Skip to main content
The Journal of Neuroscience logoLink to The Journal of Neuroscience
. 1996 Oct 1;16(19):5914–5922. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-05914.1996

Cholinergic Stimulation of AP-1 and NFκB Transcription Factors Is Differentially Sensitive to Oxidative Stress in SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma: Relationship to Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis

Xiaohua Li 1, Ling Song 1, Richard S Jope 1
PMCID: PMC6579165  PMID: 8815874

Abstract

Oxidative stress appears to contribute to neuronal dysfunction in a number of neurodegenerative conditions, notably including Alzheimer’s disease, in which cholinergic receptor-linked signal transduction activity is severely impaired. To test whether oxidative stress could contribute to deficits in cholinergic signaling, responses to carbachol were measured in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells exposed to H2O2. DNA binding activities of two transcription factors that are respondent to oxidative conditions, AP-1 and NFκB, were measured in nuclear extracts. H2O2 and carbachol individually induced dose- and time-dependent increases in AP-1 and NFκB. In contrast, when given together, H2O2 concentration dependently (30–300 μm) inhibited the increase after carbachol in AP-1. Carbachol’s stimulation of NFκB was not inhibited except with a high concentration (300 μm) of H2O2, which was associated with impaired activation of protein kinase C. Lower concentrations of H2O2 (30–300 μm) inhibited carbachol-induced [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis, and this inhibition correlated (r = 0.95) with the inhibition of carbachol-induced AP-1. Activation of [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis by the calcium ionophore ionomycin was unaffected by H2O2, indicating that phospholipase C and phosphoinositides were impervious to this treatment. In contrast, activation with NaF of G-proteins coupled to phospholipase C was concentration dependently inhibited by H2O2, indicating impaired G-protein function. These effects of H2O2 are similar to signaling impairments reported in Alzheimer’s disease brain, which involve deficits in receptor- and G-protein-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis, but not phospholipase C activity. Thus, these findings indicate that oxidative stress may contribute to impaired phosphoinositide signaling in neurological disorders in which oxidative stress occurs, and that oxidative stress can differentially influence transcription factors activated by cholinergic stimulation.

Keywords: oxidative stress, transcription factors, AP-1, NFκB, phosphoinositide, cholinergic signaling


Oxidative stress appears to be one of the primary factors contributing to neuronal dysfunction in a number of debilitating conditions, potentially including Alzheimer’s disease, aging, and epilepsy (Halliwell, 1992; Coyle and Puttfarcken, 1993;Shigenaga et al., 1994). Activation of two transcription factors, AP-1 and NFκB, represents cellular signaling processes that are particularly responsive, or susceptible, to oxidative stress (Abate et al., 1990; Staal et al., 1990). Thus, it has been reported that exposure of a variety of cell types to oxidants induces increases in both AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding, as measured by the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) (for review, see Karin and Smeal, 1992;Siebenlist et al., 1994). Therefore, activation of these two transcription factors comprises potentially important signaling pathways for mediation of cellular responses to oxidative stress, which can range from adaptive mechanisms, such as the induction of antioxidant enzymes, to terminal signals leading to cell death.

Activation of AP-1 and NFκB in many cases constitutes a downstream consequence of signaling pathways that activate protein kinase C (for review, see Karin and Smeal, 1992; Siebenlist et al., 1994). For example, the phosphoinositide signal transduction system, in which receptors coupled to the G-proteins Gq and G11 stimulate phospholipase C to hydrolyze phosphoinositides, activates protein kinase C subsequent to diacylglycerol production from the cleaved phosphoinositides (Fisher, 1995). Protein kinase C activates both AP-1, by altering the phosphorylation state of the Jun and Fos immediate early gene proteins, and NFκB, by phosphorylating the inhibitory protein IkB and reducing its interactions with the transcription factor proteins (Karin and Smeal, 1992; Finco and Baldwin, 1995). Thus, in many cells agents that activate phosphoinositide hydrolysis have been shown to stimulate protein kinase C and to increase AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities as measured by the EMSA with nuclear extracts. Both the AP-1 and NFκB transcription factors are composed of protein dimers. Members of the Jun and Fos protein families interact to form a heterogeneous mixture of AP-1 dimers, which are usually detected as a single band using the EMSA. NFκB consists of dimers of two families of proteins, exemplified by p50 and p65 (RelA), which are often resolved into two or more bands by the EMSA.

The purpose of this investigation was to test whether oxidative stress modulated the activation of AP-1 and NFκB transcription factors induced by stimulation of the phosphoinositide signal transduction system in neuronal cells. Focus was placed on identifying the consequences of oxidative stress on stimulation by carbachol of cholinergic muscarinic receptor-associated responses. This is of special interest because oxidative stress has been linked to neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (Behl et al., 1994; Friedlich and Butcher, 1994; Hensley et al., 1994), in which there is a severe impairment of cholinergic activity that includes a large deficit in carbachol-induced phosphoinositide signaling (Greenwood et al., 1995) (for review, see Jope, 1996). Thus, the goal was to determine whether there could be a direct link between deficits in cholinergic receptor-induced signaling and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. To test the possibility that oxidative stress may directly impair responses to cholinergic stimulation, cultured human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, which have been used widely to study muscarinic receptor function (Fisher, 1995), were exposed to H2O2 to induce oxidative stress, and the effects on signaling processes leading to activation of the AP-1 and NFκB transcription factors were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture. Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (kindly provided by Dr. S. K. Fisher, University of Michigan) were grown in 100 mm culture dishes (Corning, Corning, NY) in RPMI medium (Cellgro, Herndon, VA) containing 5% fetal clone II (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 10% horse serum, 2 mml-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were plated at a density of 105 cells per dish and were harvested ∼48-72 hr later, after the treatments described in Results.

MTT assay. The method of Hansen et al. (1989) was used to measure MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) reduction. Cells (7 × 104 cells/well) were grown in 24-well plates for 48 hr, H2O2 (50, 100, or 300 μm) was added, and after 15, 30, 60, or 120 min MTT (1 mg/ml) was added. After 20 min incubation at 37°C, lysis buffer was added (10% SDS, 25% dimethylformamide, pH 4.7). After incubation overnight at 37°C, absorbance at 570 nm was measured in duplicate with a microtiter plate reader. Data are expressed as the percent of values obtained with cells not exposed to H2O2.

EMSA. To prepare nuclear extracts, cells were washed two times with PBS, and 4 ml of lysis buffer (10 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 3 mm MgCl2, 10 mm NaCl, 0.5% NP40) was added. Lysed cells were centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 30 μl of buffer containing 20 mm HEPES, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 0.3 m NaCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 0.2 mm EDTA, 1 mm dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1 mm β-glycerophosphate, 0.05 mm vanadate, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 μg/ml each of pepstatin A, leupeptin, and aprotinin. After extraction on ice for 30 min, the samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing nuclear proteins was transferred to a microfuge tube, an aliquot was removed for determination of the protein concentration (Bradford, 1976), and samples were stored at −80°C.

EMSAs were performed using a double-stranded 15 base pair oligonucleotide (5′-CTAGGGGGACTTTCC-3′) containing the NFκB consensus sequence or an 18 base pair oligonucleotide (5′-CTAGTGATGAGTCAGCCG-3′) containing the AP-1 consensus sequence, which was radiolabeled as described previously (Unlap and Jope, 1995). For the binding reaction, the nuclear protein extract (2 μg for AP-1; 10 μg for NFκB) was incubated in a total volume of 20 μl in binding buffer containing 20 mm HEPES, pH 7.9, 4% glycerol, 1 mmMgCl2, 50 mm KCl, 0.5 mm DTT, 1 μg poly (dI-dC), and ∼10,000 cpm radiolabeled DNA for 30 min at 4°C. Where indicated, reactions included 100-fold excess unlabeled AP-1 or NFκB oligonucleotides, and supershift analyses were performed with antibodies to the Fos family of proteins (kindly provided by Dr. M. J. Iadarola, National Institutes of Health), p65 (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA), or p50 (Rockland). DNA–protein complexes were resolved on a preelectrophoresed 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel in 0.25 × TBE (22.3 mm Tris, 22.3 mmboric acid, and 0.5 mm EDTA) at 4°C for 1.5 hr at 150 V. Subsequently, the gel was dried under vacuum and exposed to film. The amount of DNA–protein complex present was analyzed using a Phosphor Imager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA), and specific bands were identified by displacement of radioactivity with excess unlabeled oligonucleotides and supershift analyses. Data from treated cells were compared with controls using ANOVA.

Protein kinase C-α translocation. SH-SY5Y cells were treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) as indicated in Results, followed by two washes with ice-cold PBS. Cells were harvested in TE buffer (10 mm Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, and 1 mmEDTA), sonicated on ice for 15 sec, and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellets were washed with TE buffer, resuspended by sonication, and used as the membrane fractions. The supernatants were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, and the resultant supernatants were used as the cytosol fractions. Protein concentrations of both fractions were measured using the Bradford protein assay (1976), and aliquots were solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970) by boiling for 2 min. Proteins (25 μg) from the membrane and cytosol fractions were resolved in 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with an antibody to protein kinase C-α (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Immunoreactive bands were analyzed by densitometry, and statistical significance was determined using the paired Student’st test.

Phosphoinositide hydrolysis. SH-SY5Y cells in 100 mm culture dishes were prelabeled with 75 μCi/ml [3H]inositol (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) for 2 d at 37°C in RPMI medium containing 5% fetal clone II, 10% horse serum, 2 mml-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Labeled cells were washed and suspended in Krebs’–bicarbonate–HEPES buffer (30 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 122 mm NaCl, 3.6 mm NaHCO3, 1.2 mm MgCl2, 5 mm KCl, 1.3 mm CaCl2, 11 mm glucose) and washed twice. Suspended cells (105 cells in 0.5 ml) were incubated at 37°C for 10 min with or without the addition of H2O2 followed by incubation with 1 mm carbachol, 20 mm NaF (with 10 μm AlCl3), or 50 μm ionomycin (with 2.2 mm CaCl2) for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 1.7 ml of CHCl3:MeOH:12N HCl (1:2:0.01). Inositol monophosphate, inositol, and lipids were fractionated as described previously (Jope and Li, 1989). Radioactivity was measured in each fraction, and data were analyzed using ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

Exposure of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells to 30–300 μm H2O2 for 2 hr caused concentration-dependent changes in AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding, which resulted in bell-shaped curves (Fig. 1). AP-1 was stimulated by low concentrations of H2O2 to a maximum of ∼250% of control with 100 μmH2O2, followed by a concentration-dependent diminution in the stimulation of AP-1 to a minimum of 170% of control with 300 μm H2O2. Two bands of NFκB DNA binding activity were apparent in the EMSA, designated as upper and lower to indicate the bands with slower and faster mobilities, respectively. NFκB DNA binding activity responded to H2O2 in a bell-shaped, concentration-dependent manner similar to that observed with AP-1. Low concentrations of H2O2 increased NFκB to maximums of ∼350 and 200% of control for the lower and upper NFκB bands, respectively, achieved with 100 μm H2O2, followed by decreased stimulation with higher concentrations of H2O2 and reduction to below control levels of the upper band with 300 μmH2O2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Concentration-dependent effects of H2O2 on AP-1 (A) and NFκB (B) DNA binding activities. SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to 30–300 μm H2O2 for 2 hr. Cells were harvested, nuclear extracts were prepared, and AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities were measured by EMSA as described in Materials and Methods. Two NFκB bands were resolved and are designated as UPPER and LOWER to indicate the slower and faster mobilities, respectively. Values are given as the percent of controls that were not exposed to H2O2. Mean ± SEM. n = 6–7. *p < 0.05 compared with control values (ANOVA with a post hoc Dunnett multiple comparisons test).

Treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with carbachol increased AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities (Fig. 2). AP-1 was detected as a single band in the EMSA, and it was virtually eliminated by inclusion of excess unlabeled AP-1 oligimer in the binding reaction. Incubation with an antibody to the Fos family of proteins supershifted the AP-1 band to one with slower mobility. NFκB was detected as two major bands that were increased after treatment of the cells with carbachol, and the top one sometimes resolved into a doublet. These bands were reduced in the presence of excess unlabeled NFκB oligimer. Incubation of nuclear extracts with an antibody to p65 reduced the intensity of both NFκB bands and produced a supershifted band with slower mobility, and anti-p50 reduced the intensity of the lower NFκB band and two supershifted bands appeared.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Carbachol-stimulated AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities. SH-SY5Y cells were treated without (Control) or with 1 mm carbachol for 1 hr, followed by EMSA measurements of AP-1 (A) and NFκB (B) in nuclear extracts. Arrows indicate the single AP-1 band and the two NFκB bands. Where indicated, reaction mixtures contained 100-fold excess unlabeled AP-1 or NFκB oligonucleotides. Supershifted (SS) bands are indicated in samples that were incubated with antibodies to the Fos family of proteins, p65 or p50. ns, Nonspecific.

Carbachol induced concentration-dependent and time-dependent induction of AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities in SH-SY5Y cells (Fig.3). AP-1 was increased maximally to 1000% of control by a 2 hr treatment with 30 μm carbachol with an EC50 of ∼2 μm carbachol. NFκB DNA binding (total of both bands) reached a maximum increase that was almost 300% of control with 300 μm carbachol, and the EC50 of carbachol was ∼20 μm. Carbachol (1 mm) induced rapid increases in both transcription factors, which reached peak levels after 2 hr of treatment. Afterward, AP-1 decreased relatively steadily over time, whereas NFκB consistently rebounded after an initial decrease, followed by a decline at 20 hr.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Carbachol concentration-dependent (A–D) and time-dependent (E) activation of AP-1 (A, C) and NFκB (B, D). SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 3 × 10−7 to 10−3mcarbachol (A–D) for 1 hr (n = 3–4) or with 10−3m carbachol (E) for 0.25–20 hr (n = 3–4). Cells were harvested, and AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities were measured in nuclear extracts as described in Materials and Methods. Both bands of NFκB were measured together to calculate overall stimulation caused by carbachol. Values are given as the percent of untreated cells (controls). Mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared with control values (no carbachol) (ANOVA with a post hocDunnett multiple comparisons test).

Although carbachol and H2O2 each individually stimulated AP-1 DNA binding activity, treatment with H2O2 inhibited carbachol-induced AP-1 (Fig.4A) concentration dependently. The responses to carbachol in the presence of the lower H2O2 concentrations were especially remarkable because H2O2 alone stimulated AP-1 to values up to 250% of control (with 100 μmH2O2), whereas the stimulation by carbachol of AP-1 was concentration dependently decreased by H2O2, with an almost 50% reduction in the response to carbachol attained with 100 μmH2O2. This represents a conservative estimate of the H2O2-induced inhibition of the response to carbachol because a portion of the AP-1 stimulation in the presence of H2O2 plus carbachol is contributed by H2O2. Higher concentrations of H2O2 further decreased carbachol-stimulated AP-1, and 300 μm H2O2 eliminated stimulation by carbachol. These inhibitory effects of pretreatment with H2O2 on the response to carbachol are shown in Figure 3B, where values are expressed as the percent of the response to carbachol in the absence of H2O2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Modulation by H2O2 of carbachol-stimulated AP-1 (A, B) and NFκB (B–D) DNA binding. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with the indicated concentration (30–300 μm) of H2O2 for 1 hr followed by addition of 1 mm carbachol for an additional hour. Cells were harvested, and AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities were measured as described in Materials and Methods. Values in A, C, and D are given as the percent of controls that were not exposed to H2O2, or, in B, as the percent of values obtained with carbachol in the absence of H2O2. Mean ± SEM (n = 3–7). *p < 0.05 compared with carbachol stimulation in the absence of H2O2 (ANOVA with a post hoc Dunnett multiple comparisons test).

The interactions of carbachol and H2O2 on the stimulation of NFκB were quite distinct from those on AP-1 (Fig. 4). For the lower NFκB band, the effects of carbachol and H2O2 were approximately additive of the individual responses. Thus, H2O2 alone maximally increased NFκB (lower band) by 350% at a concentration of 100 μm, and 100 μmH2O2 increased the response to carbachol by >300%. Only at the highest concentration of H2O2 (300 μm) was there clear inhibition of the stimulation by carbachol. The response of the upper band of NFκB to H2O2 plus carbachol was more difficult to discern because of the relatively small stimulation produced by each agent individually. There appeared to be a slight inhibitory effect of H2O2 on the response to carbachol because the individual responses were less than additive, but this was not clearly evident except with the highest concentrations of H2O2.

Examination of the pretreatment time-dependence of the inhibition by 150 μm H2O2 of carbachol-induced AP-1 revealed that it was rapid and reversible. The data in Figure5 show that the greatest inhibition of carbachol-stimulated AP-1 occurred when cells were exposed to H2O2 immediately before the addition of carbachol. Preincubation with H2O2 lessened its inhibitory effect in a time-dependent manner, with clear attenuation of the inhibition occurring with a 2 hr H2O2preincubation before addition of carbachol. Concurrently, there was a time-dependent increase in AP-1 induced by H2O2in the absence of carbachol.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Time dependence of the inhibition by H2O2 of carbachol-stimulated AP-1. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 150 μmH2O2 for 0–2 hr before the addition of 1 mm carbachol. After 1 hr exposure to carbachol, AP-1 DNA binding activity was measured in nuclear extracts as described in Materials and Methods. Values are given as the percent of AP-1 in untreated cells. Mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared with control values for basal or with carbachol alone (no H2O2) (ANOVA).

To measure the magnitude of the altered oxidation state caused by H2O2, the concentration- and time-dependent effects of H2O2 on SH-SY5Y cells were assessed using the MTT assay, which measures cellular redox changes resulting from impaired mitochondrial enzyme function. Exposure of cells to 50 μm H2O2 resulted in a 10% decrease in MTT reduction, and decreases of ∼20 and 30% were obtained after incubation with 100 and 300 μmH2O2, respectively (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

MTT reduction in SH-SY5Y cells. Cells were incubated with 50, 100, or 300 μmH2O2 for 15, 30, 60, or 120 min followed by measurement of MTT reduction as described in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as the percent of controls that were not exposed to H2O2. Mean ± SEM (n = 4).

To test whether H2O2 could impair the stimulation of AP-1 or NFκB DNA binding by reducing the activation of protein kinase C, two strategies were employed using PMA to directly activate protein kinase C. First, the effects of H2O2 on AP-1 and NFκB stimulated by PMA were measured, and second, the effect of H2O2 on PMA-induced membrane translocation of protein kinase C-α was measured. PMA (1 μm) induced time-dependent increases in each of the transcription factors, with AP-1 being activated to the greatest extent and the upper NFκB band the least (Fig.7). Only at a concentration of 300 μm did H2O2 consistently inhibit PMA-induced activation of AP-1 or NFκB (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Time-dependent activation of AP-1 (A) and NFκB (B, C) by PMA. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 1 μm PMA, and AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding activities were measured in nuclear extracts as described in Materials and Methods. Values are given as the percent of controls that were not exposed to PMA. Mean ± SEM (n = 4).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Modulation by H2O2 of PMA-stimulated AP-1 (A) and NFκB (B) DNA binding. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated for 1 hr with 30–300 μm H2O2 followed by incubation for 2 hr with 1 μm PMA, and AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding were measured in nuclear extracts as described in Materials and Methods. Values are given as the percent of those obtained with PMA in the absence of H2O2 (as shown in Fig. 6). Mean ± SEM (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared with cells treated with PMA alone (no H2O2) (ANOVA).

In the second series of experiments designed to measure the interactions of H2O2 and protein kinase C, measurements were made of the modulation by H2O2 of the PMA-induced translocation to the membrane of protein kinase C-α, the major subtype expressed in these cells. PMA (0.1 μm) induced a time-dependent translocation of protein kinase C-α from the cytosol to the membrane (Fig. 9). The PMA-induced translocation of protein kinase C-α was inhibited by only 40% with 300 μmH2O2 (Fig. 10). These findings indicate that inhibition of carbachol-stimulated AP-1 activation by low concentrations of H2O2 was unlikely to be attributable to impaired activation of protein kinase C. However, because 300 μm H2O2 inhibited PMA-induced protein kinase C activation, this mechanism likely contributes to the inhibition by 300 μmH2O2 of AP-1 and NFκB activation induced by carbachol and by PMA.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

PMA-induced translocation of protein kinase C-α.A, SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 0.1 μm PMA for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min, membrane (M) and cytosolic (C) fractions were prepared, and protein kinase C-α was measured by immunoblotting as described in Materials and Methods. B, The immunoblots of membrane and cytosol protein kinase C-α were quantitated by densitometry, and data were calculated as percentage of maximal protein kinase C-α (30 min PMA treatment for the membrane fraction and no PMA treatment for the cytosol fraction).n = 3 for both membrane and cytosol protein kinase C-α using samples from three individual experiments.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Inhibition by H2O2 of PMA-induced translocation of protein kinase C-α. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 300 μm H2O2 for 45 min followed by the addition of 0.1 μm PMA. After 15 min, protein kinase C-α was measured in the membrane (M) and cytosol (C) fractions. Data were calculated as the percent of maximal protein kinase C (30 min PMA treatment for the membrane fraction and no PMA treatment for the cytosol fraction). Mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05 compared with cells not exposed to H2O2 (paired t test).

To determine whether H2O2 modulated signaling induced by carbachol at a site upstream from protein kinase C activation, carbachol-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured. SH-SY5Y cells were prelabeled with [3H]inositol, and carbachol-induced [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured with or without a 10 min preexposure to 30–500 μm H2O2. Figure11A shows that H2O2 inhibited carbachol-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis concentration dependently. There was a significant correlation between the H2O2concentration-dependent inhibition of carbachol-stimulated AP-1 and [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis (r = 0.95; p < 0.001).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Inhibition by H2O2 of [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis. SH-SY5Y cells were prelabeled with [3H]inositol for 48 hr, resuspended in assay buffer, incubated for 10 min with the indicated concentration of H2O2 followed by the addition of 1 mm carbachol (A), 20 mm NaF (plus 10 μm AlCl3) (B), or 50 μm ionomycin (C). After an additional incubation for 30 min, [3H]inositol monophosphate was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Values with each stimulant were corrected for basal [3H]inositol monophosphate production in each experiment, which are shown withsquares. D, [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis was calculated as the percent of control values obtained from cells exposed to each stimulant in the absence of H2O2. Mean ± SEM (n = 8–9). *p < 0.05 compared with agonist stimulation in the absence of H2O2(ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni test).

To identify the site of the phosphoinositide signal transduction system that was susceptible to inhibition by H2O2, [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured using NaF to activate G-proteins coupled to phospholipase C (Jope, 1988) or using the calcium ionophore ionomycin to directly activate phospholipase C (Fisher et al., 1989). H2O2 treatment inhibited NaF-induced [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis (Fig.11B) with a concentration dependence similar to that observed with carbachol stimulation, except at the higher concentrations of H2O2 where the response to NaF was inhibited less than was carbachol stimulation (Fig.11D). Incubation of SH-SY5Y cells with H2O2 did not alter the level of Gαq/11 in cell membranes detected by quantitative immunoblots (data not shown), indicating that the function, rather than the level, of Gαq/11 was impaired by H2O2. Ionomycin-stimulated [3H]phosphoinositide hydrolysis was unaffected by H2O2 (Fig. 11C). Thus, calcium-activated phospholipase C and phosphoinositide substrates were impervious to treatment with H2O2, whereas G-protein activation was impaired.

DISCUSSION

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether oxidative stress influenced cholinergic muscarinic receptor-induced signaling processes in neuronal cells. Oxidative stress caused by H2O2 was found to markedly impair carbachol-induced AP-1 DNA binding, an effect that was apparently attributable to impaired activation of the phosphoinositide signal transduction system, whereas carbachol-induced NFκB DNA binding was resistant to oxidative stress except at the highest concentration of H2O2 tested (300 μm), where inhibition was associated with reduced activation of protein kinase C. Thus, not only was neuronal carbachol-induced signaling found to be susceptible to inhibition by oxidative stress, but two downstream responses to carbachol, activation of AP-1 and NFκB DNA binding, were revealed to be differentially sensitive to impairment by H2O2.

It was interesting to find that, whereas individually, carbachol and H2O2 each increased AP-1 DNA binding in SH-SY5Y cells, coincident exposure to both agents impaired this response. Oxidative stress has been reported many times previously, and in a wide variety of cell types, to increase AP-1, as well as NFκB DNA binding (for review, see Karin and Smeal, 1992; Siebenlist et al., 1994). These effects of oxidative stress, in this case caused by H2O2, also were observed in SH-SY5Y cells, with 100 μm H2O2 causing a maximal stimulation (to 250% of basal) of AP-1. Thus, it is highly unlikely that inhibition by H2O2 of carbachol-induced AP-1 was attributable to a direct inhibitory effect of H2O2 on AP-1 constituent proteins or DNA binding (because H2O2 alone was stimulatory); it is more likely that a site upstream in the cholinergic signaling cascade was impaired by H2O2. Inhibition of protein kinase C activation may have contributed to the maximal impairment of AP-1 that was induced by 300 μmH2O2, because this treatment reduced PMA-induced AP-1 activation and protein kinase C translocation. (Unfortunately, carbachol-induced translocation of protein kinase C to the membrane was not detectable in these cells.) However, the inhibitory effects of lower concentrations of H2O2 on carbachol-induced AP-1 indicated that an earlier response to carbachol, before protein kinase C activation, was susceptible to inhibition by H2O2. Measurements of phosphoinositide hydrolysis stimulated by carbachol revealed a severe inhibition with low concentrations of H2O2, and the magnitude of the inhibition correlated closely (r = 0.95) with the H2O2 concentration-dependent inhibition of carbachol-induced AP-1. Thus, it appears most likely that diminution of carbachol-stimulated AP-1 activation caused by oxidative stress induced by H2O2 primarily resulted from inhibition of carbachol-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis.

The site of action of H2O2 that accounted for the inhibition of phosphoinositide hydrolysis appeared not to involve changes in phospholipase C or the inositol phospholipids, because ionomycin-induced phospholipase C activation was unaltered by H2O2. However, because G-protein-activated (by NaF), as well as carbachol-stimulated, phosphoinositide hydrolysis was impaired by H2O2, it appears that the G-protein is a likely target of the inhibitory actions of H2O2. Further studies will be required to identify the mechanism by which H2O2 impairs G-protein function. However, it is known that blocking sulfhydryl groups on the G-protein α-subunit impairs its activation of phospholipase C (Jope et al., 1987), so this represents one likely candidate site for the inhibitory action of H2O2. Because phosphoinositide hydrolysis stimulated by direct activation of G-proteins was inhibited by H2O2, it is unlikely that there is selectivity for muscarinic responses in this modulatory effect, but responses to other receptors remain to be investigated.

Surprisingly, carbachol-stimulated NFκB was impervious to the inhibitory effect of low concentrations of H2O2on phosphoinositide hydrolysis, which impaired the stimulation of AP-1. This suggested that different signaling pathways contributed to NFκB and AP-1 activation induced by carbachol, a proposal also supported by the 10-fold difference in the carbachol EC50 for stimulation of NFκB (20 μm) and AP-1 (2 μm). The mechanism of the resilience of carbachol-induced NFκB to H2O2 remains to be identified. However, the sensitivity of G-protein-activated phosphoinositide hydrolysis to inhibition by H2O2 may provide a clue to this problem. Because both the G-protein α-subunits and the βγ-dimers constitute signaling elements, we speculate that bifurcation of signaling at the level of the G-protein subunits may account for the differential responses of NFκB and AP-1 to activation by carbachol and inhibition by H2O2. Thus, the subunit activating phosphoinositide hydrolysis that leads to AP-1 activation was susceptible to inhibition by H2O2, whereas the other signaling subunit leading to activation of NFκB remained unaffected except at the highest concentration of H2O2. Although the G-protein α-subunit classically has been identified as the primary activator of phospholipase C, Clapham and colleagues (Stehno-Bittel et al., 1995) recently raised the intriguing possibility that the βγ-dimer fulfills this role. Thus, it remains to be determined which activated G-protein subunits are coupled to activation of NFκB and AP-1 after stimulation with carbachol and whether these are differentially susceptible to inhibition by oxidative stress.

The observations that carbachol caused a relatively prolonged activation of NFκB and AP-1 and that the effects of H2O2 persisted well beyond its lifetime demonstrate the prolonged signaling potential of these agents. Activation of NFκB is often a transient effect, but recent reports have identified conditions in which activation is more extended (for review, see Finco and Baldwin, 1995). Thompson et al. (1995) provided evidence that the release of NFκB from IκBα mediates transient responses, whereas prolonged activation of NFκB is associated additionally with release from the inhibitory action of IκBβ. Similarly, stimulation of the levels of Fos-related antigens (e.g., Fra 1, Fra 2) has been associated with prolonged activation of AP-1 compared with more transient responses attributable to increased levels of c-Fos (Pennypacker et al., 1995; Hyman and Nestler, 1996). Regulation of the duration of activation of NFκB and AP-1, and their eventual roles as mediators of apoptosis or cell survival, may depend on the selectivity of the inhibitory and constitutive proteins that are affected by stimulatory agents, an issue remaining to be addressed in identifying the responses to carbachol and to H2O2 in neuronal cells.

The inhibition by oxidative stress induced with H2O2 on cholinergic muscarinic receptor-stimulated signaling reported here is remarkably similar to impaired cholinergic responses observed in Alzheimer’s disease brain in a number of studies. Notably, cholinergic agonist-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis is severely impaired in Alzheimer’s disease, and impaired G-protein function has been identified as a primary site causing this deficient phosphoinositide signaling (for review, see Jope, 1996). These impairments correspond remarkably closely to the H2O2-induced inhibition of cholinergic receptor- and G-protein-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in SH-SY5Y cells. Moreover, Aβ peptides, which contribute to amyloid plaque formation in Alzheimer’s disease, have been shown to induce neurotoxicity via oxidative stress mechanisms, including increasing the concentration of H2O2 (Behl et al., 1994; Hensley et al., 1994). Thus, impairments in signaling induced by H2O2 in SH-SY5Y cells may model some of the mechanisms contributing to neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders in which oxidative stress occurs.

Footnotes

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AG06569.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Richard S. Jope, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1057, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abate C, Patel L, Rauscher FJ, Curran T. Redox regulation of fos and jun DNA-binding activity in vitro. Science. 1990;249:1157–1161. doi: 10.1126/science.2118682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Behl C, Davis JB, Lesley R, Schubert D. Hydrogen peroxide mediates amyloid β protein toxicity. Cell. 1994;77:817–827. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90131-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coyle JT, Puttfarcken P. Oxidative stress, glutamate, and neurodegenerative disorders. Science. 1993;262:689–695. doi: 10.1126/science.7901908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Finco TS, Baldwin AS. Mechanistic aspects of NF-κB regulation: the emerging role of phosphorylation and proteolysis. Immunity. 1995;3:263–272. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fisher SK. Homologous and heterologous regulation of receptor-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;288:231–250. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(95)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fisher SK, Domask LM, Roland RM. Muscarinic receptor regulation of cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations in human SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells: Ca2+ requirements for phospholipase C activation. Mol Pharmacol. 1989;35:195–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Friedlich AL, Butcher LL. Involvement of free oxygen radicals in β-amyloidosis: an hypothesis. Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15:443–455. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(94)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Greenwood AF, Powers RE, Jope RS. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis, Gαq, phospholipase C, and protein kinase C in post mortem human brain: effects of post mortem interval, subject age, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 1995;69:125–138. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00220-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Halliwell B. Reactive oxygen species and the central nervous system. J Neurochem. 1992;59:1609–1623. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hansen MB, Nielsen SE, Berg K. Reexamination and further development of a precise and rapid dye method for measuring cell growth/cell kill. J Immunol Methods. 1989;119:203–210. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90397-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hensley K, Carney JM, Mattson MP, Aksenova M, Harris M, Wu JF, Floyd R, Butterfield DA. A model for β-amyloid aggregation and neurotoxicity based on free radical generation by the peptide: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3270–3274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hyman SE, Nestler EJ. Initiation and adaptation: a paradigm for understanding psychotropic drug action. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:151–162. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jope RS. Modulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis by NaF and aluminum in rat cortical slices. J Neurochem. 1988;51:1731–1736. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb01152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jope RS (1996) Cholinergic muscarinic receptor signaling by the phosphoinositide signal transduction system in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dis Rev 1:2–14. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Jope RS, Li X. Inhibition of inositol phospholipid synthesis and norepinephrine-stimulated hydrolysis in rat brain slices by excitatory amino acids. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;38:589–596. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(89)90203-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jope RS, Casebolt TL, Johnson GVW. Modulation of carbachol-stimulated inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in rat cerebral cortex. Neurochem Res. 1987;12:693–700. doi: 10.1007/BF00970524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karin M, Smeal T. Control of transcription factors by signal transduction pathways: the beginning of the end. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992;17:418–422. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pennypacker KR, Hong J-S, McMillian MK. Implications of prolonged expression of Fos-related antigens. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1995;16:317–321. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)89061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM, Ames BN. Oxidative damage and mitochondrial decay in aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:10771–10778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.10771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Siebenlist U, Franzoso G, Brown K. Structure, regulation and function of NFκB. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:405–455. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.002201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Staal FJT, Roederer M, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. Intracellular thiols regulate activation of nuclear factor κB and transcription of human immunodeficiency virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9943–9947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stehno-Bittel L, Krapivinsky G, Krapivinsky L, Perez-Terzic C, Clapham DE. The G-protein βγ subunit transduces the muscarinic receptor signal for Ca2+ release in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:30068–30074. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.50.30068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thompson JE, Phillips RJ, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Ghosh S. IκB-β regulates the persistent response in a biphasic activation of NF-κB. Cell. 1995;80:573–582. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90511-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Unlap T, Jope RS. Diurnal variation in kainate-induced AP-1 activation in rat brain: influence of glucocorticoids. Mol Brain Res. 1995;28:193–200. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)00202-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuroscience

RESOURCES