The progressive rise in antibiotic resistance among enteric pathogens in developing countries is becoming a big concern. India is one of the largest consumers of antibiotics, and their use is not well regulated. V. fluvialis is increasingly recognized as an emerging diarrheal pathogen of public health importance. Here we report the emergence of azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis isolates from diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. Azithromycin has been widely used in the treatment of various infections, both in children and in adults. Resistance to azithromycin is encoded in the gene mph(A). Emerging azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis is a major public health challenge, and future studies should be focused on identifying ways to prevent the dissemination of this antibiotic resistance gene.
KEYWORDS: azithromycin resistance, diarrhea, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, Vibrio fluvialis, multidrug resistance
ABSTRACT
The azithromycin resistance conferred by phosphotransferase is encoded in the gene mph(A). This gene has been discovered in and reported for many bacterial species. We examined the prevalence of azithromycin resistance in Vibrio fluvialis (AR-VF) isolated during 2014 to 2015 from the hospitalized acute diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. Most of the V. fluvialis isolates are identified as the sole pathogen (54%). The prevalence of AR-VF was higher in 2015 (19 [68%]) than in 2014 (9 [32%]). Among AR-VF isolates, the azithromycin MICs ranged from 4 to >256 mg/liter. Twenty-eight of the 48 (58%) V. fluvialis isolates harbored the gene mph(A) and phenotypically resistant to azithromycin. All the AR-VF isolates remained susceptible to doxycycline. In addition to azithromycin, other antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes of AR-VF were also characterized. All the AR-VF isolates were positive for class 1 integron, and most of them (17/28) carried the dfrA1 gene cassettes. Only one isolate was positive for the ereA gene, which encodes resistance to erythomycin. The majority of the isolates were resistant to β-lactam antibiotics (blaOXA-1 [96%], blaOXA-7 [93%], and blaTEM-9 [68%]) and aminoglycoside actetyltransferase, conferring resistance to ciprofloxacin-modifying enzyme [aac(6′)Ib-cr] (96%). Analyses by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) showed that the AR-VF isolates belonged to different genetic lineages. This is the first study to report azithromycin resistance and the presence of the mph(A) gene in V. fluvialis isolates. Circulation of AR-VF isolates with high azithromycin MICs is worrisome, since it may limit the treatment options for diarrheal infections.
IMPORTANCE The progressive rise in antibiotic resistance among enteric pathogens in developing countries is becoming a big concern. India is one of the largest consumers of antibiotics, and their use is not well regulated. V. fluvialis is increasingly recognized as an emerging diarrheal pathogen of public health importance. Here we report the emergence of azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis isolates from diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. Azithromycin has been widely used in the treatment of various infections, both in children and in adults. Resistance to azithromycin is encoded in the gene mph(A). Emerging azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis is a major public health challenge, and future studies should be focused on identifying ways to prevent the dissemination of this antibiotic resistance gene.
INTRODUCTION
Vibrio fluvialis is a halophilic Gram-negative bacterium commonly found in coastal waters and seafood. In recent years, V. fluvialis has been recognized to cause cholera-like diarrhea. Several outbreaks and sporadic cases of acute diarrhea caused by this pathogen have been reported worldwide (1–4). The molecular characterization of this pathogen has given several insights, including its clonality and multidrug resistance (MDR) features (2, 4). The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance represent one of the most important public health concerns and are correlated with the inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents, which results in increased mortality, morbidity, and health care costs (5). Antibiotic resistance arises through several modes, such as transfer of plasmids, integrons, and transposons, mutations in target genes, and the overexpression of efflux systems (5). The rapid increase and spread of antibiotic resistance in V. fluvialis during the past 20 years are a major cause of concern because of the organism’s ability to cause epidemics (6).
We have reported the existence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and fluoroquinolone-acetylating aminoglycoside-6′-N-acetyltransferase in V. fluvialis, which confers the resistance to fluoroquinolones and β-lactam antimicrobials (7), including blaNDM-1-mediated carbapenem resistance (8). Here we report the identification and characterization of an azithromycin resistance (AR) macrolide 2 P-phosphotransferase I-encoding gene, mph(A), in 28 isolates of V. fluvialis (AR-VF) isolated during 2014 to 2015 from hospitalized patients in Kolkata, India. Azithromycin belongs to the macrolide class of antibiotics, which are primarily used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive microorganisms. This antibiotic is active also against several Gram-negative organisms (9). Considering the emergence of MDR enteric bacteria, azithromycin is recommended for the treatment of diarrhea (10, 11). Isolates with higher MICs of azithromycin were found to harbor mph(A) (12). From the previous studies, it is known that the mph(A) gene has been disseminated among different pathogens, like Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp. (13, 14). The present study was undertaken to understand the azithromycin resistance mechanisms in V. fluvialis isolates from diarrheal patients in Kolkata.
RESULTS
During 2014 to 2015, a total of 48 V. fluvialis were isolated from 2,308 (1,135 and 1,173 received in 2014 and 2015, respectively) stool specimens of acute diarrheal patients, of which 28 (58%) were found to be resistant to azithromycin. The isolation rates of AR-VF were 19% in 2014 (9 of 48 isolates) and 39% (19 of 48 isolates) in 2015. Patients from whom V. fluvialis was isolated presented cholera-like diarrhea, i.e., with watery stool (67%), severe dehydration (14%), and abdominal pain (50%) (Table 1). Out of the 28 isolates of AR-VF (each strain representing a case), 15 (54%) were isolated as the sole pathogen and the remaining 13 (46%) were recovered along with other pathogens, such as Vibrio cholerae, diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), Shigella spp., Salmonella, Campylobacter spp., parasites, and viruses. Among the polymicrobial etiology cases, V. fluvialis along with V. cholerae O1 were found to be present at a relatively high proportion (14%), followed by DEC and Shigella spp. (11% each). AR-VF infection was more often detected in adults (82%) than in children <5 years of age (18%). The other enteric pathogens isolated along with AR-VF remained susceptible to azithromycin (data not shown).
TABLE 1.
Clinical features of patients with diarrhea who were infected with azithromycin-resistant V. fluvialis
| Clinical features | No. (%) of patients |
|---|---|
| Pathogen | |
| V. fluvialis as sole infecting organism | 15 (53.6) |
| Mixed infection with V. fluvialis and other organisms | 13 (46.4) |
| V. cholerae O1 | 4 (14.2) |
| Shigella spp. | 3 (10.7) |
| DEC | 3 (10.7) |
| Campylobacter jejuni | 1 (3.5) |
| Rotavirus | 1 (3.5) |
| Giardia lamblia | 1 (3.5) |
| Age | |
| >5 yrs | 23 (82.1) |
| ≤5 yrs | 5 (17.9) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 17 (60.8) |
| Female | 11 (39.2) |
| Type of diarrhea | |
| Watery | 19 (67.9) |
| Bloody mucus and loose | 9 (32.1) |
| Dehydration status | |
| Severe | 4 (14.3) |
| Some and rare | 24 (85.7) |
| Abdominal pain | |
| Yes | 14 (50) |
| No | 14 (50) |
The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and MIC values for AR-VF isolates are presented in Table 2. The majority of the AR-VF isolates were also resistant to ampicillin (100%), erythromycin, cefotaxime (CTX), ceftriazone, and sulfamethoxazole (96% each), nalidixic acid and streptomycin (93% each), norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin (89% each), gentamicin (68%), ceftadizime (CAZ; 61%), chloramphenicol (36%), meropenem (18%), and tetracycline (14%). It was also seen that the AR-VF displayed a wide range of MIC values for most of the antibiotics (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles, integrons, and MICs of AR-VF isolatesa
| Strain | Resistance | Class 1 integron ORF size (kb) | Antibiotic resistance gene(s) | MIC (μg/ml) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | AZM | CRO | CIP | NOR | GM | SXT | MEM | NA | TE | ||||
| IDH 06261 | AM, AZM, CRO, E, GM, CTX, NA, S, SXT, CIP*, OFX*, N*, NOR* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 64 | 96 | >256 | 12 | 24 | 24 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06263 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 2.5 | arr2, cm1A5, aac(6′)-Ib | 64 | 96 | >256 | 12 | 24 | 24 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06279 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 2.5 | arr2, cm1A5, aac(6′)-Ib | 64 | 128 | >256 | 32 | 16 | 16 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06350 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 1 | aadA13 | >256 | >256 | >256 | 8 | 16 | ND | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06430 | AM, AZM, E, GM, CTX, SXT, CRO, S* | 1.5 | vfsbp | 256 | 256 | >256 | ND | ND | 64 | >32 | ND | ND | ND |
| IDH 06639 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 192 | >256 | >256 | 32 | 24 | 48 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06736 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 48 | 128 | >256 | 32 | 24 | ND | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06848 | AM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, MEM, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, AZM* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 12 | 4 | >256 | >32 | 64 | 16 | >32 | 32 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 06915 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, MEM, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | >256 | 48 | >256 | >32 | 256 | 16 | >32 | >32 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07410 | AM, E, GM, CTX, S, SXT, AZM*, CRO* | 1.5 | vfsbp | >256 | 4 | 256 | ND | ND | 24 | >32 | ND | ND | ND |
| IDH 07715 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | 256 | >256 | 8 | 16 | 48 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07930 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, MEM, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 1.5 | vfsbp | >256 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 48 | 0.75 | >32 | 0.75 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07931 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C,E, CAZ, GM, CTX, MEM, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 0.8 | aac(6′)-Ib | >256 | 32 | >256 | >32 | 24 | 8 | >32 | 3 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07968 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | 256 | >256 | 32 | 16 | 16 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07978 | AM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, AZM*, GM* | 1.5 | vfsbp | >256 | 48 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.75 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07986 | AM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, GM*, AZM* | 1.5 | vfsbp | >256 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.75 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 07992 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, GM* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 256 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 64 | 8 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08037 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, C*, MEM*, N*, TE* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | 256 | >256 | >32 | 48 | 64 | >32 | 8 | >256 | 8 |
| IDH 08125 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, MEM*, N*, TE* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | 96 | >256 | >32 | 32 | 48 | >32 | 8 | >256 | 6 |
| IDH 08126 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, C*, TE* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | 128 | >256 | >32 | 32 | 32 | >32 | ND | >256 | 6 |
| IDH 08128 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, TE, S, SXT, C*, MEM*, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 96 | 256 | >266 | >32 | 48 | >256 | >32 | 16 | >256 | 8 |
| IDH 08164 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, C, E, CAZ, CTX, MEM, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 128 | >256 | >256 | 12 | 24 | 6 | >32 | 4 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08180 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, MEM*, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | >256 | 256 | >256 | >32 | 64 | 6 | >32 | 4 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08181 | AM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, AZM* | 1.5 | vfsbp | 96 | 4 | 32 | >32 | 48 | ND | 0.5 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08223 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | >256 | 12 | >256 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1.5 | 0.75 | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08273 | AM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, GM, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, SXT, AZM*, MEM*, N* | 0.8 | aac(6′)-Ib | >256 | 12 | >256 | 12 | 24 | 32 | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08299 | AM, CIP, CRO, E, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, S, C*, SXT*, AZM* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | 16 | 0.5 | >256 | >32 | 32 | ND | >32 | ND | >256 | ND |
| IDH 08349 | AM, AZM, CIP, CRO, E, CAZ, CTX, OFX, NOR, NA, SXT, C*, MEM*, N* | 1.2 | dfrA1, orfC | >256 | 48 | >256 | >32 | 32 | ND | >32 | 6 | >256 | ND |
ORF, open reading frame; MEM, meropenem; CTX, cefotaxime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; NOR, norfloxacin; TE, tetracycline; AM, ampicillin; E, erythromycin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NA, nalidixic acid; S, streptomycin; C, chloramphenicol; GM, gentamicin; OFX, ofloxacin; CRO, ceftriaxone; AZM, azithromycin; CAZ, ceftazidime; N, neomycin; ND, MIC assay was not done for isolates susceptible to respective antibiotics. Asterisks indicate drugs to which the isolate showed reduced susceptibility.
Five distinct gene cassettes were identified in the class 1 integron-bearing AR-VF isolates, which include (i) 2 isolates with a 2.5-kb amplicon comprising arr2 (rifampin resistance), cm1A5 (chloramphenicol resistance), and aac(6′)Ib-cr (ciprofloxacin resistance); (ii) 6 isolates with 1.5-kb gene cassettes with the vfsbp gene, which confers resistance to class 1 integron periplasmic pectic oligomer binding protein; (iii) 17 isolates with 1.2-kb gene cassettes containing dfrA1 (trimethoprim resistance) and orfC; (iv) 1 isolate with a 1-kb product with the presence of aadA13, encoding aminoglycoside-3′-adenylyltransferase; (v) 2 isolates with a 0.8-kb product with aac(6′)Ib, which codes for aminoglycoside 6′-N-actetyltransferase.
Overall, 8 different resistance gene profiles were identified (Table 3). All the AR-VF isolates harbored mph(A). The resistance gene ere(A) was detected in one isolate (IDH 08223), and all remaining AR-VF isolates were negative for mph(B), erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), ere(A), ere(B), mef(A), and msr(A). Most of the AR-VF isolates also harbored blaOXA-1 (96%), blaOXA-7 (93%), and blaTEM-9 (68%), conferring resistance to β-lactamase, as well as aadB (96%; gentamicin resistance), aac(6′)Ib-cr (96%; ciprofloxacin resistance), and aadA1 (96%; streptomycin resistance). blaCTX-M-3, which confers resistance to ceftriaxone, was detected in 19 (68%) AR-VF isolates. The streptomycin and sulfonamide resistance-encoding genes strA and sul2 were detected in 24 (86%) and 22 (79%) isolates, respectively. The blaNDM-1 gene, which encodes resistance to carbapenem, was found in 11 (39%) isolates, and macrolide-modifying enzymes, such as esterase encoded by ere(A), were detected in an isolate.
TABLE 3.
Distribution of mph(A) gene along with other antimicrobial resistance genes in AR-VF isolates
| Strain | Presence of integron and macrolide and other resistance genes |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| int1 | mph(A) | aac(6´)-Ib-cr | blaOxa-1 | aadB | aadA1 | blaOXA-7 | blaCTX-M-3 | blaTEM-9 | strA | sul2 | blaNDM-1 | ere(A) | |
| IDH 07930 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 07931 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 08037 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 08125 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 08128 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 08273 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| IDH 06263 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06279 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06736 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07978 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07986 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 08126 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 08299 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07715 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07968 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07992 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06261 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06430 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06639 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 07410 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 08181 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − |
| IDH 06848 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − |
| IDH 06915 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − |
| IDH 08164 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − |
| IDH 08180 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − |
| IDH 08349 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| IDH 08223 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| IDH 06350 | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to investigate the genetic relationship between AR-VF isolates. Twenty-four different PFGE patterns were detected (data not shown). Distinct lineages were identified between the isolates and MDR patterns, suggesting that the AR-VF isolates were genetically diverse.
DISCUSSION
Globally, multidrug resistance in enteric bacterial pathogens is an emerging threat to public health (5). Infection caused by V. fluvialis has been increasingly reported worldwide (6), with frequent documentation of MDR (15, 16). The prevalence of MDR in V. fluvialis organisms varies depending on the country and the source of isolation. A study from South Africa reported the prevalence of V. fluvialis resistant to ampicillin, penicillin G, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and polymyxin B (1). The presence of a relatively high number of V. fluvialis isolates that were resistant to β-lactams and sulfamethoxazole has been reported from China (2). Previously, we have shown the presence of a transmissible MDR plasmid in V. fluvialis isolates possessing several antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes, i.e., aac(3)-IIa, blaNDM-1, blaTEM-1, dfrA15, sul1, tet(A), floR, strAB, and sul2 (8, 16). In this study, we identified azithromycin-resistant V. fluvialis with high MIC values. AR-VF emerged in Kolkata at a low level during late 2013 and subsequently increased during 2014 to 2015 (32 to 67%) among diarrheal patients. This is the first report of the emergence of azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis.
Azithromycin has been recommended for the treatment of acute diarrhea caused by Campylobacter spp., DEC, Shigella spp., nontyphoidal Salmonella, and sometimes V. cholerae (17). Due to the wide use of this antibiotic, resistance or reduced susceptibility to azithromycin has increased in several enteric pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp. (12, 18, 19).
The AR-VF isolates were characterized using phenotypic and molecular techniques to understand the mechanism of resistance and their clonal relationships. Several studies have already reported that macrolide resistance has been acquired through a variety of mechanisms. In many Gram-negative bacteria, macrolide resistance is primarily involved with target site modification by methylases encoded by erm [erm(A), erm(B), and erm(C)] genes, macrolides inactivated by modifying esterase enzyme [ere(A) or ere(B)] genes, phosphotransferases encoded by mph [mph(A) and mph(B)] genes, and acquisition of efflux pump [mef(A) and msr(A)] genes. The association of these genes with complete cross-resistance of erythromycin and azithromycin has been reported frequently (12, 13, 20). Considering this, we have targeted these nine genes for macrolide resistance while screening the V. fluvialis isolates that showed resistance to azithromycin. We detected mph(A) in 28 isolates and ere(A) in 1 isolate; no other macrolide resistance-encoding genes were detected. Twenty-eight of 48 isolates examined in this study harbored the mph(A) gene and had azithromycin MICs between 4 and >256 mg/liter. One isolate that had both the ere(A) and mph(A) genes showed an azithromycin MIC of >256 mg/liter. These results indicate that carriage of mph(A) alone can confer higher azithromycin resistance in V. fluvialis. This is similar to previous observations made in Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. (13, 14).
All the AR-VF isolates possessed class 1 integrons, of which 17 had dfrA1 and orfC. The presence of the dfrA1 gene cassette, coding for trimethoprim resistance in V. fluvialis, has been reported previously (7, 15). As reported before (16), the vfspb gene, which encodes periplasmic pectic oligomer binding protein (Sbp), was found in the class 1 integrons of six AR-VF isolates. A 2.5-kb amplicon obtained from 2 AR-VF isolates (IDH 06263 and IDH 06279) showed the presence of arr2 and cm1A5, coding for rifampin and chloramphenicol resistance. Interestingly, the presence of these genes has been reported for the integrons of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from East Africa (21). The major ESBL genes, like blaOXA-1 (96%), blaOXA-7 (93%), blaTEM-9 (68%), and blaCTX-M-3 (68%), were identified in most of the AR-VF isolates. This observation further suggests that the major ESBL groups are prevalent in V. fluvialis in Kolkata (7). Since these ESBL genes are generally located on antimicrobial resistance plasmids, they can easily be disseminated between different species of bacteria (22). The other enteric pathogens isolated along with AR-VF were susceptible to azithromycin. This indicates the genomic suitability of V. fluvialis in the quick acquisition of the mph(A) gene.
In this study, we have shown that most of the AR-VF organsims isolated in Kolkata harbor various antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes. AR-VF isolates belonged to different lineages, indicating their diverse sources of infection. This is a cause of major concern, as multidrug resistance could pose a challenge both for the treatment and prevention of spread of infections caused by V. fluvialis. It is important to monitor the genes responsible for the resistance to azithromycin and other antimicrobials in V. fluvialis and other enteric bacteria isolated as copathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates.
Twenty-eight azithromycin-resistant V. fluvialis isolated from patients with cholera-like diarrhea admitted to Infections Diseases, Kolkata, between 2014 and 2015 were included in this study. V. fluvialis was isolated from stool specimens or rectal swabs in Cary-Blair medium using thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar (TCBS), followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. Yellow colonies on the TCBS plates were examined by oxidase test, string test using 0.5% sodium deoxycholate solution, biochemical testing (ID 32GN; bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and by a species-specific V. fluvialis toxR PCR (4).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (23). Antibiotic discs (BD, USA) used were meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 μg), cefotaxime (CTX; 30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), co-trimoxazole (25 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), neomycin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), and streptomycin (300 μg). Each isolate was inoculated in Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco) and incubated at 37°C for 3 h. The turbidity of the suspension was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard, and the suspension was then spread on a Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco) plate using a sterile swab. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight after placement of the antimicrobial susceptibility test discs. The zone of inhibition was measured and interpreted as per the CLSI guidelines (23). Extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL) production was confirmed by double-disc synergy testing with CAZ and CTX. An increase of 5 mm in the zone diameter for CAZ or CTX compared to that for clavulanic acid was considered for production of ESBL. The MICs of meropenem, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and cefepime were determined using Etest (AB Biodisk, Solana, Sweden), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as quality control strains.
PCR.
Total DNA of the isolates was extracted using QIAamp genomic DNA kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was used to amplify the macrolide resistance genes (12). To detect other antimicrobial resistance-encoding genes for carbapenemase (blaNDM-1), gentamicin (aadB), streptomycin (aadA1 and strA), kanamycin (aphA1-1a), chloramphenicol (catA1), β-lactams (blaTEM, blaOXA-1, blaOXA-7, blaOXA-9, blaSHV, blaPSE-4, and blaCTXM-3), ciprofloxacin [aac(6′)-1b-cr], and chloramphenicol (floR), PCR was carried out as described previously (8, 24). For the amplification of putative antibiotic resistance gene cassettes present in the class 1 integron-bearing strains, primers inf-F (5′-CS) and in-B (3′-CS) were used. All the assays were carried out in the simplex PCR format. PCR amplicons were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels.
Sequencing.
Amplified PCR products were extracted from the gel after electrophoresis and were purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified DNA was analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel. Sequencing reactions were performed using a BigDye Terminator v.3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The dye terminators from sequencing reactions were removed using a DyeEx 2.0 spin kit (Qiagen). Purified sequences were analyzed using an ABI 3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The DNA sequences were edited with Lasergene software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI) and analyzed using the BLAST program of the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast).
PFGE.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of NotI-digested genomic DNA was performed using a CHEF-Mapper (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) according to the PulseNet standardized PFGE protocol for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae (25). The PFGE image was captured using a Gel Doc XR system (Bio-Rad), and the gel image was normalized by aligning the peaks of the Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup (H9182) size standard in each gel and analyzed using BioNumerics software v.4.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). The fingerprint patterns were also subjected to typing based on banding similarity and dissimilarity using the Dice similarity coefficient. Cluster analysis was performed based on the single-linkage method. Finally, the results were graphically represented as dendrograms.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported in part by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India, New Delhi, India, the Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan, and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; grant number JP18fm0108002). G.C. acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship received from Okayama University. A.G. is the J. C. Bose chair professor of the National Academy of Science, India.
REFERENCES
- 1.Igbinosa EO, Okoh AI. 2010. Vibrio fluvialis: an unusual enteric pathogen of increasing public health concern. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:3628–3643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liang P, Cui X, Du X, Kan B, Liang W. 2013. The virulence phenotypes and molecular epidemiological characteristics of Vibrio fluvialis in China. Gut Pathog 5:6. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chowdhury G, Sarkar A, Pazhani GP, Mukhopadhyay AK, Bhattacharya MK, Ramamurthy T. 2013. An outbreak of foodborne gastroenteritis caused by dual pathogens, Salmonella enterica serovar Weltevreden and Vibrio fluvialis in Kolkata, India. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10:904–906. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Dutta D, Guin S, Dutta S, Ghosh S, Izumiya H, Asakura M, Yamasaki S, Takeda Y, Arakawa E, Watanabe H, Mukhopadhyay AK, Bhattacharya MK, Rajendran K, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T. 2012. Vibrio fluvialis in patients with diarrhea, Kolkata, India. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1868–1871. doi: 10.3201/eid1811.120520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iredell J, Brown J, Tagg K. 2016. Antibiotic resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: mechanisms and clinical implications. BMJ 352:h6420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramamurthy T, Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Shinoda S. 2014. Vibrio fluvialis: an emerging human pathogen. Front Microbiol 5:91. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Nair GB, Ghosh A, Ramamurthy T. 2011. Transferable plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in association with extended-spectrum β-lactamases and fluoroquinolone-acetylating aminoglycoside-6'-N-acetyltransferase in clinical isolates of Vibrio fluvialis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chowdhury G, Pazhani GP, Sarkar A, Rajendran K, Mukhopadhyay AK, Bhattacharya MK, Ghosh A, Ramamurthy T. 2016. Carbapenem resistance in clonally distinct clinical strains of Vibrio fluvialis isolated from diarrheal samples. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1754–1761. doi: 10.3201/eid2210.151612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gomes C, Martínez-Puchol S, Durand D, Lluque A, Mosquito S, Ochoa TJ, Ruiz J. 2013. Which mechanisms of azithromycin resistance are selected when efflux pumps are inhibited? Int J Antimicrob Agents 42:307–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. 2012. Red book: report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 29th ed, p 645–647. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, Slutsker L, Tauxe RV, Hennessy T, Griffin PM, DuPont H, Sack RB, Tarr P, Neill M, Nachamkin I, Reller LB, Osterholm MT, Bennish ML, Pickering LK. 2001. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 32:331–351. doi: 10.1086/318514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Phuc Nguyen MC, Woerther PL, Bouvet M, Andremont A, Leclercq R, Canu A. 2009. Escherichia coli as reservoir for macrolide resistance genes. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1648–1650. doi: 10.3201/eid1510.090696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nair S, Ashton P, Doumith M, Connell S, Painset A, Mwaigwisya S, Langridge G, de Pinna E, Godbole G, Day M. 2016. WGS for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: a pilot study to detect the prevalence and mechanism of resistance to azithromycin in a UK population of non-typhoidal Salmonella. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3400–3408. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Darton TC, Tuyen HT, The HC, Newton PN, Dance DAB, Phetsouvanh R, Davong V, Campbell JI, Hoang NVM, Thwaites GE, Parry CM, Thanh DP, Baker S. 2018. Azithromycin resistance in Shigella spp. in Southeast Asia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01748-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01748-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Srinivasan VB, Virk RK, Kaundal A, Chakraborty R, Datta B, Ramamurthy T, Mukhopadhyay AK, Ghosh A. 2006. Mechanism of drug resistance in clonally related clinical isolates of Vibrio fluvialis isolated in Kolkata, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2428–2432. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01561-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rajpara N, Patel A, Tiwari N, Bahuguna J, Antony A, Choudhury I, Ghosh A, Jain R, Ghosh A, Bhardwaj AK. 2009. Mechanism of drug resistance in a clinical isolate of Vibrio fluvialis: involvement of multiple plasmids and integrons. Int J Antimicrob Agents 34:220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.WHO. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance, p 257 WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kitaoka M, Miyata ST, Unterweger D, Pukatzki S. 2011. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol 60:397–407. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.023051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gaudreau C, Barkati S, Leduc JM, Pilon PA, Favreau J, Bekal S. 2014. Shigella spp. with reduced azithromycin susceptibility, Quebec, Canada, 2012–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 20:854–856. doi: 10.3201/eid2005.130966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gomes C, Martínez-Puchol S, Palma N, Horna G, Ruiz-Roldán L, Pons MJ, Ruiz J. 2017. Macrolide resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae: focus on azithromycin. Crit Rev Microbiol 43:1–30. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1136261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Revathi G, Siu LK, Lu PL, Huang LY. 2013. First report of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in East Africa. Int J Infect Dis 17:e1255–e1228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bradford PA. 2001. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev 14:933. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 26th ed CLSI supplement M100S. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Maynard C, Fairbrother JM, Bekal S, Sanschagrin F, Levesque RC, Brousseau R, Masson L, Larivière S, Harel J. 2003. Antimicrobial resistance genes in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli O149:K91 isolates obtained over a 23-year period from pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3214–3221. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3214-3221.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cooper KL, Luey CK, Bird M, Terajima J, Nair GB, Kam KM, Arakawa E, Safa A, Cheung DT, Law CP, Watanabe H, Kubota K, Swaminathan B, Ribot EM. 2006. Development and validation of a PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae. Foodborne Pathog Dis 3:51–58. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]