Abstract
The geographical expansion of invasive species depends mainly on its dispersal potential, and the abiotic and biotic factors affecting it. Knowing the invasive dynamic of non-native species, as well as its behavior at different natural or anthropogenic scenarios, is fundamental for planning conservation management policies and control plans. The invasive sea anemone Anemonia alicemartinae in habits from the north (18°S) to the south-central (36°S) coast of Chile and its distribution range has expanded by approximately 1,928 km in the last 50 years. Previous works have proposed that human-mediated southward transport associated with regional-scale maritime activities could explain its rapid spread. To evaluate this hypothesis, we used ecological niche models (ENM) to evaluate the potential colonization of the southernmost area of South America. Additionally, we conducted a post hoc analysis to evaluate the relationship between the prediction of the ENM and human activity measured as the number of landings of ships in ports. The models were built based on presence records of A. alicemartinae, and oceanographic variables. Results showed that sea surface salinity and annual sea surface temperature (variance) are the best predictor variables to explain the distribution of A. alicemartinae. There was a positive and significant relationship between the geographical distribution of the sea anemone predicted by the ENM and the number of landings, as a proxy of anthropogenic activity. The most susceptible areas to invasion were those that showed the highest variability in both oceanographic predictors. These areas included the Biobío region, Chiloé´s inland sea, Aysén, and Chacabuco regions, which together comprise two biogeographical provinces. These results sustain the proposed hypothesis and, overall, the results suggest that along with the characteristics of the life history of A. alicemartinae, oceanographic conditions and maritime transport as vector contribute to the southern range expansion of this invasive cryptogenic species in the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem.
Keywords: Marine invasion, Chilean coast, Human-mediated vector, Range expansion, Marine transport
Introduction
Numerous studies indicate that the geographic range (or range limits) of invasive species depends on the dispersive phase, which can be affected by abiotic (e.g., biogeographical barriers or currents) and biotic (e.g., predation, competition, facilitation) factors (Levine, Adler & Yelenik, 2004; Arim et al., 2006; Döge, De Oliveira & Tidon, 2015). Additionally, anthropogenic activities can significantly affect the movement and dispersal of invaders (Seabloom et al., 2006; Molnar et al., 2008). For example, invasive marine species can be intentionally transported for aquaculture, ornamental interests, or accidentally transported, such as via attachment to ship hulls, in ballast water, or with exported products (Neill & Arim, 2011). Moreover, under the climate change scenario the probability of establishment and invasion of non-native species could increase, dynamically changing its current distribution (Molnar et al., 2008; Occhipinti-Ambrogi & Galil, 2010; Ojaveer et al., 2015). Thus, knowing the geographic distribution of invasive species, as well as its temporal dynamics given different natural and anthropic scenarios, is important for generating mitigation plans, large-scale biodiversity management and conservation policies (Pullin, 2002; Villero et al., 2017). In this context, the availability of reliable information of the distribution of non-native species and the factors defining their patterns of distribution are essential for testing hypotheses and to generate robust predictive models (Ferrier et al., 2002; Jetz, Wilcove & Dobson, 2007).
With the development of Geographic Information System (GIS) tools, more precise data has become available for the management and analysis of spatial distributions of species (Jetz, Wilcove & Dobson, 2007). Specifically, the ecological niche modelling (ENM) is a geographically explicit approach that takes advantage of GIS tools to predict the past, present, and future distribution of species (Kozak, Graham & Wiens, 2008). Along with these predictions, this type of modeling is used to evaluate the role that different ecological factors have on distribution patterns (Elith et al., 2006; Elith, Kearney & Phillips, 2010; Lippitt et al., 2008; Davis, Malas & Minor, 2013; Madariaga et al., 2014). The ENM allows for the identification of sites that are highly suitable for populations and species based on their environmental requirements (Soberón & Nakamura, 2009; Elith, Kearney & Phillips, 2010). Unfortunately, most ENMs applied to marine habitats only use bioclimatic or oceanographic factors as predictive variables, which complicates the ability to test more complex hypotheses. However, recently, some studies in terrestrial systems have implemented post hoc analyses on ENM to include anthropic variables (Alaniz, Grez & Zaviezo, 2018). Thus, the inclusion of human activities as factors that affect the current distributions of the species could help to obtain more robust predictions about non-native species expansion (Zhu, Li & Zhao, 2017).
In the coasts of the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem inhabits the invasive cryptogenic sea anemone Anemonia alicemartinae Häussermann & Försterra (2001) covering from the north (Arica, 18°S) to south-central of Chile (Concepción, 36°S) (Carlton, 1996). According to field reports, its distribution range has extended by approximately 1,928 km in the last 50 years (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001; Castilla et al., 2005). This species inhabits shallow intertidal and subtidal zones, as well as intertidal pools, and is capable of floating and disperse via currents (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001). Also, A. alicemartinae can adhere to a diverse array of substrates given its high capacity for adhesion and re-adhesion, a characteristic that also influences its dispersal (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001). López, Arancibia & Neill (2013) have suggested that A. alicemartinae has at least two dispersal mechanisms: short distance dispersal (within habitat), where the organism selects local conditions for settlement; and long-distance dispersal (among habitats), that could facilitate the colonization of new sites over large spatial scales. Therefore, one of the hypotheses suggests that its rapid expansion in the last several years may be explained by these particular biological traits (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001).
However, in addition to the high dispersal potential of A. alicemartinae, it has been proposed that the distribution expansion may be explained by human-mediated southward transport associated with regional-scale maritime activities (see Canales-Aguirre et al., 2015). Using molecular tools, Canales-Aguirre et al. (2015) show a lack of population genetic structure in A. alicemartinae along the southeastern pacific coast with greater genetic diversity at sites near main Chilean ports. These results strongly suggest that dispersal over large distances is likely also aided by anthropic vectors such as maritime activity at regional scales. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of environmental variables on the range expansion of A. alicemartinae along the southern coast of Chile using an ENM and its potential relationship with dispersion vectors such as maritime transport.
Materials and Methods
Study area and presence records of A. alicemartinae
The study area comprised the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem coasts from Perú to the southern zones of Chile including the Humboldtian, Central Chile, and Araucanian ecoregions (Spalding et al., 2007). These regions encompass the currently known geographic distribution of A. alicemartinae. In the year 2014, we surveyed the intertidal zone of 21 sites through directed searching for 2 h. To complement the field data, historical records were also used for 13 additional sites (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001; Canales-Aguirre et al., 2015). These 34 localities were haphazardly chosen in the way to represent the three ecoregions where A. alicemartinae has been reported, and to include port and no-port areas. The total dataset includes 27 georeferenced sites with presence of A. alicemartinae (Fig. 1A). GBIF records were also considered for this analysis, but after filtering for redundancy, spatial independence, and misclassified terrestrial locations, there were only 17 records which did not add to our analyses.
Environmental database
The oceanographic variables used for analyses were obtained from Marspec database (Sbrocco & Barber, 2013). We downloaded 11 variables: Concavity (degrees), Mean Annual SSS (psu), SSS of the month with the lowest salinity (psu), SSS of the saltiest month (psu), Annual range in SSS (psu), Annual variance in SSS (psu), Mean Annual SST (°C), SST of the coldest month (°C), SST of the warmest month (°C), Annual range in SST (°C), Annual variance in SST (°C) at a spatial resolution of 30 arcseconds (∼1 Km). This database has a higher spatial resolution of data compared to other marine databases, such as BioOracle, which presents a resolution of 5 arcminutes (http://www.oracle.ugent.be/, Tyberghein et al., 2012). The data processing was run in ArcGis 10.3 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA).
Ecological niche modeling
To evaluate the potential distribution of A. alicemantinae based on oceanographic predictors we used the algorithm Maxent (Phillips, Anderson & Schapire, 2006) through the “dismo package” version 1.1-4 (Hijmans et al., 2017). We performed process selected oceanographic variables. Using the variance inflation factor (VIF) to evaluate the collinearity between predictors. A VIF > 10 is a sign of collinearity problems (Quinn & Keough, 2002). Four uncorrelated variables were finally selected to run the ENM: sea surface salinity of the saltiest month, annual variance in sea surface salinity, mean annual sea surface temperature, and annual variance in sea surface temperature.
To take into account possible sampling biases in the records of A. alicemartinae caused by oversampling in some areas, we estimated a Kernel density of the current records to generate a density surface. This density surface represents the magnitude per unit area of the points with high values at the location of the point and decreasing as distance increases (Silverman, 1986). The background points were generated on this density surface using the randomPoint function in the “dismo” package (Hijmans et al., 2017), and the “Probability” argument, in which the values of the mask represent a weight of the probability.
Given the low number of records (27 localities recorded) we used the Jackknife resampling technic for partition of the occurrence data (Pearson et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2011; Shcheglovitova & Anderson, 2013), as a mean to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Given that this technique requires independence in the occurrence data, we first evaluated the spatial autocorrelation of the records through the Moran I index in the SAM software (Rangel, Diniz-Filho & Bini, 2010). No spatial autocorrelation was detected (Moran I: 0.107; SD = 0.2; p = 0.693, Table S1).
Model selection and ENM evaluation
Ecology niche model alternative models were generated by considering four uncorrelated predictors, configuring the parameters of the feature classes (FCs) and the regularization multipliers (RM; between 0.5 and 1 with a step value of 0.5). FCs determine the potential shape of the response curves (e.g., linear, quadratic; see Elith et al., 2011; Shcheglovitova & Anderson, 2013). The constraints imposed by features result in models of varying complexities; for example, models built with linear features are less complex than quadratic models (Shcheglovitova & Anderson, 2013). On the other hand, RM values impose penalties on the complexity of the model, where high RM values decreases the chance that the model could become overly complex or overfit (i.e., a protection against overfitting) (Shcheglovitova & Anderson, 2013). Multiple models were generated by varying the features class and RM.
The models were selected through the akaike information criterion (AIC; the lowest AIC value) which is a measure of relative adjustment, proportional to the likelihood of the model and the number of parameters used (Akaike, 1974; Burnham & Anderson, 2002). The best fit model was represented on the geographical space, where zero indicates minimum suitability and one indicates maximum suitability. The selection of models was made through the package ENMeval (Muscarella et al., 2014). Model constructions and analyses were run in the R software (R Core Team, 2017).
To evaluate the role of the human activity in the geographic range expansion of A. alicemartinae, the number of ship landings in ports was considered. These data were obtained from the Maritime Statistics Bulletin of the Dirección General del Territorio Marítimo y Marina Mercante from Chile (DIRECTEMAR; http://web.directemar.cl/estadisticas/maritimo/default.htm) and from the National Port Authority of Perú (https://www.apn.gob.pe). Data were digitalized and the coverage was determined through interpolation with weighted reverse distances, both using the software ArcGIS 10.2 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA).
We performed a spatial regression analysis between the geographical distribution of A. alicemartinae predicted by the ENM and the layer of human activities, using simultaneous autoregressive models (SAR); SAR has shown a greater performance when dealing with data that presents autocorrelation (Dormann et al., 2007; Tognelli & Kelt, 2004). The autoregressive analyzes were performed in the SAM 4.0 software (Rangel, Diniz-Filho & Bini, 2010).
We uploaded all the data sets to Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/record/2641259#.XLTwQphKiUk). We included all the variables used in *.asc format file. Also, the R scripts were let available.
Results
The field sampling of A. alicemartinae in the 21 sampled sites allowed the incorporation of 15 new records that had not been previously registered of this species between the intertidal rocky shore of Cobquecura (36°S, 72.96°W) and Tumbes (36.60°S, 73.40°W). This result extended the known southern distribution of this species by approximately 50 km from the intertidal rocky shore of Concepción (36°S) to Tumbes (36.60°S) (Fig. 1B).
The best model (from a total of 40 models) to predict the fundamental niches had an area under curve = 0.888 and a AICc values of 736.6 (see Table 1; Table S2). For subsequent analyzes, the model with FC = Linear + Quadratic and RM = 1.5 (see Table S2) was used to obtain the final prediction on the potential distribution of A. alicemartinae (Table 1). The variables that mainly contributed to the predicted distribution of A. alicemartinae were annual variance in sea surface salinity (39.65%) and annual variance in sea surface temperature (30.5%). The model indicated high suitability of presence (range 60–100%) in many sites along the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem coasts, including southernmost sites at 53°S where this species is not currently recorded (e.g., Palena, Chiloé, Magallanes; Fig. 2). The areas with the highest suitability included the coasts of the Biobío region (Bahía de Concepción) and the inland sea of Chiloé.
Table 1. Models with lowest AICcorrected for the study area of Chile-Perú.
Models number | Response type (features) | Regularization multiplier | Full.AUC | AICc | delta.AICc | w.AIC | Parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | LQ | 1.5 | 0.888 | 736.64 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 5 |
4 | LQ | 1 | 0.886 | 739.85 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 7 |
1 | L | 0.5 | 0.893 | 740.40 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 5 |
8 | LQ | 2 | 0.891 | 741.62 | 5.0 | 0.1 | 5 |
7 | L | 2 | 0.892 | 742.01 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 3 |
5 | L | 1.5 | 0.893 | 742.51 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 4 |
3 | L | 1 | 0.893 | 743.18 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 5 |
9 | L | 2.5 | 0.891 | 744.57 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 3 |
2 | LQ | 0.5 | 0.885 | 745.62 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 9 |
Notes:
The best model is indicated in bold. Delta AIC, absolute difference between the lowest AICc and each AICc. wAIC is the weighted AIC which represents the “weight of evidence” in favor of model i being the best approximating model in the set (Burnham & Anderson, 2002). The model with the highest AIC weight represents the best model in the set.
L, Linear; LQ, Linear+Quadratic.
The regression analysis between the prediction of the best suitability model and the number of landings, as a proxy for anthropogenic activity, indicated a positive and significant relationship between both variables (OLS, m = 0.143, p < 0.01; SAR, m = 0.133, p < 0.01; Table 2).
Table 2. Relationship between the best suitability niche ecological model of Anemonia alicemartinae and the number of landings.
OLS regression | SAR regression | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coeff | r | R2 | p-value | AIC | Coeff | r | p-R2 | p-value | AIC | |
Constant | −0.932 | 0.243 | 0.059 | <0.01 | −673.293 | −0.86 | 0.23 | 0.053 | <0.01 | −664.569 |
Number of landings | 0.143 | 0.133 |
Note:
Relationship between the best suitability niche ecological model of Anemonia alicemartinae and the number of landings. Summary of the ordinary least squares (OLS) and simultaneous autoregressive model (SAR) regressions.
Discussion
In the present study, using an ENM approach, we demonstrate that both annual variation in salinity and sea surface temperature are the main oceanographic factors that explain the distribution of the invasive cryptogenic sea anemone A. alicemartinae along the Humboldt Current coastal ecosystem. Temperature and salinity are important variables that affect physiological performance, reproduction, and behavior of marine invertebrate organisms at different life cycle stages (Spivak & Cuesta, 2009; Tittensor et al., 2010; Smyth, Mazik & Elliott, 2014). In particular, salinity has been described as one of the key limiting factors for the propagation of marine organisms, especially in sessile osmoconformers, since they are unable to actively adjust their extracellular osmolarity (Bonsdorff, 2006; Guppy & Withers, 1999). Podbielski et al. (2016) suggests that salinity may help to predict the expansion potential of the sea anemone Diadumene lineata in the Baltic Sea. They found that although this species may tolerate salinity >10 ppm, lower salinities restrict distribution expansion.
The positive and significant relationship between the geographical distribution predicted by the ENM and the number of landings of ships in ports, suggests that this anthropogenic factor contributes significantly to explain the current southernmost distribution of A. alicemartinae. This could be extended to sites in Patagonia that include the Chiloense ecoregion and the ecoregion of the channels and fjords of southern Chile (Spalding et al., 2007). These areas have high maritime traffic (ports, ships, DIRECTEMAR 2015, http://web.directemar.cl/estadisticas/maritimo/default.htm) that could facilitate the future dispersal and successful establishment of this species.
Previous studies of A. alicemartinae (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001; Canales-Aguirre et al., 2015) have not conclusively determined whether this species is native to northern Chile and has expanded its range southward, or if it is an introduced species invading the Chilean coast. However, given its conspicuous features, such as its coloration (intense red) and habitat use in the intertidal and subtidal zones, it is unlikely that this species has gone unnoticed in the records of native marine biota since the beginning of the 20th century (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001). These antecedents are in concordance with the sampling that we carried out for this study in the Biobío region, where a high abundance of A. alicemartinae was found (more than 30 ind/m2 in some localities), being easily identified by its coloration and recognizable morphological features, such as bipartite margin accretions and frequent longitudinal fission marks (Häussermann & Försterra, 2001). Therefore these observations support that A. alicemartinae is a recent invader from the Northern part of the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem coast.
Our results show that maritime transport is an important factor to explain the distribution range of A. alicemartinae, which strengthens the hypothesis by Canales-Aguirre et al. (2015) that explains the higher genetic diversity observed in localities near ports. The use of ships as transportation vectors by this species can allow colonization by individuals from different population sources, increasing local genetic diversity. This pattern has been observed in other invasive invertebrate marine species, such as sponges (e.g., Paralecilla magna; Guardiola, Frotscher & Uriz, 2016), shrimps (e.g., Palaemon macrodactylus; Lejeusne et al., 2014) and barnacles (e.g., Chthamalus proteus; Zardus & Hadfield, 2005). These three examples show an increase in genetic diversity in recently invaded localities, which may be caused by repeated introduction events from different source populations that can compensate for the effects of genetic bottlenecks and restore equivalent or even higher levels of diversity than those observed in native populations (Zardus & Hadfield, 2005; Lejeusne et al., 2014; Guardiola, Frotscher & Uriz, 2016). Additional evidence that supports the high dispersal capacity of A. alicemartinae and the potential use of maritime transport as a spreading mechanism is the null impact of biogeographical barriers in this species. Along the Chilean coast, there are three biogeographic units: Peruvian Province, Intermediate Area, and Magellanic Province, determining two main biogeographic breaks at 30°S and 41–43°S (Camus, 2001; Hernández et al., 2005; Hormazabal, Shaffer & Leth, 2004). The present distribution of A. alicemartinae crosses the northern biogeographic break (30°S) that separates the Peruvian Province and the Intermediate Area. This break has been explained by the existence of coastal oceanographic features, such as strong kinetic eddies and patterns of sea surface temperatures, as well as an abrupt continental narrowing (Strub et al., 1998; Camus, 2001; Hormazabal, Shaffer & Leth, 2004). In several marine species, a biogeographic and phylogeograhic concordance is observed at this break, suggesting a limitation for genetic flow between both sides of the break (Haye et al., 2014; Sánchez et al., 2011). The lack of population genetic structure found by Canales-Aguirre et al. (2015) in A. alicemartinae along its whole distributional range evidences that this species may cross the 30°S biogeographic break maintaining a high connection between the northern and southern populations. The ability of this sea anemone to detach and reattach from different substrates, and the potential use of ships as dispersal vectors, would allow A. alicemartinae to colonize new places. Actually, it has been reported that maritime transport facilitates the crossing of natural boundaries in the ocean by species (Kaluza et al., 2010; Molnar et al., 2008). For example, a study carried out in the ballast water and hulls of 186 vessels in the North Sea found that 57% of the species recorded were non-native (Gollasch, 2002). Similar studies conducted in the coast of Chile revealed the presence of the invasive ascidian Asterocarpa humilis attached to hulls of international ships, which may explain the rapid spread of this species for more than 2,000 km along the coast (Pinochet et al., 2017).
Our estimations predict an expansion of the actual geographic range of A. alicemartinae toward southernmost regions of the south eastern pacific coast, explained by ecological attributes of the species and the dispersion vector (ships). Although there is little evidence that this species may impact native species survival or distribution, the increase of its geographic range toward austral localities could generate negative interactions with native species through interspecific competition, or prevent the recruitment of other species (preemptive competition).
There are few examples of works that use niche models to study possible expansions of the range of marine invertebrate invaders on the southeast coast. One study was carried out with a mechanical niche model approach to evaluate possible range expansions in the invaders Ciona intestinalis (now Ciona robusta in Chile, Bouchemousse, Bishop & Viard, 2016) and Codium fragile (Madariaga et al., 2014). The main results showed that both species can be propagated to most regions of the Chilean coast, which may affect diversity and community structure (Drouin, McKindsey & Johnson, 2011; Cordell, Levy & Toft, 2013). In another study, Januario et al. (2015) modeled and validated the environmental conditions that allow the persistence and propagation of the species complex Ciona sp A and B (now Ciona intestinalis and Ciona robusta, respectively) in the Chilean coast. They found that suitable areas for Ciona intestinalis are located between 30° and 40°S, meanwhile, areas around 45°S are the most appropriated for Ciona robusta. All these studies considered only environmental suitability to predict expansion range, however, other factors may interact to promote the propagation of these species. For example, in Ciona intestinalis, the potential capacity to attach to the hulls of ships may facilitate long-distance transport in this species (Sargent et al., 2013).
Finally, our results highlight the influence of anthropogenic variables affecting the distribution of marine invasive species, specifically maritime transport, indicating important implications for the conservation of biodiversity. For future studies, we recommend conducting laboratory and field experiments to evaluate the physiological tolerance and competition ability of A. alicemartinae. An integrative approach to modeling invasion dynamic of this species should include anthropogenic variables in conjunction with biotic and abiotic variables, which may affect or prevent the process of invasion to the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem coast.
Conclusions
Studying the factors determining geographical distribution of species, and then modeling and predicting under different scenarios, are steps of fundamental importance to generate policies for the management and conservation of biodiversity, especially when the introduction of non-native species has been increasing in the last decades. In this work, we showed the importance of the variability of salinity and temperature, coupled with anthropogenic factors such as maritime transport, as the main predictors of the range expansion of A. alicemartinae, a species with high dispersive and invasive potential, along the Chilean coast. Also, we showed that the most susceptible areas to invasion were those with high maritime activity and high variability of temperature and salinity. The expansion predicted by the ENM includes two southern ecoregions, reaching the Patagonian area, and covering most of the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem.
Supplemental Information
Funding Statement
Javier Pinochet received funding from the Dirección de Postgrado of the Universidad de Concepción, Chile (EDPG LPR-161). Reinaldo Rivera was supported by a CONICYT Doctoral Fellowship (21160866) and Doctoral Fellowship from the Dirección de Postgrado of the Universidad de Concepción. Cristián E. Hernández was supported by FONDECYT grant N°1170815. Antonio Brante received funding from FONDECYT grants N° 1170598 and N°1170591. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Javier Pinochet conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Reinaldo Rivera conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Paula E. Neill conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Antonio Brante prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Cristián E. Hernández conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Additional data is available at Zenodo: Reinaldo Rivera Jara. (2019). Spread of the non-native anemone Anemonia alicemartinae Häussermann & Försterra (2001) along the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem: an ecological niche model approach (Version 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2641259.
This dataset contains the oceanographic variables used to build the Ecological Niche Models with a resolution of 1 km. Also, a data layer with the number of ships landings per port is included.
References
- Akaike (1974).Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19(6):716–723. doi: 10.1109/tac.1974.1100705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alaniz, Grez & Zaviezo (2018).Alaniz AJ, Grez AA, Zaviezo T. Potential spatial interaction of the invasive species Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) with native and endemic coccinellids. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2018;142(5):513–524. doi: 10.1111/jen.12498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Arim et al. (2006).Arim M, Abades S, Neill P, Lima M, Marquet P. Spread dynamics of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:374–378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504272102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonsdorff (2006).Bonsdorff E. Gradientes de diversidad zoobentónica en el Mar Báltico: continua sucesión postglacial en un ecosistema estresado. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2006;330:383–391. [Google Scholar]
- Bouchemousse, Bishop & Viard (2016).Bouchemousse S, Bishop J, Viard F. Contrasting global genetic patterns in two biologically similar, widespread and invasive Ciona species (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):24875. doi: 10.1038/srep24875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burnham & Anderson (2002).Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multi-model inference. New York: Springer; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Camus (2001).Camus PA. Biogeografía marina de Chile continental. Revista chilena de historia natural. 2001;74(3):587–617. doi: 10.4067/s0716-078x2001000300008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Canales-Aguirre et al. (2015).Canales-Aguirre CB, Quiñones A, Hernández CE, Neill PE, Brante A. Population genetics of the invasive cryptogenic anemone, Anemonia alicemartinae, along the southeastern Pacific coast. Journal of Sea Research. 2015;102:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2015.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Carlton (1996).Carlton JT. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology. 1996;77(6):1653–1655. doi: 10.2307/2265767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Castilla et al. (2005).Castilla JC, Uribe M, Bahamonde N, Clarke M, Desqueyroux-Faúndez R, Kong I, Moyano H, Rozbaczylo N, Santelices B, Valdovinos C, Zavala P. Down under the southeastern Pacific: marine non-indigenous species in Chile. Biological Invasions. 2005;7(2):213–232. doi: 10.1007/s10530-004-0198-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cordell, Levy & Toft (2013).Cordell JR, Levy C, Toft JD. Ecological implications of invasive tunicates associated with artificial structures in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Biological Invasions. 2013;15(6):1303–1318. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0366-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Davis, Malas & Minor (2013).Davis AY, Malas N, Minor ES. Substitutable habitats? The biophysical and anthropogenic drivers of an exotic bird’s distribution. Biological Invasions. 2013;16(2):415–427. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0530-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Döge, De Oliveira & Tidon (2015).Döge JS, De Oliveira HV, Tidon R. Rapid response to abiotic and biotic factors controls population growth of two invasive drosophilids (Diptera) in the Brazilian Savanna. Biology Invasions. 2015;17(8):2461–2474. doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0889-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dormann et al. (2007).Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling D, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography. 2007;30(5):609–628. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Drouin, McKindsey & Johnson (2011).Drouin A, McKindsey CW, Johnson LE. Higher abundance and diversity in faunal assemblages with the invasion of Codium fragile ssp. fragile in eelgrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011;424:105–117. doi: 10.3354/meps08961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elith et al. (2006).Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JMcC M, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE. Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006;29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elith, Kearney & Phillips (2010).Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;1(4):330–342. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00036.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elith et al. (2011).Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologist. Diversity and Distributions. 2011;17(1):43–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrier et al. (2002).Ferrier S, Watson G, Pearce J, Drielsma M. Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales I. Species-level modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2002;11:2275–2307. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302930424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gollasch (2002).Gollasch S. The importance of ship hull fouling as a vector of species introductions into the North Sea. Biofouling. 2002;18(2):105–121. doi: 10.1080/08927010290011361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guardiola, Frotscher & Uriz (2016).Guardiola M, Frotscher J, Uriz MJ. High genetic diversity, phenotypic plasticity, and invasive potential of a recently introduced calcareous sponge, fast spreading across the Atlanto-Mediterranean basin. Marine Biology. 2016;163(5):123. doi: 10.1007/s00227-016-2862-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guppy & Withers (1999).Guppy M, Withers P. Metabolic depression in animals: physiological perspectives and biochemical generalizations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1999;74(1):1–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Häussermann & Försterra (2001).Häussermann V, Försterra G. A new species of sea anemone from Chile, Anemonia alicemartinae n. sp. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). An invader or an indicator for environmental change in shallow water? Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2001;1(3):211–224. doi: 10.1078/1439-6092-00018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haye et al. (2014).Haye PA, Segovia NI, Muñoz-Herrera NC, Gálvez FE, Martínez A, Meynard A, Pardo-Gandarillas MC, Poulin E, Faugeron S. Phylogeographic structure in benthic marine invertebrates of the southeast Pacific coast of Chile with differing dispersal potential. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernández et al. (2005).Hernández C, Moreno R, Rozbaczylo N, Spence J. Biogeographical patterns and Rapoport’s Rule in Southeastern Pacific benthic polychaetes of the Chilean Coast. Ecography. 2005;28(3):363–373. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04013.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hijmans et al. (2017).Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J. dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. R package version 1.1-4https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo 2017
- Hormazabal, Shaffer & Leth (2004).Hormazabal S, Shaffer G, Leth O. Coastal transition zone off Chile. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2004;109(C1):C01021. doi: 10.1029/2003jc001956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Januario et al. (2015).Januario SM, Estay SA, Labra FA, Lima M. Combining environmental suitability and population abundances to evaluate the invasive potential of the tunicate Ciona intestinalis along the temperate South American coast. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jetz, Wilcove & Dobson (2007).Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP. Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLOS Biology. 2007;5(6):e157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaluza et al. (2010).Kaluza P, Kölzsch A, Gastner M, Blasius B. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2010;7(48):1093–1103. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozak, Graham & Wiens (2008).Kozak KH, Graham CH, Wiens JJ. Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2008;23(3):141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lejeusne et al. (2014).Lejeusne C, Saunier A, Petit N, Béguer M, Otani M, Carlton JT, Rico C, Green AJ. High genetic diversity and absence of founder effects in a worldwide aquatic invader. Scientific Reports. 2014;4(1):5808. doi: 10.1038/srep05808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine, Adler & Yelenik (2004).Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters. 2004;7(10):975–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00657.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lippitt et al. (2008).Lippitt C, Rogana J, Toledano J, Sangermano F, Eastmana R, Mastro V, Sawyer A. Incorporating anthropogenic variables into a species distribution model to map gypsy moth risk. Ecological Modelling. 2008;210(3):339–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- López, Arancibia & Neill (2013).López DN, Arancibia PA, Neill PE. Potential dispersal mechanisms of the cryptogenic anemone. Anemonia alicemartinae. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 2013;86(3):369–372. doi: 10.4067/s0716-078x2013000300014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Madariaga et al. (2014).Madariaga DJ, Rivadeneira MM, Tala F, Thiel M. Environmental tolerance of the two invasive species Ciona intestinalis and Codium fragile: their invasion potential along a temperate coast. Biological Invasions. 2014;16(12):2507–2527. doi: 10.1007/s10530-014-0680-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Molnar et al. (2008).Molnar J, Gamboa R, Revenga C, Spalding M. Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2008;6(9):485–492. doi: 10.1890/070064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muscarella et al. (2014).Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M, Boria RA, Kass J, Uriarte M, Anderson R. ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014;5(11):1198–1205. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.12261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Neill & Arim (2011).Neill PE, Arim M. Human health link to invasive species. In: Nriagu JO, editor. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. Vol. 3. Burlington: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 116–123. [Google Scholar]
- Occhipinti-Ambrogi & Galil (2010).Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Galil BS. Marine alien species as an aspect of global change. Advances in Oceanology and Limnology. 2010;1:143–156. doi: 10.1080/19475721003743876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ojaveer et al. (2015).Ojaveer H, Galil BS, Campbell ML, Carlton JT, Canning-Clode J, Cook EJ, Davidson AD, Hewitt CL, Jelmert A, Marchini A, McKenzie CH, Minchin D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Olenin S, Ruiz G. Classification of non-indigenous species based on their impacts: considerations for application in marine management. PLOS Biology. 2015;13:e1002130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson et al. (2007).Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Peterson AT. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography. 2007;34(1):102–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson et al. (2011).Peterson A, Soberón J, Pearson R, Anderson R, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo M. Ecological niches and geographic distributions (MPB-49) Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, Anderson & Schapire (2006).Phillips S, Anderson R, Schapire R. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2006;190(3–4):231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pinochet et al. (2017).Pinochet J, Leclerc J-C, Brante A, Daguin-Thiébaut C, Díaz C, Tellier F, Viard F. Presence of the tunicate Asterocarpa humilis on ship hulls and aquaculture facilities in the coast of the Biobío Region, south central Chile. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3672. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Podbielski et al. (2016).Podbielski I, Bock C, Lenz M, Melzen F. Using the critical salinity (S crit) concept to predict invasion potential of the anemone Diadumene lineata in the Baltic Sea. Marine Biology. 2016;163(11):227. doi: 10.1007/s00227-016-2989-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pullin (2002).Pullin AS. Conservation biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Quinn & Keough (2002).Quinn GP, Keough MJ. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2017).R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rangel, Diniz-Filho & Bini (2010).Rangel TF, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM. SAM: a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography. 2010;33(1):46–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez et al. (2011).Sánchez R, Sepúlveda RD, Brante A, Cárdenas L. Spatial pattern of genetic and morphological diversity in the direct developer Acanthina monodon (Gastropoda: Mollusca) Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011;434:121–131. doi: 10.3354/meps09184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sargent et al. (2013).Sargent P, Wells T, Matheson K, McKenzie CH, Deibel D. First record of vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1767), in coastal Newfoundland waters. Bioinvasion Records. 2013;2(2):89–98. doi: 10.3391/bir.2013.2.2.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sbrocco & Barber (2013).Sbrocco EJ, Barber PH. MARSPEC: ocean climate layers for marine spatial ecology. Ecology. 2013;94:979. doi: 10.1890/12-1358.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seabloom et al. (2006).Seabloom EW, Williams JW, Slayback D, Stoms D, Viers J, Dobson AP. Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled plant species in California. Ecological Applications. 2006;16(4):1338–1350. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1338:hipiai]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shcheglovitova & Anderson (2013).Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP. Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: a jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling. 2013;269:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman (1986).Silverman BW. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Smyth, Mazik & Elliott (2014).Smyth K, Mazik K, Elliott M. Behavioural effects of hypersaline exposure on the lobster Homarus gammarus (L) and the crab Cancer pagurus (L) Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2014;457:208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soberón & Nakamura (2009).Soberón J, Nakamura M. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:19644–19650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901637106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spalding et al. (2007).Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdaña ZA, Finlayson M, Halpern BS, Jorge MA, Lombana AL, Lourie SA, Martin KD, Mcmanus E, Molnar J, Recchia CA, Robertson J. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience. 2007;57(7):573–583. doi: 10.1641/b570707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Spivak & Cuesta (2009).Spivak ED, Cuesta JA. The effect of salinity on larval development of Uca tangeri (Eydoux, 1835) (Brachyura: Ocypodidae) and new findings of the zoeal morphology. Scientia Marina. 2009;73(2):297–305. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2009.73n2297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Strub et al. (1998).Strub PT, Mesias JM, Montecino V, Rutllant J, Salinas S. Coastal ocean circulation off western South America. In: Robinson AR, Brink KH, editors. The Sea. Vol. 11. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1998. pp. 273–313. [Google Scholar]
- Tittensor et al. (2010).Tittensor DP, Mora C, Jetz W, Lotze HK, Richard D, Berghe EV, Worm B. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1098–1101. doi: 10.1038/nature09329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tognelli & Kelt (2004).Tognelli M, Kelt DA. Analysis of determinants of mammalian species richness in South America using spatial autoregressive models. Ecography. 2004;27(4):427–436. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03732.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tyberghein et al. (2012).Tyberghein L, Verbruggen H, Pauly K, Troupin C, Mineur F, Clerck O. Bio-ORACLE: a global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2012;21(2):272–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00656.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Villero et al. (2017).Villero D, Pla M, Camps D, Ruiz-Olmo J, Brotons L. Integrating species distribution modelling into decision-making to inform conservation actions. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2017;26(2):251–271. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1243-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zardus & Hadfield (2005).Zardus JD, Hadfield MG. Multiple origins and incursions of the Atlantic barnacle Chthamalus proteus in the Pacific. Molecular Ecology. 2005;14(12):3719–3733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Li & Zhao (2017).Zhu G, Li H, Zhao L. Incorporating anthropogenic variables into ecological niche modeling to predict areas of invasion of Popillia japonica. Journal of Pest Science. 2017;90(1):151–160. doi: 10.1007/s10340-016-0780-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Additional data is available at Zenodo: Reinaldo Rivera Jara. (2019). Spread of the non-native anemone Anemonia alicemartinae Häussermann & Försterra (2001) along the Humboldt-current large marine ecosystem: an ecological niche model approach (Version 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2641259.
This dataset contains the oceanographic variables used to build the Ecological Niche Models with a resolution of 1 km. Also, a data layer with the number of ships landings per port is included.