minor modifications. For spiked plaque assays the protocol was identical except for equivalent amounts of virus being spiked into either media alone (control), or the 1:10–1:1,000 dilution of organ homogenate. HTNV-infected monolayers were fixed 7 days post-infection, while PUUV-infected monolayers were fixed 10 days post infection by 2 mL of 10% formalin per well. Immunostaining was performed as previously described [38].
Post mortem procedures
Following euthanasia, necropsies were performed. Samples were collected aseptically for the virology studies described above. For the hamsters and ferrets, samples of the following were collected: heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, brain, and urine. In addition, ferrets had samples of intestine, adrenal gland, pituitary gland, and eye were collected. Samples of the following were collected from the marmosets: heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, intestine, and brain. After the virology samples had been collected, all major internal organs in each animal were also sampled for histology.
Preparation of tissues for histology and immunohistochemistry
Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for ≥21 days. Tissues were then trimmed, processed under vacuum through increasing concentrations of alcohols, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin embedded tissue sections of 5–6 μm were cut and mounted on glass slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and mounted under a glass coverslip for routine histologic evaluation. The paraffin-embedded tissues used for producing the H&E-stained histology slides were also utilized for immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies in the hamsters. Immunolocalization of HTNV in tissues was performed with an immunoperoxidase procedure (horseradish peroxidase EnVision system; Dako) according to the manufacturer’s directions. The primary antibody was an anti-HTNV nucleocapsid rabbit polyclonal antibody diluted 1:3,500 (ferret) or 1:5,000 (hamster) (BEI Resources, Manassas, VA). After deparaffinization and peroxidase blocking, tissue sections were pretreated with proteinase K for 6 min at room temperature, rinsed, and then covered with primary antibody and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. They were rinsed, and then the peroxidase-labeled polymer (secondary antibody) was applied for 30 min. Slides were rinsed, and a substrate-chromogen solution (3,3’-diaminobenzidine; Dako, Santa Clara, CA) was applied for 5 min. The substrate-chromogen solution was rinsed off the slides, and the slides were stained with hematoxylin and rinsed. The sections were dehydrated and cleared with xyless, and then a coverslip was placed.
Immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide (Cyp)
On the indicated days, anesthetized ferrets were injected i.p. with water soluble Cyp (Baxter Health Care Corporation, Deerfield, IL) with the indicated dosages per body weight of drug diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4. In the first experiment ferrets were administered a loading dose of 30 mg/kg on Day 41 post infection, with maintenance doses of 30 mg/kg administered every other day until euthanasia. In the second experiment, ferrets were administered a loading dose of 30 mg/kg on Day -1, and a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 1, 3, 11, and 13. Administration of Cyp was discontinued between days 3 and 11 due to secondary infection. To combat the infection (rapid onset of fever and weight loss), ferrets were treated with 5mg/kg i.m. enrofloxicin(Norbrook Laboratories, Overland Park, KS) twice daily per veterinarian instructions starting on Day 4. Beginning on Day 11 with the resumption of immunosuppression ferrets were treated prophylactically with 10 mg/kg i.m. enrofloxicin once daily).
Hematology
Blood samples of 0.5 mL were collected in lithium heparin capillary blood collection tubes and analyzed using an Advia 120 hematology analyzer (Software version 3.1.8.0-MS). Per manufacturer’s recommendation, the dog setting was used for the complete blood count (CBC) and the guinea pig setting was used for the white blood cell differential (WBC) in hamsters. For ferrets, the dog setting was used for both the CBC and WBC.
Pseudovirion neutralization assay (PsVNA)
The PsVNA used to detect neutralizing antibodies in sera was described previously [42, 43]. This is a replication-restricted, recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV*ΔG) expressing luciferase, which is pseudotyped with the Hantaan glycoprotein. First, heat-inactivated sera was diluted 1:10, followed by five-fold serial dilutions that were mixed with an equal volume of Eagle′s minimum essential medium with Earle′s salts and 10% fetal bovine sera containing 4000 fluorescent focus units of Hantaan pseudovirions. This mixture was incubated overnight at 4°C. Following this incubation, 50 μl was inoculated onto Vero cell monolayers in a clear bottom, black-walled 96-well plate in duplicate. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18–24 hr. The media was discarded and cells were lysed according to the luciferase kit protocol (Promega, Madison, WI). A Tecan M200 Pro was used to acquire luciferase data. The values were graphed using GraphPad Prism (version 7) and used to calculate the percent neutralization normalized to cells alone and pseudovirions alone as the minimum and maximum signals, respectively. The percent neutralization values for duplicate serial dilutions were plotted. Fifty percent PsVNA (PsVNA50) titers were interpolated from 4-parameter curves, and geometric mean titers were calculated.
Blood chemistry
Blood was collected in serum separator tube, and spun at 500x g to isolate sera. Ferret sera was analyzed on the Piccolo comprehensive metabolic panel, and marmoset sera was analyzed on the Piccolo general chemistry 13 panel per manufacturer’s instructions (Abaxis Global Diagnostics, Union City, CA).
Urinalysis
Urine was expressed from anesthetized ferrets and analyzed by urinalysis regent strips (VWR, Radnor, PA).
Statistical analysis
A Bayesian probit model was used to estimate 95% highest posterior density intervals for a 50% and 95% infectious dose calculation. Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare white blood cell levels pre- and post-Cyp administration. P-values of <0.05 were considered significant. Standard deviation of data was assessed to ensure data was normally distributed prior to use of Student’s t-test. Analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (version 7); Bayesian analyses were performed using SAS.
Results
Calculation of ID50 and ID99 for hamster model of HTNV and PUUV infection
We have previously demonstrated that Syrian hamsters are capable of being infected by HFRS-causing hantaviruses, but they do not develop any signs of clinical disease [9]. To develop standard models of HTNV and PUUV infection for future evaluation of vaccines and medical countermeasures, groups of between 10 and 20 hamsters were exposed to serial ten-fold dilutions of either HTNV or PUUV by either the i.m. or i.n. route (from 2–20,000 PFU HTNV or 0.2–20,000 PFU PUUV). Between 28–35 days post infection, hamsters were terminally bled with infection status monitored by N-ELISA titers (Fig 1). From these data the doses required to infect 50% (ID50) and 99% (ID99) were calculated (Table 1).
Table 1. ID50 and ID99 for HTNV and PUUV.
Virus | Infection Route | ID50 | ID99 |
---|---|---|---|
HTNV | i.m. | 1.5 | 3.4 |
i.n. | 17.7 | 346 | |
PUUV | i.m. | 6.0 | 832 |
i.n. | 30.7 | 637 |
Refinement of low-dose HTNV and PUUV infection hamster models
To further characterize a low-dose standard hamster infection model for HFRS-causing hantaviruses a hamster serial sacrifice study was performed. Hamsters were challenged with either 10 PFU (~3 ID99) HTNV i.m., 500 PFU (~1.5 ID99) HTNV i.n., 1,000 PFU (~1 ID99) PUUV i.m., or 1,000 PFU (~1.5 ID99) PUUV i.n. On various days post infection, groups of three hamsters were euthanized to monitor viral and serological parameters.
Seroconversion occurred, at least partially, by Day 17 post HTNV infection and Day 24 post PUUV infection. Seroconversion on Day 28 post HTNV i.m. infection was incomplete, though viral genome was recovered from all hamsters euthanized that day indicating a productive HTNV infection occurred (Fig 2). To confirm seroconversion, all hamsters euthanized on days 17, 24, and 28 were assayed for neutralizing antibodies by PRNT regardless of N-ELISA seroconversion status. All HTNV infected hamsters with N-ELISA titers had neutralizing antibodies as measured by PRNT50, with all but one having full neutralization of virus at a 1:20 dilution of sera. (S1A and S1B Fig). Similarly, all PUUV hamsters with N-ELISA titers had neutralizing antibodies as measured by PRNT50, though three of the five PUUV i.n. challenged hamsters did not have complete neutralization of the virus at a 1:20 dilution of sera (S1C and S1D Fig). Two of three PUUV i.m. challenged hamsters that had not seroconverted on Day 17 post infection had low levels of neutralizing antibodies, while none of the PUUV i.n. challenged hamsters that were seronegative by N-ELISA had neutralizing antibodies. For both HTNV and PUUV infected hamsters, infection via the i.m. route lead to a more robust neutralizing antibody response than then i.n.route.
The kinetics of HTNV and PUUV infection in the heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, and brain were monitored by both RT-PCR and plaque assay (Figs 3 and 4). HTNV infected by either the i.m. or i.n. route resulted in a persistent infection. High levels of viral genome were detected in the heart, lung, kidney and brain of HTNV infected hamsters beginning on either Day 11 or 17 post infection (Fig 3A, 3B, 3E and 3F). Infection of the kidney and brain was found in all examined hamsters beginning on either Day 17 or 24 post infection, while the high titers of viral genome detected in the heart and lung were present in only one or two hamsters at each time point. Low levels of viral genome were detected between days 11 and 24 post infection in the liver of HTNV i.m. but not i.n. infected hamsters (Fig 3C). Hardly any viral genome was detected in the spleen (Fig 3D). To confirm the lack of viral genome in the spleen was not due to the presence of inhibitors all spleen samples from i.m. and i.n. infected hamsters were spiked with HTNV prior to RT-PCR. No significant inhibition of the spiked RNA was noted, indicating that HTNV infection does not result in virus dissemination to the spleen (S2A and S2B Fig).
The detection of PUUV in organs was transient after i.m. infection, occurring between Day 11–17 for the heart, liver, kidney and brain, with no virus detected in the spleen (Fig 3A, 3C, 3E and 3F). Viral genome was more persistent in the lung where it was detected in at least one of three hamsters on/after Day 11 post infection (Fig 3B). A small amount of viral genome detected in the brain of a PUUV i.n. infected hamster, 28 days post challenge, is the only viral genome detected in any organ at any time point post PUUV i.n. infection (Fig 3F).
Serum viremia was detected in hamsters challenged with HTNV i.m. between 11 and 28 days post infection, though the presence of virus was sporadic except for Day 24. Serum viremia was only detected in two hamsters challenged with HTNV i.n., one on Day 11 and one on Day 17. No serum viremia was detected in hamsters challenged with PUUV by either route (Fig 3G). Similarly, the presence of viral genome was sporadically detected in the urine of HTNV infected hamsters between days 17–28, but was not detected in PUUV challenged hamsters (Fig 3H).
In HTNV i.m. infected hamsters, infectious virus was first detected in the liver beginning at Day 11, and in the lung, liver, spleen, and kidney at Day 17 post infection (Fig 4B, 4C, 4D and 4E). With the exception of the kidney, in which infectious virus was recovered from every hamster after 17 days post infection, infectious virus was recovered from the lung, liver, brain and spleen in only a portion of hamsters at each time point. No infectious virus was detected in the heart at any time point (Fig 4A). Virus recovery from HTNV i.n. infected hamsters was markedly lower, with infectious virus being detected only in the kidney on Day17 and 28 post infection (Fig 4E). No infectious virus was recovered from the organ of any PUUV infected hamster (Fig 4).
To confirm that the lack of infectious virus in the spleen was not due to the presence of inhibitors select samples were spiked with HTNV virus prior to a plaque assay. No significant inhibition of the spiked RNA was noted, confirming the RT-PCR results that that HTNV infection does not result in viral dissemination to the spleen (S2C and S2D Fig).
No infectious virus was detected in the urine for any hamster tested, even those that were RT-PCR positive for HTNV viral genome. In human ANDV infected patients with ANDV antigen positive urine, samples had to be cultured in Vero E6 cells for between 16–22 days post infection before infectious virus was detected [44]. Three HTNV RT-PCR positive and three HTNV RT-PCR negative urine samples were cultured in Vero E6 cells, with supernatant collected on various days post infection for evaluation by RT-PCR (S3A Fig). All samples were HTNV RT-PCR negative for virus in the supernatant of infected cells at Day 4 post infection, the first time point examined. All three RT-PCR positive urine samples yielded infectious virus (two on Day 15, one on Day 32), while two of the RT-PCR negative urine samples also yielded infectious virus (on Day 18) (S3B Fig) as measured by the conversion of cell supernatant to HTNV RT-PCR positive. All samples were evaluated by plaque assay on Day 32 post infection. These findings were confirmed, all samples whose cell supernatant became RT-PCR positive post infection were positive for infectious virus by plaque assay. The one sample whose cell supernatant did not convert to RT-PCR positive, remained negative for infectious virus by plaque assay (S3C Fig).
Patients infected with HFRS hantaviruses exhibit leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia during infection [45, 46]. At every time point post infection, EDTA-treated whole blood from HTNV and PUUV exposed hamsters was evaluated to determine if changes in white blood cell count or platelets occurred. No changes were observed (S4 Fig).
To further characterize disease, tissue sections from HTNV i.m. infected hamsters were analyzed by IHC and H&E to assess viral localization and any pathologic changes (S5 Fig). No significant histopathological findings were noted in the kidney or brain. Splenic follicular lymphoid hyperplasia and hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis in the liver were each noted in three hamsters. Both are seen in animals from later time points in the study (days 17–28) and likely represent a reaction to HTNV infection, though other unidentified antigenic stimuli cannot be ruled out. Five hamsters between days 4 and 17 post infection exhibited a minimal to mild inflammation of the pericardium, characterized by a mixed lymphoplasmacytic histiocytic and neutrophilic infiltrate. Occasional macrophages in the inflammatory infiltrate within the pericardium are immunopositive suggesting a possible association with HTNV; however, no evidence of cardiac tissue injury is associated with the presence of HTNV antigen. Beginning on Day 4 post infection 66% (12/18) hamsters exhibit minimal (likely subclinical) respiratory lesions consisting of interstitial neutrophilic and histiocytic infiltrates in the lungs, with 44% (8/18) also exhibiting minimal amounts of alveolar edema. An additional hamster had minimal alveolar edema but not pulmonary infiltrates. Such findings suggest a response to antigenic stimulus and the presence of immunopositive endothelial cells, pneumocytes and alveolar macrophages suggest a response to HTNV infection.
Immunohistochemistry staining was uniformly negative in all tissues on Day 1 post challenge. Between Day 4 and 11 post challenge minimal antigen was sporadically detected in macrophages, pneumocytes and endothelial cells. By Day 17 post challenge mild to moderate levels of antigen were observed in endothelial cells and choroid ependymal cells in the brain, in endothelial cells, macrophages and pneumocytes in the lung, and endothelial cells in the kidney. Minimal to mild levels of immunopositivity were found in endothelial cells and macrophages in the heart, and in endothelial cells, hepatocytes and Kupffer cells in the liver. Surprisingly, given the lack of viral genome and infectious virus recovered, mild to moderate amounts of immunopositive macrophages, lymphocytes and endothelial cells were found in the spleen (Table 2, S5 Fig).
Table 2. Pathology scores for HTNV IM infected hamsters.
Day | Hamster # | Brain | Heart | Lung | Liver | Spleen | Kidney |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Pre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Pre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1 | 801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
803 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
4 | 804 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
805 | 0 | 1+/m | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
806 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
7 | 807 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1+/m | 0 |
808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
809 | 1+/e | 0 | 0 | 1+/e | 0 | 0 | |
11 | 810 | 2+/e | 0 | 2+/e,p | 0 | 1+/m | 2+/e |
811 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
812 | 1+/e | 1+/m | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
17 | 813 | 3+/e | 0 | 2+/e,p | 2+/e,h | 2+/m | 2+/e |
814 | 2+/e | 0 | 4+/e,p | 1+/h,k | 2+/m | 2+/e | |
815 | 2+/e | 1+/e | 3+/e,p | 2+/e,k | 1+/m | 2+/e | |
24 | 816 | 2+/e | 1+/e | 3+/e,p | 1+/k | 2+/m | 2+/e |
817 | 2+/e,c | 1+/e | 2+/e,m,p | 1+/e,h | 3+/m,l | 2+/e | |
818 | 3+/c,e | 1+/e | 3+/e,m,p | 1+/e,k | 3+/m,l | 3+/e | |
28 | 819 | 3+/c,e | 0 | 3+/e,m,p | 1+/k | 1+/e | 2+/e |
820 | 3+/c,e | 0 | 3+/e,m,p | 1+/e,k | 0 | 3+/e | |
821 | 2+/e,c | 1+/e | 3+/e,m,p | 1+/e,h,k | 2+/m | 3+/e |
0: no cells in section are immunopositive (negative); 1+: < 10% of cells in section are immunopositive (minimal); 2+: 11–25% of cells in section are immunopositive (mild); 3+: 26–50% of cells in section are immunopositive (moderate); 4+: 50–75% of cells in section are immunopositive (marked); 5+: >75% of cells in section are positive (severe). e = endothelial cell, c = choroid ependymal cell, m = macrophage, h = hepatocyte, k = Kupffer cell, l = lymphocyte, p = pneumocyte.
Ferret model of HTNV and PUUV infection
No published studies detail if ferrets are susceptible to hantavirus infection. To examine this, four ferrets were exposed to either 2,000 PFU HTNV or PUUV K27 i.n. No seroconversion occurred within 35 days post infection. The same animals were re-exposed to either 200,000 PFU HTNV, 94,000 PFU PUUV Beaumont (a human PUUV isolate) or 164,000 PFU PUUV Seloignes (a vole PUUV isolate) by i.m. Prior to the re-exposure one of the seronegative ferrets in the HTNV group was removed for health concerns (rapid weight loss) unrelated to the study, and it’s cage mate was subsequently removed for behavioral health reasons before the completion of the study. Data from those two ferrets are not shown. As soon as three days post infection ferrets began to lose weight with HTNV infected ferrets losing between 5–12% of peak body weight as did PUUV infected ferrets (Fig 5A–5C). By Day 35 post infection all animals had developed antibodies against all strains of the virus as measured by N-ELISA assay (Fig 5D–5F). Neutralizing antibody development began as early as Day 14 post infection and all ferrets developed neutralizing antibodies by Day 28 post infection (Fig 5G–5L). EDTA treated blood was analyzed weekly for evidence of leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia; none was observed (S6 Fig) nor was serum viremia detected by RT-PCR (S7A Fig).
Syrian hamsters infected with SNV do not develop lethal disease, unless immunosuppressed [6, 7]. On Day 42 post infection infected ferrets were administered 30 mg/kg Cyp. Within two days post administration the total white blood cell, lymphocyte and neutrophil count had decreased significantly (S8 Fig), and was almost zero seven days post administration. The immunosuppressed ferrets rapidly lost weight, became lethargic, with occasional vomiting and diarrhea. Animals were euthanized between 3 and 7 days post administration of Cyp having met humane endpoint criteria.
The organs of infected ferrets were analyzed for viral load by RT-PCR and for the presence of infectious virus by plaque assay. The lung, liver, spleen, intestine and urine of HTNV infected ferrets were negative for viral genome, with small amounts (<2 log10) detected in the heart and spleen of a single animal (S7B Fig). The heart, lung, kidney, intestine and urine of PUUV infected ferrets were negative for viral genome, though small amounts were detected in the liver (2/4) and spleen (1/4) of PUUV infected ferrets (S7C and S7D Fig). Viral genome was spiked into the assay to confirm that the lack of signal was not due to the presence of inhibitors. All organs except for the intestine (4/6) had no inhibition of RT-PCR product. Similarly, no infectious virus was found in the organ of any ferret by plaque assay, despite spiked-in virus exhibiting no significant inhibition (S9 Fig).
To confirm that immunosuppression of uninfected ferrets did not result in rapid weight loss, four healthy ferrets were immunosuppressed with a loading dose of 30 mg/kg Cyp followed by 10 mg/kg Cyp maintenance doses every other day (S10A Fig). Five days post immunosuppression ferrets exhibited rapid weight loss, fever, and lethargy due to secondary infection (S10B & S10C Fig). Immunosupression was discontinued and 5 mg/kg enrofloxicin (a broad spectrum antibiotic) was given twice daily for a week. During this time, ferrets began to gain weight and their fever diminished. On Day 11 immunosupression resumed for two doses with prophylactic enrofloxicin given once daily. Even with prophylactic antibiotics two ferrets spiked fevers within a few days post the second round of immunosuppressive treatment, though they did not lose weight (S10B & S10C Fig). Based on these results the rapid weight loss and clinical signs observed upon immunosuppression of HTNV and PUUV infected ferrets was most likely due to secondary infection. Due to the inability to completely manage secondary infection with prophylactic antibiotic treatment, no further immunosuppression studies were carried out in ferrets.
To refine the HFRS-causing hantavirus ferret infection model four ferrets were challenged with 94,000 PFU PUUV Beaumont i.m. on Day 0. Weight and temperature were recorded daily, while twice weekly blood draws and urine collection was used to monitor kidney function. As with the pilot experiment, ferrets slowly lost between 7–11% of peak body weight, recapitulating our previous findings (Fig 6A). No elevated temperatures were observed (Fig 6B). Ferrets developed a robust antibody response beginning on Day 10 post infection (Fig 6C and 6D). Neutralizing antibodies developed early as Day 14 post infection, and were present in all ferrets by Day 28 post infection, as measured by PsVNA and PRNT (Fig 6E and 6F).
Despite the slow weight loss no signs of renal impairment were observed. Proteinuria and hematuria are hallmarks of PUUV infection occurring in between 94–100% (proteinuria) and 58–85% (hematuria) of human clinical cases [46]. No prolonged proteinuria or hematuria was observed (Fig 7A and 7B) in infected ferrets. Similarly, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels in the sera, both of which are elevated due to kidney failure in PUUV patients [47] remained unchanged in PUUV infected ferrets (Fig 7C and 7D) [48, 49]. No infectious virus or viral genome was detected in the brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, intestine, or eye (S11 and S12 Figs). No changes in other serologic or urologic parameters were noted (S13 and S14 Figs).
No gross pathological changes or significant lesions associated with PUUV infection were noted in the ferrets (S15 Fig). In the lungs, one ferret had mild neutrophilic and histiocytic inflammation centered on the bronchioles and expanded alveolar septa. Given that the inflammation was centered around bronchioles and not the vasculature, it is unlikely to be in response to PUUV infection. A number of other common or age-associated lesions were observed in the ferrets. Two of four ferrets had proliferative cortical cells in either the adrenal capsule or adrenal cortex that were likely clinically silent as they lack clinical signs consistent with adrenal–associated endocrinopathy. Additionally, alveolar mineralization was noted in all four ferrets as was eosinophilic and lymphoplasmacytic enteritis, and hepatitis. Two ferrets had fibromyxomatous degeneration of the atrioventricular valve. The spleen, brain, kidney, and pituitary gland were normal in all ferrets examined.
Marmoset model of HTNV infection
As with ferrets, there is no literature on the susceptibility of marmosets to hantavirus infection. To test this, three male marmosets were exposed to 1,000 PFU HTNV i.m. Blood was collected weekly to measure seroconversion, serum viremia, as well as serum parameters relating to renal function. All three animals seroconverted by Day 21 post infection (Fig 8A and 8B) despite displaying no clinical signs of illness. Neutralizing antibody production began around the same time, and was robust by Day 30 post infection (14,866–221,557 by PsVNA50 and 10,240–20,480 by PRNT50) (Fig 8C and 8D). Due to low volumes of blood drawn at each time point serum viremia could not be examined for each individual animal, however a pool of sera from all three animals was evaluated at each time point post infection. Low levels of serum viremia were detected between days 14 and 28 post infection by RT-PCR (Fig 8G). As with the ferret infection model of HFRS-causing hantavirus, no renal injury as measured by changes noted in blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine were observed over the course of infection, nor were changes in any of the other serum parameters monitored (S16 Fig).
Animals were euthanized on Day 30 post infection to examine organs for viral dissemination. No infectious virus or viral genome was detected in the heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, intestine or brain (S17 and S18 Figs). Lymphoid hyperplasia was noted in all three animals by histology, though the location and intensity varied between the spleen, various lymph nodes and gut associated lymphoid tissue. Such hyperplasia is indicative of a response to antigenic stimulation and was most likely caused by the viral challenge. Mild to moderate congestion was also seen in the lungs of each marmoset; however, this was an acute change and was most likely associated with terminal anesthesia and euthanasia. No other significant histological lesions were noted in any of the three animals (S19 Fig). Due to the negative virology results and the lack of significant histologic changes, IHC to detect the presence of HTNV antigen in tissues was not performed.
Discussion
To date, the use of adult animal models to evaluate anti-HTNV and anti-PUUV medical counter measures has been limited. Recombinant protein, vaccinia virus-vectored, and DNA vaccines have been tested in the high dose HTNV hamster model [9, 37, 50]. Additionally, the ability of passively administered neutralizing antibodies has been evaluated in the high-dose hamster model of HTNV and PUUV and in PUUV challenged cynomolgus macaques PUUV [50, 51]. Both of these models have limitations; the size of the macaque requires large quantities of passive transfer material, and the high dose of the hamster model, with challenge doses of ~650 ID99, could require prohibitively large volumes of test article to neutralize the high initial dose. Suckling mice, which present with a disseminated disease not reminiscent of HFRS, have been used to evaluate HTNV therapeutics as well [52–55]. In this paper we present three adult animal models of HFRS-causing hantavirus infection than can be used for future evaluation of therapeutics, biologics and vaccines.
Low-dose hamster model of HFRS-hantavirus infection
The ID50’s for HTNV and PUUV determined in this report are similar to the lethal dose 50% (LD50) calculated for SNV and ANDV, <3 PFU via the i.m. route [6, 7, 41]. Also similar is that the challenge dose of ANDV required to infect/kill 50% of hamsters by the i.n. or intragastric route is ~10–30 fold higher [56]. Previous reports also demonstrate that PUUV is capable of infecting hamsters by the intragastric route, with an ID50 of >10,000, making it a much less effective route of infection [57]. Despite similarities in their ID50’s, the ID99’s of HTNV and PUUV greatly diverge, with ~200 times less HTNV required to infect hamsters via the i.m. route, and ~2 fold less required to infect via the i.n. route (Table 1). The lower ID99 doses, coupled with viral persistence in HTNV infected animals as opposed to viral clearance (Fig 3), suggest that HTNV is more infectious than PUUV in the hamster. The mechanism for this difference between these closely related hantaviruses remains unknown.
Lethal infection of hamsters with ANDV leads to extensive organ dissemination, with infectious virus recovered in the lung, liver, kidney, spleen and heart [6]. Asymptomatic infection of hamsters with SNV repeatedly passaged through hamsters has a similar organ distribution [58]. The organ distribution of both those viruses is similar to the low dose HTNV hamster model, with two notable exceptions. First, the HTNV model has low, transient levels of virus in the liver and hardly any virus in the spleen (Figs 3 and 4). This dissimilarity between the models led us to confirm the lack of virus in the spleen was not due to the presence of inhibitors by spiking either infectious virus or viral RNA into samples prior to evaluation (S2 Fig). Second, in the ANDV model, the presence of virus was determined by plaque assay, indicating the virus was infectious and replication competent. In the HTNV low dose hamster model, while there is detection of high levels of viral genome (and in the case of the HTNV i.m. model, by pathology) by RT-PCR, recovery of infectious virus is sporadic, typically occurring at low levels, in only a few hamsters per time point (Figs 3 and 4, Table 1). The discrepancy between RT-PCR/pathology and plaque assay is notable. The hamsters in this study were not perfused, and given the appearance of neutralizing antibodies as early as day XX post infection, the presence of these antibodies could be impairing out ability to recover live virus via the plaque assay. It is also possible that viral packaging is somehow impaired in the hamster, leading to a larger amounts of nucleocapsid protein and viral genome than live virus. Further studies need to be undertaken to elucidate.
The low dose HTNV hamster model also mimics the infection pattern of the virus in its host species, the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius), with viral genome being detected in the lung, liver and kidney but not the spleen (the heart and brain were not examined) [32, 59–61].
In contrast to the HTNV low dose model, the organ distribution of virus in the PUUV low dose model is transient. In PUUV i.m. infected hamsters virus is detectable by RT-PCR around Day 11 post infection, with the virus being cleared from all organs except the lung by Day 24. No infectious virus was recovered at any time point examined. Even less virus was detected in the PUUV i.n. model; only a small amount in the brain of one hamster on Day 28 post infection. In neither case was serum viremia observed (Figs 3 and 4). This is most similar to the SNV models involving low passage virus in immunocompetent hamsters: the virus is transiently detected in the lung by PCR, and then sporadically found in organs 12 to 14 days post infection using immunohistochemistry [41, 58]. The distribution of PUUV in the hamster differs somewhat from its host species the bank vole, where it is found to persist in the lung, spleen and kidney, and was not detected in the heart or the brain [62].
Seroconversion of hamsters post viral exposure remains the best way to measure infection, and should be a considered the primary endpoint for efficacy studies. Though the PRNT assay was slightly more sensitive than the N-ELISA assay, detecting neutralizing antibodies in all animals with N-ELISA titers, and in two PUUV animals that did not have N-ELISA titers, the increased time, sample, and biosafety requirements necessary for a PRNT assay make the N-ELISA a better choice (Fig 2, S1 Fig). For a 10 PFU HTNV i.m. challenge, given lower titer and specific OD sum values as compared with higher challenge doses, and the fact that one hamster with significant viral genome in its organs at Day 28 post infection (7.1 log10 in the brain, and 6.8 log10 in the kidney) did not seroconvert, waiting until Day 35 post infection to monitor seroconversion is advisable (Figs 1–3). Viral load in the brain, kidney, and lungs as measured by RT-PCR need to be evaluated at Day 35 post low-dose challenge to determine their usefulness as secondary endpoints. Recovery of infectious virus in any organ, and viremia are too sporadic to serve as proxy markers for infection.
Ferret infection model
The ferret has been used as an experimental model for numerous hemorrhagic fever viruses, and respiratory viruses [12–17], though no published reports exist examining its susceptibility to hantavirus infection. In comparison to the hamster, the ferret is far more resistant to HTNV and PUUV infection. Exposure of ferrets to 2,000 PFU i.n. (greater than the ID99 for both viruses in hamsters), failed to result in a productive infection and seroconversion. Instead i.m. challenge doses of ~100,000–200,000 PFU were needed (Fig 5). Initially ferrets were exposed to PUUV K27, a commonly used laboratory isolate that has been in cell culture for over 15 years. Repeated passaging of hantavirus is known to cause mutations [63–65]. In contrast PUUV Beaumont and Seloignes are relatively recent isolates, with no more than 3 passages in cell culture post isolation. These strains were used for all subsequent experiments to maximize the likelihood of PUUV to cause disease by eliminating possible attenuation of the laboratory strain of the virus. Despite the high challenge dose and use of recent isolates, no elevation in white blood cells was observed over the course of the experiment, no pathology or organ burden was detected at the conclusion of the experiment, and the N-ELISA specific OD sum, PRNT50, and PsVNA50 titers remained low (Figs 6 and 8 and S9 Fig). This outcome is almost identical to that of Marburg and Ravn virus infection in ferrets, where the development of neutralizing antibody titers was the only sign that productive infection occurred [66]. Previous experiments in hamsters, have demonstrated that 2x105 PFU of gamma-irradiated ANDV and SNV are not sufficient to cause seroconversion, and neither is 1x104 gamma-irradiated PFU PUUV [6, 57]. Thus the seroconversion observed in ferrets, though low, is not likely to be due to a reaction to the large quantity of antigen administered, but to a productive infection.
PUUV antigen, viral genome, or infectious virus has been found in the brain, pituitary gland, lung, heart, liver, kidney, spleen, cerebrospinal fluid, and gastrointestinal tract of human patients with clinical symptoms of NE, though the pattern of viral dissemination varies between individuals [67–70]. Acute kidney injury and vision disturbances including blurred vision, myopic shift, and lens thickening, while pulmonary involvement including pleural effusion and vascular congestion, and renal failure occurred less frequently [47, 71–74]. Given the lack of high neutralizing antibody titers, which could have aided in viral clearance, the lack of viral genome in any of the ferret organs examined is rather surprising (S6, S7, S11 and S12 Figs). Furthermore, the lack of viral antigen and pathology in the organs tested suggest either a transient infection cleared prior to Day 35 post infection, levels of virus so low as to be undetectable by the tests used, or a viral reservoir outside of the organs tested.
The lack of detectable virus is most surprising given the gradual weight loss infected animals exhibit (Figs 5 and 6). The animals gained weight until ~3 days post challenge, at which point a gradual weight loss occurs, regardless of if HTNV or PUUV was the challenge virus. While weight loss is a feature of other ferret models of infectious diseases, the pattern we observed was unique: ferrets infected with morbillivirus, avian influenza and filoviruses rapidly lose weight during the first week to two weeks post infection, while infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus results in no significant weight loss [16, 17, 75–77].
In the hamster, infection with SNV is asymptomatic unless the hamster is immunosuppressed. When ferrets were immunosuppressed on Day 42 post infection, rapid weight loss and lethargy ensured (Fig 5). Given that these clinical signs were also observed in unchallenged control animals (S10 Fig), this could likely be the result of a secondary infection or drug toxicity. The use of Cyp is well documented in ferrets, primarily given at a high dose as an emetic, and no dosage for long term immunosuppression was found [78]. The dosages used in this study (between 10–30 mg/kg) successfully reduced white blood cell levels, in ferrets and demonstrate that Cyp can be used to induce long-term immunosuppression, if antibiotics are given to control for secondary infection (S8 Fig).
Despite not being able to detect infectious virus or viral genome in the kidney, we hypothesized that the weight loss we observed could be due to kidney failure. Individuals with HFRS exhibit proteinuria and hematuria, both of which can indicate kidney damage [46, 47]. Additionally, serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels are both elevated in HFRS patients and provide a second way to measure kidney function [46, 47, 73]. Decreased platelet levels also characterize clinical HFRS in humans, impairing coagulation [46, 47, 73]. In a second experiment designed to monitor kidney parameters, PUUV infected ferrets exhibited the same gradual weight loss that characterized the first experiment. However, no prolonged signs of clinical kidney failure were observed: blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels did not dramatically increase over the five week study period. Only one animal exhibited proteinuria (day 35), and two exhibited hematuria (one on Day 4, and one on Day 21) (Fig 7). Similarly to parameters monitoring renal failure, no thrombocytopenia occurred in PUUV infected ferrets (S9 and S13 Figs). The cause of the weight loss remains undetermined.
Though susceptible to both HTNV and PUUV, the ferret has limited usefulness for studies involving medical countermeasure efficacy testing. The ferret’s large mass, even as an adolescent, makes the amount of test article needed also prohibitively large. The large challenge dose required for infection could potentially obscure the protective effect of drugs of vaccines, due to the overwhelming amount of virus administered. Moreover, although the animals are infected the resultant neutralizing antibody titers are small, resulting in potential sensitivity issues with the model. Husbandry and handling of the animals under ABSL-3 procedures is also substantially more difficult than hamsters, and they lack the genetic similarity to humans that marmosets possess.
Marmoset infection model
In this study we have demonstrated the susceptibility of marmosets to HTNV infection. Marmosets represent an attractive model for testing vaccines and therapeutics against HFRS-causing hantaviruses due to genetic similarities to humans and small size. Also, the model has a simple read-out of infection, i.e. robust antibody production as measured by N-ELISA and PsVNA, making the determination of protection by vaccine or passive transfer material, straightforward. Further optimization of the model, namely to determine the ID99, could prove important as a 1,000 PFU challenge dose could be excessively high and prohibit therapeutic effects of candidate medical countermeasures.
Overall the marmoset model is more similar to the ferret HFRS-causing hantavirus infection model than the hamster, though there are key differences. Like the ferret, no significant pathological abnormalities were noted, and no signs of renal failure were observed (S16 and S19 Figs). Serum chemistry values do not differ from the normal range with the exception of albumin, total bilirubin, and amylase. While these values fell outside the normal range, they did not change over the course of infection indicating the problem may lie in the reference values used. The Piccolo general chemistry panel used to evaluate the parameters is optimized for human testing, and therefore may be less than optimal for evaluating the marmoset, especially those parameters. Additionally, no infectious virus or viral genome was recovered from any organ at Day 30 post infection [79, 80]. This is not surprising, given the high levels of neutralizing antibodies present as early as 21 days post infection (Fig 8). Unlike the ferret, however, marmosets develop exceptionally high neutralizing antibody titers (10,240–20,480 by PRNT50 and 14,866–221,557 by PsVNA50), and display low-level serum viremia between two and four weeks post infection (Fig 8). The serum viremia is significantly lower than in hamsters infected with HTNV, where some animals displayed RT-PCR titers of >7log10, and in hamsters infected with ANDV, where infectious virus titers prior to death are > 6log10 [41].
Despite not exhibiting clinical signs of disease, the model’s robust antibody response (as measured by PRNT, PsVNA and N-ELISA) make it a useful tool for evaluating vaccines and pre-or post-exposure therapeutics.
Conclusion
This paper has explored the use of three laboratory animal species as possible infection and disease models for HFRS-causing hantaviruses: the hamster, the ferret, and the marmoset. These models, especially the hamster model and marmoset model, will be useful for evaluating medical countermeasures with the potential to induce sterile immunity. The marmosets should be particularly useful for the evaluation of passively transferred protective human antibodies because of the relative genetic similarities between species in the Order Primates, and the small size of marmosets, allowing testing with smaller volumes of material than would be required for larger species such as macaques.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank the USAMRIID Veterinary Medical Division and Pathology Division, specifically Simon Long and Kevin Zeng, for technical assistance. This work was supported in part by the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at USAMRIID administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. DOE and U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command (USAMRMC) (DE-SC0014664, Dr. Steven Kwilas), and by the Military Infectious Disease Research Program (MIDRP) Program Area T (Dr. Jay Hooper). There was no additional external funding received for this study. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are ours and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense. No competing interests declared. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at USAMRIID administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. DOE and U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command (USAMRMC) (DE-SC0014664, Dr. Steven Kwilas), and by the Military Infectious Disease Research Program (MIDRP) Program Area T (Dr. Jay Hooper). There was no additional external funding received for this study. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are ours and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense. No competing interests declared. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Clement J, Maes P, Lagrou K, Van Ranst M, Lameire N. A unifying hypothesis and a single name for a complex globally emerging infection: hantavirus disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(1):1–5. 10.1007/s10096-011-1456-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schmaljohn C, Hjelle B. Hantaviruses: a global disease problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3(2):95–104. 10.3201/eid0302.970202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heyman P, Vaheri A, Members E. Situation of hantavirus infections and haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in European countries as of December 2006. Euro Surveill. 2008;13(28). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mustonen J, Makela S, Outinen T, Laine O, Jylhava J, Arstila PT, et al. The pathogenesis of nephropathia epidemica: new knowledge and unanswered questions. Antiviral Res. 2013;100(3):589–604. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schmaljohn C. Vaccines for hantaviruses. Vaccine. 2009;27 Suppl 4:D61–4. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hooper JW, Larsen T, Custer DM, Schmaljohn CS. A lethal disease model for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Virology. 2001;289(1):6–14. 10.1006/viro.2001.1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brocato RL, Hammerbeck CD, Bell TM, Wells JB, Queen LA, Hooper JW. A lethal disease model for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in immunosuppressed Syrian hamsters infected with Sin Nombre virus. J Virol. 2014;88(2):811–9. 10.1128/JVI.02906-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vergote V, Laenen L, Vanmechelen B, Van Ranst M, Verbeken E, Hooper JW, et al. A lethal disease model for New World hantaviruses using immunosuppressed Syrian hamsters. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(10):e0006042 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hooper JW, Custer DM, Thompson E, Schmaljohn CS. DNA vaccination with the Hantaan virus M gene protects Hamsters against three of four HFRS hantaviruses and elicits a high-titer neutralizing antibody response in Rhesus monkeys. J Virol. 2001;75(18):8469–77. 10.1128/JVI.75.18.8469-8477.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hooper JW, Kamrud KI, Elgh F, Custer D, Schmaljohn CS. DNA vaccination with hantavirus M segment elicits neutralizing antibodies and protects against seoul virus infection. Virology. 1999;255(2):269–78. 10.1006/viro.1998.9586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sanada T, Kariwa H, Nagata N, Tanikawa Y, Seto T, Yoshimatsu K, et al. Puumala virus infection in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) resembling hantavirus infection in natural rodent hosts. Virus Res. 2011;160(1–2):108–19. 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Belser JA, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. The ferret as a model organism to study influenza A virus infection. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(5):575–9. 10.1242/dmm.007823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van den Brand JM, Haagmans BL, Leijten L, van Riel D, Martina BE, Osterhaus AD, et al. Pathology of experimental SARS coronavirus infection in cats and ferrets. Vet Pathol. 2008;45(4):551–62. 10.1354/vp.45-4-551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bossart KN, Zhu Z, Middleton D, Klippel J, Crameri G, Bingham J, et al. A neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protects against lethal disease in a new ferret model of acute nipah virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000642 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pillet S, Svitek N, von Messling V. Ferrets as a model for morbillivirus pathogenesis, complications, and vaccines. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;330:73–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kozak R, He S, Kroeker A, de La Vega MA, Audet J, Wong G, et al. Ferrets Infected with Bundibugyo Virus or Ebola Virus Recapitulate Important Aspects of Human Filovirus Disease. J Virol. 2016;90(20):9209–23. 10.1128/JVI.01033-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cross RW, Mire CE, Borisevich V, Geisbert JB, Fenton KA, Geisbert TW. The Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo) as a Lethal Infection Model for 3 Species of Ebolavirus. J Infect Dis. 2016. 10.1093/infdis/jiw209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kallio ER, Klingstrom J, Gustafsson E, Manni T, Vaheri A, Henttonen H, et al. Prolonged survival of Puumala hantavirus outside the host: evidence for indirect transmission via the environment. J Gen Virol. 2006;87(Pt 8):2127–34. 10.1099/vir.0.81643-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vapalahti O, Mustonen J, Lundkvist A, Henttonen H, Plyusnin A, Vaheri A. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(10):653–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Groen J, Gerding M, Koeman JP, Roholl PJ, van Amerongen G, Jordans HG, et al. A macaque model for hantavirus infection. J Infect Dis. 1995;172(1):38–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mansfield K. Marmoset models commonly used in biomedical research. Comp Med. 2003;53(4):383–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Omatsu T, Moi ML, Hirayama T, Takasaki T, Nakamura S, Tajima S, et al. Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) as a primate model of dengue virus infection: development of high levels of viraemia and demonstration of protective immunity. J Gen Virol. 2011;92(Pt 10):2272–80. 10.1099/vir.0.031229-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bright H, Carroll AR, Watts PA, Fenton RJ. Development of a GB virus B marmoset model and its validation with a novel series of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitors. J Virol. 2004;78(4):2062–71. 10.1128/JVI.78.4.2062-2071.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moncla LH, Ross TM, Dinis JM, Weinfurter JT, Mortimer TD, Schultz-Darken N, et al. A novel nonhuman primate model for influenza transmission. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78750 10.1371/journal.pone.0078750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carrion R Jr, Brasky K, Mansfield K, Johnson C, Gonzales M, Ticer A, et al. Lassa virus infection in experimentally infected marmosets: liver pathology and immunophenotypic alterations in target tissues. J Virol. 2007;81(12):6482–90. 10.1128/JVI.02876-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mucker EM, Chapman J, Huzella LM, Huggins JW, Shamblin J, Robinson CG, et al. Susceptibility of Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) to Monkeypox Virus: A Low Dose Prospective Model for Monkeypox and Smallpox Disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131742 10.1371/journal.pone.0131742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kramski M, Matz-Rensing K, Stahl-Hennig C, Kaup FJ, Nitsche A, Pauli G, et al. A novel highly reproducible and lethal nonhuman primate model for orthopox virus infection. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10412 10.1371/journal.pone.0010412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mucker EM, Wollen-Roberts SE, Kimmel A, Shamblin J, Sampey D, Hooper JW. Intranasal monkeypox marmoset model: Prophylactic antibody treatment provides benefit against severe monkeypox virus disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(6):e0006581 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006581 employed by Biofactura Inc., a company that has licensing rights related to the monoclonal antibodies used in this study. No other competing interests exist. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith DR, Bird BH, Lewis B, Johnston SC, McCarthy S, Keeney A, et al. Development of a novel nonhuman primate model for Rift Valley fever. J Virol. 2012;86(4):2109–20. 10.1128/JVI.06190-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Adams AP, Aronson JF, Tardif SD, Patterson JL, Brasky KM, Geiger R, et al. Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) as a nonhuman primate model to assess the virulence of eastern equine encephalitis virus strains. J Virol. 2008;82(18):9035–42. 10.1128/JVI.00674-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carrion R Jr., Ro Y, Hoosien K, Ticer A, Brasky K, de la Garza M, et al. A small nonhuman primate model for filovirus-induced disease. Virology. 2011;420(2):117–24. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.08.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee HW, Lee PW, Johnson KM. Isolation of the etiologic agent of Korean Hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 1978;137(3):298–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tkachenko EA, Bashkirtsev VN, van der Groen G, Dzagurova TK, Ivanov AP, Ryltseva EV. Isolation in Vero-E6 cells of Hanta virus from Clethrionomys glareolus captured in the Bashkiria area of the U.S.S.R. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1984;64(4):425–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Elgh F, Lundkvist A, Alexeyev OA, Stenlund H, Avsic-Zupanc T, Hjelle B, et al. Serological diagnosis of hantavirus infections by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on detection of immunoglobulin G and M responses to recombinant nucleocapsid proteins of five viral serotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(5):1122–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boudreau EF, Josleyn M, Ullman D, Fisher D, Dalrymple L, Sellers-Myers K, et al. A Phase 1 clinical trial of Hantaan virus and Puumala virus M-segment DNA vaccines for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Vaccine. 2012;30(11):1951–8. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schmaljohn CS, Hasty SE, Dalrymple JM, LeDuc JW, Lee HW, von Bonsdorff CH, et al. Antigenic and genetic properties of viruses linked to hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Science. 1985;227(4690):1041–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chu YK, Jennings GB, Schmaljohn CS. A vaccinia virus-vectored Hantaan virus vaccine protects hamsters from challenge with Hantaan and Seoul viruses but not Puumala virus. J Virol. 1995;69(10):6417–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hooper JW, Moon JE, Paolino KM, Newcomer R, McLain DE, Josleyn M, et al. A Phase 1 clinical trial of Hantaan virus and Puumala virus M-segment DNA vaccines for haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome delivered by intramuscular electroporation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 5:110–7. 10.1111/1469-0691.12553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jiang W, Yu HT, Zhao K, Zhang Y, Du H, Wang PZ, et al. Quantification of Hantaan virus with a SYBR green I-based one-step qRT-PCR assay. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81525 10.1371/journal.pone.0081525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pang Z, Li A, Li J, Qu J, He C, Zhang S, et al. Comprehensive multiplex one-step real-time TaqMan qRT-PCR assays for detection and quantification of hemorrhagic fever viruses. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95635 10.1371/journal.pone.0095635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wahl-Jensen V, Chapman J, Asher L, Fisher R, Zimmerman M, Larsen T, et al. Temporal analysis of Andes virus and Sin Nombre virus infections of Syrian hamsters. J Virol. 2007;81(14):7449–62. 10.1128/JVI.00238-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kwilas S, Kishimori JM, Josleyn M, Jerke K, Ballantyne J, Royals M, et al. A hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) DNA vaccine delivered using a spring-powered jet injector elicits a potent neutralizing antibody response in rabbits and nonhuman primates. Curr Gene Ther. 2014;14(3):200–10. 10.2174/1566523214666140522122633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hooper JW, Brocato RL, Kwilas SA, Hammerbeck CD, Josleyn MD, Royals M, et al. DNA vaccine-derived human IgG produced in transchromosomal bovines protect in lethal models of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(264):264ra162 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Godoy P, Marsac D, Stefas E, Ferrer P, Tischler ND, Pino K, et al. Andes virus antigens are shed in urine of patients with acute hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. J Virol. 2009;83(10):5046–55. 10.1128/JVI.02409-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bruno P, Hassell LH, Brown J, Tanner W, Lau A. The protean manifestations of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. A retrospective review of 26 cases from Korea. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(5):385–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jonsson CB, Figueiredo LT, Vapalahti O. A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(2):412–41. 10.1128/CMR.00062-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Braun N, Haap M, Overkamp D, Kimmel M, Alscher MD, Lehnert H, et al. Characterization and outcome following Puumala virus infection: a retrospective analysis of 75 cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(9):2997–3003. 10.1093/ndt/gfq118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morrisey JK, Ramer JC. Ferrets. Clinical pathology and sample collection. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 1999;2(3):553–64, vi [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lee EJ, Moore WE, Fryer HC, Minocha HC. Haematological and serum chemistry profiles of ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). Lab Anim. 1982;16(2):133–7. 10.1258/002367782781110241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmaljohn CS, Chu YK, Schmaljohn AL, Dalrymple JM. Antigenic subunits of Hantaan virus expressed by baculovirus and vaccinia virus recombinants. J Virol. 1990;64(7):3162–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Golden JW, Hammerbeck CD, Mucker EM, Brocato RL. Animal Models for the Study of Rodent-Borne Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses: Arenaviruses and Hantaviruses. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:793257 10.1155/2015/793257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chung DH, Kumarapperuma SC, Sun Y, Li Q, Chu YK, Arterburn JB, et al. Synthesis of 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-3-ethynyl-[1,2,4]triazole and its in vitro and in vivo efficacy against Hantavirus. Antiviral Res. 2008;79(1):19–27. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chung DH, Vastermark A, Camp JV, McAllister R, Remold SK, Chu YK, et al. The murine model for Hantaan virus-induced lethal disease shows two distinct paths in viral evolutionary trajectory with and without ribavirin treatment. J Virol. 2013;87(20):10997–1007. 10.1128/JVI.01394-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huggins JW, Kim GR, Brand OM, McKee KT Jr. Ribavirin therapy for Hantaan virus infection in suckling mice. J Infect Dis. 1986;153(3):489–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Deng HY, Luo F, Shi LQ, Zhong Q, Liu YJ, Yang ZQ. Efficacy of arbidol on lethal hantaan virus infections in suckling mice and in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30(7):1015–24. 10.1038/aps.2009.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hooper JW, Ferro AM, Wahl-Jensen V. Immune serum produced by DNA vaccination protects hamsters against lethal respiratory challenge with Andes virus. J Virol. 2008;82(3):1332–8. 10.1128/JVI.01822-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Witkowski PT, Perley CC, Brocato RL, Hooper JW, Jurgensen C, Schulzke JD, et al. Gastrointestinal Tract As Entry Route for Hantavirus Infection. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1721 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Safronetz D, Prescott J, Haddock E, Scott DP, Feldmann H, Ebihara H. Hamster-adapted Sin Nombre virus causes disseminated infection and efficiently replicates in pulmonary endothelial cells without signs of disease. J Virol. 2013;87(8):4778–82. 10.1128/JVI.03291-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Klein TA, Kim HC, Chong ST, Kim JA, Lee SY, Kim WK, et al. Hantaan virus surveillance targeting small mammals at nightmare range, a high elevation military training area, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0118483 10.1371/journal.pone.0118483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee HW, French GR, Lee PW, Baek LJ, Tsuchiya K, Foulke RS. Observations on natural and laboratory infection of rodents with the etiologic agent of Korean hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1981;30(2):477–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sames WJ, Klein TA, Kim HC, Chong ST, Lee IY, Gu SH, et al. Ecology of Hantaan virus at Twin Bridges Training Area, Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea, 2005–2007. J Vector Ecol. 2009;34(2):225–31. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2009.00030.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yanagihara R, Amyx HL, Gajdusek DC. Experimental infection with Puumala virus, the etiologic agent of nephropathia epidemica, in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). J Virol. 1985;55(1):34–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nemirov K, Lundkvist A, Vaheri A, Plyusnin A. Adaptation of Puumala hantavirus to cell culture is associated with point mutations in the coding region of the L segment and in the noncoding regions of the S segment. J Virol. 2003;77(16):8793–800. 10.1128/JVI.77.16.8793-8800.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sundstrom KB, Stoltz M, Lagerqvist N, Lundkvist A, Nemirov K, Klingstrom J. Characterization of two substrains of Puumala virus that show phenotypes that are different from each other and from the original strain. J Virol. 2011;85(4):1747–56. 10.1128/JVI.01428-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shimizu K, Koma T, Yoshimatsu K, Tsuda Y, Isegawa Y, Arikawa J. Appearance of renal hemorrhage in adult mice after inoculation of patient-derived hantavirus. Virol J. 2017;14(1):13 10.1186/s12985-017-0686-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cross RW, Mire CE, Agans KN, Borisevich V, Fenton KA, Geisbert TW. Marburg and Ravn Viruses Fail to Cause Disease in the Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo). J Infect Dis. 2018. 10.1093/infdis/jiy268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Latus J, Tenner-Racz K, Racz P, Kitterer D, Cadar D, Ott G, et al. Detection of Puumala hantavirus antigen in human intestine during acute hantavirus infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98397 10.1371/journal.pone.0098397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hautala T, Mahonen SM, Sironen T, Hautala N, Paakko E, Karttunen A, et al. Central nervous system-related symptoms and findings are common in acute Puumala hantavirus infection. Ann Med. 2010;42(5):344–51. 10.3109/07853890.2010.480979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hautala T, Sironen T, Vapalahti O, Paakko E, Sarkioja T, Salmela PI, et al. Hypophyseal hemorrhage and panhypopituitarism during Puumala Virus Infection: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and detection of viral antigen in the hypophysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(1):96–101. 10.1086/340859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rasmuson J, Andersson C, Norrman E, Haney M, Evander M, Ahlm C. Time to revise the paradigm of hantavirus syndromes? Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome caused by European hantavirus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30(5):685–90. 10.1007/s10096-010-1141-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mustonen J, Brummer-Korvenkontio M, Hedman K, Pasternack A, Pietila K, Vaheri A. Nephropathia epidemica in Finland: a retrospective study of 126 cases. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(1):7–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Theiler G, Langer-Wegscheider B, Zollner-Schwetz I, Valentin T, Honigl M, Schnedl W, et al. Blurred vision and myopic shift in Puumala virus infections are independent of disease severity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(10):E435–7. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03997.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Settergren B, Juto P, Trollfors B, Wadell G, Norrby SR. Clinical characteristics of nephropathia epidemica in Sweden: prospective study of 74 cases. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(6):921–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kontkanen M, Puustjarvi T, Kauppi P, Lahdevirta J. Ocular characteristics in nephropathia epidemica or Puumala virus infection. Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1996;74(6):621–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zitzow LA, Rowe T, Morken T, Shieh WJ, Zaki S, Katz JM. Pathogenesis of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses in ferrets. Journal of virology. 2002;76(9):4420–9. 10.1128/JVI.76.9.4420-4429.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Svitek N, Gerhauser I, Goncalves C, Grabski E, Doring M, Kalinke U, et al. Morbillivirus control of the interferon response: relevance of STAT2 and mda5 but not STAT1 for canine distemper virus virulence in ferrets. Journal of virology. 2014;88(5):2941–50. 10.1128/JVI.03076-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Chu YK, Ali GD, Jia F, Li Q, Kelvin D, Couch RC, et al. The SARS-CoV ferret model an infection-challenge study. Virology. 2008;374(1):151–63. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.12.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wong RH, Lao L, Berman BM, Carter AK, Wynn RL. Biphasic emetic response of in the ferret. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 1997;58(1):179–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Logan AC, Khan KN. Clinical pathologic changes in two marmosets with wasting syndrome. Toxicol Pathol. 1996;24(6):707–9. 10.1177/019262339602400605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Davy CW, Jackson MR, Walker J. Reference intervals for some clinical chemical parameters in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): effect of age and sex. Lab Anim. 1984;18(2):135–42. 10.1258/002367784780891217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW. Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents: Clinical medicine and Surgery. 2nd ed: Elsevier; 2004. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.