Abstract
Keloids are considered as benign fibroproliferative skin tumors growing beyond the site of the original dermal injury. Although traditionally viewed as a form of skin scarring, keloids display many cancer-like characteristics such as progressive uncontrolled growth, lack of spontaneous regression and extremely high rates of recurrence. Phenotypically, keloids are consistent with non-malignant dermal tumors that are due to the excessive overproduction of collagen which never metastasize. Within the remit of keloid pathobiology, there is increasing evidence for the various interplay of neoplastic-promoting and suppressing factors, which may explain its aggressive clinical behavior. Amongst the most compelling parallels between keloids and cancer are their shared cellular bioenergetics, epigenetic methylation profiles and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition amongst other disease biological (genotypic and phenotypic) behaviors. This review explores the quasi-neoplastic or cancer-like properties of keloids and highlights areas for future study.
Keywords: keloid, skin scarring, quasi-neoplastic, tumor, cancer, bioenergetics, fibroproliferative, epigenetics
Introduction
Keloids are considered as benign fibroproliferative dermal tumors, which are borne out of abnormal wound healing processes following injury to the skin. They are characterized visually by raised exophytic dermal outgrowths extending beyond the original wound boundary and microscopically by thickened hyalinized collagen bundles (1, 2).
Most individuals affected by keloid disease are aged between 10 and 30 years and are of pigmented skin with high reports in African, Afro-Caribbean, Afro-American, Hispanic, or Asian ancestry (3–6). Keloids may develop months or years after the initial injury and can be accompanied by intense pain, pruritus, and other physical, and psychosocial symptoms (7). Common sites affected are the anterior chest, shoulders, back, and earlobe, with those on the pre-sternum and shoulder regions developing under high tension. Keloids tend to be aggressive in invading adjacent surrounding healthy (normal) skin and can often recur following any form of treatment. In particular, monotherapy with surgical removal alone carries a recurrence rate of up to 100% (8). Phenotypically, keloids are consistent with non-malignant dermal tumors that are due to the excessive overproduction of collagen which never metastasize. However, the morphology and clinically aggressive behavior of keloids can be thought to bear a resemblance to neoplastic dermal tumors.
Different theories exist to explain the etiology of keloids, including elevated skin tension (9, 10), hypoxia (11), chronic inflammation (12), autoimmune (13–15), genetics (16, 17), and vascular factors (18), none of which, however, are independently sufficient to do so. To date, options for keloid treatment are poorly defined, in part due to unsatisfactory outcomes of current treatments and the poor quality of evidence surrounding their use. Compounding keloid research is the lack of animal disease models for testing.
This review aims to explore the salient cancer-like or quasi-neoplastic attributes and features of keloids (Figure 1) and highlights several key areas for future study.
Keloids: Scars or Cancerous Tumors?
Keloids are traditionally viewed as scars on the spectrum of fibroproliferative dermal diseases. To elucidate the etiopathogenesis of keloids, however, the distinction between scar and disease must be made. A scar is the endpoint of physiological wound healing, preceded by inflammation, fibroplasia and granulation, and manifest as non-functioning fibrotic tissue, which may regress over time (19, 20). Cutaneous scars often undergo changes in properties such as thickness, texture, color, and strength but remain within the confines of the surrounding intact skin (19, 21). In contrast, keloids are aggressive exophytic dermal outgrowths disproportionately grown beyond the boundaries of the original wound, from a source, which remains suspended in “wound healing” and scar maturation. Although keloids are not routinely classified as true neoplasms due to their lack of spontaneous occurrence and absence of metastasis, they exhibit various cancer-like characteristics such as uncontrolled proliferation, invasiveness into surrounding tissue, lack of spontaneous regression and ability to vascularize (22–24). Their disproportionately locally aggressive clinical phenotype suggests possible links with skin or mesenchymal tumors that need to be explored in further detail.
Owing to their similar clinical presentation, keloids have been misdiagnosed as other benign and malignant skin tumors and vice versa (25). Of these, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is the most commonly linked to keloids amongst others such as keloidal dermatofibroma (26), keloidal basal cell carcinoma, keloidal atypical fibroxanthoma (27), suggesting a possible overlap between them (28). Based on their pathobiology and clinical phenotype, keloids bear the most similarity between tumors relating to fibrosis, dermal origin, and mesenchymal origin (29). Similarities between keloids and mesenchymal tumors can be found across a range of characteristics from biomarker expression to clinical presentation (30). Seminal work on keloid mesenchymal-related biomarkers suggests that stem-cell like cells identified in keloids deviate from dermal to chondrocytic or osteogenic lineage (31), however research to confirm such hypotheses in this direction is still lacking.
Keloid Morphology: Cellular and Matrix Composition
On gross examination, keloids are well-demarcated, raised cutaneous lesions in different shapes and may be bosselated, nodular, or pendulous (32). They may appear shiny with a discoloration—often erythematous with telangiectasia in individuals with fairer skin and hyperpigmented in those with darker skin (32)—and can reach sizes between several millimeters to many centimeters in diameter (33). Keloids display a heterogenic phenotype in relation to stiffness and range from soft to extremely firm with decreased skin plasticity. The center of keloid tissue often exhibit central hypoxia due to capillary occlusion as a result of exuberant collagen and endothelial cells (34). Keloid margins contain active fibroblasts which invade into surrounding tissue and are well-vascularized through angiogenesis to upkeep the oxygen and nutrient supply required presumably to fuel their invasiveness (24, 35). This is thought to be the result of endothelial cell migration and survival from growth factor activation through kinase signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT, ERK1/2, FAK, and p38/MAPK (36, 37).
Most of the expansile keloid tissue is in the reticular dermal layer with a thickened overlying epidermis. Keloid tissues are not encapsulated and have a perimeter that advances into the surrounding tissue (2). Marginal fibroblasts are more metabolically active and engage in higher rates of collagen I and III production, as reflected by more erythematous skin overlying these margins (38). Several studies have shown that the outer margins and inner complex of keloids are populated by different types of stem cells. In particular, mesenchymal-like stem cells expressing non-hemapoetic markers constituting the inner complex appear to represent the niche that is vital to sustain keloid growth, surrounded by extralesional hematopoietic stem cells (39, 40). In relation to this, the concentration of homogenous thickened hyalinized collagen in the center surrounded by more typical-looking collagen fibers near the edges is unique to keloids (41), but not always present (2).
In brief, cutaneous wound healing involves the formation and remodeling of collagen matrix over time by fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Similarly, activated myofibroblasts and keloid fibroblasts represent the main generators of keloid matrix through their synergistic action in increasing keloid tissue stiffness (42, 43). Fibrocytes, thought to be myofibroblast precursors, are bone marrow-derived circulating cells present in keloids and tissues undergoing wound healing (44–46). They appear as a cross between fibroblasts, monocytes, and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) due to their fibroblast products, hematopoietic surface markers, myeloid antigen expression, and shared morphological characteristics (47). Their expression of CXCR4 forms part of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis, which is crucial in skin regulating cutaneous wound healing, systematic lupus erythematosus and angiogenesis of basal cell carcinoma (48).
The keloid matrix consists of different collagens, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (23, 49, 50). The initial overproduction of type III collagen in keloid matrix is replaced by type I collagen, with an extremely high ratio of type I to type III collagen (17:1) compared to normal scars (6:1) (51). The collagen fibers constituting keloids are larger than those in normal scars and disorderly arranged (2) in loosely cross-linked (51) whorls of thick bundles in the same plane as the epidermis (1). Elevated levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 are observed in keloids (52), the imbalance of which appears to dysregulate collagen production and accumulation, with upregulated MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression additionally linked to cancer invasiveness (53). Overproduction of collagen and matrix is also linked with dysregulated mTOR signaling (54), which plays a crucial role in human cancers (55). Interestingly, elastic fiber deposition is higher in the reticular dermis than the papillary dermis (56, 57), but has been shown to be absent in the keloid extracellular matrix (ECM) alongside deregulated expression of elastic fiber assembly proteins such as elastin, fibrillin-1 and fibulin-5 (58). This is attributed to the over-deposition of chondroitin sulfate (CS) which is 6.9 times higher than that in normal skin. CS is thought to suppress elastic fiber assembly through the dysregulation of fibrillin-1 deposition (58) and its aberrant expression has been found to contribute to tumor metastasis in breast cancer (59). The functions of fibulin-5 and elastin in tumor formation are complex, involving the regulation of metalloproteinases (MMPs) amongst others (60–62). The interplay between these proteoglycan-associated factors in keloid pathogenesis remain to be elucidated.
Sox9, the master regulator of chondrogenesis (63), is upregulated in keloids (31) and its ectopic expression is linked with the upregulation of COL2A1 and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) which culminates in ECM production geared toward chondrogenesis and fibrosis (64). COMP stimulates the assembly of collagen 1 fibrils (65, 66), with an expression level proportional to keloid size and is expressed in scleroderma and other tumors (67–69). Keloids exhibit significantly raised levels of biglycan in the nodular dermis of active keloid lesions alongside decreased decorin expression (70). This is interesting as decorin, which has recently been found to suppress collagen production, is raised in malignant conditions (71, 72). All these proteoglycans have been shown to be differentially regulated by basic fibroblast growth factor, that is thought to be involved in producing the tumor phenotype (73, 74).
Keloids share many similarities with other dermal tumors by virtue of their shared tissue origin. This includes the integral activation of Wnt β-catenin pathway in desmoid tumors (75) and elevated levels of TGF-β, collagen, and GAG in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (76). In both of these tumors, trauma has been cited as a precipitating factor (75, 77).
Keloids and the Hallmarks of Cancer
Although keloids exhibit the hallmarks of cancer to a large extent, these characteristics remain to be fully explored in this context (78, 79). There is potentially a key regulator or group of pre-requisite factors, which when activated after skin injury, triggers a cascade of events that culminate in keloid scar formation. The various relationships between tumor-related factors expressed in keloids may be complex and their roles in sustaining keloid growth are still unclear. Table 1 highlights key tumor biomarkers discussed in this review.
Table 1.
Biomarker | Normal physiological function | Associated tumor processes | Expression in keloids | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bcl-2 | Apoptosis regulation | Dysregulated in skin cancers and upregulated in some chondrosarcomas | Positive in basal keratinocytes and spindle-shaped cells | (79–82) |
BMP2 | TGF-β family | Highly expressed in malignant fibrous histiocytoma | ↑ | (31, 83) |
c-jun | Role in organogenesis | Proto-oncogene which promotes cell migration and motility factor ENPP2 in soft tissue sarcomas and is strongly expressed in BCC | Expressed in keloid keratinocytes but absent in resting keloids | (82, 84–86) |
CXCR4 | Increases fibroblastic expression of collagen and TGF-β | Cross-talk between tumor cells and tumor micro-environment | Positive | (87, 88) |
HIF-1 | Response to hypoxia | Adaptation of tumor cells to hypoxia | ↑ | (89, 90) |
HSP27 | Stress response protein | Highly expressed in cancers | ↑ | (91–93) |
HSP47 | Collagen maturation | Promotes cell survival in various mesenchymal tumors | ↑ | (94–96) |
HSP90 | Indicates cellular replicative potential | ↑ | (97, 98) | |
IL-6 | Interleukin with pro- and anti-inflammatory roles | Pro-tumorigenic | ↑ | (39, 99, 100) |
SERPINB5 | P53-regulated tumor suppressor | Expressed in various cancers | Positive | (101–103) |
MMP-2, MMP-9 | ECM degradation | Expressed in various cancers | ↑ | (53, 104–108) |
MRF 15 | Cell senescence | Senescence induction of human tumor cell lines | ↑ in keloid fibroblasts | (23, 109) |
mTOR | Cell signaling mediator | Dysregulated in various cancers | ↑ | (55, 110) |
Nanog | ESC marker | Multifaceted role in cancers, positive in bone sarcomas | ↑ in KPCs, KALT | (39, 111–113) |
NIP3 | Pro-apoptotic, induced in response to hypoxia | Expressed in various tumors | ↓ | (114–116) |
Notch | Cell-to-cell signaling | Dual role in tumor mediation as promoter and suppressor | ↑ | (117, 118) |
Oct4 | ESC marker | Regulates EMT and ERK1/2 signaling in ovarian cancer, positive in bone sarcomas | ↑ in KPCs, KALT | (39, 112, 113, 119) |
Osteopontin | Regulation of cellular functions | Promotes invasiveness in various carcinomas | Expressed in epidermis | (120, 121) |
p53 | Tumor suppressor gene | Mutated in more than 50% of all tumors | ↑ in central region of KFs | (122, 123) |
p63 | Inhibits p53 translational activation | Expressed in many benign giant cell bone tumors and uncommon in malignant tumors | ↑ | (124–126) |
PDGF | Protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) | Mutated in some cancers | Positive | (99, 100, 127) |
Periostin | Collagen fibrillogenesis | Tumor progression and metastasis | ↑ | (31, 128, 129) |
ROS | Apoptosis induction in DNA damage | Second messenger in intracellular signaling in cancer | ↑ | (130, 131) |
S100 | Upregulated in skin tumors | Elevated in osteosarcoma | Variable expression | (132, 133) |
Sox2 | ESC marker | Tumor initiation and maintenance of CSCs in osteosarcomas and squamous cell carcinomas | ↑ | (112, 134, 135) |
Sox9 | Master regulator of chondrogenesis | Present in classic and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma | ↑ | (31, 63, 136) |
STAT3 | ESC marker and oncogene activated by PDGF and IL-6 | Activated in various cancers and tumor cell lines | Expressed in endothelium of KALT microvessels | (112, 137–139) |
Wnt10α | Anti-apoptosis | Promotes carcinogenesis | ↑ | (140–142) |
Sustaining Proliferative Signaling
Keloid fibroblasts express higher receptor tyrosine kinase signals compared to normal skin derived fibroblasts (143, 144). This increased keloid-derived fibroblast cellular signaling, which may influence cell growth, differentiation, and survival, is linked to cancer development when dysregulated (145). Nanog, a gene which confers self-replication abilities to cells and is elevated in various cancers (111, 146, 147), is absent in somatic cells (148), yet recently found to be upregulated in keloid associated lymphoid tissue (KALT) (112). Zhang et al. (39) described a population of clonogenic, self-renewing keloid-derived precursor cells expressing mesenchymal and embryonic stem cell markers and are driven by IL-6/IL-17 mediated inflammation. IL-6, alongside hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor, is pro-tumorigenic (39). Of interest, IL-6 and its second messengers JAK/Stat3, both of which are elevated in keloid fibroblasts, form the IL-6/JAK/Stat3 pathway, which contributes toward tumorigenesis within the tumor micro-environment. In particular, Stat3 confers increased cell proliferation and migration within keloid fibroblasts (99, 149).
Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) is a well-researched cytokine in keloid pathogenesis due to its pivotal role in directing keloid fibrosis (150, 151). TGF-β1 influences keloid keratinocytes through both Smad-dependent and Smad-independent signaling pathways such as ERK1/2 and p38 to promote collagen accumulation (150, 151). In relation to cancer, TGF-β1 has been shown to inhibit initial tumor formation before accelerating its malignancy in a transgenic mouse skin cancer model (152). Keloid and normal fibroblasts exhibit a differential response to PDGF, EGF, FGF (153), and TGF-β (154), the majority of which bind to protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) family receptors. PTK receptors contribute to cell proliferation, differentiation (155), and carcinogenesis (156).
Satish et al. (23) found the upregulation of ribosomal proteins in keloid fibroblasts, which is also seen in cancer growth, indicating tighter regulations in keloids which prevent the malignant transformation of their precursor cells. Transcriptional activating factors involved include c-jun and c-fos which function as proto-oncogenes. In addition to its role in cell cycle regulation of fibroblasts (84) and Ras-activated human epidermal neoplasia, c-jun is also linked to benign inflammatory conditions like psoriasis and arthritis (157).
Evasion of Growth Suppressors
The mechanisms underlying keloid growth are not straightforward, involving both up- and downregulation of tumor suppressors. The deregulation of p53 forms the hallmark in various cancers; more recently a mechanism by which it is deregulated in keloids has been identified as TRAF4-USP10 interaction that culminates in fibroblast proliferation (158). Interestingly, whilst p53 mutation is prevalent in keloids (159), its expression has also been found to be elevated in the central region of keloid fibroblasts alongside an increase in p63 which inhibits its translation (101, 160). In turn, this leads to downstream effects including elevated SERPINB5 and maspin, the latter of which is also upregulated during keratinocyte senescence (101). The link between TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and keloids remains unclear (124, 161, 162). Other examples include downregulated miR-1224-5p which normally functions through TGF-β1/Smad3, and has a role in cancers (163). Similarly, miR-21-5p plays a key role in PTEN-mediated proliferative and apoptotic mechanisms in keloid fibroblasts (164), causing decreased levels of PTEN which is a tumor suppressor with wide-ranging downstream effects on cellular maintenance and morphology through PI3K/AKT/mTOR (165). Interestingly, elevated levels of tumor suppressors such as PML are also seen in the hypercellular regions of keloids, suggesting senescence as a factor which confers keloids their benign nature (166). It is plausible that the concerted interplay between these factors result in the quasi-neoplastic behavior of keloids.
Induction of Angiogenesis: The Role of Hypoxia in Keloid Bioenergetics
The Warburg effect is a phenomenon in cancer cells in which metabolism is favored and ATP is produced through anaerobic glycolysis in favor of oxidative metabolism. In cancer cells, the rate of glucose uptake is dramatically increased leading to lactate production, despite the presence of fully functioning mitochondria and availability of oxygen. Specifically, this refers to an increased rate of glycolysis, which is followed by a surge of lactic acid fermentation even if there is no lack of oxygen (167, 168). Similarly, keloid fibroblasts have been found to preferentially utilize the glycolytic pathway instead of oxidative phosphorylation, the latter of which is utilized by normal fibroblasts. The ability of keloid fibroblasts to tap into a wider source of energy may explain why keloids thrive in a hypoxic microenvironment. Indeed, the same study reported that keloid fibroblasts have more ATP, are 3.7 times more active than normal fibroblasts and exhibit lower levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is a byproduct of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (22). The switch to aerobic glycolysis in tumors as a means of ATP production is thought to be the result of glycolytic enzymes activated by HIF-α (169), which is also upregulated in keloids (170, 171). These findings are supported by the higher levels of lactate in keloids due to glycolysis and increase in keloid ATP synthesis on exposure to hypoxia (89, 172). As tumors become increasingly reliant on glycolysis with tumor progression (173), it may even be possible to correlate the growth of keloids with their utilization of glycolysis as a form of keloid disease staging.
Hypoxia is thought to promote tumor proliferation and invasiveness in cancer (174). In keloids, local hypoxia within the injury zone accelerates wound healing by stimulating angiogenesis and driving fibroblast proliferation (175), as evidenced by hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (176) in keloid fibroblasts and a higher density of blood vessels in keloids than normal dermis and scars. In addition to angiogenesis, hypoxia-induced fibroblast to myofibroblast-like conversion has also been observed in keloids and postulated to occur by the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway (177). Angiogenesis is vital in the development of many cutaneous diseases (178). Hypoxia induces the activation of HIF-α1 in both keloids and cancer (179). This results in the activation of Twist which mediates EMT-related cadherin switching and is a master regulator of morphogenesis and other embryonic processes (180).
Periostin, a cell-adhesion ECM protein (128), is increased in physiological processes involved in skin repair, fibrosis, cell proliferation, and ECM remodeling, and tumor processes such as growth and metastasis (181). Periostin increases angiogenesis by activating ERK1/2 and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) pathways, increasing VEGF and angiopoeitin-1 (Ang-1) expression (182). Specific to keloids, periostin is associated with promoting the ability of keloid fibroblasts to migrate and invade surrounding tissues in hypoxia (183). Periostin expression is upregulated by hypoxia through an HIF-1α-dependent pathway (183). Another group of cell adhesive receptor proteins implicated are integrins which are thought to interact with periostin to facilitate EMT, angiogenesis, and the mobility of chondrocytes, fibroblasts, and cancer cells (184). Periostin promotes angiogenesis in gastric, breast, and ovarian cancers (185, 186).
Activating Invasion and Metastasis
There is a growing body of evidence recognizing the importance of EMT in keloid pathophysiology. Whilst EMT is known to promote the migratory behavior of metastatic cells, the benign nature of keloids makes it unclear whether they are the result of type II fibrotic EMT or suspended type III metastatic EMT (187). There is no evidence of significant epidermal-dermal basement membrane zone (BMZ) breakdown or disrupted collagen IV expression in the BMZ of keloids (188), which may explain why they do not metastasize. Investigating other cell motility factors in keloids may reveal unique key agents in metastatic prevention.
E-cadherin, a component of epithelial adherens junction, is encoded by CDH1 and becomes lost in cancer cells undergoing EMT (189). Although CDH1 gene expression levels are similar between normal and keloid keratinocytes, keloids express decreased protein levels of E-cadherin (188, 190), in line with cadherin switching from E-cadherin to mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin (191), fibronectin-1, vimentin, and cadherin-11. Indeed, vimentin, fibronectin-1, and cadherin-11 have been identified in keloids, with overexpression of fibronectin-1 (23, 49). Vimentin, which is commonly expressed in soft tissue tumors, is highly expressed in keloid keratinocytes (190) and associated with changes in shape, motility and adhesion properties during EMT (192). N-cadherin, which is linked to increased tumor cell mobility (193) and progression (194), remains to be studied in keloids. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which is normally involved in regulating ECM signaling (195, 196), leads to E-cadherin suppression and promotion of tumor invasiveness (197–200) alongside a fibroblastic phenotype when aberrantly upregulated in EMT. In basal cell carcinoma, ILK expression leads to increased tumor invasiveness and EMT markers through upregulated Snail, β-catenin and α-SMA (197). β-catenin is elevated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells undergoing EMT. Similarly, a higher level of β-catenin protein activity has been found in keloid keratinocytes compared to normal keratinocytes, and is inversely proportional to E-cadherin expression despite no significant difference at transcription level (140).
Upon injury, epidermal keratinocytes induce dermal fibroblasts to produce keloid matrix features by expressing genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (201) and upregulating the expression of inflammatory mediators such as COX1 and COX2 in keloid fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells (202). The fibroblast-like phenotype in these keloid keratinocytes is potentially perpetuated by the local hypoxic environment in keloids which increase the invasiveness of these keratinocytes, thereby leading to excessive keloid growth (202).
MicroRNAs are known to facilitate oncogenesis and metastasis by regulating post-transcriptional and translational gene expression in cell proliferation, EMT and cancer stem cells (203, 204). This may explain several observations in keloids, for example, the decreased elastic fiber density in keloids despite normal elastin expression coding for elastic fibers (205). MiR-21-5p which mediates PTEN in keloids, also contributes to EMT in keloids (188, 206), thereby suggesting EMT phenotype maintenance in keloid keratinocytes through exertion of their stem-cell like effects (206). This is significant, as MiR-21-5p has been claimed to be overexpressed in most cancers and various fibrotic disorders such as those involving the skin, kidneys and cardiopulmonary systems (206, 207).
Additionally, insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, which promotes fibroblast invasiveness, is highly upregulated in keloid fibroblasts compared to normal fibroblasts (208). Osteopontin is a major cytokine, which promotes matricellular interaction, tumor progression, angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis in malignancies (120). It is expressed in keloids, skin, and mesenchymal tumors. S100 influences the chondroid metaplasia of fibroblasts to fibrocartilage cells (209) and is expressed in desmoplastic melanoma (160), however it has only been found in low levels in keloids (132).
Resisting Cell Death
Keloid myofibroblasts are thought to sustain extended “healing” by eluding apoptosis (210) despite prolonged hypoxia. Tumor cells may escape apoptosis through periostin-activated Akt/PKB pathway in hypoxia (211). In keloids, periostin activation is linked with downstream activation of ERK1/2 (182) which is known to regulate the functions of Fra-1 and ZEB1/2 in tumorigenesis (212). There is no accepted consensus on the apoptosis levels in keloids. It was previously thought that keloids elude apoptosis by sustaining lower levels of oxidative stress (213). More recent evidence contradicts this; the discovery of increased ROS (125) and downregulated Nrf2 (214) is consistent with other papers suggesting increased rates of apoptosis in keloids (215, 216). Nrf2 is protective against oxidative stresses and various diseases including cancer (217, 218), whereas ROS is thought to act both as a second messenger in intracellular signaling (130) to facilitate cancer progression and as an apoptotic agent by promoting cell senescence (219). This suggests the possibility of differential response to ROS by different cell populations.
Up to eight apoptosis genes were found to be down-regulated amongst 64 which were studied in keloids, compared to normal skin by Sayah et al. (114). Amongst these, NIP3 is known pro-apoptotic, induced in response to hypoxia by HIF-1α (115). The distribution of apoptotic cells was mapped and found to be equal across the normal tissues but were fewer and concentrated at the margins of keloid tissues. From a regional perspective, Luo et al. (220) described in detail the heterogeneous nature of the microenvironment and subcellular regions in keloids with regard to apoptosis. Within the keloid tissue itself, apoptotic cells are concentrated in hypercellular areas at the edges and lacking in the collagen-abundant center (221), corroborating with previous findings of p53 and Bcl-2 localizing to the same regions (79). The concerted up- and down- regulation of various apoptotic-related genes in keloid tissues suggest an interplay of these factors in the tumorigenic capabilities of keloids.
Keloids express several heat shock proteins (HSPs) which are responsible for increasing cell survivability through interprotein interactions in response to stresses (97, 222). HSP47, which is vital in collagen synthesis and maturation (223), is highly expressed in carcinomas of the head, neck (224), and pancreas (225). HSP90 increases in response to cellular stresses to increase cell survival (97) and is upregulated in keloids (98). Similarly, clusterin is increased in cellular stresses (226, 227), and invasive tumors (228).
A study by Yu et al. (140) found increased expression of Wnt10A, β-catenin, and telomerase in keloids. Increased Wnt signaling in keloids promotes cell growth by minimizing apoptosis through upregulation of β-catenin and telomerase activity (140). In normal cells, β-catenin is inhibited by Sox9 to promote chondrogenesis (229, 230). It is unclear whether these two molecules are simultaneously upregulated and if so, the effects they have on keloid growth. Telomerase activity, which is linked with disease aggressiveness of bone and soft tissue tumors, is found in 10% of benign and 44% of malignant tumors (231). Keloid precursor cells have been shown to demonstrate telomerase activity which may mediate telomere lengthening by interacting with IL-6 (39). There are reports, however, of decreased telomere length (131) and suppressed telomerase activity in keloids as it is thought that telomerase ceases to function after the initial stages of keloid formation (232). Unsurprisingly, telomere length is negatively correlated with ROS levels (131, 233).
It is postulated that a reciprocal protective relationship exists between tumor cells and their stem cell niche, as shown by the upregulation of various genes and proteins in endothelial cells to increase survivability in response to cytotoxic conditions (234, 235). The role of micro-environmental signals (17, 236) which promote chemokine-related changes in keloid fibroblasts (237) has been investigated recently following similar studies on epigenetics in cancer development (238, 239). Studies on DNA methylation profiles of keloid tissue and healthy skin suggest that DNA methylation may be a key driver in the pathology of keloids. These include the discovery of DNMT1 in keloid fibroblasts (240) and master regulator genes such as pyroxamide, tributyrin, PRKG2, and PENK in keloid tissue (241–243). Other studies found evidence for histone modification such as upregulated HDAC2 in keloid tissue (244) and expression of non-coding RNAs in keloids (245). These discoveries are significant as they represent known biomarkers of cancer. HSPs such as HSP27, HSP47, and HSP70 are also found to be overexpressed in keloids (246), with HSP27 and HSP70 having links to cancer (247).
Enabling Replicative Immortality: The Role of a Keloid Stem Cell Niche
Stem cells perform various roles in cutaneous wound healing (248). Distinct populations of several stem or stem-like cells (249) have been identified in keloid tissues, including hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal-like stem cells, and keloid progenitor cells (40). The fate of stem cells dictated by signals from the stem cell niche microenvironment (250) represents a tightly regulated process in keloids (251).
A population of keloid precursor stem cells (KPCs) was described in the dermis which harbor the capacity for multi-lineage differentiation and self-renewal, the latter of which may explain the high recurrence rates in keloids (39). Their telomerase activity is higher than normal skin precursor cells but lower than cancers. The significance of this is their correlation with tumor or cancer stem cells (252) which are thought to originate from adult stem cells mutated under the influence of a deregulated stem cell niche, following which they become capable of uncontrolled growth, perpetual self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation, eventually leading to cancer. They may also have a role in conferring resistance to treatment (253, 254). The role of the cancer stem cell niche is outlined in further detail by Borovski (255).
As part of the wound healing process, orchestrated upregulation and interactions between neutrophils, eosinophils, T-cells, B-cells, macrophages, and mast cells have been demonstrated in keloid tissue, and more recently along with keloid-associated lymphoid tissue (KALT) (41, 256). Within KALT, primitive cells within the sub-epidermal micro-vessel endothelium have been recently found to express embryonic stem cell (ESC) markers Oct4, Sox2, pSTAT3, and Nanog (112), suggesting a possible relationship between the immunogenicity and presence of stem cells in keloids.
Responsiveness to Cancer Treatments
High quality evidence on keloid treatment is limited (257, 258). Larger keloids often require surgical excision (259) which carry recurrence rates of up to 100% as monotherapy (8). Radiation, which is another long-established modality of treatment, has been shown to produce varying results in the literature. Primary radiation given to a sample of 84 unresectable keloids over 5 weeks resulted in 97% significant regression in the course of 18 months (260). Another study found that post-operative radiotherapy in the form of beta radiation at 400cGy twice a week totaling up to 16Gy was found to result in flattened scars in 67% of patients, but not without side effects such as pain and atrophy, and carries a recurrence rate of 21.2% (258, 261). Brachytherapy has also yielded favorable results, with a recurrence rate of 3.1% at 33.6 months in a recent study (262). Combined with surgical excision and application of platelet-rich plasma, post-operative superficial radiotherapy up to three fractions has been demonstrated to result in low disease recurrence (263).
Chemotherapy and targeted therapy agents have also shown promising results. Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been found to be effective in suppressing keloid activity by targeting the TGF-β/Smad and MAPK/ERK pathways which are involved in keloid fibroblast growth and cell cycle processes (264). A recent systematic review identified post-excision 5-fluorouracil in combination with triamcinolone acetonide as a favorable treatment with up to 92% non-recurrence (265) in what is termed as “combination therapy.” In comparison, monotherapy using intra-lesional corticosteroids, the first-line treatment for keloids (8) has been shown to yield positive results in only 77% of patients (266). The recurrence rates in triple therapy incorporating surgical excision, intra-lesional steroids, and silicone sheet have been reported at 4.6% (263), 9.1% (267), and 12.5% (268). Keloids are also responsive to recombinant adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy using CDglyTK which is used in cancer (269).
The use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in keloids led to the suppression of blood flow and collagen levels alongside improved tissue flexibility (270). This is a cancer treatment used in Bowen's, basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis, thought to suppress fibroproliferation through protoporphyrin 9 (PpIX)-mediated activation of ROS, which is in turn cytotoxic (271, 272). Although keloids are not metastatic, their responsiveness to multimodal cancer treatment suggests similar underlying disease mechanisms with tumorigenesis.
Conclusion
The idea that keloids behave like non-malignant locally aggressive cutaneous cancers is not new and this is evident in both its phenotypical and genetic properties. The biomarker expression profile in these diseases highlights the striking parallels between keloids and both benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors across transcriptional, translational, cellular, and tissue levels. Keloids also exhibit characteristics displayed by cancer cells to some degree, in particular the Warburg effect which confers increased survival to keloid cells in hypoxia. Furthermore, signaling pathways common to these diseases have been found to mold the matrix composition of keloids with the inclusion of chondrogenic signatures. This, in turn, is perpetuated by key cells such as melanocytes, keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and those from the fibrocytic family, which participate in EMT and possess stem cell-like properties. A keloid stem cell niche has also been postulated to support this. Many important tumor-related factors, which have been shown to contribute to the overall pathogenesis by influencing cellular processes such as apoptosis. To this point in time, the use of cancer treatments in keloids has shown encouraging results, further diminishing the fine line between keloids and cancerous tumors. Taken together, this poses many questions in relation to keloid pathobiology which need to be answered, in order to understand how the cascade encompassing prolonged, dysregulated wound healing culminates in the cancer-like or quasi-neoplastic processes which result in keloid formation, progression, persistence and recurrence. This is vital due to the implications it may have for the future therapy and further investigative research of this elusive disease and those with which it shares similar properties.
Author Contributions
The review article was originally conceived and structured by AB. ST performed literature search and wrote the article. NK contributed by reading and editing. AB edited the overall article.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Jumper N, Paus R, Bayat A. Functional histopathology of keloid disease. Histol Histopathol. (2015) 30:1033–57. 10.14670/HH-11-624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee JY, Yang CC, Chao SC, Wong TW. Histopathological differential diagnosis of keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am J Dermatopathol. (2004) 26:379–84. 10.1097/00000372-200410000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ketchum LD, Cohen IK, Masters FW. Hypertrophic scars and keloids. A collective review. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (1974) 53:140–54. 10.1097/00006534-197402000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lu W-s, Zheng X-d, Yao X-h, Zhang L-f. Clinical and epidemiological analysis of keloids in Chinese patients. Arch Dermatol Res. (2015) 307:109–14. 10.1007/s00403-014-1507-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.English RS, Shenefelt PD. Keloids and hypertrophic scars. Dermatol Surg. (1999) 25:631–8. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.98257.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramakrishnan KM, Thomas KP, Sundararajan CR. Study of 1,000 patients with keloids in South India. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (1974) 53:276–80. 10.1097/00006534-197403000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ud-Din S, Bayat A. New insights on keloids, hypertrophic scars, and striae. Dermatol Clin. (2014) 32:193–209. 10.1016/j.det.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2002) 110:560–71. 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chipev CC, Simon M. Phenotypic differences between dermal fibroblasts from different body sites determine their responses to tension and TGFbeta1. BMC Dermatol. (2002) 2:13. 10.1186/1471-5945-2-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suarez E, Syed F, Rasgado TA, Walmsley A, Mandal P, Bayat A. Skin equivalent tensional force alters keloid fibroblast behavior and phenotype. Wound Repair Regen. (2014) 22:557–68. 10.1111/wrr.12215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kischer CW, Shetlar MR, Chvapil M. Hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review and new concept concerning their origin. Scan Electron Microsc. (1982) (Pt 4):1699–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ogawa R. Keloid and hypertrophic scars are the result of chronic inflammation in the reticular dermis. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:606. 10.3390/ijms18030606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kazeem AA. The immunological aspects of keloid tumor formation. J Surg Oncol. (1988) 38:16–8. 10.1002/jso.2930380106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Placik OJ, Lewis VL, Jr. Immunologic associations of keloids. Surg Gynecol Obstet. (1992) 175:185–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCarty SM, Syed F, Bayat A. Influence of the human leukocyte antigen complex on the development of cutaneous fibrosis: an immunogenetic perspective. Acta Derm Venereol. (2010) 90:563–74. 10.2340/00015555-0975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bayat A, Arscott G, Ollier WE, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Keloid disease: clinical relevance of single versus multiple site scars. Br J Plastic Surg. (2005) 58:28–37. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.04.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shih B, Bayat A. Genetics of keloid scarring. Arch Dermatol Res. (2010) 302:319–39. 10.1007/s00403-009-1014-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ogawa R, Akaishi S. Endothelial dysfunction may play a key role in keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis—Keloids and hypertrophic scars may be vascular disorders. Med Hypotheses. (2006) 96:51–60. 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. (2008) 453:314–21. 10.1038/nature07039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. (1999) 341:738–46. 10.1056/NEJM199909023411006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferguson MW, Whitby DJ, Shah M, Armstrong J, Siebert JW, Longaker MT. Scar formation: the spectral nature of fetal and adult wound repair. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (1996) 97:854–60. 10.1097/00006534-199604000-00029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vincent AS, Phan TT, Mukhopadhyay A, Lim HY, Halliwell B, Wong KP. Human skin keloid fibroblasts display bioenergetics of cancer cells. J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:702–9. 10.1038/sj.jid.5701107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Satish L, Lyons-Weiler J, Hebda PA, Wells A. Gene expression patterns in isolated keloid fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen. (2006) 14:463–70. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00135.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Schalkwijk J, Kon M. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (1999) 104:1435–58. 10.1097/00006534-199910000-00031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kimura K, Inadomi T, Yamauchi W, Yoshida Y, Kashimura T, Terui T. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans on the chest with a variety of clinical features masquerading as a keloid: is the disease really protuberant? Ann Dermatol. (2014) 26:643–5. 10.5021/ad.2014.26.5.643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kanitakis J. Keloidal dermatofibroma: report of a rare dermatofibroma variant in a young white woman. Am J Dermatopathol. (2013) 35:400–1. 10.1097/DAD.0b013e31825d9d30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tongdee E, Touloei K, Shitabata PK, Shareef S, Maranda EL. Keloidal atypical fibroxanthoma: case and review of the literature. Case Rep Dermatol. (2016) 8:156–63. 10.1159/000446343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Canady J, Karrer S, Fleck M, Bosserhoff AK. Fibrosing connective tissue disorders of the skin: molecular similarities and distinctions. J Dermatol Sci. (2013) 70:151–8. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bienias W, Miȩkoś-Zydek B, Kaszuba A. Current views on the etiopathogenesis of keloids. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. (2011) 28:467–75. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F. WHO Classification of Tumours. 4th ed IARC (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Naitoh M, Kubota H, Ikeda M, Tanaka T, Shirane H, Suzuki S, et al. Gene expression in human keloids is altered from dermal to chondrocytic and osteogenic lineage. Genes Cells. (2005) 10:1081–91. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00902.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bayat A, Arscott G, Ollier WE, Ferguson MW, Mc Grouther DA. Description of site-specific morphology of keloid phenotypes in an Afrocaribbean population. Br J Plastic Surg. (2004) 57:122–33. 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Crockett DJ. Regional keloid susceptibility. Br J Plastic Surg. (1964) 17:245–53. 10.1016/S0007-1226(64)80040-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kischer CW, Thies AC, Chvapil M. Perivascular myofibroblasts and microvascular occlusion in hypertrophic scars and keloids. Hum Pathol. (1982) 13:819–24. 10.1016/S0046-8177(82)80078-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bran GM, Goessler UR, Hormann K, Riedel F, Sadick H. Keloids: current concepts of pathogenesis (review). Int J Mol Med. (2009) 24:283–93. 10.3892/ijmm_00000231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Powazniak Y, Kempfer AC, de la Paz Dominguez M, Farias C, Keller L, Calderazzo JC, et al. Effect of estradiol, progesterone and testosterone on apoptosis- and proliferation-induced MAPK signaling in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol Med Rep. (2009) 2:441–7. 10.3892/mmr_00000119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Esfahanian N, Shakiba Y, Nikbin B, Soraya H, Maleki-Dizaji N, Ghazi-Khansari M, et al. Effect of metformin on the proliferation, migration, and MMP-2 and−9 expression of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol Med Rep. (2012) 5:1068–74. 10.3892/mmr.2012.753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Syed F, Ahmadi E, Iqbal SA, Singh S, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Fibroblasts from the growing margin of keloid scars produce higher levels of collagen I and III compared with intralesional and extralesional sites: clinical implications for lesional site-directed therapy. Br J Dermatol. (2011) 164:83–96. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10048.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang Q, Yamaza T, Kelly AP, Shi S, Wang S, Brown J, et al. Tumor-like stem cells derived from human keloid are governed by the inflammatory niche driven by IL-17/IL-6 axis. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e7798. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Iqbal SA, Syed F, McGrouther DA, Paus R, Bayat A. Differential distribution of haematopoietic and nonhaematopoietic progenitor cells in intralesional and extralesional keloid: do keloid scars provide a niche for nonhaematopoietic mesenchymal stem cells? Br J Dermatol. (2010) 162:1377–83. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09738.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang C, Akaishi S, Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R. Are keloid and hypertrophic scar different forms of the same disorder? A fibroproliferative skin disorder hypothesis based on keloid findings. Int Wound J. (2014) 11:517–22. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01118.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Andrews JP, Marttala J, Macarak E, Rosenbloom J, Uitto J. Keloids: The paradigm of skin fibrosis–pathomechanisms and treatment. Matrix Biol. (2016) 51:37–46. 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ashcroft KJ, Syed F, Bayat A. Site-specific keloid fibroblasts alter the behaviour of normal skin and normal scar fibroblasts through paracrine signalling. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e75600. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bellini A, Mattoli S. The role of the fibrocyte, a bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor, in reactive and reparative fibroses. Lab Invest. (2007) 87:858–70. 10.1038/labinvest.3700654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mori L, Bellini A, Stacey MA, Schmidt M, Mattoli S. Fibrocytes contribute to the myofibroblast population in wounded skin and originate from the bone marrow. Exp Cell Res. (2005) 304:81–90. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Iqbal SA, Sidgwick GP, Bayat A. Identification of fibrocytes from mesenchymal stem cells in keloid tissue: a potential source of abnormal fibroblasts in keloid scarring. Arch Dermatol Res. (2012) 304:665–71. 10.1007/s00403-012-1225-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Metz CN. Fibrocytes: a unique cell population implicated in wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2003) 60:1342–50. 10.1007/s00018-003-2328-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bollag WB, Hill WD. CXCR4 in epidermal keratinocytes: crosstalk within the skin. J Invest Dermatol. (2013) 133:2505–8. 10.1038/jid.2013.271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen W, Fu X, Sun X, Sun T, Zhao Z, Sheng Z. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in keloids and normal skin with cDNA microarray. J Surg Res. (2003) 113:208–16. 10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00188-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bux S, Madaree A. Keloids show regional distribution of proliferative and degenerate connective tissue elements. Cells Tissues Organs. (2010) 191:213–34. 10.1159/000231899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Verhaegen PD, van Zuijlen PP, Pennings NM, van Marle J, Niessen FB, van der Horst CM, et al. Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: an objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen. (2009) 17:649–56. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00533.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ulrich D, Ulrich F, Unglaub F, Piatkowski A, Pallua N. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in patients with different types of scars and keloids. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. (2010) 63:1015–21. 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Roomi MW, Monterrey JC, Kalinovsky T, Rath M, Niedzwiecki A. Patterns of MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in human cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep. (2009) 21:1323–33. 10.3892/or_00000358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ong CT, Khoo YT, Mukhopadhyay A, Do DV, Lim IJ, Aalami O, et al. mTOR as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of keloids and excessive scars. Exp Dermatol. (2007) 16:394–404. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00550.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Guertin DA, Sabatini DM. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell. (2007) 12:9–22. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen J, Zhuo S, Jiang X, Zhu X, Zheng L, Xie S, et al. Multiphoton microscopy study of the morphological and quantity changes of collagen and elastic fiber components in keloid disease. J Biomed Opt. (2011) 16:051305. 10.1117/1.3569617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Amadeu TP, Braune AS, Porto LC, Desmoulière A, Costa AM. Fibrillin-1 and elastin are differentially expressed in hypertrophic scars and keloids. Wound Repair Regen. (2004) 12:169–74. 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012209.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ikeda M, Naitoh M, Kubota H, Ishiko T, Yoshikawa K, Yamawaki S, et al. Elastic fiber assembly is disrupted by excessive accumulation of chondroitin sulfate in the human dermal fibrotic disease, keloid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2009) 390:1221–8. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cooney CA, Jousheghany F, Yao-Borengasser A, Phanavanh B, Gomes T, Kieber-Emmons AM, et al. Chondroitin sulfates play a major role in breast cancer metastasis: a role for CSPG4 and CHST11 gene expression in forming surface P-selectin ligands in aggressive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. (2011) 13:R58. 10.1186/bcr2895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yanagisawa H, Schluterman MK, Brekken RA. Fibulin-5, an integrin-binding matricellular protein: its function in development and disease. J Cell Commun Signal. (2009) 3:337–47. 10.1007/s12079-009-0065-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lee YH, Albig AR, Regner M, Schiemann BJ, Schiemann WP. Fibulin-5 initiates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enhances EMT induced by TGF-beta in mammary epithelial cells via a MMP-dependent mechanism. Carcinogenesis. (2008) 29:2243–51. 10.1093/carcin/bgn199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Donet M, Brassart-Pasco S, Salesse S, Maquart FX, Brassart B. Elastin peptides regulate HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell migration and invasion through an Hsp90-dependent mechanism. Br J Cancer. (2014) 111:139–48. 10.1038/bjc.2014.239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat Genet. (1999) 22:85–9. 10.1038/8792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hanley KP, Oakley F, Sugden S, Wilson DI, Mann DA, Hanley NA. Ectopic SOX9 mediates extracellular matrix deposition characteristic of organ fibrosis. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:14063–71. 10.1074/jbc.M707390200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Inui S, Shono F, Nakajima T, Hosokawa K, Itami S. Identification and characterization of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein as a novel pathogenic factor in keloids. Am J Pathol. (2011) 179:1951–60. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Agarwal P, Schulz JN, Blumbach K, Andreasson K, Heinegard D, Paulsson M, et al. Enhanced deposition of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein is a common feature in fibrotic skin pathologies. Matrix Biol. (2013) 32:325–31. 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yamamoto M, Takahashi H, Suzuki C, Naishiro Y, Yamamoto H, Imai K, et al. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology. (2007) 46:1858–9. 10.1093/rheumatology/kem254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Englund E, Bartoschek M, Reitsma B, Jacobsson L, Escudero-Esparza A, Orimo A, et al. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein contributes to the development and metastasis of breast cancer. Oncogene. (2016) 35:5585–96. 10.1038/onc.2016.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liu TT, Liu XS, Zhang M, Liu XN, Zhu FX, Zhu FM, et al. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein is a prognostic factor and biomarker of colon cancer and promotes cell proliferation by activating the Akt pathway. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2018) 144:1049–63. 10.1007/s00432-018-2626-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hunzelmann N, Anders S, Sollberg S, Schonherr E, Krieg T. Co-ordinate induction of collagen type I and biglycan expression in keloids. Br J Dermatol. (1996) 135:394–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb01502.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Adany R, Heimer R, Caterson B, Sorrell JM, Iozzo RV. Altered expression of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in the stroma of human colon carcinoma. Hypomethylation of PG-40 gene correlates with increased PG-40 content and mRNA levels. J Biol Chem. (1990) 265:11389–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hunzelmann N, Schonherr E, Bonnekoh B, Hartmann C, Kresse H, Krieg T. Altered immunohistochemical expression of small proteoglycans in the tumor tissue and stroma of basal cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. (1995) 104:509–13. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12605979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tan EM, Hoffren J, Rouda S, Greenbaum S, Fox JWt, Moore JH, Jr, et al. Decorin, versican, and biglycan gene expression by keloid and normal dermal fibroblasts: differential regulation by basic fibroblast growth factor. Exp Cell Res. (1993) 209:200–7. 10.1006/excr.1993.1302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Turner N, Grose R. Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2010) 10:116–29. 10.1038/nrc2780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Skubitz KM. Biology and treatment of aggressive fibromatosis or desmoid tumor. Mayo Clin Proc. (2017) 92:947–64. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Locci P, Balducci C, Lilli C, Marinucci L, Becchetti E, Dolci C, et al. Desmoid and fibroma tumors differently respond to TGFbeta(1) stimulus and ECM macromolecule accumulation. Biomed Pharmacother. (2007) 61:131–6. 10.1016/j.biopha.2006.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Stivala A, Lombardo GA, Pompili G, Tarico MS, Fraggetta F, Perrotta RE. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: our experience of 59 cases. Oncol Lett. (2012) 4:1047–55. 10.3892/ol.2012.887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. (2011) 144:646–74. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ladin DA, Hou Z, Patel D, McPhail M, Olson JC, Saed GM, et al. p53 and apoptosis alterations in keloids and keloid fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen. (1998) 6:28–37. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1998.60106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nys K, Agostinis P. Bcl-2 family members: essential players in skin cancer. Cancer Lett. (2012) 320:1–13. 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bovee JV, van den Broek LJ, Cleton-Jansen AM, Hogendoorn PC. Up-regulation of PTHrP and Bcl-2 expression characterizes the progression of osteochondroma towards peripheral chondrosarcoma and is a late event in central chondrosarcoma. Lab Invest. (2000) 80:1925–34. 10.1038/labinvest.3780202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Teofoli P, Barduagni S, Ribuffo M, Campanella A, De Pita O, Puddu P. Expression of Bcl-2, p53, c-jun and c-fos protooncogenes in keloids and hypertrophic scars. J Dermatol Sci. (1999) 22:31–7. 10.1016/S0923-1811(99)00040-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Asano N, Yamakazi T, Seto M, Matsumine A, Yoshikawa H, Uchida A. The expression and prognostic significance of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. J Bone Joint Surg B. (2004) 86:607–12. 10.1302/0301-620X.86B4.14484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wilkinson DG, Bhatt S, Ryseck RP, Bravo R. Tissue-specific expression of c-jun and junB during organogenesis in the mouse. Development. (1989) 106:465–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sioletic S, Czaplinski J, Hu L, Fletcher JA, Fletcher CD, Wagner AJ, et al. c-Jun promotes cell migration and drives expression of the motility factor ENPP2 in soft tissue sarcomas. J Pathol. (2014) 234:190–202. 10.1002/path.4379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Laner-Plamberger S, Kaser A, Paulischta M, Hauser-Kronberger C, Eichberger T, Frischauf AM. Cooperation between GLI and JUN enhances transcription of JUN and selected GLI target genes. Oncogene. (2009) 28:1639–51. 10.1038/onc.2009.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Burger JA, Kipps TJ. CXCR4: A key receptor in the crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment. Blood. (2006) 107:1761–7. 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Shin JU, Kim SH, Kim H, Noh JY, Jin S, Park CO, et al. TSLP is a potential initiator of collagen synthesis and an activator of CXCR4/SDF-1 axis in keloid pathogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. (2016) 136:507–15. 10.1016/j.jid.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhang Q, Oh CK, Messadi DV, Duong HS, Kelly AP, Soo C, et al. Hypoxia-induced HIF-1 alpha accumulation is augmented in a co-culture of keloid fibroblasts and human mast cells: involvement of ERK1/2 and PI-3K/Akt. Exp Cell Res. (2006) 312:145–55. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vaupel P. The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist. (2004) 9(Suppl 5):10–7. 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cohly HHP, Scott H, Ndebele2 K, Jenkins JK, Angel MF. Differential gene expression of fibroblasts: keloid versus normal. Int J Mol Sci. (2002) 3:1162–76. 10.3390/i3111162 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mehlen P, Schulze-Osthoff K, Arrigo AP. Small stress proteins as novel regulators of apoptosis. Heat shock protein 27 blocks Fas/APO-1- and staurosporine-induced cell death. J Biol Chem. (1996) 271:16510–4. 10.1074/jbc.271.28.16510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Garrido C, Brunet M, Didelot C, Zermati Y, Schmitt E, Kroemer G. Heat shock proteins 27 and 70: anti-apoptotic proteins with tumorigenic properties. Cell Cycle. (2006) 5:2592–601. 10.4161/cc.5.22.3448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kuroda K, Tajima S. Proliferation of HSP47-positive skin fibroblasts in dermatofibroma. J Cutan Pathol. (2008) 35:21–6. 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00768.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Uozaki H, Ishida T, Kakiuchi C, Horiuchi H, Gotoh T, Iijima T, et al. Expression of heat shock proteins in osteosarcoma and its relationship to prognosis. Pathol Res Pract. (2000) 196:665–73. 10.1016/S0344-0338(00)80118-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Naitoh M, Hosokawa N, Kubota H, Tanaka T, Shirane H, Sawada M, et al. Upregulation of HSP47 and collagen type III in the dermal fibrotic disease, keloid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2001) 280:1316–22. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Whitesell L, Lindquist SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2005) 5:761–72. 10.1038/nrc1716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lee WJ, Lee JH, Ahn HM, Song SY, Kim YO, Lew DH, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitor decreases collagen synthesis of keloid fibroblasts and attenuates the extracellular matrix on the keloid spheroid model. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2015) 136:328e−37e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lim CP, Phan TT, Lim IJ, Cao X. Stat3 contributes to keloid pathogenesis via promoting collagen production, cell proliferation and migration. Oncogene. (2006) 25:5416–25. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ghazizadeh M, Tosa M, Shimizu H, Hyakusoku H, Kawanami O. Functional implications of the IL-6 signaling pathway in keloid pathogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. (2007) 127:98–105. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ong CT, Khoo YT, Mukhopadhyay A, Masilamani J, Do DV, Lim IJ, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis between normal skin and keloid scar. Br J Dermatol. (2010) 162:1302–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09660.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nickoloff BJ, Lingen MW, Chang BD, Shen M, Swift M, Curry J, et al. Tumor suppressor maspin is up-regulated during keratinocyte senescence, exerting a paracrine antiangiogenic activity. Cancer Res. (2004) 64:2956–61. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zou Z, Gao C, Nagaich AK, Connell T, Saito S, Moul JW, et al. p53 regulates the expression of the tumor suppressor gene maspin. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275:6051–4. 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Stetler-Stevenson WG, Aznavoorian S, Liotta LA. Tumor cell interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annu Rev Cell Biol. (1993) 9:541–73. 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.002545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Curran S, Murray GI. Matrix metalloproteinases: molecular aspects of their roles in tumour invasion and metastasis. Eur J Cancer. (2000) 36:1621–30. 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00156-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yang HK, Jeong KC, Kim YK, Jung ST. Role of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and MMP-9 in soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Orthop Surg. (2014) 6:443–54. 10.4055/cios.2014.6.4.443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tanriverdi-Akhisaroglu S, Menderes A, Oktay G. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and−9 activities in human keloids, hypertrophic and atrophic scars: a pilot study. Cell Biochem Funct. (2009) 27:81–7. 10.1002/cbf.1537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Li H, Nahas Z, Feng F, Elisseeff JH, Boahene K. Tissue engineering for in vitro analysis of matrix metalloproteinases in the pathogenesis of keloid lesions. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. (2013) 15:448–56. 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pardo PS, Leung JK, Lucchesi JC, Pereira-Smith OM. MRG15, a novel chromodomain protein, is present in two distinct multiprotein complexes involved in transcriptional activation. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277:50860–6. 10.1074/jbc.M203839200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Syed F, Sherris D, Paus R, Varmeh S, Singh S, Pandolfi PP, et al. Keloid disease can be inhibited by antagonizing excessive mTOR signaling with a novel dual TORC1/2 inhibitor. Am J Pathol. (2012) 181:1642–58. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Jeter CR, Yang T, Wang J, Chao HP, Tang DG. Concise review: NANOG in cancer stem cells and tumor development: an update and outstanding questions. Stem Cells. (2015) 33:2381–90. 10.1002/stem.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Grant C, Chudakova DA, Itinteang T, Chibnall AM, Brasch HD, Davis PF, et al. Expression of embryonic stem cell markers in keloid-associated lymphoid tissue. J Clin Pathol. (2016) 69:643–6. 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wicki A, Lehembre F, Wick N, Hantusch B, Kerjaschki D, Christofori G. Tumor invasion in the absence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition: Podoplanin-mediated remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. Cancer Cell. (2006) 9:261–72. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sayah DN, Soo C, Shaw WW, Watson J, Messadi D, Longaker MT, et al. Downregulation of apoptosis-related genes in keloid tissues. J Surg Res. (1999) 87:209–16. 10.1006/jsre.1999.5761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Bruick RK. Expression of the gene encoding the proapoptotic Nip3 protein is induced by hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:9082–7. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sowter HM, Ratcliffe PJ, Watson P, Greenberg AH, Harris AL. HIF-1-dependent regulation of hypoxic induction of the cell death factors BNIP3 and NIX in human tumors. Cancer Res. (2001) 61:6669–73. Available online at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/18/6669 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Dotto GP. Notch tumor suppressor function. Oncogene. (2008) 27:5115–23. 10.1038/onc.2008.225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Syed F, Bayat A. Notch signaling pathway in keloid disease: enhanced fibroblast activity in a Jagged-1 peptide-dependent manner in lesional vs. extralesional fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen. (2012) 20:688–706. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00823.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Liu L, Zhang J, Fang C, Zhang Z, Feng Y, Xi X. OCT4 mediates FSH-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion through the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in epithelial ovarian cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2015) 461:525–32. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Shevde LA, Samant RS. Role of osteopontin in the pathophysiology of cancer. Matrix Biol. (2014) 37:131–41. 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Miragliotta V, Pirone A, Donadio E, Abramo F, Ricciardi MP, Theoret CL. Osteopontin expression in healing wounds of horses and in human keloids. Equine Vet J. (2016) 48:72–7. 10.1111/evj.12372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lu F, Gao J, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, Ou C. Biological differences between fibroblasts derived from peripheral and central areas of keloid tissues. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2007) 120:625–30. 10.1097/01.prs.0000270293.93612.7b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science. (1991) 253:49–53. 10.1126/science.1905840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yang A, McKeon F. P63 and P73: P53 mimics, menaces and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2000) 1:199–207. 10.1038/35043127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.De Felice B, Garbi C, Santoriello M, Santillo A, Wilson RR. Differential apoptosis markers in human keloids and hypertrophic scars fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biochem. (2009) 327:191–201. 10.1007/s11010-009-0057-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Maues De Paula A, Vasiljevic A, Giorgi R, Gomez-Brouchet A, Aubert S, Leroy X, et al. A diagnosis of giant cell-rich tumour of bone is supported by p63 immunohistochemistry, when more than 50% of cells is stained. Virchows Arch. (2014) 465:487–94. 10.1007/s00428-014-1637-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Demoulin JB, Essaghir A. PDGF receptor signaling networks in normal and cancer cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2014) 25:273–83. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Norris RA, Damon B, Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Ramamurthi A, Moreno-Rodriguez R, et al. Periostin regulates collagen fibrillogenesis and the biomechanical properties of connective tissues. J Cell Biochem. (2007) 101:695–711. 10.1002/jcb.21224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Fukuda K, Sugihara E, Ohta S, Izuhara K, Funakoshi T, Amagai M, et al. Periostin is a key niche component for wound metastasis of melanoma. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0129704. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Baeuerle PA, Rupec RA, Pahl HL. Reactive oxygen intermediates as second messengers of a general pathogen response. Pathol Biol. (1996) 44:29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.De Felice B, Wilson RR, Nacca M. Telomere shortening may be associated with human keloids. BMC Med Genet. (2009) 10:110. 10.1186/1471-2350-10-110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hunasgi S, Koneru A, Vanishree M, Shamala R. Keloid: acase report and review of pathophysiology and differences between keloid and hypertrophic scars. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. (2013) 17:116–20. 10.4103/0973-029X.110701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Gebhardt C, Riehl A, Durchdewald M, Nemeth J, Furstenberger G, Muller-Decker K, et al. RAGE signaling sustains inflammation and promotes tumor development. J Exp Med. (2008) 205:275–85. 10.1084/jem.20070679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Basu-Roy U, Seo E, Ramanathapuram L, Rapp TB, Perry JA, Orkin SH, et al. Sox2 maintains self renewal of tumor-initiating cells in osteosarcomas. Oncogene. (2012) 31:2270–82. 10.1038/onc.2011.405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Boumahdi S, Driessens G, Lapouge G, Rorive S, Nassar D, Le Mercier M, et al. SOX2 controls tumour initiation and cancer stem-cell functions in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nature. (2014) 511:246–50. 10.1038/nature13305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Wehrli BM, Huang W, De Crombrugghe B, Ayala AG, Czerniak B. Sox9, a master regulator of chondrogenesis, distinguishes mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from other small blue round cell tumors. Hum Pathol. (2003) 34:263–9. 10.1053/hupa.2003.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene. (2000) 19:2474–88. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Bromberg JF, Wrzeszczynska MH, Devgan G, Zhao Y, Pestell RG, Albanese C, et al. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell. (1999) 98:295–303. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81959-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Xue H, McCauley RL, Zhang W. Elevated interleukin-6 expression in keloid fibroblasts. J Surg Res. (2000) 89:74–7. 10.1006/jsre.1999.5805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Yu D, Shang Y, Yuan J, Ding S, Luo S, Hao L. Wnt/β-catenin signaling exacerbates keloid cell proliferation by regulating telomerase. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2016) 39:2001–13. 10.1159/000447896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Igota S, Tosa M, Murakami M, Egawa S, Shimizu H, Hyakusoku H, et al. Identification and characterization of Wnt signaling pathway in keloid pathogenesis. Int J Med Sci. (2013) 10:344–54. 10.7150/ijms.5349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kirikoshi H, Inoue S, Sekihara H, Katoh M. Expression of WNT10A in human cancer. Int J Oncol. (2001) 19:997–1001. 10.3892/ijo.19.5.997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Chin GS, Liu W, Peled Z, Lee TY, Steinbrech DS, Hsu M. Differential expression of transforming growth factor-beta receptors I and II and activation of Smad 3 in keloid fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2001) 108:423–9. 10.1097/00006534-200108000-00022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Chin GS, Liu W, Steinbrech D, Hsu M, Levinson H, Longaker MT. Cellular signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in keloid and normal human dermal fibroblasts. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2000) 106:1532–40. 10.1097/00006534-200012000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Ras. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th ed New York, NY: W. H. Freeman: (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 146.Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, Tweedie S, et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell. (2003) 113:643–55. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00392-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell. (2003) 113:631–42. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00393-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Chambers I. The molecular basis of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells. (2004) 6:386–91. 10.1089/clo.2004.6.386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chang Q, Bournazou E, Sansone P, Berishaj M, Gao SP, Daly L, et al. The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forward loop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia. (2013) 15:848–62. 10.1593/neo.13706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Bettinger DA, Yager DR, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK. The effect of TGF-beta on keloid fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (1996) 98:827–33. 10.1097/00006534-199610000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Jagadeesan J, Bayat A. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) and keloid disease. Int J Surg. (2007) 5:278–85. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Cui W, Fowlis DJ, Bryson S, Duffie E, Ireland H, Balmain A, et al. TGFbeta1 inhibits the formation of benign skin tumors, but enhances progression to invasive spindle carcinomas in transgenic mice. Cell. (1996) 86:531–42. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80127-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Haisa M, Okochi H, Grotendorst GR. Elevated levels of PDGF alpha receptors in keloid fibroblasts contribute to an enhanced response to PDGF. J Invest Dermatol. (1994) 103:560–3. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12396856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Babu M, Diegelmann R, Oliver N. Keloid fibroblasts exhibit an altered response to TGF-beta. J Invest Dermatol. (1992) 99:650–5. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12668146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ullrich A, Schlessinger J. Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell. (1990) 61:203–12. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Kolibaba KS, Druker BJ. Protein tyrosine kinases and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1997) 1333:F217–48. 10.1016/S0304-419X(97)00022-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zenz R, Efer R, Kenner L, Florin L, Hummerich L, Mehic D, et al. Psoriasis-like skin disease and arthritis caused by inducible epidermal deletion of Jun proteins. Nature. (2005) 437:369–75. 10.1038/nature03963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Deng CC, Zhu DH, Chen YJ, Huang TY, Peng Y, Liu SY, et al. TRAF4 promotes fibroblast proliferation in keloids by destabilizing p53 via interacting with the deubiquitinase USP10. J Invest Dermatol. (2019). 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Saed GM, Ladin D, Olson J, Han X, Hou Z, Fivenson D. Analysis of p53 gene mutations in keloids using polymerase chain reaction-based single-strand conformational polymorphism and DNA sequencing. Arch Dermatol. (1998) 134:963–7. 10.1001/archderm.134.8.963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Kaneishi NK, Cockerell CJ. Histologic differentiation of desmoplastic melanoma from cicatrices. Am J Dermatopathol. (1998) 20:128–34. 10.1097/00000372-199804000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Yan L, Lü XY, Wang CM, Cao R, Yin YH, Jia CS, et al. Association between p53 gene codon 72 polymorphism and keloid in Chinese population. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2007) 23:428−30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Zhuo Y, Gao JH, Luo SQ, Zeng WS, Hu ZQ, Lu F, et al. p53 gene codon 72 polymorphism and susceptibility to keloid in Chinese population. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2005) 19:28–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Yao X, Cui X, Wu X, Xu P, Zhu W, Chen X, et al. Tumor suppressive role of miR-1224-5p in keloid proliferation, apoptosis and invasion via the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2018) 495:713–20. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.10.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Liu Y, Wang X, Yang D, Xiao Z, Chen X. MicroRNA-21 affects proliferation and apoptosis by regulating expression of PTEN in human keloid fibroblasts. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2014) 134:561e−73e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Chen C-Y, Chen J, He L, Stiles BL. PTEN: Tumor suppressor and metabolic regulator. Front Endocrinol. (2018) 9:338. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Varmeh S, Egia A, McGrouther D, Tahan SR, Bayat A, Pandolfi PP. Cellular senescence as a possible mechanism for halting progression of keloid lesions. Genes Cancer. (2011) 2:1061–6. 10.1177/1947601912440877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. (2009) 324:1029–33. 10.1126/science.1160809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. (1956) 123:309–14. 10.1126/science.123.3191.309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Semenza GL. Regulation of mammalian O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. (1999) 15:551–78. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhang Q, Wu Y, Ann DK, Messadi DV, Tuan TL, Kelly AP, et al. Mechanisms of hypoxic regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene expression in keloid fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. (2003) 121:1005–12. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12564.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Wu Y, Zhang Q, Ann DK, Akhondzadeh A, Duong HS, Messadi DV, et al. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor may account for elevated level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 via activating ERK1/2 in keloid fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2004) 286:C905–12. 10.1152/ajpcell.00200.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hoopes JE, Su CT, Im MJ. Enzyme activities in hypertrophic scars and keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg. (1971) 47:132–7. 10.1097/00006534-197102000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ramanathan A, Wang C, Schreiber SL. Perturbational profiling of a cell-line model of tumorigenesis by using metabolic measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:5992–7. 10.1073/pnas.0502267102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mucaj V, Shay JE, Simon MC. Effects of hypoxia and HIFs on cancer metabolism. Int J Hematol. (2012) 95:464–70. 10.1007/s12185-012-1070-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Lokmic Z, Musyoka J, Hewitson TD, Darby IA. Hypoxia and hypoxia signaling in tissue repair and fibrosis. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. (2012) 296:139–85. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394307-1.00003-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Steinbrech DS, Mehrara BJ, Chau D, Rowe NM, Chin G, Lee T, et al. Hypoxia upregulates VEGF production in keloid fibroblasts. Ann Plast Surg. (1999) 42:514–9. 10.1097/00000637-199905000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Zhao B, Guan H, Liu JQ, Zheng Z, Zhou Q, Zhang J, et al. Hypoxia drives the transition of human dermal fibroblasts to a myofibroblast-like phenotype via the TGF-beta1/Smad3 pathway. Int J Mol Med. (2017) 39:153–9. 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Laquer V, Hoang V, Nguyen A, Kelly KM. Angiogenesis in cutaneous disease: part II. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2000) 61:945–58. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.O'Connell MP, Weeraratna AT. Change is in the air: the hypoxic induction of phenotype switching in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. (2013) 133:2316–7. 10.1038/jid.2013.208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Yang MH, Wu KJ. TWIST activation by hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1): Implications in metastasis and development. Cell Cycle. (2008) 7:2090–6. 10.4161/cc.7.14.6324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Zhou HM, Wang J, Elliott C, Wen W, Hamilton DW, Conway SJ. Spatiotemporal expression of periostin during skin development and incisional wound healing: lessons for human fibrotic scar formation. J Cell Commun Signal. (2010) 4:99–107. 10.1007/s12079-010-0090-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zhang Z, Nie F, Chen X, Qin Z, Kang C, Chen B, et al. Upregulated periostin promotes angiogenesis in keloids through activation of the ERK 1/2 and focal adhesion kinase pathways, as well as the upregulated expression of VEGF and angiopoietin1. Mol Med Rep. (2015) 11:857–64. 10.3892/mmr.2014.2827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Zhang Z, Nie F, Kang C, Chen B, Qin Z, Ma J, et al. Increased periostin expression affects the proliferation, collagen synthesis, migration and invasion of keloid fibroblasts under hypoxic conditions. Int J Mol Med. (2014) 34:253–61. 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Ruan K, Bao S, Ouyang G. The multifaceted role of periostin in tumorigenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2009) 66:2219–30. 10.1007/s00018-009-0013-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Zhu M, Fejzo MS, Anderson L, Dering J, Ginther C, Ramos L, et al. Periostin promotes ovarian cancer angiogenesis and metastasis. Gynecol Oncol. (2010) 119:337–44. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Qiu F, Shi CH, Zheng J, Liu YB. Periostin mediates the increased pro-angiogenic activity of gastric cancer cells under hypoxic conditions. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. (2013) 27:364–9. 10.1002/jbt.21498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:1420–8. 10.1172/JCI39104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Hahn JM, McFarland KL, Combs KA, Supp DM. Partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition in keloid scars: regulation of keloid keratinocyte gene expression by transforming growth factor-β1. Burns Trauma. (2016) 4:30. 10.1186/s41038-016-0055-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Zeisberg M, Neilson EG. Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:1429–37. 10.1172/JCI36183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Yan L, Cao R, Wang L, Liu Y, Pan B, Yin Y. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in keloid tissues and TGF-beta1-induced hair follicle outer root sheath keratinocytes. Wound Repair Regen. (2015) 23:601–10. 10.1111/wrr.12320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Wheelock MJ, Shintani Y, Maeda M, Fukumoto Y, Johnson KR. Cadherin switching. J Cell Sci. (2008) 121:727–35. 10.1242/jcs.000455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Mendez MG, Kojima SI, Goldman RD. Vimentin induces changes in cell shape, motility, and adhesion during the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. FASEB J. (2010) 24:1838–51. 10.1096/fj.09-151639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Hulit J, Suyama K, Chung S, Keren R, Agiostratidou G, Shan W, et al. N-cadherin signaling potentiates mammary tumor metastasis via enhanced extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cancer Res. (2007) 67:3106–16. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Hazan RB, Qiao R, Keren R, Badano I, Suyama K. Cadherin switch in tumor progression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2004) 1014:155–63. 10.1196/annals.1294.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Hannigan GE, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Fitz-Gibbon L, Coppolino MG, Radeva G, Filmus J, et al. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase. Nature. (1996) 379:91–6. 10.1038/379091a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Dedhar S. Cell-substrate interactions and signaling through ILK. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2000) 12:250–6. 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00083-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Papanikolaou S, Bravou V, Gyftopoulos K, Nakas D, Repanti M, Papadaki H. ILK expression in human basal cell carcinoma correlates with epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and tumour invasion. Histopathology. (2010) 56:799–809. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03556.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Cano A, Pérez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, Locascio A, Blanco MJ, Del Barrio MG, et al. The transcription factor Snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol. (2000) 2:76–83. 10.1038/35000025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Poser I, Dominguez D, de Herreros AG, Varnai A, Buettner R, Bosserhoff AK. Loss of E-cadherin expression in melanoma cells involves up-regulation of the transcriptional repressor Snail. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:24661–6. 10.1074/jbc.M011224200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Cheng CW, Wu PE, Yu JC, Huang CS, Yue CT, Wu CW, et al. Mechanisms of inactivation of E-cadherin in breast carcinoma: modification of the two-hit hypothesis of tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. (2001) 20:3814–23. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Hahn JM, Glaser K, McFarland KL, Aronow BJ, Boyce ST, Supp DM. Keloid-derived keratinocytes exhibit an abnormal gene expression profile consistent with a distinct causal role in keloid pathology. Wound Repair Regen. (2013) 21:530–44. 10.1111/wrr.12060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Abdou AG, Maraee AH, Abd-Elsattar Saif HF. Immunohistochemical evaluation of cox-1 and cox-2 expression in keloid and hypertrophic scar. Am J Dermatopathol. (2014) 36:311–7. 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3182a27b83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Sanchez-Diaz PC, Hsiao TH, Chang JC, Yue D, Tan MC, Chen HI, et al. De-regulated microRNAs in pediatric cancer stem cells target pathways involved in cell proliferation, cell cycle and development. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e61622. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Hao J, Zhang Y, Deng M, Ye R, Zhao S, Wang Y, et al. MicroRNA control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer stem cells. Int J Cancer. (2014) 135:1019–27. 10.1002/ijc.28761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Liu Y, Yang D, Xiao Z, Zhang M. MiRNA expression profiles in keloid tissue and corresponding normal skin tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg. (2012) 36:193–201. 10.1007/s00266-011-9773-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Yan L, Cao R, Liu Y, Wang L, Pan B, Lv X, et al. MiR-21-5p links epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype with stem-like cell signatures via AKT signaling in keloid keratinocytes. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:28281. 10.1038/srep28281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Kumarswamy R, Volkmann I, Thum T. Regulation and function of miRNA-21 in health and disease. RNA Biol. (2011) 8:706–13. 10.4161/rna.8.5.16154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Yoshimoto H, Ishihara H, Ohtsuru A, Akino K, Murakami R, Kuroda H, et al. Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) receptor and the invasiveness of cultured keloid fibroblasts. Am J Pathol. (1999) 154:883–9. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65335-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Narama I, Masuoka-Nishiyama M, Matsuura T, Ozaki K, Nagatani M, Morishima T. Morphogenesis of degenerative changes predisposing dogs to rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Vet Med Sci. (1996) 58:1091–7. 10.1292/jvms.58.11_1091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Desmouliere A, Chaponnier C, Gabbiani G. Tissue repair, contraction, and the myofibroblast. Wound Repair Regen. (2005) 13:7–12. 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130102.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Bao S, Ouyang G, Bai X, Huang Z, Ma C, Liu M, et al. Periostin potently promotes metastatic growth of colon cancer by augmenting cell survival via the Akt/PKB pathway. Cancer Cell. (2004) 5:329–39. 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00081-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Shin S, Dimitri CA, Yoon SO, Dowdle W, Blenis J. ERK2 but not ERK1 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation via DEF motif-dependent signaling events. Mol Cell. (2010) 38:114–27. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Calderon M, Lawrence WT, Banes AJ. Increased proliferation in keloid fibroblasts wounded in vitro. J Surg Res. (1996) 61:343–7. 10.1006/jsre.1996.0127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Lee YJ, Kwon SB, Kim CH, Cho HD, Nam HS, Lee SH, et al. Oxidative damage and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 protein expression in normal skin and keloid tissue. Ann Dermatol. (2015) 27:507–16. 10.5021/ad.2015.27.5.507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Akasaka Y, Ishikawa Y, Ono I, Fujita K, Masuda T, Asuwa N, et al. Enhanced expression of caspase-3 in hypertrophic scars and keloid: induction of caspase-3 and apoptosis in keloid fibroblasts in vitro. Lab Invest. (2000) 80:345–57. 10.1038/labinvest.3780039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Appleton I, Brown NJ, Willoughby DA. Apoptosis, necrosis, and proliferation: possible implications in the etiology of keloids. Am J Pathol. (1996) 149:1441–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Nrf2-Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. Trends Mol Med. (2004) 10:549–57. 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Lau A, Villeneuve NF, Sun Z, Wong PK, Zhang DD. Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer. Pharmacol Res. (2008) 58:262–70. 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Chen QM, Bartholomew JC, Campisi J, Acosta M, Reagan JD, Ames BN. Molecular analysis of H2O2-induced senescent-like growth arrest in normal human fibroblasts: p53 and Rb control G1 arrest but not cell replication. Biochem J. (1998) 332(Pt 1):43–50. 10.1042/bj3320043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Luo S, Benathan M, Raffoul W, Panizzon RG, Egloff DV. Abnormal balance between proliferation and apoptotic cell death in fibroblasts derived from keloid lesions. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2001) 107:87–96. 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Akasaka Y, Fujita K, Ishikawa Y, Asuwa N, Inuzuka K, Ishihara M, et al. Detection of apoptosis in keloids and a comparative study on apoptosis between keloids, hypertrophic scars, normal healed flat scars, and dermatofibroma. Wound Repair Regen. (2001) 9:501–6. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00501.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Beere HM. “The stress of dying”: the role of heat shock proteins in the regulation of apoptosis. J Cell Sci. (2004) 117(Pt 13):2641–51. 10.1242/jcs.01284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Sauk JJ, Nikitakis N, Siavash H. Hsp47 a novel collagen binding serpin chaperone, autoantigen and therapeutic target. Front Biosci. (2005) 10:107–18. 10.2741/1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Welkoborsky HJ, Bernauer HS, Riazimand HS, Jacob R, Mann WJ, Hinni ML. Patterns of chromosomal aberrations in metastasizing and nonmetastasizing squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (2000) 109:401–10. 10.1177/000348940010900411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Maitra A, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Rahman A, Sohn TA, Argani P, Meyer R, et al. Immunohistochemical validation of a novel epithelial and a novel stromal marker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma identified by global expression microarrays: sea urchin fascin homolog and heat shock protein 47. Am J Clin Pathol. (2002) 118:52–9. 10.1309/3PAM-P5WL-2LV0-R4EG [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Djeu JY, Wei S. Clusterin and chemoresistance. Adv Cancer Res. (2009) 105:77–92. 10.1016/S0065-230X(09)05005-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Shannan B, Seifert M, Leskov K, Willis J, Boothman D, Tilgen W, et al. Challenge and promise: roles for clusterin in pathogenesis, progression and therapy of cancer. Cell Death Differ. (2006) 13:12–9. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Trougakos IP, Djeu JY, Gonos ES, Boothman DA. Advances and challenges in basic and translational research on clusterin. Cancer Res. (2009) 69:403–6. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Akiyama H, Lyons JP, Mori-Akiyama Y, Yang X, Zhang R, Zhang Z, et al. Interactions between Sox9 and beta-catenin control chondrocyte differentiation. Genes Dev. (2004) 18:1072–87. 10.1101/gad.1171104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Yano F, Kugimiya F, Ohba S, Ikeda T, Chikuda H, Ogasawara T, et al. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway promotes chondrocyte differentiation in a Sox9-dependent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2005) 333:1300–8. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Umehara N, Ozaki T, Sugihara S, Kunisada T, Morimoto Y, Kawai A, et al. Influence of telomerase activity on bone and soft tissue tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2004) 130:411–6. 10.1007/s00432-004-0553-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Granick M, Kimura M, Kim S, Daniali L, Cao X, Herbig U, et al. Telomere dynamics in keloids. Eplasty. (2011) 11:e15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Coluzzi E, Colamartino M, Cozzi R, Leone S, Meneghini C, O'Callaghan N, et al. Oxidative stress induces persistent telomeric DNA damage responsible for nuclear morphology change in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e110963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Ezhilarasan R, Mohanam I, Govindarajan K, Mohanam S. Glioma cells suppress hypoxia-induced endothelial cell apoptosis and promote the angiogenic process. Int J Oncol. (2007) 30:701–7. 10.3892/ijo.30.3.701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Brown CK, Khodarev NN, Yu J, Moo-Young T, Labay E, Darga TE, et al. Glioblastoma cells block radiation-induced programmed cell death of endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. (2004) 565:167–70. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Nirodi CS, Devalaraja R, Nanney LB, Arrindell S, Russell S, Trupin J, et al. Chemokine and chemokine receptor expression in keloid and normal fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen. (2000) 8:371–82. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2000.00371.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Russell SB, Russell JD, Trupin KM, Gayden AE, Opalenik SR, Nanney LB, et al. Epigenetically altered wound healing in keloid fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. (2010) 130:2489–96. 10.1038/jid.2010.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. (2010) 31:27–36. 10.1093/carcin/bgp220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Feinberg AP, Koldobskiy MA, Gondor A. Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat Rev Genet. (2016) 17:284–99. 10.1038/nrg.2016.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.E Y, Qipa Z, Hengshu Z. The expression of DNMT1 in pathologic scar fibroblasts and the effect of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine on cytokines of pathologic scar fibroblasts. Wounds. (2014) 26:139–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Jones LR, Young W, Divine G, Datta I, Chen KM, Ozog D, et al. Genome-wide scan for methylation profiles in keloids. Dis Markers. (2015) 2015:943176. 10.1155/2015/943176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Jones LR, Greene J, Chen KM, Divine G, Chitale D, Shah V, et al. Biological significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in keloids. Laryngoscope. (2017) 127:70–8. 10.1002/lary.26063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Garcia-Rodriguez L, Jones L, Chen KM, Datta I, Divine G, Worsham MJ. Causal network analysis of head and neck keloid tissue identifies potential master regulators. Laryngoscope. (2016) 126:E319–24. 10.1002/lary.25958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Fitzgerald O'Connor EJ, Badshah II, Addae LY, Kundasamy P, Thanabalasingam S, Abioye D, et al. Histone deacetylase 2 is upregulated in normal and keloid scars. J Invest Dermatol. (2012) 132:1293–6. 10.1038/jid.2011.432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.He Y, Deng Z, Alghamdi M, Lu L, Fear MW, He L. From genetics to epigenetics: new insights into keloid scarring. Cell Prolif. (2017) 50:e12326. 10.1111/cpr.12326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Totan S, Echo A, Yuksel E. Heat shock proteins modulate keloid formation. Eplasty. (2011) 11:e21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Lianos GD, Alexiou GA, Mangano A, Rausei S, Boni L, Dionigi G, et al. The role of heat shock proteins in cancer. Cancer Lett. (2015) 360:114–8. 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Lau K, Paus R, Tiede S, Day P, Bayat A. Exploring the role of stem cells in cutaneous wound healing. Exp Dermatol. (2009) 18:921–33. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00942.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Wang DL, Zhu JJ, Deng CL, Wang B, Yu LM. Identification of biological characteristics of human keloid-derived stem cells. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. (2011) 27:210–4. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Li L, Neaves WB. Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: the niche matters. Cancer Res. (2006) 66:4553–7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Moon JH, Kwak SS, Park G, Jung HY, Yoon BS, Park J, et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent human keloid-derived mesenchymal-like stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. (2008) 17:713–24. 10.1089/scd.2007.0210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Guo W, Lasky JL, 3rd, Wu H. Cancer stem cells. Pediatr Res. (2006) 59(4 Pt 2):59R−64R. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000203592.04530.06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Todaro M, Alea MP, Di Stefano AB, Cammareri P, Vermeulen L, Iovino F, et al. Colon cancer stem cells dictate tumor growth and resist cell death by production of interleukin-4. Cell Stem Cell. (2007) 1:389–402. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. (2006) 444:756–60. 10.1038/nature05236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Borovski T, De Sousa EMF, Vermeulen L, Medema JP. Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be. Cancer Res. (2011) 71:634–9. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Bagabir R, Byers RJ, Chaudhry IH, Muller W, Paus R, Bayat A. Site-specific immunophenotyping of keloid disease demonstrates immune upregulation and the presence of lymphoid aggregates. Br J Dermatol. (2012) 167:1053–66. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11190.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Durani P, Bayat A. Levels of evidence for the treatment of keloid disease. J Plastic Reconstr Aesth Surg. (2008) 61:4–17. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Reish RG, Eriksson E. Scars: a review of emerging and currently available therapies. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2008) 122:1068–78. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318185d38f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Juckett G, Hartman-Adams H. Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Am Fam Phys. (2009) 80:253–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Malaker K, Vijayraghavan K, Hodson I, Yafi TA. Retrospective analysis of treatment of unresectable keloids with primary radiation over 25 years. Clin Oncol. (2004) 16:290–8. 10.1016/j.clon.2004.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Darzi MA, Chowdri NA, Kaul SK, Khan M. Evaluation of various methods of treating keloids and hypertrophic scars: a 10-year follow-up study. Br J Plastic Surg. (1992) 45:374–9. 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90008-L [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.van Leeuwen MC, Stokmans SC, Bulstra AE, Meijer OW, van Leeuwen PA, Niessen FB. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of recalcitrant keloids: a unique, effective treatment protocol. Plastic Reconstr Surg. (2014) 134:527–34. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Jones ME, Hardy C, Ridgway J. Keloid management: a retrospective case review on a new approach using surgical excision, platelet-rich plasma, and in-office superficial photon X-ray radiation therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care. (2016) 29:303–7. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000482993.64811.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Wang W, Qu M, Xu L, Wu X, Gao Z, Gu T, et al. Sorafenib exerts an anti-keloid activity by antagonizing TGF-β/Smad and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. J Mol Med. (2016) 94:1181–94. 10.1007/s00109-016-1430-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Bijlard E, Steltenpool S, Niessen FB. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil in keloid treatment: a systematic review. Acta Derm Venereol. (2015) 95:778–82. 10.2340/00015555-2106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Ud-Din S, Bowring A, Derbyshire B, Morris J, Bayat A. Identification of steroid sensitive responders versus non-responders in the treatment of keloid disease. Arch Dermatol Res. (2013) 305:423–32. 10.1007/s00403-013-1328-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.De Sousa RF, Chakravarty B, Sharma A, Parwaz MA, Malik A. Efficacy of triple therapy in auricular keloids. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. (2014) 7:98–102. 10.4103/0974-2077.138347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Agbenorku P. Triple keloid therapy: a combination of steroids, surgery and silicone gel strip/sheet for keloid treatment. Eur J Plast Surg. (2000) 23:150–1. 10.1007/s002380050236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Xu B, Liu ZZ, Zhu GY, Yang JF, Zhao JP, Wang JC, et al. Efficacy of recombinant adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy in human keloid fibroblasts. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2008) 33:322–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02615.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Ud-Din S, Thomas G, Morris J, Bayat A. Photodynamic therapy: an innovative approach to the treatment of keloid disease evaluated using subjective and objective non-invasive tools. Arch Dermatol Res. (2013) 305:205–14. 10.1007/s00403-012-1295-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Calzavara-Pinton PG, Venturini M, Sala R. Photodynamic therapy: update 2006–part 1: photochemistry and photobiology. J Eur Acad Dermatol. (2007) 21:293–302. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01902.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Christensen E, Warloe T, Kroon S, Funk J, Helsing P, Soler AM, et al. Guidelines for practical use of MAL-PDT in non-melanoma skin cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2010) 24:505–12. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03430.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]