Abstract
Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) plays an important role in the progression of the Alzheimer’s disease. In this study, we used a structure-based virtual screening (VS) approach to discover new BChE inhibitors. A ligand database was filtered and docked to the BChE protein using Glide program. The outcome from VS was filtered and the top ranked hits were thoroughly examined for their fitting into the protein active site. Consequently, the best 38 hits were selected for in vitro testing using Ellman’s method, and six of which showed inhibition activity for BChE. Interestingly, the most potent hit (Compound 4) exhibited inhibitory activity against the BChE enzyme in the low micromolar level with an IC50 value of 8.3 µM. Hits obtained from this work can act as a starting point for future SAR studies to discover new BChE inhibitors as anti-Alzheimer agents.
Keywords: Butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors, Alzheimer’s disease, Ellman’s method, virtual screening, docking, pharmacophore
1. Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders that affect humans especially in older stage of their lives. It is estimated that the disease affected 50 million people worldwide according to World Alzheimer Report 2018 and the number is expected to grow to more than quadruple in the next 30 years1.
AD which is characterised by a gradual decline in cognitive function combined with behavioural and psychiatric symptoms2,3. Being multifactorial brain disorder, the exact pathophysiology of AD is not yet entirely known4. However, several pathogeneses of AD have been suggested: β-amyloid oligomerisation, τ-protein aggregation, cholinergic dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation are implicated in the development of AD5,6. Most of the current treatments are based on the cholinergic dysfunction hypothesis, which states that degeneration of cholinergic neurons and a deficiency of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) are the ultimate reasons for the loss of memory and decline of cognitive function7–9.
Cholinesterase is the enzyme which catalyses the hydrolysis of ACh and thus inhibition of cholinesterase can be an effective way for the treatment of AD10. It is well-known that two different cholinesterase (ChE) enzymes, acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), are responsible for the hydrolysis of ACh within the brain11. However, AChE has stronger acetylcholine hydrolytic activity than BChE does under the same condition12, as former enzyme can cleave more than 10,000 ACh molecules per second13. AChE is substrate specific in nature and is found in high concentrations in the brain, while BChE is nonspecific and is distributed throughout the body14. In particular, it is associated with glial and endothelial cells in the brain15. In AD, the AChE level in the brain decreases progressively, but BChE level remains the same or increases up to 165% of the normal level16. This altered enzymes levels contribute to their different activity as the severity of AD advances17. ratio of BChE: AChE shifting from 0.6 to as high as 1.1 contributes to the formation of cholinergic deficits in these regions, leading to the behavioural, and cognitive dysfunction18–21.
Anti-cholinesterase drugs which are used in the treatment of AD are reversible protein inhibitors22. They used to postpone the onset of symptoms that are associated with patient lifestyle such as memory ability to think and speak, rationale judgment, and other thought processes23. Selective BChE inhibition is potentially advantageous for the treatment of AD. It circumvents the classical cholinergic toxicity that is a common side effect of AChE inhibition24.
Current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cholinesterase inhibitors namely: donepezil25, rivastigmine,26 and galantamine27, help only in postponing the onset of the symptoms of AD and do not treat the underlying disease28.
In this study, we used a structure-based drug design approach to discover new BChE inhibitors which may serve as a valuable inspiration in the search for new treatment options of patients with advanced AD. First, an extensive literature survey was conducted to investigate the critical chemical features that contribute to the inhibition of BChE function and to better understand the binding fashion. Subsequently, we used structure-based virtual screening (VS) followed by Ellman’s method to determine the experimental activity of selected hits.
2. Methods
2.1. Molecular modeling
2.1.1. Protein and ligand library preparation
The crystal structure of human BChE protein was obtained from the protein data bank (http://www.rcsb.org, PDB: 4TPK)29. All solvent molecules were eliminated then the MOE protein preparation module30 was used to check out the protein crystal structure for any missing atoms or residues and correct them accordingly31. The protein was then prepared by Protein Preparation Wizard of the Schrödinger modeling suite,32 that included adding hydrogen atoms to the protein structure and assigning partial charges to each atom.
Ligand database was downloaded from the NCI website (https://cactus.nci.nih.gov/download/nci/). The database was prepared by processing the molecules through LigPrep, the ligand preparation module in the Schrödinger software package33. The ligands were filtered based on drug-like rules; the Veber’s rules34 and Lipinski’s rule of five35. These filters included: molecular weight ≤ 500, hydrogen bond donor (HBD) ≤ 5, hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) ≤ 10, logP ≤ 5, polar surface area (PSA) ≤ 140, and rotatable bonds ≤ 10.
2.1.2. Virtual screening
The targeted BChE protein was subjected to a docking-based VS workflow using the docking module of the Schrödinger suite, Glide (Grid-based ligand docking with energetics)33. The prepared drug-like ligand library was docked into the active site of the protein. The Glide virtual screening workflow (VSW) is a three-step docking protocol involving three levels of increasing docking precisions: high-throughput virtual screening (HTVS); standard precision (SP); and extra-precision (XP). The 2000 ligands docked and ranked by GLIDE-XP were then clustered based on the MACCS algorithm36 and were then visually inspected. Finally, 38 ligands belonging to various structural scaffolds and showing convenient binding modes in the BChE active site were selected for biological assessment.
2.2. Biological assessment
2.2.1. Quantification of BChE inhibitory activity in a spectrophotometric assay
Selected hits were obtained from NCI and they were provided as dry powders in variable quantities (5–10 mg). Compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO to give stock solutions of 100 µM. Subsequently, they were diluted to the required concentrations with Tris buffer pH 8.0 for the assay. Enzymatic inhibition assays were performed on BChE from equine serum (Sigma), according to the spectrophotometric Ellman's method37. The experiment was performed in 48-well plates in a final volume of 100 µL. Each well contained 0.22 U/mL eqBChE dissolved in Tris–HCl buffer, pH 8.0. They were preincubated for 20 min at different compound concentrations at 37 °C. Then 0.5 mM butyrylthiocholine iodide (Sigma) and 0.35 mM 5,5′-dithiobis -2-nitrobenzoico (DTNB; Sigma) were added. Colour development was measured spectrophotometrically at 412 nm using microplate reader (BioTek ELx800) at a rate of one measurement per minute over 15 min period. Positive (Eserine, sigma 100 uM) and negative (no inhibitors) controls were tested. All samples were assayed in at least duplicate measurements. In general, the amount of DMSO was kept below 1% in the assay. IC50 values were determined graphically from inhibition curves using Graph Pad prism version 6, Graph Pad Software, Inc..
2.3. NMR analysis of the top four hits
2.3.1. Compound 4
2-phenyl-9–(2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethoxy)-4a,5-dihydro-2H-chromeno[4,3-c]pyridazin-3(4H)-one (602697): 1H-NMR[DMSO-d6, 400 MHz]: (δ, ppm) 1.62–1.64 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.45 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.59 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.71 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.56–3.58 (m, 1H, CH), 3.88–4.45 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 6.89–6.91 (m, 1H, aromatic), 6.96–6.99 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.27–7.32 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.36 (brs, 1H, NH, exchanges with D2O), 7.41–7.45 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.50–7.53 (m, 2H, aromatic).
2.3.2. Compound 5
(N1-(7-chloro-3-methylquinolin-4-yl)-N4,N4-diethyl-2-phenylbutane-1,4-diamine (11052): 1H-NMR[DMSO-d6, 400 MHz]: (δ, ppm) 0.91–1.02 (m, 6H, 2CH3), 1.84 (brs, 2H, CH2), 2.03 (brs, 2H, CH2), 2.17 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.34 (brs, 1H, CH), 2.75–2.90 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 3.62–3.76 (m, 2H, CH2), 5.42 (brs, 1H, NH, exchanges with D2O), 7.18–7.24 (m, 6H, aromatic), 7.77–7.78 (m, 1H, aromatic), 8.09–8.11 (d, 1H, aromatic, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.27–8.29 (m, 1H, aromatic).
2.3.3. Compound 12
2-[2-(benzylamino)ethylamino]-1,2-diphenylethanol (39813): 1H-NMR[DMSO-d6, 400 MHz]: (δ, ppm) 3.08 (brs, 2H, CH2), 4.16 (brs, 2H, CH2), 4.57 (brs, 2H, CH2), 5.52 (brs, 1H, CH), 6.41 (brs, 1H, CH), 7.02–7.57 (m, 15H, aromatic), 9.53 (brs, 1H, NH, exchanges with D2O), 9.77 (brs, 2H, NH2+, exchanges with D2O), 10.44 (brs, 1H, OH, exchanges with D2O).
2.3.4. Compound 26
2–(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-3-yl)ethanamine (135824): 1H-NMR[DMSO-d6, 400 MHz]: (δ, ppm) 1.47 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 1.91–2.13 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 2.69 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.07 (brs, 1H, CH), 3.47 (brs, 3H, NH3+, exchanges with D2O), 6.92 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.27 (m, 2H, aromatic), 10.61 (brs, 1H, NH, exchanges with D2O).
3. Results and discussion
Computer-aided molecular modeling protocol should involve sufficient study on the active site of the target enzyme before conducting the main VS38. Hence, the catalytic pocket of BChE protein was investigated and found to be consisting of a catalytic site at which the hydrolysis reaction takes place, its located at the bottom of a deep and narrow gorge, which is composed of conserved aromatic amino acids39. This most important site, also called the esteratic site, contains the three essential amino acids, Ser198, His438 and Glu325, which create the catalytic triad. They are involved in the transfer of the acetyl group from ACh to Ser19839. An essential role in the hydrolysis process is also played by amino acids in the BChE anionic site, which is responsible for binding the substrate quaternary ammonium group with cation–π interactions. Due to the interactions with the anionic site, the proper orientation of ACh in the gorge is provided.
One of the serine hydrolase features is stabilisation of the transition state by amino acids of the oxyanion hole through highly conserved N–H dipoles, derived from amino acids of the main chain: Gly116, Gly117, and Ala19940. During the enzymatic reaction, the transition complex is created and stabilised by those amino acids. The acyl pocket is responsible for substrate specificity. Comparison of human butyrylcholinesterase (HuBChE) and human acetylcholinesterase (HuAChE) shows differences in size, especially of the acyl binding pocket. The active gorge is larger in HuBChE than in HuAChE (500 Å3 versus 300 Å3). In HuBChE, the shape of the acyl pocket is determined by two residues: these are the aliphatic residues Leu286 and Val288, the presence of the smaller amino acids, valine and leucine, makes the hollow in the acyl pocket larger in BChE and enables larger molecules to get in41.
To sum up, the main residues in the active site were classified into three groups: catalytic residues (Ser198, His438, and Glu325), acyl binding pocket (Gly116, Gly117, Trp231, Leu286, and Val288), and choline binding pocket (Trp82) are shown below in Figure 1. After reviewing the literature, we can identify the following interactions in the active site as important for binding BChE inhibitors: interactions with the aromatic rings of Trp231, Trp82, and Phe329, to lesser extent H-bonding interaction with His438 and the tendency of the hit structure to enter the acyl pocket of BChE protein.
Figure 1.
Main residues in the BChE protein binding site that are considered important in inhibiting the protein activity.
With regards to the BChE virtual screening, a schematic representation of the used protocol is shown in Figure 2. The VS started with filtering the NCI-ligand library according to drug-like characteristics The obtained drug-like ligand library where screened through three subsequent docking steps: HTVS, GLIDE-SP then GLIDE-XP so that docking precision increases gradually as ligands advance from one stage to another. The final outcome from VS process was filtered and preference was given to molecules containing features that are important for aforementioned interactions with active site residues.
Figure 2.
Schematic representation of the virtual screening protocol employed in the discovery of BChE inhibitors.
To evaluate the inhibitory action of the top ranked hits, these compounds were ordered from NCI and were tested against the BChE protein using Ellman's method37. Eserine inhibitor was used as positive control. Table 1 shows the inhibition pattern of the top ranked compounds again the BChE enzyme. The IC50 values of these six hits were then identified as shown in Table 1. These active compounds exhibited variable inhibitory concentrations ranging from low to high micromolar range. Four out of these hits showed IC50 values below 100 µM (hit compounds 4, 5, 12, and 26). Interestingly, compound 4 exhibited the maximum inhibitor activity against BChE enzyme with an IC50 value of 8.3 µM.
Table 1.
The IC50 values of the best compounds selected based on visual inspection inhibition activity of the tested top docked compounds using Ellman’s assay.
| Hit compound | NCI Code | IC50 value (μM) | Ra |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | NCS 23681 | 233.6 ± 1.22 | 0.9846 |
| 4 | NCS 602697 | 8.3 ± 0.07 | 0.9848 |
| 5 | NCS 11052 | 32.6 ± 0.11 | 0.9694 |
| 12 | NCS 39813 | 22.2 ± 0.12 | 0.9701 |
| 25 | NCS 162407 | 423.2 ± 1.19 | 0.9770 |
| 26 | NCS 135824 | 39.7 ± 0.16 | 0.9912 |
| Reference inhibitor | Eserine | 0.04 ± 0.0001b | — |
The regression coefficient of the dose–response curve as calculated by Graph pad prism 6.0. Inhibitory activity of the tested compounds was measured by half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).
The regression coefficient of the dose–response curve as calculated by Graph pad prism 6.0.
Reference inhibitor.
With regard to the in silico data, docking results for the six active hits are shown in Table 2. All active compounds exhibited low binding energies ranging from (−10.3 to −16.3 kcal/mol). These scores seem to be even more interesting if they got related to the size of the molecule since these hits scored ligand efficiency scores of around −0.5 kcal/mol. Ligand efficiency scores are calculated by dividing the docking score over the molecule weight of the compound and it indicates for suitability of the ligand to act as lead compound. Hence, these compounds look to have interesting binding energies with relatively small size when compared with the co-crystallised ligand.
Table 2.
Docking scores and glide ligand efficiencies of the selected hits from the virtual screening and the co-crystallised ligand from the BChE protein that was used in the virtual screen.
| Hit compound | NCI code | Chemical structure | Docking score (kcal/mol) | Glide ligand efficiency (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | NCS 23681 | ![]() |
−16.28 | −0.53 |
| 4 | NCS 602697 | ![]() |
−14.75 | −0.51 |
| 5 | NCS 11052 | ![]() |
−14.70 | −0.53 |
| 12 | NCS 39813 | ![]() |
−13.55 | −0.52 |
| 25 | NCS 162407 | ![]() |
−12.86 | −0.54 |
| 26 | NCS 135824 | ![]() |
−10.30 | −0.64 |
| Reference inhibitor | Co-crystallised ligand (4TPK) | ![]() |
−11.95 | −0.36 |
Docked compounds showed convenient-binding modes in the BChE active site. In particular, to the best two hits (compounds 4 and 12), the main interactions attributed to their activity relied on π–π and π–hydrogen interactions with Trp231, Trp82, and Phe329 along with hydrogen bonding with Gly117 and Ser198 (as shown in Figures 3 and 4). Additionally, the entry of the molecule within the acyl binding pocket of the active site along with the aforementioned bonding are believed to be substantially important for inhibitory activity.
Figure 3.
The docked binding mode of the most active hit, compound 4. The ligand is shown as cyan sticks and the protein is shown in as red cartoon and sticks. Hydrogen bonding is shown as blue dotted lines. Cation–π and hydrogen–π interactions are shown as green dotted lines.
Figure 4.
The docked binding mode of the most active hit, compound 12. The ligand is shown as cyan sticks and the protein is shown in as red cartoon and sticks. Hydrogen bonding is shown as blue dotted lines. Cation–π and hydrogen–π interactions are shown as green dotted lines.
1H-NMR spectroscopy was used to confirm the correct structure and the purity of the compounds. See spectra in supporting information. The structures of the compounds 4 were confirmed on the basis of 1H-NMR spectroscopy analysis. The 1H-NMR spectrum showed five characteristic signals resonates at δ = 1.62, 2.45, 2.59, 2.71, and 3.88 ppm attributed to the CH2 groups with an integration value of 16 protons. Another signal appeared at δ = 3.56 as broad band corresponding to CH proton. The eight aromatic protons resonated as a multiplet at δ = 6.89, 6.96, 7.27, 7.41, and 7.50 ppm. In addition, signal appeared at δ = 7.36 as broad band corresponding to NH-proton exchanged in D2O. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 5 showed a characteristic of two signals at δ = 0.91 and 2.17 ppm corresponding to the three methyl groups with an integration value of nine protons. The four signals attributed to the five CH2 groups resonates at δ = 1.84, 2.03, 2.75, and 3.62 ppm attributed to the CH2 proton with an integration value of 10 protons. While, NH proton resonated as a singlet at δ = 5.42 ppm and exchangeable with D2O. The aromatic protons resonated as a singlet at δ = 7.18, 7.77, 8.09, and 8.27 ppm with an integration value of nine protons. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 12 showed the correct chemical shifts of all protons of compound 12. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 12 showed three multiplets resonated at δ = 3.08 ppm, 4.16 ppm and 4.57 ppm corresponding to six protons of CH2 group. While, two broad signals corresponding to CH groups appeared at δ = 5.52 and 6.41 ppm. The aromatic protons resonated as a singlet at δ = 7.02–7.57 ppm with an integration value of 15 protons. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 12 showed characteristic peaks at δ = 9.53 and 9.77 ppm due to –NH and NH2+ bands, respectively, and exchanged with D2O. while, the –OH proton resonated as a broad singlet at δ = 10.44 ppm. The structures of the compound 26 were clearly confirmed on the bases of 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 26 showed three multiplet at δ = 1.47, 1.91 and 2.68 ppm, attributed to the corresponding five CH2 groups in the molecule. Another signal appeared at δ = 3.07 as multiplet corresponding to CH proton. A broad band at δ = 3.47 and 10.61 ppm corresponding to NH3+ and NH, respectively, both exchangeable with D2O. While, the aromatic protons resonated as a singlet at δ = 6.92 and 7.27 ppm with an integration value of 4 protons. Hence, all required integral values matches the number of protons without any other peak in the NMR spectra which confirm the purity of the compounds.
Conclusion
Computer-aided drug design was employed to study and discover new BChE inhibitors that could be a starting point for a promising drug candidate in the treatment of AD. NCI database was filtered, treated, and subsequently screened against the BChE protein. Furthermore, the top docked compounds were tested against BChE activity which showed a direct correlation between the biochemical and drug design approaches by revealing four hits with IC50 values below 100 µM. The four hits’ identity was checked and their purity was confirmed. Compound 4 (IC50 value of 8.3 µM) and compound 5 (IC50 value of 32.6 µM) showed strong inhibitory activity that could become a starting point for future development and structure activity relationship studies for the discovery of new BChE inhibitors.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Al Ain, UAE.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful for National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA for freely providing hit compounds for experimental validation. We also thank United Arab Emirate University for conducting the NMR analysis for our compounds.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
- 1.Alzheimer’s Disease International Alzheimer’s disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2018. The state of the art of dementia research: new frontiers. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tarawneh R, Holtzman DM. The clinical problem of symptomatic Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012;2:a006148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Whitehouse PJ, Price DL, Struble RG, et al. Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain. Science 1982;215:1237–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moya-Alvarado G, Gershoni-Emek N, Perlson E, Bronfman FC. Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's disease (AD). What can proteomics tell us about the Alzheimer's brain? Mol Cell Proteomics 2016;15:409–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prasansuklab A, Tencomnao T. Amyloidosis in Alzheimer's disease: the toxicity of amyloid beta (A beta), mechanisms of its accumulation and implications of medicinal plants for therapy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;2013:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tonnies E, Trushina E. Oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2017;57:1105–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ferreira-Vieira TH, Guimaraes IM, Silva FR, Ribeiro FM. Alzheimer's disease: targeting the cholinergic system. Curr Neuropharmacol 2016;14:101–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ozgun DO, Yamali C, Gul HI, et al. Inhibitory effects of isatin Mannich bases on carbonic anhydrases, acetylcholinesterase, and butyrylcholinesterase. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:1498–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gülçin İ, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT, et al. The effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on metabolic enzymes including acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, glutathione S-transferase, lactoperoxidase, and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II, IX, and XII. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:1095–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Woolf NJ, Butcher LL. Cholinergic systems mediate action from movement to higher consciousness. Behav Brain Res 2011;221:488–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coyle JT, Price DL, DeLong MR. Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science 1983;219:1184–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Perry E, Walker M, Grace J, Perry R. Acetylcholine in mind: a neurotransmitter correlate of consciousness? Trends Neurosci 1999;22:273–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bazelyansky M, Robey E, Kirsch JF. Fractional diffusion-limited component of reactions catalyzed by acetylcholinesterase. Biochemistry 1986;25:125–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Massoulie J, Pezzementi L, Bon S, et al. Molecular and cellular biology of cholinesterases. Prog Neurobiol 1993;41:31–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Darreh-Shori T, Forsberg A, Modiri N, et al. Differential levels of apolipoprotein E and butyrylcholinesterase show strong association with pathological signs of Alzheimer's disease in the brain in vivo. Neurobiol Aging 2011;32:2320.e15–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mushtaq G, Greig NH, Khan JA, Kamal MA. Status of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2014;13:1432–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lane RG, Potkin S, Enz A. Targeting acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in dementia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006;9:101–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Selkoe DJ. Translating cell biology into therapeutic advances in Alzheimer's disease. Nature 1999;399:A23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li Q, Yang H, Chen Y, Sun H. Recent progress in the identification of selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem 2017;132:294–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sujayev A, Garibov E, Taslimi P, et al. Synthesis of some tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylates, determination of their metal chelating effects and inhibition profiles against acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:1531–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Turan B, Şendil K, Şengül E, et al. The synthesis of some β-lactams and investigation of their metal-chelating activity, carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase inhibition. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stahl SM. The new cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease, part 2: illustrating their mechanisms of action. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61:813–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thompson PA, Wright DE, Counsell CE, Zajicek J. Statistical analysis, trial design and duration in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: a review. Int Psychogeriatr 2012;24:689–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Macdonald IR, Rockwood K, Martin E, Darvesh S. Cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer's disease: is specificity the answer? J Alzheimers Dis 2014;42:379–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prvulovic D, Schneider B. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2014;10:1039–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Birks JS, Grimley Evans J. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;4:Cd001191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;4:Cd001747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Birks J. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:Cd005593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brus B, Kosak U, Turk S, et al. Discovery, biological evaluation, and crystal structure of a novel nanomolar selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor. J Med Chem 2014;57:8167–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Molecular Operating Environment (MOE). Chemical Computing Group. Montreal, Canada 2016. Available from: http://www.chemcomp.com,
- 31.Halgren TA. Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules. J Comput Chem 1996;17:616–41. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T, et al. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2013;27:221–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 2004;47:1739–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem 2002;45:2615–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;46:3–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takaoka Y, Endo Y, Yamanobe S, et al. Development of a method for evaluating drug-likeness and ease of synthesis using a data set in which compounds are assigned scores based on chemists' intuition. J Chem Inform Comput Sci 2003;43:1269–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Feather-Stone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 1961;7:88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Atatreh N, Ghattas MA, Bardaweel SK, et al. Identification of new inhibitors of Mdm2-p53 interaction via pharmacophore and structure-based virtual screening. Drug Des Devel Ther 2018;12:3741–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bajda M, Więckowska A, Hebda M, et al. Structure-based search for new inhibitors of cholinesterases. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14:5608–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dighe SN, Deora GS, De la Mora E, et al. Discovery and structure-activity relationships of a highly selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor by structure-based virtual screening. J Med Chem 2016;59:7683–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jin H. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory properties of functionalized tetrahydroacridines and related analogs. 2014;4: 688–96. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.











