Skip to main content
Journal of Radiation Research logoLink to Journal of Radiation Research
. 2019 Apr 11;60(3):328–332. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz002

Short-term follow-up of intestinal flora in radiation-exposed mice

Kanako Yamanouchi 1, Takakiyo Tsujiguchi 2,, Yamato Sakamoto 1, Koichi Ito 1
PMCID: PMC6530617  PMID: 31116852

Abstract

Some gastrointestinal bacteria, otherwise known as the ‘intestinal flora’, can cause severe gastrointestinal problems, including sepsis, which are strongly linked to lifestyle-related diseases, including cardiovascular diseases. Several investigations have focused on the long-term changes in the intestinal flora associated with radiation exposure; however, the short-term effects remain unknown. In this study, we tracked the short-term changes in the intestinal flora of mice exposed to different doses of X-ray irradiation (2 Gy and 4 Gy), focusing only on the lactic acid bacteria Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. A decrease in the Lactobacillus abundance was detected immediately after irradiation in individuals exposed to both 2 Gy and 4 Gy irradiation. However, mice exposed to 4 Gy of irradiation showed a remarkable increase in Bifidobacterium, indicating a potential role of these bacteria in regeneration of the intestinal epithelial tissue. Studies on changes in intestinal bacteria as a result of radiation exposure are limited. Therefore, continuation of this field of research is expected to provide important fundamental insight into the mechanisms by which radiation causes damage to the intestinal tissues, contributing to the development of sepsis.

Keywords: intestinal flora, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, alimentary tract disorder

INTRODUCTION

The human mucosa occupies a substantial portion of the body surface area, including the oral cavity, nasal cavity, gastrointestinal tract, respiratory organs, and genital organs, accounting for an area more than 200 times that of the skin surface. Among the components of the mucosa, the digestive tract contributes a particularly big area, largely due to the presence of microvilli on the surface of the intestinal folds, villi, and epithelial cells, so as to absorb as many nutrients as possible through expanding the area [1]. In addition, various bacteria coexist on the mucous membranes of mammals. Indeed, recent reports indicate that as many as 100 trillion bacteria exist in the human intestinal tract, representing a cell population that is several times greater than that of the human host somatic and germ cells [2, 3]. These symbiotic bacteria of the gut are collectively referred to as the ‘intestinal flora’, and accumulating evidence points to a close association between the composition of the intestinal flora and host health, including the onset of disease [4, 5].

Exposure to high-dose radiation results in remarkable disturbances to tissues and organs with high regenerative ability, such as the hematopoietic tissue and intestinal mucosa [6]. However, the intestinal tract, rich in epithelial stem cells, shows high radiosensitivity, and the consequent collapse of the intestinal barrier leads to dissolution of body fluids containing electrolytes, along with infiltration of intestinal bacteria into the blood circulation [7]. Such transmigration of intestinal bacteria to the blood is referred to as bacteremia, which can progress into severe sepsis, leading to systemic symptoms such as multiple organ failure and ultimately death. For example, women exposed to 5.7 Gy radiation in the Goiania radiological accident in Brazil were reported to have suffered from septicemia [8]. In addition, the intestinal bacterial flora has been found to become dominated by Bacteroides spp. in patients receiving pelvic irradiation treatment, regardless of the presence or absence of diarrhea [9]. These findings indicate that radiation destroys the balance of the intestinal bacterial flora. Thus, one strategy to improve the symptoms induced by such intestinal injury is to restore the balance of the intestinal flora and maintain the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa. However, the specific changes in the intestinal bacteria and intestinal mucosa that occur in an individual immediately after radiation exposure remain unclear.

In this study, we exposed mice to X-ray irradiation, and compared the abundance of the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus before and after irradiation in order to evaluate the short-term effects on the composition of the beneficial bacteria comprising the intestinal flora. These genera were chosen because they are lactic acid bacteria that decompose sugars into lactic acid so as to prepare the intestinal environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal experimentation

Seven-week-old C57BL/6Njcl female mice (CLEA Japan, Inc., Japan) were used as the experimental model. After an acclimatization period of 1 week after acquisition, the 8-week-old mice were irradiated with 2 Gy and 4 Gy X-rays using an MBR-1520 R-3 X-ray irradiation apparatus (Hitachi, Japan). Irradiation conditions were 1 Gy/min, with a tube voltage of 150 kV, tube current of 20 mA, and a Al 0.5 mm + Cu 0.3 mm filter. Three mice were used in each experimental group. To monitor the health condition of the mice throughout the experiment, body weight and food intake were measured every day for 2 weeks after irradiation. Feces were collected before irradiation, and at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after irradiation for analysis of intestinal flora with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The animals were maintained in a temperature-controlled room at 23.9 ± 0.3°C with 26.6 ± 4.2% humidity. Moreover, the mice were periodically inspected for the presence of pathogens (bacteria, viruses, parasites) to confirm maintenance of a specific-pathogen-free environment. The animal experiments were conducted in compliance with guidelines concerning the use of laboratory animals of Hirosaki University (approval number: G 17003).

Real-time PCR of intestinal bacterial flora

NucleoSpin® DNA Stool (TAKARA BIO INC., Japan) was used to extract the DNA of feces. Three PCR primers sets were prepared to analyze the changes in the abundance of intestinal bacterial flora (Table 1) [1012]. Analysis was performed by detection of excitation light with a Power SYBR® Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) on the Step One Plus instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Each cycle threshold (CT) value of the target bacteria was corrected by the CT value for the ‘all bacteria’ PCR product, and compared with the respective CT value before irradiation to determine the relative abundance. All target CT values were corrected by the ΔCT method and compared with the 0 hour value (ΔΔCT method). The PCR conditions were 40 cycles of thermal denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing for 30 s, and elongation at 80°C for 30 s. The annealing temperature was set for each primer as indicated in Table 1. CT values of all fecal DNA samples were measured three times in triplicate.

Table 1.

Table showing the targeted bacterial taxa, bacterial genes and their primers used for qPCR assays

Phyla/Division Family Primer (5′–3′) Production length (bp) Annealing temp (°C)
All bacteria GCCTAACACATGCAAGTCGA 472 58
GTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG
Actinobacteria GenusBifidobacterium AGGGTTCGATTCTGGCTCAG 156 58
CATCCGGCATTACCACCC
Firmicutes GenusLactobacillus TGGAAACAGRTGCTAATACCG 232 62
GTCCATTGTGGAAGATTCCC

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of the bacterial flora, the Student’s t-test was performed as a relative comparison between the values before and after irradiation with Origin Ver. 8.1 statistical analysis software.

RESULTS

Weight fluctuations and food intake of experimental mice

Food intake decreased sharply at 24 h after irradiation, and temporary weight loss was observed on the first day after irradiation. Thereafter, both the 2 Gy– and 4 Gy–irradiated groups showed an increase in food intake and body weight, and no individuals died during the 2-week observation period (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Body weight fluctuation and feed intake of irradiated mice. (A) Body weight decreased from 1 to 3 days after irradiation in both the 2 Gy– and 4 Gy–irradiated groups. (B) A sharp decline in food intake was observed after 1 day of irradiation followed by recovery.

Short-term fluctuations of the intestinal bacterial flora upon irradiation exposure

Quantification of naturally discharged fecal bacteria showed changes in both Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (Fig. 2). In the 2 Gy–irradiated group, Bifidobacterium showed a decreasing trend from 6 h after irradiation, which continued until 72 h. However, the abundance of Bifidobacterium increased by 9-fold in the 4 Gy–irradiated group as of 48 h after irradiation, and reached a 28-fold increase compared with the pre-irradiation level after 72 h (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the expression of Lactobacillus genes decreased from 6 h to 12 h after irradiation, and then recovered up to the baseline level in both groups (Fig. 2B). This finding suggests that 2 Gy or 4 Gy irradiation might result in short-term suppression of intestinal bacterial growth, but the normal bacterial flora will be rebalanced. Interestingly, the sharp increase in Bifidobacterium with the higher dose (4 Gy) of irradiation was confirmed. Although there are individual differences, Bifidobacterium in the 4 Gy–irradiated group increased ~10 times after 48 h and reached 28 times after 72 h.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Changes in intestinal flora in radiation-exposed mice. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) when compared with the control group (0 h). (A) Bifidobacterium significantly decreased in the 2 Gy–irradiated group 6 h after irradiation, but showed a sharp increase from 48 h after irradiation in the 4 Gy–irradiated group, which continued until 72 h. (B) Both groups showed a sharp decrease in Lactobacillus from 6 to 12 h after irradiation and then recovered.

DISCUSSION

The two bacterial genera targeted in this study, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, are known to exhibit various probiotic effects, and have thus been adopted in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in clinical practice as probiotics [13, 14]. For example, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG strain (LGG) is used for the treatment of traveler’s diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis [15]. Bifidobacterium bifidum has also been reported to have a beneficial effect on the clinical course of rotavirus diarrhea [16]. These effects are attributed to several mechanisms of the bacteria, such as resistance to acids and bile, adhesion to intestinal cells, and regulation of the mucosal immune response, thereby contributing to improvement of diarrhea and pathogen reduction [15, 17]. Thus, in recent years, it has become clear that the probiotic activity of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium plays a major role in stabilization of the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa.

The normal intestinal mucosa functions as a barrier (intestinal barrier) that eliminates bacteria attempting to invade intestinal tissue and cells. However, in an inflamed, pathogenic, or radiation-induced intestinal tract disorders, the osmotic pressure of the barrier changes, allowing intestinal bacteria to invade the blood and other organs [18, 19]. Oral administration of a probiotic to living bodies subjected to such gastrointestinal disturbances has been shown to influence the intestinal permeability and contribute to normalization of the intestinal microflora, with eventual stabilization of the intestinal environment [20]. In addition, oral administration of Lactobacillus to irradiated mice is shown to prolong survival and suppress the incidence of sepsis [21].

Although few studies have examined the variation of intestinal bacteria in radiation-exposed individuals, there is some evidence that radiation leads to an increase in bacteria known to be hazardous to the host [2224]. Intestinal damage due to radiation in humans is recognized as the most frequent side effect of cancer treatment to the pelvic organs [2527]. A study on the changes in the intestinal bacterial flora in patients who received pelvic irradiation treatment shows that the radiation therapy led to deterioration in the intestinal environment due to an increase in Bacteroides spp., regardless of the presence or absence of diarrhea [9]. In addition, exposure to radiation above 10 Gy led to intestinal death in rats, which was accompanied by an increase in Proteobacteria comprising gram-negative pathogenic species [28]. Proteobacteria is a phylum that contains many pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella, Vibrio, and Helicobacter, and thus an increase in the abundance of this phylum increases the risk of sepsis [2931].

Cellular exposure to ionizing radiation leads to oxidizing events that alter atomic structure through direct interactions of radiation with target macromolecules or via products of water radiolysis [3234]. In general, radioresistant bacteria are thought to have enzymes, such as catalase and superoxide dismutase, to neutralize active oxygen species produced in vivo, and to aid DNA regeneration and repair [3537]. In this study, Lactobacillus without catalase and superoxide dismutase seems to have caused a transient decrease. Bifidobacterium, which showed an increase in this study, can produce catalase and superoxide dismutase. Therefore, Bifidobacterium may be radioresistant and may show a relative increase so as to supplement other intestinal bacteria transiently suppressed proliferation. In addition, several studies have reported that some Bifidobacterium strengthen the barrier function of the intestinal tract and prevent migration of pathogenic bacteria and foreign substances into the blood [3840]. Therefore, increased Bifidobacterium in radiation-exposed mice may be effective in restoring radiation-impaired intestinal epithelium. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium produces lactic acid and acetic acid by glycolysis and shows the action of decreasing intestinal pH and regulating the intestinal environment, so Bifidobacterium promotes the recovery of a radiation-injured intestinal epithelium injured and the associated disordered intestinal environment. It may recover the intestinal flora, including Lactobacillus, which had decreased. However, this study is a relative comparison study, and therefore this result does not reflect an actual increase or decrease in bacterial groups, so continuation of this research is necessary.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [Grant Number JP 18K15578].

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tortora GJ, Derrickson BH. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. 12th edn Danvers, MA: Wiley, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T et al. . The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:15718–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hooper LV, Macpherson AJ. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:159–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Power SE, O’Toole PW, Stanton C et al. . Intestinal microbiota, diet and health. Br J Nutr 2014;111:387–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Albenberg LG, Wu GD. Diet and the intestinal microbiome: associations, functions, and implications for health and disease. Gastroenterology 2014;146:1564–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tsujiguchi T, Yamamura H, Kashiwakura I. The medical treatment of radiation exposure and contamination in radiation accidents. Radiat Environ Med 2017;6:94–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Blikslager AT, Moeser AJ, Gookin JL et al. . Restoration of barrier function in injured intestinal mucosa. Physiol Rev 2007;87:545–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. International Atomic Energy Agency The Radiological Accident in Goiânia. Vienna: IAEA Publications, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wang A, Ling Z, Yang Z et al. . Gut microbial dysbiosis may predict diarrhea and fatigue in patients undergoing pelvic cancer radiotherapy: a pilot study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Magwira CA, Kullin B, Lewandowski S et al. . Diversity of faecal oxalate-degrading bacteria in black and white South African study groups: insights into understanding the rarity of urolithiasis in the black group. J Appl Microbiol 2012;113:418–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Byun R, Nadkarni MA, Chhour KL et al. . Quantitative analysis of diverse Lactobacillus species present in advanced dental caries. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:3128–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sartor RB. Cytokines in intestinal inflammation: pathophysiological and clinical considerations. Gastroenterology 1994;106:533–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Marco ML, Pavan S, Kleerebezem M. Towards understanding molecular modes of probiotic action. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2006;17:204–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zocco MA, dal Verme LZ, Cremonini F et al. . Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:1567–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gorbach SL. Probiotics and gastrointestinal health. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:S2–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Saavedra JM, Bauman NA, Oung I et al. . Feeding of Bifidobacterium bifidum and Streptococcus thermophilus to infants in hospital for prevention of diarrhoea and shedding of rotavirus. Lancet 1994;344:1046–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kuisma J, Mentula S, Jarvinen H et al. . Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:509–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kailasapathy K, Chin J. Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunol Cell Biol 2000;78:80–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Quigley EM, Quera R. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: roles of antibiotics, prebiotics, and probiotics. Gastroenterology 2006;130:78–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Salminen S, Isolauri E, Salminen E. Probiotics and stabilisation of the gut mucosal barrier. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 1996;5:53–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dong MY, Chang TW, Gorbach SL. Effects of feeding Lactobacillus GG on lethal irradiation in mice. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1987;7:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Basset C, Holton J, Bazeos A et al. . Are Helicobacter species and enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis involved in inflammatory bowel disease? Dig Dis Sci 2004;49:1425–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Takaishi H, Matsuki T, Nakazawa A et al. . Imbalance in intestinal microflora constitution could be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Med Microbiol 2008;298:463–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA et al. . Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:13780–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Delia P, Sansotta G, Donato V et al. . Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:912–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Giralt J, Regadera JP, Verges R et al. . Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 in prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea: results from multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled nutritional trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:1213–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chitapanarux I, Chitapanarux T, Traisathit P et al. . Randomized controlled trial of live Lactobacillus acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum in prophylaxis of diarrhea during radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2010;5:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rentea RM, Lam V, Biesterveld B et al. . Radiation-induced changes in intestinal and tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase: implications for recovery after radiation therapy. Am J Surg 2016;212:602–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K et al. . The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 2000;403:665–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, El-Omar EM et al. . IBD—what role do Proteobacteria play? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:219–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Stecher B, Robbiani R, Walker AW et al. . Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol 2007;5:2177–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Azzam EI, Jay-Gerin JP, Pain D. Ionizing radiation–induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett 2012;327:48–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J et al. . Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress–induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact 2006;160:1–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Shao F, Xin FZ, Yang CG et al. . The impact of microbial immune enteral nutrition on the patients with acute radiation enteritis in bowel function and immune status. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;69:357–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Romanovskaia VA, Sokolov IG, Rokitko PV et al. . Ecological consequences of radioactive pollution for soil bacteria within the 10-km region around the Chernobyl Atomic Energy Station. Mikrobiologiia 1998;67:274–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tian B, Wu Y, Sheng D et al. . Chemiluminescence assay for reactive oxygen species scavenging activities and inhibition on oxidative damage of DNA in Deinococcus radiodurans. Luminescence 2004;19:78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Asgarani E, Soudi MR, Borzooee F et al. . Radio-resistance in psychrotrophic Kocuria sp. ASB 107 isolated from Ab-e-Siah radioactive spring. J Environ Radioact 2012;113:171–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Candela M, Perna F, Carnevali P et al. . Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production. Int J Food Microbiol 2008;125:286–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lindfors K, Blomqvist T, Juuti-Uusitalo K et al. . Live probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis bacteria inhibit the toxic effects induced by wheat gliadin in epithelial cell culture. Clin Exp Immunol 2008;152:552–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hsieh CY, Osaka T, Moriyama E et al. . Strengthening of the intestinal epithelial tight junction by Bifidobacterium bifidum. Physiol Rep 2015;3:e12327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Radiation Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES