Skip to main content
Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest) logoLink to Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest)
. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):234–241. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2016.234

THE ROLE OF ESTROGENS AND ESTROGEN RECEPTORS IN MELANOMA DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION

C Caruntu 1,3,*, A Mirica 1, AE Roşca 1,4, R Mirica 1, A Caruntu 5, M Tampa 2, C Matei 2, C Constantin 4, M Neagu 4, AI Badarau 1, C Badiu 6, L Moraru 5
PMCID: PMC6535286  PMID: 31149095

Abstract

Melanoma has a significant mortality and its growing incidence is associated with important social and health care costs. Thus, investigation of the complex mechanisms contributing to emergence and development of melanoma are of real interest both in scientific research and clinical practice. Estrogens play an important role in the emergence and development of certain types of cancer, such as breast cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, but their role in development of cutaneous melanoma is still a matter of debate. Various data suggest that increased levels of endogenous estrogens during pregnancy or exposure to exogenous estrogens by use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may have a potential role in melanoma development and progression. Moreover, there were revealed several intracellular pathways which can support the connection between estrogens, estrogen receptors (ER) and melanoma. While ER-β plays an antiproliferative role, ER-α promotes cell growth and cellular atypia. Thus, inhibition of ER-β activity in the skin can increase the risk for development of cutaneous melanoma and spread of metastatic cells. However, despite recent advances in this area, the exact role and clinical implications of estrogens and estrogen receptors in melanoma are still not entirely understood and require further investigations.

Keywords: estrogens, estrogen receptors, melanoma, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

One of the most aggressive cancers, melanoma may occur anywhere melanocytic cells are present: skin, mucosa (oral, genital, nasal, ano-rectal, esophageal), eye, meninges, nervous central system. With a significant morbidity and mortality, the incidence of melanoma has increased faster than any other form of cancer in the last decades (1-5). Cutaneous melanoma can occur at any age, usually between 20 and 60 years. It seldom occurs before the onset of puberty, usually by malignant transformation of giant congenital nevi. Exceptionally, melanoma can develop prenatally, as a primary tumour or by metastatic transplacental transfer. Melanoma occurs more often in women, usually on their shins, in men being more common the upper thoracic location (6, 7).

Although melanoma is a disease with a strong genetic component, there are various other factors, such as extensive exposure to UV radiation, chronic inflammation induced by mechanical or chemical injuries, endogenous or exogenous hormones that are strongly involved in the development and progression of the disease (1-3, 8).

The scientific interest was drawn towards the estrogens and estrogen receptors, which proved to be involved in the emergence and progression of certain types of tumors, such as breast, ovarian, endometrial, bladder, kidney, adrenal, prostate, testis, lung, colon, thyroid, brain, pancreas, bone and skin cancers (see Fig. 1) (9-16). However, their role in the development of cutaneous melanoma still remains unclear (17). The hypothesis of a certain role of estrogens in melanoma derived from the observations of gender-related differences in melanoma progression and studies concerning the evolution of melanomas during pregnancy (17-19).

Epidemiological studies revealed a higher survival rate in women with metastatic melanoma compared to men of the same age, and also a higher survival rate observed in premenopausal women than postmenopausal women. Possible roles of estrogens were suggested by the low incidence of cutaneous melanoma before puberty, followed by a dramatic increase during the childbearing period and a reduction after the menopause (18-20).

The human skin has the capacity to synthesize estrogens, suggesting their important role in cutaneous physiology. They influence the activity of keratinocytes, melanocytes and fibroblasts. It has been emphasized a significant variation of skin thickness during the normal menstrual cycle, the cutaneous tissue being thinner at the beginning of the cycle, when estrogen levels are reduced. Subsequently, as estrogen levels rise, the thickness of the skin increases (21). In menopause, when estrogens concentrations diminish, skin loses its tonicity and elasticity. Estrogen administration can delay the development of aging-related skin changes (22). Also, skin healing process is stimulated by estrogens (23).

Estrogens can stimulate proliferation of melanocytes and increase the melanin content in the skin, with consecutive hyperpigmentation. Estrogen and estrogen-progestin combinations induce melanogenesis, stimulating the increase of melanin content both intracellularly and extracellularly. This is a physiological effect of estrogens action on melanocytes which can occur both in women using oral contraceptives (OCs) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and also in pregnancy (17).

Estrogen receptors and melanoma

Estrogens exert their physiological roles acting on two types of receptors: estrogen receptor α (ER-α) and estrogen receptor β (ER-β). ER-α and ER-β are proteins encoded by two different genes located on different chromosomes. ER-α was the first discovered in the 1960s and it is known for its importance in breast cancer. ER-β was discovered 30 years later and its exact role is still under study (16, 18, 24).

ER-β is the most prevalent estrogen receptor in the skin and, besides the well known estrogen responsive tissues such as uterus and mammary glands it was also found in other tissues including the brain, colon and prostate (18, 22). Activation of ER-β induces antiproliferative effects which appear to be balanced by the opposite action of ER-α. Recent studies concluded that estrogen signaling depends mainly on the balance between expression of ER-α and ER-β. Depending on the predominant estrogen receptor, in one specific tissue the global effect will be stimulation of cellular growth and proliferation or, on the contrary, their inhibition (25). In the skin, perturbation of this balance and a predominance of pro-proliferative ER-α over antiproliferative ER-β may lead to melanoma formation (26; 27) (see Fig. 2).

Interaction of estrogens with ERs generates intracellular effects through genomic and nongenomic pathways involving signaling factors which can be alterated in melanoma cells (28) (see Fig. 3). The genomic pathway involves the interaction of ERs with different transcription coactivators such as cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), modulating transcription of various genes and leading to alteration of tumor cells proliferation. Generally, is considered that ERβ induces an inhibitory effect on gene transcription and cell proliferation while ERα has an activation effect.

The non genomic pathway effects are induced by ERs interaction with several intracellular pathways in which a key role is played by MAPK/ERK pathway, a signaling system involved in carcinogenesis, cell proliferation, and with a strong connection with melanoma. Another signaling pathway potentially involved is PI3 kinase (PI3K) pathway, which can be activated in melanoma and other skin tumors (28-32).

Clinical studies using immunohistochemical staining to assess the expression of estrogen receptors emphasized the presence of both ER-α and ER-β in normal sebaceous glands and hair follicles. ER-α was reduced in melanocytic nevi and melanomas but ER-β was present in both benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, suggesting an important role of ER-β in normal skin physiology as well as in modulation of tumor cell responses (24). In addition, ER-β expression diminishes in thicker tumors (20, 26, 27, 33, 34). Furthermore, it was found that patients with cutaneous melanoma who developed lymph node metastases, showed a lower level of ER-β in the tumor compared to normal skin suggesting a possible involvement of ER-β in development of metastases (26, 27, 33). Thus, several studies suggested that ERβ tumor tissue expression may constitute a possible prognostic marker in melanoma (20, 34, 35).

Studies results performed in melanoma animal models also suggest a link between ER-β signaling and tumor growth which can be mediated by immune pathways. Tumour growth and proliferation of B16/F10 melanoma cells were significantly increased in ER-β deficient mice than in wild type, C57BL/6 control mice (36).

Thus, it is assumed that reduction of ER-β expression and a decrease on its possible antiproliferative effect can lead to melanoma development. The fine adjustment of ER-β expression may represent a possible protective mechanism against malignant transformation of melanocytic lesions. Thus, in conditions of estrogen exposure or cellular atypia, up-regulation of ER-β seems to be the key for maintaining the balance (25, 37).

A recent in vitro research opened new perspectives in the study of the relationship between ERs and melanoma (38). The study showed that ER-β is expressed in several human melanoma cell lines, such as BLM, WM115, A375 and WM1552. However, the expression of ERβ isoforms considerably varied between different cell lines, offering a plausible explanation for the variable effects of ER-β activation on melanoma cell growth. While in BLM and WM115 melanoma cells, activation of this receptor reduced cell proliferation, suggesting a tumor suppressor activity of ER-β, in A375 and WM1552 melanoma cells ER-β agonists failed to induce a similar antiproliferative effect.

It has been recently reported another estrogen receptor named G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), an integral membrane protein expressed by melanoma cells, which can mediate both tumor-promoting and antitumor actions (16, 39).

Several studies regarding tamoxifen suggested another link between estrogen receptors and cutaneous melanoma. Tamoxifen has a dual effect, acting as an antagonist of ER in breast tissue, and as an agonist of ER in other tissues such as endometrium. Thus, tamoxifen may be regarded as a selective estrogen-receptor modulator (40). Early studies have shown conflicting results. Thus, in hamster melanoma cell line HM-1, tamoxifen significantly reduced melanoma growth (41), but another in vitro research performed on three human melanoma cell lines, UISO-MEL-1, UISO-MEL-2 and UISO-MEL-4 was not able to reveal an effect of tamoxifen on cell growth in any melanoma cell line (42). In a more recent study performed on murine melanoma cell line B16BL6 tamoxifen significantly reduced cell migration, invasion and metastasis (43). These effects may be explained by the decreased expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases and inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) signaling, which appear to play major roles in melanoma progression. These results suggest that tamoxifen could have potential therapeutical applications in metastatic melanoma. The anti-metastatic effects of anti-estrogens could also be explained by reduction of interactions between melanoma cells and matrix proteins. Thus, an in vitro study on murine B16 melanoma cells showed that tamoxifen and droloxifene reduce the attachment of melanoma cells to extracellular matrix proteins. Moreover, tamoxifen decreases the interactions between human ocular melanoma cells and type I collagen (44) and reduces the formation and proliferation of neoplastic cells, diminishing the occurrence of metastasis in mouse melanoma (43).

A recent experimental study on K1735-M2 mouse melanoma cells showed a more intense cytostatic action induced by endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen (45).

However, the use of estrogen-receptor modulators in treatment of melanoma still remains controversial and deserves further investigations (22).

Effect of estrogens in relation to melanoma

Various in vivo and in vitro experimental studies that have examined the effects of estrogen on melanoma in several species have often led to conflicting results.

Estradiol did not significantly influence the in vitro growth and plating efficiency of S91 mouse melanoma B line cells, but slightly increased their pigment production (46). Estrogen enhanced tumor growth and stimulated metastasis of B16 melanoma in mice (47). Also, estrogen treatment increased proliferation of B16 mouse melanoma cells inoculated intramuscularly in normal female mice or in male C57BL6J syngenic mice and was associated with a higher number of metastases (48).

Conversely, estrogen inhibited growth of hamster melanoma cell line HM-1 in vitro and reduced growth of hamster HM-1 melanoma in athymic mice (41).

An in vitro study conducted on three human melanoma cell lines, UISO-MEL-1, UISO-MEL-2 and UISO-MEL-4 showed that estradiol exposure did not influence the plating efficiency or growth of melanoma cells (42). Other in vitro results revealed that estradiol exposure induces growth inhibition of human metastatic melanoma cell lines by reducing the interleukin-8 production (49).

Chronic estradiol exposure enhanced tumor latency and reduced tumor progression in an in vivo athymic mice model bearing UISO-MEL-2 human melanoma cells (42). On the other hand, experimental results on human melanoma cell lines grown in young athymic mice showed that the incidence of metastasis slightly increases after estradiol exposure. This effect was attributed to the strong inhibition of NK cell activity induced by estradiol (50). A similar immunosuppressive effect of estradiol was associated with an increased number of pulmonary metastasis in mice bearing B16 melanoma tumors (51).

Conflicting results resulting from experimental studies may be explained by species differences, various experimental designs, different expression of estrogen receptors in various cell lines, as well as by indirect actions of estrogens.

Various clinical studies suggested a potential role of estrogens in the pathogenesis of melanoma (17; 35; 52). A retrospective study stated that ever use of estrogens is associated with a higher risk of melanoma (53). Other researches have confirmed the existence of a correlation between exposure to exogenous estrogens and the appearance of cutaneous melanoma (54; 55). However, no statistically significant association between the use of estrogens and tumor thickness was observed (53).

It is known that some cancers are estrogen dependent, such as breast cancer. The incidence rates of cutaneous melanoma in women resemble to those of breast cancer, suggesting that female sex hormones can be involved in the development of melanoma in women (56). At the same time, another study showed that women previously diagnosed with breast cancer have a higher risk of melanoma and patients with melanoma are at risk for breast cancer (57).

In addition, some studies have linked obesity with increased risk for melanoma, in the context of which the adipose tissue represents an endogenous estrogen production (54, 58).

Other reports showed that exogenous estrogens do not increase the risk for developing cutaneous melanoma (59) and various data even suggested a protective role of estrogens. First is the important advantage regarding progression of cutaneous melanoma found in the female population. Furthermore, women have a longer delay before relapse and a higher cure rate compared to men (60). A recent study pointed out that menstrual irregularity - reflecting anovulatory cycles and implying a reduced exposure to hormonal factors including endogen estrogens, can be associated with an increased risk of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma (61).

Conflicting results have been found by the numerous studies that have taken into consideration aspects that may indicate endogenous variations of estrogen levels, such as age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, number of pregnancies or age at natural menopause (58, 62-64). A case-control study highlighted a positive association between nodular melanoma and age at menarche ≥15 years, in contrast with menarche <13 years (64). Conversely, a large French prospective analysis, stated that risk of melanoma is decreased in women with age at menarche ≥15 years and age at natural menopause < 48 years, suggesting an apparent protective effect induced by a shorter ovulatory life (61).

The above overview highlighted the major differences between various clinical situations linked with modified plasma estrogen levels. The following sections will present a detailed review of the main clinical research concerning the relationship between cutaneous melanoma and both exposure to exogenous estrogens (OC and HRT) and modifications of the endogenous estrogen levels, as seen for instance in pregnancy; the results of the most relevant clinical studies are summarized in Table 1.

Oral contraceptives (OCs) and risk of melanoma

Starting with the late 1970s, few cohort studies found a higher incidence of cutaneous melanoma among women using OCs compared to women who never used OCs (65), but it must be take into account that doses of estrogens used in OC pills have declined since the 1970s. At the same time, large studies with a long-term follow-up of the patients showed that risk of developing cutaneous melanoma is higher among women using OCs, but without demonstrating a dose-effect relationship (66).

A large prospective study showed a two fold increase of melanoma risk in women who use OCs compared to women who never used OCs, with a supplementary risk in women who used OCs for over 10 years. However, the same study showed a rapid risk reduction after discontinuation of OCs, two years after cessation the treatment the risk of melanoma being similar with women who never used OCs (67). It is interesting that the same effect of OCs was observed on breast cancer.

It was assumed, that use of OCs may not be an independent risk factor for melanoma, but associated with other significant risk factors may contribute to melanoma induction. It was estimated that the risk for melanoma induced by current use of OCs is three times higher in patients with other associated risk factors and it is minimal in patients without other risk factors (67). However, other numerous studies showed opposite findings, so it has not been still confirmed whether OCs use increase the risk of cutaneous melanoma (54, 58, 62, 64, 68).

Influence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on melanoma

Menopause is the permanent cessation of menstruation, stage in which the ovaries follicular reserve is exhausted and endogenous estrogen production decreases. After menopause, women are deficient in their main estrogenic hormone, 17 β-estradiol. Estrogen deprivation exposes women to risks such as osteoporosis, stroke and other neurological pathology. HRT in menopausal women requires long-term administration of synthetic estrogen. The product 17 β-estradiol has the same action on ER-α and ER-β and is present in most therapies for HRT.

The mean age of melanoma onset in women is the early fifties, which is the same with onset of menopause (69). The risk of melanoma in post-menopausal women could be influenced by exogenous administration of estrogens, particularly for women that undergo menopause at younger ages (premature menopause). Therefore, several studies tried to unravel the possible relationship between HRT use and risk of melanoma and provided conflicting results (70). Even though most of these studies identified no connection between HRT use and risk of cutaneous melanoma (53, 54, 58, 63, 64, 68), the others indicated an elevated risk (62). Conversely, data from one prospective observational study suggested that HRT may induce a survival advantage in melanoma patients (71).

Evolution and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma in pregnancy

During pregnancy, the increased levels of melanocyte-stimulating hormone and estrogens can induce cutaneous hyperpigmentation. Characteristic are brown macules and patches on skin creases (especially of the hands), nipple and buccal mucosa. A significant increase of melanocyte-stimulating hormone synthesis occurs during the first trimester and may promote cell proliferation, which can be further intensified by growth hormone activation. Pregnancy-related skin hyperpigmentation occurs because of an increased synthesis of melanin resulting from enlarged melanocytes, whose number, however, does not change (72).

Pregnancy is also associated with darkening and enlargement of cutaneous nevi, but usually these physiological changes tend to disappear after delivery (22, 25). Also, melanocytic conjunctival lesions may change during pregnancy (73). The most common changes found in the nevi during pregnancy are structural disorganization, increased vascularization and increased pigmentation (25). Immunohistochemical evaluation of congenital nevi during pregnancy revealed a reduced expression of ER-β (25), but other research has not identified a significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women (74).

In addition to endogenous estrogen exposure, the level of growth hormone is also elevated during pregnancy and can stimulate the melanocyte-stimulating hormone signaling pathway, accelerating the growth of various skin lesions (63). Moreover, typical physiological immunosuppression during pregnancy may stimulate the development and the clinical expression of the preexisting melanocytic lesions (63).

Melanoma is the most common malignancy developing during pregnancy (75) with a rate almost double compared to general population (76). The risk of pregnancy-associated melanoma is even higher with increasing maternal age (68, 77). However, the impact of pregnancy on the clinical course of melanoma is also a source of controversy in the literature.

First studies have documented an accelerated course of melanoma during pregnancy and an enhanced risk of malignant transformation of nevi. In addition, it was suggested a worse prognosis for pregnant women diagnosed with melanoma, hence it was recommended the termination of pregnancy (78, 79).

Later studies highlighted that melanomas diagnosed during pregnancy are thicker and often localized on head, neck and torso, areas encumbered with a worse prognosis (77, 80, 81). Also, it has been revealed that pregnancy is associated with an increased incidence of lymphatic metastasis and a higher mortality rate (75, 80, 82, 83). It was also suggested that pregnancy may affect the course of the disease by inhibition of cellular immunity and stimulation of lymphangiogenesis (17, 82, 83).

Other research showed a more complex perspective, revealing that a single pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of melanoma, while multiparity and younger age at first birth are associated with risk reduction (54, 84). Other studies have also shown that women with multiple pregnancies (five or more live births) have a lower risk of developing melanoma as compared with nulliparous women (62-65, 84-86). At the same time, other reports have shown no effect of parity on the risk of developing cutaneous melanoma (54, 62).

Data from more recent studies suggest that there is no correlation between present or subsequent pregnancy and development of cutaneous melanoma. Also, in women with cutaneous melanoma there is no correlation between pregnancy and a worse prognosis, more frequent metastasis or a reduced survival. Thus, there is no scientific support for the idea that patients diagnosed with melanoma should avoid future pregnancy (7, 59, 80, 85, 86). Moreover, since the risk of transplacental metastases is low, abortion in pregnant melanoma patients is no longer recommended (85). On the other hand, considering the fact that most relapses of melanoma occur in the first 2-3 years, it is a cautious approach to avoid or postpone pregnancy for at least 3 years after melanoma treatment. However, planning future pregnancies after diagnosis of melanoma must be adapted to each particular case (70, 80-83).

There is also a controversy in the literature regarding the treatment of cutaneous melanoma during pregnancy. If the primary tumor is identified, it is necessary to excise it, because minor surgery constitutes a minimal risk for the fetus. Conversely, there are major problems for a pregnant patient with metastatic melanoma, because the fetus can be threatened by major surgery or systemic treatment (81).

Considering that early diagnosis of melanoma is the best way to increase melanoma cure rates, it is essential that the family doctor or the obstetrician perform a complete clinical examination, with careful investigation of the skin all over the body, in order to identify any suspect lesions (81, 86).

In conclusion, even if the relationship between estrogens, ERs and melanoma was extensively studied, their role in the occurrence and development of this aggressive skin malignancy has not been fully clarified. Although it has been suggested a possible link between melanoma and OC or HRT use, recent data do not confirm entirely this association. Thus, the use of OC or HRT should not be forbidden in women with a history of localized cutaneous melanoma. However, it must be taken into account that use of OC or HRT may be associated with a higher risk of melanoma in patients with other associated risk factors.

Regarding the association between melanoma and pregnancy, the current opinion is that a future pregnancy is not contraindicated in women diagnosed with localized cutaneous melanoma. However, counseling women about future pregnancies should be based on prognostic factors and must be adapted to each particular case. A closer attention should be given to each new or preexisting skin lesion during the entire pregnancy period.

Future research is required and may reveal new pathophysiological mechanisms and new therapeutic targets in cutaneous melanoma.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest concerning this article.

Acknowledgement

The first two authors contributed equally to writing and editing the manuscript.

Authors wish to thank Prof. Leon Zagrean and Prof. Bogdan O. Popescu from “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest for their support during the course of this work.

This paper is partly supported by the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development (SOPHRD), financed by the European Social Fund and the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU 141531/2014, by grant PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-1407 (Project 190/2014) financed by Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation and by Young Researchers Grant 33891/2014 financed by “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest.

References

  • 1.Aydin M, Turk G, Yuksel M, Cevik A, Mukremin AA, Yilmaz S. Effect of electromagnetic field on the sperm characteristics and histopathological status of testis in rats. Medycyna Wet. 2007;63(2):178–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan Gye MC, Park CJ. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39(1):1–9. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gutschi T, Al-Ali BM, Shamloul R, Pummer K, Trummer H. Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. Andrologia. 2011;43(5):312–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bodera1 P, Stankiewiczl W, Zawada K, Antkowiak B, Paluch M, Kieliszek1 J, Kalicki B, Bartosiñski A, Wawer I. Changes in antioxidant capacity of blood due to mutual action of electromagnetic field (1800MHz) and opioid drug (tramadol) in animal model of persistent inflammatory state. Pharmacological Reports. 2013;65(2):421–428. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(13)71017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shahin S, Singh VP, Shukla RK, Dhawan A, Gangwar RK, Singh SP, Chaturvedi CM. 2.45Hz Microwave Irradiation-Induced Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(5):1727–1751. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-0079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McLauchlan K, Steiner UE. The spin-correlated radical pair as a reaction intermediate. Molecular Physiology. 1991;73(2):241–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Till U, Timmel CR, Brocklehurst B, Hore PJ. The influence of very small magnetic fields on radical recombination reactions in the limit of slow recombination. Chemical Physics Letters. 1998;208(3):7–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gulnihal CA, Coskun Sand Seyhan N. Effects of various extremely low frequency magnetic fields on the free radical processes, natural antioxidant system and respiratory burst system activates in the heart and liver tissues. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics. 2008;45(5):326–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fernie KJ, Reynold SJ. The Effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines Avian Reproductive Biology and Physiology: A Review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B. 2005;8(2):127–140. doi: 10.1080/10937400590909022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hardell L, Sage C. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmacotherapy. 2008;62(2):104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abdullah Al-Damegh Mona. Rat testicular impairment induced by electromagnetic radiation from a conventional cellular telephone and the protective effects of the antioxidants vitamins C and E. CLINICS. 2012;67(7):785–792. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Atessahin A, Karahan I, Turk G, Gur S, Yýlmaz S, Ceribasy AO. Protective role of lycopene on cisplatin-induced changes in sperm characteristics, testicular damage and lipid peroxidation in rats. Reprod Toxicol. 2006;21(1):42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hales DB, Allen JA, Shankara T, Janus P, Buck S, Diemer T. Mitochondrial function in Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Ann NY Acad. 2005;1061(1):120–134. doi: 10.1196/annals.1336.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reproduction Update. 2001;7(5):473–481. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.5.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goraca A, Ciejka E, Piechota A. Effects of exteremely low frequency magnetic field on the parameters of oxidative stress in heart. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2010;61(3):333–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Wave Exposure from Cellular Phones on the Reproductive Pattern in Male Wistar Rats. Apply Biochemistry Biotechnology. 2011;164(4):546–559. doi: 10.1007/s12010-010-9156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cenesiz M, Atakisi O, Akar A, Onbilgin G, Ormanci N. Effects of 900 and 1800MHz Electromagnetic Field Application on Electrocardiogram, Nitric Oxide, Total Antioxidant Capacity, Total Oxidant Capacity, Total Protein, Albumin and Globulin Levels in Guinea Pigs. Kafkass Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2011;17(3):357–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Aitken RJ, Roopman P, Lewis SEM. Seeds of concern. Nature. 2004;432(7013):48–52. doi: 10.1038/432048a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Behari J, Kesari KK. Effects of microwave radiations on reproductive system of male rats. Embryo Talk. 2006;1(1):81–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heredia-Rojas JA, Caballero DE, Rodriguez AO, Ramos G, Rodriguez LE. Lack ofalterations on meiotic chromosomes and morphological characteristics of male germ cells in mice exposed to a 60 Hz and 2.0mT magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25(1):63–68. doi: 10.1002/bem.10184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Al-Akhras MA, Elbetieha A, Hasan MK, Al-Omari I, Darmani H, Albiss B. Effects ofextremely low frequency magnetic field on fertility of adult male and female rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001;22(5):340–344. doi: 10.1002/bem.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bushra AH, Leila R, Amir AA, Jafar SR. Histological Study of Testes and Sperm Parametersin Adult Mice Exposed to 50 Hz Electromagnetic Field during Developmental Period. 2011;2(5):455–462. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chung MK, Lee SJ, Kim YB, Park SC, Shin DH, Kim SH, Kim JC. Evaluation of spermatogenesis and fertility in F1 male rats after in utero and neonatal exposure to extremelylow frequency electromagnetic fields. Asian J Androl. 2005;7(2):189–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2005.00007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ivanova L, Kartashev A. The effect of alternating electric field of industrial frequency on testicles of white mice. Fiziol Zh. 1991;37(6):71–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burack G, Seto Y, Asieh S, Dunlap J. The effect of parental exposure to a 60 Hz highintensity electric field on postnatal development and sexual differentiation. Journal of Bioelectricity. 1984;3(3):451–467. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaya H, Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Dittrich R, Siebzehnrubl E, Widt L. Lipid peroxidation at various estradiol Concentrations in human circulation during ovarian stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins. Hormone Metabolism Research. 2004;36(10):693–695. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Erel O. A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable ABTS radical cation. Clin Biochem. 2004;37(4):277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ghodbane S, Lahbib A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H. Review article: Bioeffects of Static Magnetic Fields: Oxidative Stress, Genotoxic Effects, and Cancer Studies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International. 2013;2013(2):1–12. doi: 10.1155/2013/602987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mark W, Cunningham Jr, Jennifer MS, Crystal AW, Chris B. Renal Redox Response to Normal Pregnancy in the Rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304(6):443–449. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00496.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Desai NR, Kesari KK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation:oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7(5):114– 123. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertile Sterile. 2009;92(4):1318–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar S, Kesari KK, Behari J. Influence of microwave exposure on fertility of male rats. Fertile Sterile. 2010;95(4):1500–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salama N, Kishimoto T, Kanayama HO. Effects of exposure to a mobile phone on testicular function and structure in adult rabbit. Int J Androl. 2010;33(1):88–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dasdag S, Zulku f, Akdag M, Aksen F. Whole body exposure of rats to microwavesemitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(3):182–188. doi: 10.1002/bem.10083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Uzar E, Yilmaz HR, Yilmaz M, Efkan UZ, Yurekli V, Dundar B, Koyuncuoglu HR, Comlekci S. Effects of 50Hz electric field on malondyaldehide and nitric oxide levels in Spinal cord of rats at prenatal plus postnatal period. Turk J Med Science. 2011;1(1):65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bediz CS, Baltacy AK, Mogulkoc R, Oztekin E. Zinc supplementation ameliorates electromagnetic field-induced lipid peroxidation in the rat brain. Tohuko J Exp Med. 2006;208(2):133–140. doi: 10.1620/tjem.208.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gharib AO. Role of Kombucha Tea in the Control of EMF 950 MHz Induced Injury in Rat Heart and Lung Organs. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research. 2011;1(3):281–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hamada AJ, Singh A, Agarwal A. Cell Phones and their Impact on Male Fertility: Fact or Fiction. The Open Reproductive Science Journal. 2011;5(4):125–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bast A, Haenen GR, Doelman CJ. Oxidants and antioxidants: State of the art. Am J Med. 1991;91(3):2–13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90278-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Forgaçs Z, Somosy Z, Kubinyi G, Sinay H, Bakos J, Thuroçzy G, Surjan A, Hudak A, Olajos F, Lazar P. Effect of whole body 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on mouse Leydig cells. The Scientific World Journal. 2004;4(2):83–90. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2004.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amara S, Abdelmelek H, Garrel C, Guiraud P, Travant JL. Effects of sub chronic exposure to static magnetic field on testicular function in rats. Arch Med Res. 2006;37(8):947–952. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Al-Akhras MA, Daramani H, Elbetieha A. Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on sexhormones and other fertility parameters of adult male rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(2):127–131. doi: 10.1002/bem.20186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim YJ, Jeon SH, Lee KS, Lee SK, Kim N, Ju YJ, Gimm YM, Kim YW. Continuous exposure to 60Hz magnetic fields induces duration- and dose-dependent apoptosis of testicular germ cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014;35(2):100–107. doi: 10.1002/bem.21819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ozguner M, Koyu A, Cesur G, Ural M, Ozguner F, Gokcimen A, Delibas N. Biological and morphological effects on the reproductive organ of rats after exposure to electromagnetic field. Saudi Med J. 2005;26(3):405–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ribeiro EP, Rhoden EL, Horn MM, Rhoden C, Lima LP, Toniolo L. Effects of subchronic exposure to radio frequency from a conventional cellular telephone on testicular function in adult rats. J Urol. 2007;177(1):395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Djeridane Y, Touitou Y, de Seze R. Influence of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM-900 cellular telephones on the circadian patterns of gonadal, adrenal and pituitary hormones in men. Radiat Res. 2008;169(3):337–343. doi: 10.1667/RR0922.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kesari KKBJ. Effects of microwave at 2.45 GHz radiations on reproductive system of male rats. Toxicoll Environ Chem. 2010;92(6):1135–1147. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang SM, Wang DW, Peng RY, Gao YB, Yang Y, Hu WH, Chen HY, Zhang YR, Gao Y. Effect of electromagnetic pulse irradiation on structure and function of Leydig cells in mice. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2003;9(5):327–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhou W, Wang XB, Yang JQ, Liu Y, Zhang GB. Influence of electromagnetic irradiation on P450scc mRNA expression in rat testis tissues and protective effect of the shield. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2005;11(4):269–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Khyyat LI. The histopathological effects of an electromagnetic field on the kidney and testis of mice. Eur Asia Journal of Biosci. 2011;5(1):103–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rajaei F, Mahdi F, Ghasemi N, Sarreshtehdari M, Gheybi NA, Saraeisahneh MS. Effect of electromagnetic field on mice epididymis and vas deferaneA morphometric study. J Gorgan University Med Science. 2009;1(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Margonato V, Veicsteinas A, Conti R, Nicolini P, Cerretelli P. Biological effects of prolonged exposure to ELF electromagnetic fields in rats. Bioelectromagnetic. 1993;14(5):479–493. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250140508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee JS, Ahn SS, Jung KC, Kim YW, Lee SK. Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure on testicular germ cell apoptosis in mice. Asian J Androl. 2004;6(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lee B, Johny H, Lim J, Kim J. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on the antioxidant defense system in mouse brain: A chemiluminescence study. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2004;73(2):43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Amman RP. Use of animal model for detecting specific alterations in reproduction. Fundamental Apply Toxicology. 1982;2(1):13–26. doi: 10.1016/s0272-0590(82)80059-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramadan LA, Abd-Allah AD, Hamdy AA, Saad-El-Din AA. Testicular toxicity effects of magnetic field exposure and prophylactic role of coenzyme Q 10 and L-carnitine in mice. Pharmacological Research. 2002;46(4):363–370. doi: 10.1016/s1043661802001718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hong R, Zhang V, Liu Y, Weng EQ. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on DNA of testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure in mice. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing ZaZhi. 2005;23(6):414–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ryan BM, Symanski RR, Pomeranz LE, Johnson TR, Gauger JR, McCormick DL. Multigeneration reproductive toxicity assessment of 60-Hz magnetic fields using a continuous breeding protocol in rats. Teratology. 1999;59(3):156–162. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199903)59:3<156::AID-TERA7>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cao XW, Zhao TD, Wang CH, Zhou Q, Li LQ, Yao HG, Zhang SQ, Tang JT, Wei W. Alternating magnetic field damages the reproductive function of murine testis. Zhonghua Nan KeXue. 2009;15(6):530–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest) are provided here courtesy of Acta Endocrinologica Foundation

RESOURCES