Skip to main content
JBMR Plus logoLink to JBMR Plus
. 2019 Jul 7;3(7):e10202. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10202

How To Build a Bone: PHOSPHO1, Biomineralization, and Beyond

Scott Dillon 1,, Katherine A Staines 2, José Luis Millán 3, Colin Farquharson 1
PMCID: PMC6659447  PMID: 31372594

ABSTRACT

Since its characterization two decades ago, the phosphatase PHOSPHO1 has been the subject of an increasing focus of research. This work has elucidated PHOSPHO1's central role in the biomineralization of bone and other hard tissues, but has also implicated the enzyme in other biological processes in health and disease. During mineralization PHOSPHO1 liberates inorganic phosphate (Pi) to be incorporated into the mineral phase through hydrolysis of its substrates phosphocholine (PCho) and phosphoethanolamine (PEA). Localization of PHOSPHO1 within matrix vesicles allows accumulation of Pi within a protected environment where mineral crystals may nucleate and subsequently invade the organic collagenous scaffold. Here, we examine the evidence for this process, first discussing the discovery and characterization of PHOSPHO1, before considering experimental evidence for its canonical role in matrix vesicle–mediated biomineralization. We also contemplate roles for PHOSPHO1 in disorders of dysregulated mineralization such as vascular calcification, along with emerging evidence of its activity in other systems including choline synthesis and homeostasis, and energy metabolism. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Keywords: PHOSPHO1, PHOSPHOCHOLINE, INORGANIC PHOSPHATE, BIOMINERALIZATION, MATRIX VESICLE

Introduction

Biomineralization of the skeleton is a fundamental process indispensable for health and wellbeing throughout life. The vertebrate skeleton is a complex organ that performs varied and diverse functions encompassing its action as a biomechanical and protective scaffold in conjunction with the musculature, its role in calcium and phosphate ion homeostasis, and recent evidence demonstrating its capacity as an endocrine organ involved with energy homeostasis.1 At the level of molecular constituents bone is composed of a combination of inorganic mineral, type I collagen, noncollagenous proteins (NCPs), and water, arranged into an extremely ordered hierarchical structure.2 The fine details of this architecture remain controversial at the nanostructural level,3 particularly with respect to differences between embryonic and mature tissue; however, the mineral phase has come to be regarded as a poorly‐crystalline substituted hydroxyapatite phase, mainly composed of calcium phosphate.

Biomineralization of the skeleton therefore requires generation and manipulation of calcium and phosphate ions on a massive scale. The biological mechanisms through which ions are liberated, contained, and targeted to the developing collagenous framework, and ultimately nucleate mineral in a controlled manner, remain the subject of intense research. Phosphatase enzymes are essential in promoting biomineralization as one pathway through which inorganic phosphate (Pi) may be liberated from biological molecules. These include enzymes with a canonical role in bone development such as tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP). Although TNAP activity has long been implicated in the mineralization process, it is now recognized that TNAP is only one component and the full story requires a more complex biochemical system.

Orphan phosphatase 1 (PHOSPHO1; EC 3.1.3.75; encoded by the Phospho1 gene in the mouse and the PHOSPHO1 gene in humans) has been an increasing focus of research in this field over the last 20 years and now holds an established function in biomineralization. Here we review the scientific literature on the characterization, localization, regulation, and activity of PHOSPHO1 with respect to its role in physiological and pathological biomineralization, along with potential contributions to other biological processes.

Characterization, Protein Structure, and Substrate Specificity

PHOSPHO1 (originally known as 3X11A) was initially cloned from chick hypertrophic growth plate chondrocytes, in which a fivefold increase in expression was observed in comparison to resting or proliferative chondrocytes.4 This distinct upregulation was also found be approximately 100‐fold higher than in non‐chondrogenic tissues. Although the specific function of this novel protein was at this stage unknown, sequencing of the 3X11A RNA transcript derived from differential display analysis revealed two partially conserved domains that bore sequence similarity to the phosphotransferase enzyme superfamily, including the ATPases and various phosphatases catalyzing Pi liberation from a range of phosphomonoester substrates.4 Primers designed against these motifs succeeded in transcribing a 537‐bp fragment from RNA isolated from the human osteosarcoma SaOS‐2 cell line, demonstrating 69% similarity to the chicken sequence.5 These fragments were identified as corresponding to several previously unattributed EST transcripts from both the human and mouse Phospho1 gene, with a high degree of conservation at both the gene and protein level between these two mammalian species. Chromosomal mapping led to the conclusion that the Phospho1 gene was indeed conserved between the bird and mouse genomes, located within a region of conserved synteny on the HSA17 and GGA27 chromosomes, respectively.5

Stewart and colleagues6 used homology modeling to identify three conserved peptide motifs composing the active site, certifying PHOSPHO1's membership of the Mg2+‐dependent haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily. These included two characteristic aspartic acid residues in motif 1 that coordinate the catalytic Mg2+ ion in this family, along with other markers such as the hydrophobic amino acid residues within motif 2. Along with identification of orthology between PHOSPHO1 in rat and the previously identified species, substantial homology between the amino acid sequences of PHOSPHO1 and proteins in the fruit fly was also found, along with several plant species including the LePS2 phosphatases in the tomato plant involved with phosphate homeostasis.7, 8, 9

A PHOSPHO1 model protein structure was developed, based upon the crystal structure of the phosphoserine phosphatases (PSPs).6, 10 This model revealed conservation of residues complexing the substrate phosphate group; however, those residues that confer substrate specificity to phosphoserine in the PSPs are absent. Roberts and colleagues11 purified recombinant human PHOSPHO1 by amplification of a curtailed cDNA transcript from the SaOS‐2 osteosarcoma cell line, and continuous spectrophotometric phosphate assays with several potential phosphomonoester substrates revealed PHOSPHO1's specific activity toward the metabolites phosphoethanolamine (PEA) and phosphocholine (PCho), with highest activity between pH 6.0 to 7.2. Disruption of the protein active site using site‐directed mutagenesis decreased PEA and PCho hydrolysis dramatically to an undetectable level in some mutants.12

Bone Biology and Mineralization

The ubiquitous phosphatase TNAP has a long‐established role during skeletal biomineralization. Mutations in the ALPL gene are associated with several skeletal disorders in humans including various forms of hypophosphatasia.13, 14, 15 Genetic ablation of TNAP in a mouse model induced a phenotype mimicking infantile hypophosphatasia with severe skeletal abnormalities,16, 17 including those in dental and craniofacial mineralization and morphology.18, 19 Detailed ultrastructural examination of these mice revealed that although hypomineralization of the skeleton was evident, hydroxyapatite mineral crystals were generated as normal.20 The hypomineralized phenotype was therefore attributed to the inability of the mineral phase to propagate in the absence of TNAP's hydrolysis of the potent mineralization inhibitor pyrophosphate (PPi).20, 21

These observations led to the hypothesis that another phosphatase was active during skeletal biomineralization with PHOSPHO1 a strong candidate to fulfill this role. Following the observation of PHOSPHO1 upregulation in mineralizing hypertrophic chondrocytes,4 immunohistochemistry revealed localization of the protein to these cells in the chick growth plate, along with active bone surfaces at the ossification front and in the trabecular compartment.22 Whole‐mount in situ hybridization in the embryonic chick lower limb furthermore demonstrated expression of PHOSPHO1 restricted to the developing bones during ossification.23 In vivo suppression of PHOSPHO1 activity using the noncompetitive inhibitor lansoprazole (identified specifically as an inhibitor of PHOSPHO124) during chick development induced ablation of mineralization in the lower limb bones.23 Together these data provided strong evidence that this novel phosphatase plays a critical role in the very first steps of skeletal biomineralization.

The generation of the PHOSPHO1 knockout mouse (Phospho1 –/–) enabled the detailed investigation of its phenotype and thereby allowed interrogation of the enzyme's specific function in the skeleton.25 Huesa and colleagues26 used a variety of compositional and biomechanical analyses to show that the mineral:matrix ratio of femora of juvenile Phospho1 –/– mice was significantly lower than wild‐type controls, accompanied by plastic deformation upon three‐point bending and a reduced hardness and elastic modulus. A further investigation of the mechanical properties of these bones corroborated this high fracture toughness and also showed significantly higher indentation distance increases under reference point indentation compared to wild‐type controls.27 Histological examination of Phospho1 –/– long bones revealed reduced mineralization in the trabecular compartment, whereas 10% to 15% of 10‐day‐old mice exhibited a complete lack of secondary ossification center development.25 These bones also demonstrated osteoid accumulation, a hallmark of hypophosphatasia (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, micro–computed tomography (µCT) revealed no differences between 4‐week‐old Phospho1 –/– and wild‐type mice in bone volume relative to tissue volume (BV/TV), but rather a significantly reduced bone mineral density (BMD) that was accompanied by diverse spontaneous greenstick fractures and marked thoracic scoliosis25 (Fig. 1B). Similarly, PHOSPHO1 plays a critical role in fracture healing, with induced tibial fractures in Phospho1 –/– mice demonstrating osteoid accumulation and elastic deformation upon loading at 4 weeks postsurgery.28

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Goldner's trichrome staining of wild‐type and Phospho1 –/– tibial sections demonstrating osteoid accumulation in the trabeculae bone (red staining; black arrowheads). Tibias were dissected from 21‐day‐old C67BL/6 mice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde before decalcification in 10% EDTA in PBS and standard histological processing. Three‐micrometer (3‐µm) sections were cut using a rotary microtome and used for staining. Scale bars = 200 µm. (B) Radiographic images of 1‐year‐old Phospho1 +/– and Phospho1 –/– mice demonstrating thoracic scoliosis on ablation of Phospho1 (black arrowheads). Whole‐body images were acquired using a MX20 Specimen Radiograph System (Faxitron Bioptics, LLC, Tucson, AZ, USA). Scale bars = 20 mm.

These findings have been extended to investigate the function of PHOSPHO1 in the development of bone's hydroxyapatite mineral phase at the smallest length scales. X‐ray diffraction (XRD) along with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed a lower bulk mineral content with significantly lower mineral:matrix ratio in Phospho1 –/– femurs, also accompanied by a smaller apatite crystal size.29 Backscattered scanning electron microscopy (BSE‐SEM) furthermore revealed generalized hypomineralization relative to wild‐type mice in transverse tibial cross‐sections of the same animals.29 Further analysis of the Phospho1 –/– microstructure exposed diffuse regions of hypomineralization in diaphyseal cortical and trabecular bone with large areas of osteoid accumulation.30 Interestingly, there was no discernible anatomical pattern between individual Phospho1 –/– animals, but regions lacking mineral exhibited small focal areas of mineral nucleation at their borders, which failed to propagate more widely.

In the very early studies of its function, characterization of the Phospho1 –/– bone phenotype was performed in young juvenile mice, and therefore to examine the bone phenotype more fully Javaheri and colleagues31 investigated whether PHOSPHO1 plays a persistent long‐term role in the adult bone's biology where skeletal turnover is relatively slow. Using digital image correlation (DIC) the expected lower stiffness of Phospho1 –/– was found, which was corrected with age. µCT analysis demonstrated several differences in tibial trabecular microarchitecture, including trabecular number and connectivity, between Phospho1 –/– and wild‐type mice, which changed transiently across four age groups, with significant differences detected in the 5‐week and 34‐week age groups, but not in the 7‐week or 16‐week groups. Upon examination of the cortical bone, however, the authors noted a significant reduction in BV/TV in animals from 7 weeks of age that was not corrected over time. NanoCT scanning (0.6‐µm resolution) furthermore revealed a greater number of larger osteocyte lacunae, along with higher vascular porosity in Phospho1 –/– tibias, a surprising finding which was compounded by an early increase in both Pdpn (embryonic day 11 [E11]) mRNA expression in primary osteoblast cell cultures, potentially indicating accelerated terminal osteocyte differentiation in these cells.31 PHOSPHO1 may therefore play a role in regulation of osteocytogenesis, which in turn may regulate bone microarchitecture in skeletally mature animals. Further research is required, however, to assess whether this relationship is mediated through reduced mineralization, or whether PHOSPHO1 may act within a distinct mechanism altogether. Our data also shows that the Phospho1 –/– phenotype is present during skeletal development, with murine embryos exhibiting a reduced extent of mineralization across all bones during embryogenesis (unpublished data; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

OPT reconstructions of mouse embryos at 17 days of gestation (E17) showing marked ablation of mineralization in bones of the skull in Phospho1 –/– animals. E17 C67BL/6 wild‐type and Phospho1 –/– embryos were culled using Schedule 1 methods, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and whole‐mount stained in a 0.001% Alizarin Red solution in 1% potassium hydroxide. Samples were embedded in 1% agarose and scanned using a Bioptonics 3001 OPT Scanner (Bioptonics, Medical Research Council Technology Group, UK). Data were reconstructed using NRecon (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and visualized using Imaris (Bitplane, Belfast, UK). Scale bars = 10 mm. OPT = optical projection tomography.

One‐year‐old Phospho1 –/– mice showed reduced plasma concentrations of TNAP with a concomitant increase in ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase1 (NPP1), thereby resulting in significantly higher PPi concentrations compared with wild‐type controls.25 Intriguingly, high serum PPi is a key characteristic of infantile hypophosphatasia in humans, with the resulting inhibition of mineralization attributed to the ensuing rickets/osteomalacia.17, 32 Yadav and colleagues25 attempted to rescue the Phospho1 –/– phenotype by cross‐breeding with mice overexpressing TNAP (ApoE‐Tnap) and thereby reduce PPi concentration. Although the authors did indeed observe an approximately fourfold increase in TNAP in plasma and a significant reduction in PPi, the hypomineralized Phospho1 –/– phenotype was not corrected, with animals exhibiting persistent skeletal defects at 7 months. Furthermore PHOSHO1; TNAP double knockout (Phospho1 –/–; Alpl –/–) mice exhibited complete ablation of skeletal mineralization and perinatal lethality.25 These data were augmented and confirmed in vitro with osteoblast‐like MC3T3‐E1 cell lines (clones 14 and 24) along with ex vivo metatarsal cultures using specific PHOSPHO1 and TNAP inhibitors in culture.33

PPi is known to regulate the expression of other mineralization‐associated proteins, particularly osteopontin (OPN; Spp1).34, 35, 36 Along with PPi, OPN is another potent mineralization inhibitor.37, 38, 39 The protein's inhibitory effects are mediated through its phosphorylation status,40, 41 and this has been shown to be regulated by TNAP.42 Significantly elevated OPN, which also exhibited a greater degree of phosphorylation compared to controls, was found at the protein and gene levels in serum and spinal lysates of Phospho1 –/– mice at 1 months and 3 months postnatally.43 Interestingly, no differences were observed in femoral lysates. Yadav and colleagues43 investigated the interplay between PHOSPHO1 and OPN through the generation of Phospho1 –/–; Spp1 –/– mice and found a partial rescue of the Phospho1 –/– phenotype, with animals at 1 month and 3 months of age exhibiting a reduction in the typical hyperosteoidosis and thoracic scoliosis that characterizes the single knockout animal. The Phospho1 –/– hypomineralized mouse phenotype is therefore partially attributable to an increased expression of OPN, which may obstruct mineralization during bone formation. This is likely exacerbated by a relative hyperphosphorylation of OPN, mediated by the established reduced expression of Alpl in Phospho1 –/– mice.25, 43

Collectively these findings establish a nonredundant role of PHOSPHO1 in mediating biomineralization of the skeleton, as well as its regulated synergy with TNAP, along with other mineralization‐associated factors including PPi and OPN, as part of this process.

Dental Mineralization

Along with its established role in bone biomineralization, PHOSPHO1 has also been implicated in the mineralization process of the dentition. McKee and colleagues44 studied dentin formation in perinatal mice and found localization of PHOSPHO1 to odontoblasts during the very first steps of dentin formation. Phospho1 –/– mice exhibited reduced mineralization in the dentin by histology, µCT, and radiography, a phenotype that was aggravated by the additional deletion of one Alpl allele (Phospho1 –/–; Alpl +/–). Others have examined PHOSPHO1 function in the other dental hard tissues, namely cementum and enamel. PHOSPHO1 was found to show expression in osteoblasts and cementoblasts of alveolar bone and cementum, respectively, during their mineralization phases where osteoid accumulation was evident in the bone and was accompanied by delayed mineralization of the cellular cementum in Phospho1 –/– animals.45 Intriguingly, acellular cementum formation was normal, despite downregulation of Phospho1 –/– in a bone sialoprotein knockout model in this region.46 PHOSPHO1 is therefore an enzyme critical for the integrity of the periodontal tissue interface, along with normal development of these hard tissues. In enamel, Phospho1 –/– mice exhibited a 25% increase in tissue volume, with a significantly reduced level of mineralization.47 The authors furthermore reported that ablation of PHOSPHO1 caused loss of enamel prism morphology and an impaired crystal organization compared to wild‐type mice.

At the level of local cellular regulation, control of mineralization through the PHOSPHO1 pathway has been shown to be influenced by the TRPS1 transcription factor in an odontoblast‐like cell line.48 Mutations in the Trps1 gene are associated with trichorhinophalangeal syndrome in humans and manifest craniofacial and skeletal dysplasias associated with defective endochondral mineralization.49, 50, 51 Loss of TRPS1 has also been implicated in abnormal tooth development and mineralization.52 Kuzynski and colleagues48 overexpressed Trps1 in preodontoblastic 17IIA11 cells and found reduced mineralization compared with controls. Interestingly, reduction of Trps1 expression also ablated mineralization and was associated with downregulation of Phospho1 and Alpl expression. The authors proposed that TRPS1 acts to repress mineralization associated genes in dentin in a biphasic manner to first inhibit ectopic mineralization, and further to prevent hypermineralization by modulation of osteogenic gene expression, including Phospho1.

The PHOSPHO1 Mineralization Mechanism: Matrix Vesicle–Mediated Biomineralization

Matrix vesicles (MVs) are membrane‐bound nanospherical bodies of approximately 100 to 300 nm in diameter that are typically rich in lipids and proteins known to chelate Ca2+ and Pi, and which are associated with both physiological and pathological biomineralization.53 Their function continues to be remain controversial since their discovery in 1967 in growth plate cartilage,54, 55 with some authors attributing these as specimen‐preparation artifacts.56 Nevertheless, many in vitro and in vivo studies have shown the first mineral crystals in diverse mineralized tissues such as bone, dentin, cartilage, and mineralized vasculature are associated with these structures in the extracellular matrix (ECM).55, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63

The structure and function of MVs in skeletal and vascular mineralization has recently been reviewed by several authors.53, 64, 65, 66, 67 The biogenesis of these vesicles may occur through multiple proposed mechanisms; however, the most prevalent theories include polarized budding from the parental cell membrane, or from microvilli on the cell surface, as demonstrated in hypertrophic chondrocytes and SaOS‐2 osteoblast‐like cells.68, 69, 70, 71 The theorized function of MVs in biomineralization is to facilitate a localized concentration of Ca2+ and Pi, protected from the ECM, from which hydroxyapatite or its precursors may form.53 Vesicles may also assist in concentrating Pi to engender a Pi:PPi ratio that is permissible for mineralization.72 MVs are known to be enriched in Ca2+ by way of their intracellular biogenesis from mitochondria under oxidative stress, at least in growth‐plate chondrocytes.73, 74 Recently published research by Chaudhary and colleagues75 may correlate well with these findings, showing that Pi stimulates release of MVs from osteogenic cells, although the authors did not comment on their mitochondrial origin.

Pi accumulation within MVs is thought to be mediated by extravesicular and intravesicular phosphatases, of which PHOSPHO1 plays a critical role.11, 20, 25, 26, 76, 77, 78 Stewart and colleagues77 were the first to suggest PHOSPHO1 as a major intravesicular phosphatase, showing its presence in MVs isolated from embryonic chick growth plates. This was more recently confirmed in MVs isolated from the ECM of both cultured MC3T3 and SaOS‐2 osteoblast‐like cells using Western blotting75 and quantitative proteomics.71, 79 Further work using both growth plate–derived and primary osteoblastderived vesicles established that although TNAP does indeed liberate Pi extravesicularly, PHOSPHO1 is biochemically active intravesicularly.24, 80 Therefore, it is hypothesized that accumulation of Pi inside MVs occurs via a combination of the intravesicular action of PHOSPHO1 and intravesicular trafficking of TNAP‐generated Pi via a Type III Na‐Pi co‐transporter, PiT1 (encoded by the Slc20a1 gene in mice)77, 80 (Fig. 3A). Experimental evidence for this hypothesis comes from the work of Yadav and colleagues,81 who generated a cartilage specific PiT1 knockout mouse driven by a col2a1‐Cre on a Phospho1‐null background (Phospho1 –/–; P i T1 Col2/Col2). The authors report an exacerbation of the Phospho1 –/– phenotype, including growth plate defects, extensive hyperosteoidosis, decreased BMD, and impaired mechanical properties. MVs isolated from differentiating chondrocytes in these animals furthermore demonstrated a loss of their capacity to nucleate hydroxyapatite crystals compared to both Phospho1 –/– and wild‐type controls.81 Interestingly, both Phospho1 –/– and Phospho1 –/–; P i T1 Col2/Col2 MV were reduced in numbers compared to wild‐types, potentially indicating a role for PHOSPHO1 in MV biogenesis. Together, these studies, along with those characterizing the Alpl –/– and Phospho1 –/–; Alpl –/– mice,16, 17, 20, 21, 25 afford good evidence for this mechanism integrating the PHOSPHO1 and TNAP Pi generation pathways.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Schematic diagram illustrating the hypothesized mechanism of PHOSPHO1 function within MVs. (A) PHOSPHO1 functions synergistically with TNAP: (1) TNAP hydrolyses its substrates to produce Pi extravesicularly; (2) extravesicular Pi is transported into the MV via PiT1; (3) PHOSPHO1 hydrolyses Pcho intravesicularly to further accumulate Pi. (B) Generation of PHOSPHO1 substrates within MVs: (1) an unidentified PLA2 converts PC from the vesicle membrane to lysoPC; (2) NPP6 subsequently catalyses the hydrolysis of lysoPC to generate Pcho; (3) PHOSPHO1 liberates Pi from PCho. (C) Alternative pathways of PCho generation: (1) nSmase2 breaks down SM from the MV membrane to form Pcho; (2) the α/β choline kinases phosphorylate choline to form PCho; (3) PHOSPHO1 generates Pi from PCho.

Although this work provides a strong evidence base for the pivotal role of PHOSPHO1 in vesicle‐mediated biomineralization, the specific biochemical pathway within it by which it achieves intravesicular Pi liberation remains unclear. Stewart and colleagues82 proposed a mechanism through which PHOSPHO1's substrates PEA and PCho may be generated intravesicularly by enzymatic action upon the vesicle's phospholipid membrane, as mediated by a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 6 (NPP6)82 (Fig. 3B). The PLA2 family of enzymes catalyze cleavage of the acyl group at the sn‐2 acyl position of glycerophospholipids resulting in a free fatty acid and lysophospholipid (LPL).83, 84, 85 These enzymes may therefore act to breakdown phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in the MV membrane, forming lysophosphatidylethanolamine and lysophosphocholine LPLs, respectively, along with arachidonic acid.82 Indeed, the MV membrane has been shown to be enriched in phospholipids containing PCho and PEA, which progressively decline during mineralization,74, 86, 87 whereas PCho was also identified as an abundant metabolite in developing mouse long bones by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐imaging mass spectrometry.88 There are upward of 30 identified mammalian PLA2 enzymes that exhibit a huge range of localizations (including secreted, cytosolic, and lysosomal groups) and have been shown to be involved with many physiological and pathological processes.83, 84, 85 Mebarek and colleagues89 comprehensively reviewed the evidence for the role of phospholipases in mineralization, noting several experimental studies confirming expression of both secreted and cytosolic PLA2s in chondrocytes and osteoblasts where they play several roles. Although some specific PLA2s have been shown to have an effect on bone formation,90 it is currently unclear whether these act directly within the mineralization process. Therefore, further research is required to identify specific candidate proteins that fulfill this niche.

A second enzymatic processing phase is hypothesized to convert generated LPL to PCho for direct hydrolysis by PHOSPHO1, mediated by NPP6.82 NPP6 is a member of the nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family and has been shown to possess lysophospholipase C activity, catalyzing the conversion of lysophosphocholine with a monoacylglycerol by‐product.91, 92, 93 Expression of NPP6 has been demonstrated in bone tissue lysate and was immunolocalized to hypertrophic chondrocytes and forming bone surfaces.82 Specific localization of NPP6 to MVs has yet to be established, however.

Alternative biochemical pathways through which PHOSPHO1 substrates may be generated have also been proposed (Fig. 3C). Neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSmase2) is encoded by the Smpd3 gene in mice and is capable of catalyzing the hydrolysis of another MV membrane phospholipid, sphingomyelin, to produce PCho with a ceramide byproduct.94 The fro mutation in the Smpd3 gene generates a distinctive phenotype with extensive musculoskeletal defects resulting in dwarfism.95, 96 Khavandgar and colleagues97 demonstrated that the fro/fro mouse exhibits delayed mineralization of the long bones and calvaria, along with impaired hypertrophy in growth plate chondrocytes during embryonic development. Using tissue‐specific mouse knockout models it was also established that Smpd3 expression is required in both osteoblasts and chondrocytes in a cell‐autonomous manner for normal bone development.97, 98 These effects were moreover shown to influence mineralization during tooth development and fracture healing.99, 100 Like PC and PE, sphingomyelin is enriched in MV preparations and declines during mineralization,74, 86, 87 whereas the nSmase2 enzyme has been localized to MV isolates in conjunction with PHOSPHO1.79 nSmase2‐mediated production of PCho may therefore provide another pathway for the intravesicular generation of PHOSPHO1 substrates. Another potential alternative pathway includes generation of PCho by phosphorylation of choline through the action of the α and β choline kinases (encoded by the Chkα and Chkβ genes, respectively). Although mice lacking Chkα display lethality during embryonic development,101 the Chkβ –/– mouse exhibits forelimb deformities and delayed mineralization, accompanied by an extended and disorganized hypertrophic zone within the growth plates at the distal radius and ulna.102 PCho was also shown to be reduced by ∼75% in primary chondrocytes isolated from these animals.102 Intriguingly, PHOSPHO1 was upregulated in Chkβ –/– primary chondrocytes, potentially indicating compensation for a restricted substrate availability.102 Both Chkα and Chkβ were found to be expressed in human osteoblast‐like MG‐63 cells, and gene silencing of Chkα resulted in a reduction of ∼70% in cellular PCho with an accompanied inhibition of TNAP activity and mineralization in culture.103

Endocrinology and Regulation

As a critical effector of biomineralization it is likely that PHOSPHO1 expression and function will be stringently controlled at both the local and systemic level. As a major organ, and one which is metabolically expensive to produce and maintain, it is well established that bone formation and resorption are tightly controlled by many factors during development and in adulthood, some of the most significant of which include the sex steroids,104, 105, 106 vitamin D,107, 108, 109 and parathyroid hormone (PTH).110, 111, 112 Whether the observed differences in mineralization caused by regulatory influences are caused wholly or partly by control of PHOSPHO1 or other associated proteins is as yet unknown.

Some evidence for the systemic regulation of PHOSPHO1 comes from work surrounding the effect of PTH on osteoblasts, with RNA‐seq in an osteocyte‐like cell line (IDG‐SW3 cells) stimulated with PTH in culture demonstrated an effect on both Phospho1 and Smpd3 expression.113 Houston and colleagues114 extended these analyses, examining the expression of Phospho1, Smpd3, and Alpl specifically in MC3T3 osteoblast‐like cells and ex vivo calvaria culture models with continuous PTH exposure. The authors report rapid and coordinate downregulation of Phospho1 and Smpd3 expression after the addition of PTH to culture media, which was likely regulated through the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. This downregulation of both Phospho1 and Smpd3 was independently found in Kusa 4b10 cells and in young rats exposed to PTH and PTH‐related protein 1 (PTHrP).115, 116 The catabolic effects of continuous PTH on the skeleton are well demonstrated in human conditions such as hyperparathyroidism; however, much research has associated this with the upregulation of osteoclastogenesis through the RANKL/OPG axis.117, 118, 119 These data may indicate, however, a simultaneous mechanism effecting inhibition of bone formation as mediated by PHOSPHO1. The transcription and posttranslational modification (phosphorylation) of Runx2, the transcription factor and master regulator of osteoblast differentiation, is also strongly enhanced by PTH.120 Interestingly, the overexpression of Runx2 in mouse limb bud cultures simultaneously enhances the expression of both Phospho1 and Smpd3.121

Collectively, these data surrounding PTH tentatively suggest that control of bone biomineralization may occur by modulating PHOSPHO1 expression, and thereby the MV‐mediated biomineralization mechanism. This relationship is, however, currently far from explicit and much further research is required to establish the regulatory mechanisms behind PHOSPHO1 expression and function within the context of the MV.

PHOSPHO1 in Pathologies of Mineralization

Aside from its central function in mediating physiological biomineralization, PHOSPHO1 may also have a role to play in the onset of pathological mineral formation; for example in vascular calcification. Phospho1 is upregulated during mineralization of vascular smooth muscle cells (VMSCs) in culture, whereas Phospho1 –/– VSMCs exhibited a significant reduction in mineral generation.122 Also, the PHOSPHO1 inhibitor, MLS‐0263839 reduced calcification of cultured VSMCs by ∼60% and when combined with the TNAP inhibitor MLS‐0038949, calcification of VSMCs was reduced by ∼80%.122 Phospho1 is also upregulated during atherosclerotic vascular calcification in a rabbit model.123 Furthermore, Hortells and colleagues124 induced aortic calcification in a rat nephrectomy model with a 1.2% phosphorous diet for 12 weeks postsurgery and observed significant upregulation of Phospho1 expression in animals exhibiting calcification, along with several other mineralization‐associated genes. These studies suggest that PHOSPHO1 has a critical role in VSMC mineralization and that “phosphatase inhibition” may offer therapeutic strategies to mitigate vascular calcification.

Several authors have investigated the process responsible for vascular calcification, with some implicating PHOSPHO1 and TNAP as part of the MV mechanism.125, 126 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB‐SEM) of human calcified valves and vasculature revealed nanospherical particles composed of crystalline calcium phosphate.127 Using in vitro models together with calcified human tissue, these particles were later implicated in the formation of mineralized atherosclerotic plaques through their initial aggregation and nucleation of the mineral phase.128 Furthermore, particles isolated from mineralized aortas were subsequently shown to induce pathological changes in valvular endothelial cells (VECs) and valvular interstitial cells (VICs) in culture.129 These studies demonstrate compelling similarities between calcified particles found in the vasculature and MVs. The localization of PHOSPHO1 or other MV‐associated enzymes with these structures has not as yet, however, been confirmed and so the mechanism behind their generation remains elusive.

There is now substantial evidence that the mineralization status of the subchondral bone is altered in osteoarthritis, and that this may lead to modified mechanical integrity, engendering greater articular cartilage degeneration.130 Phospho1 is upregulated during chondrocyte differentiation,131 and aged hypomineralized Phospho1 –/– mice exhibit increased articular cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation, when compared to the age‐matched wild‐type mice.132 Further, noninvasive loading of Phospho1 –/– mouse knee joints revealed diminished loading‐induced changes in the subchondral bone plate thickness and epiphyseal trabecular bone microarchitecture.132 Together, these data suggest that the hypomineralized bone phenotype in Phospho1 –/– mice provokes osteoarthritis pathology. This therefore implies that local modifications in the bone matrix mineralization may underpin subchondral bone sclerosis in osteoarthritis; however, further analyses are required to fully define this relationship.

There are also more speculative roles for PHOSPHO1 in osteoarthritis because of its role as a phosphatase capable of hydrolyzing PCho and PEA. Lipidomic analysis of the synovial fluid from patients with osteoarthritis suggests that alterations in the phospholipid composition and concentrations are associated with disease development, due to the lubricating function of the synovial fluid in the joint.133 Specifically, PC concentrations are increased in the synovial fluid of both early (2.7‐fold) and late (5.4‐fold) osteoarthritic patients in comparison to controls.133 Similarly, there has been reported high activity of PLA2, thought to break down PC, in the synovial fluid of osteoarthritic patients134 and a role for PLA2, in articular cartilage chondrocyte function.135 It has been suggested that the ratio of PC to lysophosphatidylcholine is a good diagnostic marker for rheumatoid arthritis.136 However, whether this is the case for osteoarthritis and the potential involvement of PHOSPHO1 in this is yet to be established.

Other Physiological Roles

In the 20 years since its characterization, the vast majority of research focusing on PHOSPHO1 has concentrated on biomineralization. However, as a phosphatase capable of hydrolyzing PCho and PEA with the generation of metabolites such as choline, PHOSPHO1 has the potential for activity in many other body systems. PC and PE are two of the most abundant lipids in the body, comprising 40% to 50% and 15% to 20%, respectively, of total cellular phospholipids of any given tissue in mammals.137 These molecules are therefore of critical importance in a huge variety of biological systems, from the integrity of plasma membranes, and other structures such as vesicles, lipoproteins and chylomicrons, to regulating the activity of proteins at the cell membrane.137, 138 Interestingly, the breakdown products from PC in particular have also been implicated as signaling molecules.139, 140 Although speculative, it is therefore an intriguing possibility that PHOSPHO1 may have a role to play in the biosynthesis and catalysis pathways of these phospholipids, regulating substrate availability. Choline is the breakdown product from PHOSPHO1 activity on the LPL lysophosphatidylcholine derived from PC, and is an essential dietary nutrient in mammals. Although choline is primarily used in PC biosynthesis, it may also be used to generate betaine in the liver and kidney, or acetylated to form the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the brain.141 PHOSPHO1 may therefore be an appealing candidate to act within a secondary mechanism of choline homeostasis in these and other tissues. Indeed, gut enteroids maintained in choline‐deficient media exhibited hypomethylation at 3′ CpG islands within the Phospho1 gene, potentially regulating gene expression.142

One system within which PHOSPHO1 plays a significant role in this regard is erythropoiesis. An expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis initially found that single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with β‐thalassemia in human peripheral blood samples were also associated with changes in PHOSPHO1 expression.143 PHOSPHO1 was also found to be substantially enriched in erythroblasts undergoing differentiation.144 Subsequently Huang and colleagues145 investigated PHOSPHO1 in terminal erythropoiesis; a process during which the phospholipid composition of red cells is substantially altered. PHOSPHO1 expression was significantly upregulated during erythroblast differentiation, and moreover loss of PHOSPHO1 induced defective erythropoiesis accompanied by a lack of choline generation and an increased phosphocholine:choline ratio.

Several other studies have found intriguing associations between PHOSPHO1 expression and disorders of altered energy metabolism such as diabetes and obesity. Epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) have found significant associations between methylation at loci within the PHOSPHO1 and the future risk of type‐2 diabetes in human cohorts.146, 147 Indeed, Willmer and colleagues148 highlighted differential methylation at sites within the PHOSPHO1 gene as a potentially useful biomarker for clinical application in the early detection of type‐2 diabetes. Moreover, increased methylation was positively correlated with high density lipoprotein (HDL) concentration in blood and was decreased in muscle tissue from diabetic patients.147 This relationship with HDL concentration was also reproduced independently in an EWAS focused on serum lipid profiles conducted in a separate cohort.149 Relatedly, Wu and colleagues150 further found an association between PHOSPHO1 and SNPs relating to clinical measures of obesity in a Chinese population. These studies provide a promising avenue of investigation for future research to consider the mechanisms through which PHOSPHO1 may act to influence lipid metabolism and disorders of its dysregulation such as diabetes and obesity. Supporting this idea, changes in Phospho1 expression have been found in several studies examining the thermogenic brown adipose tissue (BAT) and the browning of white adipose tissue (WAT), of great relevance to obesity. Phospho1 is expressed at a higher level in BAT than WAT,151 and suppression of fatty acid oxidation in adipose tissues causes a downregulation in expression during cold challenge.152 Furthermore, studies that have investigated creatine metabolism as an alternative pathway for thermogenesis in beige fat have implicated PHOSPHO1 in this process, although the specific mechanism remains elusive.153, 154

Inhibition of PHOSPHO1—a Therapeutic Target?

The LOPAC and Spectrum chemical reference libraries were used to identify potential chemical inhibitors of PHOSPHO1 and semiautomated high‐throughput chemical screening used to test inhibition of PEA hydrolysis.24 Of those identified, three molecules, Lansoprazole, Ebseleln, and SCH202676, exhibited noncompetitive inhibition of recombinant PHOSPHO1 activity by 80% or more.24 This study showed that neither Lansoprazole nor SCH202676 inhibited TNAP activity, but Lansoprazole has recently been shown to act as a noncompetitive inhibitor of TNAP.155 Following this, Bravo and colleagues156 synthesized a series of benzoisothiazolone inhibitors of PHOSPHO1; the final selection from these inhibitors was tested and passed medicinal chemistry criteria in deliverability, metabolic stability, solubility, and permeability, while also demonstrating no cellular toxicity.

The development of these compounds opens the potential for inhibition of PHOSPHO1 activity as a therapeutic intervention. Although there has been no experimental research exploring this possibility to date, the imputation of PHOSPHO1's association with pathologies in both biomineralization and lipid metabolism may make it an attractive drug target in the future. In terms of disorders of pathological mineralization, although the PHOSPHO1‐mediated mineralization mechanism is critical for the proper development of the skeleton in immature organisms, as has been discussed here, there is currently no evidence to suggest that it plays an active role in maintenance of the skeleton in adulthood. Ablation of mineralization in the adult may be desirable when attempting to control soft tissue mineralization, eg, vascular calcification and also ectopic bone formation, as is the case in several musculoskeletal disorders including osteoarthritis. In these instances pharmacological inhibition of PHOSPHO1 may prove to represent an effective intervention that also entails limited adverse off‐target effects.

Outlook

Over the past 20 years PHOSPHO1 has been an increasing focus of research in the bone biology and biomineralization communities. Work performed in our and in other groups has succeeded in establishing its canonical role in MV‐mediated biomineralization of the skeleton and dentition, while opening new fields of investigation into its function in other body systems. Many questions remain to be answered surrounding aspects of PHOSPHO1's biology, including detailed elucidation of its upstream biochemical mechanism, targeting of the enzyme to MVs, how local and systemic regulation is integrated with other aspects of bone biology during the bone formation process, and the precise role of PHOSPHO1in musculoskeletal disease. Future studies integrating aspects of structural biology and biomineralization with cellular and molecular biology and endocrinology will give us a holistic appreciation of these processes and contribute to our understanding in this fundamental aspect of bone biology.

Disclosures

All authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) through an EASTBIO Doctoral Training Partnership studentship award (1803936) and Institute Strategic Programme Grant Funding (BB/J004316/1); and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number (AR53102).

Authors’ roles: SD, KAS, JLM, and CF contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript, and approved the final version.

References

References

  • 1. Suchacki K, Roberts F, Lovdel A, et al. Skeletal energy homeostasis: a paradigm of endocrine discovery. J Endocrinol. 2017;234(1):R67–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reznikov N, Shahar R, Weiner S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(9):3815–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Reznikov N, Shahar R, Weiner S. Three‐dimensional structure of human lamellar bone: the presence of two different materials and new insights into the hierarchical organization. Bone. 2014;59:93–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Houston B, Seawright E, Jefferies D, et al. Identification and cloning of a novel phosphatase expressed at high levels in differentiating growth plate chondrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 1999;1448(3):500–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Houston B, Paton I, Burt D, Farquharson C. Chromosomal localization of the chicken and mammalian orthologues of the orphan phosphatase PHOSPHO1 gene. Anim Genet. 2002;33(6):451–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stewart AJ, Schmid R, Blindauer CA, Paisey SJ, Farquharson C. Comparative modelling of human PHOSPHO1 reveals a new group of phosphatases within the haloacid dehalogenase superfamily. Protein Eng. 2003;16(12):889–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Baldwin JC, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG. LEPS2 a phosphorus starvation‐induced novel acid phosphatase from tomato. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(2):728–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Stenzel I, Ziethe K, Schurath J, Hertel SC, Bosse D, Köck M. Differential expression of the LePS2 phosphatase gene family in response to phosphate availability, pathogen infection and during development. Physiol Plant. 2003;118(1):138–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Baldwin JC, Karthikeyan AS, Cao A, Raghothama KG. Biochemical and molecular analysis of LePS2; 1: a phosphate starvation induced protein phosphatase gene from tomato. Planta. 2008;228(2):273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wang W, Kim R, Jancarik J, Yokota H, Kim S‐H. Crystal structure of phosphoserine phosphatase from Methanococcus jannaschii, a hyperthermophile, at 1.8 Å resolution. Structure. 2001;9(1):65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Roberts SJ, Stewart AJ, Sadler PJ, Farquharson C. Human PHOSPHO1 exhibits high specific phosphoethanolamine and phosphocholine phosphatase activities. Biochem J. 2004;382(1):59–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Roberts SJ, Stewart AJ, Schmid R, et al. Probing the substrate specificities of human PHOSPHO1 and PHOSPHO2. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2005;1752(1):73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nielson CM, Zmuda JM, Carlos AS, Wagoner WJ, Larson EA, Orwoll ES, et al. Rare coding variants in ALPL are associated with low serum alkaline phosphatase and low bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(1):93–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ozono K, Michigami T. Hypophosphatasia now draws more attention of both clinicians and researchers: a Commentary on prevelance of c. 1559delT in ALPL, a common mutation resulting in the perinatal (lethal) form of hypophosphatasias in Japanese and effects of the mutation on heterozygous carriers. J Hum Genet. 2011;56(3):174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ermakov S, Toliat MR, Cohen Z, et al. Association of ALPL and ENPP1 gene polymorphisms with bone strength related skeletal traits in a Chuvashian population. Bone. 2010;46(5):1244–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Narisawa S, Fröhlander N, Millán JL. Inactivation of two mouse alkaline phosphatase genes and establishment of a model of infantile hypophosphatasia. Dev Dyn. 1997;208(3):432–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fedde KN, Blair L, Silverstein J, et al. Alkaline phosphatase knock‐out mice recapitulate the metabolic and skeletal defects of infantile hypophosphatasia. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(12):2015–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu J, Nam HK, Campbell C, da Silva Gasque KC, Millán JL, Hatch NE. Tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase deficiency causes abnormal craniofacial bone development in the Alpl−/− mouse model of infantile hypophosphatasia. Bone. 2014;67:81–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Foster B, Nagatomo K, Tso H, Tran A, Nociti F, Narisawa S, et al. Tooth root dentin mineralization defects in a mouse model of hypophosphatasia. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(2):271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Anderson HC, Sipe JB, Hessle L, et al. Impaired calcification around matrix vesicles of growth plate and bone in alkaline phosphatase‐deficient mice. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(3):841–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Anderson HC, Hsu HH, Morris DC, Fedde KN, Whyte MP. Matrix vesicles in osteomalacic hypophosphatasia bone contain apatite‐like mineral crystals. Am J Pathol. 1997;151(6):1555. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Houston B, Stewart AJ, Farquharson C. PHOSPHO1—a novel phosphatase specifically expressed at sites of mineralisation in bone and cartilage. Bone. 2004;34(4):629–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. MacRae VE, Davey MG, McTeir L, et al. Inhibition of PHOSPHO1 activity results in impaired skeletal mineralization during limb development of the chick. Bone. 2010;46(4):1146–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Roberts S, Narisawa S, Harmey D, Millán JL, Farquharson C. Functional involvement of PHOSPHO1 in matrix vesicle–mediated skeletal mineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(4):617–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yadav MC, Simao AMS, Narisawa S, et al. Loss of skeletal mineralization by the simultaneous ablation of PHOSPHO1 and alkaline phosphatase function: a unified model of the mechanisms of initiation of skeletal calcification. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(2):286–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Huesa C, Yadav MC, Finnilä MA, et al. PHOSPHO1 is essential for mechanically competent mineralization and the avoidance of spontaneous fractures. Bone. 2011;48(5):1066–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Carriero A, Bruse JL, Oldknow KJ, Millán JL, Farquharson C, Shefelbine SJ. Reference point indentation is not indicative of whole mouse bone measures of stress intensity fracture toughness. Bone. 2014;69:174–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Morcos M, Al‐Jallad H, Li J, et al. PHOSPHO1 is essential for normal bone fracture healing: an animal study. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(6):397–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rodriguez‐Florez N, Garcia‐Tunon E, Mukadam Q, et al. An investigation of the mineral in ductile and brittle cortical mouse bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(5):786–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Boyde A, Staines KA, Javaheri B, Millan JL, Pitsillides AA, Farquharson C. A distinctive patchy osteomalacia characterises Phospho1‐deficient mice. J Anat. 2017;231(2):298–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Javaheri B, Carriero A, Staines K, et al. Phospho1 deficiency transiently modifies bone architecture yet produces consistent modification in osteocyte differentiation and vascular porosity with ageing. Bone. 2015;81:277–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Whyte MP. Hypophosphatasia and the role of alkaline phosphatase in skeletal mineralization. Endocr Rev. 1994;15(4):439–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Huesa C, Houston D, Kiffer‐Moreira T, Yadav MC, Millan JL, Farquharson C. The functional co‐operativity of tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) and PHOSPHO1 during initiation of skeletal mineralization. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2015;4:196–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Addison WN, Azari F, Sørensen ES, Kaartinen MT, McKee MD. Pyrophosphate inhibits mineralization of osteoblast cultures by binding to mineral, up‐regulating osteopontin, and inhibiting alkaline phosphatase activity. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(21):15872–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Harmey D, Hessle L, Narisawa S, Johnson KA, Terkeltaub R, Millán JL. Concerted regulation of inorganic pyrophosphate and osteopontin by akp2, enpp1, and ank: an integrated model of the pathogenesis of mineralization disorders. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(4):1199–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Johnson K, Goding J, Van Etten D, et al. Linked deficiencies in extracellular PPi and osteopontin mediate pathologic calcification associated with defective PC‐1 and ANK expression. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(6):994–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Speer MY, McKee MD, Guldberg RE, et al. Inactivation of the osteopontin gene enhances vascular calcification of matrix Gla protein–deficient mice: evidence for osteopontin as an inducible inhibitor of vascular calcification in vivo. J Exp Med. 2002;196(8):1047–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Steitz SA, Speer MY, McKee MD, et al. Osteopontin inhibits mineral deposition and promotes regression of ectopic calcification. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(6):2035–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Boskey A, Spevak L, Paschalis E, Doty S, McKee M. Osteopontin deficiency increases mineral content and mineral crystallinity in mouse bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71(2):145–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Boskey AL, Christensen B, Taleb H, Sørensen ES. Post‐translational modification of osteopontin: effects on in vitro hydroxyapatite formation and growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;419(2):333–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. George A, Veis A. Phosphorylated proteins and control over apatite nucleation, crystal growth, and inhibition. Chem Rev. 2008;108(11):4670–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Narisawa S, Yadav MC, Millán JL. In vivo overexpression of tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase increases skeletal mineralization and affects the phosphorylation status of osteopontin. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(7):1587–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Yadav MC, Huesa C, Narisawa S, et al. Ablation of osteopontin improves the skeletal phenotype of Phospho1−/− mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2369–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. McKee M, Yadav M, Foster B, Somerman M, Farquharson C, Millán J. Compounded PHOSPHO1/ALPL deficiencies reduce dentin mineralization. J Dent Res. 2013;92(8):721–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zweifler L, Ao M, Yadav M, et al. Role of PHOSPHO1 in periodontal development and function. J Dent Res. 2016;95(7):742–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ao M, Chavez M, Chu E, et al. Overlapping functions of bone sialoprotein and pyrophosphate regulators in directing cementogenesis. Bone. 2017;105:134–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Pandya M, Rosene L, Farquharson C, Millán JL, Diekwisch TG. Intravesicular phosphatase PHOSPHO1 function in enamel mineralization and prism formation. Front Physiol. 2017;8:805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kuzynski M, Goss M, Bottini M, et al. Dual role of the Trps1 transcription factor in dentin mineralization. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(40):27481–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Napierala D, Sam K, Morello R, et al. Uncoupling of chondrocyte differentiation and perichondrial mineralization underlies the skeletal dysplasia in tricho‐rhino‐phalangeal syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(14):2244–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Fantauzzo KA, Tadin‐Strapps M, You Y, et al. A position effect on TRPS1 is associated with Ambras syndrome in humans and the Koala phenotype in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(22):3539–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Momeni P, Glöckner G, Schmidt O, et al. Mutations in a new gene, encoding a zinc‐finger protein, cause tricho‐rhino‐phalangeal syndrome type I. Nat Genet. 2000;24(1):71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kantaputra P, Miletich I, Lüdecke H‐J, et al. Tricho‐rhino‐phalangeal syndrome with supernumerary teeth. J Dent Res. 2008;87(11):1027–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Cui L, Houston D, Farquharson C, MacRae V. Characterisation of matrix vesicles in skeletal and soft tissue mineralisation. Bone. 2016;87:147–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Anderson HC. Electron microscopic studies of induced cartilage development and calcification. J Cell Biol. 1967;35(1):81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bonucci E. Fine structure of early cartilage calcification. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967;20(1–2):33–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Landis WJ, Paine MC, Glimcher MJ. Electron microscopic observations of bone tissue prepared anhydrously in organic solvents. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977;59(1):1–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Anderson HC. Vesicles associated with calcification in the matrix of epiphyseal cartilage. J Cell Biol. 1969;41(1):59–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Anderson HC, Cecil R, Sajdera SW. Calcification of rachitic rat cartilage in vitro by extracellular matrix vesicles. Am J Pathol. 1975;79(2):237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bonucci E. The locus of initial calcification in cartilage and bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;78:108–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Landis WJ. A study of calcification in the leg tendons from the domestic turkey. J Ultrastruct Mol Struct Res. 1986;94(3):217–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Reynolds JL, Joannides AJ, Skepper JN, et al. Human vascular smooth muscle cells undergo vesicle‐mediated calcification in response to changes in extracellular calcium and phosphate concentrations: a potential mechanism for accelerated vascular calcification in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(11):2857–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Kapustin AN, Shanahan CM. Calcium regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell–derived matrix vesicles. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2012;22(5):133–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Cui L, Rashdan NA, Zhu D, et al. End stage renal disease‐induced hypercalcemia may promote aortic valve calcification via Annexin VI enrichment of valve interstitial cell derived‐matrix vesicles. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(11):2985–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Hasegawa T, Yamamoto T, Tsuchiya E, et al. Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of matrix vesicle‐mediated mineralization. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2017;53(2):34–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Bottini M, Mebarek S, Anderson KL, et al. Matrix vesicles from chondrocytes and osteoblasts: their biogenesis, properties, functions and biomimetic models. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2018;1862(3):532–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Murshed M. Mechanism of bone mineralization. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8:a031229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Anderson HC. Matrix vesicles and calcification. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2003;5(3):222–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Borg TK, Runyan RB, Wuthier RE. Correlation of freeze‐fracture and scanning electron microscopy of epiphyseal chondrocytes. Calcif Tissue Res. 1978;26(1):237–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Anderson HC. Molecular biology of matrix vesicles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;314:266–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Fedde KN. Human osteosarcoma cells spontaneously release matrix‐vesicle‐like structures with the capacity to mineralize. Bone Miner. 1992;17(2):145–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Thouverey C, Strzelecka‐Kiliszek A, Balcerzak M, Buchet R, Pikula S. Matrix vesicles originate from apical membrane microvilli of mineralizing osteoblast‐like Saos‐2 cells. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106(1):127–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Thouverey C, Bechkoff G, Pikula S, Buchet R. Inorganic pyrophosphate as a regulator of hydroxyapatite or calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate mineral deposition by matrix vesicles. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(1):64–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Shapiro IM, Golub EE, Chance B, et al. Linkage between energy status of perivascular cells and mineralization of the chick growth cartilage. Dev Biol. 1988;129(2):372–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wuthier RE, Lipscomb GF. Matrix vesicles: structure, composition, formation and function in calcification. Front Biosci. 2011;16:2812–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Chaudhary SC, Kuzynski M, Bottini M, et al. Phosphate induces formation of matrix vesicles during odontoblast‐initiated mineralization in vitro. Matrix Biol. 2016;52:284–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Hessle L, Johnson KA, Anderson HC, et al. Tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase and plasma cell membrane glycoprotein‐1 are central antagonistic regulators of bone mineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99(14):9445–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Stewart AJ, Roberts SJ, Seawright E, Davey MG, Fleming RH, Farquharson C. The presence of PHOSPHO1 in matrix vesicles and its developmental expression prior to skeletal mineralization. Bone. 2006;39(5):1000–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Millán JL. The role of phosphatases in the initiation of skeletal mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(4):299–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Thouverey C, Malinowska A, Balcerzak M, et al. Proteomic characterization of biogenesis and functions of matrix vesicles released from mineralizing human osteoblast‐like cells. J Proteomics. 2011;74(7):1123–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ciancaglini P, Yadav MC, Simao AMS, et al. Kinetic analysis of substrate utilization by native and TNAP‐, NPP1‐, or PHOSPHO1‐deficient matrix vesicles. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(4):716–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Yadav MC, Bottini M, Cory E, et al. Skeletal mineralization deficits and impaired biogenesis and function of chondrocyte‐derived matrix vesicles in Phospho1–/– and Phospho1/Pit1 double‐knockout mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(6):1275–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Stewart AJ, Leong DT, Farquharson C. PLA2 and ENPP6 may act in concert to generate phosphocholine from the matrix vesicle membrane during skeletal mineralization. FASEB J. 2017;32(1):20–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Burke JE, Dennis EA. Phospholipase A2 structure/function, mechanism, and signaling. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(Suppl):S237–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Dennis EA, Cao J, Hsu Y‐H, Magrioti V, Kokotos G. Phospholipase A2 enzymes: physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem Rev. 2011;111(10):6130–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Murakami M, Taketomi Y, Miki Y, Sato H, Hirabayashi T, Yamamoto K. Recent progress in phospholipase A2 research: from cells to animals to humans. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50(2):152–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Wu LN, Genge BR, Kang MW, Arsenault AL, Wuthier RE. Changes in phospholipid extractability and composition accompany mineralization of chicken growth plate cartilage matrix vesicles. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5126–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Wuthier RE. Lipid composition of isolated epiphyseal cartilage cells, membranes and matrix vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975;409(1):128–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Fujino Y, Minamizaki T, Yoshioka H, Okada M, Yoshiko Y. Imaging and mapping of mouse bone using MALDI‐imaging mass spectrometry. Bone Rep. 2016;5:280–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Mebarek S, Abousalham A, Magne D, et al. Phospholipases of mineralization competent cells and matrix vesicles: roles in physiological and pathological mineralizations. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(3):5036–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ramanadham S, Yarasheski KE, Silva MJ, et al. Age‐related changes in bone morphology are accelerated in group VIA phospholipase A2 (iPLA2β)‐null mice. Am J Pathol. 2008;172(4):868–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Stefan C, Jansen S, Bollen M. NPP‐type ectophosphodiesterases: unity in diversity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30(10):542–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Sakagami H, Aoki J, Natori Y, et al. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a novel choline‐specific glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase belonging to the nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(24):23084–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Morita J, Kato K, Mihara E, et al. Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X‐ray crystallographic analysis of Enpp6. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2014;70(6):794–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Khavandgar Z, Murshed M. Sphingolipid metabolism and its role in the skeletal tissues. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(5):959–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Stoffel W, Jenke B, Blöck B, Zumbansen M, Koebke J. Neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (smpd3) in the control of postnatal growth and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(12):4554–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Stoffel W, Knifka J, Koebke J, et al. Neutral sphingomyelinase (SMPD3) deficiency causes a novel form of chondrodysplasia and dwarfism that is rescued by Col2A1‐driven smpd3 transgene expression. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(1):153–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Khavandgar Z, Poirier C, Clarke CJ, et al. A cell‐autonomous requirement for neutral sphingomyelinase 2 in bone mineralization. J Cell Biol. 2011;194(2):277–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Li J, Manickam G, Ray S, Yasuda H, Moffatt P, Murshed M. Smpd3 expression in both chondrocytes and osteoblasts is required for normal endochondral bone development. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36(17):2282–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Khavandgar Z, Alebrahim S, Eimar H, Tamimi F, McKee M, Murshed M. Local regulation of tooth mineralization by sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3. J Dent Res. 2013;92(4):358–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Manickam G, Moffatt P, Murshed M. Role of SMPD3 during bone fracture healing and regulation of its expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2019;39(4):e00370‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Wu G, Aoyama C, Young SG, Vance DE. Early embryonic lethality caused by disruption of the gene for choline kinase α, the first enzyme in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(3):1456–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Li Z, Wu G, Sher RB, et al. Choline kinase beta is required for normal endochondral bone formation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2014;1840(7):2112–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Li Z, Wu G, van der Veen JN, Hermansson M, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine metabolism and choline kinase in human osteoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2014;1841(6):859–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Compston JE. Sex steroids and bone. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(1):419–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Frenkel B, Hong A, Baniwal SK, et al. Regulation of adult bone turnover by sex steroids. J Cell Physiol. 2010;224(2):305–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr Rev. 2002;23(3):279–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Thacher TD, Clarke BL. Vitamin D insufficiency. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(1):50–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Yamamoto Y, Yoshizawa T, Fukuda T, et al. Vitamin D receptor in osteoblasts is a negative regulator of bone mass control. Endocrinology. 2013;154(3):1008–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Priemel M, von Domarus C, Klatte TO, et al. Bone mineralization defects and vitamin D deficiency: histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies and circulating 25‐hydroxyvitamin D in 675 patients. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(2):305–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Compston JE. Skeletal actions of intermittent parathyroid hormone: effects on bone remodelling and structure. Bone. 2007;40(6):1447–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Jiang Y, Zhao JJ, Mitlak BH, Wang O, Genant HK, Eriksen EF. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–34)[teriparatide] improves both cortical and cancellous bone structure. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(11):1932–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Hodsman AB, Bauer DC, Dempster DW, et al. Parathyroid hormone and teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for its use. Endocr Rev. 2005;26(5):688–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. John H. C. S., Meyer MB, Benkusky NA, et al. The parathyroid hormone‐regulated transcriptome in osteocytes: parallel actions with 1, 25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3 to oppose gene expression changes during differentiation and to promote mature cell function. Bone. 2015;72:81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Houston D, Myers K, MacRae V, Staines K, Farquharson C. The expression of PHOSPHO1, nSMase2 and TNAP is coordinately regulated by continuous PTH exposure in mineralising osteoblast cultures. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(5):510–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Allan EH, Häusler KD, Wei T, et al. EphrinB2 regulation by PTH and PTHrP revealed by molecular profiling in differentiating osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(8):1170–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Gooi J, Pompolo S, Karsdal M, et al. Calcitonin impairs the anabolic effect of PTH in young rats and stimulates expression of sclerostin by osteocytes. Bone. 2010;46(6):1486–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Eriksen EF. Primary hyperparathyroidism: lessons from bone histomorphometry. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17 Suppl 2:N95–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Locklin RM, Khosla S, Turner RT, Riggs BL. Mediators of the biphasic responses of bone to intermittent and continuously administered parathyroid hormone. J Cell Biochem. 2003;89(1):180–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Ma YL, Cain RL, Halladay DL, et al. Catabolic effects of continuous human PTH (1–38) in vivo is associated with sustained stimulation of RANKL and inhibition of osteoprotegerin and gene‐associated bone formation. Endocrinology. 2001;142(9):4047–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Krishnan V, Moore TL, Ma YL, et al. Parathyroid hormone bone anabolic action requires Cbfa1/Runx2‐dependent signaling. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17(3):423–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Nishimura R, Wakabayashi M, Hata K, et al. Osterix regulates calcification and degradation of chondrogenic matrices through matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) expression in association with transcription factor Runx2 during endochondral ossification. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(40):33179–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Kiffer‐Moreira T, Yadav MC, Zhu D, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of PHOSPHO1 suppresses vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(1):81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Tan L, Wang Z, Li Y. Rabbit models provide insights into bone formation related biological process in atherosclerotic vascular calcification. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;496(4):1369–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Hortells L, Sosa C, Guillén N, Lucea S, Millán Á., Sorribas V. Identifying early pathogenic events during vascular calcification in uremic rats. Kidney Int. 2017;92(6):1384–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Bobryshev YV, Orekhov AN, Sobenin I, Chistiakov DA. Role of bone‐type tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase and PHOSPO1 in vascular calcification. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(37):5821–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Bertazzo S, Gentleman E. Aortic valve calcification: a bone of contention. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(16):1189–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Bertazzo S, Gentleman E, Cloyd KL, Chester AH, Yacoub MH, Stevens MM. Nano‐analytical electron microscopy reveals fundamental insights into human cardiovascular tissue calcification. Nat Mater. 2013;12(6):576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Hutcheson JD, Goettsch C, Bertazzo S, et al. Genesis and growth of extracellular‐vesicle‐derived microcalcification in atherosclerotic plaques. Nat Mater. 2016;15(3):335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. van Engeland NC, Bertazzo S, Sarathchandra P, et al. Aortic calcified particles modulate valvular endothelial and interstitial cells. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017;28:36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Li B, Aspden RM. Mechanical and material properties of the subchondral bone plate from the femoral head of patients with osteoarthritis or osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(4):247–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Chen L, Fink T, Zhang X‐Y, Ebbesen P, Zachar V. Quantitative transcriptional profiling of ATDC5 mouse progenitor cells during chondrogenesis. Differentiation. 2005;73(7):350–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Staines KA, Brain F, Javaheri B, et al. Hypomineralisation drives joint instability and osteoarthritis in mice. In: Committee BRS, editor. Bone Research Society Annual Meeting 2016; Liverpool, UK: Frontiers in Bone Research; 2016. p. 39.
  • 133. Kosinska MK, Liebisch G, Lochnit G, et al. A lipidomic study of phospholipid classes and species in human synovial fluid. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(9):2323–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Pruzanski W, Bogoch E, Wloch M, Vadas P. The role of phospholipase A2 in the physiopathology of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991;27:117–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Leistad L, Feuerherm A, Faxvaag A, Johansen B. Multiple phospholipase A2 enzymes participate in the inflammatory process in osteoarthritic cartilage. Scand J Rheumatol. 2011;40(4):308–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Fuchs B, Schiller J, Wagner U, Häntzschel H, Arnold K. The phosphatidylcholine/lysophosphatidylcholine ratio in human plasma is an indicator of the severity of rheumatoid arthritis: investigations by 31P NMR and MALDI‐TOF MS. Clin Biochem. 2005;38(10):925–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. van der Veen JN, Kennelly JP, Wan S, Vance JE, Vance DE, Jacobs RL. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2017;1859(9 Pt B):1558–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Cole LK, Vance JE, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and lipoprotein metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2012;1821(5):754–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Exton J. Phosphatidylcholine breakdown and signal transduction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1212(1):26–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Exton J. Signaling through phosphatidylcholine breakdown. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Li Z, Vance DE. Thematic review series: glycerolipids. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(6):1187–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Alves da Silva AV, de Castro Oliveira SB, Di Rienzi SC, et al. Murine methyl donor deficiency impairs early growth in association with dysmorphic small intestinal crypts and reduced gut microbial community diversity. Curr Dev Nutr. 2018;3(1):nzy070. [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Westra H. ‐J., Peters MJ, Esko T, et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Gautier E‐F, Ducamp S, Leduc M, et al. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of human erythropoiesis. Cell Rep. 2016;16(5):1470–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Huang N‐J, Lin Y‐C, Lin C‐Y, et al. Enhanced phosphocholine metabolism is essential for terminal erythropoiesis. Blood. 2018;131(26):2955–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Chambers JC, Loh M, Lehne B, et al. Epigenome‐wide association of DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood from Indian Asians and Europeans with incident type 2 diabetes: a nested case‐control study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(7):526–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Dayeh T, Tuomi T, Almgren P, et al. DNA methylation of loci within ABCG1 and PHOSPHO1 in blood DNA is associated with future type 2 diabetes risk. Epigenetics. 2016;11(7):482–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Willmer T, Johnson R, Louw J, Pheiffer C. Blood based DNA methylation biomarkers for type 2 diabetes: potential for clinical applications. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Sayols‐Baixeras S, Subirana I, Lluis‐Ganella C, et al. Identification and validation of seven new loci showing differential DNA methylation related to serum lipid profile: an epigenome‐wide approach. The REGICOR study. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(20):4556–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Wu Y, Duan H, Tian X, et al. Genetics of obesity traits: a bivariate genome‐wide association analysis. Front Genet. 2018;9:179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Wang H, Liu L, Lin JZ, Aprahamian TR, Farmer SR. Browning of white adipose tissue with roscovitine induces a distinct population of UCP1+ adipocytes. Cell Metab. 2016;24(6):835–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Lee J, Choi J, Aja S, Scafidi S, Wolfgang MJ. Loss of adipose fatty acid oxidation does not potentiate obesity at thermoneutrality. Cell Rep. 2016;14(6):1308–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Kazak L, Chouchani ET, Jedrychowski MP, et al. A creatine‐driven substrate cycle enhances energy expenditure and thermogenesis in beige fat. Cell. 2015;163(3):643–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Bertholet AM, Kazak L, Chouchani ET, et al. Mitochondrial patch clamp of beige adipocytes reveals UCP1‐positive and UCP1‐negative cells both exhibiting futile creatine cycling. Cell Metab. 2017;25(4):811–22.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Delomenède M, Buchet R, Mebarek S. Lansoprazole is an uncompetitive inhibitor of tissue‐nonspecific alkaline phosphatase. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2009;56(2):301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Bravo Y, Teriete P, Dhanya R‐P, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of benzoisothiazolones as selective inhibitors of PHOSPHO1. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24(17):4308–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBMR Plus are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES