Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb 1;46(5):459–470. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1043-0

Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology

Michel Daudon 1,2, Paul Jungers 3, Dominique Bazin 4,5, James C Williams Jr 6
PMCID: PMC6711148  NIHMSID: NIHMS1043415  PMID: 29392338

Abstract

Few studies have examined the relative risk of recurrence of different stone types. The object of the present study was to evaluate the tendency for stone recurrence as a function of major mineral composition of the stones and morphological characteristics of the stones.

This study was carried out using 38,274 stones for which we had data available to specify if the stone was from the first or a subsequent urinary stone episode. Stones were analyzed for morphology by stereomicroscope and for composition by infrared spectroscopy.

Overall, 42.7% of stones were from patients who had had a previous stone event, with these being more frequent in men (44.4%) than in women (38.9%, P<0.0001). Age of first stone occurrence was lowest for dihydroxyadenine (15.7±16.6 y) and highest for anhydrous uric acid (62.5±14.9 y), with the average age of first stones of calcium oxalate falling in the middle (40.7±14.6 y for calcium oxalate dihydrate, and 48.4±15.1 y for calcium oxalate monohydrate, COM). By composition alone, COM was among the least recurrent of stones, with only 38.0% of COM stones coming from patients who had had a previous episode; however, when the different morphological types of COM were considered, type Ic—which displays a light color, budding surface and unorganized section—had a significantly greater rate of recurrence, at 82.4% (P<0.0001), than did other morphologies of COM. Similarly, for stones composed of apatite, morphological type IVa2—a unique form with cracks visible beneath a glossy surface—had a higher rate of recurrence than other apatite morphologies (78.8% vs. 39–42%, p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Stone mineral type alone is insufficient for identifying the potential of recurrence of the stones. Instead, the addition of stone morphology may allow the diagnosis of highly recurrent stones, even among common mineral types (e.g., COM) that in general are less recurrent.

Keywords: urinary stone, stone analysis, morphology, recurrence

Introduction

Epidemiological studies on rates of stone occurrence and recurrence in industrialized countries agree on two points: first, urinary stones strike men more often than women, and second, recurrence of at least one more stone occurs in 40–50% of affected persons [13]. However, few studies have examined the relative risk of recurrence of different stone types. It seems reasonable to state that cystine stone disease, because of its genetic basis, leads to greater stone recurrence than most other types of stone disease [4]. Similarly, uric acid stones in older patients are often quite recurrent [5]. However, it is not so clear what to say about the stones composed of calcium salts. For calcium oxalate, studies from some years ago suggest that weddellite (calcium oxalate dihydrate, COD) stones are more likely to recur than whewellite (calcium oxalate monohydrate, COM) stones [6], and that stones with a significant component of calcium phosphate are more likely to recur than stones composed of pure calcium oxalate [7]. The object of the present study was to evaluate the tendency for stone recurrence as a function of the major mineral composition of the stones, but also to take into account the morphological characteristics of the stones and the sex of the patient.

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out using 38,274 stones collected from all regions of France for which we have data on both stone recurrence and the patient’s age at the first stone episode. The stones were analyzed for morphology and composition (by infrared spectroscopy, as previously described [8, 9]). Briefly, stones were examined using a stereomicroscope and each was classified according to established morphological criteria [9, 10]. These criteria include the appearance of the stone surface but also the appearance of the stone interior after the stone was cleaved one or more times to reveal its presumed nidus. The main characteristics of the stones are summarized in Table 1 and some examples of stone types are given in Figure 1. Following these visual observations, samples of stone material were dissected away for analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. For each stone, patient data were available to specify if this was from the first or a subsequent stone episode. The results are expressed according to the principal constituent, morphological type, and structural characteristics of the stone, and separated according to the sex of the patient.

Table 1.

Morphoconstitutional classification of urinary calculi (from [9, 10])

Morphological type Subtype Main components Main morphological characteristics (for more details, see [9, 10]
Surface Section
I Ia Whewellite Mammillary, brown Concentric, radiating organization, brown
Ib Whewellite Rough and mammillary, brown Unorganized, brown
Ic Whewellite Budding, cream to pale yellow-brown Poorly organized, cream to pale yellow-brown
Id Whewellite Smooth, beige or pale brown Concentric, compact, beige
Ie Whewellite Locally budding and mammillary, pale yellow-brown to brown Locally unorganized, locally radiating organization, pale yellow-brown to brown
II IIa Weddellite Bipyramidal crystals aggregated, with sharp angles and ridges, pale yellow Loose radial organization, pale yellow
IIb Weddellite ± whewellite Bipyramidal crystals aggregated, with blunted angles and ridges, pale yellow Unorganized, pale yellow
IIc Weddellite Rough, grey-beige Thin layers in periphery, unorganized core, grey-beige
III IIIa Uric acid Smooth, ochre to orange Concentric, radiating organization, orange
IIIb Uric acid Embossed, rough and porous, beige to orange Unorganized or poorly organized and porous, orange
IIIc Various urates Rough, locally porous, beige to greyish Unorganized with porous areas, beige to greyish
IIId Ammonium urate Embossed, rough and porous, grey-brown Alternated layers, thick and brownish, thin and greyish
IV IVa1 Carbapatite Rough or slightly embossed, cream to beige Poorly organized, whitish to cream
IVa2 Carbapatite Embossed, glazed with cracks, yellow-brown Alternated layers, thick and yellow-brown, thin and cream
IVb Carbapatite Heterogenous, both embossed and rough Alternated layers, thick and cream, thin and yellow-brown
Heterogenous color, cream to brown
IVc Struvite Amalgamate crystals with blunted angles and thick ridges, whitish Crude radial crystallization, whitish
IVd Brushite Finely rough or aggregated rods, cream to beige Concentric, radiating organization, cream to beige
V Va Cystine Rough or grainy, yellowish Poorly organized, loose radiating organization, yellowish
Vb Cystine Smooth, cream to pale yellowish Concentric in periphery, unorganized core, cream to yellow
VI VIa Proteins Smooth, cream to pale brown Unorganized, cream to pale brown
VIb Proteins Rough and flaked off, dark brown to black Crude and diffuse foliated structure, dark brown to black
VIc Proteins Homogenous, smooth, dark brown Soft concentric dark-brown shell, unorganized beige core
Main mixed types:
Ia+IIa and Ia+IIb Whewellite+weddellite
Ila+IVal and IIb+Iva1 Weddellite+Carbapatite
Ia+IIa+Iva1 Whewellite+Weddellite+Carbapatite

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Main morphological stone types

Statistical comparisons were carried out using ANOVA and Chi-squared tests, as appropriate, using NCSS software (NCSS, Kaysville, Utah, USA).

Results

Of the 38,274 stones, coming from 26,368 males (68.9%) and 11,906 females, 16,336 (42.7%) were from patients who had had a previous stone event. Of these patients with recurrent stones, 11,702 were male and 4,634 female, illustrating the fact that recurrent stones were more frequent in men than in women (44.4 vs. 38.9% of the total for each sex, P<0.0001). The mean age of patients with recurrent stones did not differ between the sexes (45.0 ± 14.3 years old for men, 44.0 ± 14.8 for women).

Mean age at first stone as a function of stone mineral.

We first consider the data on patients’ initial stone events, looking at the age of first stone occurrence for the different crystalline species. The data are shown in Table 2, where, for each majority stone component, the mean age of the patients is given for each sex, with the stone components listed according to increasing mean age of first occurrence. It is striking that the first five compositions listed in Table 2—that is, the stone types occurring at the earliest ages—are crystalline species that are relatively rare, representing <5% of all stones [10, 11]. We are aware that the small number of samples in these groups is a limiting factor for the significance of the data regarding these stones. However, as expected, due to their inherited origin, the first groups of calculi are dihydroxyadenine and cystine. The crystalline species occurring at the youngest age is dihydroxyadenine. The second species is cystine, followed by octacalcium phosphate and whitlockite, then ammonium urate. Coming next in the table are more common types of stone, the first of which is COD, the calcium-dependent type of calcium oxalate [1214]. The mean age at which this crystalline species appeared as a stone was 40 years, eight years younger than the mean age for COM stones, the other form of calcium oxalate. The distribution of calcium oxalate stones according to the crystalline phase and the patient’s age and gender at the onset of the disease is illustrated in Figure 2.

Table 2.

Mean age (years ± SD) at the first stone episode according to the stone composition

Main component Males Females All P value
M vs F
N Age N Age N Age
Dihydroxyadenine 15 7.2 ± 9.3 6 29.0 ± 17.3 21 15.7 ± 16.6 < 0.01
Cystine 43 26.5 ± 20.1 51 27.7 ± 16.3 94 27.1 ± 18.2 NS
Octacalcium phosphate pentahydrate 16 25.6 ± 18.4 18 31.0 ± 13.2 34 28.6 ± 15.9 NS
Whitlockite 21 25.1 ± 19.2 22 37.4 ± 16.3 43 31.4 ± 18.4 <0.05
Ammonium hydrogen urate 48 25.4 ± 27.1 35 43.7 ± 19.8 83 33.1 ± 26.1 < 0.001
Weddellite (COD)* 3440 41.0 ± 14.0 1039 39.7 ± 16.1 4469 40.7 ± 14.6 < 0.05
Brushite 162 42.8 ± 16.8 59 38.2 ± 16.2 221 41.6 ± 16.9 NS
Carbapatite 1064 39.4 ± 22.9 1702 43.1 ± 16.9 2766 41.7 ± 19.6 < 0.001
Amorphous carbonated calcium phosphate 17 37.7 ± 30.1 29 44.4 ± 25.1 46 41.9 ± 27.1 NS
Struvite 157 44.2 ± 26.5 205 47.2 ± 21.3 362 45.9 ± 23.7 NS
Whewellite (COM)* 7890 48.8 ± 14.4 3383 47,4 ± 16.5 11273 48.4 ± 15.1 < 0.01
Uric acid dihydrate 192 58.3 ± 12.9 40 62.9 ± 14.0 232 59.1 ± 13.3 NS
Uric acid anhydrous 1080 62.8 ± 14.6 366 61.8 ± 15.1 1446 62.5 ± 14.9 NS
*

COM = calcium oxalate monohydrate – COD = calcium oxalate dihydrate

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Age distribution of patients at the onset of COM or COD stone disease in both genders

Between COD and COM are four forms of phosphate stone. Finally, the species appearing latest in life are the two forms of uric acid. The distribution of uric acid stones according to the patient’s age and gender at the onset of the disease is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Uric acid stones

Frequency of stone recurrence as a function of principal component.

Table 3 shows the proportion of patients having a recurrent stone episode (that is, the second or later stone episode for the patient) for each principal stone component. Within this, the stone components are ranked according to increasing proportion of recurrent stones. Among the stone mineral types that have the lowest percentage of recurrence, two are phosphate stones, including struvite. However, among the seldom-recurring stones comes also COM, the constituent most commonly found in urinary stones [10, 1516]. All the stone compositions that follow struvite in the table—with the exception of COD in men and women, and carbapatite and octacalcium phosphate in women—are more recurrent than the average percentage for all stones. Among these more-recurrent compositions, the two forms of uric acid appear at the head with a percentage of recurrence above 50%, significantly higher than the average percentage for all stones. Finally, the three species at the bottom of Table 3 are particularly recurrent, apparently all forms of stone caused by very active metabolic processes: These are brushite, cystine, and dihydroxyadenine.

Table 3.

Frequency of stone recurrence according to the stone composition

Males Females Total
Component N % N % N %
ACCP(1) 8 32.0 13 30.2 21 30.9
Whitlockite 10 32.3 14 38.9 24 35.8
Whewellite (COM) 5241 39.5***, e 1768 34.1 e 7013 38.0e
Struvite 143 47.0** 121 36.7 264 41.6
Presence of struvite 492 44.9*** 526 36.5 1018 40.1
Ammonium Urate 28 36.8 32 47.1 60 41.7
Weddellite (COD) 2883 45.2*** 625 37.2 3508 43.5a
Carbapatite 1022 48.8***, e 1143 39.9 2165 43.6a
Uric acid anhydrous 1193 52.1*, e 329 46.8c 1522 50.9e
Uric acid dihydrate 198 50.6a 50 55.6b 248 51.6c
Octacalcium phosphate 28 63.6*, a 15 45.5 43 55.8
Brushite 479 75.7e 143 70.8e 622 74.5e
Cystine 378 90.9e 293 86.7e 671 89.0e
Dihydroxyadenine 19 95.0d 7 100b 26 96.3e
All stones 11702 44.4*** 4634 38.9 16341 42.7
(1)

ACCP = amorphous carbonated calcium phosphate

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.00001 vs females

a

p < 0.05;

b

p < 0.01;

c

p < 0.001;

d

p < 0.0001;

e

p < 0.00001 vs mean recurrence for a given gender or by comparison to the whole series

For stones of calcium oxalate, brushite and cystine, we have also recorded the number of stone episodes in the patients with recurrent stones. The patients who produced calcium oxalate stones had a mean of 3.5 stone episodes, while that number exceeded 7.5 for both brushite and cystine. This number is probably even higher for patients with uric acid stones, but it is difficult to evaluate with precision, as these patients often repeatedly form sand and/or very small stones that are passed spontaneously with limited clinical symptoms. Moreover, in contrast to other crystalline species, stones composed of uric acid can be dissolved by urinary alkalization [17].

Frequency of stone recurrence as a function of stone morphology.

The frequency of stone recurrence varied with morphological type (Table 4 and Figure 4). This was especially apparent in calcium oxalate stones where the recurrence rate varied among morphological types from 27 to 82%, and in calcium phosphate stones, where the recurrence rate varied from 39 to 79% among the different morphological types. Overall, the recurrence rate of COM was relatively low (table 3), but the morphological types Id, Ie, and especially Ic, had higher rates of recurrence (Figure 4). Thus, recognition of these morphological types of COM in a patient could alert the physician to the possibility of a greater chance of stone recurrence.

Table 4.

Frequency of stone recurrence according to the morphological type of the stone

Males Females Total
Morphological type(1) N % N % N %
Calcium oxalates
Ia 1735 35.9***,e 499 29.8d 2234 34.3e
Ib 58 26.1c 25 30.9 83 27.4d
Ic 29 85.3e 13 76.5b 42 82.4e
Id 66 40.0 43 46.2 109 42.3
Ie 44 54.3 26 48.2 70 51.9
Ia + IIa 424 41.7 147 38.6 571 40.8
Ia + IIb 1051 39.5**e 306 32.1b 1359 37.6e
IIb + Ia 1433 44.4** 380 38.7 1813 43.1
IIa 773 44.6** 161 37.6 934 43.2
IIb 400 39.1a 86 25.4 486 38.4
IIa + IVa1 959 48.5 **,b 286 40.8 1245 46.5c
IIb + IVa1 213 39.1 99 40.4 312 39.5
Ia + IIa + IVa1 682 46.4** 326 36.8 1008 42.8
Calcium phosphates
IVa1 (w/o struvite) 110 47.8**, a 125 38.0 235 42.0
IVa2 26 70.3a 53 84.1e 79 79.0e
IVb 221 48.3*** 335 35.2a 556 39.4b
IVd 229 73.6e 73 68.9e 302 72.4e
Struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate)
IVc 29 53.7 17 32.7 46 43.4
Uric acids
IIIa 186 45.7 39 50.7a 225 46.5
IIIb 840 53.2**, e 230 47.2b 1070 51.8e
Cystine
Va 312 90.7 233 84.7e 545 88.1e
Vb 20 100d 7 100b 27 100e
(1)

Complete description of the stone types is given in Daudon et al [910].

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.00001 vs females

a

p < 0.05;

b

p < 0.01;

c

p < 0.001;

d

p < 0.0001;

e

p < 0.00001 vs mean stone recurrence for a given gender or for total

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Recurrence of stones by morphology, with photographs of selected morphological types. Data are for all patients in each group (see global percentages for each type in table 4; for breakdown by sex, also see table 4. *Significantly different from mean of all stones, P<0.01, with mean shown by horizontal line.

For stones containing mainly COD (type II), the percentage of stones that were recurrent was generally not different from the mean of all stones, except for type Ia+IIb (mixture of COM and COD) which were less recurrent and type IIa+IVa1 (COD and carbapatite) stones which were significantly more recurrent.

Regarding stones composed primarily of forms of calcium phosphate, types IVa1 and IVa2 (both types of carbapatite) were very different, the latter being significantly more recurrent than the mean of all stones from men and women, suggesting the possibility of more active metabolic processes driving these morphological form. Type IVd (brushite) was also significantly more recurrent in both sexes, consistent with the high recurrence rate of this stone type reported in American studies [1820].

Stones composed of uric acid of type IIIb (not type IIIa, often related to stasis) or cystine were significantly more recurrent than the mean for all stones, consistent with these stones resulting from metabolic processes more active than those that drive the formation of common calcium stones.

Influence of Randall’s plaque (RP)

As seen in Table 5, calcium oxalate stones developed from RP actually seem to exhibit a slight tendency to be more recurrent than stones formed by other mechanisms (P=0.02), with a significant difference according to the gender of patients. In men, 41% of stones with a RP were recurrent by comparison with 38.6% of stones without any RP (P<0.01). No significant difference was found in stones from women, whatever was the stone type. However, differences exist regarding the stone type. For example, COM stones of type Ia developed from a RP appear significantly more recurrent than COM stones of type Ia without RP in men (38.1% vs 33.5%, p < 0.001) with only a trend in women (32.1% vs 28%, p = 0.07). In addition, stones of mixed types I+II and II+I are significantly more recurrent than type Ia stones in men in both groups of stones with and without RP and in women in the group of stones without RP.

Table 5.

Comparison between umbilicated stones or not

Males Females Total
Morphological type First stone Recurrence First stone Recurrence First stone Recurrence
Umbilicated stones with Randall’s plaque
Type Ia alone 1549 954 (38.1)***,b,xx 501 237 (32.1)x 2050 1191 (36.7)****
Mixed types I+II 869 650 (42.8)**,b, ✝✝ 332 171 (34.0) 1201 821 (40.6)✝✝
Mixed types II+I 360 328 (47.7)c, ✝✝✝✝ 108 57 (34.6) 468 385 (45.1)✝✝✝✝
Total 2778 1932 (41.0)**,d,xx 941 465 (33.1)xx 3719 2397 (39.2)*,xx
Stones without any umbilication nor Randall’s plaque
Type Ia alone 1551 781 (33.5)b 674 262 (28.0)xx 2225 1043 (31.9)xx
I+II 1332 825 (38.2)a,xx, ✝✝✝ 548 282 (34.0)x,✝✝ 1880 1107 (37.1)xx,✝✝✝✝
II+I 1433 1105 (43.5)a,✝✝✝✝ 493 323 (39.6)✝✝✝✝ 1926 1428 (42.6)✝✝✝✝
Total 4316 2711 (38.6)c,xx 1715 867 (33.6)xx 6031 3578 (37.2)xx
*

p=0.02;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001;

****

p < 0.0001 vs non-umbilicated stones

a

p < 0.05;

b

p < 0.01;

c

p < 0.001;

d

p < 0.0001 vs females

x

p < 0.01;

xx

p < 0.0001 vs mean occurrence of stone recurrence for a given gender

p < 0.05;

✝✝

p < 0.01;

✝✝✝

p < 0.001;

✝✝✝✝

p < 0.0001 vs type Ia stones for a given gender

Stones of mixed types I+II include stones with various subtypes where COM was the main crystalline phase of calcium oxalate. By contrast, stones of mixed types II+I include stones with various subtypes where COD was the main crystalline phase of calcium oxalate.

Discussion

Stone disease is a very common finding in industrialized countries and is constantly increasing as revealed by epidemiological studies [2123]. In most cases, it is a consequence of dietary imbalance and/or chronically insufficient water intake. In general, the correction of these factors should prevent stone recurrence. However, among stone diseases, metabolic forms exist that expose the patient to multiple recurrences of calculi with the possible consequence of altering the kidney function and, sometimes, inducing end-stage renal failure. These may result from inherited or acquired pathologies, the diagnosis of which is of crucial importance to treating them and reducing the risk of stone recurrence and crystallization in the kidney. Stone analysis at the first episode is one method for the early detection of stone diseases which are prone to recur. As shown in the present study, there are great differences in terms of stone recurrence risk according to both stone composition and morphology.

Onset of stones.

The mean age at the onset of the disease, as revealed by a stone episode, varied in relation to the stone composition. The earliest component found was dihydroxyadenine, which corresponds to an adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, an inherited autosomal disease often inducing end-stage renal failure when undiagnosed [2427]. Unexpectedly, there was a strong difference in the onset of the disease according to gender, males being prone to develop stones earlier than females. Perhaps a bias exists due to the small number of cases. Coming next were cystine stones which, despite the fact that they result from a congenital defect in tubular transport, in contrast to dihydroxyadenine stones, are known to make their appearance in the second or third decade of life [28, 29]. Indeed, the data here suggest that some cystine stone formers do not present their first stone until the seventh decade of life. The next earliest component was octacalcium phosphate, an instable form of apatite able to convert to it in some months. The next component was whitlockite, an infrequently found form of calcium magnesium phosphate, which, in our experience, is essentially a marker of infection [30].

Ammonium hydrogen urate stones were found significantly earlier in men than in women. A possible explanation is related to stones induced by urea-splitting bacteria. Such stones contain ammonium salts such as struvite and/or ammonium urate. They are especially frequent in very young boys (at the time where uricosuria is still elevated) and more later in life for women.

COD, found as the first stone at the mean age of 40 years, is a rather calcium-dependent form of calcium oxalate stone, mainly observed in hypercalciuric states [1213, 31]. Four forms of phosphate stone, including amorphous carbonated calcium phosphate, carbapatite, brushite and struvite, also appeared at an average first age in the forties. Interestingly, the average age of onset of the most common form of stone, COM, was later than all of these, at 48 years of age. Of note, in Japan, Koide et al. reported in the eighties that patients who form COD stones are different from those who form COM stones and that COD stones were observed earlier than COM stones in Japan [32]. Finally, the age of first occurrence of uric acid stones was much later, at about 60 years of age, probably related to the increased occurrence at older ages of overweight, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes [33, 34].

Stone recurrence.

A stone recurrence rate around 50% is commonly accepted in the literature, both in children and adults [35, 36]. However, no data are reported regarding crystalline phases of the stones. Among the stone mineral types seen with the lowest percentages of recurrence (table 3), three were phosphate stones composed of minerals that have been shown to be related to urinary tract infection (whitlockite, amorphous carbonated calcium phosphate, and struvite) [30]. These results seem reasonable because stones occurring due to infection are not likely to recur if the infection is successfully treated. Within the range of recurrence frequency of infection stones, however, came also stones composed of COM, for which the underlying cause for stone formation is generally a hyperoxaluria of moderate degree [12, 3738]. Thus, it is apparent that COM stones are less likely to be recurrent than are other calcium stones whose origins are also metabolic, but for which the endogenous biochemical abnormalities are more marked. It is also interesting to note that the percentage of recurrent COM stones is less than the mean percentage for all recurrent stones, for both men and women.

If we consider that physicians propose for preventing recurrence of all urinary stones adequate dietary advices or medical treatment according to the stone composition (calcium stone, uric acid stone, cystine stone, struvite stone, etc.), it is unlikely that stone recurrence might be a consequence of an inappropriate medical care. Obviously, we cannot exclude the possibility that patients were not compliant with physician recommendations. However, there is no evidence that such default of compliance may depend on stone type. Thus, intrinsic characteristics of crystalline phases or of stone morphology appear highly suggestive for different courses of stone disease according to stone composition and morphology.

Among the four compositions that are least recurrent, struvite is obviously special. Although in women the percentage of recurrent stones composed of struvite was slightly less than the mean for all stones, struvite stones were considerably more recurrent in men. This difference may occur for a number of reasons. First, anatomical and disease conditions could make the formation of struvite stones more favorable in men, especially prostatic hypertrophy, which often causes incomplete emptying of the urinary bladder. However, in our experience, only one third of bladder struvite stones associated with prostate hypertrophy were recurrent. Another reason for the higher incidence of recurrent struvite stones in men could be that infection is less expected in men, and thus not recognized and promptly treated as often as it is in women. In any case, when one examines the epidemiologic changes in stones in France over the past 30 years, one can see that the frequency of infection stones has fallen dramatically for women—3.5-fold—while that for men has dropped by only 20% [39]. Of note, recent epidemiological data suggest that struvite stones could be more frequent in recent decades by comparison to previous reports, especially in men [40].

Ammonium urate was found to be slightly less recurrent by comparison to the whole series. It was a more recurrent component in women than in men. Although it is always found with hyperuricosuria, other factors are necessary to its formation and it can appear in the context of different pathologies (anorexia and laxative abuse, infection with urea-splitting organisms, poor animal protein diet and chronic diarrhea, etc. [4142]).

Among the more-recurrent compositions, octacalcium phosphate and the two forms of uric acid are at levels just slightly above the average percentage for all stones. These stones include a species that is at least suspected of being calcium-dependent (octacalcium phosphate [30, 43]), and two species (uric acid, both anhydrous and dihydrate) that are frequently associated with metabolic syndrome and diabetes [33, 34, 44].

The three most recurrent species were found to be dihydroxyadenine, cystine and, surprisingly, brushite. The first two crystalline species are due to well-defined, inherited disorders. In contrast, brushite in stones is not recognized as a marker of any genetically linked pathology; yet the rapid growth of brushite stones leads to recurrence rates similar to those of stones formed as the result of genetic disorders, with 75% of brushite stones coming from patients who have already had at least one stone episode. Moreover, patients with brushite stones very often have had repeated stone episodes, and frequently are found to have multiple stones with each incidence and a higher number of urological procedures [1820]. Brushite stones are also classed, along with those of cystine, as the stones most difficult to break [45]. These results suggest the need for more sophisticated studies of the metabolic disorders present in the patients who produce brushite stones. Indeed, the incidence of brushite stones has increased considerably over the past years, from 0.8% of all stones in 1980 to 2.2% today in France [46] and from 1.7 to 4.1% in the United States [47].

If one compares the recurrence rate of stones between men and women, one can state that all stone types recur more frequently in men, with the exception of ammonium urate, uric acid dihydrate, brushite, and the stones of an obviously genetic origin (cystine and dihydroxyadenine) for which one observes no significant difference in recurrence rates between the sexes. These data suggest a role for environmental factors, particularly nutritional differences, for those stone types that are more recurrent in men; conversely, endogenous metabolic disorders, congenital or acquired, for which stone occurrence is linked to the nature of the metabolic abnormality rather than to environmental factors, seems to be more important for those stone types for which recurrence does not differ between the sexes.

Relationship between stone recurrence and morphology.

A unique aspect of the present study is the examination of relationships between stone recurrence and morphologies of stones, which can differ even within the same compositional class. For example, even though the overall recurrence rate of COM stones was relatively low, the recurrence rates of some morphologies of COM were significantly higher (figure 4). We are aware of the relatively small number of stones regarding some morphological types. However, despite this limitation, the significant differences between stones types for the same crystalline species may alert us to special risk factors related to such stone types. Thus, recognition of more recurrent morphologies of COM in a patient could be of benefit in diagnosis and treatment.

Among stones composed mainly of COD (type II), the sub-type IIb was found to be significantly less recurrent than were the sub-types IIa or IIa+IVa1, the latter of which was more recurrent than the mean for all stones, whether just for men or for the entire series. However, these recurrence rates among morphological forms of COD stones—in contrast to what was observed for COM—are relatively small, perhaps reflecting the overall influence of hypercalciuria in the formation of this mineral type [1113].

Among stones composed mainly of carbapatite, the morphology of type IVa2 (stones with an irregular but shiny surface, with subsurface cracks visible beneath the translucent surface coat) correlated with a higher incidence of recurrence than for other carbapatite stones. In our experience, these stones are associated with all conditions of distal tubular acidosis, i.e. Sjögren syndrome, inherited renal tubular acidosis, medullary sponge kidney [48]. In contrast, carbapatite morphology IVb (heterogeneous surface composed of incomplete layers with varying texture and color, including bumpy/rough regions) was less recurrent, especially in women. This morphology is frequently associated with infection [9], so the difference in its recurrence between men and women could be related to a poorer detection and/or a less effective medical surveillance for men in this context than for women.

At last, we found differences in the occurrence rate according to the presence or not of an umbilication on the stone identified as RP. It has been shown that for more than twenty years RP has been the main factor involved in initiating calcium oxalate stone formation [4951]. Based on visual inspection of papillae by endoscopy, it was reported that most calcium stone formers exhibit multiple papillary calcifications [52]. On the other hand, it was reported that a higher occurrence of kidney stones was related to papillary coverage by Randall’s plaque [53]. Thus, it would be expected that stones developed from RP should be especially at risk to recur. As shown in Table 5, the difference between stones developed from RP and similar stones developed without RP is not very dramatic. However, when stone types are taken into account, calcium oxalate stones made of a combination of COM and COD (mixed types I+II and II+I) are significantly more recurrent than stones exclusively made of COM (Table 5), suggesting that metabolic differences could exist between patients producing these different types of stones. Further studies are needed to confirm such an hypothesis.

In conclusion, recurrence of urolithiasis is quite variable, being correlated with not only the crystalline composition of the stones, but also with morphological types and certain other structural characteristics. Among calcium oxalate stones, COD stones recur considerably more often than do stones composed of COM. Among calcium phosphate stones, octacalcium phosphate and, above all, brushite stones are more recurrent than other phosphate stone compositions. Brushite stones are especially notable in this regard, not only for their high degree of recurrence, but also because they tend to recur as multiple stones and because the underlying causes of brushite stone formation have not yet been clearly established. Our results also show that the morphology of the stones is important. Thus, it would seem appropriate for clinical work not to limit stone analysis to stone composition only, but also to take into consideration the morphology of the stone, as this can help in diagnosis and in pinpointing the factors that are causative for stone formation, so that better measures for prevention of stone recurrence can be prescribed for each patient.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

All the specimens of our database were de-identified

All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ljunghall S, Lithell H, Skarfors E (1987) Prevalence of renal stones in 60-year-old men. A 10-year follow-up study of a health survey. Br J Urol 60: 10–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahlstrand C, Tiselius HG (1990) Recurrences during a 10-year follow-up after first renal stone episode. Urol Res 18: 397–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ulmann A, Clavel J, Destree D, Dubois C, Mombet A, Brisset JM (1991) Histoire naturelle de la lithiase rénale calcique: données obtenues à partir d’une cohorte de 667 malades. Presse Med 20: 499–502 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chow GK, Streem SB (1998) Contemporary urological intervention for cystinuric patients: immediate and long-term impact and implications. J Urol 160:341–344; discussion 344–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Millman S, Strauss AL, Parks JH, Coe FL (1982) Pathogenesis and clinical course of mixed calcium oxalate and uric acid nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 22:366–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koide T, Itatani H, Yoshioka T, et al. (1982) Clinical manifestations of calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydraté urolithiasis. J Urol 127: 1067–1069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohman S, Larsson L, Tiselius HG (1992) Clinical significance of phosphate in calcium oxalate renal stones. Ann Clin Biochem 29: 59–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Daudon M, Protat MF, Réveillaud RJ (1978) Analysis of calculi by infrared spectrophotometry. Advantages and limits of the method. Ann Biol Clin 36: 475–489 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Daudon M, Bader CA, Jungers P (1993) Urinary Calculi: Review of classification methods and correlations with etiology. Scanning Microsc 7: 1081–1106 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daudon M, Jungers P (2012) Stone composition and morphology: a window on etiology In: Talati JJ, Tiselius HG, Albala DM, Ye Z (eds), Urolithiasis: Basic Science and Clinical Practice, Springer Verlag, London, pp. 113–140 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daudon M, Donsimoni R, Hennequin C, Fellahi S, Le Moël G, Paris M, et al. (1995) Sex and age-related composition of 10617 calculi analyzed by infrared-spectroscopy. Urol Res 23: 319–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daudon M, Réveillaud RJ (1984) Whewellite and weddellite: toward a different etiopathogenesis. The significance of morphological typing of calculi. Néphrologie 5: 195–201 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Asplin JR, Lingeman JE, Kahnoski R, Mardis H, Parks JH, Coe. FL(1998) Metabolic urinary correlates of calcium oxalate dihydrate in renal stones. J Urol 159: 664–668 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parent X, Boess G, Brignon P (1999) Calcium oxalate stones. Relationship between biochemical risk factors and crystalline phase of the stone. Prog Urol 9: 1051–1056 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mandel NS, Mandel GS (1989) Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J Urol 142: 1516–1521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brien G, Schubert G, Bick C (1982) 10,000 analyses of urinary calculi using X-ray diffraction and polarizing microscopy. Eur Urol 8: 251–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moran ME (2003) Uric acid stone disease. Frontiers in Bioscience 8:1339–1355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klee LW, Brito CG, Lingeman JE (1991) The clinical implications of brushite calculi. J Urol 145: 715–718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Parks JH, Worcester EM, Coe FL, Evan AP, Lingeman JE (2004) Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones. Kidney Int 66: 777–785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, et al. (2005) Crystal-associated nephropathy in patients with brushite nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 67:576–591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM Jr, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63: 1817–1823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hesse A, Brandle E, Wilbert D, Kohrmann KU, Alken P (2003) Study on the Prevalence and Incidence of Urolithiasis in Germany Comparing the Years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 44: 709–713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E, Del Nero A, Zanetti G, Pisani E (2000) Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 37: 23–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gagné ER, Deland E, Daudon M, Noel L-H, Nawar T (1994) Chronic renal failure secondary to 2,8-dihydroxyadenine deposition: the first report of recurrence in a kidney transplant. Am J Kidney Dis, 24: 104–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Jong DJ, Assmann KJ, De Abreu RA, et al. (1996) 2,8-Dihydroxyadenine stone formation in a renal transplant recipient due to adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency. Journal of Urology, 156: 1754–1755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Glicklich D, Gruber HE, Matas AJ, et al. (1988) 2,8-dihydroxyadenine urolithiasis: report of a case first diagnosed after renal transplant. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 68: 785–793 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stratta P, Fogazzi GB, Canavese C, et al. (2010) Decreased kidney function and crystal deposition in the tubules after kidney transplant. Am J Kidney Dis 56: 585–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singer A, Das A (1989) Cystinuria: a review of the pathophysiology and management. J Urol 142: 669–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prot-Bertoye C, Lebbah S, Daudon M, et al. (2015) CKD and its risk factors among patients with cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 842–851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maurice-Estepa L, Levillain P, Lacour B, Daudon M (1999) Crystalline Phase Differentiation in Urinary Calcium Phosphate and Magnesium Phosphate Calculi. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33: 299–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Daudon M, Jungers P (2004) Clinical value of crystalluria and quantitative morphoconstitutional analysis of urinary calculi. Nephron Physiol 98: 31–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Koide T, Itatani H, Yoshioka T, et al. (1982) Clinical manifestations of calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate urolithiasis. J Urol 127: 1067–1069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women Urol Res 34:193–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Daudon M, Traxer O, Conort P, Lacour B, Jungers P (2006) Type 2 diabetes increases the risk for uric acid stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2026–2033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tasian GE, Kabarriti AE, Kalmus A, Furth SL (2017) Kidney stone recurrence among children and adolescents. J Urol 197: 246–252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. (2016) Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 16008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Normand M, Bergua D, Bouvet JP, Cayotte JL, Gottis M (1989) Correlations between the cause and the composition of urinary stones - the interest of morphological and infrared analysis. Ann Biol Clin 7: 29–34 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Daudon M, Doré JC, Jungers P, Lacour B (2004) Changes in stone composition according to age and gender of patients: a multivariate epidemiological approach. Urol Res 32: 241–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Daudon M (2005) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis in France. Ann Urol 39: 209–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moses R, Pais VM Jr, Ursiny M, Prien EL Jr, Miller N, Eisner BH (2015) Changes in stone composition over the two decades: evaluation of over 10,000 stone analyses. Urolithiasis 43: 135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Soble JJ, Hamilton BD, Streem SB (1999) Ammonium acid urate calculi: a reevaluation of risk factors. J Urol 161: 869–873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuruma H, Arakawa T, Kubo S, et al. (2006) Ammonium acid urate urolithiasis in Japan. Int J Urol 13:498–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Méria P, Hadjadj H, Jungers P, Daudon M and Members of the Urolithiasis Committee of the French Urological Association (2010) Stone formation and pregnancy: pathophysiological insights gained from morphoconstitutional stone analysis. J Urol 183: 1412–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abate N, Chandalia M, Cabo-Chan AV Jr, Moe OW, Sakhaee K (2004) The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance. Kidney Int 65: 386–392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Williams JC Jr, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2003) Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 61: 1092–1096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Daudon M, Bouzidi H, Bazin D (2010) Composition and morphology of phosphate stones and their relation with etiology. Urol Res 38: 459–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mandel N, Mandel I, Fryjoff K, Rejniak T, Mandel G (2003) Conversion of calcium oxalate to calcium phosphate with recurrent stone episodes. J Urol 169: 2026–2029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dessombz A, Letavernier E, Haymann JP, Bazin D, Daudon M (2015) Calcium phosphate stone morphology can reliably predict distal renal tubular acidosis. J Urol 193: 1564–1569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Low RK, Stoller ML (1997) Endoscopic mapping of renal papillae for Randall’s plaques in patients with urinary stone disease. J Urol 158:2062–2064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, et al. (2003) Randall’s plaque of patients with nephrolithiasis begins in basement membranes of thin loops of Henle. J Clin Invest 111: 607–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Daudon M, Bazin D, Letavernier E (2015) Randall’s plaque as the origin of calcium oxalate kidney stones. Urolithiasis 43 (S1):5–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim SC, Coe FL, Tinmouth WW, et al. (2005) Stone formation is proportional to papillary surface coverage by Randall’s plaque. J Urol 173: 117–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Matlaga BR, Williams JC Jr, Kim SC et al. (2006) Endoscopic evidence of calculus attachment to Randall’s plaque. J Urol 175:1720–1724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES