Skip to main content
PMC home page
Insects logoLink to Insects
. 2019 May 6;10(5):132. doi: 10.3390/insects10050132

Insecticidal Properties of Capsaicinoids and Glucosinolates Extracted from Capsicum chinense and Tropaeolum tuberosum

José L Claros Cuadrado 1, Elder O Pinillos 2, Richard Tito 3,4,5,*, Carlos Seguil Mirones 6, Norma N Gamarra Mendoza 1,6,*
PMCID: PMC6572632  PMID: 31064092

Abstract

Food security and biodiversity conservation are threatened by the emergence and spread of pest and pathogens, and thus there is a current need to develop pest management strategies that are sustainable and friendly to the environment and human health. Here, we performed laboratory and field bioassays to evaluate the insecticidal effects of several concentrations of capsaicinoids and glucosinolates (separately and mixed) on an aphid pest (Aphis cytisorum). The capsaicinoids were extracted from the fruits of Capsicum chinense and glucosinolates from the tubers of native Andean crop Tropaeolum tuberosum. We found that both capsaicinoids and glucosinolates have a biocidal effect on A. cytisorum, acting within a fairly short time. Under laboratory conditions, the toxicity of the compounds increased in relation to their concentrations, causing a high percentage of mortality (83–99%) when the aphids were exposed to dilutions of 10% capsaicinoids, 75–100% glucosinolates, or a mixture of 10% capsaicinoids and 90% glucosinolates. The mortality of aphids sprayed in the field with 5% capsaicinoids, 50% glucosinolates, or with a mixture of 5% capsaicinoids and 45% glucosinolates reached 87–97%. Results obtained from laboratory and field experiments were consistent. Our results suggest the potential use of bioinsecticides based on capsaicinoids and/or glucosinolates as an effective alternative to synthetic pesticides.

Keywords: aphid pests, bioinsecticide, climate change, eco-friendly products, natural insecticides, natural products, pest control

1. Introduction

The predicted increase in the abundance and distribution of pests and pathogens in response to climate change threatens to cause a severe impact on both wild and agricultural plant species [1,2]. For instance, a recent field experimental study showed that pests and diseases will be one of the main causes of crop production loss under future climate change conditions [3]. Chemicals are commonly used to counteract the impact of phytophagous, mainly on crops. In fact, the use of pesticides has increased in recent decades, and this rising trend will likely accelerate in the coming decades [4,5]. However, it is widely known that synthetic pesticides affect non-target organisms as well as the environment e.g., [6]. In addition, the inappropriate use of chemicals facilitates the acquisition of pest resistance to common chemicals [4], which in turn leads to an increase in the use of even more potent pesticides. Therefore, proper pest control management should be prioritized to maintain a reasonably healthy condition for human health and the environment [7]. There are several pieces of evidence that show that the use of plants with insecticidal properties is one of the main ecologically friendly and economically feasible alternatives to synthetic pesticides [8,9].

Previous studies showed evidence that capsaicinoids and glucosinolates have biocidal activity against phytophagous insects [10,11]. Glucosinolates are amino acid-derived natural plant compounds that act as a defense against herbivores. They are found in several plant species, including in the genus Tropaeolum [12,13]. Under natural conditions, glucosinolates can be hydrolyzed by myrosinases to (primarily) benzyl isothiocyanates upon tissue damage [14]. On the other hand, capsaicinoids are a group of secondary metabolites found only in the genus Capsicum [15]. Among the capsaicinoid components, capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin are responsible for approximately 90% of the total pungency [16,17].

Aphids are one of the largest and most important pests in wild and agricultural plant species [18], and their population is expected to increase due to climate change—elevated temperatures accelerate aphid reproduction and increase their fecundity [19,20]. Aphids are specialized insects that feed on the phloem sap of vascular plants. Therefore, aphids have a direct impact on the host plant fitness, mainly due to the loss of sugars and defense compounds (secondary metabolites) that are abundant resources in the sap [21,22]. Aphids are also disease vectors—due to their feeding mechanism (i.e., sap-sucking herbivore), they can transmit pathogens to the interior of the host plant tissue [23,24]. In addition, the intestinal tract of aphids has evolved to exude the excess of sugars consumed in the form of honeydew, a sugary substance that facilitates the development of pathogens such as sooty mold fungus, which can cover the surface of the plant and alter its photosynthetic and respiratory processes [25]. These indirect effects often become more significant to the survival of the plant than the direct effects caused by aphids [22,26].

In the Andes, one of the most biodiverse ecosystems in the world [27], the invasive exotic plant Spartium junceum L. (Fabaceae, commonly called Spanish broom or retama) has been massively infested by Aphis cytisorum Hartig (Homoptera: Aphididae) since 2005 [26]. As expected, the infestation of aphids facilitated the rapid proliferation of sooty mold fungus. This aphid–fungus damage led to the high mortality of S. junceum populations [26]. Despite that, in the Andes, A. cytisorum is currently reported to infest only S. junceum [26,28], but there is a risk that this polyphagous aphid [29,30,31] will infest other Andean plant species (agricultural as well as wild plants) [26]. Therefore, there is a real need to carry out adequate control management to avoid the possible ecological and economic impact of this and other pests.

Here, we evaluated the potential bioinsecticidal activity of glucosinolates and capsaicinoids on A. cytisorum. We performed laboratory and field experiments to test the toxicity of different concentrations of glucosinolates and capsaicinoids, separately or mixed. The results of this study can help to promote the use of natural compounds with biocidal effects for pest management, thus reducing the risks of chemical pollution. The glucosinolates were extracted from tubers of the Andean plant Tropaeolum tuberosum (Tropaeolaceae, locally known as mashua or isaño) and the capsaicinoids from the placentas of the fruits of Capsicum chinense (Solanaceae, locally called as ají panca). Tropaeolum tuberosum is cultivated throughout the Andes (from Colombia to Argentina) between 2100 and 4000 m of elevation, and the Andes of Peru are the largest producing region [32,33]. On the other hand, C. chinense is cultivated in tropical ecosystems from sea level to the high elevations of the Andes [34]. These two species are widely produced and used as food and in the food-processing industry. In the case of C. chinense, consumers prefer the pericarp of the fruit and the placenta is discarded [35], and this resource was used in this study to extract the capsaicinoids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Compound Extraction and Quantification

The fruits of Capsicum chinense were obtained from the local chili industry (Sazon Lopesa, Peru). The fruits were produced on the Peruvian coast (Tacna; 18°00′52″ S, 70°15′13″ W) during the 2013/2014 sowing period. On the other hand, tubers of Tropaeolum tuberosum were obtained from the farmers of the Pampas district of the Huancavelica region, Peru (12°23′53″ S; 74°52′04″ W) and grown during the 2014/2015 sowing period. Both species were grown free of synthetic agrochemicals. In the case of C. chinense fruits, the placentas and interlocular septa (the structure that divides the internal cavity of the fruit) were used, since these structures contain approximately 5–10 times more capsaicinoids in comparison to the pericarp and seeds [35,36]. The capsaicinoids are secondary metabolites derived from benzylamides [36,37].

The extraction of glucosinolates and capsaicinoids was performed in the food chemistry laboratory at the Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú. Each sample of tubers of T. tuberosum and placentas of C. chinense were dried at 45 °C until its moisture content reached 10–12%. In the case of T. tuberosum, prior to drying, the tubers were immersed into hot water (70 °C) for five minutes in order to inhibit the myrosinase enzymes and thus avoid hydrolysis. Dry samples were crushed and sieved in order to obtain uniform particle sizes (0.43–1.0 mm). These particles were pretreated under supercritical CO2 at a pressure of 300 bar at 60 °C and 400 bar at 40 °C for T. tuberosum and C. chinense, respectively. This procedure was carried out to improve the extraction of the focal compounds. Then, the glucosinolates were obtained from crushed and pretreated samples of tubers of T. tuberosum using 70% methanol at 75 °C and agitating constantly for 20 minutes [38]. The mixture was filtered, centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min, and then stored at 4 °C. On the other hand, the capsaicinoids were extracted from crushed and pretreated samples of placentas of C. chinense using absolute ethanol at 60 °C and stirring at 270 rpm for 12 h, following the procedures commonly used in the literature [39,40]. The extracted compounds were used to perform the toxicity tests on aphids in the laboratory and in the field.

The capsaicinoids and glucosinolates were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an ultra-fast liquid chromatograph (UFLC) system(Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) with a pinnacle II column (C18, 250 mm, 5 µm x 4.6 mm). The capsaicinoids were separated at 30 °C and glucosinolates at 28 °C with a flow speed of the mobile phase of 1.5 mL min−1 and 0.8 mLmin−1, respectively. The mobile phase for capsaicinoids was prepared with water at 1% of acetic acid and acetonitrile (50:50 v/v), while for glucosinolates with 0.01% trifluoroacetic acid and methanol (20:80 v/v). The elution of capsaicinoids was performed under isocratic conditions for 20 min and the elution of glucosinolates under gradient conditions for 40 min. Capsaicinoids were recorded at a 280 nm wavelength and glucosinolates at 229 nm. The calibration curves were previously elaborated using capsaicinoid (capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, and nordihydrocapsaicin) and glucosinolate (sinigrin, glucotropaeoline, and gluconasturtine) standards.

2.2. Laboratory and Field Bioassays

The sampling of aphids and field experiments were carried out in the central Peruvian Andes (Mantaro Valley, 12°15′46″ S, 73°58′44″ W) in May 2017. For the first laboratory experiment, a total of 1000 aphids were randomly collected from 10 adult plants of S. junceum. Immediately after collection, the insects were carefully transported (in polyethylene containers) to the laboratory (Integrated Pest Management Laboratory at the Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria in Peru) to perform the toxicity tests on the same day that they were collected. To this end, capsaicinoid and glucosinolate extracts were diluted using distilled water to obtain four different concentrations of each compound and a mixture of the two compounds (mg/10 mL). Specifically, the concentrations (v/v) were capsaicinoids at 1%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%; glucosinolates at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%; and a mixture of capsaicinoids and glucosinolates in proportions of 1:24%, 2.5: 47.5%, 5:70%, and 10:90%. In order to test insecticidal activity, 50 adults of A. cytisorum were exposed to each of these bioinsecticide dilutions in Petri dishes (10 cm in diameter and 15 mm deep). Each treatment was replicated three times. The bioinsecticides were administered only once, by spraying the dilutions equivalent to 2 mL per Petri dish. The number of dead insects in each Petri dish was recorded 30 minutes after spraying.

The second experiment was conducted in the field. Nine adult plants of S. junceum (~2 m height and ~1.2 m canopy diameter) infested by A. cytisorum were randomly chosen, >5 m apart from each other. The total number of alive aphids in the apical part of 12 randomly selected branches per plant was recorded. The apical part of the branches is where aphids tend to agglomerate (Figure 1). In three of these 12 randomly selected branches (where the aphids were quantified), one of the following four treatments was sprayed: dilution of (1) 5% capsaicinoids, (2) 50% glucosinolates, (3) mixture of 5% capsaicinoids and 45% glucosinolates, and (4) distilled water (control). In other words, the four treatments were sprayed three times (i.e., on three branches) on each plant. Compound concentrations were chosen based on the results from our first laboratory experiment. The administration of bioinsecticides was carried out in the morning (7 am), using a sprinkler that allowed homogeneous spray. After 24 and 168 h of administration, the number of dead aphids was recorded (i.e., field experimentation lasted seven days). At the time of setting up the experiment, a white blanket was spread at the base of the plant to check the dead aphids that fell off the branches.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Images of Spartium junceum L. infested by Aphis cytisorum in the Peruvian Andes. (A) Apical branches, the tender region of the branch where a massive infestation of aphids can be observed. (B) Adult plant of S. junceum infested by A. cytisorum and sooty mold fungus Capnodium sp. (black powder that has blackened the green stems of the plant). Photos by Richard Tito.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The effect of the different concentrations of the bioinsecticides on the mortality of A. cytisorum was tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA): Two-way ANOVA was used for the results from the laboratory experiments and repeated-measures ANOVA in the case of field experiments. The Tukey test was used to conduct multiple comparisons between treatments. The assumptions for performing parametric analyses were verified by means of residue exploration.

3. Results

3.1. Content of Capsaicinoids and Glucosinolates

The total concentration of capsaicinoids (capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, and nordihydrocapsaicin) in the extracts of the placentas of Capsicum chinense was 1.48 mg.mL−1, and the concentration of glucosinolates (gluconasturtin, glucotropaoelin, and glucoaubrietin) in the extracts of tubers of Tropaeolum tuberosum was 1.62 mg.mL−1.

3.2. Toxicity under Laboratory Conditions

The level of toxicity of the bioinsecticides sprayed on Aphis cytisorum depended on the compounds (i.e., capsaicinoids, glucosinolates, or the mixture of these two compounds) and their concentrations (F2.6 = 61.6; P < 0.001). When aphids were sprayed with dilutions of capsaicinoids, aphid mortality increased in direct proportion to the increase in concentration (F3.8 = 215.9; P < 0.001; Figure 2A). Aphids sprayed with 10% capsaicinoids experienced high percentages of mortality (~82%; Figure 2A). The toxicity of glucosinolates also varied according to the concentration, with higher lethality at higher concentrations (F3,8 = 1095.5; P < 0.001; Figure 2B). Glucosinolates at 75% and 100% caused a high and similar percentage of mortality (~92%) of aphids (Figure 2B). The mixture of capsaicinoids and glucosinolates significantly increased the toxicity effects compared to the activity of each compound separately (F3,8 = 1067.8; P < 0.001; Figure 2C), and toxicity also increased with compound concentration (Figure 2C). The mixture of 10% capsaicinoids and 90% glucosinolates caused the highest percentage of mortality (99%) of aphids (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Percentage of mortality of Aphis cytisorum exposed (in the laboratory) to different concentrations of (A) capsaicinoids, (B) glucosinolates, and (C) a mixture of these two compounds. Different letters above error bars indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05) in mean values between treatments.

3.3. Toxicity under Field Conditions

All treatments (i.e., 5% capsaicinoids, 50% glucosinolates, and a mixture of 5% capsaicinoids and 45% glucosinolates) caused a high percentage of mortality of aphids (F3,32 = 22.6; P <0.001; Figure 3). When the aphids were sprayed with distilled water, however, mortality was insignificant (Figure 3), suggesting that the manipulation in our study system did not influence the results. In all treatments, a high mortality of aphids (87–97%) was recorded within 24 h after spraying with bioinsecticides (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Percentage of mortality of Aphis cytisorum exposed (in the field) to dilutions of capsaicinoids at 5%, glucosinolates at 50%, and a mixture of 5% capsaicinoids and 45% glucosinolates. The results are shown for a period of 168 h after the aphids were sprayed with the bioinsecticides. Asterisks above error bars indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between treatments.

4. Discussion

Consistent results found in the laboratory and the field experiments strongly suggest that capsaicinoids and glucosinolates can be an ecofriendly alternative to synthetic pesticides. Our results clearly reveal that dilutions of capsaicinoids (from 5% in concentration) and glucosinolates (from 50% in concentration) can effectively control Aphis cytisorum. In addition, the rapid biocidal activity of compounds (within 30 minutes) is important for application in the field, where some abiotic factors (e.g., rain) can influence the effectiveness of pesticides. Aphis cytisorum has been reported as an aggressive pest of Spartium junceum in the Andes and threatens other Andean plant species [26], which could lead to serious ecological and economic consequences. In other regions, A. cytisorum is a pest that affects several plant species [30,31]. Our results are also consistent with results from several previous studies that have shown clear evidence that capsaicinoids and glucosinolates are efficient bioinsecticides for controlling several other species of herbivores. The capsaicin extracted from Capsicum annum (a species related to C. chinese) caused the mortality of approximately 97% of A. myzus [37]. The toxicity of capsaicin dilutions has been previously verified on potato beetle larvae (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) [41] and on Tenebrio molitor [11]. Similarly, glucosinolates have been shown to be an effective bioinsecticide against aphids [42] and larvae that attack corn root (Diabrotica virgifera) and grain (Oryzeaphilus surinamensis, Tribolium castaneum, Rhyzopertha domínica) [10,43]. Furthermore, it was shown that glucosinolates are toxic to Aedes aegypti larvae [10], a mosquito that transmits multiple diseases (dengue, Chikungunya, and zika) that affect millions of people [44,45].

As expected, the mixture of capsaicinoids and glucosinolates increased the biocidal effect of these compounds in laboratory conditions, although that effect was not as obvious in the field experiments. Previous studies that tested the effect of a mixture of two bioinsecticides also showed a significant increase in biocidal activity. For example, Edelson et al. [46] showed that capsaicinoids administered as the only biocidal component caused low percentages of mortality of A. persicae, but acting simultaneously with other insecticides, generated a synergistic effect that caused higher levels of mortality. Likewise, Olszewska et al. [11] showed that capsaicin intensifies the effect of pyrethroids, since their simultaneous administration increased the metabolic rate of Tenebrio molitor larvae and caused intoxication. Therefore, a mixture of bioinsecticides can increase effectiveness, but if this is not feasible, our results indicate that the application of capsaicinoids or glucosinolates alone is also highly effective.

The concentrations of capsaicinoids and glucosinolates found in the placentas of C. chinense and tubers of T. tuberosum were relatively high, indicating that these plant structures are valuable resources for the extraction of these compounds. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the content of capsaicinoids in C. chinense fruits and glucosinolates in T. tuberosum tubers varies depending on the varieties and several other abiotic factors, such as temperature, humidity, and soil properties [15,38,47]. On the other hand, the placentas of the fruits of C. chinense that are commonly discarded would be low cost raw materials [35].

5. Conclusions

Our results strongly suggest that bioinsecticides (particularly capsaicinoids and glucosinolates) can be used for pest management. This may represent a viable, effective, and ecofriendly alternative to synthetic pesticides. In addition, the use of raw material discarded in industry or gastronomy (such as the placentas of C. chinense) is essential to achieve this goal, considering that the land and climatic conditions required for agricultural production to meet the growing food demand are also threatened [3,48].

Acknowledgments

We thank Alexis Diaz, Belen Fadrique, and three anonymous reviewers for reading and commenting on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

J.L.C.C. and N.N.G.M. conceived and designed the experiments; J.L.C.C., E.O.P. and C.S.M. performed the experiments; R.T. analyzed the data; J.L.C.C., R.T. and N.N.G.M. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fund for Innovation, Science, and Technology–FINCYT, Peru, Grant Number Nº 219-FINCyT-IA-2013.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Bebber D.P., Ramotowski M.A.T., Gurr S.J. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013;3:985–988. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bebber D.P., Holmes T., Gurr S.J. The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014;23:1398–1407. doi: 10.1111/geb.12214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tito R., Vasconcelos H.L., Feeley K.J. Global climate change increases risk of crop yield losses and food insecurity in the tropical Andes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018;24:592–602. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oerke E.-C. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 2006;144:31–43. doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bourguet D., Guillemaud T. The Hidden and External Cost of Pesticide Use. In: Lichtfouse E., editor. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Volume 19. Springer International Publishing; Basel, Switzerland: 2016. pp. 35–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aktar W., Sengupta D., Chowdhury A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009;2:1–12. doi: 10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foley J.A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., Mueller N.D., O’Connell C., Ray D.K., West P.C., et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gupta S., Dikshit A.K. Biopesticides: An ecofriendly approach for pest control. J. Biopesticides. 2010;3:186–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mazid S., Kalita J.C., Rajkhowa R.C. A review on the use of biopesticides in insect pest management. Int. J. Sci. Adv. Technol. 2011;1:169–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsao R., Reuber M., Johnson L., Coats J.R. Insecticidal toxicities of glucosinolate containing extracts from Crambe Seeds. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 1996;13:109–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Olszewska J., Tegowska E., Grajpel B., Adamkiewicz B. Effect of application of capsaicin and pyrethroid on metabolic rate in mealworm Tenebrio molitor. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A. 2010;17:1355–1359. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fahey J.W., Zalcmann A.T., Talalay P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry. 2001;56:2–21. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00316-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mikkelsen M.D., Petersen B.L., Olsen C.E., Halkier B.A. Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering of glucosinolates. Amino Acids. 2002;22:279–295. doi: 10.1007/s007260200014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wen-Zhao L., Yi-Deng D., Zhang Y., Ying-Zhou C., Zong-Yi S., Wen C., Mei-Juan R., Hua-Ping Z. Optimized formation of benzyl isothiocyanate by endogenous enzyme and its extraction from Carica papaya seed. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014;13:1303–1311. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zewdie Y., Bosland P.W. Evaluation of genotype, environment, and genotype-by-environment interaction for capsaicinoids in Capsicum annuum L. Euphytica. 2000;111:185–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1003837314929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li F., Lin Y., Wang X., Geng Y., Wang D. Preparative isolation and purification of capsaicinoids from Capsicum frutescens using high-speed counter-current chromatography. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009;64:304–308. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sganzerla M., Coutinho J.P., de Melo A.M.T., Godoy H.T. Fast method for capsaicinoids analysis from Capsicum chinense fruits. Food Res. Int. 2014;64:718–725. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Blackman R.L., Easptop V.F. Aphids on the World’s Crops: An Identification and Information Guide. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; Chicheste, UK: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asin L., Pons X. Effect of high temperature on the growth and reproduction of corn aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) and implications for their population dynamics on the northeastern Iberian peninsula. Environ. Entomol. 2001;30:1127–1134. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-30.6.1127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Blanchard S., Lognay G., Verheggen F., Detrain C. Today and tomorrow: Impact of climate change on aphid biology and potential consequences on their mutualism with ants. Physiol. Entomol. 2019 doi: 10.1111/phen.12275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Douglas A.E. The nutritional quality of phloem sap utilized by natural aphid populations. Ecol. Entomol. 1993;18:31–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1993.tb01076.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Züst T., Agrawal A.A. Mechanisms and evolution of plant resistance to aphids. Nat. Plants. 2016;2:1–9. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ng J.C.K., Perry K.L. Transmission of plant viruses by aphid vectors. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004;5:505–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ryalls J.M.W., Harrington R. Climate and atmospheric change impacts on aphids as vectors of plant diseases. In: Johnson S.N., Jones T.H., editors. Global Climate Change and Terrestrial Invertebrates. Wiley; Oxford, UK: 2016. pp. 148–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wood B.W., Tedders W.L., Relly C.C. Sooty mold fungus on pecan foliage suppresses light penetration and net photosynthesis. Hort. Sci. 1988;23:851–853. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tito R., de la Torre-Mayorga F. Effects of an aphid pest on an invasive plant in the Peruvian Andes. Plant Ecol. 2016;217:817–823. doi: 10.1007/s11258-016-0596-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mallqui K.V., Cobián C.V. Los áfidos (hemiptera: Aphididae) en el callejón de Huaylas—Ancash, Perú. Ecol. Apl. 2011;10:93–98. doi: 10.21704/rea.v10i1-2.418. (In Spanish) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tambs-Lyche H. Aphids from the Canary Islands. Entomol. Scand. 1971;2:125–131. doi: 10.1163/187631271X00158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fernández M.V.S., Durante M.P.M., Zumeta J.B., Nafría J.M.N. Pulgones (hemiptera: Aphididae) de un sabinar de Juniperus thurifera L. de los Monegros (Zaragoza) Zapateri. Revta. Aragon. Ent. 1998;8:113–119. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ortego J., Difabio M.E., Mier Durante M.P. Nuevos registros y actualización de la lista faunística de los pulgones (Hemiptera: Aphididae) de la Argentina. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 2004;63:19–30. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grau A., Dueñas R.O., Nieto C.C., Hermann M. Mashua (Tropaeolum Tuberosum Ruíz & Pav.). Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), International Potato Center; Lima, Peru: 2003. p. 25. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bulacio E., Ayarde H. Aspectos ecológicos y distribución de Tropaeolum tuberosum Ssp. silvestre (Tropaeolaceae) en Argentina. Bol. Soc. Arg. Bot. 2012;47:97–101. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gamarra M.N., Roque L.B. Avances de Investigación en Especies de ajíes del Perú: Evaluación Morfobotánica y Fitoquímica de Especies y Variedades de ajíes (Capsicum) Nativos y Domesticados de la Provincia de Oxapampa, Región Pasco (Perú) CONCYTEC; Lima, Peru: 2012. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guillen N.G., Tito R., Mendoza N.G. Capsaicinoids and pungency in Capsicum chinense and Capsicum baccatum fruits. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2018;48:237–244. doi: 10.1590/1983-40632018v4852334. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pandhair V., Sharma S. Accumulation of capsaicin in seed, pericarp and placenta of Capsicum annuum L Fruit. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008;17:23–27. doi: 10.1007/BF03263255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gudeva L.K., Mitrev S., Maksimova V., Spasov D. Content of capsaicin extracted from hot pepper (Capsicum annuum ssp. microcarpum L.) and its use as an ecopesticide. Hem. Ind. 2013;67:671–675. doi: 10.2298/HEMIND120921110K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ramallo R., Wathelet J., Le Boulengé E., Torres E., Marlier M., Ledent J.-F., Guidi A., Larondelle Y. Glucosinolates in isano (Tropaeolum tuberosum) tubers: Qualitative and quantitative content and changes after maturity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004;84:701–706. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Al Othman Z.A., Ahmed Y.B.H., Habila M.A., Ghafar A.A. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in Capsicum fruit samples using high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules. 2011;16:8919–8929. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Juangsamoot J., Ruangviriyachai C., Techawongstien S., Chanthai S. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in some hot chilli varieties by RP-HPLC-PDA after magnetic stirring extraction and clean up with C18 cartridge. Int. Food Res. J. 2012;19:1217–1226. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maliszewska J., Tęgowska E. Capsaicin as an organophosphate synergist against colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) J. Plant Prot. Res. 2012;52:28–34. doi: 10.2478/v10045-012-0005-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pane C., Rongai D., Zaccardelli M. Foliar spray application of glucosinolates and essential oils on processing tomato in open field production system. Agric. Sci. 2013;4:149–153. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.43022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsao R., Peterson C.J., Coats J.R. Glucosinolate breakdown products as insect fumigants and their effect on carbon dioxide emission of insects. BMC Ecol. 2002;2:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Musso D., Cao-Lormeau V.M., Gubler D.J. Zika virus: Following the path of dengue and chikungunya? Lancet. 2015;386:243–244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61273-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marcondes C.B., Ximenes M.D.F.F.D. Zika virus in Brazil and the danger of infestation by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes. Ver. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2016;49:4–10. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0220-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Edelson J.V., Duthie J., Roberts W. Toxicity of biorational insecticides: Activity against the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) Pest Manag. Sci. 2002;58:255–260. doi: 10.1002/ps.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jeeatid N., Techawongstien S., Suriharn B., Bosland P.W., Techawongstein S. Light Intensity Affects Capsaicinoid Accumulation in Hot Pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) Cultivars. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017;58:103–110. doi: 10.1007/s13580-017-0165-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alexandratos N., Bruinsma J. World Agriculture towards 2015/2030: The 2012 Revision. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2012. p. 147. 12-03, ESA Working Paper. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Insects are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES