Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219122

Season and size of urban particulate matter differentially affect cytotoxicity and human immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Srijata Sarkar 1, César E Rivas-Santiago 1,¤, Olufunmilola A Ibironke 1, Claudia Carranza 2, Qingyu Meng 1, Álvaro Osornio-Vargas 3, Junfeng Zhang 4, Martha Torres 2, Judith C Chow 5, John G Watson 5, Pamela Ohman-Strickland 6, Stephan Schwander 1,7,*
Editor: Horacio Bach8
PMCID: PMC6622489  PMID: 31295271

Abstract

Exposure to air pollution particulate matter (PM) and tuberculosis (TB) are two of the leading global public health challenges affecting low and middle income countries. An estimated 4.26 million premature deaths are attributable to household air pollution and an additional 4.1 million to outdoor air pollution annually. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infects a large proportion of the world’s population with the risk for TB development increasing during immunosuppressing conditions. There is strong evidence that such immunosuppressive conditions develop during household air pollution exposure, which increases rates of TB development. Exposure to urban air pollution has been shown to alter the outcome of TB therapy. Here we examined whether in vitro exposure to urban air pollution PM alters human immune responses to M.tb. PM2.5 and PM10 (aerodynamic diameters <2.5μm, <10μm) were collected monthly from rainy, cold-dry and warm-dry seasons in Iztapalapa, a highly populated TB-endemic municipality of Mexico City with elevated outdoor air pollution levels. We evaluated the effects of seasonality and size of PM on cytotoxicity and antimycobacterial host immunity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA)+ and IGRA- healthy study subjects. PM10 from cold-dry and warm-dry seasons induced the highest cytotoxicity in PBMC. With the exception of PM2.5 from the cold-dry season, pre-exposure to all seasonal PM reduced M.tb phagocytosis by PBMC. Furthermore, M.tb-induced IFN-γ production was suppressed in PM2.5 and PM10-pre-exposed PBMC from IGRA+ subjects. This observation coincides with the reduced expression of M.tb-induced T-bet, a transcription factor regulating IFN-γ expression in T cells. Pre-exposure to PM10 compared to PM2.5 led to greater loss of M.tb growth control. Exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 collected in different seasons differentially impairs M.tb-induced human host immunity, suggesting biological mechanisms underlying altered M.tb infection and TB treatment outcomes during air pollution exposures.

Introduction

Two preventable conditions, M.tb infection and air pollution exposure, still cause enormous loss of human life worldwide. More than 10 million people develop tuberculosis (TB) and 1.4 million die from TB annually worldwide [1]. Urban outdoor air pollution in cities is one of the main environmental public health risk factors and estimated to have caused 4.2 million premature deaths globally in 2016 [2].

While most infections with M.tb remain asymptomatic, various factors contributing to immunosuppression increase the risk of TB development [3]. Exposure to tobacco smoke [48] and household air pollution [914] increase the risk of TB development. Recent studies also indicate that urban outdoor air pollution exposure increases the mortality of TB patients during TB therapy [15] and the risk of development of active TB [16, 17]. A potential link between long-term exposure to suspended particulate matter (PM) and increased rates of pulmonary TB has also been reported in North Carolina where levels of air pollution are relatively low [18].

Supporting the epidemiological evidence for adverse air pollution impacts on the natural course of M.tb infection, our group has demonstrated that diesel exhaust particles (DEP), a component of urban PM, impair human PBMC immune responses to M.tb via the downregulation of toll like receptor (TLR)-dependent cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) [19]. We have also shown that urban PM2.5 and PM10 induce cellular senescence and suppress M.tb-induced responses by impairing production of cytokines and antimicrobial peptides and growth control of M.tb in human respiratory epithelial cells [20]. In a recent study we have reported evidence that real-world inhalation-uptake of urban PM in human alveolar macrophages correlates with suppression of M.tb immunity in human lung and blood immune cells [21].

The size of PM during inhalation exposure is believed to determine affected target organs and health outcomes as PM2.5 penetrates terminal bronchioles and alveoli while the coarse fraction of PM10 primarily deposits in upper airways [2224]. Differences in the physicochemical characteristics of urban PM resulting from seasonal differences in the content of agricultural and organic compounds, industrial production, vehicular traffic and home energy use may also modify interactions with biological systems [25, 26].

Seasonal variations of outdoor air pollution PM-related health effects have been demonstrated [27, 28] in epidemiological studies. Most biological studies, with the exception of a few [25, 29, 30], have been conducted with PM from selected seasons, thus evaluating health effects of PM with chemical composition characteristics representing short exposure periods only. However, physicochemical characteristics of urban PM could potentially be modified by seasonal effects and interactions with gaseous pollutants (NO2 and O3) that subsequently affect biological responses differentially [25, 26]. As the primary emissions and secondary formations of PM show seasonal variabilities, it is critical to consider seasonal variations of PM compositions while examining the health effects of PM exposures. Indeed, the toxic and inflammatory potential of PM has been shown to vary due to variations in chemical PM components based on differences in PM source locations and seasons [3036]. PM size, season, composition and collection location have also been shown to affect PM-exposure-induced cardiovascular responses in rats [25].

In the current study, we examined in vitro the effects of exposures to urban air pollution PM from Iztapalapa, a municipality with a high prevalence of air pollution [37] and TB in Mexico City, on key components of protective human host immune responses to M.tb. PM2.5 and PM10 from rainy (R), cold-dry (CD) and warm-dry (WD) seasons, which vary in their chemical constitution, were examined regarding their capacity to induce cytotoxicity and modulate inflammatory PBMC responses to M.tb. Pre-exposures of PBMC to PM2.5 from R (R2.5), CD (CD2.5) and WD (WD2.5) and PM10 from R (R10), CD (CD10) and WD (WD10) seasons resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of IFN-γ-production upon M.tb infection and stimulation with purified protein derivative (PPD), primarily in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects, i.e. persons with proven evidence of prior M.tb infection.

IL-1β-production was also inhibited, predominantly by CD10 and WD10 in M.tb-infected PBMC from both IGRA+ and IGRA- subjects. Further, upon PM pre-exposure, we observed a PM-size and season-dependent reduction of M.tb phagocytosis and M.tb growth control in monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) and PBMC.

Combined, our findings suggest that exposure to urban outdoor air pollution PM of different size ranges and from different seasons modulate M.tb-induced immune responses, corroborating epidemiological findings of air pollution exposure effects on M.tb infection outcomes in the real-world.

Materials and methods

Approval to perform this study, collect personal health information, and perform venipunctures was given by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Rutgers University, NJ (Protocol number: 2012001383) and the scientific and bioethics committee of the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas in Mexico City, Mexico (INER, protocol B22-12). All study subjects provided signed written informed consent prior to any study interactions.

Human subjects

Forty-two healthy subjects were recruited from staff, faculty and students at Rutgers and in Mexico City (the latter for Western Blot analysis only). Healthy nonsmoking men or women, 18–65 years of age, weighing at least 110 lbs., were included. Persons on anti-inflammatory medications were not eligible. At the initial study visit, 10 ml peripheral venous blood were collected and sent for T-SPOT.TB test (Oxford Diagnostic Laboratories, Memphis, Tennessee). This IGRA test determines the presence (IGRA+) or absence (IGRA-) of M.tb infection by quantifying frequencies of M.tb antigen-specific IFN-γ releasing blood T cells. During subsequent visits, approximately 100 ml of heparinized peripheral venous blood were collected to obtain PBMC for experimental studies.

Collection of air pollution PM2.5 and PM10

PM2.5 and PM10 were collected from June 2012 to May of 2013 on the rooftop of the National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change (CENICA) in Iztapalapa, a highly populated, high vehicular traffic-exposed municipality of Mexico City, following the protocol described previously [20]. To collect adequate amounts of PM on modified nitrocellulose membranes, PM2.5 and PM10 was sampled for 24 h on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays weekly using high-volume samplers (TE6070V-2.5, Tisch Environmental, Inc.; Village of Cleves, OH, USA, airflow rate 1.13 m3min-1) [38, 39]. The PM collection periods comprised the three seasons namely cold-dry (CD, November-February), warm-dry (WD, March-May) and rainy (R, June-October). Following careful mechanical recovery from the membranes, PM samples were pooled by particle size and months. Following measurements of the total monthly PM mass, PM samples were stored in baked glass vials at 4°C in desiccators in the dark. Seasonal bulk PM samples for in vitro studies and chemical analysis were subsequently generated by pooling monthly PM2.5 and PM10 samples according to their proportional contributions to the total mass of the total monthly PM samples included in the seasonal PM pools. PM samples were sterilized by autoclaving prior to use in in vitro exposure experiments.

Analysis of PM chemical composition

PM2.5 or PM10 samples were combined for each size fraction by season and analyzed at the Desert Research Institute (Reno, NV) for 51 elements (from sodium to uranium) by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [40]; eight ions (Cl-, NO3-, SO42- NH+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and K+) and levoglucosan by ion chromatography (IC) [41]; elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) by thermal-optical analysis [41], and 114 polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [42]. We analyzed non-autoclaved and autoclaved (at 121ºC, 30 minutes, 10.0 in. Hg in a SV1262 Prevac steam sterilizer, Steris, OH, USA) PM samples and no differences in the component composition were observed between them. Autoclaved PM was used in all experiments presented in the current study.

Preparation of PM samples for in vitro use

Details of PM preparations for in vitro studies were described previously [20]. Briefly, R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, and WD10 were weighed on a microbalance (CPA225D; Sartorius, Bohemia, NY, USA) and placed in prewashed and baked glass vials. Following sterilization by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min, PM stock suspensions (1 mg/ml) were prepared in complete cell culture media phenol red free RPMI1640 (BioWhittaker, Lonza Walkersville, MD) supplemented with L-Glutamine (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and 10% human AB serum (Valley Biomedical, Inc., Winchester, VA)] and sonicated for 5 minutes at 100 Watts (351OR-DTH; Branson, Danbury, CT, USA). PM working suspensions (two-fold final concentrations) were prepared in 14 ml falcon tubes from stock suspensions, sonicated for 2 min and vortexed before adding onto cell cultures. All dilutions were prepared in complete cell culture media.

Preparation of PBMC and MDM

PBMC and MDM preparations were performed as described previously [19, 43]. Briefly, heparinized peripheral venous blood was diluted with equal volumes of RPMI-1640. PBMC were obtained by density gradient centrifugation Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Sweden), counted in a hemocytometer and then resuspended at required concentrations in complete cell culture media for subsequent in vitro studies. Enriched CD14+CD3- monocytes were generated by immunomagnetic separation from PBMC using a negative selection Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Monocytes (5 x 105 per well) were then allowed to adhere on chamber glass slides (BD Falcon, Bedford, MA, USA). Non-adherent cells (lymphocytes) were removed by gentle washing. Adherent cells were cultured for differentiation to macrophages (MDM) at 37ºC in 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for seven days and then used for the M.tb phagocytosis assay.

Preparation of M.tb

M.tb H37Ra (ATCC 25177, Manassas, VA) was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka. MO) and M.tb stock harvested following 21 days of incubation at 37°C in a shaking incubator. M.tb cultures were then centrifuged at 2095 x g (3000 rpm) for 30 min at room temperature (RT), suspended in Middlebrook 7H9 broth medium with 6% glycerol (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), aliquoted in cryotubes and stored at –86°C until use. Concentrations of the M.tb stock were assessed by counting colony-forming units (CFU) from serial dilutions on 7H10 agar plates (Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka. MO). For the infection of PBMC or MDM, M.tb aliquots were thawed, centrifuged at 6000 x g for 5 min, suspended in 1 ml complete culture medium and de-clumped by vortexing with five 3 mm sterile glass beads followed by centrifugation at 350 x g for 2 min. Supernatants containing single M.tb suspensions were used for in vitro infections of PBMC or MDM.

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay

To assess cellular viability upon PM exposure, freshly isolated PBMC (105/well) were exposed to 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of PM suspensions or left unexposed for 20 h in 96-well tissue culture plates. PM-exposed PBMC were also subsequently infected with M.tb at MOI1 (multiplicity of infection 1, infection with 1 bacterium/monocyte) or left uninfected. Following a 20 h incubation (37ºC in 5% CO2), cell supernatants were collected and LDH leakage (a marker of cytotoxicity) assayed (Promega, Madison, WI) as described previously [20, 43]. Briefly, 50 μl cell culture supernatants were incubated with 50 μl of substrate (CytoTox 96 Non-radioactive cytotoxicity Assay, Promega, Madison, WI) in a 96-well assay plate at room temperature for 30 minutes in the dark. Stop solution (50 μL) was added to each well and absorbance determined at 493 nm. Cellular toxicity was defined as percent (%) LDH leakage from cells calculated from the ratios of ODs of PM-exposed PBMC (after background subtraction) to the ODs of unexposed PBMC (after background subtraction) x 100. Supernatants from unexposed PBMC and SDS lysed PBMC served as negative and positive controls, respectively. OD of cell culture mediun served as background.

ELISPOT assays

Frequencies of IFN-γ and IL-1β-producing PBMC upon PM exposure and M.tb infection were assessed by ELISPOT assays, as described previously [19]. Briefly, freshly isolated PBMC (2 x 105/well for IFN-γ and 105/well for IL-1β) were exposed to 0 (No PM), 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of PM in triplicate in 200 μl complete cell culture media in high protein-binding 96-well plates coated with appropriate amounts of either IFN-γ or IL-1β antibodies.

Following incubation at 37ºC in 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 20 h, PBMC were infected with M.tb at MOI1 or exposed in complete culture media to PPD. After incubations, PBMC were removed by washing, and ELISPOT plates developed according to manufacturer’s protocols. Plates were then scanned for image analyses of IFN-γ and IL-1β-producing cells (spot frequencies) with an automated ELISPOT reader (Immunospot series 5 analyzer, software version 5.0; Cellular Technology, Cleveland, OH). Frequencies of cytokine-producing cells were calculated by averaging spot numbers from triplicate wells for each experimental condition and plotted as functions of PM type, PM concentration and seasonal PM source.

M.tb phagocytosis assay

MDM were pre-exposed in 8-well chamber glass slides (Thermo Nunc Lab-Tek II. NJ. USA) to R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10 or WD10 at final concentrations of 1 and 5 μg/ml and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Pilot experiments using 10 μg/ml of PM2.5 and PM10 had shown too many particle inclusions in MDM making accurate counts of phagocytosed M.tb impossible.

Following PM pre-exposure, MDM were washed three times with RPMI1640 to remove non-phagocytosed PM, infected with Mtb at MOI 1 for 2h (37ºC, 5% CO2), and again washed three times with RPMI1640 to remove extracellular mycobacteria. Chamber glass slides were fixed with methanol (Bio Whittaker, Basel, Switzerland, stained with Kinyoun Staining Kit (AlphaTec. WA. USA), covered with coverslips (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) using slide mounting fluid (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Numbers of acid-fast bacilli in MDM were counted by bright field microscopy (Zeiss Axio Lab.A1 Laboratory Microscope, Göttingen Germany, 1,000x, oil immersion). Proportions of MDM with intracellular M.tb were determined within a total of 300 randomly selected MDM for each experimental condition.

M.tb growth control assay

PBMC (2 x 105) from IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects were exposed to R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10 or WD10 at final concentrations of 0, 1, and 5 μg/ml in 96-well round bottom tissue culture dishes (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY) and incubated at 37°C for 18 h followed by centrifugation at 1200 rpm (335 x g) for 5 minutes. Supernatants containing non-phagocytosed PM were then carefully removed, PBMC washed twice and infected with M.tb at MOI1. Following 2-h infections, plates were washed three times to remove non-phagocytosed M.tb and plates incubated in complete culture media. On days 0 (1 h post infection), 1, 4 and 7, PBMC were lysed using 0.1% SDS for 10 min at room temperature followed by neutralization with 20% bovine serum albumin in Middlebrook 7H9 broth. Serial dilutions of cell lysates were then plated in triplicate on 7H10 agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 21 days when colony forming units (cfu) were assessed as described [20]. Observations of PM effects on M.tb growth control show day 4 data only.

Western blotting to assess T-bet expression levels

To identify the expression levels of T-box transcription factor (T-bet), PBMC were exposed to 0, 1 and 10 μg/ml of PM2.5 annual bulk used in Mexico City for human bronchoalveolar cell exposures [21] in culture media for 24 h followed by M.tb infection at MOI1 or MOI5 or left uninfected for an additional 24h.

Following incubation, PBMC were lysed with RIPA (radio immunoprecipitation assay) lysis buffer system (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). Protein lysates were analyzed by SDS/PAGE followed by transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. T-bet and GAPDH-specific proteins were analyzed by western blotting with specific antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).

Statistical analysis

Means and standard deviations summarized frequencies of cytokine-producing PBMC for PM size, PM dose, PM season, infections (M.tb), stimulant (PPD) and IGRA status. To examine the effects of PM size fractions, PM doses, PM seasons, and stimulants on frequencies of cytokine-producing PBMC, we used mixed linear regression models. Random intercepts for subjects accounted for correlation between measurements of samples from the same individuals. We considered each factor (PM size, dose, season, and stimulant) separately, and stratified by levels of all other factors. In addition, analyses were conducted for the combined group of individuals as well as stratified by IGRA status (positive +/negative-). F-tests were used to assess significance overall, while t-tests were used to examine pairwise differences. Additional tests examined whether IGRA status modified the effect of each factor through adding the cross product between the indicators for IGRA status and the factor in addition to main effects to the regression model and conducting an F-test of the interaction term. Sensitivity analyses using log-transformed counts rather than the raw counts as the response, given the somewhat skewed nature of some of the counts, yielded similar results.

Statistical comparisons of season and size differences in inorganic and organic components found in samples collected over a 12-month period representing three seasons were performed as follows. Mixed linear models controlling the Family-wise error rate at 0.05 was used to identify components that showed predictable variation. In particular, differences between component concentrations in (1) particle size fractions (PM2.5 vs. PM10) controlling for month and particle size, (2) rainy vs. cold-dry vs. warm-dry within PM2.5 and PM10 samples and (3) autoclaved versus non-autoclaved controlling for month (data not shown), were examined. In the first set of analyses, month and size were controlled as random effects. In the third case, only months in which the samples were both autoclaved and not autoclaved were included. For each set of analyses, p-values were calculated for each component and examined via QQ-plots. Benjamini-Hochberg’s procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons.

Results

Characterization of PM2.5 and PM10 samples from different seasons

To examine whether PM of different size and seasons vary in composition, we analyzed the main chemical components of the seasonal PM2.5 and PM10. The concentrations (ng/mg) of inorganic and organic components showing significant differences between PM2.5 and PM10 are presented in (S1 Table). Higher concentrations of organic compounds were observed in PM2.5 compared to PM10. Higher Ca concentrations were observed in PM10 than in PM2.5 samples, while V, Zn, Pb contents were higher in PM2.5 than PM10 samples. Anthropogenic emission products thus seem to be higher in concentration in PM2.5, while elements from the soil are present in higher concentrations in PM10.

Only a few statistically significant differences in the concentrations of the chemical components of PM2.5 and PM10 were noted comparing the PM from the three seasons. CD10 showed higher levels of ba-hopane (C30ba-hopane), benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[j+k]fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)fluoranthene, and benzo[a]pyrene contents than R10 or WD10 (S2 Table). R2.5 showed higher ba-hopane (C30ba -hopane) content than CD2.5 or WD2.5; and CD2.5 showed higher benzo[e]pyrene content compared to R2.5 or WD2.5 (S3 Table). Endotoxin contents in monthly PM samples were very low (S4 Table).

Cytotoxicity of PM2.5 and PM10 from different seasons

To assess the effect of exposure to PM from different seasons and each size fraction on the cell viability, PBMC were exposed to 0, 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10 or WD10 for 20 h followed by infection with M.tb MOI1 or left uninfected for an additional 20h, and LDH leakage, as a measure of cytotoxicity, assessed. No significant increases in LDH leakage were observed in PBMC from either IGRA- (Fig 1A) or IGRA+ (Fig 1C) subjects after exposure to R2.5, CD2.5 or WD2.5. Similarly, exposure to R10, CD10 or WD10 did not significantly increase LDH leakage in PBMC from IGRA-subjects (Fig 1B). LDH leakage was, however, increased significantly in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects exposed to 10 μg/ml of CD10 or WD10 but not R10 (Fig 1D).

Fig 1. PM-induced cytotoxicity.

Fig 1

PBMC from IGRA- (n = 6) and IGRA+ (n = 6) subjects were exposed in cell culture to 0 (no PM), 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, WD10 at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 20 h. Following exposure to PM, PBMC were infected with M.tb at MOI1 (E, F, G, H) or left uninfected (A, B, C, D) and incubated for an additional 20 h. Culture supernatants were analyzed by LDH assay as described in Materials and Methods. Cytotoxicity is expressed as % LDH leakage (OD of treated—media background / O.D. of control—media background) x100. Results are shown as means ± SEM and statistical significances between doses (p ≤0.5) relative to unexposed PBMC (no PM) in A-D and M.tb-infected PBMC in E-H are shown with solid lines. Statistically significant differences between seasons are shown with dotted lines.

Pre-exposure to R2.5 (Fig 1E) and CD10 and WD10 (Fig 1F) caused more cytotoxicity in M.tb-infected PBMC from IGRA- subjects than in M.tb-infected, but PM-unexposed PBMC. In IGRA+ subjects, pre-exposure to 10 μg/ml WD2.5 (Fig 1G) as well as R10, CD10 and WD10 (Fig 1H) followed by M.tb infection resulted in statistically significant increases in cytotoxicity relative to M.tb-infected but PM-unexposed PBMC. The reasons for the decreases in LDH levels relative to unexposed control PBMC, noted in certain conditions, are not clear.

Seasonal and size variations in PM-induced cytotoxicity were observed. CD10 (10 μg/ml) and WD10 (1 and 10 μg/ml) were significantly more cytotoxic than R10 (Fig 1B, 1D, 1F and 1H), irrespective of the IGRA status of the study subjects. CD10 and WD10 (Fig 1B, 1D, 1F and 1H) induced more cytotoxicity than CD2.5 and WD2.5 (Fig 1E and 1G), suggesting a possible PM size-dependent difference in cytotoxicity, particularly at the higher exposure concentration (Table 1).

Table 1. Effect of PM size on viability of PM-exposed M.tb-infected PBMC.

R10 vs. R2.5 CD10 vs. CD2.5 WD10 vs. WD2.5
0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml 0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml 0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml
IGRA- n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s CD10>CD2.5, p = 0.036 n.s n.s WD10>WD2.5
p = 0.038
IGRA+ n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s CD10>CD2.5 p = 0.004 n.s n.s WD10>WD2.5
p = 0.042

n.s. not statistically significant

In summary, these data provide evidence that urban PM-induced cytotoxicity predominantly relates to PM dose, size and season, suggesting that the composition of PM10 from CD and WD seasons may be responsible for the differences noted in comparison with PM10 from R season.

Effect of PM exposure on M.tb phagocytosis in MDM

To assess the effect of PM exposure on M.tb phagocytosis, MDM were exposed to 0, 1 or 5 μg/ml of PM2.5 and PM10 from the three seasons. PM pre-exposed MDM were then infected with M.tb at MOI1. M.tb phagocytosis was significantly reduced in MDM following pre-exposure to 1 and 5 μg/ml of R2.5 and CD2.5 (but not WD2.5) compared to unexposed MDM. Pre-exposure to R10 (5 μg/ml), CD10 (1, 5 μg/ml) and WD10 (1 μg/ml) followed by M.tb infection significantly reduced phagocytosis of M.tb compared to unexposed (No PM) M.tb-infected MDM (Fig 2). The effect of PM collection season on M.tb phagocytosis was greater than that of PM size.

Fig 2. PM effects on M.tb phagocytosis.

Fig 2

MDM were exposed to 1 and 5 μg/ml of R2.5 (n = 10, 1 μg/ml; n = 8, 5 μg/ml), CD2.5 (n = 9), WD2.5 (n = 9), R10 (n = 9, 1 μg/ml; n = 7, 5 μg/ml), CD10 (n = 9), and WD10 (n = 9) or left unexposed (n = 11) at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 18 h. Following exposure to PM, MDM were infected with M.tb at MOI1 for 2 h. Phagocytosis of M.tb by MDM was assessed by identification of acid-fast bacilli (Materials and methods). Proportions of MDM with intracellular M.tb were determined by bright field microscopy (1000x, oil immersion) within a total of 300 MDM in each experimental condition. Data are presented as medians, interquartile ranges (IQR) and 5th and 95th percentiles. Statistical comparisons were done by non-parametric Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test. Statistically significant changes relative to M.tb-infected (no PM control) PBMC within each dose are shown with * (p ≤0.05) or ** (p ≤0.001).

PM-induced IFN-γ and IL-1β production

IFN-γ and IL-1β are critical components of the protective human host immune response to M.tb and predominantly produced by T-cells and monocytes, respectively. To explore whether exposure to PM of different sizes and seasons induces proinflammatory responses in PBMC, frequencies of IFN-γ and IL-1β-producing PBMC were examined by ELISPOT assays (Fig 3) following PM exposure. PBMC from IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects were exposed to 0, 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10 or WD10.

Fig 3. PM-induced IFN-γ and IL-1β production.

Fig 3

PBMC from IGRA- (n = 8 for IFN-γ and n = 7 for IL-1β) or IGRA+ (n = 7) subjects were exposed to 0 (unexposed control), 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, or WD10 or left unexposed at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 40 h. Frequencies of IFN-γ and IL-1β-producing PBMC were examined by ELISPOT assays (see Materials and Methods). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) between doses relative to unexposed control PBMC are shown with solid lines. Statistically significant differences between seasons are shown with dotted lines.

Frequencies of IFN-γ-producing cells increased significantly, irrespective of PM size and PM season, at 10 μg/ml concentrations in PBMC from both IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects, with the exception of WD2.5 exposure in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects (Fig 3A–3D). The higher frequencies of IFN-γ-producing PBMC upon exposure to R10 10 μg/ml in both IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects compared to the frequencies induced by CD10 or WD10 (Fig 3B–3D) may be attributable to the lower cytotoxicity noted with R10 compared to that of CD10 or WD10 (at 10 μg/ml) (Fig 1B–1D).

Frequencies of IL-1β-producing PBMC increased significantly upon exposures to R2.5, CD2.5 and R10, particularly at 10 μg/ml, in PBMC from both IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects (Fig 3E–3G). Intriguingly, higher frequencies of IL-β-producing PBMC were observed in IGRA+ than in IGRA- subjects (compare Fig 3E and 3F with 3G and 3H).

Unlike the observed dose-dependent increase in the frequencies of IFN-γ-producing PBMC upon exposure to CD10 or WD10 (Fig 3B–3D), no such significant increases were observed assessing the frequencies of IL-1β-producing PBMC (Fig 3F–3H). As IFN-γ and IL-1β are predominantly products of T-cells and monocytes, respectively, these results suggest that exposures to PM from different seasons impact PBMC subpopulations differentially.

PM effects on M.tb and PPD-induced IFN-γ and IL-1β production

We further investigated whether PM pre-exposure modifies host immune responses to M.tb and PPD. PPD is a gemisch of culture filtrate-derived M.tb proteins used in tuberculin skin testing. PBMC were exposed to R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10 or WD10 followed by infection with M.tb MOI1 or stimulation with PPD.

In IGRA- PBMC, M.tb-induced IFN-γ spot frequencies were reduced upon exposure to R2.5, CD10 and WD10 at the 10 μg/ml dose only (Fig 4A and 4B). In IGRA+ subjects, however, frequencies of M.tb-induced IFN-γ-producing PBMC were suppressed in PBMC pre-exposed to 10 μg/ml PM2.5 and PM10 from all seasons (Fig 4C and 4D). The robust suppression of the frequencies of M.tb-induced IFN-γ-producing PBMC (>85%) relative to unexposed M.tb-infected PBMC observed upon pre-exposure to CD10 and WD10 (10 μg/ml, Fig 4D), may in part be due to PM-induced loss of cell viability (Fig 1D). Similarly, strong suppression of the frequencies of PPD-induced IFN-γ-producing cells was observed in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects when exposed to PM2.5 or PM10 from all seasons (Fig 4G and 4H). On the contrary, suppression of PPD-induced IFN-γ production in PBMC from IGRA- subjects was observed only upon pre-exposure to CD2.5, CD10 and WD10 (Fig 4E and 4F). As expected, the frequencies of M.tb- and PPD-induced IFN-γ producing PBMC were higher in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects (Fig 4C, 4D, 4G and 4H) than IGRA- subjects (Fig 4A, 4B, 4E and 4F) due to the higher frequency of M.tb-specific memory T cells, the primary producers of IFN-γ, in PBMC from IGRA+ subjects.

Fig 4. Effect of PM on M.tb and PPD-induced IFN-γ production.

Fig 4

PBMC from IGRA- (n = 8 for M.tb and n = 6 for PPD) or IGRA+ (n = 7 for M.tb, n = 7 for PPD) subjects were exposed to 0 (no PM), 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, or WD10 at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 20 h. Following exposure to PM, PBMC were infected with M.tb at MOI1 (A, B, C, D) or stimulated with PPD (E, F, G, H) and incubated for an additional 20 h. Frequencies of IFN-γ-producing PBMC were examined by ELISPOT assays. Results are shown as means ± SEM. Statistical significance (p≤0.05) relative to unexposed control PBMC is shown with solid lines. Statistically significant differences between seasons are shown with dotted lines.

PM season-specific effects on frequencies of IFN-γ-producing cells were observed in M.tb-infected PBMC following pre-exposure to CD10 compared to R10 at 1 and 10 μg/ml in IGRA+ subjects (Fig 4D) and WD10 compared to R10 at 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml in both IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects (Fig 4B–4D). Furthermore, PM size-specific effects on frequencies of IFN-γ-producing cells were observed in M.tb-infected PBMC comparing PM10 and PM2.5 from the R and CD seasons at 10 μg/ml and the WD season at 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml, irrespective of the IGRA status (Table 2). Although the differences between PM exposures from different seasons were small, nevertheless they were statistically significant in PBMC pre-exposed to high concentrations of PM followed by M.tb infection.

Table 2. Suppressive effect of PM size on M.tb-induced IFN-γ production.

R10 vs R2.5 CD10 vs CD2.5 WD10 vs WD2.5
0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml 0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml 0.1 μg/ml 1 μg/ml 10 μg/ml
IGRA- n.s n.s R10>R2.5,
p = 0.004
n.s n.s CD10>CD2.5, p = 0.021 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.029 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.055 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.030
IGRA+ n.s n.s R10>R2.5, p = 0.048 n.s n.s CD10>CD2.5, p = 0.0028 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.028 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.031 WD10>WD2.5, p = 0.012

n.s. not statistically significant

In contrast to the higher frequencies of M.tb-induced IFN-γ-producing PBMC in IGRA- subjects, no differences in frequencies of IL-1β-producing PBMC were observed between IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects (Fig 5A–5D). Pre-exposure to CD10 and WD10 suppressed the frequencies of IL-1β-producing cells at 10 μg/ml concentrations irrespective of the IGRA status of the study subjects (Fig 5B–5D). Unlike our findings with IFN-γ production, which showed that PM10 within each season was more suppressive than PM2.5 (Table 2), no statistically significant effects of PM size were observed in any of the three seasons on frequencies of M.tb-induced IL-1β-producing PBMC.

Fig 5. Effect of PM on M.tb-induced IL-1β production.

Fig 5

PBMC from IGRA- (n = 7) or IGRA+ (n = 7) subjects were exposed to 0 (no PM), 0.1, 1 and 10 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, or WD10 at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 20 h. Following Exposure to PM, PBMC were infected with M.tb at MOI1 or left uninfected (A, B, C, and D) and incubated for additional 20 h. Frequencies of IL-1β-producing PBMC were examined by ELISPOT assays (see Materials and Methods). Results are shown as means ± SEM. Statistically significant (p≤0.05) dose-dependent changes relative to unexposed control PBMC is shown with solid lines. Statistically significant differences between seasons are shown with dotted lines.

PM size and season effects on M.tb growth control

To examine whether the observed PM-mediated suppression of M.tb-induced IFN-γ and IL-β-production by PBMC is associated with alterations in the control of M.tb growth in PBMC, we exposed PBMC from IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects to PM2.5 and PM10 (0, 1 and 5 μg/ml) from the three seasons followed by infection with M.tb at MOI 1. Pre-exposure of PBMC to PM10 (1 and 5 μg/ml) suppressed the control of M.tb growth (i.e. increased cfu numbers) by PBMC from both IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects to a greater extent than pre-exposure to PM2.5 on days 0, 1 and 4 (Table 3). Results from day 4 are shown in Fig 6. On day 4, pre-exposure to WD10 at 5 μg/ml resulted in a greater suppression of M.tb growth control than WD2.5 at 5 μg/ml in both IGRA- and IGRA+ PBMC (Table 3, Fig 6). On day 1, pre-exposure to R10 induced greater suppression of M.tb growth control than R2.5 in both IGRA- and IGRA+ PBMC (Table 3). Season-specific differences between WD10 and R10 were observed in IGRA- subjects (Fig 6). M.tb growth control on day 7 could not be interpreted because no viable PBMC were left due to cell death from PM-induced cytotoxicity (data not shown). Statistical significances (p-values) of PM size-specific differences between WD10 and WD2.5 and R10 and R2.5 are shown in Table 3. For easier understanding, comparisons of cytotoxicity and host responses upon seasonal PM exposure followed by M.tb infection or PPD stimulation are shown in Table 4.

Table 3. PM size effect on M.tb growth control.

IGRA Status Dose [μg/ml] Day PM10 vs PM2.5 p-value
- 5 4 WD10˃WD2.5 0.032
+ 5 4 WD10˃WD2.5 0.02
- 1 0 R10>R2.5 0.0095
+ 1 0 R10 vs R2.5 (n.s.) 0.51
- 1 1 R10>R2.5 0.0029
+ 1 1 R10>R2.5 0.016
- 5 1 R10>R2.5 0.026
+ 5 1 R10 vs R2.5 (n.s.) 0.32

n.s. not statistically significant

Fig 6. Effect of PM size and seasonal source on M.tb growth control.

Fig 6

PBMC from IGRA- (n = 7) or IGRA+ (n = 5) subjects were exposed to 0 (no PM), 1 and 5 μg/ml of R2.5, CD2.5, WD2.5, R10, CD10, or WD10 at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in a humidified environment for 20 h. Following pre-exposure to PM, PBMC were infected with M.tb at MOI1 or left uninfected. After 2 h infection, non-phagocytosed M.tb was removed by washing and plates subsequently incubated in complete culture media. PBMC were lysed and serial dilutions of cell lysates plated in M.tb growth media in triplicate on 7H10 agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 21 days until M.tb colony forming units (cfu) were determined. Results from day 4 are shown. Statistically significant (p≤0.05) differences relative to PM-unexposed M.tb-infected control PBMC are shown with solid lines. Size and season-specific differences are shown with dotted lines.

Table 4. PM-induced cytotoxicity and M.tb-induced host immune responses in seasonal PM-pre-exposed PBMC.

Increased Host Response R2.5 CD2.5 WD2.5 R10 CD10 WD10
PM-induced Cytotoxicity
(LDH, Fig 1A–1D)
n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. + +
Phagocytosis
(% M.tb uptake, Fig 2)
- - n.s. - - -
PM-induced IFN-γ
(spot frequency (Fig 3A–3D)
+ + + + + +
PM-induced IL-1β
(spot frequency (Fig 3E–3H)
+ + n.s. + n.s. n.s.
PM + M.tb-induced IFN-γ in IGRA-/IGRA+ subjects
(spot frequency, Fig 4A–4D)
-/- n.s./- n.s./- n.s./- -/- -/-
PM + PPD-induced IFN-γ in IGRA-/IGRA+ subjects
(spot frequency, Fig 4E–4H)
n.s./- n.s./- n.s./- n.s./- - -
PM + M.tb-induced IL-1β in IGRA-/IGRA+ subjects
(spot frequency, Fig 6A–6D)
n.s./- n.s./n.s. +/- n.s./n.s. -/- -/-
Loss of M.tb growth control
(CFU on day 4, 5μg/ml, Fig 7)
n.s./+ +/+ n.s./+ n.s./+ +/+ +/+

n.s. indicates no statistical significance relative to control unexposed PBMC; + or–indicates statistically significant increase (+) or decrease (-) relative to control PBMC; / indicates comparison between IGRA- and IGRA+ subjects.

PM exposure and its effect on M.tb-induced signaling pathways

Finally, we examined whether the observed PM-mediated suppression of M.tb-induced IFN-γ expression could result from a PM-mediated modulation of T-bet, a T-box transcription factor involved in the regulation of IFN-γ production by T cells. Pre-exposures to R2.5, CD2.5, and WD2.5 did not cause cytotoxicity to PBMC (Fig 1A–1C) even at the highest concentrations despite of the capacity of the PM to suppress M.tb-induced IFN-γ-production by PBMC relative to unexposed M.tb-infected PBMC (Fig 4A–4C). In contrast to PM2.5, pre-exposure to PM10 caused cytotoxicity at the 10 μg/ml concentration.

It was therefore decided to use PM2.5 only for the following experiments. PBMC were exposed to PM2.5 for 24 h and infected with M.tb at MOI1 and 5, or left uninfected. As in our earlier study [21], for this set of experiments, annual bulk PM2.5 was used and M.tb infections were performed at MOI 1 and 5. T-bet and GAPDH expression from a representative experiment is shown in Fig 7A. As evidenced from the normalized data, T-bet expression increased in PM2.5-exposed PBMC as well as upon M.tb infection at MOI1 and MOI5. Interestingly, in contrast, M.tb-induced T-bet levels were reduced in PM2.5 pre-exposed and M.tb (MOI5)-infected PBMC compared to M.tb (MOI5)-infected PBMC (Fig 7B). These findings suggest that PM2.5-mediated reduction in T-bet expression contributes to the reduction of M.tb-induced IFN-γ expression in PM-pre-exposed PBMC.

Fig 7. Effect of PM on T-bet expression in PBMC.

Fig 7

PBMC (n = 3) were pre-exposed to 0, 1 and 10 μl/ml PM2.5 for 24 h followed by infection with M.tb at MOI1 and 5 or left uninfected for 24h. Protein lysates (see Materials and Methods) were analyzed with SDS/PAGE followed by western blotting with T-bet and GAPDH antibodies. (A) T-Bet and GAPDH expression in one representative of three independent experiments from three subjects (S1 Fig); (B) T-Bet and GAPDH specific bands were quantitated by ImageJ and the ratio of percentage of T-bet and GAPDH (normalized) for each condition were plotted as a function of PM concentration (Mean ± SEM from three independent experiments involving three different subjects). Statistical significances (p≤0.05) of PM-exposed relative to unexposed PBMC that were uninfected or infected with M.tb were analyzed by student t test (2-tailed pairwise comparison) and p-value is shown.

Discussion

M.tb infection is endemic in many, primarily, low-income countries of the world where air pollution is on the rise due to growing urbanization. Seasonal variations of TB incidence rates with highest rates being in springs and summers have been observed in some studies globally [35, 4446]. Alterations in human immune responses, co-infections with seasonal respiratory viruses, increased indoor exposures during winter months and seasonal differences in humidity or temperature [44] have been attributed to TB seasonality. However, the roles of urban air pollution exposures and seasonal variations in PM composition in determining seasonality of TB are inconclusive. To address these knowledge gaps, effects of exposures to urban PM2.5 and PM10 from different seasons on M.tb-induced inflammatory responses, M.tb phagocytosis and M.tb growth control in PBMC were examined in the current study.

PM exposure of PBMC prior to M.tb infection suppressed M.tb phagocytosis. This may be explained by a competitive engagement of PM with cellular M.tb uptake mechanisms, for example via scavenger receptors and/or TLR interactions [47]. Seasonal differences in proportions of organic components in PM may modify such mechanisms.

To examine whether PM may alter critical M.tb-specific protective human host immune responses, we focused on the M.tb-induced IL-1β and IFN-γ production by PBMC. IL-1β production by monocytes/macrophages is pivotal for intracellular M.tb growth control in macrophages [48]. IFN-γ activates macrophages to confer immunity to M.tb and is released primarily from CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, which upon stimulation can expand in the respiratory tract or extravasate from the systemic circulation into the lung compartment. Urban air pollution PM impaired IFN-γ responses following M.tb infection (Fig 4A–4D) or stimulation with PPD (Fig 4E–4H), reminiscent of our earlier studies with diesel exhaust particles [19].

Inclusion of IGRA+ and IGRA-subjects in the current study, allowed us to examine PM effects on M.tb-induced PBMC responses in the context of immunological memory to prior M.tb infection. As expected, frequencies of M.tb-antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing PBMC were higher in IGRA+ than IGRA- subjects (Fig 4C, 4D, 4G and 4H). In contrast, to M.tb-induced IFN-γ, the M.tb-induced IL-1β production was independent of the IGRA status of the study subjects as IL-1β is a product of innate immune cells and T cell memory-independent.

Seasonal changes in anthropogenic and soil elements in dry and wet seasons in Mexico City have been reported [39]. Further, seasonal variation of PAH content in PM10 in Mexico City has been shown to correlate with differences in toxicity [49]. In the current study, CD10 and WD10-mediated suppression of frequencies of M.tb-induced IFN-γ and IL-1β-producing PBMC (Figs 5B, 5D, 6B and 6D) may in part be due to the cytotoxic effects of the PM at 10 μg/ml concentration. CD10 or WD10, induced more cytotoxicity in PBMC than the other four PM samples (Fig 1B and 1D). R10 had a significantly higher capacity to stimulate the production of IFN-γ than CD10 or WD10 (Fig 3B–3D). Taken together, seasonal changes in the chemical composition of PM from rainy and dry seasons may account for observed differences in biological responses.

To examine whether the modulation of the cytokine profiles of PBMC following PM pre-exposure affects the growth control of M.tb by PBMC, we compared exposure effects of seasonal PM in PBMC from IGRA+ and IGRA- subjects. Both PM2.5 and PM10 induced loss of M.tb growth control in IGRA+ subjects, whereas only PM10 induced loss of M.tb growth control on IGRA- subjects (Fig 6). Further, PBMC pre-exposure to WD10 (Table 2) induced a significantly greater loss of M.tb growth control than WD2.5 (Fig 6), which is consistent with the greater IFN-γ suppression effect noted upon WD10 exposure (Table 2).Significant differences in the chemical composition (S1 Table) of PM2.5 and PM10, may be important drivers of the inhibitory effects on M.tb growth control (Fig 6).

To gain insights into the mechanisms underlying the observed PM-mediated suppression of the frequencies of IFN-γ-producing PBMC, we examined if PM2.5 affects the expression of T-bet, a transcription factor known to regulate IFN-γ expression in T cells. Interestingly, PM2.5 exposure prior to M.tb infection led to a reduction of T-bet expression, particularly in M.tb MOI5-infected PBMC (Fig 7), thus potentially contributing to the suppression of IFN-γ-production by PBMC.

The analysis of PM composition showed significant differences in organic and inorganic components between PM2.5 and PM10 (S1 Table). Differences in the chemical composition in PM2.5 and PM10 between the seasons were less evident (S2 and S3 Tables). The different functional responses observed here cannot be linked with certainty to differences in specific chemical components of the PM alone, as interactions among chemical components of the PM may be additional confounders [27].

Overall, the current study shows that differences in the biological responses of PBMC to PM in some instances were related to the presence of PM only, and in others to PM size or season or a combination of all. Future studies may have to specifically focus on the biological effects of chemical components of air pollution PM10 and PM2.5 and their emission sources as such studies may help identify specific high impact targets for regulatory interventions to protect public health.

The findings from this study suggest that complex interactions between cell surface receptors and PM and its chemical components underlie air pollution exposure effects on M.tb host immune responses. In addition, the effects of real-world air pollution exposures and their biological consequences are likely far more complex than what can be modelled in experiments, such as those chosen in the current study. Air pollution effects are mediated by complex mixtures of gases and volatile compounds in addition to PM, and immune cell exposures in the respiratory spaces occur in the context of interactions with respiratory epithelial cells and a multitude of bioactive proteins including surfactants found at the air-fluid-cell interface. However, despite these limitations, our study demonstrates that concentration and size of PM and seasonal differences in PM composition differentially impair M.tb-induced cytokine production and M.tb growth control and thus modify crucial components of human antimycobacterial host immune responses. These findings may have public health implications that go beyond the risk of increased rates of TB development in air polluted environments. Given the observed alterations of M.tb and PPD-induced cytokine responses following PM exposures, one may speculate that the performance of M.tb antigen-based immunodiagnostic (IGRA assays) and immune responses to novel anti-tuberculous vaccines may be modified in air-polluted environments.

In summary, the findings from this study provide biological plausibility supporting the growing epidemiological evidence that exposure to urban air pollution PM influences the outcome (e.g., seasonality) of M.tb infections and TB treatment. Air quality, PM content and PM composition in different seasons likely modify the natural course of M.tb infection (incidence rates, disease outcomes) differentially in different areas of the world.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Mean concentrations (ng/mg) of chemical components that are significantly different between PM10 and PM2.5.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differences in chemical component concentrations (ng/ml) in seasonal PM10.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Differences in chemical component concentrations (ng/ml) in seasonal PM2.5.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Endotoxin levels in monthly PM samples used for the study.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. T-bet and GAPDH expression in three subjects.

(PPTX)

S1 Data. Raw data for Fig 1.

(XLS)

S2 Data. Raw data for Fig 2.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. Raw data for Fig 3.

(XLS)

S4 Data. Raw data for Fig 4.

(XLS)

S5 Data. Raw data for Fig 5.

(XLS)

S6 Data. Raw data for Fig 6.

(XLSX)

S7 Data. Raw data for Fig 7.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to and thank all the study subjects for their participation in this study. We are grateful for the support from Kathleen Black PhD, from Rutgers Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute (EOHSI), who facilitated this work with her diligence and efforts in recruiting study participants and assuring compliance with the IRB at all stages.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by: S.S. (last), Grant R01ES020382, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, https://www.niehs.nih.gov/; S.S. (last), Grant P30 ES005022, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, https://www.niehs.nih.gov/; O.A.I., Grant 3R01ES020382-05S1, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, https://www.niehs.nih.gov/; O.A.I., EPA Star Award FP-91782501-0, United States Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/research-fellowships.

References

  • 1.Organization WH. Global tuberculosis report 2016. 2016.
  • 2.Organization WH. Fact Sheet; Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health.
  • 3.Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Dye C, Raviglione M. Drivers of tuberculosis epidemics: the role of risk factors and social determinants. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(12):2240–6. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.den Boon S, Verver S, Marais BJ, Enarson DA, Lombard CJ, Bateman ED, et al. Association between passive smoking and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):734–9. 10.1542/peds.2006-1796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.du Preez K, Mandalakas AM, Kirchner HL, Grewal HM, Schaaf HS, van Wyk SS, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure increases Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection risk in children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(11):1490–6. 10.5588/ijtld.10.0759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lindsay RP, Shin SS, Garfein RS, Rusch ML, Novotny TE. The Association between active and passive smoking and latent tuberculosis infection in adults and children in the united states: results from NHANES. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93137 10.1371/journal.pone.0093137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alcaide J, Altet MN, Plans P, Parron I, Folguera L, Salto E, et al. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for tuberculosis in young adults: a case-control study. Tuber Lung Dis. 1996;77(2):112–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Altet-Gomez MN, Alcaide J, Godoy P, Romero MA, Hernandez del Rey I. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of smoking and tuberculosis: a study of 13,038 cases. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(4):430–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garcia-Sancho MC, Garcia-Garcia L, Baez-Saldana R, Ponce-De-Leon A, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Bobadilla-Del-valle M, et al. Indoor pollution as an occupational risk factor for tuberculosis among women: a population-based, gender oriented, case-control study in Southern Mexico. Rev Invest Clin. 2009;61(5):392–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kolappan C, Subramani R. Association between biomass fuel and pulmonary tuberculosis: a nested case-control study. Thorax. 2009;64(8):705–8. 10.1136/thx.2008.109405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haque MA, Barman N, Islam MT, Mannan M, Khan MH, Karim MR, et al. Biomass Fuel Smoke and Tuberculosis: A Case-Control Study. Mymensingh Med J. 2016;25(1):31–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lakshmi PV, Virdi NK, Thakur JS, Smith KR, Bates MN, Kumar R. Biomass fuel and risk of tuberculosis: a case-control study from Northern India. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(5):457–61. Epub 2010/12/02. 10.1136/jech.2010.115840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mishra VK, Retherford RD, Smith KR. Cooking with biomass fuels increases the risk of tuberculosis. Natl Fam Health Surv Bull. 1999;(13):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin HH, Ezzati M, Murray M. Tobacco smoke, indoor air pollution and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2007;4(1):e20 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blount RJ, Pascopella L, Catanzaro DG, Barry PM, English PB, Segal MR, et al. Traffic-Related Air Pollution and All-Cause Mortality during Tuberculosis Treatment in California. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(9):097026 10.1289/EHP1699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lai TC, Chiang CY, Wu CF, Yang SL, Liu DP, Chan CC, et al. Ambient air pollution and risk of tuberculosis: a cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(1):56–61. 10.1136/oemed-2015-102995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jassal MS, Bakman I, Jones B. Correlation of ambient pollution levels and heavily-trafficked roadway proximity on the prevalence of smear-positive tuberculosis. Public Health. 2013;127(3):268–74. 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith GS, Schoenbach VJ, Richardson DB, Gammon MD. Particulate air pollution and susceptibility to the development of pulmonary tuberculosis disease in North Carolina: an ecological study. Int J Environ Health Res. 2014;24(2):103–12. 10.1080/09603123.2013.800959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sarkar S, Song Y, Sarkar S, Kipen HM, Laumbach RJ, Zhang J, et al. Suppression of the NF-kappaB pathway by diesel exhaust particles impairs human antimycobacterial immunity. J Immunol. 2012;188(6):2778–93. 10.4049/jimmunol.1101380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rivas-Santiago CE, Sarkar S, Cantarella Pt, Osornio-Vargas A, Quintana-Belmares R, Meng Q, et al. Air pollution particulate matter alters antimycobacterial respiratory epithelium innate immunity. Infect Immun. 2015;83(6):2507–17. 10.1128/IAI.03018-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Torres M, Carranza C, Sarkar S, Gonzalez Y, Osornio Vargas A, Black K, et al. Urban Airborne Particle Exposure Impairs Human Lung and Blood Mycobacterium tuberculosis Immunity Thorax. (In Press). 10.1139/apnm-2016-0271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feng S, Gao D, Liao F, Zhou F, Wang X. The health effects of ambient PM2.5 and potential mechanisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;128:67–74. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu D, Huang N, Wang Q, Liu H. [Study of ambient PM2.5 on the influence of the inflammation injury and the immune function of subchronic exposure rats]. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008;37(4):423–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang KL, Liu SY, Chou CC, Lee YH, Cheng TJ. The effect of size-segregated ambient particulate matter on Th1/Th2-like immune responses in mice. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0173158 10.1371/journal.pone.0173158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Farraj AK, Walsh L, Haykal-Coates N, Malik F, McGee J, Winsett D, et al. Cardiac effects of seasonal ambient particulate matter and ozone co-exposure in rats. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2015;12:12 10.1186/s12989-015-0087-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mauderly JL, Samet JM. Is there evidence for synergy among air pollutants in causing health effects? Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(1):1–6. 10.1289/ehp.11654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen R, Peng RD, Meng X, Zhou Z, Chen B, Kan H. Seasonal variation in the acute effect of particulate air pollution on mortality in the China Air Pollution and Health Effects Study (CAPES). Sci Total Environ. 2013;450–451:259–65. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qian Z, Lin HM, Stewart WF, Kong L, Xu F, Zhou D, et al. Seasonal pattern of the acute mortality effects of air pollution. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010;60(4):481–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mirowsky J, Hickey C, Horton L, Blaustein M, Galdanes K, Peltier RE, et al. The effect of particle size, location and season on the toxicity of urban and rural particulate matter. Inhal Toxicol. 2013;25(13):747–57. 10.3109/08958378.2013.846443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kurai J, Watanabe M, Sano H, Hantan D, Shimizu E. The Effect of Seasonal Variations in Airborne Particulate Matter on Asthma-Related Airway Inflammation in Mice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hetland RB, Cassee FR, Lag M, Refsnes M, Dybing E, Schwarze PE. Cytokine release from alveolar macrophages exposed to ambient particulate matter: heterogeneity in relation to size, city and season. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2005;2:4 10.1186/1743-8977-2-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jalava PI, Hirvonen MR, Sillanpaa M, Pennanen AS, Happo MS, Hillamo R, et al. Associations of urban air particulate composition with inflammatory and cytotoxic responses in RAW 246.7 cell line. Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21(12):994–1006. 10.1080/08958370802695710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar RK, Shadie AM, Bucknall MP, Rutlidge H, Garthwaite L, Herbert C, et al. Differential injurious effects of ambient and traffic-derived particulate matter on airway epithelial cells. Respirology. 2015;20(1):73–9. 10.1111/resp.12381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Salonen RO, Halinen AI, Pennanen AS, Hirvonen MR, Sillanpaa M, Hillamo R, et al. Chemical and in vitro toxicologic characterization of wintertime and springtime urban-air particles with an aerodynamic diameter below 10 microm in Helsinki. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30 Suppl 2:80–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. The effect of fine and coarse particulate air pollution on mortality: a national analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(6):898–903. 10.1289/ehp.0800108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alfaro-Moreno E, Martinez L, Garcia-Cuellar C, Bonner JC, Murray JC, Rosas I, et al. Biologic effects induced in vitro by PM10 from three different zones of Mexico City. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(7):715–20. 10.1289/ehp.02110715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Secretaría del Medio Ambiente de la Ciudad de México. Calidad del aire en la Ciudad de México iM, D. F: Dirección General de Gestión de la Calidad del Aire. Dirección de Monitoreo Atmosférico.; 2016.
  • 38.Alfaro-Moreno E, Torres V, Miranda J, Martinez L, Garcia-Cuellar C, Nawrot TS, et al. Induction of IL-6 and inhibition of IL-8 secretion in the human airway cell line Calu-3 by urban particulate matter collected with a modified method of PM sampling. Environ Res. 2009;109(5):528–35. 10.1016/j.envres.2009.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Manzano-Leon N, Serrano-Lomelin J, Sanchez BN, Quintana-Belmares R, Vega E, Vazquez-Lopez I, et al. TNFalpha and IL-6 Responses to Particulate Matter in Vitro: Variation According to PM Size, Season, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and Soil Content. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(4):406–12. 10.1289/ehp.1409287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chow JCaW, J.G. Ion chromatography in elemental analysis. In. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles. S Landsberger and M Creatchman, Eds Gordon and Breach Science, Amsterdam,. 1999;1: 97–137.
  • 41.Chow J, Watson J. Enhanced Ion Chromatographic Speciation of Water-Soluble PM2.5 to Improve Aerosol Source Apportionment2017.
  • 42.Ho SS, Yu JZ, Chow JC, Zielinska B, Watson JG, Sit EH, et al. Evaluation of an in-injection port thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method for analysis of non-polar organic compounds in ambient aerosol samples. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1200(2):217–27. 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sarkar S, Leo BF, Carranza C, Chen S, Rivas-Santiago C, Porter AE, et al. Modulation of Human Macrophage Responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Silver Nanoparticles of Different Size and Surface Modification. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143077 10.1371/journal.pone.0143077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tedijanto C, Hermans S, Cobelens F, Wood R, Andrews JR. Drivers of Seasonal Variation in Tuberculosis Incidence: Insights from a Systematic Review and Mathematical Model. Epidemiology. 2018;29(6):857–66. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fares A. Seasonality of tuberculosis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3(1):46–55. 10.4103/0974-777X.77296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.You S, Tong YW, Neoh KG, Dai Y, Wang CH. On the association between outdoor PM2.5 concentration and the seasonality of tuberculosis for Beijing and Hong Kong. Environ Pollut. 2016;218:1170–9. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shoenfelt J, Mitkus RJ, Zeisler R, Spatz RO, Powell J, Fenton MJ, et al. Involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in inflammatory immune responses induced by fine and coarse ambient air particulate matter. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86(2):303–12. 10.1189/jlb.1008587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jayaraman P, Sada-Ovalle I, Nishimura T, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, Remold HG, et al. IL-1beta promotes antimicrobial immunity in macrophages by regulating TNFR signaling and caspase-3 activation. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):4196–204. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mugica V, Hernandez S, Torres M, Garcia R. Seasonal variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure levels in Mexico City. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010;60(5):548–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Mean concentrations (ng/mg) of chemical components that are significantly different between PM10 and PM2.5.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differences in chemical component concentrations (ng/ml) in seasonal PM10.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Differences in chemical component concentrations (ng/ml) in seasonal PM2.5.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Endotoxin levels in monthly PM samples used for the study.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. T-bet and GAPDH expression in three subjects.

(PPTX)

S1 Data. Raw data for Fig 1.

(XLS)

S2 Data. Raw data for Fig 2.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. Raw data for Fig 3.

(XLS)

S4 Data. Raw data for Fig 4.

(XLS)

S5 Data. Raw data for Fig 5.

(XLS)

S6 Data. Raw data for Fig 6.

(XLSX)

S7 Data. Raw data for Fig 7.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES