Abstract
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a group of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in social interaction and communication, and repetitive behaviors. In addition, co-morbidities such as gastro-intestinal problems have frequently been reported. Mutations and deletion of proteins of the SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains (SHANK) gene-family were identified in patients with ASD, and Shank knock-out mouse models display autism-like phenotypes. SHANK3 proteins are not only expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we show expression in gastrointestinal (GI) epithelium and report a significantly different GI morphology in Shank3 knock-out (KO) mice. Further, we detected a significantly altered microbiota composition measured in feces of Shank3 KO mice that may contribute to inflammatory responses affecting brain development. In line with this, we found higher E. coli lipopolysaccharide levels in liver samples of Shank3 KO mice, and detected an increase in Interleukin-6 and activated astrocytes in Shank3 KO mice. We conclude that apart from its well-known role in the CNS, SHANK3 plays a specific role in the GI tract that may contribute to the ASD phenotype by extracerebral mechanisms.
Keywords: microbiome, gut, ProSAP2, Phelan McDermid Syndrome, gut–brain interaction, leaky gut, IL-6, SHANK
1. Introduction
SHANK3 (SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 3, also known as proline-rich synapse-associated protein 2 (ProSAP2)) is a known scaffolding protein of the postsynaptic density (PSD) of glutamatergic excitatory synapses [1,2,3] that has been associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) [4,5,6,7]. Further, the Phelan McDermid Syndrome (PMDS/22q13.3 deletion syndrome) is a rare genetic disorder associated with a heterozygous loss of SHANK3 in the majority of patients. Individuals with PMDS show symptoms of the autism spectrum along with mental retardation and muscular hypotonia, and can suffer from seizures and gastrointestinal (GI) problems [8,9,10]. Besides the CNS, SHANK3 is expressed in different levels in many tissues, such as liver, heart, kidney, skeletal muscle [8], and epithelial cells of the GI tract [11,12].
A growing number of studies indicate a role of abnormal development and function of the gastro-intestinal (GI) system as a factor in ASD, with many patients having symptoms associated with GI disorders [13]. Research indicates a link between the dysfunctions associated with ASD and GI problems such as abnormal trace metal uptake, alterations in the microbiome, and immune dysfunction and inflammatory processes [13,14]. In line with this, we have reported expression of SHANK3 in human enterocytes, where SHANK3 was functionally linked to zinc (Zn) transporter levels mediating Zn absorption [12].
The gut harbors a complex community of microbes—the microbiome—that is able to influence, among others, the development of the central nervous system (CNS) [15]. Recently, a study identified a dysregulation of several genera and species of bacteria in the gut and colon of Shank3 KO mice [16] and the treatment of Shank3 KO mice with L. reuteri led to the attenuation of some ASD-associated behaviors [16]. However, the underlying factors of the altered microbiota composition are currently not well understood.
Thus, here, we made use of a Shank3αβ knock-out mouse line that was reported to display ASD-like behavior with abnormal ultrasonic vocalization, repetitive self-grooming, and reduced interest in novel mice in nonsocial versus novel social pairing in the three-chamber test [17,18]. In these animals we performed a detailed analysis of the GI tract including further analyses determining microbiota composition. Our results confirm expression of SHANK3 in the GI epithelium. Further, Shank3αβ knock-out mice display an altered GI morphology and, in line with published data [16] we can confirm changes in gut microbiota composition. Altered GI morphology and microbiota composition lead to exaggerated responses to bacterial metabolites and compounds eliciting an immune response [19]. An increase of inflammatory markers has been reported in individuals with ASD and animal models [20,21]. Especially the cytokine Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been proposed as a biomarker for autism [22] and was shown to be mechanistically linked to the development of autistic behaviors in mice [23,24,25]. Intriguingly, we detected an increase in IL-6 levels in Shank3αβ knock-out mice along with increased activation of astrocytes in the frontal cortex of Shank3αβ knock-out mice. Astrocyte activation has previously been linked to ASD [26].
2. Results
2.1. SHANK3 is Expressed in GI Epithelium of Mice
In the first set of experiments, we investigated the GI system of Shank3αβ KO mice that have been characterized in the lab previously [27]. Using the method described by Nik and Carlsson [28], we separated intestinal epithelium from mesenchyme. The purity of the lysate was confirmed by Western Blot analysis of the expression of Vimentin, whose presence would indicate unsuccessful separation of the epithelium, and Cytokeratin 7, which should be found in epithelium but not in mesenchymal cells of the submucosa (Figure S1). Apart from the expression of many ASD-associated genes [29] normally found at synapses in the CNS, we detected mRNA of SHANK family proteins and their “synaptic” interaction partners in GI epithelium (Figure 1A).
On protein level, in wildtype animals, only expression of SHANK2 and SHANK3, but not SHANK1 was found in GI epithelium in mice (Figure 1B). Further, in gut epithelium obtained from Shank3αβ KO mice, gene expression of Shank2 and Shank3 was decreased in comparison to wild type controls (Figure 1C). Knock-out animals do not show a total loss of Shank3 due to the expression of the Shank3γ isoform that is detected by qRT-PCR primers.
2.2. Shank3 KO Mice Show Abnormal GI Morphology
Shank3αβ KO mice did not show signs of diarrhea, stool blood, weight loss, or increased mortality. However, the analysis of the GI tract of Shank3αβ KO mice revealed significantly altered gut morphology (Figure 2A–D). Using paraffin-embedded sections from intestine, we performed histological and morphometric analyses. Shank3αβ KO mice show a significantly decreased length, but not width, of small intestinal villi compared to wild type mice (Figure 2B,C). Given that the crypt depth remains unchanged in Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 2D), the ratio between villi length and crypt depth, which is considered normal in a range between 3 and 5, is reduced to below 3 in Shank3αβ KO mice.
Further analyses of the GI epithelium using immunohistochemistry and protein biochemistry revealed further alterations. We selected three markers, FABP2 (Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2), CLAUDIN3, and ZONULIN1 (Figure 2E,F). FABP2 is a cytosolic protein found in small intestine epithelial cells where it participates in the uptake, intracellular metabolism, and transport of long chain fatty acids. CLAUDIN3 is a cell adhesion protein found at tight junctions between gut epithelial cells. ZONULIN1 is a modulator of tight junctions and alterations in the ZONULIN-regulated pathways have been associated with both intestinal and extra-intestinal inflammatory disorders [30]. Especially a decrease in FABP2 and increase in ZONULIN1 have been proposed as markers of gut dysbiosis and gut permeability integrity [31]. Protein levels were assessed measuring fluorescence intensities. The results reveal slight but not significantly lower levels of FABP2 in Shank3αβ KO mice. In contrast, the levels of ZONULIN1 were significantly higher in Shank3αβ KO mice compared to wild types (Figure 2E). This result was confirmed using gut epithelial protein lysate and western blotting (Figure 2G). No significant differences were found in CLAUDIN3 levels (Figure 2F).
A loss of intestinal barrier function was reported secondary to upregulation of ZONULIN, which is, to our knowledge, the only known physiological modulator of intercellular tight junctions [32]. Increased intestinal permeability may be responsible for increased translocation of bacterial components and metabolites into the systemic circulation [33]. Given the observed abnormalities in GI epithelium, we therefore investigated next whether the abnormal GI morphology of Shank3αβ KO mice facilitates the enrichment of bacterial compounds in the host system.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels from bacterial origin were not significantly different in the GI epithelium between Shank3αβ KO and wild type mice (Figure 2F). Detoxification and degradation of microbial products from gut-derived microbiota is a function of the liver. In the liver, hepatocytes mediate the clearance of endotoxin of intestinal origin [34]. Interestingly, when we analyzed liver samples regarding the levels of bacterial (E. coli) LPS, we found a significant increase in liver LPS in Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 2G), hinting at increased LPS absorption (leakiness) of the GI system.
2.3. The Microbiome of Shank3 KO Mice Is Altered
Abnormalities in the GI system might translate into persistent changes that may affect several processes and features such as microbiota composition and may cause chronic inflammatory activity. Altered composition of gut microbiota has been reported before in Shank3 KO mice [16]. Thus, in the next set of experiments, we assessed the microbiome of Shank3αβ KO mice to confirm the presence of alterations in our mice. Feces from 10 weeks old Shank3αβ KO mice were collected and compared to age and gender matched controls. Housing conditions of the mice (bedding material, nesting material, number of animals per cage) were the same between groups and animals were housed side by side in wire cages. DNA was extracted from feces from four mice and pooled to one sample and three samples per group were analyzed using 16s microbiome profiling (Figure 3). The results show significant alterations in the microbiome of Shankαβ KO mice compared to Controls (Figure S2A,B). The amount of Actinobacteria was significantly higher in feces from Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 3A). While the amount of Bacterioidetes (Figure 3B) was not altered, significantly higher levels of Firmicutes (Figure 3C) were detected in Shank3αβ KO mice. Further, only in Shank3αβ KO mice, Deferribacteres (Figure 3D), Tenericutes (Figure 3F), and Chlamydiae (Figure 3H) were found. In contrast, significantly lower levels of Proteobacteria (Figure 3E) and Verrucomicrobia (Figure 3G) were detected. In general, the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria dominate the microbiome of control mice, while a shift towards Firmicutes and Actinobacteria occurs in Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 3I).
Given that an increase in Actinobacteria in the gut of Shank3 KO mice has been reported before [16], we closer investigated the alterations within this phylum. The increase in Actinobacteria was caused by a significant increase in the order Bifidobacteriales (class Actinobacteria) and Eggerthellales (class Coriobacteria) (Figure 3J,K). Both orders consist of one detected family, Bifidobacteriaceae and Eggerthellaceae, respectively. Within the family Bifidobacteriaceae, only bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium were detected. Within the family Eggerthellaceae, the genus Adlercreutzia did not show an increase, while bacteria of the genus Asaccharobacter, Eggerthella, Enterorhabdus, and Paraeggerthella increased in abundance (Figure 3L). In particular, the bacteria species Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, Assacharobacter WCA-131-CoC-2, Eggerthella YY7918, and Enterorhabdus caecimuris were drivers of this increase (Figure S2C), which have been associated with inflammation and infection of the gastrointestinal tract [35,36]. However, classification on species level using 16S RNA sequencing cannot be done with a high level of confidence and needs to be confirmed by more detailed studies in the future. Another limitation of the performed analysis is that mice have been pooled into three samples, which obscures inter-individual differences. For analysis, we assumed a normal distribution of data. While pooled samples within one group showed great homogeneity, high levels of variability on individual level are not uncommon for microbiota composition.
2.4. Altered GI Morphology and Microbiome of Shank3 KO Mice May Be Linked to Increased Inflammatory Marker Expression
One hypothesis that has been proposed for ASD is that GI pathologies such as a “leaky gut” will expose the host to epitopes from microbiota that reside within the gut in altered composition, and thereby produce an immune activation leading to inflammatory responses, which may contribute to CNS pathologies during certain time-windows in development. Altered inflammatory cytokine levels have been reported recently in Shank3 KO mice [16].
Therefore, next, to investigate whether higher intestinal barrier dysfunction of Shank3αβ KO mice might translate into increased expression of inflammatory markers, we analyzed the expression of Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker for astrogliosis, in the cortex of WT and Shank3αβ KO mice using immunohistochemistry. Our results reveal a significantly increased number of GFAP positive cells in Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 4A). Further, because of its importance in relation to ASD, we analyzed IL-6 levels in brain sections of Shank3αβ KO mice. IL-6 signals resulted from diffuse staining of neural tissue and signals from blood vessels. The immunofluorescence of IL-6 was slightly, but not significantly, higher in neural tissue of Shank3αβ KO mice compared to WT (Figure 4B). In contrast, signals in blood vessels were significantly increased in Shank3αβ KO mice (Figure 4B) hinting at a systemic increase of IL-6 as previously reported in individuals with ASD.
3. Discussion
A growing amount of research reveals abnormalities in the GI system of ASD patients with many of them having symptoms associated with GI disorders. It is likely that these extracerebral alterations contribute to and modify the pathology of ASD. Here, we investigated Shank3αβ KO mice and found significant GI abnormalities that translated into altered microbiota composition, increased accumulation of bacterial LPS in liver, and signs of increased immune activation in the periphery and the brain.
The structural and functional integrity of the gastrointestinal mucosal barrier is important for protection from various luminal agents such as acids, enzymes, bacteria, viruses, and toxins. The abnormal GI morphology may lead to downstream effects resulting in the often-reported GI-related symptoms and co-morbidities in ASD [13]. One frequently reported GI alteration in ASD is an altered microbiome. In mammals, intestinal microbiota have a marked influence on health status via gut–brain–microbiota interactions [37,38]. In humans, stool was shown to contain a high bacterial composition, with >90% of sequence data belonging to bacteria [39], with predominately bacteria belonging to two phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes [39]. Interestingly, feces of mice also showed mostly bacteria from the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes in our analyses. The dysbiosis we observed in Shank3αβ KO mice is marked by an increase in microbiota of the phylum Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, and bacteria from the phylum Tenericutes, Deferribacteres, and Chlamydiae were only present in Shank3αβ KO mice, while the mount of Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia was lower. Interestingly, in humans, a significant increase in the Actinobacterium phylum was found in patients with ASD [40]. Our results are also in line with the previous reported alterations in gut microbiota of Shank3 KO mice [16], where similar to our results, an increase in Actinobacteria was reported. The consistent increase in Actinobacteria in two distinct Shank3 KO models housed in different animal facilities therefore arises as consistent pattern with relation to ASD in humans.
On genus level, we found a significant increase in Enterorhabdus and Mucispirillum in Shank3αβ KO mice. Both genera contain species that have been associated with both inflammatory markers and active colitis [36,41]. In particular, Mucispirillum expansion has been observed during intestinal inflammation [41]. In addition, we observed an increase in the Clostridium genus. Bacteria of this genus are major producers of toxins and an increase has been reported in ASD [40,42]. Further, Shank3αβ KO mice show significantly higher levels of Parasutterella. Parasutterella were reported to be characteristic for patients with Crohn’s disease [43] but they also emerged as significantly associated with children with Autism and functional gastrointestinal disorders that experience abdominal pain [44]. Among the genera significantly decreased in Shank3αβ KO mice were Akkermansia. Akkermansia (e.g., Akkermansi muciniphila) were found low in feces of children with autism [45]. In general, a picture emerges where the observed alterations in the microbiota composition of Shank3αβ KO mice support a model of increased inflammation.
In ASD, dysbiosis of microbiota has been associated with a disruption of the mucosal barrier leading to alteration in the intestinal permeability [46], which may cause a change in the inflammatory status of mice, a major process in the interaction between gut and brain. In our study, we could confirm the previously reported expression of Shank3 in gut epithelial cells [12]. Loss of Shank3αβ in mice not only produces a phenotype in nervous tissue. Here, we report abnormal GI morphology. The length of villi was reduced in Shank3αβ KO mice and ZONULIN expressed at significantly higher level.
Increased intestinal permeability has been recently proposed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases [32], such as irritable bowel syndrome [47], but also ASD [48]. Since the intestinal epithelium provides the interface between host and environment, inappropriate antigen trafficking through the intestinal mucosa may occur upon increased intestinal permeability. While under normal physiological conditions, the majority of antigens passes through the transcellular pathway, where lysosomal degradation produces small non-immunogenic peptides, only ∼10% of proteins cross the epithelium through the paracellular pathway as full intact proteins or partially digested peptides. This results in antigenic tolerance, which can be severely affected in case this ratio changes [32]. Intestinal permeability in turn is tightly connected to microbiota composition. ZONULIN is a major regulator of intestinal permeability and an increase in ZONULIN as observed here in Shank3αβ KO mice has been associated with increased permeability [49].
In line with this, we could show that bacterial LPS accumulates in significantly higher amount in the liver of Shank3αβ KO mice. Together, these results hint towards a disruption of the mucosal barrier.
We could further confirm the increased expression of inflammatory markers in Shank3 KO mice. In particular, we observed significantly higher IL-6 levels in the capillary network within the brain of Shank3αβ KO mice, likely reflecting higher systemic IL-6 levels. Increased serum cytokine levels in autistic patients have previously been modeled in mice by maternal immune activation (MIA). MIA results in the production of inflammatory cytokines leading to neurological and immunological disturbances in the offspring resulting in autism-like behavioral deficits. These studies have pointed towards IL-6 as a key cytokine involved in these events [25]. During inflammation, IL-6 was shown to induce the expression of other cytokines and immune regulatory genes. In addition, IL-6 can initiate the transcription of neural regulatory genes [25]. Intriguingly, administration of an anti-IL-6 antibody in MIA mice rescued some of the behavioral deficits.
The increased levels of IL-6 were accompanied by significantly increased number of GFAP positive cells in the brain of Shank3αβ KO mice. GFAP expression is a marker for astrogliosis [50] and increased levels of GFAP expression in cortex were also reported in some human individuals with ASD [51].
Taken together, in line with our previous report on SHANK3 in the GI tract [12] the presence of other “synaptic” proteins in the GI epithelium makes the existence of a protein complex similar to the one described at excitatory postsynapses in enterocytes more than likely. The loss of this complex may lead to morphological and functional abnormalities in the GI tract, ultimately resulting in alterations in the microbiome and the passage of bacterial metabolites and compounds into the host animal. While our data shows correlation and not causation, these molecules may act as trigger for immune responses leading to increased levels of cytokines, among them IL-6 causing an inflammatory response that ultimately will affect brain development and function, e.g., via the activation of astrocytes. Thus, the contribution of extracerebral factors to the phenotype of SHANK3 deficient mice and humans is likely. The possibility of specific interventions to alter the microbiome may provide new vistas for novel therapeutic approaches such as dietary manipulations in ASD.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials
Paraformaldehyde was purchased from Merck and D-Saccharose was from Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany. Alexa Fluor conjugated secondary antibodies and ProLong® Gold antifade reagent from Invitrogen/Life Technologies Europe, Darmstadt, Germany. Zonulin 1 antibody was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Invitrogen) (Waltham, MA, USA); Claudin3 antibody from Abcam (Berlin, Germany); FABP2 antibody from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Invitrogen); LPS antibody from Origene (Rockville, MD, USA); and IL6 antibody was purchased from Cell signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, USA); GFAP antibody was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); Cytokeratin and Vimentin antibody from Abcam. For SHANK3 western blotting in-house polyclonal rabbit SHANK3 antibodies were used that have been described previously [27,52]. iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis Kit, SSoAdvanced Universal SYBR® Green Supermix and customized PrimePCR plates were purchased from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA. QuantiTect Primer Assays, RNeasy Mini Kit and QuantiFastTM SYBR_Green RT-PCR kit were purchased from Qiagen, Hilden, Germany. Unless otherwise indicated, all other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
4.2. Animals
Shank3αβ mutants were published and characterized before and raised on a C57BL/6 background [27]. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the guidelines for the welfare of experimental animals issued by the Federal Government of Germany and approved by the Regierungspraesidium Tuebingen and the local ethics committee (Ulm University) (project code - O.103, date of approval May 12th 2016). Both wild type and Shank3αβ KO mice received the same standard laboratory diet (ssniff GmbH, Germany) and consumed similar amounts of food and water that was accessed ad libitum.
4.3. Microbiome Analysis
DNA extraction—DNA extraction of murine fecal samples was performed using the Mo Bio PowerFecal DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. After elution, the resulting DNA concentration was measured on the Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Purity was assessed by calculating the measured A260/A280 ratio using a Nanodrop. DNA samples with an A260/A280 ratio in between 1.7 to 2.0 were considered pure and used for MiSeq.
Pyrosequencing of 16S rDNA region V3 to V5—Primers were designed to target conserved sequences around the variable region 3 to 5 (V3 to V5) of bacterial 16S rDNA. 16s Microbiome Profiling with MiSeq was performed by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany).
Pyrosequencing data processing and taxonomic classification—Data processing and taxonomic classification was performed by Eurofins Genomics. In brief, after removing all reads with errors, the remaining reads were processed using minimum entropy decomposition (MED), thereby partitioning the marker gene dataset into OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units). Taxonomic information was assigned to each OTU by BLAST alignments of representative cluster sequences to the NCBI database. A specific taxonomic assignment for each OUT was transferred from a set of best-matching reference sequences. Only reference sequences with an 80% sequence identity across at least 80% of the sequence were considered for reference purposes. Sequences were not assigned to an OTU if they were considered as noise according to the OTU picking algorithm (including potential chimeric sequences and singletons). OTU and taxonomic assignments were further processed with the QIIME software package (version 1.8.0, http://qiime.org/). Normalization after Angly [53] of bacterial and archaea taxonomic assignment abundance with lineage specific copy numbers of marker genes was performed for estimate improvement. Therefore, the number of reads assigned to one species was divided by a known or assumed number of marker regions/genes.
Statistical analysis was performed testing for significance without correction for multiple comparisons due to the low number of simultaneous tested hypotheses. Correction for multiple comparisons does not alter results reported in the manuscript with the exception of differences observed for Proteobacteria on phylum level.
4.4. Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded sections of small intestine were cut at 4.5 to 5 μm thickness. Afterwards, sections were treated with Xylene 2× for 5 min each and submerged in 100%, 90%, 70% Ethanol and H2O for 5 min each. Sections were treated in 10 mM sodium citrat buffer pH 6.0 for 15 min around boiling point (Microwave at 600 W). The slides were cooled down to room temperature (RT) for approximately 30 min und washed two times in PBS for 2 min each. The tissue on each slide was surrounded with a fat tissue stick. To avoid unspecific antibody binding the tissue was blocked with blocking solution (BS) (10% FBS in 1× PBS) for 1 h at RT. Subsequently, the tissue was incubated with primary antibody diluted in BS for 2 h at RT in a humid chamber. After washing 3× with PBS for 5 min, the tissue was incubated with secondary antibody, diluted in BS, for 1 h in a humid chamber, followed by a wash step with PBS for 5 min. The tissue was counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-Diamidin-2-phenylindol).
Frozen brain sections were cut at 14 μm thickness. After cryosections were thawed for 20 min in a hydrated staining chamber, sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/4% sucrose/PBS for 20 min and washed three times in PBS for 5 min each. Subsequently, sections were treated with 1× PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 20 min at RT and 1× PBS with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 10 min at RT. To avoid unspecific antibody binding blocking was performed with blocking solution (BS) (10% FBS in 1× PBS) for 1 h at RT. Afterwards, the tissue was incubated with primary antibody diluted in BS overnight at 4 °C in a humid chamber. The following day after washing with 1× PBS with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 10 min, the tissue was incubated with secondary antibody coupled to alexa488 or alexa568, diluted in BS, for 2 h at 37 °C in a dark humid chamber, followed by a 3× wash steps with 1× PBS with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 5 min each and a 5 min wash step with 1× PBS. The tissue was counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-Diamidin-2-phenylindol) for 5 min at RT, washed with aqua bidest before being mounted with Vecta Mount. Fluorescence images were obtained using an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM710, Göttingen, Germany) and an ImageXpress Micro Spinning Disc Confocal High-Content Imaging System (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), and analyses of signal intensities were performed with ImageJ 1.48r.
4.5. Histology
Paraffin-embedded sections from intestine were obtained of small intestine from adult mice (10 weeks of age). From each intestine, 4 cm were fixed in 4% buffered formalin. Per sample, three small parts were embedded in paraffin wax longitudinally (for cross sections) and horizontally (for longitudinal sections). For morphological analyses, small intestinal sections were cut at 2 µm and stained with Haematoxylin/Eosin (HE) or the periodic acid–Schiff (PAS)-reaction. Immunohistochemistry staining of 4.5 to 5 μm sections was performed using the Benchmark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical systems, Tucson, USA). All required reagents were purchased from Ventana. Dilution of primary antibodies was done according to the respective manufacturer’s recommendations. For detection of primary antibody the OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit or the ultra universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Kit was used. Additionally, sections were washed in water, lightly counterstained with Haematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Images were obtained using the Mirax Desk scanner and the MIRAX Viewer 1.12.22.0 software (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).
4.6. qRT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All of the optional purification steps were performed and RNA eluted with sterile RNAse-free water.
cDNA synthesis of pooled RNAs was performed with the iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol in a total reaction volume of 20 µL and a maximum of 1 µg RNA/reaction. Quantitative real-time-PCR was performed using the SSoAdvanced Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and customized PrimePCR plates in 96 well format with immobilized primers (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with a final reaction volume of 20 µL and 2 ng cDNA/well. Resulting data were analyzed using the hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) or Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene as an internal standard to normalize transcript levels. Cycle threshold (ct) values were calculated by the CFX Manager (Bio-Rad, version 3.1, Hercules, CA, USA).
Alternatively, first strand synthesis and quantitative real-time-PCR amplification were performed in a one-step, single-tube format using the QuantiFastTM SYBR_Green RT-PCR kit from Qiagen according to the manufacturer’s protocol in a total volume of 20 µL. Thermal cycling and fluorescent detection were performed using the Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR machine (model 2-Plex HRM) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The SYBR Green I reporter dye signal was measured. Resulting data were analyzed using the HMBS gene as an internal standard to normalize transcript levels. Cycle threshold (ct) values were calculated by the Rotor-Gene Q Software (Qiagen, version 2.0.2, Hilden, Germany). All quantitative real-time PCR reactions were run in technical triplicates and mean ct-values for each reaction were taken into account for calculations.
4.7. Protein Biochemistry
To obtain homogenate from GI tissue, small intestinal epithelium was isolated from mesenchyme following a protocol after Nik and Carlsson [28]. In brief, small intestine was cut into 4–5 cm long pieces. Gut mucus was removed by gently squeezing it out of the intestine with the blunt point of tweezers. Each piece was inverted by inserting a rod, securing the intestine at one end with a suture and pulling the rod back. The rod with the inverted piece was inserted into a pipet tip (1000 μL) and one end of the intestine pulled onto the tip. After careful removal of the rod, the second end of the intestinal piece is pinched off with a suture. The inverted intestine with the attached pipet tip was submerged in cell recovery solution and repeatedly inflated and reflated with air over the course of at least 30 min per piece. During this time the epithelium is separated from the other intestinal layers. For lysis, RIPA buffer + PI (Complete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablets; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) is applied to the collected mouse tissue. To disrupt the epithelium a sonicator was used (4 pulses, lasting 1 s each). Afterwards the lysate was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C on a rotator followed by centrifugation for 20 min at 4 °C at 11,700 rpm. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford protein assay.
To obtain homogenate from liver tissue, tissue was immersed in Hepes Sucrose buffer (10 mM Hepes, 0.32 M Sucrose) and disrupted using a sonicator (fisherbrand sonic dismembranator 120, Fisher scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare). Immunoreactivity was visualized using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies and the SuperSignal detection system (Pierce, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
4.8. Statistic
Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism 5 (La Jolla, CA, USA), and tested for significance using t tests. All values were normally distributed. In experiments using pooled samples or three replicates, normal distribution was not tested but assumed as the most likely scenario. Statistical tests were two tailed with a significance level of α ≤ 0.05. Significances are stated with p values <0.05 *; <0.01 **; <0.001 ***.
qRT PCR quantification—Relative quantification is based on internal reference genes to determine virtual mRNA levels of target genes. Cycle threshold (ct) values were calculated by the Rotor-Gene Q Software (version 2.0.2, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Ct values were transformed into virtual mRNA levels according to the formula: Virtual mRNA level = 10 * ((ct(target) − ct(standart))/slope of standard curve).
Western blot quantification—Evaluation of bands from Western blots (WBs) was performed using ImageJ. Three independent experiments were performed and blots imaged using a UVITEC Alliance Q9 Advanced system (Cleaver scientific, Rugby, UK). The individual bands were selected and the integrated density was measured. All WB bands were normalized to β-Actin and the ratios averaged and tested for significance.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Katharina Mangus, Claudia Schlosser and the Department of Pathology of the Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/9/2134/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.M.G.; Data curation, A.K.S.; Formal analysis, A.K.S. and A.M.G.; Funding acquisition, T.M.B. and A.M.G.; Investigation, A.K.S., K.S. and A.M.G.; Methodology, A.K.S., J.B. and K.S.; Resources, J.B. and T.M.B.; Supervision, T.M.B. and A.M.G.; Writing—original draft, A.M.G.; Writing—review & editing, A.K.S. and T.M.B.
Funding
T.M.B. has received support from the DFG (SFB1149, A02), the Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung, the Helmholtz Society (DZNE, Ulm Site), and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Joint Undertaking (AIMS-2-Trials) under grant agreement n°777394, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution. A.M.G. was supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung (214_A251).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 1.Boeckers T.M., Bockmann J., Kreutz M.R., Gundelfinger E.D. ProSAP/SHANK proteins—A family of higher order organizing molecules of the postsynaptic density with an emerging role in human neurological disease. J. Neurochem. 2002;81:903–910. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lim S., Naisbitt S., Yoon J., Hwang J., Suh P., Sheng M., Kim E. Characterization of the SHANK Family of Synaptic Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:29510–29518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.41.29510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Naisbitt S., Kim E., Tu J.C., Xiao B., Sala C., Valtschanoff J., Weinberg R.J., Worley P.F., Sheng M. SHANK, a novel family of postsynaptic density proteins that binds to the NMDA receptor/PSD-95/GKAP complex and cortactin. Neuron. 1999;23:569–582. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80809-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bourgeron T. A synaptic trek to autism. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009;19:231–234. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delorme R., Ey E., Toro R., Leboyer M., Gillberg C., Bourgeron T. Progress toward treatments for synaptic defects in autism. Nat. Med. 2013;19:685–694. doi: 10.1038/nm.3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grabrucker A.M., Schmeisser M.J., Schoen M., Boeckers T.M. Postsynaptic ProSAP/SHANK scaffolds in the cross-hair of synaptopathies. Trends Cell. Biol. 2011;21:594–603. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guilmatre A., Huguet G., Delorme R., Bourgeron T. The emerging role of SHANK genes in neuropsychiatric disorders. Dev. Neurobiol. 2014;74:113–122. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bonaglia M.C., Giorda R., Borgatti R., Felisari G., Gagliardi C., Selicorni A., Zuffardi O. Disruption of the ProSAP2 gene in a t(12;22)(q24.1;q13.3) is associated with the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001;69:261–268. doi: 10.1086/321293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kolevzon A., Angarita B., Bush L., Wang A.T., Frank Y., Yang A., Rapaport R., Saland J., Srivastava S., Farrell C., et al. Phelan-McDermid syndrome: A review of the literature and practice parameters for medical assessment and monitoring. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2014;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wong A.C., Ning Y., Flint J., Clark K., Dumanski J.P., Ledbetter D.H., McDermid H.E. Molecular characterization of a 130-kb terminal microdeletion at 22q in a child with mild mental retardation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997;60:113–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huett A., Leong J.M., Podolsky D.K., Xavier R.J. The cytoskeletal scaffold SHANK3 is recruited to pathogen-induced actin rearrangements. Exp. Cell Res. 2009;315:2001–2011. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pfaender S., Sauer A.K., Hagmeyer S., Mangus K., Linta L., Liebau S., Bockmann J., Huguet G., Bourgeron T., Boeckers T.M., et al. Zinc deficiency and low enterocyte zinc transporter expression in human patients with autism related mutations in SHANK3. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45190. doi: 10.1038/srep45190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vela G., Stark P., Socha M., Sauer A.K., Hagmeyer S., Grabrucker A.M. Zinc in gut–brain interaction in Autism and neurological disorders. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:972791. doi: 10.1155/2015/972791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hughes H., Ko E.M., Rose D., Ashwood P. Immune Dysfunction and Autoimmunity as Pathological Mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018;12:405. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mulle J.G., Sharp W.G., Cubells J.F. The gut microbiome: A new frontier in autism research. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15:337. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0337-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tabouy L., Getselter D., Ziv O., Karpuj M., Tabouy T., Lukic I., Maayouf R., Werbner N., Ben-Amram H., Nuriel-Ohayon M., et al. Dysbiosis of microbiome and probiotic treatment in a genetic model of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;73:310–319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang Y.H., Ehlers M.D. Modeling autism by SHANK gene mutations in mice. Neuron. 2013;78:8–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoo J., Bakes J., Bradley C., Collingridge G.L., Kaang B.K. SHANK mutant mice as an animal model of autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014;369:20130143. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang M., Zhou J., He F., Cai C., Wang H., Wang Y., Lin Y., Rong H., Cheng G., Xu R., Zhou W. Alteration of gut microbiota-associated epitopes in children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;75:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gumusoglu S.B., Stevens H.E. Maternal Inflammation and Neurodevelopmental Programming: A Review of Preclinical Outcomes and Implications for Translational Psychiatry. Biol. Psychiatry. 2018;85:107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boulanger-Bertolus J., Pancaro C., Mashour G.A. Increasing Role of Maternal Immune Activation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018;12:230. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang C.J., Liu C.L., Sang B., Zhu X.M., Du Y.J. The combined role of serotonin and interleukin-6 as biomarker for autism. Neuroscience. 2015;2015. 284:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gumusoglu S.B., Fine R.S., Murray S.J., Bittle J.L., Stevens H.E. The role of IL-6 in neurodevelopment after prenatal stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017;65:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wei H., Alberts I., Li X. Brain IL-6 and autism. Neuroscience. 2013;252:320–325. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parker-Athill E.C., Tan J. Maternal immune activation and autism spectrum disorder: Interleukin-6 signaling as a key mechanistic pathway. Neurosignals. 2010;18:113–128. doi: 10.1159/000319828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Petrelli F., Pucci L., Bezzi P. Astrocytes and Microglia and Their Potential Link with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016;10:21. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schmeisser M.J., Ey E., Wegener S., Bockmann J., Stempel A.V., Kuebler A., Janssen A.-L., Udvardi P.T., Shiban E., Spilker C., et al. Autistic-like behaviours and hyperactivity in mice lacking ProSAP1/SHANK2. Nature. 2012;486:256–260. doi: 10.1038/nature11015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nik A.M., Carlsson P. Separation of intact intestinal epithelium from mesenchyme. Biotechniques. 2013;55:42–44. doi: 10.2144/000114055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huguet G., Ey E., Bourgeron T. The genetic landscapes of autism spectrum disorders. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2013;14:191–213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fasano A. Zonulin and its regulation of intestinal barrier function: The biological door to inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:151–175. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stevens B.R., Goel R., Seungbum K., Richards E.M., Holbert R.C., Pepine C.J., Raizada M.K. Increased human intestinal barrier permeability plasma biomarkers zonulin and FABP2 correlated with plasma LPS and altered gut microbiome in anxiety or depression. Gut. 2018;67:1555–1557. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sturgeon C., Fasano A. Zonulin, a regulator of epithelial and endothelial barrier functions, and its involvement in chronic inflammatory diseases. Tissue Barriers. 2016;4:e1251384. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2016.1251384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Szabo G., Bala S., Petrasek J., Gattu A. Gut-liver axis and sensing microbes. Dig. Dis. 2010;28:737–744. doi: 10.1159/000324281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jirillo E., Caccavo D., Magrone T., Piccigallo E., Amati L., Lembo A., Kalis C., Gumenscheimer M. The role of the liver in the response to LPS: Experimental and clinical findings. J. Endotoxin Res. 2002;8:319–327. doi: 10.1179/096805102125000641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gardiner B.J., Tai A.Y., Kotsanas D., Francis M.J., Roberts S.A., Ballard S.A., Junckerstorff R.K., Korman T.M. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Eggerthella lenta bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:626–635. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02926-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clavel T., Duck W., Charrier C., Wenning M., Elson C., Haller D. Enterorhabdus caecimuris sp. nov., a member of the family Coriobacteriaceae isolated from a mouse model of spontaneous colitis, and emended description of the genus Enterorhabdus Clavel et al. 2009. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010;60:1527–1531. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.015016-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.De Angelis M., Francavilla R., Piccolo M., de Giacomo A., Gobbetti M. Autism spectrum disorders and intestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2015;6:207–213. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1035855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang Y., Kasper L.H. The role of microbiome in central nervous system disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014;38:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arumugam M., Raes J., Pelletier E., Le Paslier D., Yamada T., Mende D.R. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–180. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Finegold S.M., Dowd S.E., Gontcharova V., Liu C., Henley K.E., Wolcott R.D., Youn E., Summanen P.H., Granpeesheh D., Dixon D., et al. Pyrosequencing study of fecal microflora of autistic and control children. Anaerobe. 2010;16:444–453. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Loy A., Pfann C., Steinberger M., Hanson B., Herp S., Brugiroux S., Gomes Neto J.C., Boekschoten M.V., Schwab C., Urich T., et al. Lifestyle and Horizontal Gene Transfer-Mediated Evolution of Mucispirillum schaedleri, a Core Member of the Murine Gut Microbiota. Msystems. 2017;2:e00171-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00171-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.De Angelis M., Piccolo M., Vannini L., Siragusa S., de Giacomo A., Serrazzanetti D.I., Cristofori F., Guerzoni M.E., Gobbetti M., Francavilla R. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ricanek P., Lothe S.M., Frye S.A., Rydning A., Vatn M.H., Tønjum T. Gut bacterial profile in patients newly diagnosed with treatment-naïve Crohn’s disease. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2012;5:173–186. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S33858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luna R.A., Oezguen N., Balderas M., Venkatachalam A., Runge J.K., Versalovic J., Veenstra-VanderWeele J., Anderson G.M., Savidge T., Williams K.C. Distinct Microbiome-Neuroimmune Signatures Correlate With Functional Abdominal Pain in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;3:218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang L., Christophersen C.T., Sorich M.J., Gerber J.P., Angley M.T., Conlon M.A. Low relative abundances of the mucolytic bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium spp. in feces of children with autism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:6718–6721. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05212-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.De Magistris L., Familiari V., Pascotto A., Sapone A., Frolli A., Iardino P., Garteni M., de Rosa M., Francavilla R., Riegler G., et al. Alterations of the intestinal barrier in patients with autism spectrum disorders and in their first-degree relatives. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010;51:418–424. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181dcc4a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Camilleri M., Gormyan H. Intestinal permeability and irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2007;19:545–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.00925.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.D’Eufemia P., Celli M., Finocchiaro R., Pacifico L., Viozzi L., Zaccagnini M., Cardi E., Giardini O. Abnormal intestinal permeability in children with autism. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85:1076–1079. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.El Asmar R., Panigrahi P., Bamford P., Berti I., Not T., Coppa G.V., Catassi C., Fasano A. Host-dependent zonulin secretion causes the impairment of the small intestine barrier function after bacterial exposure. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1607–1615. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.36578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dossi E., Vasile F., Rouach N. Human astrocytes in the diseased brain. Brain. Res. Bull. 2018;136:139–156. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Edmonson C., Ziats M.N., Rennert O.M. Altered glial marker expression in autistic post-mortem prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. Mol. Autism. 2014;5:3. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Grabrucker S., Jannetti L., Eckert M., Gaub S., Chhabra R., Pfaender S., Mangus K., Reddy P.P., Rankovic V., Schmeisser M.J., et al. Zinc deficiency dysregulates the synaptic ProSAP/SHANK scaffold and might contribute to autism spectrum disorders. Brain. 2014;137:137–152. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Angly F.E., Dennis P.G., Skarshewski A., Vanwonterghem I., Hugenholtz P., Tyson G.W. CopyRighter: A rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome. 2014;2:11. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.