Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders, and both genetic and histopathological evidence have implicated the ubiquitous presynaptic protein α-synuclein (αSyn) in its pathogenesis. Recent work has investigated how disrupting αSyn's interaction with membranes triggers trafficking defects, cellular stress, and apoptosis. Special interest has been devoted to a series of mutants exacerbating the effects of the E46K mutation (associated with autosomal dominant PD) through homologous Glu-to-Lys substitutions in αSyn's N-terminal region (i.e. E35K and E61K). Such E46K-like mutants have been shown to cause dopaminergic neuron loss and severe but L-DOPA–responsive motor defects in mouse overexpression models, presenting enormous translational potential for PD and other “synucleinopathies.” In this work, using a variety of biophysical techniques, we characterize the molecular pathology of E46K-like αSyn mutants by studying their structure and membrane-binding and remodeling abilities. We find that, although a slight increase in the mutants' avidity for synaptic vesicle–like membranes can be detected, most of their deleterious effects are connected to their complete disruption of αSyn's curvature selectivity. Indiscriminate binding can shift αSyn's subcellular localization away from its physiological interactants at the synaptic bouton toward trafficking vesicles and organelles, as observed in E46K-like cellular and murine models, as well as in human pathology. In conclusion, our findings suggest that a loss of curvature selectivity, rather than increased membrane affinity, could be the critical dyshomeostasis in synucleinopathies.
Keywords: α-synuclein, Parkinson disease, neurodegeneration, intrinsically disordered protein, protein–lipid interaction, CD, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), 11/3 helix, large unilamellar vesicle, small unilamellar vesicle
Introduction
Parkinson's disease (PD)3 is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized in its early stages by resting tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity because of loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (1). Its prevalence in industrialized countries is estimated at 1% in people over 60 years of age, making it the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease (2). α-Synuclein (αSyn), a small presynaptic protein ubiquitously expressed in nervous tissue (3), has long been considered a key player in the pathogenesis of PD, as supported by both genetic and histopathologic evidence (4). Its role in neuronal physiology, although still debated, has been tied to the maintenance of synaptic homeostasis (5, 6). These mechanisms are especially important in dopaminergic neurons, which exhibit high-frequency activity bursts (7).
One of the recurring themes of αSyn biology is its affinity for lipid interfaces and how such interplay shapes its function and dysfunction. Although αSyn has been classically considered an intrinsically disordered protein (8, 9), its N-terminal region contains seven imperfect 11-mer repeats (with the consensus XKTKEGVXXXX), homologous to those of apolipoproteins (10–12). In fact, upon interaction with liposomes and micelles, αSyn undergoes a coil-to-helix transition and binds robustly to curved, negatively charged interfaces (13, 14). In particular, its specificity for lipid bilayers similar in charge and curvature to those of synaptic vesicles (15) is attained by virtue of the periodic arrangement of mildly hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid side chains (16). In addition, the numerous lysines in the N-terminal region mediate the formation of ionic bridges with the charged heads of negative membranes (17). αSyn's N terminus has also been shown to be critical for its subcellular localization to the presynaptic terminals (18) and its partitioning between the cytosol and membranes, regulated by electrical activity (19).
Along with its role in cellular physiology, the lipid-binding ability of αSyn's N-terminal region has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration (20). Overexpression of αSyn and its mutants associated with autosomal dominant PD (fPD) in yeast and mammalian cell models severely compromises vesicle trafficking and protein clearance through abnormal membrane association (21–23). In addition, vesicle and organelle clusters have been recognized as prominent features of Lewy pathology (24).
Recent work has shown that modifications in αSyn's repeats that enhance the amphipathic nature of its membrane-binding helix modulate toxicity upon overexpression (25, 26). Inserting either more hydrophobic residues on the largely apolar face of the helix or charged residues on the cytosol-exposed side appears to increase the ability of αSyn mutants to induce toxicity and cluster a variety of intracellular vesicles and organelles into αSyn-rich inclusions. Among these mutants, Glu-to-Lys mutations homologous to the fPD-associated E46K mutation (27) (e.g. E35K and E61K) are of particular interest because of their direct connection to disease and their robust toxicity in cellular models (28). Readouts of cellular toxicity (e.g. viability and apoptotic markers) and their ability to cluster vesicles correlate with the number of Glu-to-Lys substitutions, suggesting a common molecular mechanism between the E46K mutation and these “exacerbated” E46K-like mutants. In addition, such mutants have been shown to markedly decrease the ratio between aggregation-resistant αSyn tetramers (29) and aggregation-prone monomers, whose imbalance has been proposed as one of the molecular mechanisms underlying disease inception (28, 30). Lastly, heterozygous transgenic mice overexpressing E46K-like αSyn mutants present a robust and progressive PD-like phenotype with severe tremor and gait deficits (partially rescued by L-DOPA administration), loss of dopaminergic neurons, and formation of protease-resistant, αSyn-rich inclusions in neuronal bodies (31).
In this work we characterize the lipid-binding and lipid-remodeling abilities of three of these Glu-to-Lys mutants (E46K, “K”; E35K,E46K, “2K”; and E35K,E46K,E61K, “3K”; Fig. 1) using a variety of biophysical methods. Through comparisons between multiple E46K-like substitutions in αSyn's N-terminal region, we draw insights into the molecular pathology of E46K (and E46K-like) αSyn mutants and the structure of membrane-bound αSyn.
Results
E46K-like mutants increase N-to-C interactions and coil compactness
To characterize whether the Glu-to-Lys mutations induced any change in the structure of the lipid-unbound protein, CD spectra of the recombinant mutants in buffer were measured. Recombinant WT αSyn has long been known to exist in a predominantly unstructured “random coil” conformation (8), and the fPD mutant E46K and the 2K and 3K artificial mutants do not appear to affect the protein secondary structure enough to cause a change in the far-UV CD spectrum (Fig. 1B). Analogously, the weak near-UV CD signal of the protein is minimally affected by the mutations, if at all (Fig. S1). Nevertheless, size-exclusion chromatography analysis of the mutants' hydrodynamic radii shows a marked decrease moving from the WT to E46K (as reported previously (32)) and from E46K to 2K and 3K (Fig. 1C). Although the elution volumes still indicate that all mutants have an extended conformation (because their hydrodynamic radii are unusually high for 14.5-kDa proteins (8)), the addition of lysines induces increasingly more compact structures.
Because CD cannot document small changes in the proteins' conformational equilibria upon Glu-to-Lys substitution, 1H-15N HSQC spectra of the 15N-labeled proteins in buffer (at 15 °C) were also recorded and compared (Fig. 2A and Table S1). In accord with the CD data, the overall spread of the amide peaks of the E46K-like mutants reflects their disordered structure. However, numerous shifts in the resonances can be clearly observed, and some of these changes (especially in the case of C-terminal residues) correlate well with the increment in Glu-to-Lys mutations. After assignment of the amide peaks, relying on deposited datasets of the 1H-15N HSQC of WT αSyn (33, 34), a histogram of the absolute weighted chemical shift perturbations throughout the protein sequence was obtained, highlighting the regions that are mostly affected by the sequential Glu-to-Lys substitutions (Fig. 2B). Compared with WT αSyn, all mutations show changes in the N terminus, not only around the site of the Glu-to-Lys substitutions but also mild-, medium-, and long-range effects. Interestingly, the C-terminal region is also markedly affected by the mutations and in a much clearer incremental fashion (i.e. correlating with the insertion of more and more lysines) than the N terminus. WT αSyn is known to exist in a variety of unstructured conformational states, many of which are stabilized by long-range N-to-C interactions, probably electrostatic in nature (35, 36). E46K αSyn has also been shown, in both experiments and simulations, to have increased long-range contacts, most likely because of the substitution of the Glu-46 negative charge with a positively charged lysine, making transient bonding with the negative C-terminal region more favorable (37, 38). We can imagine similar (and much more marked, at least according to the magnitude of the perturbations) effects playing a role in this case, explaining the decrease in hydrodynamic radius as well (Fig. 1C). Indeed, analysis of the charge distribution of the N terminus of WT αSyn and comparison with its K, 2K, and 3K mutants confirms that, although the overall charge density is unperturbed by the mutations, the Glu-to-Lys substitutions increase the overall charge polarization (Fig. 2C). If we take the segment 1–95 as the N terminus of the protein, we observe a net +6 charge increase going from WT αSyn (which has a mild imbalance of +3.1 charges) to 3K αSyn.
E35K and E46K most affect the micelle-bound “broken helix”
Extensive biophysical work has concluded that a single continuous helix is the preferred conformation of αSyn upon interaction with curved lipid bilayers (e.g. small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) and large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs)) similar in morphology and composition to the physiological membranous interactants of αSyn (17, 39). Nevertheless, the best-characterized helical structure of αSyn is that classically described as a broken helix (33) and observed mainly in lipoprotein nanoparticles (12) and on detergent micelles (33, 40). We therefore decided to explore how the Glu-to-Lys mutations affected αSyn's broken-helix structure by recording 1H-15N HSQC spectra of the recombinant 15N-labeled mutants in the presence of SDS micelles (Fig. 3A and Table S1). The distribution of the amide resonances of all mutants is consistent with a folded structure, and the Glu-to-Lys mutations seem to cause relatively few perturbations in the chemical shifts, which are mainly clustered in the N terminus of the protein, as is clearest after plotting the chemical shift perturbations of each mutant compared with WT αSyn (Fig. 3B). By comparing each of the K mutants with its homolog (with one less Glu-to-Lys substitution) we can also probe how each site affects the structure of the broken helix (although in an imperfect fashion, as the perturbations could well not be perfectly additive). These differences are shown in Fig. 3C. Although both E46K and E35K have robust, long-ranging effects on αSyn's resonances, E61K appears to act prevalently on a local scale, with only minor “ripples” in the residues away from the substitution site. Inspection of the deposited structure of micelle-bound αSyn (PDB code 1XQ8) allows us to draw structural correlations that confirm our NMR findings. Although Glu-35 and Glu-46 are localized close to the “ordered loop” region and oriented in a way that facilitates electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged heads of the detergent, Glu-61 points directly opposite of the hydrophobic side of the second amphipathic helix and can therefore be expected to only marginally affect the structure of αSyn upon charge inversion (Fig. 3C, inset). These results contradict previous in vitro and in vivo work with the E46K-like mutants, which showed a stepwise increase in toxicity with further Glu-to-Lys mutations and, if anything, a more prominent effect of the E61K mutation (28, 31). A structure other than the broken helix could be predominant in cellular and murine models and would explain such inconsistencies.
Glu-to-Lys mutations mildly increase the “avidity” for curved membranes
To further explore the molecular events leading to the vesicle clustering and toxicity caused by overexpression of the E46K-like mutants (26), we studied the binding of WT αSyn and its Glu-to-Lys mutants to negatively charged SUVs. Upon interaction with curved membranes, such as when titrating the recombinant protein with SUVs, αSyn undergoes a coil-to-helix transition that can be monitored by CD (13). SUVs were prepared by sonication (obtaining a dispersion of vesicles ∼33 nm in diameter; Table S2) of a 70:30 hydrated mixture of zwitterionic 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) and anionic 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-l-serine (DOPS). αSyn, as expected, bound avidly (Fig. 4, A and B) to these membranes; the titration curves obtained were analyzed to derive the thermodynamic and stoichiometric parameters of the binding event. An N-independent binding site model was used to describe the binding events (see “Experimental procedures”). Because the molar lipid concentration was used as the ligand concentration, the N value, rather than the number of binding sites, measures the average number of lipid molecules that are necessary to form a lipid binding site for αSyn. As the number of lipid molecules constituting a vesicle can be considered constant, N is then inversely proportional to the number of binding sites on a given vesicle. A decrease in N therefore reflects a higher number of saturable binding sites on the vesicles' surface and vice versa. We observe a mild decreasing trend in the N values obtained by fitting the mutants' titration curves; this represents an increase in the number of αSyn binding sites, although this result does not reach significance in the cases of K and 2K αSyn (Fig. 4C and Table S3). Although E46K has been reported previously to have a higher affinity for negatively charged, curved lipid interfaces (41, 42), more recent work has not been able to detect differences with WT αSyn, either when using recombinant E46K αSyn and artificial liposomes or measuring synaptic localization in cultured primary neurons (43). It must also be noted that E61K has the highest effect on N of all Glu-to-Lys mutations. Finally, the increase in binding does not correspond to significant changes in the plateau ellipticity values associated with the membrane-bound helical structures, suggesting only minor (if any) conformational rearrangements. Similar CD-monitored lipid-into-protein titrations were also performed in the presence of 150 mm NaCl to test the effect of a higher ionic strength on αSyn's binding behavior and confirmed the results obtained under low-salt conditions (Fig. S2 and Table S3). As expected, the end-point ellipticities and the kB values are smaller, probably because of the electrostatic masking of the charged moieties in the lipid heads and in some of αSyn's residues, decreasing the strength of ionic interactions at the vesicular interface.
Knowing the critical role of cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in αSyn's physiology (18) and the high content of cholesterol in the membranes of synaptic vesicles (15), we also studied whether the rigidity of the double layer affected the binding of the Glu-to-Lys mutants. CD-monitored titrations were performed in the same way as those with 70:30 POPC:DOPS, but a 52.5:17.5:30 POPC:DOPS:cholesterol lipid dispersion was sonicated to generate SUVs (∼36 nm in diameter). The results (both N and the plateau ellipticity values) are similar to those obtained with POPC:DOPS SUVs (Fig. 5), but, in this case, there is a much clearer distinction between the binding behavior of the 3K and that of the other mutants, which are practically indistinguishable and show no trends in their N values (Fig. 5B). Again, E61K appears to be the mutation site that most significantly affects the ability of αSyn to associate with membranes.
Although CD-monitored lipid-into-protein titrations can provide accurate estimates of the number of lipids per binding site (N) and macroscopic structural information regarding the coil-to-helix transition, their estimates of the apparent microscopic binding constants (kB) are poor. For this reason, and to confirm the previous results by means of an independent technique, we also measured the binding curves of WT αSyn and its Glu-to-Lys mutants to SUVs by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The results for 70:30 POPC:DOPS are analogous to those found by CD-monitored titrations (Fig. S3, A and C, and Table S3). In addition to N, ITC provides thermodynamic information about the heat released upon binding (Fig. S3D), but the interpretation of these data, although marked differences are observed between the mutants, is made challenging by the fact that the ΔH values are a combination, among others, of the heat of binding of αSyn to the membranes, the heat exchanged because of the coil-to-helix transition, and the heat contributions of the lipids themselves (e.g. tail hydration, bilayer rearrangement, and remodeling). ITC, as expected, provides much more accurate estimates of the apparent binding constants, which, however, do not appear to change significantly between mutants (Fig. S3E and Table S3). ITC of 52.5:17.5:30 POPC:DOPS:cholesterol SUVs did not detect any binding processes in the cases of WT, K, and 2K αSyn, possibly because the heat exchanges of bilayer reorganization processes masked the heat from the protein's binding and folding. The only mutant that showed a clear sigmoidal profile by ITC was 3K αSyn, again in accord with the CD evidence that the E61K mutation alone increases binding to more rigid membranes (Fig. S3B and Table S3).
In conclusion, it is important to consider how, based on the combined CD and ITC data, the αSyn mutants (3K in particular) do not necessarily appear to have a higher “affinity”, in its classic interpretation (higher kB), for curved charged membranes. Rather, the more Glu-to-Lys mutations are present, the more αSyn molecules seem to be able to bind to a single vesicle, which, to borrow from the nomenclature of polyvalent interactions, corresponds to a higher avidity of lipid bilayers for the E46K-like mutants (44).
Glu-to-Lys mutations cause a progressive loss of curvature selectivity
One rarely explored aspect of the molecular pathology of fPD-associated αSyn mutants is how their binding selectivity is affected by mutations. Because αSyn has long been known to bind preferentially to small vesicles (13), and its dynamic association with synaptic vesicles upon exo- and endocytosis is believed to be central to its function (19, 45), we chose to explore how Glu-to-Lys mutations modify αSyn's selectivity for certain curvature radii. We performed CD-monitored titrations of WT αSyn and its Glu-to-Lys mutants with LUVs prepared by extrusion of a 70:30 POPC:DOPS dispersion using 0.1-μm polycarbonate membranes, obtaining vesicles ∼100 nm in diameter (Table S2). As expected, the binding propensity of both WT αSyn and its mutants to charged LUVs is markedly lower than that observed with SUVs (Fig. 6, A and B). The curvature of the titration curves is much shallower than the sharp bends of SUVs titrations, signaling that the kB values are orders of magnitude lower (Table S3). The ellipticities of the helical conformers of LUV-bound αSyn are also roughly half of those recorded before (Figs. 6A and 4A), possibly because of a more dynamic equilibrium between partly folded and partly unfolded conformations, which has been proposed to be one of the curvature-sensing mechanisms adopted by αSyn (46). Furthermore, although the effects of Glu-to-Lys mutations are generally mild in the SUV titrations (possibly because of the overall high affinities), robust changes are evident in the LUV titrations, especially after curve fitting with our N-independent binding site model (Fig. 6, C and D). Going from WT αSyn to 3K, we see a decrease in N (number of lipids per binding site) that is truly stepwise incremental, as are the effects observed in cellular models (28). In addition, although we could not detect significant differences between the avidity (nor the affinity) of E46K and WT αSyn using SUVs, here we observe a clear loss of curvature selectivity with the introduction of the fPD-causing mutation, which could be one of the factors underlying its propensity for pathology. In addition to the increased avidity of negatively charged LUVs for E46K-like mutants, a slight increase in plateau ellipticities is also detected, but, although significant, the effects are as minor as those described previously in the case of SUVs (Fig. 6D).
As with the SUVs titrations, the experiments were repeated in the presence of 150 mm NaCl to explore the effect of increased ionic strength (Fig. S4). However, given the already weak affinity of αSyn for the mildly charged LUVs, the presence of a higher salt concentration almost completely abolished binding for all mutants except 3K (confirming its much stronger ability to bind bilayers in all of the conditions studied). To be able to quantitatively compare the different Glu-to-Lys mutants, we used the slope of the binding curve in its early phase as a measure of the strength of the affinity (Fig. S4C). Although not as mechanistically valuable as the N-independent binding site model, comparison of the binding slopes among the different mutants still shows a much stronger progression (WT to 3K) than the one observed with SUVs (Fig. S4D), confirming previous conclusions.
E46K-like mutants have increasing membrane remodeling abilities
One further aspect of αSyn's interplay with membranes was then studied; namely, its ability to remodel lipid bilayers into bilayer tubes, micellar tubes, and lipoprotein nanoparticles (12, 47, 48). A dispersion of multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) was prepared by hydration of a 90:10 mixture of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (16:0–18:1 PG or POPG) and POPC. The content of charged lipids was chosen to magnify differences in tubulation rates arising from progressive Glu-to-Lys mutations. Upon addition of αSyn, the robust scattering signal from the heterogeneous dispersion of large (d > 1 μm) MLVs is drastically decreased as αSyn induces the formation of tubules, vesicular structures, and lipoprotein nanoparticles, which all exhibit reduced scatter. Remodeling rates can thus be studied by light scattering (e.g. absorbance at 500 nm) and also by CD because it is the association of αSyn with the vesicles (and its consequent folding) that drives the membrane remodeling (Fig. 7, A and B). The rates of vesicle clearance correlate well with αSyn's increasing avidity for LUVs, with a stepwise increase going from WT to 2K αSyn; however, they plateau at 3K, showing little difference upon introduction of E61K. Fitting of the clearance curves using a two-phase exponential decay confirms qualitative observations (the decay rates of the “slow” phase were compared, because the early “fast” phase has too few points to provide accurate parameters). Half-lives decrease upon introduction of the first two Glu-to-Lys mutations (E46K and E35K), and no differences can be detected between 2K and 3K (both in absorbance-monitored and CD-monitored experiments; Fig. 7C). Electron micrographs obtained after mixing WT αSyn and its Glu-to-Lys mutants with MLVs also reveal robust membrane remodeling in all cases. However, the introduction of successive Glu-to-Lys mutations leads to the more frequent appearances of narrower (d ∼ 5–6 nm) membrane tubes (Fig. 7, D–G). Previous work (47, 48) has shown how such narrow tubes are micellar in nature and are increasingly generated at higher protein-to-lipid ratios. This phenomenon reflects the increased avidity of Glu-to-Lys mutants toward large curved membranes (Fig. 6), resulting in a greater number of bound αSyn molecules and more profound bilayer remodeling.
Discussion
In the search for the molecular determinants underlying the inception of PD and other synucleinopathies, a great deal of attention has been devoted to the biophysics and biochemistry of fPD-associated αSyn mutants. Historically, most of these mutants were characterized in their ability to generate toxic oligomers upon aggregation (49, 50). However, after the discovery of the robust and specific lipid-binding ability of WT αSyn (13), several lines of evidence have shown how disruption of such binding equilibria can also lead to cellular toxicity and disease (20, 24, 51).
In this work, we focused on the molecular mechanism behind the lipid-mediated toxicity of E46K αSyn and its exacerbated analogs (2K and 3K αSyn, Fig. 1A), which have been shown, in both cellular and murine models, to cause trafficking defects, αSyn-rich vesicular inclusions, and a PD-like motor phenotype (26, 28, 31). We described how E46K, 2K, and 3K αSyn, in accord with previous reports (26, 31), exhibit a stepwise increase in membrane avidity (Figs. 4–6) and in their membrane-remodeling abilities (Fig. 7). Although the effects of E46K and E46K-like mutations on αSyn's binding to small curved vesicles were relatively minor (Figs. 4 and 5), these mutants caused a much more profound disruption in the protein's curvature selectivity, which was almost completely abolished in 3K αSyn (Fig. 6). Although some reports have previously described E46K αSyn as binding more avidly to small, charged vesicles (41, 42), our tightly controlled CD-monitored titration experiments, combined with an independent technique such as ITC, failed to reproduce these results, in agreement with more recent work (43). 2K and 3K αSyn also displayed only small (or even undetectable) effects when SUVs were used as their binding partners (Figs. 4 and 5) but exhibited much more severe changes in their LUV-binding ability (Fig. 6), strengthening the case that they behave as exacerbated E46K mutants. Finally, membrane tubulation assays, performed using heterogeneous dispersions of large MLVs, confirmed such trends (Fig. 7). Successive Glu-to-Lys mutations appear to transform αSyn from being predominantly a “curvature sensor” (WT) to acting as a robust “curvature inducer” (2K and 3K), although it is likely that these aspects are ultimately linked and can both be traced back to the loss of curvature selectivity.
We hypothesize that behind the pathogenesis of both E46K-associated fPD and 2K/3K murine models of synucleinopathy there could be a redistribution of the membrane-bound αSyn population to larger intracellular vesicles (such as those involved in secretory or endosomal pathways) rather than an increased avidity for synaptic vesicles, their natural binding partners. Such a shift could then act as a combined toxic gain of function, with αSyn disrupting vesicular trafficking through its abnormal binding and damaging loss of function because of αSyn being less available at the synaptic bouton, where it would normally regulate synaptic vesicle fusion and recycling (6).
In addition to characterizing the molecular pathology of E46K-like mutants, the sequential insertion of Glu-to-Lys mutations at specific points in the 11-mer repeat region allows us to rationalize the observed phenomena using structural determinants. αSyn's primary structure, upon inspection of its sequence hydrophobicity (Fig. S5A), is clearly split between a neutral (neither robustly polar nor apolar) N terminus (1–95) and a negatively charged C terminus, consistently characterized as disordered. Also, either by plotting Eisenberg's hydrophobic moment (measuring the degree of polarity segregation in a helical structure) versus the helix's periodicity (52, 53) or by calculating the fast Fourier transform of the vector of the side-chain hydrophobicities in segment 1–95 (54, 55), we can see how the N terminus can be arranged into robustly amphiphilic helical structures with periodicities around 3.6 amino acids per turn (Fig. 8 and S5B). Depending on the amphiphilic interactant, αSyn's membrane-bound (or detergent-bound) structure has been either described as a broken helix, with two α-helical segments (3.6 amino acids per turn) connected by an ordered loop (33, 40), or as a single continuous 11/3 helix (∼3.67 amino acids per turn), spanning throughout the whole 1–95 region (17, 39). Subsequent work has described the possibility of an interchange between these two forms, quantifying the equilibrium as shifted toward the 11/3 helix when αSyn is bound to charged SUVs rather than detergent micelles (12, 56).
If we plot a Schiffer–Edmundson helical wheel diagram (57) with an 11/3 periodicity and its helical net (58), spanning αSyn's N-terminal region (1–95), and highlight the positions of the three Glu residues progressively substituted by lysines, we can hypothesize how their arrangement could increase their avidity for bilayers with a progression comparable with that observed in our experiments (Fig. S6). The proximity of Glu-35, Glu-46, and Glu-61 to the negatively charged surface of the vesicle's membrane could allow the formation of ionic bridges between the positively charged lysines and the phosphate heads, favoring the binding and stabilizing the 11/3 helix. Although all three residues are in very similar positions, the presence of the 53–56 (ATVA, Fig. 1A) break in the 11-mer periodicity region shifts Glu-61 slightly closer to the membrane surface. While this small difference might be masked in 3K αSyn by the dynamic nature of the 11/3 helix (17, 46, 59), especially in fluid POPC/DOPS SUVs (Fig. 4), it could become more important in the case of rigid membranes, rich in cholesterol, also explaining the lone increased avidity of 3K for such interfaces (Fig. 5).
In conclusion, our biophysical characterization recapitulates all relevant features of cellular and murine models of the E46K-like mutants and, at the same time, allows us to advance the possibility of a loss of curvature selectivity, rather than increased membrane affinity, as the critical dyshomeostasis in synucleinopathies. In light of these results, there appears to be an even greater translational potential in therapies modulating the cellular lipid composition to compensate for αSyn defects, which has recently started to be explored (60, 61).
Experimental procedures
Materials
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine (16:0–18:1 PC or POPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-l-serine (18:1 PS or DOPS), and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (16:0–18:1 PG or POPG) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL) as chloroform solutions. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted.
Molecular cloning
pET21a-α-synuclein, encoding codon-optimized untagged human αSyn, was a gift from the Michael J. Fox Foundation (Addgene plasmid 51486). Fragments encoding E46K (K), E35K,E46K (2K), and E35K,E46K,E61K (3K) αSyn were amplified with PfuUltra II Fusion HS (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) using their constructs in pcDNA4 (28) as templates and the primers αSyn_InFu_FWD 5′-AAGGAGATATACATATGGATGTATTCATGAAAGGACTTTCAAAGG-3′ and αSyn_InFu_REV 5′-TGCTCGAGTGCGGCCGCTCAGGCTTCAGGTTCGTAGTCTTGATACC-3′. The amplified fragments were then inserted into pET21a (linearized with NdeI/NotI) using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA), following the manufacturer's protocol. Cloning of pET21a-K-αSyn, pET21a-2K-αSyn, and pET21a-3K-αSyn was confirmed by DNA sequencing and restriction analysis.
Protein expression and purification
BL21(DE3) Escherichia coli (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) were transformed with the pET21a-based constructs, and single colonies were inoculated in LB + ampicillin. Cultures were induced at an OD600 of ∼0.5 with 1 mm isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG) for 4 h. The cell pellet, after harvesting, was resuspended in 20 mm Tris buffer and 25 mm NaCl (pH 8) and lysed by boiling for 15 min. The supernatant of a 20-min., 20,000 × g spin of the lysate was then processed further. The sample was loaded on two 5-ml (tandem) HiTrap Q HP anion exchange columns (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mm Tris buffer and 25 mm NaCl (pH 8). αSyn was eluted from the columns with a 25–1000 mm NaCl gradient of 20 mm Tris buffer and 1 m NaCl (pH 8). Peak fractions were pooled and further purified via gel filtration on a HiPrep Sephacryl S-200 HR 16/60 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) using 50 mm NH4Ac (pH 7.4) as running buffer. Peak fractions (>95% pure, by Coomassie Brilliant Blue–stained SDS-PAGE) were pooled, aliquoted, lyophilized, and stored at −20 °C. Purified samples were also analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS and by trypsin digestion followed by MALDI-TOF MS to confirm the intact mass and sequence of the proteins (Molecular Biology Core Facilities, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). Lyophilized proteins were reconstituted fresh, before experiments, in 10 mm NH4Ac (pH 7.4) and not reused (relyophilized and reconstituted) more than twice. Protein solutions were spun down every time after resuspension, before spectroscopic quantitation of the protein concentration, at 21,130 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove any large αSyn aggregates. Concentration was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm (ϵ = 0.412 mg·ml−1·cm−1).
15N-labeled protein expression
For the expression of 15N-labeled αSyn, the bacteria were grown in M9 complete medium + ampicillin supplemented with [15N]H4Cl. M9 complete medium was prepared fresh from a 10× M9 medium stock (60 g·L−1 Na2HPO4, 30 g·L−1 KH2PO4, 5 g·L−1 NaCl), 50× 20% d-glucose, 1000× 1 m MgSO4, 5000× 1 m CaCl2, 1000× 1 mg·ml−1 thiamine and biotin, 100× trace element solution, 1000× vitamin solution, and 1 g·L−1 [15N]H4Cl. The 100× trace element solution was prepared by dissolving (in 1 liter of MilliQ water) 5 g of EDTA, 0.50 g of FeCl3, 84 mg of ZnCl2, 12 mg of CuSO4, 10 mg of CoCl2·6H2O, 10 mg of H3BO3, 1.6 mg of MnCl2·4H2O, and 1.6 mg of Na2MoO4·2H2O and adjusting the pH to 7.0 (it was then filter-sterilized and stored at room temperature). The 1000× vitamin solution was prepared by dissolving (in 1 liter of 95% MilliQ water and 5% acetonitrile) 50 mg of riboflavin, 0.5 g of niacinamide, 0.5 g of pyridoxine hydrochloride, and 0.5 g of thiamine. After filtration with a 0.22-μm cutoff (to sterilize and remove the undissolved riboflavin), the solution was stored at 4 °C protected from light. BL21(DE3) E. coli (New England Biolabs) were transformed with the pET21a-based constructs and single colonies inoculated in 2× YT + ampicillin. Cultures were grown for 6–8 h. at 37 °C under shaking and then used to inoculate an overnight preculture in M9 complete medium + ampicillin, which, on the following day, was diluted again 1:10 in M9 complete medium + ampicillin. The expression and purification of 15N-labeled proteins were, from this point on, performed as described under “Protein expression and purification.”
Size-exclusion chromatography
Samples were injected on a Superdex 200 (10/300 GL) column (GE Healthcare) at room temperature and eluted with 50 mm NH4Ac (pH 7.4) while measuring (in-line) the conductivity and the 280-nm absorption of the eluate. For size estimation, a gel filtration standard (catalog no. 151-1901, Bio-Rad) was run on the column, and the calibration curve was obtained by semi-logarithmic plotting of molecular weight versus the elution volume divided by the void volume.
Liposome preparation
Aliquots from chloroform stock solutions of POPC, DOPS, and cholesterol were mixed thoroughly in the desired proportions and dried under a stream of argon. The dried lipid film was then kept under a vacuum overnight to remove traces of organic solvent. For both SUVs and LUVs, lipid solutions were freshly prepared by resuspending the dried lipids in 10 mm NH4Ac (pH 7.4) to their final concentrations and hydrating them for 1 h at 37 °C while nutating. SUVs were prepared by pulse-sonicating the phospholipid suspensions for 10–20 min at room temperature with a microtip sonicator (Misonix S-4000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT). The SUV suspensions were then spun down at 21,130 xg for 10 min to remove any metal particles and larger lipid aggregates. LUVs were prepared by manual extrusion (25 passes) using an Avanti Mini-Extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids) and 0.1-μm polycarbonate membranes, following the manufacturer's protocol. For MLVs, aliquots from the lipid stock solutions in chloroform were mixed thoroughly in the desired proportions and dried under a stream of nitrogen. The dried lipid film was then kept under vacuum for more than 12 h to remove traces of organic solvent. MLV dispersions were prepared by resuspending the dried lipids in the buffer of choice and vortexing.
CD
Spectra were recorded with a Jasco J-815 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Easton, MD) at 25 °C using a 1-mm path length cuvette for far-UV CD (a 1-cm path length cuvette was used for near-UV CD measurements). Temperature control with an accuracy of ±0.1 °C was achieved with a heating/cooling accessory equipped with a Peltier element (PFD-425S) connected to a water thermostatic bath. When possible, buffer spectra were recorded and subtracted. In titration experiments, spectra were corrected for the dilution effect from the addition of titrant; control lipid-into-buffer titrations were also recorded to confirm the negligibility of the liposome scattering signal. Three independent titrations (although with the same vesicle preparation) were performed for each condition. In “high-salt” (150 mm NaCl) titrations, NaCl was spiked into protein and lipid samples right before the experiments using a 5 m stock.
Stoichiometric and thermodynamic parameters (N, ϴ, kB) were determined by fitting the CD titration curves according to an N-independent binding site model. The expression of the fractional saturation ϑ (ratio of occupied sites to total sites) as a function of Pt and Lt (the total concentrations of protein and lipid), kB (the apparent microscopic binding constant), and N (the number of saturable binding sites on the surface of the vesicles) was taken from the classic derivation of the Wiseman isotherm for an N-independent binding site model (62).
(Eq. 1) |
In CD-monitored titrations, the 222-nm signal comes from the combination of the random coil signal from unbound αSyn and the helical signal of lipid-bound αSyn, each proportional to the molar ratios of the two species (ϴ is the molar, or residue, ellipticity at each point of the titration).
(Eq. 2) |
ϑ (at each point of the titration) can then be expressed as
(Eq. 3) |
Combining Equations 1 and 3, we can write ϴ as a function of the lipid:protein molar ratio X, obtaining the final form of the fitting equation.
(Eq. 4) |
Because the molar lipid concentration in the cuvette is used as Lt, the N value, rather than the number of binding sites, measures the average number of lipid molecules forming one lipid binding site.
ITC
ITC measurements were performed on an iTC200 instrument (Malvern Instruments, Westborough, MA). Typically, 18 fresh SUV dispersion injections of 2 μl each (+1 0.4-μl preinjection) were titrated in the calorimeter chamber. Both linear baselines and control titrations of vesicles into buffer alone were used for baseline subtraction. The data were processed using the MicroCal ORIGIN 7.0 software (Malvern Instruments, OriginLab, Northampton, MA). After integration of the differential power signal, stoichiometric and thermodynamic parameters (N, ΔH, and kB) were determined by fitting the sigmoidal titration curve using an N-independent binding site model (with the sites assumed to localize on the vesicles' outer surface). The apparent (given the approximations used) microscopic binding constant was labeled kB. The total lipid concentration in the syringe was taken as the ligand concentration; thus, the N value measures the average number of lipid molecules forming a binding site. In all experiments, the stoichiometric and thermodynamic parameters were obtained from three independent titrations (although performed using the same vesicle preparation). ΔS was obtained from ΔG = −RTlnkB and ΔH.
Dynamic light scattering
The hydrodynamic radius of the liposomes (5 mm) was measured using a DynaPro dynamic light scattering instrument (Wyatt Technology Corp., Santa Barbara, CA). The dynamic light-scattering cell was thermostated at 20.0 °C; the hydrodynamic radii were obtained by averaging three independent samples.
Phospholipid vesicle clearance assay
The ability of αSyn and its mutants to remodel phospholipid vesicles was studied by measuring light scattering as a function of time using a Jasco V-550 UV/VIS spectrophotometer as described previously (47). Briefly, light scattering was monitored at 500 nm using a 2-nm slit width and a “medium” response time. MLVs were prepared in 20 mm HEPES and 100 mm NaCl (pH 7.4). No changes in light scattering of the MLV dispersion were observed in the absence of protein. CD-monitored vesicle clearance experiments were performed at 25 °C using a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter in a 1-mm quartz cell. Blanks were recorded under similar conditions and subtracted.
Transmission electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy specimens were prepared on carbon-coated formvar grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Samples were adsorbed on the grids for 5 min and then negatively stained with 1% (w/v) aqueous uranyl acetate. Images were taken on a JEOL 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
NMR
1H-15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled αSyn were recorded in 50 mm phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and 10% D2O. Spectra were recorded on a 600 MHz Bruker AVANCE II spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA) equipped with a Prodigy CryoProbe at either 15 °C (120 μm αSyn) or 37 °C (120 μm αSyn and 15 mm SDS). Resonances were assigned, where possible, by inspection and comparison with the previously assigned spectra of WT αSyn (BMRB 5744, 6968) (33, 34). Data processing and analysis were performed with Bruker TopSpin software and CcpNmr Analysis (63). Perturbations in the chemical shift values for 1H and 15N were calculated as [(Δδ1H)2 + (0.15·Δδ15N)2]1/2.
Data analysis and primary sequence analysis
Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Statistical significance was determined by ordinary one-way analysis of variance followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons test, with a single pooled variance: n.s., p > 0.05; *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001; ****, p ≤ 0.0001.
Primary sequence analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and Wolfram Mathematica 10 (Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL), using the hydropathy index values of Kyte and Doolittle (64). Helical wheel and net diagrams were plotted using in-house Python code, modeled after the WHEEL and HELNET programs (65).
Author contributions
M. R., A. E. P., H. J., J. C. P., L. F.-O., and D. S. P. data curation; M. R., A. E. P., H. J., J. C. P., L. F.-O., A. A., R. L., J. V., and T. B. formal analysis; M. R., A. E. P., H. J., J. C. P., L. F.-O., and D. S. P. investigation; M. R., A. E. P., H. J., J. C. P., L. F.-O., and A. A. visualization; M. R., J. V., and T. B. writing-original draft; M. R., A. E. P., H. J., J. C. P., L. F.-O., D. S. P., A. A., R. L., J. V., and T. B. writing-review and editing; D. S. P. validation; D. S. P. methodology; A. A. software; R. L., J. V., and T. B. conceptualization; R. L., J. V., and T. B. supervision; R. L., J. V., and T. B. funding acquisition.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Kelly Arnett and the Center for Macromolecular Interactions at the Harvard Medical School Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology for assistance with CD and ITC measurements and many helpful discussions; Simon Jenni, Yoana Dimitrova, and the Harrison laboratory at the Harvard Medical School Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology for the use of instruments and assistance with dynamic light scattering measurements; and Jim Lee and the Molecular Biology Core Facilities of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for assistance with MS. Finally, we also thank our colleagues at the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases for many helpful discussions and Martina Astrid Rodda for editing and revising the manuscript.
This work was supported by NINDS, National Institutes of Health Grant R21NS107950 (to T. B.), American Parkinson Disease Association Grant PF-JFA-1884 (to T. B.), National Institutes of Health Grants NS084345 and GM115736 (to R. L.), and Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-13-1-0563 (to (A. A.) and Parkinson's Disease Foundation Grant PF-JFA-1884 (to T. B.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
This article contains Figures S1–S6 and Tables S1–S3.
- PD
- Parkinson's disease
- αSyn
- α-synuclein
- fPD
- familial Parkinson's disease
- HSQC
- heteronuclear single-quantum coherence
- SUV
- small unilamellar vesicle
- LUV
- large unilamellar vesicle
- POPC
- 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine
- DOPS
- 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-l-serine
- ITC
- isothermal titration calorimetry
- MLV
- multilamellar vesicle
- POPG
- 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol).
References
- 1. Poewe W., Seppi K., Tanner C. M., Halliday G. M., Brundin P., Volkmann J., Schrag A.-E., and Lang A. E. (2017) Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 3, 17013 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. de Lau L. M., and Breteler M. M. (2006) Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 5, 525–535 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Iwai A., Masliah E., Yoshimoto M., Ge N., Flanagan L., de Silva H. A., Kittel A., and Saitoh T. (1995) The precursor protein of non-Aβ component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid is a presynaptic protein of the central nervous system. Neuron 14, 467–475 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90302-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shulman J. M., De Jager P. L., and Feany M. B. (2011) Parkinson's disease: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 193–222 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bendor J. T., Logan T. P., and Edwards R. H. (2013) The function of α-synuclein. Neuron 79, 1044–1066 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lautenschläger J., Kaminski C. F., and Kaminski Schierle G. S. (2017) α-Synuclein: regulator of exocytosis, endocytosis, or both? Trends Cell Biol. 27, 468–479 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grace A. A., and Bunney B. S. (1984) The control of firing pattern in nigral dopamine neurons: burst firing. J. Neurosci. 4, 2877–2890 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-11-02877.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Weinreb P. H., Zhen W., Poon A. W., Conway K. A., and Lansbury P. T. (1996) NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer's disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry 35, 13709–13715 10.1021/bi961799n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nielsen J. T., and Mulder F. A. (2016) There is diversity in disorder-“in all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order”. Front. Mol. Biosci. 3, 4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. George J. M., Jin H., Woods W. S., and Clayton D. F. (1995) Characterization of a novel protein regulated during the critical period for song learning in the zebra finch. Neuron 15, 361–372 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90040-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bussell R. Jr., and Eliezer D. (2003) A structural and functional role for 11-mer repeats in α-synuclein and other exchangeable lipid binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 329, 763–778 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00520-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Varkey J., Mizuno N., Hegde B. G., Cheng N., Steven A. C., and Langen R. (2013) α-Synuclein oligomers with broken helical conformation form lipoprotein nanoparticles. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17620–17630 10.1074/jbc.M113.476697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Davidson W. S., Jonas A., Clayton D. F., and George J. M. (1998) Stabilization of α-synuclein secondary structure upon binding to synthetic membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9443–9449 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eliezer D., Kutluay E., Bussell R. Jr., and Browne G. (2001) Conformational properties of α-synuclein in its free and lipid-associated states. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1061–1073 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Takamori S., Holt M., Stenius K., Lemke E. A., Grønborg M., Riedel D., Urlaub H., Schenck S., Brügger B., Ringler P., Müller S. A., Rammner B., Gräter F., Hub J. S., De Groot B. L., et al. (2006) Molecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle. Cell 127, 831–846 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pranke I. M., Morello V., Bigay J., Gibson K., Verbavatz J.-M., Antonny B., and Jackson C. L. (2011) α-Synuclein and ALPS motifs are membrane curvature sensors whose contrasting chemistry mediates selective vesicle binding. J. Cell Biol. 194, 89–103 10.1083/jcb.201011118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jao C. C., Hegde B. G., Chen J., Haworth I. S., and Langen R. (2008) Structure of membrane-bound α-synuclein from site-directed spin labeling and computational refinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 19666–19671 10.1073/pnas.0807826105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fortin D. L., Troyer M. D., Nakamura K., Kubo S., Anthony M. D., and Edwards R. H. (2004) Lipid rafts mediate the synaptic localization of α-synuclein. J. Neurosci. 24, 6715–6723 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1594-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Fortin D. L., Nemani V. M., Voglmaier S. M., Anthony M. D., Ryan T. A., and Edwards R. H. (2005) Neural activity controls the synaptic accumulation of α-synuclein. J. Neurosci. 25, 10913–10921 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2922-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Auluck P. K., Caraveo G., and Lindquist S. (2010) α-Synuclein: membrane interactions and toxicity in Parkinson's disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 211–233 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cooper A. A., Gitler A. D., Cashikar A., Haynes C. M., Hill K. J., Bhullar B., Liu K., Xu K., Strathearn K. E., Liu F., Cao S., Caldwell K. A., Caldwell G. A., Marsischky G., Kolodner R. D., et al. (2006) α-Synuclein blocks ER-Golgi traffic and Rab1 rescues neuron loss in Parkinson's models. Science 313, 324–328 10.1126/science.1129462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gitler A. D., Bevis B. J., Shorter J., Strathearn K. E., Hamamichi S., Su L. J., Caldwell K. A., Caldwell G. A., Rochet J.-C., McCaffery J. M., Barlowe C., and Lindquist S. (2008) The Parkinson's disease protein α-synuclein disrupts cellular Rab homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 145–150 10.1073/pnas.0710685105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Thayanidhi N., Helm J. R., Nycz D. C., Bentley M., Liang Y., and Hay J. C. (2010) α-Synuclein delays endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells by antagonizing ER/Golgi SNAREs. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 1850–1863 10.1091/mbc.e09-09-0801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Shahmoradian S. H., Lewis A. J., Genoud C., Graff-Meyer A., Hench J., Moors T., Schweighauser G., Wang J., Goldie K. N., Suetterlin R., Castano-Diez D., Perez-Navarro P., Huisman E., Ipsen S., Ingrassia A., et al. (2018) Lewy pathology in Parkinson's disease consists of a crowded organellar, membranous medley. bioRxiv 10.1101/137976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dettmer U., Newman A. J., von Saucken V. E., Bartels T., and Selkoe D. (2015) KTKEGV repeat motifs are key mediators of normal α-synuclein tetramerization: their mutation causes excess monomers and neurotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 9596–9601 10.1073/pnas.1505953112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dettmer U., Ramalingam N., von Saucken V. E., Kim T.-E., Newman A. J., Terry-Kantor E., Nuber S., Ericsson M., Fanning S., Bartels T., Lindquist S., Levy O. A., and Selkoe D. (2017) Loss of native α-synuclein multimerization by strategically mutating its amphipathic helix causes abnormal vesicle interactions in neuronal cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 3466–3481 10.1093/hmg/ddx227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zarranz J. J., Alegre J., Gómez-Esteban J. C., Lezcano E., Ros R., Ampuero I., Vidal L., Hoenicka J., Rodriguez O., Atarés B., Llorens V., Gomez Tortosa E., del Ser T., Muñoz D. G., and de Yebenes J. G. (2004) The new mutation, E46K, of α-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Ann. Neurol. 55, 164–173 10.1002/ana.10795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Dettmer U., Newman A. J., Soldner F., Luth E. S., Kim N. C., von Saucken V. E., Sanderson J. B., Jaenisch R., Bartels T., and Selkoe D. (2015) Parkinson-causing α-synuclein missense mutations shift native tetramers to monomers as a mechanism for disease initiation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7314 10.1038/ncomms8314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bartels T., Choi J. G., and Selkoe D. J. (2011) α-Synuclein occurs physiologically as a helically folded tetramer that resists aggregation. Nature 477, 107–110 10.1038/nature10324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dettmer U., Selkoe D., and Bartels T. (2016) New insights into cellular α-synuclein homeostasis in health and disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 36, 15–22 10.1016/j.conb.2015.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nuber S., Rajsombath M., Minakaki G., Winkler J., Müller C. P., Ericsson M., Caldarone B., Dettmer U., and Selkoe D. J. (2018) Abrogating native α-synuclein tetramers in mice causes a L-DOPA-responsive motor syndrome closely resembling Parkinson's disease. Neuron 100, 75–90.e5 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Fredenburg R. A., Rospigliosi C., Meray R. K., Kessler J. C., Lashuel H. A., Eliezer D., and Lansbury P. T. (2007) The impact of the E46K mutation on the properties of α-synuclein in its monomeric and oligomeric states. Biochemistry 46, 7107–7118 10.1021/bi7000246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chandra S., Chen X., Rizo J., Jahn R., and Südhof T. C. (2003) A broken α-helix in folded α-Synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 15313–15318 10.1074/jbc.M213128200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Bermel W., Bertini I., Felli I. C., Lee Y.-M., Luchinat C., and Pierattelli R. (2006) Protonless NMR experiments for sequence-specific assignment of backbone nuclei in unfolded proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 3918–3919 10.1021/ja0582206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bertoncini C. W., Jung Y.-S., Fernandez C. O., Hoyer W., Griesinger C., Jovin T. M., and Zweckstetter M. (2005) Release of long-range tertiary interactions potentiates aggregation of natively unstructured α-synuclein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 1430–1435 10.1073/pnas.0407146102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Croke R. L., Sallum C. O., Watson E., Watt E. D., and Alexandrescu A. T. (2008) Hydrogen exchange of monomeric alpha-synuclein shows unfolded structure persists at physiological temperature and is independent of molecular crowding in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 17, 1434–1445 10.1110/ps.033803.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rospigliosi C. C., McClendon S., Schmid A. W., Ramlall T. F., Barré P., Lashuel H. A., and Eliezer D. (2009) E46K Parkinson's-linked mutation enhances C-terminal-to-N-terminal contacts in α-synuclein. J. Mol. Biol. 388, 1022–1032 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.03.065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wise-Scira O., Dunn A., Aloglu A. K., Sakallioglu I. T., and Coskuner O. (2013) Structures of the E46K mutant-type α-synuclein protein and impact of E46K mutation on the structures of the wild-type α-synuclein protein. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 4, 498–508 10.1021/cn3002027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jao C. C., Der-Sarkissian A., Chen J., and Langen R. (2004) Structure of membrane-bound α-synuclein studied by site-directed spin labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 8331–8336 10.1073/pnas.0400553101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ulmer T. S., Bax A., Cole N. B., and Nussbaum R. L. (2005) Structure and dynamics of micelle-bound human α-synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9595–9603 10.1074/jbc.M411805200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Choi W., Zibaee S., Jakes R., Serpell L. C., Davletov B., Crowther R. A., and Goedert M. (2004) Mutation E46K increases phospholipid binding and assembly into filaments of human α-synuclein. FEBS Lett. 576, 363–368 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bodner C. R., Maltsev A. S., Dobson C. M., and Bax A. (2010) Differential phospholipid binding of α-synuclein variants implicated in Parkinson's disease revealed by solution NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 49, 862–871 10.1021/bi901723p [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Burré J., Sharma M., and Südhof T. C. (2012) Systematic mutagenesis of α-synuclein reveals distinct sequence requirements for physiological and pathological activities. J. Neurosci. 32, 15227–15242 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3545-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mammen M., Choi S.-K., and Whitesides G. M. (1998) Polyvalent interactions in biological systems: implications for design and use of multivalent ligands and inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 37, 2754–2794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bartels T., Ahlstrom L. S., Leftin A., Kamp F., Haass C., Brown M. F., and Beyer K. (2010) The N-terminus of the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein triggers membrane binding and helix folding. Biophys. J. 99, 2116–2124 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fusco G., De Simone A., Gopinath T., Vostrikov V., Vendruscolo M., Dobson C. M., and Veglia G. (2014) Direct observation of the three regions in α-synuclein that determine its membrane-bound behaviour. Nat. Commun. 5, 3827 10.1038/ncomms4827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Varkey J., Isas J. M., Mizuno N., Jensen M. B., Bhatia V. K., Jao C. C., Petrlova J., Voss J. C., Stamou D. G., Steven A. C., and Langen R. (2010) Membrane curvature induction and tubulation are common features of synucleins and apolipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 32486–32493 10.1074/jbc.M110.139576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mizuno N., Varkey J., Kegulian N. C., Hegde B. G., Cheng N., Langen R., and Steven A. C. (2012) Remodeling of lipid vesicles into cylindrical micelles by α-synuclein in an extended α-helical conformation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 29301–29311 10.1074/jbc.M112.365817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Conway K. A., Lee S. J., Rochet J. C., Ding T. T., Williamson R. E., and Lansbury P. T. (2000) Acceleration of oligomerization, not fibrillization, is a shared property of both α-synuclein mutations linked to early-onset Parkinson's disease: implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 571–576 10.1073/pnas.97.2.571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lashuel H. A., Petre B. M., Wall J., Simon M., Nowak R. J., Walz T., and Lansbury P. T. (2002) Alpha-synuclein, especially the Parkinson's disease-associated mutants, forms pore-like annular and tubular protofibrils. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 1089–1102 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00735-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Dettmer U. (2018) Rationally designed variants of α-synuclein illuminate its in vivo structural properties in health and disease. Front. Neurosci. 12, 623 10.3389/fnins.2018.00623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., and Terwilliger T. C. (1982) The helical hydrophobic moment: a measure of the amphiphilicity of a helix. Nature 299, 371–374 10.1038/299371a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Eisenberg D., Weiss R. M., and Terwilliger T. C. (1984) The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 140–144 10.1073/pnas.81.1.140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. McLachlan A. D., and Stewart M. (1976) The 14-fold periodicity in α-tropomyosin and the interaction with actin. J. Mol. Biol. 103, 271–298 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90313-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Finer-Moore J., and Stroud R. M. (1984) Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 155–159 10.1073/pnas.81.1.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lokappa S. B., and Ulmer T. S. (2011) Alpha-synuclein populates both elongated and broken helix states on small unilamellar vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 21450–21457 10.1074/jbc.M111.224055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schiffer M., and Edmundson A. B. (1967) Use of helical wheels to represent the structures of proteins and to identify segments with helical potential. Biophys. J. 7, 121–135 10.1016/S0006-3495(67)86579-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lim V. I. (1978) Polypeptide chain folding through a highly helical intermediate as a general principle of globular protein structure formation. FEBS Lett. 89, 10–14 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80511-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Jiang Z., Hess S. K., Heinrich F., and Lee J. C. (2015) Molecular details of α-synuclein membrane association revealed by neutrons and photons. J. Phys. Chem. B. 119, 4812–4823 10.1021/jp512499r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Fanning S., Haque A., Imberdis T., Baru V., Barrasa M. I., Nuber S., Termine D., Ramalingam N., Ho G. P. H., Noble T., Sandoe J., Lou Y., Landgraf D., Freyzon Y., Newby G., et al. (2018) Lipidomic analysis of α-synuclein neurotoxicity identifies stearoyl CoA desaturase as a target for Parkinson treatment. Mol. Cell 73, 1001–1014.e8 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Vincent B. M., Tardiff D. F., Piotrowski J. S., Aron R., Lucas M. C., Chung C. Y., Bacherman H., Chen Y., Pires M., Subramaniam R., Doshi D. B., Sadlish H., Raja W. K., Solís E. J., Khurana V., et al. (2018) Inhibiting stearoyl-CoA desaturase ameliorates α-synuclein cytotoxicity. Cell Rep. 25, 2742–2754.e31 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Indyk L., and Fisher H. F. (1998) Theoretical aspects of isothermal titration calorimetry. Methods Enzymol. 295, 350–364 10.1016/S0076-6879(98)95048-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Vranken W. F., Boucher W., Stevens T. J., Fogh R. H., Pajon A., Llinas M., Ulrich E. L., Markley J. L., Ionides J., and Laue E. D. (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 10.1002/prot.20449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kyte J., and Doolittle R. F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105–132 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Jones M. K., Anantharamaiah G. M., and Segrest J. P. (1992) Computer programs to identify and classify amphipathic α helical domains. J. Lipid Res. 33, 287–296 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.