Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cells are implicated as important anti-viral immune effectors in varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection. VZV can productively infect human NK cells, yet it is unknown how, or if, VZV can directly affect NK cell function. Here we demonstrate that VZV potently impairs the ability of NK cells to respond to target cell stimulation in vitro, leading to a loss of both cytotoxic and cytokine responses. Remarkably, not only were VZV infected NK cells affected, but VZV antigen negative NK cells that were exposed to virus in culture were also inhibited. This powerful impairment of function was dependent on direct contact between NK cells and VZV infected inoculum cells. Profiling of the NK cell surface receptor phenotype by multiparameter flow cytometry revealed that functional receptor expression is predominantly stable. Furthermore, inhibited NK cells were still capable of releasing cytotoxic granules when the stimulation signal bypassed receptor/ligand interactions and early signalling, suggesting that VZV paralyses NK cells from responding. Phosflow examination of key components in the degranulation signalling cascade also demonstrated perturbation following culture with VZV. In addition to inhibiting degranulation, IFN-γ and TNF production were also repressed by VZV co-culture, which was most strongly regulated in VZV infected NK cells. Interestingly, the closely related virus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), was also capable of efficiently infecting NK cells in a cell-associated manner, and demonstrated a similar capacity to render NK cells unresponsive to target cell stimulation–however HSV-1 differentially targeted cytokine production compared to VZV. Our findings progress a growing understanding of pathogen inhibition of NK cell function, and reveal a previously unreported strategy for VZV to manipulate the immune response.
Author summary
Natural killer (NK) cells–as their name implies–are the immune system’s ready to respond ‘killers’, being able to help control viral infection by cytolytic killing of infected cells and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines to activate and direct the immune response. In retaliation, viruses like varicella zoster virus (VZV; the cause of chickenpox and shingles) work to dampen the immune system in order to establish infection in human hosts. We have identified a previously uncharacterised ability of VZV to render NK cells unresponsive to target cells, hindering NK cells from both cytotoxic function and cytokine production. NK cells still maintained predominantly stable expression of functional surface receptors, and were capable of releasing cytotoxic granules when given a receptor-independent stimulus. In this way, VZV paralyses NK cells from functionally responding to target cells, essentially taking the ‘killer’ out of natural killer cells.
Introduction
Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes that exert a significant influence on the control of viral infection. Predominantly residing in peripheral blood circulation, lymphoid tissue and the liver, NK cells detect infected or aberrantly transformed cells [1]. Sensing of cells is achieved by a diversity of activating and inhibitory receptors through which the integration of signals stringently regulates the NK cell response [2, 3]. When sufficient activation is reached, signals from the activating receptors proceed to downstream signalling pathways culminating in polarised release of preformed granules containing perforin and granzymes [4, 5]. These cytotoxic granules will induce apoptosis of the target cell, thereby mediating the cytolytic killing function of NK cells. In a secretion process distinct from degranulation, NK cells will additionally release potent pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) [6].
The function of NK cells is tailored to directly control viral infection and contribute to promotion and immunoregulation of host defence [7]. In response to this, many viruses, including herpesviruses, encode strategies to evade detection and elimination by NK cells [8, 9]. This is particularly the case with herpesviruses, where their lifelong persistence depends upon a balance between immune evasion and control that has arisen due to millennia of coevolution between virus and host [10, 11]. A clear example of this is seen with infections caused by the human alphaherpesvirus varicella zoster virus (VZV), which presents as varicella during primary infection and herpes zoster following viral reactivation from latency. In studies of NK cell deficiency, it has been reported that many of these patients are highly susceptible to severe, disseminated varicella [12–16], indicating an essential requirement for effective NK cell immunity against VZV. To circumvent this immune control, however, we have shown that VZV manipulates expression of ligands detected by the activating NKG2D receptor of NK cells [17]. Significantly, we found there was limited activation of NK cells in response to VZV infected target cells in vitro, suggesting substantial modulation of the surface of VZV infected cells to reduce NK cell detection of infection [17]. Additionally, we and others have demonstrated that another human alphaherpesvirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), can also downregulate expression of NKG2D ligands [17–19], while for HSV-2 it has been shown that the virus can evade NK cell activity by reducing expression of CD112– the ligand to NK cell activating receptor DNAM-1 [20]. These studies demonstrate that human alphaherpesviruses encode several strategies to impede NK cell detection of virally infected cells, however there has been little investigation into how these viruses may directly affect NK cells and their function.
More recently, we have identified that peripheral blood CD56dim NK cells are highly permissive to VZV infection [21], suggesting that VZV may use these immune cells to aid dissemination of virus throughout the host. Given the discovery of this novel tropism, we investigated whether VZV infection of primary human NK cells altered their functional activity. Using a unique co-culture system that more closely models in vivo interactions, we cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with VZV infected cells, and then assessed NK cell functional capacity. Our findings provide the first evidence that co-culture of NK cells with VZV mediates a profound paralysis of cytolytic activity, affecting both VZV infected NK cells as well as NK cells exposed to VZV. Comparative experiments with HSV-1 remarkably revealed a shared capacity for this alphaherpesvirus to also infect and inhibit NK cell function. Furthermore, culture with VZV inhibited NK cell production of both IFN-γ and TNF cytokines, which was in contrast to HSV-1 where only IFN-γ expression by infected NK cells was blocked. These findings indicate for the first time that multiple aspects of NK cell anti-viral function are directly targeted for immune evasion by two human alphaherpesviruses.
Results
VZV culture renders NK cells unresponsive to target cell stimulation
To investigate the effect of VZV on NK cell cytolytic function, we examined lysis of the K562 erythroleukemia cell line–a classic NK cell target that is readily lysed due to a lack of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) expression. Our effector NK cells were obtained from CD56+-selected lymphocytes from human PBMCs, which were then cultured with mock or VZV infected cell inoculum in the presence of 200 U/ml interleukin-2 (IL-2) for 1 day. We have previously demonstrated that this technique results in 30%–85% of NK cells being VZV infected [21]. In the current experiments we observed infection of 44–73% of NK cells, as determined by flow cytometry detection of VZV surface glycoprotein heterodimer glycoprotein E: glycoprotein I (gE:gI) at 1 day post infection (pi). CD3–CD56+ NK cells were then isolated by FACS sorting and rested overnight before, at 2 days pi, NK cells were challenged with K562 target cells at varying effector to target cell ratios in a calcein-AM release assay (Fig 1A). As expected, mock NK cells efficiently lysed K562 target cells. In contrast, VZV cultured NK cells were almost completely incapable of lysing target cells even at a 20:1 effector to target ratio, where only 6% of K562 cells were lysed compared to 75% lysis achieved by mock NK cells.
VZV cultured NK cells would include both infected NK cells and NK cells that were exposed to the viral inoculum but had not progressed to productive infection. To delineate whether the loss of cytolytic function occurred only within the VZV infected NK cells, we examined NK cell function by flow cytometry which allowed concurrent staining for VZV gE:gI to differentiate VZV infected (gE:gI+), from VZV exposed (gE:gI–), NK cells. PBMCs were co-cultured with mock or VZV infected cell inoculum for 2 days, before addition of K562 targets and subsequent examination of degranulation by flow cytometry detection of CD107a. As cytolytic granules are lined with CD107a protein, staining of cell-surface CD107a allows measurement of active degranulation. Gating on live NK cells (CD3–CD56+ cells) we surprisingly observed a significant reduction in degranulation against K562 targets by both infected and exposed NK cells, compared to mock cultured NK cells (Fig 1B). As a higher level of non-specific degranulation was observed in infected NK cells, specific degranulation was calculated as degranulation against K562 targets minus background degranulation when unstimulated (Fig 1B, right). From this analysis, it was clear that VZV is able to inhibit both infected and exposed NK cells from responding to target cell stimulation.
To determine the kinetics of NK cells becoming refractory to degranulation by VZV culture, we performed a time course of VZV infection. PBMCs were cultured with mock or VZV inoculum for varying lengths of time before stimulation with K562 targets for 5 hours so that at the end of the assay NK cells had been infected for 8, 24 or 48 hours. Flow cytometry detection of CD107a revealed that VZV inhibited both exposed and infected live NK cells by 24 hours pi (hpi) (Fig 1C). 8 hours of co-culture, however, was not sufficient time to mediate inhibition to target cell stimulation, despite the fact that VZV infection of live NK cells was established within this timeframe (Fig 1D).
Taken together these findings demonstrate that VZV culture has a powerful ability to drastically reduce NK cell cytolytic function against K562 target cells.
VZV cultured NK cells degranulate with PMA/I stimulation but display impaired IFN-γ and TNF production
To investigate how VZV culture inhibited cytotoxicity against target cells, we stimulated NK cells with a lymphocyte activation cocktail consisting of phorbol myristate acetate and ionomycin (referred to as PMA/I). In contrast to target cell stimulation, PMA/I stimulates degranulation from a midpoint in the signalling pathway, bypassing the initial receptor/ligand interactions that initiate degranulation against a target cell [22]. We cultured PBMCs with mock or VZV inoculum for 2 days and then stimulated with PMA/I for 5 hours. Subsequent flow cytometry analysis of live NK cell CD107a expression revealed that exposed and infected NK cells degranulated to similar levels as mock cultured NK cells when stimulated with PMA/I (Fig 2A). This finding indicates that for VZV exposed and infected NK cells, their degranulation machinery is still intact and they are capable of degranulating, thus implying that there is a specific block upstream in the pathway to degranulation, leading to inhibition of the response to K562 cells.
Given the difference in VZV cultured NK cell degranulation between PMA/I and K562 stimulation, we were interested in examining other NK cell responses, such as cytokine production. Specifically, we measured degranulation by CD107a detection, CD69 (a marker of activation), and the cytokines IFN-γ and TNF by flow cytometry, following stimulation of NK cells cultured with mock or VZV inoculum for 2 days. In order to examine polyfunctional NK cell responses, multiparameter flow cytometry was paired with SPICE (Simplified Presentation of Incredibly Complex Evaluations) analysis, which allowed easy visualisation and comparison of the variety of responses from mock, exposed and infected NK cells evoked by different stimuli (Fig 2B). When unstimulated, VZV cultured live NK cells showed higher CD69 expression compared to mock (Fig 2B and 2C), suggesting that NK cells were activated in response to VZV, paralleling similar reports for VZV infected T cells [23]. Upon PMA/I stimulation, all NK cells showed similar levels of enhanced activation as determined by increased CD69 expression (Fig 2B and 2C).
For mock NK cells, stimulation with IL-2, or K562s without pre-activation with IL-2, elicited minimal response; however, challenge with K562s plus IL-2 stimulated degranulation and modest IFN-γ and TNF production (Fig 2B). In contrast, exposed and infected live NK cells showed not only reduced specific degranulation against K562s, but also a lack of cytokine expression (Fig 2B). This indicates that VZV culture inhibits both degranulation and cytokine expression in response to K562 stimulation, suggesting VZV culture renders NK cells completely functionally unresponsive to target cells.
As additionally demonstrated in Fig 2A, SPICE analysis revealed that PMA/I stimulation lead to similar levels of degranulation for mock, exposed and infected NK cells (Fig 2B). However, it was apparent that the degree of cytokine production differed across the NK cell populations following stimulation with PMA/I. Thus, examining cytokine expression more closely at 2 days pi, we found IFN-γ and TNF expression in exposed NK cells was significantly diminished, and in infected NK cells the reduction of cytokines produced was even further pronounced with a 4–5-fold reduction compared to mock (Fig 3A). At 1 day pi, however, only infected NK cells were significantly affected in their production of IFN-γ and TNF (Fig 3B).
Collectively, functional interrogation with different stimuli indicated that while exposed and infected NK cells exhibited equal specific inhibition of cytolytic function against target cells, VZV infected NK cells were more significantly impaired in their ability to produce IFN-γ and TNF.
Following VZV culture the NK cell surface receptor repertoire is predominantly stable
The observation that VZV cultured NK cells could degranulate with PMA/I treatment, but did not respond to external stimulation with K562 cells raised the possibility that the inhibition of function could be attributed to a loss of cell-surface receptor expression required for NK cell function. Using multiparameter flow cytometry we assessed a broad repertoire of receptors including activating NK cell receptors CD160, NKG2D, NKG2C, the natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp46, NKp44 and NKp30), and NKp80; co-receptors for activation DNAM-1 and 2B4; direct apoptosis stimulator TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL); inhibitory NK cell receptor BTLA; adhesion molecule TACTILE; and the CD11a subunit of cellular adhesion integrin, lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1). As potent inhibition of degranulation was readily observed after 1 day of VZV co-culture (Fig 1), we examined NK cells (live CD3–CD56+ cells) from PBMCs cultured with mock or VZV inoculum for 1 day, in the presence or absence of 200 U/ml IL-2. Comparison with IL-2 treatment was included as the degranulation assays against K562 cells were performed with concurrent IL-2 stimulation.
Flow cytometry analysis of cell-surface receptor expression appeared predominantly consistent between mock, exposed and infected NK cells (Fig 4A). To examine modulation of the cell-surface profile collectively–rather than each receptor individually–we visualised the frequency of expression of each marker by heatmap and performed hierarchical clustering across the 3 donors evaluated (Fig 4B). For untreated conditions, the dendrogram indicated that the PBMC donor was a more significant contributor to variation in the cohort, than VZV exposure or infection. With IL-2 stimulation, more variation in receptor expression was observed; however, changes associated with infection or exposure were not sufficiently consistent to cluster together for all donors.
Additional analysis of median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated to evaluate changes in intensity of expression for cell-surface receptors that were homogenously expressed on the majority of NK cells (Fig 4C). Compared to mock NK cells, we observed a significant increase in CD11a density on infected NK cells (+/–IL-2), increased expression of NKp46 on exposed NK cells when treated with IL-2, and increased DNAM-1 on the surface of both exposed and infected NK cells with IL-2 treatment. As NKG2D and NKp46 are key receptors involved in detection of K562 cells [24, 25], we examined expression of these two receptors in six additional donors. Together with the three donors depicted in Fig 4, we found VZV infection in the presence of IL-2 to significantly downregulate NKG2D surface expression (S1A Fig), while NKp46 expression was significantly upregulated in exposed NK cells but reduced with infection (S1B Fig). The range of modulated receptor expression, as well as the contrasting differences between exposed and infected NK cells, suggests that changes in expression of NKG2D and NKp46 are unlikely to explain the observed loss of cytolytic function.
Considering the cumulative analysis of receptor expression, the NK cell receptor profile is remarkably stable following culture with VZV. When NK cells were first CD56+-selected before co-culture with mock or VZV inoculum (as they were in the calcein-AM release assay in Fig 1A), the trend of receptor expression was also consistent (S2 Fig). These findings suggest that there is not sufficient modulation of receptor expression to explain the loss of function seen in VZV cultured NK cells. The premise that downregulation of a particular receptor is not responsible for functional inhibition is further supported by stimulation experiments using phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). PHA crosslinks glycoproteins on the cell surface, however while this led to degranulation of mock NK cells, VZV exposed and infected NK cells displayed inhibited degranulation (S3 Fig), implying that broad ligation of cell-surface receptors could not stimulate degranulation of VZV cultured NK cells.
Considered together, the data thus far indicated that VZV cultured NK cells were capable of degranulating, but no longer responded to target cell stimulation either cytolytically or with cytokine production. Furthermore, the reason for this inhibition of functional responsiveness did not appear to be mediated by a loss of cell-surface receptor expression.
NK cell function is comparably inhibited by herpes simplex virus
VZV is closely related to herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), with both being human alphaherpesviruses. As these viruses are distinct in the diseases they cause, we asked whether HSV-1 also had the capacity to modulate NK cell function. Previous studies have suggested that human NK cells may be permissive to HSV-1 infection [26, 27]. To investigate cell-associated HSV-1 infection of NK cells, we cultured human PBMCs with mock infected inoculum or inoculum infected with GFP-expressing HSV-1. Three viruses were used in infection experiments that were engineered to express GFP under an immediate early (ICP47; infected cell protein 47), early (ICP6) or late (gB; glycoprotein B) viral promoter [28]. At 1 day pi, NK cells were assessed for GFP expression by flow cytometry, and we observed similar levels of GFP+ cells with all three viruses (Fig 5A and 5B), indicating that HSV-1 was capable of infecting live NK cells, and undergoing the full temporal cascade of viral gene expression.
In direct comparison to VZV, we cultured PBMCs with mock or HSV-1 inoculum for 1 day, and challenged NK cell functional capacity by PMA/I or K562 target with IL-2 stimulation. SPICE and conventional flow cytometry analysis revealed that, similar to VZV, both HSV-1 exposed (GFP–) and infected (GFP+) live NK cells had reduced degranulation against K562 target cells, despite maintained degranulation with PMA/I stimulation (Fig 6A and 6B). In contrast to VZV, however, HSV-1 culture did not significantly affect TNF production with PMA/I treatment. IFN-γ production was also not affected in HSV-1 exposed NK cells, however in infected NK cells, IFN-γ expression was dramatically reduced 14–fold compared to mock. Thus, HSV-1 differentially regulates cytokine production compared to VZV.
VZV inhibition of NK cell degranulation is contact-dependent
The finding that both VZV exposed and infected NK cells were inhibited in their cytolytic function suggested the possibility that inhibition was mediated through the culture supernatant. To test this, PBMCs were separated from mock or VZV inoculum by a Transwell membrane, before stimulation with K562 targets and flow cytometry detection of CD107a. In contrast to NK cells in direct contact with VZV inoculum, Transwell-separated NK cells were not inhibited in their degranulation against K562s (Fig 7A). In the Transwell system, PBMCs did not become infected with VZV as determined by the absence of VZV gE:gI staining (Fig 7B). This was expected as cell-to-cell contact is required for infection due to the highly cell-associated nature of VZV in vitro, whereby virus is not actively released into the culture supernatant [29]. It was therefore possible that an inhibitory soluble factor may be secreted from infected PBMCs, which were not present in the Transwell system. To investigate this, supernatant from 1 day pi co-cultures of PBMCs in direct contact with mock or VZV inoculum were harvested and cultured with fresh PBMCs for 1 day which were then challenged with K562 stimulation. Analysis of CD107a expression revealed that NK cells treated with the VZV co-culture supernatant degranulated just as efficiently as NK cells with mock co-culture supernatant (Fig 7C). Culture of PBMCs with the supernatant also did not lead to VZV infection, as expected (Fig 7B).
Taken together, the results in Fig 7 demonstrate that the inhibition of NK cell degranulation observed is not mediated by a soluble factor, but rather direct contact between NK cells and VZV inoculum is required for VZV to exert its inhibitory effect. To delineate whether the inhibition was mediated by the infected ARPE-19 inoculum cells or the virus directly, functional assays were performed using extracted cell-free VZV supernatants. PBMCs were co-cultured with mock or VZV cell-free preparations for 1 day in the presence of IL-2, and then challenged with K562 target cells. Measurement of gE:gI staining revealed infection of NK cells by cell-free VZV, but at a lower efficiency of infection than that achieved by cell-associated VZV transmission (S4A Fig), in accordance with our previous work [21]. When CD107a was examined, it was observed that NK cells which were infected or exposed to cell-free VZV had reduced degranulation against K562s, compared to mock cultured NK cells (S4B and S4C Fig). This finding suggests that the inhibition of NK cell function by VZV is directly mediated by the virus. In support, functional assays performed with VZV inoculum that had been UV-irradiated or fixed with 1% formaldehyde no longer conferred an inhibitory phenotype to co-cultured NK cells (S5 Fig). The lack of NK cell inhibition observed with inactivated inoculum suggests that the surface expression of VZV-infected cells is not responsible for paralysing NK cell function, but rather that active and functionally-intact VZV is required to mediate this effect.
VZV culture reduces phospho–SLP-76 levels and increases ERK1/2 phosphorylation
Considering that VZV cultured NK cells predominantly maintained cell-surface receptor expression and were capable of degranulating when stimulated at a midpoint in the signalling pathway with PMA/I, we investigated whether VZV interfered with upstream receptor signalling to explain the observed inhibition to target stimulation. Comparing mock, VZV exposed, and VZV infected NK cells either unstimulated, or challenged with K562 cells for 2, 5, 10, or 30 mins, we used intracellular flow cytometry to detect phosphorylated signalling molecules involved in the degranulation pathway. Specifically, we examined phosphorylated expression levels of the Src family tyrosine kinase, Lck; the adaptor proteins, linker for activation of T cells (LAT), and SH2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kDa (SLP-76); the downstream protein kinases, mitogen-activated or extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2); and signalling inhibitor, Src homology phosphatase 2 (SHP-2). Following the general temporal signalling order outlined in Fig 8A, we observed similar phosphorylation levels of the earliest markers Lck and LAT between mock, exposed and infected NK cells, at the majority of timepoints (Fig 8B). In contrast, however, both exposed and infected NK cells had notably reduced SLP-76 phosphorylation at rest and when stimulated (Figs 8B and 8C and S6A and S6B). Closer examination revealed that the change in phospho–SLP-76 expression with stimulation was not significantly different between mock, exposed and infected NK cells (S6C Fig). There was, however, a significant reduction in phospho–SLP-76 in both exposed and infected NK cells compared to mock (S6D Fig), indicating that VZV induces a depletion of basal phospho–SLP-76 which does not recover with stimulation.
Downstream we found variable phosphorylation of MEK1/2 but increased basal phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in exposed, and especially infected, NK cells (Fig 8B and 8D). This is consistent with previous reports that the VZV ORF12 protein present in the tegument of VZV virions triggers phosphorylation of ERK1/2 which promotes viral replication and cell survival [30]. We also examined expression of inhibitory SHP-2, but did not observe any distinct differences in levels of phosphorylation between mock, exposed and infected NK cells (Fig 8B). Overall, the data revealed alterations in the degranulation signalling pathway with reduced phospho–SLP-76 in VZV cultured NK cells, as well as a basal upregulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation.
Discussion
We have identified a previously unreported strategy employed by VZV to powerfully inhibit NK cell function. Following co-culture with VZV infected epithelial cell inoculum, NK cells were rendered unresponsive to target cell stimulation, exhibiting abrogated cytokine production and degranulation, which correlated with a dramatic reduction in target cell lysis. NK cells were still capable of degranulating when stimulated with PMA/I and maintained relatively stable surface receptor expression, suggesting that VZV paralysed NK cells from responding to target cells. Recently it was observed that patients with varicella displayed significantly lower levels of serum granulysin (a marker of NK cell activity) compared to healthy controls, despite maintained numbers of circulating NK cells [31]. Similarly, a previous study of herpes zoster patients during the acute phase of disease found impaired NK cell activity against K562 targets [32]. These clinical observations lend support to our in vitro demonstration of inhibited NK cell function following VZV co-culture, which provides new insights into understanding how VZV interacts with, and evades, the host immune response.
The observation that VZV cultured NK cells degranulated upon PMA/I stimulation indicated that while the NK cells did not respond to target cells, they still retained the capacity and viability to release cytotoxic granules. Cumulatively, PMA/I treatment leads to degranulation through stimulation of protein kinase C-θ (PKC-θ) by PMA, and mobilisation of calcium induced by ionomycin [22]. Unaffected degranulation in VZV cultured NK cells stimulated with PMA/I thus suggested that the point of inhibition was upstream of PMA/I action. In correlation of this finding, examination of key signalling molecules in the NK cell degranulation pathway demonstrated perturbations following VZV co-culture. Notably, in both infected and exposed NK cells we observed a decrease in the level of phosphorylated SLP-76– an adaptor protein central to NK cell activation and degranulation in several pathways of receptor signalling, including through synergistic NKG2D, 2B4 and DNAM-1 stimulation [33]. It was possible that reduced SLP-76 phosphorylation was the result of increased antagonistic phosphatase activity, however when we compared mock and VZV cultured NK cells we did not observe any difference in the level of phospho–SHP-2, which has been previously identified to negatively regulate NK cell cytolytic and cytokine responses [34]. However, it is possible that the recruitment of SHP-2 may be altered with infection, or that VZV induces other unexamined inhibitory phosphatases that have been implicated in suppressing NK cell activity, such as SHP-1 [35]. Given the changes in phosphorylated signalling molecules that we observed, further examination of NK cell signalling following VZV co-culture could shed light on whether modulation of signalling plays a causative role in the inhibition of NK cell function by VZV.
Assays with HSV-1 revealed hampered NK cell responses to target cell stimulation in both HSV-1 infected and exposed NK cells, which was comparable to the phenotype observed with VZV. This finding supports two earlier studies which observed inhibition of NK cell activity following direct contact with HSV infected cells [27, 36]. More recently, HSV has also been characterised to inhibit lymphocyte activity in both cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and invariant NKT cells [37, 38]. In these lymphocytes, direct co-culture with HSV led to impaired T cell receptor (TCR) signalling, paralleling the reduced phosphorylation observed in our VZV cultured NK cells when stimulated with K562 cells. Furthermore, it has been found that the US3 protein kinase of HSV-1 partially mediates this inhibition of TCR signalling through interfering with the activation of key adaptor protein LAT [39]. As a closely related alphaherpesvirus, VZV encodes a homologue of US3– ORF66 protein kinase. However, investigation of NK cells cultured with a mutant virus unable to express ORF66 continued to display inhibited degranulation against K562 targets (S7 Fig), indicating that despite similar phenotypes of functional inhibition, VZV appears to elicit its inhibitory effect through an alternative mechanism to that previously identified for HSV-1 inhibition of CTLs. It would be of interest in future to also investigate whether the inhibition of NK cell function by HSV-1 occurs through the viral strategy characterised for CTL inactivation.
NK cells cultured with VZV and HSV-1 were similarly inhibited in their ability to produce cytokines in response to target cell stimulation, implying that they were paralysed from responding. However, there were clear differences between the two viruses when NK cells were stimulated with PMA/I, revealing viral interference with cytokine production independent of the inhibitory block in target cell responsiveness. As demonstrated in mock NK cells, PMA/I triggers a strong induction of IFN-γ and TNF expression, however IFN-γ production was completely abrogated in HSV-1 infected NK cells, while HSV-1 exposed NK cells were unaffected. Conversely, TNF production was not significantly modulated by HSV-1 culture, indicating that HSV-1 infection of NK cells elicits a specific and potent targeting of IFN-γ production. In contrast to HSV-1 infection, VZV infected NK cells displayed reduced expression of both IFN-γ and TNF when stimulated with PMA/I. Additionally, after 2 days of co-culture, VZV exposed NK cells also exhibited suppressed cytokine production, suggesting VZV can affect the efficiency of cytokine expression through several regulatory or inhibitory methods. Recently it was found that NK cells isolated from patients with herpes zoster exhibited significantly lower IFN-γ secretion compared to control subjects, with severity of skin lesion correlated to the degree of IFN-γ suppression [40], corroborating our findings. Reduced IFN-γ and TNF expression upon PMA/I stimulation indicates that VZV and HSV-1 impact points in the cytokine production pathway that are not shared with degranulation, which was unaffected following activation with PMA/I. While degranulation involves the coordinated exocytosis of pre-formed lytic granules, IFN-γ and TNF are not basally present in NK cells and are only expressed following stimulation [6]. Thus, in the process of cytokine synthesis, there are numerous steps–from transcription to protein expression–that could be the target of viral interference as a method of immune evasion. IFN-γ and TNF are crucial in the anti-viral immune response, with both cytokines able to limit viral spread and replication of VZV [41–44] and HSV-1 [45, 46]. The significance of TNF in controlling VZV infection is further exemplified in recent reports of increased reactivation of VZV in patients on anti-TNF regimens [47]. Localised suppression of IFN-γ and/or TNF production by NK cells would conceivably aid both VZV and HSV-1 in establishing infection in the face of a mounting immune response. The cytokine environment also influences NK cell activity, with cytokines driving further cytokine release, proliferation and enhanced cytotoxicity from NK cells. While our study examined the inhibition of cytokine production by NK cells, future investigation could complement these findings by examining additional regulation of cytokine-mediated NK cell responses by alphaherpesvirus infection.
In considering the loss of NK cell responsiveness to target cells following VZV culture, a likely cause would be downregulation of receptor expression; however, profiling of the NK cell surface phenotype suggested that this was not the case. Functional detection of K562 target cells is characterised to be elicited through several receptors, including NKG2D, NKp46, CD160, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), NKG2A, and LFA-1 (CD11a) [24, 25, 48–50]. In this study and our previous work [21], we did not find any of these receptors to be consistently downregulated on both exposed and infected NK cells, which would be required to explain the functional inhibition. Furthermore, crosslinking of surface glycoproteins by PHA did not lead to degranulation in VZV cultured NK cells, indicating a global block in responding to broad receptor stimulation. Extensive examination of NK cell receptor expression additionally provided an opportunity to further characterise the influence of VZV on NK cell surface phenotype, which has hitherto not been investigated besides our previous work [21]. Notably, here we found NKp46 expression to be significantly increased on exposed NK cells, especially when concurrently stimulated with IL-2. This upregulation was a trend shared across the other natural cytotoxicity receptors–NKp44 and NKp30– as well as related DNAM-1 and TACTILE, and the direct apoptosis stimulator TRAIL. These changes imply NK cells are dynamically responding to VZV and increasing receptor expression accordingly. It has been found that NK cell detection of HSV-1 infection in vitro is predominantly mediated by synergistic activity of the NCRs [51], and thus it was interesting to note upregulation of these receptors on VZV exposed NK cells. It is yet to be characterised for VZV how NK cells detect VZV infection, and it would be of interest to investigate this further. Additionally, examination of the granule content of NK cells following VZV co-culture would reveal whether VZV also targets granzymes and perforin to interfere with NK cell cytolytic function.
It is remarkable that VZV was capable of potently inhibiting the functional responsiveness of not just infected NK cells, but also exposed NK cells that had not undergone productive viral infection. A possible explanation for this was that a secreted factor was responsible, however NK cells were no longer inhibited when separated from VZV inoculum by a semi-permeable membrane or when treated with supernatant from VZV/PBMC co-cultures, thereby precluding the likelihood that inhibition was cytokine-mediated. An alternative explanation is that the VZV inoculum of infected ARPE-19 epithelial cells is presenting an inhibitory ligand that is instigating an inhibited state in the co-cultured NK cells. While this is feasible, it seems unlikely given that NK cells were not inhibited when cultured with inactivated VZV inoculum or cultured with intact VZV-infected ARPE-19s for only 3 hours before stimulation with K562 targets. Potentially, NK cells in co-culture with VZV inoculum may be activated by the infected ARPE-19s, dampening their responsiveness to subsequent K562 stimulation. We have previously shown however that NK cells cultured with VZV infected targets for 5 hours do not display enhanced activation compared to culture with mock targets [17]. Additionally, NK cells were highly responsive (by degranulation and activation) to K562 challenge following co-culture with UV-irradiated or formaldehyde-fixed VZV inoculum, suggesting that engagement with the surface of VZV-infected cells alone does not inhibit NK cells from responding.
Our findings demonstrate that NK cell responses are potently inhibited at 1 and 2 days post co-culture with VZV. Given the prolonged incubation period of VZV during primary infection, studies investigating the extended effects of VZV infection on NK cell function would provide insights into the role of this inhibitory mechanism in viral spread and pathogenesis. The capacity of VZV to functionally inhibit immune cells through direct contact has been previously observed with plasmacytoid dendritic cells, where VZV co-culture blocked stimulated secretion of IFN-α [52]. VZV efficiently infects NK cells through cell-to-cell spread of virus [21], however the exact process of viral spread within lymphocytes has not been fully elucidated. For HSV-1, there is evidence to suggest that infection of T cells occurs through a virological synapse [53]–similar to that which has been characterised for HIV. It is thus possible that in our co-culture system, a similar method of viral spread is occurring with virus entering all NK cells but only continuing to productive infection in a subpopulation of cells. This fits with our observation that the percentage of infected NK cells (as determined by surface VZV gE:gI detection) does not significantly increase from 8–48 hpi, implying there is a predetermined pool of permissive NK cells. We consider this hypothesis to best explain the inhibitory phenotype, which is supported by investigation of HSV-1 inactivation of T cell function, where it was established that inhibition was mediated by virus entry without the need for viral replication, postulating that a virion component was responsible [38]. Our experiments showing that NK cell function is also potently blocked in infected and exposed NK cells co-cultured with cell-free VZV additionally support a model of inhibition mediated directly by the virus.
We have characterised a powerful strategy of immune evasion for VZV, revealing that VZV elicits a profound inhibition of NK cells, paralysing their ability to functionally respond to target cells. We demonstrate a similar inhibitory phenotype elicited by HSV-1, and our findings advance the developing literature uncovering pathogen inhibition of NK cell function. Previous studies have found that the major envelope protein E2 of hepatitis C virus is able to inhibit various NK cell responses through binding of CD81 [54, 55], and similarly the secreted E3/49K protein of adenovirus can suppress functional NK cell signalling through CD45 ligation [56]. Influenza A virus is also capable of reducing NK cell cytotoxicity through direct interactions with haemagglutinin [57], while vaccinia virus mediates inhibition of NK cell cytotoxic function through non-productive infection [58]. These immunosuppression strategies are not a phenomenon unique to viruses, however, with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii also downregulating NK cell function following infection [59], as well as several bacterial toxins reported to directly inhibit NK cell activity [60–65]. Cumulatively, these studies, along with our findings presented here, shed light on a common approach–but with distinct mechanisms–utilised by pathogens to restrict effective NK cell function. Elucidating specifically how VZV inhibits NK cells may allow exploitation of this knowledge in therapeutic settings where aberrant NK cell activation can cause immunopathology, such as in certain autoimmune diseases [66], graft-versus-host-disease [67], and transplant rejection [68].
Materials and methods
Cells
PBMCs were isolated from healthy human donor buffy coats (provided by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service) by density gradient centrifugation with Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) and resuspended in complete RPMI medium (RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine [Lonza] supplemented with 10% human serum [Sigma-Aldrich]). CD56+ lymphocytes were isolated from PBMCs by MACS positive selection using CD56 MicroBeads, following manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotech), and subsequently resuspended in complete RPMI medium. For isolation of NK cells by FACS sorting, CD56+-selected lymphocytes were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies in FACS buffer, and sorted to >95% purity using a FACSAria IIu (BD Biosciences).
The ARPE-19 epithelial cell line, human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs), and the Vero cell line (all ATCC) were maintained in complete DMEM medium (DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose and L-glutamine [Lonza] supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum [FCS; Sigma-Aldrich] and penicillin streptomycin [Thermo Fisher Scientific]). K562 cells (ATCC) were maintained in complete RPMI/FCS medium (RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine [Lonza] supplemented with 10% FCS and penicillin streptomycin).
Viruses
VZV-S, VZV rOka (rOka), and VZV rOka-ORF66S (ORF66S), which is unable to express the ORF66 protein by insertion of a stop codon [69] (all kindly provided by Ann Arvin, Stanford University), were passaged in ARPE-19 cells. Cell-free VZV was generated using HFFs infected with VZV pOka (Ann Arvin, Stanford University) for two days. Mock cell-free was generated in parallel using uninfected HFFs. For cell-free preparations, cells were harvested in cold PBS and then cell pellets were resuspended in PSGC buffer (0.5 g sodium glutamate, 25 g sucrose, 450 ml PBS, autoclaved and then supplemented with 10% FCS). Samples were freeze thawed, sonicated for 3x 30 second intervals with 30 second breaks (Sigma Aldrich Ultrasonic Processor 130W 20 kHz), and centrifuged at 3,000 g for 15 mins. Suspensions were stored at –80°C, and titred on HFFs. HSV-1 pICP47_eGC (HSV-1 GFP-pICP47), HSV-1 pICP6_eGC (HSV-1 GFP-pICP6) and HSV-1 pgB_eGC (HSV-1 GFP-pgB) [28] were grown and titred on Vero cells.
Co-culture of immune cells with virus
For inoculum input, ARPE-19 cells infected with VZV at a CPE of 2+ to 3+ (approximately 50–75% of cells showing altered morphology) were used. For HSV-1 experiments, ARPE-19 cells were infected with HSV-1 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5 one day prior. Using a cell-associated method of infection, infected or uninfected (mock) inoculum cells were obtained by trypsinisation and combined with PBMCs at a 1:2–1:5 ratio (inoculum to PBMC) in complete RPMI medium in a 12-well plate (or 24-well plate when using CD56+-selected lymphocytes). Cell-free VZV infections were performed at an MOI of 0.01–0.1 using 2 x 106 PBMCs in 1 ml of complete RPMI medium in 12-well plates. For all infection methods, plates were subsequently spinoculated at 150 g for 15 mins at room temperature and then cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 1 or 2 days, as specified.
For Transwell experiments, inoculum cells were seeded into the bottom chamber with PBMCs above separated by a 0.4 αm pore polycarbonate Transwell membrane (Corning). For experiments with supernatant-treated PBMCs, supernatants were harvested from PBMCs co-cultured with mock or VZV inoculum for 1 day, centrifuged at 460 g to remove cells, and stored at -80°C. Subsequently, supernatants were defrosted and diluted 1:2 with fresh complete RPMI medium before addition to PBMCs for 1 day. For UV-irradiated inoculum experiments, the inoculum cells were seeded into a 12-well plate and irradiated with 1 μJ/cm2 (CL-1000 ultraviolet crosslinker) before the addition of PBMCs and spinoculation, as specified above. For fixed inoculum experiments, the inoculum cells were seeded into 12-well plates and allowed to adhere. One day later, monolayers were gently washed with PBS and fixed with 200 μl 1% formaldehyde for 15 mins at room temperature. Monolayers were then washed 3x with PBS before the addition of PBMCs and spinoculation, per the standard protocol outlined.
Stimulation of NK cells
PBMC co-cultures were stimulated with either K562 target cells at a 1:5 ratio (K562 to PBMC), 100 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich; kindly provided by Thomas Ashhurst, The University of Sydney), or 10 μg/ml PHA (Sigma-Aldrich). For IL-2 alone and K562 stimulations (unless specified otherwise), PBMCs were first stimulated overnight with 200 U/ml human IL-2 IS (“Improved Sequence”) (Miltenyi Biotec). Stimuli were added direct to PBMC co-cultures in tissue culture plates and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 5 hours, with monensin (BD GolgiStop; BD Biosciences) added for the last 4 hours. For detection of CD107a, a fluorescently-conjugated anti-CD107a antibody (or matched isotype control antibody) was added for the duration of stimulation. All stimulations were performed in technical duplicate. PBMCs were subsequently harvested for flow cytometry analysis.
Antibodies
For flow cytometry, fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against the following antigens were used: CD56 (clone NCAM16.2; conjugated to BV605) (B159; APC), CD3 (SK7; BUV395) (HIT3a; PE), CD107a (H4A3; APC), IFN-γ (B27; PerCP/Cy5.5), TNF (MAb11; PE), CD69 (FN50; BV421 and BV711), CD11a (HI111; BV711), NKG2D (149810; PE-CF594), NKp30 (p30-15; BV421), TACTILE (6F9; BV711), TRAIL (RIK-2; BV421), BTLA (J168-540; PE-CF594), Phospho-Lck (4/LCK-Y505; AF647), Phospho-LAT (J96-1238.58.93; PE), Phospho-SLP-76 (J141-668.36.58; PE), Phospho-MEK1/2 (O24-836; PE), Phospho-ERK1/2 (20A; BV421), Phospho-SHP-2 (L99-921; AF647) (all BD Biosciences), CD160 (BY55; PE/Cy7), NKp46 (9E2; PE/Cy7),NKp44 (P44-8; PE), DNAM-1 (11A8; APC), 2B4 (C1.7; PerCP/Cy5.5), NKp80 (5D12; PE) (all BioLegend), NKG2C (134591; APC) (R&D Systems), and VZV gE:gI (SG1-1; conjugated in-house to DyLight 488) (Meridian Life Science). Matched isotype control antibodies were also used where appropriate.
Flow cytometry
PBMCs were collected and stained with Zombie NIR fixable viability dye (BioLegend), according to manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were then resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% FCS and 10 mM EDTA) with antibodies at 4°C for at least 30 mins. Cells were next fixed in 1% formaldehyde (Cytofix; BD Biosciences) at 4°C for at least 15 mins. For intracellular staining, cells were then permeabilised by washing twice in BD Perm/Wash Buffer (BD Biosciences), staining for intracellular markers in Perm/Wash at 4°C for at least 30 mins, and concluding with 3 washes in Perm/Wash. Stained cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and acquired on an LSR-II cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Phosflow flow cytometry
For examining phosphorylation of signalling markers with K562 stimulation, PBMC co-cultures plus IL-2 were established as described above. One day pi PBMCs were collected and either left unstimulated, or combined with K562 target cells at a 1:2 ratio (K562 to PBMC) for 2, 5, 10 or 30 mins on a rocking platform at 37°C. Following the BD Biosciences Phosflow protocol, activation was terminated by immediately fixing with 1 ml warmed 4% formaldehyde (Cytofix; BD Biosciences) for 10 mins at 37°C. Cells were then washed with FACS buffer and permeabilised by slowly adding 1 ml Perm Buffer III (pre-cooled to -20°C) (BD Biosciences) while vortexing, then incubated on ice for 30 mins. Cells were subsequently washed before resuspension in FACS buffer with antibodies at room temperature for 60 mins. Finally, cells were washed again and suspended in FACS buffer for acquisition on an LSR-II cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Flow cytometry data analysis
Flow cytometry data were analysed with FlowJo software (versions 10.0.7 and 10.2; Tree Star). All data depicted are gated on live cells, as determined by Zombie NIR fixable viability dye staining. Where functional activity was measured (CD107a, IFN-γ and TNF expression) values were determined as the mean of two technical duplicates. Where specified, specific degranulation was calculated as degranulation (CD107a+) against K562 targets minus background degranulation (CD107a+) when unstimulated. For presentation of polyfunctional responses, flow cytometry data was visualised using SPICE software (Version 6.0) [70]. Heatmaps and dendrograms were generated using the matrix visualisation and analysis software Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus).
Calcein-AM release assay
NK cell cytolytic function was assessed using the calcein-AM release microassay as previously described [71]. Briefly, PBMC co-cultures plus IL-2 were established as described above. One day pi PBMCs were collected and NK cells (CD3–CD56+) isolated by FACS sorting, and rested overnight in complete RPMI medium plus IL-2. Using a 96-well V-bottom plate, varying numbers of NK cells were combined with 5 x 102 K562 target cells labelled prior with 15 μM calcein-AM (Sigma-Aldrich), to achieve NK cell effector to target cell ratios of 20:1, 10:1, 5:1 and 2.5:1, and performed in triplicate. To control for spontaneous release of dye, labelled K562s were cultured in parallel without NK cells. In order to calculate percentage of target cell lysis, maximum release was determined by parallel culture of labelled K562s lysed with 2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich). Controls were performed in 6 technical replicates. The plate was briefly centrifuged and then incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 hours. Subsequently cells were pelleted by centrifugation and supernatants harvested and transferred to a 96-well flat-bottom plate. Fluorescence was measured using a TECAN Infinite M1000 Pro. Percentage of target cell lysis (% specific release) was calculated as: ([experimental release–spontaneous release] / [maximum release–spontaneous release]) x 100.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (version 7; GraphPad Software).
Ethics statement
All human blood work was performed in accordance with The University of Sydney ethics approval and all donors provided written informed consent.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank the Sydney Cytometry Facility (The University of Sydney) for their assistance and support, especially Thomas Ashhurst; Ann Arvin (Stanford University) for providing the VZV-S, rOka, and rOka-ORF66S viruses; and Emily Machala for growing and titring virus stocks.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by NHMRC project grant APP1088005 awarded to AA, BS and BM. and NHMRC project grant APP1126599 awarded to DT and AA. DT was funded by NHMRC fellowship APP1104329. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Vivier E, Walzer T, Tomasello E, Baratin M, Ugolini S. Functions of natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(5):503–10. 10.1038/ni1582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Long EO, Sik Kim H, Liu D, Peterson ME, Rajagopalan S. Controlling Natural Killer Cell Responses: Integration of Signals for Activation and Inhibition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31(1):227–58. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lanier LL. Up on the tightrope: natural killer cell activation and inhibition. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(5):495–502. 10.1038/ni1581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mace EM, Dongre P, Hsu HT, Sinha P, James AM, Mann SS, et al. Cell biological steps and checkpoints in accessing NK cell cytotoxicity. Immunol Cell Biol. 2014;92(3):245–55. 10.1038/icb.2013.96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krzewski K, Coligan JE. Human NK cell lytic granules and regulation of their exocytosis. Front Immunol. 2012;3:335 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reefman E, Kay JG, Wood SM, Offenhäuser C, Brown DL, Roy S, et al. Cytokine secretion is distinct from secretion of cytotoxic granules in NK cells. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):4852–62. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lam VC, Lanier LL. NK cells in host responses to viral infections. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;44:43–51. 10.1016/j.coi.2016.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lisnić VJ, Krmpotić A, Jonjić S. Modulation of natural killer cell activity by viruses. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(4):530–9. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma Y, Li X, Kuang E. Viral Evasion of Natural Killer Cell Activation. Viruses. 2016;8(4):95 10.3390/v8040095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lanier LL. Evolutionary struggles between NK cells and viruses. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(4):259–68. 10.1038/nri2276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Pelsmaeker S, Romero N, Vitale M, Favoreel HW. Herpesvirus Evasion of Natural Killer Cells. J Virol. 2018;92(11):e02105–17. 10.1128/JVI.02105-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Biron CA, Byron KS, Sullivan JL. Severe Herpesvirus Infections in an Adolescent without Natural Killer Cells. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(26):1731–5. 10.1056/NEJM198906293202605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Etzioni A, Eidenschenk C, Katz R, Beck R, Casanova JL, Pollack S. Fatal varicella associated with selective natural killer cell deficiency. J Pediatr. 2005;146(3):423–5. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Notarangelo LD, Mazzolari E. Natural killer cell deficiencies and severe varicella infection. J Pediatr. 2006;148(4):563–4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wendland T, Herren S, Yawalkar N, Cerny A, Pichler WJ. Strong alpha beta and gamma delta TCR response in a patient with disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection and lack of NK cells and monocytopenia. Immunol Lett. 2000;72(2):75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mace EM, Hsu AP, Monaco-Shawver L, Makedonas G, Rosen JB, Dropulic L, et al. Mutations in GATA2 cause human NK cell deficiency with specific loss of the CD56bright subset. Blood. 2013;121(14):2669–77. 10.1182/blood-2012-09-453969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Campbell TM, McSharry BP, Steain M, Slobedman B, Abendroth A. Varicella-Zoster Virus and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Differentially Modulate NKG2D Ligand Expression during Productive Infection. J Virol. 2015;89(15):7932–43. 10.1128/JVI.00292-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Enk J, Levi A, Weisblum Y, Yamin R, Charpak-Amikam Y, Wolf Dana G, et al. HSV1 MicroRNA Modulation of GPI Anchoring and Downstream Immune Evasion. Cell Reports. 2016;17(4):949–56. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schepis D, D'Amato M, Studahl M, Bergström T, Kärre K, Berg L. Herpes simplex virus infection downmodulates NKG2D ligand expression. Scand J Immunol. 2009;69(5):429–36. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02241.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grauwet K, Cantoni C, Parodi M, Maria AD, Devriendt B, Pende D, et al. Modulation of CD112 by the alphaherpesvirus gD protein suppresses DNAM-1-dependent NK cell-mediated lysis of infected cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(45):16118–23. 10.1073/pnas.1409485111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Campbell TM, McSharry BP, Steain M, Ashhurst TM, Slobedman B, Abendroth A. Varicella zoster virus productively infects human natural killer cells and manipulates phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(4):e1006999 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chatila T, Silverman L, Miller R, Geha R. Mechanisms of T cell activation by the calcium ionophore ionomycin. The Journal of Immunology. 1989;143(4):1283–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sen N, Mukherjee G, Sen A, Bendall SC, Sung P, Nolan GP, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry analysis of human tonsil T cell remodeling by varicella zoster virus. Cell Reports. 2014;8(2):633–45. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sivori S, Pende D, Bottino C, Marcenaro E, Pessino A, Biassoni R, et al. NKp46 is the major triggering receptor involved in the natural cytotoxicity of fresh or cultured human NK cells. Correlation between surface density of NKp46 and natural cytotoxicity against autologous, allogeneic or xenogeneic target cells. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29(5):1656–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen X, Trivedi PP, Ge B, Krzewski K, Strominger JL. Many NK Cell Receptors Activate ERK2 and JNK1 to Trigger Microtubule Organizing Center and Granule Polarization and Cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(15):6329–34. 10.1073/pnas.0611655104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Strickland P, Dunston G, Roane P, Vanderpool E. Multiplication of Herpes Simplex Virus in Large Granular Lymphocytes that Co-Fractionate with Human Natural Killer Cell Activity. Immunol Invest. 1989;18(6):785–95. 10.3109/08820138909030599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.York IA, Johnson DC. Direct Contact with Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells Results in Inhibition of Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells because of Cell-to-Cell Spread of Virus. J Infect Dis. 1993;168(5):1127–32. 10.1093/infdis/168.5.1127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Russell TA, Tscharke DC. Lytic Promoters Express Protein during Herpes Simplex Virus Latency. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(6):e1005729 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weller TH. Serial Propagation in vitro of Agents Producing Inclusion Bodies Derived from Varicella and Herpes Zoster. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953;83(2):340–6. 10.3181/00379727-83-20354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu X, Li Q, Dowdell K, Fischer ER, Cohen JI. Varicella-Zoster Virus ORF12 Protein Triggers Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Inhibits Apoptosis. J Virol. 2012;86(6):3143–51. 10.1128/JVI.06923-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baljic R, Gojak R, Konjo H, Hukic M. Granulysin as a novel factor for the prognosis of the clinical course of chickenpox. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146(7):854–7. 10.1017/S0950268818000717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cauda R, Prasthofer EF, Tilden AB, Whitley RJ, Grossi CE. T-cell imbalances and NK activity in varicella-zoster virus infections. Viral Immunol. 1987;1(2):145–52. 10.1089/vim.1987.1.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim HS, Long EO. Complementary phosphorylation sites in the adaptor protein SLP-76 promote synergistic activation of natural killer cells. Science Signaling. 2012;5(232):ra49-ra. 10.1126/scisignal.2002754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Purdy AK, Campbell KS. SHP-2 Expression Negatively Regulates NK Cell Function. J Immunol. 2009;183(11):7234–43. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stebbins CC, Watzl C, Billadeau DD, Leibson PJ, Burshtyn DN, Long EO. Vav1 Dephosphorylation by the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 as a Mechanism for Inhibition of Cellular Cytotoxicity. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(17):6291–9. 10.1128/MCB.23.17.6291-6299.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Confer DL, Vercellotti GM, Kotasek D, Goodman JL, Ochoa A, Jacob HS. Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells Disarm Killer Lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(9):3609–13. 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bosnjak L, Sahlström P, Paquin-Proulx D, Leeansyah E, Moll M, Sandberg JK. Contact-dependent interference with invariant NKT cell activation by herpes simplex virus-infected cells. J Immunol. 2012;188(12):6216–24. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sloan DD, Han J-Y, Sandifer TK, Stewart M, Hinz AJ, Yoon M, et al. Inhibition of TCR Signaling by Herpes Simplex Virus. J Immunol. 2006;176(3):1825–33. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang Y, Wu S, Wang Y, Pan S, Lan B, Liu Y, et al. The Us3 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 inhibits T cell signaling by confining linker for activation of T cells (LAT) activation via TRAF6 protein. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(25):15670–8. 10.1074/jbc.M115.646422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim CK, Choi YM, Bae E, Jue MS, So HS, Hwang E-S. Reduced NK cell IFN-γ secretion and psychological stress are independently associated with herpes zoster. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193299 10.1371/journal.pone.0193299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ito M, Nakano T, Kamiya H, Kamiya T, Kitamura K, Ihara T, et al. Effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on replication of varicella-zoster virus. Antiviral Res. 1991;15(3):183–92. 10.1016/0166-3542(91)90065-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Torigoe S, Ihara T, Kamiya H. IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α Released from Mononuclear Cells Inhibit the Spread of Varicella-Zoster Virus at an Early Stage of Varicella. Microbiol Immunol. 2000;44(12):1027–31. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2000.tb02599.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Desloges N, Rahaus M, Wolff MH. Role of the protein kinase PKR in the inhibition of varicella-zoster virus replication by beta interferon and gamma interferon. J Gen Virol. 2005;86(1):1–6. 10.1099/vir.0.80466-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sen N, Sung P, Panda A, Arvin AM. Distinctive Roles for Type I and Type II Interferons and Interferon Regulatory Factors in the Host Cell Defense against Varicella-Zoster Virus. J Virol. 2018;92(21):e01151–18. 10.1128/JVI.01151-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen S-H, Oakes JE, Lausch RN. Synergistic anti-herpes effect of TNF-α and IFN-γ in human corneal epithelial cells compared with that in corneal fibroblasts. Antiviral Res. 1994;25(3):201–13. 10.1016/0166-3542(94)90004-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pierce AT, DeSalvo J, Foster TP, Kosinski A, Weller SK, Halford WP. Interferon-β and interferon-γ synergize to block viral DNA and virion synthesis in herpes simplex virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol. 2005;86(Pt 9):2421–32. 10.1099/vir.0.80979-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cacciapaglia F, Zuccaro C, Iannone F. Varicella-zoster virus infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients in the anti-tumour necrosis factor era. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(6):917–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bouteiller PL, Barakonyi A, Giustiniani J, Lenfant F, Marie-Cardine A, Aguerre-Girr M, et al. Engagement of CD160 Receptor by HLA-C Is a Triggering Mechanism Used by Circulating Natural Killer (NK) Cells to Mediate Cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(26):16963–8. 10.1073/pnas.012681099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Godal R, Bachanova V, Gleason M, McCullar V, Yun GH, Cooley S, et al. Natural Killer Cell Killing of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Blasts by Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor–Negative Natural Killer Cells after NKG2A and LIR-1 Blockade. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16(5):612–21. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lisovsky I, Isitman G, Song R, DaFonseca S, Tremblay-McLean A, Lebouché B, et al. A higher frequency of NKG2A+ than of NKG2A- NK cells responds to autologous HIV-infected CD4 cells irrespective of whether or not they coexpress KIR3DL1. J Virol. 2015;89(19):9909–19. 10.1128/JVI.01546-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chisholm SE, Howard K, Gómez MV, Reyburn HT. Expression of ICP0 Is Sufficient to Trigger Natural Killer Cell Recognition of Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells by Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(8):1160–8. 10.1086/512862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huch JH, Cunningham AL, Arvin AM, Nasr N, Santegoets SJAM, Slobedman E, et al. Impact of Varicella-Zoster Virus on Dendritic Cell Subsets in Human Skin during Natural Infection. J Virol. 2010;84(8):4060–72. 10.1128/JVI.01450-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aubert M, Yoon M, Sloan DD, Spear PG, Jerome KR. The Virological Synapse Facilitates Herpes Simplex Virus Entry into T Cells. J Virol. 2009;83(12):6171–83. 10.1128/JVI.02163-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tseng C-TK, Klimpel GR. Binding of the hepatitis C virus envelope protein E2 to CD81 inhibits natural killer cell functions. J Exp Med. 2002;195(1):43–50. 10.1084/jem.20011145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Crotta S, Stilla A, Wack A, D'Andrea A, Nuti S, D'Oro U, et al. Inhibition of natural killer cells through engagement of CD81 by the major hepatitis C virus envelope protein. J Exp Med. 2002;195(1):35–42. 10.1084/jem.20011124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Windheim M, Southcombe JH, Kremmer E, Chaplin L, Urlaub D, Falk CS, et al. A unique secreted adenovirus E3 protein binds to the leukocyte common antigen CD45 and modulates leukocyte functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(50):E4884–E93. 10.1073/pnas.1312420110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mao H, Tu W, Liu Y, Qin G, Zheng J, Chan P-L, et al. Inhibition of Human Natural Killer Cell Activity by Influenza Virions and Hemagglutinin. J Virol. 2010;84(9):4148–57. 10.1128/JVI.02340-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kirwan S, Merriam D, Barsby N, McKinnon A, Burshtyn DN. Vaccinia virus modulation of natural killer cell function by direct infection. Virology. 2006;347(1):75–87. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sultana MA, Du A, Carow B, Angbjär CM, Weidner JM, Kanatani S, et al. Downmodulation of Effector Functions in NK Cells upon Toxoplasma gondii Infection. Infect Immun. 2017;85(10):e00069–17. 10.1128/IAI.00069-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Whalen MM, Doshi RN, Bankhurst AD. Effects of pertussis toxin treatment on human natural killer cell function. Immunology. 1992;76(3):402–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Waters CA, Schimke PA, Snider CE, Itoh K, Smith KA, Nichols JC, et al. Interleukin 2 receptor-targeted cytotoxicity. Receptor binding requirements for entry of a diphtheria toxin-related interleukin 2 fusion protein into cells. Eur J Immunol. 1990;20(4):785–91. 10.1002/eji.1830200412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Paananen A, Mikkola R, Sareneva T, Matikainen S, Hess M, Andersson M, et al. Inhibition of human natural killer cell activity by cereulide, an emetic toxin from Bacillus cereus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;129(3):420–8. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01898.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Paananen A, Mikkola R, Sareneva T, Matikainen S, Andersson M, Julkunen I, et al. Inhibition of Human NK Cell Function by Valinomycin, a Toxin from Streptomyces griseus in Indoor Air. Infect Immun. 2000;68(1):165–9. 10.1128/iai.68.1.165-169.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Michałkiewicz J, Stachowski J, Barth C, Patzer J, Dzierżanowska D, Madaliński K. Effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A on IFN-γ synthesis: expression of costimulatory molecules on monocytes and activity of NK cells. Immunol Lett. 1999;69(3):359–66. 10.1016/S0165-2478(99)00121-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Klezovich-Bénard M, Corre J-P, Jusforgues-Saklani H, Fiole D, Burjek N, Tournier J-N, et al. Mechanisms of NK cell-macrophage Bacillus anthracis crosstalk: a balance between stimulation by spores and differential disruption by toxins. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(1):e1002481 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gianchecchi E, Delfino DV, Fierabracci A. NK cells in autoimmune diseases: Linking innate and adaptive immune responses. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2018;17(2):142–54. 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Simonetta F, Alvarez M, Negrin RS. Natural Killer Cells in Graft-versus-Host-Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Front Immunol. 2017;8:465 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Benichou G, Yamada Y, Aoyama A, Madsen JC. Natural killer cells in rejection and tolerance of solid organ allografts. Current opinion in organ transplantation. 2011;16(1):47–53. 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32834254cf [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Heineman TC, Seidel K, Cohen JI. The varicella-zoster virus ORF66 protein induces kinase activity and is dispensable for viral replication. J Virol. 1996;70(10):7312–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Roederer M, Nozzi JL, Nason MC. SPICE: Exploration and analysis of post‐cytometric complex multivariate datasets. Cytometry Part A: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology. 2011;79A(2):167–74. 10.1002/cyto.a.21015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Neri S, Mariani E, Meneghetti A, Cattini L, Facchini A. Calcein-acetyoxymethyl cytotoxicity assay: Standardization of a method allowing additional analyses on recovered effector cells and supernatants. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8(6):1131–5. 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1131-1135.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.