Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Anaerobe. 2018 Feb 2;50:55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.01.008

Fusobacterium nucleatum and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Epidemiological and mechanistic evidence

Emilie L Vander Haar a, Jeewon So b, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman a, Yiping W Han c,d,e,f,*
PMCID: PMC6750227  NIHMSID: NIHMS957804  PMID: 29409815

Abstract

Fusobacterium nucleatum is a Gram-negative anaerobic oral commensal associated with periodontal disease. F. nucleatum has been implicated in a wide spectrum of systemic diseases, including oral, gastrointestinal, rheumatologic, and vascular pathologies. As pregnancy risk has been linked to periodontal disease, there has also been significant research into the effects of periodontal disease on adverse pregnancy outcomes. This article reviews the epidemiological and mechanistic evidence of the role of F. nucleatum in adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: Oral anaerobe, Pregnancy complications, Preterm birth, Stillbirth, Neonatal sepsis, VE-cadherin, Placenta, Chorioamnionitis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, FadA

1. Introduction

Intrauterine infection has long been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm delivery, chorioamnionitis, and stillbirth [13]. Preterm birth is a significant problem in the United States, as the March of Dimes reports a preterm birth rate of 9.6% for 2016, well above the 7.6% goal set by the Healthy People 2010 campaign [4]. Moreover, neonatal morbidities associated with preterm birth cost the U.S. over 26 billion dollars annually [5]. Thus, as these adverse pregnancy outcomes are both common and costly, understanding the link between intrauterine infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes is critical for determining future preventive measures.

Currently, there are two major pathways by which bacteria and other pathogens may trigger an inflammatory response leading to pregnancy complications [1,6]. The direct pathway is thought to be via spread of microorganisms to the genitourinary tract. The indirect pathway is thought to occur due to a pathogenic inflammatory response mediated by locally produced pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor α, in the absence of detected pathogens [710]. Intrauterine infection is thought to arise most commonly from vaginal organisms, however non-genital-tract pathogens, and specifically oral commensal microorganisms, have also been increasingly detected in poor pregnancy outcomes, due in part to the advancement of culture-independent detection technologies [6,1113]. Moreover, pregnancy renders women susceptible to periodontal disease, as the hormonal changes lead to weakened gingival epithelial barriers and increased inflammation, evidenced by increased rates of gingivitis and progression of periodontitis during gestation [14].

Literature linking poor oral health to preterm birth, chorioamnionitis, stillbirths, miscarriage, and preeclampsia has been steadily increasing for the past 20 years [4,6,11,12,1517]. Evidence suggests that significant alteration of the bacterial load in the placenta may negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, as the placental microbiome seems to vary between preterm and term gestations [1820]. Although the presence of a placental microbiome in healthy term pregnancies has been debated [21], recent research suggests that the placental microbiome most closely resembles the human oral microbiome [22]. This finding is consistent with detection of oral bacteria in pregnancy complications including preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal sepsis [2326]. Understanding how and which bacterial species transition from the oral cavity to the genitourinary tract may lead to novel therapies for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes.

One such oral species of interest is Fusobacterium nucleatum, a Gram-negative anaerobe commonly found within the oral cavity and implicated in various forms of periodontal diseases [27,28]. F. nucleatum has also been implicated in a wide variety of systemic diseases, including GI disorders, atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and respiratory tract infections [29,30], which is well summarized in a prior review [31]. Here, we review the current literature regarding the link between F. nucleatum and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, stillbirth, and preeclampsia.

2. Fusobacterium nucleatum and adverse pregnancy outcomes

2.1. Preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and chorioamnionitis

The majority of literature regarding the link between periodontal bacteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes focuses on preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Early studies using traditional culturing techniques have documented intra-amniotic F. nucleatum infection in patients with preterm birth [3234]. More recently, using 16S rRNA-based culture independent methods, F. nucleatum has been detected in placental and fetal tissues, including amniotic fluid [24], cord blood [26], fetal membranes [35], and neonatal gastric aspirates [36], from pregnancies affected by PPROM as well as preterm birth with intact membranes. A study comparing term versus preterm deliveries found that F. nucleatum was more prevalent in the placental membranes of preterm deliveries [37]. Interestingly, F. nucleatum has also been associated with chorioamnionitis at term, as documented in a case of F. nucleatum found in the amniotic fluid of a term patient diagnosed with severe acute chorioamnionitis with intact membranes [25].

The site of origin of F. nucleatum in these tissues has been called into question, as both oral and vaginal Fusobacterium spp. have been identified [38]. The strains of F. nucleatum identified in amniotic fluid and placenta appear to match those from the maternal or the partner subgingival sites, rather than the lower genital tract [23,39,40]. Moreover, animal studies show that injecting saliva or subgingival plaque samples into mice leads to infection of the murine placenta with oral commensal species, including F. nucleatum, demonstrating that the oral bacteria are capable of translocation to the fetal-placental unit [41].

2.2. Neonatal sepsis

Neonatal sepsis has also been linked to poor maternal oral health [42], although the literature supporting this association is less robust. A recent study using culture independent methods has documented compelling evidence supporting a microbial link between intra-amniotic infection and early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) [26]. In this study, paired amniotic fluid and cord blood samples from 44 singleton pregnancies were analyzed by culture-dependent and independent methods. Several oral species, including F. nucleatum, were detected in the cord blood from those with presumed EONS, defined as clinical manifestations of EONS (lethargy, apnea, respiratory distress, hypoperfusion and shock) in newborns despite negative microbial cultures. F. nucleatum was the most prevalent species detected in the cord blood associated with presumed EONS, placing it on par with E. coli as an important neonatal pathogen. As this was the first study to document this association, further research is needed to better understand the link between F. nucleatum and neonatal sepsis.

2.3. Stillbirth

F. nucleatum has also been implicated in stillbirth. In a case study reported in 2010 [23], a strain of F. nucleatum identified in the placenta and the stillborn infant was also detected in the maternal subgingival plaque, while no fusobacteria were detected in the maternal vaginal or rectal floras, suggesting translocation of the bacteria from the oral cavity to the maternal-fetal unit. Subsequently, work by Ebersole et al. [43] found that women with miscarriages or stillbirths had significantly higher serum antibody levels to F. nucleatum compared to those with live births. As the quantity of antibodies in serum is related to the severity of periodontal disease [44], these findings support a link between oral F. nucleatum and stillbirth. Further research is needed to better categorize the severity of periodontal infection associated with this adverse outcome.

2.4. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Periodontal disease has been linked to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, including preeclampsia. In one study, pathogenic bacteria, including F. nucleatum, were found to be significantly enriched in the placentas of women with preeclampsia compared with controls [45]. Another case-control study reported that at the time of cesarean section, women with hypertensive disorders were more likely to have higher levels of oral pathogens in both the oral cavity and the placenta, when compared to the gestational age-matched controls [46].

Conversely, a study by Chaparro et al. [47] found no difference in the rates of periodontal infection or presence of F. nucleatum between hypertensive cases and controls; however, they did observe increased expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 in the placentas of hypertensive cases. TLRs are involved in the immune responses against pathogens, and stimulation of TLR2 within the placenta has been shown to induce pro-inflammatory cytokines [48]. This observation suggests that the hypertensive cases could be associated with microbial stimuli. Further investigation is required to better establish the link between periodontal infection and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

3. Mechanisms of virulence

Uncovering the virulence mechanisms of F. nucleatum is key to understanding its association with such a broad spectrum of adverse pregnancy outcomes. F. nucleatum is an invasive microorganism and can bind and invade both epithelial and endothelial cells, whereas the vaginal isolates, e.g. F. gonidiaformans, cannot [49]. The causative role of F. nucleatum in pregnancy complications has been demonstrated in a mouse model. Injection of F. nucleatum into the tail vein (mimicking dental bacteremia) of pregnant mice led to preterm and term fetal loss within 72 hours [49]. Rather than spreading systemically, F. nucleatum was found to be confined to the murine fetal-placental units, originating in the decidua basalis, followed by colonization in the placenta, fetal membranes, amniotic fluid and fetuses. This pattern parallels the pathophysiology of chorioamnionitis in humans, and demonstrates a clear hematogenous route of infection. The kinetics of this acute infection model corroborates with the afore-mentioned human stillbirth case [23]. Control experiments of infection of pregnant mice with E. coli DH5α did not cause fetal loss, indicating the effect on pregnancy is species-specific [49].

Further study led to the discovery that F. nucleatum infection of the murine placenta induced an inflammatory response similar to those observed in humans [50]. Although F. nucleatum activates both TLR2 and TLR4 in vitro, in murine placentas, it elicits inflammatory responses through TLR4, accompanied by neutrophil infiltration into the decidua [50]. In TLR4-knockout mice, as well as in wild-type mice treated with a TLR4 antagonist, F. nucleatum colonizes the placenta to a similar extent as in untreated wild-type mice, however the fetal loss was significantly reduced, suggesting that inflammation rather than the bacteria per se is the cause of fetal demise. In contrast, TLR2 plays an insignificant role because there was no change in fetal loss or inflammatory response in the TLR2-knockout mice compared to the wild-type mice.

A few adhesin molecules have been identified that are required for F. nucleatum to colonize the murine placenta, including Fap2 and Fusobacterium adhesion A (FadA) [5154]. Among them, FadA is the best characterized and plays a critical role in the murine model of infection [31].

FadA is required for F. nucleatum to attach and invade host epithelial and endothelial cells [5456]. It is uniquely encoded in F. nucleatum, absent in most other species of Fusobacterium [54]. The strains detected in the vaginal tract mostly do not belong to the species of F. nucleatum, thus they do not possess FadA, which may be why the vaginal species such as F. gonadiaformans do not invade host cells [39].

FadA exists in two forms, the intact pre-FadA, consisting of 129 amino-acid residues, and the mature FadA (mFadA), consisting of 111 amino-acid residues. The crystal structure of mFadA reveals a predominantly alpha-helical hairpin structure, with the monomers linked together head-to-tail via a novel leucine-chain motif [57]. It has been shown in vitro that pre-FadA and mFadA form an active and heterogeneous complex (FadAc) for binding and invasion [55]. In vivo, an F. nucleatum mutant without FadA is severely deficient in colonizing the murine placenta, while its complement clone restores the colonization [49,58].

FadA binds to cadherins, a large family of cell-junction molecules [59,60]. When FadA binds to the vascular endothelial cadherins (VE-cadherin), it causes VE-cadherin to migrate away from the cell-cell junction, thus increasing the endothelial permeability allowing microorganisms to penetrate through the endothelium [59]. This is likely the mechanism utilized by F. nucleatum for systemic dissemination. It may also explain how F. nucleatum can overcome such obstacles as the placental barrier. It is plausible that the tight junctions loosened by FadA permit other species to disseminate, as studies show that co-incubation of E. coli in the presence of wild-type but not the fadA-deletion mutant of F. nucleatum resulted in enhanced endothelial cell penetration by E. coli [59]. This observation indicates that F. nucleatum can serve as a ‘facilitator” and helps explain why it is frequently detected concurrently with other oral species in intrauterine infections in humans [13]. FadA-assisted systemic dissemination of oral bacteria through loosened endothelial junctions and subsequent placental colonization is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic presentation of oral bacteria translocation to the fetal-placental unit.

Bacteria enters the circulation through the inflamed gingival tissue (a) and (b). Hematogenously spread bacteria invade the fetal-placental unit through the vasculature in the decidua basalis (c) and (d). Binding of Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin A (FadA) to vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) increases the endothelial permeability, allowing F. nucleatum and other oral bacteria to disseminate into and from the circulation (b) and (c).

4. Concluding remarks

Employment of culture independent techniques for bacterial identification has substantiated our understanding of the involvement of oral commensal species such as F. nucleatum in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Current literature supports the link between F. nucleatum and preterm birth, intra-amniotic infection, stillbirth, neonatal sepsis, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. F. nucleatum possesses key virulence mechanisms that allow it to attach and disseminate across endothelium, enabling its hematogenous spread. Understanding the mechanisms involved in transformation of this oral commensal organism into systemic pathogens lays the foundation for developing prevention and treatment strategies to circumvent bacterial-induced pregnancy complications.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH grants RO1 DE014924, DE023332, and CA192111 to Y.W.H.

References

  • 1.Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1500–1507. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldenberg RL, Thompson C. The infectious origins of stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:861–873. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McClure EM, Goldenberg RL. Infection and stillbirth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Premature Birth Report Card. March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCormick MC, Behrman RE. The quiet epidemic of premature birth: commentary on a recent Institute of Medicine report. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7:8–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanz M, Kornman K. E.F.P.A.A.P.w. working group 3 of the joint, Periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: consensus report of the joint EFP/AAP workshop on periodontitis and systemic diseases. J Periodontol. 2013;84:S164–S169. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.1340016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madianos PN, Bobetsis YA, Offenbacher S. Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and periodontal disease: pathogenic mechanisms. J Periodontol. 2013;84:S170–S180. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.1340015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghidini A, Jenkins CB, Spong CY, Pezzullo JC, Salafia CM, Eglinton GS. Elevated amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels during the early second trimester are associated with greater risk of subsequent preterm delivery. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:227–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wenstrom KD, Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, DuBard MB, Cliver SP. Elevated second-trimester amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:546–550. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70436-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murtha AP, Greig PC, Jimmerson CE, Herbert WN. Maternal serum interleukin-6 concentration as a marker for impending preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:161–164. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00602-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Han YW. Can oral bacteria cause pregnancy complications? Women’s Health. 2011;7:401–404. doi: 10.2217/whe.11.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Han YW. Oral health and adverse pregnancy outcomes - what’s next? J Dent Res. 2011;90:289–293. doi: 10.1177/0022034510381905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han YW, Wang X. Mobile microbiome: oral bacteria in extra-oral infections and inflammation. J Dent Res. 2013;92:485–491. doi: 10.1177/0022034513487559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barak S, Oettinger-Barak O, Oettinger M, Machtei EE, Peled M, Ohel G. Common oral manifestations during pregnancy: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:624–628. doi: 10.1097/01.OGX.0000083542.14439.CF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC. Periodontal infection and preterm birth: results of a prospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:875–880. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jarjoura K, Devine PC, Perez-Delboy A, Herrera-Abreu M, D’Alton M, Papapanou PN. Markers of periodontal infection and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:513–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Turton M, Africa CW. Further evidence for periodontal disease as a risk indicator for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int Dent J. 2017;67:148–156. doi: 10.1111/idj.12274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prince AL, Ma J, Kannan PS, Alvarez M, Gisslen T, Harris RA, et al. The placental membrane microbiome is altered among subjects with spontaneous preterm birth with and without chorioamnionitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:627e1–e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amarasekara R, Jayasekara RW, Senanayake H, Dissanayake VH. Microbiome of the placenta in pre-eclampsia supports the role of bacteria in the multifactorial cause of pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41:662–669. doi: 10.1111/jog.12619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pelzer E, Gomez-Arango LF, Barrett HL, Nitert MD. Review: maternal health and the placental microbiome. Placenta. 2017;54:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lauder AP, Roche AM, Sherrill-Mix S, Bailey A, Laughlin AL, Bittinger K, et al. Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota. Microbiome. 2016;4:29. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0172-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:237ra65. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han YW, Fardini Y, Chen C, Iacampo KG, Peraino VA, Shamonki JM, et al. Term stillbirth caused by oral Fusobacterium nucleatum. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:442–445. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cb9955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Han YW, Shen T, Chung P, Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:38–47. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01206-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bohrer JC, Kamemoto LE, Almeida PG, Ogasawara KK. Acute chorioamnionitis at term caused by the oral pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum. Hawai‘i J Med Public Health. 2012;71:280–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang X, Buhimschi CS, Temoin S, Bhandari V, Han YW, Buhimschi IA. Comparative microbial analysis of paired amniotic fluid and cord blood from pregnancies complicated by preterm birth and early-onset neonatal sepsis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moore WE, Moore LV. The bacteria of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 1994;5:66–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, Yang ZK, et al. Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2012;6:1176–1185. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Strauss J, Kaplan GG, Beck PL, Rioux K, Panaccione R, Devinney R, et al. Invasive potential of gut mucosa-derived Fusobacterium nucleatum positively correlates with IBD status of the host. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1971–1978. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Allen-Vercoe E, Strauss J, Chadee K. Fusobacterium nucleatum: an emerging gut pathogen? Gut Microb. 2011;2:294–298. doi: 10.4161/gmic.2.5.18603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum: a commensal-turned pathogen. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;23:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wahbeh CJ, Hill GB, Eden RD, Gall SA. Intra-amniotic bacterial colonization in premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:739–743. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90558-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miller JM, Jr, Pupkin MJ, Hill GB. Bacterial colonization of amniotic fluid from intact fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:796–804. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90458-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chaim W, Mazor M. Intraamniotic infection with fusobacteria. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1992;251:1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02718272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cahill RJ, Tan S, Dougan G, O’Gaora P, Pickard D, Kennea N, et al. Universal DNA primers amplify bacterial DNA from human fetal membranes and link Fusobacterium nucleatum with prolonged preterm membrane rupture. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:761–766. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gonzales-Marin C, Spratt DA, Allaker RP. Maternal oral origin of Fusobacterium nucleatum in adverse pregnancy outcomes as determined using the 16S–23S rRNA gene intergenic transcribed spacer region. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:133–144. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.049452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Doyle RM, Alber DG, Jones HE, Harris K, Fitzgerald F, Peebles D, et al. Term and preterm labour are associated with distinct microbial community structures in placental membranes which are independent of mode of delivery. Placenta. 2014;35:1099–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gonzales-Marin C, Spratt DA, Millar MR, Simmonds M, Kempley ST, Allaker RP. Levels of periodontal pathogens in neonatal gastric aspirates and possible maternal sites of origin. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2011;26:277–290. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hill GB. Preterm birth: associations with genital and possibly oral microflora. Ann Periodontol. 1998;3:222–232. doi: 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gauthier S, Tetu A, Himaya E, Morand M, Chandad F, Rallu F, et al. The origin of Fusobacterium nucleatum involved in intra-amniotic infection and preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2011;24:1329–1332. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.550977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fardini Y, Chung P, Dumm R, Joshi N, Han YW. Transmission of diverse oral bacteria to murine placenta: evidence for the oral microbiome as a potential source of intrauterine infection. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1789–1796. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01395-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Insoft RM, Sola A. Perinatally acquired Pseudomonas infection: a newly recognized maternal risk factor. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12:25–26. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ebersole JL, Novak MJ, Michalowicz BS, Hodges JS, Steffen MJ, Ferguson JE, et al. Systemic immune responses in pregnancy and periodontitis: relationship to pregnancy outcomes in the Obstetrics and Periodontal Therapy (OPT) study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:953–960. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hayman L, Steffen MJ, Stevens J, Badger E, Tempro P, Fuller B, et al. Smoking and periodontal disease: discrimination of antibody responses to pathogenic and commensal oral bacteria. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164:118–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04314.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barak S, Oettinger-Barak O, Machtei EE, Sprecher H, Ohel G. Evidence of periopathogenic microorganisms in placentas of women with preeclampsia. J Periodontol. 2007;78:670–676. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Swati P, Thomas B, Vahab SA, Kapaettu S, Kushtagi P. Simultaneous detection of periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque and placenta of women with hypertension in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:613–619. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chaparro A, Blanlot C, Ramirez V, Sanz A, Quintero A, Inostroza C, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and toll-like receptor 2 are associated with hypertensive disorders in placental tissue: a case-control study. J Periodontal Res. 2013;48:802–809. doi: 10.1111/jre.12074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Holmlund U, Cebers G, Dahlfors AR, Sandstedt B, Bremme K, Ekstrom ES, et al. Expression and regulation of the pattern recognition receptors Toll-like receptor-2 and Toll-like receptor-4 in the human placenta. Immunology. 2002;107:145–151. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01491.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Han YW, Redline RW, Li M, Yin L, Hill GB, McCormick TS. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces premature and term stillbirths in pregnant mice: implication of oral bacteria in preterm birth. Infect Immun. 2004;72:2272–2279. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2272-2279.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu H, Redline RW, Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces fetal death in mice via stimulation of TLR4-mediated placental inflammatory response. J Immunol. 2007;179:2501–2508. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kaplan A, Kaplan CW, He X, McHardy I, Shi W, Lux R. Characterization of aid1, a novel gene involved in Fusobacterium nucleatum interspecies interactions. Microb Ecol. 2014;68:379–387. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0400-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kaplan CW, Lux R, Haake SK, Shi W. The Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane protein RadD is an arginine-inhibitable adhesin required for inter-species adherence and the structured architecture of multispecies biofilm. Mol Microbiol. 2009;71:35–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coppenhagen-Glazer S, Sol A, Abed J, Naor R, Zhang X, Han YW, et al. Fap2 of Fusobacterium nucleatum is a galactose-inhibitable adhesin involved in coaggregation, cell adhesion, and preterm birth. Infect Immun. 2015;83:1104–1113. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02838-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Han YW, Ikegami A, Rajanna C, Kawsar HI, Zhou Y, Li M, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel adhesin unique to oral fusobacteria. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:5330–5340. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.15.5330-5340.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xu M, Yamada M, Li M, Liu H, Chen SG, Han YW. FadA from Fusobacterium nucleatum utilizes both secreted and nonsecreted forms for functional oligomerization for attachment and invasion of host cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25000–25009. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611567200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Han YW, Shi W, Huang GT, Kinder Haake S, Park NH, Kuramitsu H, et al. Interactions between periodontal bacteria and human oral epithelial cells: Fusobacterium nucleatum adheres to and invades epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3140–3146. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.6.3140-3146.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nithianantham S, Xu M, Yamada M, Ikegami A, Shoham M, Han YW. Crystal structure of FadA adhesin from Fusobacterium nucleatum reveals a novel oligomerization motif, the leucine chain. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:3865–3872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805503200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ikegami A, Chung P, Han YW. Complementation of the fadA mutation in Fusobacterium nucleatum demonstrates that the surface-exposed adhesin promotes cellular invasion and placental colonization. Infect Immun. 2009;77:3075–3079. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00209-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fardini Y, Wang X, Temoin S, Nithianantham S, Lee D, Shoham M, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin FadA binds vascular endothelial cadherin and alters endothelial integrity. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82:1468–1480. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07905.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES